Dennis Prager Show - The Bird Flu!
Aired: 2025-02-22
Duration: 02:32


=== Brianna On Zero Hedge (02:27) ===

[00:00:04]  I want to get to Brianna Sigdow with beefnews.org.
[00:00:09]  Brianna, thank you so much for joining us today.
[00:00:12]  I read this column from Zero Hedge, and I know you've written about this, Brianna, but you came to mind instantly, and I wanted to have you on, so thank you for joining us here.
[00:00:25]  Thank you so much for having me on, Carl.
[00:00:27]  I appreciate it.
[00:00:29]  All right, absolutely.
[00:00:30]  Okay, so by now I'm assuming that you've read the column.
[00:00:34]  I'm just going to read the summary, and then I'm going to ask you some questions here and just get your take on this.
[00:00:39]  But it was through Zero Hedge.
[00:00:40]  Bird flu is a rerun of the COVID playbook, they say.
[00:00:43]  Bird flu can be very confusing.
[00:00:46]  They write this is true because, as is so often the case with our government, those who claim to be trying to solve the problem, our so-called public health and pandemic preparedness experts are actually the ones who created the problem.
[00:00:58]  They are actively seeking to perpetuate it.
[00:01:01]  So let me ask you this question.
[00:01:03]  There's a lot of things, Bree, in this column.
[00:01:09]  Actually, the same way that we dealt with COVID-19 and the lockdowns appears to be the same way that you have the federal government dealing with the bird flu.
[00:01:20]  Your take.
[00:01:22]  Yeah, that's absolutely right.
[00:01:23]  And when you talk about a playbook, these playbooks were written prior to the pandemic.
[00:01:28]  But I want to go back to that cliffhanger.
[00:01:32]  And in fact, they perpetuated and the reasons why.
[00:01:36]  In 2013, the Supreme Court ruled an association for molecular pathology versus myriad genetics that a corporation could not patent anything found in nature.
[00:01:50]  However, a corporation could patent genetic sequences that were created.
[00:01:56]  And so this has created a massive conflict of interest.
[00:02:00]  Wow.
[00:02:01]  Wait, wait.
[00:02:02]  Brie, Brie, Brie, I've never heard that.
[00:02:04]  Please say that again.
[00:02:05]  I'm literally writing that down as you say it.
[00:02:09]  All right.
[00:02:09]  Please say that again.
[00:02:11]  So in 2013, in the Supreme Court Decision Association for Molecular Pathology versus Myriad Genetics, the Supreme Court ruled.
[00:02:24]  That a corporation could not patent DNA sequences found in structure, or excuse me, in nature.