Before I get to my guest, whom I'm very excited to talk to, I need to express some things about what is happening in my county, Los Angeles County.
Outdoor dining has been banned.
So the restaurants that survived the first ban on eating...
At a restaurant, even outside, many will be crushed now, which is fine with the LA Times and fine with Barbara Ferrer, the county head of health.
The left, one of the great lies of our time, and of all time, is that the left is compassionate.
Their compassion is so selective as to be absurd.
One of the amazing things in life is to see the people whose lives are crushed by the Democratic Party vote Democrat.
I'm thinking of all the Hispanic workers in restaurants in the Los Angeles area who have no income now as a result of the Democrats.
That's it.
There's no other explanation.
The LA Times, of course.
This is the headline.
LA outdoor dining ban survives challenges.
COVID-19 outlook worsens.
Because they count the cases.
This is an idiotic way of determining the dangers.
And, of course, you can eat in an airplane, but you cannot eat outdoors at a restaurant.
Get that?
Just thought I'd share that with you.
How selective.
But they don't want to put Delta out of business, but they're totally happy to put Harry's Diner out of business.
So this woman, I looked up this woman, Barbara Ferrer.
I'm going to talk about her later.
I'm going to see what is doable to get her out of office.
Just to give you an idea, of those of you who think the health authorities follow science, well, Pasadena, which essentially borders L.A. County, this station is 10 minutes from Pasadena.
They're keeping their restaurants open.
They have a different health department.
The thing that every one of you cities has to do, All over the country is now make your own health department.
So the people who follow science five miles away, ten miles away, they believe you can sit outdoors at a restaurant.
The people who follow science in Los Angeles think you can't.
So there's no such thing for these people as following science.
It's all philosophy.
It's a philosophy of life.
Do I crush people to have a certain utopian result?
There's nothing good about it, even health-wise.
And, of course, the judge who dismissed the restaurant association cause, he's getting his salary.
And I would bet a great deal of money he is a Democrat as well.
You vote for Democrats, you vote to crush the society.
I give you examples every day.
This is the latest.
My guest is a remarkable woman, Heidi St. John.
She has her own podcast, her own website, has written books.
And all of that is at HeidiStJohn.com.
And Heidi is in the state of Washington.
Is that correct?
That's right.
Lucky me.
See?
She's good, folks.
You can tell already.
She's got a biting sense of humor.
I love it.
Well, I don't know who's luckier.
I'm in L.A., and you're in Washington State, so it's a tough call which one of us is governed more by fools.
Well, I think for right now, California is winning just a little bit.
They've locked us down again here in Washington, but...
We can still have outdoor seating, you know, because now it's raining and 40 degrees.
Everyone wants to eat outside right now.
So last week they closed down the restaurants here, and I'm sitting in my little hometown of Battleground, Washington, and I'm watching business after business get shuttered and closed permanently.
I've been speaking out about this for a long time.
It's horrible.
I mean, they're literally ruining small businesses.
Because, you know, Chick-fil-A's going to be fine.
Wendy's is going to be fine.
That's right.
And the big restaurant chains are just fine with the Democrats.
The left has...
They're in cahoots.
It's the little guy they crush.
I don't understand why.
So riddle me this.
I've been trying to get local business owners here to stop kowtowing to this illegal, unconstitutional lockdown, this stripping of our rights and our ability to make a living for our families.
And I'm amazed at the number of restaurants who are just like, well, I guess the government told me to.
I mean, honestly, I don't own a restaurant.
I wish I did.
We would be open right now.
I'd be like, hey, we're going to have 300 people in our little building.
I want to say to any L.A. restaurant that wants to open that I will announce that on the air and try to get as many people to protect you in the front of your restaurant as I can with my radio.
So I just...
Yeah, that's what needs to happen.
Well, and I said last week I did a Facebook Live about this, trying to petition the restaurant owners and the small businesses.
You know, right now they're telling churches in Washington State, you can't sing anymore.
You can't have a worship team up on your stage.
But you can have a soloist, because the Ronan won't get you with a soloist.
But if it's to duet you, you guys, you might die.
It's a possibility that you're going to die.
And I've been saying for a long time, why is there no civil disobedience?
They're going to kill you anyway.
I'd rather die on my feet.
I'd rather die with my restaurant open.
That's right.
That's exactly right.
So what is the story?
Where do you live exactly?
Are you near Seattle?
Where are you?
No, so I'm about 20 minutes outside of Portland, Oregon, in Battleground, Washington.
So basically a sleeper community of Vancouver, Washington, and Portland, Oregon.
And that sleeper community, the restaurants cannot operate?
They can only operate for takeout.
That's it.
Takeout.
And if you want to eat outside.
So, like, I'm watching absurd things happen.
It's cold here now.
You know, it's in the 40s.
And I'm watching absurd things happen.
I'm watching people putting tents out.
And you can eat in a tent outside of a restaurant.
And you can put a heater.
It's absurd.
It's absurd.
Yeah.
So, that's what they're doing.
And that happened last week.
That's the latest of the lockdowns for Emperor Inslee.
All right.
You have how many kids?
Seven.
I knew it was a big number.
How old are they?
Our oldest is almost 30, and the youngest is 10. So you started early?
Yeah, I was 21. Yes, relatively early.
I guess by today's standards.
By today's standards, yeah, that's correct.
So the youngest is how old?
Ten.
Oh, is that amazing.
I got a fifth grader.
So do you have a grandchild that is almost the age of your child, your youngest?
I do, yes.
So our oldest grandson is eight.
So we have an eight-year-old grandson, a six-year-old grandson, and an eight-month-old granddaughter.
Wow.
And how many of your seven live in Washington State?
So far, all of them.
Hallelujah.
They all live around here.
My son and his wife are in Seattle.
Bless them.
And everybody else, one of our sons is attending college in Portland.
And everybody else is right in the Vancouver area.
So they're all in...
I'm very, very grateful.
They're all living right around here.
So I have a tough question.
I don't...
You don't have to answer it, but it's now a question I ask every conservative and or religious person.
Usually they're the same.
How many of your children share your values?
All of them.
They're all walking with the Lord.
Two of our daughters actually work for me.
I run an organization called MomStrong International.
Our oldest daughter does all the graphic design for that.
I mean, our second oldest.
Our oldest daughter is married to a pastor, and they work at a church in Camas, Washington.
All of our kids share our values.
I honestly mean that comes from years of praying for them and years of teaching them our values, and also I think it has a lot to do with not putting them in a godless education system that was going to do its level best to make sure they didn't share our values.
Val, that's the subject.
So you homeschooled all seven?
Yes.
Yep.
We didn't start out that way.
Our oldest daughter attended public school in Oregon through the second grade.
We started seeing some things happening in the school 25 years ago that troubled us.
And so we pulled her out and took a chance.
It was a risk.
Frankly, it was nothing I wanted to do.
You know, I graduated from a private Christian school.
My husband and I graduated from a public school.
We had no experience with homeschooling.
And frankly, everybody that we knew that did homeschool, I'll just be really honest, everybody that we knew that did homeschool was a little on the nutty side.
You know, I mean, they were grinding their own wheat into flour and they weren't registering their kids for anything.
That wasn't, you know, that was never our intention.
Okay, great.
This is the subject that I need to address because I am begging people to take their kids out of schools.
And either find the grade school, which is rare, or home school, which is intimidating.
So we'll find out about the latter in a moment.
This is Owen Strand for townhall.com.
Supreme Court Judge Samuel Alito recently made a startling point.
Religious liberty is in danger of becoming a second-class right.
Alito said as much to the Federalist Society.
Just as the COVID restrictions have highlighted the movement toward rule by experts, litigation about those restrictions has pointed up emerging trends in the assessment of individual rights.
This is especially evident with respect to religious liberty.
It pains me to say this, but in certain quarters, religious liberty is fast becoming a disfavored right.
Alito argued that not only religious liberty, but free speech is imperiled.
Support for freedom of speech is also in danger, and COVID rules have restricted speech in unprecedented ways.
This is a timely and prescient warning.
Religious liberty is the very foundation of American freedom, and free speech is part of what makes America great.
We cannot sit passively by as our cherished freedoms are whittled away.
We must pay attention and take action where we can.
I'm Owen Strand. - The Pepperdine School of Public Policy, America's unique graduate program for leaders.
Learn more at publicpolicy.pepperdine.edu.
Trending now on the Larry Elder Show.
Oh Appreciate it.
Chris is in San Antonio, Texas.
Chris, you're on The Larry Elder Show.
Oh, wow.
What an honor to speak with Greg O'Dursky.
How are you doing today?
I'm doing well.
Thanks, Chris.
I guess my question is, can you imagine if this goes to the courts and then it goes to Congress and then it goes for President Trump like we all know it should?
Chris, mass suicide.
Mass suicide.
Cities are going to be burning to the ground.
Their ears would explode.
It would be catastrophic for the left if Donald Trump were awarded the election.
You think we feel that the election was fraudulent?
What do you think they're going to feel?
They're going to go absolutely bonkers.
They believe that the Russians not only interfere, but 78% of them believe that the Russians changed the outcome of the election, even though our Intelligence Committee has never reached that conclusion.
So they're going to go absolutely bonkers.
Remember what Hillary advised Joe Biden?
So we've got to have a massive legal operation.
I know the Biden campaign is working on that.
We have to have poll workers, and I urge people who are able to be a poll worker.
We have to have our own teams of people to counter the force of intimidation that the Republicans and Trump are going to put outside polling places.
This is a big organizational challenge, but at least we know more about what they're going to do.
And, you know, Joe Biden should not concede under any circumstances.
They would go absolutely ballistic.
Keep up with what's trending.
Subscribe on YouTube today.
Trending now on the Eric Metaxas Show.
Who do you think gave the high sign or made the plan behind the scenes what to do on election night?
These are people.
This wasn't an algorithm.
Who do you suppose are the Mandarins of power on the Democratic side who made these decisions?
Yeah, it's hard to say.
I mean, there's a lot of different working theories here, and I think they all might have some element of truth together and so some people are very focused on the hammer scorecard, the Dominion voting systems, and I think that actually there's a lot behind that.
We've already seen that one of the Dominion voting systems changed 6,000 votes in Michigan from a Republican losing to a Republican winning.
We've seen memory stick upload issues in three counties now in Georgia that otherwise Okay, everybody.
I want to remind you that I will be taking a cruise, another Prager cruise.
I've done it every year for 25 years except this year.
I would have done it this year, happily.
The amount of arrogant irresponsibility on the part of officials, the media, and a good chunk.
Of the epidemiological world has become known.
Apparently millions of Americans have decided that they're getting nonsense, evil nonsense, from Fauci and the CDC, and they have decided to travel.
I'm just delighted.
God bless you.
Enjoy life.
Don't listen to fools.
It has nothing to do with science.
The science is on our side.
Anyway, taking a cruise, London to Iceland.
They all sell out, and a word to the wise is sufficient.
The banner is up at DennisPrager.com.
A terrific woman is Heidi St. John, recommended to me by one of the most terrific human beings I know.
I am blessed with great people in my life, Jack Hibbs.
Jack Hibbs recommended to me someone in Ethiopia.
I would have them on the air.
But when we spoke, I was convinced that when Heidi St. John and I spoke on the phone, I realized Jack Hibbs, this great pastor, knew what he's talking about.
So she has her own podcast, her own website, HeidiStJohn.com, and I am pushing something I didn't do, so I don't know much about it.
I only know it's the only alternative in vast segments of our society, vast areas, that is to homeschool, because most schools will poison your child's soul, mind, spirit, etc.
So you started, you had no intention, you wanted to send your kids to public school, correct?
That's right, yeah.
And you began doing that.
Okay, so I'm going to jump to the end and then go back.
The bottom line, tell me...
How intimidating is it to homeschool your child?
I think it's as intimidating as you allow it to be.
Because I was listening to a narrative that was basically given to me by all of the teachers and educators that I'd ever spoken to, including people in my own family who said, you need to leave that up to the professionals.
You're not a trained teacher.
You don't know what you're doing.
And they made me feel like...
Even at, you know, 27 years old, I was somehow incompetent to teach basic math.
What are we doing to our children when they come out of our high schools and we tell them, you are not competent enough to teach a six-year-old basic math?
So it's a lie.
The premise is a lie.
And once you jump into it, and I always tell parents, don't overthink it.
Just start doing it.
And you will realize in a matter of about two days, oh my goodness, I have been lied to my whole life.
I can do this.
And that was certainly my experience.
We actually started with our daughter, Sierra, who's now 27 years old.
We started with her.
And while my oldest daughter was still in school, I was kind of experimenting with my six-year-old.
And I realized I taught her how to read.
And I remember my husband coming home from work one day, and I was like, look what we're doing.
This child who I was told I could never do that because I don't have a degree in elementary school education, she's reading.
And at that point, I just thought, I'm taking my other daughter out of school, and none of the rest of our kids have ever darkened the door of a public school, or a private school for that matter.
What about a parent who wants to continue to work?
Is homeschooling impossible?
No, it's not impossible.
I always tell parents, where there's a will, there's a way.
And let me frame it for you this way, because this is the conversation I've been having with...
Hundreds and hundreds of parents in the Portland, Vancouver area who are now going, oh my goodness, I want my kids out of these schools.
I just don't think I can do it.
If we thought for one moment, we're learning this in the Rona.
If we thought for one moment that there was a deadly disease in our schools, that our kids would catch it and they would be dead within, I don't know, a matter of weeks, months, hours, whatever.
Would we take our kids out of school and find a different way?
Absolutely.
And I'm telling them right now.
That the damage that's being done to our children psychologically, emotionally, spiritually, is ten times worse than any physical pandemic that would ever come through our school.
And the devastation that they are inflicting on our children is permanent.
It's very, very hard to undo it.
And so I've been telling parents, you can do this.
And I work.
I've written, you know, while we've been homeschooling seven children, I have written, I think, eight books now.
My husband and I have launched a podcast, an international ministry to families.
We opened the Homeschool Resource Center.
If it's a dream in your heart and you need to do it, you can do it.
I've worked in different places while I've homeschooled my children.
Is it difficult?
Yes.
But nothing that's worth doing in this life is easy.
I mean, those of us who've been married more than 10 minutes can attest to that.
It's worth it.
And I tell parents, it's going to be difficult.
I'm not going to sugarcoat it, but you can totally do it.
And the only people that will tell you that you can't do it are people who don't want you to do it because they realize the power that's in it.
You're good.
I enjoy you.
I'm on a little bit of a crusade, Dennis.
I'm on a little bit of a crusade because I'm watching.
The city that I love, people, you know, we see Portland, Oregon on the news all the time, right?
I grew up in Portland.
I went to school and graduated from high school in Portland.
I love the city of Portland, Oregon, and I hate what the leftists are doing to it.
And they're doing this largely.
You see these kids out there every night burning down our cities and tearing down statues of Abraham Lincoln in the city square in Portland, Oregon.
A lot of these kids are coming from these schools, and they've been indoctrinated to believe that they are on a righteous crusade.
They really believe it.
Every evil doctrine thinks it's righteous.
Yes, that's exactly right.
There is none that has not.
So that people think that they're good is as relevant as people think that they breathe.
Yep, yep.
That's exactly right.
Okay, so I am on a crusade, too.
I want you to know, I think that is a brilliant question to ask.
What if there was a pandemic?
That struck schools.
Would you take your kid out of school?
Of course.
So is there an intellectual pandemic?
Yes.
A moral pandemic?
Yes.
Does it make kids sick in terms of psychologically, in terms of happiness, in terms of love of country, in terms of belief that there might be something higher than them to which they are accountable?
I mean, the list is endless.
There is a pandemic.
It's just not physical.
Yep.
And the results will be much more far-reaching.
Well, look, I'm saying this because of the number of parents that I grieve with who have children who have become alienated from them and everything they hold dear.
Because they went to things that are called schools, but are actually indoctrination centers.
And here's a question.
Is the kid who turns left a happy person?
The Dennis Frager Show.
I mean, he is not where Georgians are.
Let me play that for the audience, Senator Scott Cappell.
Cut number four, this is Raphael Warnick giving a sermon in 2011. America, nobody can serve God and the military.
We have seen in modern times the rise of Trump.
And Trumpism on the shoulders of Christians brings into sharp focus the moral bankruptcy of the American church.
So Senator Scott, the moral bankruptcy of the American church, the assertion you can't serve God and be in the U.S. military.
I mean, do Georgians hear this?
Because I've had Georgians call me and tell me their airwaves are flooded with Raphael Warnock and John Ossoff, who is AOC light propaganda.
Oh, well, that's why, you know, I've had three...
We've got tough statewide elections, and you've got to raise your money.
You've got to get your message out.
You've got to tell people, here's the difference.
If you want to vote for a Republican, David Perdue or Kelly Loeffler, then you're going to vote for lower taxes, less government, better schools, more school choice.
We're going to support the law enforcement.
We're going to support the military.
Or you can vote for the Democrats.
Here's what you're going to get if you vote for the Democrats.
You're going to get them packing the Supreme Court, which will refer to our First Amendment rights and our Second Amendment rights.
You're going to get them to do Medicare for All, which means That you're going to ruin, one, the Medicare program, two, kick people off their private health care insurance plan.
You're going to have the Green New Deal, which will cost us almost $100 trillion, and kill our economy.
You're going to have reduced funding for law enforcement, and you're going to have socialism.
So the choice is pretty clear.
Keep up with what's trending.
Subscribe on YouTube today.
Trending now on The Charlie Kirk Show.
And I hope that this does not explode to the volcanic expectations that I have.
And it's actually, I'm unbelievably worried where this is going.
Because normal people, regular Americans, are not going to tolerate what is happening right now in our country.
And what's happening is the widespread criminality from within our own government.
That's where things start to get very, very dangerous.
And normal people and regular people that work their tail off to do the right thing, to not even get speaking, not even get parking tickets, to not even get speeding tickets.
People that follow the law, they see this Nevada cash for vote scheme, they see the granny farming that whistleblowers have now said exists in Nevada, I mean in Wisconsin.
They see the...
Piles of dead voters that allegedly voted in these states.
They see the 1,774% increase for older people, 90-plus-year-olds that register to vote in Pennsylvania, most of which register to vote online.
You're right.
They see the National Democrat Party suggesting re-education camps for Trump supporters.
They see the New York Times article that says, reach out to Trump supporters, I try.
They also then see the candidate that they voted for, Donald Trump, What are they saying on the front page of the New York Times?
That he might go to prison as soon as he's done with his term.
Playing with fire, everybody.
It's not good.
Keep up with what's trending.
Subscribe on YouTube today.
Trending now on the Larry Alder Show.
Starting today.
Thank you.
Gyms, movie theaters, churches can no longer meet indoors.
as a result of the emergency orders.
41 of California's 58 counties are now in what's called purple tier status, and that is Newsom's strictest category.
He's also...
Hi everyone, Dennis Prager here.
Go to HeidiStJohn.com.
Her podcast, her books, her website.
Heidi St. John is a crusader.
I know that word has been banned.
I wonder if you crusade, can you crusade against breast cancer?
Is that a legit use of the word?
The absurdity of it all.
Anyway, I'm happy to be called a crusader for getting kids out of the pandemic, the moral pandemic of our schools.
And it's an intellectual pandemic.
They learn not to think.
So I'm talking to you about people being frightened or intimidated with regard to homeschooling.
So let's say they want to start or dip their feet in it.
Is there a place to go to...
I have two questions.
Is there a place that they can go that will give them hand-holding on how to start?
And B, can't you...
People imagine that the kids are in the house all day.
My friends who have homeschooled, you know, told me, oh, we'll be in England next week with their homeschooling group.
So what is the case?
Can your kid be with others a lot?
Yeah, so I'll go back and answer your first question first.
If you're interested in homeschooling, the first place I always send people is to the Homeschool Legal Defense Association.
That's HSLDA.org.
They are the largest homeschool advocacy group or organization in the world.
And a fantastic organization.
You can go there and click on your state.
And you can find resources that are right available in your state.
You can find out what the law is in your state.
Everything you need to know about homeschooling, beginning homeschooling, I would tell parents if you're going to start, start there.
Alright, give the name of the website again.
H-S-L-D-A dot org.
It's the Homeschool Legal Defense Association.
My friend Mike Ferris and his friend Mike Smith founded that organization probably over 30 years ago.
Mike is right now, Mike Ferris is also the president currently of the Alliance Defending Freedom.
So these are people who care deeply about freedom, and one of the ways we advance freedom is through homeschooling.
And so that's where I would tell people to start.
In terms of what it looks like, our children have been to almost all 50 states.
They've been around the country.
We've taken them to Europe with us.
If we study the Constitution and the founding of our nation, we're taking them to Williamsburg, to Monticello.
We're taking them to Washington, D.C. It's a myth that homeschooling means that parents are locked up at home all day long.
If you've got a small child...
You're looking, so let's say kindergarten, you know, kindergarten to first grade, even second grade, you're looking at about a one to two hour commitment per day.
And that's hard for people to wrap their heads around because we've been conditioned to think that the school bus comes at, you know, 7.30 in the morning and we don't see our kids again until 4 p.m.
So that must be what it takes.
But it isn't.
Most of what happens in the schools is busy work, right?
Because they're teaching, you know, 25, 30 kids at one time.
You're basically tutoring children.
And even though I tutored seven children, we would start our routine at probably about 9 in the morning, and we were done by noon, almost every day without exception.
So what if I don't know geometry or algebra?
How does my kid learn that?
That's a great question.
Coming from a mom who's never taught algebra in her life to any of my kids, what we did for years was we got together with other parents who were also homeschooling, and one of the parents, sometimes a mom, sometimes a dad, would say, hey, I love algebra.
I'm great at it.
I'll teach your kids every Thursday from noon to two, and we tutored them in algebra.
Right, exactly what I assumed.
How does one find that algebra teacher?
So the best way to do it right now, honestly, is to get onto social media and say, I'm going to homeschool my kids.
This is how I do everything.
It sounds ridiculous.
No, it makes perfect sense.
So you just say, hey, I need an algebra tutor.
I'm really good at this.
We could trade.
I mean, there's a whole bunch of different ways to skin a cat.
And I think it starts with, unfortunately, social media is a nightmare right now, as you and I well know.
But I think that's the way to do it.
Also, hooking up with your state organization.
If you go to HSLVA.org and you click on your state, they're going to put you in touch with the state leaders.
The state leaders, they know what's up.
And so, like, if you live in the Portland-Vancouver area, my husband and I have opened the nation's first full-time homeschool resource center.
We're there Monday through Thursday.
On Friday, we have a homeschool co-op that meets there.
But there are tutors there for literally every subject under the sun.
It's very affordable, and we work with people who don't have the funds, and so we literally are removing every excuse that parents ever give me.
That's why we opened up the Homeschool Resource Center.
So if you have an excuse, I've got a solution.
I love you.
This is Heidi St. John at HeidiStJohn.com.
When I come back, I want to talk to people who have engaged in this from all over the country.
I'm trying to save your kids and grandkids, my friends, from poison, real poison.
And now I want to save you from pain.
I would like to get an email from someone who can afford $19.95 and who has joint or muscle pain and tell me, I'm purely curious.
Why wouldn't you try a product that I'm telling you works for the great majority of people for that amount of money?
It doesn't make sense to me because pain stinks.
Go to relieffactor.com 800-500-8384-1995 for three weeks.
You'll know within three weeks if it works.
Trending now on the Mike Deliger Show.
Today is the day that Pfizer will be formally requesting emergency use authorization for their vaccine against coronavirus.
The president initiated and the administration implemented Operation Warp Speed, which is leading to the Reveal that within weeks, it appears, millions and millions of Americans will start getting the vaccination against COVID-19.
Of course, it's coming at a time that is urgently needed.
In the Vice President's words yesterday, coronavirus is surging through the nation.
The U.S. death toll that has been attributed to coronavirus is over 252,000 Americans.
2,000 reported yesterday.
Hospitalizations, according to the mainstream media, and I always know we have to look at that with a little bit of a wary eye, but in their words, hospitalizations across America have exploded.
80,000 Americans are now in the hospital getting inpatient treatment.
Yesterday, the governor of California And I just take a lot of comfort in knowing that the Trump administration delivered essentially a vaccine that
in normal times would have taken two or three or four years keep up with what's trending subscribe on youtube today trending now on america first with sebastian what did you think of the press conference yesterday
Are you satisfied in general by the campaign's response and by the conservative response to what we witnessed two weeks ago on election night?
Well, here's what we have to understand as a predicate.
If we allow fraud to continue, if we turn a blind eye to it, if we accept the proposition that any accusation of fraud or any query of ballots cast is racist or an attack on democracy itself, then we as conservatives will never if we accept the proposition that any accusation of fraud or any query of Racist or an attack on democracy itself, then we as conservatives will never win another election again.
Because in some of these very densely populated cities, you have a feature that I like to call ballot laundering, where people didn't actually intend to vote those ballots those particular ways.
There was just a mechanized system to request ballots, submit those ballots.
and then have people count them.
By the way, talking about helping you with the education of your children, PragerU has a program now, PrEP, and it's PragerU has a program now, PrEP, and it's the PragerU Educators and Parents Program.
So you could go to PragerU.com and click on Prep.
And especially if you're a teacher, but if you know a teacher or you're a parent with a kid in school.
But we're talking now about homeschooling.
By the way, PragerU is a huge help in homeschooling.
The 450 videos are a massive education about life.
And I needed to bring that to your attention as a major help in...
Educating your kids.
My guest is Heidi St. John with her own website and podcasts, The Busy Mom, is the title, right?
Is that correct, of your website?
Yeah, that's right.
HeidiStJohn.com.
The podcast is called Off the Bench.
So Off the Bench with Heidi St. John, and it's pretty much everywhere podcasts are right now.
Excellent.
So, I keep telling you folks the poison that is being inflicted into your child's soul at most schools in the United States.
The indoctrination rather than education, so you have to take them out.
And that might mean homeschooling, and I'm trying to de-intimidize homeschooling for you with Heidi St. John.
And let's go.
Well, here's a fair question.
Malcolm in San Jose, California.
I'll just summarize it for a moment because I want to get to as many as I can.
I'm not sure a dentist knows what it's like to be poor.
We have to put our kids in public school.
How would you answer that?
Oh, you know what?
I love that question.
I don't know that Dennis knows what it's like to be poor, but I know that he knows what it's like to have your kid's heart and mind ruined through indoctrination.
And I'm going to go back to where there's a will, there's a way.
My husband and I, my husband was a pastor for 20 years, and we homeschooled seven of our children on a single income.
You know what that meant?
That meant we didn't have new cars.
It meant we only had one car for a long time.
It meant we lived in a small house.
It meant that our kids, all of them wore hand-me-down clothes.
And frankly, they still do because now we decided we like it better anyway.
I think that it's a misnomer that you have to be wealthy to homeschool your children.
That's just, it's simply not the case at all.
And for a long time, I mean, I did everything under the sun.
I sold Tupperware.
I worked nights at an emergency room.
I did all kinds of things so that I could stay home with my children and educate them.
And I think this idea, the culture doesn't like to sacrifice anything.
And so, like I told you earlier, I don't like to sugarcoat it.
Is it difficult?
Yes.
And so I ask the parents the question, are your kids worth it?
If they're worth it, then you'll figure out a way.
And if they're not worth it, you won't.
And I hate to say that because it makes people mad, but the ship is sinking.
At what point are we going to continue to stand on the deck of the Titanic and polish the brass and listen to the band while the ship is sinking?
The barn is on fire.
When do you get the horses out?
And I've been speaking to homeschool audiences for 15 years.
When I started, I was very passive about education.
I was just telling them about something that we were doing that we loved, that was working really well for our family.
I was very careful not to say, hey, this is the best thing for everybody.
I have changed my mind.
I have reserved the right to change my opinion on this.
I'm telling parents, your children are literally dying from a spiritual and a moral epidemic of indoctrination in the schools.
And stop making excuses and start looking for ways that you can take them out.
It's not a question of money, and we need to stop making it about money.
I want to emphasize to parents another thing.
Even if you think you can make peace with your kids getting indoctrinated, there's another consequence to that.
In a great number of cases, That means they become alienated from you.
If you are not a leftist, your kid will be taught that you're an a-hole.
That's the bottom line, my friends.
There is no way around it.
You are a white supremacist if you are white.
You're an Uncle Tom if you're black.
You're a sellout if you're Hispanic.
If you do not buy everything the left says, you are vile.
And that's what your child is learning about you.
Why you would send your child to a place to learn to have contempt for you, for you, is a puzzle.
It's interesting to note, I was going to tell you really quickly, I spoke to a public school principal right here in the Vancouver area on Friday night.
And he came up to meet me at an event that we were at, and he said, Heidi, what you've been saying about the public schools is true times ten.
He just spent eight hours being educated about how they will now be indoctrinating our children here with critical race theory, along with the sexual indoctrination through comprehensive sex education.
He said, Heidi, we are literally...
And he has five children, all in the public schools.
He and his wife just pulled them all out.
This is a public school principle.
Who said, no more.
I don't want my kids in this anymore.
And he said, they're turning children against their parents.
So what you're saying, Dennis, is 100% right.
And I think for us not to know it now and not to see it now is naive.
It's naive because they're not trying to hide it.
Go look at the NEA. Look what they think about parents and what they think about parents when you drop your kids off at the school.
They believe they are the moral compass for your child at that point, and you have then been sidelined.
That's correct.
I don't know, that's it, Riz, R-H-Y-S, in St. Petersburg, Florida.
Hello?
Hi, how do you pronounce your name?
Riz.
Riz, okay, hi.
Yeah, I just wanted to, I have points all over the place.
My mom homeschooled me and my sisters a little bit.
We actually ended up moving because of that, but I... I've disliked public school ever since then and ever since I got old enough to realize basically the Marxist ideology that they teach pretty much everywhere all over it.
I have two children now and I homeschool them and the only thing I would say about it as far as ease is it only takes a few hours a day.
The public school keeps your kids in school for Way too long just to teach them all kinds of things like standing in line and things that don't really matter that much.
It's easy to teach.
But the difficulty that my family has had is that we basically had to sacrifice certain things as far as money.
Alright, hold on there.
It's important to hear this.
Turning now on The Charlie Kirk Show.
A woman who treats developmentally disabled patients.
She said, I haven't been able to see my patients in person since March because of the virus.
But right after the election, one of my clients said that he voted for Biden but didn't want to.
He told me that he said Biden won because Biden would make his Social Security payments go down.
He was sad that Biden won.
I asked him why he voted for Biden, if he was worried about that, and he said that one of the helpers just came in and filled out his ballot for Biden for him.
Bombshell voter fraud revelation in Wisconsin.
To the best of our knowledge or the intelligence we have provided, no FBI investigation, no DOJ investigation.
This is News Talks.
1130.iheart.com Disability service coordinator blows whistle on vote fraud in group homes called Granny Farming.
We have long been talking about that here, which would correlate with the 1,774% increase that we saw for people over the age of 90 registering during a pandemic in battleground states.
So Rudy Giuliani laid out nine key points.
The first of which was...
Observers were allegedly prevented from watching mail-in ballots from being opened.
This is the easiest point to prove of all the different allegations out there, and it's unconstitutional.
Giuliani said that many mail-in ballots were opened without observers being able to check that they were properly signed, a key protection against fraud.
Those votes, he said, were, quote, null and void.
Especially where the envelopes had been discarded, making recounts useless.
Can we talk about Cortez?
Yes, let's talk about AOC. Your response, you have been hitting hard with your amazing videos, the insanity of political correctness of cancel culture.
Does cancel culture, is it adequate enough a phrase when we're talking about AOC tweeting out that it's time to make lists of Trump supporters?
Okay, tag me in, Sebi.
Can I go off?
Tag me in, can I? You can go off!
Yes, okay.
First of all, I don't take her that seriously, because let's be real, I don't think she can read that well to be making any lists I'd be worried about.
Plus, she is the dumbest, the dumbest human being I've ever met or seen on the internet.
I haven't met her.
She's so stupid, she probably thinks that COVID-19 is Elon Musk's new kid.
She is so stupid.
She thinks that Pfizer is a mumble rapper and we need to learn his TikTok dances.
AOC is so dumb.
She thinks that the Bitcoin bull run is an actual event, and we need to say...
This is the first of many hours I will be devoting to one of the most important subjects
I can actually speak about getting your kids out of the American school system, which has been destroyed by the left.
Destroyed.
It is a farce.
College is a farce.
High schools are a farce.
There are exceptions, okay?
But if you find the exception, send your kid to that place.
I have no problem with that.
Speaking to Heidi St. John, HeidiStJohn.com.
All right, so in a nutshell, back to Reeves in Florida.
So you had to give up some stuff materially to homeschool your kids.
Is that correct?
Yeah.
Yeah, we made some sacrifices.
I mean, not huge.
We live in a little bit smaller house.
We have one car instead of two.
You know, small things like that.
But it's so that we can make sure that we have somebody home.
Right.
Okay.
All right.
I'm letting you go because I want to take as many calls.
Look, as Heidi pointed out, these are choices you have to make, folks.
Ask the people whose kids have contempt for them.
Because they're conservative or, God forbid, voted for Donald Trump.
Ask them whether they would now, in retrospect, trade in a new car every three years or whatever it might be for a lease and such lovely things, and they are lovely things in life, to have their kids love them and respect them.
If that's what it comes down to, Then the hell with the new car.
I mean, you have to make a calculated calculation to be redundant.
Let me leave you with a final word.
Let me just say this to Esther, Richard, Alan, Janine, Sue, Abby, and Jerry.
Missouri, California, Minnesota, Virginia.
I did say Virginia.
Texas and Florida.
I am going to devote a lot of hours to this.
Next hour is male-female hour, so it won't be different.
It'll be different.
But I want to hear from all of you.
So final word to you, Heidi.
I would urge parents to really open their eyes to what's happening in the school.
I feel like I've been, I was just mulling over listening to you.
You know, I've said homeschooling is hard.
I've said you can do it.
I also want to point something out on the positive, and I guess leave it on this note.
Homeschooling was the best thing that we ever did for our children.
The best thing we ever did for our family, so much joy has come out of it.
All seven of my kids, now three of my grandkids are all being homeschooled.
And I want people to know that there's life in it.
Life is waiting for you.
And don't give up the opportunity you have.
We have ceded the parenting of our children to the schools, and it's time for us to take our children back.
Bless your soul.
HeidiStJohn.com.
Thank you.
This is Owen Strand for townhall.com.
Supreme Court Judge Samuel Alito recently made a startling point.
Religious liberty is in danger of becoming a second-class right.
Alito said as much to the Federalist Society.
Just as the COVID restrictions have highlighted the movement toward rule by experts, litigation about those restrictions has pointed up emerging trends in the assessment of individual rights.
This is especially evident with respect to religious liberty.
It pains me to say this but in certain quarters religious liberty is fast becoming a disfavored right.
Alito argued that not only religious liberty but free speech is imperiled.
Support for freedom of speech is also in danger.
And COVID rules have restricted speech in unprecedented ways.
This is a timely and prescient warning.
Religious liberty is the very foundation of American freedom, and free speech is part of what makes America great.
We cannot sit passively by as our cherished freedoms are whittled away.
We must pay attention and take action where we can.
I'm Owen Strand.
The Pepperdine School of Public Policy, America's unique graduate program for leaders.
Learn more at publicpolicy.pepperdine.edu.
Trending now on the Larry Alder Show.
Appreciate it.
Chris is in San Antonio, Texas.
Chris, you're on The Larry Elder Show.
Oh, wow.
What an honor to speak with Greg O'Dursky.
How are you doing today?
I'm doing well.
Thanks, Chris.
I guess my question is, can you imagine if this goes to the courts and then it goes to Congress and then it goes for President Trump like we all know it should?
Chris, mass suicide.
Mass suicide.
Cities are going to be burning to the ground.
Their ears would explode.
It would be catastrophic for the left if Donald Trump were awarded the election.
You think we feel that the election was fraudulent?
What do you think they're going to feel?
They're going to go absolutely bonkers.
They believe that the Russians not only interfere, but 78% of them believe that the Russians changed the outcome of the election, even though our Intelligence Committee has never reached that conclusion.
So they're going to go absolutely bonkers.
Remember what Hillary advised Joe Biden?
So we've got to have a massive legal operation.
I know the Biden campaign is working on that.
We have to have poll workers, and I urge people who are able to be a poll worker.
We have to have our own teams of people to counter the force of intimidation that the Republicans and Trump are going to put outside polling places.
This is a big organizational challenge, but at least we know more about what they're going to do.
And, you know, Joe Biden should not concede under any circumstances.
They would go absolutely ballistic.
Keep up with what's trending.
Subscribe on YouTube today.
Trending now on the Eric Metaxas show.
Who do you think gave the high sign or made the plan behind the scenes what to do on election night?
These are people.
This wasn't an algorithm.
Who do you suppose are the mandarins of power on the Democratic side who made these decisions?
Yeah, it's hard to say.
I mean, there's a lot of different working theories here, and I think they all might have some element of truth together and so some people are very focused on the hammer scorecard the dominion voting systems and I think that actually there's a lot behind that we've already seen that One of the Dominion voting systems changed 6,000 votes in Michigan from a Republican losing to a Republican winning.
We've seen memory stick upload issues in three counties now in Georgia that otherwise would not have been found if it wasn't for the canvassing and the audit in Georgia.
I also think that there's a lot to be said though about a phrase that I coined called ballot laundering, where all these ballots were sent out and you enlist 30 or 40 criminals.
It always stuns me.
People say, well, voter fraud doesn't exist.
It's like saying money laundering doesn't exist.
They're like, well, I went into my local laundromat.
I couldn't see any money laundering.
I'm like, yeah, that's the point.
I counted all their dollar bills.
I audited them.
I said, well, do you look at their books?
Did you talk to their customers?
Do you see that guy come with a big thing of cash and say, yeah, wash some of my briefs and my suits?
You have to look a little bit deeper with a little more complexity, and ballot laundering is what the New York Times said in 2012. It exists all over.
They used to cover this stuff ferociously, which is called granny farming.
There was a 1,774% increase in voter registration for people over the age of 90 in Pennsylvania in the midst of a pandemic.
Keep up with what's trending.
Subscribe on YouTube today.
Trending now on The Charlie Kirk Show.
A woman who treats developmentally disabled patients.
She said, I haven't been able to see my patients in person since March because of the virus.
But right after the election, one of my clients said that he voted for Biden but didn't want to.
He told me that he said Biden won because Biden would make his Social Security payments go down.
He was sad that Biden won.
I asked him why he voted for Biden, if he was worried about that, and he said that one of the helpers just came in and filled out his ballot for Biden for him.
Bombshell voter fraud revelation in Wisconsin.
To the best of our knowledge or the intelligence we have provided, no FBI investigation, no DOJ investigation.
This is News Talks.
1130.iheart.com Disability service coordinator blows whistle on vote fraud in group homes called Granny Farming.
We have long been talking about that here, which would correlate with the 1,774% increase that we saw for people over the age of 90 registering during a pandemic in battleground states.
So Rudy Giuliani laid out nine key points.
The first of which was...
Observers were allegedly prevented from watching mail-in ballots from being opened.
This is the easiest point to prove of all the different allegations out there, and it's unconstitutional.
Giuliani said that many mail-in ballots were opened without observers being able to check that they were properly signed, a key protection against fraud.
Those votes, he said, were, quote, null and void.
especially where the envelopes had been discarded, making recounts useless.
Keep up with what's trending.
Subscribe on YouTube today.
I'm old-fashioned.
I like two sections.
I don't know if they're going to say something I don't like.
They're very the way it's known as a new woman.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Male-female hour every Wednesday, second hour of my program.
I want to remind you, you can hear all three hours.
It's a three-hour show.
You can hear all three hours live simply by going to DennisPrager.com and so many other places on your phone, on your internet, on the home computer, or You can hear it anytime you want, with no commercials, at PragerTopia.com.
In fact, at PragerTopia.com, you can hear about 10 years' worth of male-female hours.
Many couples have said to me it has saved their marriage or profoundly improved it, and for free.
One of the things that I take seriously about doing the Male Female Hour is honesty.
People shy away from the truths about life.
This is going to be an example.
It's a difficult topic for some people to hear.
The irony is...
We are less honest about difficult topics than ever before in America for political reasons, which I won't elucidate right now.
The reason for this topic, well, I've talked about this topic since I began talking to young people in particular in my 20s, so I have addressed this off the air and only Partially on the air.
Came up in a conversation I had recently at a get-together with a lot of the terrific people who work for PragerU.
And we got together.
I was speaking to about three, four young women.
And I don't know how the subject came up.
Maybe I raised it in context, but whatever the reason, the subject was the belief he will love me for who I am.
It's not a solid real man, a good man, looks beyond the physical and will love me for who I am.
It's an interesting thing that men, I don't think, think that way as much.
She will love me for who I am, so I don't have to, and then fill in.
It's not generally about looks.
Looks are different, exponentially different importance to each sex.
I'm not saying it's unimportant to women, but...
If you ask a woman of 30 years or older, even 25 or older, I have two men.
One is very accomplished, makes a good living, very bright, and the other one is a male model.
He's really gorgeous.
And the first one is just a normal-looking guy.
I mean, it's that I even have to make the argument that looks don't have the same degree of significance to each sex is a statement of how poor education is.
So back to the issue of he will love me for who I am, which I remember young women were thinking when I was teaching this at this An educational institution where I taught from 76 to 83. And it came as sort of a shock to them.
It doesn't matter how I look.
What matters is my heart.
Now, any man who only thinks about how a woman looks is a very empty man and will end up in a very poor relationship.
But on Earth, the way God or nature has made us, that is not insignificant.
And all he cares about is who I am.
Well, then my parallel is a man saying, she doesn't care if I'm ambitious or work hard.
If I play video games much of the day, But she'll love me for who I am.
But nobody says that.
As I said, no man would say something that stupid.
Do you work hard?
Are you responsible?
So, it doesn't have a parallel in the male world.
Men know, by and large, they have to earn a woman's love.
Which is a wonderful thing, by the way.
It is one of the things that has propelled men all through history to achievement, wanting to earn a woman's love and keep her love, I might add.
I believe that people have to earn love continuously.
Obviously, if one of the partners falls ill, Then, clearly, the love should stay there, and the person cannot continue to earn it the way they did prior to the disease.
That's why I believe in moral bank accounts.
If before you got ill, you were a wonderful spouse, then that certainly will help.
You got that moral bank account with your spouse.
But putting that aside, this notion of he will love me for who I am is very naive and is not helpful to young women in finding somebody.
How do you react to what I just said?
Is it offensive?
Is it just common sense?
I think it's just common sense.
But how many young women are told this?
1-8 Prager 776-877-243-7776 The same holds true once married.
Since I believe that you continue to earn the love of your spouse, why would you let yourself go now that you have him?
These are tough questions almost never addressed in our society because it's a society that wants to deny, number one, any differences between male and female, wants to deny any significance to women's looks.
It's called sexist to emphasize that that has importance.
And anything that emphasizes it, It is just bigoted and misogynistic and sexist.
So you can't have honest conversations.
Because when honesty is actually engaged in, you are smeared for doing so.
I wrote a two-part column many years ago.
About the issue of when a wife is not in the mood for physical intimacy, mood should not alone be the determinant.
If you love your husband and he's a good man, mood alone should not be determinant.
On many occasions it might be, but it shouldn't always.
And in Huffington Post, somebody wrote that I was advocating marital rape.
So what they do is they inhibit honest discussion of male-female relations.
Subject today, he will love me for who I am.
1-8 Prager 776. Can we talk about Cortez?
Yes, let's talk about AOC. Your response, you have been hitting hard with your amazing videos, the insanity of political correctness of cancel culture.
Does cancel culture, is it adequate enough a phrase when we're talking about AOC tweeting out that it's time to make lists?
of Trump supporters.
Okay, can- tag me in, Sebby, can I go off?
Tag me in, can I? You can go off!
Yes, okay.
First of all, I don't take her that seriously, because let's be real, I don't think she can read that well to be making any lists I'd be worried about.
Plus, she is the dumbest, the dumbest human being I've ever met or seen on the internet.
I haven't met her.
She's so stupid, she probably thinks that COVID-19 is Elon Musk's new kid.
She is so stupid.
She thinks that Pfizer is a mumble rapper and we need to learn his TikTok dances.
AOC is so dumb.
She thinks that the Bitcoin bull run is an actual event and we need to save the balls.
I don't know how to process her level of stupid.
So I just laugh at her.
Those are some good lines.
Look, she is risible.
She is funny.
I'm not sure those are the coolest dance moves I've ever seen.
Keep up with what's trending.
Subscribe on YouTube today.
Transcription by CastingWords Kelly Loeffler's opponent is a Marxist.
He's called the police thugs.
I mean, he is not where Georgians are.
Let me play that for the audience, Senator Scott.
Cut number four, this is Raphael Warnick giving a sermon in 2011. America, nobody can serve God and the military!
We have seen in modern times the rise of Trump and Trumpism on the shoulders of Christians brings into sharp focus the moral bankruptcy of the American church.
So, Senator Scott, the moral bankruptcy of the American church, the assertion you can't serve God and be in the U.S. military.
I mean, do Georgians hear this?
Because I've had Georgians call me and tell me their airwaves are flooded with Raphael Warnick and John Ossoff, who is AOC light propaganda.
Oh, well, that's why.
I mean, you know, I've had three tough statewide elections.
You've got to raise your money.
You've got to get your message out.
You've got to tell people, here's the difference.
If you want to vote for a Republican, David Perdue or Kelly Loeffler, then you're going to vote for lower taxes, less government, better schools, more school choice.
We're going to support the law enforcement.
We're going to support the military.
Or you can vote for the Democrats.
Here's what you're going to get if you vote for the Democrats.
You're going to get them packed in the Supreme Court, which will refer to our First Amendment rights and our Second Amendment rights.
You're going to get them to do Medicare for All, which means...
That you're going to ruin, one, the Medicare program, two, kick people off their private health care insurance plan.
You're going to have the Green New Deal, which will cost us almost $100 trillion and kill our economy.
You're going to have reduced funding for law enforcement, and you're going to have socialism.
So the choice is pretty clear.
Keep up with what's trending.
Subscribe on YouTube today.
Trending now on The Charlie Kirk Show.
And I hope that this does not explode to the volcanic expectations that I have.
And it's actually, I'm unbelievably worried where this is going.
Because normal people, regular Americans, are not going to tolerate what is happening right now in our country.
And what's happening is the widespread criminality from within our own government.
That's where things start to get very, very dangerous.
And normal people and regular people that work their tail off to do the right thing...
Hello, my friends.
I'm Dennis Prager.
The day before Thanksgiving.
And I wish you a good Thanksgiving.
I hope you're spending it with the same number of people you did last year.
I am.
I fully understand where people have compromised immune systems and don't want to be indoors with a lot of people.
But most people do not have a compromised immune system and should not be paranoid and should live life.
Obviously, tens of millions have decided to do that.
I presume others have not.
So, I hope you have that.
Wednesday is male, female, our time.
It's a tough subject, and I'm choosing my words deliberately because I know that for some it's a painful subject.
But it's exactly for that reason that I address it.
The purpose of the male-female hour is that the sexes know each other better and get along better.
I root for both.
I don't root for one of them.
I'm not a man fan.
I'm not a woman fan.
I'm a good person fan.
1-8 Prager 776. Something that I tell young women.
Don't walk around thinking.
That you don't have to be physically appealing because a good man will love me just for who I am.
Well, we are not disembodied spirits on this earth and looks better.
And my parallel is, you're not going to...
A man who says, Elle shall love me for who I am.
I don't have to work hard.
I don't have to be all that responsible.
I can play video games for hours a day.
And, you know, get a job that isn't too demanding.
Right?
But she'll love me for who I am.
Men don't say that as much.
Men have their own issues.
This is not one of them.
It might be for some, but not in general.
All right, let's see here.
Go to your calls.
And Steve in Los Angeles, California.
Hello.
Yeah, hi, Dennis.
Long-time listener, and I told your screener that, yeah, my wife early in our marriage used that exact line when I was trying to encourage her to maybe wear some Some spicier clothing to heat up the bedroom.
And she said, well, don't you love me for the way I am?
And that kind of made me pause for a minute.
And of course I loved her, but I don't know where she got that, maybe from college.
And eventually we kind of worked through that, and she realized, all right, I can wear some racier clothing around the house sometime.
That's a perfect example.
Thank you.
That truly is a perfect example.
And it's totally understandable from the woman's perspective.
That's the reason I do a male-female hour, just as there are things that are perfectly understandable from a man's perspective but are wrong.
Likewise, the other way.
What we live in an age that doesn't believe in wisdom, we believe in feelings.
If this is what I feel, then that's all that matters.
But it's not all that matters.
That was a perfect example, the one he offered.
Yep.
Why did they make all the sexy clothing?
That's exactly right.
All right, Steve, I thank you for that.
Damon in Bradenton, Florida.
Dennis Prager, hi.
Hello.
Hi.
My point was that I've actually had, I'm married now and have been for eight years, but in my previous, you know, dating life, I've had women that I've known and liked them as, you know, their personalities, was not attracted to them in the beginning, and came to find them physically attractive after getting to know them.
And then later, My judgment of, you know, what was attractive in other women was affected by having known these people, or these girls.
I didn't understand the second point.
Why having known those people affected you?
You're not opening up.
Other girls that then reminded me of the ones I had come to find attractive were also attractive.
Like, it kind of changed my view of what was attractive.
Yes.
This is another truth that he has stated.
I'm going to tell you something that I did.
I like knowing life.
I've always wanted to understand life as best as I can while on this planet.
This was true when I was young.
So I did an experiment with myself, and I would...
I was the director of an institute of young people.
They were about 90 come in July, 90 in August.
They'd all introduced themselves the first night, young men and young women.
And unbeknownst to anybody, I'm telling you this like 30 years later, and it was done as a test.
There was nothing raunchy or anything about it.
I was extremely professional.
But I wanted to make a test of myself as a male.
So I wrote down the five females that I thought were most attractive on a piece of paper and put it away.
And I didn't remember what I wrote.
I never looked at it again until the end.
And then I wrote the five, I thought, and almost never were the five the same.
He is absolutely right.
That for men and for women, when you get to know somebody, they can become truly attractive, whereas the immediate meeting, they were not.
That is correct.
But that does not in any way negate the point that I was making at the beginning of the hour.
But that is absolutely true, which is why it's so critical.
To give people a chance and why the workplace is a particularly good place to meet somebody because you get to know them over time and they truly do become more attractive, male or female.
The initial wow can be helpful, but it also can be very, very, very misleading.
Okay.
Let's go to Maggie in Cleveland.
Hello.
Hello, Dennis.
Thank you so much for taking my call.
Thank you for calling.
I have spoken to you before.
I don't know if you probably don't remember me.
My daughter moved to Portugal because she hates, you know, the president in this country.
But anyhow, today I called.
Yeah.
So today I called about the topic.
You know, you said that women say that she likes me for who I am.
I understand women and men are wired differently, but I think...
All right, I want to hear what you think.
Stay on.
Stay on.
Supreme Court Judge Samuel Alito recently made a startling point.
Religious liberty is in danger of becoming a second-class right.
Alito said as much to the Federalist Society.
Just as the COVID restrictions have highlighted the movement toward rule by experts, litigation about those restrictions has pointed up emerging trends in the assessment of individual rights.
This is especially evident with respect to religious liberty.
It pains me to say this but in certain quarters religious liberty is fast becoming a disfavored right.
Alito argued that not only religious liberty but free speech is imperiled.
Support for freedom of speech is also in danger.
And COVID rules have restricted speech in unprecedented ways.
This is a timely and prescient warning.
Religious liberty is the very foundation of American freedom, and free speech is part of what makes America great.
We cannot sit passively by as our cherished freedoms are whittled away.
We must pay attention and take action where we can.
I'm Owen Strand.
The Pepperdine School of Public Policy, America's unique graduate program for leaders.
Learn more at publicpolicy.pepperdine.edu.
Trending now on The Larry Alder Show.
Music.
Appreciate it.
Chris is in San Antonio, Texas.
Chris, you're on The Larry Elder Show.
Oh, wow.
What an honor to speak with Greg O'Dursky.
How are you doing today?
I'm doing well.
Thanks, Chris.
I guess my question is, can you imagine if this goes to the courts and then it goes to Congress and then it goes for President Trump like we all know it should?
Chris, mass suicide.
Mass suicide.
Cities are going to be burning to the ground.
Their ears would explode.
It would be catastrophic for the left if Donald Trump were awarded the election.
You think we feel that the election was fraudulent?
What do you think they're going to feel?
They're going to go absolutely bonkers.
They believe that the Russians not only interfere, but 78% of them believe that the Russians changed the outcome of the election, even though our Intelligence Committee has never reached that conclusion.
So they're going to go absolutely bonkers.
Remember what Hillary advised Joe Biden?
So we've got to have a massive legal operation.
I know the Biden campaign is working on that.
We have to have poll workers, and I urge people who are able to be a poll worker.
We have to have our own teams of people to counter the force of intimidation that the Republicans and Trump are going to put outside polling places.
This is a big organizational challenge, but at least we know more about what they're going to do.
And, you know, Joe Biden should not concede under any circumstances.
They would go absolutely ballistic.
Keep up with what's trending.
Subscribe on YouTube today.
Trending now on the Eric Metaxas show.
Who do you think gave the high sign or made the plan behind the scenes what to do on election night?
These are people.
This wasn't an algorithm.
Who do you suppose are the mandarins of power on the Democratic side who made these decisions?
Yeah, it's hard to say.
I mean, there's a lot of different working theories here, and I think they all might have some element of truth together and so some people are very uh focused on the hammer scorecard the dominion voting systems and i think that actually there's a lot behind that we've already seen that one of the dominion voting systems changed 6 000 votes in michigan uh from a republican losing to a republican winning we've seen memory stick upload issues in three counties now in georgia that otherwise would not have been found if it wasn't for the canvassing and the audit in
georgia i also think that there's a lot to be said though about I'm Dennis Prager.
This is the Male Female Hour.
877-243-776.
1-8-PRAGER-776.
The topic is a very sensitive one, and that is something that young women often say, he will love me for who I am, so it really doesn't matter how I look.
And it's a very naive and self-destructive view.
It's just not true.
In utopia, maybe it is, but we don't live in utopia.
We live in a world of physicality as well as heart, soul, personality, brains, all of which are truly crucial, but not only.
All right, where was it?
So, Maggie, yes, you were telling us that it's not only true with regards to women thinking this way, correct?
Yeah, well, I'm just thinking that, speaking for myself and many women who I know, I have always paid attention to the brain of the man, okay?
I was married for 20 years, and my attraction to him was because he was very smart, and he was not physically attractive at all, okay?
For me, it's the brain, but I understand men and women are wired differently, and you say that, you know...
He will love me for who I am.
I think that for a lot of men, he will love me for who he wants me to be.
And I'm not saying all men, okay?
For example, I have always taken care of myself.
I worked out.
I always looked much younger than I was.
I was younger than he was.
He was almost 14 years older than I was.
And he didn't like that.
I became a member in a gym so I could work out.
He called the gym, canceled the membership, and then he bought a treadmill and a bicycle for me to use in the basement.
Wait, wait, why did he cancel your membership?
He didn't want me to take care of myself, and he didn't want me working out.
Wait, wait, it doesn't make sense.
Forgive me.
Then why did he buy you a treadmill?
Well, no, but he didn't want me to take care of myself in public where other people would be looking at me.
Oh, okay.
Finally, I got the answer.
Okay, so the issue is you were marrying...
Sorry to say you were married to a very controlling man.
Oh, yes.
That's why I decided to file...
Yes, I understand.
A controlling man can be very abusive.
Yes, I agree with you.
I agree.
Okay.
It's a separate issue, but I fully agree with you.
I can't, you know, I have to tell you something.
Really, the amount that I have learned doing a talk show is astonishing.
Because the number of people educating me is so large.
When I hear something like that...
I feel like she was married to a man from a different planet than I inhabit.
The thought of canceling my wife's health club membership or gym membership lest she take care of herself out in public and people look at her.
I thought the normal reaction of a male is that he's happy.
People look at his wife.
Let me take just a half a minute, maybe a minute, to tell you how I view the human condition.
The human being, when the human works well, that is something to behold.
I have come to realize human beings are like extremely expensive cars.
When they work, they are a magnificent creation.
But they have to be so well-tuned to work and so taken care of and administered to and so on.
We are infinitely more complex than the most complex automobile.
And so it's very easy for it to break down.
Something went awry in that man.
I always assume that what I hear is true.
I also assume there's another side to the story.
My point is not to...
I don't know the man.
I don't have any reason to berate him.
But assuming that that is true, Something went wrong in his mechanical, inner mechanics, mechanical development, that he would have that reaction to his wife working out.
Now, it is relief factor time because they are a magnificent product.
You hear me talk about it every day.
I take it every day.
My wife takes it every day.
In fact, my wife taking it every day is the only reason I endorsed it.
I had never advertised a pain reliever.
When she heard about it, she said, oh yeah, it's what I take for my knee.
And the proof is that when she forgets to take it, the knee pain resumes.
That's how effective it is.
Relief factor is an honest appeal.
If it doesn't work in three weeks, it probably won't work.
So try it for three weeks for $19.95 plus shipping.
Read about it as well at relieffactor.com, 800-500-8384.
It is effective in the great majority of cases, and if you do the three-week quick start, please take it exactly as directed.
relieffactor.com A woman who treats developmentally disabled patients.
She said, I haven't been able to see my patients in person since March because of the virus.
But right after the election, one of my clients said that he voted for Biden but didn't want to.
He told me that he said Biden won because Biden would make his Social Security payments go down.
He was sad that Biden won.
I asked him why he voted for Biden, if he was worried about that, and he said that one of the helpers just came in and filled out his ballot for Biden for him.
Bombshell voter fraud revelation in Wisconsin.
To the best of our knowledge or the intelligence we have provided, no FBI investigation, no DOJ investigation.
This is News Talks.
1130.iheart.com.
Disability service coordinator blows whistle on vote fraud in group homes called Granny Farming.
We have long been talking about that here, which would correlate with the 1,774% increase that we saw for people over the age of 90 registering during a pandemic in battleground states.
So Rudy Giuliani laid out nine key points.
The first of which was...
Observers were allegedly prevented from watching mail-in ballots from being opened.
This is the easiest point to prove of all the different allegations out there, and it's unconstitutional.
Giuliani said that many mail-in ballots were opened without observers being able to check that they were properly signed, a key protection against fraud.
Those votes, he said, were, quote, null and void.
especially where the envelopes had been discarded, making recounts useless.
Keep up with what's trending.
Subscribe on YouTube today.
Trending now on America First with Sebastian Berka.
Can we talk about Cortez?
Yes, let's talk about AOC.
Your response, you have been hitting hard with your amazing videos, the insanity of political correctness, of cancel culture.
Does cancel culture, is it adequate enough a phrase when we're talking about AOC tweeting out that it's time to make lists of Trump supporters?
Tag me in, Sebi.
Can I go off?
Tag me in, can I? You can go off!
Yes, okay.
First of all, I don't take her that seriously, because let's be real, I don't think she can read that well to be making any lists that I'd be worried about.
Plus, she is the dumbest, the dumbest human being I've ever met or seen on the internet.
I haven't met her.
She's so stupid, she probably thinks that COVID-19 is Elon Musk's new kid.
She is so stupid.
She thinks that Pfizer is a mumble rapper and we need to learn his TikTok dances.
Okay.
All right, everybody.
Dennis Prager here.
Male-female hour, second hour every Wednesday.
Incidentally, Thanksgiving always begins the drive that I make for a major charity.
In the spirit of Christmas and Hanukkah, of giving, and this year, the group that I have endorsed, and it takes a lot for me to do so, but their work is very beautiful.
They give a Christmas gift to a child whose parent is in prison.
And they have it signed, hopefully with a note, from the parent.
You can well imagine the power of what they're doing.
And they've done it now with 300,000 young people.
Who have a parent in prison.
So I ask you to go.
This is called the Angel Tree Appeal.
888-206-2801.
Or just go to my website and click on the banner.
I tell you, I'd like to set a record here for responses.
This is where we who believe that we, not the government, are the only answer to most people's ills can really do a job.
So it's 888-206-2801 or just go to DennisPrager.com and give a gift.
Angel Tree.
That's what they call it.
I'm Dennis Prager.
This is the Male Female Hour every Wednesday, hour number two.
He will love me for who I am.
Very many young women think that, so they don't think they need to make themselves attractive.
A guy really loves me.
And later on in marriage, too.
This might seem as the man called in who asked his wife to put on some sexy stuff.
And she said, Molly, don't you love me for who I am?
Like, one doesn't have anything to do with the other.
I love you.
People love, I mean, anyone who is halfway healthy loves their partner for their spouse for so many reasons.
But that doesn't negate the importance of attractiveness.
And when I get the calls, well, men should be attractive too.
I have no issue with that.
Men should try to be attractive, but as the last woman pointed out, she loved her husband, who she didn't find particularly physically appealing because he was so bright.
Do you really believe the exact same things turn men and women on?
Oh, God, then you probably went to graduate school.
Okay, Lauren in El Segundo, California.
Hello.
Hi, Dennis.
I love that last comment because I did go to grad school, but I disagree with that.
So hopefully I'm the exception to that rule.
Wait, wait, wait, wait, wait.
Why did you study in graduate school?
Oh, you're going to...
You might roll your eyes at this.
I studied public health.
Oh, my God.
That is up there with gender studies.
Oh no, I promise you it's not.
I'm a PE teacher now, but I wanted to get into health education because I worked for a non-profit for kids with type 1 diabetes.
So the master's degree was full ride tuition to a program that really kind of accelerated my career in terms of helping people.
But I agree with you in the gender study.
That's something I try to differentiate from.
All right.
Anyway, I'm delighted to hear from you.
Go ahead.
Good.
Thanks, Dennis.
I just wanted to comment.
I'm a young female.
My husband and I are high school sweethearts.
I grew up playing sports.
He did not.
He was never into fitness, never into sports.
I'm a runner.
I love marathons and all things fitness.
And every Christmas, his gift to me, and I know it's coming, it's not a surprise, but it's a renewal or a gym membership or a new gym membership every Christmas.
And I bawl in tears every Christmas when I get it because I'm so happy about it.
And it's just something he would never tell me, go to the gym and work out to look better, but I think he knows that that's something important to me, and I think it's important to keep up good physical appearance for self-confidence, and that kind of curtails back to our relationship and how much better it is when I'm fit.
Well, you know what?
You sound healthy.
It's almost a problem.
It's just an issue.
How long would I have to talk to you to find the neurosis?
Oh, a couple of years probably.
You are special.
And I always tell people it's the endorphins.
You have to keep moving.
And my husband, if I were really physically fit but miserable all the time and hungry and just unhealthy, my husband would hate to be with me.
So it's all full circle.
I have one question.
You said you run marathons.
Yes.
So would you say that you are addicted to running?
Ooh, um...
I could, I guess addicts say this anyways, I could stop at any time, but I choose not to.
I would say it's a pretty close call for an addiction, I guess.
No, no, I'm not asking it to pass judgment.
I'm asking it out of curiosity.
The other thing that I've heard is that the spouses of marathon runners are sort of like marathon runner widowers.
I could see that.
My husband and I have been together since, again, high school.
I would say that he was always a spectator in the sport, but recently he's become a runner.
So, but, yeah, I could see that.
I mean, it's been sucking a lot of time in your life.
That's right.
It takes a lot of time.
Anyway, bless you.
When I start speaking again after lockdowns, I hope you come to a talk.
I will remember this.
Remind me that you were the...
The runner who I called healthy.
How could I not enjoy this job?
The amount of fun and the amount of education is...
I don't think there's any place it could be replicated.
We'll be back.
Trending now on the Mike Dellinger Show.
Now, I just was reading some other news as I was getting ready for the show today.
Johnson& Johnson, which has not been mentioned in the equation, it's all been Pfizer, BioNTech, and Moderna.
Johnson& Johnson, a pharmaceutical giant, is going to seek FDA authorization for their vaccine.
And their vaccine is a single-dose COVID-19 vaccine.
And it looks like it might be February or sooner.
We are likely weeks away from sort of going in an entirely different direction and getting closer to putting this behind us.
Remember when Bret Baier used to say, we're one day closer to this end?
We need it.
We need it.
I know there's lots of arguing and anger and frustration over the election.
There should be.
We knew all along, all of us knew that when you're encouraging millions and millions of people to mail in ballots because of COVID, that there was a real strong potential for, oh, I don't know, the 27 Toss up races to all be won by Republicans down ballot, but Trump couldn't quite hold off.
Couldn't quite pull it off.
Yeah, right.
Biden got 10 million more votes than Barack Obama did.
Yeah, right.
Americans are not stupid.
We're not blind.
and we may be frustrated right now, and we may be stressed, and we may be prepared for whatever comes our way.
We're going to persevere.
Keep up with what's trending.
Subscribe on YouTube today.
Trending now on The Hugh Hewitt Show.
Dr. Fauci was there.
Anthony Fauci spoke about how it's just impossible to understand what Operation Warp Speed is done.
Cut number 13. And I hear a lot now when we made these announcements this past Monday and then two Mondays ago about some reticence of people.
Well, did you rush this?
Was this too fast?
Is it really safe?
And is it really efficacious?
The process of the speed did not compromise at all safety, nor did it compromise scientific integrity.
It was a reflection.
Of the extraordinary scientific advances in these types of vaccines, which allowed us to do things in months that actually took years before.
Because lives are on the line.
They've got to move fast.
They will move fast.
They will not be irresponsible.
But Operation Warp Speed is going to save millions and millions of lives.
And it's going to start in December.
Mike Pence, the vice president, put a cap on it.
it cut number 15.
I hope as you heard about the there's the male female hour He will love me for who I am.
That is the subject.
Young women say this often.
And indeed, older women might say it too.
That was a great call from the man who asked his wife to put on something sexy to get things excited.
And she said, why, you don't love me for who I am?
And that was a totally understandable question because the male and the female are so different.
That's the reason I'm addressing the question and address so many questions on the male-female hour because you're being lied to from kindergarten through graduate school that men and women are the same.
Okay, everybody.
Let me respond.
Just very quickly here, really quickly.
Ben in San Jose, California.
Hello.
Hi, Dennis.
I love your show.
Good.
Thank you.
Great.
And I'm 68 years old, married 40 years.
Of course, living in San Jose, California, the women's lib capital of the...
United States.
I have two boys, one who lives in Charleston, South Carolina.
And it's interesting to draw the contrast between women in San Jose versus women in Charleston and the large cultural difference between, you know, the two populations and how women view themselves or, you know, the way they dress and take pride in their appearance.
Where in San Jose they tend to be Much more casual, laid back.
Generally, you know, they'll go out in their sweatsuits, no makeup, hair doesn't look very great.
But when you go to Charleston, South Carolina, it's exactly the opposite.
Right.
I thank you.
I am so certain that, well, I know it's true, because I've been to all 50 states, and I travel all the time, except for lockdowns.
It's very true.
They wouldn't need to hear this show in Charleston, South Carolina, unless they went to college.
Ah, let's see here.
Christy in Spartanburg, South Carolina says, I gained about 40 pounds since we married about 10 years ago.
He respects that I am working on it.
One of the ways a woman says I love you to a man is simply working on it.
It means the world to him.
That you care about how you look is as important as how you look.
That's a big call.
Okay, everybody.
Angela, Dennis.
A young Dennis.
Ron, Dave, Robert.
Hey, listen, everybody.
during the break in the spirit of the season please give to the angel tree the gifts to kids with a parent in prison.
This is Owen Strand for townhall.com Supreme Court Judge Samuel Alito recently made a startling point.
Religious liberty is in danger of becoming a second-class right.
Alito said as much to the Federalist Society.
Just as the COVID restrictions have highlighted the movement toward rule by experts, litigation about those restrictions has pointed up emerging trends in the assessment of individual rights.
This is especially evident with respect to religious liberty.
It pains me to say this, but in certain quarters, religious liberty is fast becoming a disfavored right.
Alito argued that not only religious liberty, but free speech is imperiled.
Support for freedom of speech is also in danger, and COVID rules have restricted speech in unprecedented ways.
This is a timely and prescient warning.
Religious liberty is the very foundation of American freedom, and free speech is part of what makes America great.
We cannot sit passively by as our cherished freedoms are whittled away.
We must pay attention and take action where we can.
I'm Owen Strand.
The Pepperdine School of Public Policy, America's unique graduate program for leaders.
Learn more at publicpolicy.pepperdine.edu.
Transcription by CastingWords Appreciate it.
Chris is in San Antonio, Texas.
Chris, you're on The Larry Elder Show.
Oh, wow.
What an honor to speak with Greg Elderski.
How are you doing today?
I'm doing well.
Thanks, Chris.
I guess my question is, can you imagine if this goes to the courts, and then it goes to Congress, and then it goes for President Trump, like we all know it should?
This whole...
Cities are gonna be burning to the ground.
Their ears would explode.
It would be catastrophic for the left if Donald Trump were awarded the election.
You think we feel that the election was fraudulent?
What do you think they're going to feel?
They're going to go absolutely bonkers.
They believe that the Russians not only interfere, but 78% of them believe that the Russians changed the outcome of the election, even though our Intelligence Committee has never reached that conclusion.
So they're going to go absolutely bonkers.
Remember what Hillary advised Joe Biden?
A massive legal operation.
I know the Biden campaign is working on that.
We have to have poll workers, and I urge people who are able to be a poll worker.
We have to have our own teams of people to counter the force of intimidation that the Republicans and Trump...
Are going to put outside polling places.
This is a big organizational challenge.
But at least we know more about what they're going to do.
And, you know, Joe Biden should not concede under any circumstances.
They would go absolutely ballistic.
Keep up with what's trending.
Subscribe on YouTube today.
Trending now on the Eric Metaxas show.
Who do you think gave the high sign or made the plan behind the scenes what to do on election night?
These are people.
This wasn't an algorithm.
Who do you suppose are the mandarins of power on the Democratic side who made these decisions?
Yeah, it's hard to say.
I mean, there's a lot of different working theories here, and I think they all might have some element of truth together and so some people are very focused on the hammer scorecard the dominion voting systems and I think that actually there's a lot behind that we've already seen that One of the Dominion voting systems changed 6,000 votes in Michigan from a Republican losing to a Republican winning.
We've seen memory stick upload issues in three counties now in Georgia that otherwise would not have been found if it wasn't for the canvassing and the audit in Georgia.
I also think that there's a lot to be said though about a phrase that I coined called ballot laundering, where all these ballots were sent out and you enlist 30 or 40 criminals.
It always stuns me.
People say, well, voter fraud doesn't exist.
It's like saying money laundering doesn't exist.
They're like, well, I went to my local laundromat.
I couldn't see any money laundering.
I'm like, yeah, that's the point.
I counted all their dollar bills.
I audited them.
I said, well, do you look at their books?
Did you talk to their customers?
Do you see that guy come with a big thing of cash and say, yeah, wash some of my briefs and my suits?
You have to look a little bit deeper with a little more complexity, and ballot laundering is what the New York Times said in 2012. It exists all over.
They used to cover this stuff ferociously, which is called granny farming.
There was a 1,774% increase in voter registration for people over the age of 90 in Pennsylvania in the midst of a pandemic.
Keep up with what's trending.
Subscribe on YouTube today.
Trending now on The Charlie Kirk Show.
A woman who treats developmentally disabled patients.
She said, I haven't been able to see my patients in person since March because of the virus.
But right after the election, one of my clients said that he voted for Biden but didn't want to.
He told me that he said Biden won because Biden would make his Social Security payments go down.
He was sad that Biden won.
I asked him why he voted for Biden, if he was worried about that, and he said that one of the helpers just came in and filled out his ballot for Biden for him.
Bombshell voter fraud revelation in Wisconsin.
To the best of our knowledge or the intelligence we have provided, no FBI investigation, no DOJ investigation.
This is News Talks.
1130.iheart.com Disability service coordinator blows whistle on vote fraud in group homes called Granny Farming.
We have long been talking about that here, which would correlate with the 1,774% increase that we saw for people over the age of 90 registering during a pandemic in battleground states.
So Rudy Giuliani laid out nine key points.
The first of which was...
Observers were allegedly prevented from watching mail-in ballots from being opened.
This is the easiest point to prove of all the different allegations out there, and it's unconstitutional.
Giuliani said that many mail-in ballots were opened without observers being able to check that they were properly signed, a key protection against fraud.
Those votes, he said, were, quote, null and void.
Especially where the envelopes had been discarded, making recounts useless.
Hello my friends Well, hello, my friends.
I'm Dennis Prager on this day before Thanksgiving, and I hope you will have it with people unless you are truly immunologically compromised, in which case you will have to make your own decision.
But otherwise, people should get together.
Quality of life is actually a health benefit.
I'm delighted and in fact honored to have Professor of Epidemiology at the Yale School of Public Health, Harvey Risch.
That's R-I-S-C-H. Again, Professor of Epidemiology, a discipline that I have increasingly not respected.
I will talk to him about that, the Yale School of Public Health.
Just this past week, he testified at the U.S. Senate.
And then there was a big attack on his testimony, though not him by name, in the New York Times by another epidemiologist.
Dr. Risch, Professor Risch, welcome back to the Dennis Prager Show.
Thank you.
Nice to be with you.
Let me begin with my provocative opening.
When I hear the name epidemiologist, at this time in my life, And it's a statement about public policy.
I assume that I'm going to hear something foolish.
Okay, well, I had no idea how you would react, since it is your field.
So, please react.
Well, unfortunately today, everybody lays claim to being an epidemiologist.
There is a lot of nonsense out there of people posing as epidemiologists or giving epidemiologic advice.
And I can understand that it's hard for laypeople to know what the difference is.
This happened in our Senate hearing where I gave epidemiologic testimony and the opposing witness gave...
Testimony that had no relevance to epidemiology and is not an epidemiologist.
He has a master's of public health degree, but that alone is not sufficient to qualify one as an epidemiologist.
And so, you know, I think that regardless of titles and regardless of labeling people as epidemiologists, what matters more is the validity of the science that they quote.
And the support of the scientific evidence.
And that's the bottom line here, ultimately.
Well, to make things worse, when I hear public health, then I am, the person is guilty before, I assume they're guilty.
I'll give you an example.
I live in Los Angeles County.
You're obviously, you live in Connecticut?
Yes.
Right.
So in Los Angeles County, as of today, You cannot dine in a restaurant, even outdoors.
So more restaurants will go out of business.
More workers in restaurants will be unemployed and lose their savings.
And this is done because the case amount, not even hospitalization, the case amount has reached a certain number that...
The head of public health, Barbara Ferrer, in Los Angeles County, has deemed sufficient to ruin the lives of tens of thousands, hundreds of thousands of people.
She's a public health person.
I don't even believe she's a medical doctor.
So just let me finish for a moment because I want you to speak more.
Five miles away from where I am broadcasting, I am in L.A. County.
Five, ten miles away is Pasadena, California.
Pasadena has its own health department.
They are allowing restaurants to stay open.
So it's so obvious that it's not science that is determinative of these measures.
So I'll ask you, what is?
Well, the problem is that there's a big lack of quality data on all of these particular intangibles.
And one of the problems is that it's not even possible with whatever public health technologies we have to study some of the questions, and it takes too long to do the studies, and so it's not possible to know with any precision how to proceed.
That leads to a range of decisions based on we have to suppress everything in order to reduce the risk maximally to one is that, well, some infections do occur.
That's in the context of hundreds of thousands of people who are otherwise trying to carry on as best they can with their daily lives.
This is a risk balance equation.
That's a value judgment.
It is not a scientific judgment because there's no data.
The problem is that people are being pressed, public health people are being pressed to make these decisions without adequate data, and it leads to value judgments posing as scientific decisions.
And that's a big problem.
The science has to be done as best as possible, recognizing that there really isn't so much science for some of these considerations.
All of this then arises in the context of panic.
And that's a problem because the motivation for panic is not the actual risks that people face.
It's one that's been pushed onto the public by media who obtained benefit by exaggerating claims in order to, as journalism has done for its entire history, obtaining readership.
And that exaggeration has led to the fear and panic in the general population and to a maladaptive behavior and maladaptive meaning not just of people's personal decisions, but of public health decisions, societal decisions, political decisions, and so on.
So, basically, you have to evaluate this on a cost-benefit analysis as the health A person in Pasadena did and the one in Los Angeles did and came to different conclusions for what are essentially the same considerations.
If you were the czar of health in America, what would you call for?
I would call for availability of immediate treatment medications for people outside the hospital as soon as they get sick.
So they have access to early and beneficial and safe treatments which we know exist and which have been highly suppressed in their discussions by the media and by people in the media.
So you would not lock down the society?
Not at all.
In fact, the only motivation for locking down the society at the beginning was because we didn't know anything about the pandemic.
But even at that point, What we know now is even at that point, the infection was endemic.
That means it was in the population to such a degree that there is no way to trace every last case, to wait for every last case to have occurred and gone away.
It's not like influenza or common cold.
In the population, it comes and goes, it changes, but it cannot be eradicated completely.
And once that realization is obtained, then no amount of lockdown will do anything other than postpone.
And so lockdowns that do have an immediate benefit of reducing cases, we've seen this in lockdowns in other countries, that the caseloads go down pretty dramatically.
But what happens is you wait a few weeks or a month and they start to come back up again because the cases are in the population.
The cost of a lockdown is temporary, and the cost of a lockdown is everything that cannot be done during the time of the lockdown, which is socially and economically destructive.
So the temporary benefit is a very low level of benefit in the long term.
And what has to be realized is another mechanism has to be attained for solving the problem, and that mechanism is really treatment.
Right, which I want to talk to you about right now.
I want to remind everybody, I'm speaking to Professor Harvey Risch, Professor of Epidemiology at Yale School of Public Health.
And when you speak of early intervention, I assume we're talking about something like hydroxychloroquine and zinc?
Or ivermectin?
Or bromexine, which may be available here?
We have a whole regimen of different medications that play various overlapping and helpful roles, and doctors know how to treat them.
Doctors who are on the ground treating thousands of patients know how to manage this and to treat it very effectively.
All right, we'll be back in a moment, Dr. Risch.
He was accused of selling snake oil to the U.S. Senate in the New York Times.
We'll talk about that Starting today Gyms movie theaters churches can no longer meet indoors and
As a result of the emergency orders, 41 of California's 58 counties are now in what's called purple tier status, and that is Newsom's strictest category.
He's also considering instituting a statewide curfew.
Meanwhile, the governor attended a dinner party at an upscale French restaurant.
And had more than the 10 people that he is saying that you can only have when you are in some sort of social gathering.
And he's put out a statement saying, oh, I'm sorry, I didn't realize it.
You know, we're all going to do better.
And as soon as I sat down at the larger table, I realized it was a little larger group than I had anticipated.
And he started counting them.
One, two, three, four.
And maybe he didn't realize that he had exceeded the number.
First, he sends his children to in-person private school while attacking school choice and keeping public schools closed throughout California.
Now he attends a private gathering while telling Californians to do otherwise.
You've got to own that.
And so I want to apologize to you because I need to preach and practice, not just preach.
Sacramento Bee editorial board, quote, if Newsom can't get his head into the game, perhaps he should make the governor thing a one-term affair and leave the job open for someone with a desire to lead, end of quote.
You know, he told you not to...
Have a gathering of more than 10 people.
He exceeded that.
But spiritually, he didn't exceed it.
He may have exceeded it physically.
Keep up with what's trending.
Subscribe on YouTube today.
Trending now on the Eric Metaxas show. - Hello.
Millions are praying, millions from around the world.
Are praying for this election, which is obviously not yet settled.
What do you see happening right now that people like me might be unaware of?
Being where you are and being close to the center, what do you see cooking?
Yeah, I mean, look, there's no doubt that this election...
I don't use this word lightly, was stolen.
President Donald Trump outperformed every part of the country that was not a focal point for Joe Biden to get enough votes electorally through the Electoral College to get over the top.
Some great examples, Eric, and we have this incredible whiteboard here where we've been going through all of this.
I mean, President Donald Trump outperformed...
Obama, he outperformed Mitt Romney, John McCain, and even his own numbers in 2016 dramatically.
Miami-Dade County, President Donald Trump overperformed by 15 points versus 2016. He did better in New York City, Eric.
He did better by about five or six points in New York City.
And my best example for all of this, Eric, and this is just the most logical way that I could show it.
I'm from the Midwest.
I know Madison, Wisconsin really well.
And Madison, Wisconsin, of course, is where the University of Wisconsin-Madison is.
And so in 2008, at the height of the Obama movement, President Barack Obama got 71% of the support in Dane County, Wisconsin.
Joe Biden got 76% this time and 60,000 more votes.
And the campus is closed, Eric.
How is that possible?
Keep up with what's trending.
Subscribe on YouTube today.
Trending now on the Mike Gallagher Show.
you you Today's a big day.
Today is the day that Pfizer will be formally requesting emergency use authorization for their vaccine.
Against coronavirus.
The President...
I'm Dennis Prager, and I'd like to remind you that the rates on mortgage right now are at historic lows, better known as HLs.
They are so low that I can't imagine you wouldn't want to refi, take out money.
Or get a new house or whatever it might be.
The people to do it with, I really admire.
Andrew and Todd at andrewandtodd.com for Sierra Pacific Mortgage.
Cash out refis, new purchases, refi, reverse mortgage.
They handle it all and I really salute them.
They have been with me helping you do this from the first day of the lockdown.
They did not close up shop.
They attended to people's needs.
AndrewandTodd.com or call them at 888-888-1172.
No obligations, but you should definitely contact them.
AndrewandTodd.com, 888-888-1172.
My guest is a professor of epidemiology at the Yale School of Public Health, testified this past week at the U.S. Senate hearing, New York Times, Which is a propaganda sheet.
It is.
I say this.
It's not overkill.
I grew up reading Pravda in Russian.
Never thought that I would apply my skills at reading propaganda to American newspapers.
But that's the way it is.
So, of course, it's a one-sided report.
They took the word of a public health dean at Brown University.
To call those who advocate for hydroxychloroquine snake oil salesmen.
I thought, first of all, I always thought that people selling snake oil had some benefit in the people purchasing the snake oil.
So if people are selling snake oil but get no benefit from it, why would they be selling the snake oil?
But of course, nobody will ask the professor at Brown this question because...
You don't challenge people on the left.
Anyway, how did you react to the New York Times piece?
I reacted approximately the same way as the misinformation that he gave at the hearing, which is that he did not respond to the points that were raised, the science and the clinical points that were raised, but he went off on a tangent onto his points that were irrelevant.
And pretended that those irrelevancies applied to what we spoke of.
And then he accused us of doing what he actually did.
Would you debate him on a public forum?
If he agreed to stick to the rules of the debate, yes.
Well, if I were you, I would just debate him and let him talk about baseball if he wants.
These people don't debate.
You have much more experience in the sciences.
I have much more experience in this realm.
The left doesn't debate.
Never.
It's a very unremarked-upon fact.
I have offered $20,000 to New York Times columnists to debate me or any of my colleagues.
And, of course, there's no response.
It's not a little money, $20,000, just to defend your position.
So, what is his name?
Joe?
What is his?
J-H-O? Is that his name?
Joe.
J-H-A. J-H-A, yeah.
So, I want you to know, Professor Risch, that I, for about five months now, I have been taking hydroxychloroquine and zinc every week.
I take zinc every day, hydroxychloroquine once a week.
I don't believe that I am buying snake oil.
And anyway, nobody is profiting from it.
It is so cheap that nobody is profiting.
By the way, I also think that the fact that nobody profits from it because it's so cheap is part of the reason for the opposition.
Any merit to that?
Yes, that's been stated many times.
That it's inexpensive, but the third part of that equation is that it's effective.
If it weren't effective, then who would worry about it?
The whole point is it's in the marketplace where it solves the problem at a cost-effectiveness point that puts out of business much more costly agents even if they worked as well.
So just look at it from the marketplace point of view.
How do you answer the charge that there are no studies that show that it works?
Well, there are at least 170 studies that show that it works in different contexts.
But in my case, what I'm laying claim to is early outpatient use.
And that is the one where all the evidence is completely consistent.
There are seven studies of Non-randomized but controlled trials, these are studies where patients came to their doctors as outpatients in the first few days of the illness and were given the choice as to what to take and the patients in consulting with their doctors chose to take hydroxychloroquine or other medications or not.
And all of these studies show Substantial benefit, all statistically significant benefit of at least 50% reduced risk of hospitalization.
Now, the criticism of these, of course, is that they weren't randomized.
But when one looks at the details of who was in the study, you see that patients who were thicker when they went to their doctors were more likely to take the medications.
The people who weren't quite as sick thought, okay, I could probably get this on my own.
I don't really need the medications.
They were less likely to take it.
So the people who were already sicker, who were more likely to be hospitalized, were the ones who were taking the medications.
And in spite of the fact that they were sicker, they did better than the ones who didn't take the medications.
So in addition, there's now seven studies, seven randomized control trials.
All of these are weak studies, contra to what Dr. Jha said as these were well-designed.
You know, important in his puffery language.
Studies, these were studies that were cut short in the middle that did not recruit enough patients.
There were studies done of people who were too young to benefit, not high-risk patients.
Nevertheless, when these studies, these randomized controlled studies, are analyzed together, they show, again, statistically significant benefit of reduced risks of hospitalization and mortality.
And so all of the evidence on outpatient studies.
Early outpatient studies shows that the risk of hospitalization mortality is reduced by taking hydroxychloroquine.
There is no other evidence in outpatient studies.
Everything else that is cited are inpatient studies that are smeared into outpatient studies.
Which is very different.
It has to be taken early.
So if you have the time, I'd just like you to respond to this $64,000 question.
Why has the CDC come out against hydroxychloroquine?
And why has the NIH come out against hydroxychloroquine?
And why has the FDA come out against hydroxychloroquine?
Yeah, good.
Now you've tripled the 64,000.
So the answer is, whose interests are being served?
Good.
Answer it when we come back.
Qui bono, as they say in Latin.
Who benefits?
epidemiologist at Yale School of Public Health, professor of epidemiology, Harvey Risch, who, among other things, is courageous.
Trending now on America First with Sebastian Berka.
Can we talk about Cortez?
Yes, let's talk about AOC. Your response, you have been hitting hard with your amazing videos, the insanity of political correctness of cancel culture.
Does cancel culture, is it adequate enough a phrase when we're talking about AOC tweeting out that it's time to make lists?
of Trump supporters.
Okay, can- tag me in, Sebby.
Can I go off?
Tag me in, can I? You can go off!
Yes, okay.
First of all, I don't take her that seriously, because let's be real, I don't think she can read that well to be making any lists that I'd be worried about.
Plus, she is the dumbest, the dumbest human being I've ever met or seen on the internet.
I haven't met her.
She's so stupid, she probably thinks that COVID-19 is Elon Musk's new kid.
She is so stupid.
She thinks that Pfizer is a mumble rapper and we need to learn his TikTok dances.
AOC is so dumb.
She thinks that the Bitcoin bull run is an actual event and we need to save the balls.
I don't know how to process her level of stupid.
So I just laugh at her.
Those are some good lines.
Look, she is risible.
She is funny.
I'm not sure those are the coolest dance moves I've ever seen.
Keep up with what's trending.
Subscribe on YouTube today.
Subscribe on YouTube.
Kelly Loeffler's opponent is a Marxist.
He's called the police thugs.
I mean, he is not where Georgians are.
Let me play that for the audience, Senator Scott.
Cut number four, this is Raphael Warnick giving a sermon in 2011. America, nobody can serve God and the military!
We have seen in modern times the rise of Trump and Trumpism on the shoulders of Christians brings into sharp focus the moral bankruptcy of the American church.
So, Senator Scott, the moral bankruptcy of the American church, the assertion you can't serve God and be in the U.S. military.
I mean, do Georgians hear this?
Because I've had Georgians call me and tell me their airwaves are flooded with Raphael Warnick and John Ossoff, who is AOC light propaganda.
Oh, well, that's why, you know, I've had three tough statewide elections.
You've got to raise your money.
You've got to get your message out.
You've got to tell people, here's the difference.
If you want to vote for a Republican, David Perdue or Kelly Loeffler, then you're going to vote for lower taxes, less government, better schools, more school choice.
We're going to support the law enforcement.
We're going to support the military.
Or you can vote for the Democrats.
Here's what you're going to get if you vote for the Democrats.
You're going to get them packing the Supreme Court, which will refer to our First Amendment rights and our Second Amendment rights.
You're going to get them to do Medicare for All, which means...
That you're going to ruin, one, the Medicare program, two, kick people off their private health care insurance plan.
You're going to have the Green New Deal, which will cost us almost $100 trillion and kill our economy.
You're going to have reduced funding for law enforcement, and you're going to have socialism.
So the choice is pretty clear.
Keep up with what's trending.
Subscribe on YouTube today.
Trending now on The Charlie Kirk Show.
And I hope that this does not explode to the volcanic expectations that I have.
And it's actually I'm unbelievably worried where this is going.
Because normal people, regular Americans, are not going to tolerate what is happening right now in our country.
And what's happening is the widespread criminality from within our own government.
That's where things start to get very, very dangerous.
And normal people and regular people that work their tail off to do the right thing Okay,
everybody, Dennis Prager with Professor of Epidemiology at the Yale School of Public Health, Harvey Risch, who testified before the Senate this week, and then, of course, a one-sided piece in the New York Times, condemned his message as selling snake oil, namely defending hydroxychloroquine.
Now, you excellently increased the price of my question from $64,000 to three times that amount.
I asked you why the CDC has come out against hydroxychloroquine and then you immediately said so is the FDA and the NIH.
Okay, I really want to know why you believe that is the case.
Well, we know it's the case because they've all made public statements.
The question is why, as you said, And I think the answer to that is back to the marketplace and whose interests are being served.
And the answer is if you have one product that does a job effectively and safely at one price that it prices out of the marketplace competing medications, that costs a hundred or a thousand times more to do the same job.
How do they benefit from high prices?
Doesn't the profit go to the drug makers?
Well, it does, but when you have a drug that costs 30 cents a tablet, and a prescription is $3 or $5 for the treatment period, then the drug manufacturers are not making a large amount.
Plus, there's probably 40 or 50 manufacturers of hydroxychloroquine across the world.
And so it's kind of spread around as to who's making what for where.
And some of those manufacturers have given tens of millions of doses to the United States and other countries already gratis.
You know, so we're not talking about large profit motives in these...
Right.
Again, what is the connection between the profits of the companies making...
Expensive drugs as opposed to hydroxychloroquine, why does that matter to the CDC, NIH, or FDA? Well, because the FDA has somewhere between 33% and 60%, depending on how you calculate it, of its income provided by fees that it charges to drug and device manufacturers for their services, for the regulatory services.
Why does the regulatory service get affected?
Because a drug company is not profiting from something that competes with hydroxychloroquine.
What is the connection?
I mean, it sounds fraudulent, obviously, but I don't even care.
I do care, but that's not what I'm aiming at.
I'm trying to just see the direct connection.
company X makes an expensive drug for for COVID and why will its profits help the FDA NIH or or the CDC well because that company pays the FDA millions of dollars in order for the FDA to green light using that medication
And the FDA is therefore beholden to these companies to keep it in financial solvency.
Does the average American know how much private pharmaceutical companies pay these government agencies?
They could.
It's on the FDA's website.
No, but that's a separate issue.
Do you think the average American...
I didn't know this, okay?
And I'm pretty well informed.
So I assume...
Almost no Americans know that private pharmaceutical companies are substantial contributors to these three government agencies.
Well, the FDA, anyway, let's say that.
Okay, then why did the CDC? So I go back to my original question.
Why did the CDC come out against hydroxychloroquine?
The CDC, I can't address.
I can address the NIH also.
You could go there.
Yes, I do.
Yes, go there.
Okay.
It has patents that it co-developed in research with vaccine manufacturers.
And this is great.
And, in fact, I've been consulting for pharma companies in the past, and I highly value their research efforts.
It's what keeps Americans in health, and we need every bit of that on the research side.
But on this side, on the marketing side, we have a problem.
And what happened is that the NIH developed patents and has patent-sharing agreements with vaccine manufacturers.
And NIH stands to gain large amounts of money and billions of dollars from these profit-sharing agreements.
Okay.
All right.
Please hold on.
I mean, this is truly like a mystery hour.
Dr. Javi Risch, Professor of Epidemiology at Yale.
Dennis Prager wants to remind you about Riduzone.
Riduzone is composed of OEA, the molecule that we all produce, which tells our brain we're full, so we eat less.
Eating less has enormous benefits.
The obvious one is potential weight loss.
But I believe it has tremendous health benefits generally.
So, Riduzone...
is available only at RiduZone.
It was made by doctors.
It's got two patents.
Go to RiduZone.com, use the promo code Dennis, and you get an immediate 30% off and free shipping.
WZone.com, promo code Dennis.
This is Owen Strand for townhall.com.
Supreme Court Judge Samuel Alito recently made a startling point.
Religious liberty is in danger of becoming a second-class right.
Alito said as much to the Federalist Society.
Just as the COVID restrictions have highlighted the movement toward rule by experts, litigation about those restrictions has pointed up emerging trends in the assessment of individual rights.
This is especially evident with respect to religious liberty.
It pains me to say this but in certain quarters religious liberty is fast becoming a disfavored right.
Alito argued that not only religious liberty but free speech is imperiled.
Support for freedom of speech is also in danger.
And COVID rules have restricted speech in unprecedented ways.
This is a timely and prescient warning.
Religious liberty is the very foundation of American freedom and free speech is part of what makes America great.
We cannot sit passively by as our cherished freedoms are whittled away.
We must pay attention and take action where we can.
I'm Owen Strand.
The Pepperdine School of Public Policy, America's unique graduate program for leaders.
Learn more at publicpolicy.pepperdine.edu.
Trending now on the Larry Elder Show.
Appreciate it.
Chris is in San Antonio, Texas.
Chris, you're on The Larry Elder Show.
Oh, wow.
What an honor to speak with Greg O'Dursky.
How are you doing today?
I'm doing well.
Thanks, Chris.
I guess my question is, can you imagine if this goes to the courts and then it goes to Congress and then it goes for President Trump like we all know it should?
Chris, mass suicide.
Mass suicide.
Cities are going to be burning to the ground.
Their ears would explode.
It would be catastrophic for the left if Donald Trump were awarded the election.
You think we feel that the election was fraudulent?
What do you think they're going to feel?
They're going to go absolutely bonkers.
They believe that the Russians not only interfere, but 78% of them believe that the Russians changed the outcome of the election, even though our Intelligence Committee has never reached that conclusion.
So they're going to go absolutely bonkers.
Remember what Hillary advised Joe Biden?
So we've got to have a massive legal operation.
I know the Biden campaign is working on that.
We have to have poll workers, and I urge people who are able to be a poll worker.
We have to have our own teams of people to counter the force of intimidation that the Republicans and Trump are going to put outside polling places.
This is a big organizational challenge, but at least we know more about what they're going to do.
And, you know, Joe Biden should not concede under any circumstances.
They would go absolutely ballistic.
Keep up with what's trending.
Subscribe on YouTube today.
Trending now on the Eric Mat...
Hi, everybody.
Hello, everybody.
Hi, everybody.
How would you like to have unlimited text and unlimited talk and two gigabytes of data on your phone service for $20 a month?
$20 a month.
Before I would endorse it, I actually tried it.
I got a phone and signed up.
This is basically the same thing I have and have had with a much more expensive service.
This is a Pure Talk USA. Just dial pound 250 on your phone and say Dennis Prager.
I have, as I told you, achieved something my parents, may they rest in peace, would be most proud of.
I am a promo code.
Pound 250, say Dennis Prager.
All right, I am speaking to Professor Harvey Risch, professor of epidemiology at Yale School of Public Health, testified at the Senate this week, and was roundly condemned by another professor, JHA, at the Brown Public School of Health, or School of Public Health.
And the passion is fascinating, but I... The antipathy to hydroxychloroquine is unprecedented in my life.
For a drug that's been around for 65 years, billions of doses, tens of millions of people, some places it's available over-the-counter, and all of a sudden it's a dangerous drug.
So I asked you not knowing the answer.
Why the FDA and then you...
I said CDC and you said FDA and NIH as well.
Federal Food and Drug Administration, National Institutes of Health, and the Center for Disease Control.
So you don't...
It's fascinating to me, and I respect that, but I just want to reassert you don't have an explanation for the CDC's opposition to hydroxychloroquine.
That would be speculative.
I have my, you know, ideas, but I have better evidence on the other two, as I've mentioned.
Right.
So the other two, what is involved is financial interest.
Is that correct?
Yes, that's what I believe.
Because they get a great deal of money from the drug companies, which, again, I did not know.
I thought that taxpayers supported federal agencies.
I did not know that they were supported by private enterprise and certainly to the extent that they are.
So specifically, if hydroxychloroquine works, then the need for a vaccine is diminished.
Is that the point you're making?
Yes, and you could also imagine that the better it worked, the more ferocious the pushback would be.
Yes, exactly.
There's nothing to be made if hydroxychloroquine works.
So, what prompts...
I know, I'm sorry, I'm asking you, so to speak, to analyze a human being's intents, which is always impossible to a certain extent, but I won't even mention his name again, but the professor at Brown, with the vicious attack on you, not by name, so I'm not going to mention his name now, it was mentioned earlier, What prompts him?
Well, one thing that we know is that he is or has been funded by the Gates Foundation, which is highly interested in vaccine production.
Wow.
You just blew my mind.
Wow.
God.
How did you find that out?
It's on Brown University's website.
It describes his having taken on this new job this year, and in his appointment it describes his qualifications, and one of the things that it says is that he's been working on research funded by the Gates Foundation.
And the Gates Foundation is passionately pro-vaccine.
Yes.
And why is that?
They don't stand to make money from vaccines, do they?
That's beyond my pay grade.
But they've supported money for outpatient medication trials in small amounts, relatively speaking.
But they seem to have put a large amount of money in vaccine development and trials.
Those of you in the sciences, I can't do my own trial.
I believe it works.
I take it.
What prevents scientists from having, you know, this apparently the yardstick of studies, and that is a randomized trial with hydroxychloroquine?
It's actually not so simple in endeavor.
First of all, it has to be approved by the FDA, and the FDA has a way of dragging things out and making minutiae of requirements and interfering with that.
And secondly, these are very expensive to get, you know, hundreds of thousands of people on each treatment department of study, identify them, and enroll them and provide the medications and so on and then follow them up.
It cost many hundreds of thousands to millions of dollars to do.
This was the reason for the hearing in the first place in the Senate, because the government has put many billions or trillions of dollars into research in hospital and vaccine research, but put almost nothing for the last six months into outpatient early treatment.
It's a sin.
It's just a sin.
How many people do you think unnecessarily died because they didn't take hydroxychloroquine and zinc?
Oh, I think usually 200,000.
And more, every day more.
And I'm not trying to be theatrical or inflammatory.
I think there's so much evidence that it's incontrovertible, the evidence.
And the evidence shows, the weakest evidence shows that it would be half of the 265,000 so far.
And the more likely evidence...
Is the study in Saudi Arabia, which was a national study that had some 8,000 patients who were treated either with hydroxychloroquine and zinc or just zinc alone, and they obtained a four- to five-fold reduction in mortality in those 8,000 patients.
This is a national study across the whole country.
Saudi Arabia's got a modern health system now.
They've improved their health system more.
All right.
I have one more question for Dr. Javi Rish.
Today's a big day.
Today is the day that Pfizer will be formally requesting emergency use authorization for their vaccine against coronavirus.
The president initiated and the administration implemented Operation Warp Speed.
Which is leading to the reveal that within weeks, it appears, millions and millions of Americans will start getting the vaccination against COVID-19.
Of course, it's coming at a time that is urgently needed.
In the Vice President's words yesterday, To coronavirus is over 252,000 Americans.
2,000 reported yesterday.
Hospitalizations, according to the mainstream media, and I always know we have to look at that with a little bit of a wary eye, but in their words, hospitalizations across America have exploded.
80,000 Americans are now in the hospital getting inpatient treatment.
Yesterday, the governor of California And I just take a lot of comfort in knowing that the Trump administration delivered essentially a vaccine that
in normal times would have taken two or three or four years.
Keep up with what's trending.
Subscribe on YouTube today.
Trending now on America First with Sebastian Berger.
What did you think of the press conference yesterday?
yesterday.
Are you satisfied in general by the campaign's response and by the conservative response to what we witnessed two weeks ago on election night?
Well, here's what we have to understand as a predicate.
If we allow fraud to continue, if we turn a blind eye to it, if we accept the proposition that any accusation of fraud or any query of ballots cast is racist or an attack on democracy itself, then we as conservatives will never win another election then we as conservatives will never win another election again.
Because in some of these very densely populated cities, you have a feature that I like to call ballot laundering, where people didn't actually intend to vote those ballots, those particular...
I did not expect to take the whole hour, and I'm deeply grateful to Professor Harvey Risch, Professor of Epidemiology at the Yale School of Public Health.
So with very little time left, I have two questions, and they are, do you have allies, any allies at all at Yale?
Number two, well, three actually.
Number two, do you know of and are you part of the Great Barrington Resolution or Statement?
And number three, do you believe that 250,000 Americans died of COVID?
So we have little time and three questions.
So the answer to the first question is yeah.
I have colleagues at Yale who support my policies and opinions.
As to the Great Barrington Declaration, I support it insofar as it goes, but it's only halfway.
The other half is that The criticism of the inability to completely protect high-risk people is true, in my opinion, and both people require access to immediate treatment by safe outpatient medications that we've been discussing.
So the Great Barrington Declaration works when you have an arsenal of early treatments, which we know we have.
And the third question is, do I believe in the number of deaths?
Now, this is a philosophical question that cannot be answered on the basis of numbers because it's a judgment as to causes of death.
This has been debated by epidemiologists and coroners and government officials for quite a while as to whether somebody who comes with two different causes, which one is the likely cause of death and which is the underlying cause of death, and how death certificates are coded.
And it's very difficult to address somebody.
My feeling is that if somebody has an underlying condition that would not have killed them at the very moment that they died, then the other condition that did kill them when they died is the one that is the cause of death.
And the first one is just contributory.
However, this may or may not be how death certificates are coded, and it's very difficult to know exactly in different jurisdictions how it's done.
Do you believe a story like somebody with COVID died in a motorcycle accident and they called it a COVID death?
Well, I think that goes to what I was saying, that the immediate cause of death was the accident, even somebody who had an underlying COVID condition.
The person might have also had diabetes, and that wasn't his cause of death either.
Right.
Well, sir...
There are a lot of people who support your knowledge and your courage, and I thank you.
And my pleasure to talk to you.
Thank you.
Dr. Harvey Risch.
Had we followed Dr. Harvey Risch, Dr. Zelenko, and others, we might have saved 150,000 or more lives.
I believe that.
As strongly as I believe, I am talking to you.
I wish you, from the bottom of my heart, as happy a Thanksgiving as you can have.