All Episodes
Previous Next
Jan. 10, 2012 - Radio Free Nortwest - H.A. Covington
01:07:50
20120110_mhs
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
This is Mike Harris.
It is Tuesday, January 10th, 2012.
So, there's just some very, very interesting things going on in the world.
Let me speak a minute about our guest today, a gentleman named Harold Covington.
He's an author who's written a series of books.
I've had him on once before, and I've had numerous requests to have him back on, so I invited him back on to talk some more about his books.
I believe he has a new book coming out that I want him to talk about as well.
I've just been told that our guest is ready, so ladies and gentlemen, let's welcome Harold Covington.
He's a very good author.
I've read all of his books.
I find them absolutely fascinating and really thrilling adventure stories.
So Harold, how are you this morning?
Oh, pretty good.
Pretty good.
Well, good.
I was just telling our listeners a little bit about your books, and my understanding is you've got a new one that's just gone to press and is now available.
And so why don't you introduce the series by telling them what the series is and how it is.
And let's just be very clear, this is a fictional work that exists only in your mind, but it really draws a potential future.
Of what society could be to like if white people could get their act together and behave in a racially conscious manner to their own benefit.
And as it is right now, white people in this country in particular, and in Europe as well, we have the burdens of having to support permanent underclass.
And just imagine if the taxation or the revenue that's generated...
Did not have to benefit those who don't produce it, but merely benefit those who do produce it.
I have one of my characters in the books make that very point when it mentioned that the Northwest Republic of the future has a space program and we're only a few million people and the president of the republic says it's amazing what you can do when you don't have to support a lot of welfare types.
Well, anyway.
Okay.
There's a bit.
It's my fault because I was a little late getting you on in my vehicle.
We'll be right back in a few minutes.
Three minutes.
Well, good morning and welcome back.
This is Mike Harris on the Republic Broadcast Network.
It is Tuesday, January 10th, 2012.
And we're on with special guest Harold Covington.
Who is an author who's wrote a number of books, but the ones that I've read is called The Northwest Quartet, and particularly The Northwest Quintet now, since you have a new one to it.
But what this book does, it's a bit of a science fiction book.
It takes place 50 years in the future.
And it's also a social fiction book to where Harold has forecast the future of the U.S. 50 years into the future if nothing is done today to save the Republic and the way we're on with Zionist influence in the U.S. government.
And in how things get worse and worse and worse until life becomes untenable in the U.S., then a group of brave men and women get together and try to make some effective changes in order to change the quality of life.
So really, I'm doing all the talking here with Harold Gassman, but really how he's set this thing up is really it's a colonial war as to how it's a breakaway colony, that a portion of the U.S. wishes to secede from the Union, similar to what happened in the War of Southern Secession, which we know is the Civil War of history books.
But Harold, welcome back.
I'm sorry for talking so much, but I'm just trying to prep our listeners so they understand that these are good books and they're worth Okay, well...
As you say, the Northwest Quintet, as it is now, or the Northwest Independence novels, deal with the establishment of a country called the Northwest American Republic, and this country is established by an armed insurrection on the part of white people against the United States government based very I don't think much on the kind of things that I've experienced in my own life.
I was in the Rhodesian army for a while, and also I lived in Ireland for a number of years, so I was able to observe firsthand the IRA and their campaign against the British in Northern Ireland.
Essentially, the books are based on the concept that there will eventually be a Soviet-style or Yugoslavia-style breakup of the United States into separate...
Geographic, ethnic, and racial enclaves, whatever you want to call them.
Most likely, the blacks will get a large part of the South.
The Mexicans, of course, will get a large part of the Southwest.
They're already doing this in the form of what they call Aslan.
And New England will probably turn into a sort of a liberal ville.
Large parts of the Midwest will still be racially homogenous and white, and so you'll probably have enclaves out there.
But the idea is that the white man has to get a piece of the pie when this breakup occurs, and the most logical place and the most historically appropriate place for this to happen would be the Pacific Northwest.
Harold, let's talk about Aslan for a moment, because I live in Arizona.
I've lived there for a very long time, and one of the things that alarms me very, very much is this whole concept of Aslan is actively promoted on both high school and college campuses.
Hispanic students can go join an Aslan group right on the campus of ASU or right on the campus of U of A. Of course, if white students were to try to do the same thing, they'd probably be expelled from college.
Well, that's my point exactly, and there's this entire double standard out there.
This is welcomed and sanctioned as part of their cultural diversity, and this is forced down our throat.
And I, for one, I'm tired of having this forced down my throat.
It's just what goes on, but the Hispanic students can do it.
Well, as I say in my novels, the problem is that white people are confronted with this situation, and we have spent the past 50 years complaining, complaining, complaining, whining, whining, whining, going into voting booths and voting, voting, voting, and none of it's done a damn bit of good.
I had a guest on my own show a few weeks ago who put it very succinctly, the solution to America's problems is to be found not in the ballot box, but in the cartridge box.
Well, that's pretty succinct.
At what point do we actually resist all this garbage that comes from the liberals and the Democrats, the government, the Jews, the blacks, the non-white minorities, etc.?
At what point do we stand up and fight?
How bad does it have to get?
Before white people realize that this is no longer our country, that we are living under a government that has failed.
We are living in a political system with a judicial system, a legal system that is completely and irredeemably broken.
How long is it going to take before we wake up and we finally take actual physical action to free ourselves?
I'll be honest with you, when I was a younger man, I thought that by the time that I had reached this point in my life, something would have been done by somebody.
At least something would have happened.
But instead, we have this long, slow slide of America into a situation where we're Brazil at best.
America is now a third world country, including a third world president who is now becoming a third world dictator.
Well, Harold, there's our music for our break.
We'll be back in three minutes to continue the conversation.
You're listening to the Republic Broadcasting Network.
Because you can handle the truth.
Music.
Good morning.
This is Mike Harris on the Republic Broadcasting Network.
It is Tuesday, January 10, 2012.
We're on with author Harold Covington.
Harold, before the break, you made a couple of really good points about how the United States is becoming more of a dictatorship.
And, you know, it was bad enough with the passage of the Patriot Act, but now this recent National Defense Authorization Act, where American citizens can be detained indefinitely without right of trial, actually renditioned and held prisoner with no rights whatsoever.
This is really a breach of the American Constitution.
So, in spirit, the United States no longer exists.
What does it take to get people to wake up and realize that we have become enemies in our own country because we have allowed foreign infiltrators from a certain small Middle East country that they stole from Palestinians to really control our government now.
I've had a number of segments on this show about the problem we have with dual citizens serving within our federal government.
They have completely undermined the corrosive effect on civil liberties for the remaining 310 million Americans.
It's been disastrous.
We do know that these things are happening.
We do have the internet.
We do have the media.
And these things aren't being done in secret.
Beginning with the Patriot Act, you go through what's called the Military Commissions Act of 2006, which in essence indemnifies any official of the federal government and immunizes Any cop or whatever who does anything in so-called good faith, up to and including murder and torture.
And now you've got this National Defense Authorization Act, which in essence not just revokes the United States Constitution, if you want to go back and get really legally nitpicky about it, it revokes the Magna Carta.
One of the foundations of Anglo-Saxon jurisprudence was the Magna Carta, the great charter of 1215, that you may have heard of King John and the barons at Runnymede, etc., etc.
Now, the main purpose of the charter and the main historical legacy of the Magna Carta is that it establishes the rule of law.
The principle of the Magna Carta is that everyone is subject to the law, including the king, and that no man may be deprived of his life, liberty, goods, etc., Due process of law, and this National Defense Authorization Act,
with one stroke of Barack Obama's pen, has just thrown out almost 800 years of Anglo-Saxon legal precedent, which makes us, once again, as I've said, a third world country, because we have just thrown out one of the primary heritages that we received from our European, and specifically our British ancestors.
Well, let me take some exception with you there, because Barack Obama, although he did sign it into law, he had the, what's the right word, the connivants.
There was 93 connivers who helped him, schemers, plotters, conspirators, in the United States Senate, and there was a number of them in the House of Representatives.
Obama himself is an empty suit.
I do not believe for one second that Barack Obama has the intelligence to inflict all the damage that has been inflicted on this country in the past three years.
He's basically a sock puppet for the whole.
I don't know.
What do you want to call it?
The conspiracy, the agenda, the power structure, this...
What I call it is a cancer.
We have a cancer on our country.
It's like a parasite.
It's sucking the life out of the United States.
And it's doing a very good job.
But I look at each of those senators and congressmen who signed that agreement for NDAA and the Patriot Act.
I consider that open treason.
Well, we haven't had any legal standard of treason in this country since Jane Fonda was allowed to get away with going to North Vietnam, a country at war with the United States.
Posing behind an enemy anti-aircraft gun wearing a North Vietnamese helmet.
And then she came back to the United States.
Instead of being arrested and put on trial, she was given the red carpet treatment by the lefty liberal establishment.
So ever since that particular incident back in the 1960s, there has been no concept of treason in this country.
It's time to renew that concept of treason because it's happening.
I mean, we've had actual traitors in the sense that we've had people working against the best interests of the country in our government for generations.
Ever since the 1930s and Roosevelt's New Deal, when there were active members of the Communist Party, such as Alger Hiss, involved in the New Deal and involved in the government in Washington.
So, you know, treason in high places in this country is by no means anything new.
But again, the question is, what do we do about it?
We do have a media.
They tell us that these things are happening.
When this National Defense Authorization Act was passed a few weeks ago, there was some...
Squawking on right-wing blogs and left-wing blogs and everyone says, oh, this is just horrible, and we moan and we groan and we tap on our computer keyboards and nothing is done.
There is no actual power left in the hands of the people anymore in this country except for the one that we won't use, specifically the power given to us by the Second Amendment, the right to keep and bear arms.
In any actual third world country, I believe that this government would have been overthrown a long time ago, but unfortunately us pale, civilized white people seem to have gotten out of the habit of killing our enemies and oppressors, and so long as these people understand that they can get away with anything.
That the American people will swallow anything, then it's just going to keep on happening.
The reason that Obama and his little cohorts, or whoever actually was behind it, passed this National Defense Authorization Act, stripping away 800 years of legal precedent, stripping away one of the last vestiges of legal defense that ordinary citizens had, the right of habeas corpus, the reason they did this was because they could, and they knew they could.
They knew that they could get away with this and nothing would be done.
The American people swallowed the Patriot Act, swallowed the Military Commissions Act in 2006, swallowed these pointless, stupid wars in the Middle East.
Basically, they have gotten the idea that the white American people, by the way, when I say American people, I mean the white American people, they've gotten the idea in Washington that we will put up with anything, and I'm sorry to say they're probably right.
Well, let's do a little history lesson here, because in my lifetime, and I'm 57 years old, but in my lifetime, the problems began that I could really see and track began in 1963 when they murdered Kennedy.
Then two years later, they passed the Immigration Reform Act of 1965, which changed the complexion of immigrants into this country from white to dark.
That was Teddy Kennedy that did that.
Teddy Kennedy and Howard Metzenbaum were the two sponsors on the bill.
A drunken Jew.
Then we've had 35 million illegal aliens cross the border with no enforcement.
We had 9-11 occur, which was a false flag job, which was an inside job between members of our government who were complicit in it and the Israeli Assad who did that.
And everything since then has been really just a downhill slide.
And as these things go on, the evildoers become more bold and more audacious to where they're going to start rounding up entire cities.
Sure they will.
What they're doing now is they're getting these laws in place so that they're available when a future dictatorship or future tyranny wants to use them.
True, Obama passed this NDAA a couple of weeks ago, and they haven't immediately started kicking in doors and dragging people away, but from now on, they have the legal right to do so.
And I'm sure when that does start happening in a few years' time, as it probably will to some degree during Obama's second term, everyone's going to say, but you can't do that!
How are you doing this?
And it's because, basically, we allowed this thing to be instituted.
Well, Harold, you mentioned something a little earlier about how the U.S. is becoming a Soviet-style state.
And I've read Alexander Solzhenitsyn, and I've told our listeners on this show before that if you're going to read one chapter of the book Gulag Archipelago, read the chapter called The Arrest, and realize that the Stalinists, during Russia, in Leningrad, they went out and arrested 25% of the city's population.
In a matter of weeks, just mass detention, mass arrest of anybody who had any rumor of being a patriot and supporting the old regime, and they disappeared into the gulag system, never to be seen again.
And that's what's coming to this country unless the people get up off their...
Deadass and do something about it.
Absolutely.
Now, this is essentially what my novels describe.
It describes a small group of white Americans, men and women, who have finally had enough and who decide that they are going to act.
Now, they've come to realize that the problem in this country is systemic, it's institutional, that the United States itself, as good an idea as it was in 1776, simply no longer applies.
It is no longer a country or a society that has any place for white people, the original people who created it, and that if we are going to implement the 14 words of David Lane and secure the existence of our people and a future for white children, we have to bring to an end the authority of the United States over at least part of this country so that our people, white people, can have a homeland reserved totally for our own use.
And so that we can raise up other generations of children in health and in safety and with some hope of some kind of future for them.
And the only way that that can be done is to seize back part of our land.
We can't take all of it because the problem is now simply too big.
We have let it get too far.
I may have mentioned this last time.
I personally believe that the time for the white man to take up arms again and resist by force...
Occurred in 1958 when Eisenhower sent those troops into Little Rock and attempted to use government coercion in order to get blacks into schools and to be in the process of racial destruction through integration of the education system.
That is the point where, in my opinion, the South, at least, should have risen up in arms, redeclared the Confederate States of America, and had a rematch from 1861.
Unfortunately, we did nothing.
We talked and we ranted.
We've gotten into this horrible habit of believing that to articulate a problem is to solve it.
The government has realized that as long as you allow white people some way to let off steam, you can pretty much get away with anything.
In the old days it was color TV and air conditioning and a luxurious lifestyle.
These days it's the internet.
As long as the white man has an out, he will take it.
White people will take any excuse to do nothing.
We are absolute masters.
Of the art of finding good, sane, rational reasons to do nothing.
And of course, as the Roman statesman Cicero said, the only thing that's necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.
And we have been proving that in the past 70 years in this country.
We've done nothing, and now we're on the verge of extinction.
Well, let me ask you a question.
In your novels, what was the incident that started, that woke white people up?
Well, what was the particular, I know the answer to this, but what was it that got white people to actually, you know, take up arms and start to defend this cause?
In my book?
Yeah, in your book.
Okay, right.
In my book, there is a family in Coeur d 'Alene, Idaho named The Singers.
And the head of the family is a guy named, I believe, Gus Singer, and he's fairly well regarded on his street and in his neighborhood.
He and his relatives recently helped get an elderly couple out of a burning building, and so everybody likes them.
And then they get turned into what I refer to in my novels as It Takes a Village, after Hillary Clinton's book, of course.
This is a federal department, kind of like child welfare, which is another thing I think is coming down the pike.
We already see signs of this in, for instance, in Michelle Obama trying to basically take over the public schools and jam tofu down the kids' throats and that sort of stuff.
But anyway, it takes a village.
What they do is, in essence, they take away white people's children.
And then sell them on the open market to rich yuppies and queers and anybody that wants a white child because there are so few white babies being born now that on the adoption market you can get a pretty penny for a healthy white child.
And so somebody turns in the singers for being pagans and for teaching their children Norse myths at bedtime and that sort of stuff.
And, you know, typical denunciation in a Stalinist-style society by an informer.
And so on the morning of October the 22nd, I'm not...
It's specific about what year this happens, but on the morning of October 22nd, a bunch of federal marshals come storming into Singer's house, going to take away his children, and we've seen this happen before in places like Waco and with the Texas Mormons and that sort of stuff, and they're going to basically take his children away, charge him with hate crime for teaching his kids Norse mythology, and sell his kids to the highest bidder.
Singer himself resists with a rifle, and to everyone's surprise, As the federal marshals are surrounding the house and yelling and come out with their bullhorns and all that sort of stuff, up and down the whole street, I've kind of envisioned this scene, the windows are quietly sliding open and rifle barrels are sticking out and all of a sudden the whole street opens up on the federal forces.
It's a spontaneous expression of this was it.
Through some magic alchemy, this was the straw that broke the camel's back.
And that's why the people in the Northwest Republic celebrate October the 22nd.
As their Independence Day because it was the day that the white man had finally had enough and resisted the United States and its armed men with weapons, with firearms.
Lexington and Concord are the new nation.
We've seen the same thing happening in our country.
You look at how our police forces have gone from, they've gone from being peace officers to being law enforcement officers.
And I mean jackbooted and full right here at every occasion.
They're becoming militarized.
Basically, this is the way that the United States government is getting around the Posse Comitatus Act of 1878, where you're not supposed to use federal troops.
There's our break music and we'll be right back in three minutes to finish this point.
Okay.
I have a question on the sand.
Next year's bridge.
Next year's bridge.
This is Mike Harris on the Republic Broadcasting Network.
It's Tuesday, January 10, 2012.
We're on with author Harold Covington.
And Harold, you know, I need to share the fact that, you know, I get fan mail about you.
I get people asking me when I'm going to have you back on again, so I thought I'd reach out and invite you back because I really think that the worm is turning, and I think that there is a segment of American society that's ready to hear your message and ready to become proactive about this.
And I have to reiterate one more time that all of your works are fiction.
For now.
And that this is all hypothetical discussion.
And let's just keep it as such.
By the way, if someone would like more information, they can always go to the party's website at northwestfront.org.
That's all one word, northwestfront.org.
And you can learn about the NF, and you can see copies of our party program, you can see copies of the proposed Constitution for the Northwest American Republic, because we do have something that's ready to substitute for the old system once we can eventually...
We do have further information available, and we're not just sitting here reading my novels and fantasizing.
There is a beginning now of a political movement for white independence here in the Pacific Northwest.
The mountain has begun to move, you might say, over the past year.
2011 was a very good year for us in many respects, and so people would like to say if they want to go to northwestfront.org, they'll be able to learn more about it.
Okay, well tell us more about the books.
Where can people get copies of your books?
You may order my books.
Well, the first four, the novels, you can order off Amazon, BarnesandNoble.com, Libris.com.
They have to be ordered online.
You can go into a Barnes and Noble and ask for my books to be sent to that particular store.
It'll take them a while to get there because very few, if any...
Stores actually stock my stuff.
I don't know if there is any that actually keeps any in inventory, but the simplest way to do it, frankly, is online, or you can contact me directly.
I do have a stock of books here.
See, we use what's called print-per-order, and this is a revolutionary technique which has kind of broken the Jewish publishing monopoly, and I think it's one of the greatest advances that we have to thank the Internet for.
It used to be, back in the days, a politically incorrect author had to search for years.
To get a publisher for a book like Imperium or Which Way Western Man, and eventually you had to privately print 10,000 copies at a time at immense expense.
Now we have print per order, which enables just about anybody to get published and to do so without censorship.
Frankly, without print-for-order, I doubt I could have gotten any of my political works published.
Longheader just brought up an interesting point, because you mentioned the Jewish monopoly in print.
It's not the only Jewish monopoly, but one of the Jewish monopolies that people don't consider is that the Jewish monopoly in used bookstores.
And one of the reasons for that is that they operate a used bookstore if a controversial book comes in.
They either can buy that book from the seller who's looking to raise some cash, and they'll destroy the book, and so that that book doesn't exist, and so as a function of time, any books which disagree with the Zionist agenda are eventually winnowed out, and they become more rare and more rare until eventually it's impossible to find copies.
There are certain books now that I read when I was young, which...
We'll be right back.
Okay.
Okay.
This is Mike Harris on Republic Broadcasting.
Today is January 10, 2012.
We're on with author Harold Covington.
And Harold, you know what makes you a dangerous man?
Is you have ideas.
And, you know, on my show, we've done segments on how there's been repression of energy technology.
Most recently, it's come out that Jim Fetzer on last week talking about how the coal fusion process was repressed because it endangered the oil monopoly, the petrodella monopoly.
In the book I'm working on right now, the Northwest Republic is powered by coal fusion and Tesla generators.
But the ideas that you have are more dangerous than even cold fusion.
Because ideas are the most dangerous thing in demand because once they're out there, and that's why I want you on the show, is because I want you to give our listeners a glimpse of what your ideas are and those who are really truth seekers and really want to find a working model for our race, for mankind, to look at your ideas because they...
Everything that we've been told for the past, since 1933 when Franz Boas, the fraud, who called himself an anthropologist, who really established knowledge about race and racial differences, he was Jewish and he created, he perpetrated a great fraud upon mankind.
And you come out with a new set of ideas, which are really an old set of ideas, that have been repressed for so long, and really the establishment, the science establishment has gone out of its way.
There's nothing new about my ideas at all.
I am simply asking for the white Americans of this generation to do what our ancestors did in 1776 and again in 1861.
Fighting for freedom is not a new idea by any means.
Our people have been doing it for thousands of years.
But, you know, I was trying to say this the last 50 or 60 years, actually going back to 1933, when the Frankfurt School moved to New York City to the Lower East Side, there has been active repression of what was the established knowledge, what was the common knowledge that everyone accepted.
And they've been very successful in their propaganda war against the American people.
And you come out with these established, beneficial ideas that freedom is worth fighting for.
And that people have a right to be free, a God-given right to be free.
Well, you've got a copy of the Brigade, I assume.
And on the cover of the Brigade, there is the fictional, so far, Northwest Volunteer Army seal.
And there's a slogan on that seal.
It's Ex Gladio Libertas.
Loosely translated means freedom comes from the sword.
This is an idea that we have forgotten in this country and we have suffered for forgetting that.
The Founding Fathers of the United States did not give us the Second Amendment so that people could go duck hunting.
In fact, I think you said that on the last time on your show.
The Founding Fathers gave us that Second Amendment so that if the need ever arose, they would have the means to hand to resist a tyrant.
In Washington, D.C. I maintain that that time came a long time ago.
I think we can all debate as to exactly when the big rot set in.
I personally would probably select 1933 with the election of Franklin Roosevelt, but the fact is that We're in a position of a minority people in our own country.
We are in danger of physical extinction through misogynation, rakes mixing.
If we don't do something 100 years from now, we're all going to be baby crap brown if we don't do something to preserve our race.
And faced with this threat, we do nothing.
We tap on computer keyboards and whine and moan and bitch on blogs.
We go into stupid little booths and...
Pull levers for candidates who mean nothing.
The electoral process is useless because you have to have $10 million to run for city council these days.
Hang on, there's a break music again.
We'll be back in three minutes.
Okay.
Okay.
Good morning and welcome back.
This is Mike Harris on the Republic Broadcast Network.
Today is Tuesday, January 10, 2012.
We're on with author Harold Covington.
And Harold, I'm hearing what you're saying about the white races being read out.
But I listened to Brother Louis Farrakhan, and his attitudes about the black race are very similar to yours.
And he wants to see the black separatists, and I happen to agree with him.
I think that these things happen for a reason.
I think we can find more in common if we just lay these discussions out openly and not allow...
I'm having a little bit of trouble hearing you.
Can you kind of speak up?
Are you?
Okay, I'm sorry.
Let me change my position a little bit here, change my microphone a bit.
Is that better?
Yes, sir.
Okay, good.
I hope that we have a good connection and sometimes we have a little trouble here with our internet connections, etc.
The Jews were very heavily involved in the slave trade, and some people like Farrakhan and the Nation of Islam have indeed been able to educate some blacks to this effect.
And in places like New York, Chicago, etc., where blacks have a fair degree of personal contact with Jews, then, yeah, there's a lot of friction.
Places like Williamsburg and New York.
For example, I don't know if you've seen this on the news, but now they've got a so-called series of hate crimes going on in Brooklyn against Jews, and the local police are running up and down screaming, and the local rabbis are running up and down screaming, etc.
And judging from the descriptions of the suspects of these people who were in spray painting swastikas and whatnot, apparently the suspects are black or Puerto Rican.
Basically, nobody who lives around Jews likes them.
They manage to alienate everybody, and so in the larger cities where there's any degree of personal contact, you're going to get anti-Semitic blacks, anti-Semitic Mexicans.
As a matter of fact, I believe some Mexican school teacher in Los Angeles got thrown out of the Occupy movement because she was ranting and raving about all the bad things that the Jews had done to the Mexicans.
So there's nothing like personal contact with Jews to create anti-Semites in any race of people.
Well, there was that famous YouTube clip of that black woman going on about the Jews from the Occupy movement, that they're the ones responsible for all the banking fraud.
And there's the other comment out there from the Occupy Wall Street movement that 99% of the 1% is Jewish.
Oh, of course.
I think it's remarkable that with all the financial problems we've been having for the past three or four years, the banking failures, the foreclosures, the fraud, the general mess, the printing money like it was...
Confetti, this sort of stuff.
Not one individual has been arrested, tried, and sent to prison for any of this horrible stuff that's going on in the past three or four years in the financial world, except for Bernie Madoff.
Madoff, I think his name is pronounced Madoff.
Anyway, the only reason that Bernie Madoff went to prison was he ripped off his fellow Jews.
And other than that, no one has been punished for all this misery, and that's largely because the people who have inflicted this misery on the people of this country and the world, indeed, are mostly Jews.
Jews can get away with anything.
Well, that's absolutely true, and that's one point that I point out within our government, is how many dual citizens have serving, both to elected office in the Senate and Congress, and then on the staffs, you can find so many dual citizens who are both Israeli and U.S. citizens serving in virtually every congressional or senatorial office out there.
They're completely overstaffed.
And for someone who's 1.7% of the general population, they certainly have a very large footprint on governmental affairs.
I was wondering if you could opine and give us what your opinion is on this.
I'm sorry, could you repeat that?
I was hoping that you would give us your opinion on why such a small segment of the U.S. population has such a large influence on our government.
Because that is their historic modus operandi.
I personally do not believe that there's some big conspiracy of rabbis whispering around a guttering candle in the synagogue at night trying to take over the world.
I believe that every group of people has a kind of racial personality and a pattern of behavior which has been kind of drilled into them over thousands of years.
And the Jews, as they will be the first to tell you, are survivors.
Now, the way that they survive is by being parasites.
In every country where the Jews have gone over the past 2,000, 3,000 years, you can see the same pattern.
They worm their way into a host society.
They get their people strategically placed.
They take over all of the various centers and crucial points or junctions where money and communications flow.
And eventually, they get their own people next to the Gentiles who were in power and start whispering in their ear.
And, in essence, they take over a society from within.
Eventually, they wear out their welcome.
You start having pogroms and, you know, anti-Semitic riots, etc., and eventually the Jews are expelled.
In virtually every country that they have been for the past 2,000 years, the Jews have been forcibly expelled.
To popular action, mob action, or legal action.
For example, I often figure that one of the reasons that England developed in the strong and vigorous fashion it did was that in the year 1290, King Edward I had enough of them and ordered the Jews out of England.
Permanently, and they weren't allowed back in until the time of Oliver Cromwell.
They basically bought their way back in by lending Cromwell money in order to fight King Charles.
So for a crucial period of about 350 years there, as England was going from the Middle Ages into the Renaissance and so forth and so on, they were free of Jews, which I believe is one of the reasons that England and the British people have always had a bit of an edge, because they were able to go through that crucial stage of their history without Jews.
I believe that eventually the Jews will be in some manner dealt with in this country as well, because more and more people are becoming aware of the Jews, and more and more people are becoming aware of what they're doing and what they have done, and eventually the United States, like everybody else, will have had enough of them.
The problem is, unless they're going to run to Israel, right now we've got this global village type thing.
The world is a lot smaller place.
And there's really nowhere that they can run from here.
Maybe China, maybe India, I don't know.
But eventually the United States will be like the rest of humanity, all the nations of the world down through history.
They will have had enough of the Jews and we're going to boot them out or get rid of them in some other way.
We just have to wait and see, I suppose, on that one.
We haven't seen anything towards that end yet.
Well, at least we're aware.
You can actually say Jew now in public in a way that you couldn't say 30 years ago.
Again, Americans are all talk.
So in a sense, I suppose talk itself is a little bit of a sign of progress.
The crucial point will come if and when the white American decides to take the guns out of the closet where they've been gathering dust and start using them.
When that time occurs, and I fervently believe it will, not in the Northwest and someplace else, when that time comes, Some of those guns are going to be used on Jews as well as minorities and government bureaucrats and so forth.
So we can only hope that that time comes and comes.
Well, one of the things in your novels, and I read the section about Hollywood Adventure, where they pulled that caper off at one of the award shows, and really, I look at the influence of complete Zionist control of the media, whether it's the news media, whether it's television, whether it's the movies, whether it's publishing, academia, any sources of information have been completely Zionist controlled for some time now.
Reading your book, I'll tell this to our listeners again.
These things are high adventure.
These guys that he has, these characters he's created, really pull off some swashbuckling stuff.
The incident you refer to is when our guys go in and they hit the Oscar night ceremonies.
I think of all the things I've written, I probably had the most fun writing that particular section of that particular book.
Well, I'll tell you what, but the whole series is just fun.
I mean, I literally couldn't put the books down because the adventure, the drama, the danger, just the feelings.
And you captured the texture of the characters on both sides of the conflict, on the Federalist side and then again on the Liberation side.
And I haven't even given out the dial-in number, which I'll do right now, but we already have a caller who wants to talk.
Let me give out the number real quick, and we'll take Ron from Fort Worth next.
But the number is 1-800-313-9443.
Once again, it's 1-800-313-9443.
And let's welcome Ron from Fort Worth on.
Ron, how are you, sir?
Hey, Mike.
Thank you.
I wanted to ask, I've become a new listener to RVN.
Y 'all are just coming to Fort Worth and Dallas.
And I've heard with several of you and the guests, We'll talk about these groups who are working their agenda on us.
In this case, with your guest now, I'm hearing about the Jews and others.
And my question is...
Ron, we're bumping up against the break.
We'll take you right back after the break.
I apologize.
that timing on my life.
This is Mike Harris on Republic Broadcasting.
It's Tuesday, January 10th, 2012.
In Ron...
Oh, Ron dropped.
I'm sorry.
I just got a message that he dropped.
That's unfortunate.
Ron, if you get a chance, call back.
We're really hoping to take your call.
It was bad timing on my part.
I should have waited until after that commercial break.
I just let the clock get away from you.
My mistake.
Anyway, well held.
There went that one.
I was hoping to get a call around, but let me give out the dial-in number again at 1-800-313- 9443.
Where does this come from?
You know, Harold, if you could change three things in the world today, in this country, what would you change?
Three things.
Well, let's see.
It would have to be, in other words, if I could sort of go back in time and change certain historical events, well, I would change that Immigration Reform Act of 65, for one thing.
That kind of opened the floodgates.
Even though there is very little immigration enforcement right now, if we didn't have the basically open borders policy that that act created, we wouldn't have at least some of the problems we've got today.
I would reverse Brown v.
Board of Education back in 1953, the year I was born, because that in essence destroyed the American educational system and it has absolutely ruined the lives of millions of white people.
Myself among them through being forced into integrated schools.
And I would probably avoid this whole business of these pointless, endless foreign wars that have so sapped our strength and so distorted our foreign policy and so forth and so on.
But that's if I was some kind of presidential figure.
Now, if I was a godlike figure, I could change history at will, there'd be a whole different list.
But I say everyone can argue and debate as to where we went wrong in the past.
Some people say it was in 1913 when we established the Federal Reserve, and that's certainly part of it.
Some say it was through the establishment of an income tax.
I personally think we kind of reached a very significant, very bad fork in the road in 19, well, actually it would be 1932 when Roosevelt was elected, but with the whole New Deal that created, in essence, the first infrastructure of a socialist welfare state in this country and took us for the first time significantly away from the free enterprise economic system that Americans had been used to.
And some could say Brown v.
Board of Education in 1953, let's say so forth and so on.
The rot did set in, and we have to reverse it, and we have to reverse it now.
Well, if you could make three reforms today that would affect the future going forward, what would those three be?
Well, if I could make three, again, you'd have to presume kind of godlike powers on my part, and a massive amount of military force, but I would, first off, just simply enforce the law.
We don't need new anti-immigration laws or anything like that.
All we need to do is enforce the laws that exist.
And if we don't have the federal manpower to do it through the Border Patrol or ICE or anything like that, which we probably don't because the crisis has become so big, then fine.
Let local officers enforce immigration laws.
This idea that...
I know you've got your problems down there in Arizona with this law, but this idea that...
Local officers, police officers aren't supposed to enforce federal law is ridiculous.
Bank robbery is a federal offense.
Do these people suggest that if somebody knocks over the bank downtown, that local law enforcement officers aren't supposed to respond?
So that would be the first thing I would do if I were, say, President.
I'd just say, okay, fine, we're going to start enforcing the law in this country, and when someone is found to be in this country without proper documentation, they will be physically arrested, and they will be forcibly removed to their country of origin.
They will not be taken down and maybe booked in the local jail and given a ticket of appearance and told to pitch up in three months' time before a judge or anything like that.
They will be seized and they will be forcibly deported.
That's the first thing I'd do.
Second thing I would do would be to cut all aid for Israel.
I would freeze every Israeli asset in this country, and I would tell these people, okay, fine, you've got to beef with the Arabs over there, you want to fight wars, you want to attack Iran, you want to do all this stuff, fine.
Israel is an independent country.
I'm President of the United States, Prime Minister of Israel, you can do what you want, but you're not going to do it with our money.
That girl, Rachel Curry, Yes, the one who was run over by the bulldozer.
Yeah, right.
That was an American-made bulldozer that she was run over.
That bulldozer that crushed Rachel Kari was paid for with American tax money and given to the Jews by our government.
So that's the first thing I do.
I tell Israel, okay, fine, you want to fight the Arabs, go to town.
But you're on your own.
There will be no American troops.
There will be no American air cover.
There will be no American patriot missiles.
There will be no American money.
Then I would just basically sit back and say to the Arabs, enjoy.
Because I think we all know that without that American lifeline, Israel wouldn't last a month.
Okay, there's our break music again.
And next after this, we'll take Dan from Illinois.
So Dan, hang on for just a minute.
Okay.
Thank you.
You're listening to the Republic Broadcasting Network.
Because you can handle the truth.
*music*
Good morning and welcome back.
This is Mike Harris on the Republic Broadcasting Network.
We're on with Harold Covington, author of the Northwest Quartet today.
And, Harold, I'm going to give you a choice.
We've got callers holding.
Would you rather take the callers, or would you rather give the third, particularly the third reform you would implement?
Well, let's take the callers.
Okay, let's take Dan from Illinois.
Dan, welcome to the show.
How are you, sir?
Good, how are you?
Doing pretty good today, so far.
I was curious.
I had a question.
Where would you, would Mr. Covington draw the line at who is Jewish and who is not?
There's been a lot of...
You know, relations between Jews and whites and some people, you can't tell the difference.
Like, let's say, somebody like William Shatner.
I would have never guessed that he was Jewish until he said so.
So would you start at a parent or a grandparent or a great-grandparent?
Where would you draw the line at?
Well, under Jewish ritual law, anyone whose mother is Jewish is considered to be a Jew.
But as far as the Jews that are actually causing the problems, they're pretty obvious when you know what to look for.
Like, for example, knowing what I know now, I could have spotted William Shatner as a Jew right off just from the name.
Anyway, that's kind of esoteric.
The best definition of a Jew that I ever heard was one that was given to me by my late movement mentor, Pastor Bob Miles, and he said that Jews are not...
a race or a religion, Judaism is a state of mind.
And it's, Harrell, some of the worst Jews that you will ever meet.
We not only have a problem in this country with Jews per se, racial Jews, but with a whole Jewish outlook and a whole Jewish pattern of behavior that has been imposed on our culture.
Now, as far as individuals go, I don't have a crystal ball.
People often ask me, well, specifically, what are you going to do in this, this, this situation, etc., etc.?
We're talking about a major revolutionary upheaval, and a lot of eggs are going to get broken to make the omelette.
So I don't make specific predictions like that, but I will say this, that we have to fight against not just the Jews as a race.
But as a whole state of mind, as a whole pattern of behavior, as a way of thinking, as a way of believing, and that belief is total, complete materialism.
Both communism and capitalism are, in essence, Jewish formulations.
They view mankind as an economic animal only, with no spiritual element.
Judaism is a very materialistic religion.
and most of the Talmud and the various commentaries have to do with money relationships between themselves and between themselves and the Gentiles.
That in essence is the Jewish worldview, one of complete and utter materialism.
We have to fight against Jews individually.
We have to remove them from their positions of power.
But we also have to fight against their ideas and their whole godless, if you will forgive the word.
Philosophy.
Now, as far as every individual, do I have dreams of walking down a long line like Dr. Mangala and saying, you, you, you, and you?
That, realistically speaking, isn't going to happen.
But when the time comes, we are going to have to remove them from society.
That's all I can really say at this point.
How that's going to happen, who and how it's going to affect specifically, I have no idea.
What about in the past?
You were talking about England.
I wonder how they went about determining who was Jewish and who wasn't.
Well, in the old days, Judaism was considered to be a religion, and if you wanted to get in on European society, you could simply get baptized and become an ostensible Christian.
The Jewish philosopher Heinrich Hein converted, and he became either a Lutheran or a Roman Catholic, I forget which, but anyway, he stated that his baptismal certificate was his ticket to European culture.
So, our ancestors had a very simple definition.
It was religion, period.
And it was possible for Jews to be...
And then, after a few centuries, I think they began to get the idea that this wasn't completely accurate.
In Spain, for example, they had many Jews who converted at the time of the Spanish Inquisition, but who later continued to, in essence, behave as Jews.
And so, the concept of Jews as a race, as a separate people, actually comes probably from the 19th century.
Oddly enough, one of its main proponents was Benjamin Disraeli, who was a Jew himself.
He converted, either himself or his family converted to Christianity at a very young age, but Disraeli himself always identified himself as a Jew, and he stated on many different occasions that the Jews were, as he put it, a people apart, not just based on religion.
So in the old days, though, it was pretty cut-dried.
If you wore a yarmulke and you worshipped in a synagogue, you were a Jew.
You got a war cross, and you worshipped in a Christian church, you were a Christian, and never the twain shall meet.
Okay, thank you.
Well, we've got our caller, Ron, who dropped off, who has come back on.
Okay.
Let's go ahead and take him next, and Linda will be to you right after this, okay?
So, Ron, how are you?
Welcome back.
Yeah, Mike, sorry.
My boss doesn't appreciate my need to talk to you guys.
Anyway, I was trying to get to the question.
My question was, a lot of these guests I'm seeing on RBN, they talk about various groups like the Jews, etc., but I'm missing the link between the Jesuit order, who runs the two-invented Zionism and all that, and the Jesuit papal connection to the Jewish domination we're experiencing.
Is your guest aware of that connection?
Oh, papist plot.
Hey, I haven't heard about papist plot since I left Ireland.
Well, I'm not quite sure what to say about that, Ron.
I'm familiar with history, and yeah, the Catholic Church has pulled some fast ones in the past, but I'm afraid that...
Yeah, my research has shown in the past the Jewish-Jesuit connection, and I just didn't know if you were aware of that, because the teams always come up missing with all the guests on Army, and they don't make the...
They always talk about the front men, you know, like the Vioness founders and all that.
But they never get to the Jesuits who drive the front men.
Well, I think with the Jesuits, they were the order of assassins, is what their initial charter was.
I know that several popes have actually gotten ticked off with the Jesuits and actually suppressed their order for a while, so I don't know, maybe that has something to do with it.
I have to admit, that's one field in the general study of conspiracy theory that I haven't really...
Well, it's well documented.
It's not conspiracy.
It's well documented.
In the 1500s, when that folk gave them hell, they came back with a vengeance, and they're totally dominating.
If you notice, all the Georgetown and everybody that's in D.C. is the might of Malta, which is a Jesuit creation, too.
So it's well documented.
There's no conspiracy nonsense.
Okay.
Any other questions or comments, Ron?
No, that's good.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Let's go ahead and take Linda from Ohio.
Linda, good morning and welcome to the show.
Hi.
It certainly does get confusing.
You know, where do Freemasons come into this?
Because I know, and I'm Roman Catholic, and I know that there was a Look article back in the 1960s, and the title of it was How Jews Changed Catholic Thinking.
And so they've infiltrated the Church, but I can't tell, like, where the line of Jewishness runs into Freemasonry, Are they one and the same?
Okay.
Are you still there?
Yeah.
Okay.
Freemasonry has a long and sort of dishonorable history.
They don't go back thousands of years like they claim.
It goes back to a character named Adam Weishaupt in the late 18th century.
But you might say that Freemasons are the voluntary Gentile auxiliaries of the Jews.
A lot of American lodges, as far as Freemasons go, are kind of like what they showed on The Simpsons, where everyone basically gets drunk on beer and plays ping-pong.
And some American Masonic lodges individually are harmless, but where they really get bad is in Europe, where you get this so-called Grand Orient Lodge, where you get the P2 Lodge in Italy that was involved with the Banco Ambrosiano scandal in the 1980s, the Papal Bank, and so forth and so on.
So in Europe, masonry is actually a lot nastier than it is here.
A lot of British police officers, for example, down through the years have been found to be senior masons, and they've been colluding and whatnot, conniving to do various nasty things.
But that, I suppose, would be the best definition of the Masonic order.
They are the Jews' Gentile auxiliaries.
They tend to follow the same types of liberal programs and generally tend to assist the left-wing liberal conspiracy in its work.
All right, where did the Torah Jews come in?
Are they the Torah?
You know, the Torah Jews?
Torah Jews.
T-T-O-R-A-H?
No, no.
T-O-R-A-H.
Yeah, Torah, yeah.
Yeah.
It's a division between the Talmud Jews versus the Torah Jews.
That's a division within their own religion.
Oh, really?
I'm not totally familiar with that distinction, but Torah, I believe, is generally considered to be, what, the first five books of the Bible?
The Talmud is a series of commentaries by rabbis covering actually several thousand years that have accumulated over the years.
People say, well, I've got a copy of the Talmud.
Actually, a full copy of the Talmud would take up about 40 volumes because there is a difference between the Torah itself, which is part of the Bible, and the Talmud, which, like I say, is a commentary by rabbis down through the generations because in their commentaries, the rabbis say a lot.
They let slip a lot more than just the Bible itself does.
The really bad stuff in Judaism comes from the Talmud.
Yeah, I've seen parts of it.
Yeah, right.
And Michael Hoffman displays a lot of it, too.
Yeah, I know Michael.
He's a very good researcher.
Yeah.
Okay, well, I guess that clears up as much as I can understand it this time.
Thank you for your guest.
Thank you for your call.
And let's welcome Chris from Las Vegas.
Chris, welcome to the show.
We made an interesting conversation this morning.
You had mentioned Brown v.
Board of Education a little earlier, and that is a very important case in the history of changing the law in America.
And Eustace Mullins in his Rape of Justice brings out specifically that, I believe it was Felix Frankfurter, I may have a justice, Who was the justice who was deciding justice and the sitting justice on that case where the perpetrator or the purported expert that provided the Dahl test,
they had to change locations to the northern, more racially abused areas of the nation states because they were fairly well accommodated in the south and didn't work there, was later decried as a barely passing student in his studies.
He was testified as an expert.
And Frank Furter, who had made special access to the Supreme Court by the untimely removal of a previously-set-exeased justice, had previously, before he heard the case, been specifically the counsel general for the NAACP who had brought the case for Brown and should have,
by all right and due process of law, recused himself from said case that he adjudicated and controverted and changed the law without lawful substantive facts.
And it's just insidious corruption that the Supreme Court justices...
We've got the same situation coming up right now with this Jewish Elena Kagan on the Supreme Court refusing to recuse herself from hearing the case on Obamacare because it turned out she was involved in Obamacare when she was working for Obama.
And so, yeah, I mean, the Supreme Court...
...is exercising a power in this country which it was never intended to exercise.
Felix Frankfurter was a notoriously corrupt and left-wing liberal...
Basically, racial integration in this country and the integration of the schools that's caused so much misery is yet another thing we have to thank the Jews for, specifically the Jews on the Supreme Court and the Jews who were lawyers for the NAACP and the Jews who have enforced it down through the years to the so-called Justice Department, etc.
Let me point something out to you.
Right now, there's no sitting white Anglo-Saxon Protestant on the entire Supreme Court.
However, there are three sitting Jews on the Supreme Court, and they're only 1.7% of the entire population versus white Anglo-Saxon Protestants, who are over 60% of the population.
So the white Anglo-Saxon Protestants have no representation on the Supreme Court at all, none.
Well, Jews admit to being 1.7% of the population.
I personally think there's a lot more than they admit.
They probably base that on synagogue attendance or something, because I tell you, they seem to be everywhere.
That's specifically the fine definition of judicial activism, where the judiciary acts as a prosecutor of a political agenda as opposed to dispensing justice and deciding on law of fact.
If you guys will go to northwestfront.org and look at a copy of our draft constitution for the Northwest American Republic, you will see that we, in our new constitution, have eliminated the judicial branch of the government completely.
There is no provision in the Northwest Constitution for the courts to, in any way, shape, or form, rule on the constitutionality case, anything like that.
The courts exist, as they should exist in the same society, solely for the purpose of finding of fact in criminal and legal cases.
They have no constitutional role whatsoever.
In the Northwest Constitution, the constitutional interpretative role is taken by the Constitutional Committee of the National Convention, of the legislature.
Interpreting the Constitution becomes a role of the legislative branch of government and not the judicial.
We have completely eliminated the entire judicial branch of government in the Northwest.
And it should be because that is probably where the worst abuses of the present system have crept in over the past few generations is the assumption by the courts and by judges of arbitrary power.
To, in essence, say, do this, do that, which is not a power that they were ever intended to exercise by the original Constitution.
That's one of the flaws in the Constitution, is the Supreme Court justices are specifically appointed by the POTUS-in-Chief and thereby able to be conflicted by the obligation of the appointment and the favors that they enjoy at the express extent of the POTUS and the party that placed them in their lifetime appointment.
Highly profitable, enjoyable positions.
Gentlemen, we're having our background music creep in.
And Chris, thank you so much for your call.
And when we get back from this break, we'll take our last caller, which will be Mark from Georgia.
So just hang tight.
be back in three minutes This is Mike Harris on the Republic Broadcast Network with the author Harold Covington.
Harold, we have one last call to take today.
Mark from Georgia.
Mark, how are you?
Welcome to the show.
Hello, Mark.
You're okay.
There you go.
I can hear you now.
All right.
Yeah, I just want to...
I think there's a vital point that you can acknowledge is that there's morally legitimate experience such as Erwin Russo, late Erwin Russo, Erwin Schiff, law defense of his father, and wrote...
like the Federal Mafia, because he was disgusted by the sense of his father and thought to repent things, and he lost his early gang reason in Federal Prison Amor in the Railroad.
So we don't want to make a blanket indictment that just because somebody's Jewish, that that means, by inference, that they're part of the synagogue.
They're the Bible-driven states.
I'm having difficulty hearing this gentleman.
Mark, we have a terrible connection.
Let me go ahead and reiterate for Harold.
Mark's concern is that you can't make a blackened statement about all people who are Jewish just because some are not.
You don't want to make a blackened statement that all are members of the synagogue of Satan.
I couldn't make out the rest of it either because of that.
The answer to that is yes, I can.
It's not beyond the possibility that there might be one Jew out of 8 or 10 million who's a decent individual, but when a people as a whole behaves in a certain manner.
Year in, year out, generation in, generation out, and when that people has carried out the same types of behaviors and been expelled from every country that they have ever existed in over the past 2,000 or 3,000 years, yes, I think you can make certain generalizations about that people, and any exceptions are statistically insignificant.
I'm sure that All of us in our various acquaintances with blacks down through the years can remember one or two nice old Uncle Tom types that we've met personally that weren't bad guys.
What you have to understand is that the individual good exception does not invalidate the rule.
It is absolutely essential for the future of human civilization that the Jews as a people be removed from the social, political, and economic equations in life or else, well, you see what's coming.
We've had about 70 years of Jewish rule right now, and the white race in this country is on the verge of extinction.
So you have to generalize, because there are times throughout history where certain groups...
Classes, races of people simply have to be taken out of the picture if everyone else is to survive and if civilization is to survive.
There are times when nations and empires and cultures have to literally sweat blood in order to continue to exist, to get rid of the diseased elements, so to speak.
And we have a situation like that in this country.
So the only way that we can preserve our civilization, our race...
Any kind of future for ourselves is, yes, to make generalizations.
This idea that you can't ever generalize and that you've got to take everybody as individuals is essentially a Jewish idea in itself.
It's one of those shades of gray wherein the Jews thrive.
That's one of the ways that the Jews have been able to do what they've been able to do for the past few centuries.
they have been able to eliminate black and white, right and wrong, and they have created one vast ocean of shades of gray, of ambiguity, wherein they can slither like reptiles, etc.
So that may not be making much sense, Well, Harold, we're out of time.
Thank you for being a guest.
Mark, thank you for your call.
And I'll be back tomorrow morning, same time, same place.
And we'll talk to you all then.
Thank you all very much for listening.
Bye-bye.
▲
Export Selection