July 25, 2024 - Human Events Daily - Jack Posobiec
48:58
American Flags on Fire As Kamala Lies Her Way to Nomination
Here’s your Daily dose of Human Events with @JackPosobiec Save up to 65% on MyPillow products by going to https://www.MyPillow.com/POSO and use code POSO Go to https://www.BlackoutCoffee.com/POSO and use promo code POSO20 for 20% OFF your first order.Go to https://www.patriotmobile.com/poso/ or call 878-PATRIOT to get free activation with offer code POSOYou can get a FREE report with all the details on how the Bank On Yourself strategy adds guarantees, predictability and control to ...
I want to take a second to remind you to sign up for the Pozo Daily Brief.
It is completely free.
It'll be one email that's sent to you every day.
You can stop the endless scrolling, trying to find out what's going on in your world.
We will have this delivered directly to you, totally for free.
Go to humanevents.com slash Pozo.
Sign up today.
It's called the Pozo Daily Brief.
Read what I read for show prep.
You will not regret it.
humanevents.com slash Pozo.
Totally free.
The Pozo Daily Brief.
This is what happens when the fourth turning meets fifth generation warfare.
A commentator, international social media sensation, and former Navy intelligence veteran.
This is Human Events with your host Jack Posobiec.
They say something happened to me when I got shot.
I became nice.
And when you're dealing with these people, they're very dangerous people.
When you're dealing with them, you can't be too nice.
You really can't be.
So, if you don't mind, I'm not gonna be nice.
Is that okay?
For three and a half years, Lyon Kamala Harris has been the ultra-liberal driving force behind every single Biden catastrophe.
She is a radical left lunatic who will destroy our country.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu met with protests on his consequential trip to Washington.
The rampant speculation who will be Kamala Harris's running mate,
We've heard about the focus on Governor Josh Shapiro and Senator Mark Kelly, but today there's word Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg is also in the mix.
She's got a new line, you know.
She's going, I'm the prosecutor and he is the convicted felon.
That's their campaign.
I don't think people are going to buy it.
President Biden addressed the nation from the White House tonight, laying out his decision to bow out of the 2024 presidential race, endorsing his Vice President Kamala Harris, saying he was doing this for the good of the country.
I believe, I reckon as president, my leadership in the world, my vision for America's future, all merited a second term.
But nothing, nothing can come in the way of saving our democracy.
That includes personal ambition.
So I've decided the best way forward is to pass the torch to a new generation.
I'm going to call for Supreme Court reform because this is critical to our democracy.
Supreme Court reform.
Alright, Jack Prosopo here, back live, Human Events Daily.
For the first time in a while, back in Washington, D.C., today is July 25th, 2024, Anno Domini.
Well, the entire mainstream media is out now attacking J.D.
Vance for writing a blurb on the book, Unhumans.
That's something we've been looking at.
And they're saying, oh, can you believe that they say there's an irregular communist revolution going on in America?
That's crazy.
That's insane.
How could J.D.
Vance possibly believe such a thing?
Well, I don't know.
Maybe he took a look at what was happening at Union Station.
I don't know.
Literally yesterday.
Let's show what was happening at Union Station.
One of the greatest, by the way, train stations in all of America, where the American flags were run down, set on fire with Antifa and anti-Israel protesters and rioters dancing around, chanting and singing as the American flag was burned and Palestinian flags were put up.
And I'm sorry, we're not supposed to believe that this is part of some communist revolution, that it's all just happening by accident, it's all just totally organic, it's not connected to anything, there's just a whole crowd of thousands of lone wolves.
No, it's very obvious what's going on.
So please, If you want to continue to support these things, if you want to continue to support the Campus Radicals and the Union Station Radicals and the Washington, D.C.
Radicals, then by all means, continue to support it, you communist, atheist freaks, because that's what you're supporting.
So I'm more than happy, I'm more than happy to ask you about why you support this stuff.
And it's very clear.
We say throughout the book, we want this to end.
We want to go back to an America for all people.
Where your rights are protected, where your civil liberties are protected, where we can just live in peace, we can live in safety, safe from crime, safe from your radicalization.
That's what's going on in the streets.
But oh God, oh God no!
We wrote a book!
God forbid!
You know something?
Our anti-communist book is currently number one Publishers Weekly in the entire country.
number one national bestseller.
And I'm not saying that it's number one because of some anything, and it's not because of us, it's because of you.
It's because of what you've been doing to this country, what you have put the American people through for all of these years.
And J.D. Vance and Donald Trump and the rest of the people of this party and the rest of the people of this country are absolutely sick of you and these freaks that you've been letting run wild in the streets, We're sick of it and we want to do something about it.
We're going to follow the law.
We're going to be legal.
We're going to be reciprocal.
But we are going to be firm.
We are absolutely going to be firm.
And so that every one of those people that was out there, guess what?
We'll treat you the same.
Treat them the same way.
That they treated the J6ers.
How do you like that?
With the facial recognition, and the geo-tracking, and the going after everyone.
You know what?
Defacing National Monuments.
Uh oh!
Defacing National Monuments.
I think there's a couple federal crimes on the books for that one.
Stay tuned.
You'll be hearing from us very soon.
Human Events Day.
Ladies and gentlemen, one of the best ways that you can support us here at Human Events and the work that we do is subscribing to us on our Rumble channel.
Make sure you're subscribed, you hit the notifications, so you'll never miss a clip, you'll never miss a new live episode, and we're putting them out every single day of the week.
You talk about influences.
These are influences and they're friends of mine.
Jack.
So like where's Jack?
He's got a great job.
All right, Jack.
Human Events Daily.
Folks, Americans are tired and frustrated by a stalling economy, inflation, endless wars, and the relentless assault on our values.
Thankfully, there's companies like Patriot Mobile that still believe in America and our Constitution.
I'm proud to partner with Patriot Mobile because they're on the frontlines fighting for the First and Second Amendments, sanctity of life, and our military and first responder heroes.
Take a stand for conservative causes and put America first by switching to Patriot Mobile today.
You'll get the same nationwide coverage as the big providers because Patriot Mobile operates across all three major networks.
Plus, they back their service with a coverage guarantee.
Their 100% U.S.-based customer service team will find the best plan for your needs.
Keep your number, keep your phone, or upgrade.
Go to patriotmobile.com slash poso or call 972-PATRIOT.
Right now, get a free month when you use promo code POSO.
Don't get fooled by other providers pretending to share our values or have the same coverage.
They don't and they can't.
Join me and switch to America's only Christian conservative mobile provider, Patriot Mobile.
Go to patriotmobile.com slash poso or call 972-PATRIOT for your free month of service today.
Very excited to have on now Lieutenant Colonel Tony Schafer.
Tony, so we're talking about Kamala Harris.
We're talking about the communists that she supports.
The fact that she is, by the way, one of these cold, unfeeling, unempathetic ruthless, brutal, and I would say fake, absolutely fake commies.
And when you've got somebody like fake Kamala, who is up there potentially saying that she wants to run American national security and American foreign policy, I'm sitting there going, wait a minute, isn't fake Kamala the same person that nearly provoked World isn't fake Kamala the same person that nearly provoked World War III just two years ago at the Munich conference when she said that Ukraine absolutely has to be in NATO and Putin got the message and invaded Ukraine two days later.
Tony, walk me through this.
So she's completely ham handed and naive to the ways of the world.
I mean, I'm wearing a Reagan shirt partly because, you know, Ronald Reagan and his team during the Cold War actually understood how to speak the language of the Cold War.
And ultimately, they were able to use a series of national tools, not only military force, but diplomacy, deception, denial, and then military in the right way to cause the Soviet Union to collapse.
There's no such Brilliance on the side of the Democrats or the current progressives.
Let's walk through this.
There's three pieces of Kamala, which I find, the first one, she's a DEI hire.
Joe Biden said it herself, and Jack, last time I checked, the progressive left was supposed to be okay with that.
Right now, we're being told that calling her a DEI hire is somehow demeaning her.
Okay.
Well, it's your term.
Anyway, secondly, Just the fact that she's been exposed to no real consequences from her ham-handed comments.
Like you point out, two years ago, she was ready to get us into World War III.
I don't think she was smart enough to understand what she did.
She's... I'm gonna say this, I'm gonna get in trouble.
She's too stupid to know she's stupid.
That's how bad it is.
I mean, she's that naive to the fact that when she says something, She doesn't understand there's going to be consequences.
And third and most important, she is simply another puppet for whoever's going to be behind the scenes pulling the strings.
And I think that's why there's rumors right now of Barack Obama and others being a little bit concerned because she's, she's polished enough to say things and be taken seriously in some circles.
But when she says something that's really bad, as you've mentioned, Jack, people on the other side may take her serious.
And that could lead to real consequences.
So those are the three pieces that I'm seeing right now that ultimately add up.
You add them all together, it adds up to a potential train wreck, a dumpster fire wrapped in a train wreck of foreign policy, should she be the one that becomes in charge.
And this is something where we've already seen again that she was someone that was completely used by the military industrial complex to do their bidding saying that say and doesn't under even understand doesn't even have the basic understanding of what her statements mean they say go over there and make sure you make the case for Ukraine and NATO that's all she's given and so she says fine I'm gonna say that so she goes over and makes the case for Ukraine ukraine and nato and what do we get a potential provocation of world war three
and even a situation by the way where we were told that even that beforehand putin wanted negotiations that a month later he wanted to go exactly boris johnson by the way who blew those up even has his own piece out now in the daily mail admitting that they should start negotiating with putin boris johnson has finally come out now and started saying this but kamala harris she doesn't care she doesn't know and more
but most importantly she has no concern for the consequences of her actions as long as she's able to get power no The same way she doesn't care about the people of this country, she doesn't care about the people affected by the southern border, she doesn't care if your daughter is raped by... your daughter becomes the next Lakin Riley who gets raped by one of the Biden-Kamala newcomers.
No.
She doesn't care at all because fake Kamala only cares about herself.
But seriously, talk to me about that for a little bit.
What responses would you imagine seeing from a Russia and a China should she, let's devil's advocate, actually become president?
Well, she is, to your point, a true Marxist.
I mean, I'm not joking.
You can go out there and see videos of her talking about equity as something that should be the centerpiece of our political system.
That's Soviet.
I mean, Jack, she's a Soviet.
She's more Soviet than the Soviet Union.
So when you start with that, she sees herself as someone who needs to exude power.
When you exude power without the skills to understand how to manage power, you're simply going to go out there and be a bully.
And other folks out there, especially right now, we've talked about this a number of times on your show, there's a number of nations that just aren't going to stand for that.
The Russians, Are definitely not going to stand for it.
The Chinese are becoming much more muscular.
They're going to be able to push back and effectively so.
So the lack of finesse and the complete no reference point regarding history or historic fact makes her very dangerous because she is literally going to come in I think that because she has the power, she has the authority, she's going to be a bully to others.
And I'm telling you right now, if she's left to her own devices to be a bully, we're going to see the consequences economically, militarily, and diplomatically rapidly.
And oh, by the way, I mean, you think it's bad now with Jake Sullivan and Tony Blinken?
Imagine someone who is more like a wrestler I love Hulk Hogan, but imagine a Hulk Hogan type with no brain out, and I'm not demeaning him.
He's a great guy.
I'm just saying she would hire someone who has no ability to think at all regarding the intricacies that need to be managed regarding diplomatic actions.
Well, hold on, Tony.
Hold on now, Tony.
Don't say that she would hire DEI hires to staff the State Department and the Department.
Don't say it, Tony, because we're not allowed to say that.
Mika Brzezinski says we're not allowed to say these things.
We're not allowed to pronounce her name wrong.
Got to be very, very careful.
I've been told that D.E.I., that D.E.I., saying D.E.I.
is like saying the N-word, which is confusing to me because you guys are the ones who came up with D.E.I.
in the first place, and then we started talking about it, and then you didn't like it, and then you said it was the N-word, except that you guys were the ones who made it up, so does that mean that, I'm just trying to follow the logic here, that, you know, we would never, I would never, ever consider that Kamala Harris
As an astute student of foreign policy, as knowledgeable in foreign affairs as she is, would ever choose, say, I don't know, the next Ketanji Brown Jackson over at the State Department, or the Department of Defense, or some kind of girl boss running the Joint Chiefs of Staff.
I would never imagine that Kamala Harris would do a thing like that.
She'll hire Leslie Hedlund to be in charge of the State Department.
Yeah.
Oh my goodness.
No, you're going to get potentially—she'd bring Hillary back.
I'm sure she would bring Hillary back in some form.
This is what you're going to get, by the way.
You're going to get this weird coalition of, like, all the cast-offs and all the has-beens of the Democrat Party.
So Hillary would come back.
You would get Susan Rice back within a heartbeat.
You'd have Susan Rice potentially launching.
And Victoria Nuland would be back in a second.
Tony, talk to me about what would happen if and when Kamala Harris put Victoria Nuland back.
Well, I think it would continue the accelerated failure of the Biden policy.
I mean, I said this several times on my network, on Newsmax, say hello to the new boss, same as the old boss, except in this case, that the old boss actually had some level of people who were kind of working to maintain a direction.
The direction we don't agree with, I might add, but it was a direction.
That direction by Jake Sullivan, by Tony Blinken, was to essentially basically toe the globalist line.
That is to say, they are for this one world government, the whole World Economic Forum thing, but they were doing it gradually.
They're trying to do it in such a way that wasn't overwhelmingly obvious.
Well, Kamala is not going to have such a fine point on anything she does.
She's a globalist.
She's literally a Marxist.
And I think her not having the ability to kind of hold back and do things gradually, just kind of letting the cat out of the bag will have consequences because we're not gonna be on board with that.
Nobody I've talked to is on board.
I think there's a huge backlash that's being underreported right now, Jack, by the black and Latino community against the idea of her being the candidate.
And she's not going to have the ability to actually have people to help her out.
I think she's gonna pick the wrong people.
Joe Biden picked the right people to help him gradually move things forward.
Lloyd Austin, I know Lloyd Austin.
He's a Marxist, but he has some skill to hold back and not be obvious about it.
Same with Blink.
And she's not going to have that ability.
She's going to pick people who I think are going to be the DEI hires who have no ability to kind of manage things without being obvious.
They lie to us constantly, Jack.
And maybe this is a blessing in disguise because they're not going to, she's going to be so obvious about picking the people who are going to try to create equity globally.
I think it'd be an immediate and overwhelming backlash.
Unfortunate backlash may come.
With a military bite to it where we are the ones who have to go into go to war again to stop her in what she gets us into.
Folks, she would get us into World War 3.
It's as simple as that.
More human events.
Quick break.
Lt.
Col.
Tony Schaffer, right back.
I grew up in the hood.
I rolled with bloods.
And them boys had a saying.
You can't be listening to all that slappy, whack, trimatizolitsabam-ship, nippy-bam-bam, like Human Events with Jack Posobiec.
Today we're back with Human Events Daily.
The world absolutely flames, and Bidenomics is a complete and total disaster.
But it cannot and will not ruin my day.
Do you know why?
It's because I start my day with a hot America-first cup of Blackout Coffee.
This coffee is 100% America.
Blackout Coffee is 100% committed to conservative values, from sourcing the beans to the roasting process, customer support and shipping.
They embody true American values and accept no compromise on taste or Quality.
Look, I love this stuff.
Powers me, powers us on travel, and it's going to power our business.
Go to blackoutcoffee.com slash poso and use promo code poso20 for 20% off your first order.
Back to school is just around the corner, and it's never too soon to give mom the gift of your heart, those close to your heart, the gift of being awake, not woke, with Blackout Coffee.
But Senator Chris Chaffer, we've got, we have news that as last night, there was a joint patrol, air patrol of Russian and Chinese bomber aircraft, long range bombers that strafed the Alaskan Air Defense Identification Zone, the ADIZ, up there during Joe Biden's speech, as he was essentially handing the reins over to Kamala Harris.
Was that just an accident that it was timed for exactly as the speech was starting?
Was that just a coincidence?
Was that just something that happened by totally at random and this is a routine thing, Tony?
Walk us through what that means and what the stakes are for a potential third world war.
Yeah, I mentioned the last segment, the language of the Cold War.
Jack, the Russians have been speaking to us in the language of the Cold War for the last three years, and there's nobody there to understand it.
We literally have people who are incapable of understanding The language of power.
Now, Putin is wielding power.
Xi, President Xi of China is wielding power.
We have people here who only see the world through appeasement.
And so something like this would not have crossed their mind that, oh my goodness, maybe the Russians and Chinese may act out during this fake power transfer.
Now, we all know that Biden was pushed out We all know he does not want to not run.
And this whole thing with Kamala is something that I think that is going to be problematic, because that's why you saw this demonstration of the Chinese and Russians working together.
It's a huge, huge indicator, Jack, that the world is watching our completely insane passage of power.
And let me be very clear on this.
14 million people's votes were ignored by their process.
So the more that they see this, the more they're going to start poking us.
And the problem is Kamala is not going to understand how to actually poke back effectively.
She has no concept, no depth of understanding of how to actually back people off.
She will do things like speak aggressively about Ukraine joining NATO, not understanding that that may well be something that Putin takes seriously, and that's a red line for him.
And next thing you know, without her understanding what she did, we may be at war.
That's how stupid she may be.
And I think the people who work for her, DEI hires, would be that stupid as well to not recognize The consequences of her words and the inability to understand that the words she uses may well require others to act.
It's those others acting, Jack, that I'm worried about, and her inability to understand that they're going to take her words seriously.
You know, when I was on with Tucker the other day, he asked me about, you know, about female leaders in the past.
And I actually said that there are studies of British monarchs and kings and queens of the United Kingdom going back hundreds of years, which we have a very long track record of this, by the way, that actually shows that on hand, female leaders were 25 that actually shows that on hand, female leaders were 25 to 33% more likely to go to war than male leaders in the past.
And it's specifically what you're talking about.
These types were Kamala Harris.
Clearly, clearly, that's obviously not all female leaders.
Margaret Thatcher, for example, although the Falklands would probably disagree, that diplomacy is not something that's ever been part of Kamala Harris's handbag.
So what do we mean by that?
Well, I mean, that she would say, all right, in order to in order to strike back, we need we need to use aggressive posture.
So they would actually use over aggression to compensate for what she views as an insecurity.
So this over-aggression would be seen in direct dealings with the nuclear state of Russia, with the nuclear state of China, and look, I'm just going to say it, the nuclear state of Iran.
I'm sorry, Tony, and I say this as an intel guy, but Iran's been two weeks away from building a nuclear bomb for what, like the next 10 years?
You mean to tell me that they don't have a couple of hot ones sitting on the shelf?
Please, it's a joke.
No, it's a negotiating tactic.
Right, exactly.
Right, they're using it as a negotiating tactic.
We promise we won't make one if you give us some money, give you a good deal, give you a good price, you know.
Look, we did the same thing in the 90s.
I was part of a black operation where we knew by the fact by 92 that the North Koreans had nuclear weapons, yet the Clintons were pretending they didn't know that.
So I'm just telling you that that's what happened last time with North Korea.
They pretended not to know the North Koreans had nuclear weapons and negotiated from that position of, we're trying to stop the North Koreans from getting nuclear weapons.
I think you have the same basic people in charge, some of the same people in charge, and that's why you'll see the same thing again with the Iranians regarding that nuclear weapons issue.
And look, this is why it's so dangerous.
It's dangerous for our children.
It's dangerous for our children's children.
Do we want to live in a country that's going to another war?
Do we want to live in a country that isn't going to talk about diplomacy, that isn't going to talk about the Abraham Accords, that's going to say, we're going to go to war in the Middle East.
We're going to go to war in Russia.
We're going to potentially go to war in China, of course, over Taiwan.
The specter of war looms over Taiwan.
And it's true when President Trump said that.
but that means the stakes are higher than ever you go to one of those wars right now we couldn't even close down uh excuse me we couldn't even stop the shutdown of the red sea by the houthis because they can't stop effectively create a blockade from one season this is her own administration right now is losing to the houthis They're losing everywhere in the country.
They're losing everywhere in the world.
They've lost the border.
They're certainly losing in Ukraine.
And they can't even beat the Houthis in the Red Sea.
Why in God's name would we be giving Kamala Harris a promotion with a record like that?
No, instead she's going to double down on those failures and rather than working to number one, strike down anybody that's actually, you know, swat down and causing anyone who's causing us these kind of troubles at sea.
But number two, make sure to understand the situation when you're dealing with a nuclear armed state.
Absolutely.
like any of the three or the four that you and I have been discussing here, including North Korea.
Donald Trump is the kind of person who says, let's sit down and have a conversation.
Kamala Harris is one of the people who's going to say, I want bombs.
I want guns.
I want war.
Your children will go to war under Kamala Harris.
Absolutely.
And to that point, Jack, look, people mistake our rationality to their insanity, because we look at this and say, "How could anyone want to go to war?" Well, that's why they're promoting her, because they want to go to war.
This is their policy.
Despite what they say publicly, the progressives want war, and they're part of the neocons.
It's the neocons and neolibs who want this.
It's the permanent state.
It's the deep state, whatever you want to call it.
That's who that is.
She is the Deep State's candidate.
Let's be very clear about this.
That's why they pushed Biden out, because he's just not as good as they need him to be.
That is to say that he's not as believable as the guy who can come out and lie about things.
It's all about being credible when you lie.
And so this is what they're trying to do, is have someone who can come in and be that person to smooth things over.
But that's why Austin didn't get fired over Afghanistan.
That's why Chito only got fired Because of their side in Congress calling her out.
Otherwise, she'd still be there sandbagging the entire investigation.
That's why the left does not fire these DEI folks because, Jack, their policy is chaos.
Their policy is to fail.
And she's the ultimate failure that they're going to promote and get up even higher.
Look, this is dangerous times.
Do you want the president of peace or do you want the president of war?
There's no question in my mind.
This is why you're seeing all of Hollywood, you're seeing the entire military industrial complex getting behind her.
This is also, by the way, the same reason.
Talk to me a little bit, Tony Schafer.
Why is it that all of the biggest warmongers on the right, Lindsey Graham, Rupert Murdoch, all of these people were so against J.D.
Vance?
So J.D.
Vance is, I'm going to kind of say it, one of us.
I'm mostly libertarian in many of my views.
One of those is we should never go to war unless absolutely necessary.
I've been to war.
I've seen the consequences of war.
I've seen it up close.
I've seen the loss of bodily parts by our young troops who were then permanently maimed.
Unless there's a good reason to go to war, you should never do it.
And J.D.
Vance is of that mind.
He's a Marine.
I think he understands the consequences of bad decisions at the strategic level that leads to human suffering across the board.
Because of his understanding of that, he's with Trump to try to prevent or end major conflicts.
That's not good for the military-industrial complex, the very complex that Eisenhower warned us about, Jack.
So this is important for people to understand that a lot of the folks that, you know, neocon Nikki, Rupert Murdoch, they are neocons.
They are truly despicable people who simply wear the robe of the Republican Party, but deep down, they are literally Trotskyites who are more than willing to use military operations, military warfare, As a tool of enhancing their control on power, both foreign and domestic.
So this is not something we should accept.
And they don't like J.D.
Vance because he's not going to accept their behavior.
He's not going to accept the nonsense of a Secretary Graham or a Nikki Haley.
And I think, again, he's a good second or supporter of Trump because Trump sees things this way as well.
All right.
Lieutenant Colonel Tony Schafer, fantastic and disturbing revelations.
Let's people know where they can follow you to get more information.
Sure.
Project Sentinel, projectsentinel.com.
And of course, follow me on, on, on X. It's like they follow you.
We always have interesting things we post.
Just saying.
So.
Some great repartee on there.
If you're not on, you gotta get in because we know this extends 24-7.
Look, Tony's always putting up stuff.
He's putting up information analysis in real time.
Stay tuned.
Be right back.
Human Events Daily.
Big show coming up.
Where's Jack?
Where's Jack?
Where is he?
Jack, I want to see you.
Great job, Jack.
Thank you.
What a job you do.
You know, we have an incredible thing.
We're always talking about the fake news and the bad, but we have guys, and these are the guys who should be getting policies.
Jack Poselbeck back live, Human Events Daily.
Folks, we've been brainwashed into believing the only way to grow our money for retirement is to risk it in the stock market.
You know, that is simply not true.
You can reach your financial goals and dreams without taking unnecessary risks.
That's where Bank on Yourself comes in.
Bank on Yourself is the proven retirement plan alternative that lets you bypass Wall Street, beat the banks at their own game, and take control of your financial future.
Because with Bank on Yourself, you're in control.
Access your money for any purpose with no questions asked and no government penalties or restrictions on how much income you can take or when you can take it.
You can't do that with a 401k or IRA.
This is the strategy famous businesses like McDonald's used when no banker would lend them a dime and almost anyone can do it.
Your money is guaranteed to grow by a larger dollar amount every single year in both good times and bad.
Look, You can get a free report with all the details on how the Bank on Yourself strategy adds guarantees, predictability, and financial control to your plan.
Just go to bankonyourself.com slash poso bankonyourself.com slash poso for your free report today.
All right, we got to get on my man, the People's Pundit, Rich Barris.
Rich, it's been too long.
By the way, your presence was lacking at the RNC in Milwaukee.
It was felt.
It was a hole, I really think.
But I do have to say, though, that It seems like everything that happened in Milwaukee is kind of overshadowed by everything that's happened since.
And Rich, you know, when I turn on the TV now, it tells me that Kamala Harris is the favorite to win this election.
She's going to win.
The K-Hive has taken over.
All the polls say it.
Rich, that's true, right?
That's what's going on, isn't it?
Yeah, I'm going to have to give a big fat negative on that.
Look, I think people should understand what's going on, and we're going to have a new poll out soon.
There are definitely some groups that were reluctant on Joe Biden that are moving.
They're Democratic groups, though, Jack, and they're moving back to Harris, at least for the time being.
And I would caution everybody, this is how my business works.
This could be a response bias, period.
And that's coming with the sacrifice Of other voters that Biden actually appealed to.
And I'm gonna throw one out here because it's a big deal.
Seniors.
So while she may be doing about six points better than Biden with voters under 35, she's doing worse with seniors.
And here's a problem for the Democrats.
Seniors vote at much higher rates.
They're higher propensity voters.
So if she's doing marginally better with black voters, I don't know what some people are talking about with some of these other groups.
We're just not seeing it.
With Hispanics, not at all.
But if she's doing marginally better with black voters and that holds, and I'm going to make that That's a huge caveat.
And that holds.
That is still not going to be enough to overcome what looks to be the loss with senior voters, which could make for a pretty big polling era.
And I think that's important for people to understand.
That's what makes a polling error, Jack.
That's what that's the ingredients when you're baking a polling error cake right there.
That's where it comes from.
And also, I would I'm going to say this.
The most likely outcome is that Tony Fabrizio was right.
And this is the best it's going to get for her.
And if that's the best it's going to get, then we're going to revert to the mean in this election, which we have seen.
And that is Donald Trump is still and I'm going to agree with David Axelrod.
Donald Trump is still a substantial favorite here, even with Kamala Harris usurping Joe Biden, which is what happened here.
Let's get real.
Well, and Biden says it himself, but going back to these polls, because I keep seeing this, all the hype trains on, the hype trains on.
I said it to Tony Schafer there.
It's like one of those, it's kind of the hype, like one of those really bad, woke Disney Star Wars films gets right before it gets like 25% on Rotten Tomatoes audience score.
Oh, this is going to be the best.
This is going to be the gayest Star Wars ever.
This is going to be the gayest DNC ticket ever, which it might actually will be if Pete Buttigieg is chosen.
So when when we're looking at the actual polls, though, you know, there's a lot of issues that I see.
But, Rich, look, you know what I'm going to ask you about, man?
You know what I'm going to say?
We're talking about the Rust Belt.
It's all the Rust Belt, baby.
Look, I've been where did I tell people I would be the last the last three events that I've done?
Michigan, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin.
Yep.
Michigan, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin.
In that order.
And I've been spending time, of course, in my great home state of Pennsylvania, but then also just spent a week in Michigan, in Detroit.
Yes, folks, in Detroit.
And then Milwaukee, of course, for the RNC, though I will admit my kids got to see more of Milwaukee than I did because I was running around between all the work I was doing.
But Rich, this is what this is the part that I understand.
Did they honestly think that Kamala Harris can play well in the Rust Belt?
Is that honestly what they think?
Jack, this is what I was telling people before any of these polls even came out.
I said, you know, brace yourself for this hype.
We're going to get it.
We know what we should know this by now.
And it shouldn't be a surprise to anybody.
Let's get back down to planet Earth.
Let's look at Saginaw, Michigan.
Let's look at Macomb County, Michigan.
Let's look at Erie County, Pennsylvania.
Northampton County, Pennsylvania.
These are the counties that carry or don't presidencies.
Does anyone seriously believe that Kamala Harris is going to outrun Scranton Joe Biden in Saginaw, Michigan?
Does anybody seriously believe that?
Let's get real for a second.
Even with his mental decline, what the Emerson polls for the Hill today, And Spencer's a good pollster.
What they showed is exactly what we would have expected and what we're kind of seeing already, which is that, yeah, some of those groups come back to Kamala, which make it look like it's a little bit closer.
But guess what?
When you lean, when you make those undecided voters decide, those hesitant Trump voters that otherwise may have went to Biden, they're still out there.
They don't, and they go back to Donald Trump.
Donald Trump's ceiling is higher.
So the floor appears to be higher for Democrats because Joe Biden was facing a huge collapse of Bush second-term proportions.
He was facing that, but now that she's in the race kind of stabilized and that that's that floor is now not as low as it was under Biden.
But that being said, Biden had a higher ceiling.
That is what it's not just us.
That is what everybody else is showing.
So in some of those polls out today from the Hill, Wisconsin was the only one that was tied.
The rest Trump had a lead in.
But when look at the leaners, Jack, when leaned, it's not really that close, is it?
It's not, because she appears to be getting some of those groups back that were reluctant to Joe, but the reluctant Trump voter goes back to Trump.
And that's a major problem for Democrats and Kamala Harris.
And by the way, he's still doing it now, performing the Senate candidate's down ballot, which is something Republicans better wake up to quick.
And it's, it's, it's so ridiculous that they seem to think this, which by the way, you know, for those older voters out there, it's like, this is the candidate, just literally the candidate that, you know, when they try to paint Joe Biden as, as a radical, it's, and I'll admit this, I'll admit this.
This has been something that's always tough to do with Joe Biden because he's just, he's boring.
He seems like Scranton Joe.
There's a lot of people who see him that way.
There's a lot of, and we saw this by the way, with a lot of, of 65 and older voters, there was kind of an identity politics thing going on between him and Jill's relationships, certainly with Jill Biden and older women.
This was something that came in, not, not conservative women, but you see it, right?
You do see this strand, this strain with Kamala Harris.
There's none of that.
She doesn't have the family story.
She doesn't have the background.
She doesn't have the experience in politics.
And oh, by the way, she actually was, despite what the media will tell you, she actually was the most liberal senator in America.
That is not going to play well with older voters, period, full stop. - Pennsylvania, when we think about older voters, everybody thinks about Florida.
Pennsylvania has a huge share of 65 plus.
And by the way, Michigan, the state, Donald Trump became the first Republican since 88 to win the state of Michigan.
What did it at the end?
I remember it like it was yesterday.
It was a Democratic group of older white voters that had been voting for Obama.
They voted for Kerry.
They voted for Gore all throughout their lives.
They were undecided because they didn't like Hillary Clinton.
They were undecided until the very end, and then the last couple of weeks they broke for Trump.
Some of those votes went back to Biden in 2020.
They did.
We could see it in the polls.
Although Trump brought in newer people into the coalition, that vote left him, or at least some of it did.
I'm going to get in trouble again for saying this, but it's an appropriate analogy, so I'm going to say it again.
Kamala Harris is not good on the campaign trail.
She looks great on paper, and she looks great when the media cheerleads for her like they're doing at a level we have never seen before.
But she's basically the black Hillary Clinton.
She's like a black female version of Hillary Clinton.
And when she gets in front of people, they repel from her.
They don't like her.
And that, I suspect, is going to happen again.
You've seen it before, Jack.
We're gonna see it again.
Quick break, right back.
We'll be back, Rich Barris.
I hear about the boring people at your office.
I'm trying to listen to the new human events with Jack.
In 2016 and 2015, top FBI officials infamously texted about, quote, their insurance policy to make sure Trump was never elected or inaugurated as president.
Have any FBI agents texted, emailed, or expressed disappointment that Trump survived the assassination attempt or otherwise editorialized about the assassination attempt?
I don't know about any agents.
There have been at least two instances, I think, or one instance of an individual who posted something that I consider outrageous and totally inappropriate and unacceptable.
And that individual has been referred to our inspection division, which is the arm, our sort of internal affairs investigatory arm that Okay, so there's FBI Director Chris Wray admitting that there were FBI agents who were expressing their displeasure with the fact that Donald Trump wasn't killed.
Rich, I gotta ask you, the assassination attempt that the media has attempted to erase from the headlines did happen, by the way, actually less than two weeks ago.
And by the way, there's a picture of the bullet that's being fired at Donald Trump's head.
And yet Newsweek and all of these people are running around out there saying, oh, maybe it wasn't actually shot.
I have a picture.
How many times do you actually see a picture of the bullet?
This isn't just a Bruder film, okay?
Literally have with the way that the lens capture works there, the shutter, that you actually have a picture of the bullet in flight about to shoot the president.
And they are still, which by the way, this is in the media, because by the way, attacking me and JDB Vance over this, over our book, and I say, and I say, and it's what Yuri Bezmenov said, that a communist, a fully propagandized communist, will not believe accurate information when you show them.
I have a picture of the bullet.
I have it happening on video.
They won't believe it.
But Rich, here was a question that producer Fahs threw in over the break there.
The polling response from the assassination attempt, would we expect that to evaporate?
And it's true.
It's just true.
This was something that switched on a lot of independents, a lot of normie types out there, moving them more to the Trump's camp.
Would we expect that to evaporate just because the media's news cycle has changed? - No. - I have my theory that it wouldn't.
And and let me hear your your side and I'll give mine.
Yeah, I think people need to understand and educate themselves on what response biases are.
And the media can absolutely influence response biases when there is events like this.
You know, we would probably expect to see a bump for Trump.
Also, we have to be careful and, you know, take note of what part of that bump may actually just be a response bias.
Democrats hiding and not wanting to talk because, oh my god, they almost killed the other party's nominee.
And then, um, there's no, you know, there's no doubt, though, that there is very, that there's going to be a profound impact on the electorate because of that.
And by the way, when JFK was assassinated, it propelled Lyndon Baines Johnson.
It did.
Um, you know, but The only thing that you could do to get that out of the news cycle is to have the sitting president of the United States pushed out in a political coup, and that can remove it from the news cycle.
But none of that is going to make people forget, Jack, about what happened.
It would re-energize those Democrats to want to talk on the phone again or take that survey online or however their approach to do these polls.
But it's not going to like melt or evaporate the impact of the assassination attempt on Donald Trump, which, by the way, is the culmination of multiple different efforts to get rid of this guy that are really the same.
They're different sides of the same coin.
You know, lawfare and the assassination attempt, I would argue, are very much connected.
And in the minds of the American public, they're very much connected.
It's all just part of this, this what they view to be this effort to get rid of this man.
And when you get rid of somebody in that way, you know, when you even if it wasn't directly intentional, these people still view it as the obvious outcome of.
of everything that's thrown and hurled in this guy's direction day in and day out it's like of course this was going to happen eventually and i remember uh by the way great interview with tucker carlson but i remember you talking to tucker carlson about this months ago and you bringing me up and saying you know what uh the people's pundit said they think they're going to take a sheet he thinks they're going to take a shot and what did tucker do when you said that what was his reaction jack
he giggled and he said of course you know it was that is not far at all from the sentiment that has been brewing in this population for months months if not the better part of a year so So while it still is shocking to people, it isn't surprising.
And that's not going to go away because the media is cheerleading for Kamala Harris and trying to change the news cycle.
It's just not.
Well, and Rich, and thank you, by the way, on the compliment on the episode, but here's my take on the polling side of this, is the media response that we're seeing, yeah, that's only That only affects people that are constantly consuming media, who are constantly focused on politics.
That's your political wonks, your junkies, people like me and you, right?
Admittedly, I will confess, right?
The political class of which we are members, although we're sort of counter-political, I would say.
Your average normie out there, they remember the debate, they remember the assassination attempt, and they know that Biden just resigned.
Hulk Hogan ripping his shirt, right?
One of the greatest moments of my life, by the way.
Easily, at first I said top 10 political moments of my life that I was there for.
I've been thinking about it.
It's gotta be top three.
It might be number one, but actually be number one.
I can't think of anything that defeats it.
I was at the Trump, I was at when Trump spoke at Mount Rushmore with the flyover and, and the fireworks.
That was pretty good, but Hulk Hogan, you know, it's, it's debatable.
But anyway, anyway, look for the average voter out there, the average person, the, these low propensity voters, they don't pay attention to the day to day stuff.
They're not seeing the hype behind Kamala Harris.
They're not seeing any of it.
They remember the debate.
They remember the assassination attempt.
They know that Joe Biden's out.
But they don't really know who Kamala Harris is yet.
That's the fight right now, isn't it, Rich?
That what you're discussing is the difference between like a micro take and a macro take.
And it's the narratives that sink in to us and weigh on our minds when we make these decisions.
And I'll even illustrate it and put it this way.
When they took a shot at Donald Trump, I was waiting on a table out to eat with a family and family friends.
And it was like my son, his girlfriend, their family.
And we were waiting on everybody in the restaurant, from the waitress to the bartender to the people sitting next to us, had heard about and was talking about the attempted assassination of Donald Trump.
Exactly.
And I'll throw it back to you.
By the way, Rich, I'll throw it back to you because I was up, I was at a restaurant right after the Biden news dropped.
Guess what?
Nobody was talking about it.
Nobody.
Rich, we are just about out of time here on the show today.
