Jack Posobiec and Will Chamberlain analyze Republicans' redistricting victory after the Virginia Supreme Court struck down a Democrat-led amendment, predicting a potential 12 to 14 House seat gain despite losing the popular vote. The discussion covers the Tyler Robinson case, where transparency battles over courtroom cameras clash with defense motions, while Libby Emmons argues live streaming is vital against online speculation. Additionally, the episode addresses FBI warnings on violent grooming groups, Operation Tidal Wave's cruise ship detentions, and Iran's missile attacks on American destroyers, concluding with Brian Glenn's departure from White House coverage to prioritize family over social media battles. [Automatically generated summary]
Transcriber: CohereLabs/cohere-transcribe-03-2026, WAV2VEC2_ASR_BASE_960H, sat-12l-sm, script v26.04.01, and large-v3-turbo
Time
Text
Virginia Redistricting Victory00:14:47
Hey guys, it's Jack.
I wanted to let you know that we're starting a new push for subscriptions here on Human Events Daily.
So make sure that when you're listening to this podcast, you hit subscribe, you download it, and you share it with five of your friends.
Make sure they're all going and downloading as well because we need to get the signal out as much as possible.
Look, we've done so much over the past couple of years since this show started, and we're only going to do so much more.
Let's get it.
This is what happens when the fourth turning meets fifth generation warfare.
A commentator, international social media sensation, and former Navy intelligence veteran.
This is Human Events with your host, Jack Posobic.
Christ is King.
Robinson does face multiple charges and a possible death penalty for the assassination of Charlie Kirk last September on the campus of Utah Valley University, including aggravated murder.
His defense has attempted multiple times to ban cameras inside the courtroom in an effort, they say, to protect Robinson's right to a fair trial and an impartial jury pool.
But prosecutors and Kirk's widow, Erica, of course, want cameras allowed for transparency.
And the judge is expected to finally settle that matter once and for all today.
The FBI is flooding the internet with warnings for parents.
We're going after the new form of what I refer to as modern day terrorism in America.
Children are being misled.
Groomed, threatened, and extorted into hurting themselves and even committing acts of murder.
It's led to school shootings coast to coast, from Tennessee to Wisconsin to Colorado.
The threat online groups called 764, Maniac Murder Cult, and other names.
Why?
This was the video that sparked questions as to why Customs and Border Protection boarded and detained workers on board a Disney cruise ship docked in San Diego in late April.
I don't know.
CBP and ICE are now responding, calling it Operation Tidal Wave, an ongoing multi agency child pornography enforcement operation based on information received from the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children.
CBP says 27 people from eight cruise ships were detained over the course of five days, all suspected of being involved with possession, distribution, or viewing child pornography.
President Trump last night confirmed the U.S. and Iran have exchanged fire in the Strait of Hormuz.
They trifled with us today.
We blew them away.
They trifled.
I call that a trifle.
Central Command says it was self defense after Iranian missiles, drones, and small boats attacked three American destroyers.
They shot missiles at it and drones at it and these stupid boats that came at it.
They got blown away in about two minutes.
Well, ladies and gentlemen, welcome aboard today's edition of Human Events Daily.
We're here May 8th, 2026.
Anno Domini, folks.
Pop the cafefe, crank up the kid rock.
Because today the good guys just won the redistricting war.
The Republicans have won the redistricting war.
The Virginia Supreme Court, in a razor thin 4 3 decision, just struck down that sneaky Democrat naked power grab.
Remember that Virginia Democrat Spanberger Obama amendment?
Gone.
Toast.
Invalidated on procedural grounds.
Because the Democrats couldn't even follow their own rules while trying to ram this through for amending the Constitution.
This was not an innocent tweak.
This was Democrats trying to steal four, maybe even more House seats in Virginia by redrawing the maps mid-decade to turn a competitive 6-5 edge into a ridiculous 10-1 or 9-2 blowout.
Boom!
Gone.
Barack Obama down in flames.
Spamberger down in flames.
Republicans have held the line, and our path to keeping the House majority just got a whole lot clearer.
This victory didn't happen in a vacuum, it was built on momentum.
Red states successfully redistricted and fought for.
Back, many of which did.
Texas, under Governor Abbott, redrew the maps last year.
That was five more Republican leaning seats.
Florida jumped in, special session.
Governor DeSantis knew lines that could net the GOP four additional seats.
You got other states, North Carolina, Missouri, Tennessee, also moving forward with adjustments to protect and expand conservative strongholds.
Now, let's get real about this.
This didn't start with us.
Virginia Democrats, egged on by Barack Obama himself, lit the fuse.
Barack Obama.
The guy who once preached against gerrymandering, right, Barack Obama?
He jumped in with ads, with rallies, pushing a blatant partisan map to quote unquote, we're fighting back, we're fighting back those, those, uh, MAGA Republican agendas.
Yeah, with his buddy Mark Hamill calling for President Trump to die.
They wanted to override the bipartisan commission that Virginia voters had approved, all to offset losses elsewhere.
Democrats in blue strongholds have been playing this game for years.
But when Republicans started winning fair and square after the census, suddenly it's an assault on democracy.
Well, guess what?
Actions have consequences.
And your aggressive push in purple Virginia and other swing competitive states fired up the red states.
Texas and others, under Trump's lead, said game on.
They redrew the maps, protect Republican seats, pick up extras where they legally could.
It's called tit for tat.
You want to rig the game in a battleground?
Well, then don't cry when the other side reinforces.
Their strongholds.
That is not about hypocrisy.
That is about survival in a republic where both parties play by the same rules.
It's about applying the new rules to the Democrats as well.
And let's not forget, it was the Supreme Court that set the stage for this victory.
Justice Sam Alito, and you saw the recent book, we had Molly Hemingway on here about it.
His majority in the Louisiana case blew a powerful, powerful delivery against racial gerrymandering.
The unconstitutional map drawing, they struck down Louisiana's map as an illegal racial gerrymander.
That set the stage that, boom, Virginia's map could get struck down too.
And that put pressure on the Virginia courts.
It all had to happen in this order.
Huge win for fair maps, for the voters, for Republican chances in 26.
The leftover reached and they got checked.
They got checked by we, the people, standing strong and fighting back.
But we're going to stay vigilant, patriots.
The war is not over.
But we just won a major victory.
What a day.
Right back.
We'll stand in our way, and our golden age has just begun.
This is Human Events with Jack Posobic.
Now it's time for everyone to understand what America First truly means.
Welcome to the Second American Revolution.
Ladies and gentlemen, we are back.
Human Events Daily.
Jack Posobic, Real America's Voice.
Folks, America is entering its 250th year.
And the direction of this country is being decided right now in our culture and our economy.
And who we choose to support matters more than ever.
Most wireless companies don't care who you are or what you believe.
They just want your money.
Well, Patriot Mobile is different.
For more than 12 years, they've stood with Americans who believe freedom is worth defending, funding the Christian conservative movement when others stayed silent.
And here's the deal you don't have to give up quality or service when you switch to Patriot Mobile.
They deliver premium priority access on all three major U.S. networks, so you'll get the same or better coverage than you have today.
Think switching is a hassle?
No.
Keep your number, keep your phone, or upgrade.
Their 100% U.S. based support team can activate you in minutes.
Still paying off a device, Patriot Mobile even offers a contract buyout.
This is a defining year.
We must work together to save our country.
Go to patriotmobile.comslash poso or call 972 patriot.
Use promo code POSO for a free month of service.
That's patriotmobile.comslash poso or 972 patriot and make the switch today.
So we've got Will Chamberlain on from the Article 3 project.
Will, I'm calling this a victory in the redistricting war in terms of the throwing out of the districts there in Virginia, but also the fact that Republicans actually responded by using power for once.
That's something you and I have been talking about for the better part of a decade, almost over a decade at this point.
And talk to us through what a resounding victory this was, but also the fact that.
Guys, all you have to do is pick up the pen and actually do things.
That's right.
It's a huge victory in Virginia.
It actually makes the decision of the GOP not to spend a huge amount of money fighting the redistricting battle make a lot more sense.
Maybe they were more confident and rightly confident that the referendum was illegal under the Virginia state constitution.
But it's really nice to see.
I mean, if you look at the entirety of the redistricting battle, I mean, except with the exception of places like Indiana.
That those recalcitrant legislators have now been punished.
In general, we're seeing Republican legislators all around the country be extremely aggressive about using the power they have and about using the recent Calais decision from the Supreme Court to go ahead and move aggressively to redistrict away a lot of these blue districts in the Deep South, which there are no equivalent to these districts in New England, for example, where there's just a complete lockdown by the Democrats.
It's looking very good for the Republicans on redistricting.
I mean, we should pick up something like 12 to 14 seats, I believe, total, which is, you know, in the context of a 435 seat House where most of the seats are pretty safe.
That's an enormous change.
I mean, it's going to put Democrats really behind the eight ball.
I mean, they might still win just a very tiny majority now, but just in general, they're going to be behind the eight ball really badly going forward for almost every House seat.
And then that's not even accounting for the fact that when you have the census coming in 2030, that's going to shift even more seats into red states.
And away from blue states, things are going to get really, really apocalyptic for the Democrats.
No, this is actually a huge, huge pickup.
Tyler Boyer is up there.
I was just chatting with him from Turning Point Action, talking about how this really means that Republicans only need to win a few toss ups and actually can hold on to the House, which would be in a midterm year like this kind of unprecedented.
This is something so 90% of the time, we have the crack staff over here at Human Events Daily.
Checked this.
And I think only in 1998 and 2002, again, after the September 11th attacks, that was the only time that we saw this, where the incumbent party that held the White House was able to maintain the House.
So it really doesn't happen often.
But because of these moves, Republicans could actually buck the trend.
Yeah, no, and it's a really good thing.
And I think Democrats have gotten away with a lot of shenanigans.
I think a really good way to understand what's happening is that.
Despite having won a two point popular vote victory, which should have given, when you think about it, the Republicans about a 10 to 12 seat majority in the House.
If that popular vote victory was translated into House seats, we only had like a one or two seat majority.
And that's because of the existing gerrymandering disparity against Republicans, right?
When you compare a place like Illinois to what had been like in the South, I mean, it's just been absolutely brutal for Republicans for a very long time.
So I think we're really going to see a course correction here.
And Democrats are suddenly, I think this is actually the way ultimately to get to a kind of resolution of what is the most fiercely polarized moment in our politics for a long time.
It's so polarized because it's so close.
In a world where Democrats simply don't feel like they can win the House back with their current set of policies, they may just have to moderate if they ever want to win again.
And that itself would be a massive victory.
No, I think it would.
And it just needs to be said that, guys, this, well, what would your message be to the sort of the Republicans who are now unemployed?
In places like Indiana or the Republicans in Utah that were unwilling to go along with the redistricting.
And I would be remiss if I did not mention the fact of the Republicans in the state Senate of Nebraska, where in 2024, Charlie Kirk himself went in and said, Hey guys, why are you just handing a district over to the Democrats every year?
We called it the great Cornhusker swindle, where they were just handing an electoral vote away to the Democrats.
And then they were under certain conditions.
Election models that year, that vote could have come in extreme importance.
And yet they said, oh no, we don't do things that way.
That's not how we play.
What is it with that form of Republican?
I think that form of Republican in the modern world is going to find themselves private citizens in short order.
I think it's really straightforward.
In a world where Democrats wield their political power unbelievably aggressively against conservatives and have the ability.
To do incredibly damaging things at the federal level.
You, as a Republican office holder, your first obligation is not to weaken the electoral power of the people who voted for you.
That's number one.
And I think it's bigger than Trump, it's bigger than BAGA.
It's fundamentally about what are your voters electing you to do?
Are they electing you to dilute their voting power?
No, they're electing you to maximize their voting power.
And so, you know, you can't be fair to people who wouldn't be fair to you in return.
Peacetime Conservative Deals00:04:13
And there's no evidence anywhere in the country.
That Democrats would intentionally be fair to Republicans when it came to redistricting, ever.
They have a normative view that Republicans are evil and therefore disenfranchising them is good.
You shouldn't respond to that by trying to win their approval.
You should respond to that by taking the fight to them in turn.
Will, I believe you had a term at one point for those types of conservatives.
Do you recall that term?
I do.
I called them peacetime conservatives.
I think that's still very applicable.
The idea being that, hearkening back to The Godfather, where Tom Hagan was described as a peacetime consulier.
And you're not a wartime consulier, Tom.
Things are about to get hairy.
Well, things are hairy in this country between Republicans and Democrats.
And those of you, the peacetime conservatives who would be inclined, or peacetime Republican officeholders who'd be inclined to make deals with their counterparts and give them power that they're not entitled to and that there's no reason to give them, those people are going to find themselves sidelined, rightfully so.
Oh, exactly right.
Well, I wanted to originally have you on because so later today, I believe it's going to be about 5 p.m. Eastern.
Big ruling, set of rulings in the Tyler Robinson case is going to be delivered by WebEx, where Judge Graff is going to come down on two pieces.
One being whether or not the preliminary hearing, which is currently set to begin in 10 days, whether or not that will be delayed because Tyler Robinson's lawyers have used a variety of, shall we say, creative reasons to call for a delay, and also on cameras in the courtroom.
What do you expect we're going to hear in just a couple hours' time in the Tyler Robinson rulings?
I expect that the prosecution is going to win across the board.
That would be my expectation here.
I don't think that the defense motions are particularly persuasive.
You know, the arguments that we need to continue a preliminary hearing, a preliminary hearing is just whether you determine whether there's been probable cause.
And intuitively, there's obviously probable cause in this case.
So the court is going to be reluctant to delay that.
And, you know, any arguments that would be prejudicial are just going to seem sort of frivolous.
On cameras, I suspect that the court is just going to want to ensure that there aren't conspiracy theories about this case and that therefore it's very important that.
Justice be seen to be done, and that people, the public, be able to see what these witnesses have to say about what was one of the most public murders in American history.
And yeah, so I want to get, we have a couple of minutes till the break, but I do want to dig into that a little bit more.
On the question of, and this is a big ruling, the question of the live streaming, the cameras, this isn't going to be about, and correct me if I'm wrong, this isn't going to be about cameras in the entire trial.
This is just going to be about the prelim.
Is that right?
I'm not sure, actually.
I haven't read the specifics of that part of the motion, so I don't know.
Maybe you know better than I do.
It could, well, it could, I suppose, could potentially cover both.
But at the same time, even if it is only the cameras in the prelim, I'm sure we can sort of get a sense of where the judge is at on this question, given how he rules today.
And I think that, you know, there's an interesting, oddly enough, I think the question of cameras in the preliminary hearing is closer than cameras in the trial because there's a reasonable argument to be made that given that evidence might be presented in the preliminary hearing, you want to minimize the extent to which people see it at this point in the trial because the jury hasn't been selected yet.
And so there's not that sort of curative instruction going on where the jury is knowing that they should not be accessing the internet, blah, blah, blah, because we don't even know who the jurors are.
So, that I actually, you know, off the top of my head intuitively, that's actually a much closer question.
No, I completely agree with you.
I think that it does actually make sense that there could be a difference here.
But at the same time, I do also think that, and I've just always said, for the purposes of transparency, you know, this is, of course, what the judge is going to have to be weighing.
Public transparency versus bias, jurors.
That's the ruling that we're going to get in just a couple hours' time.
Tyler Robinson is set to return to, at least virtually, court today for the murder of Charlie Kirk.
Mom Wants Clean Water00:02:21
Be right back.
You talk about influencers.
These are influencers.
And they're friends of mine.
Jack.
Where's Jack?
Jack.
He's done a great job.
All right, folks, we're back live, Human Events Daily, Real America's Voice, right?
Will Chamberlain from the Article Three Project.
And before we get into that, though, I want to remind everybody that Mother's Day is coming up this Sunday.
And why not get mom?
You could order it if you haven't got mom presents yet.
You can just order this.
Go right ahead.
Why not order mom the gift of a beautiful and wonderful new water filtration system?
That's what your mom needs.
That's what your mom deserves.
So you could get mom some supplements.
You could get her a new diet or tell her to get in a workout, but is that what your mom wants?
No.
Your mom wants something right now.
And in fact, she deserves it.
She deserves it.
So why don't you go with the new filtration system from Cove Pure?
We're talking basics, the most important basic thing of all water.
Even mild dehydration, it impacts energy, focus, and metabolism.
Believe me, moms need those.
And when you think about all the garbage that's in your mom's current water, you're starting to be behind the curve before you even begin.
So, with Cove Pure, you get clear wave technology certified to remove up to 99.9% of contaminants for mom.
Pretty much anything that isn't in mom's water PFAs, microplastics, pharmaceutical residue, fluoride it all gets removed so your mom can have the purest water she deserves.
And what I love most about my Cove Pure, Tanya Tay loves it, you can choose the temperature of your water hot, cold, warm.
It makes your water taste so good, pure, clean, no aftertaste.
Cove Pure makes it so easy to get pure water with the push of a button.
So, this year, Go and get mom what she deserves.
Improve her health with clean water.
Right now, you can get $200 off for a limited time if you use my link, covepure.comslash poso.
That's C O V E P U R E dot comslash poso right now for Mother's Day.
Don't put it off any longer.
Just go to the website, covepure.comslash poso, get it from mom, and then boom, it's ordered.
Courtroom Cameras Matter00:14:32
It's in the mail.
You don't have to worry about it anymore.
I want to get back here with Will Chamberlain.
For the Article III project.
So, well, we're just a couple hours away from this ruling coming down in the Tyler Robinson case.
And there's an interesting motion that I saw regarding, and this is up.
Andrea Burkhart, the great lawyer, had it up, and she's been live streaming.
We've had her on the program here, and she's been doing just a wonderful job on this.
She was talking about how she does have the list of potential witnesses that'll be called.
And keep in mind, everyone, this is about the preliminary hearing.
This isn't a trial, there's no jury here.
This is just about really the.
Actually, Will, why don't you tell us?
Will, you're here.
Well, it's about establishing probable cause and justifying the decision of the prosecutor to bring charges.
And it's evaluated by a judge.
It's not a trial by jury.
It's not beyond a reasonable doubt.
The standard is probable cause, which is not a high standard to meet.
I think it's going to, when this hearing happens, it's going to be met in spades.
This is, you know, so the question of delaying the hearing is really just delaying the trial.
And that's the reason they want to do it.
It's where.
You know, it's where the government has the state has to come in and say, Hey, you know, we're filing these charges and here's why.
Yeah.
And here's the evidence.
And, you know, here's some of the evidence.
We don't, it's not even all the evidence.
Here's some of the evidence that demonstrates that at a minimum, there's probable cause that this person committed this crime.
And in this case, the evidence is overwhelming.
So one thing I saw that was kind of interesting on the witness list, it, you know, it lists a lot of, you know, it seems to be a lot of some local police that were at the, UVU campus, where Charlie was murdered, multiple state agents.
It looks like SBI, that's the State Bureau of Investigation in Utah.
But then also number five, Lance Twiggs.
And this is interesting.
It looks like he's going to be doing a recorded statement in lieu of testimony.
And the fact that it was disclosed October 24th, there's actually a typo.
It says 2022-5, but let's say that was 2025.
Does that sound like it's a recording of an interview that was Lance Twiggs being the boyfriend of Tyler Robinson, an interview that was recorded with him in the wake of the initial investigation?
And, you know, so he won't be, you know, called personally to the stand.
And normally you would see that.
You wouldn't see in a trial pre recorded testimony.
Most of the time you would see live witness testimony.
And again, is that because this is the preliminary hearing?
I think so.
But, you know, this is, I finally started reading that motion about hearsay, and a lot of it had to do with the confrontation clause.
So suddenly that all makes sense.
I didn't understand that that was what was going to happen with Mr. Twiggs.
But I think what the defense is trying to say is that the federal confrontation clause, which entitles, Criminal defendants have the ability to confront their accusers.
The idea being that even their argument is even in a preliminary hearing, we should be entitled to confront our accusers and cross examine them.
So if Twiggs isn't going to show up in person, then his video testimony should be excluded as hearsay.
And that certainly at trial, this would not be permissible, right?
Certainly at trial, Twiggs would not be able to just record his testimony and then send it in.
He'd have to show up in court to testify against Robinson, which I think everybody would agree is a sensible precaution, a way to ensure that.
You know, it's not a one sided presentation that Robinson's attorneys are able to cross examine him properly, which I actually look forward to because it'd be really interesting to see Twiggs himself cross examined by Robinson's lawyers and maybe Twiggs's culpability fully explored.
But, well, no, in the end, I think I don't think it'll ultimately matter one way or the other whether Twiggs is going to be able to testify at this hearing.
I mean, the judge might conclude that actually, yeah, he shouldn't be able to testify via recorded video, even though it's just a preliminary hearing.
But I think that's one of the issues that will be determined this afternoon is this specific question.
Well, it seems to be because they have this motion coming up now.
And again, to your point about the cross examination there, that's going to be very interesting because we've also seen in Robinson's defense statements questions about his parents and whether or not they'll be called.
It doesn't look like they're being called at the preliminary hearing, but it does appear that the defense expects the prosecution to call the parents at the The trial.
And of course, you know, all of this is just very unprecedented.
It is something that you do not typically see people this close to a defendant coming up and testifying.
Yeah.
Well, it's rare for parents to turn in their own children, but in this case, they did so.
And credit to them.
I think, you know, it's a real, real credit to the parents to understand that, to be pro social in that respect and understand that.
Amen.
Amen.
Whatever their affinity towards their son, they had to pick up the phone and make that call for my own kids.
Will, we are just about out of time.
We've got Libby Emmons right after you.
Where can people go to follow you?
At Will Chamberlain on X, and you can follow what the Article 3 Project is doing at A3PAction.com.
All right, folks, big hearing in the Tyler Robinson case coming up in just a couple hours.
We're previewing that here, Human Events Daily.
Stay tuned.
Jack, where's Jack?
Where's Jack?
Where is he?
Jack, I want to see you.
Great job, Jack.
Thank you.
What a job you do.
You know, we have an incredible thing.
We're always talking about the fake.
News in the bag, but we have guys, and these are the guys who should be getting bullish.
All right, folks, Jack Brasovic here, Human Events Daily.
Folks, let me be blunt.
Before the crashes of 1999 and 2008, a rare market signal appeared.
Most people ignored it.
The smart money did not.
Gold and stocks were rising at the same time, and that is not normal.
Stocks are supposed to rise when confidence is strong.
Gold rises when confidence starts to break.
They move in opposite directions until something underneath the system is off.
Right now, they're both breaking records again.
That's only happened twice before major market repricing events.
Does that mean a crash is tomorrow?
No.
But it does mean risk may be dangerously mispriced.
Gold doesn't surge because it's popular.
It moves when currency confidence weakens.
That explodes and central banks prepare quietly behind the scenes.
And here's what should get your attention banks are buying gold at record levels right now.
They're not guessing.
Gold doesn't depend on earnings, it doesn't depend on credit markets, it doesn't depend on political promises.
Stocks do.
If you have a savings or retirement account, you don't get a do over.
This is about protection, not speculation.
Call 844 577 POSO or visit protectwithposo.com.
That's 844 577 76 76 76 76 77 7 7 7 76 or protect with POSO.com.
Learn how a gold IRA can help shield what you have worked decades to build.
All right, we've got Libby Emmons on here, the editor in chief of the post millennial and human events.
Libby, how are you?
I'm good, Jack.
Thanks.
Well, Libby, so I know that you and the team are primed for this motion in the Tyler Robinson case, something that you've been covering extensively and we've been covering together, of course, at both sites.
And also, of course, we got name checked by Tyler Robinson's legal team.
Because of our open letter regarding cameras in the courtroom.
Talk to us about why it's important, specifically in this case, that we do get that ruling for, again, just the basic right of live streaming, of cameras, of having access to evidence in the interest of public transparency.
Yeah, I think it's essential that we have cameras in the courtroom so that we can get the truth as it unfolds in court before the judge, and so that people who are following this case, the public, Can see what's really going on and can understand that.
You have the defense who's really interested in getting rid of cameras from the courtroom because they say that it could harm jury selection, that it could bias jurors ahead of that time when they are doing the selection.
But what they're really saying when they say that is that they don't want truth to be out there.
They just want all the speculation and hearsay that is out there now to be the only thing that jurors hear.
They want jurors to be biased against convictions.
Tyler Robinson.
And that is, of course, something that we've seen across the internet.
We've seen lots of podcasters and people coming out saying, you know, that perhaps Robinson wasn't the guy or that there were all of these other conspiracies or things like that.
And that's the only thing that prospective jurors are going to hear if we don't have cameras in the courtroom so that people can really see what's going on.
The truth is the only antidote for all of the madness that we see out there surrounding this case.
And that's why it's so important to have cameras in the courtroom for the public.
And also, as you say, this is definitely a First Amendment issue.
The press has the right to cover this case.
Charlie Kirk was killed in public on live stream.
And I think that it's only right and just that the trial of his alleged killer should be on live stream as well.
Well, Libby, it's also that.
And even if you are someone who has questions, if you have skepticism, then surely you would want to see the evidence to have your own ability to weigh it, have your own ability.
To have access to what's going on.
And I've said that from the start that things like the ballistics report, things like different medical reports and different things that came out from the actual crime itself, that we do want these out in the public.
I want Tyler Robinson to have a fair trial.
I think that everyone deserves that.
And yes, even he deserves that.
Now, I also believe just having read the evidence myself that this is the guy and he should fry for it because that it that seems to be what it's stacked up against.
But I'm willing to go through that same process again.
And Libby, talk to us as well, by the way, because there is, there's even this question that I wanted to throw your way that we may get sort of a half, you know, kind of a half measure where we get a camera in the courtroom.
But if you notice the last camera in the last few hearings, it doesn't show the defendant, doesn't show Tyler Robinson, Kyle Rittenhouse, who's, you know, in the news because he's Spider Kyle now.
Is, you know, didn't have that luxury.
You know, he was on video every single day.
And also a question of whether or not we're going to be able to see the videos and other evidence as it's entered in.
So will that be shown on the live stream?
Yes or no?
I think there's actually a lot of aspects to this.
Yeah, I think so too.
And we have seen circumstances in the, you know, pretrial hearings and whatnot where the judge has witnessed things on video and those things have not been played on the live stream.
You also had the ruling from Judge Graff in the fall saying that Robinson could not be photographed or videoed while he was in shackles, that the shackles could not be seen, which means that he cannot be filmed or photographed entering or leaving court.
And there's been a lot of kerfuffle about moments when the camera person has panned over to him and accidentally caught something that, you know, perhaps they weren't supposed to catch.
And the defense has made a big stink about that.
But yes, there have been in these, In these hearings so far, we've seen the camera pulled back and moved out of the way and their location changed multiple times.
So, I do think that circumstances under which they are permitted to film and what they're permitted to film will be part of this ruling.
That's my guess.
And I do think that Graf, given what has gone on so far, will permit cameras in the courtroom.
And I certainly hope that he permits that for the entire trial.
And by the way, you know, this question of the delay in the hearing, that's also.
Something that's coming up, you know, I've seen now.
So, we just had Will Chamberlain on here, he says it's going to happen, it's going to go forward.
I've uh, we have Andrea Burkhart, the great Andrea Burkhart, on uh, she's come on the program, she thinks it'll go forward.
But I've also got other lawyers that are that are messaging me and and coming in as we talk, saying, Oh, you know, I'm not sure, you know, we might we could actually see a delay on a number of these things.
Do you have any sense on that?
Whether because again, this isn't about the actual trial itself, this is just about.
The presentation of charges and the probable cause, meaning the preliminary evidence that's been gathered.
Yeah, and I think that, you know, and this might just be a hopeful wish on my part, but I do think that Judge Graff is going to allow it to go forward.
The prosecutors made a really strong argument that a preliminary hearing is simply to establish if there's probable cause, and they had listed the evidence that they plan to bring to show that there's probable cause.
Now, for the defense, they want to have this delay, but if there's no probable cause that Robinson Is the guilty party, then why wouldn't they want to go ahead with the preliminary hearing, say that there is no probable cause, and get their guy sprung as quickly as possible?
It seems that they know there's probable cause.
The prosecutor knows that there's probable cause, and probably that probable cause should be shown so they can get this whole thing underway.
This has already been delayed.
There's been a lot of delays from the defense.
We even saw an instance where Judge Graff scolded the defense for not what he said prioritizing the scheduling for this capital case, which takes precedence over a lot of other things.
So we're going to have to see what happens.
But I would think that he would allow this to go forward.
He does seem like a man who's interested in expediency in this case.
Well, and not only that, you know, there's that question that really came up if Tyler Robinson's lawyers view him as innocent, if they view him as not guilty, why is it that they are the ones who are pushing for delay, knowing that he is incarcerated during any delay that may occur?
Yeah, that's such a huge point.
Real America's Voice Mission00:10:46
And it's such a really good question.
And it's one that I'm sure the defense doesn't want to answer because I think their tactic.
With the delays that they keep asking for, is to have this case continue to fall out of the public eye or to have there be a completely polluted group of potential jurors so that nobody can come in unbiased in this case.
I think that they want to do everything they can to try and get their client off on some kind of legal technicality rather than actually go through with a case that would show his guilt.
Right.
So if they think there's innocence, then please, you know, you'd think they'd be demanding their day in court.
You know, you got the wrong guy, and we're going to show you the evidence.
And, you know, this is the wrong person, and here's why.
The DNA doesn't match, the fingerprints don't match, the gun doesn't match, something.
So you'd think they would want to encourage that so that they could overturn these charges and get their client out of jail.
But instead, they're doing the opposite.
Libby Emmons, thank you for doing the yeoman's work on this.
Where can people go to follow all of the postmillennials coverage?
You can come check us out at thepostmillennial.com and humanevents.com.
Thank you so much.
All right, folks, we've got a very special segment coming up next with our good friend and someone that I have the utmost respect for, Brian Glenn, here on Real America's Voice, an integral member of the team.
Stay tuned.
We'll be right back.
Jack Vasobic Appreciation Hour.
I can say confidently, I believe, I think Josh Shapiro would be the vice presidential nominee if it wasn't for Jack.
Hi, America.
It's Brian Glenn.
I am excited to announce that I'm coming here to Real America's Voice.
Let's go.
Brian Glenn.
Brian, go ahead.
Brian, go ahead.
Oh, look at some friends in the back.
Brian, you didn't show up early enough to get some good real estate up here.
I'm very impressed that you asked that question because nobody knew that.
We love you, Brian.
Oh, I love you too.
He's a good man.
Brian.
Brian Glenn.
Brian Glenn.
Brian, welcome.
Why don't you wear a suit?
Why don't you wear a suit?
You're the highest level in this country's office, and you refuse to wear a suit.
Do you own a suit?
Maybe something like yours, yes.
Maybe something better, I don't know.
I like that guy.
Now that's called a question.
And he's a great reporter, actually.
President Zelensky, have a little bit of fun with me as well.
Yeah, you look good.
I said the same thing, President Zelensky.
And the same suit.
You see, I changed.
You are not.
But, you know.
Hello.
There you go.
You're popular.
Yeah, thank you very much.
You know what?
Here, hold this microphone.
Oh, gosh.
Here he goes.
Oh, my God.
Look at that.
I owe Brian Glenn five bucks.
I owe him five bucks.
I love it.
Is that a 5 a.m. shoot?
I need some more of those.
We're headed to Fort Bragg, North Carolina.
We finally made it to Switzerland.
Great state of Alaska here in Davos.
There's the wall.
There's Mexico that way.
At MetLife Stadium, waiting for President Trump's, these two characters right here.
We're in the DC Studio, surprise!
Stand over here in the corner.
In the corner.
This is the corner.
It's a good corner.
Good afternoon, everybody.
Good to see you all.
To be here covering it is a blessing of a lifetime.
Brian, you're not a second wife.
Trump was right about everything.
You got a forehead like this that collects a lot of moisture and a lot of sun.
Right here in Arizona.
Keep watching.
Thank you very much.
Turn off the camera.
This is a time within our party.
We have so many people that are so fractured on one side of the party, the other side of the party.
We're arguing about percentages and debt ceilings and all this stuff.
We're not our enemy.
The left, the radical left, the person who shot Charlie Kirk, that's our enemy.
This is a time, at least for me, to try to step back from the noise of the world and just really reflect on what you have your health, your family, your friends, your opportunities, and that you live in the greatest country in the world.
I'm very thankful.
For Real America's Voice.
I'm thankful for this network and its commitment to not only supporting the White House and supporting President Trump, but also supporting faith and freedom and family.
That's what this network is all about.
This past Sunday, sitting at home in Georgia, I decided that it's time to, and I'll use an MMA reference, it's time to leave the gloves in the ring and walk away.
The people of Real America's Voice, they are just not the owners of a conservative news outlet that love this country.
They genuinely love their employees.
They are one of the best companies.
They are the best company that I've ever worked for.
We love you, Brian.
And we've got, of course, the great Brian Glenn with us.
Brian, man, the way that thing ended, I thought this was like, rest in peace, Brian Glenn.
What's going on?
Yeah, I don't know, Jack, if people should send flowers to mourn this.
It sounds like an obituary.
Put some dates on the end of it and call it a day.
No, it is a great tribute video that Clayton and the folks at Real America's Voice put together to kind of highlight my time here.
And, Jack, it's been a Pure pleasure of being here at the White House and covering the White House for Real America's Voice and for you as well for human events.
It's just been an honor, Jack.
And I just want to say thank you to you and everyone else behind the camera.
Yeah, I remembered that so many times we do this stuff and we just move on to the next thing.
And I was sitting there, I was like, oh, yeah, I was out in Davos with you and we did the Alaska, that one.
And I can't even remember rallies and all the rest of it, even going back to.
I want to say 2020 is probably when I first started, you know, kind of rubbing elbows at different rallies and stuff with you out there.
So I certainly hope that I do get to bump into you from time to time again, man.
You can't go out completely.
Now, I can't go out completely, but it is kind of a step back.
And I said this on the morning show.
I want everyone watching this right now, you need to get your news of the day.
Okay.
Got to stay informed.
You got to do what you got to do.
But I say disconnect.
You got to get back in the real world.
Don't spend your time on X battling with some booger eater or some bot about.
Policies about the Hermoose, Straight of Hermoose, or anything like that, or Israel.
Just don't waste your time on it.
I want people to really take their life back and prioritize their family and themselves.
And that's a little bit of what I'm doing, Jack.
I'm just stepping away from this whole world of television news and getting back into the real world and reconnecting with people that I have neglected the last six, seven years of being on this Trump campaign.
But I enjoyed every bit of it.
I enjoy working with colleagues like yourself.
We've got a great company.
We've got great people here at the White House, actually, up and down.
Pebble Beach.
Obviously, great people in the press room.
I've got nothing but praise for everybody who runs the comms team here with the Trump administration.
President Trump doing what he's doing and trying to fight and save America.
So I'm on board there, and I will continue to keep an eye on everything.
But as far as the day to day basis of coming to the White House, I'm going to put my gloves in the ring as an MMA fighter would do.
Put the gloves in.
The ring.
No, I, it's, it's, it's incredible to see, man.
I mean, you're definitely, when I was coming up, you were someone that I looked to to say, hey, that's, that's a guy who does the job right.
So, you know, take, take what you can learn from this guy, take a look at him and say, this is someone who has got it down on lock.
Because I, you know, I came from the world of social media originally and I wasn't really doing the on air stuff.
It was just sort of a new, you know, a new world for me.
And so I was looking for people that I thought did the job right.
And you were one of them.
You always were, man.
Well, I appreciate it.
You know what?
In my role into all of this, I kind of fell into it, to be honest with you.
I got fired from the biggest broadcast company that owns all the most TV stations in the country.
I got fired from them for really talking about COVID and talking about the mask mandates and the vaccine passports and all that stuff.
They didn't want to talk about anything like that.
And they knew I was a Trump supporter.
So when they whacked me, I got out of that.
And well, then next thing you know, I'm end up on Right Side Broadcasting Network.
Very appreciative of those folks giving me a chance to really shine.
And then, of course, transitioning over to Real America's Voice, a much larger platform with shows and programming and the opportunity to come here at the White House.
So, for any young journalist out there that wants to get into the business, as long as you do what Jack Posobic does and what Charlie Kirk did and what all the personalities on Real America's Voice, as long as you tell the truth and you're very truthful and upfront with the American people, who cares about the critics?
Who If you're standing on the truth, that's all that matters.
And that's all that we've ever tried to do here at Real America's Voice.
You may not agree with some of the stuff I say, the viewers, but I try to break it down and try to be truthful.
And I try to be critical at times of the Republican Party, which we got to.
I don't just fall like sheep and just take whatever they say.
We must hold people accountable, Jack.
And that's one thing that you do really well you hold people accountable and you call out, you call balls and strikes.
And that's what we try to do here at Real America's Voice.
Hold People Accountable00:00:51
I tried that, Brian.
I want to ask if you can.
There is.
And speaking of holding people accountable, you know, I do have to ask you about this rumor that's been going around the office that you've purchased plane tickets to Kiev and you're actually planning on going suit shopping with Vladimir Zelensky.
Is this true?
Can you confirm these rumors?
I cannot confirm or deny, but I will confirm that I picked up probably that I picked up.
I will confirm this that I picked up the only bottle of Russian vodka.
That's in this country after 2022 because Joe Biden put a block on any kind of imports.