April 6, 2026 - Human Events Daily - Jack Posobiec
55:41
Inside the Easter Rescue Operation and the Mission to Save CA From Gavin Newsom
President Trump details a high-risk Iranian rescue mission, asserting the nation is militarily decapitated and threatening tolls on the Strait of Hormuz if negotiations fail by 8:00 PM ET. He criticizes NATO allies while praising Gulf states for support. Steve Hilton, Trump's endorsed California gubernatorial candidate, joins to challenge Gavin Newsom, blaming his policies for $2/gallon higher gas prices and promising energy independence. Hilton argues that suspending the gas tax and opening oil production could secure victory, leveraging a voter ID initiative against a weak Democratic field. Ultimately, the episode frames these actions as essential steps toward restoring national sovereignty and economic stability. [Automatically generated summary]
Transcriber: CohereLabs/cohere-transcribe-03-2026, sat-12l-sm, and large-v3-turbo
|
Time
Text
Nuclear Path to New York00:15:22
Hey guys, it's Jack.
I wanted to let you know that we're starting a new push for subscriptions here on Human Events Daily.
So make sure that when you're listening to this podcast, you hit subscribe, you download it, and you share it with five of your friends.
Make sure they're all going and downloading as well because we need to get the signal out as much as possible.
Look, we've done so much over the past couple of years since this show started, and we're only going to do so much more.
Let's get it.
I don't think there's any, because frankly, it's not a question of bravery.
We're all brave, right?
You're brave.
I'm brave.
We're all brave.
But we're also intelligent.
If you have people shooting at you expert shots with the best rifles you can get and hitting you right between the eyes every single time, and you're looking here and you're seeing and you're looking here, you're out of there.
I don't care who you are.
Mark Merritt, Fox News.
I know that.
Go ahead.
America's watching.
No.
Can we go back to the weekend?
First off, was everyone on board with the Operation, or were there people that were trying to talk you out of going through with the operation this weekend?
Not everybody was on board.
Somebody else within?
No, there were military people, very professional, that preferred not doing it.
These two were totally on board, which was very important.
If they weren't, I would have had a little difficulty.
But no, there were military people that said, you just don't do this.
You don't go into the heart of a very powerful military.
You know, this is, hey, you have countries and countries.
You have some countries where military is not their strong suit.
This whole thing is.
Militarized like nobody's ever seen before.
Half the people are wearing uniforms.
And we had people within the military.
Usually it's not done.
That's one of the reasons.
I was surprised.
Somebody said it's the only time it's ever been done.
I said, that's not possible.
But it is possible because you're going into hundreds of thousands of soldiers along the path.
I mean, look at some of the helicopters, how they got hit.
So, yeah, there were people within the military that said it's a wise.
And don't forget, how many men did you send altogether, approximately?
For the operation.
I'd love to keep that a secret.
Okay, well, we are.
But I will tell you the number, I'll keep it a secret, but it was hundreds.
And hundreds of these people, that's pretty good.
Is he central casting?
But hundreds of people went into this journey.
Hundreds of people could have been killed.
Forget about the equipment, a lot of equipment, nobody cares.
Hundreds of people could have been killed.
So we had people that were within the military that said this is not a wise thing, and I understood that, but I. Decided to do it.
Was there a point that you were thinking there's too much on the line, and somebody was saying maybe we abort this now and wait?
I mean, given the resource, like the general said, it seemed like there was so much on the line here.
You must have been thinking this could have completely changed the situation.
So, the first one, which was in many ways as dangerous as the second, I guess it gets, because we're flying over daylight.
You know, we're the best at the world at night.
We have goggles that nobody, we have goggles.
I've tried them.
They're unbelievable.
I see better with the goggles at night than I see without them during daylight.
I mean, daylight today, we have a beautiful day.
You see just as well with goggles.
In many ways, it's enhanced.
So we have the best in the world.
So it's much safer for us to do it at night, whereas other people, no other country has that capability.
They don't have that particular piece of equipment like we do.
But when I was told flying in daylight, I think we flew seven hours over Iran, and that's a long time, over unbelievably hostile territory where they have nothing but weapons.
We took out their anti aircraft, which is great.
We took out their radar, which is square.
We took out a lot.
But they still have, you know, what hit this one was a shoulder, handheld shoulder missile, heat seeking missile.
So it's not like, you know, they're totally whatever.
But, and they had probably a little luck because you got to get lucky.
But they shot it and it got sucked in right by the engine.
But these guys were out of there.
They were great.
Their timing was great.
But no, I was told that this is a very dangerous mission.
I understood.
They didn't say it's a foolish mission.
They said, You know, we're going to be sacrificing hundreds of people to do this.
This is, I mean, you have tankers that are flying over this area so that they could, the flight was so long they had to refuel.
It's a very dangerous mission.
I just felt it was worth it.
If you would have told me that we would have been successful, gotten both, and nobody was even essentially injured, I would have said that would be impossible.
Yeah, please.
Mr. President, thank you very much.
Thank you, sir.
We'll come back to you.
Okay.
Given that you are now dealing, you say, with a more reasonable, less extreme situation, Leadership in Iran, what does that mean for the protesters, for the human rights movement in that country after this conflict?
What's your expectation?
Yeah, if they assume control, if we do something and they assume control, I think it's very positive, a big step.
I don't think you'd see the radicalization that you have seen in the last.
Look what happened.
I mean, women are being executed because they're not properly clothed, they say.
They're not properly clothed, and they execute the women.
They absolutely shoot them right on the street.
No, you have a much different group of people.
Now, I'm not saying we are dealing with them.
Essentially, they have till 8 o'clock tomorrow night, Eastern Time.
But we are dealing with them.
I think it's going well.
Mr. Witkoff is here, and JD is involved in the dealing.
Mr. Witkoff is sitting right here, and I think it's going fine, but we'll have to see.
You have to understand, we've been dealing with these people for 47 years.
I'm standing here with a much more powerful Iran.
As of a month ago, not anymore.
Right now, they are decapitated.
But I'm standing here a month ago with a much more powerful Iran than it was at any point during 47 years.
This should have been handled by seven presidents, a lot of presidents.
And those presidents are saying now, every one of them, to their friends, we should have done this a long time ago.
So it's not something I like doing.
It's very dangerous.
And we're getting them at the height of their strength.
If I didn't.
Terminate the Barack Hussein Obama Iran nuclear deal, they would have had a.
Don't forget, that was a path to a nuclear weapon.
Remember this.
He chose Iran over Israel, pure and simple.
How Israel can vote for a Democrat is if you're Jewish in New York City or anyplace else in this country, and how you can vote for a Democrat is imbibable because he chose Iran, a very hostile Iran.
Remember when he filled up a 757 with cash, billions of dollars of cash.
And he sent it over to them.
Then they gave them tens of billions of dollars.
He chose Iran over Israel and really the Arab world, if you look, because, you know, and I can add Bahrain and you can add others.
He chose such an unlikely candidate.
Nobody could believe it.
Frankly, if you're going to choose between Iraq and Iran, he should have chosen, he should have befriended Iran.
He went in the exact opposite direction of all thinking.
And he made a terrible mistake.
But that was a road to a nuclear weapon.
And when I terminated that, everyone said, oh, he terminated it.
It was one of the best things we ever did because he had a road to a nuclear weapon.
And it was a very short term deal.
You know, countries don't do 10 year deals, countries do hundreds of years.
You don't do a 10 year deal.
For a country, you need this isn't you're a landlord, you're renting a store on a certain street.
And you give somebody a five year or 10 year lease.
This is a country.
It was a short term deal.
It was ready to expire.
I terminated it before it expired.
It took a lot of heat, and it was one of the best things I ever did because he would have had a nuclear weapon.
Then he would have had another nuclear weapon had those beautiful B 2 bombers not gone in eight months ago and obliterated that set.
And by the way, the word is obliteration.
CNN said, well, maybe it wasn't complete.
It was so complete that they still haven't been able to get it.
It was obliteration.
But if we didn't hit them, That was a courageous decision, too, because we had all those planes flying in at night with very little cover, unbelievable stealth planes, and they were able to do their job.
If we didn't do that, Iran would have had a nuclear weapon at a high level, either one of those two instances.
And if they did, in my opinion, I told this to Bibi Netanyahu yesterday, Israel would have been extinguished.
Large portions of the Middle East would have been extinguished, whether it's Saudi Arabia, Qatar, UAE, or others.
And you saw that with thousands of missiles raining down upon them.
They didn't think they were going to be hit, they thought they'd be watching us fight.
And all of a sudden, UAE got hit by 1,500 missiles.
He would have taken them out also.
And they were powerful.
If I didn't come along and terminate the Obama deal, which was terrible, the Iran nuclear deal was a road.
To a nuclear weapon, a big one, unlimited, legally.
I terminated it without even much thought, it was so easy.
I terminated that, and then the B 2 bombers.
And I did one other thing.
I had killed Kassam Soleimani, who was an evil genius.
And the reason I did it, I heard he was going to knock out five of our military bases.
And had he lived, I believe we would be fighting perhaps a different.
Iran right now because he's never been replaced.
And I also did one other, but this one was not picked up.
Osama bin Laden.
If you read my book, I said you've got to take him out one year before the World Trade Center came down.
So I wish you'd read the book.
But as a president, to be a good president, I believe you have to have good instincts.
And a lot of this is instinct.
Yeah, please.
Thank you so much.
My question is, Mr. President.
Mr. President, last week, Last week, you suggested that Europe should take the lead on reopening the Strait of Hormuz.
Has circumstances changed now that you're issuing a direct 48 hour ultimatum?
And secondly, would a new ceasefire include Israel or would it just be between Iran and Israel?
I can't talk about ceasefire.
But I can tell you that we have an active, willing participant on the other side.
They would like to be able to make a deal.
I can't say any more than that.
You've talked to the President.
You've listened to the President.
Who are you with?
My name is Diyar Kurdam.
I'm with the largest Kurdish media outlet, Rudal Media Network.
It's based in Iran.
Go ahead.
Mr. President, you said before that you don't want the Kurdish forces to enter Iran and be harmed.
Do you still want them to stay away, or what role do you expect them to play now?
I'd rather have them stay away.
I'd rather have them stay away because I think they bring with them some problems and some difficulties.
And I don't think they bring death, I mean, you know, to themselves.
But I'd rather have them stay away.
Thank you, Mr. President, for the question.
Deliberate attacks on civilian infrastructure violate the Geneva Conventions and international law.
Who are you with?
I'm with the New York Times.
Zolan from the New York Times.
The failing.
The failing.
You see circulation way down at the New York Times.
Are you concerned that your threat to bomb power plants and bridges amount to a crime?
No, no, no.
I hope I don't have to do it.
But again, I just said 47 years they've been negotiating with these people.
They're great negotiators.
And because they're not going to have.
A nuclear weapon.
And if somebody that takes my place someday is weak and ineffective, which possibly that will happen because we had numerous presidents that were weak, ineffective, and afraid of Iran, we're never going to let Iran have a nuclear weapon.
And if you think it's okay for people that are sick of mind, that are tough, smart, and sick, really sick, ideologically, you know, from a policy standpoint, from a Stand any which way you want to say.
Mentally, these are disturbed people.
If you think I'm going to allow them, and powerful and rich, to have a nuclear weapon, you can tell your friends at the New York Times not going to happen.
Quite, quite, quite.
You no longer have credibility at the New York Times.
Because the New York Times said, oh, Trump won't win the election, and I won in a landslide.
I won every swing state.
The New York Times said, oh, Trump won't win the election.
The New York Times says, no credibility.
The credibility they have is it used to be all the news that's fit to print.
A great, the old gray lady, it was great, but they're running on past fumes, and you can't keep doing that.
You have to be able to give the correct news.
And people like you, who I know, are fake.
You're fake.
Go ahead, please.
Mr. President, your messaging on the war has moved from the war is coming to an end to war going to be bombing Iran to the Stone Ages.
And we've heard a range of those kind of messages.
So, which is it?
Are you winding this down?
I can't tell you.
I can't tell you.
I don't know.
I can't tell.
It depends what they do.
This is a critical period.
They have a period of, well, till tomorrow at 8 o'clock.
I gave them an extension.
They asked for an extension of seven days, right?
I said, Steve, give them 10 days.
10 days is up actually today, so I gave them 11, I guess, indirectly.
I thought it was inappropriate the day after Easter.
I want to be a nice person.
They have till tomorrow.
Now we'll see what happens.
I can tell you they're negotiating, we think, in good faith.
We're going to find out.
We're getting the help of some incredible countries that want this to be ended because it affects them also.
A lot of people are affected by this.
But we're giving them until tomorrow, 8 o'clock Eastern Time.
And after that, they're going to have no bridges, they're going to have no power plants.
Stone Ages, yeah.
Stone Ages.
CNN fake.
Venezuela Weaponry and Missiles00:08:09
Are you willing to make a deal that does not include reopening the Strait of Hormuz, or is that now a top priority?
I would say it's a very big priority because, see, that's one thing that's a little different than other things.
We can bomb the hell out of them, we can knock them out for a loop.
But to close the Strait, all you need is one terrorist that somehow has a truck loaded with, because you can carry them in trucks, large trucks, a water mine, drop them in the water.
And now you tell people that own ships that cost a billion dollars to, don't worry about the mine.
You can do that even just by saying we put mines in the water.
So it's not like the rest.
We can knock out their military.
We already have.
We've knocked out their Navy.
We've knocked out their Air Force completely.
We've knocked out 158 ships in three days.
We've knocked out even their mine droppers.
They don't have any mine droppers anymore, but they put them on other boats and they could drop them.
I'm not even sure they have any mines there, by the way.
I'm not sure.
Personally, they say there might be eight.
I don't know.
I don't know.
I think there might be none.
Because they're very good bullshit artists.
That's why for 47 years they've been bullshitting other presidents and they haven't done the job.
And people are living in hell.
You live in that country, they're living in hell.
No, I think that 47 years of this stuff is long enough.
They're at the weakest point they've ever been.
They have no Navy, they have no Air Force, they have no anti-aircraft weaponry, they have no radar, they have no communication.
In fact, the biggest problem we have in our negotiation is that they can't communicate.
I said to Steve, what are they saying?
Sir, they can't communicate.
They have no method of communication.
So we're doing, we're communicating like they used to communicate 2,000 years ago with children bringing a note back and forth.
They have no communication.
But all I want to see is I want to have a safe world.
And you're not going to have a safe world.
Israel will be gone.
The Middle East will be gone.
And then they're coming for Europe.
And I have to tell you, I'm very disappointed in NATO.
Very.
I think that NATO.
I think it's a mark on NATO that will never disappear.
Never disappear in my mind.
You know, they're coming to see me on Wednesday.
They're going to say, oh, we'll do this, we'll do that.
Now they all of a sudden want to send things, you know.
But they said it loud and clear at the beginning when I spoke to the UK of all.
I would have said they would have been the first because they're the oldest.
And I said, yeah, I'd love to have a little help.
He said, no, sir, we'd rather wait till you win.
I said, I don't need help after we win.
They have two old broken aircraft carriers, barely work.
I said, I guess we can use them.
Who the hell knows?
I called the general.
He didn't even want them.
He said, We don't really need them.
We got the SS Abraham Lincoln, sir.
We don't need them.
You know, we have, in terms of technology, we had one day 101 missiles going at 2,700 miles an hour aimed at the Abraham Lincoln.
101 missiles.
Out of 101 missiles, 101 missiles were shot down.
Unbelievable technology.
Ten years ago, five years ago, I don't know if that would have been possible.
But 10 years ago, that wouldn't have been possible.
101 missiles heading to a ship that's not that far off the coast.
And out of the 101 missiles, we shot down all 101.
We have weaponry.
The Patriots are unbelievable.
We have weaponry.
That's unbelievable, yeah.
Go ahead, please.
Thank you, Mr. President.
You said earlier today during the angle that you would like to take Iran's oil, but Americans want U.S. forces home.
Correct.
What's that trade off?
If I had my choice, yeah.
Because I'm a businessman first.
With Venezuela, as you know, the war was over in about 45 minutes.
And we have great people running Venezuela, very good people.
I mean, the relationship is good.
And we are a partner with Venezuela.
And we've taken hundreds of millions of barrels, hundreds of millions.
Over 100 million barrels already is in Houston, refined and out.
And paid for that war many, many times over, many times.
You know, the old days, to the victim.
Okay, you know that.
To the winner belong the spoils.
Go the spoils, and I've said, why don't we use it?
To the victor, go the spoils.
And we don't have that.
We haven't had that in this country probably in 100 years, because even the Second World War, you look at the Second World War, we didn't have it with the Second World War.
We helped rebuild all those countries.
We rebuilt Germany.
How about Germany telling us that, well, it's not their war.
We had nothing to do with it.
They wanted me to go and tell them everything I was doing.
We didn't know anything about it.
Well, if I would have told them, they would have leaked it.
And we wouldn't have been nearly as successful, possibly, right?
But to the victor belong the spoils.
So we haven't heard that in, I think, maybe hundreds of years.
Now, with Venezuela, and just so you understand, the people of Venezuela, they say if I ran for president of Venezuela, I'm polling higher than anybody has ever polled in Venezuela.
So after I'm finished with this, I can go to Venezuela.
I will quickly learn Spanish.
It won't take too long.
I'm good at language.
And I will go to Venezuela.
I'm going to run for president.
But we're very happy with the president elect that we have right now, the people that are running it.
If you remember Bush with Iraq, they fired the generals, they fired the police, they fired the people that worked in their equivalent of the White House, they fired everybody.
And you know what they had?
They had a mess.
And you know what happened?
ISIS formed.
Those generals and those soldiers got together, the police got together, they all got together, they formed ISIS.
Not going to happen with us.
So, Venezuela has been an incredible situation.
We went in, we were very successful, military power like nobody's ever seen.
The general, Venezuelan general said, I was on that site.
I said, I've never seen ferocity like that.
I've been doing this for 40 years.
He said, I've never seen it.
They hit us from 17 different places.
They were all set.
They saw that big, beautiful aircraft carrier, the Ford in that case, and planes were pouring off it at 1 o'clock in the morning.
So typically, when you see that late at night, you know, you could be in trouble, right?
And we were all ready.
They had their equipment, it was Russian, and they had Chinese equipment.
It was all set, they were going to give us a fight.
He said, and then they came, and they came at speeds like we've never seen.
And they came at 17 different angles.
The general and his people, that was a lot of angles.
They hit them from every angle.
He said, We knew it was over in three minutes.
We were waiting for them.
Their equipment didn't work, and there's a reason it didn't work.
Someday we'll explain that to people.
They pressed the button, nothing happened.
They pressed it again and again, nothing happened.
And he said, We knew this whole thing was over in three minutes.
We've never seen any.
He used the word ferocity, the ferocity of these planes from 17 different angles, and it was over.
They went inside, and remember, that was on a military base with thousands of soldiers.
And those soldiers looked and they said, Get the hell out of here.
Thousands.
We didn't have thousands.
We had like 200 people.
So we have a great military.
And I'll tell you what, somehow this rescue captured the world's attention, more so than normally.
Rescue Captures World Attention00:09:38
You're talking about two people.
But this rescue.
Captured the world's attention.
But we did it in Venezuela.
That was amazing.
And now we have a very bad man in prison and going to trial.
I mean, he released, aside from the drugs, which he was terrible, Maduro released hundreds of thousands of people from jails into our country.
Drug dealers, murderers, the worst people in the world were released into our country because we had a stupid president who probably didn't know.
And we had a border czar who never went to the border.
And never once called our great Border Patrol agents, right?
Not once, Kamala.
She never called the Border Patrol.
She never said, How are we doing?
I used to call the Border Patrol guys every day.
You can ask them, Paul, ask any one of them, Brandon, ask them all the time, How are we doing?
How are we doing?
And we now, I'm proud to say, have a totally sealed border.
Nine months, nobody is coming through our border.
And nobody even tries because they know they're not going to get through.
So we don't have caravans anymore.
So maybe one or two more and we'll be done.
Mr. President, are you willing to end this conflict with Iran charging tolls for passage through the strait?
Us charging tolls?
Iran.
What about us charging tolls?
Is that something you're considering?
I'd rather do that than let them have them run.
Why shouldn't we?
We're the winner.
We won, okay?
They are militarily defeated.
The only thing they have is the psychology of, oh, we're going to drop a couple of mines in the water, all right?
No, I mean, we have a concept where we'll charge tolls.
I thought you meant us.
Your question would have been more accurate if you said us.
Go ahead.
So, just to clarify, in order for Iran to successfully meet your deadline tomorrow, do they have to make a deal, open the street, or both?
We have to have a deal that's acceptable to me.
And part of that deal is going to be we want free traffic of oil and everything else.
Mr. President, thank you very much.
You said, Glory be to God in this conflict.
Do you believe that God supports the United States' actions in this conflict?
I do, because God is good, and God wants to see people taken care of.
God doesn't like what's happening.
I don't like what's happening.
Everyone says, I enjoy it.
I don't enjoy this.
I don't enjoy it.
These two guys don't enjoy it.
You know, people say, Oh, boy, they're so tough.
They don't like seeing people killed.
I've ended eight wars.
Nobody's ever done it.
The person who won the Nobel Prize came to me and said, You deserve the Nobel Prize.
She announced that when they announced, they said, Goes to Maria.
She's a great person, really a good person.
She said, No, no, no.
This is ridiculous.
They gave me the Nobel Prize.
President Trump aimed at eight wars.
I could go over every one of them, including India and Pakistan, where the prime minister of Pakistan said, President Trump saved from 30 to 50 million lives.
That makes me much happier than what we're doing right now.
That makes me much happier.
We have one more to end, by the way.
You called the, yesterday in your Truth Social, you called the Iranians crazy bastards.
True.
What is your response to critics who say that it is.
I don't care about critics.
What is your response to critics who say that it is your mental health that should perhaps be examined as this war continues?
I haven't heard that.
But if that's the case, you're going to have to have more people like me because our country was being ripped off on trade, on everything for many years until I came along.
So if that's the case, you're going to have to have more people.
Josh, you go.
Josh, you go.
You said that very little is off limits in Iran as far as.
Of targeting, including power plants, bridges, you've mentioned those.
Very little is off limits.
Are there certain kinds of civilian targets, though?
I'm thinking, schools, hospitals, that you would have to do that.
I don't want to tell you that.
We have a plan, because of the power of our military, where every bridge in Iran will be decimated by 12 o'clock tomorrow night, where every power plant in Iran will be out of business, burning, exploding, and never to be used again.
I mean, complete.
Demolition by 12 o'clock, and it'll happen over a period of four hours if we wanted to.
We don't want that to happen.
We may even get involved with helping them rebuild their nation.
And you know what?
If that's the case, the last thing we want to do is start with power plants, which are among the most expensive things, and bridges.
You saw the bridge.
The bridge went.
We were very close to a deal.
And then I got a call from Mr. Whitcoff, Mr. Kushner, and JD saying, I think they're breaking the deal.
I said, tell them that's okay.
Don't worry about it.
But tell them to look out their window and watch.
And within 45 minutes, I gave the order to knock out the biggest bridge.
I gave the order to knock out the biggest bridge in, I believe, the Middle East, but the biggest bridge in Iran.
And within 10 minutes after I gave that order, that bridge was over.
So do I want to do that?
No.
Do I want to destroy their infrastructure?
No.
It will take them 100 years to rebuild.
Right now, if we left today, it would take them 20 years to rebuild their country, and it would never be as good as it was.
And the only way they're going to be able to rebuild their country is to utilize the genius of the United States of America.
Pleasure with NATO in the past.
Is there a danger to the U.S. not being the de facto leader of the alliance and then other powers within the alliance then getting the decision making when it comes to wars and nuclear weapons?
No, it's not a danger.
Look, we went to NATO.
I didn't ask very strongly.
I just said, hey, if you want to help, great.
No, no, no, we will not help.
I said, that's all right.
You don't want to help?
Because I've always said NATO is a paper tiger.
See, NATO is a paper tiger.
Putin's not afraid of NATO.
Putin's afraid of us, very afraid of us.
And he's explained it to me a lot of times.
I got to know him very well.
I know him very well.
NATO's a paper tiger.
NATO is us.
And when we needed them, but we didn't need them, by the way.
We didn't need them, obviously, because they haven't helped at all.
Just the opposite.
They've actually gone out of their way not to help.
They didn't even want to give us landing strips.
Think of it.
And it's not just NATO.
You know who else didn't help us?
South Korea didn't help us.
You know who else didn't help us?
Australia didn't help us.
You know who else didn't help us?
Japan.
We've got 50,000 soldiers in Japan to protect them from North Korea.
We have 45,000 soldiers in South Korea to protect us from Kim Jong un, who I get along with very well, as you know.
Do you notice he said very nice things about me?
He used to call Joe Biden a mentally retarded person, okay?
So don't tell me about Your stuff.
Joe Biden, he said he's a mentally retarded person.
He was so nasty to Joe Biden, it was terrible.
But to me, he likes Trump.
And do you notice how nice things are with North Korea?
It's very nice.
But we have 45,000 people, soldiers, in harm's way, and right next to Kim Jong un with a lot of nuclear weapons.
45,000, which should have never happened.
If a certain president, I'm not going to mention this president because I happen to like him, believe it or not, but if a certain president did his job, Kim Jong un would not have nuclear weapons right now, but they were all afraid to do their job properly.
But just to conclude and just to finish, Japan didn't help us, Australia didn't help us, South Korea didn't help us, and then you get to NATO, NATO didn't help us.
There were some countries that did.
Now, countries that have been good, now you could also say they've got to be a little bit more involved because they're in the territory, but Saudi Arabia has been excellent, Qatar has been excellent, UAE has been excellent, Bahrain, Kuwait.
I mean, Kuwait did shoot down three of our planes.
The only planes, really, that we lost with friendly fire, they call it.
I call it unfriendly fire.
They unfortunately didn't know how to use our great patriots.
The pilot said, What kind of a missile's coming at us?
Patriot.
Boom, they got out because they know a Patriot never misses.
So they had beautiful Patriots.
There were planes heading in their direction.
Unfortunately, they decided to shoot those planes.
They were our planes.
So, no, NATO is a paper tiger.
Now, he's coming to see me on Wednesday, as you know.
He's a wonderful guy.
Secretary General is great.
And Mark Rutte, he's a great person.
He's got and you know it all began with if you want to know the truth Greenland We want Greenland.
They don't want to give it to us.
And I said, bye bye.
Okay, thank you very much, everybody.
Thank you.
NATO Paper Tiger Reality00:11:58
This is what happens when the fourth turning meets fifth generation warfare.
A commentator, international social media sensation, and former Navy intelligence veteran.
This is Human Events with your host, Jack Posobic.
Christ is King.
Ladies and gentlemen, welcome aboard today's edition of Human Events Daily.
We're here live in Washington, D.C. Today is April 6, 2026.
Anno Domini, we're here in studio.
President Trump just giving a round robin.
Press conference on this incredible rescue, successful mission that took place behind enemy lines in Iran.
We've got Kevin Pasoba, Kay Poso, our field correspondent, riding side saddle.
We got Tom Sauer here as well, United States Navy veteran.
Tom, you know, you've gone through a lot of these courses, EE, walked through, you know, just how remarkable it is that the United States was able to pull off this kind of mission and how, quite frankly, this is the kind of thing that you just don't usually see.
No, that's right, Jack.
By the way, I'll just say it.
I think all of us kind of in the vet community were sort of waiting for that message that, hey, they caught him.
Yeah, I was actually really worried about it.
Totally agree.
I mean, I'm not saying we wanted it.
I'm saying there was that anxiety that, like, eh, he's way in there.
No, absolutely.
And one of the things that they always teach us is that very rarely do you rise to the occasion, you sink to the lowest level of training.
Correct.
And so that is something that all these pilots have been trained in consistently.
And then this time they knew it was happening for real.
And now, when that actually happened, he was.
Injured, he knew what to do.
He had to get high, he had to hide, and he had to get high.
And at the same time, we deployed that Guardian Angel package, which is incredible with Air Force Pararescue.
And then we also had the HC 130s with the little birds.
I mean, we set up our own base out there, our own little FARP, you know, forward area, what, forward area refueling point?
Fueling point, yeah.
Yeah.
I mean, it's just like we set one up right there.
We immediately got to work.
We bombed the living daylight of all the approach roads.
I was watching satellite pictures where they actually had all the roads that approached where the Americans were.
And they dropped several 2,000 pound bombs there.
And these craters, they said from space, you could see them, the craters were about nine meters wide.
So basically, like any avenue of approach for the Iranians to come to where our little base was and to where our down pilot was.
Because he's way out there in Indian country.
Yeah, he's way out there.
And his call sign is Dude44.
How cool is that?
Awesome.
Kevin, one of the things, let me ask you on this, because I saw a lot of this, and I'm sure you saw as well online, where people were saying, a lot of foreigners were saying, why do the Americans do this?
Who cares?
I mean, you spent a bunch of money, you had to.
You know, frag a couple of your own platforms.
Why do Americans care so much about getting that one person, that lone survivor, allowing to get that one person home?
Why are we willing to go to such great lengths?
What do other countries miss about us?
Well, this is not just, I mean, all soldiers, we can't leave them behind.
No man left behind.
And I think that's the motto for the U.S. paratroopers, the Air Force.
So that others may live.
Absolutely.
That's it there.
Yeah, I mean, this is an F 15 pilot.
I believe there were two as well, or just the one was recovered.
Well, they're both recovered, the pilot, and then this was the weapons officer.
I see.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
But I'm saying, what does it say about the American ethos that we put our human life on such a high pedestal?
Other countries don't do this, by the way.
I mean, we value all the American military members, service members overseas.
I mean, this is a critical operation.
We don't want to see them stuck behind at all.
And, you know, it's an amazing mission.
We saved the dude, right?
Save the dude.
The dude is coming home.
That's it.
The dude is coming home.
Tom, let me ask you this because, on the same question, because I'll just say that I was involved in an exercise with a, let's say, partner force nation.
Yes.
As you know, the ubiquitous partner force nation that we like to talk about, but we don't like to name names.
Right.
And I remember talking about this exercise purposes situation that they said, okay, we're going to do this, then we're going to send this unit in, and then we're going to have this.
And I said, wait, you're going to send the unit in before you have air assets?
I mean, you're going to get all those guys killed.
And I remember this partner force nation officer said to me, they're infantry.
That's what they're for.
Again, there's just other countries don't fight like we fight.
I'll give you a great example of this with another partner force nation that was a third world country.
That many people on Twitter love saying poor things about.
That's another third world country.
Sure.
And we had a picture, we saw a picture from an actual IED event where there was a EOD technician, a bomb technician from this partner force country sticking his hands into a bomb, a live bomb, with this bomb suit visor up.
As you do.
As one does.
And then I thought to myself, well, wait, who's taking the picture?
Right.
Right.
And then we asked him, I said, well, wait, why don't you use the Talent robots that we sold to.
And that third world country's officer said to me, Those robots cost $150,000.
You know?
Yeah.
So.
No, actually, come to think of it, I remember a number of times when, as you know, because I had done some EOD work and gone from the Inzel side, that that would come up over and over.
Where we would give them, sometimes we'd sell them technology, a lot of times we'd just give it to them.
Right.
And then you'd go back and it's like, oh, we haven't used it since the last time you guys were here.
Right.
And you're like, you're supposed to be using those to protect people, especially science against all the stuff.
And they're just not using it because they don't put that.
They don't put that premium on human life that we do, which, by the way, you know, at the same time, it's even if you take, you know, sort of, Kevin, like you're talking about the, you know, the moral aspects of it and even the spiritual aspects, I'd go that far.
Just from a military perspective, think about how much time and investment and money that you've put into training whoever that guy is, that getting him to that point, if something happens to him, you gotta yank somebody off the street, you know, Joe Nobody, and you gotta start from scratch, Tom.
Another experienced F 15 pilot.
You can't just buy another senior enlisted special operations team sergeant or team chief or anything like that.
That takes time to develop.
So, even again, from a military standpoint, people are far more important than hardware.
That's something that General Kane said today, and I see it on Twitter or on X now a lot.
But to me, that's something that I always knew.
And I think some people are just now realizing that that is how the US military has and always will operate.
So that's one of the things I thought was really interesting.
People, you know, I see the Europeans, and you spent $300 million and you lost all these aircraft just to recruit one guy.
And it's like, guess what?
And we'll do it again.
And we'll do it again.
We'll do it every single time.
A great example of this as well, if you've ever heard of Neil Roberts, Roberts Ridge was a Navy SEAL from Naval Special Warfare Development Group, SEAL Team 6, who was lost in Takur Gur in Afghanistan in 2002.
And they didn't know if he was alive right away.
And then eventually, even after they knew he was killed in action, seven men died and 12 were wounded, and two or three helicopters were lost.
Just to recover his body.
They knew he was dead, but they did that simply to recover his body.
So that's something when it comes to combat search and rescue, it's not just about saving a life.
It's like, no, no, because we know that every time, hey, were you growing in harm's way?
No matter what happens to me, people will fight and kill and die for you, your body, dead or alive, to come home.
That's how they know no matter what happens.
So that's pretty impressive.
Well, and it speaks as well, I would say, to it is part of the ethos.
I mean, I would say it does kind of give you that subconscious knowledge that if something happens to me, that someone's got my back.
Yes.
Because if you want more people to join, you have to understand that's the ethos.
But I wouldn't necessarily say that that's something that people actively think about.
It's just, it's not really something that I've heard people talk about.
But again, it's that Espiriticor.
Yeah.
It's that Espiriticor that, hey, if my buddy's down there, I'm going to go help my buddy, or I'm going to do whatever I can.
And in many cases, some people were saying that, you know, some of the F 15s that were flying the cap for this thing that may have even been part of the same squadron as the guys who went down.
Oh, yeah.
And it shows we follow through, too, as Americans.
You have video games about modern warfare, you got Top Gun movies, you got the movie Behind Enemy Lines was literally the same situation.
So we talk about joining and, you know, being pro military.
We have this in movie theaters, and Hollywood's pushing this out, but it's like, hey, guys.
We're following through.
Well, this was that was actually one of the things that was trending this weekend because the plot of not Top Gun 1, but Top Gun 2 is the is there the F 15 crash?
Well, I guess I guess it's the F 35, I think, or a 22 in Top Gun 2.
I forget actually.
But the point is Tom Cruise, all right, Tom Cruise crashes with his Wizzo, and then they have to find a Tomcat that just happens to be on the ground.
Again, third world nation, but it's definitely Iran in that movie.
Yeah, so so people were saying that is he gonna maybe he'll just find it there and they can hot wire it and fly it back up again.
Was that a little predictive programming?
What do you think?
I don't know.
Maybe.
I mean, who funded Top Gun Maverick?
Chinese companies.
That's a great point.
Because they took Taiwan off the patch.
And I don't know.
I think they wanted to go after it.
That's an interesting take because we know that, of course, the Chinese are standing.
Well, put it this way the Chinese don't like the instability that's going on right now.
They want the oil flowing.
They don't like seeing this.
They're working with the Pakistanis to try to work out this five point plan.
They're pushing Iran to say, hey, guys, say you want a ceasefire.
But there is.
And I'm just going to say as well, there is a huge split right now between the Iranian civilian leadership, because you've seen them come out and say, hey, we would like a ceasefire.
The president, Peshian, has come out and said this.
But again, the military leadership is like, no, no ceasefire.
We're going to keep going.
Because remember, and this is absolute key, is that the IRGC, right?
Their loyalty isn't to pragmatism, their loyalty is to the regime itself.
They're considered the defenders of the revolution.
That's why it's the Revolutionary Guard Corps.
So they're chosen for their loyalty.
To the revolution, therefore, they don't care what happens to the economy, they don't care what happens to any of that stuff, they're going all in.
They're all in.
So, just Tom, last bit to you before I know you got to run.
When you're dealing with all of this, look, let's zoom out here.
Great operation, incredible to see.
And I said this on Twitter regardless of what anyone's position on the war is, the strategy, it's just cool.
And it's just awesome.
Right?
It's just awesome to see the prowess of the United States military.
But, Tom, that being said, the fact that they were able to shoot down a number of our planes, that does speak to the fact that they're still in the fight.
They've still got something.
I agree.
I mean, they are going to be able to get a few pot shots here and there.
There might be one or two missiles that they pull out of Heidi, there might be a few drones that they pull out.
But by and large, we've got a lot of control.
over the airspace and over that country.
But I agree with you.
It is great to see winners winning.
And also, I think one thing that's always important to keep in mind that, like, me, for instance, I had some real doubts and reservations on the run up to all this.
But now that we're doing as well as we are, despite what many other people would like to tell you, the fact that we're doing as well as we are, I'm very, I'm actually, I'm very pleased about it because also, like, even if when it's just that success, even if it's something that maybe some people might not have been too excited about us doing, when you succeed at it, it becomes more popular.
Oh, winning breeds popularity.
Gold Stocks Rising Together00:02:02
Tom Sauer, can people follow you, brother?
Find me on x at Thomas B. Sauer.
Thomas B. Sauer.
All right, he'll be right back, folks.
Human Events is a very special guest.
You'll understand why.
up next here we turn real america's voice all this the jack the so big appreciation hour i
I can say confidently, I believe, I think Josh Shapiro would be the vice presidential nominee if it wasn't for Jack Posobic.
And that is, I'm being honest.
All right, Jack Posobic, here we are back live, human events daily here in Washington, D.C. Folks, let me be blunt.
Before the crashes of 1999 and 2008, a rare market signal appeared.
Most people ignored it.
Smart money did not.
Gold and stocks were rising at the same time.
That is not normal.
Stocks are supposed to rise when confidence is strong.
Gold rises when confidence starts to break.
They move in opposite directions until something underneath the system is off.
Right now, they are both breaking records again.
What does that mean?
It's only happened twice before those major market repricing events.
Does that mean it crashes tomorrow?
No.
But it does mean that risk may be dangerously mispriced.
Gold doesn't surge because it's popular, it moves when currency confidence weakens, debt explodes, and central banks prepare quietly behind the scenes.
And here's what should get your attention.
Banks are buying gold at record levels right now.
They're not guessing.
Gold doesn't depend on earnings.
It doesn't depend on credit markets.
It doesn't depend on political promises, but stocks do.
So if you have a savings or retirement event, you don't count.
You don't get a do over.
This is about protection, not speculation.
California Gas Production Debate00:08:26
Call 844 577 POSO or visit protectwithposo.com.
That is 844 577 76 76, or visit protectwithposo.com.
Learned how gold IRA can help shield what you've worked decades to build.
Again, that's 844 577 7676 or visit protectwithboso.com.
I'm very excited right now.
Very special guest.
I told you guys about this.
I don't short sell it whenever I have a great guest on, and we have one today.
He's been on the show before.
We've done sit downs, and he's kind of the man of the hour for a number of reasons.
Ladies and gentlemen, Steve Hilton, candidate for California governor, joins us today right on the heels.
Of his endorsement early this morning by President Trump.
Steve, how are you?
I'm fantastic.
Great to be with you, Jack.
And I'm thrilled because this is my first public reaction, and it's with you.
And I'm so happy that it is.
We saw each other not that long ago, a few months ago, in Bakersfield when we were both there with Megyn Kelly on her tour.
And I told you then, I think that we can do this in California.
People are sick of the nonsense after 16 years of Democrat one party rule.
And it's been getting better and better since then.
I've been leading in the polls, leading on fundraising.
There's a lot of energy.
And this was a great, great piece of news, totally unexpected.
I hadn't spoken to the president about this at all.
I did speak to him afterwards, and it's just wonderful.
And of course, an incredible honor to be endorsed by our president.
Well, that's incredible.
I was just going to ask you, I can tell you've got some interviewing skills there because you anticipated my first question was, did you know beforehand?
So you said you didn't know.
You did speak to him afterwards.
Are you able to tell us what the president said to you when you spoke after your endorsement?
Yeah, he was obviously.
I know the president.
We have not close in the sense that we're not on the phone the whole time, but we've known each other for years, as he noted in his endorsement message.
And we had a great conversation.
And he was obviously very this is the incredible thing about this man.
With everything else going on, he was very aware of the dynamics of the race, the Democrat candidates, the other Republican in the race.
We had a bit of a conversation about that.
But the thing that we most discussed, and the thing that is so exciting about the prospect of Of the potential change we can bring about in California is like imagine what it will be like when I win in November, take office in January,
and then you've got the governor of our biggest state, by far the biggest economy in America, working with the president and his team to advance common sense goals like energy independence and finding fraud and enforcing our immigration laws, all these things and many, many more, where literally the people in charge now, Newsom, And he's especially his attorney general, Rob Bonta, are constantly fighting Trump on everything.
Anything Trump wants to do, or anything that the administration wants to do with respect to California, it's no, we're fighting it lawsuits, everything.
And it's just ridiculous.
It's going to be a huge day, not just for California, but for the whole country when you've got our biggest state, the biggest economy now aligned.
With the common sense goals in terms of energy and fraud and all the other things and deregulation and enforcing immigration law.
It's going to be a huge, huge change for the whole country.
Now, I have to ask you because we've seen recently that Governor Newsom has come out and talked about, oh, the gas prices are so up, they're so much higher in California, and he's blaming all of it on Iran.
And certainly, to be sure, the oil markets have absolutely contracted.
But, Steve, is that the real reason?
That gas is up so high in California, and is there anything that the governor could do, or perhaps a new governor, to provide relief there?
Of course.
Look, the reason that we have the highest gas price, I mean, you go around California, I'm on the road the whole time.
And so, you know, last week we were seeing 650, 690, we saw 723 at one point, and it's just insane.
However, bad it is in America in terms of the temporary spike from what's going on in the Mideast, it's at least $2 a gallon worse in California.
Trump is the president here.
As well.
The Iran war is also going on, as it were, here.
So it can't be that.
It's obviously not that.
It's obviously Gavin Newsom and his policies.
A combination of the gas tax, which is the highest in the country, the regulations on production and refining of oil, which are ridiculous and don't do anything for the climate.
All they do is cause pain.
And then the final part is shutting down our oil and gas industry in California.
We have abundant oil reserves in California, and yet we're closing it down.
We are now importing nearly 80% of the oil we use in California.
There's no pipeline in and out of California.
So, what we're doing is shipping it in from halfway around the world.
Our number one provider of oil today is Iraq.
It's just insane when we have it here, all in the name of climate.
They're spewing out carbon emissions on these tankers bringing oil from Iraq to California when we have it here.
But they want to pretend that this is good for the environment.
It's just insane.
And so, Steve, as As governor, what could you do to provide relief to Californians on this?
So, number one is you can suspend the gas tax.
And in fact, even some Democrats have been calling for that.
And that has to be with the legislature, but that can be suspended over time, it needs to be reduced.
But the underlying thing that the governor really can do directly is open up California oil and gas production, because they're closing it down through administrative action through one of the agencies of state government, where I would kick out the climate fanatics who are there now, put in place Common sense pro energy people and tell them to issue every single permit that the industry needs.
I've had these conversations with the industry, and we think that if we've got a sensible attitude there, we can double California oil and gas production every two years.
That creates more business for the refineries so they don't have to close down, so we don't have to import finished gasolines, and the whole system can get back on track.
So, actually, there's a lot you can do, and very quickly as governor, to turn this situation around and bring down prices.
It was actually one of my previous conversations with the president, I'll share with you.
One of the first pledges that I made, in fact, the first pledge on the campaign trail after I launched my campaign was $3 gas in California.
Of course, $3 gas for the rest of the country sounds, what's so good about that?
For us, it's amazing.
And I remember speaking to the president about something else, and he cut me off and he'd seen me talking about it.
He said, Hey, Steve, I've seen you talk about $3 gas.
Keep saying that.
You'll win the race just with that.
And then he stopped and said, Wait, what about 250?
What about 250?
Steve, real quick, our field correspondent, Kevin Posobic, has a quick question for you.
Hey, Steve, and your endorsement now, it comes on the heels of another voter ID initiative in California.
Amidst this filibustering with the Save Act, I wanted to ask you so you guys got over a million signatures and you only needed about 800,000, it seems.
What's your team doing to head this on moving forward?
Real quick, just one minute, Steve.
I'm so glad you raised that.
It's actually one of the main reasons we really can pull this off and bring the shock victory in November, which I know no one is expecting.
They say California is so Democratic.
It's all about turnout, of course, in a midterm election.
And voter ID on the ballot in November, as it will now be, is a huge driver of Republican turnout.
So that's one of the big reasons I think we can win that voter ID ballot initiative.
The other, of course, is the disastrous Democrat field.
I mean, look at who they're sending.
As the president would say, they're not sending their best.
Eric Swalwell.
Katie Porter, the billionaire climate fanatic Tom Steyer.
These Democrats are all beatable.
And now, with the president's endorsement, I'm very confident that I will indeed beat whichever one of them.
Well, congratulations and Godspeed to you, Steve Hilton.
Check him out, Steve Hilton for governor.
Check out Kevin Posobick as well on X. Ladies and gentlemen, as always, you have our permission to lay ashore.