All Episodes
Feb. 2, 2012 - Radio Free Nortwest - H.A. Covington
01:09:28
20120202_rfn
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Oh, then tell me, Sean O 'Farrell, tell me why you hurry so.
Hush-a-woogle, hush and listen, and his cheeks were all aglow.
I bear orders from the captain, get you ready quick and soon, for the pikes must be together by the rising of the moon.
By the rising of the moon, by the rising of the moon.
For the pikes must be together by the rising of the moon.
Oh, then tell me, Sean O 'Farrell, where the gathering is to be.
In the old spot by the river, right in the north to you and me.
One more four for signal, token, whistle of the marching tune.
Warrior bike upon your shoulder by the rising of the moon.
By the rising of the moon.
By the rising of the moon.
Which applied upon your shoulder by the rising of the moon Out from many a mud wall cabin eyes were watching through the night Many a manly chest was rubbing for the blessed warming light The waters passed along the valleys like the man she's lonely crew And a thousand blades were flashing at the rising of the moon At the rising of the
moon, at the rising of the moon And a thousand days were flashing out, rising all the blue It's February the 2nd, 2012.
I'm Harold Covington, and this is Radio Free Northwest.
When I'm doing these podcasts, I'm never quite sure whether it's best to put all the heavy stuff first or more toward the end.
On the one hand, I don't want to bum you out immediately with some intense rant and rave on some topic you probably don't want to hear about to begin with.
And on the other hand, I don't know how many of you bothered to listen through to the end.
So what I'll do this week is just go ahead and start with a couple of our guests before I go to the first music break.
This is our friend from across the pond, Lord Lucan.
This is our friend from across the pond.
Evolution is the most conservative philosophy in existence.
It teaches us survival of the fittest or survival of the smart and the extermination of the foolish.
If we observe nature, in nature there is no law against armed robbery or murder.
I mean, when was the last time you saw a lion getting arrested for killing a zebra?
Now one of the most successful creatures on our planet is the ant.
The ant is totally altruistic.
That means the ant is totally dedicated to the survival of the colony.
Totally dedicated to the survival of its race and nation.
Now, according to nature, our world is ruled by the sword.
It is not ruled by the foolishness of capitalism.
Nature has no respect for private property.
It has no respect for the slow that cannot run away from danger.
It has no respect for those who do not store their food for the winter.
It has no respect for the 1% who think they can enslave the other 99%.
Nature does not have any rules against genocide.
In fact, according to the fossil record, 98% of all species have become extinct.
Losing your temper with foolish people is part of nature.
Nature is telling you that such fools are threatening your survival.
Now the greatest threat to the survival of the white race comes from believing in foolish nonsense.
Such nonsense as believing in the second coming, or Jesus saves, that America is a government for the people by the people.
In reality, America is a government for the rich, by the rich, and especially rich Jews.
Now empires come and empires go.
The Roman Empire came and went just as the British Empire came and went.
At first the British were an industrial nation, but the Empire has been destroyed by the British upper class, just as Rome was destroyed by the Senate.
Now if you observe the ant colony, under no circumstances whatsoever are foreign ants permitted into the colony.
Instead, foreign ants represent an act of war, and yes, ants fight wars.
Now, there are two colonies of the British Empire that were the first to disintegrate as a result of the policies of the British upper class, India and Africa.
Now, the British upper class have the same opinion as the Jews when it comes to the lower classes.
They consider the lower classes to be cattle.
Consequently, they also consider foreigners to be cattle.
So in their stupid minds, the British working class and foreigners are equal.
Now, in the colonies run by the British upper class, such as India and Africa, they hired the conquered people to work on the farms.
They even exported the conquered people of India to South Africa instead of importing the British working class.
Yes, Gandhi was born in South Africa.
Now, in the 1950s came the Mau Mau.
This came about as a result of the stupid policies of the British upper class.
Now, the occupied people want their land back, and they're going to demand the loyalty of the upper class house servants to slit their stupid throats.
Now let us compare the working class colonies with India and Africa.
Both America and Australia are British working class colonies.
Now the British working class have a lot more common sense than the utterly stupid upper class.
The working class, early Americans, hired only their own kind to work on the farms and ranches.
They did not hire the Indians.
Instead, we herded them into reservations.
However, as time passes, our farmers and ranchers have become as stupid as the British upper classes.
This has come about because they look down on the American worker and consider the American worker equal to the Mexican.
These idiots have surrounded themselves with Mexicans to such an extent that Mexicans can vote to take away their land by the policy of communism, which means seizing the means of production by the state.
As evolutionists, we can see this coming reconquista will become a reality.
Just as it became a reality for Ian Smith and his farmers in Rhodesia.
There is no such thing as private property.
Never has been, never will be.
Our world is ruled by the sword.
All property is won or lost on the battlefield.
We did not buy America from the Indians.
We conquered them.
We did not buy California, Arizona, Colorado, New Mexico, or Texas from the Mexicans.
We took it from them on the battlefield.
and our stupid upper class, such as our farmers and ranchers, are going to give it back to them.
Music.
Now, there seems to be a bit of an argument going on among some of our listeners regarding Gretchen the Librarian's theme music.
So far, we've had a German march, like Sally's, we've had a heavy rock intro contributed by the late Colonel House, possibly for humorous reasons, and last week I gave her Vivaldi's Rites of Spring.
I asked Gretchen what she wanted herself, but she hasn't gotten back to me yet.
I have a few ideas myself.
No, no, I think not.
By the way, I did not just arbitrarily pick Axis Sally's theme music.
For those of you who are not as familiar with history as you might be, the German version of Lily Marlene was also the introduction and theme music for the original Axis Sally in Berlin during the war, who was a very brave American lady named Mildred Gillers.
Anyway, because there seems to be some disagreement, and I haven't heard from the lady herself on the subject, I won't use any theme music this week.
Good evening, comrades.
Today I'm going to talk about one of the back issues of the Occidental Quarterly that I received as a Christmas present from Harold.
And this is from this past summer.
Now, the first article is very fascinating and I would say very important.
It's called Strategies in Asymmetric Struggle.
The author writes about particularly the Civil War and also ancient Rome.
He says there are basically two kinds of conflicts.
There are political conflicts, such as, for example, the Iraq War, and also ethnic tribal wars, which can be wars of attrition.
And he says that these types of conflicts can be very different in the way they are strategized.
Now, he talks about the Civil War, and he says that the problem with that war was that there were more Union soldiers than Confederate soldiers, so the Confederates had to do better than the Unionists, but in fact they didn't.
Both sides did about equally as well, but the Confederates had to do better, and they didn't.
Okay, and one of the things that he says is that for the war, in most areas, The Confederates had about a year to prepare, but instead of laying a communication grid, they ended up going into outdoor camping situations where they lived for about a year,
and apparently they didn't have very much to do, but they became very ill because there were a lot of communicable illnesses that went around these campsites.
So he says there were a lot of missed opportunities there because they should have spread out and they should have made a communication grid, which they did not do.
And he talks a great about the strategies of Bedford Forest, which actually were successful strategies.
I think it would be interesting to read more about what he was doing.
And he also talks about tribal wars that were fought against the Romans, and again he says these were wars of attrition.
This is a fascinating article because it talks about the undefended places such as, for example, becoming involved locally in city governments, becoming a grants writer, for example, making yourself indispensable behind the scenes.
A lot of excellent strategies here and really legal strategies, quite honestly, that Could be used by people in the homeland, and I would really suggest that everyone have a copy of this article, okay?
Because I think it's very valuable.
And then the second article is the Anglo-Saxon as Pariah, and I found this article somewhat fascinating and rather disorienting, really, because I kept on feeling like I was back in the 30s or the 40s, because, to be honest, I really don't know anyone.
It uses the term wasps a great deal.
It talks about white Anglo-Saxon Protestants.
Honest, I don't know anyone that fits that description, certainly.
I know white people.
I know some people who are Protestant, and I know some people who have some English ancestry in their background, but I don't know anyone who fully fits this definition.
So I really was not clear on who exactly this would apply to, but apparently the author is talking about English dysphoria around the world, in places, for example, like the U.S., but also in New Zealand and Australia.
And maybe, well, certainly in England itself, it's fine, but in England, I mean, I'm sure people can have Celtic ancestry, they can have Scottish ancestry.
I found it rather confusing in that sense, but I suppose if you substitute white for Anglo-Saxon, that's fine.
Then the third article was the role of Jews in South Africa since 1948, and it talked about the very bad press that the apartheid system in South Africa received.
Which, of course, is not surprising since the system and ideology is very much on the outs in today's world and really has been on the outs since the end of the Second World War.
And the article states that really this system promoted economic growth.
To what extent that's true, I really don't know, because I've heard different opinions on that, even within supposedly our movement.
People have different opinions.
A poster on Stormfront said that the system was inefficient.
Of course, you don't always know who's posting on Stormfront.
And then the fourth article was Eternal Strangers, Anti-Jewish Musings Throughout History.
This was an article for people who really enjoyed history.
A lot of quotes from people who made various negative comments about the Jewish tribe historically.
To be honest, I understand why we do this.
I mean, the Jewish people are very influential in the media, and they shape a lot of opinions.
They have a lot of influence.
But on the other hand, I think we spend...
Too much time talking about everybody else's faults.
This is a tendency not only in our movement, but it's a tendency with conservatives.
And there are a lot of conservatives in our movement.
Although, to be honest with you, I have never claimed to be a conservative.
I'm really not a conservative at all.
I think Harold knows this.
I don't know how many other people do, but truthfully, I would never call myself a conservative, except perhaps for the conservation or the preservation of the white race, but aside from that, I'm no conservative at all.
And then we come to our book review.
Which is a hatchery of bad ideas, review of schools for misrule, legal, academia, and overlawyered America by Walter Olson, and again, a book about too many lawsuits.
And an overabundance of lawyers and legalism.
That's really Harold's domain, so I'll kind of leave that to him.
So really, if anything, I would suggest that everybody make a photocopy of this first article in the Occidental Quarterly, because I think it's an important reference article.
You know, when you're getting ready for an exam, for example, or you're looking into a strategy for A place where you work or something like that.
There's really no need to reinvent the wheel when you can look to various reference sources for important information.
So I think this first article is very helpful, okay, just for education and reference and organization.
Getting a grid together, a communication grid, a framework for any Thank you for listening, and I'll be back with some more reviews and discussions, so thank you very much.
Okay, we'll go to first music break a bit early, I think.
I had this requested by a listener who wanted to hear some Scots Gaelic, and it occurs to me that some of you folks out there, especially the newer listeners, probably have never heard what this most romantic of the Aryan tongues sounds like.
This is Karen Matheson.
I'm going to go to the next one.
I read a lot of white nationalist websites and Facebook pages and literature, and after all kinds of long, involved analysis of the problem, I constantly hear this cry, What can we do?
Well, we all know what we should be doing, and we all know it ain't gonna happen.
So given that we will not make the one response which is called for above all else, there does remain just one thing else we can do about all this.
We can create our own country.
It has been done before, more than once.
What the hell do you think our ancestors were doing when they got on those leaky wooden sailing ships from Europe?
The Jews themselves have done it within living memory.
We could do it exactly as the Jews did, beginning in 1898 when they laid out the Protocols of the Elders of Zion in Basel, Switzerland, at the First World Zionist Congress.
We select a parcel of land.
The Pacific Northwest will do nicely.
And then we all actually go there and take it over by a lifetime of hard work and struggle using whatever means come to hand.
Finally, we liberate it politically from the control of the United States and create our own sovereign Aryan nation, a nation which will someday become strong enough to kick down the door and take back all of North America.
Could such a thing be done assuming leadership, luck, courage, and perseverance?
Absolutely.
Will it be done?
Yes, eventually.
Will it be done in time?
Ah, there's the rub.
Within limited parameters, certain historical parallels do in fact apply to our present situation, most notably the Bolshevik Revolution of 1917 and the Irish War of Independence from 1916 to 1921.
There is a third parallel, the formation of the State of Israel, as distasteful as we may find the people involved.
There are also other parallels down throughout the past century in the form of African and Asian colonial wars.
We tend to disregard these examples because of our own contempt for non-whites, our own reluctance to admit that non-whites could beat white armies, and also because many of these situations are ambiguous in other ways, politically and economically.
But there are in fact some useful observations we can make here.
The basic formula for winning successful colonial wars has been replicated many times, and we can apply it to our own situation here in North America if we can ever find within ourselves the will to do so.
there are three indispensable components which must be present in any successful revolution first there must be a revolutionary movement disciplined and organized and motivated with a clear political plan and a strategy for implementing that plan secondly there must be withdrawal of consent to be governed on the part of the majority of the people of the territory under question this is achieved through a combination of economic and political circumstances affecting their daily lives to the point where they come to hate and fear the established authority And
also by propaganda on behalf of the revolution.
Finally, the ruling power or authority must lose their credible monopoly of armed force, i.e.
the revolutionaries must commit serious and sustained acts of armed resistance, get away with it, and be seen to get away with it, i.e.
things go boom in the night and bad guys in suits get dead and no one is caught or punished for these acts.
It is important always to bear in mind one thing.
Colonial wars are not won by the so-called freedom fighters, nor are they lost by the generals and the politicians of the occupying power.
They are lost by the accountants.
The strategic goal of the revolutionaries must be to make it so costly in manpower, money, and lost revenues for the occupiers to maintain their grip on the colony that the occupying power becomes so wary of the whole mess that they decide to cut their losses.
Eventually, usually after many long years of increasingly pointless carnage and destruction, The accountants go to the politicians and show them the long columns of red ink which continued attempts to hold on to the colony are generating and tell the politicos, flatly, this has to end.
We are being bankrupted by this situation.
Find somebody over there who looks halfway moderate and will allow us to save a bit of face, then declare victory and get our asses out of that hellhole.
Once this has been accepted, the political leadership of the occupying power then begins a search for so-called moderates among the rebels, to whom the colony may be handed over while maintaining a kind of specious fig leaf, a fiction that the occupying power was not really chased out.
The object of the Northwest migration from our point of view would be to create our own version of the tripod in Washington, Idaho, Oregon, and western Montana.
This is a big territory, to be sure, but it is still smaller than the entire continental United States.
The logistic, communications, mutual support, and interaction problems facing us would be reduced considerably.
There are still more than enough racially aware whites in North America to carry out this plan, should we ever collectively decide to implement it.
The relocation of a thousand first-class white activists to the Northwest is within our capabilities and would create a very significant alteration in the political demographics of the region.
We will be assisted immensely by the fact that an organic or natural movement into the Northwest is already taking place by whites who are fleeing from diversity.
The first thing one notices in Seattle is that half the local inhabitants seem to be from Southern California.
These organic migrants will, of course, cut off their own ghoulies rather than admit that they have fled from the enforced association with Third World mud.
They use all the right code words, like good schools and clean air and less congestion and so forth and so on.
But eventually, many of these organic migrants will join forces with the Aryan settlers, and our ranks will be considerably swelled by people who are comfortably off and who have talents and skills which would be of immense use in the building of a new state.
Once the Northwest Front actually manages to get off the ground, the federal government of the United States, which is substantially weaker, more incompetent, and more demoralized than we would ever give it credit for being, will eventually be forced to cut its losses and agree to the dismemberment of the precious Union.
This is by no means the unthinkable stretch we might think it.
This process has already occurred in the former Soviet Empire.
Barack Obama is not Abraham Lincoln.
No matter how he hates white supremacists, the crumbling and senile system he will be inheriting simply cannot afford to fight a long conflict in the Northwest, especially if we have done our work properly and created a situation where independence from Washington is the genuine desire of the majority of the inhabitants.
The regime is stretched too thin already in other colonies around the world, Iraq and Afghanistan, and Saudi Arabia and Europe.
I'm not saying that this will be easy.
It won't be.
It will be an ordeal of soul-crushing difficulty, and it will possibly take a whole generation to accomplish.
It will require an amount of blood, sweat, and tears greater than that put into almost anything else our people have ever done on this continent.
But Northwest Migration and a sovereign Northwest Republic is our only hope, and we have to make it happen.
Music by Ben Thede I know, let's go to the Huffington Post.
They generally have some silly stuff on there.
So, Huffington Post is interesting.
It's probably the most liberal blog website on the internet, but about half of their site is devoted to nonsense, just fluff, celebrity stuff.
New Girl Scout cookie.
Okay.
Pepsi, a mouse in Mountain Dew, turns into jelly-like goo.
I could have told you that.
That's something we all need to know about.
Okay, let's take a look at that.
Again, this is the main liberal opinion leader in the country as far as the internet goes, and they're writing stories about mice and Mountain Dew.
Mountain Dew drinkers know their distinctively yellow beverage of choice is packed with caffeine, but a new lawsuit might get them thinking about what else is there.
PepsiCo, the drinks manufacturer, is being sued by Ronald Ball of Illinois, who claims in a 2009 lawsuit that he opened a can from a vending machine, tasted something foul, and spat out a dead mouse.
Now, can a dead mouse...
Was this in a can?
Was this in a bottle?
Yeah, it must be a very small mouse.
That's what I was thinking.
I'm looking at my soda can right now, and that would be a fairly small hole to get a mouse through.
Anything?
Possibly a cockroach, but no mice.
Oh, I put that there.
Sorry.
Oh, okay, right.
Can't sue the company then.
I'll sue you, but you don't have any money.
Ball, who was seeking damages in excess of $50,000, claims he then sent the mouse to Pepsi, which destroyed the mouse's body.
Okay, so he mails a dead mouse to Pepsi Cola, and he wonders why they destroyed it.
However, Pepsi is now moving to dismiss the case, citing testimony from an expert who claims that the acid used when the drink is bottled would have caused the rodent to transform into a jelly-like substance.
So, these people want you to buy and drink something that dissolves bodies into a jelly-like substance.
I'm getting other ideas.
Okay, if it'll do that to a mouse, a small animal, what will it do to your stomach lining?
I think I know what happened to all those six million Jews now.
Mountain Dew's mouse-dissolving capabilities may also be helped by another ingredient in the bubbly beverage, brominated vegetable oil, or BVO.
A chemical that Gizmodo points out is banned in Europe and Japan, but is allowed in limited quantities in soda like Mountain Dew, Squirt, I'm drinking a squirt right now, and Fanta Orange.
What about grape soda?
Are our nigger brothers going to be okay?
Man driving car with three wheels arrested for DUI.
Woman shot in the eye refuses treatment until she finishes beer.
Car lands on roof.
I say again, this is from the Huffington Post, a very serious liberal website.
This is weird news at the beginning of it.
Are you sure that wasn't a link to something else?
I mean, they're links to all stories.
They're just like Drudge does.
Interestingly enough, they've recently passed the SOPA law for internet piracy, blah, blah, blah, blah.
What that is is an effort to nobble the Matt Drudge report because what it does is it forbids linking to other stories on other sites unless you pay them a copyright fee.
So, that's one of these backdoor efforts to shut down Matt Drudge, which is one of the few sites where you can find certain information in this country that's not suppressed by the mainstream media.
Just like the Hush Rush Act, the so-called Fairness Act in broadcast communication, the idea is basically to shut up Rush Limbaugh and Michael Savage and all the right-wing talk show hosts.
Well, you know what?
Just going back to some of the subjects from before, we were talking about how young white men and women try to seek an escape through either this vampiric stuff, video games, whatever the case may be.
And I've actually had accusations implying that that's all the Northwest Front is.
That's all the movement is.
Well, you're just doing your own form of escapism where you have these novels and this radio show and you're just fantasizing your country and you can never do that and it's never going to work.
And, well, you've heard them all before, but the truth is we're trying to establish a better way of life to where...
Now, others can say that that's foolish all they want, but really consider that, ladies and gentlemen, when you think, who else out there is really trying to provide a better way?
There's a certain amount of truth in that.
Yes, we do rely on the Internet, and believe me, I'm aware of the irony of using the Internet to denounce the Internet.
As soon as we get sufficient boots on the ground here, I want us to go beyond the internet.
I do believe in doing the traditional activities, the leaflets and business cards, and I want to see flag actions where people are running up tricolor flags all over the Northwest, things like that.
Not so much because I think we're going to win thousands of recruits by doing so, but because I want our people to get back into the habit of getting out from behind these computers, getting out into the real world, and doing real-life things with real-life people.
But we can't do that until we can hit square one, so to speak.
We have to get our activity groups and ourselves in place.
We'll be talking about that more in podcasts to come and also in our organizational letter and things of that nature.
Stuff is happening here, folks.
Real-world stuff.
Unfortunately, at the phase we're in right now, a lot of it isn't very spectacular.
It's not getting system publicity.
But then again, we're pretty much banned from system publicity anyway.
I have been interviewed by...
So-called mainstream media twice since The Front was founded about a little over three years ago, and that was when Jeff Hughes was murdered in October of 2009, and I was interviewed by the CBC and some other Canadian publications up in Vancouver, British Columbia, of which only a few bits and pieces were actually published.
I don't think any of my interview with the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation was aired.
And the second time was in January of 2010, about a year ago, when we had the bionic backpack incident in Spokane.
At that time, we did get national-level publicity from the Rachel Maddow or Maddow Show.
I'm not even sure I should pronounce it.
This is her name because I don't watch the stupid bitch on TV.
But she vowed and swore that she was going to hunt us to the grave.
Somebody had pointed out the northwestfront.org website to her, and she was on us like ugly on an ape.
And she said she was going to hound these wicked racists because she was convinced we had planted that backpack.
And after two days, the blog thread was locked down.
All of the pro-Northwest front posts, including mine, were removed, and the thread was locked and closed.
And from that day to this, we haven't had word one from Rachel Maddow.
Obviously, what happened is that somebody gave Rachel a call and said, Hey, Rach, we need to have a word.
The decision has been made.
These people don't get any publicity.
So we are kind of restricted to the internet right now because it's all we've got by way of a communications medium.
I don't like it.
We are going to be improving our presentation in various ways over the next year.
We are thinking in terms of having at least an intermittent live show where you can do call-ins.
We are thinking of doing videos similar to what David Duke does.
We haven't worked out all the details, but we will be improving and we will be trying to develop a proper alternate media.
Realistically speaking, that means the internet because we just don't have access to cable news and to the various system media channels right now.
So, yeah, there's a little bit of truth in that, but no, we are not just an internet fantasy.
We are an ideal, an aspiration, and there's a big difference.
Now, as far as boots on the ground, do you see any value in the flyers on car windshields and things like that?
Well, as far as bringing people in, not really.
Back in the day when that's pretty much all we did, except for our white power messages.
We used to get tens of thousands of Thunderbolts or Truth At Last newspapers, roll them up with the leaflets, and we would hit various parts of North Carolina with 20, 30, 40,000 pieces of literature at the same time.
And I did a kind of a little tabulation, and I figured that it took around 5,000 pieces of literature distributed to get even one response to a post office box.
Now, we did get a lot of new listeners to the White Power message, but as far as actually bringing in hundreds of members, no, that type of Ah, racism!
No, no, Mr. Bill!
They still are aware that there is someone in their area who is...
Thinking outside the box, so to speak.
And for many people in the Northwest, since we don't get media publicity, finding a leaflet or a sticker or something that directs them to the Northwest Front website, something like that, is going to be the first intimation they have that there even is a Northwest independence movement.
And the second good thing is you can use these Perfectly legal activities, such as going out to pass out business cards, leaflets, possibly put up some posters, something like that, as practice for other kinds of activities.
You assemble a small group of people.
You brief them on the mission.
You arm them or equip them with their literature.
You send them out.
You possibly coordinate teams with cell phones, walkie-talkies, what have you.
They go to a targeted area.
They carry out a specific mission.
They break contact with the area and they make it safely back to base.
I think you all can get some idea of my drift here.
These things can be good practice for other kinds of activities that may become practical and necessary on down the road.
Now, as far as recruiting, if we want to attract more normal people who haven't had a lot of experience in various movement groups that aren't very productive, where would you suggest we look?
What we're looking for as far as people who might actually join and support and give us practical help are the people who have been screwed by the system.
We are probably going to draw our best elements, and we seem to be doing so, from people like students, university or high school students who have been through the system recently, like Wallace, and who know what a farce it is.
The unemployed, people who have been downsized, who have had their jobs shipped to Guatemala or India, someplace like that, foreclosed people, people who are basically suffering in some way because of political correctness.
We have never really drawn too much in the way of people from upper-middle-class homes or people who are doing well, and that's pretty much true of all revolutionary groups.
People who are doing well don't have any real gripe with the system.
We're going to have to offer people hope for a new life, but before that can happen, they're going to have to be dissatisfied with the old life.
So that basically would be the first group of white people that we need to target, is white people who have suffered some loss or suffered some problem at the hands of the system.
Now, when you say people who have lost and suffered, isn't there going to be a fine line between the people who have been screwed over and then the people who are screwed over to such a degree where they would actually be a danger and a hindrance to what we're trying to do?
Oh yeah.
This society produces a lot of wreckage.
A lot of white people these days are very, very badly damaged, especially if they've never had any kind of moral training to begin with, and they've grown up in this totally materialistic world where everything is always about them, don't work hard, work smart, life is a game, and he who dies with the most toys wins, that whole attitude, because then what they're going to want to do is they're going to just want to get some for themselves,
We see this phenomenon all the time.
I've always said that...
Your typical disgruntled white man, if he wins the lottery or you can suddenly give him a $100,000 a year job and two SUVs in the garage and a big plasma screen TV and trips to Six Flags on a weekend and all the usual suburban lifestyle stuff, you give him that stuff, he's going to be out of here like a shot.
A lot of people do come to the movement because they're not really revolutionaries.
They don't want to change the system.
They just want the system to work for them.
They want America to keep its promise.
And, okay, there's nothing really, I suppose, wrong with that in one sense.
It's perfectly humanly understandable.
A lot of white people feel very badly betrayed by the present system, and they have been.
But we need people with a spark of idealism, people with a spark of intelligence, people who understand that in order for there to be any lasting good for themselves or for their descendants, the whole system has to change from top to bottom.
We need revolutionaries, not just reactionaries who are ticked off because they had their toys taken away or because they think they didn't get a big enough piece of the pie.
Uh, did they find out if that park ranger was a white supremacist?
No, he's dead.
Oh, yeah.
Oh, I heard about that.
Well, you know what?
That is a good point.
Something else to keep in mind is that shooting near Mount Rainier...
Now, granted, I actually have not seen anything where they called this guy a white supremacist or a white nationalist of any kind.
But what I did see is one thing they've mentioned is the way they stated it in the article.
I believe it was accessed through the Yahoo website or something like that.
They said he was suffering from post-traumatic stress disorder, which was never treated.
So, way to go there, USA.
That's really supporting our troops and taking care of our boys.
Now, it's possible this guy may have had issues even before that, but even still, it's just another one of those situations where just somebody, like you said already, Harold, is so damaged, this is the kind of thing that results, and it's terrible.
Well, the Army has lowered its recruiting standards to the point where you're right.
The guy could have been screwed up like a Chinese fire drill even before he went in the military.
Right now, in order to make up their quotas for Iraq and Afghanistan and whatever other little Middle Eastern war we've got coming, probably a war with Iran now, they have lowered recruiting standards to the point where they're taking drug addicts, criminals, mentally retarded...
Complete, utter losers.
And every six months or so, some recruiters get in hot water because they've been fiddling with test scores or concealing criminal records or concealing drug use or using bribes and this sort of stuff.
So the quality of the military, from what I can see, seems to have gone down a lot, even since I was in, as far as just the caliber of the men goes.
So this guy could have been a real head case even before he went in.
But I noticed something else.
This female park ranger who evidently tried...
Now, what I want to know is why does the National Park Service feel it's necessary to have...
Law enforcement trained park rangers up to an FBI standard running around in national parks.
What do they think is going to happen in these parks that might require such training?
Possibly guerrilla warfare?
There was another article that I may have mentioned on another show or not, I can't remember, but they're starting to militarize police all around the country.
They're issuing little police departments in Fargo, North Dakota, and weird little towns out in Iowa and bumfucking Nebraska and places like this where they've got zero crime problem, and yet the police departments are being loaded up with SWAT teams and armored cars, APCs,.50 caliber machine guns, gas.
Stun bombs, all the usual thing.
Their officers are being sent to various military bases and given paramilitary training.
Now, of course, you may be aware there's something called the Posse Comitatus Act of 1878, which states that the United States military cannot be used against American citizens or to enforce the laws of states and whatnot other than in the case of martial law, etc., etc.
Sounds to me like somebody's looking ahead to a time when they may have to get around the Posse Comitatus Act, and so they're turning local police departments into these private goon squads for the system.
I'm not excusing this head case shooting this female ranger.
She was a mother of two children, and I'm not saying that she deserved it or anything like that, but I am kind of curious to know why the National Park Service feels that they need to have FBI-trained law enforcement officers out in these parks.
Maybe a white supremacist kicked a raccoon one day or something.
Yeah, maybe they found some of our literature on windshields there.
Wallace was saying earlier today, off the mic, that he has an acquaintance who is in one of the motorcycle clubs, whose name I won't mention because I definitely don't want to get them pissed off at me.
But this guy was saying that he had some experience with cops and FBI, and he said that these people would actually overlook them.
The motorcycle club.
This is what happens when you ad lib.
And this guy was saying that cops will overlook genuine criminals who are engaged in seriously antisocial activity in order to get at us, so-called white supremacists.
And, of course, I knew this for a long time.
Earlier, I referred to some controversy we've had on the show about some of the theme music we play.
We also have some disagreement among our listeners about the type of music break that they prefer.
There is still some of this business that I get from some of our older listeners to the effect of, Why are you playing that knuckle-dragging rock-and-roll music, Harold?
That's the devil's music!
And some of that.
And then on the other hand, I get some of this.
Hey man, you need to play more rock, man.
You need to play more Ian Stewart, man.
And so forth and so on, and blah blah blah.
And both of these points of view, by the way, are entirely legitimate in their own way.
Music is a matter of taste, just like anything else.
I also get some people who don't quite get my taste for Irish, Gaelic, Celtic, bagpipes, that sort of stuff.
That has largely to do with my personal background and the fact that I lived in those countries for many years.
And so the result is I probably play a little bit too much of everything for some people who don't like various things, if you get my drift.
But really, there's not that much need for a conflict between the rockers and the others, so to speak, because in its own way, rock music is a pretty versatile form.
There is, in fact, a good deal of Celtic rock.
I don't know if you ever heard any run rig.
I found this on YouTube.
It's a sort of a heavy metal version of that medieval Top of the Pops from Ireland called Brian Beru's March.
It's listed as being by Lorena McKennett, although she doesn't actually sing on here, so I assume this means it's by Lorena McKennett's band.
But I think it shows that it actually is possible to combine modern electric instruments and modern musical art forms with the ancient Aryan musical tradition.
see what you think.
We'll see you next week.
This is an email from John King in Indiana.
Dear Harold, I much enjoyed your dialogue at the end of last week's podcast, but let me play devil's advocate.
In Europe, they do have proportional representation, but look at how poorly our people are doing.
The BNP sucks, and my membership runs out next month.
The NPD is getting nowhere in Germany.
Nigerians are invading Dublin, but there's no party in power that stands up for the Irish.
The Front National doesn't have a single delegate in Parliament, and Paris is the new Mecca and Brussels the new Medina.
Everywhere in Western Europe, where there is mud invasion, the pro-white parties are sucking.
But in Hungary, without the turd worlders, Jobbik is the third biggest party and has a power-sharing agreement.
These people have PR, but what is their goddamn problem?
Why are they so freaking incompetent?
I think Nick Griffin is controlled opposition.
At the best, he is an honest retard when it comes to management skills.
He can talk good.
I've been with him in London, but he couldn't manage his way out of a paper sack.
Wanted your commentary about this phenomenon on the next podcast.
Okay, John, this is a very interesting and completely legitimate question.
I'll try and do my best to answer it without violating the first taboo.
I.e., don't name names whenever you refer to the fact that the overwhelming majority of our so-called white nationalist leaders are incompetent, dishonest, perverted, bird-brained, stupid, or all of the above.
I'm not sure if Nick Griffin of the BNP is still covered by the first taboo in this country.
My personal opinion is that Griffin is now so utterly despised by legitimate white nationalists in the UK, and he's proven so disastrous a leader that he has lost his first taboo shielding.
But then I don't think that shielding should exist in the first place, so what do I know?
Okay, first thing I want to point out.
Europe is not America, and vice versa.
The historical and political and racial situation in Europe is very different from that of America in so many ways that if I tried to discuss them in detail, we'd be here all night.
One good example of these differences is that they don't have Mexicans like we do.
They have Muslims.
So many Muslims that a certain amount of leaning towards neoconservatism and letting Jews off the hook is understandable in our compatriots in Europe, if not acceptable.
This is one aspect of so-called movement modernization, by the way, which is another topic entirely.
This is much more prevalent and advanced in Europe than it is here so far, thank God.
One aspect of movement modernization is this idea that Muslims are the real problem and we need to make alliances with quote-unquote right-wing Jews and accept Jews as quote-unquote part of the European cultural heritage or some such crap and even support Israel outright.
And yes, I've heard all of these things coming from movement modernizers in Europe.
Does the name English Defense League ring a bell?
Apparently, it's pretty openly run by Jews.
They've discovered that they don't have to hide anymore.
Suffice it to say that the rules are at least somewhat different over there, and the people are at least somewhat different, and the problems are sufficiently different so that American and European nationalists really shouldn't pontificate and shout the odds about how each other should proceed.
But here goes anyway.
There are several reasons why proportional representation isn't doing as well in Europe as it should be.
First and foremost, there's the primary problem with the white race.
Character.
The character of westernized white people as a whole, and the character of the so-called party leadership of some of these groups.
To make a long story short, in Europe as well as in North America, the large mass of white people in every western country these days are bloody stupid.
They are as dumb as a bag of hammers.
They believe everything they see on the telly and read in the sun.
They believe what they are told by the government and the media, just like these morons over here do.
And it is extremely difficult for any minor political party with only limited access to money and the media to convince them otherwise in large enough numbers to make any significant difference in the voting booth.
And by the way, they have the same problem in Europe that we have here with the Democrats.
In any case where there is a chance that a genuine alternative candidate or party might win, the votes are not counted honestly.
They're fiddled in various ways.
Now, the problem is the laws they have in Europe regarding things like Holocaust denial, racial incitement, etc.
Even parliamentary politicians in Europe are not free to address racial and cultural and Judaic problems completely freely in the way that we can here, well, in theory anyway.
Nick Griffin himself, for example, has been tried for allegedly inciting hatred against Muslims.
There is a certain limited amount of parliamentary privilege that allows our people to say some of these things, if necessary, like on the floor of parliament and the course of a speech, something like that.
But we're not getting that many people elected, and so the privilege doesn't apply.
So that's the way that the system in Europe takes out a lot of alternative parliamentary politician types.
They arrest them for hate crime or hate speech or denying the Holocaust or saying unkind things about Muslims, turbans, or whatever.
Another problem is the poor personal and political character of the leadership of these parties.
Now, I'm not going to get into the whole Nick Griffin debacle in Britain.
Suffice it to say that you got the wrong man at the top in the BNP.
And if there is any possibility of salvaging anything from the past 15 years of the BNP, which there may not be, it's not going to happen until Griffin and a few of his butt buddies are gone from the scene.
This, regrettably, is a very common situation in the white nationalist movement worldwide.
For some reason, the men who work their way to the top of our little heaps in both this country and in Europe have, for the most part, been remarkably poor specimens.
Why me, Lord?
You made other men out of clay.
Mine, you made out of shit.
Down through the decades, we've been able to produce quite a few people who would be good sergeant majors in any man's army, but no more than a handful of true generals.
The few that we once did have are either dead, or they're incredibly ancient, or else they have character problems themselves which are so seriously debilitating as to prevent them from ever truly serving the 14 words.
Jean-Marie Le Pen in France is 83 years old.
Enoch Powell died at the age of 86. Jorg Haider from Austria ended up wearing a Yarmulke at the Babi Yar Holocaust Memorial in Israel.
Pim Fortune from Holland was an open, practicing faggot who lived with another man.
This is another aspect of so-called modernization, by the way.
I would have talked about this before, but it can't be discussed without breaking the first taboo against naming names.
Several European groups, especially in Britain, have been led by men who were later proven to be outright government agents in the pay of MI6 and Jerry Gable, including the notorious Ray Hill, Kingsley Reed, and Tim Heppel.
The problem of no-good leadership and aging leadership is a movement-wide problem.
In this country, Ed Fields and Willis Cardo and Sam Dixon and the tiny remaining handful of great names from the post-war period are all in their 80s and 90s, for Christ's sake.
I'm 58, and there are still a few old guys around from back in the day who call me the kid.
With a few possible exceptions, who may yet shape up, we're just not producing another generation of real leaders.
Even leaders of the relatively mediocre caliber that we used to have.
Democracy doesn't.
This is glaringly obvious in Europe, wherein you've got so-called nationalist parties trying to use liberal democracy, which is a system that encourages and rewards mediocrity.
A democratic party run by Robert's Rules of Order by definition cannot be revolutionary since the purpose of democracy is to prevent change.
So, what did I mean last week when I said that if America had PR, I would be a parliamentary politician?
Let me slightly rephrase that.
What I meant was that if America had proportional representation and we were able to gain admittance to Congress or state legislatures by garnering a minimum 5% of the vote, which we could do without difficulty if the votes were counted honestly, I would use the democratic process in order to gain access to the media whether they wanted me to have it or not.
I would not be a legislator, nor would I use the electoral process for that purpose.
I would be a propagandist and use the legislature, Congress or whatever, for my forum from which I would communicate our ideas to white people.
The object being not to get a majority of them to go into a booth and pull a little lever for us.
But to create an educated and racially aware white population from which one day would spring the elite, the vanguard, who would then lead us into genuine revolution.
Now, in certain democracies in the past, it has proven possible to use the democratic electoral process as a propaganda medium and as a base-building exercise for a genuine revolutionary movement outside the parliament or Duma or Congress or whatever.
The prime example of this, of course, is Adolf Hitler's NSDAP in Germany.
And the Bolsheviks in Russia before 1917.
Both Lenin and Dr. Goebbels made some remark to the effect at the time that, as a tactical measure, they were willing to enter Parliament in order to destroy it.
That's what I meant, John.
I have used elections in the past as propaganda tools, and they worked somewhat, largely because I was wearing the swastika openly, which, as Commander Rockwell said, the media and the Jews cannot.
Ignore.
Completely.
Never.
In the present day, there's no point in even making the attempt, since we're so destitute and we don't have any realistic possible candidates, including myself, anymore.
I think we've done better with Colonel House's YouTube videos.
Now, this may change in the future, and a time may come when using the electoral system offers some possibilities.
But at this point, no.
The enemy has gotten the drill down to Pat.
They've been able to marginalize Ron Paul two elections in a row, and Ron Paul is able to raise millions of dollars.
Okay, moving along.
Back in 1970, I went to a summer school called Governor's School in North Carolina, where one of the kids I met was a young man from a rural part of the state who, even in those days, was a mean bluegrass mandolin picker.
I fooled around with the banjo a bit during my early days, and we actually formed a little band that lasted all of a month while the summer school was in session.
Unlike me, this young man went on to become one of the best and most famous mandolin players in the bluegrass and country music industry.
I won't name him here so as not to cause him any embarrassment at this late stage of our lives, but take it from me, he's good.
This is one of his favorite showpiece tunes.
It's called Get Up, John.
Country rocks, but bluegrass rules.
Hey, baby!
Country rocks, and bluegrass rules.
Country rocks, and bluegrass rules.
you At any given time, I'm dealing via email with at least a dozen people around the country who vow and swear that their coming home, for sure, for sure, that their arrival on their scouting trip, at least, is imminent, and sometimes their actual arrival for good and all.
Now, to be fair, some of these people do exactly as they tell me they're going to do.
I've heard some of them already on Radio Free Northwest, and I have no doubt you'll be hearing some more from people like this, successful migrants who have come here to make Sometimes, though, that's not the case.
Every now and then it turns out that some asshole has simply been yanking my chain on the internet, but usually it's not as malicious as that.
More often than not, when people don't come home or do their scouting trip as planned, they're suffering from one of the great American syndromes, a chronic inability to get their Act together in this or anything else in life.
I'm sure most of you know what I mean.
It's a feature of American life these days.
This constant half-stepping.
The eternal yes-butting.
The dithering.
The intellectual laziness.
The inability to make up one's mind or commit to anything.
Never mind actually do anything that requires physical action.
Unless, of course, someone is being paid.
Now when money is involved, Americans will do anything, anytime, anywhere.
Lickety-split.
I'm dealing with several of these people right now, and I'm running into something I find a little bit disturbing.
I'm not going to name any names or give any details here, but I've noticed that in more than one case, one of the things holding a person back from migrating here to the Pacific Northwest is a belief or an idea which is profoundly incorrect and which we really, really need to deep-six.
You might call this idea baseless optimism.
A lot of us, especially the younger men among us, because they haven't yet seen enough of life in liberal America to understand what a shower of shit it is, seem to have this strange idea that we have a choice.
All too many of us have bought into this conservative, Rush Limbaugh-type notion that since America is allegedly the greatest country in the world and exceptional, then all of this horror is someday, somehow, going to get better.
That in some unexplained manner, the past dozen years are just going to turn out to be another hiccup or minor downturn in our nation's history.
And that all of a sudden, one morning, we're just going to wake up and find it's all been a bad dream.
We'll be living a Brady Bunch lifestyle in a split-level suburban McMansion.
Mommy and Daddy driving two cars to their crapulous jobs every morning.
Barbecuing in the backyard on weekends and letting the television set and maybe a Mexican maid raise our one or two kids while we eat out or bring home prefix dinners from the Safeway every night because mommy's always too tired to cook.
Furthermore, some of these young guys think that they're going to get lucky.
And their middle-class cupcake won't divorce their asses and run off with their kids in their 30s and spend the rest of their lives financially draining them like a leech, and that somehow they will avoid all of the other horrific things that happen to white people in this society,
like a catastrophic illness that wipes out your life's savings and loses you your house, or a violent attack by black or brown criminals, or your kid turning into a junkie at 17. Or some kind of contact with our so-called criminal justice system, God help them.
In other words, back in childhood, I think most of us, to some degree or other, swallowed all this American dream horse hockey, and a lot of us haven't gotten over it yet.
We think we have options.
No, we don't.
We think that there's no real need to come to the homeland.
Interesting idea, though it might be, because these things will eventually get better.
No, they won't.
Have you checked the price of gas lately?
How about the price of beef?
Neither of them is ever coming down again for any sustained length of time.
Have you noticed how there's less merchandise in the stores and far less selection than there used to be even a couple of years ago?
The signs are slow in coming and hard to see, and the system is doing their best to conceal those signs.
But they're there.
This time, there's no going back.
The time is coming when there will be no more suburban homes.
No more backyard barbecues.
No more happy motoring.
No more American Idol.
No more video games.
No more trips to Six Flags.
No joy.
No happiness.
No security.
No safety.
Look around you out there in Florida and Texas and Rhode Island and Ohio and Missouri and Bakersfield.
Look ahead 20 years.
What do you think life is going to be like for you there when you're 45 or 62 or 70 years old if your nigger neighbors don't break into your house and beat you to death for your wallet first?
What do you think life will be like for your family where you are now?
Now for God's sake, come here to the homeland.
Bring your family with you if you can, but if they won't come, then you come anyway.
Because here is where you are needed.
I am desperately trying to create a situation here in the Northwest where the white man will at least have a chance.
Surely there isn't anyone out there stupid enough to really believe that things are going to get better, or even go back to the way they were a few years ago.
That's not going to happen.
And every damned one of you listening to me knows it.
You just don't want to face up to it because if you did, you'd feel obligated to do something about it.
But you're too lazy to do so, and then you'll feel bad about yourselves.
And we can't have that now, can we?
Now if you stay where you are, you're going to die after a life of misery in some state-run nursing home when your Nigerian orderly cuts your throat for your IV, or in some other equally horrible way.
Here and help me!
I can't promise you that you will live to see victory.
But I can promise you that at least you'll die on your feet not crawling around in the mud and the crap clawing for a few pennies and not lying helpless in a nursing home bed while a shit-skinned animal murders you.
Yeah, I know, that doesn't sound like much of a deal.
But it's the best America offers to people with our skin color.
And it's the best you're gonna get.
Quit screwing around.
Pack the van and get your ass out here.
Well, our time is up, and so that's it for this week's edition of Radio Free Northwest.
This program is brought to you by the Northwest Front, Post Office Box 4856, Seattle, Washington, 98104.
Or you can go to the party's website at www.northwestfront.org.
This is Harold Covington, and I'll see you next week.
Until then, Sasha Underban.
Export Selection