All Episodes
Previous Next
June 6, 2013 - Radio Free Nortwest - H.A. Covington
01:14:54
20130606_rfn
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Oh, then tell me, Sean O 'Carroll, tell me why you hurry so.
Hush your vocal, hush and listen, and his cheeks were all aglow.
I bear orders from the captain, get you ready quick and soon, for the pikes must be together by the rising of the moon.
By the rising of the moon, by the rising of the moon, for the pikes must be together by the rising of the moon.
Oh, then tell me, Sean O 'Farrell, where the gathering is to be.
In the old spot by the river, rifle known to you and me.
One more roar for signal, token, whistle of the marching tune.
Warrior bike upon your shoulder by the rising of the moon.
By the rising of the moon, by the rising of the moon.
Which arrived upon your shoulder by the rising of the moon.
Out from many a mud wall cabin eyes were watching through the night.
Many a manly chest was throbbing for the blessed warning light.
The waters passed along the valleys like the man she's lonely crew.
And a thousand blades were flashing at the rising of the moon.
At the rising of the moon, at the rising of the moon.
And a thousand days were clashing out, rising all the moon.
Greetings from the Northwest Homeland, comrades.
It's June the 6th, 2013.
I'm Harold Covington, and this is Radio Free Northwest.
Okay, we'll start with a small housekeeping item.
Apparently, on the last couple of occasions when I closed out the show, I gave the wrong zip code for our party's post office box, which is box 4856, Seattle, Washington, 98194.
Not 98104, which I apparently said.
That's just my mad cow disease catching up with me.
98104 is my personal zip code, which in my delirium I seem to have confused with the right one.
This is the main post office in Seattle, and like many such, it has a separate zip code for the boxes.
I apologize for the error, and again, the correct address is box 4856, zip code 98194.
Secondly, a quick reminder that the latest issue of the Northwest Observer, our party's newsletter or magazine, is now out, and subscriptions are $30 per year within the United States and Canada, $50 a year for overseas airmail.
Thirdly, a special word of thanks to all you comrades who have responded to our Northwest Front media project of this week.
You know who you are.
No results yet, but I will, of course, keep plugging away.
Now, something else I want to touch on briefly.
Recently, a certain individual, reasonably well-known in movement circles in the state of Idaho, was outed by the SPLC, which I won't get into except to say that I know him personally, and I visited him with his wife in their home, but he later decided he didn't want anything to do with me because I write quote-unquote dirty books.
That was some years ago, but recently the same issue came up with someone else who objected to certain scenes in my fiction other than the Northwest novels.
I actually send out copies of certain of my books when I send them out at all with a disclaimer sheet.
But let me run this down for you guys real quick because I know that others among you get to reading some of my non-Northwest work and you're bothered by it, as in a way you should be.
So here's a 411.
Prior to the second Matt and Heather novel, Slow Coming Dark, all my fiction was written down through the years with the intention of submitting it for publication through the existing publishing establishment, which consists for all practical purposes entirely of Jews, feminists, left-wing liberals, and the six or seven multinational corporations who control the industry.
Now, the way it works is that any novel manuscript by any author who wants to get published by the establishment has to pass muster first by a literary agent who, whatever his or her personal political views, knows full well what the industry will publish and what it will not.
And if they know that there's no chance in hell for a book to be published, they're not even going to bother with it.
Secondly, a novel has to pass through a succession of house readers, mostly leftist women and homosexuals.
Now, then it has to be accepted by an editor who submits it to a board of other editors and market analysts who decide not only if the book is politically correct, but whether it will make any money.
As you know, if you've read any of my non-Northwest work, the chances of any of my stuff passing any such process of kosher vetting is slim indeed.
But for many years, I refused to give up, so I included in certain of my books a number of elements of political correctness that you as a white nationalist will find disturbing and displeasing, as do I. I also would usually and deliberately include a couple of raunchy sex scenes.
These are known in the publishing trade as commercial dirt.
It is now virtually impossible to publish any work of fiction without them, and I had to include something of the kind were I to have any hope at all of getting the book past the politically correct gatekeepers of contemporary fiction such as it is.
The worst offenders in this regard are probably the first Matt and Heather novel, Fire and Rain, my Civil War murder mystery, Bonnie Blue Murder, And Revelation 9. But I admit that there are elements of this kind of liberal pandering in almost all of my work prior to about the year 2000, when print-per-order publishing came along and I no longer had to worry about pleasing agents and the whole phalanx of kikes and lefties and libs in the publishing industry, and I could write whatever I wanted.
Which is just a great experience, believe me.
After all those years, I spent beating my head against that particular wall.
Now, Fire and Rain especially has gotten a few people hot and bothered.
It was not intended primarily for movement readers.
It was frankly an attempt to slip some political incorrectness past the system and make some money while doing so.
In fact, it failed.
Fire and Rain was rejected out of hand by every literary agent I submitted it to, including one who had attempted to sell several of my other novels and who sent the manuscript back with a note which read in part, Harold, you know better than this.
I like your work, but I'm not going to commit professional suicide for you.
Now, Bonnie Blue Murder is almost as bad with certain Negroid characters, like the high-yellow Charleston whorehouse madam and the smart-ass nigger butler.
Revelation 9 is a straight Stephen King knockoff, and yeah, certain sections of it are pretty grotty.
It was written in the late 80s, and by then I just said to hell with it, and I decided I was going to write whatever crap these damn people wanted me to write so that I could just make some damn money.
Now, that didn't work either.
The female agents I was using at the time didn't like it because the heroine was a Christian, and they thought she was too much of a victim, even though I actually rewrote the ending for them and really messed up the whole book.
That's probably the worst thing I've ever written, and I don't talk about it much.
But guys, the racial and political message is there in everything I've ever written.
I just don't seem to be able to leave it out, although sometimes you do have to do a lot of reading between the lines.
You need to recognize my politically correct interpolations as the clearly intended camouflage which they are, and understand the deeper meaning of the novels.
That one guy in Idaho is the only person so far who has just flat-out refused to accept my explanation as to why some of that stuff is in my earlier work, but I know it bothers some people.
Now, what can I tell you?
It is what it is, and I think you'll find something of racial value in everything I've ever written.
I hope so, anyway.
Now, here's Andy.
Greetings from Seattle, comrades.
Andy Donner here.
Several weeks ago...
I promised a discussion on what exactly constitutes a solution to white genocide, but I've had a hard time delivering.
I've experienced the perfect storm of severe examples of bad solutions and bad strategic thinking, which has prompted me to re-examine this lecture almost every day for some time.
What makes this even harder is that the party regularly complains that very few so-called white nationalists are subject to reasoned arguments.
Which is why we tend to rely on shaming tactics for the little bit of progress we do get.
Admittedly, I'm shooting for the minds of those of you who still consider facts and logic when making your political and life decisions.
I've had to console myself with the reality that any version of this chat would involve logic from the get-go and that so far, the party has attracted people who actually respond to substantial thought without falling back on flights of racial fancy.
But first, I need to thank a couple of comrades for some help I've been given.
I rag on the quality of our internet interactions all the time, and for good reason.
But as of late, I've had certain help from a couple people, and it's really quite significant.
One comrade hit me up on the party message board in the recent past with a suggestion on a viable spot to spread party material in a place where it might be well received.
I've not had a chance to do this properly yet, but that's purely on me.
It's sad, too.
Because this comrade provided directions and examples.
Comrade, rest assured I'm very grateful and I fully intend to make use of your well-thought-out suggestion.
Next, I want to specially thank Comrade Travis from Montreal.
I mentioned to him that I was having trouble framing this particular discussion on solutions.
More precisely, I needed a very broad way of introducing the main point without hopping right into details for the benefit of those still underdeveloped in their political and strategic understanding.
Comrade Travis was quite easily able to provide me with the most generic definition of a solution as opposed to what he calls a non-solution.
I like his terms, so I'll stick with them.
Before I get into it, though, I have to provide background.
As with any topic, most people can't quite relate to it without understanding why someone would bring it up in the first place.
Presumably, those of you listening to Radio Free Northwest are at least somewhat interested in furthering the 14 words.
I wish I could say I'm sure every single one of you were dedicated to securing the existence of our people and a future for white children, but given the history of the movement as a whole, and the general refusal of real-world involvement in anything which could possibly save our race from extinction, I must call the matter into question.
Okay, I'll start in on a tangent if I'm not careful, and I haven't been talking but more than a couple of minutes already, so I'd better drag myself back to the point.
So why bother talking about what constitutes a solution to our racial problems in the first place?
Primarily, it's the middle point between having a problem and fixing a problem.
But as I said earlier, I've personally experienced the perfect storm demonstrating the lack of real political thought in the movement as of late, and it will need discussing for everyone's benefit.
If we take it for granted that at least some of us are interested in our race's need for preservation, then we'd better have some criteria for deciding which actions to take.
If this sounds rather basic, that's because it is.
Unfortunately, the white nationalist movement hasn't developed its basic logic and decision-making, and rather, we're actually getting worse at it.
I'm not sure what's causing this, but I suspect, among other things, it's a lack of book learning.
Nevertheless, I can't fix that by talking at you, so I'll stop the speculation.
So, getting on with it.
Comrade Travis reminds us of a couple of things.
First, the objective universe is reality, as it is, while the subjective universe is subject to one's state of mind, where reality can be interpreted to match a person's preferences without regard to fact.
Second, and this is the important part, something which merits the title solution can alter or at least interfere with the objective universe.
Travis went on to point out that, according to this very good definition, a non-solution is therefore limited to something that merely interferes with the subjective universe.
Clearly, this should indicate the movement has only ever utilized non-solutions, with the exception of very early organizations which actually had a chance at using system politics.
That was so very many years ago, it's not applicable now due to the difference in the quality of white people available.
So what do we do with these basic concepts?
Now that I've got a proper hook to hang my chat on, I'll expand the definition of a solution.
I said earlier that a solution is the middle point between having a problem and solving it.
If a solution is intended to solve a problem, then it has the fix as its goal.
I'm going to run the risk of turning this into a management seminar and bring up SMART goals.
SMART is an acronym for specific, measurable, actionable, relevant, I'll point out that while the Butler Plan doesn't have a literal time of expiration on it, the extinction of the white race certainly limits the time in which we may act, and presumably ignites a sense of urgency in at least some of us.
And that means you're all packing your moving vans now, right?
I won't go any further into that idea, since I could be here all day.
But I will apply it to each example I bring up.
Before I do that, I'll start with the most obvious non-solutions from the world of Ayn Rand-style neoconservativism.
There have been a couple of really laughable items on Rush Limbaugh's program while I've been trying to create the talking points for describing solutions.
The first is that Limbaugh and the GOP in general are now in a wait-and-see mode, just like the movement.
They're waiting for something to happen which is said to finally wake people up since all efforts at converting them through logic have failed.
At this point, when you're using the same strategy as the dictatorship's kept opposition, you're out of ideas and ought to admit it.
Any so-called solution which relies on outside forces agreeing with your agenda isn't a solution at all since it places you entirely in a passive mode and therefore isn't actionable.
About two weeks before I'm recording this, someone called into Limbaugh and couldn't come up with a reason to love America today even though they love what it used to be.
As an aside, if you're in the same boat, why aren't you helping us implement the Butler Plan?
Anyhow, Limbaugh's response was weak.
The country can be that way again if we strengthen ourselves and keep fighting for our beliefs, or something to that effect.
This is, again, another one of the favorite phrases of the movement which is absolutely meaningless in the real world.
Incidentally, it's probably going to be meaningless in the voting booth soon enough.
Critical analysis reveals these two ideas are just as silly as waking people up.
Waking people up is, in and of itself, a non-solution since it only affects the subjective universe.
For those of you who care to argue that point with me, I can presume you consider yourself awake and I can also presume you're not in the homeland.
If you are, I'll be happy to meet with you face-to-face and discuss it.
But for the rest of you, I can only point out that the effects of all three non-solutions discussed so far are the same.
Nothing at all.
I'll say that again differently to make my point stronger.
Despite your beliefs being different, your effect on the world is that of a rank-and-file GOP-er.
That ought to really, really bother you.
Wait-and-see isn't a plan, system politics aren't a plan, and waking people up is...
well, I've harped on that enough.
Moving on to movement-specific non-solutions.
The first thing we encounter is the white community concept.
Whiteopias, PLEs, and enclaves have been discussed before, but they bear re-examining for our purpose today.
Let's assume the Whiteopia in question gets off the ground and is the best Whiteopia in all of history.
It's still a non-solution.
What?
Why?
I mean, hey, it's a real change in the real world, right?
Well, how?
The problem it was supposed to solve still exists in exactly the same magnitude as if the Whiteopia had never come about.
Further, what is the purpose of the Whiteopia?
I can already hear cries of, But Donner, what about the 14 words?
There are little white kitties doing little white kitty things in our Whiteopia!
I'll grant that, but the 14 words require security, and a Whiteopia, Enclave, Compound, PLE, or whatever else you like isn't secure.
Any solution which purports to actually fit the bill must be effective, and enclaves aren't effective for anything other than internet rumor-mongering.
As an aside, I was once confronted with the suggestion, completely out of nowhere, that it starts with compounds.
I immediately asked what starts with compounds, since I wanted to actually analyze what this person was saying.
But I got no answer.
Is it sinking in yet that significant commentary on solutions and non-solutions is quite badly needed?
Perhaps the most bizarre attempt at detailing a solution I've ever encountered was something called pan-secessionism.
It sounded interesting at first, but it turned out just to be a reworded, armchair intellectual type of when the balloon goes up, and really was disappointing.
It was, like everything else, completely anti-Northwest for some strange reason.
This particular idea called for all sorts of activity with no objective impact on the world, such as militia training, community building, political re-education, and all sorts of other things to be done by everyone but the guy proposing the idea.
As is usual.
Further, the moment of action was going to be when the balloon finally went up and a whole bunch of teeny tiny little countries could be created when Zog couldn't do anything about it.
So...
The same thing we've been planning on most of the movement's history and therefore it's already been covered today.
As an aside to the aside, the Butler Plan is always criticized as being vulnerable to invasion by China.
I can't help but notice the people making that claim more or less back the teeny tiny country approach after the mythical balloon goes up, and China doesn't seem to factor into their plans at all.
I guess they don't really believe the objection they make.
Um, what's the word for that?
Oh yeah, dishonesty.
And they wonder why I won't call them comrade.
While we're on the topic of dishonesty, my next talk is planned to be on why people aren't participating in the Butler Plan like they say they want to.
It's going to have to cover the white character issue again, which includes dishonesty and its underlying causes.
That conversation is really going to be a fun one.
Backing off from the nested asides and arriving at an applicable point, it would do all of us quite a bit of good to listen to the earlier episodes of Radio Free Northwest again.
As in the first few months it ran.
In order to pick up on the explanation and justification of the Northwest Imperative.
I've gone long enough today, and it might make a decent bit of homework for all of you to evaluate the Butler Plan in light of the criteria presented here and on the other RFNs.
Plus, I don't especially feel like doing the whole spaced repetition thing right now.
I really want you all to make an effort to digest what I'm saying, because most of the communication I get from random people claiming to think like I do reveals they don't think a whole lot at all.
Let alone agree with the party enough to actually act on their beliefs, which, of course, begs the question of what their beliefs really are.
Hail victory, comrades!
You know, this week I think we'll have a few numbers for our pagan listeners, of whom I know we have quite a few.
This is a group I was just introduced to called Emerald Rose, and this is called The Pict Song, about the pre-Celtic inhabitants of the British Isles.
The music is the group's, but the lyrics were written by none other than the British poet and author Rudyard Kipling.
The music is the one that was written by none other than the British poet and author Rudyard Kipling.
The music is the one that was written by none other than the British poet and author Rudyard Kipling.
Rome never looks where she treads Always her heaviest fall Our bellies, our hearts, and our heads Rome never hates when we squall Our sentries pass by and that's all We gather behind them in hearts What do we conquer the
wall?
With only our tongues as our swords We are the little folk we Too little to love or to hate But leave us alone and you'll see How fast we can drag down the state We are the worm in the wood.
We are the rod at the root.
And we are the taint in the blood.
We are the thorn in the foot.
A mistletoe killing an oak.
Rats gnawing cables in two.
Mauds eating holes in a cloak How they must love what they do Yes, and we little folk too We are as busy as they Working our works out of you Watch and you'll see it someday
We are the little folk, we...
Too little to love or to hate But leave us alone and you'll see How fast we can drag down the state We are the worm in the wood We are the rod at the root We are the taint in the blood We are the thorn in the foot Although
maybe we are not strong Yet we know peoples who are Gladly will guide them along To smash and destroy you in war We shall be slaves just the same When have we never been slaves?
You will die of the shame Then we will dance on your graves We are the little folk we Too little to love or to hate But leave us alone and you'll see How fast we can drag down the state We are the worm in the wood We are
the rod at the root And we are the taint in the blood.
We are the thorn in the foot.
*Cheering*
Good evening, comrades.
Tonight I'm going to be reviewing Bill White's The Tradition of the Mother.
And in this book he wants to talk about different forms of worship and the differences between Yahweh and Odin.
He really goes into a lot of ancient societies in this book.
I just want to try to find the things that are most important.
Now, he starts out by saying there are these three haploid groups, and all whites are in the end group.
Now, he thinks that northern Europe is the original point for the Aryan race, but he thinks that there's a second Asiatic center.
He believes that the Sumerians were Mediterranean whites.
They were non-Indo-European, and they were the ones that founded northern Egypt.
But then later, the Semites came into Sumer, and they brought in various forms of demonology, and then he tries to explain where these things came from.
Now, he says that the Persian and Indians retained a purer version of the Nordic faith than did the Western and Southern Europeans because they had fewer Near East influences.
He says that even the Celts were somewhat influenced by Val, but he says that whites made all of history.
And he talks about the Bible a bit, and he says that you really don't have to believe everything is fact, that even if you're a believer, you have to realize there are going to be things that were incorrect.
And he talks about the story of Noah as really being more of a mythical story than a story that you can take literally.
It talks about how there's a lot of misinformation on the Bible because there have been a lot of mistranslations over time.
That's understandable because ancient languages were hard to translate, and we've only started to recently understand some of these languages.
Now, the thing about ancient Greece was that ancient Greece absorbed a lot of different influences.
The other thing was that one ancient society that was very important in Europe was Tuscany.
They had a very strong cult of the Great Mother.
And you also have to understand that they also had a lot of Phoenician and Carthagian traders that lived there.
And Tuscany became very rich very quickly, and they didn't really have enough time to develop their own culture.
He also says that the Egyptians also had many influences and that Akhenaten was really someone that wanted to go back to the worship of Osiris.
He also talks about the Hittites and how they had an Indo-European language but they often adopted Semitic symbols and they translated the name Jove into the term Yahweh.
He goes into reasons why Yahweh is the correct pronunciation.
So he says that there's a difference between adhering to the Old Testament and Christianity, which is more of a reform, more of a salvation.
Ethical teachings message.
So again, he's trying not to alienate humans, and he makes some good points.
And again, he talks about the difference between sky and earth-based religions.
And he says that there are some...
Researchers that have assumed that the Indo-Europeans were very much influenced by Mesopotamia, but he tends to think it's completely the opposite.
Now, he has some very interesting observations about Nordic religion vis-a-vis Egyptian religion.
And he says that if you read the Book of the Dead from Egypt, and you read about how the dead are judged Nordic religion, you find that it's really, it's almost as if they've copied each other.
He says that there are a lot of these similarities between the Nordic religions and the Near East, but he thinks that these come through Tuscany, especially.
He talks about this seasonal withdrawal of the smiths, which is the explanation of winter.
He talks about how Frey was in opposition to Odin and also Loki later on, and this brought about temporary change in sacrifices.
He talks about these demonic gods, and he finds many of them, even Ostera, who I always thought was the Vedic goddess Ng.
But it might also be Terra, which is a tantric goddess.
And he's always talking about how the ancients that practiced this kind of demonology knew that blood reawakened the disembodied spirits.
And so he's very worried about these cults.
And he talks about the legend of Arthur as something that was designed so that the British people would resist Christianity, but obviously that didn't work.
Then he talks about Ragnarok, and he talks about how Thor can cross Bifrost, but during Ragnarok, the bridge is destroyed.
The bridge is a symbol for humans crossing over into the Transcendent.
He talks about how during the wolf age, people become so decadent that they no longer transcend the mundane, and how this idea of the waters is really a word for filament and also for spiritual chaos.
He talks about the cult of Nikkei and the cult of victory, and talks about how events were thought to have souls.
And he talks about, again, the idea of the fetch, which is the soul of a man which is represented as a woman.
He talks about how in Rome they had reenactments of victory so that the citizens would be one with the spirit of victory.
The writer sees Thor as the ultimate man against time because he fights against time and gives his life to restart the Golden Age and is free until the end.
Now, the whole reason that Bill White ended up writing this book is that he believes that there used to be these guardians which came from the roots of the Aryan race, but these guardians are no longer there.
And now there are these spirits that he saw when he was in prison in these evil dimensions, and they've been let loose.
And he describes these dimensions very much in a Lovecraft sense.
These spirits can, in a sense, even though this might not make sense rationally, they can devour flesh and blood.
And these days, because there's a lot of promiscuity and decadence, I suppose there always was that to a certain degree, but now there's a lot more of it.
And there's a lot of abortions, and that they...
Are taking these blood sacrifices, whether they're meant that way or not.
I mean, no one consciously makes blood sacrifices to these beings, but they can accept any blood sacrifice.
So because there are all these abortions, these spirits are growing stronger.
And Bill White believes that there's no way to stop these dark forces.
He really wishes that he could have better news, but he really doesn't.
And he saw these visions because prison, apparently he was being given some medication, and he saw these beings that exist in other dimensions.
Now, what I'm hoping is that these beings, if they exist at all, are...
Presenting themselves as more powerful than they really are.
And I also choose to believe what Harold told us about his vision of how we win eventually.
So I'm hopeful that Bill White is in some way mistaken or that these demons are misrepresenting themselves.
I would comfort Bill White by saying that it may be...
Judging by what he's saying, that he really doesn't have much more time.
I would that his suffering is going to end soon, and that he's been accepted by Odin, which I think he has been.
So I really think that Bill White shouldn't worry so much, because I just hope that he just doesn't have much more time on this earth, because right now his life is just complete suffering.
So those are just my thoughts.
I just want to tell Bill that I was thinking of when I was in college and I got a chance to watch The Ring Cycle and how there was a scene where Brunhilde is telling Siegfried that he's not going to make it.
And both of them are so upset.
And, of course, it's part of the story, and that's why Brunhilde becomes mutinous.
But, really, I think to myself...
Why is that bad for either one of them?
I mean, his has been confirmed, because obviously if he's talking to a Valkyrie, then his faith must be correct.
It's not like he has to imagine it or believe in something that he doesn't see.
It's a good thing that she likes him, because she's taking him to where she lives, so I just ask myself, why is that upsetting for him?
It doesn't seem like it would be such a bad thing.
So I think that if he does die, and if he is someone that's very heroic, then he doesn't have to worry.
So that's sort of what I think about it, and I hope he doesn't suffer much longer.
So I hope you enjoyed this review, and this book does have a lot of information in it.
He really doesn't talk about his own experiences until the end of the book.
I think it would be more compelling, actually, if he did talk more about his own experiences, but he wants to have a background for what he experienced.
So I hope you found my review interesting and maybe even enjoyable, although it's such a dark topic.
So thank you very much for listening.
Thank you.
Okay, that was a review of Bill White's book, The Tradition of the Mother.
Now, while we're on the subject of Bill White, and before I resume my Edgar Steele speculations of last week, I need to take another stab at getting us to wrap our minds around the very serious implications of both of these cases.
Because we really need to understand what the enemy's doing here, what they're building toward.
Now, I know I ran this down a couple of months ago, but no kidding, guys.
This is important.
In neither of these cases does the dictatorship in the person of its United States attorneys even so much as claim that either of these men actually did anything at all.
In Edgar Steele's case, every physical act, including the manufacture of an explosive device and the attempted murder of Cindy Steele with that device, was committed by the FBI asset and informer Larry Fairfax.
Who did 16 months of relaxed county jail time and was then allowed to disappear with about 50 grand worth of silver that he stole from the Steele family.
Edgar got 40 years for nothing but speech.
Speech which, it turns out, was fabricated by FBI technicians.
In both cases, these men have been sentenced to crushing prison terms for speech alone.
In White's case, for simply being silly on the Internet.
And in Steele's case, on the basis of outright and deliberate fabrication of evidence and perjury on the part of the Federal Bureau of Investigation.
Since Gretchen just talked about him, some of you have pointed out to me that back in the day, Bill White and I were not exactly on one another's Christmas card list, and that's true.
But this situation is more important than any of these silly internet squabbles from past decades.
Now, it's true that Bill did some things in the past, in terms of what he posted to the internet, that were obviously, in retrospect, in pretty poor judgment.
Not the least of which was posting the projected cover of his group's magazine with a picture of Obama and a headline that said, Kill this nigger at the height of the 2008 election dog and pony show.
Which, by the by, is not what White was actually charged with.
Since, as ill-advised as that might have been, it was so clearly covered by the First Amendment that not even the U.S. Attorney cared to take it on, and so they followed the old federal tradition of making up bogus criminal complaints when the regime wants to do an end run around the First Amendment.
And they got him for some equally ill-advised stuff that he posted on his website, and for sending an irate email to a loan officer at one of his banks.
What can I tell you?
Bill's just one of these guys who, when he sits down behind that computer keyboard, he gets a visit from Mr. Hyde.
Which is a very common phenomenon on the internet as a whole, and one which we're all very familiar with, and it certainly doesn't deserve years in prison, the destruction of his marriage, the loss of his family, and extended torture and involuntary drugging at the hands of the dictatorship.
I've had people ask me about Bill's little road trip south of the border about this time last year.
Now, he's asked me not to discuss that in public because the dictator's servants are still slithering around like snakes in the water there looking for other charges to hang on him.
But I've heard his side of the story and it does, in fact, make a little bit more sense than it first appears.
That's all I can say.
This one is a classic case of don't believe everything you see and hear in the media.
Anyway, the two most important things we need to get our arms around in the Bill White case are number one, the dictators, servants, and the judicial system have used this episode to transmute and transform the legal definition of what constitutes a threat.
Now, under the old Constitutional Republic, before Black Tuesday of 2008, a threat had to be credible.
In other words, a guy had to be pointing a gun at you, or swinging a baseball bat, screaming, I'm going to bash your head in!
There had to be some common sense indication that, yeah, whoever was doing the threatening might actually do it.
The prosecution never claimed that in Bill White's case, and in fact conceded that White was just banging on his keyboard and never intended actually to harm anybody.
In other words, they charged him with making threats, and at the same time admitted that he wasn't threatening anybody.
It must be nice to be a federal employee in the judicial system where you can get a judge and a jury to believe six impossible things before breakfast.
Instead, they succeeded in getting several court rulings in the course of the case which basically say that a threat is something that causes someone to feel quote-unquote apprehensive and in fear of their life.
Note the term reasonable apprehension has now vanished from the equation.
Under the old Constitutional Republic, pre-Black Tuesday, there was a legal standard called the reasonable man that courts basically used to define whether or not a case was bullshit.
They don't use that standard anymore.
Now, according to the Bill White precedent, and I suspect some others that I haven't heard of yet, it's up to the person allegedly being threatened to decide what constitutes a threat, with no standard of reason or credibility.
That is enough for someone to feel afraid or claim in a court of law that they feel afraid in order to lock somebody up.
For speech alone.
Always bear in mind, that's the end game with these people.
That's the prize that the dictatorship seeks.
The lawful authority to lock people up, make them disappear, or just plain kill them.
For speech alone.
For their minds not being under control, for their refusal to believe in the divinity of Barack Hussein Obama.
In essence, the Bill White case constitutes judicial nullification of the First Amendment.
The Fourth and the Fifth Amendments are long gone, and the Second will go next through executive order from the dictator, and that's pretty much that.
In the Bill White case, they got him into a courtroom in Roanoke, Virginia, with a jury full of niggers and white people who would be afraid to stand up to the niggers during deliberations for fear of being called racist, and they got some little black sapphire from the bank in Virginia Beach all dolled up to the nines in her church clothes and probably wearing her mama's church crown and drenched in perfume to hide her acrid smell on the witness stand.
She gets up on the stand and she weeps into her handkerchief to the effect of, Oh, when I see that awful email, and I know it come from that wicked, evil man, Bill White, and I seen him on TV, and he a neo-Nazi, and I was so scared, I was just so apprehensive and in fear of my life, motherfucker!
Now, as I recall, she was some secretary or something.
The email wasn't even addressed to her.
It was addressed to one of the bank officials.
Now, you see where this leads?
This can be used against me or anyone who is saying anything that the regime or certain politically protected minorities don't like.
I could get busted tomorrow by some Jew who moans to a Jewish judge and a jury full of niggers and cowed and terrified whites about, I give out.
This I am hearing on the podcast and 257 of my family was gassed in Auschwitz.
And this Nazi I am hearing.
Harold Covington and I am making so afraid and in fear of my life.
3,000 years of persecution!
Don't laugh.
That's pretty much what they did to Bill White.
So, from now on, all that's necessary for the dictatorship to arrest someone like Bill White, and maybe disappear them like Edgar Steele, is for someone else to claim that something any of us said or wrote or broadcast or did, although perfectly legal in itself, Made them feel apprehensive and in fear of their life.
Oh, come on now, Harold, that's paranoid bullshit.
Even the Americans will never go that far.
Won't they?
I repeat that the Americans did that very thing to Bill White.
Not to mention invading several foreign countries and slaughtering about a million people in the past ten years and wrecking the economy and foreclosing on millions of white people's homes and seizing control of the health care system and using the Internal Revenue Service to terrorize little old Tea Party ladies who protested against all of the above.
Not to mention God knows how many other atrocities which I could sit here the whole night listing.
Why won't the Americans do that to us?
Is there some deep and profound reserve of moral restraint and goodness and ethics in Barack Hussein Obama that has escaped my notice, that will restrain him from doing whatever the hell he wants?
Of course not.
He is a third-world dictator.
He is Idi Amin in a $5,000 suit.
Serious question, guys.
If the dictatorship does decide that they want to arrest me or you or anybody else...
And charge us with making some total stranger we never heard of apprehensive, or they decide to send us to Guantanamo Bay, or Dracula's castle in Romania to be tortured, or simply have us shot and buried in the woods.
Which the dictator, by the way, has now appropriated unto himself the legal right to do.
Now, what will stop them?
Who will stop them?
The law and the electoral system are now useless because white people no longer control it, white people no longer have access.
Our ancestors gave us the Second Amendment for this purpose, but we're too weak and timid and frightened to use it.
So who's going to stop these sons of bitches from doing any damn thing they want?
By the way, I wouldn't make it up that Dracula's Castle bit.
I'm told that the Fortress of Hunidua in Romania, where Vlad Tepes the Impaler had one of his palaces during the 15th century, is now a secret American prison with a number of detainees, name and nationality unknown.
Probably mostly Muslims, but then how would we know?
Could be all Americans in there.
The whole thing is classified.
Okay, time for another pagan music break before I continue with my paranoid ravings.
This is called Harvest Rain by a group called Fuel Tide.
It's not a bad piece, but it has the usual fault of most of our rock-like music, and that is bad electronic mixing.
The clanging guitars and the drums and whatnot are too loud, and the lyrics are too soft and low to be easily understood.
Now, may I suggest to our budding group of white nationalist artistic types around the world who seem to be listening to this show, and who seem to include some musicians, that we might, as a group, want to look at moving away from electrical instruments and going to acoustic like most of the Irish songs I play on here?
You know, that's actually probably a subject we need to talk about all on its own at a later date.
Anyway, here's Fuel Tide.
Fuel Tide.
Spicy heaven.
Got the clothed in the smile.
And tonight I draw you.
All the branches you're in.
Like a skeleton in the wind.
Now the air is wise.
Seeking flames of war and fire.
And the witchy power.
And the snow white world of gold.
Right, back again.
Okay, as I said earlier, there are two aspects that we need to wrap our minds around regarding the Bill White case.
Now, I know I went over this as recently as a few weeks back, but the more things develop, the more convinced I am that this may be something extremely pivotal for us, and we really need to pay attention here, especially since so much of what we do is dependent on the internet.
The first is the transmogrification of the legal definition of what constitutes a threat into something out of Alice in Wonderland, in order for the regime to make an end run around the First Amendment and silence its critics.
The second is a ruling which was made by a Jewish judge during the course of White's second arrest and imprisonment.
That came about in the following manner.
One of the four charges on which White was first convicted, all of which were thrown out on appeal on constitutional grounds, was appealed by the regime's lawyers.
Now, it has been pointed out to me that having one's conviction reversed and vacated by an appeals court is not the same as an acquittal, and this is the legal fig leaf that the dictatorship used to avoid the constitutional prohibition against double jeopardy.
It has also been pointed out that while it is legal for the prosecution to appeal a reversal of a verdict, it is extremely rare, and in the case of ordinary murderers, thieves, nigger dope dealers, etc., the government usually just shrugs and lets it go.
Now, that clearly is not the situation as regards wicked evil white boys who think forbidden thoughts and write forbidden things.
These reversals are only appealed by the government in about 1% of the cases.
Bill White's case was among that 1%.
Surprise, surprise, Sergeant Carter!
Okay, moving right along here.
To make this long and complex story as short and simple as possible, the case the regime used to re-imprison Bill White after he had that very conviction reversed by a higher court was one in which he was accused of publishing on his website certain information that anyone who knows how to use Google could have found for themselves in three minutes or less.
The prosecution did not dispute that the information was a matter of public record.
What they did was demand that Bill White be sent back to prison because he published it on his own website.
They used a truly bizarre legal technicality, which I would love to get into, but which would keep us here until 3 o 'clock in the morning if I got off onto that tangent, to claim that even though the conviction itself was null and void due to its reversal by the Court of Appeals,
The original sentence had been incorrect because it should have been one of these so-called enhanced sentences for political crimes, and therefore Bill White should be re-sentenced to further prison time for a crime for which he had already been legally exonerated by another court.
I'm not making this up, you know.
Now, it would have helped, of course, if Bill White had been allowed a defense attorney in all this.
But all he has is a public defender, which isn't the same thing.
Apparently, the public defender he had in the original case was back in Virginia, but they took him to Chicago for the re-sentencing hearing, and so the lawyer either couldn't or wouldn't make the trip.
I think he's still using that one because the judge won't let him fire the bimbo, but he seems to be doing most of his own legal work on the appeals, per se.
Now, from what I can gather from his emails, he has another public defender in this ludicrous Roanoke case, which has been pending for about five months and whom he hasn't even met yet.
He supposedly has a hearing coming up on June the 24th, and they may or may not take him back to Virginia for that.
If they do, he may get to meet his attorney.
He may not.
And yes, White could, of course, appeal all of this happy horse shit on constitutional grounds, but the trouble is he'd need an actual attorney for that.
And since he's destitute and the ACLU doesn't represent anyone to the right of center anymore, since they lost most of their Jewish financial donors after Skokie, they won't lift a finger.
The left-wing liberal faggot spy and traitor Bradley Manning gets the ACLU full throttle.
Bill White gets nothing.
Period.
That's the way it works for us white boys.
And you guys need to understand this.
We have no hope in these courts.
Never.
The last acquittals we will ever see took place in 1988 at the Fort Smith Sedition Trial and in 1989 at the Shelby Trial in North Carolina.
I remember I was peripherally involved in both.
After those cases, steps were taken to make sure it never happened again.
The judicial darkness descended on us, and we will remain forever outcasts and victims outside the law.
Until such time as we find within ourselves the courage to use that Second Amendment that our Founding Fathers gave us for the purpose it was intended for.
That's just the way it is.
Okay, I'm wandering off the subject here, which is that at some point during the re-sentencing hearing in Chicago, the Jewish judge ruled that the First Amendment did not apply to Bill White publishing this publicly available information because...
Are you ready for this now?
Because of who he is and because of who his alleged audience is.
What he ruled, stripped of all the gobbledygook, was that Bill White was a quote-unquote white supremacist, whatever the hell that is, and that his audience as well for whom he was writing were also white supremacists, and that white supremacists are inherently violent and inherently criminal and inherently prone to violence or some such language.
How's that for racial profiling?
And that, therefore, for Bill White to publish or say something in public is not the same as John Q. Citizen or the Holy Rabbi Hyman Hebelbaum saying it in public.
John Q. and the Holy Rabbi can write or publish or say XYZ because they are good little liberals on the side of the angels in the Democratic Party.
Bill White is wicked and evil, and White in every sense of the term, and he thinks bad thoughts.
And so do the people who read his website.
And therefore, when Bill White publishes XYZ, he goes to prison.
And if his conviction is thrown out by a higher court, well, screw that.
The regime gets endless bites of the apple because the law is different for us wicked, evil white supremacists, right?
Yeah, that's pretty much what the judge ruled.
Swear to God I'm not making this up.
And who's going to do one goddamn thing about it?
And how, when the defendant himself can't even get a real lawyer to take his case?
At no time did the prosecution ever bring forward any proof of any kind to demonstrate that Bill White's audience on overthrow.com was inherently criminal or violent.
Not even one example.
It was just assumed as a given by the court.
Isn't it great when prosecutors and judges don't have to bother with those damn pesky defense attorneys?
I think you guys can see where this is headed.
How long before some Jew in a yarmulke and a black robe rules that you guys listening to this podcast are inherently violent and inherently criminal, and that therefore I have no right to speak to you, what with me being a wicked and evil white supremist and all?
Look, guys, what can I tell you?
I have to admit, I'm getting a little tired of all the cringing, but I seem to be a minority of one.
The solution is rusting away in your closet.
Use it or lose it.
Or you can do something completely legal and actually beneficial.
You can get your ass up here to the Northwest, where the hell you're supposed to be, and you can form communities and become part of the real solution.
Okay, I'm starting to run a little long, and we still have Olivia to go, so I'm going to leave my Edgar Steele commentary for next week.
I'm going to leave my Edgar Steele.
Oh, oh, oh, oh.
Good afternoon, comrades.
Olivia from Seattle here.
I recently received an email entitled, White Women.
Not quite sure what to expect, I opened the email with a bit of trepidation, which, as it turns out, was unnecessary.
After an in-depth explanation about the purpose behind the email, the writer then made the following statement and asked the following questions.
I notice Harold is always going on and on about the weaknesses he sees in modern-day white male, and he's still waiting for those few of us who still possess the alpha gene to move up there and help him out.
My question is, what about white women?
Don't white women care about their own racial extinction?
My first reaction was, well, obviously some of us do, since I'm sitting here reading this and Gretchen the Librarian appears on RFN regularly.
But I knew that wasn't what he meant.
He went on to explain his reaction during what could be considered a typical American weekend experience, whether at the mall, an amusement park, a water park, or any other of a variety of amusements we can partake of should we desire to do so.
That of seeing white women with non-white males, mostly niggers and spics, far more often than white men with non-white females.
Obviously, I don't have a pat answer and he wasn't looking for one.
What was clear to me, though, was he was...
Asking truly heartfelt questions and trying to understand, like so many of us, why white women are turning to such obviously inferior male specimens, barely human in some cases, when there are white men available who would welcome them with open arms, assuming, of course, that they're at least reasonably sane and able to have a relationship.
I've often wondered something very similar when I see white men walking around with their Asian China dolls.
Why would they choose something so foreign and inferior, turning their backs on their race and their future?
These questions have come up in my mind often in the past few years, mostly since I became racially aware, but even before to a limited extent, as interracial relationships have always been downright disgusting to me.
Some of it is related to anti-white propaganda, of course, which aggrandizes nigger, so-called athletes, and uses not so subtle commercials.
Like one forwarded to me a few months ago by email advertising the Italian laundry detergent Coleria, where a white woman throws her boring white husband into the washing machine, and when the cycle ends, what is supposed to be an ooh-la-la sizzling ripped nigger comes up out of the machine accompanied by the slogan, Colored is Better!
Talk about turn my stomach.
Anti-white propaganda is not the entire answer, though.
The white guilt that has been pushed on our race for the last three or four generations plays a large role as well.
This is something I've run into in various places I've worked.
In one particular case, I spent some time talking to a woman who was white, trying to understand why she stated she only dated niggers.
Well, okay, she said blacks, but you get the point.
And was proud of the fact, even to the point of having had a child with one, by carefully listening to what she was saying, I realized she hated herself because she was white, like she'd been taught to do.
And blamed all the problems in the world on horrible, wicked, racist, woman-hating white men, like the good little leftist that she was.
And this was her way of trying to make up for all the horrible things her race had done in the past to the gentle, peace-loving American Indians.
Oh wait, sorry, she said Native Americans.
Like she isn't one herself since she was born here.
Then there's feminism, the bane of every woman's life, even if she doesn't realize it.
Just because a woman is capable of doing certain things doesn't mean it's healthy, mentally, emotionally, or spiritually, for her to be doing them.
Feminism certainly had a profoundly negative impact on my own life.
We were told, and still are in fact, that we could have it all.
A loving husband, a large well-maintained house, beautiful well-behaved children, and a fulfilling career without breaking a sweat, and not necessarily in that order.
I knew differently having grown up with babysitters after school and a mom who was always so tired from work and all the other 101 things she had to do around the house that she rarely had much time to spend with us.
I was one of the lucky ones, though.
My grandparents were very involved in our lives and they picked up many of the dropped threads.
But even having had experienced all this, I still fell for feminism when it came knocking on the door.
Of all the things the enemies of our race have heaped upon us, I think feminism has been the most instrumental in tearing us down as a people.
When marriage and motherhood are devalued to the point that women see their natural role in society as degrading and come to believe their only options for happiness and fulfillment lie in the world that has traditionally been the domain of men, we as a people start to lose our direction and focus.
We then become easy targets for those who believe they have the right to control the world and its future.
The Jews As each succeeding generation is raised by babysitters and nannies, with values different than those of traditional white society, it becomes easier and easier to instill values that are antithetical to our race, sexual perversions, race mixing, and the like.
That being said, I think most are truly a lost cause, but, as controversial as this may sound, I think there may be a rare few who, given the right conditions and circumstances, might be able to turn their lives around.
The vast majority are basically what Harold has always said.
There's something wrong in their internal wiring.
Something in them is damaged to the point where they honestly can't see their own self-destruction in an interracial relationship, especially now with the social engineering that has made it more acceptable and mainstream.
But those rare few I mentioned may not necessarily be damaged, per se, just seriously ignorant, dumb, and misguided.
They're bombarded all around with messages, like the ad I mentioned earlier, that colored is better.
And they were raised by strangers who instilled anti-white, race-decimating values in them, to the point where they have very little sense of self and no real idea of what it means to be a white man or woman.
They're so totally disconnected from who they are, they don't hear that small, still voice inside that's saying, Don't do it!
It's wrong!
Or they ignore it because it would make them stand out.
But given the chance to understand the true reality of what's been done to them, maybe, just maybe, those few might be able to overcome and turn their lives around.
At the end of his email, he asked whether white women wanted to see their race go extinct.
Do they just not care?
Again.
He wasn't asking for a quick pat answer since he knows there isn't one, but he was curious what I, as a woman in the movement, thought.
In some ways, I can't answer that because even before I was racially aware, the sight of a white man or woman with another race was sickening to me.
But for the vast majority of white women, no.
They don't want to see their race go extinct, and they do care.
They just don't know what to do about it because they don't know where to turn for help.
Unless they go searching for it and look deep, they're not allowed to see the information that would set them on the course to racial understanding and freedom.
We need to change that, comrades.
Hail Victory!
I heard the story on RTE, the Irish National Radio, many years ago, so I've forgotten some of the details, but it seems that archaeologists were excavating a dig on the Isle of Lewis off the coast of Scotland, and they found the site of an old feast hall or something of the kind from the Viking era, and they found either all or part of an ancient chess set, which carbon dating indicated went back to the early 11th century, about the year 1000.
Which made these the oldest chess pieces found in Europe up until that time.
And it meant that the game actually entered Europe, or at least Scandinavia, much earlier than historians up until that time had thought to be the case.
The Scots folk singer Doogie McLean saw these chess pieces in a museum, and he was able to actually hold some of them.
And he wrote a song about them.
Thank you.
The open hand, blinding all who see, they feast upon the desert land, marching on.
They burn upon the open hand, blinding all who see, they feast upon the desert land, marching, marching, marching, Mr. She holds her weary
hand, her heavy horsemen stand alone.
It's for the living and the dead, to search their fortune far from home.
And they burn upon the open hand, blinding all who see, they feast upon the desert land, marching on.
They burn upon the open hand, blinding all who see, they feast upon the desert land, marching, marching, marching, Mr. And they burn upon the desert
land, marching on.
They burn upon the desert land, marching on.
There is majesty, there is tragedy all in its place.
There is majesty, there is majesty all in the desert land.
There is majesty all in the desert land.
Thank you.
Thank you.
So I ad-libbed and used a lot of pre-recorded material and now I'm almost past the 120 mark.
An hour and 20 minutes being the maximum time that one of these shows can run because that's the maximum that can be copied onto a single CD.
Which a lot of you guys are doing for me, and which is deeply appreciated.
So, I won't have time for a long, inspiring closeout like I usually do.
Except to say that this thing I need the extra day to get started on this week is important, and will be very good for the NF in the long run.
Things are moving forward, comrades.
No bull, they really are.
But our time is up now, and so that's it for this week's edition of Radio Free Northwest.
This program is brought to you by the Northwest Front.
Post Office Box 4856, Seattle, Washington, 98194.
Or you can go to the party's website at www.northwestfront.org.
This is Harold Covington, and I'll see you next week.
Until then, Sarsha and Aban.
▲
Export Selection