All Episodes
Previous Next
July 5, 2024 - Human Events Daily - Jack Posobiec
48:09
THE COMMUNIST OCCUPATION HAS BEGUN

Here’s your Daily dose of Human Events with @JackPosobiecSave up to 65% on MyPillow products by going to https://www.MyPillow.com/POSO and use code POSOSupport the Show.

| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
I want to take a second to remind you to sign up for the Pozo Daily Brief.
It is completely free.
It'll be one email that's sent to you every day.
You can stop the endless scrolling, trying to find out what's going on in your world.
We will have this delivered directly to you, totally for free.
Go to humanevents.com slash Pozo.
Sign up today.
It's called the Pozo Daily Brief.
Read what I read for show prep.
You will not regret it.
humanevents.com slash Pozo.
Totally free.
the Pozo Daily Brief.
This is what happens when the fourth turning meets fifth generation warfare.
A commentator, international social media sensation, and former Navy intelligence veteran.
This is Human Events with your host Jack Posobiec.
Christ is King.
The crime victim Make you sin In struggle sessions Your transgressions It won't help you to comply You're guilty of the crime Of simply being a lie There is only one way through We have to win Or we will lose Much more than just the right to rule
It's a war for love and truth It always ends its way When the demons come out to make us all into a human Now this time we must make them fail We'll survive, deny, they cry for revolution
The way of demons Ladies and gentlemen, welcome aboard today's edition of Human Events Daily Here live, Washington, D.C.
Today is 5 July 2024.
Anno Domini.
This is American Independence Week and the ideals that were fought for on the 4th of July are more on the line now they've ever been in our entire lifetime perhaps than in the entire life of this Republic.
I need to be very clear about something right now.
You do not live in a republic right now.
So if you've been out there, hanging out at the barbecue, hanging out, eating your hot dogs, watching fireworks, I hope you did that stuff, and I hope you love that stuff.
But I want you to remember two names.
Stephen K. Bannon and Peter Navarro.
Stephen K. Bannon and Peter Navarro.
Because they're not out there enjoying hot dogs and fireworks right now.
They're behind bars.
They're sitting in the gulags.
Just like all the J6ers sitting in the DC gulag right now.
So how did this happen?
How did we go from the Republic That was born on that day, July 4, 1776, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, Independence Hall.
And then later, 1791, same building, with the drafting of the Constitution.
How did we go from that system to the system we have now?
We lost all of it.
We lost it over time.
You know why?
I'll be very clear about this.
And my co-host is going to come on here after this segment and explain this as well.
This movement put principles over power.
You put principles over power.
You focused entirely on principles, and you totally ceded the ground on power.
And then another group of people come up.
The leftists.
The un-humans.
And those people focused entirely on power.
They have no principles!
They have no need of them.
They focused on nothing but And guess what?
They got it.
They got a lot of it.
They got so much of it, in fact, that they were able to take over every single institution in the country.
Until a man came along named Donald J. Trump, got back the White House, was able to finally swing the Supreme Court, so we've got a little bit of hope left.
But the Republic is hanging by a thread, an absolute thread.
And so as we sit here, there are now political prisoners in the United States, and you've got a Supreme Court Justice who just recently, this week, said that we should be able to throw previous presidents, former presidents, in jail, like a third world country.
That's what they want.
They want the coalition of the fringes.
They want to turn us into this.
So that is why we'll be talking about this in the show today.
The new book, Unhumans, is that you must read this book, you must study this book, and you must put this book into action.
Because this is the playbook to explain what these people have done before, what they've done in the past, the horror that they've wrought.
How we can fight back.
They will not stop until they are stopped.
When I gave this book to Stephen K. Bannon, he read the entire thing in one sitting, in one night, and he came back with one line.
He said, you know what the most important line in this book is?
They will not stop until they are stopped.
Read your history.
Know your history.
He just wrote a whole book about it.
But understand, until they have been stopped, and we've changed the entire conversation ever since we even started talking about this book.
Reciprocity.
Reciprocity is coming.
The entire left is freaking out because we're actually talking about doing the things to them that they have done to us.
We'll be right back.
Ladies and gentlemen, one of the best ways that you can support us here at Human Events and the work that we do is subscribing to us on our Rumble channel.
Make sure you're subscribed, you hit the notifications, so you'll never miss a clip, you'll never miss a new live episode, and we're putting them out every single day of the week.
Today, you know, they talk about influences.
These are influences.
And they're friends of mine, Jack Russovic.
Where's Jack?
Jack?
He's got a great job.
Jack Peselbeck back live.
Human events daily.
Folks, understand the situation we are in.
Understand who we are up against.
Understand that the people that we are up against do not share the same principles as us.
And, oh by the way, they intend to use our principles against us.
Specifically, our idea of fairness.
They will say, In order to be fair, you must be tolerant.
And in order to be tolerant, that means you must accept the gay pride orgies in public where you've got people that are just parading themselves around in San Francisco committing sex acts in front of children, where you've got people that are being as lewd as possible.
By the way, in many cases, now, in terms of This happening in front of kindergartners, in front of little children, and hopefully, in their minds, including the little children involved, and they'll say, you must be tolerant of this.
Well, let me talk about this, because the co-author of the new book, Unhumans, is on with us.
Joshua Lysak, get in here, because explain to me, how has it gotten so bad that there are people on our side who are completely immune or terrified to actually do something back when all of this is steve bannon behind bars pierre navarro behind bars president trump not only about to be sentenced in just a few days time
But oh, by the way, the entire left is calling for his assassination through drone strikes.
And yet you've still got people who say, ho, ho, ho, ho, ho, we shouldn't fight back.
That wouldn't be principled.
Joshua, I'm losing my mind over here, man.
Yes, thanks for having me on again, Jack.
So I was reading through Unhumans again today.
It's always fun to read your own work.
And what struck me was the fact that there have been throughout history It doesn't particularly matter what it is that you call it, because it's not a philosophy.
the most masculine word in the English language, which is no.
Francisco Franco, the general in Spain, he said, "Wherever I am, there will be no communism." And I understand everyone that communism, leftism, Marxism, progressivism, socialism, whatever ism that you want, it doesn't particularly matter what it is that you call it because it's not a philosophy.
It is a principle and it is one principle and that is the principle of power.
You know how we have this rule in our society, follow the money, right?
What guides the far left is follow the power.
If you want to understand why they are the way that they are, it's power.
It's pure power.
It's power over children.
It's power over families.
It's power over communities.
It's power over the kids in San Francisco, the kindergartners.
It's power over Steve Bannon.
Power over Peter Navarro.
It is 100% power over everything.
And what's so striking that I would like the right to understand, and the center, and the few who are on the left who are awakening to the trouble of wokeness, it's that the right, as an institution, as an organization, they take their fringes, they take the fringe right, and gently send them off on the short bus.
The left takes their fringe and puts them in charge of everything.
So that is the nature of the situation.
Now if we want to know why that's the case, why specifically, I had a semi-viral post on X a couple of weeks ago pointing out the history of the Christian Martyrdom North Star.
Meaning, so I grew up in an Evangelical Christian community, and in that community you often see artwork and stories and songs about the necessity of martyrdom in order to be the, let's say, the most sanctified or most holiest believer that you can possibly be, at least in that community.
Not that all Christians believe this, but this is certainly what was taught in my community growing up.
And so the image of being thrown in by the government to be eaten by lions, men, women, and children, and everyone, that is considered the highest moral good.
That is what it means to be principled.
And then you understand that evangelical Christians Republicans, they're the ones who are in power in the GOP and in many conservative think tanks.
You understand that we have one party, one side, one reality in which their one principle is power above everything else.
And the other one is in part guided by the belief that to be slaughtered, literally and metaphorically, is the highest moral good.
The greatest demonstration of your faith and your belief system that values.
If you game theory that what's going to happen, exactly what you're seeing today, one side will find a way to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory in the culture war, in political battles, and even real life situations.
And the other will do whatever it takes to win.
If their principle is winning, then anything is justified.
They can always say, we're on the right side of history.
Well, so let me push back on that just a little bit because there, and certainly there is a history of Christian martyrdom, but there are two ways to become a martyr, right?
There are two ways to become a martyr.
The first way of becoming a martyr is, as you say, to lay prostrate and let the world run roughshod over you.
And so hopefully that you are on your knees and pushed down by the government and thrown out.
And hopefully, oh gosh, yes, this is the time.
This is the time for me.
The other way to die a martyr is to go out and fight for the glory of God.
Ad Majorum Dei Gloriam.
For the greater glory of God, as Saint Ignatius of Loyola taught us.
By the way, that's what I texted Steve Bannon on the day that he was held off to the gulags.
For the greater glory of God go I, A-M-D-G, St. Ignatius of Loyola.
So if you die in battle for Christ, if you die in battle against the unhumans, certainly you become a martyr then as well.
But it's, so I guess there's the piece of it that I guess I would push back on is, what is it about this type of quote unquote principled Christianity or principled conservatism that preaches pacification?
Yes, it is a sort of Christian version of white guilt, where a lot of progressive female liberals, affluent white females, will have this belief where, Gosh, I'm doing really well for myself, and I'm really pretty and really rich, and I just feel bad for everyone who's not rich and successful and beautiful like I am, and who's also white.
And so they then become woke in order to make up for that.
And it seems like, if you talk to a lot of epically evangelical Christians, there is this feeling bad about the Crusades, because a lot of people were killed during that.
That's really not what Jesus was about.
He was about turning of the cheek and being blessed are the peacemakers, right?
So I gave a few weeks ago when I was on your show, Jack, I mentioned the example of a local Christian school where I grew up.
They decided to change the name of the mascot from the Crusaders to something like the Eagles.
Or something very plain and simple like that.
Because so many of the moms of the basketball players and sports players were kind of feeling offended and feeling bad about the image of the Crusader because that's, I mean, isn't that what Muslims do?
We don't want to be like that.
They're the ones who are out convincing and converting with a sword.
We can't do that.
We're supposed to be the ones getting marched into the arena.
We're supposed to be the ones being slaughtered and massacred, not doing anything of the same.
And so there's a false binary.
That either you have to be the innocent being killed or harmed in some way, or you're the one harming innocents.
There's not a sense of or understanding of reciprocity.
And this is what the Unhumans book, particularly chapters 12 and 13, are teaching and are designed to teach and are entering the conversation that you don't have to do bad things to be a good person.
If someone is weak or unable to defend themselves, you being weak and not defending yourself does not help them.
You being strong, you being powerful, that is what can help people.
That is what can protect.
I'm reminded of Teddy Roosevelt.
Speak softly and carry a big stick.
He does not say speak softly.
It's speak softly and carry a big stick.
And that sort of muscular Christianity is what Teddy Roosevelt is remembered.
We're seeing that being revived.
Uh, particularly with, with, um, younger, younger Roman Catholics.
Go ahead.
And real quick, by the way, there was also some Teddy Roosevelt, by the way, who is uniquely familiar with on humans because he ascended to the presidency after the assassination of his predecessor, William McKinley, which is never taught anywhere in schools.
I talked about in my Antifa book, my previous book to Unhumans, that he was assassinated, that the president of the United States was assassinated by an anarcho-socialist in 1901.
But of course, we're just told that was the first red scare, that it was just a big conservative, naughty plot, that it wasn't actually real, even though one of them may have killed a president.
But don't worry about that.
Those are just minor details.
It's the right that's violent.
It's the right that's evil.
It's the right that needs to be censored.
But Teddy Roosevelt gets in.
And I think and I talked about this with Jay Bhattacharya, and I referenced something that you and I got into with Charlie Kirk on his great podcast, which people should go check out.
I believe that's out.
You and I had a discussion with him from Detroit, and we pre-taped it, was that Teddy Roosevelt understood that not only do you have to deal with the unhumans directly, but also that you should mitigate the inequalities and unbalances in society, because if you don't release the pressure valve off, then you get a totalitarian revolution.
Because Teddy Roosevelt could see how bad things would get, of course, and keep in mind that at the time, you had anarcho-socialists, they took out Czar Alexander in St. Petersburg, threw a grenade and killed him.
They were killing people all across Europe at this point, which of course culminates, as everyone knows, about a decade later in the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand, who was the successor to the Habsburg Empire.
There were all of these assassinations going on around the world, but it was the United States that, through Teddy Roosevelt, that mitigated a lot of the pressures that lead to unhuman revolutions and was able to off-ramp that here in the United States, the same forces of inequality that blew into the Second and First World Wars.
We'll be right back.
Quick break.
Joshua Lysak.
steal back your independence.
When I grew up in the hood, I rolled with bloods.
And them boys had a saying.
You can't be listening to all that slappy whack.
Trim out his alitzabam ship.
Nippy bam bam.
Like Human Events with Jack Posobiec.
All right, Jack Posobiec back live here, Human Events Daily.
We're talking about how to off-ramp and mitigate the un-human's revenge when the un-humans rise up.
And Joshua, so I know we're jumping around here, but one of the through lines that I saw, that we saw, when running through the research for this, and I talked about it with Bhattacharya on that interview we did, was that in so many of these instances,
Whether it be the French Revolution, whether it be Russia, whether it be Spain, whether it be China, it's always when the elites in power accumulates, the 1% accumulates so much of the wealth that the rabble-rousers then come up and say, you see that wealth that those guys have?
Let's go kill them and kill their families and rape their children and take it away from them.
Now, you can mitigate that, and many people, Teddy Roosevelt, I would be at the top of my list who's done so, Pyotr Wrangel in Russia, with the White Army who's doing so, in at least the part of Russia that he controlled, of Southern Russia, but Joshua, walk me through this idea that the un-humans are able to tap into legitimate grievances to enact their un-human designs.
Yes, we begin the book in terms of the timeline about 250 years ago with the French Revolution.
Now, at that time, there had been an absolute monarchy in France, where the will of the king was the will of God, was the will of the government.
And so everyone had to fall in line.
And there was a strict class structure between the aristocrats and everybody else.
The concept of the middle class did not yet exist.
We'll come back to the middle class here shortly.
And so there was, in fact, an opportunity for conflict, for class conflict.
And this is what later the Communist Manifesto of 1848 by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels would talk about, how there was the bourgeois, that was the owners of everything, the people who owned the properties, owned the land, owned the farms, owned the factories, and so on and so forth.
And that all of the actual power had actual asymmetric privilege.
And then there was everyone else who was effectively disenfranchised.
Not a second-class citizen, but a last-class citizen.
It would have been not a positive and encouraging place to grow up, frankly, if you were not one of the privileged classes.
We saw something similar in the Russian Revolution in Russia.
There was a system of serfdom, where it was effectively debt slavery.
And then there had in fact been slavery prior to 1861 in Russia, where the peasantry, similarly in China, Where the vast majority of the people owned very little of anything.
That is what Lenin and Stalin exploited.
That's what Mao Zedong in China exploited.
That's what Robespierre and the other proto-communists, we call them, in France exploited.
There was a very real situation where there were people who had a lot of stuff, unfairly you might even say, by birth, not by merit.
A pre-merit system.
Not a great society, not a great civilization.
It's not Lindy.
And so what there was, fortunately, there was a push for, let's say, lowering the ladder down so that people could, through their merit, climb their way up.
We saw this in France with the creation of a legislature prior to the revolution, which allowed for the common man and woman to have a voice in government.
We saw this also in China.
We saw this also in Russia.
With Russia in the 1910s, there was a land reform movement which made it easier for the serfs to pay off their debts and to have farmland that they could own and raise and to create something like a middle class.
But guess what happened?
Their voices were shouted down.
The reformers in Russia were assassinated, were murdered because it wasn't fast enough.
And there were a lot of people who were very angry about the status quo.
We saw this also in France, where the most radical leftists who hated the status quo and change was not coming fast enough.
They were called the Jacobins.
That, of course, was the Rumsfeld crowd.
We saw this in Russia, where it was the Bolsheviks as opposed to the Mensheviks and other people who wanted to have fairness created a little bit slower and, shall I say, a little bit more easily.
We saw this in Spain as well, where the socialists were elected to power in Spain prior to the Spanish Civil War.
But what did the Spanish socialists do?
They allowed their violent factions of these anarcho-communist militias to roam the countryside, setting businesses on fire, looting businesses, burning farms, burning churches, murdering business owners, murdering priests, murdering nuns, just going about murdering anyone and everyone.
And they were allowed to do so.
Remember I said at the outset that the left always takes their fringe and puts them in charge of everything?
That's why.
The far left drives the right.
Or rather, the far left drives the left, but the far right is kind of set up to faster, institutionally speaking.
And real quick, by the way, because you take the historical analogy of that, but we're also seeing that play out in real time right now before our eyes as the hard left is trying to throw out their own president.
And I saw so many people watching this and seeing the debate reaction and saying, oh, I can't believe that they're going after their own guy.
How could they do this?
And I would say, this is just, guys, the Bolsheviks always come for the Mensheviks.
The Jacobins are the ones who rise.
But Jacobin Club was not the only grouping of the, you know, the leftists, the anti-monarchists during the States General, which eventually becomes the National Assembly of France, which, by the way, of course, is also going up for an election as we speak.
And it looks as though the right is finally returning to power there in France.
But also, they are the most brutal.
They are the most ruthless.
They are the ones who are able to institute the reign of terror.
You see this again with the Bolsheviks when they say, you know what, this provisional government in Russia after this, because the czar abdicates in Russia.
He says, look, I'm out.
Fine.
You guys want me out?
I'm out.
He goes along with it.
Then the provisional government of Russia comes up.
This is why you have the February Revolution and then the October Revolution.
But then during the October Revolution, that's because Lenin and his cadre of Bolsheviks say, you know what, this isn't going well enough.
This isn't going hard enough.
It's not going fast enough.
We need to be killing more Russians.
We need to be killing more Christians.
We are going to take over.
And so he launches another coup within his own coup.
Or Chairman Mao, as an example, who launches a revolution called the Cultural Revolution against his own party.
Again, this is what the left always does.
And if you understand the history of un-humans, that is why when Steve Bannon, before he went out, he said, Not at all.
must read this book, you must study this book, and then you must share this book.
Because the same thing has happened again and again.
When you understand their system, you will be able to predict what happens next.
So Joshua, were you even a little bit surprised when you saw them turn against Biden, given that you know the unhuman lens already?
Not at all.
One of the ways that these characters take themselves out is what we call the Ouroboros That's the ancient symbol of the snake devouring its own tail.
The self-devouring serpent.
And that is what very much the left does.
Now, the far left, it tends to be good at organizing.
What they do is they foment discontent.
They stoke rage.
Where there is not actual oppression, they will use the language to make you feel oppressed.
That's why if you talk to Let's say gay pride activists now, they will act and think and speak as if they're still systematically disenfranchised, as opposed to elevated to a protected class in society, which they are.
It does not comport with reality.
It's as if it's 100 years or 60, 70 years behind the times.
Talk to those who are activists within the Black Lives Matter organization.
They will speak as if tens of thousands of young, innocent black men are murdered by police every single year.
It does not comport with the facts.
They have the oppressor versus oppressed mindset, and therefore what they do, through that ancient Marxist lens that goes back long before Marx, it goes back even to the time of the Romans, as we and of course Steve himself details in the foreword of the book, it's the oppressor versus the oppressed.
If we are overthrowing the oppressors, whatever we do is justified.
A naked gay origin in front of children is justified.
That is the lens of the oppressor versus the oppressed.
It's being on the right side of history.
Ends justify the means.
This is the language of the Communist Manifesto, which says that waiting it out is not enough.
You have to attack.
You have to get your mates together.
You have to seize the means of production, or in this case, the means of reproduction.
And you have to have total power no matter what.
And if you have one side that says, well, I just want to be left alone, be libertarian.
You know, I'm kind of, uh, fiscally conservative, just kind of leave me alone.
Let me have my little family.
Who's going to win tens of millions of that or a few thousand who say we will win no matter what we will take everything.
We will destroy everything.
We will have total and complete power.
Who's going to win a few thousand of those or tens of millions of, I just want to be left alone, go away.
It seems like it's so easy.
And by the way, this is what I always say to folks who say, Oh, I'll just, I'm just going to go out to the red states and I'm going to unplug and everything will be fine.
And they're never going to come for me.
Really?
Did that work during COVID?
Did they not come for you?
Did that work when the transgenders started murdering their parents in Utah?
And by the way, the revolutionaries getting into someone's mind and indoctrinating them to the point where they are actually able to, willing to murder their own parents.
I say, well, this is exactly what we saw in the Chinese Cultural Revolution.
Not similar.
Not akin.
No, exactly.
The only difference being The attack on gender itself, but this of course also is part and parcel with the updated version of Marxism to Neo-Marxism, Neo-Bolshevism, Bio-Leninism, and Cultural Marxism, where economics is traded in for sociology.
So we would expect to then see the rise of new humans in ways that the Khmer Rouge could only dream of.
Because rather than create new humans, which Pol Pot claimed he was doing, we are now literally creating a new version of the human race.
Transcended humans, we are told to believe, transcending humanity by becoming transgender.
They are ascending over And Jack, where is Jack?
Where is Jack?
Where is he?
the way well then mom and dad have to go remember folks communism is only one mass killing away one genocide away from utopia we'll be right back myself joshua lysac giving you the understanding you need to fight back and jack where is jack where is jack where is he jack i want to see you
Great job, Jack.
Thank you.
What a job you do.
You know, we have an incredible thing.
We're always talking about the fake news and the bad, but we have guys, and these are the guys who should be getting Pulitzer's.
Jack Pasovic back live, Human Events Daily.
We're talking now with Joshua Lysak, the co-author of the hottest book of the summer, Unhumans, The Secret History of Communist Revolutions and How to Crush Them.
Joshua, I want to get into the how to crush them part.
You know, I know communism is bad.
I don't like it.
But are there times in the past where people have crushed this?
And let's let's fast forward a little bit because prior to Steve Bannon going to jail earlier this week, There were so many people, ABC, NBC, Wall Street Journal, New York Times, and I was in some of the interviews.
He obviously did most of them.
But they were terrified of him saying that there was going to be reciprocity.
So we give that note.
So, you know, we're putting the book together.
We say, well, reciprocity is the answer.
That's clearly the fastest and most effective answer to this while, by the way, dealing with the coefficients of the wealth in America, which, by the way, Donald Trump has always put at the forefront of his movement.
We talked about Teddy Roosevelt in the past mitigating it, but obviously The leader of populism right now in America today is Donald Trump, and he has always put the economic well-being of the lower class and middle class first and foremost in his mind.
This is why places like your home state of Ohio, my home state of Pennsylvania, have always been the most disaffected economically, but also the ones where you find the most hardcore Trump supporters, because speaking to those people specifically who were disenfranchised by the system of globalization. because speaking to those people specifically who were disenfranchised by That being said, why is it that we come up with this idea of reciprocity?
Steve Bannon reads the book, then Steve Bannon starts spitting it out on the war room, the entire media, and by the way, these regime apparatchiks like Andy McCabe start saying things like, well, I need to update my passport.
I couldn't possibly imagine living like this, living in fear like something might come back at me.
I said, wait a minute.
Whoa, whoa, whoa.
And then Jen Psaki, she finally comes up and says, well, you know, I mean, they are just talking about doing this within the confines of the law.
It's like they've never actually encountered people on the right who say these things, have they, Joshua?
No, no.
The left who, again, puts power above everything, the most extreme version of the left, always has power.
There's a passage where we go back to 1947 in the book On Humans, where Walt Disney was calling out the fact that in entertainment, media, the culture was already overrun by atheistic communists who wanted to just destroy The United States of America and all of Christian civilization with it.
1947.
That's the recent version of post-World War II cultural Marxism.
It goes back to when we document the history further into the 1950s, into the 1960s.
And what we have now is the illusion of legitimate institutions.
I caught the ABC interview at the very tail end.
ABC News with Steve Bannon a few days ago at the time of this viewing, where The newscaster said, and this is the tone of voice he used, so spot the propaganda.
He said it like this.
Stephen K. Vannin claims that he is a political prisoner despite having lost his appeals.
He said it like that.
Like, political prisoner?
Really?
Are you?
That's kidding.
Obviously, it was contempt.
It was real, obviously.
And so that is the reality That the vast majority of news media consumers, we can call them normies, I like to call them NPR Americans, that's the reality in which they inhabit.
Where, oh, well, you know, I guess if he was convicted and he lost his appeal, I guess there was really a law broken there.
The average person on the right, center, anywhere, does not yet understand that we live in what John Robb calls the hollowed state.
And this is at the late stage of an empire, and we have a global American empire, again, Republic, long gone.
In our empire, in any late-stage empire, there is a hollowing out of key institutions.
They are overrun always by power-hungry people who try to accelerate the end of everything as quickly as they can in order to steal, kill, and destroy for their own gain and for the attainment of power.
So to the average observer, to the normie, what's happening to Steve Bannon, what's happening to Peter Navarro, it looks legitimate until you realize what's really going on.
until you read a book like Unhumans and you get a mental model upgrade.
It's like a new filter on reality where you realize that's what's happening to Peter, Steve, what's happening to Trump, what's happening to so many people, what's been happening for decades here in the United States.
There is a track record of this.
There is a series of patterns, of arcs, of processes.
You could call them standard operating procedures to destroy a civilization from within by far leftists.
It's been happening for 250 years now.
And we said earlier, even shades of this red go back to the Roman Republic fall and the rise of the Roman Empire.
None of this is new.
Yet when we talk about communism, It seems like this thing is always in the past, it's old, it's whatever.
So with this historical nonfiction book, we have brought the past, the present, and the future together to create a complete three-dimensional reality upgrade to all readers, to the right, to the world, so that there's no longer going to be, I just want to be left alone, right, versus the, I will take everything you have and your children too, left.
It will be.
And I know you're not the biggest Star Wars fan.
In fact, you might be one of the least there in the galaxy.
I am a, excuse me, excuse me, excuse me.
I am a recovering Star Wars fan.
A recovering Star Wars fan.
People tried to, they tried to test me on the Nightsisters the other day and they're like, well, Jake, the Nightsisters were actually always witches.
And I was like, excuse me, excuse me.
Are you talking about the Nightsisters of Dathomir?
The Nightsisters of Dathomir, the planet?
That was controlled originally by the Imperial Remnant, which Han Solo won in a sabacc game, which he tried then to use to win the hand of Princess Leia away from Prince Isildur of the Hapes Consortium during the courtship of Princess Leia.
Do you mean those Nightsisters?
Guess what?
Yeah, they were always witches, but they weren't always lesbians.
That's the point.
But please, I digress.
Yes, so the prequels specifically are my favorite when I was young and growing up, and they're my son's favorite too, and we average probably two or three viewings of one of those films a week now.
And I realized that the battle of Anakin versus Obi-Wan, that duel in Revenge of the Sith, is a powerful metaphor for what the right needs to understand.
I explain this to my son.
In any conflict, both sides will say that they're the good guys.
If you look at and you listen to the leftists, to the anti-civilization forces, to those who would unhuman you and your family, what words do they use?
Fairness, equality, peace, justice, love.
These sorts of words that, oh, you're a bad person.
You're filled with hate if you oppose any of those things.
You're a bigot, far right, transphobe.
They use these labels, right?
That's how they demonstrate that they've lost.
But they're trying to gain moral superiority over you so that you fall back into martyrdom mode where, oh, that's right.
Back into the arena, guys.
Okay, I'm sorry.
Back into the arena.
What we want to do is to look at who's hurting children, the innocent children.
Well, obviously that's Anakin and Skywalker in the Prevention of the Sith film, following this analogy, this metaphor.
Well, obviously.
And of course, he says, well, from my point of view, the Jedi are evil, is what he says famously towards the end of the Battle of Mustafar.
And of course, Obi-Wan says, well, then you are lost.
Now, Obi-Wan has a what?
He has a weapon.
He does what to Anakin?
He fights him.
Oh, you mean the right should fight the left with the exact same weapon that they're using through their hollow state apparatus to steal, kill, and destroy and launch these micro revolutions where they attempt to unhuman people like Steve Bannon, like Peter Navarro, like Donald Trump and his family and his business empire, like children, Christian children in Nashville, like anyone who's binging TikTok.
And becoming the next, unfortunately, and we hope not, becoming the next potential would-be assailant of children, sort of a transgender Anakin Skywalker.
That is happening in this country today, this mass unhuman movement.
And it takes someone, this is what I told my son, it takes someone to be an Obi-Wan, who says, as Obi-Wan did, I will do what I must.
Wherever I am, there will be no unhumans.
Francisco Franco.
Paraphrased.
And this is the upgrade that this book on humans brings to the Republican Party, to conservatives, to the right, old, new, young.
It's going to be quite something as we see this book penetrate the unfortunately hollowed out Republican Party, but the new people rising up, the Millennials, the Zoomers, even the Gen Xers coming to power, realizing, no, we can't just say, well, do what you must.
You know, we'll just put principles over power because we're principled conservatives.
Imagine if the roles were reversed.
That sort of thinking, those days are over.
And that is a shock to those on the left, institutionally, who are used to conservatives snatching defeat from the jaws of victory.
And suddenly, suddenly they've encountered a group of people on the right who say, we're not going to let you beat us.
In fact, we're going to fight back.
Stay tuned for Impact Human Events today.
Stop buzzing in my ear about the boring people at your office.
I'm trying to listen to the new human events with Jack Posobiec.
Back live, Cune Events Daily, Joshua Lysak.
So we've encountered the situation that we're in.
We've explained how we got here.
How do we get out?
How is it that we are able to use reciprocity to end this situation?
Because, I keep explaining, it does boil down, and Steve Bannon said, personally, many times, when he was talking about this book, and We should also throw out again that Steve Bannon was so gracious as to sign over 200 copies of this on humansbook.com.
I think it's completely sold out right now.
They sold so quickly that he believed in this book so much that he was able to do so for us.
And he said, the key to understanding everything is that they will not stop until they are stopped.
There's no rhetoric, there's no argument, there's no op-ed, there's no email, there's no tweet that they are ever going to listen to.
This isn't going to stop until there are Democrats in handcuffs.
And it's as simple as that.
It's as simple as understanding that power must be responded to with power.
By the way, and you and I were discussing this before, that the Russians understand this.
That the Russians understand that when the United States puts nuclear-tipped missiles in Turkey, they're going to respond with the same thing in Cuba.
When the United States gives ATACOM's long-range missiles to the Ukrainians and the President of the United States, Joe Biden, goes on TV in France and says he's given authorization for those missiles to be used to strike inside the The conventional territory of Russia, so the original, this mother Russia that we're talking about, not the contested areas, but in legitimate Russia, that they are now being attacked with U.S.
missiles.
How do they respond?
It's called gunboat diplomacy, atomic diplomacy.
They send nuclear submarines off the coast of Miami.
Why?
Because when all other diplomacy fails, you must respond with power that doesn't mean you go to war but of course biden might do so because i don't really see how many other options he's got left if he wants to save his skin joshua lisek what say you are there ways that we can do this without doing what uh you know so many people out there saying oh we need a national divorce and that's going to work
we're just red states are going to separate and we'll be good to go yes that is all terribly unwise and fanciful um bad fan fiction for a dystopian future novel That's not going to happen.
What has worked in the past to, ironically, de-escalate, is to escalate.
What we have is an asymmetric battle between, again, those who will say, power above everything else, and the other who says, principles before power, so that even if we lose everything, we've won the moral high ground or something.
Even if that results in our death or imprisonment or, let's say, loss of civil rights, well, then, you know, we still won on paper officially.
That's not going to work anymore.
Understand that there are things that any of us, all of us, soccer moms and little league dads who are listening to this show right now, watching the show, people who are county sheriffs, school board members, whatever your area of influence or sphere of influence is, you can be the one who says, wherever I am, there will be no communism.
Or as Obi-Wan Kenobi said, drawing his lightsaber, I will do what I must.
Now again, that is not about hurting innocent people.
That's what the unhumans do.
They unhuman the innocent, the helpless.
We are the ones who defend them.
But we can't do that if we're weaponless.
We can't do that if we say, imagine if the roles were reversed.
We have to show a show of strength.
And what that means is, If in your area of influence there is unhuman activity intended to harm children, let's say in your school district, in your library, from the parks department, guess what you're going to do?
It's probably going to be parents who do this.
You're going to gather up your mates, your girlfriends, and you're going to go run and you're going to completely take over that school board or that parks board or that library association.
That's what you're going to do.
And so that you can say, Wherever I am, there will be no cultural Marxism.
I will do what I must.
And that is the language of power.
And power speaks only the language of power.
And that's a small local example.
There's also things that you can do.
Let's say if you have a career where you're working for a multinational corporation advancing the interests of the global American empire, that is unfortunately un-humaning a lot of innocent people in the Ukraine-Russia border right now through our Uh, various weapons and cash money and all sorts of shenanigans that are happening that I can't believe that my tax dollars are going for, but that's another conversation.
What we can do at any level of influence, any sphere of influence is we can say, how do I prepare my own personal environment for when the revolution comes to me?
And this is a key point that we, that we put forward a hypothesis that the new communist revolution that we're experiencing now is a wave of micro revolutions.
The target specific individuals or institutions, organizations, from the NRA to the Trump family administration, to individuals like Steve Bannon, to perhaps you and also me, Jack.
We're certainly laying ourselves in that onslaught, in the direct line of fire.
And are we going to say, oh dear, please don't.
Yeah, that doesn't work.
That doesn't work.
That puts us in victim mode, as opposed to defensive mode, into protector mode.
Big dad energy.
BDE is what this nation needs.
That's what Franco manifested in his defense and salvation of Spain.
By the way, And by the way, just our final minute here, I'll reflect on something that we wrote in the book, that had George Washington and the Founding Fathers lost, then guess what that would have been referred to as?
That the events of 1776 would have been referred to as a failed military coup against the British Empire.
So, history is written by the victors.
Although, in the case of the Spanish Civil War, history was written by the losers because the communists, to be fair, had pretty much all the best writers.
They had Hemingway on their side.
Orwell was fighting for them.
Although, when you get the book, you'll see that Orwell actually gets red-pilled by this.
Joshua Lysak, final word to you, man.
Just 30 seconds.
Yes, what we want to do with this book is we want to teach people that hope is not lost.
There is something that you can do.
Something that conservative, right-wing, let's say modern political books will often do is build outrage.
This shows that there are things to be outraged about.
It gives you, that guy, it gives you a lightsaber.
It gives you law.
It won't stop.
It won't stop until we stop it and we will stop it.
▲
Export Selection