All Episodes
Previous Next
May 1, 2014 - Radio Free Nortwest - H.A. Covington
01:01:25
20140501_rfn
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Oh, then tell me, Sean O 'Farrell, tell me why you hurry so.
Push a wiggle, push and listen, and his cheeks were all aglow.
I bear orders from the captain, get you ready quick and soon, for the pikes must be together by the rising of the moon.
By the rising of the moon, by the rising of the moon, For the bikes must be together by the rising of the moon.
Oh, then tell me, Sean O'Farrell, where the gathering is to be, In the old spot by the river, rightful, known to you and me.
One more roar for signal, token, whistle up, and arching tune, For your bike upon your shoulder by the rising of the moon, By the rising of the moon, by the rising of the moon, With your bike upon your shoulder by the rising of the moon.
Out from many a mud-walled cabin eyes were watching through the night, Many a manly chest was throbbing for the blessed warning light.
Warpers passed along the valleys like the man she's lonely crew, And a thousand blades were flashing at the rising of the moon, And the rising of the moon, and the rising of the moon, And a thousand blades were flashing at the rising of the moon.
Thank you.
It's May the 1st, 2014.
I'm Harold Covington, and this is Radio Free Northwest.
Right, where do we begin this week?
Glenn Miller?
Nah, I think not.
Everybody's pretty much beaten that one to death.
Yes, I know, the Peaches story came out this week, but that's old news for me.
I've known about Peaches since 1989, and so has the federal government.
Guys...
There really is no reason to go around constructing all kinds of elaborate conspiracy theories on Glenn Miller.
I knew the man many years ago, true, but everything I know about him indicates that he hasn't changed at all in the past three decades, which is in itself kind of sad.
I think the truth is he got drunk And in an alcoholic fugue state, he went out and tried to start the Great Revolution, kind of like Charlie Manson did with a pointless act of mindless violence that made sense to nobody but himself in his own befuddled mind.
My guess is that when he finally sobered up, he was horrified by what he'd done.
No more whiskey in jail.
Sorry, guys.
Occam's razor applies here.
All other things being equal, the simplest explanation is usually the correct one.
Or, if you'll forgive me for quoting Sigmund Freud, sometimes a cigar is just a cigar.
Next up, the Cliveden-Bundy ranch scene.
My opinion remains the same.
Bundy is now tagged as a racist, which, by the way, he is not.
I read his comments, and he's basically a 75-year-old Republican who occasionally maybe listens to Rush Limbaugh.
And as soon as the hoopla dies down, he will be taken out, probably after the November midterm elections.
He and the people who have helped him will be secretly indicted by a grand jury and there will be dawn raids by federal forces loaded for bear and in the absence of media they will be authorized to shoot to kill.
My guess is that Mr. Bundy himself will be murdered and the rest of the Bundy family will be buried alive.
Now, how about the Donald Sterling racial tirade?
Nothing much to do with us except as an interesting example of how our lords and masters are turning on one another.
Sterling is a Jew.
For those of you who didn't know, his real name was Donald Tokowitz.
One interesting thing about this episode is that the Monkoid ballplayers are demanding that white people be banned from owning NBA basketball teams.
They claim it makes them feel like slaves.
Some of these slaves are paid millions of dollars, and their slave cabins have swimming pools, and they drive cars that cost enough to put a whole family of white children through college.
Another interesting aspect is that the trophy girlfriend of this alleged racist, the one who is setting him up and apparently was threatening to blackmail him with secretly recorded conversations, is a non-white as well.
What kind of racist has a non-white Hoppe girlfriend?
Now, for those of you who have not yet caught the interview with political prisoner Edgar J. Steele, which I posted to the ThoughtCrime blog for Sunday, April 27th, Please go there to downwithjugears.blogspot.com.
That's downwithjugears.blogspot.com and read it.
This is, to my knowledge, the first full interview Ed has done and the first significant contact he's had with the outside world since he was taken to Victorville to die.
I constantly get emails from people wanting to know what they can do about this or that or the other injustice.
Well, here's something you can do that might prove to be a genuine, righteous act that will win you pennies in heaven.
However, there is a catch to it.
You're going to have to step out from behind the computer to do it.
Now, as Ed states in the interview, the bulk of his mail is simply disappearing.
This has always been the situation ever since his arrest.
Ed's communication with the outside world has always been highly restricted, including a period of almost three months after his arrest when he disappeared completely.
He was held incommunicado and no penal institution would admit to holding him including the one where he was being held The most common complaint from people in this case is that they write Edgar Steele a letter of support And maybe send a little money for his commissary and they never get any response or thank-you notes And so they get discouraged and they give up which is of course the reason for the policy The dictatorship does not want anyone communicating with Edgar Steele the dictatorship wants you to forget that Edgar Steele exists
Now, what might help Edgar?
With those who are not afraid to bring themselves to the attention of the beast, is to write to him via certified mail or something that requires a return receipt, the address is in that article on the blog, so that you will have some record of the letter arriving at the prison.
And then, when you don't get an answer, demanding that the post office do traces, file official complaints with the prison administration in the mailroom, etc., when you don't receive a reply or any record that Ed got your letter.
You might also try writing your congressman, writing to the Bureau of Prisons, etc.
In other words, make their practice of withholding Edgar's mail generate a paper trail.
Prison industrial complex bureaucrats are like any other of the dictator's servants.
They hate to be made to work.
It is possible that if we can create a situation whereby continuing to withhold Edgar's mail generates more paperwork and annoyance than justifies whatever spiteful pleasure someone's getting in tormenting a sick old man, they may just say, screw it and just give the man his mail.
In the Bill White case, we've learned how important mail receipt is for prisoners.
Come on, guys, let's raise a stink until they give Edgar Steele his mail.
Okay, moving on to something a little more serious.
I spotted this on WorldNetDaily and apparently no one else in our wee little community has yet.
I quote, If two Democratic lawmakers have their way, Barack Obama's Justice Department will submit a report for action against any Internet sites, broadcast, cable, television, or radio shows determined to be advocating or encouraging quote-unquote violent acts.
This, according to the text of a new bill from Senator Ed Markey and Representative Hakeem Jeffries, both of whom were Democrats.
Wait, one quick question.
Is that encouraging violent acts or displaying violent acts?
Now, you know how many shootings and stabbings and bombings and beatings occur in one night of primetime television?
I mean, two of the most popular cable TV series in history were Breaking Bad, which is about a high school teacher who turns into a methamphetamine drug lord and slaughters his way to the top.
And Dexter, which is about the life and loves of a serial killer, with the serial killer as a hero.
That one floored even me, I have to admit.
One of the most effective counters to the anti-gun hysteria after Newtown was an ad that the NRA or somebody ran showing clips from the movies of all these big Hollywood stars who had just been on the news weeping and sobbing and demanding nationwide gun confiscation, and these film clips showed them doing gun scenes in their movies, shooting and spewing automatic weapons fire everywhere, so forth and so on.
But I digress.
Back to World Net Daily.
The Hate Crime Reporting Act of 2014, which I never heard of until now, Would create an updated comprehensive report examining the role of the internet and other telecommunications in encouraging hate crimes based on gender, race, religion, ethnicity, or sexual orientation and create recommendations to address such crimes.
The one-page bill.
Only one page, not like Obamacare.
Calls for the Justice Department and the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights to analyze information on the use of telecommunications, including the Internet, broadcast television, radio, cable television, public access television, commercial mobile services, and other electronic media, blah, blah, blah, to advocate and encourage violent acts and the commission of crimes of hate.
Even I am not really sure what they're talking about on there.
Probably me.
The bill does not define which actions by broadcasters would be considered to have encouraged violence, seemingly leaving that open to interpretation.
Yeah, I bet it doesn't.
And who will decide what quote-unquote encourages violence, as opposed to the usual round of murders and explosions and beatdowns which comprise most so-called drama today?
Why, some bureaucrat.
Sitting in an air-conditioned cubicle in a windowless office building somewhere in Washington, D.C. Of course.
Back to W&D.
Once the report is compiled, the bill calls for any recommendations for action, quote-unquote, consistent with the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States that is determined to be an appropriate and necessary way to address the purported encouragement of violent acts.
Whatever the hell that means.
Look, guys, I've said this before, and no one believed me.
I'm going to say it again, and no one will believe me now.
Someday, somehow, we're going to lose the internet.
The dictatorship has come up with all kinds of schemes in the past 15 years, everything from a plan to charge a penny per email to the imprisonment without charge or trial of Alabama blogger Roger Shuler for criticizing a local Republican nabob.
And they themselves have come to depend on the World Wide Web, but they keep on looking for some way to do an end run around the United States Constitution and deny genuine dissidents the right to access any genuine mass communications media.
And this is why I keep begging you guys to do what you can to bring people to Northwestfront.org, because there's going to come a time when we're going to have to go back to those old mimeograph machines some of us still have out in the garage.
Okay, since we're going to have another old codger on yet again this week, here's one for all you fossils of my age.
Now, back in 1971, there was a hippy-dippy so-called counterculture movie called Billy Jack, which starred an actor named Tom Laughlin as the world's first and only red-haired, freckle-faced, and green-eyed Navajo Indian.
Yes, it was that ridiculous.
Now, the movie was pure horse dung, but it had a very catchy theme song, which some of us old coots may recall fondly from our wild and uproarious youth.
Now, to most of you, this will just sound like hippy-dippy mush, but to someone of my generation who recognizes this theme song, it will provoke memories of lost youth, blah, blah, blah, blah.
Anyway, it's my show, so there.
Music Music Music
Listen, children, to a story that was written long ago About your kingdom on a mountain and the valley folk below On the mountain was a treasure We're
There won't be any trouble that's blowing Come the judgment day On the bloody morning after One tin soldier rides away So the people of the valley Sent a message off the hill Asking for the buried treasure Towns of gold for
which they kill Came an answer from the kingdom With our brothers we will share All the secrets of our mountain All the riches buried there Now the valley cried with anger Mount your
horses, draw your sword And they killed the mountain people So they won their just reward Now they stood beside the treasure On the mountains of red Turned the stone and looked beneath it Peace
on earth was all it seemed Go ahead and reach your neighbor Go ahead and cheat a friend Do it in the middle of heaven You can justify it in the end There won't be any trouble that's blowing Come the judgment day On the bloody morning after One tin soldier
right away Go ahead and reach your neighbor Go ahead and cheat a friend Do it in the middle of heaven You can justify it in the end There won't be any trouble that's blowing Come the judgment day On the bloody morning after One tin
soldier right away
It's the way Greetings from Seattle, comrades.
This is Andy Donner.
Today I'm going to cover Real Politics 4, which is an overview of the subject of race.
Quite a few of you might not get a whole lot out of this, since a longtime white racist isn't going to be too surprised at what I've got to say.
But it needs to be said.
Quite a few different elements in the alternative political scene won't clearly state what they mean when they talk about the problems they want to address.
Before I get that far in the Real Politics series, I need to justify where I'm taking the discussion and make sure everyone is ready to go there.
Further, all this is fair game for spaced repetition.
Race as an abstract subject doesn't come up on this program very much even if we regularly discuss consequences and tangible realities of race.
It's also the case we have folks wandering to and from on the internet who aren't exactly sure what white nationalism actually is.
For the record, yes, we do mean race.
We're racists.
We aren't especially fond of people who aren't white and we think you should hold the same position.
The immediate question is why?
Why would we hold this position?
Attempting to explain this in detail would take quite literally a lifetime.
Good thing it's not necessary.
There are very few high points I need to cover in my general discussion before I move on to a specific issue which tends to elude new and less well-read white nationalists.
The first is that behavior, despite all the liberal, progressive, whiny opposition to reality, is genetic in nature.
Every single one of us has exhibited odd little incidents within our families where someone mimics some odd mannerism of a relative we've never seen express that mannerism.
We don't even know we're doing it until a parent, aunt, or uncle points it out.
Further, quite a few studies exist where twins, triplets, and other children of multi-child births are separated and later reunited.
This even turned into a daytime television trend for a while.
The similarity in life choices, including the ages at which crimes were committed, and even the similarity in the particular crimes is all quite stunning to someone not expecting it.
But so what?
Well, as I said, criminality is involved.
Criminality, for my purposes today, is defined as behavior contrary to civilization, which is another concept I'll touch on briefly.
It's well understood by just about every white person, even lefty assholes, that whites living near niggers don't like niggers.
Whites living around mestizos don't like them either.
There are a number of Arab hotbeds in traditionally white countries, and they are real hellholes.
In fact, There are various sorts of Asians all over the place, and their little communities in large cities are also disasters.
What seems to elude us is putting all these things together into a big picture.
For some odd reason, the conclusion that white people define what is proper, acceptable, and good is only discussed among very close friends and family behind closed doors.
I've had non-racist family members find out my politics and claim they don't agree with me as a prelude.
For expressing the beliefs I've just named.
It's that whole, I'm not racist, but, thing which liberals make fun of normal white people for.
Just about every white person has these opinions in one form or another that they won't express until they believe they're in a place safe to do so.
Even in that context, some of us have an awful time trying to verbalize what we're thinking.
Mr. Covington periodically reminds us of the reason behind his attachment to the novel 1984, and with good reason.
This is a perfect example of controlling thought by controlling vocabulary.
White people have trouble expressing their opinions because they don't quite know how to do so.
It should be completely obvious to all but the most whacked-out, self-hating whites.
Race is genetic.
If race and behavior are caused by the same thing, then they are intrinsically tied to one another.
Those of you in serious disagreement with me or merely curious to learn more about this should reference a book titled Race, Evolution, and Behavior by Philippe Rushton.
This is the definitive scientific work on the subject and I couldn't recommend it more.
Following that, material concerning the social impact and problems racially mixed societies deal with can be found in two books by Carlton Putnam, Race and Reason, and the follow-up, Race and Reality.
The two Putnam titles have very excellent point-counterpoint material to handle objections to pro-white racism.
When you get done with all that, it's best to proceed to understanding what sorts of consequences for civilization race entails.
For that, I recommend Lothrop Stoddard's The Revolt Against Civilization, The Menace of the Underman.
Stoddard does a great job of documenting the strain on a society which is plagued by the problems racial heterogeneity invariably causes.
From there, Proceed on to a textbook by Arthur Kemp, titled March of the Titans.
Kemp's history of the white race very carefully and thoroughly demonstrates, through verifiable evidence, should any of you still be interested in arguing, that the world's great civilizations were the product of higher quality white peoples, and were only destroyed when they allowed themselves to come into regular contact with, and be overrun by, non-white peoples.
The takeaway here is that the world we all know and love will very easily disappear should white people not retain their own territory and defensive capabilities to ensure they may raise future generations free from the problems modern white men and women are all too familiar with.
But am I going too far with this?
Could there possibly be some good non-whites?
Well, it's actually not relevant.
It's just like the reality that there will always be some unsavory whites running around.
Those few degenerates in the white race don't keep society from operating.
On the flip side, even if there are good non-whites, they clearly don't have any effect on the fact that their racial brethren are incredibly dangerous to be around.
Should these mythical beings exist, they have no bearing on anything whatsoever.
But really, am I taking this too far?
Can non-white hordes really overwhelm our societies to the point where they break?
Well, yes.
Demonstrably so, considering I can quote history textbooks to prove my point.
But the real trouble is that it's happening again.
Most normal white people come further and further right, to the point of being near racists when they take stock of the ills currently plaguing us.
The magazine Mother Jones recently ran an online article explaining why politics might be hardwired into people's brains based on genetics that give them a behavioral predisposition to one thing over another.
But do politics really fall along racial lines?
As it turns out, they do.
After the 2010 midterm elections, a shifty diversity education contractor for the federal government named Tim Wise wrote an open letter to white people.
He claims it is only to the white right, but as I'm about to demonstrate, he really did mean all white people.
The letter was quite long, so I'm going to cite the portions relevant to my point.
Quote, Real damned limited.
And you will lose.
This isn't hubris.
It isn't ideology.
It is not wishful thinking.
It is math.
In 40 years or so, there won't be any more white folks around who think the 1950s were the good old days, because we'll be able to teach about them accurately and honestly.
In about 40 years, half the country will be black or brown.
And there is nothing you can do about it.
Like I said, this is math, and numbers don't lie.
End quote.
That wasn't too pleasant, was it?
As I said, I cut quite a lot of the letter, but I didn't alter its meaning one bit.
It's on the man's website, and anyone can verify what I pulled from it with very little effort.
Incidentally, anyone who wants to can verify any of the things I've said today with very little effort.
Anyhow, Mr. Wise claims he's speaking to right-wing white people only.
But is that really the case?
If ideology were the issue here and not race, then why would half the country being non-white be a problem for the right?
And further, what is Mr. Wise under the impression current and future generations will be taught?
I've gone through enough material to make it very simple for anyone to learn the truth about race in history.
Race is real, and it matters.
Tim Wise knows this.
Everyone who isn't a complete buffoon knows this.
Most importantly, Wise's remarks in his letter show he knows ideology, as reported on by the aforementioned Mother Jones piece, is just as genetic and therefore racial as anything else.
When he says white-right, he really means white.
Non-whites universally lean left, and normal white people, even those in larger cities, contrary to popular opinion, Tend toward the right, though they would rather not admit it.
Further, Wise very carefully calculated his words and he understands that white people are going away as a whole, not just particular ideas, though they're almost the same thing.
We are being overwhelmed just as our ancient civilizations were ages ago.
But why is Tim Wise, who claims to be white, so excited about this?
Well, you'll note I used the word claims.
He's anything but white.
And with that, I've arrived at the more delicate of my points I mentioned when I started introducing my subject.
There are some more important nuances to the subject of race which sometimes confuse new white nationalists.
I understand some longer-term white nationalists, who are otherwise squared away, aren't up to snuff on this next point.
Before we begin, I'm going on the record as saying that I personally consider this a severe failure on their part.
If you will recall the stages of learning concept I introduced some weeks back, a long-time white nationalist should have reached the level of unconscious competence on the material I'm talking about today.
But quite a few haven't, despite the amount of time and effort they've put into the subject.
It's no one's fault but theirs, either.
So, if Tim Wise isn't white, then what is he?
Let's consider that his name could also be pronounced Weiss.
What sort of name is that?
It's Jewish.
Tim Wise is a kike.
As an aside for just a second, Jews are quite good at changing their names to hide, and there are plenty of historic periods where they've done so.
Kikes aren't white, and this, provided someone understands race as well as they should, is almost trivial to demonstrate, which I will do now.
As has been pointed out, behavior is associated with race, not religion.
Jews are notorious for behaving the same way throughout all of history, which has resulted in their being kicked out of all manner of countries hundreds of times, especially by whites.
Religions change over time, even if many would like to pretend they don't.
In some cases, such as Spain, conversion to Christianity was an option which permitted remaining in the country, but that didn't make Jews any less kikish than they were before.
Racial behavior is an invariant over time.
One cannot tell a Buddhist, Catholic, Protestant, Atheist, or Pagan from one another by lining them up.
One can, with a certain amount of knowledge and a little bit of intuition, tell a Jew by their appearance.
I'm told that New Yorkers can spot a heave from a mile away due to the amount of exposure they have to New York kikes.
In fact, I had the severe displeasure of knowing a couple of Messianic Jews some years ago, and they were just as obnoxious and horrible to be around as any other Jew.
They were literally the stereotype of a sheenie and were just as anti-white as their racial brother Tim Wise.
Religion doesn't constitute Judaism.
Race does.
Religious Jews and atheist Jews think of each other as totally Jewish.
This couldn't be the case if Judaism weren't a race.
Since I've referenced materials which contain hard racial science, I'll point out that nearly all of world Jewry, even the whitish-looking ones, have blood protein which tests in the Asiatic variety.
This proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that a Jew cannot be white any more than a nigger, spick, or other shit-colored hominid.
The Northwest Front recognizes this in its draft constitution.
Section 1 establishes the standard of nationhood and citizenship in the proposed Northwest American Republic.
Article 5 reads, The race commonly known as Jews are in culture and historic tradition an Asiatic people and shall not be considered white or accorded white racial status under law.
No Jew shall be allowed to enter or reside in the Northwest American Republic under any circumstances.
End quote.
This is the sum of the party's commentary on the matter, and anyone not in compliance with this position cannot be said to be of the same mind as the Northwest Front.
Having said that, there's a matter I must address.
On Radio Free Northwest, and on his personal weblog, Mr. Covington has repeatedly quoted the late Pastor Bob Miles on the subject of Judaism and Jewish ancestry.
On the surface, Pastor Miles appears to completely contradict every sane white nationalist's understanding of the Jewish question.
What he said, specifically, is that Judaism is a state of mind and that, quote, Jews aren't a race.
Some of the worst Jews you will ever meet won't have a drop of Hebrew blood in their veins.
Obviously, that's not literally true.
My understanding is that Pastor Miles subscribed to Christian identity and could not in any way believe that to be literally accurate.
I figured I better cover this to prevent a litany of questions from people who remember official party sources as having repeated the remark Miles made many years ago.
Truth be told, Pastor Miles was definitely on to something, but it's complex.
Whenever someone says something which cannot be literally true, it's best to try to imagine what they're actually getting at before writing them off.
Mr. Covington captured this best on his personal thought-crime blog when he expounded on Miles.
Judaism, or at least the Judaism in view, is the rejection of man as a spiritual being and the reduction of life to purely material terms.
Both communism and capitalism, being economic expressions of what happens when racial Jews run society, are totally materialistic.
A better way of thinking of the concept is to realize Pastor Miles was talking about what happens when an otherwise decent white person becomes the Jewish equivalent of a wigger.
A white kike.
A wike, perhaps?
Regardless of the terms we use, the phenomenon should never be used to invalidate the fact that Jews, whatever else they may be, are a race.
I've gone way too long today, but it needed to be done.
Using race as a gauge allows us to talk about not only the problem of white genocide, but also to examine various ideologies and possible solutions in terms of their impact on race, and therefore, on white genocide.
Hail victory, comrades!
This is Fairport Convention, the Bonnie Black Hair.
The On the 14th of May, and the dawn of the day, We've begun his shoulder to the roots, I did stray, In search of some game, if the weather prepare, To see if I could get a shot of the Bonnie Black Hair.
Well, I'm there to go there, with a face as a rose, The skin was as pale as the meek rose, I said, now you've made them, why ramble your soul?
Can you tell me where the Bonnie Black hair to go?
When the answers she gave me, her answer was no, But it would be a problem, well they say you'd be broke, And if you're not to see, Well, I laid the girl down with a face to disguise.
I gladly ran what I mean.
It's like lies, I said wrap your legs round me and begin with your heels, for the closer we get, the better it's free.
While the birds they were singing in the bushes and trees, the song that they sang was a song.
Oh, she's easy to believe.
I felt her heart quiver, and I knew what I'd done.
I said, have you had enough of the old sporting gun?
Well, the answer she gave me, her answer was nay.
It's not very old and sportsman like he can't miss right.
So if your powder is willing and your bullets play fair, why don't you keep firing at me, I need black hair.
Well, my powder is wasted and it's all gone.
We ran on his name and I cannot fire on.
Let's get back tomorrow morning.
Well, I vow and declare we'll both go again and hold the bonnie black hair.
Well, I vow and declare we'll be the bonnie black hair.
Tonight I'm going to talk about another Eggers book, and this one is called The Warrior Revolution.
Eggers starts out talking about the Burgers, and he talks about how they were once revolutionaries, because they were defying the medieval order of society.
But he talks about how they became educated and settled down.
And they became very much the middle class, and they didn't want to have any kind of embarrassment.
They wanted to sort of take the middle of the road.
But they did sometimes cultivate bohemians and intellectuals to appear somewhat edgy, but really they became very tame.
But he talks about how everything changed after World War I, and he says that the foundations of the Western world were very much shattered at this point.
And he says what Harold often says.
He talks about the law of history and how you can't restore a condition that existed in the past.
He talks about those that were conservative revolutionaries at the time and remained loyal to the monarchy.
They tried to use revolutionary language and to tame revolutionaries.
The one good service that they did perform was they raised questions, and real revolutionaries had to sort themselves out.
He talks about how conservatives never could have created a new world, and he talks about why the Germans in the past have never truly had a revolution.
He talks about the emotional and geographic disunity of Germany at this point in history, and also the fact that he says that the Germans are very obedient.
He talks about the need for leadership, and I agree it's very hard to, anytime you look like a great leader, He talks about how the soldiers were transformed into a new comradeship, and how some of them had joined the Freikorp, and how the warrior revolution was brought to reality during the 30s and 40s.
And he talks about total life commitment, and how you have to become simple but not primitive.
He talks somewhat in this pamphlet about how Germans don't have a tame nature, and he attributes that to the cold climate.
And not challenge all the time, and they have this hardened nature for conflict and danger, and that their purpose is to bring order to the world.
But in World War I, the soldiers realized that the throne and the altar were not real, and they came to a realization of race.
Now, not surprisingly, he hates Thomas Mann and the League of Nations, which were, of course, the predecessors of the UN.
And he talks about how the Germans had become wedded to the Fuhrer, and the Church no longer has any hold, and that comrades are standing to fight for a new idea.
Those who don't make total life to this are traitors.
He talks about the eternal volunteers, and they're separated from the lukewarm, and how to actually be German is an act of will.
Other Germans that have not made total life are simply coincidental Germans.
And he talks about the fighter is greater than any philosopher.
There are certain elements in society that would rather have Germany become harmless.
But he talks about how Germany is like a volcano.
The warrior dies peacefully after the fulfillment of duty.
And carriers of this thinking are the activists.
They will always be asking themselves if they're worthy to be Germans.
And then he talks about the state in terms of eugenics and the education of the state and how they have all these wonderful Hitler schools and political education institutes and they also have an occupational competition and science foundations about how one who is the master lives a life of duty.
So it's really, it's another, it's a very inspiring small book.
I have to call it a pamphlet because it's really so profound.
The next small book by Eggers I'm going to talk about is one called Live Bravely, Die Courageously, when he defines the life of a warrior.
And that's also a really exciting little book, and I'm very excited to talk about that next time.
But I have to pace myself because I don't want to tell you everything and then have nothing for next week.
So thank you for listening.
Thank you.
Well, guess who popped by again this week?
Comrade Charles from Montana.
So, while we're waiting on somebody else here, we figured we'd just have a little bit of a natter and see if we could come up with anything worthy of inclusion in our wonderful Radio Free Northwest podcast.
How you been doing, Charles?
You said I'm doing really good.
The rumors of my demise have been grossly exaggerated.
I'm trying to think about some of the news items that were on since you came last.
I think we've pretty much talked out Fraser Glenn Miller.
The Peaches thing has been confirmed.
Like I say, for those of us who were involved in the case at the time, that's old news.
Let's see what else.
There's the big events on the Bundy Ranch.
Again, I think that's pretty much been talked out now.
Do you have anything to...
I think I said it last time.
The BLM never sent in a SWAT team because my old man wasn't paying his grazing fees.
Okay, and let's quote-unquote racist rant on the part of that 80-some-odd-year-old Jew that uses the name Don Sterling.
His real name was Don Walkalitz or something like that.
He's actually, but he is a Jew.
He's in his 80s.
His girlfriend, who seems to be either a nigger or a wog of some kind, secretly recorded him making comments about blacks to not so much their inferior monkeys or anything like that, He doesn't want them at his dinner table.
He doesn't want them sitting in the owner's booth with him watching his other niggers bounce the ball.
Which is actually, by our standards, his racism is pretty mild.
And so now she's set him up and they're talking about, oh, how this Jew has to be stripped of his ownership of the team and he has to be fined and he has to be burned at the stake and all that sort of stuff.
All because of comments which he made in a private capacity to someone, his so-called girlfriend or trophy wog or whatever.
Anyway, that's another thing I've seen supposedly.
This he was something.
Well, he was born in 1934, so that makes him 80 years old now, I think.
And there was a good deal of speculation that he just walks around with this little bit of 30-something caramel-colored arm candy around to maintain that he can still get it up.
I mean, this guy's supposed to be a racist, but his girlfriend is some kind of...
Well, I can't figure out what she is.
She could be a Filipino, could be a Mexican, could be just a hoppa of some kind.
Anyway.
Well, I got some bad news for that guy.
He's being set up for his next divorce.
I don't know.
He may be divorced already.
I don't keep up with...
Well, she's clearly setting the guy up for some reason.
Well, she said on some show that she had 100 hours of taped conversations, which sounds to me like a blackmail attempt.
But anyway, the thing is, this guy, Jew though he may be, is going to lose his livelihood, lose his business, apparently be forced out of ownership of this team, so forth and so on, because of...
Private remarks that he made in a private conversation which were illegally recorded.
Again, anyway, I wish this guy wasn't a Jew because it sounds like I'm defending him, but this is wrong in so many ways that I can't even begin to count them.
This is not what is supposed to happen in this country.
You're not supposed to be penalized for speaking what you believe in a private conversation that was not meant to be overheard by anyone else.
This is pure, utter police state, and it's not being run by the police.
It's being run by the liberal news media and our whole politically correct culture with the idea of punishing and penalizing anyone with stature, anyone with celebrity.
Well, to quote Malcolm X, it sounds like the chickens have come home to roost.
Well, I've mumbled about this before on Radio Free Northwest.
White people need permission slips in order to be brave, in order to do anything, in order to act on anything.
Before they'll do it, it's not that we're just total cowards, because as I've said, white police officers, white soldiers and marines, white firefighters display physical courage all the time.
It's not like we are just completely, totally lacking in these characteristics, but the thing is, the firefighters and the soldiers and the police have a permission slip to be brave from our lords and masters.
After they're brave and after they shoot whoever they're told to shoot, they get patted on the head by the Jew and said, good little dog.
That's what they have to have.
And so I think one of the reasons that these liberal lynch mobs are concentrating on anybody in the system who makes a politically incorrect remark or says nigger or criticizes Obama or whatever, I think the reason they're concentrating on people like this is because they don't want anyone from the world of celebrity who, in the minds of white people has the power to write permission slips to be brave or to engage in politically deviant conduct to get a leg up.
The world of celebrity is being Because I think having created this magical world of celebrity that all the white goyim follow like sheep, they're a little bit scared they're going to lose control of it, and I'm babbling.
Well, that's actually true.
It's a double-edged sword, this whole star system that they've developed.
And a good example is their name.
Princess Diana.
Yeah.
You know, I mean, she was a worldwide celebrity because she was the quintessential princess.
And then it went to her head, and she went off the deep end, and they finally had to axe her.
But there's really a big danger of these celebrities going off like that.
Because, you know, most of them aren't really very smart.
They're kind of like idiot savants.
Oh, yeah.
They're really good at...
But that's about it.
Some of them aren't even there.
Jersey Shore, Snooki, and JWoww, and the situation.
I mean, my God!
What kind of idiots have we become?
I don't have a TV.
You're not missing anything.
So anyway, I don't know who you're talking about.
I won't bother.
It's insane.
Google it if you must.
I'm not going to watch it anyway, so it's a waste of time.
Okay.
I heard you mention something there.
This is probably not what we really need to be discussing here, but do you genuinely believe that Princess Di got chopped?
Oh, yeah, of course.
She was really running totally wild, and they can't allow that kind of stuff to happen, so they got rid of her.
I'm telling you, if you think that the politically correct in this country are totalitarians, what do you think about the Queen of England?
I think she is the richest person in the world.
And to quote her, one time she said, this business of ours.
So the whole monarchy thing is a big business.
And they can't put up with wackos like that.
Well, I was going to use a crude term, but stirring up the pond.
What amazes me, and you know who I feel sorry for in that whole menage?
That poor, jug-eared bastard, Prince Charles.
Because all his life, this guy was born for one reason only.
I mean, he was just about one of the very few people in the world who was born into a job.
It is the only one he is suited for.
It is the only one he would ever be allowed to carry out.
This was his function in life.
He was going to be Prince of Wales, and he was going to be King of England, and apparently his senile batty mum has just decided she doesn't like the boy, and she's decided, no, no, you're not going to be King Charles.
I'm going to sit here and live and live and live, and then when I croak, it's going right to your son William.
You're just totally bypassed.
You're never, ever going to be king.
That appears to be the situation.
Okay, she is pushing 90 now, I think.
Charles is in his 60s.
I know that.
My God, can you imagine what kind of life that poor schlub must have had, waiting all your life to finally step in and do this one job that you were literally born for, and then this crazy old bat decides, no, you're not going to do it.
Charles, I think, can't help but wonder just what his life has been like, and I wouldn't be at all surprised to see him go berserk and start shooting people in a London tube station or something.
He gets so frustrated.
Well, I'd like to try to generate some sympathy, but do you know what the difference is between common people and the nobility?
What?
Well, common people will do anything to save their relatives.
The nobility will do anything to kill their relatives and take over the kingship or whatever.
Well, in the Middle Ages, that was true.
I worked over in London for a number of years.
Well, in the early 90s, I was a guard or security poor, whatever you want to call it, to two merchant banks in London.
One was Morgan Grenfell, and the other was Life, the London International Financial Futures Exchange.
And I noticed something.
And I was an American, and I was like there on the front desk, and I was patrolling around the building, and I was escorting visitors in and out, blah, blah, blah.
And so we had some contact with the big knobs, and especially Morgan Grenfell, which is a very major investment bank.
And the actual nobility, and we had some in the upper reaches of both corporations.
Knights, baronets, had a couple of higher nobility earls and whatnot.
I can't remember all of them, but not many, but there was like, you know, six or eight at both institutions in the very upper levels of management.
And I noticed something.
They still had what I suppose you would call noblesse oblige.
If I was on the front desk or something, they usually remembered my name.
Oh, yeah, you're the Yank, aren't you?
You know, how's things, you know, across the pond, all that sort of stuff.
They were polite.
I mean, I'm sure that they considered me to be dog-do to be scraped off their shoes, but they never, ever let me know it.
Because that's not the done thing, you know.
We need the lower orders.
And it doesn't do to be rude to them, you see.
But the ones that gave me and the other officers and all of the lower-level employees at those institutions the most problems were goddamn Thatcher's children, the British yuppies of the 1980s and 90s.
God, they made me sick.
At London International Financial Futures Exchange, which is kind of like one of their private stock exchanges, they have some habits which are sufficiently disgusting, so I won't describe them here.
But one of the things they would do when they made a big trade or coup, Whoopi!
Whoopi!
You know, watching all the peasants dive for them.
And it was almost like something out of the Middle Ages or some Roman emperor.
Rockefeller.
Yeah, and just their attitude towards anyone who didn't trade on the floor with them and earn 20 million pounds in a day for their principles or their...
Company sweats after I was just, oh, you were just lower than dog shit.
I just always thought that that was interesting because most of them were just jumped up barrel boys themselves.
And they were, as the saying used to be, but the genuine old nobility, like I say, I'm sure they held us in just as much contempt as being working class stiffs as did the others, but they were courteous about it.
And little things like that, when you're on the bottom, that's what you appreciate.
I would have gone out of my way to help some of those older nobleman types who, if they had a problem or anything like that, I would have gone out of my way to help them specifically because they were courteous to me.
Some of those Thatcher's children, yuppie types, as far as I'm concerned, they could go fall in the Thames and I wouldn't bother to pull them out.
Well, I tell you what, we used to call those kind of new rich people back when I was a kid, but since that guy in Los Angeles got into trouble for using the N-word, I better say something else.
For those of you who don't remember him from earlier panel discussions, our comrade Don just walked in, and to tell the truth, this is not anything planned.
Shall I say Charlie?
We're sitting here in front of the microphone, bullshitting and engaging in senile, old men's ramblings.
What?
Do you have anything you want to add?
Oh, yeah.
I was just talking about that.
Since that guy down there in Los Angeles got in trouble for using the N-word, I better not be using it either.
Yeah.
But, you know, we used to call newly jumped up rich people.
What?
Nigger rich?
Oh, no.
Not that.
Oh, yeah.
That's an old saying.
Yeah, I remember that.
But, you know, I was just talking about that.
I've been working over in London, and I noticed that the old-line nobility, the knights, baronets, and the earls and dukes and whatnot, I'm sure they considered the guards and the lower employees and secretaries to be total scum, but they were always polite.
They would exchange a few words to you, make an effort to remember your name.
It's called noblesse oblige, and they still had it.
And on the other hand, the new capitalists of the Thatcher era were just total arrogant assholes.
Gormless gits, as the locals called them.
So anyway, so that's what we were babbling about when you came in.
We were mentioning that Jew basketball team owner down in Los Angeles who got none for telling his girlfriend in a private conversation that he didn't want to bring in niggers into, I'm not even sure where it was, I think it was into the owner's booth during the games.
Here's a man who's making millions and millions of dollars out of buying and maintaining a stable of niggers who bounce a ball, and whom he also, by the way, pays millions of dollars per year, so obviously he must think something of black people.
He makes his living off niggers, but he just doesn't want them sitting next to him, stinking and flapping their bubble lips while he's trying to watch the game or whatever.
And for this, he is going to lose his franchise and all that sort of stuff.
Can they do that?
There appears to be some doubt.
Apparently, in the NBA owner's covenants or whatever, there are certain sins of moral turpitude for which an NBA owner can be disciplined specifically.
Gambling, gambling on games, taking bribes to throw games, mostly having to do with the stuff that's actually happened in professional basketball, in other words, for the past 40 years.
There is no provision for dismissing, disciplining, or executing an NBA team owner for private remarks that were not meant to be overheard by anyone and instead ended up on YouTube and TMZ.com, which is how this happens.
So they're kind of treading in unknown territory.
But we're going to be seeing more and more of this.
This is what we were talking about before.
Heresy trials, in essence.
This man is going to be very severely punished.
Through loss of millions of dollars for the crime, you want to call it a crime, of expressing opinions which are contrary to those which are held by the king or the established church, which in our case is Obama and the world of political correctness.
This is exactly the sort of thing that happened under King Henry VIII and the Spanish Inquisition and for many, many centuries before that.
In those days, people were burned at the stake.
Nowadays, you just lose all your stuff.
In the Middle Ages, they lit a fire under your ass.
I don't think so much it's because they're afraid that the cops are going to come and shoot them through the head, but they're afraid that lawyers are going to come and take their stuff, and an American will do anything other than give up his stuff.
I don't know why that last section with me and Charles sounded so...
Anyway, it did on my machine.
I don't know how it sounded on you guys' computers.
It sounded a little off there.
Maybe it's because of how we were sitting around the microphone.
Anyway, we've got one more music break, so here's a little bit of Irish-American history for you.
This is Hair of the Dog.
The wind blows cold at night.
The brave are melting potty.
If you stand in the dark with your ear to the wind, you'll hear the sound of money.
Deep in the dark of that old mine shaft, you smell the smoke and the fire.
And the murder lowered the mind below, the same ghost of mommy mcguire.
I come from Harvard County.
I shot the boss of Lexford.
My life's always up for a bounty.
And I will die with my head held high, I fought for the men below.
The men who worked and fight and die down in that black hell hole.
But I'll tell you my boys, my god, I'll tell you my name, I'm high, I'm high in the morning.
And I shot Jack Jones for skeet in my balls, I'll tell you the sound of morning.
And I will die with my head held high, I fought for the men below.
The men who worked and fight and die down in that black hell hole.
Well, I'll tell you me boys, Alex Campbell is my name.
No pistol did I fight.
Then I will fall from the gallows wall to be in Marty Maguire.
Yes, I will die with my head held high.
I fought for the men below.
For the men who worked and died and died down in that black hell hole.
The wind blows cold at night.
The brave are male and molly.
Deep in the dark of that old mine shaft, you smell the smoke and the fire.
Head of Burlboro in the mind below It's the ghost of Molly and the Blyer It's the ghost of Molly and the Blyer It's the ghost of Molly and the Blyer Okay, I've saved the part that's going to get me in trouble until last.
I know that this is going to start the goat dancers leaping and twirling yet again, but it's time somebody stepped up to the plate and said these things out loud.
Somehow that always seems to be my duty station in the movement.
It was long ago, and now it's getting that way again.
And I'm going to say something that I ask all of you to consider carefully.
I am offering this seriously and without rancor or any personal access to grind.
And I ask that you accept it in that spirit.
I believe that it is time for the American and Canadian white nationalist movements to sit down and seriously rethink and reevaluate our relationship to the Stormfront and VNN bulletin boards, with a view toward ceasing and desisting to post or follow these boards ourselves, and that we should actively discourage other white nationalists from posting there.
I don't think I have to tell you why.
Stormfront and VNN are notorious data mines for the FBI, DHS, NSA, and other secret police agencies.
Stormfront and VNN are riddled with trolls, many of them moderators, some of whom are almost certainly the FBI's $400-a-week men or some of Cass Sunstein's cognitive dissonance operatives, or whatever they're called now.
People who are deliberately paid and inserted to spread confusion and discord and chaos and, in many cases, completely blow off and alienate potential supporters of the Fourteen Words, which is their purpose.
There have simply been too many well-publicized incidents where Stormfront and VNN have been used as sources for information and quotations which have been turned against the white community by the enemy media.
VNN has proven to be exceptionally egregious.
Fraser Glenn Miller, whom Alex Linder spent years trying to rehabilitate and force back into our community against the wishes and the better judgment of virtually everyone, is just the most recent example.
But there was Yankee Jim and Joe Snuffy and Craig Cobb and God knows how many more.
I don't.
I stopped following both VNN and Stormfront myself years ago.
But the problem has gotten so bad, I just have to say something.
Speaking of the loathsome Miller...
I will at least give Alex Linder this much credit.
He has realized that promoting and attempting to rehabilitate Miller was a mistake, at least to the point of pulling offline the thread discussing Miller's little drunken spree up there in Kansas City.
Guys, look.
I'm not going to shout.
I'm not going to argue.
I'm not going to debate.
Things have reached the point where the facts speak for themselves.
Posting anything at all to Stormfront or VNN is dangerous to others.
And hazardous to your own health.
And if you can't see that by now, then frankly you need to do some re-evaluation of your own motives and desires in participating on those boards.
Whatever you're looking for on there, it's not worth the risk, and I mean the sheer physical risk that you will be identified, targeted, and victimized by bad people with badges or crazy people getting $400 per week in cash from the bad people with badges.
Really, guys, you'd have to be a damn fool to keep on hanging out on those boards.
But our time is up now, and so that's it for this week's edition of Radio Free Northwest.
This program is brought to you by the Northwest Front, Post Office Box 4856, Seattle, Washington, 98194, or you can go to the party's website at www.northwestfront.org.
This is Harold Covington, and I'll see you next week.
Until then, Sasha Andoban.
Freedom.
▲
Export Selection