Feb. 22, 2025 - Dennis Prager Show
02:32
| 
| Time | Text |
|---|---|
| I want to get to Brianna Sigdow with beefnews.org. | |
| Brianna, thank you so much for joining us today. | |
| I read this column from Zero Hedge, and I know you've written about this, Brianna, but you came to mind instantly, and I wanted to have you on, so thank you for joining us here. | |
| Thank you so much for having me on, Carl. | |
| I appreciate it. | |
| All right, absolutely. | |
| Okay, so by now I'm assuming that you've read the column. | |
| I'm just going to read the summary, and then I'm going to ask you some questions here and just get your take on this. | |
| But it was through Zero Hedge. | |
| Bird flu is a rerun of the COVID playbook, they say. | |
| Bird flu can be very confusing. | |
| They write this is true because, as is so often the case with our government, those who claim to be trying to solve the problem, our so-called public health and pandemic preparedness experts are actually the ones who created the problem. | |
| They are actively seeking to perpetuate it. | |
| So let me ask you this question. | |
| There's a lot of things, Bree, in this column. | |
| Actually, the same way that we dealt with COVID-19 and the lockdowns appears to be the same way that you have the federal government dealing with the bird flu. | |
| Your take. | |
| Yeah, that's absolutely right. | |
| And when you talk about a playbook, these playbooks were written prior to the pandemic. | |
| But I want to go back to that cliffhanger. | |
| And in fact, they perpetuated and the reasons why. | |
| In 2013, the Supreme Court ruled an association for molecular pathology versus myriad genetics that a corporation could not patent anything found in nature. | |
| However, a corporation could patent genetic sequences that were created. | |
| And so this has created a massive conflict of interest. | |
| Wow. | |
| Wait, wait. | |
| Brie, Brie, Brie, I've never heard that. | |
| Please say that again. | |
| I'm literally writing that down as you say it. | |
| All right. | |
| Please say that again. | |
| So in 2013, in the Supreme Court Decision Association for Molecular Pathology versus Myriad Genetics, the Supreme Court ruled. | |
| That a corporation could not patent DNA sequences found in structure, or excuse me, in nature. |
Export Selection