Pearl and JJ clash over Luke Ford’s 16-year stealthing sentence, with Pearl questioning if non-consensual condom removal alone qualifies as rape while JJ warns of legal misuse. They debate Nick Fuentes’ harassment—pepper-sprayed, doxxed, and nearly targeted by John Lyons—highlighting free speech vs. activism risks. JJ’s shift from pro-Israel to pro-Palestine stems from firsthand accounts (e.g., 45,000+ Gaza deaths post-October 7th) and critiques U.S. double standards, suggesting Holocaust narratives are weaponized selectively. The episode ties these conflicts to broader themes of justice, historical revisionism, and personal transformation, leaving listeners to weigh accountability against systemic bias. [Automatically generated summary]
Welcome to another episode of Pearl Daily here on the Audacity Network.
Today, I have a special guest on the show, leftist, animal rights activist, BLM activist, and Palestine activist.
Welcome to the show, JJ, also my guitar teacher.
Hello.
Hey, Pearl.
Thanks for having me.
Thanks for coming.
So I was telling them the other day we're the most unlikely of pals because we agree on like nothing.
Pretty much.
Yeah.
But I just thought it'd be interesting to have you on to get another point of view because I'm always talking.
I never get any pushback or back and forth.
So I just thought it would be fun to have you on.
So thank you for coming.
Glad to be here.
So the first thing that we're going to talk about today that I thought was kind of interesting.
So there's a man in Scotland who got 16 years for stealthing.
Now, stealthing refers to the deliberate removal or tampering of a condom during sexual activity without the partner's knowledge or agreement.
While often dismissed as a mere breach of trust, stealthing can lead to unintended pregnancies, transmissions of STIs, and significant emotional trauma.
So we're going to play the clip.
So you might want to put on your headphones.
Oh my god.
To jail for stealthing, removing a condom without his partner's consent.
Luke Ford was found guilty of 19 offences, including seven counts of rape, one of which was stealthing.
It's the first time someone's been prosecuted for this in Scotland, and only the third conviction ever in the UK.
Ford, who claimed to have worked as Brad Pitt stand-in on the set of World War Z, will spend 16 years in prison.
One of his nine victims gave Ford a condom before sex and thought he'd used it, but he later admitted that he hadn't and told her to take a morning after pill or have an abortion if she was pregnant.
Prosecutors were able to prove that this is rape.
The prosecutor Katrina Parks said Ford was a serial offender who demonstrated no respect for the consent of victims.
She urged any victim of similar offending to come forward and seek help.
So what do you think?
Stealthing is relatively a new law.
So do you think that to me, I'm not sure if it's the equivalent of rape.
What do you think?
Well, it doesn't go into all the details about because I think it's in nine counts of rape, including one of stealthing.
So there may have been other things he was doing besides stealthing that led to the 16 years.
But I mean, I think that's absolutely disgusting.
That's deplorable.
I couldn't imagine someone doing that to another person without their consent.
I think it's disgusting, but I think if he got it for, if basically if he got it, I think that's a bit harsh, 16 years.
Like, I don't, I think that's a little bit harsh.
Well, this was a repeat offender.
Yeah, I know, but the thing is, it's like women commit paternity fraud all the time, and that's not illegal.
So it just seems like we keep increasing all the things that men can't do, like that women or men can't do to women, but we don't hold women accountable on the other end.
But we're talking like you can't stealth someone like, you can't take a condom off without permission.
I mean, that's.
I mean, I think it's wrong, but I just, I think 16 years is a bit much.
And I'm not just 16 for stealthing, though.
Yeah, but how do you, the other question I ask, how do you multiple?
How do you prove that?
You don't have to, like, how do you prove that?
She said, no, it's just like a he said, she said.
I think he even admitted it to her.
I think that's how she found out.
He was like, oh, by the way, you should take this pill because I didn't, based on that video, I don't know anything else about this case.
I think it's wrong, but my concern is that's going to get abused as a law.
The same way that sexual assault is now abused because it turns into a he said, she said.
And you see a lot of guys going to prison falsely.
I'm if I had to see a lot of people get away with it that don't get convicted, too, because victims don't come forward.
So.
Yeah, but I would disagree.
I think.
You would disagree with it?
Yeah, because I think that most of the time it's like women just like when I was doing my show, like I told you how I went to England and I was interviewing a thousand people.
What I found is when women said they were abused, assaulted, whatever, was that they essentially, when you ask them like three questions, their story doesn't make sense.
And I just found that to be more common when they said like they didn't come forward or didn't go to the police.
Their stories just lacked evidence.
I mean, it's hard for them to prove after the fact.
That's why a lot of them don't get.
Well, can I give you an example?
So there was one woman in London where she came on my show and she said she was abused.
Now, normally my gut reaction used to be to believe women, right?
I used to think, you know, why would you lie about something so serious, right?
Then she says I was abused.
And I say, what happened specifically?
Like, what happened leading up to the fight?
Because I think if you're comfortable enough to say it on a public platform, like if you're going to make the assertion, everyone knows who your ex-boyfriend is, I should be able to ask questions to make sure you're telling the truth.
And what happened was he pushed her down the stairs because she refused to leave.
So he was trying to shove her out of the house and she ends up, so she said, oh, he threw me down a flight of stairs.
But what really happened was she came into his house without telling him.
His son was there.
They were fighting and he was trying to get her to leave.
She wouldn't leave.
And so while maybe he shouldn't have pushed her like out of the house.
Definitely.
Probably shouldn't have.
But my point is she was trespassing.
You can't trespass on people's property.
She was the one who committed the first crime.
Sure, but then you dial the police and you.
I agree.
It was stupid.
I totally agree with you, but I just find that's way more common is that people like people take it.
Women have a tendency to take advantage of the laws.
Does that make sense?
I think everybody has a tendency to do that.
I don't think it's based on male or female.
People will, yeah, that's just people do that.
Yeah, well, I agree, but I think there's more room for women to do it than men.
I don't think men can really falsely accuse women the way that women can falsely accuse men.
And so, so, so, stealthing, for example, I just see this as a negative because even though I think it's wrong, I just have the feeling that it's going to be taken advantage of.
I'd rather that than a world where uh stealthing is not prosecuted and a guy gets away with doing that.
I mean, that's that's they said it's horrible.
Yeah, I just think that it's worse when you're putting innocent men in jail than like I think that's personally worse.
Well, because someone taken off a cunt, that's an L. That's a big L. You know my thoughts on the judicial system and the whole crime and punishment in America.
So, I know a little bit.
I know you want to abolish the police or something, but I don't know massive reform.
We do two-hour lessons, so it's not that we don't go that deep, you know.
Yeah, I think there's major reform that needs to be done.
And I think a lot of countries have had success with a crime and reform type of system versus crime and punishment because, like you said, a lot of innocent people go to jail on trumped-up charges.
And I mean, that's also deplorable, but that doesn't mean we don't have laws to protect people from things like stealthing.
Yeah, yeah, like it's it's tough because I think it's wrong.
I think spending years in prison for it is a bit extreme for me for the crime, but I see it, I see it getting abused.
This was a serial offender.
I think there were nine accounts of this, or this or rape, or I don't know all the details of it, but it sounds like this was multiple charges.
That's what they that's what they say.
I'm a little bit skeptical, but I'd have to look more into the case.
I just was more curious on your thoughts on the stealthing law.
So, I think it's a good law to have.
I don't think people should do that to other people.
And I don't think he had 16 years for just that.
I don't know what the what it was for just that one charge, but I'm glad it got prosecuted.
Okay, so moving on, we are going to talk about Nick Fuentes.
So, oh boy, so we're going to talk about Nick recently was attacked.
Now, the initial this is the initial attack that happened to him, or initially a woman showed up at his door unannounced.
So, and he ends up pepper spraying her.
So, this was the original footage.
Hi, oh my god, what are you doing?
He had gone viral for a clip that he made saying, Your body, my choice, far-right streamer.
He ends up getting a charge with battery in the alleged attack of the woman, ends up going to jail.
And she ends up pressing charges, and everyone sort of said that he shouldn't have did that, that it was like an overreaction.
Which Kira, so this is her pressing charges with the police.
Okay, so what happened?
Okay, so I'm just asking, this is important for you to realize.
Are you familiar with the resident?
No, I'm not.
I don't know who that is.
So, I'm not gonna add extra to it.
His name is Nick Fuckles, and he was a white supremacist, proudly, and he was on his very popular YouTube channel talking about how after Trump won to women everywhere, basically, your body, my choice.
I got kind of somebody that's kind of doing this.
There are a lot of people who are doxing him because he basically threatened every woman and their daughters by saying your body, my choice.
I don't care how he votes.
I mean, well, you can, I mean, it kind of bothered you, right?
It doesn't matter.
I mean, I know a lot of Republicans, my favorite aunt is a Republican.
But my point is, that is a threatening statement, and there are a lot of people who are upset about it.
I came by here because I live in Berwin.
I live on the south side.
And I came to do a little video because my friends keep saying, you know, he lives near town.
So I went outside and did a little video.
Ring and a friend was that?
In front of his house?
On the sidewalk.
And what was the reason for that for Leo Tipping?
Because I wanted to show people that there was no people making claims that they're going to send deliveries to him of dog poo and stuff.
And I was showing there are no boxes of that.
Okay.
And so a woman driving by said, ring his doorbell and say hello.
So there are no signs on there saying anything about no solicitors.
Okay.
So I rang the doorbell, immediately opened the door, sprayed me with pepper spray, and pushed me down the steps.
He sprayed you with pepper spray?
Yes, he did.
And it got in your eyes?
Yes.
I call in my face.
Okay, before we go any further, I'm going to call the ambulance to make sure you open.
No, but I want you to get checked down.
Whatever it is.
To the Berlin.
God.
Can you roll in the ambulance this way?
If you stayed in that, she got pepper sprayed in my face.
I just want to make sure he's okay.
Okay.
So he opens a door.
He opened the door in the same movement.
He sprayed me and pushed me down the steps.
And you fell backwards.
I fell onto the sidewalk and, you know, kind of rolled.
He grabbed my phone and went back and okay, that's her side of the story.
And they end up like, I'm not going to play the rest because it's like another three minutes, but police basically ask if he wants to press charges and then he does.
I'm going to continue to keep it on because I'm going to show you the next part.
Then this is the other side of the story.
So this was, I think I wrote down one minute, Mark.
I think it was nine minutes.
There we go.
This is not your eyes.
You could sign a medical refusal, and then you don't have to go with them, but I do want him to check your eyes out, okay?
Give me a second.
Okay, so I'm getting a couple things about it.
Well, I'm telling you, I'm going to do it here.
Let's do it here.
Come on, man.
Why?
I don't want to argue with you.
I don't want to go in the backyard where she can't have a line of sight in front of me.
Well, she's not even.
So, Nick, I don't want to.
I'm trying to go to the backyard.
Is your name Nick?
Yes.
Okay, Nick.
I'm trying to get your side of the story.
And by you acting like this, it's not helping, man.
I got two sides, two stories, and I'm trying to just kind of find a middle ground.
Let me take your card because I'm not doing an interview.
What I'm going to tell you is this.
Well, I heard they're targeting your house.
Yes.
About all social media.
Okay, and what is that about?
I posted a joke on the internet.
I'm a live streamer.
Like a YouTube channel?
Or Eastern?
Or something?
Yeah.
You saying you're a white supremacist?
I'm not a white supremacist.
I'm Mexican.
I know I kind of saw the white supremacist.
Yeah.
Okay.
But, I mean, you know, this one's 24, man.
You made one bad joke.
And this happens.
Especially right now at the Trump one.
Right.
Okay.
Yeah, but it's a very political thing to say.
Well, we also live in a free country where you can speak without people showing up and trying to hurt you.
I'm sorry.
She's across the street.
Yeah.
She's the one on her phone.
Yeah, she's the one on her phone.
What's the story?
Apparently, well, what I'm getting is this guy over here made a bad joke online, and now people are targeting his house.
This lady is, you know, she came over here, rang the doorbell.
Apparently, he sprayed her with mace in the eyes and pushed her down the stairs.
So last night I had paid her.
Since she fell into the concrete, I make sure she's okay.
And then her eyes, apparently, she has pepper spray.
She's a little too graphic.
Pepper spray.
Huh?
No, that's what she's claiming.
So I'm going to switch them to the other party here and see what I like, kind of what happened.
Yeah.
Hey, man, did you spray her with pepper spray?
I'm not doing an interview right now.
Huh?
All I'm going to say is, I'm going to take your card, and my defense attorney didn't touch with you.
This is a report.
I'm kind of.
I'm not.
All I'm going to say is, I'm a high-profile person.
I want someone stationed here.
20 people came by last night.
I have paid security.
They documented all of it.
I called.
They're coming tonight at 7 o'clock.
I can't afford to have it 24 hours.
I called earlier because somebody else was in front taking pictures of my house.
Cops drove by, saw the car that I reported with the license plate making model, and they didn't even stop.
And the lady stood there filming my house, pointing at my house, gesturing to it.
It's been going on for the past three days.
I've been calling the police.
Clearly, no one's taking it serious.
You're not her or anything, are you?
No, I'm okay.
All right, cool.
I'll go check it out.
Yeah, thank you.
Look, man, like, to be honest, I'm trying to talk to you, get your side of the story.
I know the whole thing.
I'm not.
You're not here to help me.
Well, I'm not here to help you.
No.
I just got you.
How do you know I'm here to help?
I know my rights.
I'm not trying to fight with you, but I'm also not going to be toned.
Do you agree with that?
Because you.
I'm just curious if you think the way he's interacting with the cops is how you would, where he's saying, I'm not going to talk.
So I know you've done the animal rights strikes and stuff.
Yeah, I attend a lot of protests for a lot of different reasons.
Yeah, so I'm just curious if you think the way he's interacting with the cops is how you would.
Because I know you have, like, he said, you're not here to help me to the cops.
And I think you have a similar thought process.
I think he's a little aggressive.
He's coming across a little abrasive.
But the whole, I'll get in touch with my defense attorney before I speak is actually that's like in know your rights training that they train a lot of activists on.
That's exactly what they tell you to do.
You don't want your words to be spun or say anything that can come back to bite you.
So it's good to have an attorney mediate that.
And then also just make sure that keep the police accountable.
So I think that part's good.
But I do think he's just, he's being really aggressive.
In the chat, they're saying he's trying to get they're trying to get him to admit to assault.
That's what they were saying in the chat.
I was just curious if that's what you thought they were trying to do, the cops.
I mean, you can't read someone's mind.
You can't know it for sure, but we do know that they will use different tactics to get people like that.
That happens at protests all the time.
They try to, you know, if they're looking for something to charge someone with, yeah, if you say something that incriminates you, that's why they say everything that you say can and will be used against you.
And it will.
So you can't take it back once it's said.
So I think that it's smart to wait to have an attorney and not do an interview or interrogation or whatever you want to call it right there on the spot.
That's actually good.
It's interesting because everyone thought a lot of people, the perception was that he was overreacting to the woman that came to his door.
Agree, disagree?
I mean, why would you answer the door?
If you know, if there's hostile people outside of your house three days in a row, why are you even answering the door?
I would be doing what he says.
What he claims to have been doing, which is calling the police, I would have called the police and not answered the door, not put myself like you want to de-escalate situations when you're in them, not escalate them.
And opening the door and immediately pepper spray.
Like, you have no reason why she's there.
Could she have been there to hurt him, possibly?
But most of the time, when an activist shows up at your door, like I've led home demos before, and like, sure, it's jarring to have someone outside of your house, you know, with a bullhorn, a megaphone, and you know, shouting and chanting and holding signs.
But like, I've done that before at like different executives' houses, different, you know, politicians.
You can't go on their property, though.
You cannot go on their back.
You stay on the public sidewalk.
It's she's the one who breached it first, though, wouldn't you say?
Because she went on the property and that's not allowed.
Yeah, at the point where she crossed onto his property, she has a right to he has a right.
Like if they're on the public sidewalk, like even if he called the police, there's nothing they can do about it.
But once they're on your property, at that point, yeah, the police can ask her to leave.
You can say you're trespassing, but again, you can get a megaphone.
You can, you know, crack a window and say it or talk through the door to her and say, please leave my property.
I'm calling the police.
There's ways to de-escalate besides, you know, pepper spraying someone and pushing him down the stairs.
But he also doesn't know if she has a weapon or anything.
Like, he doesn't know that.
Like, if he, even if he peeped through the, we're going to show the footage later, but even if he peeped through the door before, he would have been shot.
He would have been dead.
Well, that's why I would not have opened the door.
Like, the fact he opened the door, I think, shows that, like, again, why would you do that if you thought she was armed?
Call me a coward, but I'd be locking the doors and calling the police and hiding, not answering the door.
So I saw this.
I think I sent this to you the other day.
I saw this tweet from Nick, and it said, Last night, an armed killer made an attempt on my life on my home, which was recently doxxed on this platform.
The gunman carried a pistol, crossbow, and incendiary devices.
I believe he intended to kill me.
He is dead now, and I'm okay.
According to the police, the would-be assassin committed a triple homicide in southern Illinois early yesterday before he arrived at my doorstep and his pistol drawn calling my name.
I am grateful to God that I'm still alive today.
Tragically, the gunman broke into a neighbor's house to evade police and killed two of their dogs.
While heartbreaking, it could have been so much more unimaginably worse.
God have mercy.
Doxing is not a game.
The nihilistic lynch mom behavior must end before anyone else is killed.
I will now have to uproot my life and relocate while I can handle whatever comes to my door.
It is irresponsible to expect neighbors with young families to share that burden.
In the meantime, I have to contract 24-hour security to protect myself and my property.
If anyone would like to contribute to the cost of $13,000 a week of private security, I'm only accepting crip.
He's been banned.
Okay, who cares?
Then the next part is Nick's side to the police.
Nick is attacked.
Oh, this is the footage.
So this is the guy who came to his door.
Oh my God.
you imagine seeing that on ring so that's one and then the other And then I think there's footage of his back door, too.
Is that a weapon in his right hand there?
Yeah.
Yeah.
It's a pistol.
Oh my god.
And I think they said this is like a crossbow.
No, no.
Looks like a crossbow.
Who's saying Nick?
He was streaming.
And then, so that's the, I think he goes to the back door too, not that one.
Let me see.
Oh, and now he's looking for an Illinois attorney to help me pursue legal action against the most high-profile social media users who posted my address under the Illinois Act anti-doxing statute.
Please DM if you're able to.
So now he's looking for a lawyer to sue, which I think that's good, right?
Yeah, I mean, you shouldn't dox people.
That's crazy.
Even if you disagree with them, you shouldn't tax them.
Even if they've done something bad, like that's just not the way to handle things.
The killer drove 2.5 hours directly to my house where he parked and then attempted to gain entry to my home, home, and the front and back door for 10 minutes until the police arrived.
So this is the thing he wrote.
Wow.
Oh my gosh, that's so scary.
And apparently he, the police chased him into the neighbor's house and the neighbors were home and he just like shot through the doors.
And luckily it didn't hit them, but it hit their dogs.
Poor dogs.
That's terrible.
Yeah.
So then there's him going.
This is the back door.
So that's like where the cops came before.
And that's the back door.
I just, I cannot believe this happened.
Yeah, that's terrifying.
Has anything happened with you like doing activist work?
Like anyone you know, something similar has happened to?
I mean, nothing to that level.
I've been assaulted by, you know, random passersby many times.
So have a lot of my friends in the movement.
But I mean, no one's ever like a weapon like that.
I've been threatened with weapons before, but no one's ever shown up my doorstep with a weapon or like, you know, pulled a weapon on me at a protest.
But I've gotten threats of violence, of weapons, saying going to go home and grab X, Y, and Z.
But they never came back and showed up with it.
This is the last one.
So this is the neighbor saying his side of the story.
Berwin, police say when they caught up with the 24-year-old murder suspect, he started shooting at them.
They returned fire, killing him.
It was around 11.30 Wednesday night when Scott Wishcobe says he noticed Berwin police on his block shining a floodlight, appearing to be searching for someone.
That someone ended up in Scott's basement.
And when I turned on the light, the guy was standing at the end of the end of I blocked my son and I told him to get upstairs and get his mother and get out of the house.
Police say that man who opened fire was 24-year-old John Lyons of Westchester.
Scott says Lyons shot and killed two of his dogs before taking off.
The dog is really emotional.
The how did I not get hit as he was shooting so many times at me is also in my mind.
You know, how he got from south two-hour-way drive to here into my basement is also what I'm trying to...
There's just so many that you're trying to figure out that I don't know.
Before ending up in the basement, police say Lions was wanted in connection to a triple homicide in Mohammed, which is about two and a half hours south of Berwin.
Police there found three people who had been shot and killed.
The Champaign County coroner identified the victims as 61-year-old Janice Mason, 26-year-old Sarah Mason, and 23-year-old Caleb Mason.
Last night, members of that community gathered at a local church for a vigil.
A lot of questions about why something like that would happen to someone that did not deserve it in any way.
Back in Berwin, police say Lions ran from Scott's basement and police spotted him in a nearby yard where they ordered him to drop his weapon.
Instead, they say he started shooting at them.
They returned fire, killing him.
Five gunshots, and then she called the cops.
Anxious and nervous in the pit of my stomach that it happened on our right here.
Now, we do expect to get more information.
I just can't imagine what motivated him.
Like, I understand Nick's a polarizing figure, but to the point where you show up at his house, like, was he mentally unstable?
Was he a part of a certain like extremist group that gets together and plans these kind of things?
Like, what do you think motivated him?
I have no idea.
I mean, I think we're going to have to follow this and see.
Because, you know, it wasn't just showing up at Nick's.
He did a place.
He killed three people in his hometown.
And they don't seem to know the motive of that either.
And that wouldn't have been connected to Nick.
So I can't believe this was politically motivated or any, you know, wasn't some sort of vigilante justice.
I mean, maybe that's why he showed up at Nick's house was for that, but this just sounds like a very disturbed individual.
I'm wondering if he was crashing out and just figured he was going to go out and take everyone with him, like that he doesn't like.
Maybe.
You know, because if you're committing that big of a crime, you have to assume your life's over.
They're locking you up and throwing away the key.
Rightfully so.
But yeah, I mean, definitely a deranged person.
And the scary thing, too, is not only that he showed up at Nick's doorstep.
I mean, that alone is terrifying.
But the fact that, I mean, the neighbors, they're not even involved in any way, shape, or form.
They just have bullets start flying through, and the guy's got a kid, and two dogs were hit.
Yeah.
And they have nothing to do with it.
They just got caught in the crossfire.
Right.
And that's what I think it's the right thing for him to move because it's not fair to his neighbors that aren't involved in this.
You know, it's not like you got to be somewhere that's a bit more remote because like it's just not fair to the people around you, you know.
Really?
Well, yeah, that's the thing is actions have consequences.
And when someone, when someone doxes someone like that, it doesn't only affect that person's life in this country in a way.
Like, I know they say we do, but it's like if you're kicked off of platforms for which we both have been, yeah.
That's somewhere we can agree for sure that, you know, is it better than most countries?
There's, you know, there's a lot of places where you cannot criticize your government or cannot have certain positions or, you know, you can get, you know, thrown in prison or executed in some extreme regime.
So I'm glad we have a First Amendment.
I'm glad we have that right here.
And I think it is important that we fight for that right.
And I don't care what you're fighting.
I mean, as long as it doesn't involve harming another person or individual, you know, there are times I will walk past a protest that I do not agree with their message.
They are on the right.
They're holding Trump flags or whatever.
And I'll give them a high five and say, I'm so glad you're exercising your First Amendment right.
Don't mean I agree with their message, but we need more people doing that if we value that right.
And we have to understand that each should be unified on.
Yeah, but like, what free speech do we have if you're afraid a gunman might show up to your house if you say something?
I mean, which I know he's extreme, he is, but it's like you don't really have free speech if someone's going to show up to your house.
You're going to get doxxed and have this mob, you know, because what incentive does the average person have to speak their mind if they know that's like they potentially lose their job, they get kicked off of a social meeting, you know, then normal people are just going to say, this is, I'm not going to speak my mind because it's just not worth it.
Right.
Well, and what do most people end up doing?
They either exist in an echo chamber of people that think like them or they just don't take a stance on anything.
Yeah.
And they just stay apolitical.
And that's exactly what the people in power want.
They don't want a politically active, engaged community of people.
They don't like the idea that someone like you and someone like me can get on a show together and talk.
And so keeping us polarized and divided and fighting amongst each other, then, you know, we're not united to make any real systemic change in this country that actually benefits the middle class, the working class.
That's part of the reason why I'm here today, because I think to, rather than showing up at someone's house that you disagree with with a gun, it's like, why not sit down and have a conversation and see what common ground we do have and where we disagree, seeing why and letting people hear the other side.
But I can't really blame average people for not getting politically involved because the risk is just too high for normal people.
It shouldn't be.
It shouldn't be.
But it shouldn't.
Okay, if you work in corporate America and you've worked 15 years for your position and you know if you post the wrong thing, your company is going to boot you.
Some people will say this cause is so amazing that it's worth it.
But a lot of people are going to say, I'm good.
I like my job.
I like my life.
Even if I'd rather be happy than right, you know?
And it's unfortunate, but even though they say we have free speech, I really don't think we do because there's just too many consequences for speaking your mind.
Yeah, it's, I mean, it's a gradient.
We don't live under, you know, an oppressive regime like, you know, like a North Korea, for example.
Yeah, of course.
But do we have work to do so that we are freer as a country, both from a legal standpoint, but also just a fellow citizen to fellow citizen?
And I think part of that is by not being so polarizing.
And we can thank, you know, social media and even traditional media for that.
It's like they fan the flames.
But if, you know, I have a saying that it's like, if not me, who?
You know, if not now, when?
So that's why I'm fortunate enough that I have a career where I don't have to worry about what my boss says because I don't really have a boss.
I'm self-employed.
But I left a corporate America job when I was very fortunate that I'm able to.
And it gives me a little bit more of that freedom.
I don't have that fear of repercussions from an executive at the company or whatever.
Yeah.
So the next story we're going to go over, I'm really curious to see your opinion on the Pierce Morgan and Candace Owens debate.
So Candace Owens has been historically pro-Israel.
For the past decade, she has been pro-Israel.
And really most of my life, I would say, well, I'm not, the Middle East isn't like my issue per se, but I'd only really heard one side being in America.
Everything was pro-Israel, pro-Israel, pro-Israel.
But it's interesting to see this wave of people on the right that is pro-Palestine, which I would say is more of a general left position.
So it's interesting to see like you guys agreeing maybe on that more than in the past.
So I'm going to show you the clip and I just want to know what your thoughts are on what she says.
Here we go.
I have two clips.
I'm going to show you one and then the other.
Uncensored recently.
I got to say, it took a pretty shocking turn, the interview.
I hadn't fully factored in just how, in my opinion, after talking to him, brazenly anti-Semitic he is.
And this included this clip here.
Do you not understand why Jewish people might feel a sense of victimhood given that six million of them were killed in World War II by a genocidal monster in the Holocaust?
Do you not understand why that might make Jewish people feel that, yes, they have indeed been victims?
Yeah, I mean, that figure has been revised.
They said that it was 4 million that died in Auschwitz, and then they said it was down to a million.
So they've revised the figure.
Well, how many people?
How many people do you think were killed in the Holocaust?
I think it's about 71,000.
Less than 6 million.
I mean, just the mathematics don't work.
You can't cremate that many bodies.
I'm sorry, but I just find that unbelievably offensive.
And I'm not even Jewish.
You see, this is where I'm like you.
I think there's been a weaponization of all these things.
Whether you're transphobic, you're racist, you're sexist, you're anti-Semitic, whatever it may be, your Islamophobia.
I mean, people just spray this stuff around all the time to the extent where it does become meaningless.
And actually, people who genuinely are those things, they get caught up in the wash and almost protected by the kind of wash of stuff.
But when you hear someone like Dan Bulzerian, what do you feel about someone like him?
Yeah, so I actually didn't watch that interview, so I haven't seen it in its full context.
And I try never to weigh in on clips because there'll be something I'm missing and then everybody screams at me.
But what I will say is this.
The larger discussion that's happening right now is whether or not having survived a Holocaust gives you the permission to commit a Holocaust.
And for whatever reason, people have been, what I would say, milking the Holocaust narrative in the same way that black Americans.
So now nobody can say that anything we do is wrong.
And that's the big issue today, is that we have so many people that will not recognize that it is totally feasible that a Jewish person, and I'm speaking here about Bibi Net and Yahoo, could do something as horrific as what was done to the Jews throughout World War II or throughout history.
But is that an accurate comparison?
And I'll tell you why I say that.
As we know, I mean, whatever Dan Bulzerian wants people to believe, six million Jews were killed in the Holocaust, another six million people were murdered by Hitler and the Nazis.
The numbers of people being killed in Gaza are, in my view, have gone way beyond what is acceptable as a response to October the 7th.
However, you're still talking about, at the moment, a death toll of under 50,000.
There's no comparison in the amount of dead people compared to the Holocaust.
So is it, do you understand why?
But it is a Holocaust, what's happening?
Well, is it though?
Yes.
So I think language is really important.
I think language is really important as well.
People say Holocaust, genocide.
I think what's happening is a Holocaust.
The burning bodies of the children that I'm seeing every day, and we spoke about this a little bit on my show, but like, I have recognized that the ability to see this stuff every day has transformed my opinion.
Maybe the numbers wouldn't have gotten so high if people had spoken up when it was happening at the very beginning during World War II.
And so I want to use my platform to say that I believe that they are intentionally executing a Holocaust.
I think Bibi Netanyahu, there's tons of evidence.
And obviously the Western media is not reporting on this, but the corruption trials that are going on with Bibi Net and Yahoo pertaining to October 7th and him editing the transcripts and the prior knowledge that he knew is now becoming extremely pertinent.
It is a question as to whether or not he allowed the attacks to take place, essentially, to then be able to go in and to commit this Holocaust against the Palestinians.
Okay, so that's one.
And I'm going to show you one more clip.
Oh, if you're a comment, you can go, but I'm going to deal with it.
This general feeling that people have that you're an anti-Semitic, address that head on.
Judaism is a faith.
Israel is a state.
It is not above critique.
And that what Bibi Netanyahu has done to Palestinians since October 7th is a Holocaust.
This was about power.
This was about control.
I'm not going to quiet my perspective on that to kowtow to whatever the prevailing narrative is at the New York Post.
All of my gay friends are like, they better not hold a trial within, you know, 50 miles of Hell's Kitchen in New York.
This halt assassin executed.
Okay, so do you agree with Candace Owens?
I have been pro-Palestine for a long time.
I have, I wasn't always growing up.
I mean, I wouldn't say growing up like as a kid.
You were pro-Israel before?
Yeah, I mean, as a young adult, I didn't.
I didn't really, I didn't know much about it.
I wasn't very political in my earlier years.
So I just kind of took things at face value.
And overwhelmingly, the media is pro-Israel in America, as are most corporations.
So I just assume that America's always the good guy, Israel's always a good guy, and the enemy's always the bad guy.
So what switched for you?
Because it seems like it's a whole, I don't want to say trend movement.
It just seems to me there's a huge group of people that like thought also was pro-Israel and went to Palestine.
So like what did you see that changed your mind?
Like I'm kind of agnostic.
I don't, you know, I don't go one way or the other.
Like what was the evidence that made you switch?
It was a gradual change as I got exposed to more information.
But one of the most eye-opening opening experiences of my life was a good friend of mine that she's traveled to over 100 and some odd countries.
And she doesn't just like go there for like a long weekend and say, oh, I've been there.
She'll like, she has a career where she can work remotely.
And so she'll live different countries for like weeks or months at a time.
And she actually spent quite a bit of time in Palestine and showed me things on her phone.
And her experience, and you can't even record the Israeli.
So you met someone that was directly there.
Yeah.
And she had a different perspective than what you would hear on the news.
Correct.
And I was already fine, just like with social media, we have access to information that isn't controlled.
It's not mainstream media controlling the narrative.
So you can get other points of view.
So I was already open to it.
And I was like, well, what was your experience?
And she started telling me, like, literally, like, she would be in the car and they would just stop and frisk Palestinians and stop their cars.
And she said they live under just such oppression all the time.
And I just, it's like, that just doesn't seem right.
Like, I know that they're in fear of an attack, but like you just cannot oppress people.
And she was talking about their living conditions and just everything about them.
She's like, they're the nicest people you'll meet and just very generous.
She's like, I never felt unsafe there other than when like these Israeli soldiers were just like basically terrorizing the people.
So hearing that perspective, I started just looking into more information about it.
And there's a news outlet, Democracy Now.
I've been following them for a long time and I like that they're very, I mean, they definitely are left-leaning.
So I don't know if you'd like them, but they aren't beholden to corporate interests in mainstream America.
And they do a pretty objective way of covering it.
So as I listened to some of the ways they covered it versus the way that the mainstream media narrative, you saw that there was two different sides, like deliberately targeting Al Jazeera journalists and other journalists before October 7th, years ago.
And I'm like, what right do they have to go after journalists?
To me, no one does that unless they have something to hide.
So that started to turn me in that direction.
And then one of my best friends, his husband is Palestinian and had family there after October 7th.
And I was getting, you know, every couple days updates on just the atrocities that are being committed there.
And that was, there was no going back after that.
So once you know people personally, I think it's, it's a difference.
Yeah, because for me, it's, I've interviewed people on both sides before.
And they both will tell me the other side's faking their facts.
And it's very confusing to like the average person who's not like an expert in war, who doesn't like follow the, you know, the conflicts like 100 years old, who doesn't know the history of it when both sides come in and say the other side is lying, you know?
So, but it's interesting to see how much public perception has shifted the last 10 years.
And I wonder if that's because of social media.
Like, I think that's probably why.
Or like personal friends, maybe.
That's how I was kind of curious about that.
We can get on-the-ground coverage from other perspectives, not just the perspective that, you know, from the mainstream media perspective or the perspective that Netanyahu's putting out into the world because he's been caught lying about different facts and figures and information.
And I don't, I'm not an expert.
Like you said, I'm not an expert on war.
I'm not an expert on this topic.
But from what I know about it, there are horrible things being done there.
And whether or not to use the word genocide, I do use that word, but whether or not that's the correct term is, again, I think it is.
I think that the excuse that, okay, there's one person hiding in this tower, this building, therefore we have to blow the whole thing up.
And modern, you know, with all the technology we have where they can literally like with satellites, you know, see like a dime, like the face on a dime, you know, across the world.
They can see a face on a dime.
Yeah, from satellites, yeah.
It's like amazing how detailed the technology is and how we've taken out and other, you know, advanced countries have taken out individuals, you know, with snipers and other weaponry.
Again, not an expert on war, but I know that we have very precise weapons.
And then you just see like entire towns and cities just, I mean, obliterate.
I mean, I don't know if you've seen any of the footage or photos out of Palestine, but I mean, entire towns just wiped out.
I'll tell you what I see on Twitter.
It goes, footage goes viral that looks really terrible.
And I'm like, wow, that's terrible.
Other side says they're faking the footage.
Is it like, I'm like, are they faking it?
Are they not like it?
It's not being faked because again, I know people on the ground.
I don't know them personally, but I know family members of people who have well, even, but sometimes it's the Palestinians saying the Jewish people are faking the footage.
Like sometimes it's like they both say the other is faking it.
Does that make sense?
Like both sides will say the other is faking it.
And of course, every side's going to put their spin on it.
And it wouldn't surprise me that both sides have things that are being faked.
But I know that the videos and footage that I've seen on the ground from just real life people are real.
That is not being doctored.
And it's horrible.
It's interesting because we're going into an age of social media where people aren't really going to know what's real and what's not real.
You know, because of AI is getting AI is getting so good.
It's scary.
I've even reported on stuff where the next day I have to say that wasn't actually a real video.
Yeah.
Or it was a skit.
Like you think something's real.
It's like actually a skit.
And it makes it very confusing at times.
Yeah.
But yeah.
It'll be interesting to see where we go from here because I think there will also be technology that'll be good at detecting AI and fakes and things like that.
So hopefully that technology keeps pace with the technology that's creating it.
I think it's going to also be a problem for like higher IQ.
Like it's going to make the divide bigger between higher IQ and lower IQ people because people that aren't as smart are just going to believe the original stuff.
Where I think people that are like smarter are going to be able to say, no, that's fake.
No, that's real.
You know?
Yeah, I could, I could see that.
I don't know that it's entirely divided by intelligence, but I think people that value truth and value knowledge will take the time to really research things.
People that just want a reaction.
And I think intelligent people can be guilty of that just as much as people of a lower IQ.
But in general, I think that people that are used to doing research are going to take the time to research things before they formulate an opinion.
So it'll be curious to see where we go from here.
Do you think that there can't be much change in the war, like with the new administration?
It has to be the same old because I think Trump's, he's pro-Israel and he supports Israel.
So I'm like, it has to be the same thing.
It's just going to keep going.
You can't not support Israel and get elected in America.
That's just the Candace Owens got fired, you know?
Right, right.
Yeah.
Yeah.
Well, and that's the thing you, if you're pro-Palestine, I mean, I constantly call an anti-Semite and all these horrible terms just for being pro-Palestine.
I'm like, I thought we could all agree that like, you know, just the death toll of children alone, like, you'd think that wouldn't be a political issue.
You wouldn't think that anyone would be hated for saying, hey, there's, I know you have a right to defend your country.
You have a right to protect yourself from, you know, another terrorist attack, but you don't have a right to just kill thousands and thousands of children.
And the tolls, the death toll is at around 45,000.
And what she didn't say in that video, I don't know the exact number.
So, you know, don't quote me on the exact number, but I believe it's over 200,000 people are still missing.
I think it's north of 200,000 people are still missing.
The majority of those people that are missing are probably dead.
Don't know that for sure, but the actual number is way higher than that.
So that's how they inflate it.
Oh, because they're missing.
Because they're missing.
And after weeks, it's been a year now, over a year.
What are the odds that they're still alive under all that rubble?
Right.
Or maybe some fled the country or hiding somewhere.
So hopefully it'd be nice if that was the majority, but the reality is the majority are probably not alive.
And so that number is much higher than 45,000.
And to be clear, I was very critical of the U.S. government and the way that we conducted our wars in the Middle East too.
So to say that it has to do with their religion is ridiculous.
I'm critical of any government or any military that is killing indiscriminately.
The same way Putin and Ukraine, everyone's rallied behind how horrible that was and pro-Ukraine.
But when it's someone who is that the U.S. backs, then you must be anti-Semite if you are critical of a government.
I have a question.
I know you don't like Trump.
Now, if Trump in his next four years somehow ended these wars, would you become a Trump fan?
Would I be like, what do you, if he in the next four years got both of these wars to stop somehow, would you then, like, how much would it make you like Trump?
Like, would you become a fan or would you just be indifferent?
There's literally no politician I'm a fan of, though.
He was, he's exonerating that judge for cash for kids where he was literally getting paid, bribed off to, like, you know, inflate these sentences for literally kids.
The youngest was eight years old that this judge sent to prison in exchange for money.
And he got caught in this and sentenced like 19 years.
And Joe Biden's pardoning him.
I am no Joe Biden fan, to be clear.
But when a politician does something good, I am the first to also, even if they're on the opposite side of the spectrum, I'm the first one to say, hey, kudos to you.
I like the fact that Trump didn't get us involved in any wars in those for any additional wars in those four years.
That's one thing that I'll say that I liked.
I don't know if it had anything to do with him or not.
So, yeah, if he ended those wars, I'd be able to do that.
I'll say, good for you for ending those wars, if he, in fact, does end those wars.
But that doesn't mean I'll be a fan because I like to challenge power.
So, whoever's in power, I'm willing to be, I'm going to be able to do it.
What if they're good power?
Like, what if it's power you like?
Like, it's making it better, your life better.
Absolute power corrupts, absolutely.
I think power does something to people.
So, even if I agree with their platform, I'm still going to keep them in check because before you know it, that power gets someone's head.
I think it's a healthy, good thing to have a citizenry that is active and that challenges its authority and its government and keeps them in check.
You know, the famous saying that a government should fear their people, not the people fear a government.
I don't care if it's a Democrat or a Republican in charge.
I'm going to take this as yes.
You're going to come back and say Trump is awesome.
I'm not going to say Trump is awesome.
Just like I won't say Biden is awesome.
That was an awesome thing, Trump.
I will say I'm glad he ended the wars and saved lives.
I would absolutely give him that if he did, but that's a big if that I highly doubt.
Hey, you never know.
Could you?
Yeah, okay.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
So, you know, I have been on the front lines of the simp epidemic for years, but I need to tell you guys about a quiet weapon being ratcheted up against men that is rarely talked about.
It's not just the relentless anti-masculinity propaganda and OnlyFans hoes causing the societal issues that we discuss on this show.
Did you know that the average city's tap water contains trace pharmaceuticals and endocrine disruptors?
This often includes estrogen from birth control.
The average adult consumes a credit card worth of plastic every single week.
That's five grams of plastic a week on average.
So it's no wonder that the average male's testosterone is half of what it was 50 years ago.
Testosterone levels decline 1% a year, and without a course correction, we are headed towards extinction.
No matter how base you are, you need to be naturally boosting your testosterone.
My friends at chalk, C-H-O-Q.com, are on a mission to save mankind from extinction by boosting your vitality.
Chalk's male vitality stack contains premium and potent herbs clinically studied to naturally boost your testosterone levels, sperm count, and overall vitality.
Just one of the many ingredients in the male vitality stack was studied in double-blind human clinical trials to boost total testosterone 20% in 90 days.
When you boost your testosterone, you'll have more mental clarity.
You're more capable of making decisions and taking risks.
Having high testosterone will also affect your pheromone, so women will find you more attractive subconsciousness.
Witnesses describe seeing large glowing drones flying in synchronized patterns, sometimes numbering in dozens or even hundreds.
It was like a fleet of military-grade drones just silently gliding across the sky, says Emily Parker, a resident of eastern Colorado.
Despite widespread concern, no clear explanation has emerged.
The FAA and U.S. military have denied any involvement in the sightings, and local law enforcement has struggled to track the drones, which appear to avoid radar detection and fly at high altitudes.
Former President Donald Trump has weighed in on the growing mystery, calling the drone phenomenon a huge security threat and questioning whether these drones are a part of a foreign surveillance operation.
Why are these drones flying across our country?
Who's behind them?
Trump wrote in a post on his social media platform.
We need answers now and we need to protect our airspace.
This is something the Biden administration is ignoring and it's a huge mistake.
Trump's comics reflect border concerns about natural concern, natural national security and the potential risks posed by the unidentified drones.
He suggested that the U.S. should be taking a more aggressive approach to investigating and preventing such intrusions into American airspace.
Several theories are circulating about the drone's origin and purpose.
Foreign surveillance, private or corporate testing, amateur drone enthusiasts.
Authorities have formed a multi-agency task force to investigate, but law enforcement remains in the dark.
Experts warned that the drones could pose a risk to aviation safety, particularly if they interfere with commercial flights.
Dr. Linda Hayes, a former FAA official, emphasized that the drones' presence at high altitudes could create dangerous situations for low-flying aircrafts.
In addition, the mystery surrounding the drones has reignited debates about drone regulation and stronger airspace security in the United States.
As authorities continue to investigate, residents are on the edge, unsure of whether these drones represent a harmless technological experiment or a more serious threat.
The drone mystery remains unsolved with no official word on their origin or purpose.
For now, the nation waits for answers.
So what do you think?
It is baffling, I will say, and I can't pretend to know what exactly it is.
But for fun, take your gas.
This is a fun show.
I think I just, I don't fully buy that they don't know what's going on.
They have to know.
Yeah, I mean, the amount of surveillance that we're under and the technology that's available to them.
And you're telling me that all these drones are just coming out of nowhere and they don't know.
And I heard from one reporter that they're specifically hovering over like military bases.
And it's not just these different states, but it's like military bases in Texas and Colorado and Utah.
I haven't fact-checked that.
I only heard one report from military bases.
I can look it up.
Yeah, let's see a drones spotted over military bases.
And if that's true, they're either our military's drones or someone's trying to spy on our military.
Why wouldn't they be shooting them down?
Zap it and put it in a bag inside military's response to drones flying over bases.
Yeah, you're right.
Yeah, so there's been some reports about them flying over bases.
And our military doesn't immediately shoot them down.
I mean, again, I'm not a military guy, so maybe we do allow them to fly, but if it's like a no-fly zone, why wouldn't they just immediately shoot them down unless they're their drones?
And then if they are, why wouldn't they just tell us that they're, oh, the military's trying new, you know, drones?
Like, we know we use drones.
You know, Obama conducted countless drone strikes in the Middle East.
So did Bush.
But if they're spying on average Americans, I think that would be a problem, which we already know they did.
But Snowden and NSA, like, it's not a surprise to anyone.
But I don't think they'd tell us if they were spying on us.
They're not going to say we're spying on you.
No, of course not.
That's what I said.
It just wouldn't surprise me if it turns up that they are our own drones.
And I don't know what they're being used for or why, but it just wouldn't surprise me.
So what about a foreign government?
If you had to guess who they were.
I think that's the least likely situation because if a foreign government is flying drones over our airspace, they'd be shot down immediately.
I can't imagine they'd be o okay with that.
I'd be okay with them shooting them down.
Why would a foreign entity be flying drones over a country if not for nefarious purposes?
There was a guy who shot one and the police came and he just like did.
Sorry, it was such a funny, I wish I could find, I'm not going to spend time finding it, but it was so funny.
He shot the drone and the police came to his house and he just like, he was like, yeah, it was over my house, so I shot it.
And then he's like, yeah, and he's like, is that, they're like, you can't do that.
And he's like, that's illegal.
And they literally arrested him.
Well, yeah, we don't want citizens just shooting down random flying objects.
Like, that's not, that's not the solution either by any means.
Because that's dangerous.
And you shoot that down.
It could, it could land on someone.
And they've been, they've been mistaking helicopters and small, you know, you know, private planes.
And they're saying, like, stop shooting.
Like, people are shooting like laser lights at them thinking they're drones and they're blinding pilots.
That's dangerous.
Like, yeah, it needs to be that.
That's not a good thing for sure, shooting them down.
So what?
I'm just wondering why now?
Like, what are they spying on Americans for?
I like how you're just assuming that's what they're doing.
We don't know that that's what it is.
I know.
Well, that's my guess.
I'm just, I'm critical.
I'm critical.
That's technology.
Oh, that's what you think.
They're just testing to see how.
I'm saying it could be.
I'm not saying that's what I think it is.
I don't know what it is, but it wouldn't surprise me if, you know, some new technology, you know, they have all kinds of ways of listening in and stuff.
So if you have some super like high-tech camera or microphone, that could be a possibility.
Do you believe in aliens?
Do I believe aliens have visited our planet?
That's a different question.
Or do I believe there's other life out in this massive universe?
No, do you think they've come here?
I don't think they've come here.
I don't think they have either.
But I'm almost certain there's life on other planets and other galaxies.
Sometimes the flat earthers get me.
What do you sometimes I think they have a point?
I don't believe in them.
I'd like to say I don't believe in them.
I don't actually, but sometimes they're very convincing.
What's one of the points that they've convinced you on?
Let's see.
I don't remember.
I'm going to be honest.
I'm going to be honest.
It was like a year ago I interviewed a guy who is a flat earther.
And I just remember leaving the interview thinking, oh, I understand why he thinks that.
You say that about everyone, though, don't you?
You're like, I can see their point.
I always can understand the point of view, you know.
Sure, but I recently saw a flat earther that made it to Antarctica.
He admitted he was wrong.
Good.
At least he admitted.
We all are wrong about things in our life, right?
I think it takes a lot of strength to be exposed to new information and then decide to change course.
So I commend him for that.
But I do have a friend that they are a flat earther and they, you know, I didn't cancel them over that.
I don't do that to people.
And they were just like, oh, no, that's not a thing.
And I'm like, have you ever been to the top of a tall building or mountain?
You literally can't, you can only see so far because the earth bends.
And then they were like, I'll have to check and get back to you.
And I'm like, don't go with the obvious answer.
Go like find some rabbit hole and see what the flat earthers have to say about it.
What do you guys think in the chat?
Flat earth, yes or no?
Oh, I know you, I know.
I know you have a hard stop, so you have to go.
But tell them where they can find you.
I'll finish up the show myself, but I'll tell them where they can find you because it's 401.
I know you gotta go.
I know you gotta go.
Yeah, yeah, I gotta go.
So just tell them really quick where they can find you.
Where they can find, oh, like online.
Yeah, if you have anything you want them to follow.
If you do, it's up to you.
Not really, not especially.
Okay.
Well, thank you for coming, JJ.
Yeah, glad to be here.
This was fun.
I appreciate it.
I have one more story I'm going to go over, but I think you have to go.
Yeah, I got to go.
Yeah, unfortunately.
Guys, say thank you in the chat to JJ for coming on, and we'll definitely have you back.
Great.
Look forward to it.
Bye.
All right.
I'm going to do the one more.
So, all right, guys.
See ya.
The last, apparently, guys, I have again pissed off the sex workers of society.
Now, apparently, Pearl is just the bad guy because I have pointed out that sex workers don't have the credentials to be preachers.
I don't know why I have to go back and forth so much on the internet to thank you, Sim.
Be nice, guys.
I don't know why.
Oh, by the way, I'm very sorry.
If you guys have a comment you want read, put it on the Audacity question or on the Audacity Network, and I will read in a second.
So I'm going to start over.
What am I doing?
I'm just slow today.
All right.
So apparently I have pissed off the sex workers and women because I dared to question the authenticity of women's conversions.
As you know, women go to church.com, whatever Protestant church they can find, get dunked in some water, and think they're born again.
Now, what I'm not saying is that baptism cannot change hearts.
But typically, when someone is baptized, I imagine that not only will their hearts be changed, but their actions will change.
Now, there is a sex worker, Nala Ray, who I have been talking about for a long time.
I know you guys are like, I'm sick of hearing about this woman.
If I have to deal with their tweets, you guys have to too.
Misery loves company.
Now, they made a article saying that former OnlyFans creator preaches Christ to hypocrites Laura Loomer and Pearl Davis.
Former OnlyFans model turned repentant Christian Nala Ray has responded to vicious attacks from internet personality Laura Loomer, calling out her self-righteousness while proclaiming the good news instead.
Nine months ago, Laura Loomer, who is Jewish, these only wrote, these OnlyFans, what does the Jewishness have to do with anything?
These OnlyFans girls can pray away their slutty behavior all they want.
They will never be respectable, no matter how much they cry to God, praying to be respectable person with all the things that I'm putting out on the internet because I want other people to see that, hey, listen, I could not take away my own sin.
God sent his son to die on the cross, a perfect lamb to cover up the debt that I owed.
This is as simple as it gets.
A negative does not cancel out a positive.
That is why God sent his son in human form to save us.
I wear my shame outside.
I'm not afraid of others to literally see for who I am.
But the people like you who continue to call me by sin is exactly what the devil does.
So keep it up by all means.
Did she insinuate that we're the devil?
All right.
I'm so tired of these sex workers calling me the devil.
It is just, it's getting old.
It's, I can't take this anymore.
I'm going to continue spreading the word of God and what God did for me.
I'm in no way a prophet, a prophet, a disciple.
I'm just here to share the good news.
The good news is what Christ did in my life by radically saving me.
And continue to judge.
I don't care.
You made a whole video on something you don't care about.
There are so many like you, Laura, so many.
And I truly hope that one day, oh my gosh, I'll pray for you.
It never ends.
You can experience the love of God that I did at that level because none of us are perfect.
Absolutely none of us, the least of all me.
So maybe that's why you're judging me because you never did sex work.
But believe it all, believe it or not, it's not the worst sin.
All sin is, is something that separates you from God.
So go through.
We do not believe that all sin is the same.
We don't.
So you know what?
We have venial sins and mortal sins, all right?
So it actually is worse than some sins according to my religion.
So yeah, she doesn't even know what she's talking about.
So go through your life really quick in your head before you get too judgmental and think about the things you have done and said, even on social media that have separated you from Christ.
I do not care, my girl.
I do not care.
But take the plank out of your own eye before you try to help somebody with a plank in theirs.
God bless.
And I guess what, so what did I say?
Can you be a retired corn star?
But does that make you not a corn star?
No, you're still a porn star.
Okay, let's let's take another example.
A cheater who stopped is always a cheater.
He just stopped cheating.
But who he is, he could change the nature, but he'll always have that temptation to cheat.
Same with alcohol.
If you were an alcoholic and you stopped drinking, you are still always an alcoholic.
You just stopped drinking.
And what the porn stars want to do is they do porn, then they stop doing porn.
Then they make some sucker wait till they're married so they can get married.
So they artificially inflate their price and then start preaching as if, you know, doing the bare minimum, which is not starting in OnlyFans, somehow makes you qualified to teach religion.
And they yell at me because I point out you're still a porn star.
The internet's forever.
And your nudes are still on the internet.
So, you know, I do believe in a change of heart, but I need to see action.
I would love to see these ladies donate the money.
Yes.
And if you spent the money, it's time to make enough money to pay it back or spend the rest of your life trying to pay it back or donate to something.
Until you, you ladies do that and maybe get off of, get off of the internet, I won't believe it.
Anyways, they said Pearl doesn't recognize the power of confession.
No, I am not saying, I'm not saying you cannot have a change of heart.
What I'm saying is when you, okay, let me get this straight.
When you go film your baptism and put it on the internet, then start building a brand and making money off of religion.
Color me shocked when I don't necessarily believe you.
I mean, anyways.
All right, guys.
Yeah, Subway is hiring.
Let me read the comments at the end of the show.
So, okay, so remember, if you guys do want your comments read, I do apologize.
I usually do it two or three times a show, but today was just once.
So Jacob says blue lives matter.
Peter says, what happens when women lie about male aggression?
Nothing.
Dane Schneider, the guilt guitar hero, says he'd rather have innocent men getting convicted for false essay charges than he would men getting away with stealing.
So he's stealthing.
He's not against injustice for injustice's sake.
Guitar Hero's position on stealthing shows that he doesn't believe in equal protection under the law.
He's in favor of feeling virtuous by supporting laws intended to empower women, not the same thing.
Please ask him how many, sorry, next time.
He'll be back.
I see him all the time.
We do the guitar lessons.
So please ask him how many innocent men will have to be falsely convicted of essay charges from a scorned woman before he'll think it's an injustice and be willing to speak up to defend them.
Jacob, tri-wave raving a rainbow flag in the Middle East.
Peter, did he vote for Kamala?
I don't think so, actually.
I don't know, but I don't think he likes either side.
Does he think workers in society, you know?
But what you're not going to do, what you're not going to do to me is do corn for a decade and then convince me that you're now holy because you got dunked in some water.
I just, and then, and I know that sounds insensitive, I think, to the religious folks who haven't seen this over and over again yet.
You're going to get sick and tired of it too.
Just give it like a year, five years, whatever.
But I need to see some action with it.
So Peter says that the old sex workers can at least advise the younger sex workers against it.
No, do you know what I think would be better?
The women that never did it and got a really good outcome saying why they shouldn't do it.
Anyways, guys, please like the video on your way out.
They said Pearl should hire that girl from the Daily White.
I mean, I would like to hire her too.
My producer says he'd like to hire her too.
You know, guys.
She's married.
Hey, hey, so number one.
Wait, which one?
Are you talking about Candace or Brett?
Both?
Yeah.
Yeah.
Well, I would assume they're talking about Brett.
Candace has been gone for a minute.
I'd love it if we could get Brett on the show.
That would be amazing.
Yeah, that would be awesome.
Look, I don't look at it.
I got a lot of hate last show, okay?
They were all saying that I was wrong because I said Brett knew what she was doing, which he was unfollowing and deleting.
You guys, you guys can come and say that, you know, you can talk all the trash you want.
I'm in media.
You know what's going to happen if everybody has the cameras on you and you start deleting pictures.
You know it.
You know that, like, you guys are not going to convince me otherwise.
It's the unfollowing and the deleting pictures, that's passive aggressive.
And that's trying to, that's trying to send a message without saying anything.
You guys aren't going to convince me otherwise.
But I do love Brett.
So I would like her on the show.
You're not going to make me change that take.
You're not going to, you're not going to bully me into it.
She's got so many options.
She's going to go to, I wouldn't even be surprised if like Fox News or she just starts her own thing.
I could see it either way.
And yeah, I was nice about it.
The way you guys did me in the comments, like you think I was crucifying the woman.
I'm like, no.
And I even gave her, I even said, I even said when I was 22 or she's 23, I might have did the same thing.
I'm not even judging.
All I'm saying, all I'm saying is she knows what she's doing.
And you're not fooling me.
And I would just advise from not going that route because it's not going to be good long term, even though short term, it, you know, the victim narrative, the, I mean, that's, I was betrayed by my, even though maybe she was, but It'll give you good short term, but long term, it's going to be something if, you know, they're going to think about when hiring you.
If she keeps going, I don't think she will.
Anyways, I'm done.
I'm done.
I'm done.
So like the video, subscribe to the channel, and let me know what you guys think in the comments.
And I will see you guys on Monday.
So I think, or is Monday Christmas?
What, what, when?
Thursday.
Also, go to theaudacitynetwork.com if you want to support the show.
10 bucks a month, 80 bucks a year, and you will be unlimited comments that I can read during the show.