Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

April 14, 2021 - Dennis Prager Show

02:54:49

The Dennis Prager Show LIVE

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Thank you.
	How late?
	It's not that late.
	It's, uh, what time is it broadcast?
	Is it 10 p.m.
	Eastern?
	It's called Gutfeld.
	That makes sense.
	That makes perfect sense, because that's who it is.
	He's extremely witty, by the way.
	I've been on with him since Red Eye, many years ago.
	And I just learned, and I'm not certain this is accurate, but I think I've learned that this will be actually not broadcast live, but broadcast Friday night, because they are going to be covering the riots in Minneapolis.
	And I'm not exactly clear.
	I'll ask them why they would do that, since we could talk about the riots on the show.
	No, no, no, no, no.
	This is the new Greg Gutfeld show.
	Anyway, that's why I'm in New York.
	I have a cute story for you.
	My wife and I were walking with a dear friend who lives in New York.
	Poor thing.
	I mean, who lives in New York.
	And this was in Times Square.
	And a young black kid walks over to me and basically goes, Are you famous?
	I know you.
	No, I know you.
	And I tell him my name.
	Oh, and he's very excited.
	I have a question.
	He's a very polite kid.
	And full of life.
	He's a good kid.
	I should have taken him home with me.
	Wouldn't you?
	My wife is right here.
	We would have taken this kid home in a second.
	I mean, there's a very good chance he has parents, but nevertheless.
	Anyway, I have a question for you.
	How old would you say he was?
	Oh, he was like 20-ish.
	Oh, 20. As old as 20?
	Yeah, okay.
	And he said, I have a question for you.
	He was very earnest.
	What is it like to be famous?
	And usually I get, are you famous?
	Which is a very funny question, because if you're famous, they don't ask you if you're famous.
	It's a self-contradictory question.
	But anyway, it shows...
	The kid's a thinker.
	To think of what is it like.
	So I basically told him that, for me, it's a non-issue.
	But that's because I have a very strong value system.
	And a whole host of other reasons as well, which I didn't get into.
	But I told him, please understand something.
	Fame is like a drug or alcohol.
	And it can ruin your life.
	It can utterly, utterly, and it does.
	It ruins a lot of people's lives, especially early fame or overnight fame.
	And that, you know, it's not what matters in life.
	Anyway, I felt so good as having this opportunity to tell a young person, That this is not what he should be pursuing.
	He took it in.
	It was clear.
	I should have taken his name, stayed in touch with him.
	Anyway, it was fun.
	The different types of people who said hello to me in Times Square.
	Times Square is about one-third as full as it is normally.
	And it is probably ten times fuller than it was six months ago.
	I was very curious to see New York, and this offered me the opportunity.
	Virtually every restaurant in Manhattan has an outdoor seating area, this booth area.
	And also now there was indoor seating, which of course I utilized at the restaurant that I was at.
	And I have no idea.
	I really don't.
	I'd be very interested to find out how many restaurants close down permanently.
	All right, that's the report from New York.
	Yes, the Gutfeld Show is at 11 p.m.
	Eastern.
	There you go.
	Thank you.
	And I'm going to try to find out during breaks if they're really postponing.
	The airing of the show.
	We're taping the show tonight, but the airing of the show to Friday.
	So, CNN refers to the riots as protests.
	Now, I played for you yesterday people yelling at a press conference.
	I think it was the chief of police in Brooklyn Center, Minnesota.
	Who referred to them as riots, and they yelled at him.
	Now, one of you called in to say it wasn't necessarily media people yelling.
	It might have been activists who showed up at the press conference.
	Whether they were me, I suspect there's a combination of activists and media, but in any event, the media don't call it riots.
	So whether they protested verbally or not, the mainstream media do not refer to left-wing riots as riots.
	But they do refer to what happened in Washington on January 6th as the insurrection.
	The manipulation of language by the media is exactly what Orwell predicted would happen.
	If you rely on CNN and the New York Times, you are getting an utterly distorted picture of reality.
	I know they say that if you rely on Fox and talk radio.
	That's correct.
	So one of us is wrong.
	It's as simple as that.
	But I would like to have...
	Let's have some contest here.
	Of what?
	Mainstream talk radio and Fox News and the Wall Street editorial page and all the other conservative major media.
	Town Hall, Daily Wire.
	What is the Glenn Beck's thing?
	Is it Daily Beast?
	The Blaze.
	I always make that.
	Not wrong.
	Beast is on the left.
	I'd like to have a list of the lies they tell and the lies our side tells.
	And we'll see the number and, more important, the significance of the lies on each.
	It would be a very important thing to see.
	I mean, if my side lies, I have to acknowledge it.
	So they won't call what is happening in Minnesota riots.
	And the reason is the same as the thousands of medical people in the medical profession who said that the height of the lockdown, that it's okay, it's healthy to have massive number of people protesting because protesting, in other words, from a health perspective, because protesting racism is a health benefit.
	So everything's been perverted by the left.
	Not to call it a riot.
	The policewoman who I believe, I do believe, accidentally killed Dwayne Wright has fled her home.
	Dante.
	What did I say?
	Dwayne, yes.
	Dante Wright.
	Names and I have never been friends.
	It's just...
	I know that it's a family issue because my brother is quite bright, a professor of medicine.
	Distinguished professor of medicine.
	Has the same issue with names.
	Anyway, Dante Wright.
	The woman who accidentally killed...
	And I think there's every reason to believe it was accidental.
	Even though it's a little, it is bizarre.
	I mean, I don't know how, I've never used either on people, taser or gun, but you almost never hear of it.
	It happens where you can confuse one for the other, but her reaction and the fact that she used it once, police trying to kill somebody do not shoot someone once.
	And her immediate reaction, oh, I shot him, all suggest that it was accidental, but it doesn't mean anything.
	The narrative is, a white cop shot a black man.
	And that's all you need to know for the haters of the left.
	That's all you need.
	The woman has fled her home.
	It's a very bad sign for society.
	When this happens, that the terror of a group, namely the left, is so great that a policeman or anybody else has to flee their house.
	I don't know exactly at what point people will understand the mortal threat the left poses to civilization.
	It may not happen, and it may be so late when it does.
	More evidence when we come back.
	1-8 Prager 776. I'm sorry?
	This is Carol Platt-Lebow for townhall.com.
	Calling new Biden legislation and infrastructure plan is like calling a shark a dolphin.
	They both may have dorsal fins, but you mistake one for the other at your peril.
	Don't be fooled.
	Only 5% of the bill's spending would actually go for roads and bridges, what normal people think of as infrastructure.
	Add in items like Amtrak and broadband, and you're still only at 30% of the eye-popping total of $2.3 trillion.
	And you're supposed to pay for all of this with the biggest tax increase since 1968. Here's what's worse.
	The bill is actually about leftist social engineering.
	It would end right to work, something the left hates because it guarantees no one can be forced to join a union or pay union dues in order to hold a job.
	Ending it offers a rich new source of campaign contributions for Democrats.
	Calling a shark a dolphin doesn't make it one.
	I'm Carol Platt-Lebow.
	Trending now on the Charlie Kirk Show.
	We now have a radical, unproven philosophy, critical race theory, that is running our entire government.
	The CDC director says racism is a serious public health threat.
	Quote, a growing body of research shows that centuries of racism in this country has had a profound and negative impact on communities of color.
	That's not true.
	It's not true.
	Read Discrimination and Disparities by Thomas Sowell.
	Just because there is a disparity does not mean that discrimination is to blame.
	The fatherless epidemic in the black community is a serious public health threat.
	You want to know what's keeping black people down?
	It's not racism.
	It's government programs, failing public schools, Democrat policies and the lack of fathers in the home.
	Keep up with what's trending.
	Subscribe on YouTube today.
	Trending now on the Larry Elder Show.
	you Thank you.
	Bye.
	Thank you.
	Headline, and I'm quoting, Two CBS TV executives are fired after one called a black TV anchor just a jive guy, and the other called a female employee an effing idiot.
	Peter Dunn, president of CBS television stations, and David Friend, senior VP for News.
	The stations were ousted on Wednesday.
	I'm laughing because polls show that 83% of Democrats believe that Donald Trump is a racist.
	83%.
	This guy is calling a black TV anchor just a jive guy while reporting how racist Donald Trump is.
	I can't make this up.
	Keep up with what's trending.
	Subscribe on YouTube today.
	Trending now on America First with Sebastian Parker.
	Why is it that we have to wait?
	Is this so often the case for a British tabloid newspaper to report the story of Hunter Biden for anybody to take notice?
	This.
	Because our media just aren't interested.
	Our media want to protect the Bidens.
	They want to protect liberals.
	Most of the media.
	And they're not on as brokers.
	We knew the contents of this laptop in September and October.
	This should have been out and out everywhere.
	Everywhere.
	But what do we have instead?
	Instead, we had the New York Post being blocked from Twitter.
	Instead, we had CNN and others suggesting that...
	Hunter Biden's own laptop that he signed over was somehow Russian disinformation.
	Absolute nonsense.
	Well, it's strange, isn't it?
	It's strange to say, you know, it's Russian disinformation.
	Then for Hunter...
	Friends, I'm Dennis Prager.
	Hello.
	I want to remind you that I will be going with you to Israel in October, and there is a Stand with Israel banner up at DennisPrager.com.
	The Prager annual cruise has been canceled.
	The lines are, the cruise lines are not going yet.
	It was scheduled for June.
	I consider it a farce.
	I would have gone last year on the cruise.
	The whole thing about getting COVID from inanimate objects, from surfaces, turns out to be 100% incorrect.
	100%.
	All of those fears, all of the scouring of tables and chairs and utensils is all a joke, a bad joke.
	The whole lockdown was a bad joke.
	We're living in an age of spectacular lies.
	Do you know that Governor DeSantis of Florida had a number of scientists on questioning the lockdown?
	This happened last week, but I just learned about it now.
	I think maybe I even mentioned it, but I don't believe I did.
	And this is the governor of a major state of this country.
	And what was it, Twitter?
	Which group took it down?
	Got to find that out.
	What?
	Which one?
	YouTube?
	So I'm looking this up right now as I speak to you folks.
	Let's see.
	DeSantis, YouTube.
	Okay, here we're getting it.
	Oh, YouTube.
	That's not...
	It's only telling me it's YouTube.
	Taken down.
	Let's see if that gives me the...
	The details are really astonishing.
	Okay, here we go.
	This is from yesterday.
	DeSantis blasts YouTube for taking down COVID-19 video over...
	Oh, my God.
	Of course, this is...
	Who is...
	What's reporting is this?
	Who's the Herald Tribune?
	It's not the New York Herald.
	USA Today, that's what it is.
	Last week, the governor called a news conference where he lashed out for 20 minutes attempting to rebut a report aired on CBS's 60 Minutes that claimed Publix was favored...
	All right, that has nothing to do with it.
	Anyway, what we are witnessing is Orwellian.
	It's a big tech corporate.
	This is DeSantis.
	Big tech corporate media collusion.
	The end result is that the narrative is always right.
	Well, I don't think that's what the American people want.
	I wish he were right.
	I think half the American people are perfectly okay with corporations dictating what they read, what they see, and what they hear.
	That's correct!
	And by the way, overwhelmingly, it's the better educated half, meaning the better indoctrinated half.
	This is quite remarkable.
	Here we have ABC News.
	DeSantis attacks YouTube for yanking his pandemic video.
	You know, it started with PragerU, more or less.
	Remember that?
	And then what did I say?
	You can look.
	My hearing is still on YouTube at the U.S. Senate.
	And I said, today it's us, and the next day, the next group, and they quoted the famous statement of Pastor, I think, Niemöller.
	You know, first they came for the communists, and I wasn't a communist.
	I said nothing.
	Then they came for the Jews.
	I wasn't a Jew, and I said nothing.
	It goes down.
	Then they came for labor, and then they said, I'm not a union man.
	Then they came for me, and there was nobody left to speak up.
	This is exactly what is happening in the United States.
	The parallels, and I say this as a Jew who has done a great deal for my fellow Jews and for Judaism in my life.
	And nevertheless, the parallels to the Hitler Youth that I see, for example, if you look at the video of Will Witt of PragerU, I don't know why anybody would find
	these parallels in any way morally irresponsible.
	I'd like the screaming and shutting down Of books and speakers with whom they differ is exactly what communist and Nazi groups of youth did.
	Okay?
	But the cowards of the left and the cowards who were liberals won't acknowledge this.
	So what they do is they focus your attention on the virtually non-existent number of white supremacists in the United States.
	Countries in crisis, my friends, and most people do what they always do with regard to evil.
	They ignore it.
	That is, they hope it'll go away.
	If it goes away, it only goes away because people fight it.
	And most people are too afraid to fight.
	I was listening to a recording.
	My wife supplied me from a program in L.A. called...
	I'm sorry?
	The John and Ken Show, yes.
	In fact, John has given a PragerU video.
	So we have a wonderful relationship with these guys.
	And we're talking about the homeless in an area in Los Angeles.
	How much damage they're doing to perfectly innocent people in the area.
	And two citizens from the area who wanted to remain anonymous, they're actually afraid to speak out with their names because of the gangs that are infesting these homeless areas.
	Of course, they mention that they get absolutely no response from the city councilwoman or Adam Schiff, who represents their arena.
	Adam Schiff doesn't give a damn about his constituency.
	And they deserve not to be cared about because they vote for him like lemmings.
	Anyway, he asked one of them, either John or Ken asked one of them, Something to the effect, or the guy, no, the guy actually, he wasn't even asked.
	He said.
	I'm sorry?
	He was asked?
	I thought he volunteered the fact that he says, you know, I'm even on the left.
	I'm, you know, I'm a progressive and so on.
	So, John and Ken did not pursue it.
	I would have.
	This is a perfect example of a man watching His community ruined by policies that are exclusive to the Democratic Party, ignored completely by the Democratic Party, and who votes Democrat.
	I listen, and it doesn't raise my opinion of my human fellow species.
	What?
	Thank you.
	What?
	I will ask for your reaction to the president's promise that nothing he recommended impinges on the Second Amendment.
	I guess unique interpretation of what the Second Amendment is then.
	You know, if we're looking at the infringement upon the Second Amendment and the government trying to pass any kind of restrictions on that, I certainly think there's an argument to be said that if he's passing the idea that you can no longer build a firearm in your home, which has always been legal in America, even before the founding of our nation, you could build a firearm in your home.
	If he's now saying you can't do that, well, I would argue that we're looking at an infringement upon Second Amendment rights.
	If he's talking about reclassifying an entire class of pistols under the National Firearms Act, which would make it So you couldn't possess these firearms unless you submit your photo, you submit your fingerprints, you pay a $200 tax stamp and undergo extensive background checks through the ATF, and then put on a government watch list simply for exercising your Second Amendment rights.
	I think that that's called an infringement upon your rights, and I think that's something that the American public needs to reach out to their members of Congress and remind them that they are the check.
	On the executive branch.
	The legislative branch is one of the checks to keep the executive branch within their role and make sure that they're not overreaching.
	Which is precisely why Biden wants to use executive orders.
	He wants to do an end around and he wants to try to avoid the legislative process because the legislative process is ultimately the way the American people can push back against restrictions.
	constitutional restrictions like this.
	Keep up with what's trending.
	Subscribe on YouTube today.
	Trending now on the Hugh Hewitt Show.
	Same thing.
	What about Big Tech?
	Your predecessor, Josh Hawley, was going after Big Tech.
	He's continuing to do that in the Senate of the United States.
	I hope you've continued the investigation into Google.
	Absolutely.
	So we're actually one of the states that were part of the William Barr Justice Department's antitrust suit.
	There were a handful of us that joined that antitrust suit against Google.
	We led the investigation into Facebook, have also filed a lawsuit against Facebook for their...
	I think this is an emerging...
	Well, it's not emerging.
	It's here.
	It's right in front of us.
	You saw last night Google slash YouTube TV cancels, deletes this roundtable Governor DeSantis was having on how lockdowns don't work.
	Woodrow Wilson was more concerned with his legacy than what was right for America.
	He believed the founding fathers were misled.
	He was the first president in American history to actually philosophically and politically challenge the beliefs of the founding fathers.
	Woodrow Wilson and Joe Biden are very similar.
	They care about a radical restructuring and redefinition of America.
	And I'm going to say something controversial that I have not said publicly.
	You ready for this?
	Joe Biden is governing much more radically than Barack Obama.
	Let me say that again.
	Joe Biden is governing much more radically.
	Is that the right way to say it?
	Much more radically?
	I guess that's correct.
	It just doesn't sound right.
	He's governing more radically than Barack Obama.
	He's governing more radically than Barack Obama.
	There are some people who are fighting in this society without these relatively small number We have no chance.
	I have analyzed with you many times why some people fight and most people don't.
	And one good piece of news is helping the fighters is as important as being a fighter.
	Not everybody is cut out.
	To be one.
	One of them is the Alliance Defending Freedom.
	They take a lot of the liberty cases in this country to the Supreme Court.
	They're at adflegal.org slash Dennis.
	Alliance Defending Freedom, adflegal.org slash Dennis.
	I have on the line their senior counsel at the Alliance Defending Freedom, Tyson Langhofer.
	Tyson, welcome, I think, back to the show, correct?
	Yes, absolutely.
	Thanks for having me, Dennis.
	So do I take it as a good sign that you were willing to come back on?
	I treated you all right?
	Yeah, I absolutely did.
	So what's the latest case that you personally or your organization has been involved in?
	The latest good news, actually, coming on to talk about good news, Dennis, is that we represent a professor at Shawnee State University in Ohio, Dr. Nicholas Merriweather.
	And he's been a professor there for more than 20 years, a professor of philosophy and religion.
	And a couple years ago, in a philosophy class, he was told by a student, a male student, that he must address the student as a female.
	And Dr. Merriweather...
	Said, I don't think I can do that, but I'll call you by your first or last name, whatever you choose, and avoid the use of pronouns.
	That wasn't good enough, and the student complained to the university, and the university punished Dr. Merriweather and said that he had created a hostile environment for simply declining to use the preferred pronoun.
	And we sued.
	The district court dismissed the case, but just last week, the Sixth Circuit ruled So, you say you have a victory at what level?
	At what court level?
	So, this is at the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals, which is over...
	Ohio and Kentucky and several other states.
	And so this is a really big win.
	It's the first win in the country on this particular issue dealing with professors in public universities.
	And so it's a very big win, and it's a great opinion by the court.
	Will the school appeal it?
	That's a good question.
	We are not sure yet.
	The school has the ability to appeal it to the entire Sixth Circuit en banc and ask them to rehear it.
	They could appeal it to the Supreme Court, or we could go back to the District Court and continue litigating it there.
	The defendants have asked for an additional 30 days to decide how they're going to proceed.
	So we should know in the next month or so.
	Okay, so forgive my ignorance.
	I don't understand how it can go back.
	Once it's decided by the circuit court, what does it mean go back?
	So what happened was the district court dismissed the case on a motion dismissed before we even got to litigate it.
	They said, you don't even state a claim.
	So we appealed that, and the circuit court said, no, they definitely stated a claim, and if they can prove at the district court what we alleged, then you will win.
	So essentially, it goes back to the district court, and we would actually engage in discovery and litigate.
	I understand.
	So the district court simply refused to hear it, and they were told by the higher court, the circuit court, that they have to hear it.
	That's correct.
	But the good thing about it is the circuit court made very clear that...
	The professors do not lose their right to speak when they're in the classroom, and that was one of the key issues the district court got wrong.
	The circuit court made that very clear.
	His speech is protected, and it also made it very clear that titles and pronouns express a message, and they're part of an important ongoing debate, and that the government can't compel ideological purity.
	And one of the great lines out of the opinion is that if the university could do that, it could force a professor, a pacifist professor, to argue that war is just, or a civil rights icon to criticize the freedom riders, or an atheist could be compelled to affirm that God exists.
	And this opinion says that no one should be forced to express a message that violates their convictions.
	All right, stay on with me.
	This is a big deal.
	Although there are so many cases like this at universities.
	We'll continue in a moment, but I did want to remind you about this is an organization that fights.
	Go to adflegal.org slash Dennis.
	adflegal.org slash Dennis.
	I've told you about a product called Nerve Renew.
	I am one of those who congenitally has had, you know, this numbness in feet.
	In my case, some have it in hands.
	And spent so much of my life, I just sort of made peace with it.
	But then I got special inserts for my shoes, which were tremendously helpful.
	And then I got rid of the inserts after using Nerve Renew for about nine months.
	Go to NerveRenew.com if you have this issue.
	Trending now on the Hugh Hewitt Show.
	What about the idea that Chuck Schumer has a ruling from the parliamentarian that says he can amend the reconciliation instructions and thereby get another bite at the apple, indeed an infinite bite at the apple, with 51 votes?
	In the first place, that's what Chuck Schumer says.
	So let's see if that's what the parliamentarian really is saying.
	And let's get the details of it, okay?
	And also, you know, and I have to go back and research this.
	I mean...
	I think there have been years when they've passed more than one reconciliation bill, but that doesn't mean you can put anything on reconciliation.
	You know, you can put tax changes on reconciliation, and the process by which you do it, by the way, is pretty difficult.
	And I know, you know, let's have a vote on these tax changes.
	I mean, Biden's already back and away from the corporate stuff.
	Yes, he is.
	Yes, he is.
	And so, well, let's see if they can get 50 votes for these.
	I mean, I have a feeling they can.
	Tax increases aren't very popular.
	I mean, what we've seen so far is they've spent an enormous amount of money, and now they want enormous tax increases.
	And that's really what they did in 2009, too.
	And Jamie Dimon said yesterday there's going to be a boom.
	And there has to be a boom when you spend this much money.
	Money's got to go somewhere.
	It's going to go into stocks and real estate.
	When does that boom end, in your experience, Jim?
	Is it a year or two years?
	I'm not sure there's going to be a boom.
	When you funnel it through...
	The networks and the apparatuses they're funneling it through, I don't know how economically productive that is.
	Oh, interesting.
	It passed a $900 billion stimulus in 2009, predicted 4% growth, and what do we get?
	Like 1% growth?
	Keep up with what's trending.
	Subscribe on YouTube today.
	Trending now on the Hugh Hewitt Show. . .
	You know, on the first day of office, Joe Biden issues this executive order that deals with the Keystone Exxon pipeline.
	We're involved in that lawsuit to challenge that.
	He also created a working group, as he called it, with unelected cabinet members to decide what is the quote-unquote social cost of greenhouse gases.
	It's more like Nostradamus than it is Newton, right?
	They're predicting warfare and migration patterns and all these things, hundreds of years in the future, pulling all of that back and then giving a blank check to the EPA and transportation, all these agencies to overtax and overregulate every aspect of our lives, making things more expensive like cars and microwaves.
	We're on the front lines fighting that.
	And if you look and see what the AGs are doing across the country.
	Dennis Prager here.
	And I am with an official, a leader of the Alliance Defending Freedom.
	And he had a victory with regard to free speech with a professor.
	I'm sorry.
	Where was the professor?
	This is Tyson Langhofer I'm speaking to, Senior Counsel for Alliance Defending Freedom.
	Where was this professor?
	At Shawnee State University in Ohio.
	Right, okay.
	So the Sixth Circuit sent it back, said you have to hear the case.
	He refused to call a male student by a female pronoun, though he was completely okay with calling him by a female name, correct?
	Correct, that's right.
	They referred to the student by whatever his chosen name was.
	I'm just trying to imagine when even a professor would use a pronoun.
	I mean, if I'm calling, I taught at college, I'm trying to figure this out.
	So, okay, Susan, would you give us your thought on this text?
	And then I guess if I'd say, well, you all heard what Susan said, and that...
	The professor was willing to do, but not say, you all heard what she said.
	Is that correct?
	That's correct.
	It's a little bit...
	Go ahead.
	Well, I'm just going to say that Dr. Merriweather, because he teaches this philosophy class, he kind of teaches it in a Socratic method, so there is a little bit more dialogue with the students.
	So that may come up a few more times in class, but I agree, it's pretty rare.
	Yeah, exactly.
	I mean, when you speak to someone, you never use a pronoun.
	Correct.
	Unless you use the pronoun you, but you has no male or female in English.
	So it would be very rare for it to come up.
	Are you familiar with the case of the Georgetown Law Professor Sandra Sellers?
	Are you familiar with that?
	Is ADF? I'm not.
	Yeah, so the only reason I'm out, I don't expect you to be, you can't possibly be familiar with all these cases.
	But this is in, you should take a look at it.
	It's in the Great City Journal.
	Canceled to Georgetown.
	And it is about a Georgetown law professor, Sandra Sellers, who said privately on Zoom and not to a colleague, Not knowing that it was being recorded.
	I hate to say this, I end up having this angst every semester that a lot of my lower-graded ones are black.
	Some black student seller said did well, but the overall pattern made her, quote, feel bad.
	And for that, she was immediately dismissed.
	Even though the whole point was she felt bad.
	So, I just want you to be aware of this case at Georgetown and maybe perhaps look into it.
	I've always wondered this about ADF. Do you get more cases than you can handle?
	Oh, absolutely.
	Unfortunately, you know, we receive...
	You know, thousands of requests every year, and we're unable to take them all.
	And so, obviously, we can only take as many as we can staff, and we can't staff all the requests we receive.
	So is that a good example of where you raise more money, you can take more cases?
	Absolutely.
	You know, we have, and obviously with the new administration, there are new threats looming right now, such as the Equality Act, which are going to create...
	If that passes, that would create a huge influx of all kinds of violations of people's constitutional rights.
	Dr. Merriweather here is just another example of kind of the coercive forces trying to compel people to say things they don't believe.
	And we've got numerous ones of those, but we just can't take them all.
	Well, I salute you, and I thank you.
	You're doing magnificent work.
	And folks, you want to help them, go to abflegal.org.
	Slash Dennis.
	Or call 855-649-2020.
	855-649-2020.
	ADFlegal.org slash Dennis.
	Thank you again, Tyson Langhofer.
	That's right.
	They take more cases when they raise more money.
	Makes perfect sense, doesn't it?
	Yep.
	Oh, you know what?
	Hold on.
	Somebody's asking a question.
	I wonder if he's still on.
	Tyson, are you still there?
	I'm here, Dennis.
	Oh, good.
	I always wonder at what point the people, I think, hang up within a minute, within a second.
	They stay on to hear.
	I always wonder about that.
	So I'm glad you stayed on because there's a caller in Laguna Beach, California that donates to ADF and wants to know, are you involved with the January 6th prisoners?
	We are not.
	No, we have, you know, our cases are limited to, you know, free exercise of religion, freedom of speech, and so forth like that.
	And so, obviously, there's limits on what we take, and I don't know exactly.
	I just wanted to know that.
	Okay, that's fair.
	Listen, thank you again.
	All right.
	Thanks, Dennis.
	Right.
	Thank you.
	All right.
	I got you an answer there.
	Jerry in Laguna Beach.
	What's happening in the United States, the rapidity of the decline in freedom in this country and the power of the left and its Orwellianism, that's what's stupefying, the speed.
	But it's really, when you think about it, it seems like it's overnight, but it's generational.
	I mean, it's taken two generations, since World War II, really.
	And even before that, because of the perversion of the academic institutions beginning in the early 20th century.
	But it was not obvious to people.
	Ronald Reagan had it right that it only takes one generation for freedom to be lost.
	Most people thought that the human being yearns to be free, but the human being does not yearn to be free.
	The human being yearns to be taken care of.
	If the human being yearned to be free, the left would never gain power in any country.
	We will be back in a moment.
	Trending now on the Charlie Kirk Show.
	You see, the people that perpetually want more power for themselves, they crisis hop.
	They hop from one crisis to the other.
	the environmental crisis.
	The Chinese coronavirus crisis.
	A crisis allows you to justify a power grab.
	There's nothing quite like a crisis that makes you feel more self-important and act like a totalitarian.
	A crisis generally means that the public will give up their freedoms and liberties.
	There's something even deeper going on here, though.
	As the CDC director says racism is a serious public health threat, they are now blending two of their most effective strategies.
	The fact that Americans will not question the science when it comes from anything from the CDC, despite the fact the CDC has lied to you about basically everything over the last year.
	The CDC has been wrong about almost everything, contributing to a serious mental health crisis, a suicide epidemic.
	Alcoholism, drug usage, self-worth issues with young people.
	40% of small businesses being closed.
	And the lockdowns did nothing.
	Let me say that again.
	The lockdowns did nothing to actually improve the well-being of our country.
	But the CDC now knows that Americans would rather be safe than free.
	And that safetyism is the predominant viewpoint in America.
	And they also know That Americans will not challenge this idea that America is systemically racist.
	Just won't.
	Keep up with what's trending.
	Subscribe on YouTube today.
	Trending now on the Mike Deliger Show.
	He's made a very big deal about ghost guns.
	Homemade guns, as you said, that cannot be traced.
	I didn't realize there was a rash of ghost guns used in these high-profile mass killings that Biden referenced.
	Are they?
	Are these massacres in Charleston and in Colorado and all these terrible scenes, are those all with people who made their guns at home?
	No, Mike, you're right.
	These aren't people who have produced their own firearms in their own homes.
	We're talking about, in many of these instances, the failures of people to either enact on the laws that are available to them or the authorities who failed to take action when they were supposed to.
	So if we look at the most recent...
	Murders in Boulder, Colorado, we see that Colorado already has red flag laws.
	We see that the family was already concerned about the mental disturbance of the individual who's accused of these crimes to the point where they actually took the firearm away from him at one point, and he obviously got that back and committed his heinous crimes.
	But they could have reached out and they could have used the red flag laws available to them there and they didn't.
	So more on Governor DeSantis and his YouTube video with scientists.
	This is from ABC News.
	So it was taken down.
	This is scientists taken down by YouTube.
	YouTube says it took down the DeSantis panel video.
	Because some participants said children should not wear masks because they are ineffective at that age and a possible health hazard.
	YouTube said that contradicts U.S. government guidelines that say children two and older should wear masks in public and when around people they don't live with.
	YouTube has clear policies around COVID-19 medical misinformation.
	To support the health and safety of our users, the company said in a statement Monday.
	We removed this video because it included content that contradicts the consensus of local and global health authorities regarding the efficacy of masks to prevent the spread of COVID-19.
	Wow.
	So if the government said tomorrow three and over, then that would be the only permitted idea.
	Do you know the history of government health policies that have been wrong?
	Like the pyramid, remember the food pyramid?
	One of the reasons Americans got overweight.
	So there is no...
	Dissent allowed on YouTube among scientists.
	Consensus.
	This is how you reach truth in science?
	Through consensus?
	Does any one of you believe?
	Well, of course some of you believe.
	I know that.
	What percentage of Americans, I'll put it that way, believe that two-year-olds transmit COVID? Or that two-year-olds get COVID, let alone die from COVID. Far more two-year-olds die in car crashes.
	So you cannot have dissenting scientists from what the government says.
	When I tell you that the New York Times is to the government what Pravda was to the Communist Party, that is literally true.
	That's not an attack.
	This is an admission on the part of YouTube.
	If the government says it, we allow it to be said.
	If it doesn't say it, we take it down.
	Why is that different from Pravda's relationship to the Communist Party of the Soviet Union?
	If the Communist Party, the government, says it, we allow it.
	If not, we do not.
	There is no difference.
	Amazing America 2021.
	Thanks to the left.
	Trending now on America First with Sebastian Berger.
	Well, it's strange, isn't it?
	It's strange to say, you know, it's Russian disinformation.
	Then for Hunter Biden in a PuffPiece interview this week, say, yeah, it could have.
	I don't know.
	I'm not sure if it was mine.
	It could be Russian disinformation.
	Boris, if your lawyers are demanding the computers back, doesn't that mean they are Hunter Biden's?
	Am I crazy there?
	You're not crazy, my friend.
	You're not crazy.
	You're more rational than Hunter Biden.
	You're definitely not crazy.
	This whole thing is such a joke.
	Hunter Biden is laughing in the face of Americans with these interviews.
	Jimmy Kimmel, where he dares to attack Don Jr., while T. Hunter is literally the face of nepotism in America.
	I mean, this is somebody who's a good-for-nothing failure.
	Who's committed crime after crime.
	All you have to do is look at the contents of the laptop.
	And yet he gets to go on CBS this morning.
	And by the way, talk about collusion.
	Talk about cahoots.
	ViacomCBS owns Simon& Schuster, which put out the book.
	And then he goes on CBS to promote it.
	That's globalism for you in today's economy.
	Hunter Biden is an affront to the American people.
	The fact that the truth about him didn't come out during the campaign is...
	a huge failure of mainstream media, but not one that I think they're gonna fix anytime soon because they're so in bed with the left. - Keep up with what's trending.
	Subscribe on YouTube today.
	Trending now on the Larry Elder Show. - AOC in mid-season form.
	Remember when she said there's no surge at the border because children are not insurgents?
	They want to say, what about the surge?
	Well, first of all, just gut check, stop.
	Anyone who's using the term surge around you.
	Gut check, stop.
	Consciously is trying to invoke a militaristic frame.
	A militaristic frame.
	Is trying to invoke a militaristic frame.
	She can sling it, can't she?
	And that's a problem.
	Because this is not a surge.
	It is not a surge.
	It is more of a...
	These are children.
	Oh, so therefore it's not a surge.
	And they are not insurgents.
	Ah, okay.
	And remember when she had difficulty trying to figure out what a garbage disposal was?
	I am told this is a garbage disposal.
	I am told, I don't know who told me, I can't reveal the identity, but a whistleblower told me that this is a garbage disposal.
	I've never seen a garbage disposal.
	I've never smelled a garbage disposal.
	I've never had one in any place I've ever lived.
	I've never fondled one.
	I don't know what to use it for.
	I don't know whether or not it's alive.
	It appears to be motionless, but it might be playing possum.
	It is hard to say.
	Or what its purpose is.
	Like food scraps?
	Like food scraps?
	I don't know.
	Keep up with what's trending.
	Subscribe on YouTube today.
	Trending now on the Hugh Hewitt Show.
	What about the idea that Chuck Schumer has a ruling from the parliamentarian that says he can amend the reconciliation instructions and thereby get another bite at the apple, indeed an infinite bite at the apple with 51 votes?
	In the first place, that's what Chuck Schumer says.
	So let's see if that's what the parliamentarian really is saying.
	And let's get the details of it, okay?
	And also, you know, and I have to go back and research this.
	I mean, I think there have been years when they've passed more than one reconciliation bill, but that doesn't mean you can put anything on reconciliation.
	You know, you can put tax changes on reconciliation, and the process by which you do it, by the way, is pretty difficult.
	And I don't, you know, let's have a vote on these tax changes.
	I mean, Biden's already back and away from the corporate stuff.
	Yes, he is.
	Yes, it is.
	And so, well, let's see if they get 50 votes for these.
	I mean, I have a feeling they can.
	Tax increases aren't very popular.
	I mean, what we've seen so far is they've spent an enormous amount of money, and now they want enormous tax increases.
	And that's really what they did in 2009, too.
	And Jamie Dimon said yesterday there's going to be a boom.
	And there has to be a boom when you spend the two years.
	I'm not sure there's going to be a boom.
	Paratuses, they're funneling it through.
	I don't know how economically productive that is.
	Oh, interesting.
	The past $900 billion stimulus in 2009 predicted 4% growth.
	And what do we get?
	Keep up with what's trending.
	Subscribe on YouTube today.
	Trending now on The Hugh Hewitt Show.
	You know, on the first day of office, Joe Biden issues this executive order that deals with the Keystone Xstone pipeline.
	We're involved in that lawsuit to challenge that.
	He also created a working group, as he called it, with unelected cabinet members to decide what is the quote-unquote social cost of greenhouse gases.
	And so it's more like...
	Nostradamus than it is Newton, right?
	They're predicting warfare and migration patterns and all these things, hundreds of years in the future, pulling all that back and then giving a blank check to the EPA and transportation, all these agencies, to overtax and overregulate every aspect of our lives, making things more expensive like cars and microwaves.
	We're on the front lines fighting that.
	If you look and see what the AGs are doing across the country to really push back, Missouri's in the lead on that.
	Keep up with what's trending.
	Subscribe on YouTube today.
	Trending now on The Charlie Kirk Show.
	You see, the people that perpetually want more power for themselves, they crisis hop.
	They hop from one crisis to the other.
	The environmental crisis.
	The Chinese coronavirus crisis.
	A crisis allows you to justify a power grab.
	There's nothing quite like a crisis that makes you feel more self-important.
	Thank you.
	Welcome to the Dennis Prager Show.
	And before anything else, I want to welcome a new station to the Dennis Prager Show.
	Sparta, Tennessee, News Talk 1050 WSMT. That's great.
	That is great.
	Well over 300 stations now and I look at it as a moral demand on my life to get to as many people as possible because I say important things about life and the more people who hear it the better chance we have of goodness and truth prevailing.
	Or as the Superman theme would have it, truth, justice, and the American way.
	To think that that was popular among the baby boomers, many of whom grew up to despise truth, justice, and the American many of whom grew up to despise truth, justice, and the American way, it's Isn't it?
	Anyway, it's the male-female hour.
	The second hour every Wednesday is devoted to the most honest discussion of men and women that I know of in the media.
	We talk about every aspect of male-female relations.
	And as I remind you each week, I am not a male fan or a female fan.
	I am a good people fan, and there are good and bad men and good and bad women, as a nanoseconds reflection will reveal.
	Interesting subject today that I have never raised with you, and that is, how do you regard your spouse's family?
	1-8 Prager 776. One of the most common jokes, even when I was a kid, or maybe even, especially when I was a kid, were mother-in-law jokes.
	And usually humor is rooted in truth, otherwise it's not funny.
	I mean, if somebody told...
	With third cousin jokes, nobody would laugh because nobody has any stereotypical notion about what third cousins are like.
	But presumably, mothers-in-law, that is the plural of mother-in-law, mothers-in-law were the butts of jokes because so many people did have friction with their mother-in-law.
	So, is that the case?
	And I'm not just talking about mothers-in-law or fathers-in-law, just the in-laws in general.
	How do you regard them?
	Are they a detriment to your marriage?
	Are they irrelevant to your marriage?
	Or are they actually a boon to your marriage?
	How important is your spouse's family in general?
	People will often marry already having dislike for the in-laws.
	People will often marry in part because they so like the in-laws.
	So that's the question on the table.
	1-8 Prager 776. 877-243-7776.
	My suspicion is that the answer runs the gamut from I'm crazy about them to I can't stand them.
	So the question is, were mother-in-law jokes rooted in reality?
	I'm trying to think of all the people that I know.
	And, I mean, I know a lot of people, but I obviously don't know their relationship to their in-laws.
	But it would be an interesting survey.
	if it could be done scientifically I would be very curious to know how people would rate the positive or negative influence of in-laws on on their marriages and for that matter do you like your your son-in-law or daughter-in-law
	I mean, that's not really the question of the hour, but it would be presumably related.
	My mother was quite crazy about my wife, and I'll never forget my mother.
	May she rest in peace.
	I was once on the car phone with her and saying, if I marry Sue, and then I hear this voice yelling back at me, what do you mean if, when?
	And that, look, it's a nice thing, let's be honest.
	If your husband and your parents like each other, your wife and your parents like each other, But I have no idea what the general rule is, or with brothers-in-law and sisters-in-law to the extent that that's relevant.
	An interesting question, can in-laws do as much good for a marriage as they can do harm?
	And I think the answer is, like in the rest of life, it is much easier for one person to do harm.
	Or a lot of harm than for one person to do a lot of good.
	The scales weigh in favor of mischief.
	It's the way it is in life.
	And I don't know, I wonder, isn't it funny when you think about it?
	Is there any poll on this question?
	I mean, there are polls on everything.
	So you wonder, how do they choose certain subjects and ignore other subjects for polling?
	But this would be...
	I'm going to look it up during the break if there is anything that even approaches some sort of scientific poll.
	Anyway, the truth is I'm not interested in the results because I don't trust polls.
	And I don't know why anybody would trust polls given their utter...
	Abject failure over the last decade.
	The reason I think people trust polls is because they want to trust polls, and they're told to trust polls by the media.
	But, I mean, maybe on a non-political subject, this one has no political overtones, maybe on a non-political subject with enough responses, You can get some sort of accurate response.
	It would also be interesting to know if it differs from country to country, from culture to culture.
	Do people in America think of their in-laws the same way that people in Holland do?
	I don't know.
	All right, let's see here.
	Kristen, Greenville, South Carolina.
	Thank you.
	Oh, no.
	Yeah, there it is.
	South Carolina.
	Hi.
	How are you doing, Kristen?
	Good afternoon.
	Hi.
	Thank you for taking my call, Dennis.
	My husband and I will be celebrating our 10-year anniversary on May 21st, and his family is from Venezuela, so English is his second language.
	So there's a little bit of a communication, I would say, issue for language barrier for his in-laws.
	They also live in Houston, and we are in South Carolina, raising two young boys.
	His mom has had very good intentions for four to six years of moving here.
	Okay, you're leaving us in suspense.
	Don't go away.
	way we will continue this is carol platt lebow for townhall.com Calling new Biden legislation an infrastructure plan is like calling a shark a dolphin.
	They both may have dorsal fins, but you mistake one for the other at your peril.
	Don't be fooled.
	Only 5% of the bill's spending would actually go for roads and bridges, what normal people think of as infrastructure.
	Add in items like Amtrak and broadband, and you're still only at 30% of the eye-popping total of $2.3 trillion.
	And you're supposed to pay for all of this with the biggest tax increase since 1968. Here's what's worse.
	The bill is actually about leftist social engineering.
	It would end right to work, something the left hates because it guarantees no one can be forced to join a union or pay union dues in order to hold a job.
	Ending it offers a rich new source of campaign contributions for Democrats.
	Calling a shark a dolphin doesn't make it one.
	I'm Carol Platt-Lebow.
	Turning now on the Charlie Kirk Show.
	We now have a radical, unproven philosophy, critical race theory, that is running our entire government.
	The CDC director says racism is a serious public health threat.
	Quote, a growing body of research shows that centuries of racism in this country has had a profound and negative impact on communities of color.
	That's not true.
	It's not true.
	Read Discrimination and Disparities by Thomas Sowell.
	Just because there is a disparity does not mean that discrimination is to blame.
	The fatherless epidemic in the black community is a serious public health threat.
	You want to know what's keeping black people down?
	It's not racism.
	It's government programs, failing public schools, Democrat policies, and the lack of fathers in the home.
	Keep up with what's trending.
	Subscribe on YouTube today.
	Trending now on The Larry Elder Show.
	Headline, and I'm quoting, Two CBS TV executives are fired after one called a black TV anchor just a jive guy and the other called a female employee an effing idiot.
	Peter Dunn, president of CBS television stations, and David Friend, senior VP for news.
	The stations were ousted on Wednesday.
	I'm laughing because polls show that 83% of Democrats believe that Donald Trump is a racist.
	83%.
	This guy is calling a black TV anchor just a jive guy while reporting how racist Donald Trump is.
	I can't make this up.
	Keep up with what's trending.
	Subscribe on YouTube today.
	Trending now on America First with Sebastian Berger.
	Why is it that we have to wait?
	Is this so often the case for a British tabloid newspaper to report the story of Hunter Biden for anybody to take notice?
	this.
	Because our media just aren't interested.
	Our media want to protect the Bidens.
	They want to protect liberals.
	Most of the media.
	And they're not on as brokers.
	We knew the contents of this laptop in September and October.
	This should have been out and out everywhere.
	Everywhere.
	But what do we have instead?
	Instead we had the New York Post being blocked from Twitter.
	Instead we had CNN and others suggesting that Hunter Biden's own laptop that he signed over was somehow Russian misinformation.
	Absolute nonsense.
	Well, it's strange, isn't it?
	It's strange to say, you know.
	It's strange to say, you know.
	It's an amazing gift to you, so to speak, of saving about $800 a year.
	Thank you.
	Pure Talk gives you the exact same coverage as the big carriers, T-Mobile, AT&T, Verizon, but it costs you about half.
	The average family is saving over $800 a year.
	Unlimited text, unlimited talk, 6 gigabytes of data for just $30 a month.
	And if you go over data, they don't charge you for it.
	Switching is easy.
	You can keep your phone, keep your number, or choose from the latest iPhones and Androids.
	I tested it out.
	This is all true.
	Dial 250, pound 250 on your phone, pound 250, say Dennis Prager.
	Pure Talk USA, pound 250, and say Dennis Prager.
	The subject of the male-female hour, second hour every Wednesday, is how do you get along with your spouse's family?
	Are mother-in-law jokes a relic of the past, or do they have a lot of truth to them, etc., etc.?
	Kristen is married to a Latino.
	Where is he from again?
	Venezuela, right.
	Venezuela.
	And you have linguistic issues with your mother-in-law.
	Is there a father-in-law involved?
	Some, somewhat, but they're not married.
	And she's been trying to move to South Carolina to help us with our two young boys.
	My husband's back in school full-time working on his doctorate, and we could really use the help, but at the same time, I think their relationship is not that great.
	And every time that she says she's moving, has her bags packed or boxes packed and is coming, it just falls through.
	They get in a fight or whatever.
	So we're kind of to the point of feeling it's God's message to say maybe it's going to be worse for the marriage and worse for our family than more beneficial, as you were talking about.
	Is it toxic or beneficial?
	And we would love to have her here, and we love her, but we're just kind of at a mercy of...
	What do we do?
	I mean, it's been two years we've been trying to get her to move here and help us, and it's not coming to fruition.
	So wait, we love her, but my husband doesn't get along with her?
	Correct.
	So can one say, forgetting you for a moment, he loves her but doesn't like her?
	Yeah, you could say that.
	Okay.
	I love that.
	Yeah, you could say that.
	So, I'm not sure you even need God in this one.
	I'm a big God believer.
	It sounds more like it's not just a message from God.
	I feel terrible because I want her to be with your kids.
	Look, you just have to weigh, as we all do, every decision.
	You have to weigh the pros and the cons.
	I have to do a show on the difference between loving somebody and liking somebody.
	I have a feeling that a lot of people love a relative and don't like the person.
	I am of the opinion that like is more important than love.
	But that is another great subject.
	Thank you, Kristen, and let me know actually what happens.
	I'm curious.
	All right, and Don, Chicago, hello.
	Hey, Dennis.
	My mother-in-law just passed away five years ago.
	She was part of my life for around 50 years because I started dating her daughter in junior high, and we dated all through high school, and I've been married to that girl for 44 years.
	And I came to love my mother-in-law just like my own mother because she was a straight shooter.
	She told you what she really felt.
	And she lived close by.
	And I really started to love her over a period of time.
	And I used to send her, this is a great tip for son-in-laws, I used to send my mother-in-law flowers on my wife's birthday thanking her for giving birth to my wife.
	That is a crack-up.
	That's very interesting.
	Should I send...
	I'm thinking of that now.
	Sending my mother-in-law flowers on my wife's birthday in thanks of having her...
	I wonder if my mother-in-law would think that I was flipping out.
	My mother-in-law is very astute.
	I think she would think I'm having an affair.
	If I... If next January, my wife's birthday, I sent her flowers.
	Even if I said, thank you for giving birth to Sue X number of years ago, the reaction would be, there's something going on.
	Okay.
	That's a good one though, Don.
	I'm not joking.
	I'm just saying I don't know if it works in every case.
	In mine it would arouse suspicion.
	That's my theory.
	Alright, let's see here.
	And Juliet, Illinois.
	Dan, hello Dan.
	Hey Dennis, thanks for having me on your show.
	So my wife and I dated for ten years, and we have been married for eight.
	We actually ran into you at a cigar night in Bolingbrook.
	But our relationship, my relationship with my in-laws started out very tenuous.
	They did not think that I was good enough for their daughter.
	They did everything they could to kind of keep us at odds at times until we got married, and then the relationships with me and my in-laws began to change.
	But there were still some issues.
	They kind of thought I was, again, maybe not good enough for her.
	I was streaming her along, and then actually everything really changed.
	Why did they think you weren't good enough?
	I'm not exactly sure.
	I don't know.
	That's not possible.
	Wait, you dated for how many years?
	Ten.
	Okay.
	I'm not giving you a hard time, I'm just not fully understanding.
	I just think that they thought their daughter could do better than me.
	Right, so I'm keeping you on.
	What did that mean?
	Make more money?
	I'm serious.
	I'm very curious what that would have meant.
	What is our story, Sean?
	Oh, so I still have time.
	I feel bad.
	Where is my man?
	Dan, I still have some time.
	So why did they think you could make more money?
	No, I think part of it was I was pursuing an education for a specific career.
	And I was trying, I was kind of having to bounce around to various locations throughout the country to do that.
	And I think that they thought that I was just, you know, basically on holiday, just kind of screwing off and not really pursuing.
	The means to an end to provide for my now wife and our family of four kids.
	I get it.
	And now you proved them wrong.
	That's a good feeling.
	What did you say to me that I thought I had to get off?
	I thought I had to get off.
	You know, on the first day of office, Joe Biden issues this executive order that deals with the Keystone Xstone pipeline.
	We're involved in that lawsuit to challenge that.
	He also created a working group, as he called it, with unelected cabinet members to decide what is the quote-unquote social cost of greenhouse gases.
	And so it's more like...
	Nostradamus than it is Newton, right?
	They're predicting warfare and migration patterns and all these things, hundreds of years in the future, pulling all of that back and then giving a blank check to the EPA and transportation, all these agencies to overtax and overregulate every aspect of our lives, making things more expensive like cars and microwaves.
	We're on the front lines fighting that.
	If you look and see what the AGs are doing across the country to really push back, Missouri's in the lead on that.
	Keep up with what's trending.
	Subscribe on YouTube today.
	You see, the people that perpetually want more power for themselves, they crisis hop.
	They hop from one crisis to the other.
	The environmental crisis.
	The Chinese coronavirus crisis.
	A crisis allows you to justify a power grab.
	There's nothing quite like a crisis that makes you feel more self-important and act like a totalitarian.
	A crisis generally means that the public will give up their freedoms and liberties.
	There's something even deeper going on here, though.
	As the CDC director says racism is a serious public health threat, they are now blending two of their most effective strategies.
	The fact that Americans will not question the science when it comes from anything from the CDC, despite the fact the CDC has lied to you about basically everything over the last year.
	The CDC has been wrong about almost everything contributing to a serious mental health crisis, a suicide epidemic, alcoholism, drug usage, self-worth issues with young people.
	40% of small business is being closed and the lockdowns did nothing.
	Let me say that again.
	The lockdowns did nothing to actually improve the well-being of our country.
	But the CDC now knows that Americans would rather be safe than free and that safetyism is the predominant viewpoint in America.
	And they also know that Americans will not challenge This idea that America is systemically racist.
	He just won't.
	Keep up with what's trending.
	Subscribe on YouTube today.
	Trending now on the Mike Deliger Show.
	He's made a very big deal about ghost guns.
	Homemade guns, as you said, that cannot be traced.
	I didn't realize there was a rash of ghost guns used in these high-profile mass killings that Biden referenced.
	Are they?
	Are these massacres in Charleston and in Colorado and all these terrible scenes, are those all with people who made their guns at home?
	No, Mike, you're right.
	These aren't people who have produced their own firearms in their own homes.
	We're talking about, in many of these instances, the failures of people to either enact on the laws that are available to them or the authorities who failed to take action when they were supposed to.
	So if we look at the most recent...
	We see that Colorado already has red flag laws.
	laws.
	We see that the family was already concerned about the mental disturbance of the individual who's accused of these crimes to the point where they actually took the fire.
	I'm laughing.
	I'm sorry, because the responses to my question of the male-female era, I'm Dennis Prager, are skewed in the negative direction with regard to relations are skewed in the negative direction with regard to relations with in-laws.
	That's the question on the table for this.
	This male-female hour, how do you get along with your in-laws?
	And as I said, it doesn't look too good in most cases here.
	But some, let's see, some are doing great.
	Here's in the great arena.
	Rose, South Carolina.
	Sorry, Fair Play, South Carolina.
	Hi.
	Hi, Mr. Parker.
	How are you?
	I'm well, thank you.
	So, I just wanted to call in and say that I have an excellent relationship with my in-laws.
	I'm getting married next weekend, so I'm very excited to be officially part of the family.
	But my mother isn't involved in my life, my biological mother.
	So, my mother-in-law has just been a very supportive female figure in my life.
	I'm very blessed to have met her through my fiancé.
	I've also, my brother passed away very early on in our relationship, and his family was right there to support me and my father and sister in anything that we needed.
	And so I've just, it's just been very great.
	We share the same faith, so we're able to go to Mass together, celebrate holidays together.
	It's just been a very positive experience for me that I've been welcomed into the family the way I have been.
	Oh, that's wonderful to hear.
	Why are you estranged from your mother?
	She's made a lot of decisions in her life that I just, it's very unhealthy for me to be in contact with her right now.
	I'm hoping that when she gets the opportunity to clean herself up and go down this straight and narrow path, that we'll be able to talk again, but it's just very toxic right now.
	And it just would not be beneficial for me to have her in my everyday life.
	Okay.
	And what about your father?
	My father's great.
	He's a huge support for me.
	He's my hero.
	He's been there through everything.
	All the bad decisions I've made, all the good decisions I've made.
	He's a really great role model.
	And your future father-in-law?
	Your future father-in-law?
	He's great, too.
	He's welcomed me into the family.
	Even though he has five children, he's always invited me to go out with them.
	I have dinner with my in-laws by myself sometimes.
	So it's great to have a lot of adult figures in my life that I can reach out to and give me advice when I need it.
	Well, bless you.
	I'm very happy for you.
	Look, like so much of life, I hesitate to say this, but I do believe it.
	Like so much in life, it's a crapshoot.
	It is.
	Do you get wonderful in-laws?
	Or not?
	You can have a wonderful spouse and awful in-laws.
	You can have an awful spouse and wonderful in-laws.
	It is the way it is.
	Anyway, let's see here.
	Maggie in Cleveland, Ohio.
	Hello.
	Hi, Dennis.
	Thank you for taking my call.
	I love your show.
	I'm divorced now, but I have the parents-in-law from hell.
	And I also had ex-husband, so well.
	But I met my parents-in-law only after I was married for a few years.
	And I was born in Brazil, but I was raised in this country.
	And I don't know if you know this, Dennis, but Brazil, outside of Japan, Brazil has the largest Japanese colony in the world.
	So my ex-husband's family is Japanese.
	My mother-in-law from hell didn't like me because I was not Japanese.
	She told me, I don't like you because you're not Japanese.
	I wanted my son to marry a Japanese girl.
	And my father-in-law did a lot of things that I didn't agree with, including once he decided that he had the right to hit my daughter just because she was running.
	She was a little toddler and she was running.
	In front of the TV, and I told my ex-father-in-law, you know, I don't want anybody hitting my kids.
	Well, I can't blame you on that one.
	Absolutely.
	All right.
	That's another issue is the intercultural issues that obviously could arise.
	Back in a moment, just a minute to tell you about Relief Factor.
	ReliefFactor.com, 800-500-8384.
	And this is a magnificent product.
	If you have any sort of muscle pain, it is very likely to help you immensely.
	Simple as that.
	You will know in three weeks if it works.
	If it doesn't work, you cancel your order.
	If it does work and it doesn't work, you've spent $19.99 plus shipping.
	If it does work, you keep ordering it.
	As long as you want.
	Give it a three-week try for $19.99.
	And that's at relieffactor.com, 800-500-8384.
	All right, let me tell you what the...
	Trending now on America First with Sebastian Berger. - Well, it's strange, isn't it?
	It's strange to say, you know, it's Russian disinformation.
	Then for Hunter Biden in a Puff Peace interview this week say, yeah, it could have, I don't know, I'm not sure if it was mine.
	It could be Russian disinformation.
	Boris, if your lawyers are demanding the computers back, doesn't that mean...
	They are Hunter Bidens?
	Am I crazy there?
	You're not crazy, my friend.
	You're not crazy.
	You're more rational than Hunter Biden.
	You're definitely not crazy.
	This whole thing is such a joke.
	Hunter Biden is laughing in the face of Americans with these interviews.
	Jimmy Kimmel, where he dares to attack Don Jr. while T. Hunter is literally the face of nepotism in America.
	I mean, this is somebody who's a good, For nothing.
	Failure.
	Who's committed crime after crime.
	All you have to do is look at the contents of the laptop.
	And yet he gets to go on CBS this morning.
	And by the way, talk about collusion.
	Talk about cahoots.
	Viacom CBS owns Simon& Schuster, which put out the book.
	And then he goes on CBS to promote it.
	That's globalism for you in today's economy.
	Hunter Biden is an affront to the American people.
	The fact that the truth about him didn't come out during the campaign is a huge failure of mainstream media, but not one that I think they're going to fix anytime soon because they're so in bed with the left.
	Keep up with what's trending.
	Subscribe on YouTube today.
	Trending now on the Larry Elder Show.
	AOC in midseason form.
	Remember when she said there's no surge at the border because children are not insurgents?
	They want to say, what about the surge?
	Well, first of all, just gut check, stop.
	Anyone who's using the term surge around you...
	Gut check, stop.
	...consciously is trying to invoke a militaristic frame.
	A militaristic frame.
	Is trying to invoke a militaristic frame.
	She can sling it, can't she?
	And that's a problem.
	Because this is not a surge.
	It is not a surge.
	It is more of a...
	These are children.
	Oh, so therefore it's not a surge.
	And they are not insurgents.
	Ah, okay.
	And.
	Okay.
	Hi, everybody.
	This is the Male Female Hour, the second hour every Wednesday.
	How do you get along with your in-laws?
	And I wonder, I don't think there even is a rule.
	I mean, you should try to, obviously, you should try to get along with any family member, in-law or out-law.
	But, some things are just givens.
	This is the way...
	My mother-in-law, my father-in-law, my brother-in-law, sister-in-law is.
	Or this is the way you are.
	Now, here's an interesting take.
	Aaron in San Diego.
	Hello, Dennis Prager.
	Hey, Dennis.
	I've been a divorce lawyer for almost 20 years, and I made darn sure when I was thinking about marrying my wife that I met her folks and saw how she and her family interacted and how they interacted with me.
	Because bad in-law relationships pay my mortgage.
	And what was the last part about the mortgage?
	I said people with bad relationships with their in-laws pay my mortgage.
	That's a very common point.
	Oh, they pay your mortgage because they get divorced.
	That's fascinating.
	You think that relationships with in-laws are that determinative of the quality of a marriage?
	Certainly a significant factor because it puts some real pressures on people, especially when you get kids involved and there are fights over upbringing of the kid.
	I think it can very well be a corrosive factor in a relationship like that.
	Especially, I would imagine, if the person you're married to feels torn between his or her parents and the spouse.
	Who do I side with?
	Precisely.
	So I was very pleased, made sure that my in-laws and I had similar values.
	We got along.
	So if you really loved a woman and you didn't like her in-laws, the prospective in-laws, you would end the relationship?
	It would certainly be a huge red flag.
	It would be something that would have to be addressed.
	I'm not saying you're wrong.
	I'm just trying to clarify.
	So you really would put it up there in, let's say, the top three problems that afflict a marriage?
	Easily.
	Wow.
	What were the other two, by the way?
	I assume sex and money.
	Finance.
	I would say kids and money.
	Oh, interesting.
	I'm happy to hear it, actually, because a lot of couples, it's not the strongest area of their intimacy, but it's kids, kids, and money.
	So kids, money, and in-laws, those three are the big three?
	I think so, because with kids, I also include the fact that a lot of people are blended families, and so how a new partner treats kids from a different relationship.
	By the way, since I have you on the line, Do you ever represent a party in a divorce that you think is wrong?
	I suppose it would depend on what you mean for values of wrong.
	Well, let's say there's a conflict.
	In a conflict, there could be both wrong, both right, or one more wrong than the other.
	Have you ever represented someone you thought was more wrong than the other?
	If I thought that they could change and be coached and improve their behavior, yes, because then I think I'm doing something positive.
	My hard line for my firm is we don't assist admitted child abusers.
	Look, I'm only asking you this.
	None of this is to put you on the spot.
	It may put you on the spot, but that's not my purpose.
	I do that enough to other people, but it's only fair.
	Right.
	Good man.
	So, my experience in life has been, when I hear of a horrible breakup, massive sums of money spent on lawyers, kids in the middle, I have tended to find, with no rule of male or female, I have tended to find That one party seemed to me to be considerably more irresponsible than the other.
	You have not found that?
	Oh, I think that can be very fair.
	And it depends on...
	So would you represent the irresponsible party?
	That was my question.
	If I think that they can be coached and helped more towards responsibility, I'd turn clients down when their attitude has shown clearly that they won't take direction and lack self-insight.
	Alright, so it's not a matter of just child abusers.
	Well, those are case-by-case basis.
	Child abusers is a hardline rule.
	Right, I know.
	So I'm saying you only gave me your hardline rule, but you have another hardline rule.
	If a person is irresponsible and will not take coaching from you, you will drop them.
	Is that correct?
	Yeah.
	Yes, I suppose that's true, yes.
	Do you think that you are typical of divorce lawyers?
	Typical of the circle of divorce lawyers that I associate with, yes.
	I know there are others out there with less exacting standards.
	That was the essence of diplomacy.
	You're a good man.
	I appreciate your call, Aaron.
	You sound like an honest guy.
	My belief is that the American...
	The so-called family law system favors the irresponsible party.
	I don't believe that they favor women.
	I used to think that many years ago, the heyday of feminism.
	I think that right now, the irresponsible party has all the advantages in American law courts, family law courts.
	I think, as a general rule, they stink.
	It's not had anything to do with my own life, but I know so many people, and I speak to so many people on the radio.
	That has been my experience.
	The irresponsible party has a massive advantage in being destructive.
	I hope I'm wrong, but I'm just telling you what I have heard about.
	And the number of people who use children in order to get back at the other spouse, and that I do think tends to be more female, is another problem.
	We return.
	The return is the male-female hour.
	Turning now on the Charlie Kirk Show.
	Woodrow Wilson was more concerned with his legacy than what was right for America He believed the Founding Fathers were misled.
	He was the first president in American history to actually philosophically and politically challenge the beliefs of the Founding Fathers.
	Woodrow Wilson and Joe Biden are very similar.
	They care about a radical restructuring and redefinition of America.
	And I'm going to say something.
	Controversial that I have not said publicly.
	You ready for this?
	Joe Biden is governing much more radically than Barack Obama.
	Let me say that again.
	Joe Biden is governing much more radically.
	Is that the right way to say it?
	Much more radically?
	I guess that's correct.
	It just doesn't sound right.
	He's governing more radically than Barack Obama.
	One of the main reasons is because the people behind him are growing impatient.
	And they're starting to smell and taste victory.
	Cut 86. MSNBC analyst says it himself.
	Play cut 86. Just trying to push forward.
	So that's a big thing.
	A paradigm kind of shift.
	Maybe.
	I know we've been talking about this for several weeks here.
	You know, the Roosevelt era to the Reagan era.
	Are we on the verge of a new activist progressive era led in an unlikely way by Joe Biden?
	I think that's not impossible.
	Not impossible.
	MSNBC starting to get excited.
	Joe Biden is doing more.
	for the anti-American cause in America than any person that has been in office recently.
	Keep up with what's trending.
	Subscribe on YouTube today.
	Trending now on the Larry Alder Show.
	Holding in my baby brown libertarian fingers an article from the Daily Mail.
	This is the headline.
	Outgoing CNN anchor Brooke Baldwin rails against network about lack of women in leadership, saying, quote, the most influential and highest paid anchors are men, close quote, just months after she was temporarily taken off the air and just months after she was temporarily taken off the air and replaced by Jake And it goes on and talks about how she's expected to leave this month, and she gave an interview.
	With Ms. Magazine.
	I had no idea Ms. Magazine was still being published.
	Is it still being published?
	Wow.
	I should start subscribing.
	I had no idea.
	Ms. Magazine, she said, quote, the most influential anchors on our network, the highest paid, are men.
	My bosses, my executives, are men.
	The person who oversees CNN Dayside is a man.
	And my executive producer for 10 years is a man.
	So I've been surrounded by a lot of men.
	All right, y'all.
	Dennis Prager here.
	You and your in-laws.
	Scott in Dallas says the in-laws love each other.
	That's really...
	That may be the rarest.
	And his folks joke that they like the wife more than him.
	I can see that.
	Well, let's see here.
	Oh, where was the one?
	Oh, yeah.
	Laying down rules.
	Ann in Cleveland.
	Dennis Prager.
	Hi.
	Hi, Dennis.
	Thank you for taking my call.
	Thank you for calling.
	Yeah.
	So I had called to say I have a wonderful relationship with my in-laws and in fact my parents have a wonderful relationship with my in-laws to the point where they get together without us.
	And I'm always pointing this out to my kids like how amazing this is that you have such amazing grandparents who are doing this and have these kind of relationships.
	So to go with what I called about there were some things early on in our marriage where my in-laws We'd call and say, well, you need to know this about our son, and you need to know this about our son.
	And I'd say, well, I'm going to figure that out, and we'll deal with it together.
	And your time, I wasn't mean about it, but just like, your time with your son is done.
	He's left you guys, and now he and I will figure that out.
	So that was one thing I had to, because they were trying to tell me bad things about their son.
	Really?
	Yeah.
	Not terrible things, but just, you know, he has really bad anger issues, and I didn't know how bad they were, which was absolutely true.
	But as a newly married person, I didn't know what to do with that.
	So I figured it out later on, and it was pretty rough, but we worked through that.
	Well, they sound like very decent people in trying to tell you about that.
	They were.
	They were decent.
	I think, for me, it was hard because how they saw him as an angry person was really hurtful to him.
	And so I didn't take it as decent at the time, but now I see it.
	Now I can see it that way.
	Right.
	Well, that's certainly how it hits me.
	All right, let's summarize here.
	Let's see here.
	Janine in Garden Grove, California.
	Lots of in-laws all get along well.
	Hmm.
	Yeah, I see that.
	Now it got more positive here.
	Husband loves her mother.
	Flora in Chatsworth, California.
	Husband loves her mother.
	That's great.
	Wife and mom didn't get along, became closer when his brother died.
	That's in Westmont, Illinois.
	Well, like everything else, as I said, it's sort of a crapshoot, but it's a great thing if you have it.
	We continue.
	Say it again.
	Say it again.
	Trending now on America First with Sebastian Berkett.
	Well, it's strange, isn't it?
	It's strange to say, you know, it's Russian disinformation.
	Then for Hunter Biden in a PuffPiece interview this week say, yeah, it could have, I don't know.
	I'm not sure if it was mine.
	It could be Russian disinformation.
	Boris, if your lawyers are demanding the computers back, doesn't that mean they are Hunter Biden's?
	Am I crazy there?
	You're not crazy, my friend.
	You're not crazy.
	You're more rational than Hunter Biden.
	You're definitely not crazy.
	This whole thing is such a joke.
	Hunter Biden is laughing in the face of Americans with these interviews.
	Jimmy Kimmel, where he dares to attack Don Jr. while T. Hunter is literally the face of nepotism in America.
	I mean, this is somebody who's a good, For nothing.
	Failure.
	Who's committed crime after crime.
	All you have to do is look at the contents of the laptop.
	And yet, he gets to go on CBS this morning.
	And by the way, talk about collusion.
	Talk about cahoots.
	ViacomCBS owns Simon& Schuster, which put out the book.
	And then he goes on CBS to promote it.
	That's globalism for you in today's economy.
	Hunter Biden is an affront to the American people.
	The fact that the truth about him didn't come out during the campaign is...
	a huge failure of mainstream media, but not one that I think they're gonna fix anytime soon because they're so in bed with the left. - Keep up with what's trending.
	Subscribe on YouTube today.
	Trending now on the Larry Alder Show. - AOC in mid-season form.
	Remember when she said there's no surge at the border because children are not insurgents?
	They want to say, what about the surge?
	Well, first of all, just gut check, stop.
	Anyone who's using the term surge around you.
	Gut check, stop.
	Consciously is trying to invoke a militaristic frame.
	A militaristic frame.
	Is trying to invoke a militaristic frame.
	She can sling it, can't she?
	And that's a problem.
	Because this is not a surge.
	It is not a surge.
	It is more of a...
	These are children.
	Oh, so therefore it's not a surge.
	And they are not insurgents.
	Ah, okay.
	And remember when she had difficulty trying to figure out what a garbage disposal was?
	I am told this is a garbage disposal.
	I am told, I don't know who told me, I can't reveal the identity, but a whistleblower told me that this is a garbage disposal.
	I've never seen a garbage disposal.
	I've never smelled a garbage disposal.
	I've never had one in any place I've ever lived.
	I've never fondled one.
	I don't know what to use it for.
	I don't know whether or not it's alive.
	It appears to be motionless, but it might be playing possum.
	It is hard to say.
	Or what its purpose is.
	Like food scraps?
	Like food scraps?
	I don't know.
	Keep up with what's trending.
	Subscribe on YouTube today.
	Trending now on the Hugh Hewitt Show.
	What about the idea that Chuck Schumer has a ruling from the parliamentarian that says he can amend the reconciliation instructions and thereby get another bite at the apple, indeed an infinite bite at the apple with 51 votes?
	In the first place, that's what Chuck Schumer says.
	So let's see if that's what the parliamentarian really is saying.
	Ah.
	And let's get the details of it, okay?
	And also, you know, and I have to go back and research this.
	I mean, I think there have been years when they passed more than one reconciliation bill, but that doesn't mean you can put anything on reconciliation.
	You know, you can put tax changes on reconciliation, and the process by which you do it, by the way, is pretty difficult.
	And I don't, you know, let's have a vote on these tax changes.
	I mean, Biden's already back and away from the corporate stuff.
	Yes, he is.
	Yes, it is.
	And so, well, let's see if they can get 50 votes for these.
	I mean, I have a feeling they can.
	Tax increases aren't very popular.
	What we've seen so far is they've spent an enormous amount of money, and now they want enormous tax increases.
	And that's really what they did in 2009, too.
	And Jamie Dimon said yesterday there's going to be a boom.
	And there has to be a boom when you spend this much money.
	Money's got to go somewhere.
	It's going to go into stocks and real estate.
	When does that boom end in your experience, Jim?
	Is it a year or two years?
	I'm not sure there's going to be a boom.
	When you funnel it through the networks and the apparatuses they're funneling it through, I don't know how economically productive that is.
	Oh, interesting.
	It passed a $900 billion stimulus in 2009, predicted 4% growth, and what do we get?
	Like 1% growth?
	Keep up with what's trending.
	Subscribe on YouTube today.
	Transcription by CastingWords You know, on the first day of office, Joe Biden issues this executive order that deals with the Keystone Xstone pipeline.
	We're involved in that lawsuit to challenge that.
	He also created a working group, as he called it, with unelected cabinet members to decide what is the quote-unquote social cost of greenhouse gases.
	And so it's more like Nostradamus than it is Newton, right?
	They're predicting warfare and migration patterns and all these things hundreds of years in the future, pulling all that back.
	And then giving a blank check to the EPA and transportation, all these agencies, to overtax and overregulate every aspect of our lives, making things more expensive, like cars and microwaves.
	We're on the front lines fighting that.
	act if you look and see what the ags are doing across the country to really push back missouri's in the lead on that keep up with what's trending subscribe on youtube today trending now on the charlie kirk show you see the people that perpetually want more power for themselves they crisis hop They hop from one crisis to the other.
	The environmental crisis.
	The Chinese coronavirus.
	One of the best-known people at PragerU is Will Witt, the young man who goes around the country and has a fascinating take on so many issues, interviews people, so to speak, on the street.
	gives talks at colleges, and I watched a video of him.
	I don't know exactly where it is except that it's Colorado.
	Shouted and banged down.
	by Black Lives Matter thugs, which is a redundant term most of the time.
	As I said in hour one, these young people reminded me of the Hitler Youth and the Komsomol in the Soviet Union.
	If you can tell me of a moral difference, we'll talk about the Hitler Youth prior to the Holocaust, between 1933 and 1939, and the Komsomol at any time, Communist Youth League.
	If you see a difference between those three groups in terms of The suppression of liberty.
	The thuggishness.
	I would like to know what that difference is.
	And most people don't have the courage to say what I just said.
	This is no boast.
	It's a statement about the cowardice is the human norm.
	Not to call BLM what it is, is a function of cowardice.
	Nothing else.
	So I have Will Witt on the line.
	And, Will, first of all, I want to understand, where was this?
	So this was at University of Northern Colorado, which is funny because Greeley, where it is, is actually a pretty conservative place.
	Yeah, but it's irrelevant.
	Universities are outposts of leftism wherever they're located.
	So it really doesn't matter.
	I wouldn't be surprised if this would happen at the University of, or North Dakota State University.
	When did this happen?
	So this happened two nights ago.
	I was going up there to speak.
	I thought it was going to be a pretty routine event.
	And then I learned from the administration that I would have to wear a mask while I spoke.
	And I said, there's no way I'm wearing a mask while I go up there and speak.
	There's absolutely no way.
	And so then I went up there to give my speech, and it turned out there were 50 protesters in the back.
	And when I went up there, I took my mask off, and then the protesters went absolutely crazy.
	Banging on the tables, flipping things, yelling at me, calling me racist, telling me to put my mask back on as they chose to come to this event.
	It was just absolutely insane.
	So, what does BLM have to do with masks?
	I don't understand what it had to do with it.
	And the crazy thing is, the craziest part of all this is that the police came and I was like, finally, the police or the campus security, they're going to kick these kids out for making a scene.
	But they don't kick the kids out.
	They kick me off because I'm the dangerous one because I refuse to wear a mask while I'm 20 feet away from people speaking on a stage.
	Again, the universities are all falling apart.
	Okay, so I really want to go through this precisely.
	You came to speak at the University of Northern Colorado.
	When you first entered the room, were you wearing a mask?
	No.
	There were three girls who put on the event and they introduced me.
	They all wore their masks.
	And then I wore my mask for about 10 seconds.
	And I only wear a bandana because it's just better fashion sense.
	And I wore it up to the stage.
	And then as soon as pretty much about 10 seconds up into my speech, I took off the mask.
	So, theoretically, had you worn the mask the whole time, would there have been a demonstration?
	Oh, of course there would have.
	Of course there would have.
	These people, I mean, they didn't know before coming that I was going to take off my mask when I started my speech.
	They probably thought I was going to keep my mask on for the speech and then also disrupt and do something.
	So they don't even have any principles to stand on where it's like, oh, they came to keep their fellow university students safe from COVID.
	They came because they wanted to shut down a conservative event.
	So the guy yells, put the mask on while banging like a lunatic on the table.
	Let's say you did put on your mask.
	Which, by the way, I would not want you to do.
	I just want to make that clear.
	I do not believe in superstition, and a mask 20 feet away is an act of superstition.
	It has nothing, zero to do with science.
	It has solely to do with control of human beings.
	But let's say you had.
	Would they have lost their raison d'etre of screaming at you?
	It's funny that you bring that up, because in that moment, I was thinking, what would Dennis Prager do?
	And then I was trying to do what you would do, so it's funny you say that.
	But I think that they would have not stopped their screaming.
	I think they would have continued to go, because, I mean, they're calling me a racist the whole time.
	And then these thugs, I mean, they literally, there's children with families, you know, people from around the state of Colorado who came to come see me speak for hours.
	And they're threatening these people with children, you know, and causing a whole scene.
	So it wasn't about me wearing the mask.
	I mean, one of the people, he's yelling at me to put my mask on, calling me a racist.
	And he's taking his mask off so that I can hear him better.
	It's delusional.
	These people are literally delusional.
	So the police came and they threw you out and not them?
	Yes.
	The police came and they escorted me off campus.
	Were these Greeley police or university police?
	You know, I believe they were the university police.
	But I think that there was some involvement with the Greeley police as well.
	So then they kicked me off.
	And there were about 250 people who showed up just to see me.
	And then about 50 protesters.
	And I was escorted out the back.
	And then I asked the cop.
	I said, you know, where is anywhere that's public?
	And he said, oh, well, you can go down to the street right here.
	And I said, all right, let's go.
	So I took about the 100 remaining people who actually came to see me speak.
	And I gave the speech right there out in the cold.
	A nice man, let me borrow his jacket.
	So I just gave it on the public street.
	And they didn't scream that?
	Well, they did.
	The protesters kept coming by.
	The protesters were driving in their cars, playing music with curse words.
	They were cursing at us, causing a scene.
	But, you know, I wasn't going to let that deter me.
	I was going to give this speech no matter what, and these people drove a long ways to come and hear me speak, and I wanted to give them what they came for.
	And it was a great example of, you know, standing up to the mob, not cowering to these people, because you give them an inch and they take a mile every single time.
	You have to give them nothing.
	Nothing.
	I am curious, since you said, what would Dennis do?
	And I don't know what I would have done, actually.
	Speaking to you in the calm of our conversation now, just to test how much it was ideology and how much allegedly a health issue, I would have put on the mask and seen what would have happened.
	I'm not saying I would have.
	I'm thinking now that that would be a way to test the...
	The proposition that it was 100% ideological and 0% mask.
	I mean, had you gotten up there and given a pro-BLM speech without a mask, it is inconceivable to me they would have screened you down.
	So I entertain both facts.
	So ironically, I'm asking, what would Dennis do just as you did?
	Well, now you can start asking, what would Will Witt do when you go to these?
	Well, yeah, but we know what Will Witt did.
	That's the point.
	We have a video.
	We don't have a video of what that is.
	So that's not really an open question.
	I would love to have isolated that issue with them.
	But obviously, how do you know they were BLM? Well, many of them had BLM stuff on their shirts or on their masks.
	And then there were some with gay pride flags and things like, you know.
	I can kiss whoever I want, stuff like that on their shirts, you know.
	So it was kind of an amalgamation of different...
	Did anybody actually articulate ideologically why they were opposed to you?
	No, of course not.
	No, they didn't.
	Well, usually they do.
	They usually say you're a homophobe, Islamophobe, germophobe, whatever.
	So there were no names this time.
	There was racist.
	I heard racist, and that was about all I could pick through because at the same time as they're yelling at me, I'm trying to yell my speech.
	I had all the students that still remain in the room, I had them huddle around me, you know, basically saying to hell with social distancing and getting them all around me so I could give the speech while these people are terrorizing everyone else in the back.
	And what's worse, I'll tell you why they weren't just there to talk about the masks, because the girls who set up this event, they went out to dinner afterwards.
	And the protesters followed them to dinner to give them help.
	So it's not like these people were worried about social distancing or masks or whatever.
	They came to terrorize people, and they came to be evil.
	All right.
	I want to ask you a few more questions.
	If any of you have, 1-8-Prager-776.
	Willwood of Prager U. Screamed, shouted, banged down.
	The University of Northern Colorado.
	That this does not frighten most Americans frightens me.
	You see, the people that perpetually want more the people that perpetually want more power for themselves, they crisis hop.
	They hop from one crisis to the other.
	The environmental crisis.
	The Chinese coronavirus crisis.
	A crisis allows you to justify a power grab.
	There's nothing quite like a crisis that makes you feel more self-important and act like a totalitarian.
	A crisis generally means that the public will give up their freedoms and liberties.
	There's something even deeper going on here though.
	As the CDC director says racism is a serious public health threat, they are now blending two of their most effective strategies.
	The fact that Americans will not question the science when it comes from anything from the CDC, despite the fact the CDC has lied to you about basically everything over the last year.
	The CDC has been wrong about almost everything, contributing to a serious mental health crisis, a suicide epidemic.
	Alcoholism, drug usage, self-worth issues with young people.
	40% of small business is being closed.
	And the lockdowns did nothing.
	Let me say that again.
	The lockdowns did nothing to actually improve the well-being of our country.
	But the CDC now knows that Americans would rather be safe than free.
	And that safetyism is the predominant viewpoint in America.
	And they also know...
	That Americans will not challenge this idea that America is systemically racist.
	Just won't.
	Keep up with what's trending.
	Subscribe on YouTube today.
	Trending now on the Mike Gallagher Show.
	He's made a very big deal about ghost guns.
	Homemade guns, as you said, that cannot be traced.
	I didn't realize there was a rash of ghost guns used in these high-profile mass killings that Biden referenced.
	Are they?
	Are these massacres in Charleston and in Colorado and all these terrible scenes, are those all with people who made their guns at home?
	No, Mike, you're right.
	These aren't people who have produced their own firearms in their own homes.
	We're talking about, in many of these instances, the failures of people to either enact on the laws that are available to them or the authorities who failed to take action when they were supposed to.
	So if we look at the most recent Murders in Boulder, Colorado, we see that Colorado already has red flag laws.
	We see that the family was already concerned about the mental disturbance of the individual who's accused of these crimes, to the point where they actually took the firearm away from him at one point, and he obviously got that back and committed his heinous crimes.
	But they could have reached out, and they could have used the red flag laws available to them there, and they didn't.
	We look at the Pulse nightclub shootings.
	In fact, the FBI knew about that, and they didn't act.
	In fact, that was a terror attack and was not just an industry.
	If we look at Marjory Stone of Douglas High School, we know that the FBI was warned twice.
	We know that the city, state, and county officials have been warned over 40 times that there were concerns with this individual, and they never acted upon those.
	So what we're talking about is a failure of the system to actually work in the way it's supposed to because people were either too afraid or because authorities didn't act when they were warned to.
	This is not an issue of so-called ghost guns.
	And part of the issue is that these are being conflated a lot of times with firearms that show up at a crime scene with the serial numbers obliterated.
	Keep up with what's trending.
	Subscribe on YouTube.
	Today.
	Trending now on America First with Sebastian Korka.
	Why is it?
	That we have to wait, as is so often the case, for a British tabloid newspaper to report the story I
	want to remind you that there's a very funny movie out that is actually a Christian funny movie that is not common.
	It comes from executive producer Mike Lindell of MyPillow.
	It's called Church People, starring Thor Ramsey, Stephen Baldwin, Donald Faison, and Joey Fatone.
	Indeed, hilarious and heartwarming reminder about the Gospel's message.
	It's about an American pastor who realizes he's stuck in the megachurch marketing machine and wants to find his passion again.
	But when he attempts to get back to the heart of ministry, he is thrust into the throes of dissuading his misguided church leadership.
	from performing a strange and potentially blasphemous stunt for the upcoming Easter service.
	So, you will laugh and you will also be uplifted.
	You can stream churchpeople at salemnow.com churchpeople at salemnow.com Will Witt of PragerU You can see the video.
	Is the video up, by the way, at PragerU?
	I'd like people to see.
	Yeah, you can go to our PragerU Facebook page.
	You can go to my Instagram at the Will Witt or Twitter.
	And then it's also up on PragerU Clips, which is our new YouTube channel as well, for shorter content.
	So you can check it out on all those places.
	People should see what this country has allowed and indeed encouraged.
	Among both white and black students, watch No Safe Spaces for the scene of the confrontation with Brett Weinstein, a lifelong liberal progressive who was ultimately kicked out of or forced to resign from evergreen state, I think it's called.
	Just look at the students screaming and cursing.
	Look at the students screaming and cursing at the professor at Yale.
	That's up on YouTube.
	Because they, I think they said, wear whatever you want for Halloween.
	And that was enough to get them demoted at Yale.
	Yale is one of the worst colleges in the country at this time.
	In terms of openness to ideas and freedom.
	So, we have created a monster among those who believe that anything they differ with, if they're on the left, can be shouted down, cursed down.
	And you were a target of this.
	People should see the video.
	These are very scary human beings who shouted you down.
	Truly scary.
	I do believe if they could get away with it, they would kill you.
	That is my belief.
	I can't prove it.
	I do believe not all of them.
	I think a serious percentage of them would engage in homicidal violence if they knew they could get away with it.
	That the country allows for it.
	That the university sent the police to kick you out under the guise of the speaker not wearing a mask.
	I mean, the universities are supposed to be science-based.
	There's nothing science-based.
	A speaker at least 20 feet in front of the first row, there's no evidence, there's no suggestion that he would be infecting, let alone killing anybody.
	We have somebody who apparently was there, Kristen in Parker, Colorado.
	Hi.
	Hi, Dennis and Will.
	Yeah, we were there.
	I brought my 18-year-old son, who I've homeschooled since first grade.
	He was so thankful to be there.
	But he specifically noticed a lot of the Black Lives Matter guys.
	He was on high alert.
	He felt like they were specifically wearing their jackets with their arms inside of their coats and sweatshirts like they had a weapon.
	Yeah, I definitely believe that.
	I didn't get a good enough look at him to say that that was the case.
	But I do know...
	That these people were already harassing people.
	And you look at videos from all sorts of things where Black Lives Matter, Antifa type of people show up.
	I mean, they hurt people.
	That's what they do.
	They hurt people.
	It's supposed to be the party of love and tolerance.
	And they go out of their way to hurt people.
	So it only takes one guy for me to be up on stage speaking to throw a brick or to throw a bucket of paint.
	And these people also, one of the things that the university did as well, they had to let these people in.
	They didn't have to vet them.
	Many of these people, I doubt, were even students of the university.
	They came from somewhere else.
	And so the university just let whoever in without vetting them for anything they're wearing or anything, a weapon, and just let everyone in.
	Kirsten, how did your 18-year-old react?
	Oh my gosh He said he was So thankful to have been there and experienced it.
	We thought we were going to be kicked out right away.
	And so he was really disappointed right away.
	But when we followed Will out to the street and were able to listen to him speak, and he promised everybody he'd be back, he has now shown these videos to all of his friends.
	His two hockey teams he's on, they've all said, we're so ready to come back and watch Will.
	People who didn't know Will are...
	Fully behind him, fully excited to come back and see him speak.
	It's spreading more and more goodwill and more and more knowledge about Will and PragerU.
	What do you say to that, Will?
	I mean, it's truly an amazing thing.
	I don't know exactly what to say, but, you know, this is...
	I mentioned this in my speech that you guys listened to when I went out on that street, but...
	It seems like it's really scary to go and stand up to the left because you don't know what the left will do to you.
	But it's like people who are scared of what the left will do to them now should be way more scared of what will happen if they do nothing now.
	And so when I stand up for my values, it turns out that your life actually gets better.
	Your life gets better when you speak up and say what you believe and stand up as a conservative.
	I say this to every single person.
	Your life will be better when you stop cowering to the mob or stop cowering to the left and you speak up and you'll have better friends, you'll have better relationships.
	Everything will get better for you.
	That's exactly right.
	Thank you, Kirsten.
	I think she makes a very important point.
	It's critical to get these things out.
	I think the majority of Americans don't follow this stuff.
	This is news to them.
	They don't want to know.
	They want to watch sports.
	They want to watch movies.
	They want to see what's streaming.
	On Netflix or Amazon and not be bothered.
	That's the human condition.
	Don't bother me about evil because it's painful to confront it.
	But if the guy on your hockey team sends it out, look at what happened at something I went to, they'll watch it.
	So that was a very important lesson.
	What's your next speech?
	Going to Texas A&M next week.
	Actually, I'm speaking with Candace Owens this weekend in Chattanooga for her Blexit events.
	I'm their token white guy at those.
	Then after that, for Candace.
	You're white?
	I am, apparently.
	So, according to the lab.
	That's fine.
	It's fine with me.
	I was just checking.
	I'm glad you asked.
	Keep up the good work.
	I want to cover what happens with you and Candace in Tennessee.
	I'd be very curious.
	We shall return 1-8 Prager 776. Black Lives Matter co-founder Patrice Cullors,
	the one who says she is a trained Marxist.
	Myself and Alicia in particular are trained organizers.
	We are trained Marxists.
	Okay, that's Patrice Cullors, a trained Marxist.
	She just did this multi-million dollar deal with the Warner Brothers and she's just purchased a home here in California.
	The home is located in Topanga Canyon.
	3.4 million.
	Three baths.
	I'm going to give it up.
	It pays to be a trained Marxist.
	Keep up with what's trending.
	Subscribe on YouTube today.
	This is Carol Platt-Lebow for townhall.com.
	Calling new Biden legislation an infrastructure plan is like calling a shark a dolphin.
	They both may have dorsal fins, but you mistake one for the other at your peril.
	Don't be fooled.
	Only 5% of the bill's spending would actually go for roads and bridges, what normal people think of as infrastructure.
	Add in items like Amtrak and broadband, and you're still only at 30% of the eye-popping total of $2.3 trillion.
	And you're supposed to pay for all of this with the biggest tax increase since 1968. Here's what's worse.
	The bill is actually about leftist social engineering.
	It would end right to work, something the left hates because it guarantees no one can be forced to join a union or pay union dues in order to hold a job.
	Ending it offers a rich new source of campaign contributions for Democrats.
	Calling a shark a dolphin doesn't make it one.
	I'm Carol Platt, leave out.
	Turning now on the Charlie Kirk Show.
	We now have a radical, unproven philosophy, critical race theory, that is running our entire government.
	The CDC director says racism is a serious public health threat.
	Quote, a growing body of research shows that centuries of racism in this country has had a profound and negative impact on communities of color.
	That's not true.
	It's not true.
	Read Discrimination and Disparities by Thomas Sowell.
	Just because there is a disparity does not mean that discrimination is to blame.
	The fatherless epidemic in the black community is a serious public health threat.
	You want to know what's keeping black people down?
	It's not racism.
	It's government programs, failing public schools, Democrat policies and the lack of fathers in the home.
	Keep up with what's trending.
	Subscribe on YouTube today.
	Trending now on the Larry Elder Show.
	Thank you. you Headline, and I'm quoting, Two CBS TV executives are fired after one called a black TV anchor just a jive guy, and the other called a female employee an effing idiot.
	Peter Dunn, president of CBS television stations, and David Friend, senior VP for News.
	The stations were ousted on Wednesday.
	I'm laughing because polls show that 83% of Democrats believe that Donald Trump is a racist.
	83%.
	This guy is calling a black TV anchor just a jive guy while reporting how racist Donald Trump is.
	I can't make this up.
	Keep up with what's trending.
	Subscribe on YouTube today.
	Trending now on America First with Sebastia.
	Transcription by CastingWords What's going on in Minneapolis?
	The riots are called protests at CNN. It's part of the gigantic lies that are told.
	I document another one of them.
	Omission and commission in the so-called mainstream media, who are just Democratic Party media.
	They are nothing more than that.
	New York Times, Washington Post, CNN. They never differ with the party.
	They never differ with the government if the government is in democratic hands.
	And they are just left-wing outlets.
	There's not a bone in my body that says this with joy, but you need to know if you cannot call what is happening in Minneapolis a riot, you are a liar.
	Let's go to Kyle in Boulder, Colorado.
	Hello, Kyle.
	Hi, Dennis.
	Hi.
	Hello?
	Hello.
	Can you hear me?
	I do.
	Okay, cool.
	I just wanted to ask you and Will Witt about...
	You keep complaining about the left-wing violence, but I'd just like to ask about right-wing violence because it is far more prevalent than left-wing violence.
	Do you believe that?
	Do you believe that?
	I'm just curious.
	Well, according to the Center for Strategic International Studies.
	I just want to know.
	These studies lie.
	So I just want to ask you a question.
	Do you believe that?
	I'm not challenging you.
	I promise.
	I'm not going to give you a hard time.
	Well, I know you are challenging me.
	I just made a point.
	And then by definition, you just called me a liar.
	And then what I'm saying is...
	No, I did not.
	Not true.
	I said they lied.
	I said they lied.
	Yes.
	You don't know the difference between...
	Go on.
	What I'm saying is I agree with them.
	Otherwise, I wouldn't come in here saying that.
	I don't believe you're lying.
	I believe they lied and you believe they're lying.
	It's not quite the same thing at all.
	So I'm just asking you a question.
	If you don't answer it, I'll hang up.
	You can ask me anything and say anything.
	No, no, no.
	I'm not asking you if you agree with them.
	I'm asking you a very unbelievably simple, honest question.
	Do you in your heart believe that there is more right-wing violence than left-wing violence in the United States of America?
	Yes.
	Yes, I... That's what I just said.
	They're saying that there is, and I'm saying I agree with them.
	That is true.
	I'm not saying...
	I don't understand...
	So why do you agree with them?
	That's why I asked...
	So your heart doesn't say...
	I'm giving you my reason.
	If you look up any statistic...
	Literally almost any statistic that is not from an overwhelmingly biased right-wing source would say that right-wing commits far more violence than left-wing.
	Right, and you believe that.
	So I'll ask you a question.
	We had an entire year...
	No, no, no.
	Allow me to speak now.
	I allowed you to speak without interruption.
	We had an entire year of left-wing violence last year, and we are having it now in Minneapolis.
	Tell me any right-wing equivalent other than January 6th.
	Give me one right-wing equivalent to an entire year of left-wing violence.
	I would like to challenge your premise that was an entire year of left-wing violence.
	If you don't give me an equivalent...
	All right, so you don't have an equivalent.
	Is that correct?
	No.
	I'm not...
	I'm not saying I don't, but what I'm saying is there is no, there is no equivalent to what you are saying because the situation you are saying is not really, it was not the whole year.
	Okay, eight months.
	Eight months.
	Eight months.
	No, because it wasn't eight months, because also an overwhelming amount of the protests were not violent.
	Right, but many were.
	I want to know, is there a right-wing equivalent to eight months, six months, five months, whatever number you want, or what is happening now in Minneapolis?
	Yes, there were many incidences of the Proud Boys or many other right-wing militia groups.
	Oh, really?
	And the Proud Boys have...
	Okay, okay, okay, that's good.
	All right, that's what I needed to hear.
	The Proud Boys who have...
	To the best of my knowledge, burned no buildings, smashed no windows, looted no stores are the equivalent.
	Look, your call is invaluable to me.
	And I want to be gentle because I want to encourage as many people who believe what you do to call this program.
	Ladies and gentlemen, to see what is happening and to deny it, is one of the most frightening things that the human species can engage in.
	It's not happening, my friends.
	All this left-wing thuggery, screaming down speakers, of which there was no right-wing equivalent on any campus in the United States of America of shouting and screaming down a left-wing speaker.
	None of this is happening because studies show otherwise.
	Kyle, it's a scary call.
	Relief Factor is a relief not for scary calls, but it is a relief for the common pain that people have, back pain, joint pain, and the like.
	It's a phenomenal product.
	I use it regularly.
	My wife uses it every day.
	It's the only reason I ever sponsored a painkiller was because it worked with regard to her knee.
	Give it a try for three weeks.
	You'll know in three weeks if it works.
	If it doesn't, you cancel your order and you've lost $19.99 plus shipping.
	That was it.
	Is it worth a three-week try?
	Seems to me it is.
	Relieffactor.com 800-500-8384 I will ask for your reaction to the president's promise that nothing he recommended impinges on the Second
	Amendment.
	I guess, unique interpretation of what the Second Amendment is then.
	You know, if we're looking at the infringement upon the Second Amendment and the government trying to pass any kind of restrictions on that, I certainly think there's an argument to be said that if he's passing the idea that you can no longer build a firearm in your home, which has always been legal in America, even before the founding of our nation, you could build a firearm in your home.
	If he's now saying you can't do that, well, I would argue that we're looking at an infringement upon Second Amendment rights.
	If he's talking about Classifying an entire class of pistols under the National Firearms Act, which would make it—so you couldn't possess these firearms unless you submit your photo, you submit your fingerprints, you pay a $200 tax stamp and undergo extensive background checks through the ATF, and then put on a government watch list simply for exercising your Second Amendment rights.
	I think that that's called an infringement upon your rights, and I think that's something that the American public needs to reach out to their members of Congress and remind them that they are the check.
	On the executive branch.
	The legislative branch is one of the checks to keep the executive branch within their role and make sure that they're not overreaching.
	Which is precisely why Biden wants to use executive orders.
	He wants to do an end around and he wants to try to avoid the legislative process because the legislative process is ultimately the way the American people can push back against restrictions.
	constitutional restrictions like this.
	Keep up with what's trending.
	Subscribe on YouTube today.
	Trending now on the Hugh Hewitt Show.
	Same thing.
	What about Big Tech?
	Your predecessor, Josh Hawley, was going after Big Tech.
	He's continuing to do that in the Senate of the United States.
	I hope you've continued the investigation into Google.
	Absolutely.
	So we're actually one of the states that were part of the William Barr Justice Department's antitrust suit.
	There were a handful of us that joined that antitrust suit against Google.
	We led the investigation into Facebook.
	We've also filed a lawsuit against Facebook for their...
	I think this is an emerging...
	Well, it's not emerging.
	It's here.
	It's right in front of us.
	I mean, you saw last night Google/YouTube TV cancels, deletes this roundtable Governor DeSantis was having on how lockdowns don't work.
	Keep up with what's trending.
	Subscribe on YouTube today.
	Trending now on the Charlie Kirk Show.
	Woodrow Wilson was more concerned with his legacy than what was right for America.
	He believed the founding fathers were misled.
	He was the first president in American history to actually philosophically and politically challenge the beliefs of the founding fathers.
	.
	Reflecting on the last call, the young man believes the right actually commits the young man believes the right actually commits more violence than the left while watching every night the left commit violence with no, absolutely no parallel to the right.
	Okay.
	It's a very scary thing to think that people can see something, know something, and deny it.
	So I looked up Proud Boys' example of right-wing violence.
	I looked up all the anti-Proud Boys websites that I could find, which is, I mean, there are many more than I found.
	It's all you find, actually, is anti-Proud Boys stuff.
	If you Google Proud Boys violence, which I did, so they gave no example except for January 6th at the Capitol.
	That was the entirety of...
	Of the Proud Boys' violence.
	But here's a typical example of the way they describe them.
	This is from Dazed at Digital, one of the first to come up on the Google search.
	Though the group reportedly rejects white supremacy, parentheses, it permits non-white male members.
	So, isn't that a funny thing?
	Isn't it an odd thing to describe a group as rejecting white supremacy and then noting that it allows non-white members?
	So why would you even say it disavows white supremacy if you acknowledge that it allows non-white members?
	Are you familiar with any other racial supremacist organization that allowed members of other races in the history of white or any supremacist organization?
	Does Farrakhan's organization, does black supremacist organization allow white members?
	Did the Nazis allow Jewish members?
	Did the Ku Klux Klan allow black members?
	Next, it has regularly participated in racist events.
	I'm still looking for where it's violent.
	The FBI has labeled it an extremist group with ties to white nationalism.
	And then in parentheses, although the agency later backtracked.
	This is how your kids are taught at high school and college.
	Yes, indeed.
	uh Phil in Los Angeles.
	Hello.
	Hello, Dennis.
	Yep.
	So, I just want to tell you something that happened to me quickly this weekend.
	So, I was at a Veterans Center here in Los Angeles I was working at.
	Sorry about that.
	I see a big, tall guy coming up.
	Obviously a military guy.
	He sees me working out.
	I'm just about finished my workout.
	He calls me over and says, would you like to join our military group meeting?
	So he said, sure, to be polite.
	Sorry, Dennis.
	So he's talking about how he wants volunteers.
	So I walked up.
	I'm not wearing my mask, and everybody else is wearing a mask.
	So I can see that they're very nervous that I'm not wearing a mask.
	So I told him, you know, I can't volunteer right now, but I gave him my number.
	I said, get a hold of me and I'll see what I can do.
	As I got back on the freeway, I thought, you know what?
	There's something I can do.
	I do physical therapy for a living.
	I go to people's homes.
	So I turned around, came back and said, listen, I'd be happy to volunteer.
	Now, he had walked me out to my car and was standing guard because I wasn't wearing a mask.
	So I came back and I told him, I said, Listen, I'll volunteer my services to do physical therapy.
	This whole group looked like they were terrified that I wasn't wearing a mask.
	But my point is that I go there, I volunteer my time.
	I'm not afraid.
	I'm not afraid to go in front of people and say, hey, listen, show them that I'm not afraid to wear a mask.
	Yeah.
	Look, it's very distressing.
	This has been a very revelatory year to me.
	The ease with which people can be brainwashed is, even for me, shocking, given that I've studied brainwashing and totalitarianism all of my life.
	But it's like anything else in life.
	When you experience it, it is just so much more real.
	Read my column a couple of months ago.
	The Good German, and then the next week's column, The Good American.
	I much better understand, after a lifetime of studying the Nazi and communist regimes, I now much better understand the ease with which a population can be brainwashed.
	If it can happen in a free society, can you imagine how easily it can be done in a totalitarian society?
	There is no amount of lying.
	There is no amount of idiocy, patent idiocy, that people will not believe.
	Massive numbers of people will not believe if the media simply repeat it often enough.
	We have seen it with COVID, and we have seen it with the left.
	That is why it is so important to have dissenting voices.
	However, the left always suppresses dissent.
	There has never been an exception in the history of the left.
	It is only a matter of what they can get away with.
	But that is the human condition.
	I am not saying this for you to despair.
	I'm saying this for you to fight.
	And that is a choice we make, by the way.
	Despair or fight.
	We shall return.
	This is Carol Platt-Lebow for townhall.com.
	Calling new Biden legislation an infrastructure plan is like calling a shark a dolphin.
	They both may have dorsal fins, but you mistake one for the other at your peril.
	Don't be fooled.
	Only 5% of the bill's spending would actually go for roads and bridges, what normal people think of as infrastructure.
	Add in items like Amtrak and broadband, and you're still only at 30% of the eye-popping total of $2.3 trillion.
	And you're supposed to pay for all of this with the biggest tax increase since 1968. Here's what's worse.
	The bill is actually about leftist social engineering.
	It would end right to work, something the left hates because it guarantees no one can be forced to join a union or pay union dues in order to hold a job.
	Ending it offers a rich new source of campaign contributions for Democrats.
	Calling a shark a dolphin doesn't make it one.
	I'm Carol Platt-Lebow.
	Trending now on the Charlie Kirk Show.
	We now have a radical, unproven philosophy, critical race theory, that is running our entire government.
	The CDC director says racism is a serious public health threat.
	Quote, a growing body of research shows that centuries of racism in this country has had a profound and negative impact on communities of color.
	That's not true.
	It's not true.
	Read Discrimination and Disparities by Thomas Sowell.
	Just because there is a disparity does not mean that discrimination is to blame.
	The fatherless epidemic in the black community is a serious public health threat.
	You want to know what's keeping black people down?
	It's not racism.
	It's government programs, failing public schools, Democrat policies, and the lack of fathers in the home.
	Keep up with what's trending.
	Subscribe on YouTube today.
	Trending now on The Larry Elder Show.
	Headline, and I'm quoting.
	Two CBS TV executives are fired after one called a black TV anchor just a jive guy and the other called a female employee an effing idiot.
	Peter Dunn, president of CBS television stations, and David Friend, senior VP for news.
	The stations were ousted on Wednesday.
	I'm laughing because polls show that 83% of Democrats believe that Donald Trump is a racist.
	83%.
	This guy is calling a black TV anchor just a jive guy while reporting how racist Donald Trump is.
	I can't make this up.
	Keep up with what's trending.
	Subscribe on YouTube today.
	Hi, everybody.
	I'm Dennis Prager.
	or And Cornelius in Augusta, Georgia.
	Hello.
	Oh, hello, Dennis.
	How are you, man?
	It's so good to talk to you.
	Thank you.
	God bless you.
	Hey, I was just calling, man.
	I'm in Augusta.
	They're looking for a replacement for Rush because they're kind of WGAC here, the talk radio station, and they're looking for a replacement for Rush, and I was thinking you would be great.
	So I don't know if you could contact them.
	I could call them or try to ask them to put you in there.
	Well, it's very kind of you.
	That has happened in a number of cities, and I don't personally campaign for this.
	Rush and I were close.
	The Wall Street Journal asked me to write their featured piece on him, which I did.
	And we were on at the same hour, so we were theoretically competitors, though I never thought of it that way.
	We were two people doing work for this country.
	But obviously I'm honored whenever I fill in the essentially unfillable shoes, but in my own way, I am a good person for that position.
	So if you want to write to them, that would be great.
	And any stations or any of you who know stations where that would be an opening now.
	For me, the issue has nothing to do with money.
	The issue is entirely idealistic.
	The more people that I can touch with my ideas, the better I think things are.
	Thank you, Cornelius.
	That was very kind.
	And Colorado Springs, Phillip.
	Hello.
	Hi, this is Phillip.
	Am I on?
	Yes, you are.
	Hello, thank you for taking my call.
	It's very much appreciated.
	Yes, sir.
	So the reason why I wanted to call today was, first of all, I feel like every time you get a call from Colorado, it's somebody who's very left-wing, and I want to put it out that we are not all like that.
	And I'd hate to see this great state go the way of California, but unfortunately it seems like it's going that way.
	All that being said, Look at things from other people's perspective, especially when I disagree with them.
	With that being said, I do not comprehend how some people, like my friend, what was the name, Kyle from Boulder, can seriously think that right now, at least, the majority of violence is coming from people who they say are quote-unquote in the right.
	I think he wants to believe it.
	It is so obvious to anybody who takes truth seriously that it is not the case.
	That's why it was more sad than angering.

▲