Aug. 20, 2025 - Human Events Daily - Jack Posobiec
47:43
France and the UK Walk Back Reports of Military Peacekeeping in Ukraine
Here’s your Daily dose of Human Events with @JackPosobiec Go to https://www.protectwithposo.com or call (844) 577-POSO now. You can move part of your 401(K), IRA, or savings into real, physical gold and silver, and you may qualify for up to 5000 Dollars in free silver. Stay prepared with a Medical Emergency Kit from The Wellness Company. Visit https://www.TWC.HEALTH/POSO and use code POSO and save 10% + Free Shipping on all orders. US Residents Only. Support the show
I want to take a second to remind you to sign up for the Poso Daily Brief.
It is completely free.
It will be one email that's sent to you every day.
You can stop the endless scrolling trying to find out what's going on in your world.
We will have this delivered directly to you, totally free.
Go to humanevents dot com slash Poso.
Sign up today.
It's called the Poso Daily Brief.
Read what I read for show prep.
You will not regret it.
humanevents dot com slash Poso, totally free.
The Poso Daily Brief.
This is what happens when the fourth turning meets fifth generation warfare.
Safety, safety, safety!
A commentator, international social media sensation, and former Navy intelligence veteran.
This is Human Events with your host, Jack Posobic.
Christ is killed.
Overnight, fiery strikes across Ukraine amid the push for peace.
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky writing, the strikes, quote, only confirm the need to put pressure on Moscow.
While President Trump is pitting his hopes for peace on direct talks between Zelensky and Russian President Vladimir Putin.
I thought it would be better if they met without me, just to see.
I want to see what goes on.
The president saying he would join a future session with both leaders if needed.
If necessary, and it probably would be, but if necessary, I'll go and I'll probably be able to get it closed.
President Donald Trump has pulled security clearances from thirty seven intelligence officials who he says have abused the public trust.
Those thirty seven individuals that we revoked directed the revocation of security clearances from today by under the direction of President Trump, they aided and abetted in this action, this seditious conspiracy that undermined our democracy.
Well, tonight a Stockton truck driver is facing vehicular homicide charges after a deadly crash in Florida.
He's also now facing extradition and possible deportation.
28-year-old Harjender Singh made his first appearance in court today.
The case is sparking attention from politicians questioning his immigration status and why he was issued a California commercial driver's license.
President Donald Trump's putting teeth into a decades-old federal rule requiring commercial truck drivers to read and speak English.
The executive order signed in April mandates that drivers must pass on the spot English proficiency tests as a non-negotiable safety standard.
Secretary of Transportation Sean Duffy says the law put in place during the Obama administration has never properly been enforced.
Allowing drivers who cannot read stop signs or understand police officers' instructions to operate a 80,000 pound big rig threatens the safety of every American on our roadway.
Well, ladies and gentlemen, welcome aboard today's edition Human Events Daily.
We're here live in Washington, D.C. Back in studio, back in studio here for the first day after a couple of days on the road.
We did the show from Alaska.
We did the show the last two days up at the White House itself, but now we are back in studio.
Today is August 20th, 2025, Anno Domino.
So the questions now come down.
The bilateral meeting was held between President Trump and President Putin up there in Anchorage, Alaska.
That was Friday.
Had the honor of traveling alongside the delegation on Air Force One.
It was there on the tarmac as President Putin and President Trump met one another.
The B-2 fly over our heads.
Everyone got to see that.
Incredible.
Incredible moment, incredible historic moment.
Then we had the multilateral meeting at the White House.
That was on Monday.
So the questions come in.
Where then is the status of the deal?
President Trump, and over the weekend we heard other members of the administration talking about the question of security guarantees, security guarantees.
And President Trump said in an interview yesterday morning that perhaps those security guarantees could include the use of British, German, and French troops as a peacekeeping force on the ground in Ukraine.
I remarked yesterday at the White House press briefing where I got to sit in the new media chair.
Hope everyone does that, by the way.
I hope everyone has the opportunity to.
And thank you to the White House press team, Caroline Levitt and everyone else for allowing me that opportunity.
But I asked, would that be possible to get the Russians to agree to, even though given the fact that they have unequivocally stated that they would not want or would not accept NATO troops on the ground in Ukraine?
And of course, these deliberations are ongoing.
Well, Foreign Minister of Russia, Sergei Lavrov, who was there at the meeting in Anchorage as well, has come out and stated once again, no security guarantees that involve NATO troops.
However, he had an interesting statement, to say the least.
He said, why not security guarantees of the United Nations Permanent Security Council members, which of course include the United States, Great Britain, and France, but it would also include Russia as perhaps a member of this security guarantee, as well as, who's the fifth member?
The People's Republic of China.
And we've been telling you that from the very start that they were going to bring China into all of this because all of this is about the role of China moving forward.
So Sergei Lavrov brings this up saying, let's get China involved.
Now there's an interesting angle that you could look at from here and we'll talk about that with our next guest.
We've got Dan Caldwell coming in, former DOD official in the Trump administration, because one of the pieces of skepticism on the Russian side of this has always been the two years, four years cycle, the idea that if they make a deal with the Americans, how can you be
Well, one of the ways around that, of course, could be a security resolution, Security Council resolution from the United States.
So have President Trump with his authority as the U.S. leader, President Putin with his authority, Xi Jinping with his authority as well, get a resolution, maybe it's 3-2, you know, but prevent France and Great Britain from vetoing it, then you have the ability to actually enshrine something in this higher body.
And again, by the way, I'm not going to sit here and say the United Nations is some bastion of efficiency, but you would at least have something that they could point to and say, your government agreed to this.
We all agreed to this, so let's all get.
on the same page.
Could it be possibly that the United Nations Permanent Security Council is the right venue to move to next in this forum?
We're going to talk about that all and the probability of whether or not a deal gets made in the next two weeks here on Human Events Daily.
Real America's Voice will be right back.
We'll stand in our way.
And our golden age has just begun.
This is Human Events with Jack Postovic.
Now it's time for everyone to understand what America First truly means.
Welcome to the second American Revolution.
All right, Jack Presopic, here we are back at Human Events Daily Washington, D.C. today on Real America's Voice.
Folks, when President Trump won the biggest election of our lifetimes, he promised that the economy would be popping within months of him taking office.
And you know something, he was serious, especially when it comes to gold.
Now, in April, gold shattered its all-time high, set 40 years ago when it hit $3,500 per ounce.
Silver is now on the rise too.
But the way things are looking, especially with the uncertainty of war, the sky is the limit.
That's precisely why President Trump declared last week that he will not be placing tariffs on gold.
It's very simple.
There's no stopping the precious metals market.
And that's why I partnered with Allegiance Gold.
Whether you're a collector looking for the best pricing in the precious metals space or you're looking to really protect your family's future, it doesn't matter.
If it's $5,000 or $5 million, now's the time to act.
So just go, it's really simple.
Go to protect withwithposo.com you can get started at protectwithposo.com Allegiance Gold will show you why they have the top ratings in the industry and I've been partnered with them for years at this point.
We put our money where our mouth is.
So when you go to protectwithposo.com or give them a call, 844-577 Poso, you can move part of your 401k IRA or savings into real physical gold and silver.
You may even qualify for up to $5,000, seriously, in free silver.
And with the way the market is looking, that free silver could be worth a lot more by the time it actually arrives securely at your doorstep.
So give them a call.
It's 844-577.
POSO or you can visit of course protectwithposo.com that's 844-577-7676 or visit protectwithposo.com it's smart secure and simple call them 844-577-7676.
All right, I want to get back into this.
A lot of these questions, the security guarantee, Russia's counter now with a security guarantee from the United Nations would bring in our next guest.
It's Dan Caldwell, former DOD official in the Trump administration.
Dan, how are you?
Thanks for having me on, Jack.
Well, Dan, before we even get into We've seen the incredible visuals.
I got to see them with a front row seat there in Anchorage as well as at the White House for the multilateral meeting.
But when it really comes down to the nitty gritty, this is something that I've been saying all weekend.
I'll say here again, you know, when we're talking about security guarantees or Article 5, that means that some country has got to roger up and say, we are willing to go to war, to put our country at war with the Russian Federation.
And in three and a half years of this thing, you have not seen any other member, whether it be Europe, the EU, NATO, or otherwise, nobody has been willing to do that.
People are willing to send arms, they're willing to send money, they're willing to send their emotional support, but you know what you don't see?
Actual boots on the ground.
So the question is, when it comes to these security guarantees, is this something that's actually serious or not?
So we've actually been through this before.
Earlier this year, when I was in the Trump administration, is that the Europeans tried to get together what at the time they were calling an assurance force.
It was a force that would deploy to Ukraine after a ceasefire because at that time the focus was on getting a ceasefire and then going to a peace deal.
And by the way, I think Trump is right to recognize that trying to get a ceasefire and then a peace deal is not a good idea and he's right to focus on securing a broader settlement to the conflict.
But the Europeans at that time, they were trying to get together 20,000 troops and they couldn't do it.
Some of the biggest armies in Europe, whether it was the Polish, the Germans, the Italians, they outright refused at the beginning to participate and then it really fell to the British and French and they could not pull together the troops to do it.
And since then, not much has changed and you're kind of seeing the cycle repeat itself.
You've already seen the Germans come out and say they're not going to contribute.
They're saying, oh well, we just deployed all these new troops to the Baltic.
We can't do it.
The Italians have said they're not going to contribute.
The Poles have said they're not going to contribute.
And today both the French and the British poured cold water on them actually contributing in a significant way to a peacekeeping force that would be part of a security guarantee or some type of post-conflict settlement.
So the point of me walking through that is this, is that I think, again, President Trump has made significant progress here.
But what I'm increasingly worried about is that the Europeans are trying to do a bait and switch on us, is that they're trying to get us to commit to doing certain things and that they won't hold up their end of the bargain and lead us holding the bag in terms of providing these security guarantees by ourselves.
So to those who are hopefully watching the administration of the White House, I would just say that we need to be incredibly careful here that the Europeans don't do what they've been doing really the last 30, 40 years and pass the buck to us again and make us bear the primary burden for solving yet another problem in Europe's backyard.
Well, And that's where it comes down to, because suddenly you hear this stuff about, oh, we're going to provide coordination and maybe some air cover and air support.
And it sounds a lot like a no-fly zone, which gets you into the same situation that it got in, that these exact same conversations when they were happening at the time over Syria.
Because all of a sudden, if you're in a situation where we've got our combat air patrols up and the Russians have theirs up, guess what?
One mishap, one, one issue that goes wrong, suddenly you're going to find yourselves in a shooting war with Russia.
And this is something that even Barack Obama understood is not something the United States wants to get into.
That's 100% correct.
And it's important to remember that if you're going to establish a no-fly zone, that doesn't just entail flying planes over a certain area.
You saw this in the wars in the former Yugoslavia where NATO did a no-fly zone and then in Iraq where the United States and Britain and then for a while France did no-fly zone.
It entails shooting down other aircraft.
and also bombing air defense sites that could threaten American or NATO aircraft.
So that is something that I think will actually probably be a non-starter for the Russians and something that we need to be incredibly cautious about.
Now, if air support means the United States helps move troops, assuming the Europeans can get them together, and as I said, that's really looking increasingly unlikely, but if the British or French need help moving troops from one side of the continent to another, and that requires our airlift, Okay, fine.
That's not that big of a deal.
But the minute you start to send assets across that border or you start to station certain types of capability on the border in Poland or Romania or Slovakia or Hungary, that's when things get really dangerous and so not only do I think it's a non-starter for the Russians but if we go ahead with it and focus a lot on it we could start to to get ourselves in a really difficult position well and so this is this is kind of where it comes down to because I
just read through some of Sergei Lavrov's comments earlier today and he mentioned right away he said no NATO but he would be open to and this was so interesting members of the UN permanent security council contributing to the guarantees now we didn't talk about boots on the ground, but he was talking about guarantees.
So one would, I think, at this point believe that there's some, some, a bit of synonymity between this idea of a guarantee as well as a peacekeeping force.
But he mentioned something that not only, so, okay, the UN Security Council, that's the United States, that's France, that's Great Britain.
It's also, however, Russia, of course, who is one of Ukraine's neighbors, something he's talking about.
And in addition, it's China, the People's Republic of China.
So possibly bringing China into all of this.
And while I think that obviously changes the calculus.
I do think that there's perhaps an interesting opening here for getting some kind of resolution done at the UN level, because this is a rare time where you might actually be able to get the United States, Russia and China to all agree on a resolution.
Yeah, I think it's an interesting, you know, situation.
And what I mean by that is a collection of countries, both within Europe, possibly just outside of Europe, like Turkey, and possibly even countries as far as field, like Saudi Arabia or India, to help guarantee their security going forward.
And again, security guarantees doesn't necessarily just mean troops on the ground.
It could mean things like that a certain set of countries provide training or certain capabilities to the Ukrainians.
They commit to provide a certain amount of arms.
And that's actually somewhat of what our relationship is with the Israelis is like is we have a memorandum of understanding that we're going to provide them x billion dollars worth of arms.
That's why a few years ago you had some people saying, hey, the Israel model as a security guarantee structure would work for Ukraine.
Now, it's not a perfect solution.
Of course, the Russians would have concerns about us providing certain capabilities, but again, a lot of people have this binary idea of how security guarantees work.
It's either like NATO Article 5 or it's nothing.
And there's a lot of different things in between that could work here and that ultimately the Russians would agree to.
And again, they've admitted since 2022.
to they of course have their interest they want some type of veto and say in it and you understand why but they have have always admitted that that some post-conflict resolution is going to invite and involve some type of security guarantee for Ukraine it's just a matter of what it is and what it isn't Yeah, that's exactly right.
Dan, we've got a quick break coming up here.
I want to hold you over because this is the most important story in the world.
This is the top of the news cycle and we are going to get to the bottom of where all of this is going.
Who knows?
Perhaps in two weeks we'll be in Moscow.
jack posobiec real america's voice human events daily right back They talk about influencers.
These are influencers.
And they're friends of mine.
Jack Preselvik.
Where's Jack?
Jack.
He's got a great job.
All right, Jack Preselvik.
We're back here live human events daily Washington, D.C. We're on with Dan Coba, a former DOD official from the Trump administration.
We're talking about all these questions regarding a security framework for Ukraine.
And Dan, I'll just throw it to you.
you know this is the the uh the six billion dollar question but do you think that the sides can come together on this because you know we keep hearing these questions about security guarantees but then You hear these leaders, they seem like they want to do a deal.
The Russians have shown their willingness.
They flew all the way from Moscow to Anchorage, Alaska to talk about doing a deal.
It just seems like what's in the middle are the blob, it's the media, it's neocons, it's the industrial complex, all of these various things.
things are standing in the way but it's an incredible situation where you actually have all of the world leaders fairly aligned on this and you know certainly there's questions about you know is it the contact line or the oblast line and and those things that can be hammered out but it really seems as though the impediment to peace is not the leaders or the people involved here it's as as they call it the men in dark suits Yes,
you know, I do think one thing that has been interesting to watch is that you have seen certain European leaders, at least rhetorically and of course the Zelensky regime really start to recognize that look, we gotta move away from this idea that we're going to achieve this total victory against the Russians.
And I think the real turning point with that was when the United States demonstrated in early March that it was willing to shut it all off.
And by all of it, I mean our aid, our intelligence, and other types of support that we were providing to Ukraine.
That had demonstrated to the Europeans and the Ukrainians that, look, the United States could walk away if we view that continuing to involve ourselves in this conflict, continuing to try and drive a peace arrangement that nobody seems to want, we will walk away.
And that I saw that firsthand as that changed the Ukrainian tune significantly.
So that was a very important move that the Trump administration did in early March, and if you remember, everybody was melting down back then.
They were calling at the end of NATO and the liberal international order and all this other nonsense.
But that was an important demonstration of American willingness to walk away, which creates incentives for other people to do more and to do the right thing.
I will say that I said specifically the European rhetoric has changed.
I think we need to acknowledge that there's a lot of people in Europe and Europe isn't a unitary entity who want this war to continue.
Again, it's not everyone in Europe, but there are a lot of people who want it to continue for a variety of reasons.
Either they still cling to this illusion that Ukraine can win a total victory, or they think it's in their interest for Russia to continue to lose troops in Ukraine, or they think it's a way to keep the United States overinvested in the continent in terms of providing a security umbrella.
And really, that's what I think the main European goal has been the last couple of weeks.
Weeks is to try and use a peace settlement, not necessarily just to end the war, but to keep the United States involved in being the primary security provider for Europe.
And that's why they're trying to structure security guarantees in a certain way where there's a they're calling it an American backstop, but what they really want is a leading role for the United States.
And so again, that's why I think the administration needs to be really careful about how these security guarantees are structured and what the actual responsibilities of the United States are and make sure the Europeans don't buck past to us yet.et again.
Well, and of course, you've also got to run the situation of the potential for bad actors to get involved here because certainly there's elements of all sides here as well as who knows what other third parties could get in and really throw a monkey wrench in the works because, you know, people, I remember the media kept saying, where's the ceasefire?
Why hasn't Trump gotten a ceasefire up in Anchorage?
And of course, how can he agree to a ceasefire when he's not one of the leaders of the armies that are currently fighting?
So if he sits down and tells the Russians that we're going to have a ceasefire and then some Ukrainian brigade goes out and one of these drone forces launches an attack, then who just broke the ceasefire?
Now you just bought the entire conflict at this point.
And the big worry here that you hear in D.C. a lot, that I'm hearing a lot too, is that people don't want to get into a situation where this becomes Trump's Afghanistan, where we saw the fall of Kabul and the absolute overrun of the Afghan National Army, the
the flight of the prime minister out by the as the taliban took over the entire country and unfortunately the russians have shown that they are far uh far more willing to keep fighting they're willing to go all all the way up to the Dneper River and possibly even march on Kiev in the next couple of years here if they don't get a deal because they're basically saying we are willing to pay the price no matter the cost because it's in our security interest to do so.
And the real question here is will they be able to be satiated for whatever they're given, whether from the Ukrainian side as well as the security guarantees as well?
The enemy gets a vote.
Absolutely.
And I think you were alluding to this, but we also need to remember too, is that the current government in Ukraine, and I have to say they, they're not completely unifying themselves.
You know, I won't exactly say who, but there are elements that I think would surprise a lot of Americans that see the writing on the wall, that recognize that they need to end this, this war.
And there are people in the current government in Ukraine that are realistic and behind the scenes they're trying to drive an end to this conflict that preserves a decent future for a Ukrainian nation.
However, I think it's fair to say that Zelenskyy and a lot of his closest agents, it is in their interest for this war to continue.
I think we both know that if there are elections held in the next few months that Zelensky probably loses.
Either loses to somebody like Zhluzhny or he loses to somebody on the super far right, you know, somebody associated with like an Azov battalion or a right sector type movement.
So it is in his interest for this war to continue for a period of time.
And you can't ignore that.
And that's why the United States, just like we were in March, needs to be prepared to use its leverage.
over Ukraine to get them to agree to things.
We've got to use leverage in every way possible.
And that's what President Trump is doing.
Dan, where can people go to follow you to get access to what you're putting out?
Best place is on my X account at DanD Caldwell.
That's where I put out most of my work these days.
Folks, give him a follow.
Serious stuff only over there.
That's where the work really takes place, Dan Caldwell.
Thanks so much, Ryan, for being on.
All right, we'll be right back.
Real America's Voice, Human Bot Zero.
Jack, where is Jack?
Where is Jack?
Where is he?
Jack, I want to see you.
Great job, Jack.
Thank you.
What a job you do.
You know, we have an incredible thing.
We're always talking about the fake news and the bad, but we have guys., and these are the guys who should be getting publicity.
All right, Jack Subic back here, Human Events Daily.
Really excited to have our next guest on.
We have Dr. Alejandro Diaz.
He is from the Wellness Company, and he is the chief of pediatric medicine.
Dr. Diaz, how are you?
Hey, Jack, how are you?
Thank you so much for having me on.
Of course, it was great to see you, by the way, over there in Warsaw.
I said, wow, the wellness company's even over here in Warsaw.
You guys are really covering down on all your travel, because that's always when I get my wellness company kit.
I always make sure I grab it for my travel now.
Yeah, thank God that the wellness company, it's everywhere.
Yeah, and it was a pleasure meeting you.
And I think it was an amazing event during the inauguration of President Navarrocki.
No, it was great.
And by the way, twc.helpslash post so, twc.helpslash post so, get your travel kits, get your emergency kits, get everything.
Folks, I want to play now this clip that's just come out.
It's RFK Jr. talking about this huge announcement on mRNA vaccines.
Let's play it.
At HHS, we have a division called the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority, or BARTA.
BARTA drives some of our most advanced scientific research.
It funds developments of vaccines, drugs, diagnostics, and other tools to fight emerging diseases and national health threats.
Over the past few weeks, BARTA reviewed 22 mRNA vaccine development investments and began canceling them.
Let me explain why.
Most of these shots are for flu or COVID, but as the pandemic showed us, mRNA vaccines don't perform well against viruses that infect the upper respiratory tract.
Here's the problem.
MRNA only codes for a small part of the viral proteins, usually a single antigen.
One mutation and the vaccine becomes ineffective.
Millions of people, maybe even you or someone you know, got the Omicron variant despite being vaccinated.
That's because a single mutation can make MRNA vaccines ineffective.
The same risk applies to flu.
After reviewing the science and consulting top experts at NIH and FDA, HHS has determined that MRNA technology poses more risks than benefits for these respiratory viruses.
That's why after extensive review, BARDA has begun the process of terminating these 22 contracts totaling just under $5 million.
So huge announcement from our Secretary of Health there, RFK Jr.
Dr. Alejandro Diaz, can you walk us through why it was?
And I think we've all sort of heard about the issues with mRNA, but why was it specifically that RFK Jr. came in and said, we're canceling this.
It's terminated.
You know, Jack, what I can tell you is that this is bad news for a few but great news for the rest of the world you know as an immunologist and very actively and an active voice internationally during the initiation of the covet operation uh i was against this mass vaccination because that was an experimental vaccine and now we know unfortunately the damage it's already done but What I admire and
deeply admire about Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. as well as Director of NIH, Dr. J. Babcheria, is that they promise to make America healthy again through the Maha movement.
And that's exactly what they are delivering.
So I'm very proud of them.
I am very proud of President Trump.
And I am very proud of what they're doing because that's exactly what we need.
But let me make something very clear.
And it's important to mention this to your audience.
Secretary Kennedy, he wants to make sure that everybody understand that the research for mRNA, the research for mRNA will be only for upper respiratory viruses.
And I think that's an amazing decision.
I'm very proud of them as an immunologist and obviously as a pediatrician..
So when we look at this now, the response from big pharma and anyone can just go see the headlines.
Wall Street Journal has a huge op-ed out saying RFK's dangerous attack on mRNA research, biopharma drive, Kennedy's mRNA cuts could set U.S. science back, et cetera.
Even the LA Times is coming out now, the BBC, NPR, they're fact-checking him left and right, Washington Post.
Are we seeing this big industry response because of the fact that he's doing exactly what he said he would do on the campaign trail and that he's actually demanding that real studies be done before U.S. taxpayer money is going to this new technology.
That is exactly right, Jack.
And, you know, he's delivering what he promised.
And I'm very supportive of him.
I had a conversation, very deep conversation with him once through Zoom.
And it's amazing the amount of knowledge that he has in terms of medicine.
He's a lawyer, but I bet he knows, sometimes he knows more things than many many of my colleagues so they they took an an amazing turn of can canceling this 22 mrna contracts worth nearly 500 million dollars and that's something that's something that's why i say bad news for a few and great news for the rest of the world and i think this is we're going on the on the right track And
so when it comes down to it though, how should people be looking at these mRNA vaccines?
You know, there's a lot of talk about them, a lot of skepticism, a lot of worry.
We now have several years of data and just in terms of their mass adoption by a lot of people obviously who took the vaccines what are we seeing that's come out as a result of this so let me go through the numbers jack there are approximately 5.5 billion people who unfortunately took those jabs worldwide and we we we are seeing the damage we are seeing the collateral of
all this and the side effects from myocarditis to pericarditis to autoimmune disease, you know, orticaria, hives, infertility, so many problems.
And I want to mention, you know, the turbo cancers.
We are seeing an increase in turbo cancers from lymphomas, breast cancer, brain cancer, you know, you name it.
There's a lot of cancer going on.
There's a potential risk that we have to acknowledge and just right after the application of this mass vaccination worldwide, which I consider a human catastrophe.
And so when we're looking at it that way, what are, can you walk us through some of those symptoms for people who do potentially have these injuries?
Well, we see, I don't know if you're familiar with POTS, POTS syndrome.
You know, these are patients that they start to get dissonance, palpitation, and they weakness and things along that line.
Their life just changed.
That's only for POTS.
And we're starting to see a lot of POTS everywhere.
I diagnose POTS very.
very regularly in my clinic.
Also myocarditis, which is inflammation of the heart, pericarditis, which is the inflammation of the sac that covers the heart, a lot of thyroid problems, autoimmune problems, skin problems.
And so this was a catastrophe.
You know, I was very hardly criticized because I, first because I predicted the pandemic a year before.
That's kind of my journey.
I predicted the pandemic because a year before, on the third week of October 2018, because I was watching very closely what was happening at the global sphere, what was happening in Europe, what was happening in Canada, United States, Central America, South America, and what happened during the gathering of the caravans in Honduras on the third week of October 2018.
And we were just about to be 100 years after the last pandemic, which was the Spanish flu in 1918.
So I only thought, you know, this is chaos and we need a reset.
And I thought that it was a pandemic coming.
And I said it on national podcast.
done and then they handed the entire country over to Dr. Anthony Fauci.
And by the way, you know, every time I think about this guy and what he did and you go back to it.
Ed Martin now has the emails that are starting to come out that said, you know what, even Biden's Department of Justice had problems with the pardons that were being signed by this autopen.
That thing is completely invalid.
That pardon was not signed by the President of the United States, and he was certainly not acting in good faith and of sound mind when he wrote that thing.
I think Dr. Fauci's pardon should be challenged.
I think they should challenge that.
Take it all the way to the Supreme Court.
It was obviously not.
not done properly and he needs to be investigated.
By the way, states can also go after this guy and look at what he did, the lies that were told, the fact that this happened and affected so many people.
That's what Dr. Fauci needs to worry about.
I'll be right back.
Back, Jack Posobiec, the America's Voice, Kingdom Uncensored.
Hey, great guy.
He's been my friend right through the beginning of this whole beautiful event.
And we're going to turn it around and make our electricity go to him.
Amen.
All right, Jack Pacific.
We are back here, Human Events Daily, Washington, D.C. We're on with Dr. Alejandro Diaz.
He is the chief of pediatric medicine over at the Wellness Company.
If you want to check them out, by the way, and all the great things that they have to offer, all natural solutions.
the ultimate spike detox as well for anyone who's come in contact with this it's really easy i use wellness company i love their stuff i love their kits i've got them all over the place here you just go to twc.health slash poso twc.health slash poso and save 10% plus free shipping with promo code POSO.
By the way, these kits, I love them so much.
I've got them for myself.
I've got them for my wife.
I've got them for my family members.
So we just, you know, we just keep loading up.
And it makes a great gift, too, if you want to get it in terms of that for something that's a little bit different, but also something that really helps people in your family.
I wanted to also get into.
I wanted to get also get into there's been a story that has been, and Dr. Diaz, this has been really rocking all over social media.
People came to me with it, and then boom, we see this in Mar Martha's vineyard just a couple of days ago.
Meat and dairy allergies, they claim from tick bites, are now skyrocketing where in Martha's vineyard this summer, as well as all over the country, they're talking about this alpha gal syndrome.
I want to play a clip now describing it.
I have like meat for dinner at night.
and I'd be absolutely fine after I ate it.
And then in the middle of the night, I would wake up and I would be throwing up or have severe stomach pain.
I have abnormal levels of the alpha Gau in my blood work.
The bite of a lone star tick seems to cause an immune system response that can result in folks having an allergic reaction to the consumption or exposure to this alpha gau sugar.
Prior to her diagnosis, Miller says she struggled with mysterious and uncomfortable symptoms for years.
Miller says she would also get hives or rashes, asthma issues and fatigue.
You start thinking that it's in your head.
You're making these things up.
The muscle aches and problems with my muscles and stuff like that.
What's the first thing you go to?
You go to an anti-inflammatory, you go to Tylenol, you go to some ibuprofen.
Well, it's making it worse because they have mammal products in them.
Dr. Diaz, walk us through this.
What is AlphaGal syndrome?
Why does it seemingly cause this allergy to meat and dairy products?
And is this really just something that came out of ticks?
Wow, I didn't know you're going to ask me this, Jack, but this is very interesting and it's very kind of fairly new syndrome and it's called AlphaGal syndrome or AGS.
There has been diagnosed approximately 90,000 cases since the early 2000s.
That's pretty much about 11,000 cases approximately a year.
And so what it is, it's a foreign protein that it gets from a tick bite.
And the reason it's called alpha-gala-1, it's because there are two molecules of galactose, which is Galactose 1 Alamut.
alpha 1 3 galactose and it's a pharyng protein because that protein it's unique for mammals, specifically cows, pork, deer, and lamb, and many others, but these are the most important.
It does not exist in human.
So once you get infected or once you get a tick bite, you will get sensitized and the patient will produce what we call IgE, specific antibodies.
So when that specific person or patient will eat red meat, again, they can develop what we call a severe, kind of severe allergic reaction with skin hives, swelling of the ears,
the eye, the lips, respiratory problems like coughing, wheezing, shortness of breath, you know, heart problems as well, low pressure, palpitations, gastrointestinal problems like diarrhea, abdominal pain.
And, you know, it mimics an allergic reaction, almost an anaphylactic reaction.
So it is very interesting.
The tricky part here, Jack, is that you have to be very well trained.
Why?
Because as allergists, we see patients that they develop what we call hypersensitivity type one that's an immediate reaction like let's say somebody is allergic to to peanut they eat peanut and immediately within minutes sometimes seconds they develop the problem same for the other allergens here it's a different story it can take from two to six hours after that so it's it's kind of tricky
and the other tricky part for my allergy colleagues worldwide is that not every time that the patient that it's allergic to this foreign protein will develop when they eat red meat again.
So it's very tricky.
It's fairly new kind of a disease and we have to be prepared.
So I recommend everybody to go and be checked by their allergist.
I think that's exactly right.
And for folks that are worried about this in general, I would also suggest twc.health slash posso just head in there make sure you've got stockpiles that are run up on this but this this syndrome you know it's it's really just the the symptoms of it are really strange and And it's got a lot of conversation out there about, you know, where it really was that the origins of AlphaGal came from.
And I'm honestly not someone who's dug in on it as much as I was on COVID-19, but I do hear a lot of people saying that it acts very differently to other syndromes that we've seen before.
Yeah, so I'm an allergist, immunologist, and pediatrician.
So I've been trained to see all sorts of allergic reactions and those kind of reactions.
We have been in touch with ticks for thousands of years.
We've been eating red meat for thousands of years.
How come this is a new trend?
So it's important.
Here I just want to put the facts and then I want everybody to make their own conclusions.
Well, no, I think that's exactly right.
And it's, it's, it's obviously something new, some kind of new syndrome that's come out.
And the fact that it's all over Martha's vineyard of all places is, is it, They've got absolutely everything up in Martha's Vineyard that you've got concierge doctors and all the rest.
And yet even they can't seem to figure out how to deal with this.
That is exactly right.
And something important to mention is that the vast majority of all the cases, this close to 90,000 cases, they have seen in southeast of the United States and Midwest.
So it's interesting, but there are some important issues that we have to take a look as allergists.
I think it's exactly right.
And it's something that, of course, people worry about Lyme disease, even to this day, the other famous tick-borne illness.
And it's something that even to this day, even though that's been around for decades at this point, that's still something that causes a lot of concern and can in some cases still be deadly.
Once anybody is facing one of our biggest fear as allergists or doctors, it's to encounter with a patient with an anaphylactic reaction.
That's a life-threatening problem, and we have to act immediately.
But I strongly recommend anybody who are dealing with new hives and things along this line that they go and be checked by their local allergists.
