All Episodes
Previous Next
July 8, 2024 - Human Events Daily - Jack Posobiec
48:45
Where are the House Republicans on the Security Disaster of Biden's Mental Crisis?

Here’s your Daily dose of Human Events with @JackPosobiecSave up to 65% on MyPillow products by going to https://www.MyPillow.com/POSO and use code POSOGo to https://www.BlackoutCoffee.com/POSO and use promo code POSO20 for 20% OFF your first order.You can try their male vitality stack for 22% off… Go to https://www.CHOQ.com, and use promo code POSO for 22% OFF ANY CHOQ subscription FOR LIFE!Support the Show.

| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
I want to take a second to remind you to sign up for the Pozo Daily Brief.
It is completely free.
It'll be one email that's sent to you every day.
You can stop the endless scrolling, trying to find out what's going on in your world.
We will have this delivered directly to you, totally for free.
Go to humanevents.com slash Pozo.
Sign up today.
It's called the Pozo Daily Brief.
Read what I read for show prep.
You will not regret it.
humanevents.com slash Pozo.
Totally free.
The Pozo Daily Brief.
This is what happens when the fourth turning meets fifth generation warfare.
A commentator, international social media sensation, and former Navy intelligence veteran.
This is Human Events with your host, Jack Posobiec.
I was sick.
I was feeling terrible.
Matter of fact, the docs with me, I asked them if they did a COVID test because they were trying to figure out what was wrong.
They did a test to see whether or not I had some infection, you know, a virus.
I didn't.
I just had a really bad cold.
I can tell you with certainty that as recently as last Friday and Saturday after the debate, there were quite a few people who felt like it was just an off night.
As of today, the ship has sailed and there is basically almost no support remaining for him as the candidate.
Not against him personally, but because nobody thinks he can beat Trump.
I haven't lost.
I beat him last time.
I'll beat him this time.
Come with me.
Watch.
Watch.
I'm getting so frustrated by the elites in the party, who they know so much more.
If any of these guys don't think I should run against me, go ahead, announce the president.
Challenge me at the convention.
The questions were sent to me for approval.
I approved them.
OK, so the White House sent the questions to you ahead of the interview.
Yes.
I got several questions, eight of them, and the four that were chosen were the ones that I approved.
This is what the victory rally for the new French government looked like, and as you can see in that footage, there are far more Palestinian flags being waved than French flags.
In fact, there are hardly any French flags at all.
It comes as Marine Le Pen's National Rally Party was defeated in the second round of the French parliamentary elections, and the country's left-wing alliance, the New Popular Front, look set to win after exit polling indicated it would win the most seats.
Ladies and gentlemen, welcome to today's edition of Human Events Daily Live, Washington, D.C.
Today is July 8th, 2024, and I'm with Dominique.
I have a question.
So, I spent all weekend seeing what's going on, following the news, time with family here and there, emailing back and forth with Steve and Kay Ben, and yeah, that's right.
And one of the big questions that I have is how is it that we are living through a national security crisis, crisis right now, with the commander-in-chief of our military, which is engaged in a proxy war on the bloody eastern battlefields of Ukraine with the Russian state,
Where he's publicly come out and stated that he's approved attacks on the Russian mainland and yet we have no investigations, we have no calls for hearings, we have no subpoenas, we have no letters out from the House GOP demanding an answer to any of this.
Lloyd Austin!
What did you know and when did you know it?
Secretary Mayorkas, what did you know and when did you know it?
Now we know Jen Psaki is going to be coming up soon.
Great.
But that's only a staff transcribed deposition.
This needs to be in public and it needs to be transparent.
Where is the House oversight committee?
Because everyone's sitting in receivership mode, receivership mode.
The White House is running in receivership mode too right now, by the way.
And everyone's going, oh, well, let's see what the Democrats do.
Let's see what the Democrats do.
Excuse me.
Excuse me.
I believe that the Republicans still have control of the House.
And if Republicans have control of the House, they have control of the oversight committees, which means they have oversight control of subpoena power.
So if you control subpoena power, then guess what?
We get, by the way, the Afghan withdrawal.
Who was giving the orders?
Who was calling the shots?
Was it actually Joe Biden?
I got a question for you.
Mark Milley!
Hey, General Milley!
Guess what?
You're going to be subpoenaed right now, and we're going to pull you in and say, General Milley, were you the one calling the shots, or were you taking orders from Joe Biden?
How were those orders received?
Did you speak with him?
Did you see him in person?
Or was it in writing?
Was it delivered by an aide?
Because we keep hearing these stories that Jill Biden and the senior leaders of the aides and Steve Ruscetti and Ron Klain and all these people are putting these layers in between Biden and his actual administration.
And so if that's the case, who is actually running the security of our country?
The NATO Summit opens tomorrow.
The NATO Summit opens tomorrow right down the street in Washington, D.C.
And we are at a time, we're at a time where the Commander-in-Chief doesn't even mentally exist.
And for once, by the way, the media can't accuse me of making it all up because you're the ones saying it.
So go ahead and post that, Biden HQ.
You love posting my clips, 2 million impressions over the weekend.
Go in and post all my clips now with your own side admitting that your commander, our Commander-in-Chief, Ladies and gentlemen, one of the best ways that you can support us here at Human Events and the work that we do is subscribing to us on our Rumble channel.
Make sure you're subscribed, you hit the notifications so you'll never miss a clip, you'll never miss a new live episode, and we're putting them out every single day of the week.
Talk about influences.
These are influences.
And they're friends of mine.
Jack Prasovic.
Where's Jack?
Jack.
He's got a great job.
All right, Jack Prasovic back live here at Human Events Daily.
World is in flames, Bidenomics complete and total disaster, but it cannot and will not ruin my day.
Do you know why?
It's because I start my day with a hot America First cup of Blackout Coffee.
This coffee is 100% America.
Blackout Coffee is 100% committed to conservative values from sourcing the beans to the roasting process, customer support and shipping.
They embody true American values and accept no compromise on taste or Quality.
Look, I love the stuff.
Powers me.
Powers the business.
Powers the family.
Get yours.
Blackoutcoffee.com slash poso.
Use promo code poso20 for 20% off your first order.
Mother's Day is next month and it's never too soon to give mom and those close to your heart the gift of being awake, not woke.
I realize Mother's Day has already passed, but hey, there's a Mother's Day every year.
That's blackoutcoffee.com slash poso blackoutcoffee.com slash poso promo code poso 20.
All right, very excited that we have a Republican on here who understands that his job isn't to just sit back and collect a paycheck.
No, it's actually to go forth Hey, doing well.
Thanks for having me on.
So we last talked before about this lawsuit that you were putting together with the state of New York.
Now that lawsuit has gone forth.
General Andrew Bailey, and he hails from the show me state of Missouri.
Andrew, how are you?
Hey, doing well.
Thanks for having me on.
So we last talked before about this lawsuit that you were putting together with the state of New York.
Now that lawsuit has gone forth.
Tell us what are the updates and what's going on?
Well, again, this is about fighting to protect Missouri's sovereign interest in participating in a national presidential election on equal We can't let a rogue progressive prosecutor and collusive judiciary in the state of New York upend the presidential election.
This is the heat of a campaign in the most consequential presidential election in this nation's history.
And Missourians need to have access to and to be able to hear from a presidential candidate, President Donald Trump.
That's what we're fighting for.
The founders contemplated That there would be disputes amongst the states.
And they codified a method by which those grievances could be redressed.
It's in Article 3, Section 2.
It's called the Original Action Docket.
And so the case has been filed with the Supreme Court, Missouri v. New York.
We are waiting for the court to issue orders.
What's likely to happen is that the court will issue an order to New York to provide some responsive briefing.
And then the case will move forward from there.
You know, everyone keeps saying, well, the Supreme Court's out of session.
Well, that's because their appellate term ended.
But they were always in session when it comes to original actions.
So this case will be placed on the original action docket and will receive the review necessary in order to redress Missouri's grievances.
We've got to fight back against this lawfare that's injecting poison into our democratic process.
And this is the tool I have at my disposal to fight back.
And what's interesting though is that we also, by the way, we also saw a filing from President Trump's own legal team against his case in New York, potentially would overturn his conviction because we have this new Supreme Court ruling that came down on immunity, which of course, one of the functions of that was that evidence that was collected that had to do pertaining to official acts of the president cannot be used in criminal and civil proceedings.
That ruling, by the way, I think is actually a little bit more sweeping than a lot of people realize, isn't it?
Yeah, it is.
It grants the president broad legal immunity for acts he performs in his official capacity that are the core functions of the president.
Certainly, there's a fruit-of-the-poisonous-tree doctrine about evidence that would have been collected that, you know, would have been generated by one of his official acts.
It's then used kind of in an ex post facto way to look back in time And to try to convict him of a crime from before he was president.
And so, yeah, I think that, first of all, all of these cases should be dismissed.
Let me be clear about that.
There should not be any criminal prosecution of President Trump because it's not supported by the facts or the law.
These are all illicit witch hunt prosecutions.
And the fact that the Supreme Court even had to weigh in demonstrates how desperate the left is to try to pin something on President Trump.
But it was never intended to gain a legally valid conviction.
These illicit witch hunt prosecutions are only intended to take him off the campaign trail.
And that's why Missourians are harmed, because they put a gag order on him where we can't hear from him.
And we have a First Amendment right to hear from a political candidate, as well as a right to participate in an election by accessing, physically being present with that presidential candidate.
And if he's tied up in a New York courtroom or sentenced to house arrest or probation or, God forbid, prison, then Missourians' rights are violated.
And that's why we're fighting so hard.
Well, again, you know, I've asked you this before, but why is it that it seems that there's, there's a tendency in the Republican Party, um, not just among the attorneys general, but Republicans writ large when they get elected to not take these kinds of steps that you're fighting to not actually go down this road, chop the wood, step up to the plate and take swings.
Because, you know, it's, it's, you know, like you were talking before about being in the military and how we both served.
Yeah, that's right.
So if our military is engaged in a conflict, if we don't ever actually take the initiative, you can't actually win that conflict. - Yeah, that's right.
One of the first things I learned is that when you're caught in a near ambush, you assault through the ambush.
You can't turn and run.
They'll just shoot you in the back.
So your only option is assault through the ambush.
And that's what's guided my my legal strategy throughout my career as an attorney and certainly as Missouri's attorney general.
And so, yeah, if we don't have warriors that are willing to fight back and take the fight to the enemies of freedom, safety and prosperity, we're going to lose those things.
And again, this lawfare is injecting poison into the democratic process and it goes beyond just the state of New York.
It affects every state.
So I would encourage You know, my colleagues in any office to stand up and fight back and let your voice be heard and find weapons in your arsenal that you can use to engage the enemy of freedom.
And this is key, by the way, because so the you know, it's funny, the Biden campaign has a clip of me talking about my new book.
We're talking about this very same situation.
And I had this phrase where I said, you have to you can't just have principles.
You have to wield power.
And so, of course, they click they clip that without any of the context.
where I said you also can't wield power without principles at the same time.
But I've often looked at the problem is that the Republicans seem to be addicted to rules and say, well, if my principles are the best, then I should just win automatically.
And that's not actually how it works.
Because if you're not up there actually looking at tools, and it's so key to what you just said, tools clearly within the legal process, within the legal framework, within the constitutional framework, we're not even talking about, you know, twisting the bounds of what's legal and constitutional that we see Bragg and Letitia twisting the bounds of what's legal and constitutional that we see Bragg and Letitia James and Merrick Garland do It's simply looking at the framework that exists, and that's what you've done in this case.
Look, you're demanding communications between the DOJ, between Alvin Bragg, AG Letitia James, and Fulton County Fannie Willis, and so we know We know that these have been going on from the start.
We can see, by the way, that they've been to the White House.
We can see that they've been appointing people to various points of it.
So the question is, are there any communications?
I think that's a fairly obvious thing to look at.
And yet some people are saying, oh, this is reciprocity.
Couldn't possibly do that.
It's beyond me to understand that there are conservatives who don't see this as a fight.
Yeah, look, we know that there have been communications in the past, right?
Think about 2016 with Lisa Page and Peter Strzok.
I mean, how many text messages went back and forth in the deep state about how they were going to, you know, serve to undermine President Trump's administration.
I mean, they were already after him before he had taken office.
So you're telling me there aren't communications now?
No way.
I don't believe it.
The people are owed transparency and accountability when it comes to this collusive lawfare.
President Biden has deployed resources from his crooked Department of Justice to assist these state-level prosecutions.
And again, that underlies and emphasizes the illicit witch-hunt nature of the prosecutions.
And it also will demonstrate an incurable political impropriety.
Those prosecutors should have been disqualified from those cases.
And the systems are failing.
The people are owed transparency and accountability.
And so my lawsuit against the DOJ is about exposing that level of collusion.
And again, laying bare that incurable impropriety so the people can see it for what it is.
And that, again, allows the Trump team to ask for...
So there's the suit against New York, the suit against the DOJ.
because of the incurable impropriety.
All of these cases should go away.
They're all injecting poison into the veins of our democratic process.
And so two different techniques, two different tools I have.
Number one, the suit against New York, and then number two, the suit against the DOJ. - So there's a suit against New York, the suit against the DOJ.
Walk me through a little bit more of the DOJ one specifically. - Yeah, look, we've demanded records under the Freedom of Information Act, and the DOJ has to respond to that request.
They have failed to do so.
They failed to comply.
Now, you'll hear Merrick Garland in Congress saying, well, there's no communications.
Well, how does he know?
Has he talked to everybody up and down his chain of command?
Again, if the If there are no responsive documents, then they owe us that explanation, but there's no way that's true.
The circumstances alone are enough to, again, impute the impropriety into the process that should justify dismissal of charges at a minimum, certainly disqualification of those prosecutors, and certainly reversible error.
So our lawsuit is to obtain any and all communications between the state-level prosecutors and Biden's crooked Department of Justice.
When he deployed Matthew Colangelo, the former DNC consultant, Again, there was enough of an impropriety alone with Alvin Bragg, but that just doubles down because you've got a political opponent of President Trump doing President Biden's bidding in a New York State courtroom at that point.
And this is the issue, and of course this came up.
I saw J.D.
Vance, by the way, was getting questioned about this on NBC, and they were saying, oh, how can you allege this?
He said, it's the number three.
The number three at the DOJ moving over to the Manhattan prosecutor's office, and he put the question on Christian Welker and said, how many times has this happened?
Is this often?
Is this a career move that people typically make over and over?
And she was defending the move as if it was something normally that took place.
Yeah, they want to deny the circumstances and show you a bunch of trees and try to convince you there isn't a forest.
If I go to bed and I look outside my window and there's no snow on the ground, then I wake up and there's snow, I can tell you it snowed last night even if I didn't see the snow falling.
Look, this is the show-me state.
People in Missouri want action, and that's what these lawsuits are all about.
Both the lawsuit against the DOJ to force their transparency and accountability in lawfare, the collusive relationship in the lawfare between the DOJ and the state prosecutors, but also against the state of New York.
To allow President Trump to take to the campaign trail and speak with the full might of his voice and court the electorate and allow Missouri electors to have access to their chosen presidential candidate.
Folks, this is showing how an Attorney General can actually do their job.
So if you're in a red state right now, you should be asking, why isn't my Attorney General taking these steps, doing these things?
Andrew, let's hold you over for a second because I want to drill down on some more.
By the way, folks, 1776 at humanevents.com.
1776 at humanevents.com.
Send us in your questions.
Why?
Answer the question.
Why is it that other Republicans are not taking action, even Given what time it is.
Do they know what time it is or not?
not 1776 human events.com.
And then boys had a saying, you can't be listening to all that slappy whack trim out his outlets, a bam ship nippy, bam, bam, like human events with Jack Posobiec.
All right.
So back live human events daily.
Folks, I want to tell you about today's episode sponsor, Chalk.
Chalk offers a whole lineup of products formulated to increase your energy, focus, balance your hormones, detoxify your body, boost your testosterone.
Their products are organic and all-natural.
This isn't overpriced vegetable pills or powder.
They, and you will feel the difference, they have the clinical studies to back it up all over the site.
For a limited time, get 35% off Any Chalk subscription for life.
Just go to Chalk.com spelled C-H-O-Q and use promo code POSO.
Chalk was created as a way to combat the contaminated food supply that has been depleting you of essential nutrients and draining men of energy and testosterone.
It's time to make America great again.
And to do that, we need to make men's vitality great again.
So join Chalk Nation today.
Claim your special 35% off discount today.
Chalk.com, C-H-O-Q.com, promo code POSO.
We're on with Attorney General Andrew Bailey and we're discussing these cases.
AG Bailey, before I move on, I want to ask more about Biden, but before I move on, let me ask this.
So people will say, what's the standing here?
So walk me through the legal understanding of, so we're looking at these cases.
So people will say, well, hold on a second.
You're the AG of Missouri.
You represent the people and obviously the state of Missouri, but these are cases between Donald Trump and the city of New York, cases between the Department of Justice.
How is it that you have standing to go up against these various entities in your current position?
Well, it's because Missourians' rights to participate on equal footing in the democratic process and the national presidential election, in the heat of the campaign, in the most consequential Presidential election in this nation's history, those rights are being violated.
Again, if you look at the normal criminal appeal process, it's unique to an individual.
So the individual defendant has an appeal.
It can take 18 to 24 months to adjudicate that appeal, but that process is inadequate to redress Missouri's grievances because of the defendant here.
It's a presidential candidate in the heat of the campaign.
And so the gag order is one of the most pernicious elements of this lawfare in the sense that President Trump has a First Amendment right to speech, but Missourians also have a First Amendment right to hear President Trump's political speech.
The First Amendment covers speakers and listeners, so our rights as listeners are being violated during this campaign.
Also, his physical presence, he's being tethered to a Manhattan courtroom for weeks at a time, potentially sentenced to prison at a minimum, you know, probation, house arrest, community service.
Those things will take him off the campaign trail and deny Missourians of access to a presidential candidate.
And by statute, under the caucus system in Missouri, we have electors that that have been selected to go cast votes for a presidential candidate at a convention.
And if they can't hear from and access that presidential candidate, then their rights are violated.
Finally, there's a doctrine in law called the Purcell Doctrine.
It essentially stands for the proposition that courts should not meddle in elections and those considerations become heightened the closer you get to an election.
And the court is really afraid of people, you know, a judge through a judicial decision, injecting confusion into the election process, Well, that's happening now.
I get constituents who reach out to my office all the time and say, hey, is President Trump going to be allowed to be on the ballot?
Can he still serve as president if he's a felon?
Can we still vote for him?
Is he going to be able to be the president if he's sentenced to prison?
And so, again, the judiciary in New York's actions are violating and running up against and running afoul of that Purcell doctrine.
And there you go folks, it's that simple.
The rights of your citizens are being violated, and if those constitutional rights are being violated, that gives you standing.
So to anyone out there, I got an email in here from Joe in South Carolina asking about Alan Wilson, so many others, this is what you do.
You go back and walk people, you can show them that segment right here where AG Bailey just explained it to everyone that this is how you lay the framework for it.
And so, Attorney General, I wanted to ask you, and this obviously stepping out of your lane from, as in Attorney General, but I want to go back to your lane as a combat veteran and ask you this question because it's something I was talking about recently as well.
That's we have this NATO summit coming up tomorrow.
Joe Biden hosting the NATO summit, bringing all the NATO members here, as well as Japan, South Korea, and of course, Zelensky from Ukraine, are all coming to Washington, D.C.
Biden is going to be running this thing.
But at the same time, we're also being told that Biden hasn't been the one running his administration.
We're being told that his senior aides and political staffers are keeping him separated from the rest of his cabinet, separated from making the decision process.
This goes completely against our chain of command.
It's a violation of the chain of command.
No commanding officer in a unit, no divo in a unit, division officer in a unit, Would be able to run things this way.
So shouldn't there be investigations?
And why aren't there investigations into who is actually making these orders?
Who is actually calling the shots?
Because when I hear stuff like this, and I've been calling for the House Republicans quite strongly to ask Jen Psaki, bring up General Milley and all these others, particularly as pertains to the Afghanistan withdrawal and what we saw in Kabul, who was calling the shots?
Who was putting those orders out?
Because if that wasn't actually Joe Biden, then there's a real question as to whether or not those were legal and lawful orders delivered by the commander chief.
Walk people through the process of how it is supposed to work and how it could work if, as they tell us, as the media tells us, that this guy might not actually be running things.
Yeah, I mean, it's a frightening day when you've got a president who lacks the mental faculties to, you know, basically execute the core functions of his office.
But it is especially true in a military, you know, situation where you've got this linear chain of command all the way up through the Department of Defense with the ultimate and the only civilian able to issue, you know, orders to the military being the commander in chief at the very top, the apex of the military.
of that chain of command.
And so, yeah, if his staff has cloistered him and are making decisions and communicating those decisions as if they're coming from him, attributing those decisions to him, and when in fact they're not, then those decisions and those orders would lack the legal authority and the imprimatur of the chain of command.
And again, this is frightening.
And especially so when you look at the disastrous withdrawal in Afghanistan, where innocent Americans Americans were killed.
And certainly we left our honor on the battlefield in a full retreat because Biden couldn't be bothered to do his job and to do it well.
And the generals still haven't been held accountable.
I think it's high time that there be congressional inquiry into these matters.
I think that you need look no further than the fact that the Department of Justice declined to prosecute President Biden for a much more egregious case of mishandling classified documents than and then they have to drum up charges against President Trump.
And the excuse from the DOJ is, well, President Biden's an enfeebled old man and no one's going to believe he had the requisite mental state to take these documents and to know what he was taking.
Well, then he shouldn't be running the country and there's a constitutional mechanism by which the cabinet can remove him.
And so they should absolutely be exploring those options.
And if they're not going to do it, then Congress needs to investigate why they're not using the mechanisms at their disposal to ensure the safety of this country.
This is the guy with the nuclear codes.
This is a guy who's calling into MSNBC, screaming at Joe and Mika and melting down, challenge me, fight me, face me on all this.
And he seems like he's acting more and more desperate and deranged.
But there's a serious question, a national security question.
Well, we're told that he only works from 10 a.m.
to 4 p.m.
And David Steinberg, who's a follower of the show, just commented, well, if that's true, then who is the commander-in-chief from 4 p.m.
to 10 a.m.?
Because it ain't this guy.
So who's the one that's actually holding?
Is he handing off?
Which, by the way, there is a process where he can hand that off to Kamala Harris.
Is he doing that every night at 4pm?
If so, I think the American people would like to know if he's actually not the one running things, who is?
Who's signing off?
None of them have lawful authority.
And to your point, this is exactly what Herr said, that you couldn't criminally prosecute him for this because of his mental state.
That being said, how does it not trigger the 25th Amendment?
I think it has to trigger the 25th Amendment.
I think that, you know, the drafters and ratifiers of the 25th Amendment contemplated that there would be situations where a president would be incapacitated and unable to perform the functions of the job.
And so the cabinet, it's up to them to get around a table, discuss the matter, cast a vote, and then transmit those findings to the appropriate leadership in Congress.
And if they're not going to do it, then they should have to answer to Congress.
At the end of the day, again, this is going to require bold action on somebody's part to hold the wrongdoers accountable.
Let me say this again.
This is the deep state.
I mean, this is so the deep state wants President Biden and people because they want to retain authority.
This is really just, you know, the deep state taking care of itself.
And that's what we said.
This is the difference between leadership and receivership.
Leadership is what President Trump showed us.
Leadership is when he called the shots.
And of course, by the way, we saw the deep state very upset when he would say, I'm going to hold a conversation with Kim Jong-un.
I'm going to fly over there and meet him in Singapore.
And I might even walk personally into North Korea without an escort.
because that's how I'm going to enact peace.
I'm not going to go through all of your machinations.
I'm actually going to have one-on-one diplomacy.
And we tell them to do this again and again and again around the world versus Joe Biden, who's receivership.
What does receivership mean?
That means he's not the one actually in control of the estate.
It's like when you have an estate that goes to a receiver, a business in bankruptcy or something.
There's a trustee who's appointed.
And guess who the trustee is of the US government?
The trustee in this case is, as you say, it's the deep state.
It is the people that are actually in control.
And by the way, these are the people who are now openly calling, openly calling for changing out their own receiver.
They're saying, oh, we don't like this guy anymore.
We're going to get rid of him.
Well, wait a minute.
He was duly voted for by the members of your party.
He's legally the nominee, or at least the presumptive nominee.
He'll be legally the nominee at Chicago.
And so the question is, are they just openly admitting, I'll give this to you for the last minute, are they openly admitting that this isn't, it's not just the party, it's an administration in a national security crisis, well, maybe not a crisis, but an admission.
Yeah, I think that's right.
that we are not actually controlled by the chain of command as is formally constituted. - Yeah, I think that's right.
A failure to act, an omission in activity when the situation requires activity is misfeasance, malfeasance, nonfeasance.
This is clearly a legal problem.
You have a lack of legal authority for the orders that are being issued from the White House if they're not coming from the Commander in Chief.
You've got, you know, a group, a slate of administrative officials, cabinet leaders who are failing and refusing to discharge their constitutional obligations under the 25th Amendment.
At some point, this becomes what it is, a constitutional crisis.
Absolutely.
AG Bailey, tell people where they can go to follow you to get more information.
Yeah, check us out at ago.mo.gov.
That's ago.mo.gov.
You can follow us on social media and check out the lawsuits that we're using to fight and win for Missourians.
There you go, folks.
There's the gold standard for an attorney general.
All right, 1776 at HumanEvents.com.
We'll be getting to your emails coming up in the next segment.
By the way, Rumble comments, checking those out.
X comments, a little bit.
But 1776 at HumanEvents.com, that is the main spot to go.
We'll be right back.
Where's Jack?
Where's Jack?
Where is he?
Jack, I want to see you.
Great job, Jack.
Thank you.
What a job you do.
You know, we have an incredible thing.
We're always talking about the fake news and the bad, but we have guys, and these are the guys should be getting Pulitzer's.
All right, Jack Posobiec here, back live, Human Events Daily.
Keep sending your emails in, 1776humanevents.com, 1776humanevents.com.
1776 human events dot com 1776 human events dot com.
The question is why aren't Republicans fighting back?
We know the Congress is back this week.
So they're back there.
They're sitting in, and to my view, to my eye, and we'll check.
We'll check around.
Feel free to come on.
Open invitation.
Everybody knows how to contact me.
Come right on the show and explain to us what the game plan is to get to the bottom of the national security crisis that the United States is currently in.
You got this guy going to NATO tomorrow, literally tomorrow, right down the street in the DC Convention Center, and he's going to be addressing them.
At a time when he's a cadaver.
Yeah, I hope it's between 10 and 4.
I certainly hope that that's what's going on.
I'll be downtown on Tuesday, Wednesday, by the way, this week.
I'll be right across the street, basically, over at the National Conservatism Conference at NACON.
So I'll be there speaking Wednesday morning.
And here's my question.
My question is, do we have a president?
And if we don't have a president, who is in charge of NATO?
And if we don't know who's in charge, then what?
So everybody wants to know.
Who is Donald Trump's VP pick?
And we talked about this the other day.
I would like to go through it as well.
So send your questions, comments on this one.
In addition, we'll get to it in a second because I want to give some time for people to get it in.
1776humanevents.com.
Who should Donald Trump's VP be?
You listen to the media, you hear Burgum, J.D.
Vance, and Marco Rubio.
Those are the top three that we currently hear.
We also know that President Trump is going to be holding events coming up in the following week.
So, typically... Alright, let me walk back for a second.
Typically, the Vice President is announced prior to the convention, because the convention is a time and will be there.
We've got a whole thing planned.
It's going to be massive.
Everybody's coming in, all the shows, Real America's Voice, Rob Sigg, Parker Sigg, everyone's going to be all set up.
Harry's going to have the whole crew there.
It's going to be amazing.
We'll be broadcasting live, bringing you the inside information as to what's actually going on behind the scenes at the RNC.
See, I mean, the platform, the policy planks, the VP, it's all, it's all up.
It's all up for contention.
And some of these fights are going to get heated.
We'll bring all that to you.
But the first fight going out, who will be the VP?
So people are saying there's a couple of different options, a couple of different ways to look at this.
They say you go with a Doug Burgum.
Doug Burgum is someone who, as we said before, he has a lot of ties to the energy industry, American energy dominance, someone who could definitely lead the way on that.
But at the same time, as we've highlighted, a lot of these ties to Bill Gates, to Microsoft, to selling out the farmland to Bill Gates of North Dakota.
So things that give us pause.
He's also, you know, he's also a little bit older there, at least compared to the other two.
So Rubio's in his 50s and JD Vance, of course, is in his 30s.
And so he would be someone who may be able to run again in 2028, but not necessarily someone who would be really, really talking about for going forward.
Rubio would be able to.
Now, Rubio, of course, ties directly into the neocon side of things.
Obviously, he's been in D.C.
a lot longer, and on Rubio's section, there's two huge issues.
Number one, the fact that he's been associated with amnesty so much in the past, has been totally associated with amnesty, and for a lot of Republicans, is going to be a non-starter on that very issue.
In addition to his support for neoconservatism and You know, all of these various wars of adventure.
People say he's gotten better over the years.
I'll believe it when I see it.
But at the same time, we know what his track record has been.
Also, there's a constitutional issue with Marco Rubio.
The fact that he holds residence, the same residence there.
Finally, I just got this email that I'm going to read in a second.
Then finally, you have JD Vance.
JD Vance, of course, hails from Ohio, so a critical state in the Rust Belt, a very pro-Trump state, but also someone who can speak to those specific Rust Belt depreciated areas of America, places where people have lost so much because of globalization.
the Appalachia, the Midwest and the South.
He can speak to that.
He wrote a whole book about it.
He has a whole Netflix movie about it.
The Hillbilly Elegy story.
It's all out there.
He's a US Marine.
We all know about this.
However, some of the demerits for him, 'cause we discussed everyone, so we're gonna be fair, that he's very junior.
He'd just been elected to the Senate.
So someone who he, you know, has a lot of a good record in terms of his stances on things, obviously very well versed on foreign affairs, very well versed on the Ukrainian war.
He's always been a huge voice against that.
But at the same time, like I said, hasn't been around a long time.
And of course, people point out the fact that he was not a Trump supporter in 2016.
Obviously he reversed himself on this, but it's also something that gives people pause.
Also a lot of ties to Silicon Valley, though at the same time, he's been able to use those ties to bring people to Trump now.
So there you go.
Got this email in from John Stewart Edwards.
He says, "Everyone I know is voting for Trump.
Nobody I know is voting for Republicans down ballot because they all suck.
My wife signed up many times to volunteer for Trump." I mean, you hear this so much.
Oh yeah, we should also mention, I neglected to mention this, that Trump followed, Trump followed, this is from Craig Newman, Trump followed Ben Carson over the weekend on TruthSoSoul, so it might be Ben.
That's true!
Trump, and I highlighted this on Twitter as well.
So Ben Carson and his wife, Candy, celebrated 49 years their anniversary over the weekend.
They have this great post.
President Trump gave them a huge congratulations, followed Ben back on Twitter.
Could that be an epic pick?
People saying, will you tell the truth about Vance's Ties Amplify Bio company that is gene editing?
Think Vaxxers.
Like I said, he's got a lot of investments in Silicon Valley.
He's got this background.
If, you know, Faz, by the way, if you can pull up, if you could find anything, a company on gene editing, let's, let's pull that out.
Carrie Lake.
So got a comment in here.
What about Carrie Lake?
Look, Carrie Lake's running for Senate.
I think that's something that she's going to be focused on.
She was on War Room this morning talking about this.
I saw a great interview there.
She's very focused on Senate.
Mike Flynn and watch the left's head explode.
No, I'd love to see Mike Flynn as the national security advisor, rather than the vice presidential pick.
Because let's look at this from two perspectives, folks.
A vice presidential pick is not just Someone that you run with and then people say, oh, well, can they pick up this type of vote or that type of vote?
A vice presidential pick is also someone who look at what we just said throughout the show here today.
If Joe Biden is not capable of being president, then you need someone who can step in and be president in their stead.
That's what vice president means.
That's why the role exists.
So you have someone who can pick who can step in and pick up the slack.
Needs to be someone who can do that, day one.
Obviously, we have neither right now, because we don't have a Commander-in-Chief, and we don't have someone who can fill in as Commander-in-Chief.
So everybody's talking, by the way, about who Donald Trump is going to pick as his Vice President, and yet Donald Trump doesn't even know who he's running against.
Plus, you also gotta look at Vice President from this perspective.
It's an opportunity for Republicans to build out their bench for the future.
Like it or not, Like it or not, this will be the final Donald Trump campaign.
This is the last one.
That's why I've been trying to go to so many things.
That's why I've been trying to go all over the place.
That's why I'll be at the convention.
That's why I've been going to rallies.
That's why I've been out there as much as I can in the swing states.
We just came back from Michigan.
We came back from Pennsylvania.
We're going up to Milwaukee next.
I've been talking about the Rust Belt all this time.
Guess what?
Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin.
Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin.
I know there's a lot of folks down in Georgia.
There's obviously Charlie and all the guys have Arizona.
But for me, it's Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin.
Those three states are the election.
And as it turns out, I'm actually from Pennsylvania.
We've got a message here from Susan, says JD Vance or Vivek Ramaswamy?
Now Vivek is an interesting, is a very, we've got a lot of emails coming in here late, so I'm going to pull those up in the next segment because we're running up on a break.
Vivek is an interesting case because, again, like JD Vance, newcomer to politics, comes from that business background, also has a biotech background.
But in terms of track record, isn't a senator, hasn't been a governor, hasn't been a congressman.
And so the question is, how would he play?
I think Vivek has all the makings of a cabinet member, a solid cabinet member, because I think he's someone who would be easily confirmable.
I saw some people, by the way, talking about John Ratcliffe for Attorney General.
Vivek Ramaswamy, what cabinet, send this in, send this in, 1776humanevents.com, what cabinet position would you see for Vivek Ramaswamy?
Homeland Security?
DOJ?
Probably not DOJ.
But no, that's an interesting question.
UN Ambassador?
By the way, cards on the table.
I would love to see—here's one for UN Ambassador.
Tulsi Gabbard.
Someone who would absolutely drive the globalists insane.
We're going to talk about the globalists a little bit coming up next here.
Be right back.
...ear about the boring people at your office.
I'm trying to listen to the new human events with Jack Posobiec.
Alright, Jack Posobiec, we're back here live, Human Events Daily, final segment here.
We're talking about where are the Republicans?
Is Donald Trump the only Republican in America?
Is Donald Trump the only one carrying the entire Republican Party on its back?
So, you know, the question, of course, is like, what what's the deal?
I've got a couple more emails.
This is great from from Don.
Don says, Jack, there are three reasons why Republicans don't fight back.
Number one, corrupted.
Number two, compromise.
Number three, coercion.
They are too connected and controlled by their paymasters slash donors.
Here's Jeff in Florida, willing to see if any of our Republican leaders are willing to fight for this country.
This is the greatest experiment into the human condition, the USA, to see if The broken condition will choose fighting for right or choose greed, power and control.
One path saves the country.
The other destroys it.
Will human beings let this great experiment called the United States collapse without a shot fired?
I believe this is going to be the course before us.
Or if Republicans don't want to fight for this country, then let the ones who want it have it the most.
At this point, there's no turning back the wheels that drive the bus called the Republican Party.
And by the way, you know, because, of course, people are talking about Project 2025 and bloodless revolution.
We don't want there to be shots fired.
That's the point.
That's what we're all saying.
We want this to be solved politically.
And we just want our leaders to actually step up and do the work.
It's as simple as that.
Janine in Kentucky writes, who should be vice president?
Janine says, Ted Cruz, outspoken minority, knows border issues, no amnesty, good on economy.
Why don't Republicans fight?
And again, she's talking about cowardice.
Look, you know, I've said for a while, I think Ted Cruz would be great as DHS.
Ted Cruz, DHS secretary, unless we give it to Stephen Miller, then Ted Cruz for sure.
Though, of course, I don't know if Stephen Miller would be allowed to be confirmed because of the Senate.
Look, we know.
President Trump has said that this is going to come out.
This is going to come out.
This decision will be made by next Monday.
So look, I think there's a lot of good picks out there.
He's got a lot of choices.
Every pick is going to have its pros and cons.
But at the end of the day, it's not just about who's there standing next to Trump.
It's also about who potentially could be commander in chief, if God forbid, God forbid, anything should happen to President Trump.
Obviously, he's healthy, but you never know what the way things are.
But we also know that it's someone who could potentially set up to be the future of MAGA, the future of the movement.
And I'll tell you this right now, because go and look at what happened in France and the UK.
I've waited the whole episode to talk about this today.
Here's my response to France and the UK.
And this has been something that I've been talking to a lot of people about, something that I've been talking to Steve Bannon about.
Yeah, that's right.
We have correspondence.
And here's the thing, folks.
Thank you.
The globalists made a deal with the devil.
The globalists made a deal with the un-humans themselves.
That's why you see the un-humans unleashed.
The un-humans have been unleashed on the people of France and the people of the UK to cow them into obedience to their globalist masters.
This is what it's all about.
This is why they're doing it.
Go look at these videos.
Go look at the burnings.
Go look at France.
You can see all of it, folks.
You can see the uprising.
The Jacobins have returned.
Who promised you this?
Who told you this?
We wrote the book!
We wrote the book saying that this would all go down this way.
Labor got a third of the votes in the UK, but two-thirds of the seats.
So, Nigel is speaking for, what, 50% of the country?
Then you get Macron, throws the country into chaos and would rather do so than have a right-wing government.
Absolute and total chaos.
The Democrats and the ruling class in the United States know the same thing.
They will knowingly hide material information from citizens and then take your right to a primary away.
That's what they did, by the way.
Make no mistake.
The Democrats took a right to a primary away from their own voters.
You think they won't do that to the American people in general?
You think they won't do that, by the way, to your own citizens when they get into government?
No.
The ruling class are the agents of chaos.
They are, and they constantly say that it's you, it's your fault, it's you Christians, it's you traditional Catholics, you're the chaos, you're the Christian Nationalists, you're the problem, you're the domestic terrorists, you're the Timothy McVeighs.
No, no.
The chaos is coming from inside the house.
The chaos is coming from the top.
The chaos is coming from the ruling class, and they are unleashing their hordes.
They're unleashing their Antifa militias.
They're going to be unleashing migrants, by the way, on the UK and France.
And by the way, so for everybody who thinks that it's all sunshine and roses because Biden's in a state of collapse, you think For a second that the ruling class in this country won't make a deal with the devil here in the United States to stop Donald Trump from being elected?
Do you think that they're just going to allow him to have a landslide?
Do you think that these people, do you think that these people are going to just let you save your country?
They're just going to let you have your country back?
No.
No.
Go look at what they're doing.
Go look at the cities in France right now.
Go look into Paris.
Go look into London.
Go look what they're doing to their own countries.
They don't view you as legitimate human beings.
They have unhumaned you.
They are unleashing their crack forces.
They're unleashing their shock troops.
This is all happening right before your eyes.
I wish I was wrong.
But if you think for a second this is going to be easy, if you think you can just rest on your laurels and not be on offense and not be committed to action, action, action, then guess what?
You're going to get the same thing that they're seeing right now.
Now, look, I understand.
They're terrified.
They're desperate.
But when an animal is cornered, the animal will lash out.
And that is what they are right now.
They are feral animals.
They have been backed into a corner by who?
By you, by the people of this movement, by the populist nationalist movement, which has grown Beyond borders, by the way.
The left likes to say they're the internationalists.
But no, we actually are.
Why?
Because it's the little guy.
The populist nationalist little guy in country after country all around the world is now actually standing up because they face a crooked ruling class in every country on earth.
What do you do?
What do you do when you're faced with this?
They say, we're going to throw you off.
We are going to be the ones to throw you off.
The GAE, Brussels, the globalists, the EU, the WEF, whatever you want to call yourselves, the WHO, whatever nomenclature, whatever acronyms you want to use, it doesn't matter.
We know what goes on.
There's globalists and there's nationalists.
You guys all work together.
Everyone on your team is on one team, but guess what?
There's more of us than there are of you, and we are gonna fight you, and we're gonna fight smart.
We're gonna fight smart.
Be right back tomorrow.
1776humanevents.com.
▲
Export Selection