Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Sept. 23, 2010 - Radio Free Nortwest - H.A. Covington

01:59:17

20100923_rfn

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Oh, then tell me, Sean O 'Farrell, tell me why you hurry so.
	Hush your vocal, hush and listen, and his cheeks were all aglow.
	I bear orders from the captain, get you ready quick and soon For the pikes will ski together by the rising of the moon By the rising of the moon, by the rising of the moon, For the pikes must be together by the rising of the moon.
	Oh, then tell me, Sean O'Farrell, where the gathering is to be, In the old spot by the river, rifle known to you and me.
	One more roar for signal, token whistle, up the marching tune, For your pike upon your shoulder by the rising of the moon.
	By the rising of the moon, by the rising of the moon, With your pike upon your shoulder by the rising of the moon.
	Out from many a mud wall cabin eyes were watching through the night, Many a manly chest was throbbing for the blessed morning light.
	Wars passed along the valleys like the man she's lonely crew, And a thousand blades were flashing at the rising of the moon.
	Out from many a mud wall cabin eyes were flashing at the rising of the moon.
	It's September the 23rd, 2010.
	I'm Harold Covington, and this is Radio Free Northwest.
	This is going to be a special Radio Free Northwest in that I'm going to use this one as a kind of FAQ broadcast.
	There are certain questions and issues regarding the Northwest migration and the Northwest Front that come up time and again, which I've dealt with over and over and over, and which I'm sure some of our regular listeners are getting tired of hearing about.
	What I'll do in this broadcast is to try and deal with these recurring issues here definitively, and from now on, whenever they come up, I'll refer people to RFN number 35, dated September 3rd, 2010, for their answer.
	That means I'm going to have to cover a lot of ground in this podcast, so this one will probably run a bit longer than usual.
	One thing I want to clarify before I begin, though, whenever I respond to these recurring questions and objections and naysays, possibly because I have dealt with them so many times before, I often sound like I'm being contemptuous and running the people who make these objections down.
	I don't mean to sound like that.
	I understand perfectly that without hundreds of solid supporters out there, I couldn't accomplish even as little as I do, so I would certainly never intentionally alienate someone for any reason.
	I also understand that many of you who come up with these, let's call them sidetracks or diversions, honestly do believe that you are the first person ever to think of this, whatever it is.
	Well, no, you're not.
	I've been an advocate of Northwest migration for 10 years now, and I think I can honestly state that there is not a single objection or naysay or cavil or question that I have not heard and dealt with already.
	This is the purpose of this podcast, to serve as a kind of canned answer to some of the common issues that people bring up.
	All that having been said, people, we have got to get our heads together.
	We have the plan now, the Northwest migration.
	There's nothing else, and realistically, there will be nothing else.
	Events in the outside world, the real world, have finally caught up with us, and at long last our window of opportunity is visible on the horizon.
	It's hurtling towards us with the speed of a freight train, and we're going to have to jump on that train as it passes.
	It's not going to stop for us.
	If we miss that train, it's long gone, and God knows when another one will come by.
	Probably longer than we can afford to wait.
	We have to be ready to take that window of opportunity when it offers.
	We are nowhere near ready now, and it's making me tear my hair out and bang my head against the wall and rage in frustration.
	So when I sound a bit testy sometimes, that's why.
	Okay, first, Cavill, which I get every so often, words to the effect of, Harold, in your novels and the Northwest Front literature, you're advocating violence and illegality.
	A close cousin to this particular cavil is that we are quote-unquote preaching hate.
	Now, first off, let me explain the whole philosophy behind what I do and behind these podcasts specifically.
	For many years, what passes for a white resistance movement in America has consisted almost completely of news commentary, which is the pablum of the right wing.
	It's always been, oh, look at this.
	Look what they're doing to us now.
	Oh, it's just so horrible.
	Isn't it just so awful what the Jews and the government and the Bilderbergers are doing now?
	Please, please send me money so I can keep on telling you how horrible it all is.
	For 60 years, out of hundreds of right-wing and racial groups and personalities, it's been all news commentary, whining and complaining, and there's been virtually I can't make white people brave again or give them the moral courage of our ancestors.
	They have to find that within themselves.
	But I want to at least remove the taboo on thinking and speaking about solutions to our racial and political problems that will actually bring about change.
	Real change you can believe in, if you'll pardon the expression.
	If I so chose, I could spend this more or less hour every week ranting and raving about Obongo and the Jews who are running him like Rahm Emanuel, David Axelrod, and Cass Sunstein.
	I could rant and rave about the economy or unemployment or the foreclosure crisis or the banks or the Federal Reserve or Israel or the Bilderbergers, so forth and so on and so on.
	And in the long run, there would be no difference between me and the Northwest Front and, say, American Free Press or WorldNetDaily or Newsmax.com or even Rush Limbaugh.
	I could spend all my time doing what all the other groups and spokesholes and personalities do, rabbiting on and on and on about the problem, discussing and dissecting the problem in a hundred different ways and uttering not one whisper about the solution or about the terrible flaws in our own character which prevent us from taking that solution.
	But at some point, somebody has to talk about these things out loud.
	We at the Northwest Front and we in the Northwest migration movement have to be different if for no other reason than we are so small and so destitute that we can't possibly compete with some of these larger groups and websites when it comes to news commentary.
	If I'm going to somehow obtain enough of a market share, pardon the expression, in order to place the Northwest Front at the head of first the movement and then the white community as a whole, then I have to start out by being different.
	I'm going to have to talk primarily about the two topics which up until now we have avoided like the plague, solutions and character.
	Now, first off, let's deal with this idea that what the NF and white nationalists in general advocate is some kind of hate.
	It's nothing of the kind, of course.
	Our cause is the survival of our race, but then the media and our lords and masters have never been too interested in the facts of the truth.
	Knowing the natural propensity of humans to gravitate towards the positive rather than the negative, the Jews have succeeded in calling the good bad and the bad good, and they've achieved a monumental propaganda victory by getting the vast majority of the public to believe it.
	Through their control of the media, churches, and other outlets, the Jews have seized control of the parameters of discussion and thought.
	By declaring what is moral and what is immoral for the rest of us to hear and say and think, the Jews have seized the moral high ground on all issues, especially those dealing with race and culture.
	Unfortunately, most people these days have not developed the adequate historical knowledge or the political awareness necessary to understand how today's morality has changed from that of our people's long past.
	Most white people today haven't got a clue that indeed most of the famous people in history from Plato to Thomas Jefferson would be considered hateful bigots by today's liberal standards.
	There can be no greater morality than that of the survival of the white race, and yet this is the first age in history where those who hold this viewpoint are widely viewed as evil and immoral, as haters.
	Ninety years ago, a politician had a hard time getting elected in the South without Ku Klux Klan support.
	When the Klan marched, they marched in broad daylight down the streets of major cities to the cheers of an adoring public.
	At a rally today, 50 or so Klansmen need police protection from the hundreds and thousands of jeering fools and scum.
	While this has much to do with the declining state of the overall quality of our movement, it also reflects the sheer magnitude of the Jewish victory over our minds.
	What we think and say and teach is the truth.
	What the Jews and the United States government say is lies.
	It's that damn simple.
	The truth is not hatred.
	It is simply the truth.
	The truth can never be offensive.
	It simply is.
	Is a man called a hater for loving his own family more than the family of another?
	If a man prefers his own wife over another, does this mean he hates all other women?
	And yet this is the logic that our enemies often use when they accuse us of hatred for loving or preferring our own racial family more than another.
	The racial enemy, the Jews and their lick-spittle lackeys in the media, have taken this noblest of all ideals, that is, the preservation of God's creation, and turned it into something twisted and evil.
	They've taken what is perfectly natural and right, the innate propensity of people to prefer their racial kindred, and called it hatred and bigotry.
	But so what if we do hate?
	Some things and some people deserve to be hated.
	To hate what is wrong and what does harm to ourselves and to the people we love is a perfectly logical, understandable human reaction.
	There is nothing wrong with hatred if properly placed, but we have to make sure that our Northwest movement is not about hatred.
	It has to be about building a new society based on the natural and historic order of things.
	Justice, which is the inevitable consequence of white rule, will occur without the useless fog of fury that clouds the mind in times when a clear mind will be needed the most.
	There's a thin line between hatred and justice, and we do have to make sure that we never lose sight of it.
	Now, on the advocating violence thing, I'm not advocating anything of the kind.
	That would be illegal, and God forbid that I should ever break the precious laws of our wonderful lords and masters in the District of Columbia.
	Oh, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, perish the thought.
	I'm simply making a few perfectly valid observations and asking a few pointed questions about human nature.
	Is there anybody out there who is really still dumb enough Vote our way out of this mess?
	Come on now.
	If for no other reason, although white people aren't yet a purely numerical minority in North America, we are now effectively outnumbered at the polls due to the archaic electoral college system that swings most of the power to choose a president to the large minority-heavy states like California, Florida, New York, and Illinois.
	And the same thing is the case on House of Representatives apportionment.
	We're simply outnumbered now.
	Look at what happened in 2008 when a combination of foreign money from George Soros and massive vote fraud on the part of Acorn put a nigger in the White House.
	Now, does anyone really believe that racially conscious white men will ever again command that kind of money and power and influence?
	And remember, the very purpose of democracy is to prevent change.
	Look, occasionally we do get dumbasses who believe that the world I portray in my Northwest novels is real.
	And they're going to arrive up here in the homeland and be handed a rifle and told to go out and shoot somebody by the NVA.
	They get disillusioned real quick.
	Right now, the Northwest Front operates on a basis of complete legality.
	Someday that may change, but obviously I'm not going to sit here and discuss that.
	Legality is a tactic, nothing more, nothing less, for the purpose of ensuring that we can continue to function.
	For now, legality is our position, though.
	And I do, in fact, tell people, time and again, not to engage in illegal acts.
	And I've done so repeatedly on several previous occasions on these podcasts.
	But I'll be happy to do it again.
	Guys, do not break the law.
	Don't even jaywalk or spit on the sidewalk.
	And I mean it.
	This is not just something I'm saying to cover my ass.
	You do no good.
	To anyone in prison, not to yourself and not to the Northwest Republic.
	Okay, moving right along here.
	Next question.
	What makes the Northwest Front different from all these other groups?
	A legitimate question in view of the fact that, as yet, our listenership consists mostly of people who have some movement experience and who've been burned by previous fearless leaders.
	Well, actually, a lot of things make the NF different from all the others, and I'll do my best to hit the high points.
	First and foremost, the Northwest Front has a plan.
	It's called the Butler Plan, and it's in the party manual, the white book.
	The others don't have a plan.
	None of them, at all.
	Northwest Front, plan.
	All of the others, no plan.
	It's that damn simple.
	Are we clear on this now?
	Good.
	That's the first thing that makes us different.
	The second thing that makes the Northwest Front different from all the others is that our group is deed-based rather than word-based.
	All the other groups' central purpose or litmus test or reason for being is based on something that you say.
	The Northwest Front is based on something that you do, specifically coming here to the Pacific Northwest to make your life here and to join in the struggle for a sovereign and independent white nation.
	These other so-called white groups, those that are left anyway these days, demand that you fill out a form and or pay so much money per month and then you're in like Flint.
	Now, we demand of our people that they commit a completely legal physical act, specifically, that they come here to the Northwest.
	Other organizations have membership cards.
	With the Northwest Front, your membership card is your zip code.
	The rest of the movement responds to this existential crisis of civilization our race is facing by tap-tap-tap-tapping on a computer keyboard and, maybe once in a blue moon, having a little meeting in a rented motel banquet room, where they eat rubber chicken served by Mexican and nigger waiters, where they can stand up and whine about how bad things are and pass around a few books and pamphlets describing the Jewish world conspiracy, so forth and so on.
	The same information that was available 50 years ago.
	The same thing we were doing 50 years ago.
	Except not nearly so many people at the rubber chicken dinners these days.
	Meet, eat, and retreat, and then shuffle out into the darkness while the third world waiters clear away the debris and set the table for the Rotary Club luncheon tomorrow.
	That's it, the whole John Mert Society shtick.
	That's all the existing movement is doing about our impending racial extinction.
	Unless you want to count posting a lot of deranged and childish rubbish on V-bullets and internet forums, which I don't.
	Now, there's something else that makes the Northwest Front different from the rest, a mindset that I've discussed before, but I'll give it another whack.
	Throughout the so-called movement, deeply embedded therein, there runs a streak of profound and overpowering defeatism.
	The terrible fact is that most of us have accepted in our own mind that our race is completely doomed.
	That there is nothing that can actually be done to save our people or Western civilization, and that any attempt to try is foredoomed and very dangerous.
	The Northwest Front rejects that, absolutely.
	I say again that our whole strategy is based on one primary actual physical act, a deed, which, although it's perfectly legal, will eventually lead to revolution, because in addition to its strategic and tactical value, Homecoming produces a profound moral and psychological victory.
	It breaks the pattern of passive acceptance and gets white people back into the habit of doing rather than saying.
	It puts an end to the interminable tap, tap, tap, tap, tap.
	At least it will do if we can fix our character problem.
	Now, there's something else.
	Growing out of this sense of hopeless defeatism...
	There is also, some of us think, some kind of tacit agreement that we have with Zog.
	This is especially common among the so-called leaders in the existing movement, such as they are and such as it is.
	You see, these people know in their hearts that they don't really mean it, and they think that Zog knows and accepts that as well, and so will refrain from crushing them just so long as we don't actually rock the boat.
	Well, they're half right.
	Let's be honest, guys.
	Collectively speaking, most of us don't really know.
	Mean any of this racial stuff we babble about on the internet?
	I mean, come on.
	For once, let's tell it like it is.
	If we meant any of this, we wouldn't be babbling about it on the internet.
	We'd be out there in the real world doing real things.
	Barefoot Iraqis and Afghans with nothing but an AK-47 and a couple of magazines can fight against the same tyrant who oppresses us, and they do so with success.
	We can't, apparently.
	These people that we despise and whom we call ragheads and sand niggers will fight.
	We won't.
	The difference is simple.
	They believe.
	We don't.
	It's time we looked a brutal fact in the face.
	None of us feels sufficiently strongly about our so-called racial ideals to place our physical bodies at risk of death, prison, pain, or even moderately uncomfortable physical exercise.
	We know that life for our children and grandchildren is going to be a hell that we cannot even imagine.
	And we do nothing about it because it's too hard and too dangerous, the armchair is too soft, the beer is too cold, and the nachos are too salty and tasty.
	And we're just going to do like our own grandfathers and our own fathers did.
	We're just going to sit back, enjoy the ride as much as we can, and we're going to let our children and our grandchildren fend for themselves.
	That's been the unspoken movement attitude for 50 years.
	And then along comes this horrible Northwest migration led by the horrible Harold.
	For the first time, we have a chance to change ourselves inside by adopting a simple program, the Butler Plan, and just acting on it.
	Really doing it, and not just talking about it.
	It's safe and it's legal.
	The only danger is economic, and that can be avoided as well with a little effort in advanced planning.
	Now, laying aside the merits of the idea itself for the moment, what is the Northwest migration?
	It is first and foremost an act.
	It involves physical motion, doing physical things like packing one's possessions into a van, driving up an interstate highway to the Northwest homeland, not sitting behind a computer screen and playing in the artificial virtual movement that exists on the V-bulletin boards and the internet forums.
	These acts are not of themselves illegal.
	The Northwest novels are fiction.
	There's no NVA yet.
	In real life, no one's asking you to shoot anybody or detonate a bomb or break a single law that will get you in trouble.
	Northwest migration is completely lawful, and once the preliminary hurdles are overcome, it's actually in your self-interest, since the Northwest is one of the very few remaining decent places to live on this continent.
	As an aside, I have yet to hear of anyone leaving here once they get properly settled in and established.
	I've heard of people turning down six-figure salaries rather than relocate from the Northwest back to California or Chicago.
	But at the risk of repeating myself to the point of boring you, I cannot emphasize enough that the precedent of doing rather than talking is what makes us different.
	Somehow, down through the years, we have bought into this false idea that knowledge alone is enough.
	How many times have we heard this business about, well, we have to educate our own people, and when this or that happens, it'll wake white people up.
	Okay, but once you get white people awake, what then?
	We have to somehow break out of this paralyzed mindset that prevents us from acting.
	The Northwest Front is the beginning of that process, and this is what makes us different.
	First music break.
	Since I'm mostly repeating stuff on this podcast that I've already gone over here on several occasions before, I think I'll replay some of my favorite music from past podcasts.
	Let's start out with The Hills of Peace by Frederick the Great of Prussia.
	The Hills of Peace by Frederick the Great of Prussia
	The Hills of Peace by Frederick the Great of Prussia
	Thank you.
	Right, I just played that first part back, and I admit I got a little bit long-winded when I was discussing those first couple of questions.
	I promise I'll try to tighten things up and cut down on the babble, because we have a lot to get through in this podcast.
	The next few issues I need to deal with, I think, are basic misconceptions as to the whole nature of Northwest migration.
	I don't want to call these misconceptions heresies, because this is not a religion.
	I don't want to call them errors, because that makes me sound arrogant and patronizing, like I claim to know everything and be right all the time, which I don't.
	So let's just call these things sidetracks or distractions, because they sidetrack us and distract us from building a proper independence movement and preparing for the establishment of a sovereign nation here in the Northwest.
	Now, while most of these sidetracks and distractions are sincerely believed by the people who speak about them, in all honesty, I have to point out that a lot of these sidetracks are basically excuses for us to continue to do nothing, and above all, excuses for us to avoid confronting the United States and its armed men.
	Guys, we can't be making these excuses anymore.
	We have to act, or else our race really is going to become extinct within the next century.
	The first thing we have to do is to stop trying to think up excuses to avoid personal risk and inconvenience, because there's no way that anything can ever be accomplished without risk and inconvenience.
	A good rule of thumb we need to adopt in the white resistance movement is, if it's easy and safe, then it probably won't work.
	Okay, first let's deal with what I suppose might be called the survivalist sidetrack.
	Northwest migration as a purely personal survival project and not as a political act.
	The idea that Northwest migration means run away and hide in a wee cabin in the Northwoods where Obama can't find us.
	Well, you can do that if you want, so long as you at least hide out in a little cabin here in the Northwest.
	At least that'll get you into the ballpark.
	But I have two words for you, folks.
	Ruby Ridge.
	Ask Randy Weaver how well trying to hide out in the woods worked out for him.
	The FBI spent hundreds of thousands of dollars to spy on Randy and his family in their cabin, and they arranged an Edgar Steele-style frame-up to try and put him in prison on a bogus gun charge through a law that shouldn't even exist at all.
	And the man never did anything at all to anyone.
	He just sat out there in the woods all on his own, and yet the government could not abide that.
	They could not allow this one man and his family to separate themselves from the world of Ronald McDonald and MTV.
	They wouldn't let Randy Weaver do it, and they won't let you do it either.
	Because, you see, the great liberal lefty hippy-dippy utopia, where everybody lives off a government check and runs around grazing in the grass and screwing everything with a pulse and the Democrats rule forever.
	Can't work unless everybody is forced to participate.
	You can't be allowed to opt out because it's such a basically shitty and degenerate dream and such an unnatural way to live that if people were allowed to opt out in any way, most white people would do so.
	And the liberal brave new world can't exist without white people.
	Otherwise, you don't have a brave new world.
	All you've got is the third world, if you get my drift.
	A similar sidetrack is the Beaver Cleaverville idea, the idea that we find some little isolated town in Idaho or wherever and build a 1950s theme park complete with white bread, Ozzie Nelson cardigans, bobby socks, some good old-fashioned whitewashed Protestant churches for Sundays, the red, white, and blue, and the whole Pat Boone scenario.
	That's also known as the Brady Bunch fantasy, i.e.
	the idea that we can somehow turn back the clock.
	The trouble is, that's not possible.
	And the problem is, as I've just said, they won't let us do it in any case.
	Folks, I get it.
	Believe me, I do.
	There are a lot of people out there who share this dream.
	I know.
	I talk to them online every day.
	These folks want to create Beaver Cleaverville, and I get that 100%.
	It's a white thing.
	It means they have good racial instincts.
	The white man has a long pastoral history of living on small farmsteads and in very small towns, which provide a few simple goods and services.
	It's a good way of life, one that's natural to us.
	I understand that.
	It was like that for the first 150 years or so in this country before capitalism and the Jews began economically squeezing us all into the cities where we could be more easily controlled and where they could profit from our labor.
	And for many generations, white Americans have been seeking some way to escape back into this wonderful time we seem to remember in our chromosomes.
	But we can't.
	Folks, I don't know how else to say this.
	The clock of history and human events runs forward.
	Always.
	It cannot be turned back.
	The past is the past.
	We have to start looking to the future, and we have to accept that that future is going to be a lot different from what we might want it to be.
	The North American continent now contains massive numbers of completely unassimilable non-whites who do not share this dream and who will never share it, and who will never fit into any such scenario.
	Remember, there were no mosques or taco stands or nigger gangbangers in the Beavers' hometown, and the Brady Bunch never had to deal with crack cocaine or sodomy.
	Well, at least not on the television screen.
	The actors were a different story, but we won't get into that.
	Whether we like it or not, those things and worse are what America is all about these days, and the dirt can't be scrubbed or vacuumed or sandblasted away.
	Then there is the uncomfortable truth that if anyone ever did succeed in creating Beaver Cleaverville in some small valley here in Idaho or in Alabama or anywhere else, eventually the lumbering thugs in the body armor with the automatic weapons would come.
	They would make up some excuse like they did with the Branch Davidians or the Texas Mormons or the Weaver family.
	The United States Marshals and FBI will come in the dawn and drag the Cleavers away into living hell because, as I say again, the only way that any American version of the liberal's brave new world will ever work is if...
	Everybody participates either voluntarily or by force because the brave new world of the liberals is so utterly repugnant to the human spirit that if you give people an out, they will eventually take it and nobody will be left in the wonderful new paradise for people like Rahm Emanuel and Arianna Huffington and Al Franken and Jon Stewart to lord it over and feel superior to.
	And we can't have that now, can we?
	The United States of America has proven time and again that they will brutally punish anyone who tries to separate themselves from the brave new world of Bill and Hillary Clinton and Barack Hussein Obama.
	Ask Bill White.
	Ask Edgar Steele.
	And if you dare to resist, their snipers will gun you down in your own doorway like they did to Vicki Weaver.
	And they'll burn your home to the ground with you and your family inside, just like they did the Branch Davidians.
	I know it's been 17 years since Waco, but to me it's like yesterday, and I know all of you must have seen the video footage.
	I don't know how anybody can watch that burning compound with the children inside all those years ago and not get the message, but apparently an awful lot of our people don't.
	Folks, we can indeed build such a white paradise here in the Pacific Northwest, but first we have a revolution to win.
	There can be no hope for white people without a nation-state of our own, only for us.
	We can indeed create your Beaver Cleaverville many times over, but only once we have removed the evil people who now rule us and taken our political and racial destiny back into our own hands.
	We must someday confront the United States and its armed men, and we must begin preparing for that day now.
	Guys, if you learn nothing else from anything I have ever written or said, burn this into your brains.
	Nothing can be accomplished without state power in our hands, not theirs.
	Somehow, sometime, we must find within ourselves the courage and the will to confront the powers of darkness and defeat them.
	There's no way out, no matter how we may try to wriggle and rationalize our way off the hook.
	At some point we fight, or someday we die.
	All of us.
	This would be a good lead-in to address the whole question of white enclaves as opposed to a whole new nation.
	Now, just as the Northwest idea is not original with me, the idea has been around almost 40 years now, so is the idea of establishing small local white enclaves rather than a whole new white nation.
	It's a concept that's been around for quite a while.
	On the Internet, this idea is best expressed in what's called the Pioneer Little Europe, or PLE.
	The basic idea is that since there's tens of thousands and indeed hundreds of thousands of white nationalists, depending on how broad your definition of white nationalism is, now the question is this, what if we could get all of us to move to some little town or medium-sized city like Peoria, Illinois, which was Matt Haley's, And then we get everybody registered to vote and we take We get our own sheriff who hires only white nationalist deputies.
	We get our own mayor and county commissioners and our own dog catchers, so forth and so on, thereby creating our own white enclave or reservation or bantu stand, whatever you want to call it.
	Now, this kind of thing has been done before.
	The Rajneesh cult took over a small town here in Argon for a couple of years in the 1980s by bringing in thousands of cult members to live in their commune and outvoting the locals.
	And the Scientologists have done the same in some small town in Florida whose name escapes me at the moment, and I believe they voted in their own city council, which for all I know may still be the case.
	And granted, all of this sounds very logical and convincing.
	On the internet.
	Like everything else to do with us, it's when we try to take it off the internet and into the real world that the problems start cropping up.
	And when you look a little closer, there are a lot of problems with this whole PLE concept, both practical and ideological problems.
	Now, we'll deal with the practical ones first.
	The first practical difficulty which emerges with the PLE idea is that same perennial problem that all of white nationalism has, that of character, the perennial disconnect between what is said and what is done.
	This weird idea we have that to articulate a problem is to solve it.
	The complete lack of any connection in our own minds between what we say on the internet and what we do in our real world lives.
	We're not weirded out cult members and we simply don't have the kind of brainwashed discipline to pack up and move whenever and wherever some guru tells us to.
	Oh, would it were so!
	With white people, us and the libertarians and the Christian fundamentalists, everybody wants to talk about it on the internet and nobody wants to actually do it.
	And we're waiting for somebody else to give us permission.
	We're waiting for somebody else to go first, just like with the Northwest.
	Why the hell do you think I'm on here every week begging and pleading for people to come home?
	And it's not just us.
	The libertarians are running into the same problem with their New Hampshire migration, and the Christian fundamentalists are running into it with their South Carolina migration.
	I think they've gotten maybe a dozen families each actually to make the move, and their assets, resources, and communications are far better than ours.
	We all have the same situation.
	The poor character, apathy, and lack of seriousness of the white population, who are basically consumer animals, 20th century economic units of production and consumption.
	They don't want to move anywhere.
	They want to go to the mall.
	They want all their problems solved in place by some magical, fearless leader, so they don't have to exert any effort or take any risk.
	And that's how certain fearless leaders make a living off the movement.
	They promise white people that all these terrible problems can be solved without blood and sweat and tears, without packing a moving van and above all, without ever having to show strength and courage and confront the United States and its armed men.
	And white people desperately, desperately want to believe them, which is why I have as much difficulty as I do getting through to people.
	I don't tell white people what they want to hear and I get stoned for it.
	We come up with these brilliant ideas on the internet.
	We talk it to death, and then when it comes time for somebody to give up their precious leisure time off work to get behind the wheel of their car and do some long-distance driving to meet people in the flesh, or open their checkbook and write a man-sized check with some serious zeros on it, all of a sudden we become frightened.
	We lose interest and we start wandering away, surfing the net for some other form of entertainment.
	Yes, you don't need to remind me.
	There are honorable exceptions to this.
	More and more of them.
	I've met some of them this month, in fact.
	And slowly but surely, we are identifying these people, contacting them, and getting them all ginned up to make the move.
	But this process is way, way too slow, and I'm really worried that events will overtake us while we're waiting for whites to make up their mind.
	There are an abundance of internet rumors about mysterious PLEs that are supposed to be...
	Set up here, there, and everywhere.
	Now, as nearly as I can determine, and I've done my best to track some of these stories down, none of this seems to be actually happening except in a small way here in the Northwest through the Northwest Front.
	It seems to be one of our neurotic ways of dealing with the fact that none of us are actually doing doodly squat, that we make up these stories about all kinds of secret activity and revolutionary happenings that the Jew media is suppressing, of course.
	But none of it's really happening.
	The few times that anyone even vaguely white and racial has actually done anything physical and in the real world, we see how the media reacts in real life.
	They don't suppress it.
	They descend like a cloud of shrieking vampire bats on whatever hapless group of white boys happens to have screwed up and actually done something.
	Ask April Gaty up in Kalispell.
	She gets hit with a media-feeding frenzy almost every week.
	And besides, as far as mysterious and secret...
	I simply don't believe that we're capable of keeping a secret like that.
	There's no secret PLEs out there except for our own tiny primary settlement areas here in the Northwest.
	I do know that there are small groups of Christian identity people in certain small towns in Idaho, mostly left over from the Butler days.
	Maybe half a dozen families or so apiece, but I don't know if you'd call that a PLE.
	In the long run, the biggest problem with enclaves in general is that they would be too small to survive on their own and they would necessarily be surrounded by hostile territory.
	One of the main objections to setting up a homeland in an area like, say, New England is that it would be too small.
	The existing United States military would be able to surround it and occupy it, something that these Vermont secessionists and New Hampshire libertarians can't seem to wrap their minds around.
	Landlocked enclaves would be very difficult to keep supplied with the necessities of life that they'd have to import from somewhere else, since the land space and possibly the airspace surrounding the enclave would be controlled by the Americans or by other hostiles, the Aslan, Mexicans, or whatever the situation is that might arise in years to come.
	Look at what the Israelis are doing to Gaza and the West Bank, even as we speak, and you'll see the problem with small enclaves surrounded by superior military force.
	Do you want your children living like the children of Gaza are forced to exist?
	I know I've said that we're talking about a Soviet-style collapse, but we don't yet know for sure precisely how the dissolution of the United States is going to come about.
	Will it be bit by bit?
	Will it be one huge collapse?
	How much military force will the United States still command?
	Will the military itself mutiny?
	Will they just sell their weapons for food and wander away like a lot of the Soviet military in Eastern Europe did in the 1990s?
	Will they transfer their allegiance to smaller states and entities that can actually pay them like the Soviet military did?
	We just don't know these things yet.
	If the Zionist regime in Washington DC remains in even partial power, then some small white enclave attempting to secede would be surrounded by a bitterly hostile enemy and would eventually be overrun and destroyed.
	A new white nation in North America needs to possess certain geographic, demographic, and economic assets in order to be viable.
	We need a lot of geography.
	There would have to be a lot of room to grow into, since we'll be taking in the remnants of white populations from the world over.
	The Northwest is so big that the United States simply can't occupy all of it.
	The Americans can't put a soldier or a cop behind every Douglas fir.
	A new white nation will need a coastline with deep-water harbors so that all access to the country would not rely on overflying or overland travel through hostile territory.
	There'll have to be some kind of navy to resist blockade.
	Imagine what would happen if the wretched inhabitants of the enclave of Gaza were strong enough and had a navy and an air force to break the Israeli blockade.
	There will have to be mineral resources, sufficient arable and pasture land to grow our own food, and a sufficient infrastructure in manufacturing, energy, transportation, and so forth, so that the new nation will have a chance to survive and prosper and take in the millions of white people who will eventually flee to the homeland from the ends of the earth, which are still controlled by the Zionists and the liberals.
	The Pacific Northwest has all these things.
	No other contiguous part of the continent does.
	Oh, and by the way, all of the above also applies to little 20-acre compounds as well.
	I went over that one just a couple of weeks ago, and I'll do you all the courtesy of assuming that after the Branch Davidian and Montana Freeman and Ed and Lorraine Brown sieges, you can all figure out why our holing up on one little piece of property is even more hopeless than our trying to take over some little town and turn it into Beaver Cleaverville.
	Right, second music break.
	Actually, I think we'll probably have more than three music breaks in this one because of the length of the podcast, but this is a song from the Civil War, actually from the border war between Missouri and Kansas, which is one of the bloodiest aspects of that particular conflict and one which has gotten very little in the way of media and historical attention.
	Anyway, it's about a girl from Missouri who falls in love with a dashing young rebel longrider.
	This is Kathy Barton and Dave Parra.
	Music
	I wrote out one morning to see what I could see I fell in love with a pretty little girl We're
	I love the gorilla man, love the gorilla man Whisper low in mother's ear, I love the gorilla man My daughter, oh dear daughter, I can't Treat me so To leave your dear old mother And
	with a gorilla We're good
	I'm a ruffle shirt that wears a ruffle shirt Rather have a bill of man that wears a ruffle shirt I've undone up my clothing, my true love by my side And I roam this town Be a gorilla bride.
	Roll this country over and be a gorilla bride.
	With his pockets lined with silver, a pistol in each hand A long life and full success to the roving gorilla man To the roving gorilla man A long life and full success to the roving gorilla man I am
	the roving gorilla The road from town to town And here I spy a pretty little girl
	With joy I do sit down With joy I do sit down Every pocketbook I spy With joy I slide her down With joy I do sit down
	First off, let me explain that I'm talking about Tea Partiers and other people who are basically sincere and who are motivated by genuine anger and fear for the future.
	I don't mean established neocons or talk radio hosts like Rush Limbaugh and Glenn Beck.
	I mean real white people, grassroots conservatives, from whom we will be drawing a very large number of our recruits here on the Northwest Front as soon as we can get them to grow out of their conservatism and become revolutionary in outlook.
	What are we talking about here?
	Commander Rockwell once said, A National Socialist is someone who is concerned about his race.
	A conservative is only concerned about his money.
	Now, that pretty much hits the nail on the head.
	Not just National Socialism, but Christian identity and all kinds of genuinely revolutionary white concepts are concerned with race, with the effect of race on every issue from culture to religion to politics to science, not just economics.
	Race is the American issue and has been since Columbus first landed on that Caribbean island and chucked his flagpole in the sand on the beach and claimed the New World for the King and Queen of Spain.
	The basic issue is whose land this is.
	An American conservative may have the odd social issue on his agenda, like abortion or prayer in the schools or whatever, and most likely he's against gun control.
	But the fact remains that primarily he simply doesn't want to be taxed in order to support non-white minorities with black and brown skins.
	He has to work, he never had anything given to him in his life, and he doesn't see why people with black and brown skins should get a free ride on his back.
	We're often reminded that our ancestors revolted against Britain over a simple tax on tea, and while that's a gross oversimplification of the situation in 1776, it's close enough for our purposes.
	It's humanly understandable, of course.
	Nobody likes paying taxes.
	But to view life through any economics-only perspective is essentially a Jewish construct.
	Remember what I've said in the past about the essence of the Jewish worldview being pure materialism, not spiritual, not political, not moral, not human.
	You also need to understand that in the American context, there are several different kinds of conservatives.
	The two that we need to be concerned with now are what's known as paleoconservatives and neoconservatives.
	Paleoconservatives are your old red, white, and blue Pat Buchanan and Sam Francis types.
	They believe in limited government, states' rights, strict construction of the Constitution, unrestricted free enterprise, your basic laissez-faire capitalism.
	These are the guys who would have been right at home during the presidency of William McKinley back in 1900.
	The neoconservatives are basically Jews pretending to be conservatives.
	People like Irving Kristol and the whole Gooboo Jew crew who took over the White House for eight years when Juggiers Bush was president.
	The spiritual founder of neoconservatism, in fact, was a Jewess named Ayn Rand, or Ayn Rand, whose real name was Elisa Rosenbaum.
	I think most of you listening to this will be sufficiently familiar with what I'm talking about, so I don't have to go off into a long spiel about who's what and why and all the details.
	You can get all that info from other sources.
	But the conservatives who concern us here in the Northwest are not these ideological guru types from the think tanks who argue about how many mettoids can dance on the head of the pin.
	They're part of the establishment.
	The ones we need to be concerned with are those who are not part of the establishment, the ordinary white people who have emerged from these town hall meetings and tea parties over the past year.
	They represent something that hasn't been seen in this country for a long time, not really since the Wallace for President campaign of 1968.
	They're a genuine grassroots movement of white resistance against the tyranny from Washington, D.C., mostly against the forced imposition of socialized medicine in the form of Obamacare, but also because more and more white Americans have come to realize that somehow, they're not sure how, a ghastly mistake was made on November 4, 2008, and now there are people ruling them who do not have their best interests at heart and who want to rob them and take their freedom in many ways that they never would have believed possible before.
	We refer to these people as Tea Partiers because it's a convenient handle, although many of them have probably never attended one of these Tea Party meetings or rallies.
	They're very uneasy and upset about the way that the country and the government in Washington, D.C. are moving, but they are still expressing themselves mostly in economic terms, at least in public.
	The racial undertone is definitely there, though, because for the first time ever, government oppression now has a black face in the form of Obama.
	This has brought about a very subtle change in conservatism in that it's no longer quite so forbidden to mention or at least hint at race.
	The liberal media jump all over anyone who does bring it up, of course, but I don't think that's having the same effect it used to have.
	It's quite obviously just a ploy to shut people up by designating any criticism of Obongo and the Democrats as racism, and it's so obvious that I think it really just pisses people off and makes them much less susceptible to running and hiding under the bed when someone utters the word racist, and that's a very encouraging development.
	What's really going to open the can of worms is that the next big item on the Democrat agenda after Obamacare is going to be so-called immigration reform, in other words, amnesty for the 25 to 30 million or so illegal aliens now unlawfully residing in North America, mostly Hispanic mestizos.
	At that point, when Obama and his Jewish handlers try to legalize all those beaners, I think it's going to be almost impossible to keep race out of the discussion.
	That amnesty thing is going to come to a head after the elections in November.
	Everyone seems to agree that the Republicans are going to seize control of the House and maybe the Senate as well, but I wouldn't be surprised to see Obongo call the lame-duck Democratic Congress back into session in November and then ram an amnesty bill through, since the Democratic members of Congress will either be already bounced by the voters...
	And on their way out, or else they won't have to worry about re-election for another two years.
	They'll go ahead and pass the amnesty no matter how much the Republicans in the Tea Party jump and shout and holler.
	The object of the Democrat game plan will be, of course, to do this in such a way that the newly amnestied beaners can get registered to vote and enter the polling booths in 2012.
	But still in all, the fact is that most of the Tea Party people and Rush Limbaugh and Glenn Beck listeners who comprise this growing grassroots movement of white resistance are in it for economic reasons and because their own economic ox is being gored.
	Many of them are out of work and more will be as the months and years roll on.
	Unemployment benefits are running out and many of them are having their homes foreclosed on and there doesn't look to be any real recovery coming in any future that anybody can foresee.
	Grassroots conservatives know that something is very badly wrong and they're starting to get a few vague glimpses and flashes of inspiration in their minds as to what.
	People like Limbaugh and Glenn Beck are giving them a little bit of the story in a very diluted form, but I think these Tea Party types sense that there's a lot more they're not being told.
	I imagine that the reluctance of the establishment conservative types to come to grips with immigration is a dead giveaway.
	Bear in mind, organized conservatism serves the Republican Party, and the Republican Party serves capitalism.
	And it's capitalism that's brought the 30 million illegal aliens here.
	The main defect of these people's outlook is that they've almost no idea about the Jews or the ramifications of the Jewish question.
	Most of them either think Israel is biblical prophecy or else all they know about Jews comes from watching that stupid movie Fiddler on the Roof.
	That's going to be one of our main roles in the coming years, to somehow bring these people to an awareness of the Jewish aspect of their problems.
	It's like A.K. Chesterton said back in the day when discussing the same problem, if they don't name the Jew, their message isn't true.
	But to what end?
	The biggest problem of all is that grassroots Tea Party types still believe that the system can be salvaged.
	They still believe in traditional electoral politics.
	They still believe that they can vote their way out of their problems, and there are major efforts being made by the powers that be, notably Rush Limbaugh, to absorb these people into the Republican Party and to prevent them from striking out on their own politically.
	So long as white people are mentally and spiritually trapped in these outdated and archaic forms of political thought, so long as they're unable to think outside the electoral box, so long as they still believe that the solution lies in pulling a lever in a booth for some guy in a suit, then there will never ever be any real change in the society.
	There is simply no point in holding elections if there are no candidates who represent the white man's racial interests, and these Tea Party people need to be made to see that.
	Always remember, the primary purpose of democracy is to prevent change, to ensure that actual state power is always held and retained by the same class or group of people, even if different individuals are sitting behind the desk in the Oval Office.
	Democracy is one of the most brilliant and effective forms of mass deception ever devised.
	The mighty Wizard of Oz with smoke and noise and mirrors and pay no attention to that little hook-nosed man behind the curtain.
	As long as conservatives and Tea Partiers and Ron Paulites and whoever refuse to acknowledge the issue of race and remain ignorant of the Jewish question, they will never be able to effect any kind of change, and things will keep on getting worse and worse and worse until the white race becomes extinct about a century from now.
	Next question.
	Why do I use forbidden words on here, specifically nigger and kike and faggot and so on?
	And don't I think I would attract a better class of people if I used all the usual polite circumlocutions?
	Okay, I went over this one just a couple of weeks ago, but this is a very commonly asked question, and the answer is important in a spiritual sense, so I'm going to have another go at it.
	And I apologize to those of you to whom this will be old hat.
	Now, before I get into it, I want to take time out and urge all of you that if any of you out there have not read George Orwell's historic novel 1984, I urge you to obtain a copy and do so immediately.
	I myself try to reread this book at least once a year.
	I've probably read it more often than Mein Kampf and White Power combined.
	Even though it was written in 1948, and even though it describes an older, Stalinist form of tyranny, Orwell's novel explains almost everything you always wanted to know about the world we live in today but didn't know who to ask.
	When you get your copy, I recommend that you start with the appendix at the end of the book, which discusses something called Newspeak.
	This is, in my opinion, probably the most brilliant and insightful part of the novel.
	It's an essay on the use and perversion of language in order to control thought, and it's even more applicable today than it was 60 years ago when it was first written.
	This, in essence, is the secret of the Jewish control of our lives.
	They are able to dictate what we think and control what we believe because they select the parameters of discussion and thought, and they decide what ideas and what thoughts are acceptable and what isn't.
	The people who rule us don't give a rat's ass about the poor offended feelings of blacks or spics or even Jews and bugger boys.
	That's not the reason these words are forbidden.
	What the ruling class wants to do is to control our very thoughts by making us afraid to speak certain words out loud for fear of economic retaliation and, in Europe, legal punishment, or, in this country, fear of psychotic violence from non-whites.
	Our masters want us so afraid to speak these words that we censor our own selves so effectively that we don't even think these words or think about the concepts and ideas of racial difference and white superiority that those words convey.
	Our masters don't only want us afraid to say nigger, they don't want us even to think nigger or to be able to think it.
	The wealthy liberals and Jews who rule us don't want white people to think any thought that contradicts what we're taught in our politically correct classrooms or by our left-wing Zionist state media.
	They don't want white people even to have in their minds words that can even so much as formulate forbidden thoughts, never mind express them.
	The long-term goal, as stated in Orwell's 1984, is to make so-called thought crime impossible, because we will lack even the language necessary to formulate forbidden thoughts in our minds.
	This is the reason that I use words like nigger and kike and beaner and faggot, because our slave masters don't want me to, and whatever the regime wants white people not to do, we're under a moral obligation to do as often as possible.
	White people have to break out of this mental straight jacket and recover our freedom of speech and thought, and that first and foremost represents the freedom to say nigger and kike and faggot.
	Because, you see, that's exactly what these people are.
	There is no such thing as an African American.
	There is no such thing as a black person.
	The term person implies an equality with white people which does not, in fact, exist in the real world.
	They are not...
	People, at least not in the same sense that we are.
	They're niggers.
	There is no such thing as a gay person.
	There is nothing gay about filthy and unsanitary perversions that spread loathsome diseases.
	The word homosexual is simply a descriptive term for certain unnatural sexual acts.
	It does not describe the people who commit those acts.
	Those people are faggots.
	Queers, bugger boys, dykes.
	To refer to these people without any negative connotation is to imply that they and their perversions are somehow acceptable in civilized society, and they're not.
	White people and the defenders of Western civilization have to stop letting the enemy define the parameters of discussion and determine what is and is not acceptable by way of thought and language.
	We need to force that power out of their hands and back into ours, preferably with a good sharp crack in the skull from a baseball bat.
	Now, that's another thing we need to be free to at least think.
	We need to be able to encompass in our imaginations the concept of liberals and Jews being forced to do things that we want them to do.
	We need to envision them being compelled to change their behavior.
	We need to see them in our mind's eye being punished for what they have done in the past, and I don't mean by being scolded on blogs.
	The thought is father to the deed, as liberals know full well.
	If we are free to think disrespectfully of minorities and perverts and the system itself, then it's only a matter of time before we start thinking about doing something about them, and bringing about genuine change, and breaking out of the forced respect and subservience which democracy imposes on us.
	And that's what they're really terrified of.
	There is nothing that frightens a Jew or a liberal more than a white man whose mind is not under control.
	Okay, next question, although it really isn't a question, it's a naysay.
	I get this one a lot.
	I ain't gonna move, Harold.
	Or, more often, I get, uh, Harold, I just can't pull up stakes and move to the northwest.
	It's too hard.
	The hill is too steep, and I'm too poor, and oh, isn't it all so horrible?
	Yadda, yadda, yadda.
	Well, the short answer is, fine.
	Stay where you are, right there, while your surroundings get blacker and browner and crappier.
	Until you're the only white person left in your neighborhood, and until you're in your 60s and 70s and you've got iron bars on all your windows, and you don't dare leave the house for fear of being assaulted, robbed, or murdered by niggers or beaners, and then you can cower in your living room all day staring at the TV, wishing to hell you could turn the clock back to 2010 and come home to the Northwest like Harold Covington begged you to do back then.
	Look, people.
	The coming decades are going to be full of problems and chaos everywhere, and one way or the other there will be a lot of migration going on on the part of everybody, a lot of it unwilling and unwanted.
	Northwest migration is a good and sensible answer to a lot of the problems you have in your personal and family life, problems that you will eventually have to deal with one way or the other.
	And while it's not easy, it's always easier to consciously choose to step away before you are forced to leave.
	Much easier than it is to abandon your home in pain and storm and disaster when something happens that makes it simply impossible for you to remain where you are any longer.
	All this talk about standing and fighting is bullshit.
	It's just another excuse not to come home, to avoid risk and inconvenience.
	No one is standing and fighting anywhere.
	For white people, getting out of Dodge is the way to go, to the Northwest, where we can build communities and someday really stand and fight with our own people around us.
	People, things are going to get bad, bad, bad.
	You really should consider leaving where you are and doing it sooner rather than later, because you have little or no hope of successfully remaining in place in the storm that's coming.
	If you wait to make the move until things get much worse...
	How likely is it that you'll be able to sell your house as the area you live in becomes unfit for human habitation?
	You may be worried that you can't get your equity out now.
	What about another five or ten years?
	Do you really want to gamble on the system being able to right itself one last time?
	I mean, you do realize, don't you, that the great housing boom of the early 2000s is gone forever and it's not coming back?
	You may be one of those stubborn people who just says, this is my home and I'm staying here.
	But I got a hot flash for you.
	Your right to live where and how you want is not inviolable.
	When things get worse and worse, no one is going to care about you or what you want or your so-called rights.
	In case you hadn't noticed, white people don't run this country anymore except for the very super rich ones at the top.
	And when something bad happens and you call the police, there's a good chance nowadays that the officer who responds is going to have a black or brown face.
	That means that he hates you for the color of your skin.
	What kind of help or support for your so-called rights do you think you're going to get there?
	Guys, the clock is ticking.
	You damn well better start making serious plans to come home now, while you can still bring with you some of your assets and some of your old life.
	Because when the shit hits the fan, if you can make it out of Pittsburgh or Devil's Johnny House, Tennessee or Milwaukee, you're going to find yourself and your family fleeing Northwest with nothing.
	This is Saga.
	Music
	The sun on the meadow is summer we walk And the stag in the forest runs free We're together to greet the storm Tomorrow belongs to me Tomorrow
	belongs to me The branch on the land is leafy and green And the rain gives its gold Tomorrow belongs to
	me.
	Tomorrow belongs to me The baby
	And its cradle is closing his eyes And the blossom embraces the peak But soon sets the whisper Rise,
	arise Tomorrow belongs to me And tomorrow Tomorrow belongs to me.
	Now fatherland, fatherland, show us the sign.
	Your children have been waiting to see.
	The morning will come when the world is mine.
	tomorrow belongs to me tomorrow belongs to me
	Tomorrow belongs to me Tomorrow belongs to you you you Next question, which I get in all kinds of contexts.
	Dear HAC, why not extend the Northwest Republic to Northern California?
	Or Alaska?
	Or Utah?
	Or South Dakota?
	Or Minnesota?
	Or basically, why not extend the Northwest American Republic to everything west of the Mississippi so I don't have to move?
	As you can guess, this idea comes mostly from people who live in San Francisco or Salt Lake City or Alaska or wherever, and it's basically a matter of they don't want to go to all the hassle and inconvenience of packing a moving van.
	We've been getting this ever since the publication of the first Northwest novels.
	People from Northern California, Alaska, Utah, Colorado, North and South Dakota, all over the show, often come to me suggesting that we include their home states in the projected boundaries of the NAR so that they don't have to move.
	I've seriously had people try to persuade me to include San Francisco and San Jose and Silicon Valley as part of the Northwest homeland so that people living there don't have to move.
	You look on a map, and despite the climate, you'll see just how far south along the California coast San Francisco is.
	As much as I would love to go into that beautiful city with the NVA and the SS and clean out all those filthy faggots and Oakland niggers from top to bottom, to call it part of the Pacific Northwest is absurd.
	Sorry, Greg.
	Now, don't get me wrong.
	I get why these people want me to do this.
	Packing everything you own and moving steaks is an incredible hassle.
	Believe me, I get it.
	I do.
	God knows I should.
	I've done it myself often enough.
	As recently as 1998, at the age of 45, I was forced to reduce my entire life to a single suitcase.
	So I, of all people, know about the stress and aggravation of moving.
	I have nothing at all against these people who are trying to schmooze me into relieving them of the moral responsibility to pack that moving van, and I don't blame them for trying, not at all.
	I just can't let them do it.
	Now remember the whole theory behind what we're trying to do here, which is to concentrate our numbers in a given area to where we can actually form communities, real people living in the real world within half an hour's drive of one another, and begin functioning in the real world as opposed to the internet, and also to reduce the whole problem of white racial survival and revolution to manageable proportions.
	Remember, when the excrement impacts on the revolving blades, we want to be fighting a colonial war, struggling for the independence of a far-flung outpost of empire, far removed from the capital and the centers of wealth and power.
	A backwater that the wealthy Jews and multinational corporate executives of Washington, D.C. and New York and Houston really won't be all that upset about giving up if it has to be done to preserve their power and their profits.
	We need land to grow into as a nation, true, but on the other hand, we have to keep this practical and we mustn't get too greedy.
	There are enough existing racially conscious whites so that if, I say if, we can ever get our act together, lay aside all our petty differences, stop listening to the goat-dancing idiots from the 1990s who hang around V-bulletin boards and still claim to lead us, and finally, unite behind the Northwest migration as every ounce of remaining common sense dictates that we should.
	If we can ever do those things, then we can easily concentrate 10 or 20,000 of us at least in three and a half states.
	That will give us the basis for serious missionary work among the locals so that we can finally begin to draw our personnel not from this damaged and dysfunctional we movement of ours, but directly from the white community.
	Now, that is a major strategic goal.
	We have to break out of the movement bubble.
	We have to start drawing our people directly from the population.
	We could be doing that now, of course, except that nobody in the white population of the Northwest knows that we are here.
	Our websites are stuck on a few hundred hits per day, and we haven't yet figured out how to get any responsible establishment publicity without somebody getting killed and without standing on a street corner holding a sign and wearing a costume and making fools out of ourselves.
	If that ever changes, we'll be on our way.
	But we do still have to reduce the problem to manageable proportions.
	Now, the original proposed white homeland consisted of a core territory of three complete Northwest American states, Idaho, Oregon, and Washington.
	In my novels, I referred to Wyoming, but that was fiction.
	We've since added western Montana largely because of the intensity and dedication of one single female comrade who was forming her own primary settlement area in Kalispell.
	But at some point, guys, we've got to draw the line.
	At various times in the past, other parts of the Northwest have been suggested as potentially forming part of the homeland.
	These include the northern third of California above Redding, the state of Wyoming, The state of Alaska and the present Canadian provinces of British Columbia and Alberta.
	Those Canadian provinces I would especially like to include in the Northwest Republic when the time comes, but they'll be the responsibility of Northwest Front Canada.
	There is a half-assed independence movement in Alaska, but it's kosher conservative and capitalist and Sarah Palin-like in nature, and so it's useless as a vehicle for racial survival.
	There's also a separatist movement with a distinctly racial tinge to it that already exists in Western Canada, but they don't seem to have gotten very far with it.
	Neither have the French and Quebec, as far as that goes.
	The fact is that no separatist movement that attempts to use liberal democracy will ever get very far.
	Remember, the purpose of democracy is to prevent change.
	Now, for the entire three-and-a-half state settlement area, we're looking at a total of almost 300,000 square miles.
	That's a lot of territory to cover, as I can tell you just from one road trip we did to Idaho a few months ago.
	We talk about reducing the scale of the problem, but let me tell you, the Northwest homeland is a big-ass place, and it's going to be hard for us to move around in it, given our limited resources, when even a single tank of gas is a major financial project.
	Imagine how it would be if we started to include these other areas and had to take road trips to Salt Lake City and Cheyenne or San Francisco just because some of our people don't want to exert the necessary effort of will to pack the moving van.
	The whole purpose of reducing our operational area to something manageable would be defeated.
	Just as we need communities of racially conscious white people living within half an hour's drive of one another, we need every place in the homeland to be within at least a long day's drive, max.
	Now, when the balloon goes up, I personally would like to glom on to as much territory as possible.
	If we're in some kind of situation whereby we can acquire Northern California and Utah and Wyoming or whatever great, but we don't know exactly how and when and under what circumstances the inevitable breakup of the United States is going to occur.
	Until we have a little more information in that area, the Northwest Front has to keep to the present three and a half states.
	God knows they're going to be hard enough to work with.
	Next question.
	This is one that doesn't come from our own people.
	It's something that apparently is driving our hippy-dippy idiot enemies on the internet around the twist, and apparently they're really pestering Colonel House about this, so I'll give this a brief mention.
	That is all the heckles that we get on the blogs and our YouTube sites, and just in general, from Indians and Mexicans and mestizos of various kinds.
	We also get a lot of this drivel from white morons who think they're part Indian, or who think there's something cool about Indians, or who just basically have shit for brains.
	Anyway, their rap is as follows.
	White people don't belong here because Columbus was an imperialist exploiter, and white people were mean and cruel to the Indians, and anyway, the Indians were here first.
	Booga booga booga.
	Well, that assertion is so just plain wrong on every count, I don't even really know where to begin.
	First off, Columbus was not the first dead European white male to discover America.
	The Norse discovered America around the 10th century AD.
	They had some settlements up in Newfoundland and thereabouts, and if you believe the Kensington Roomstone, they were actually still mounting expeditions to North America as late as 1361.
	Secondly, the Indians themselves were no prizes.
	They most assuredly were not noble savages.
	The Aztecs were the most technically advanced Indians at the time of the white arrival, but they liked to raid their neighboring tribes in order to capture people, and then cut their hearts out with obsidian knives at the top of a pyramid as a sacrifice to the sun god.
	And it's known that the hearts and at least some of the other body parts of the sacrifices were then thrown to the mob and eaten as delicacies.
	Everyone has marveled that Hernán Cortés was able to conquer Mexico City and overthrow the Aztec Empire with only 700 men and 17 horses.
	But he had thousands of Indian allies who supplied him and helped him because they were so desperate to get the so-called noble and civilized Aztecs off their backs.
	You ever want a good movie version of that?
	Try Mel Gibson's Apocalypto.
	It deconstructs the whole noble Aztecs idea pretty thoroughly.
	Okay, I have a certain amount of time for the Plains tribes like the Lakota and the Cheyenne and the Comanches, but the East Coast tribes the early settlers found were pretty scummy and really primitive.
	They were Stone Age savages who lived like animals and who routinely practiced torture and murder of any captives and the rape of any woman who fell into their hands.
	They had no written language.
	No ability to build in stone like even some of the Central American Indians had, and after thousands of years, they hadn't learned even rudimentary metalworking or agriculture or the domestication of animals.
	Thousands of years ago, American Indians and white people in Europe were on the same primitive level.
	White people advanced and learned and created and grew in mind and culture and technology.
	Indians never did.
	And they were still in the Stone Age when the first white settlers landed.
	Ah, but the idiots say the Indians were here first.
	Yeah, that's the official version, sure, and it has been for a century, but in the past few decades, some pretty interesting archaeological evidence has emerged that indicates otherwise.
	Now, I don't have the time here to go off into a long college degree course lecture, but I'll try to hit the high points for you.
	The discussion is hampered by archaeological and historical uncertainty on exact dates, since we're dealing with many millennia back and we can't know for absolute certain sure what happened that far back in time.
	And if I get into the question of how many thousands of years this and so-and-so BC, that I will be here all night.
	But basically, the evidence that Caucasians from Europe arrived in North America before the Asian ancestors of the Red Indians falls into two categories.
	First off, there's the scattering all over North America of stone artifacts, mostly spearheads and arrowheads, but also tools such as hand axes, and also artifacts made of bones such as fish hooks and needles.
	Which indicate a connection with Europe, and which are found nowhere else but in Europe and parts of the American East Coast.
	Not in Africa, not in Asia, not in Polynesia, nowhere else.
	The most common of such artifacts are what's known as Clovis points, which are of a unique shape and manufacture, which I won't try to describe verbally, just take my word for it.
	They're very distinctive and identifiable, and you can easily find pictures of Clovis point stonework online.
	There is also a style of arrow and spearheads called Solutrian that looks sort of like a sharpened oblong or leaf shape, the oldest of which were found in caves and buried in Paleolithic strata around a town called Solutre in the Loire district of France.
	These are about 15,000 years old, and they're believed by some scholars to be of Cro-Magnon origin.
	From this, we get the term Solutreans for our earliest white ancestors.
	These Solutrean artifacts are also scattered all over North America, large numbers of specimens having been found in Virginia, Pennsylvania, and Florida.
	Nothing of the kind has ever been found in Asia or Siberia or Polynesia, where the American Indians' ancestors are believed to have come from.
	Only in Europe.
	The second body of evidence, which indicates that white people came here first, is more fascinating and more conclusive, although more rare, and that is actual human remains.
	The most well-known instance of this kind of evidence is Kennewick Man.
	whose skeletal remains were discovered in 1996 in Kennewick, Washington, right here in the homeland.
	Again, if I were to try and get into all the hannahana between scientists and the organized Indian lobby and the political left over the Kennewick remains, I'd be here all night.
	But to give you the Cliff Notes version, early examination of the remains caused forensic anthropologists at the University of California in Riverside to state their opinion that the remains were Caucasian.
	I should emphasize that determining the race of a human skeleton is one of the easiest things for a trained anthropologist or pathologist to do.
	It's Forensic Pathology 101.
	Skin color is by no means the only difference between the races.
	It's just the most obvious.
	Our whole bodies are built differently according to race, especially bone and skull structure.
	Often, it's actually easier to tell the race of a deceased person than it is the gender, especially if you have an incomplete skeleton.
	Remember, the first examination took place before all the sound and fury started, and so the experts routinely classified the remains as Caucasian.
	They figured Kennewick Man was a settler from the 19th century.
	But then the political problems started to appear.
	The radiocarbon dating showed that the remains were 9,300 years old, which is way, way before Columbus and Leif Erickson, way before any of us white boys are supposed to be around here in America, and what's worst of all, Before the oldest known Indian remains.
	If the analysis was correct, then it means that the first people in North America were white.
	But since that conclusion was politically unacceptable, then the analysis and the scientists who made it had to be personally attacked and discredited.
	And oh boy, did the shit hit the fan then.
	The Kennewick remains were seized by court order and still remain the legal property of the Army Corps of Engineers, who refuses to allow access to them to any genuinely independent scientist.
	There was a legal battle for almost ten years as the organized Indian tribes and their left-wing allies tried to prevent any further examination.
	The army finally allowed brief access in 2005, but by then numerous Indians had been allowed contact with the remains, using various excuses, and the material was hopelessly contaminated.
	Parts of the skeleton were missing and the whole thing had become so hopelessly politicized that no further examination can really be trusted.
	Contrary to popular belief, the actual results of a DNA test performed in 2005 were never released for anyone in the scientific world to examine for themselves.
	And again, contrary to the media, The original identification of the Kennewick remains as Caucasian has never been disproven.
	Of course, in the present political climate, for any reputable scientist to admit that the remains are Caucasian would be the end of his career.
	But there have been other ancient Caucasian human remains found in North America, including one at Lake Jackson, Texas, which was carbon-dated at over 11,000 years old, and a woman's skull found near Mexico City, of all places, dated nearly 13,000 years ago.
	Both of these discoveries took place in 2002.
	And then there's the Spirit Cave Mummy, found in Nevada in 1940, that lay around the Nevada State Museum until 1996, when somebody finally got curious enough to have the remains carbon-dated and found that the body was 9,400 years old, more or less contemporary with Kennewick Man, give or take a century.
	The mummy is said to, quote-unquote, exhibit Caucasian racial characteristics.
	Now, there is a lot of interest in this whole Solutrean thing in the movement, and there's a new novel coming out in October by a young man named Kyle Bristow called White Apocalypse, which deals with this whole issue of ancient white remains and the persecution of scientists who study them.
	I recently had the pleasure of reading and reviewing an advanced copy in PDF format.
	Look, this is a fascinating subject, and if I don't shut up now, I won't shut up for an hour.
	I would, however, like to recommend that anyone who has truly got the Solutrean bug to go online to Amazon.com or wherever and order a DVD of a Discovery Channel program called Ice Age Columbus, Who Were the First Americans?
	It's well worth a viewing.
	It'll convince anyone with an open mind that, like everything else, political correctness tells us this business about the Indians being here first ain't necessarily so.
	Well, I haven't had one of my Irish rousers on this program so far, so here's Modena with Farewell to Aaron.
	Modena with Farewell to Aaron.
	Next question.
	Why do we have to settle for only three and a half states?
	Why can we not hope to win back the entire United States of America from sea to shining sea?
	Actually, I haven't been getting this one all that much recently, because I think everyone pretty much knows the answer by now, but still, it's a legitimate question.
	So why not take it all back?
	Well, for one thing, no one has ever been able to come up with any kind of plan to take over the entire United States of America and purge it of all its uncleanness that has anything to do with reality.
	Okay, let's think about this from a practical viewpoint.
	The official estimated population of the United States right now is 330 million people.
	Nobody knows for sure how many non-whites there are, because in the first place, there's no accurate count of illegal aliens.
	In the second place, there's no accurate count of blacks.
	Because all these college kids and retirees they hire for census takers are all afraid to go into the major black ghettos in this country.
	I mean, can you see some little college sophomore girl knocking on doors in Harlem or Compton or the Cabrini-Green projects in Chicago and asking to count how many niggers are in each apartment?
	A third, we forget that there are millions on millions of non-whites of various descriptions in this country legally with full green cards or as naturalized citizens.
	So let's ballpark this.
	Let's say on an educated guess that there are 230 million white people remaining in the U.S. That's 100 million non-whites that we must somehow cause to vanish in a puff of smoke if we want to bring back the Brady Bunch and the days of Ozzie Nelson and his cardigan barbecuing on the grill in the backyard.
	Okay, that figure may not be exact, but I think it's close enough.
	So how do we do it?
	How do we make all those millions of niggers and wogs and gooks and spicks disappear?
	And while we're at it...
	How about the millions of Jews and bugger boys and just plain asshole white morons who would pull the lever for the straight Democratic ticket if the Democrats were running Jack the Ripper for president?
	So long as Arianna Huffington and Jon Stewart told them to.
	Now bear in mind that the white gene pool in this country needs a heavy dose of chlorine as well.
	There are millions of whites who are just so irredeemably stupid that they are beyond recovery or re-education and have to be removed from participation in the political process somehow.
	The simple fact is, guys, that what used to be called normal Americans are now in a minority in this country.
	Add to that the fact that most of us remaining norms are over the age of 40. Add to that that a large portion of the remaining otherwise halfway decent population are Christian fundamentalists of the 700 Club variety who believe whatever their blow-dried televangelist preachers tell them about the Jews being the chosen people of God and Israel being the fulfillment of biblical prophecy and how we have to start a nuclear war in the Middle East to make Jesus come back.
	Folks, we have a real problem.
	Even if all these parasites and fools could be gotten rid of, there would be just barely enough normal and uncontaminated white people left to run the country.
	By now, I think you've all gathered from growing up in this country and looking at the world around you that democracy doesn't work, and that in the end, democracy inevitably results in being ruled by people like Bill Clinton, Juggiers Bush, and our current baby-shit brown man-child president.
	But let's assume for the sake of argument that we could somehow get somebody like David Duke elected president.
	That would never happen, of course, and even if it did, the Jews would just go running to the federal courts as fast as their bandy little legs would carry them and get the election overturned.
	But let's assume that tactic fails, and whoopee, there we've got David Duke or Rush Limbaugh or some conservative governor sitting in the Oval Office, and let's assume, furthermore, big stretch, that this person is, in fact, a sincere and dedicated, quote-unquote, real American.
	Who has somehow reached that elevated level of the presidency with all his principles intact, and that he does, in fact, have the political will to at least try to do something about this ghastly mess that the country has turned into since 1933 or thereabouts.
	Now, you see already how we're having to reach on this.
	We're already in the realm where I think all of us can see the problems and can understand that out here in the real world, nothing like this will ever occur.
	But we're engaging in science fiction speculation here, so let's proceed.
	Right, our guy's in the White House.
	Yay!
	Okay, now what?
	What exactly will such a white president do?
	To assume that he has a pro-white Congress, which will help him pass new laws, is just too much.
	That's even beyond science fiction.
	So the only thing he has left is his role of commander-in-chief of the armed forces.
	In essence, he would have to declare a civil war on all the non-whites.
	And use the armed force of the United States military to remove them from the country one way or the other.
	In the first place, no such presidential order would be obeyed, because in case you hadn't noticed, the armed forces of the United States are now majority non-white in their rank and file and in their junior officer corps.
	At present, it looks as if in a matter of months, all the queers will be coming out of the O.D. Green closet as well.
	Secondly, even if somehow part of the armed forces, the remaining white part, would obey, then there would be immediate bloodshed between the pro-president and the pro-liberal factions of the military.
	So we'd end up with something like the Russian or Spanish Civil Wars on our hands, and there would be years of massive destruction all around which would hardly bring back the Brady Bunch in suburbia, and which most likely wouldn't even remove all the non-whites.
	Most likely, what would happen would be that massive numbers of white people would end up fleeing to the Northwest anyway.
	Indeed, that possibility I just described of a massive race war in the rest of the country may be one of the ways in which we gain the Northwest Republic.
	Now, another question I want to segue into here from this one, and that's the fabled day when, quote-unquote, the balloon goes up.
	Right-wingers and racists have been talking about this for years.
	It's been an article of faith that someday the balloon will go up.
	And of course, we can't really do anything until the balloon goes up.
	Some right-wingers nod their heads wisely and say, things aren't bad enough for ordinary white people.
	Things have to get really bad.
	But mostly they just talk about that balloon that just hasn't gone up yet.
	Darn it!
	If only that pesky balloon would go up, then you'd really see something.
	Then you'd see how brave we all are and how brilliant we all can be.
	Now this balloon going up crap is mostly an excuse to avoid actually doing anything right now that requires any risk or inconvenience.
	However inept we may be at everything else, we're real crackerjacks at thinking up excuses to do nothing.
	The basic idea is that at some point there will occur some cataclysmic political or economic event or natural disaster or plague or nuclear war or something of the kind which will magically lift the federal monkey off our backs without our ever having to incur any risk or inconvenience and, of course, without our ever having to confront the United States and its armed men.
	Once this act of deus ex machina takes place, Then we'll all end up living like Mad Max road warriors, roaring up and down the highways on motorcycles and Humvees, wearing purple Mohawks and leather S&M outfits, and shooting at each other with crossbows.
	I've got a better idea, guys.
	Screw the balloon.
	Even if such a cataclysmic event does occur, let's forget all this mere survival crap and Mad Max garbage, and let's try to actually preserve some remnants of Western civilization and the old American way of life, shall we?
	Complete with electricity and motor vehicles and comfortable homes instead of caves and, who knows, maybe even some air conditioning and the odd CD player or two so I can play all my 60s and 70s oldies.
	How does that grab you?
	Look, guys, I think all of us, if we're honest with ourselves, understand that there's no way we'll ever achieve any racial salvation through the ballot box.
	The only other alternative we seem to have come up with, besides Northwest migration, is head-for-the-hills survivalism, waiting for the balloon to go up.
	Come on, guys, do any of us really want to live like animals out in the woods if we don't have to?
	The entire history of our race is the story of humanity's attempt to get away from nature.
	The entire reason Aryan people built civilization in the first place is to get away from that kind of life.
	I think we need to devote our efforts towards trying to save something of what our people have built, not go all the way back to a hole in the ground to start over.
	The way to win this fight is what amounts to a colonial war for independence.
	There are plenty of templates from the past hundred years that we can use for that.
	It's been done time and again.
	This formula works.
	We select a viable piece of territory, the Pacific Northwest, and replace the occupying power, the United States, in a position where it no longer has either the ability or the will to maintain its authority over that territory.
	As I say repeatedly in my novels, it's never the generals who surrender in a colonial war.
	It's the accountants.
	Speaking of which, this podcast is starting to run way, way long, even longer than I thought it would, and we still have ground to cover, so what I want to do is urge each and every one of you who has not done so to either order all four Northwest novels from Amazon.com or Barnes& Noble, or else download them for free in PDF format and read the damn books.
	Those are really my FAQs.
	They discuss all of this in far more detail than I can do here.
	Okay, what else, what else?
	I know I'm going to leave all kinds of things out, and in another few months I'll probably be doing another FAQ broadcast, but what else can I cover here real quick?
	Well, there's the male-female thing, but I think I've got enough good canned answers in email format for that, so what else, what else?
	Okay, here's one.
	Alliances with non-whites and so-called good Jews.
	Now, the answer to that one is simple.
	No, never.
	There are no good Jews.
	Well, dead ones.
	Okay, that doesn't mean that we can't make use of some of their material.
	I occasionally repost James Howard Kunstler's stuff on ThoughtCrime because he has such a brilliant way with words in describing the contemporary capitalist world.
	And I recommend that everybody view the Jew David Cole's Auschwitz video.
	If you ever need to be convinced that there was never any Holocaust, that's the video that will do it.
	But as far as letting Jews into the magic circle, or considering them to be part of the European tradition, or any of this other neocon crap, no, no, no movement modernization here.
	Then there are these proposals that we somehow ally ourselves with various non-white groups in some way, even with niggers for God's sake.
	Now this is frankly pretty contemptible.
	It's an admission that we are so weak and so spavined and lost and confused that we have to hang on and leech off non-whites to take advantage of their strength and courage.
	And I could never understand how anyone can't get that, or how even the lowest and most degraded white nationalists can even suggest such a thing.
	But I look at it like this.
	Everything we're doing here is about race.
	If we're going to compromise on race, even in the smallest detail, then why the hell are we doing this at all?
	People ask me how the NF can be so cruel as to refuse to let non-whites live at all in the Northwest Republic.
	But if we're going to allow non-whites to reside in whatever territory we manage to liberate, then, you know, damn well, in another 50 or 60 years, it'll all have to be done over again.
	They want to know how we can be so mean to homosexuals, and yet they can't seem to wrap their mind around the historical fact that any toleration at all for that particular perversion, in the long run, means the end of the nation or culture that tolerates it.
	Guys, let me put it this way.
	Our task is to serve the 14 words of David Lane.
	We must secure the existence of our people and the future for white children.
	And we are never going to be able to do that without being mean and cruel to somebody.
	So let's harden our hearts, stiffen our spines, and do what has to be done.
	What else?
	What else?
	Ah, yes, here's one.
	Young white people are completely useless.
	They're stupid beavis and buttheads with nothing on their mind except video games.
	And we should quit wasting our time trying to educate them or recruit them.
	If the over-40 generation can't get this job done, then it won't get done and we are doomed.
	Yeah, I get that one a lot, and I understand the rage and the frustration behind it.
	Sometimes I even agree with it before my rationality catches up with my rage.
	This view of young white people as essentially useless is widespread in the movement, and we need to be honest with ourselves.
	There's a lot of truth to it, and the truth hurts.
	But the fact is that we in the movement have developed a bad habit down through the years of writing off certain huge sections of our own race, mostly to avoid the boring, repetitive, and incredibly frustrating task of trying to shake these people out of their slumber and wake up their ideas and energize them with the truth.
	It's a form of laziness.
	It's too hard for us to slowly, carefully, patiently feed truth into these skulls full of mush until something finally takes root.
	Believe me, I get it.
	But I'm sorry, guys.
	There's no way we're getting off the hook.
	We have to deal with these people and try and slap some sense into them.
	Trying to reach white people, any white people with the truth, can drive you batty.
	It's like trying to sculpt a feather pillow into shape.
	The minute you step back and leave it alone, it flops down into a blob again.
	But we can't give up on them any more than any race or any species can give up on its own young.
	Like any race or any species, our young are our future, God help us.
	Guys, we're going to have to understand that this project we have in mind of securing the existence of our people in a future for white children in a homeland of our own will eventually involve quite a bit of storming the barricades, literally.
	And that cannot be done by an army of middle-aged people in their 50s like me, nor can it be done by an army of senior citizens in their walkers and their wheelchairs.
	Revolution is a young man's game.
	That's probably my main criticism of the whole Tea Party thing.
	There are way too many gray heads in there.
	I give the Tea Party crowd very high marks for building a genuine grassroots movement.
	But in all the media coverage I've seen of their events, I don't see many young people in there.
	Maybe I just haven't seen footage of the right events.
	I suppose it's a minor comfort to know that we're not the only ones who are having trouble recruiting youth.
	In some ways, I have to concede the point.
	Today's white youth are pretty much a waste of rations.
	And let's be honest, Beavis and Butthead and Otto the Bus Driver and the comic book guy from The Simpsons and Chris Griffin from the Family Guy cartoons are not really cartoon characters.
	They're drawn from the life.
	Some of you older people may not get those references I just made, but young white people in my listening audiences will.
	And that's the tragedy, because those are their role models.
	Many young white people, especially young white males, have grown up watching caricatures like that, both in cartoon form and on TV, in the movies, so forth and so on.
	The Simpsons, Family Guy, South Park, Beavis and Butthead, the Porky's movies, so forth.
	You get the idea.
	That's part of their social conditioning, and it's given them hideous role models.
	Arguably, the biggest problem with white youth today is that it lasts too long.
	Young white males used to become a man at 16, or at least at 18 when they got drafted and had to go into the Army.
	Sorry, I'm digressing like I always do, but just to show you that I understand the problem, I need to describe something that happened to me a few years ago.
	Now, I know some of you have heard this story, but we're going to have a lot of new listeners who haven't.
	Don't worry, this is the FAQ Podcast, and I promise you I won't bore you with it again after this.
	Around the turn of the century, I was working in an IT-related major corporation in College Station, Texas, which is the home of Texas A&M University.
	My fellow employees were, on the whole, much younger than me, mostly IT, Master of Science degree holders, or candidates, college kids who were supposedly the best and the brightest that America has to offer, and to be fair, there was something to that.
	Some of those kids were pretty darn sharp, professionally and personally.
	But during the little over three years that I worked there, I noticed something about our up-and-coming white generation, the general immaturity and irresponsibility lasting well into adulthood, which simply wouldn't have passed muster back in the 50s, or even really in the 70s.
	It's because there's no real demand these days for white kids ever to grow up.
	And this applies especially to white males.
	Part of it may well be because there hasn't been a draft in this country since 1972 and these punk kids weren't dragged away to fight a war like my generation and my father's generation and my grandfather's generation were.
	I wasn't drafted myself, but I had almost as little choice.
	I went into the Army at age 17 as a volunteer because my father threw me out of the house and it was either the Army or Flip Burgers, which is a very similar situation to what a lot of white kids today find themselves in and will be finding themselves in more and more.
	Anyway, getting back to my story about that IT company in Texas, I noticed things like these ostensibly intelligent white boys bringing their childhood toys like plastic dinosaurs and transformers to work to set up in their cubicles.
	I also noticed when I went into the smoking area during lunch or during breaks that you would always find white males clustered off in a corner talking among themselves about video games like World of Warcraft or whatever this online video game they all played was.
	This was guys in their late 20s and their 30s who, in a normal society, should by that time have been married and raising families and taking part in civic and political duties in the community.
	Instead, they talked about their imaginary identities as warrior dwarfs or dragon slayers like they were living in the Lord of the Rings movie, and in a sense they were.
	The internet has allowed young white men to create and to some degree live in a fantasy world of magic and adventure and devoid of political correctness, a kind of escape from the real world which is truly insidious because it's just as addictive as alcohol or cocaine.
	Why bother to read and educate yourself and follow politics and think about what's going on in the world when you can leave work, go home, order in a pizza, and sit up until 2 o 'clock in the morning living in a magical world with dragons and dwarves and warrior maidens in armored bikinis?
	So what if it isn't real?
	For white boys, the fantasy is so much better than the reality.
	Why bother to change the reality?
	In the same smoke hole at that company back in Texas, the white women employees would always be bunched together over in another corner regarding these overgrown adolescents of their own race with a kind of resigned disgust.
	I noticed that there was almost never any interaction between the two groups.
	It was like third graders in a schoolyard with the boys in one corner and the girls in another.
	As horrific as it is for me to admit this, I can understand why so many white women these days are choosing non-white sexual partners and non-white fathers for their children, especially Asians and Arabs and even Latinos, who on first glance at least appear to have some kind of work ethic, some kind of maturity and seriousness, some kind of willingness to show responsibility.
	Although those white girls who make this bad, bad choice more often than not end up paying for it in terrible ways, sometimes gruesome ways.
	The fact is, a normal woman wants a man in her life, a mate and a provider and a good father for her children, not just another big baby that she has to carry along with the real kids.
	Again, let me say that while I condemn these women who betray their race without reservation, I do understand why some of them do it.
	And it's our fault.
	Because white males refuse to grow up and get out of the animal house stage of our lives, we should have left behind at age 20 at the latest.
	Okay, to drag myself kicking and screaming back to the subject, I have to agree.
	Right now, as things are, as people go, the overwhelming majority of young white people are useless and even detrimental to our long-term racial interest.
	However, other than my contention that we're stuck with them and we can't write them off, I would like to add the following caveats, ifs, ands, and buts.
	First off, the political, racial, and economic situation in North America is not static.
	It's changing all the time, faster and faster now.
	People change along with their environments.
	People change along with their personal circumstances, along with their family and community circumstances, and above all, people change along with their economic circumstances.
	Now, most people, young or old, are capable of change if that change is forced on them in some way that they can't avoid.
	That includes the present more or less damaged crop of young white people.
	Remember, they have in their chromosomes the same potential that all of the explorers, inventors, and conquerors of our race ever had.
	Genetically speaking, we are the same people our ancestors were.
	It takes more than three generations of liberalism and political correctness to erase 10,000 generations of racial heritage and instinct.
	I remember that balloon I was talking about earlier.
	Well, we're now entering a period of this country's history where at long last the fabled balloon that we all claim to have been waiting for all these years might actually go up, however sluggishly.
	These white kids, who are cocooned in their fantasy world, With their computers and their MP3 players and their rooms and their basements are about to get a big punch in the mouth from reality.
	They aren't going to be able to stay cocooned in there too much longer because upstairs in the house, mom and dad have probably lost their jobs, or they're about to, and the house and the basement itself ain't going to be there much longer because it's about to be foreclosed.
	Circumstances are about to come crashing down on young Beavis and young Butthead and drag their pale skinny asses right out of their rooms and their basements.
	And rip those video game headphones right off their ears.
	Those of you who have read A Distant Thunder and A Mighty Fortress will remember two of my young Northwest volunteers, Shane Ryan and Cody Brock.
	I deliberately created those characters with the kind of backstory that will eventually produce our young revolutionaries in real life.
	And that scenario is approaching with the speed of a freight train.
	If a conservative is a liberal who's been mugged, then Shane and Cody are Beavis and Butthead who've had their house foreclosed and who've been forced into the army or the job market at age 17 in order to escape having to live under a bridge.
	Shane Ryan and Cody Brock are out there today, all across the Northwest and all across America.
	They're probably about 10 or 12 years old right now, but when they hit 16 or 17, they're going to find themselves standing in line outside Mickey D's.
	Begging some female manager for a chance to flip burgers for $7 an hour, and then losing out on those jobs to Juan Mendez and Ichiku Kabumba from the Congo, who are willing to flip the same burgers off paper for $4 or $5 an hour.
	Some of those white boys will still try to bury their heads in the video games as they sit under the bridge, and some of them will turn to drugs and petty crime and other self-destructive behaviors.
	That's inevitable.
	A lot of them will be forced into the military, not just for a paycheck, but for the chow hall and for some kind of medical care for their families.
	But when the military is through with them, they're going to be tossed right back under the bridge.
	Then they will be ready for us.
	And we have to make sure that we're ready for them.
	Okay, last music break.
	Back when I was writing the Northwest novels, I used to do mixtapes and play those while I was writing as a kind of mood music for each important character and scene.
	I had a Shane Ryan theme, and a Kiki McGee theme, and an Oscar Night Massacre theme, and a Battle of Sunset Beach theme, and a Rescuing the Mormon Refugees theme, and so forth and so on.
	I even made some of those mixtapes and sent them out to readers who were interested.
	Anyway, for some reason I've never understood.
	My most popular female character in the four novels seems to be not Kiki McGee or Nightshade, but Rooney Wingfield from A Distant Thunder.
	And some months ago...
	Someone demanded to know what Rooney's theme music would be, and so I selected this Appalachian song called June Apple, which also happens to be one of the first banjo pieces I ever learned.
	This is Nobody's Darling.
	Oh, I wish I was a tree.
	A tree hanging on a tree.
	Every time I love walk by, take a little bite of me.
	Take a bite of me, my love, take a bite of me.
	Every time I love walk by, take a little bite of me.
	Hey!
	You ride the old gray mare, I'll ride the throne.
	You get there before I do, leave my guy alone.
	Train on the island, heard that whistle blow.
	Thought I heard someone say, yonder comes my home.
	Oh, I'm going across the mountain, going on a swing.
	When I get to the other side, I hear my true love sing.
	Don't you hear that banjo sing?
	Wish that guy was mine.
	Don't you hear that banjo sing?
	I wish that guy was mine.
	Oh, Charlie E's a nice young man.
	Charlie E's a dandy.
	Oh, Charlie E's a nice young man.
	Feed the girls on K&E.
	Going down river to feed my sheep.
	Going down river, Charlie.
	Going down river to feed my sheep.
	Gotta feed them all on Marley.
	Hey!
	Oh, I wish I wasn't you now, oh, hanging on a tree.
	Every time I love walks by, take a little bite of me.
	Take a bite of me, my love.
	Take a bite of me.
	Every time I love walks by, take a little bite of me.
	Woo!
	Bye!
	you you you I need to wind this up now.
	We're running over two hours, and I've probably lost a lot of my listeners already.
	You know Americans and their short attention spans.
	This podcast has been an attempt to answer a number of frequently asked questions about the Northwest Front so I don't have to keep on repeating myself over and over again in future programs, and I hope it served that purpose.
	Since we still have an almost entirely movement-oriented audience, just let me sum all this up.
	We now have the idea and the plan which will secure the existence of our people and a future for white children.
	If we have the strength of character and the strength of will to implement it, that plan is the Northwest migration and the establishment of the Northwest American Republic.
	There's nothing else.
	There's not going to be anything else besides the Northwest, and we damn well better get on with it.
	We have completely wasted the past 50 years, and we now have a very short time left in which to create the kind of infrastructure and the kind of base that we should have been working on 50 years ago, right after Little Rock.
	That is a fact.
	Some of that wastage was due to sincere and hopeful expeditions down some dead ends, which, in retrospect, were pretty obvious.
	The Duck Club and electoral politics are two examples which spring to mind.
	We've also been plagued with a series of self-appointed leaders who have been corrupt, incompetent, and dishonest, and we're still plagued with some of these holdovers from the past.
	I'm sorry if you feel like I'm criticizing your favorite fearless leader.
	I probably am.
	Had we not wasted those 50 years, it's possible that we might be in a position now to engage in actual resistance against the regime.
	We're not.
	And anyone who tells you otherwise is either a damned fool or a cop of some kind.
	I'm telling you to get your heads together and learn.
	I'm not asking you to die for your race.
	I'm asking you to live for it.
	And more difficult still, I'm asking you to work for it.
	I know this is a message many don't want to hear.
	But for the sake of our future folks, you'd best take heed.
	Can we do this?
	Of course we can.
	We're Aryans.
	We're better than anybody else.
	And we can do anything we set our mind to.
	But before we can even think about rebelling against the tyrant, we must produce a different kind of white man in this country.
	We must become men and women whom our great-grandparents would have recognized.
	I've spoken of this moral transfiguration before, and if it sounds hard, it is.
	But we may not have to do it all on our own.
	There's a good possibility the regime may do it for us.
	Because, you see, oppression either breaks men or it makes them.
	The philosopher Nietzsche said, That which does not destroy me makes me stronger.
	The Jews and their leftist allies have turned this country into a revolting, putrid swamp.
	But dangerous beasts breed in swamps.
	I think the Jews and the Obama regime suffer from the typical defect which the arrogance of power breeds, an overestimation of their ability to control events.
	Some people say, well, you can't rebel against the United States.
	They're the law.
	Of course they're the law.
	Tyrants always are.
	That's what makes a tyrant different from your typical gangster.
	The law is a weapon, and like any other weapon, it is only as good or as bad as the people wielding it.
	Right now, the law is in the hands of some very bad people, some of the worst in human history.
	The law is being used to pillage you, to disrupt and break up your family, to steal your home through foreclosure.
	The law is being used to deny you employment and any kind of income.
	The law is being used to rob your children of a future and will eventually destroy you in your old age.
	The law in its present state deserves no respect from any white man or woman in America.
	Indeed, obedience and respect for the law have become counter-survival, and human nature being what it is, anything which is counter-survival will not endure.
	By allowing millions of white families to be expelled from their homes through foreclosure, by denying jobs and educational opportunities to white males through racial quarters, not to mention through the Obama Depression, by persecuting those who resist with hate crime laws and vile civil lawsuits, by shouting their derision and their hatred for everything white through their controlled media, and by subjecting the white male to an unending torrent of insult, abuse, and vilification, the scum who run this country are sowing dragon's teeth.
	Four hundred years before Christ, a Greek chronicler named Xenophon wrote as follows about the famous March of the Ten Thousand.
	Strength and weapons alone do not always prevail in battle.
	When an army is stronger in soul, then their enemies cannot withstand them.
	You want to know how to beat the United States and take back our freedom in a new country of our own?
	Make yourselves stronger in soul than the apes and the mad dogs who are tearing at our flesh.
	Don't worry about the economy or the Bilderbergers or illegal immigration or gun control.
	Work on what's inside your mind and your heart.
	When you put some iron in your heart, there'll never be any problem finding some iron to put in your hand.
	Adolf Hitler himself stated in Mein Kampf, when a people is being driven to destruction through the instrument of governmental authority, Then rebellion is not only the right, but the duty of that people.
	This point is so obvious that I really can't make it any more clear.
	If you honestly don't understand this, then you shouldn't be in the movement at all.
	Finally, there's the moral dimension to be considered.
	Looking for easy outs and safe shortcuts is not only futile, it's wrong.
	Before we can have a new white world, we must earn it.
	That's the way life works.
	Like all persecuted minorities, white males are despised.
	We're despised by the government, by the liberal establishment.
	We're despised by the nigger criminals who rob and rape and kill our people.
	We are despised by the media, and to a large degree we're despised by our own children.
	We are despised because we are correctly viewed as weak, cowardly, lazy, incapable, and unwilling to defend ourselves or take any serious action against those who despoil and victimize us, other than to go whining to the enemy's police in the enemy's courts, or maybe call Rush Limbaugh.
	Why in the name of God should anyone respect us?
	Why should we respect ourselves?
	It's time white men recovered our self-respect and the respect of those who hate us, and it's a long-standing human truth that respect among men is earned by the shedding of blood.
	Well, our time is up, and so that's it for this week's edition of Radio Free Northwest.
	This program is brought to you by the Northwest Front, Post Office Box 4856, Seattle, Washington, 98194.
	Or you can go to the party's website at www.northwestfront.org.
	This is Harold Covington, and I'll see you next week.
	Until then, Sasha and Bon.
	Freedom!
	of the rising of the moon, of the rising of the moon.

▲