April 7, 2026 - Human Events Daily - Jack Posobiec
47:39
The Countdown to the Deadline, Plus Prosecutors Slam Delay Request Filed by Tyler Robinson Defense
Jack Posobiec details President Trump's April 7, 2026 ultimatum to Iran, threatening destruction by noon if the Strait of Hormuz deal fails, while noting North Korea's withdrawal and a massive U.S. naval presence including the USS Ford. He then exposes defense attorney Tyler Robinson's baseless May 18 hearing delay tactics despite overwhelming evidence like DNA on a screwdriver and multiple confessions. Posobiec concludes by highlighting a Catholic conversion surge under Pope Leo XIV and advocating for "retaking cities" via broken windows theory to combat urban decay and binge drinking. [Automatically generated summary]
Transcriber: CohereLabs/cohere-transcribe-03-2026, sat-12l-sm, and large-v3-turbo
|
Time
Text
Iran Strikes Oil Infrastructure00:07:18
Hey guys, it's Jack.
I wanted to let you know that we're starting a new push for subscriptions here on Human Events Daily.
So make sure that when you're listening to this podcast, you hit subscribe, you download it, and you share it with five of your friends.
Make sure they're all going and downloading as well because we need to get the signal out as much as possible.
Look, we've done so much over the past couple of years since this show started, and we're only going to do so much more.
Let's get it.
This is what happens when the Fourth turning meets fifth generation warfare.
A commentator, international social media sensation, and former Navy intelligence veteran.
This is Human Events with your host, Jack Posobic.
Christ is King.
Donald Trump says he has given Iran a final notice.
Do a deal by tomorrow night, 8 p.m. Eastern, or he said we're blowing up the whole country.
We have a plan because of the power of our military, where every bridge in Iran.
Will be decimated by 12 o'clock tomorrow night, where every power plant in Iran will be out of business, burning, exploding, and never to be used again.
I mean, complete demolition by 12 o'clock.
The president telling reporters yesterday it would take less than four hours for the U.S. to destroy Iran's power plants and bridges.
Iranian officials called the president delusional.
The entire country could be taken out in one night.
The president.
Brushing off any suggestion that hitting those targets would constitute committing a war crime.
Oh, no, no, I'm not.
I hope I don't have to do it.
He is issuing this warning this morning here, saying a whole civilization will die tonight if a deal isn't made to reopen the Strait of Hormuz.
Iran rejected a proposed 45 day ceasefire deal on Monday, saying they want a permanent end to the war instead.
North Korea appears to be quietly pulling back from longtime partner Iran while keeping its options open with the United States.
New reports of explosions on Karg Island.
This handles almost all of Iran's oil exports, about 90%.
If you look at that map, it's actually, yeah, you can see it all the way up there at the top of the Persian Gulf there, just off the coast of Iran.
President Trump has repeatedly threatened to bomb or seize the island, and there have been strikes before.
We feel confident that we can get a response, whether it's positive or negative.
We're going to get a response from the Iranians by 8 o'clock tonight.
I hope they make the right response, because what we really want. is we want a world where oil and gas is flowing freely, where people can afford to heat their homes and cool their homes, where people can afford to transport themselves to work.
That's not going to happen if the Iranians are engaged in acts of economic terrorism.
So they've got to know we've got tools in our toolkit that we so far haven't decided to use.
The President of the United States can decide to use them, and he will decide to use them if the Iranians don't change their course of conduct.
Ladies and gentlemen, welcome on board today's edition of Human Events Daily.
We're here live on Real America's Voice.
Today is April 7th, 2026.
Anno Domini, President Trump, coming out early today with perhaps his most belligerent language yet regarding this evening's deadline.
We are six hours away now from this deadline that he's given to the Iranian leadership, talking about destroying the civilization.
Talking about total and complete regime change, but also saying that perhaps there can be a way to move on past this and reaching out to the people of Iran itself.
And when you look at what is out there within the United States military arsenal right now, within the region, within the area, you've got multiple carriers.
You've got the Lincoln right there in the Indian Ocean.
You've got The Ford, and I've been tracking on this.
It looks like the Ford is still operating in the eastern Mediterranean.
The CVN 78 operating the East Med out of port from Croatia.
And then, of course, we've got the USS George H.W. Bush, CVN 77, has departed its home port as of yesterday.
And we're told that it is also making its way to the Middle East.
So that's two aircraft carriers within range of Iran, as well as their entire fighter and bomber.
Compliments on them as well as the surface combatants.
So, 8 to 13 Arleigh Burke guided missile destroyers spread across the Arabian Sea, the Red Sea, the East Med, the Strait of Hormuz approaches, the Persian Gulf, and the Persian Gulf, as we know, are in the Persian Gulf region.
That's your Tomahawk capability.
Also, of course, your submarines that the United States has as well in the area, the littoral combat ships, the Canberra, the Tulsa, the Santa Barbara.
Operating that had been based out of Iran and those marine ships, the Tripoli and the Boxer, which we know are within region as well.
Not to mention, of course, the air assets that we have simply from the United States Air Force bombers, fighters, those F 18 Echo Strike Eagles, the B 2 bombers, the multiple refuelers that we have to be able to keep this up, all of course can be brought to bear.
Today, on or tonight, at least in on U.S. East Coast time, Eastern Standard Time, where we've seen the ability of the administration to strike into Iran itself.
Now, potentially looking to strike oil refineries, oil infrastructure, other infrastructure, including the bridge that we saw that was targeted over the weekend, Karg Island, the president has made numerous posts about, other military infrastructure could certainly be hit, as well as defense infrastructure within Iran.
And so We could see quite a bit tonight, or things potentially could go down another road.
That's what we're here, of course, at Human Events Daily, setting up and being prepared to cover in full.
And we'll be able to give you all those details as it sees fit.
But as it comes down to now, as it comes down to now, President of the United States, the world, Iran, all wait, and everything is held in the balance.
Six hours to go.
We will be here.
I know I'll be here.
Human Events Daily will always be here.
In fact, we'll be right back here on Real America's Voice.
Ladies and gentlemen, stay tuned.
Delaying The Preliminary Hearing00:14:25
Stand in our way, and our golden age has just begun.
This is Human Events with Jack Posobic.
Now it's time for everyone to understand what America First truly means.
Welcome to the Second American Revolution.
All right, folks, Jack Posobic back live here, Human Events Daily.
And folks, let me be blunt.
Before the crashes of 1999 and 2008, a rare market signal appeared.
Most people ignored it, the smart money did not.
Gold and stocks were rising at the same time, and that is not normal.
Stocks are supposed to rise when confidence is strong.
Gold rises when confidence starts to break.
They move in opposite directions until something underneath the system is off.
And right now, they're both breaking records again.
This has only happened twice before major market repricing events.
Does that mean a crash is tomorrow?
No.
But it does mean risk may be dangerously mispriced.
Gold doesn't surge because it's popular.
It moves when currency confidence weakens.
Debt explodes and central banks prepare quietly behind the scenes.
And here's what should get your attention banks are buying gold at record levels right now.
They're not guessing.
Gold doesn't depend on earnings, doesn't depend on credit markets, doesn't depend on political promises.
Stocks do.
And if you have a savings or retirement account, you don't get a do over.
This is about protection, not speculation.
Call 844 577 POSO or visit protectwithposo.com.
That's 844 577 76 76.
Or protectwithposo.com.
Learn how a gold IRA can help shield what you have worked decades to build.
Call 844 577 7676.
Well, folks, last week there was much ballyhoo online about a defense filing that took place in the Tyler Robinson case.
And of course, this is the case determining the outcome of guilt, not guilt, right?
On the question of who murdered Charlie Kirk.
And.
That went hyper viral because of a completely out of context defense claim made by the Daily Mail.
It was ridiculous.
It was community noted.
And many people shared it without any real, you know, any real critical thinking.
But in reality, anyone who thought about it for two seconds when they were making this question about the claims regarding the ballistics report in Charlie's murder, they didn't actually look into what the article itself said.
Or what the report itself said.
Well, that was from the defense side.
Now the prosecutors have made their response and they're pretty much slamming not only all of the arguments that the defense made in their briefing, but also they're coming up and pointing out that once again, these are delay after delay after delay tactics, not only in the case itself, but in the preliminary hearing, which is set to take place just a little over one month.
Away from today, I believe it's May 18th for the preliminary hearing.
Because keep in mind, folks, Tyler Robinson has not even had this because of the way Utah politics works, or excuse me, the Utah courts work, that Tyler Robinson has not yet had to plead guilty or not guilty.
He hasn't even entered that formal plea yet.
So the preliminary hearing, which is the hearing where the probable cause is brought, the charges are brought, the reason for charges is brought, and then the evidence is laid out.
That hasn't even occurred yet.
And this is the way Utah law works.
But again, the lawyers keep trying over and over and over to delay.
His defense team attempts to delay.
And what's interesting.
is that the case, and we brought this up last week, the situation regarding this ballistics report, they said, oh, well, you know, the ballistics, it's, you know, we haven't been able to get a match yet between the rifle and the bullet fragment that was recovered during Charlie's autopsy.
What's going on with that?
Well, as it turns out, that further testing hasn't been able to occur because of a delay in the case of the bullet fragment that was caused by the defense's own objection in the first place.
And so the state's responding here saying, this is completely ridiculous.
You're making an argument that the delay should give cause for delaying the actual hearing itself.
When the state responds, the reason that there's a delay is you objected to the testing.
Why are they objecting to the testing?
Why don't they want more testing being done in the ballistics here?
This is all very confusing from the perspective of a client that would be perhaps, oh, I don't know, innocent, but of course, completely consistent with the idea.
That these are all delay tactics because they know their client is in fact guilty and doesn't really have anything else to stand on.
So, here to walk me through and all of us through this, and perhaps if I've got any of my legal analysis incorrect, he will be certain to correct me, is Will Chamberlain from the Article 3 Project.
Will, how are you?
Always good to be with you, Jack.
I'm doing good.
Will, and as we know, look, I always get my nomenclature wrong on this, but is my general sense on this correct?
And I read through this document in full last night as well as By the way, the Daily Caller, and I'll shout out to those guys.
They released some information.
I'm not going to get into it right now, but more about the day of what happened on September 10th, 2025, on that campus.
They've got a response from the campus.
Not a lot in there, but some interesting tidbits I want to get into later.
But, Will, regarding this, is that kind of what we're seeing?
Are we seeing the prosecutors just get a little frustrated about these delay tactics?
A little bit.
I mean, I think they just are responding to a pretty bad and weak motion in the way that I would expect prosecutors to respond with the correct arguments here.
I mean, let's understand what this motion is trying to do.
They're not trying to delay the trial in the motion itself.
They're trying to delay a preliminary hearing where there's a question of whether there's probable cause.
And at the preliminary hearing, all the evidence that the prosecutors present is evaluated in the way most favorable to the prosecution, because the idea is like, can we even go forward with a case at this point?
And so the defense's argument is well, we haven't completed all expert discovery yet, meaning we haven't.
Exchange expert reports, had our experts review their expert reports, blah, blah, blah.
So we can't even have a preliminary hearing because we haven't done that.
Well, that's bogus.
Expert discovery is one of the last things that you handle in either civil or criminal discovery.
And it certainly, in the criminal context, doesn't get completed before you can have a preliminary hearing because all you need to do is it's the same probable cause, is the same thing you need to arrest somebody.
So, in the same way that they had probable cause to arrest the guy, obviously, given the enormous weight of evidence they were able to uncover even within 48 hours, they clearly have probable cause to have a.
There's sufficient probable cause.
To have a preliminary hearing.
And moreover, the prosecutors have turned over every bit of evidence they've had to the defense.
There's no prejudice.
And the final point I'll make before I'll let you get back to this if the defense really had some gotcha piece of evidence here or some gotcha fact, like the one that was blasted all over the Daily Mail and blasted all over social media a week ago, if that was really dispositive, they would be rushing to trial.
They would want to get to trial as quickly as possible to prevent the prosecutors from fixing their case.
But they don't have that.
They're just throwing stuff out randomly to the media to create doubt.
And then they're also trying to delay, delay, delay what they see, I'm sure, as an inevitable outcome here.
Well, well, and to your point, that something dispositive would be, say, oh, I don't know, a case where the actual Daily Mail's headline had stood up.
So if that had stood up under scrutiny where it said, hey, we conducted ballistics analysis of this bullet that was found in the victim's autopsy and this rifle, and we found that it's not the same rifle, oh my gosh, they would be saying, let's go to trial right now.
This will be great.
Or, you know, quite frankly, they probably wouldn't be having to have this argument in.
In court motions, they'd probably be, you know, talking in person about whether or not these charges should continue.
That would be the type of evidence you'd be looking for.
If you have ballistics disproving the prosecution's theory, then there wouldn't be probable cause, which means you'd want a preliminary hearing so you could get your client out of jail because then the judge might agree there's no probable cause and toss the case.
But no, that's not what's happening at all, obviously.
No, so that's not which.
And by the way, so if you are someone, right, who fell for that Daily Mail headline and we had people, I had Vita Duffy on here and it was a great.
Interview because she didn't fall for it, but she said, Well, I'm confused.
She said, I was confused by it.
I didn't understand what it really meant and what it meant for the case.
And then we walked through it and explained how the and, and, and, well, I love the way you put that because the actions of the defense team don't even line up with what people are saying that these headlines mean because you're exactly right.
They would want to continue the trial.
And in fact, Erica herself has said many times, including invoking this special victim's privilege.
That Utah has where they push for the speedy right, the right of speedy trial to go forward as a victim's right, which is something, by the way, the state brings up multiple times in this motion to say, look, you know, we've got competing rights here and you guys just want to delay, delay, delay, delay.
I mean, it has been over six months and we haven't even had a preliminary hearing yet.
Yeah, that's exactly right.
I mean, you know, you can ignore the daily mail headlines and look at what the defense is asking.
What the defense is trying to accomplish.
A defense that had clear cut evidence that their client was innocent would not try and delay a preliminary hearing while their client is remanded on bail.
Remember, Tyler Robinson is not out of jail.
He is sitting in jail.
And if you're a lawyer with a client sitting in jail who you believe is innocent and who you have evidence to demonstrate is innocent, you'd be rushing to the courthouse.
You'd be trying to get a hearing ASAP because you could put an end to this nonsense very, very quickly.
And you have evidence of actual innocence, which is what this would be.
But that's not, of course, what the defense is doing.
And instead, they're talking to the Daily Mail.
They're trying to delay, delay, delay because they want to take as much time as possible to create stuff like the Daily Mail headline to create doubt in the minds of a potential future juror pool.
And that's clearly what's going on here.
The game that is being played is not whether or not the trial, you know, the game that's being played is not weighing the evidence in the case.
It's weighing the narrative warfare.
It's the narrative warfare and the information warfare, something I'm quite familiar with, that is going on prior to this getting into court.
Because the more time you're outside of court, the more time you can use to push whatever theories you want or whatever nonsense or whatever out of context or spin that you can put on something. into the minds of any potential juror, seed whatever narratives you want out into the populace, and then, and only then until you feel like you've got to that point, then you can go to trial.
So it doesn't seem to be a rush to want to go to trial at all.
Why is that if you're so concerned with the innocence of your client?
Really simple.
Right back, Jack Sobek, Will Chamberlain, Human Events Daily.
You talk about influencers.
These are influencers.
And they're friends of mine.
Jack Brsovich.
Where's Jack?
Jack.
He's done a great job.
All right, ladies and gentlemen, we're back here.
Human Events Daily, Real America's Voice.
And I want to dig in through some more of this filing in the latest update in the Tyler Robinson case.
Utah prosecutors responding to that headline last week.
And I should say that motion that generated a headline that.
You know, went viral, but it was a complete misleading claim that they're now pushing it back against these delay tactics completely.
But it, and here's an important line I think that really jumped out at me is aside from forensic reports, so they talk about all the forensics and all the hoopla around the forensic situation.
Of course, we need to get into all that as well.
But they also state, aside from all the forensics, the evidence will also include images of the defendant at the scene.
Incriminating evidence in his possession, no further information, NFI on that, and multiple confessions.
So, Will, I want to get you on here real quick to explain this to us.
When they're saying that we have this evidence outside of the forensics, is that what they're going for in terms of trying to say, look, the forensics are there, but even without the forensics, we could still make our case?
Yeah, no, it's totally not necessarily for a preliminary hearing, right?
You've got, even without forensics, you've got the The pictures of the guy, and then you've got all the confessions, and then you've got the process that led to him being turned in.
That's all testimonial evidence.
That's not forensics.
So you have sufficient.
I mean, all of that is sufficient for probable cause.
I mean, remember, they didn't have, you know, when they made the arrest, they didn't have DNA evidence, I don't think from Tyler Robinson yet, because obviously they didn't know who he was.
They caught him on the basis of the video evidence and then the family turning him in.
And that was sufficient for probable cause.
So, you know, none of this is.
There's, I mean, it's just an example.
Like, there's so much evidence here.
This is not a case that comes down to the forensics on the gun, although, obviously, the forensics of the gun support the prosecution because his DNA is all over it.
But yeah, this is pretty simple.
And in fact, I believe there's also going to be, and this is in the case, this is in this filing as well.
Screwdriver Found On Roof00:04:28
They're bringing up again a screwdriver, which was found on the roof of the building, the Sorensen Center, because presumably because that screwdriver was used to reassemble the gun that he had used it in a state of disassembly where part of it was down one leg and part of it was sort of underneath the shirt.
And he concealed it in his clothing so that he could be able to walk up to.
That roof then uses the screwdriver to reassemble it, takes the shop, but for whatever reason, you know, I'm sure in his haste, leaves the screwdriver with the DNA on it, the touch DNA on it on the roof.
And so, Will, that's important because that not only does that put him, you know, kind of explain the concealing process, but as we can see even in the images that are being shown right now, that we don't see any rifle in the images.
We just see this strange gate, which is, you know, later explained by the concealing of the rifle.
But also, it puts him on the top of the roof.
So, forensically, they can say, well, this guy was on the roof, and we know because the screwdriver was found on the roof, et cetera, et cetera.
And also, by the way, we know from the defense filing, when you mentioned testimonial evidence, what we're going to see is his parents, who played a huge part, obviously played the key part in identifying him to law enforcement, are going to be called to testify, or at least are on the witness list and expected to testify, as well as his boyfriend.
And I'm sure that the parents are going to be asked to testify regarding.
The identification and make sure that they're able to hold up the story that's in the charging document.
And then the boyfriend more than likely is going to be asked to attest to the veracity of these text messages that they've presented.
And I'm sure they're going to look at him and say, you know, show him the text and say, hey, were these your messages?
And, you know, were these his responses?
Do I have that right?
Yeah.
That's, I mean, that's the kind of thing you'd put them up there to say.
Anything, you know, you'd put the family up there to explain.
You'd walk them through the story of how they discovered they thought it was him, what, What Tyler would have said to them, because that might be hearsay, but it's an admission against interest.
So that's one of many hearsay exceptions that would likely be applicable here.
So they'd almost certainly be able to bring in testimony as to everything.
Go ahead.
So let me ask you that admission against interest.
So, are you saying in the fact that, you know, that a father and mother don't have an interest in turning their own child in?
Correct.
But I'm talking about it's they could also probably testify as to what Tyler said when they confronted him because Tyler's statements would be admissions against interests.
They'd also probably qualify as excited utterances.
So, you know, you'd think, oh, it's hearsay, right?
Like, you know, it would be the parents testifying about what somebody else said.
That's classic hearsay.
Yeah.
In that case, it's a very, very clear except, though there's obvious exceptions that would apply to that party.
It's also the admissions of the party in interest.
That's another hearsay exception.
So it's, you know, that testimony would come into as well.
So they could go through the whole story about how they figured out how they identified Tyler in those photos, how they confronted him, how he responded.
All of it can come into evidence.
And now in this hearing, so they're calling witnesses, they're testifying.
Defense has their role to play.
What do you, if when they're walking through a story like this, and when you have the boyfriend up there as well, what sort of cross examination would you then expect to find from the defense team?
You know, they're, you know, these are his parents.
These are some of the people that he's closest with in his entire life.
So, what do you really do with a situation like that?
You might do nothing.
That's actually a really hard cross to do effectively, especially.
I mean, I think what you might want to do, you might bring them back on your own direct to try and discuss.
Sort of more independent matters about his character, about whatever you think you might be able to get out of them in a positive way.
But cross is limited to the issues brought up on direct examination.
So I don't know unless you really can want to hurt one of these people.
Maybe you would go after the boyfriend and try and put more of the blame on him somehow.
But even if you did that, you'd still be condemning your client because if the boyfriend's at fault, then clearly the client pulled the trigger.
So there's not really a lot of good cross examination material there.
Ghostbed Mattress Review00:04:06
Well, and Will, you know when that's going to come up is.
You know, let's not get too far ahead of ourselves.
But if he is found indeed guilty because this is a capital case, I certainly believe that's when the influence of the boyfriend or just influence of others is going to come up, will be in the death penalty phase.
Yeah, I think that's right.
Yeah.
Will Chamberlain, where can people go to follow you and get your work?
At Will Chamberlain on X and A3PAction.com to follow what the Article 3 project is up to.
And check them out and check out the article as well, folks, up on the post millennial.
And don't take my word for it, check it out.
Full.
We got Kevin Posobic.
We had him in studio yesterday.
We were able to sit down and pre tape a couple of great segments with him.
So make sure you stay tuned.
You've never seen this before.
Some of the hottest issues going on in our world this Easter season.
Human Events Daily, right back.
Jack, where's Jack?
Where is he?
Jack, I want to see you.
Great job, Jack.
Thank you.
What a job you do.
You know, we have an incredible thing.
We're always talking about the fake news and the bad, but we have guys, and these are the guys who should be getting publishers.
All right, ladies and gentlemen, welcome on board.
We're back here, Human Events Daily.
And, folks, I got to tell you something.
I was, so I was down on, um, On a little bit of a, I was out of town.
I was out of town this weekend.
Let's put it that way.
I was out of town for a little bit, had to sleep on a hotel bed, and my back was killing me.
I did not like this bed.
It was so rough and lumpy and just bad.
Everything about it was just bad.
And I woke up, and you know what?
You sleep on a bad bed and then you just feel crappy all day.
That's how I felt on this thing.
And then I went home.
And I went home to my ghost bed.
And let me tell you something.
We got Kevin Posobic here in studio.
Kevin!
That's right.
You famously do not invest.
In anything, uh, you don't even sleep on a mattress, do you?
Well, especially when we travel, I get the couch.
Yeah, Kevin, you either sleep on the couch, the floor at home, you just gotta make it.
You got a couple of burlap sacks on the floor, right?
At home, that's right, something like that, just on top of each other.
Kevin, we need to get you a ghost bed, and you know, actually, because you're down in Florida most of the time, you're here in DC right now, but you're down in Florida most of the time, they even have their setup right down in Florida because they're family owned, they're family operated, three generations of doing business.
Let me tell you something, me and Tanya.
Tanya and I have the hybrid bed.
So it's sort of like a regular mattress.
You have the support of a regular mattress combined with the memory foam.
So giving you that customizable, sort of like built to you feeling of the custom bed that you would get with memory foam.
But it's a little bit more support.
So you can actually roll off it, you can move.
It's not like the hybrid bed.
You don't sink into it.
Yeah, you don't sink, which drives me nuts.
When the memory foam, I did it once years ago.
We had one, I forget.
Gosh, I want to say, probably when Tanya and I first got together, we had that one, and I just couldn't do it.
I couldn't do it at all.
Here's the coolest thing about the Ghostbed.
You're going to love this because, Kevin, I know you're someone you like to take your time with things.
You like to move slow.
You like to kind of really get your teeth into something.
So, Ghostbed, listen to this for 101 nights, will allow you to try a Ghostbed at home.
And if you don't feel the difference, you can send it back risk free.
So, right now, Ghostbed is offering our audience, and that includes you, Kevin.
Okay.
Their lowest prices of the season, plus an extra 10% off.
So, Kevin, one of the reasons that while you're here in DC, I wanted to sit down with you and get you on is this news.
And I see report after report coming out this Easter.
Catholic Faith Journeys00:07:28
I think it started with the New York Times.
Roman Catholic Church sees a surge of new.
Converts.
New Jersey seeing a surge in people converting to Catholicism.
Iowa, a surge in Catholic converts.
And just over and over and over, headline after headline after headline of reports of a surge in Catholicism.
And Kevin, I know that you're someone who's been tweeting about this.
Obviously, you and I were both raised Catholic, St. Pat's got our sacraments done.
So, what is it though?
So, coming from the perspective of two cradle Catholics, what do you see as a rise and a return to Catholicism and specifically traditional Catholicism with the Latin Mass, what do you attribute this to?
Oh my goodness, well, what do I attribute it to?
Would be the Holy Spirit, of course.
No question.
Ideally.
And I would attribute it to this decline in culture all around, as we see in cities, the degradation of just the social contract, really.
We've got third worlders coming in, immigrants coming in, cultures clashing.
So we're seeing that nationwide, and if not worldwide, arguably worse in Europe.
But I would attribute it to.
A rejection of that, and you know, we spoke about this a rejection of modernity, a rejection of modernity, absolutely.
Yeah, yeah, and especially amongst zoomers, uh, in that we discuss this all the time between that they're they're they have this purity thing where they're either hard all the way this way or hard all the way against that way.
There's really, I put it this way zoomers have no middle, that's right, there's no middle, yeah.
So they're very interested in coming back to oh, my goodness, like everybody's dressed in sharp, I'm not the most dressed.
Sharp today, but women are wearing dresses again and veils, even.
And what's this all about?
So it's a balance between that and then also we have these pizza parties springing up all over New York City.
And it's one thing to be like, hey, come into church with grease and pepperoni slices, stains on your shirt, come in or whatever, go into a social beforehand.
Aftermath, that's what we're talking about.
Because you are actually, and you know, as cradle cats, we can point out that you are supposed to fast one to two hours prior to receiving communion.
Yes, but even that's being walked back via modernity.
No, I don't like that.
We don't like that.
I fast before communion.
I've always done it.
I actually can't think of a time that I didn't do it.
I really, and it bothers me.
It actually bothers me if I eat before communion.
So it's exciting.
It's amazing this tidal wave surge of conversions coming in, and that's of course what we want, but how do we make it so it's not just another.
New Year's resolution, where you go to the gym for a week or a month and then it's not trendy anymore.
And how do we retain these new souls?
Because it's much more than just, okay, it's gym season or tanning season.
This is your life.
This is your soul we're talking about here.
And I'm getting a lot of that.
I have a lot of Catholic sources.
I have sources in New York City.
So we'll have to follow up on this.
A lot of Catholic sources.
I do.
You do.
You still got your Vatican press ID from the Conclave.
Yeah, you got yours too, brother.
Yeah.
So that's what we're focused on.
Of course, we want socials, but we want to be modest about this.
Yes, hopefully, have it after Mass.
And there's nothing wrong with that.
My church outside of Philadelphia, we would have coffee and donuts in the basement.
You have men's night.
Sometimes you can have women's night.
And the priest himself will be down there in the basement as the bartender, just getting the guys together, cigars, beer, liquor, whatever, and have fraternity.
And of course, ideally, it's much more than that.
We want to be seeing group rosaries.
We want to be seeing Bible studies.
We want to be reading papal encyclicals.
This is called Holy League and instituted by Cardinal Burke.
Well, I'm sorry, it was resurrected by Cardinal Burke.
So we have.
National Catholic Register reports that 1.4 billion people are now Catholic.
And New York City, the diocese yesterday reported around 3,500 converts.
Okay, and it's great.
It's amazing.
3,500?
In New York City.
Wow.
Yeah, in New York City.
That's amazing.
So again, yeah, how do we retain this?
Because the whole trad influencer thing is kind of getting bashed online, and everybody thinks it's about one thing.
It's not a brand, it's not like a lifestyle brand, it's a way of life.
It's a way of actually living for something bigger than yourself.
It's living for God.
It's living as Christ instituted when Christ brought the church.
You know, I know, and, you know, a lot of my friends, you know, of course we read the Bible.
Remember, Jesus didn't write a book, right?
He founded a church.
And so for many of us, that's the way that we try as hard as possible as we can to live.
And as Catholics, of course, we say, what is a good Catholic?
A Catholic is a bad Catholic trying to be a good Catholic, right?
That's a good Catholic.
That's right.
That's right.
And by the way, another example of this, just to throw out there, is that we have JD Vance.
We have the new book coming out from our vice president talking about his conversion to Catholicism, where he sort of started as a low church evangelical.
I think he moved to Methodist or maybe Pentecostal, and then eventually to Catholicism and sort of his faith journey.
And a lot of people are on these faith journeys.
And I certainly want to throw out to anybody that we're ecumenical here.
We're not saying that you have to be one or the other, but we are saying that we are Catholics.
And we've always been Catholics or Polish, kind of only come with one flavor that way.
And that it's just cool.
It's cool to see people having the interest, and I hope they stick with it.
I think that's where you're coming from, too.
Yes, they absolutely stick with it.
And we should have them send their confirmation names in the email.
Oh, yeah.
So if you let us know your confirmation name, let us know your confirmation.
1776 at humanvents.com.
That's it.
Yeah.
And what's the name of JD's new book?
It's Communion.
Communion.
Okay.
And that comes on the heels of Pope Leo XIV himself.
Talked about communion specifically because, you know, our Catholic sources are concerned about the different rites.
So the Latin Mass itself being retained as well.
So he is addressing the communion between the Novus Ordo Masses and Latin Masses moving forward.
And that's that way.
So for folks to know, that's the Mass in the vernacular language.
That's Vatican II style modern Mass versus the ancient traditional Latin Mass.
Just so you know, Kevin is a big, big.
Latin Mass proponent, but I believe he said that he didn't want there to be division.
He wants there to be communion, and that he called it the generous inclusion of those attached to the Latin Mass.
And we certainly appreciate Pope Leo's call for the communion there.
Kevin and I, of course, as you may remember, both attended his papal conclave and his invective there in Rome.
Boston Baseball Movement00:09:49
Right back here at Human Events Daily, Real America's Voice.
So, we're going to call this the Jack Posobic Appreciation Hour.
I can say confidently, I believe, I think Josh Shapiro would be the vice presidential nominee if it wasn't for Jack Posobic.
And that is, I'm being honest.
All right, and we're back.
Jack Posobic, Kevin Posobic, Human Events Daily, Real America's Voice.
Now, Kev, I got to ask you this thing.
Did you see super viral this past weekend?
So, Fenway Park, they had their opener baseball seasons back, and this was going all over the place.
This video, That the Boston Red Sox posted of, I guess it was just Boston in the 1950s.
And you look at some of these scenes and you look at the amount of virality that it went through.
And I think just looking at it, you know, people say, wait a minute, you know, what happened to our cities?
And for me, that's the reason it went so viral.
It wasn't so, and by the way, I think they had to turn off the comments.
That really got on it, yeah, on Twitter because people are looking at this going, Oh my gosh, nobody's fat, everybody is well dressed, everybody is clean, everything seems very bright, and obviously, it's you know, beautiful weather on this day.
But you see, women wearing like white gloves as they go to a baseball game, and it's just you know, you compare that.
I'm just gonna say it like I'm gonna say it right now that there's nothing look, you want a hot take?
Wait, guys, throw me up on this when I say this.
Nothing.
There's nothing worse that I see in sports or anywhere than when I go to go see some sporting event or I go to watch sports on TV and there's nothing worse than I see a bunch of women out there just binge drinking, slamming beers.
Taylor Swift did it a couple years ago at a Chiefs game.
I mean, to put this in perspective, the Boston Red Sox Fenway Park is the oldest stadium in Major League Baseball, and it's downtown in the middle of the city, okay?
It is the holy grail, okay?
And what we've seen here is, you know, this is the land of the green monster, okay, in left field.
This is a very, very, very famous stadium.
America's pastime, Jack.
And the land of Ted Williams, okay?
And this video is probably during the opening.
Opening ceremonies of one of those, one of his seasons, okay?
So, This is our pride.
I mean, this comes on the verge of America's 250th anniversary.
And by the way, we say this as Philly guys who have a lot of respect, have nothing but respect for Fenway Park, which we've been to many times, both as kids and as adults, checking out the Green Monster, that we have nothing but respect.
But even looking at Philadelphia, when you go back, it isn't about the baseball, it's about what happened to our cities.
And so here's what I'm saying, all right?
People took a lot of this to heart when I said, get out of cities in 2020.
All right.
And that was necessary, but that was a tactical withdrawal, a tactical withdrawal from cities.
Kev, I'm going to say it, man.
I think it's time to start retaking the cities.
It's time to start retaking.
Retake the cities.
And this is a big difference between, I think, we've talked about this before on the show between the rural right and the conservative or the urban right.
The rural right and the urban right.
And for folks that aren't from, Cities.
I get it.
People say, oh, what do you go there for?
Cities are decrepit.
Cities are places where there's nothing but crimes, where people go to die, degenerate behavior.
And I'm not disputing any of that.
I'm really not.
I mean, you go look at Philadelphia, right?
It's disgusting, not to mention.
But here we are in Washington, D.C., and look how nice it is after President Trump cleaned it up with what?
Law and order, with the National Guard, the deployments.
You go look at what Bukele, Did down in El Salvador.
Kev, can we take our cities back by going Bukele on every single city in America?
Bukeleying, as a verb, if you will.
I mean, Lord knows I tried, Jack.
I was in Philadelphia from 2016 to 2020 proper.
I was working for a furniture company and the urban right.
We did push back a lot against the drugs and the crime.
But what I'm saying is, you did that as one person or one firm.
Oh, absolutely, yeah.
And people will say, oh, I want to do this, I want to do that.
You can't.
What did Trump say on Twitter, right?
Or on True Social, rather?
He said, if you import the third world, you become the third world, and that's not going to happen to the United States of America as long as I'm the president.
And what did he do right after that?
He posted a video, the Mall of America, and how it's looking.
And he's talked about this urban decay.
Donald Trump is a man of the urban right.
The MAGA movement started on Fifth Avenue on a golden escalator.
All right?
So this movement has been done in reaction to what's happened to our cities.
It is a reaction, yeah.
And we're seeing that across demographics, too.
You're seeing members of every race.
Who wants to live in a decrepit city?
Who wants crime in their city?
No, no.
And just like sporting events, when we were growing up, we would at least get a guy like trying to sell you t shirts before a game or something.
Like a big t shirt guy or concerts, you know?
Now it's just beggars or, yeah, scalping tickets.
Like now it's just beggars or just homeless people.
They're not even trying anymore.
But yeah, we got to retake this.
And that starts with going to county meetings.
To voice your opinions on new sanctuary city laws trying to be pressed and immigration laws being pressed.
So go to your county.
Meetings, voice your opinion.
That's definitely one way to do it.
Get organized.
There's no excuse nowadays.
I mean, we're breaking our backs trying to expose signal chats.
They're getting organized on the laptop.
Well, and we love who's great has been doing that is Frankie Scale, who's up in Philly, right?
That's right.
That's right.
Serge Philly's doing a great job.
Serge Philly's doing a great job.
And what does it come down to, folks?
It comes down to demanding law and order.
And the federal government has the ability to do this in certain areas, but they're not able to do so without the governors if you're talking about a blue state.
So Joshie Shapiro sitting up there in Pennsylvania.
Or some of these folks, Groucho Whitmer up in Michigan, it ain't gonna happen, all right?
It ain't gonna happen.
Although she has been a little bit better to Trump because she wants to run and she's got different designs on certain things.
But you look what he's done in Memphis, you look when the governor called him in, you look what he's done right here in Washington, D.C., you look what he's done in so many places.
It comes down to basic law and order.
And what do I mean by that?
I also mean enforcing the law.
I actually mean going after the worst of the worst, going to the criminals.
And by the way, Going down to the lower level.
You know, Kev, they started going after the fare jumpers here on the Washington Metro.
They went after the fare, and guess what?
That reduces crime.
Wow.
Really?
Yes.
Because it's those same fare jumpers that cause most of the crime on the Metro itself, on the subways.
So again, it just goes back to Rudy Giuliani, the broken windows theory.
If you go after the low level crimes, it will have a roll up effect where the higher level crimes, whether it be muggings, whether it be murder, whether it be Rape or worse things that were being done when you prosecute the low level crimes, it sends a message to the whole city.
It even helps the economy too for the subway.
I mean, people are afraid to go in the subways now.
I mean, for justifiable reasons.
Exactly.
And if you clean up the subways, literally clean them up so they don't smell, you know, like trash and urine and drugs.
So if you clean that up, then there will be less traffic because what else are you going to do?
Take a scooter to work?
No.
Take an Uber or Lyft?
No.
With somebody who might not have a valid license in the first place.
And by the way, getting the illegals out of the cities too.
So, deportations, mass deportations, getting them out, reinstating Greg Bovino, something that you and I certainly both agree with, getting the commander back where he needs to be, and getting these people out of our country.
Not only will that help our cities, but it will also, from the crime perspective, make our cities more livable.
How will it do so?
By reducing the amount of people because our cities are overcrowded.
So, you've got this massive crowding of services of people that shouldn't be in our country, have no right to be in our country, and we are committing a crime by being in our country in the first place.
Get them out.
They shouldn't be here.
We don't want them around.
And guess what?
The crime will go with them as well as rents will go down, economics will go up, and then you'll have more people willing to come to the cities, more businesses opening in cities.
It's going to be amazing.
Kevin, where can people go to follow you?
You can follow me on X, Kevin Pasobic, and at Instagram.
Same name.
This is our real names.
At Kevin Fasoba.
Ladies and gentlemen, as always, you have our permission to lay ashore.