All Episodes
Previous Next
Feb. 9, 2012 - Radio Free Nortwest - H.A. Covington
01:02:59
20120209_rfn
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Oh, then tell me, Sean O 'Farrell, tell me why you hurry so.
Hush-a-wooggle, hush and listen, and his cheeks were all aglow.
I bear orders from the captain, get you ready quick and soon, for the pikes must be together by the rising of the moon.
By the rising of the moon, by the rising of the moon, for the pikes must be together by the rising of the moon.
Oh, then tell me, Sean O 'Farrell, where the gathering is to be?
In the old spot by the river, rifle known to you and me.
One more roar for signal, token whistle, up the marching tune.
For you're packed upon your shoulder by the rising of the moon.
By the rising of the moon.
By the rising of the moon.
With your eyes upon your shoulder By the rising of the moon Out from many a mud wall cabin eyes Were watching through the night Many a man's chest was throbbing For the blessed warning light Wormers passed along the valleys Like the man she's lonely crew And a thousand blades were flashing At the rising of the moon At the rising of the moon At the rising of the moon And a thousand
flames were flashing out Rising all the blue It's February the 9th, 2012.
I'm Harold Covington, and this is Radio Free Northwest.
For those of you who are following my novel, Freedom Sons, Volume 2, I'm afraid I haven't been able to get any more writing done in the past week or so.
The reason is that I had a busy weekend.
On Saturday, we had a get-together here in the Seattle area, and I had the pleasure of meeting a new comrade from right here in Washington State.
Apparently, he liked what he saw on the Northwest Front, and he's on board now.
Sunday, I and some other comrades met with a young married couple who flew into Seattle from the East Coast for their homecoming scouting trip.
We were impressed with them, and we hope the feeling is mutual.
They're now doing a tour of the Olympic Peninsula and seeing the sights in what will hopefully become their new home in a new country.
They don't know when they'll be able to come home, because the man owns his own business, and he's going to have to transfer the whole kit and caboodle out here, and the wife needs to get a job in a very specialized area.
But I believe both of these people are serious about migrating and will see them out here again within the year.
The reason I mention all this is not to make excuses for not writing this weekend, but to let you folks out there know that it is happening.
New people really are coming on board with the Northwest migration, and we really are growing and beginning to build white communities here in the Northwest.
It's happening way, way too slowly, but it is happening.
It's happening
way, way too.
Hi guys, this is Axis Sally, and I'm sick of hippie potheads ruining the Northwest for everyone else.
The question has come up several times of where does the Northwest Front stand on the issue of marijuana legalization or drugs in general?
It's obvious what the real question is.
Harold, if I join your thing and move out there, can I still get stoned all the time?
I don't like to join things that tell me I can't do everything I want.
Nice to know where your priorities are.
For anyone who truly wants to know what the Northwest American Republic's policy on drugs is, you can put down your smoking devices and read Freedom Sons, Volume 1. Nobody likes a stupid hippie.
A revolution has no use for shiftless retards who like to get high and stare at swirly lines and talk about how things are, like, interconnected.
The main problem I have with potheads is they won't shut up about it.
With alcohol or other drugs, people will simply admit to using the substance and state how much and that's it.
With marijuana, a user cannot refrain from a verbal diarrhea of justification and a list of all the wonderful ways hemp solves the world's problems.
Usually ending with the accusation that people who frown on pot smoking are probably Zog lovers of some sort.
In that respect, they're as bad as faggots.
They can't just do their weird little thing in their own home.
They have to force it on everyone else and demand legislated respect.
If someone were to ask me if he could get high all he wanted to in the Pacific Northwest after we took it away from the Jews, I'd have to ask why that was on his mind in the first place.
When a group has the means to kickstart a real revolution and form an entire new country, Why is there some bozo in the crowd who is asking if he can still indulge in his little hobby?
Do people not understand that in times of war we will have to give up things we like?
In addition to crap you can smoke, there may also be times when you will have to do without your favorite foods, your electronic toys, or your preference of living arrangements.
And the same is true for me and other people who don't find plants you can smoke to be of the utmost importance.
In times of war, we may need to form temporary alliances with those we absolutely hate.
I'm obviously speaking only of other white people, but, as we all know, there are other white people who are completely for the Northwest Front and who will work and die for us, but with whom we would otherwise never interact.
So, for all the stoners, if you learned that your super important weed was not welcome in the Northwest American Republic, would you suddenly lose your enthusiasm and start looking for racial organizations that love it as much as you do?
I can probably point you in a few directions.
And, for my fellow hippie haters, if you learned that our Aryan homeland might include some people who tend to make hemp necklaces for their pet ferrets, would you run screaming to the hills of, uh, well, I can't think of places these freaks don't inhabit.
The point is, there are going to be parts of this revolution that are no fun at all.
We will give up things we like and spend time with people we don't like in order to form a country we may not live to see.
Ask yourself if this is worth it to you.
I can understand why it may not be.
As of now, the lifestyle of all the marijuana and hot dogs and video games you like while living in Texas or California somewhere and occasionally throwing a few dollars at the Northwest Front so we can continue to amuse you is widely available to everyone.
Right now, we're too busy forming units and meeting new migrants who actually gave up stuff to move all the way out here.
We don't have time to enforce various drug laws.
Basically, if you have a substance abuse problem that will negatively affect your duties to us, we will know and we won't work with you.
Many white nationalists are people who have successfully kicked drug habits and we can spot an addict.
And if you're a chronic pot smoker, we will know because you will tell us all about how it helps your back pain and how it's a harmless plant that grows out of the earth and how you can make paper out of hemp.
Why do you even care if it's legal?
You probably started smoking it back when nearly everyone couldn't get a prescription for it just by saying they were depressed.
Many illegal things will have to be done in order to create our homeland.
As of now, I'm sorry to say, recreating every scene in Harold's novels is illegal.
The question should not be, is this legal?
The question should be, is what I am doing good for the race or not?
Is it good for your family?
Good for the rest of your life?
If you can honestly say that your love affair with marijuana causes you no problems, then make your decision accordingly, but please shut up about it.
I can't wait to find out what music Harold will pick to follow this.
Sometimes up I know When troubled times begin to bother me I'll take a toke and all my cares go up in smoke Up in smoke That's where my money goes In my lungs Sometimes up I know And
troubled times begin to bother me I'll take a toll and all my cares go up and
smoke We're good
to bother me.
I'll take a toke and all my cares go up in smoke.
I'll take a toke and all my cares
As some of you know, I did advocate in Freedom's Sons that in the Northwest Republic, marijuana be legalized and taxed and its production controlled and basically treated in the same manner as alcohol.
This got some people upset.
It does not mean that I in any way personally advocate the use of marijuana.
I don't.
I think I've smoked pot about two or three times in my entire life.
Didn't seem to do anything for me.
This, of course, was when I was very young.
I do not like pot users and habitual potheads.
Contrary to all that crap you used to see back in the 1930s with reefer madness and whatnot, I am fully aware that it does not send people into hysterical homicidal rages and sprees of, you know, murder and rape and that sort of stuff.
But what it does do is it turns them into useless sort of vegetables.
Usually when you find some guy age 35 who's still living in his mother's basement, of course the Obama Depression may have something to do with it, but it's also a very good chance that he's an habitual marijuana user and he just has no ambition.
As Sally says, they just want to sort of sit there and blow their weed and...
Contemplate the richness of what and that sort of stuff.
So I do not in any way, shape, or form personally favor marijuana use.
I won't allow marijuana users anywhere around me personally because there are security risks.
But that having been said, we're talking about what is going to happen when we obtain power in a sovereign white homeland of ours here in the Northwest.
Number one.
We are going to need sources of revenue.
If you look at the 2006 draft of the Northwest Constitution, you will see that it forbids income tax.
You will see that it forbids tax on homestead property.
In other words, where you've actually got a family with white children living in a house, dwelling or whatever.
And the simple fact is that the government is going to have to raise money somehow.
Legalized marijuana has to be looked at practically as a potential income stream for the state in a society which does not have income tax or much in the way of property taxes.
That is simply the practical issue that we're going to have to deal with.
In my personal opinion, in the Northwest Republic, we are going to have other fish to fry and a lot more to worry about than policing and arresting people and flogging them or whatever for smoking something that grows wild in the woods in some places.
Whether we like it or not, in North American society these days, marijuana usage is a reality.
The present regime has been trying to stop it for 75 years and they have failed.
They're not going to stop it and neither will we.
That does not mean that the Northwest Republic needs to encourage its use.
I think we need to treat marijuana the same way that we treat things like alcohol and tobacco.
They are unfortunate facts of life.
For whatever psychological or personal reasons, people want to use these substances.
They're going to use them, whether the law says so or not.
And we might as well figure out some way to keep a handle on its use, to control it.
Yes, to raise money off of it.
In part to undo some of the damage it does, and we've got to figure out some way to approach these problems that we can live with and that's based somewhere in the real world, as present legal policy towards marijuana is not.
I am very much in favor of continuing the forcible prohibition of things like crack cocaine, crank, LSD, heroin, that sort of stuff.
These drugs are an entire different story from marijuana.
But anyway, that is just my personal opinion.
You guys do know, I presume, That we do not know how the Northwest Republic is going to come about, but at some point there will have to be a Constitutional Convention, and this issue, among others, will be one of the problems that are discussed and dealt with at that time.
You guys who eventually do create and inherit the Republic may decide that you want to continue busting kids for a joint.
I'm not sure why, but that's not going to be up to me.
It's going to be up to you.
None of these things that I write in my novels are written in stone.
My vision of the Northwest Republic may not necessarily be yours, and it may not necessarily be the one that comes into fruition in the fullness of time.
Okay, I'll butt out a Sally segment of the program now.
Music by Ben Thede
Regarding the controversy on Gretchen the Librarian's theme music, she finally got back to me and told me that she prefers the more Baroque style, that being Vivaldi's Rites of Spring.
And so, here she is.
Tonight I'd like to talk to you about The Future of Man by Robert Clark Graham.
This is a book that uses a great economy of words.
It's only 94 pages.
But in it, the author talks about hominid evolution, as you might expect from the title.
And he's concerned that...
Up until the time when agriculture was developed, before agriculture, there was a great deal of selection for intelligence because there was a great deal of competition in terms of hunting and you had to learn to make tools to hunt and if you didn't, often you were killed by predators and you died very young.
But when agriculture was developed, Suddenly, people could have much larger families, and you really didn't have to be very smart.
And you could just live on a farm, and you had enough food, and so forth.
And then, the Industrial Revolution came along.
And at that point, again, you could work in a factory, you could have a large family, and again, you wouldn't really have to be very smart.
So the author worries that this could be very dysgenic.
So he's concerned for people such as graduate students and Nobel Prize winners and the more intelligent factions of society to have more children because he fears that often they don't.
And I think there's a lot of truth to this concern.
So he proposes various different ways to deal with this, ways to motivate graduate students to have more children.
It's his discussion of evolution, and I've always found this to be a fascinating topic.
He makes a lot of generalizations.
They're fairly common.
He talks about the competition that went on in Europe between the Neanderthals and the Cro-Magnons.
He makes the assumption that many people make that it was simply that the Neanderthals were dumb and the Cro-Magnons were smart.
In actuality, you have to realize, of course, that the Neanderthals were very much a boreal species.
They were a northern species that were specialized to a winter condition, an ice age condition.
And as such, they were very spread out and they had large hunting territories.
Probably even at best, I would imagine there were fewer Neanderthals than Cro-Magnons.
So I think just that fact alone tipped the balance to the Cro-Magnons.
Even though in some respects, for instance, when you look at the cutting tools of the Neanderthals that they used to saw through or hide some of the stone tools they made, were really very good.
But having said that, the Cro-Magnons were much better at creating an interconnected network.
And because of sharing a common culture and the fact that they were so inter-connected and they were always exchanging genes with each other and they were so many and they were so able to tap into a diverse array of talent, they ultimately were the ones that primarily prevailed, although, as we now know, there was some interbreeding.
Now, the second assumption that he makes That as I think about it, I'm somewhat concerned about, is that he says that, well, once there was agriculture, and particularly after the Industrial Revolution, he feels that there was no more natural selection.
I can't prove this per se, but it is possible...
It's possible that, and even likely, the natural selection would continue, but it may select for different qualities.
Maybe a good farmer who does really well might have some different mental qualities or even physical qualities than a hunter might, but selection is about what works in its environment.
Taking it even further along, when you talk about the development of Industry, for example.
Someone who does well inventing something, or someone who just is very successful at their job in a factory, or nowadays someone who could be a computer programmer and do a very good job at that, and have a lot of resources and have a large family.
Maybe those traits would be selected for, because it's all about what works in the environment.
I was reading a very interesting article a few years ago and it talked about how industrialization and particularly the use of computers might in some sectors of the community and particularly in places like Silicon Valley for instance it might tend to select For traits that we would talk about and perhaps even malign as being somewhat Aspergerian
in nature because to do perhaps repetitive tasks or to be someone who relates to mechanical devices, maybe that's something that in some sectors of society is being selected for.
Selection is about what works in its environment.
So that's just something to contemplate as I'm thinking about selection.
You know, it depends what works at that time.
At any rate, this particular author was an innovator in one very fascinating sense, and that is he started a sperm bank for Nobel Prize laureates.
And this was really a very interesting thing.
This was where obviously men of attainment, of great achievements and so forth, were urged to donate sperm to this bank.
And at first he wanted to use young men, but unfortunately he didn't really have enough younger men.
I mean, many Nobel Prize winners, oftentimes they don't achieve that until they're older.
So that was one of the things that...
Put a damper on his plan.
And also, there were some restrictions on the women that could be inseminated.
They had to be of a certain IQ level, and they had to be married in this case.
It was kind of a morality clause.
And this sperm bank was open from sometime in the 80s to the late 90s.
It produced somewhere in the vicinity, it was over 300 children.
They did skew to the right on an IQ chart.
That is to say, they had generally higher IQs.
Even though, as I say, the quality of the sperm was not as high as he had hoped.
But still, it doesn't really matter in terms of fat because apparently there were still 372 babies born.
They also diluted it somewhat by including athletes.
Because obviously in our society we revere athletes even though athletes aren't necessarily geniuses.
So obviously that would dilute the result.
But I would still say that it worked.
fairly well and when you consider this was only done for one generation imagine if you had done this for several generations so he was kind of a beer header in that sense bringing forward concept of sperm banks and because of this he created an atmosphere in which eventually sperm banks became much more consumer driven and of course now if you have the money Pretty much you can Google for sperm online,
and I mean there are pull-down menus.
It's really wonderful for the consumer if you can afford it.
Okay, and of course that naturally gives anyone pause.
Now I would have to say that the idea of being a single parent for a woman in this movement, I would say it's fairly tempting, especially if you believe in eugenics as much as I do.
But of course, that's not something to be entered into lightly by any means.
So the question that you'll have now, I'm sure, is, well, are children traumatized when they're born this way?
Well, according to the research I've done, honestly, no.
Because they know the score from the beginning.
So it's different than abandonment or something like that.
If you're born into a certain situation, and that's your situation from day one, you accept it.
So honestly, do I think it's a damaging idea for children?
I would say no.
I would say no, not necessarily.
Now, of course, the other criticism of this bank and of this experiment is that the mothers provided an enriched educational environment for the children.
I suppose that's true, but I would say that an enriched environment is not enough if you do not have a foundation which is there to begin with.
Of course you can tutor someone and you can help them and that'll work when you're standing over them, but really a person either has an ability or they don't.
At least that's been my observation.
It's great to have a supportive environment.
Everyone should have a supportive environment.
But all the support in the world, if you don't have a foundation for it, it just doesn't go anywhere.
So I think that even though there are some aspects of this book that are dated, such as concern about the Soviets, for example, which is no longer a concern, still I like that this individual has some very rational concepts.
And in terms of his ideas to motivate graduate students to have larger families, and also his ideas for building communities that would support large families, I would say there are ideas in this book that can be implemented in the Republic someday, I would hope.
So honestly, you should read Graham's book if you can find a copy of it.
So thank you very much for listening.
Music by Ben Thede
Periodically, I get emails from listeners, something to the effect of, oh, why do you have that woman Gretchen on all the time, reading about all these books?
Sounds like I'm back in sixth grade, and, I mean, it's not like I can read or anything.
Come on, Harold, play some more skinhead rock music, that kind of stuff.
Well, there is a reason that we have Gretchen on, and it is specifically, in a sense, because of that.
Because of the increasing level of illiteracy in every sense of the term, political, social, and reading-wise, that many young white people manifest, we need to demonstrate that our movement is something other than tattooed skinheads screaming white power at the top of their lungs and waving one arm in the air in a vague imitation of the National Socialist salute while waving a can of beer around in the other hand.
So anyway, that's why Gretchen is on here.
But we don't mind taking an occasional bow to the skinhead element.
They also are, of course, an important part of our movement.
So this is, I think it's No Remorse.
I'm sorry, actually, it's one of these songs that have been just hanging around my hard drive for some months now, and I've frankly forgotten who it is.
Anyway, it's called The Flame That Never Dies.
Together in Britain, we have lit a flame that the ages shall not extinguish.
In every British heart that burns immortal flames A pride that never wavers,
a banner yet untamed The enemies of Britain won't cease to wonder why They can never beat the flame that never dies Blue
And none can ever dampen the flame that never dies.
guitar solo
And none can beat the sound.
The heather on the lock side.
The streams are near and dry.
They can try, but they can't tame the flame that never dies.
guitar solo On the streets of Ulster, the flag is always seen.
A sign of distant victories, and more that yet shall be.
To stay as part of Britain, many heroes die.
No enemy will ever smash the flame that never dies.
The Welshman in his country, a language of his own.
The strength in British Union, ensuring safer homes.
Diversity and culture, the British people's pride.
Again they try and fail to kill the flame that never dies.
They can kill the British people, and try to drag us down.
They can jail us on false charges, repression all around.
But as British men, we will not bend.
Our Union Jacks will fly.
Again they try and fail to kill the flame that never dies.
The flame that never dies.
I'll see you next time.
Thank you.
Okay, I'm going to do a quick ad lib here just on the subject of me and telephones.
I'm going to talk about two aspects of this issue.
Now, the first is, at least once a week, I get an email, sometimes a letter, but usually an email, or a Facebook message, or...
Something of the kind, to the effect of some guy that I never heard of, or at least have never met, is giving me his phone number, and he's saying, Call me, Harold!
You gotta call me!
You gotta call me right now!
Nothing else will do on earth, but you must call me.
Just for the record, I never, ever respond to such requests, although a lot of times they're not couched as requests, they're pretty much demands.
That's another reason I don't respond to them, but there are actually some legitimate reasons why I don't respond to such demands that I place a call to a total stranger.
The first is the fact that this person is a total stranger.
To some degree, a telephone is just like a computer.
You never really know who is on the other end unless you know the person, unless you've met them.
Unless you've come to know them as an individual.
You don't know what their agenda is.
You don't know who they really are.
And it's just not a good idea for someone in my position, living on the edge of the law as I do, living under surveillance, living, frankly, in a goldfish bowl where everything I do is monitored and watched and wiretapped and overheard and spied on.
It's just not a good idea for someone in that position to be calling up total strangers to chat.
I am not saying that these individuals who make these demands that I call them are all federal agents or anything like that.
Most of them probably are not, but it's just not a good idea.
Another reason I don't place such calls on demand is that let's assume for the sake of argument that the person making the demand that I call them is a wrong and of some kind.
That means that the phone records will show that I called them.
Now, a lot of times, these people who are making these demands or requests with varying degrees of politeness that I call them long distance, never having met them before, having no idea really who they are, a lot of times they will kind of hint in their email that they have to talk about something just really, really vital.
Well, maybe they do, maybe they don't.
The first sort of red flag there is in view of my novels.
It strikes me that there's a possibility that this person might want to talk about something illegal, which is a very stupid thing.
It's a no-no.
Why someone would want me to call them sight unseen and then speak or at least listen to them talk about illegal activity, I don't know.
I don't know why they would think that I would go along with that, but apparently some people do.
As you may gather, I've had a couple of close calls with things like this.
But mostly, I've generally found when someone absolutely insists that I must call them right away, absolutely must call them, now, now, now, nothing else but Harold will do, usually what they want to do in some form or another is something I've referred to in the past.
What it almost always boils down to is that these are essentially lonely white boys, sometimes middle-aged men, who are so isolated, who have become so paranoid and depressed and frustrated by the kind of lives that they have to live, that they are willing to do anything just to have somebody to talk to, even if it's only a stranger on the phone.
What these people who want me to call them usually have to say, and like I say, I've actually made a couple of these calls, believe it or not, in the past.
Usually what they have to say is they've got some scheme or other that they say is, we're going to make a lot of money, Harold.
Yeah, yeah, we're going to do this, we're going to do that.
It's going to bring in all kinds of money for the party.
Of course, it doesn't involve them actually donating anything.
But I found actually that that's more or less just an excuse.
These multi-level marketing schemes and all these fancy money-making schemes, Or it'll be something else, some kind of security threat.
They've just got to tell me that so-and-so and so-and-so is a Jew.
He's a queer.
He's an agent.
He's an alien from the planet Neptune or something like this.
Basically, these people are just looking for an excuse to finally, finally get somebody that they can talk to.
Somebody to whom they can release what...
George Orwell referred to in 1984 as the unending monologue that goes around and around and around in Winston Smith's head, and which, of course, it is illegal for Winston Smith or for a white boy today to speak out loud.
And so, look, I understand.
Guys, I get it.
Please don't think I'm actually bashing these people or insulting them.
I understand.
No problem.
But, look, guys...
Look, how can I put this without sounding really, really rude?
And I don't intend to.
I really don't.
I don't mean to sound dismissive.
I don't mean to sound like I'm blowing you off.
But guys, as much as I understand your deep, frustrated, passionate longing just to have somebody to talk to, as humanly understandable as that is, that's not what I'm here for.
That's not my duty station.
Speaking of duty stations, back at the old headquarters on Franklin Road and on North Street and Rockwell Hall, that's what we had a duty officer for.
A large part of his job was to answer the phone and just talk to the supporters and let them hear a Nazi voice every now and then.
And that was an accepted part of his job description.
It was an accepted part of his mission because we've always known that our people, yes, really do need somebody to talk to.
But it's not me because...
To be blunt, as calloused and as cynical as this sounds, I simply don't have the time.
Let me tell you a little story.
I think I've told this before.
In 1990, I was running a campaign for the North Carolina House of Representatives.
I was all alone.
I had no campaign manager, no money.
It was just one of those things where you scrape up a filing fee, walk in, and register to run in the Republican primary.
Last election I ever ran in, in fact.
And Dr. Ed Fields of the Truth at Last newspaper, purely in a spirit of helpfulness, Published my unlisted number in his newspaper.
The result was that I ended up spending, no exaggeration, between 8 and 10 hours per day talking on the phone with people whom I couldn't afford to be rude to because they might be potential campaign contributors.
So I couldn't just blow them off and say, Hey, come on, I've got to get back to work.
Get off the damn phone.
Yes, I've heard all this stuff.
I know it's the niggers.
I know it's the Jews.
I know America has done you hard.
Come on now.
Let me get back to work so I can do something about it.
Anyway, I'm rambling again.
You have to understand that there is a reason for pretty much everything I do.
The reason I don't give out my phone number, the reason I generally do not conduct extended conversations on the telephone have to do with two things.
Number one is security, because even if you do know who you're talking to, we have to assume automatically that all our telephone conversations, all our emails, all our electronic conversations are intercepted in some way.
And the second reason I don't give out my phone number and spend long hours every day babbling with people on the phone...
Is because, frankly, right now we're getting to a point, especially nowadays, when my time is at a premium and I just can't afford the time.
This is one reason that I need help here in the community here that we're building in the Pugetopolis.
I need assistance.
I need people who are willing to kind of step forward and shoulder some of this burden.
And part of that burden, by the way, from these assistance I'm going to have to get, is going to be talking to supporters and people on the phone.
Because, as I said before, I do recognize that this is a legitimate issue for our people.
They don't need to feel all isolated.
We need to do something to break this sense of isolation and alienation.
Unfortunately, I can't provide that voice.
And again, getting back to my original subject before I started on this long ramble, I cannot simply pick up a phone and call a total stranger.
It's just something I don't do for the reasons stated.
Again, I apologize.
I am not trying to be rude.
I'm not trying to blow people off.
I'm not trying to belittle in any way the supporters, you guys, who keep me going.
But it's basically just something that I'm going to do.
Okay, now...
What happens with these panel discussions that I make with myself and Wallace and Sally and sometimes other people, Lord Lucan and the two Andes and so forth and so on, is we'll just basically sit here and we'll bullshit for a while behind the mic, get about 45 minutes, an hour or so of just talk, and then I'll cut it up into little fragments and pieces that might be usable for the show.
And so this is a fragment of a panel discussion we had between Wallace and Sally and myself last week.
It's been scientifically proven racists are stupid, and that brings us to the point, Harold, you said there was a news article that apparently there is scientific evidence now that racists are stupid of lower intelligence.
I guess if you follow millennia's worth of natural instinct, you're a fool, and all I can say is every time these liberals find something that they really want to believe in, all of a sudden there's this miraculous scientific evidence that just proves whatever they want.
The...
Well, we got one dumb racist over here.
Okay, this is an article from the Huffington Post, which if you follow the liberal internet at all, you will know is just the super-duper liberal website.
So, anyway, it says, Are racists dumb?
Do conservatives tend to be less intelligent than liberals?
A provocative new study from Brock University in Ontario, don't ask me where the hell that is, suggests the answer...
To both questions, maybe a qualified yes.
No doubt this study was probably paid for with Canadian taxpayers' money.
The study published in Psychological Science...
Which, for all we know, might be some idiot's blog, showed that people who score low on IQ tests in childhood are more likely to develop prejudiced beliefs and socially conservative politics in adulthood.
IQ, or intelligence quotient, is a score determined by standardized tests, and they're virtually useless.
But whether the tests truly reveal intelligence remains a topic of hot debate among psychologists.
Okay, blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah.
It closes with, what do you think?
Do conservatives tend to be less intelligent, or is this just political opinion masquerading as science?
Why, that would never happen in today's society, would it?
What is your IQ, by the way?
Seriously, were you ever tested?
Do you even know?
I have no idea.
I was never tested, and I don't know if they're doing that in school nowadays.
It seems to me that they've stopped specifically because, number one, it's not really that reliable, and number two, it gets very embarrassing when the nigger kids always score about 20, 25 points.
I'm not kidding.
That's probably why they've stopped it, yeah.
Just for the record, I think it's the latter.
I think it is political opinion masquerading as science.
Let's not forget.
There was a time where you would have been in threat of being put to death for saying that the Sun was the center of the universe and not the Earth, and it seems it's generally universally accepted that the Sun's the center of the universe now, so really, science can just be another means for political advancement.
I actually remember a while back, Harold mentioned something about how some group of psychiatrists were trying to come up with a diagnostic criteria for racism as a mental illness, but they couldn't find a way to do it without excluding Jews.
I also read a psychiatric paper, admittedly this was from about 40 years ago, stating that schizophrenia is the official Jewish mental illness because so many Jews suffer from it.
And schizophrenia, by the way, does not mean split personality or anything like that.
Schizophrenia is a decayed personality.
A lot of these guys you see wandering down the street talking to themselves, they're actually schizophrenics.
Most of them should be institutionalized, but about 20 years ago, the Clinton...
And people decided, no, no, we mustn't have mental institutions.
We must return these poor people to the community so they can interact.
So now we get to interact with a bunch of lunatics on the street.
Let's just see what the news here is on Drudge Report.
First of all, the $30 billion Jew, okay?
Well, you're talking about Facebook?
Yeah, Zuckerberg of Facebook.
He's going to take his company public now, so Facebook is going to have a stock that you can buy.
Used to be you bought shares in a company that made something like General Motors or IBM or something like that.
Now you're buying shares in a website.
Like these images on computer screens have some kind of value.
It's insane.
Madonna's Super Bowl promise.
I'll keep my clothes on.
Well, at her age, I don't think anybody cares anymore.
Concerns grow over volcanic eruptions in the USA.
Maybe we ought to check that out because there's so many people who are scared to come to the Northwest.
What?
I saw the word racist.
Where?
Read your volcano thing.
Okay, well, concerns grow over volcanic eruptions.
Scientists have known for decades.
Hidden under those impressive vistas at sites such as Death Valley and Yellowstone National Park are magma pools that, under the right conditions, can trigger explosive eruptions.
Yeah, well, that's volcanoes.
You know, a lot of people have said that one of the reasons they won't come to the Northwest is because of the volcanoes.
It's true that Mount Rainier and Mount Hood and Mount Baker are all very long dormant volcanoes, and one of these days they'll probably blow about maybe 30,000 years from now.
No one knows when or how, but I suppose if that really worries you, you can always say that that's one reason not to come to the Northwest.
Of course, if you're really looking for an excuse not to come, you'll find one anyway.
And so you saw the word racist here.
French L denies Obama.
French L denies Obama fashion piece racist.
Okay.
Elle magazine, by the way, is one of these women's magazines.
French fashion bible Elle has denied charges of racism after unleashing a storm by suggesting that a black American elite inspired by the Obama couple...
Was finally embracing white fashion.
He put on a belt?
I guess.
Pulled his damn pants up?
Yeah, that's probably it.
I will say this.
I have never seen Obama with his pants down around his ass crack.
I suppose that is embracing white fashion after a manner of speaking.
Okay.
The piece has since been removed from Elle's website.
Journalist Natalie D 'Olivo cited singers Erykah Badu or Rihanna and the actress Zoe Saldana, who, by the way, is actually, well, she's a nigger, but she's also a spic, she's Dominican, as black Americans who understood the importance of style.
Well, interestingly enough, I don't know about this one, but Rihanna and Zoe Saldana are negresses, but they also are very careful to straighten their hair and not go around all nappy-headed, so maybe that's the importance of style that they're referring to.
In an America governed for the first time by a black American president, Sheik has become a plausible option for a community up until then bound by its streetlights.
So I guess when niggers actually try to look human and just kind of make the best with what they're stuck with, then it's racist to think that's, you know, less bad.
Well, according to this, in 2012, the blackgeoisie, which is, I suppose, black bourgeoisie, I suppose, okay, has integrated all the white codes.
Integrating them asses.
Just integrate!
But with a twist.
Bourgeois with an ethnic reference that recalls their roots, she argued.
This actually is pseudo-intellectual twaddle.
The U.S. website Huffington Post slammed the piece last week saying a clumsy attempt to praise black style had unraveled into a string of controversial, stereotypical, and insulting statements.
This woman is saying that the Obamas look good.
That's an insulting statement.
I mean, it's a stupid statement, but it's not insulting.
Okay, so, being chic and sophisticated beyond jeans and a t-shirt has only been an option for black people since 2008 when Michelle Obama became first lady, it asked.
Well, it was always an option, it's just that they don't take it.
Instead, they prefer to walk around in cargo pants and black tank tops with their butt cheeks exposed and wearing, you know, gold change and basically looking like niggers.
Niggers have always had the option to dress well and clean themselves up and keep their nappy hair short and trimmed and look, you know, fairly decent.
And, okay, Obama, give him his due.
He does that.
He doesn't look totally like a street nigger.
I've seen some pictures of him when he was young, and he basically looked like something that crawled out of a sewer, but he has cleaned up his act a bit since then.
Okay.
Anyway.
Blah, blah, blah, blah.
French star journalist Audrey Polvar, one of the rare black faces in France's media landscape, called the article racist and imbecila- Okay.
Another one of these artificial tempests in a teapot.
Basically, it's an election year, and anything that's even mildly critical of Obama is gonna get slammed.
Well, the interesting thing about this, when you look at what they're doing, this isn't even critical of Obama.
When you actually see what the Elle magazine was saying, it's just the fact that they're mentioning race at all.
And this ties in with their desire to implicate thought crime.
The fact that somebody even mentioned it, they want to make a big deal about it, put this magazine under pressure, just so they can stop people even discussing the issue at all.
I've spoken to people who come from Europe who say, well, you just don't talk about that.
And that's exactly what they want.
They don't want people talking about this race stuff because they want people to refuse to acknowledge that it exists, and that ties in with their idea of eliminating racism by eliminating race, which of course they can't do because it's stupid, but that's not going to stop them from trying anyway.
Well, they don't want people to talk about it because if you allow people to talk about it, then there's too much chance that they might say things that are uncomfortably true.
It's not that they don't want people talking about race.
They don't want people talking honestly about race.
Oh, in addition to us being stupid, study says brains of addicts are inherently abnormal.
Okay.
Taco Bell linked a salmonella probe after 68 people fall ill in 10 states.
It's probably because in addition to Mexican cuisine, they probably got real Mexicans serving the tacos.
We get these scares in the United States.
Now, for the past five or six years, I've noticed every spring, every summer, we seem to get these things where diseased meat, diseased produce, basically it's all these damn wetbacks we've got handling the food, and they're bringing in these strange diseases from south of the border, and they're contagious, and they end up.
Mexican-style fast food chain was linked to an outbreak of salmonella enteroditis, but declined to name the company because it felt there was no public health reason to.
Well, this is going to happen more and more.
People are going to get poisoned by their food because the people who've got handling the food are diseased.
Speaking of food, have you guys checked out food prices recently in the grocery stores and restaurants?
It's just going completely out of...
I remember you saying it was on Radio Free Northwest actually well over a year ago about how even the food that looks like it's the same price, there's actually less food in the package.
They've been doing that for a while, but right now the big thing that's going through the roof to the point where even the left-wing media has to mention it is beef.
I can't buy beef anymore.
It's just too expensive.
It's a combination of a few things like drought, but also it's peak oil finally starting to set in.
I mentioned on last week's Radio Free Northwest, the price of gas and the price of beef ain't coming down anytime soon.
Matter of fact, probably not ever because peak oil affects not just the price of gas in your car, although that's probably going to go up to about $17 a gallon if these idiot Jews attack Iran and close the Straits of Hormuz so we lose all our imported oil.
But we need gasoline and diesel fuel to ship food from the processing centers and the farms and whatnot to the stores.
We need energy run by fossil fuel, diesel, and gasoline in order to generate electricity.
We need energy to run what few factories we have left.
When the price of oil finally goes through the roof because the Jews can't keep their grubby little claws off Iran, Then the whole bottom is really going to fall out because the price of energy not only just affects the price of the gas you put in your car, it affects the price of everything.
Everything we do, all our infrastructure, everything we produce, everything we need, all of this involves generating energy.
And right now, like it or not, that means fossil fuel of various kinds, petroleum products.
And when you cut off one-third of the world's petroleum supply all at once, you're going to have problems.
On December the 29th, I did a lengthy Radio Free Northwest that consisted of nothing but music, mostly from the previous year's selections, but also there was a section in that podcast of theme music from my novels after a fashion.
These were songs that I'd use to gin myself up into a creative frenzy or whatever, soundtracks, if you will, from the novels.
That was a fairly popular feature, but I got an email from one especially longtime supporter wanting to know why I had not included what she calls the love theme from Fire and Rain.
Well, for one reason, Fire and Rain is not actually a Northwest novel as such.
It's kind of anti-Clinton and anti-hippie-dippie, but if anything, I suppose it could be considered kind of conservative.
I wrote that in my pre-Northwest Independence days.
But in Fire and Rain, I do quote several lines from a Robert Burns poem, and that, of course, has been turned into a folk song by the Scots.
And this lady wanted to know if I could refer her to any actual recorded versions of the song, and of course I can.
So, I guess this could be called the love theme from Fire and Rain, if there was a love theme in Fire and Rain, which I suppose that's a matter of individual taste.
Anyway, I'm babbling again.
This is Scotland's Greatest Tenor, Kenneth McKellar.
Oh, my love is like a red.
Red, red rose that's newly sprung.
Oh, my love is like a melody that's sweetly played in tune.
As if there was all my bonnie loss See if in love am I, and I will love thee still, my dear, till all the sea's going dry.
Till all the sea's going dry, my dear, till all the sea's Be still, My dear, till all the seas gines rise.
My dear, till all the seas gines rise.
And the rocks melt with the sun, and I will love thee still, my dear, while the sands alive shall Ten
thousand miles, my love, Lord, well, ten thousand miles.
And I will come again, my love, Lord, well, ten thousand miles.
God bless you.
Okay, normally this is the point where I'd sign off with six or seven minutes of ranting and raving, sometimes literal ranting and raving like I did last week, demanding that all you people out there pull your socks up, load the moving van, get your asses out here, so forth and so on.
I'm sure by now most of you know the drill.
This week I don't really have the time to do that.
It's been one of those strange days with all kinds of weird crap popping up on my email and in the real world outside that only I can deal with.
And so I'm going to have to slap together some kind of quick sign-off, get this podcast edited, and get it uploaded to the website quick so I can get it done for another week and move on and deal with some of this other stuff.
So, what can I say off the cuff here to convince you people that I haven't already said before?
What can I say for my weekly effort to try and get through to you that what I'm saying here is not something you're supposed to listen to every week, it's something you're supposed to actually do?
Sometimes this show and the audience reminds me of the early days of broadcasting back in the 1930s when all the First Depression families huddled around the big wooden box in the living room listening to Ma and Paul Kettle and the Shadow Nose and the Joy Boys of radio.
We're kind of at that level now.
Hopefully we'll grow into a major communications media at some point in the future, but that's up to you.
For the record, we are slowly increasing our listenership here on Radio Free Northwest.
Our hits average is up to about 4,200 per week now.
Anyway, I'm trying to think of something brilliant and new to say to wind this show up this week, and I can't.
Think of anything new, that is.
I can only think of the same old obvious points.
The Northwest Front has an idea.
The Northwest Front has a plan as to how to bring that idea into the real world.
No one else has such a plan.
No one else has anything even remotely resembling a plan.
I can't understand why I can't seem to get any traction on just this one point, that there is nobody else.
Who?
Who else is there?
Who's left?
I mean, really.
Let me put it this way.
Who's left who is not in his 80s?
Who's left who doesn't have a whole cemetery full of skeletons in his closet?
Who's left who doesn't go weak in the knees and fold like a lawn chair at the sound of the J-word?
And who's left who has at least a couple of brain cells to rub together and we can take him out in public?
Is there anyone new on the scene?
Well, actually, yeah.
We're starting to build our own alternative media, at least, via the internet, albeit very slowly.
Mike Harris from Republic Broadcasting and James Edwards of Political Sesspool are both good examples.
But media is media.
It is not a political ideology, and it's not a revolutionary movement.
Napoleon once said that revolution is an idea that has found bayonets.
Media, per se, is a valuable asset, and we have to have it, hence this very program.
But media is not an idea.
Northwest independence is.
Media has no bayonets.
We will someday, if I can ever get you guys to listen.
Okay, I need to wrap this up and get on to some other stuff.
So that's it for this week's edition of Radio Free Northwest.
This program is brought to you by the Northwest Front, Post Office Box 4856, Seattle, Washington 98104, or you can go to the party's website at www.northwestfront.org.
This is Harold Covington, and I'll see you next week.
Until then, Sasha Underban.
Freedom.
▲
Export Selection