All Episodes
Previous Next
Jan. 19, 2012 - Radio Free Nortwest - H.A. Covington
01:05:01
20120119_rfn
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Greetings from the Northwest homeland, comrades.
It's January the 19th, 2012.
I'm Harold Covington, and this is Radio Free Northwest.
I'm sure you notice that this week there's no opening theme to this podcast.
There's a reason for that.
Normally, what I would do once I completed an episode of Radio Free Northwest is that I would use an FTP program to send the file to our technical guy, Colonel House, out in Montana.
And he would do the opening and closing voiceovers on the show's theme music, this being an art that I've never quite mastered on this software program.
But I can't do that anymore.
It is with the deepest regret and a sense of personal loss that I have to inform our listeners that Colonel House, whose real name was Dan Coplitz, died of a heart attack in the early hours of January 12th in Kalispell, Montana.
He wasn't found until the evening of the 15th, hence the delay in informing the rest of us.
If memory serves, Dan was 54, although I'm ashamed to say that I'm not actually certain how old he was.
Younger than me, anyway.
I spoke with a medical examiner from the coroner's office on the phone, and the cause of death was given as cardiac arrest, which of course can mean anything.
But so far as we can tell, there was nothing hinky about it.
He apparently awoke in the night feeling bad, and he was trying to take his blood pressure when the coronary hit.
Dan had been ill for some time with malignant hypertension and incipient diabetes, the twin perils of middle age, generated by the combination of 50 years of the American diet and the incredible stress of being jobless and having no future at all in the land of his forefathers.
Like most white males of our generation, Dan had no medical insurance, which gave him only limited access to health care.
Like most of us, he went to the doctor only when absolutely necessary.
And whenever he could scrape up the necessary hundred bucks or so that most quacks charge simply to walk in the door of their office, Dan was able to find a reasonably priced doctor out there and get on medication.
And according to the coroner I spoke with, the autopsy showed he was taking it at the time of his death.
Basically, Dan Coplitz died of being a white male in Obama's America, which in one way or another is our demographic's leading cause of death these days.
America threw Dan Coplitz away.
They'd already tried to destroy him.
Beginning in 1998, Dan did six years in a federal prison for the horrible, wicked crime of possessing a firearm that our lords and masters didn't want him to have.
The Second Amendment guarantees all Americans the right to keep and bear arms.
But some U.S. attorney decided that Dan was a stroppy white boy and didn't know his place.
And the Constitution didn't apply to him.
And so they took away six years of his life just to show him who was boss.
Dan never talked much about his prison experience.
I mean, my God, what is there to tell?
But he did mention that when he was at the Sheridan prison camp in Oregon, he had the honor of meeting the Order hero, Richard Kemp, and he was part of Kemp's large and well-organized Asatru group there.
Dan was one of these guys you meet sometimes in the movement whom you're always...
Amazed.
Actually stuck with it after all the crap America dumped on him.
Now, let's be honest.
A lot of these prisoners who talk the talk by mail simply disappear when they get out of jail.
Now, I've never held that against them, by the way, and I'm always glad to do what I can to at least get them a little mail while they're inside.
It's what the Jews call a mitzvah, a good deed that one does because it is right and to store up brownie points in heaven.
But, like I said, I do this knowing full well that most of these prisoners will vanish once they get out and we'll never hear from them again.
Dan not only stuck with the movement, he was able to assume a really critical and creative role with the Northwest Front by becoming our primary maker of videos and our technical editor for audio files, like this program, for instance.
Colonel House's NVA Attacks video of 2010 has already become a kind of minor classic on YouTube.
Nobody knows how many views it's had since the kikes who run YouTube keep trying to pull it down, and it has therefore proven necessary to keep uploading and uploading it to 20 different channels at a time under a variety of names.
But my guess is that it's had at least 100,000 views since it first appeared.
I know that doesn't sound like many views when cute puppy or slapstick home videos can get 2 or 3 million views a pop.
But for a media product of our little community, that's top door.
And of course, these videos will get even more views in the years to come.
The death of Colonel House is also significant and very symbolic in another way.
America has always had its ways of punishing those among us who refuse to conform.
A prison is one, of course.
And the threat that if you annoy the people with wealth and power, you will die in prison like Edgar Steele is a terrible one.
But Dan Coplitz and others as well have showed us that it's possible to survive prison and not give in.
Then there are the economic sticks that Zogg beats us with.
Of course, the foremost among these is blacklisting from employment, not just from a dissident white man or woman's field or trade, but blacklisting from all employment, period.
America doesn't send men with clubs to come and drag us to prison and then to the camps, or rather they only do that in a few special cases like Edgar Steele.
America starves its dissidents into submission by refusing to allow them to make a living, and by denying them the material wealth that is America's reward for conformity, or was until Obama came along.
Dan was one of the most technically skilled people with electronics, computers, software, and graphic design that I've ever known.
Yet because of his traceable political and racial past, he was always marginally employed ever since I met him.
Indeed, when I first met him here, he was working as a roofer.
None of the high-tech IT companies here in Seattle of all places would hire him because he had the mark or the swastika branded on his file, so to speak.
Even more subtle is the incredible social pressure that America brings against those of us who refuse to speak and think as they should, those who refuse to accept and believe all the left liberal codswallop were ordered to believe.
The system makes sure that we true dissidents, white dissidents, are utterly outcast.
We are stripped of our families, our marriages, our children, and our position in the community.
America doesn't just send us to prison and bankrupt us and sometimes kill us.
America takes everything.
America is a monster.
And if a white boy dares to raise his head in the monster's presence, everything he has will be taken away and devoured.
This is what happened to Dan Coplitz.
He has a grown son and an ex-wife, whom he apparently hasn't seen for years.
And who he evidently didn't even know where they were.
At least the police and medical examiner didn't find any phone numbers or addresses in his room.
I've been desperately trying to track them down and contact them for some days now.
As of late today, they will not respond to any of my emails or phone messages.
Dan's wife and child may know he's dead, they may not.
I'm certainly not just going to leave a message like that on an answering machine, so if they won't talk to me, they may never even find out he's gone.
But that kind of thing is supposed to be part of Dan's punishment for not being a good little white boy.
White boys in America over the last 50 years are expected not just to eat shit, but to smile while they eat it and pretend it's ice cream.
Dan Coplitz refused to do this.
So do I, and I think that's why Dan and I were always so simpatico.
We had a commonality of experience.
We were both men in their 50s who had had our women and our children taken from us by the beast.
We both simply accepted that this was a fact of life in America and nothing could be done about it, and we both refused to bend the knee and beg for mercy.
We both knew that there would be no point in doing so.
Dan Coplitz's death, the manner of it, dying all alone on the cold floor of a single room in the dark, is one of the primary threats that America levels against those white men and an increasing number of white women who refuse to bend the knee.
I actually have Jews sending me heckling comments on the blogs from time to time.
Ha ha ha, Harold.
You're gonna die all alone because the God of the Jews will punish you for opposing his chosen people.
That kind of thing.
Sometimes in almost those very words.
And these assholes are right.
Realistically speaking, that's probably something like how I will go.
Unless our lords and masters decide to do an Edgar Steele on me and fabricate audio files wherein I'm hiring some wino as a hitman to kill Octomom or whatever stupidity they decide to make up.
Or, of course, unless you folks decide to listen to what I'm saying and act on my words within my lifetime.
That's not very likely, but we live in hope.
It takes courage to charge a machine gun nest, and it takes courage to defy the all-powerful state and rise in arms against the most powerful and terrible tyranny that the world has ever seen.
Someday, all of you are going to have to find that courage within yourselves.
It takes a different kind of courage to live your whole life, year in, year out, serving the ideal of right and racial truth, living in abject poverty, In most cases, living without the comfort of a wife or even a woman friend, with no hope of reward and no hope in your lifetime of seeing any of the change that you're fighting for.
It takes a different kind of courage voluntarily to give up all the enticing rewards of sex and drugs and rock and roll that America offers to those who conform, and to stand alone for the right for years against all comers in your workplace, in your hometown, in your community.
In your family, in your marriage, and against your own ego and your own desires.
Now, we don't have the first kind of courage yet, the courage to fight.
But that second kind of courageous men and now a few women, those we're starting to get.
Thank God.
Dan Coplitz was one of them.
There are many kinds of heroic death, and not all of them involve going down in a hail of bullets, although sometimes that happens, as in the case of Jeff Hughes.
The Valkyries of legend are supposed to gather their heroes where they've fallen on the field of battle, but I like to think that last week one of them was able to make a detour to a cold, dark room in the middle of a Montana winter.
So long, comrade.
See you on the other side.
Over the sea.
It calls to me Yesterday's gone I'm all alone The long boat it sails Into the sunset You've finally found Your place to rest Sleep well,
my brother Do not be afraid I can see the alchemy Take me with you Take me so far away I can see the alchemy Now
you have joined The ranks of the fallen Carried away By Valhalla's calling Now battle by day And feast by night The glories you've seen Come into the light Sleep,
O my brother Do not be afraid.
I can see the lucky.
Take me with you.
Take me so far away.
Oh I can see you again
Oh I can see you again
And rest with the chosen And rest in peace I've picked up the standards And I will release All that you fought for And all that you loved Watch over me,
brother And guide from home I cannot be afraid I can see the Valkyrie Take me with you Take me so far away Oh,
I can see Okay, I want to do a special musical profile again this week, but this is going to take a bit of explaining.
At times in the past, I've played some cuts on here from a group from the 1960s called the Kingston Trio.
The Kingston Trio were three clean-cut young white boys who were part of the 1960s folk fad or revival or whatever the hell you want to call it.
This included singers and groups like Joan Baez, Peter Paul and Mary, the Weaver, the Lost City Ramblers, Pete Seeger, etc., etc.
Now what you have to bear in mind was that the 1960s folk, whatever the hell it was, was not any kind of legitimate revival of interest in America's folk heritage.
It was a left-wing political phenomenon and had very little to do with the music itself.
These groups were all lefties, in some cases actual communists, like Pete Seeger, and the whole purpose behind the phenomenon, which began on college campuses and in university coffeehouses, was to swing the youth of the baby boom generation leftward, which of course it did in large numbers, I'm sorry to say.
This is very hard for anyone who wasn't there to understand.
But the folk music craze of the 60s created a kind of atmosphere among young, educated white people that continued on into the hippy-dippy flower power crap of the late 60s and ended up in today's drug culture.
You might say the same kids who started out on beatnik poetry and Pete Seeger in college in 1962 ended up with hair down to their butt cracks and dropping acid in 1969, and then, by the mid-70s, either their brains were completely burned out, or they were dead of an OD, or else they were working at some government job, and they were liberal yuppies parroting the lefty Democrat line for the rest of their lives, and today they read Huffington Post and worship Barack of St. Obama and Teddy Kennedy as gods.
What you have to understand is that in the 60s, it was hip and cool and far out, man, to be a lefty liberal and even an outright cummy like those SDS loons.
And that this whole bizarre perversion of thought got its start with Peter, Paul, and Mary singing about if I had a hammer and where have all the flowers gone.
Our house was full of that shit.
My father was at one stage a minor folk singer himself, and he used to open in the local coffee houses for Joan Baez and Burl Ives.
Now, why was I not affected?
I'm not sure.
I guess like the Black Death in the Middle Ages, some people can just walk through the plague untouched.
Anyway, most of the so-called folk music of those days wasn't, really, and what there was of it that was legitimate was usually all jazzed up so that the original people who sang these songs around campfires out on the plains or in front of mountain cabins back in the old days wouldn't have recognized them.
But the Kingston Trio had one advantage over most of the others.
They were actually good musicians who could sing in tune and play their instruments.
They were also a little bit less political and a lot more about the music than some of the others.
So what I'm going to do this podcast is play some of the better Kingston Trio folk songs from the 60s to give you a little taste of what it was like back in the days when you could actually hear songs like this on the radio.
Decide Advertising Boston, New York and Buffalo.
A hundred hardy sailors are whaling for you.
Singing, blowing in the morning.
Bowling in the morning.
All the way to running gear and bow, boys bow.
They tell you what the clipper ships are running in and out.
They say you'll take 500 whales before you're six months out.
Singing, blowing in the morning.
Bowie winds, I-O, all the way around here and mow, boys, mow.
The skippers on the afterdeck are squinting at the sails, when up above the lookout spots a mighty school of whales sing.
Bowie winds, I-O, all the way around here and mow, boys, mow.
Then lower down the boats, my boys, and after him we'll travel.
But if you get too near his tail, he'll kick it to the dare, but I'll sing.
Bowie winds, I-O, all the way around here and mow, boys, mow.
And now that he is ours, my boys, we'll bring him alongside.
Then over with our plover hooks and rob him of his hide.
Singing Bowie winds, I-O, all the way around here and mow, boys, mow.
Bowie winds, I-O, all the way around here and mow, boys, mow.
And hang this clever way, let's sing.
Bowie winds, I-O, all the way around here and mow, boys, mow.
Obama like Marie Antoinette.
Good, maybe we'll guillotine him.
I probably need to edit that out.
I guarantee if I leave that in, I'm going to have the goddamn Secret Service knocking on my damn door.
I tell you.
Okay.
No, they're too busy about the nativity scene, picking up the faggot statues.
No, that's the FBI.
Really, in August of 2008, I did have a visit from the local police and from the Secret Service because they claimed that one of my blogs was...
Menacing Obama.
Didn't say threatening him.
Didn't say threatening to kill him, but it was menacing, according to the cop.
I believe I may have mentioned this before.
They sent the local cop in first.
As I mentioned before, I know my own rule about saying nothing but the five words, but he looked like a fairly decent guy.
He just said, look, you're not some militia type with a big apartment full of guns or anything, are you?
And I said, well, no, but...
You realize that if I was, those Secret Service bastards sent you in ahead first so you would catch the brunt of it.
And he says, yeah, the thought did occur to me.
Anyway, okay, let's see what have we got here.
And again, in case anyone claims I was threatening Obama by talking about the guillotine, I was referring to an article in the Huffington Post wherein Romney says that Obama is like Marie Antoinette.
So if the Secret Service is going to come visit me, maybe they should go visit Mitt Romney as well.
All right.
Political vitriol and its consequences for democracy.
Click on that.
Dinner to win.
Dinner with Michelle.
Okay.
Ah!
You guys can't see this.
Obama, Biden.
Paid for by Obama for America.
Want to meet Barack and Michelle.
We really better shut up about Obama because the Secret Service really is going to be coming here claiming we're plotting to eat dinner with them or something.
I don't know.
Well, are they going to come to us, or do we have to meet them?
That doesn't sound very fair.
Well, whatever it is, they want too damn much money.
It's probably the invitation to one of these $10,000 a plate fundraising dinners.
Blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.
Calling Ron Paul a racist because of some newsletters he put out in the 1990s.
I'm sorry, guys.
Ron Paul is not one of us.
Kelly Clarkson faces severe backlash after Ron Paul endorsement.
Who cares?
Okay.
Controversial poll about Jews and Jesus.
Okay, here we go.
Fox apologizes.
Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Fox Latin America has apologized for a poll on whether Jews killed Jesus Christ.
I wonder who made them apologize.
One of its staffers put on a Facebook page promoting the National Geographic Channel's Christmas special.
Okay.
The poll asked readers who they think is responsible for the death of Christ.
Pontius Pilate, the Jewish people, or the high priests.
The Simon Wiesenthal Center, when they misspelled Wiesenthal, in Buenos Aires called it a defamatory reference to Vatican propaganda that resulted...
In the persecution and murder of Jews for two millennia, the Jewish group says it's outraged that Fox would perpetuate an idea that the Vatican annulled back in 1965.
Are the Jewish groups ever not outraged about stuff?
Well, not really.
That's a good point.
They get paid an immense amount for being...
You know, what I find interesting about this article is, okay, so the Jewish group says it's outraged that Fox would perpetuate an idea, here we go, that the Vatican annulled back in 1965.
I didn't know annulling things made them go away.
Well, officially the Pope is supposed to be infallible and all that.
Like, the Mormon prophet is supposed to be infallible, but I've always found some of his revelations to be very politically convenient.
Like, they gave up polygamy when it was a condition for Utah to enter the Union, and they gave up their racial views in 1977 when they were no longer chic and that sort of stuff.
So, again, I do not want to get into religion here, but this is one thing I just have to say.
I'm sorry, guys.
The Bible is very clear.
Yes, the Jews killed Jesus.
It was the high priests who had him condemned.
It was the Jewish mob that said, give us Barabbas.
I mean, how much more clear do you have to be?
And I'm going to shut up now because I'm going to start a riot here.
I feel some outrage coming on.
Yeah, right.
Okay.
Okay, but now here's something else.
They're outraged about the poll.
It didn't even say what the response was.
Well, probably in Argentina.
I don't think they wanted to know.
The Argentine people have always been pretty Jew-aware.
Back during the dictatorship, it did not escape the notice of Galtieri and General Videla that a lot of their left-wing opposition and communist opposition was coming from Jews, and so they got...
Who's that, that hebe that wrote that prisoner without a number, cell without a name, this long-involved thing about how persecuted he was in Argentina?
Timmerman, Timmerman, Jacobo Timmerman.
Of course, the fact that he survived to write this memoir...
It couldn't have been he was a death camp or anything.
All the Holocaust survivors, if it was so bad, how come they survived?
Really, if it was a plot to kill all the Jews, why did they survive?
And this Timmerman guy is the same way, but what Timmerman and others fail to comment on or fail to be honest about is that most of those hebes weren't in prison in Argentina getting electrodes wired up to their ghoulies and whatnot for being Jews.
They were there because they were commie-lefty oppositionists who were opposing the government and in some cases carrying out active terrorism and this kind of stuff.
It's like that Jew female, Laurie Berenson, who was arrested and sent to prison in Peru for 25 years for supporting the Shining Path, and all the lefties were yelling and screaming, "Oh, poor Laurie!
Oh, they've got this number of American Jewish princess in prison in Peru!
It's just so horrible!
They've got her up in the Andes!" Well, you know, she was supporting the Shining Path, who was probably one of the most murderous guerrilla insurgencies in South American history.
These were the commie assholes who would just go through a village and kill everything that moved.
Men, women, children, dogs, llamas, whatever.
And so, yeah, she was helping them, and she was supplying them, and the Peruvian government locked her up.
But I'm babbling again, aren't I?
Well, actually, that's a good point.
A lot of these lefties and commies, it's okay for them to do it on other people.
But when their opposition does it, it's completely and totally wrong.
I'll give you a prime example from my own experience when I would argue with these lefties at a college or university.
I got into a debate about the Holocaust, and one of the things that I used in my favor, I said, well look, there's this documentary called One Third of the Holocaust that breaks it down.
If you look at all those videos, all of them 7-10 minute videos, and he goes piece by piece.
Points out all of these discrepancies in sources that come from these so-called survivors.
A guy claiming that a bullet went through his clothes and stopped at his skin.
I mean, he would point out things like this in their literature and just mention how obscure it is.
That's just to name one.
And none of them looked at the argument.
Not one of them did.
All they said was, Well, this guy doesn't give his real name, so he's not a reliable source, and you shouldn't be listening to him, and therefore we shouldn't be listening to you.
Then this idiot sent me an email, and I refuse to participate in this arguing over email or anything like this.
A faculty member at that institution actually sent out an answer to that documentary.
He claimed that it debunked this person's documentary, fact by fact, piece by piece.
The whole documentary wasn't even nearly as long as the original.
It was about seven five-minute videos, supposing to just counter everything in this extensive study that I had mentioned.
And, lo and behold, the person that created it didn't reveal their identity either.
Yet, that was okay for them to use that.
Not okay for me to use somebody who did not do this.
And let's not forget, on that subject, did you...
Jews quite openly had a practice called the ban that when they invaded a place, they slaughtered every living thing.
That's a known fact.
That's something that they claim the ancient Hebrews did.
They did it to, you know, a lot of places that they invaded.
So, once again, it's okay for them to do it, not okay for others.
Well, again, I don't know if I should even mention this.
I'm going to get emails, lots of emails.
But if you look at the Bible, the ancient Hebrews or Israelites, if you call it, like Joshua.
Joshua wiped out whole cities.
Some children mocked the prophet Elijah.
The Lord sent bears to tear them to pieces.
Okay, I'm going to shut up now, but if you want to really freak out a Holocaust exterminationist, and this is going to be hard because you're going to have to somehow strap them into a chair and do like Alex in A Clockwork Orange, take their eyelids open to force them to watch, but get them to watch the David Cole video.
Now, Cole is a Jew.
Which, normally I don't have anything good to say about Jews who try and horn in on our act here, but it is a very good video, and Cole actually went into the Auschwitz concentration camp.
He had some guy with him with a video camera, and because he was wearing a yarmulke and carrying his little prayer book and everything, he got the whole tour from some little Polish girl who looked like she was about 19 years old.
Quite a little guide for a concentration camp where millions of people were supposedly murdered.
Anyway, he got the $10 tour from the little girl from the Polish government, and they went into the so-called gas chamber, and the guy with the camera is showing the whole chamber.
It's about maybe the size of the living room in a one-bedroom apartment, very small.
And, of course, they've got the shower head sticking out of the wall, but you look up at the ceiling, and there's skylights in the ceiling.
Now, you're filling a room with hydrocyanide gas, and you've got...
Skylights.
And David Cole points this out, and the little girl, quite seriously, apparently she fully expects to be believed here, says, yes, well, sometimes you see the gas was taking too long and the Nazis would open the skylights and throw down gas grenades into the Jews.
I'll wind this up here, but if anyone needs to be convinced that the Holocaust is a hoax, all they need to do is watch that video, or for that matter, any other, that shows the interior of the so-called Auschwitz gas chamber.
The idea that six million people were gassed in that thing is just insane.
Now, David Cole later recanted and said that he was sorry for saying all those horrible things, but I guess you can't take back the video footage, the documentary he made that showed everything.
I suspect his rabbi got together and had a quiet word of prayer with him and says, David, my son, you're going to either recant this stuff or we're going to have a second circumcision ceremony for you.
That could have very well been it, too.
Yeah.
You know, they have no problem doing it to their own people as well, especially if they do something like that.
In fact, they might even hate them all the more.
One thing that I've heard is the radio show host, Alan Berg, who was killed by the Order.
One of the things that set him off the most is when he heard a Jew call in that said, yeah, I think there really is a conspiracy of the Jews to run thing.
I heard that drove him more insane than anything any white nationalist or anyone like that said.
Have you ever heard of a guy named Mordecai Venunu?
He was kind of a hippy-dippy Israeli-type Jew.
He was a nuclear scientist who worked at the nuclear atom bomb project in Demona, which is out in the Negev Desert in Israel.
And about 25 years ago or so, he escaped to the West, so to speak, went to London, and he was holding press conferences talking about the Israeli nuclear bomb.
Now, it's kind of an open secret that Israel has atomic weapons, but you're not supposed to admit it.
And this really pissed the Israeli government off.
They lured him to Italy by some girl promising him an amorous encounter.
It's called a honey trap.
They grabbed him, they drugged him, they put him in a cargo plane, and they took him back to Israel, locked him up for about 20, 25 years.
A few years ago, they finally let him out.
I think he's in his 60s by now.
But he was under strict orders from the judge, you must live in this little house, you must not have any contact with any media person.
He basically, somehow a reporter got to him and he told the reporter something like, Well, I'm not supposed to talk to you.
Anyway, the fact is he said something to the reporter.
Judge found out about it in Israel.
They dragged his ass right back to prison.
So, yes, when Jews threaten the well-being, put it that way, of the tribe as a whole, they will come down on you.
There's a guy named Norman Finkelstein as well who has written a Holocaust revisionist book basically where he says, look, it's bull.
We Jews all know it's bull.
We've been ripping off Ugoyim for 60 years now.
Ha ha!
What are you going to do about it?
And, oh God, Finkelstein has been torn to pieces.
He's lost tenure at his university.
He's been hounded.
He's been threatened.
I think he's been driven underground now.
You know, I've always wondered, when the big Jews are bringing up the little Jews, do they pull them aside and teach them, okay, now we have this Holocaust thing, and it's kind of the only thing we have going for us, and we need to carry this on?
Or do little Jews grow up believing that it actually happened?
Personally, I think it's the latter.
I will give them this.
The average everyday hebe on the street probably does believe it happened because everybody tells him, just like everybody else, it's kind of like the mythology of his people.
Americans believe that George Washington chopped down the cherry tree, which he didn't.
Americans believe that Columbus discovered America, which he didn't.
Jews probably believe in the six million, even though that never happened.
I think the actual knowledge that it's a fraud is restricted to a few sort of top heebs in places like Israel, in places like the Hollywood movie industry, the government, etc.
Like, for example, the judge in Israel who sequestered Anne Frank's original diary, locked it up in a vault in Israel and won't let anybody look at it.
Obviously, that judge knows there's something in there that they don't want people to see, like the fact that about half of it's written in ballpoint pen, which wasn't invented until 1950.
I'm going to tack an addendum of my own on here because this is an interesting question, and it's one that I don't think has gotten as much attention from the movement as a whole down through the years as possibly it should have done.
The question is, to what degree are individual Jews themselves aware of the fact that the Holocaust as advertised did not happen, and to what degree are individual Jews complicit in perpetuating the fraud?
Well, heck, it obviously depends on the due concern.
I'm sure that there are a lot of kikes out there who do swallow the whole six million spritz wholesale, just like the most gullible Christian Zionists, although they have less excuse for doing so because they're a lot closer to the source of this horse hockey, and most individual hebes really are fairly intelligent, although not smarter than everybody else like they claim.
Most Jews are probably smart enough as they enter into adulthood to spot certain internal inconsistencies in the Holocaust stories, like their parents will tell them that they had 62 relatives gassed at Auschwitz, but no one quite knows who they were, and the details are kind of sketchy, like Grandpa and Grandma had numbers tattooed on their arm, and yet they still survived and managed to end up in a 16-room colonial mansion in Skokie and a winter condo in Miami.
Like, for people who were supposed to be so deadly efficient, the Nazis sure as hell let a lot of these number-tattooed hebes escape.
That kind of thing.
Usually, of course, the Altcockers and the Babushkas with the tattoos in their arms didn't talk about their experiences in Auschwitz or Belsen or Dachau or wherever, and everybody in the synagogue just assumed that that was because the stories were too horrible.
But then again, maybe it's because there wasn't that much to tell.
And they got it that it wasn't in the interest of the Jewish people for them to tell what really happened, which was that they were in jail, and they were made to work hard, and the food was scarce and lousy, and towards the end it got worse with the typhus and the malnutrition, and it was no fun.
And by the way, nobody denies that, not even me.
But there were no gas chambers, and no lampshades, and no kosher soap, and basically no mass genocide.
So most of them probably, to this day, have sense enough to shut the hell up and draw their checks every month from the German government, which they probably use to make their Lexus payments.
That kind of unspoken knowledge probably permeates the so-called world Jewish community, but knowledge of outright fraud is probably restricted to a small number of top Jews who happen to be in positions where they could hardly fail to understand that they're peddling horse dung to the world.
A good example is the one I made in the discussion about that Israeli judge who sealed up the original diary of Anne Frank in the bank vault in Tel Aviv.
Now, he had to have known what he was doing.
He probably took one look at that ballpoint pen in the diary, and if he didn't know before, he knew from then on that he was perpetuating a hoax, which I'm sure bothered him not one little bit, since it was for the greater glory of Israel, in the larger sense of the word Israel.
My guess is that most of the top figures in the world Jewish establishment, the ADL, the B 'nai B 'rith, AIPAC, the American Jewish Committee, Hadassah, anything at all to do with Israel, the upper strata of the rabbis, so forth and so on, probably have at least some general idea that the so-called Holocaust is a hoax, or at least it didn't happen as advertised.
How many people that half-knowledge permeates, I can't guess.
But it's probably a couple hundred thousand of the most wealthy and influential people in the world.
I do kind of wonder how these people speak about it among themselves.
Probably the same way that white liberals speak about racial realities, like the necessity to lock your car doors and windows and alarm your houses and stay out of certain neighborhoods.
It would be something that everyone at all these Temple Schmuck Ale and APAC dinners and ADL board meetings knows about, but they never speak of it and always talk around it.
I suspect that it's a very Orwellian kind of life, using a lot of double-think.
Orwell described Winston Smith's job of faking news and history as "rectifications" and "corrections" and producing "definitive editions" of things, so that, in his words, "there is never any open admission."
I should also bear in mind that the Jews, in their roles as Marxists, came up with one of the most fascinating aspects of Marxist dialectic and liberal thought control, the concept of subjective reality, which again Orwell describes in 1984.
Basically, in the bizarre world of Jewish leftism, there are two realities.
Objective reality, which is the way things really are, the facts in other words, and subjective reality, which is the consensus of the state and the political and the social apparatus and the power structure and the media as to how things are on a given topic.
I know for a fact...
That a lot of liberals practice subjective reality, i.e.
looking at the world and its specific issues as they should be according to liberal left-wing orthodoxy rather than as they are.
This is how liberals have been able to ignore the realities of race for almost 60 years since Brown v.
Board of Education.
I suspect that the Jews do this a lot among themselves as regards the so-called Holocaust.
They all agree, without actually spelling it out, that a certain set of ideas and alleged historical events is the truth, and they proceed as if it was, completely ignoring the illogic of a great deal of it, never examining it at all, and pretending that the contradictions don't exist.
In other words, I think the Jews not only lie to others, but on some level they lie to themselves.
Which is a distinct weakness that we can use against them one day.
An enemy prone to self-deception is always vulnerable to truth.
Here's the Kingston Trio again, an old Southern outlaw ballad called John Hardy.
John Hardy was a pintin' man Carried a razor every day Killed a man in Mobile town You ought to see my Johnny Gilway You ought to see my Johnny Gilway Gilway Gilway,
Gilway, Gilway We're Johnny John Hardy was standin' at the bar So drunk he could not see Along came the sheriff with the warrant in his hand Johnny boy,
you'd better come with me Yeah, Johnny boy, you'd better come with me I've
been to the north and have lived in the south.
This will be my burying ground.
This will be my burying ground.
But I've been this wide world over, been this over route.
I've been to the river and I've been baptized.
Take me to my very end ground.
Get away.
Acc nothing to me.
A bill that would require private insurers to cover abortion if they also cover maternity care will go before state lawmakers.
How in the world are those two things related?
What does providing medical care for pregnant women have to do with killing children?
That's like saying if your health plan covers eyeglasses, it should also pay for a punch in the mouth, or if it covers immunizations, it should pay for someone to come blow up your house.
Except those two things would make more sense.
It's bad enough this vile practice is allowed to exist and is considered medicine in the first place.
But there is something especially wrong with a health plan that will cover the costs for someone wanting to have her child killed.
If a health plan will pay to have an innocent person killed, maybe one day they'll start paying to have other people killed.
You know, like people who are a danger to your health.
Maybe the expenses for killing your nigger neighbors who sell drugs, or the illegal Mexicans who defecate in libraries.
Or Jews, because you hate Jews, will soon be covered by your employer's health plan, assuming anyone still has health insurance and a job.
At this time, the legislature is also dealing with gay marriage and marijuana.
I think I'd rather hear about drug-using faggots than about women who can now have someone else pay when they have to hire a hitman to kill their children.
The article continues, A state conscience clause law allows health insurance plans sponsored by religious organizations to refuse to pay for abortion.
I'd really like it if the religious angle was not always present when it comes to homicide.
I oppose abortion because I personally believe killing children is wrong, even black children, even deformed or retarded children, and I really don't care what any religion has to say about it.
Some things are just common sense.
Why is there no common decency clause that allows insurance plans to opt out?
Is it really that unusual to believe that all children have a right to live without attaching some religious belief to it?
I don't think I need to remind you of the slippery slope this can create.
I doubt our audience has many pro-choice members, but I do know of a few in the white nationalist movement, though I don't know how this can be.
I have worked in environments where a lot of death was present, and I have seen body bags containing fully formed white babies, children with facial features, and all organ systems developed, labeled elective termination.
This has nothing to do with adequate health insurance coverage.
This is the product of a sick society that does not value human life.
We're allowed to kill those who are the most defenseless simply for being inconvenient.
Harold writes in a couple of his novels of the time when it will be legal to do the same to old people, and, like much of what he writes about, I don't think he's very far off at all.
What was Adolf Hitler's secret?
The secret that enabled an unknown soldier, with no money or influence, and only a few friends from his army days, to triumph against all the odds and become the leader of Germany after only 14 years of struggle.
What is this secret which we in these dark days for our race might learn and use to help us in our own struggle?
His secret was really very simple.
His secret was that he genuinely cared for and loved his people in a selfless way.
So it was that he devoted the whole of his adult life to his people and lived by the principles which he, and the political organization he created and led, propounded in public.
In his own private life, he was frugal.
He was always spontaneous with people and never once tried to cultivate or uphold any sort of public image.
He really was a man of the people.
He triumphed against all the odds because over the years of his struggle, more and more of his people liked him and felt he was a good man who had their interests at heart.
He did have some extraordinary gifts, such as his ability to speak in public, his resolute determination, and his superb memory.
But most of all he was a simple, unspoilt, and uncomplicated man.
He won his victory because of his own personal character, and the foundation of his personal character was this simple love of his people.
Indeed, his very reason for living was to care for and help his people.
The love which Adolf Hitler felt and expressed for his own people is what made him so popular and so loved by the German folk of the time.
And it is the truth about and memory of his love that his Zionist enemies have striven so hard to destroy with their ignoble and hateful lies about him, his movement and his government.
If we want to express the truth about Adolf Hitler, we must express the genuine and selfless love and concern he felt for his own people.
The secret we can and indeed must learn from him is this simple, uncomplicated and genuine love for our people.
This love comes before any political program.
This love comes before any rhetoric and before any propaganda.
This love comes before any political demonstration.
This love comes before any thought or mention of hating enemies.
Above all, it is this simple, genuine, and uncomplicated love for our own people which should and must motivate us to act in a political way.
If we feel and try to express this love, this concern, and care for our own people, we can and will win.
For it is the lack of this love which has made us fail for the past 60 years.
Music by Ben Thede
Like so much that these people say this is simply not true.
It's not exactly secret within the movement that when Pierce was alive I had some serious reservations about some of the things he did, and I still have those reservations.
But they have to do with certain of his specific and undeniable...
My problem with Pierce was never racial or ideological, nor was it on his part.
As you will learn in the next audio clip, our respective visions of the white world to come were never all that far apart.
Listen closely as Dr. Pierce describes the North America that he imagines and believes to be worth fighting for.
Substitute the words Northwest American Republic, and you'll see what I mean about our having very similar visions for the future.
In these talks I have with you every week, I try to choose topics of current interest.
Topics that are in the news or that should be in the news because it's important for all of our listeners to understand that the things we talk about in these broadcasts are real and relevant and they demand our attention now.
They're things that listeners can check on for themselves if I tell them where to check.
Even when I choose to talk more about ideas than about current news, I try to tie the ideas into events, either current or historical, in order to keep listeners aware that the ideas are relevant, that they have consequences in the real world.
I want everyone always to have in mind that the essence of these broadcasts is not entertainment, that it's not even education.
It's our whole future.
It's the continuation of the process of life that began on this earth hundreds of millions of years ago and is now on the brink of disaster.
The reason I make these broadcasts is to move people, our people, to accept responsibility for where the process is going, to help pull it back from the brink.
To deal decisively with those people and policies which pushed it to the brink and then to help guide it back onto an upward path again.
But sometimes listeners tell me, yes, that's important, but please tell us more about the direction in which we should guide things after we overcome the enemies of our people and repair the damage done by their policies.
Show us the path ahead.
Tell us a little about where we want to go after we are able to plan the type of world we want.
Well, I believe that's a reasonable request.
I don't like to build castles in the air.
I don't like to spend too much time planning things that we aren't yet able to implement.
But I think it is reasonable to think sometimes about the future even beyond those things that we have the power to implement now.
What sort of world do we want to strive for?
Let's dream about that for just a few minutes today.
We cannot, of course, ever return to the past, but we can compare various periods in the past with each other and with the present in order to make decisions about institutions and lifestyles, decisions about social structures and fashions and types of behavior.
Different people, of course, will judge the past differently.
We'll make different decisions about which institutions and lifestyles in the past were desirable and which were not.
For example, I have one occasional listener who thinks that it would be good to return to a time when his church ruled everything and witches and heretics were burned at the stake by the thousands.
And he thinks that I should be the first to be burned.
So the type of world we strive for depends upon our values, upon what we think is important.
The person who believes literally in a biblical picture of heaven and hell and whose primary motive is to avoid being cast into the fires of hell will want a different sort of world from the completely self-indulgent person whose ideal is to be able to amuse or entertain himself in any way he chooses.
And neither of these people is likely to be attracted to a vision of a world which is best for our race.
So, before we begin describing our ideal world, let's be sure about what is really important to us.
I can only tell you now what I believe is important, but I think that many listeners will agree with me and so will share my vision of the sort of world for which we should strive.
I'm a very race-conscious person.
A person who is very conscious of the profound spiritual and psychical differences between my race and other races.
And the world I want is one that provides the maximum scope for the spirit of my people to soar.
A world that matches their inner nature.
A world in which they are at home and can roll up their sleeves and go to work as if they were remodeling their own castles.
A world in which they can unleash the full power of their imagination and of their creative spirit.
A world in which the Faustian spirit of my people can exult in its striving to find and conquer new worlds, to perform noble deeds.
And in the words of Tennyson's Ulysses, To follow knowledge like a sinking star beyond the utmost bound of human thought.
A world which matches our inner nature will be a world not too different from that in which our nature was shaped over thousands of generations in Europe.
That was a world of mountains and forests and rivers and lakes and fjords and seacoasts.
It was not the Semites' world of desert and bazaar or the Negroes' world of jungle and dung-plastered huts.
Nor was it a world of asphalt and concrete and neon and billboards and diesel buses and fast food drive-thrus and pollution-spewing factories and mile after dreary mile of tenement houses.
In contrast to what I just said, it seems to me that there is a portion of the nominally white population of the United States whose nature has been shaped during the past three or four generations by concrete and asphalt and billboards and subway trains and trash-filled vacant lots.
One sees a lot of these people in places like New York City.
But I'm not convinced that they should be counted as white any longer, these raceless urban linings.
So we might begin our description of the sort of world we want by talking about the natural environment and the way in which our people should fit into that environment.
We need, for one thing, a much lower average population density than we have now in North America and in Europe.
Instead of a North America with a rapidly growing population of 300 million featherless bipeds of every known ethnicity, I have a vision of a continent with a stable population of 50 million European Americans, saner, healthier, stronger, better looking, and more intelligent European Americans than is the norm for most parts of the continent today.
And no non-whites at all.
And I have a vision of these 50 million white North Americans living and working in a land of regrown forests and unpolluted rivers and lakes and clean air.
A land without litter along its roads and pathways and with bears and wolves and mountain lions and eagles returned to their natural habitats and forming once again a natural part of our environment.
And in my vision, A substantial part of these regrown forests and unpolluted rivers and lakes are in the public domain.
In fact, a continuous public domain stretching from coast to coast between and around private holdings.
And I envision no cities.
Certainly none of the sprawling, noisy, congested asphalt and concrete monstrosities surrounded by smoke-belching factories.
Clogged freeways and honky-tonk strips with which we are all too familiar today.
Towns with populations of no more than 10,000 should be adequate for commercial centers, manufacturing centers, educational centers, and any other sort of facility requiring the cooperative efforts of a couple of thousand people.
I'm assuming, of course, modern transportation, communication, and manufacturing methods.
Even plants for smelting ore, producing steel, or making ball bearings, if designed and operated to take advantage of modern technological developments, should be able to do without the huge concentrations of labor used today.
In fact, I believe that ultimately we can do without an urban proletariat altogether.
It is unrealistic to try to plan things in too much detail now.
But a good approach to the problem of who does the dirty work is the sort of thing the Germans did in the 1930s with every young person going through a period of a couple of years of labor service, regardless of whether he was destined ultimately to be a poet or a factory owner or a farmer or a research scientist.
That not only gets the garbage collected and the tomatoes picked, but it pulls the community together and minimizes inter-class hostility.
The Germans had many other excellent ideas which were put into practice in the 1930s.
Ideas about housing and transportation and industrial management and labor relations and community structure and the raising of children and the training of young people and public health and so on.
We can learn much from a study of what they accomplished before we all were tricked into a horribly destructive and unnecessary war which switched the whole world off the track of racial progress and onto the ruinous track of multiculturalism.
This is one of the best renditions of this particular song I've ever heard, and it, of course, is by the Kingston Trio.
Well, John, there's some little Maggie with her grand glass in her hand.
She's drinking away her troubles, oh Lord, and fooling another man.
How could I ever stand it?
Just to see them two blue eyes They shine just like the diamonds Like the diamonds in the sky Pretty flowers were made for blooming Pretty stars were made to shine Pretty girls were made for boys to love Surely Maggie was made for mine Well,
you understand, little Maggie With her grand glass in her hand She's drinking away her troubles, oh Lord, and fooling another man.
Well, they marched me down to the station with my suitcase in my hand.
I'm going away for to leave you, my love, going to a far distant land.
Well, sometimes I have a nickel, and sometimes I have a dime, and sometimes I have ten dollars a In
view of the sad tidings I mentioned earlier in the program, I suppose I'd better say some things now that need saying.
This kind of death is not uncommon among our people.
Late middle-aged and elderly racists being found lying on the floor dead or dying days after they had a heart attack or a stroke or kidney failure, whatever the case may be.
It's happened to Rick Cooper, Demi Johnson, David McCauldin, and Dan Coplitz, among others.
I'm sure most of you could add some names to the list of old movement hands who have gone out in this way.
It's part of the price that we pay for having lived our lives as free men, at least free as far as our minds and our souls are concerned.
Some of you have started asking me in the past few years what happens when my own time comes.
Some of you are at least partly aware of the answer.
I'm not going to discuss this at length because not having a crystal ball, no one really knows what will happen.
It's entirely possible that our lords and masters have plans for me which will render moot any arrangements I've made.
The main question I get is, have I made any arrangements for a succession?
My usual answer to that is, succession to what?
This isn't like it was with Dr. Pierce, who had land and buildings and inventory and stocks and bonds and a going concerned business to dispose of, as well as an incorporated entity which had a board of directors, who spent the last year of his life circling like buzzards, and when he died, descended to rend and tear at the carcass.
Now me, I don't have a carcass worth chewing on.
The Northwest Front is just a name right now.
It's not an organization, and the only thing I have to dispose of is a small amount of personal property worth considerably less than ten grand.
All I have to leave is my printed and recorded work for the past 40 years, and the ideal of a free white nation on Earth to serve as a homeland where we can secure the existence of our people and the future for white children.
And I don't leave that to anyone.
I leave it to everyone.
That being said, I do have a last will and testament with appointed executors.
I will not discuss the provisions thereof, because there are people listening to this podcast who don't need to know these things.
But yes, there is a will, and I highly recommend that all of you make one.
Apparently, Colonel House died without one, and now his stuff is locked up in a county storage locker where it may sit for years until somebody figures out what to do with it.
I recommend very strongly that all of you make a will.
And try to appoint an executor who's liable to be around for a while to make sure that your wishes are carried out.
Failing all else, you can try to find an attorney who seems to have some vestige of conscience remaining and who will do what you've paid him to do.
This is especially important if you do, in fact, intend to leave the Northwest Movement or any other racial group or individual anything of value.
The problem here is your non-racial relatives.
Even with a will, they will probably contest it, and if you die intestate, they'll drop down from the sky and pick your bones clean.
We had an especially bad situation regarding the death of Rick Cooper between two family members, one of whom was racial and the other was not.
There was also the case of a man in Massachusetts named Richard Cotter, who many years ago died and left a very substantial sum of money to the revisionist Ernst Zundel.
As I recall this story, his non-racial kids deliberately tied the whole estate up for years with lawsuits in order to make sure that Ernst never got to see a penny of the money, even though the will was clear and they didn't have a legal leg to stand on.
There is some speculation that the Cotter relatives were generously compensated by certain unnamed Jews to do this, in essence getting their inheritance from these kikes, who also paid their legal expenses to make sure that Ernst was cheated.
Remember, just because you make a will doesn't mean that your heirs will honor it.
There is nothing so common in civil courts as legal action over disputed inheritances, especially large estates.
For many centuries, this type of situation has always seemed to bring out the worst in our people.
The Jews actually have a better system.
The testator lodges his will not only with the courts, but with the rabbi.
And after his death...
The rabbi holds what's called a beth den, a secret court or tribunal, and by iron tradition what the rabbi says goes, period, end of story.
This is often used by the relatives of rich Jews to cheat the old man's shiksa trophy wife or mistress or other Gentiles out of their share, since it is also ironclad Talmudic law that Jewish wealth must never ever be voluntarily surrendered to Gentiles.
It always stays in the Jewish community.
Anyway, I'm rambling again.
No kidding, guys.
Even if you don't have one thin dime and nobody to leave it to if you did, you need to get ready for the day when it comes your turn to hit the floor in some little furnished room all alone, if only to keep what you do have from being seized by the city or county and given away to niggers or Mexicans.
And on that cheerful note, our time is up, and so that's it for this week's edition of Radio Free Northwest.
This program is brought to you by the Northwest Front.
Post Office Box 4856, Seattle, Washington, 98104.
Or you can go to the party's website at www.northwestfront.org.
This is Harold Covington, and I'll see you next week.
Until then, Sasha on the bond.
Freedom!
▲
Export Selection