All Episodes
Previous Next
Sept. 8, 2022 - Paul Joseph Watson
39:11
Summit News Hour: PJW Responds To Death Of Queen Elizabeth II
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
So, it is sad in a way.
Of course, the vilest people you can imagine, the anti-racists, the anti-colonialists, despite the fact that the Queen decolonised much of the world, are out on Twitter celebrating it feverishly, popping champagne corks.
So, to align with those kind of people, I want to steer well away from that because, you know, it is sad.
I'm not devastated because I wasn't intimately tied in with supporting the Royal Family, but For the country, it does mark the passing of a time which was very different to what Britain manifests itself as today.
So in that sense, it does feel quite monumental whether you like the royalty, the monarchy or not.
The facts and common sense are in.
Yes, there have been corrupt empires.
Yes, they manipulate.
Yes, there are secret societies.
Yes, there have been oligarchies throughout history.
And yes, today, in 2002, there is a tyrannical organization calling itself...
The New World Order pushing for worldwide government, a cashless society, total and complete tyranny.
By centralizing and socializing health care, the state becomes God, basically, when it comes to your health.
And then by releasing diseases and viruses and plagues upon us, we then basically get shoved into their system, where human beings are absolutely worthless.
All right, Paul Joseph Watson from England is taking over right now.
The Queen of England, Queen Elizabeth II, has died at 96.
And people can celebrate that, but I'm not celebrating it because, ladies and gentlemen, Prince Charles, Charles III, is about to be the King of England.
So, Paul, obviously the Queen was more conservative.
Her son is a globalist, and I know you live there.
You know these people.
You've interviewed these people.
You're involved in it.
You've told us on air you're more of a royalist now.
What on earth do you expect from this and King Charles III, and how long will he be king before his son becomes king, Paul?
Well, I reckon he'll be king for quite a while because he's only 73 years old at the moment.
So I reckon, you know, given their lineage, he's probably got a good two decades or more left.
But yeah, it's a sad time.
Obviously, the Queen is an icon, a representation of Britain.
She's been on the throne since 1952, over 70 years.
And the country's changed a lot, a hell of a lot.
It's almost unrecognizable in some places, since 1952.
So for her to pass, it's kind of a passing of something far more monumental than just the Queen as an individual.
We had a Jubilee celebration back in June.
For her 70th year on the throne.
And it was weird.
It didn't feel like a celebration.
It felt like more kind of a wake for the country that she represented that has now been lost thanks to, you know, massive political polarization, thanks to mass immigration that's continually changed the identity of entire areas of the country.
So it is sad in a way.
Of course, the vilest people you can imagine, the anti-racists, the anti-colonialists, despite the fact that the Queen decolonized much of the world, are out on Twitter celebrating it feverishly, popping champagne corks.
So to align with those kind of people, I want to steer well away from that because, you know, it is sad.
I'm not devastated because I wasn't intimately tied in with supporting the royal family, but For the country, it does mark the passing of a time which was very different to what Britain manifests itself as today.
So in that sense, it does feel quite monumental, whether you like the royalty of the monarchy or not.
Paul, I totally agree with you.
And this is very nuanced.
They demonize the British royal family.
They attack it.
The left hates it.
So that makes us as conservatives or nationalists or Christians or populists want to then support it.
I don't think she was a bad person.
I totally agree with what you're saying.
So I'm sad the Queen of England died.
I think overall she was probably a good person.
The longest living monarch in world history, from the numbers we have, not just British history, 70 years.
And so this is a big deal.
But just because the left attacks her, doesn't mean I support the whole structure that's now taken over the British Empire.
And what is behind it?
And so I'm really concerned about Prince Charles and his whole globalist carbon tax, New World Order system coming in, so we can talk about the Queen being dead all day long and the left celebrating it.
And I agree, they vestigially see her as the enemy, and that is the enemy for them, but She was really the head of state and presided over the breakup of the UK and this whole third world invasion.
So I don't want to completely abscond her or separate her from that guilt.
Don't speak ill of the dead.
I get that.
I'm just saying she could have done a lot more Against the U.N.
replacement migration.
And so that's my issue.
I know the left's celebrating it.
I'm not with them.
They hate nationalism.
They hate sovereignty.
Even though the Windsor's not really British.
She's a little British.
Mainly German.
Mainly Hungarian.
Romanian.
Dracula, literally.
I get that they're the symbol of it.
So we love the U.K.
We love Britain.
We love England.
One of the most storied cultures in the world.
I'm not an Anglophile, but if I'm anything, that's my roots.
But at the same time, Paul, It's like she's being attacked, but she also went along with it.
So I'm going to let you take over.
I'm going to be listening.
But how do we deal with the royal family presiding over all this?
And now, if you didn't like Queen Elizabeth, man, I love her compared to Prince Charles.
Speak to Prince Charles, who really is his father's son when it comes to depopulation.
Paul Joseph Watson of Summit.News.
Thanks, Alex.
Yeah, it gets back to the whole debate of whether the royal family's ceremonial or they actually exercise any power.
Of course, they own a lot of land in the United Kingdom.
They still exercise dominion in that way.
But I think what you will see, and it'll be interesting, the early statements and manoeuvres that Prince Charles makes is the contrast between how interfering he is as a sovereign in the affairs of a country, which you can argue is a good thing or a bad thing, depending on whether you agree with him.
It's very hypocritical.
But then on the side of the Queen, you could argue that she tried to stay out of state affairs, and maybe she shouldn't have stayed out to such a degree, given how much the country has changed since she sat on the throne.
But again, that is a debate that will follow in the next few days and weeks.
Obviously, King Charles III has been named, As the new Sovereign of England, tributes are flooding in.
One person who was notable by his absence in offering tributes or at least concern as the Queen was dying.
Now, I think what actually happened, the rumours were flying and this seems to make a lot of sense.
The Queen actually died last night.
She probably died last night in her sleep.
The last public appearance for the Queen was on Tuesday when she approved, swore in the new Prime Minister, Liz Truss, and she was on camera shaking the hands of the new Prime Minister.
I mean, obviously looked frail.
She's 96 years old, but didn't look too bad.
And that was only on Tuesday.
So she must have rapidly declined in the past 36 hours.
Apparently, probably died last night.
The doctors then came out with a statement saying they were deeply concerned, which was basically a red flag, an indication to get the machinery of government and of media into gear.
To prepare the population for this announcement, which it probably happened last night, but they delayed the announcement until about 6.30pm today.
And it has been announced that the Queen is dead.
Donald Trump has come out with a statement from him and former First Lady Melania Trump.
Said Melania and I are deeply saddened to learn of the loss of Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II.
Together with our family and fellow Americans, we send our sincere condolences to the Royal Family.
The best statement actually, if you are moved by this, which a lot of people are in this country, it's a monumental occasion, actually was by Boris Johnson, not the most popular person in the country right now, from either the left or the right, but he said, and he's a very good writer, whatever you want to say about Boris Johnson and his record in government, he's always been an outstanding writer, he said this, This is our country's saddest day.
In the hearts of every one of us there is an ache at the passing of our Queen.
A deep and personal sense of loss far more intense perhaps than we expected.
Went on to say in these first grim moments since the news I know that millions and millions of people will be pausing whatever they have been doing to think about Queen Elizabeth, about the bright and shining light that's finally gone out.
And that's it.
Whether you're into the monarchy or not, When somebody is a part of the fabric of the country, they become a part of your life for decades and decades and decades, given that she's been on the throne, as I said, for 70 years.
So whenever somebody dies like that, you don't even need to have a personal connection with them, don't need to necessarily like them, or the institution that they represent, to feel that monumental shifting in the nation, in the culture, in the world.
I mentioned it briefly earlier, Breitbart reports US professor hopes Queen of, quote, raping genocidal empire is in excruciating pain.
This was a tweet put out about five hours ago, shortly before Queen Elizabeth died, or at least the announcement was made.
This was a Nigerian-born professor at Carnegie Mellon University who said, quote, I heard the chief monarch of a thieving, raping, genocidal empire is finally dying.
May her pain be excruciating.
Aside from the whole debate, she actually decolonized the empire.
Whether you want to agree that the British Empire was a force for good or not, I agree, I would argue it was mainly a force for good.
But again, what kind of sick What individual do you need to be to immediately get on Twitter when you hear of this news and celebrate it and hope somebody dies in pain?
This is the anti-racist left.
We'll be back.
Don't go away.
Well, I'm going to get into the energy crisis in a moment, but I knew it would happen.
The national broadcaster, the BBC, is busy in response to the death of the Queen of England literally an hour ago.
Droning on about diversity and white privilege.
That's their response as the national broadcaster in league with, by the way, this Carnegie Mellon professor who said she hoped the Queen had died in excruciating pain.
A lot of other world leaders were paying tribute to the Queen, hoping for her recovery before she died.
Joe Biden didn't even bother to put a tweet out, by the way.
But now, BBC Radio 4, this is the national broadcaster on the day the Queen of the country of 70 years died.
is busy telling us, this is a tweet by Sam Ashworth-Hayes, about how the monarchy is at odds with society which values equality, diversity, inclusivity, while the monarchy is about white inherited privilege.
Again, they can't go two friggin hours after the Queen of England dies without banging on about anti-racism and white privilege.
It's an absolute cult.
And the national broadcaster within hours of the death of the Queen is engaging in it.
Absolutely incredible.
That should be a scandal in and of itself.
Let's get on to the energy crisis now though because we've had this announcement by the new Prime Minister Liz Truss that basically the government is going to pay Two-thirds of people's energy bills, they're going to cap the energy bills which were set to rise to £6,500 a year, even beyond that, that's about $9,000 a year, by next spring.
Governments come out and announce that they're going to cap that at £2,500, basically by paying off the energy companies.
Where that money's coming from, we all know where it's coming from, crippling future taxes, crippling future inflation, more money printing, more devaluation of the currency.
No one really cares about that right now because they think it's a magic money tree that has no consequences.
But what came out earlier in the week before this, and we're going to go to this video in a second explaining it further, a strange time in the UK, is one of the primary reasons for the government giving this mass handout to individuals to pay their energy bills.
And I'm not saying that people weren't going to struggle, that people weren't going to righteously steal food if they needed to, to feed their families.
But one of the main reasons the government handed out this money, which will run into the hundreds of billions over the course of the next two or three years, by the way, is because the police across the country And the headline is, UK police prepare for breakdown in public order caused by cost of living crisis.
The police across the country told them that people will riot in huge numbers and start looting shops if the government doesn't give them a massive handout.
Now again, We've had looting, we've had mass rioting in England as little as 10 years ago with the London riots, riots that spread to other major cities.
At the time, the metropolitan elite progressive media came out with this narrative that it was righteous re-appropriation of wealth, that it was just poor people struggling desperately, having to steal merely to live.
Absolute bollocks!
It was People stealing Air Jordans from Foot Locker.
That was the vast majority of it.
It was people smashing into electronic stores.
It was people smashing into off licenses and stealing alcohol.
It was a feral criminal underclass, which we've had in this country for decades, partly because of unintegrated diversity.
Stealing things which they didn't need.
Criminal opportunists taking advantage of a situation which has been wrongly framed by the media.
And it was about to happen again.
We've already had a wave in recent weeks and months of mass burglaries, thefts, mass looting in central London.
The media barely even reports on it.
The only way you find out about it is via viral videos on Twitter and YouTube.
of groups, mobs of urban youth, as they call them, smashing into candy stores, smashing into off-licenses 7-Elevens, stealing sweets, stealing alcohol.
This has been building over the summer months.
The police chiefs got together and put out a report and basically said there's going to be widespread looting in urban areas if you don't give them a massive handout.
They're already giving them 400 pounds later this month.
And then they're going to give them basically pay half their energy bills.
That was one of the major reasons why the new Prime Minister went along with this.
And we've got a video talking about it now.
A strange time in the UK.
Here it is.
Well, it's a strange time to be living in the UK right now.
Today we have a new Prime Minister.
Yes, another one.
Who, to deal with the cost of living crisis caused by her government trying to desperately prolong a war 1,500 miles away, is set to authorise a massive benefits bonanza for the general public.
Today we learn that the primary reason for the handout is to prevent people committing crimes and rioting in the streets.
One MP briefed by local police said if the new Prime Minister doesn't dole out enough free cash it would, quote, push more people towards crime and lead to public unrest.
Other police chiefs warn that crime is already on the rise.
Shops are routinely being ransacked, with scenes like this in Norwood, South London, becoming commonplace, yet barely making the news.
A woman was also violently attacked by the same mob during the same incident.
Police have already said they don't have the resources to respond to or investigate theft and burglary.
Presumably because many of their officers are elsewhere performing more important duties, like doing the Macarena at Gay Pride Parade.
Of course, no one even asks where the 100 billion plus pound benefits handout is even coming from.
Presumably, as ever, from the magic money tree called crippling future taxes.
Yes, the people who work hard and actually earn money will foot the bill to ensure that urban youth don't get upset and start smashing up JD Sports and Sports Direct shops.
Now, I'm not saying that legitimately desperate people won't need to steal food this winter in order to get by without any support.
But there's a big difference between that and mass looting the nearest footlocker so you can get your hands on the latest pair of Air Jordans, isn't there?
When that happened during the 2011 riots, which took place mainly in London and in other ethnically diverse cities, much of the media framed such mindless theft as a justified protest or the legitimate re-appropriation of wealth.
In reality, it was Britain's feral underclass exercising their warped sense of self-entitlement to engage in rampant criminal opportunism, knowing the metropolitan elite and its propaganda organs would give them a free pass.
Expect a similar response to any mass public disorder later this year.
Meanwhile, the country's paper of record, the London Times, can barely contain its glee at the fact that there will be no white men in major cabinet positions in the new government For the first time in British history.
But hey, I guess it's just another example of institutionalised racism and white male privilege.
Gonna come back on the other side and talk about the situation in Europe, because whereas in the UK we've had a government handout, promised government handouts, basically gonna pay two-thirds of people's energy bills, In Germany, in the Czech Republic and in other European countries, they haven't had such a bailout as of yet.
There's now mass protests on the streets that are being ignored by the media.
In the Czech Republic, Swiss government is saying that they will imprison people for turning their heating up above 19 degrees Celsius.
In Switzerland, It's really coming down to the wire.
Summit.News will be back.
Well, back during the COVID lockdowns of 2020 and early 2021, we pointed out that this was a dry run, a test run for climate lockdowns, that they would enforce punitive measures against people emitting carbon dioxide or using energy in the event of a, quote, climate emergency, even though, of course, we know the whole climate change hysteria is precisely that.
It was actually happening in some countries.
It was happening in India in 2020.
The government would literally come out and announce, pollution's too high, we have a climate emergency, no cars in certain cities or in certain areas of cities on this day in India.
Simultaneously, the much-vaunted fact-checkers came out and said, there's no such thing as climate lockdowns.
They don't exist.
No one's even talking about them.
Of course, you had the WEF and all these other globalist technocrat groups celebrating how quiet it was during the lockdown and how nature was flourishing.
At the expense of humanity, of course.
Climate lockdown's happening.
Fact-checkers simultaneously claiming that anyone who said that was a dangerous conspiracy theorist and needed to be banned and censored.
Well, what is happening now?
We have energy emergencies.
We have punitive measures being enforced against citizens for using energy.
I had this story last week.
Power company seizes control of thermostats in Colorado during heatwave.
22,000 households in Colorado lost the ability to control their thermostats after the power company seized control of them during a heatwave.
Saw the same thing in California yesterday, of course, where they're asking people, at the moment it's asking, next it's going to be telling, not to use energy until, what was it, 9pm at night or something like that, to avert an energy crisis.
They're going to roll the energy crisis into the climate crisis.
In colorado what appears to have happened was that these people signed up for a rewards program where if they allowed outside forces to control their thermostat or at least give them recommendations on what to do with that thermostat that they would get some money off their bills what they didn't realize that time of course was that.
The power company could literally hijack their thermostat and flash up an emergency warning and prevent them from turning on the AC, which is exactly what happened to 22,000 households in Colorado because of smart meters, which we were warning you about, what, 15 years ago?
Now we see it happening.
Meanwhile, EU demands mandatory energy rationing.
European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen Has asked EU member nations to implement mandatory.
Mandatory.
Remember that?
In Spain, they have bans on AC being below 27°C, which is pretty darn hot in summer, and being above 19°C in winter.
Fines of up to €600,000.
In other words, if you're a business that puts your heating on in winter against the government mandate, your business is finished.
They have inspectors going round.
We now have the European Commission president saying they're going to have mandatory energy rationing to flatten the curve, using the exact same language that the totalitarian technocrats used to lock us down.
We now know that lockdown was a complete scam from beginning to end, yet they're still deploying the same weaponised language.
Switzerland.
Swiss face up to three years in prison for violating heating rules.
People in Switzerland have violated the country's new heating rules which forbid setting the temperature above 19 degrees.
Bear in mind...
Old people who are especially susceptible to the cold.
Again, we were supposed to lock down the entire society, take five booster shots to protect the elderly.
Oh, but when it gets to winter, they're going to literally kill them off by having the heating below 19 degrees.
That may seem okay for most people, but if you're elderly, you need to stay warm.
We had an entire lockdown based around protecting vulnerable people.
As soon as it gets to the winter, oh Sodom, let's get that heating down because we've got an energy crisis.
Under the new rules, buildings that use gas heating systems are restricted to 19 degrees Celsius, that is 66.2 Fahrenheit for you Americans, while hot water can only be heated up to 60 degrees Celsius and radiant heaters are banned entirely.
They may fine you $30, they may fine you $3,000, or they may put you in prison for three years.
Good news though is that we've now got mass protests on the streets against this.
Not against Vladimir Putin, but against the actual sanctions on Russia, against the lie that this is solely Vladimir Putin's fault when we had the inflation beforehand, when we had the disastrous net zero agenda, climate change hysteria, crap that has made all these European countries overly dependent on green energy, overly dependent on Russian energy.
To the point where, up until a couple of weeks ago, the German government was planning to shut down all its nuclear plants across the entire country, despite this massive cost-of-living crisis.
They only reversed that decision at the last minute.
This is called revolt against the current thing.
This is about the protest in Prague that happened this past weekend.
Let's roll it.
There were gigantic protests in the Czech capital of Prague over the weekend.
An estimated 70,000 people marched out of a population of 10.7 million.
That's the equivalent of over half a million people marching in Germany.
*Sings* What were their demands?
An end to energy sanctions on Russia, neutrality regarding the conflict in Ukraine, an end to weapons supplies in Ukraine and the resignation of their government.
This was the first major revolt against the current thing crisis.
Some of the demonstrators carried banners saying aid for Ukrainians and two sweaters for us.
The crowd also chanted demise and we've had enough in reference to their desire for the government to resign from power.
People prepared slogans against the EU, NATO, Prime Minister Peter Fiala, the Green Deal for Europe and the government's rejection of Russia.
"This is not our war," the crowd asserted, angry at soaring inflation and spiralling energy bills.
And you can't dismiss the Czechs as being unwitting agents of Putin.
They suffered under the brutal occupation of Soviet forces right up until the end of the 80s.
Similar protests are also being planned in major German cities over the course of the next month.
It remains to be seen what the response of the authorities will be, given that protesters have already been demonised as domestic extremists and warned that they're being watched by the security services.
That indeed is happening in Germany, where of course we've had numerous top public officials come out over the last few weeks and say, these protesters who are planning to demonstrate against cost of energy increases, massive spikes in bills, they're domestic extremists, they're just continuing from the anti-vaxxer stuff, we need to have literal secret services watch them, people struggling to pay their bills.
In the UK, we've had a better outcome, of course.
I talked about it earlier with the new Prime Minister, Liz Truss.
The one thing she has done, the one good thing she has done, Apart from this bailout, which we'll end up paying for anyway, is she's restarted fracking in the UK, which there should have never been a moratorium on fracking in the first place.
It was an energy miracle for the United States, and it was initially for the United Kingdom.
This cost of energy crisis, in terms of shortages of gas, energy rationing and so forth, would have never have happened If we'd have kept that fracking running, well now she's finally reintroduced it, at least lifted the ban on it, so hopefully that will come to pass.
Economists, Europeans, are mad with anger and it will worsen.
That is French economist Charles Gave saying that Europeans now recognize that it isn't all Vladimir Putin's fault, that it's their own leaders' over-dependent stupidity of pursuing net-zero policies that has led us down this path.
And also, We just played the video there of the mass protests in Prague.
This was censored by the media.
Obviously, there were some news reports about it.
Getty Images did not send a single photographer to the mass demonstration in Prague involving 70,000 people.
Bear in mind, that's a country with a population of only about 10 million.
If that was in Germany, as I said in the video, it'd be half a million people.
You go on Getty Images news, Type in Prague protest.
The last thing they have on there, bear in mind they're supposed to cover world events entirely, is a protest, never again, a pro-Ukraine protest from May 2022, from four months ago.
Not a single Getty Images news photographer was sent to a giant mass protest in the capital city of the Czech Republic on Saturday to document that.
It's a cover-up.
We'll be back.
No, go away.
Now I still have some housework to do in terms of covering remaining UK issues because we had a new Prime Minister and we also had a media celebrating the fact that there was no white man in a major government role in this new Conservative government.
Like, being white or male was a bad thing.
It's not.
And we're going to get into that, but first I want to play the first few minutes from this new video that went up a few hours ago, because we've had some major damaging revelations about OnlyFans and the damage it's doing to both men and women over the course of the past few days, as it's revealed that their profits run to, in terms of the owner of OnlyFans, this shadowy pornographer, Half a billion dollars in profit.
This is called Simpocalypse.
Here's the clip.
Remember in early 2020 when I made that simps video?
What on earth is a simp?
Trying to urge young men against pursuing such a vacuous destructive habit.
Yeah, took a big fat L on that one, didn't I?
For the simps are now legion and they are many.
Welcome to the simpocalypse.
OnlyFans majority owner Leonid Radvinsky, a shadowy pornographer about whom virtually nothing is known and the media barely tries to find out, made $500 million from OnlyFans in the space of just 18 months.
The company's profits have soared from $61 million in 2020 to $433 million last year.
Their user base has metastasised to 220 million, most of them men, with 2021 seeing a 128% increase.
Get this, simps spent 4.8 billion dollars on OnlyFans last year alone.
Lockdown handed them an army of new users, and now the cost of living crisis will hand them an army of new creators.
Whenever society catches a metaphorical disease, OnlyFans is the first parasite on the scene, quick as a flash to make it all immeasurably worse.
Andrew Tate gets vilified and banned for supposed misogyny.
He's apparently this massive, dangerous threat to young men.
Yet we've lost, completely lost, an entire generation of young men to simpery and OnlyFans.
Tate's the devil incarnate for offering courses teaching young men how not to be dysfunctional, emotionally crippled losers.
Yet courses teaching young women how to be OnlyFans camgirls, rapaciously feeding off the corpse of masculinity.
Oh, that's just fine!
Whether you're just starting out at OnlyFans or in the process of creating one, this program is for you.
I give you all the secret tips and tricks other creators don't want you to know.
Yeah, OnlyFans might literally be shrinking young men's brains, but Andrew Tate said something offensive!
OnlyFans founder Radvinsky ran websites in the 90s and 2000s providing hacked passwords to porn sites, featuring underage performers and bestiality.
Countless under-18s are selling explicit videos on OnlyFans.
There are children as young as 14 years of age that are then seeing the opportunity to generate income.
Children are getting OnlyFans user accounts approved after using their grandmother's passport.
Police say one 14-year-old used her grandmother's passport to sell explicit images.
Nonsense are then trying to meet up with them in real life.
These are the types of comments she received while promoting her OnlyFans account on Twitter.
Some request more graphic content and ask she'll meet up.
Missing children are even appearing in explicit OnlyFans videos.
Childline says children have anonymously contacted their counselling service and talked about their experiences on the site.
Some reported separately being victims of historic sexual abuse.
We saw a dozen or so children that were also linked with content on OnlyFans.
Becoming increasingly clear that OnlyFans is being used by children.
Children on occasions are being blackmailed and exploited.
The company are not doing enough to put in place the safeguards that prevent children exploiting the opportunity to generate money, but also for children to be exploited.
All of this gets a pass from the dominant culture.
No action is taken.
No one cares.
Yeah, it's Andrew Tate who's the real problem.
Yeah, he's the one who must be stopped.
But OnlyFans changed their colours to the Ukrainian flag!
They posted the black square in solidarity with Black Lives Matter.
I mean, yeah, they may be facilitating the trafficking and sexual abuse of children.
They may be utterly destroying normal, healthy human relationships.
That's where your five billion beta bucks went.
But isn't it more important that they support the message?
Andrew Tate didn't put a Ukraine flag in his bio.
There you have it.
You can watch the rest of that video on YouTube, but I want to move into this topic, and we've got another final video to play on this.
Because again, we've had a new Prime Minister in the UK, and she has chosen a government cabinet that contains no white men.
The newspapers, the media heralded this, they commended it.
Headline Times newspaper highlights how no white men will hold major office in new UK government.
The Times newspaper in the UK has published an article noting how no white men will hold major office in the new government led by Liz Truss.
No grey offices of state will contain white men.
And again, can you imagine the new government of Nigeria Which recently banned diversity in advertising, by the way.
Very interesting.
Imagine the new government in Nigeria containing no black men in any of their major government offices, and then the media in Nigeria celebrating that as a great example of progressivism, despite the fact that the overwhelming majority of the population in Nigeria is of course black, just as still.
The majority of the population, around 86%, is white in the United Kingdom.
This video is called No Country for White Men.
Let's roll it.
For the first time in British history, no great office of state will be held by a white man.
Liz Truss's new Conservative government contains no white man in a prominent cabinet position.
Ha!
Take that, leftists!
Who are the real racists now?
Following on from the Times, the Telegraph became the latest newspaper to commend this as a boon for diversity.
Diversity that's not quite diverse enough to include white men.
In Britain, where the population is 87% white, yeah, not that kind of diversity.
Liz Truss forms most diverse cabinet in history with no white males in top jobs.
She appointed her key ally, Kwasi Kwarteng, who has gone A in heritage, to the Treasury, James Cleverley, whose mother is from Sierra Leone, was made Foreign Secretary, and Suella Braverman, whose parents are of Indian origin, became Home Secretary.
Meanwhile, this is the woman who has been picked to become Health Secretary.
Hmm.
Now, I'm not trying to be mean.
Everyone at some point in their life has struggled with weight gain.
But not everyone gets to become the Health Secretary.
It seems to be a common theme.
Belgium previously appointed a 20 stone woman as Health Minister.
Maybe the next Chancellor of the Exchequer will be someone with a history of bankrupted businesses and petty theft convictions.
Or maybe not.
To her credit, Therese Coffey, who is Catholic and anti-abortion, good for her, ...addressed her critics.
She acknowledged that she's not a role model for health, but will do her best in the job anyway.
I mean, good luck to her.
She can't be any worse than arch lockdown zealot Matt Hancock, can she?
But will Liz Truss be any better than Boris Johnson?
The early signs aren't great.
The first thing she did upon becoming Prime Minister was to pledge a loyalty oath to the current thing.
Prolonging the war 1,500 miles away.
And how did Liz Truss address the very real crisis of record numbers of boat migrants arriving in England on a daily basis?
A massive security threat, a huge drain on economic resources, a total insult to the very notion of borders and nationhood.
Well, she didn't even mention it.
No, not a single word.
And in further fallout from the announcement of this new diverse cabinet, Remix News reports ex-BBC presenter issues grovelling apology after calling new Conservative administration the Coconut Cabinet.
This is a left-wing anti-racist.
The former BBC TV and radio presenter has apologised for and withdrawn a controversial remark about Liz Truss's new government, referring to what is the most diverse administration in British history as the Coconut Cabinet.
Now what was interesting about his grovelling apology on Twitter Was that in apologising for calling it a coconut cabinet, and again, you know, these people in this cabinet may be far better than the white men in the previous Boris Johnson cabinet.
That's not the point.
The point is, why is the media celebrating the fact there's no white people in it?
That's weird.
That's effed up.
But then this Ian McWhirter, this former BBC journalist, apologised for making what he said was an ironic reference to a term used by some on the left about black people who are deemed traitors to the cause through joining the Tory party.
And again, it's that whole narrative bigotry of low expectations.
They expect people's skin colour to be wedded to their political opinions.
They think black people are all stupid and should all think the same things, but they're the anti-racists.
But in making this grovelling apology, he said, quote, Indeed!
I tweeted earlier that the trust cabinet made the Scottish government look, quote, hideously white.
I have always championed racial diversity in my columns, so in making his apology for being racist, he proudly showcased his previous tweet in saying that another cabinet in Scotland was, quote, hideously white.
What other race does he think is hideous, or is it just white people?
And how, on any sane planet, is that an anti-racist apology for him making a racist statement?
That's going to wrap it up for the Summit News Hour.
Coming up next is the War Room.
Don't go away, stay tuned.
The rage for more than a decade have been concentrated green powders.
with wheatgrass and so many other ingredients that are known to make us healthy, to make us vibrant, and to defend our immune systems.
Now, over a year and a half ago, we came out with a product that was top-sourced, top-of-the-line, as good as it's going to get, but then the supply chain broke down and it was sold out for more than a year.
Finally, green fiber capsules, this big old bottle, jam-packed, is back in stock for a limited time at InfoWareStore.com, 30% off.
In this limited time, we'll have time
▲
Export Selection