DEMS IN TURMOIL AND THE BIDENS' STRUGGLE TO MAINTAIN CONTROL OVER NARRATIVE
Here’s your Daily dose of Human Events with @JackPosobiecSave up to 65% on MyPillow products by going to https://www.MyPillow.com/POSO and use code POSOThe Wellness Company’s Medical Emergency kit is what you need to be prepared. To order, just go to https://www.TWC.HEALTH/POSO and enter PROMO code POSO for 10% off. SIGN UP at https://www.moinkbox.com/poso RIGHT NOW and the Human Events audience will get FREE bacon for a YEAR.Support the Show.
I want to take a second to remind you to sign up for the Pozo Daily Brief.
It is completely free.
It'll be one email that's sent to you every day.
You can stop the endless scrolling, trying to find out what's going on in your world.
We will have this delivered directly to you, totally for free.
Go to humanevents.com slash Pozo.
Sign up today.
It's called the Pozo Daily Brief.
Read what I read for show prep.
You will not regret it.
humanevents.com slash Pozo.
Totally free.
The Pozo Daily Brief.
This is what happens when the fourth turning meets fifth generation warfare.
A commentator, international social media sensation, and former Navy intelligence veteran.
This is Human Events with your host, Jack Posobiec.
What do you think our adversaries saw in President Biden last week, and does that concern you?
The morning after when I looked at this, I said to myself, well, he had a really, really bad night, and we'll move forward.
Obviously, we have to take the voters where they are, and there is concern about this situation.
These people who have supported him, loved him, campaigned for him, see him often, say that in the last six months particularly, there has been a marked incidence of cognitive decline and physical infirmity.
We have a country that 72% want something different.
If the Democratic Party can't produce something different that 72% of people want, then why do we exist?
What are we here for?
I mean, the country is clamoring for change.
And what are we going to offer them?
The same stuff?
It doesn't make any sense, Jake.
This nation was founded on the principle that there are no kings in America.
Each, each of us is equal before the law.
No one, no one is above the law, not even the President of the United States.
With today's Supreme Court decision on presidential immunity, That fundamentally changed.
I mean, this is a death squad ruling.
This is a ruling that says that as long as you can construe it as an official or quasi-official act, you can do absolutely anything and never be held accountable, not only while you are president, but forever.
There is no chance we see any trial before the election, and The case is going to disappear if Donald Trump is re-elected.
He will direct the Department of Justice to dismiss the case.
He will get rid of the special counsel somehow.
We should suffer no illusions that this case continues through the courts if Donald Trump is re-elected.
This court has said, yes, you are a king and we are the king's hand.
And together, the seven of us will rule this country.
Ladies and gentlemen, welcome aboard to today's edition of Human Events Daily here live, Washington, D.C.
Today is July 2nd, 2024.
Anno Domini.
Gonna move back here for a little bit, because I gotta show you guys my new shirt.
There we go, right there.
That's the new shirt, alright.
Free Bannon because Steve Bannon is currently a political prisoner in the gulag sent to the Bureau of Prisons under Merrick Garland.
Lisa Monaco there.
However, of course, we have the breaking news from Alvin Bragg and others.
The Supreme Court's ruling on immunity states that President Trump's sentencing can be delayed past the RNC.
So what's going on here, folks?
125 days out.
When we're 125 days out, the left is not only feeding off of chaos, they are creating chaos.
I promised you this, that they would be in an escalatory mode.
They currently are conducting the escalation that we've seen.
And the spark of truth that we saw on the debate stage last week has yielded a wildfire of madness from the Democrats.
Now is the time, more than ever, stay frosty.
You've got to stay frosty.
Biden says, "Oh, the president's on a king." Really, the president's on a king.
Because Biden, with the stroke of his pen, his king's pen, opened the southern border.
He could, with the stroke of his king's pen, close the border right now.
In fact, this is really only going on, and I'll tell you why, what's going on here, folks, and this is the unhuman's lens, the unhuman filter.
The Democrats only care about power.
The left only cares about power.
The right is addicted to rules.
The right is addicted to, oh, we have the best principles, and if we have the best principles, we're always going to win.
Guess what?
If you have no power, you can't win anything.
Not in the room, not in the deal.
So what do the Democrats do?
they realize they don't have control of one institution in the United States right now.
And that institution is the Supreme Court.
And only because the power of the human events audience and the war room audience, the power of the MAGA movement have put the Supreme Court now in play.
That is why you're hearing and seeing the freak out against the Supreme Court right now, because Biden and the Democrats want to get in.
And if they win, they will pack the court.
Biden said it already when he said the next president will get the ability to appoint two Supreme Court justices.
He's not talking about replacing justices.
Biden's talking about adding justices.
They've talked about this before.
They want to add justices.
This is FDR's old plan.
Remember, he always talks about he's the new FDR.
Biden wants to replace Any conservative influence with his own influence, this is the left's plan to make you angry, to make you hate the Supreme Court and say that the only reason to vote for us, yeah, we know Biden's got problems, but you must pack the court.
That is the plan.
That's why they're firing up the targets at the court right now.
Roger Stone joins us next.
We're going to be talking about all of this and more.
Stay tuned.
Stay tuned for a right back to Human Events.
Make sure you're subscribed, you hit the notifications, so you'll never miss a clip, you'll never miss a new live episode, and we're putting them out every single day of the week.
You talk about influences.
These are influences.
And they're friends of mine.
Jack?
Where's Jack?
Jack?
Alright, Jack Posobiec back live here.
Human events daily.
We got a lot going on today, so folks, you need to be paying double close attention.
DOUBLE close attention!
Because, I'll tell you this as well, when the next medical crisis strikes, you want to be confident that you can protect your family and be prepared.
Whether it's another pandemic or something closer to home, preparedness is no longer an option, it's a necessity.
That's where The Wellness Company comes in, and for something innocent and natural like a tick bite to COVID to the next bioweapon manufactured in a lab, The Wellness Company's Medical Emergency Kit is what you need to be prepared.
It contains life-saving medications like Ivermectin, emergency antibiotics, a Z-Pak, and so much more, as well as a guidebook to aid in the safe use of these life-saving medications.
Wellness Company and their doctors, including Dr. Peter McCullough, Dr. James Thorpe, Dr. Harvey Reich, Dr. Drew Pinsky, and Dr. Robert Sieck, so many more.
These are medical professionals you can trust, rest assured, knowing you're ready for whatever the globalists throw at us next.
To order, just go to TWC.Health.Poso.
That is TWC.Health.Poso, and enter promo code POSO for 10% off.
The Wellness Company and their licensed doctors are medical professionals you can trust, and their medical emergency kits are the gold standard to keeping you safe.
Again, that's twc.health slash poso.
Promo code poso for 10% off.
Check out the site for details.
Prescription may be required.
No, it's very clear, folks.
It's very clear.
Remember, the Democrats will tell you, you must respect democracy.
You cannot have threats to democracy.
You cannot have misinformation out there.
And then suddenly, you must respect the results of the elections.
Well, do they respect the results of a Supreme Court ruling?
Do they respect the security of the Supreme Court justices?
They're calling for them to be executed.
They're calling for them to be assassinated in military Osama Bin Laden style.
Get Robert O'Neill up there kicking the door in like the Abbottabad compound going after Alito and Gorsuch and Roberts and Kavanaugh.
They're openly calling for violence against the Supreme Court because this is the one institution they don't control.
To understand what's going on, to walk us through all this, Roger Stone joins us now.
Roger, has the left gone completely mask off?
And if they have, why so?
What is the goal?
Look, the goal is obvious.
They have been trying to fast track, to expedite a bogus prosecution of President Donald Trump in order to head off his election.
They're apoplectic that Trump has won his due process rights.
That's the system.
They complain about delay.
The real issue is not your point of delay, but one of their trying to expedite it.
Who could forget when special counsel Jack Smith wanted to bypass the appeals court and take the question of immunity directly to the Supreme Court?
And the court said, no, you have to go through the regular process.
You have to appeal first at the appeals court level and then And then it can be heard by the court.
So they are apoplectic because this ruling today, which I think is correct, which is ironically precisely what Richard Nixon was arguing back in the late, pardon me, the early 70s regarding presidential immunity.
But because of the atmosphere in the country, there are a bunch of Supreme Court decisions regarding Nixon's tapes and other things that reversed hundreds of years of executive privilege precedent to give the howling mob what they wanted, the goods to destroy Richard Nixon and remove him from office.
So then he could not rein in the FBI and the national security apparatus.
So that's what this is really about.
But the juxtaposition is laughable.
If you criticize any federal judge who made a ruling for, say, Robert Mueller, well, then you were a dangerous radical.
You were an insurrectionist.
You were a traitor.
But now you have an entire class of pundits and politicians.
all of those in the Democrat cabal openly challenging the decision by the Supreme Court.
We have a president of the United States who will not accept a decision by the Supreme Court.
There's nothing illicit or illegal about this Supreme Court.
By the way, the Supreme Court ruling last week on internet censorship was shocking, was horrific.
So it's not like the Supreme Court is giving conservatives or Trump supporters everything they want.
But this decision is solid.
I think people need to understand what it means.
What it means is these questions about immunity will now go back to the trial court.
The government will argue that Trump's actions on January 6th were outside the scope of his responsibilities and his authority as president.
The president's lawyers will presumably argue that his requirement under the law and the constitution to see that the laws, particularly the laws regarding elections, are faithfully executed put his actions on January 6th well within the scope of his responsibilities are faithfully executed put his actions on January 6th well within the scope of his The trial judge will rule against Trump.
The D.C.
Circuit Court of Appeals, notoriously political, will rule against Trump.
And he would end up in front of the Supreme Court again.
But none of that is likely to happen before the election.
One caveat, Jack, a piece yesterday in Reuters indicates that Judge Chuck Tan still may try ...to get Donald Trump to stand trial prior to the election.
And that, of course, will be seen for exactly what it is — election interference.
Well, it's precisely what it is.
And Roger, I'd even go back, and you and I have done a lot of discussions here on the program about Richard Nixon, on specifically this question of presidential immunity.
This goes back to the Constitution.
It goes back to the arguments that the founder, Hamilton, wanted a monarch.
Hamilton said, why don't we do an elected king?
And certainly the founders were familiar with such things.
They were also familiar with the way that the romans would bring back cincinnatus and give them extreme power with immunity during times of crisis handed over from the senate and then be handed out two times of course it happened with cincinnatus non-consecutive i might add uh but the the idea of a of an unbridled monarch or has always been around that it's been part of our system
and so what the founders did was they found a way to compromise this this idea that sometimes during times of crisis you can't rule by committee it's just this is 101 civics that we have to go back to here that uh that is why they put on the executive and of course with something that i believe we all used to call checks and balances.
This is why there are checks and balances, as there have always been, which of course is the impeachment power.
But Roger, and we argue this in the book, and the book is out now, Unhumans, that the left, they have no principles.
And when you have no principles, the Constitution just becomes a collection of words.
And the ideas behind our legal system are just not a system as we talk about, the abstract concept of justice, but a system to punish your enemies and reward your friends.
And so Tanya Chutkin, Fanny Willis, Jack Smith, Merrick Garland, Lisa Monaco, everybody knows the names.
They are using this directly as a system to reward themselves and their friends in Fannie Willis' case, but also to punish their enemies.
This is why we're seeing the media freak out so much right now, Roger.
And I said in the opening, and I'll say it again, that it's very clear to me that they're trying now because of the president's collapse, Biden's collapse at this debate, his personal collapse throughout his term, and the insanity that has ensued, they're trying to reframe this election to be about the Supreme Court. they're trying to reframe this election to be about the And Biden has said in the past that he would support packing the Supreme Court.
What are your thoughts?
This is just another spoken there, kind of a...
Entirely defensive agenda.
So their campaign has to be built around Trump is a convicted felon, citing the New York trial, January 6, where they cling to a largely discredited narrative about what really happened that day, and specifically what Donald Trump's role in it was and was not.
The false claim that the Republicans and Trump want to take away a woman's right to choose, when all we actually did was send it Back to the states where those decisions about abortion can be made by the voters, by the people.
And even Joe Biden unleashed the oldest trick in the book.
The Republicans want to cut your Social Security.
They want to extend the age beyond what you can receive your benefits, and they want to look at your additional income beyond Social Security, so-called means testing.
To cut your benefits, something Donald Trump has very specifically ruled out repeatedly, something, by the way, that Joe Biden has advocated throughout his political career.
So now you can add to this the vilification of a Supreme Court that they don't like simply because they will not do what the hard left is demanding.
They're used to getting their way.
They get their way in the courts in D.C.
They get their way in the courts in New York.
They don't like it when you get an independent jurist who actually follows the law and doesn't give them everything they want.
They're like spoiled children.
And then, of course, they add to this, Jack, the fake narrative that, well, Joe may be comatose.
I mean, Joe may be a tomato can.
Joe may be entirely out to lunch.
But at least he's not a liar like Donald Trump.
Really?
Didn't we see Joe Biden sit there and say that no American military service member died on his watch?
Is he oblivious to what happened in Afghanistan?
The same Joe Biden who said that inflation was 15% when he became president when it was actually 6.3%.
Joe Biden who says that No woman aborts her baby in the eighth or ninth month, which we've seen Virginia Governor Ralph Northam talk about extensively in a shocking video.
It was lie after lie after lie.
The guy, if you tabulated all of the lies here, Joe Biden lied about virtually everything, yet the Politico had a story yesterday in which Biden's advisors said the real problem of the debate wasn't Joe's terrible performance.
It was the failure of the two hosts to fact check Donald Trump.
Absurd.
Well, and of course, there's no fact checks on Joe Biden for the fine people hoax, the drinking bleach hoax, all of the lies about January 6th.
We've got a quick break coming up.
Back more, Roger Stone, tumultuous, tumultuous news today, the fact that President Trump is ascended, and in fact, he's winning.
Stay tuned, we'll be right back.
I rolled with bloods, and them boys had a saying.
You can't be listening to all that slappy-whack-trematozal-it's-a-bam-ship-nippy-bam-bam like Human Events with Jack Posobiec.
All right, Chaps, welcome back live to Human Events Daily, Washington, D.C.
Folks, I like knowing exactly where my food comes from, and with Moink Box, that place is from small family farms all across the country.
You can help save the family farm, get access to the highest quality meat on earth when you join the Moink movement today.
Moink runs their business from a town of 97 people in Newark, Missouri, and they're helping save our tradition, our values, and helping save rural America with every order.
Moink delivers grass-finished Beef and lamb pesto pork and chicken sustainable wild-caught Alaskan salmon straight to your door.
You get to choose the meat delivered in every box.
We're talking ribeyes, chicken breast, pork chops, salmon fillets, and the best bacon.
Look, I love this stuff when we do fire pit with the kids out back when when I've got time when I'm not running around out to That's West Virginia for Tim Pool and all the rest.
We love to do that and I expect we'll be doing some this weekend for the 4th of July.
So support American farmers by signing up at moinkbox.com slash poso right now and the Hunan Events audience will get free bacon for a year.
One year of the best bacon you'll ever taste but for a limited time.
It's spelled m-o-i-n-k box dot com slash poso.
That's moinkbox.com slash poso.
We've got a clip now of our guest Roger Stone here from one year ago at Turning Point.
Let's go.
Joe Biden will not be the nominee of the Democratic Party in 2024.
Kamala Harris will briefly become president.
But the only way in their party they can replace a woman of color is with another woman of color.
And yes, you heard it here first.
The Democratic nominee for president will be Michelle Obama.
They have already rigged their primaries.
The reason that they have canceled the Iowa caucuses and the New Hampshire primary is to put South Carolina, a state where a majority of the Democratic primary voters are African Americans, and they will allow Gavin Newsom to purchase the vice presidential nomination, but the Obamas will hold him up for six or eight hundred million dollars to do so.
Roger Stone is on.
Look, Roger, that's you one year ago.
Now we're in the very situation.
It seems as though CNN has completely turned on him.
Jake Tapper, one of the moderators of the debate itself, is really taking the lead.
We've always said that Jake Tapper specifically speaks as a mouthpiece of the regime.
Barack Obama putting up a tweet that seemed like he was supportive of Joe Biden, yet we're hearing reports that the tweet itself was disingenuous.
So Roger, you called this a year ago.
First question is, do you think that it's possible to get rid of him?
And then number two, do you think Michelle Obama is still in the lead?
You, your thoughts, sir? - Yes, first of all, I stick to all of my predictions.
First and foremost, that Joe Biden will not be the 2024 nominee.
Now, it is true that the Bidens have a pretty firm lock on the Democratic nomination.
He got 95% of the vote of about 7,000 delegates, and they have been carefully selected to be Biden people.
So if Joe goes, and I think Joe will go in the end, he will have to go willingly.
What I think happens here is that Barack Obama's tweets and his public statements are disingenuous.
They are to provide cover while he works backstage to pull together enough cabinet members and, of course, the vice president, who has an inherent interest, and go to Joe privately and threaten to enact the 25th Amendment.
In other words, to remove him as president, in which case, as I predicted, Kamala Harris would become president.
Interesting that CNN has a pullout just moments ago.
The show's Donald Trump only beating Kamala Harris by one point.
No, I'm sorry.
I don't believe that.
So, what really has happened here is interesting.
It's very much like the situation of Woodrow Wilson.
Elected in 1912, Wilson had a debilitating stroke in 1919.
Essentially, he was both mentally and physically completely incapacitated.
They kept him hidden.
He made no public appearances.
No one saw him.
His wife, First Lady Edith Galt Wilson, was the de facto president of the United States.
With the assistance of Colonel Edward Howes, the White House chief of staff, she was the de facto president because Wilson was completely incapacitated.
I think that's precisely what you have going on here today.
Jill Biden, Dr. Jill Biden, is your de facto president.
The president's chief political advisor has emerged as Hunter Biden.
So it's not surprising that both Hunter and Jill are urging Joe to hang on for dear life.
In the end, I think if he refuses to just announce he's not running.
Wouldn't require his resignation, then I think they are prepared to remove him if necessary.
They know they cannot go into an election with Joe Biden as their standard bearer.
They know that they will lose.
Now, this creates a lot of interesting dynamics.
Were they, were he to simply say he wasn't running again and then have a wide open convention in which he releases his delegates?
Presumably he would announce this just before their convention or between now and their convention.
There is no question that a runaway Democratic convention would choose the most popular Democrat in the country who's eligible, and that would be Michelle Obama.
People who scoff at this make an enormous mistake.
She would be a far more formidable candidate than Kamala Harris.
She would be a more formidable candidate than Gavin Newsom.
She would be very difficult to beat.
She has no public record to attack.
Attacking a woman in politics is always tricky if you're her male opponent.
Hillary Clinton is the one exception to that because she was so universally despised.
But yes, I stick to my prognostication.
First of all, that Joe will not be the nominee.
And then if they go to an open process, which is what I expect, That they would draft, and this is a key point, draft Michelle Obama.
I never said she wants to run.
I never said she is running.
I never said she's planning to run.
I think she will be persuaded that she is the best prospect for the Democrats, not only to beat Donald Trump, but to keep all of them out of prison, which is what they really fear the most.
Well, and so this is actually key because something we saw on the morning of the debate, and there were a few key reads, and what we would say in the IC, warnings and indicators, or indicators and warnings, INW, so there was INW prior to the debate that Hillary Clinton announces this public book tour, this massive nationwide book tour, whistle-stop tour, she's running around wearing the white, putting the dress on again, then all of a sudden Kamala Harris, Rolling Stone has the profile,
Jill Biden comes out with the cover of Vogue, also wearing a way.
It's like this huge memo has gone out to Democrat women.
But then also, and in a little noticed story, Axios.com, Michelle Obama released a statement, or essentially, you know, sources close to Michelle Obama, so it's her, which was a dagger towards the Bidens, and specifically Jill and Hunter, because apparently and specifically Jill and Hunter, because apparently Michelle Obama is close friends with Hunter Biden's first wife, Kathleen Buell.
And she's making this comment and releases the story to Axios, I say, as a dagger on the morning of the debate.
So before the debate has even taken place, we're already seeing the INW prior to this operational preparation of the environment for a takeout of Biden as the candidate.
The issue, of course, becomes, as you say, Roger, if Jill Biden and Joe Biden are the ones that are controlling access to the president, so much so that even the staff of the residents of the White House do not have direct access to the president, something that is completely unheard of across administrations and only political aides have access to the president, then there is no indication that they would let him go.
So, Roger, what happens in that situation where you've got this de facto Edith Wilson type figure who's holding on to power?
Is there any chance that Biden of his own volition then steps down?
Well, I think Biden understands or maybe his wife understands, Hunter certainly understands that if he is removed from office under the 25th amendment, he would no longer retain his ability to pardon Hunter, his brother Jimmy, probably Joe himself, other members his brother Jimmy, probably Joe himself, other members of the Biden crime.
crime family.
This is why they cling desperately to power.
By the way, you're right about one thing, Jack.
I haven't seen this much white on Democrats since the Ku Klux Klan rallies of the 1920s.
And Hillary Clinton is out there looking for her opening.
She's launched a new book tour.
You got to see the cover of her new book, You haven't seen this much airbrushing of a photo in a long time.
Anybody, any Democrat who would take Hillary Clinton for a vice presidential running mate would have to recognize that if elected, they would need a food taster.
But she's still bitter about the 2016 election.
She still wishes to be president.
It's the greatest disappointment in her life.
And she's treacherous and dangerous.
By the way, the Obamas probably dislike the Clintons even more than, I don't know, than we do.
So you have a lot of backstage intrigue here.
The Bidens are going to dig in their heels, but I still think that at the end of the day, the Clintons, and particularly the Obamas, and the professional chorus behind the Democratic establishment, the New York Times, the Philadelphia Inquirer, Politico, Axios and so on, they've already given the signal.
The signal is very clear.
Joe doesn't know it yet, but he's going to go and they will pick the strongest candidate they can imagine.
I still believe that that will be Michelle Obama.
Stick to that prediction.
I think that's a very interesting prediction.
All of this, of course, coming to a head mid-August, the Democrat convention in Chicago.
And speaking of, we mentioned Richard Nixon earlier, 1968, of course, the election which he won in a massive landslide, only to be surpassed by his even greater landslide in 1972.
That was the position the Democrats were in that went to incredible turmoil, incredible rioting.
Roger, are we in shape?
And just a minute left here until the break.
Are we in store for another 1968 Democratic Convention in Chicago?
Unless the Democratic National Committee does what they were talking about yesterday, which is to expedite the whole thing, have it as soon as possible, maybe as soon as next week, do it all virally, virtually, so that Joe Biden is locked.
I think any of them would be a sure loser at this point against President Trump, who is completely ascendant against all the lawfare and the political attacks against him.
He's immune from those as well, folks.
nominee in my opinion.
I think any of them would be a sure loser at this point against President Trump, who is completely ascendant against all the lawfare and the political attacks against him.
He's immune from those as well, folks.
Stay tuned.
Right back.
Where's Jack?
Where is he?
Jack, I want to see you.
Great job, Jack.
Thank you.
What a job you do.
You know, we have an incredible thing.
We're always talking about the fake news and the bad, but we have guys, and these are the guys who should be getting Pulitzer's.
All right, Jack Posobiec here, back live, Human Events Daily.
Roger Stone is our guest.
Roger, you're of course been one of the preeminent political strategists for the Republicans for quite some time.
Here's something that I think a lot of people are asking is, it seems as though there's a lot of momentum, there's a lot of traction against the Democrats right now, yet I don't see the Republicans pushing for anything.
You've got people being on our side being hauled off to the gulags and yet Johnson and others simply sit there and they post tweets.
They talk about how upset they are.
They talk about double standards.
We see the president United States who's completely, completely unfit for office.
Yet we hear no, no opening of an investigation into this.
We hear of no subpoenas to the White House or demands for meetings, which by the way, the question should be coming out right now that if they're talking openly about replacing him as candidate, then shouldn't we from the nationals, purely from a national security perspective, because this is a national security purely from a national security perspective, because this is a national security crisis, be demanding that the president United Why is it the Republicans in the House and even the Senate don't seem to have the appetite for this?
Bye.
You're absolutely right, Jack.
I mean, the Clintons, pardon me, Biden's own Justice Department, in the report by Special Counsel Robert Hur, concluded that Biden was not of mental fitness to stay in trial.
Well, if he's not well enough to stay in trial, how is he well enough to have his finger on the nuclear trigger?
The House Republicans really You have Merrick Garland thumbing his nose at a House subpoena, a subpoena which Steve Bannon unjustly, in my opinion, was incarcerated for denying yesterday.
First they say that they're going to dispatch the Sergeant of Arms, which is a perfectly legal procedure to bring him in for testimony.
Then they back off and say, no, we're going to fine him $10,000 a day.
Which, of course, if they were successful, the government would pay.
Now they say they're going to sue him.
Our problem today are not the left-wing Marxist socialist screwball Democrats.
Our problem are the feckless, weak-kneed, lily-livered, spineless, feckless country club establishment Republicans who just don't have the courage for the fight.
It is outrageous to me, for example, that the House Speaker did not call the bipartisan legal advisory group, Blag, which speaks for the House in legal matters, back into session to essentially decertify the January 6th committee report.
Enough evidence to justify that.
That committee operated illegally outside of House rules.
The subpoenas were never signed off on by any minority member, which is a requirement to make the subpoenas valid.
Why didn't he just reverse the decision of that committee and Steve Bannon would have walked away from this witch hunt?
It is outrageous.
The lack of courage on the part of House Republicans, not all House Republicans, obviously, but enough of them that they are impotent, that they sit by and watch what's going on.
You're absolutely right.
House Republicans should be calling for the removal of Joe Biden.
In fact, House Republicans, based on what the House Oversight Committee has already produced, and very important congressmen like Jason Smith, for example, there's more than enough ample evidence to justify articles of impeachment Roger, this man has the unilateral power to order nuclear strikes.
the Democrats and be the right thing to do based on the evidence.
But of course, the House Republicans sadly do nothing.
Roger, this man has the unilateral power to order nuclear strikes.
He calls world leaders and, you know, whenever they pick up the phone, where is the check part of the check and balance on the president?
350 million Americans are are supposed to be protected by this guy and he has obvious dementia.
And so, of course, I think one of the greatest worries of this, and I spoke about this with Alex Jones when I was down in Austin on Friday, is that the reason that Biden kept bringing up NATO Article 5, NATO Article 5, again and again and again, he keeps bringing this up, NATO Article 5, He's doing that as a threat because now he seems as though he's weakened.
He's terrified of looking so enfeebled.
That's why he's going all in on the bronzer.
That's why he's trying to hold more events, desperately trying to cling on.
Roger, I think that when in a situation like this, you will have people like Jill Biden and people like Hunter going to to whispering in his ear that you need to do something to show you're tough on the world stage.
You need to stand up to Russia.
You should, I don't know, go ahead and authorize some strikes inside Russia or authorize direct strikes on Russian forces.
One of these moves that would absolutely trigger a third world war.
That's why he kept bringing up NATO Article 5.
What say you?
I totally agree.
In fact, I think this is already baked into the cake.
Antony Blinken, our feckless Secretary of State, has already announced that in September, Ukraine will be joining NATO.
Now, that's in violation of two specific agreements that we have signed with the Soviets, the Budapest Memorandum and the Minsk Accords.
When East and West Germany were united, and the Russians agreed to that, we agreed not to push NATO to accept Ukraine.
Really what this means, of course, is not to mount ICBM missiles aimed at Russia on the ground in Ukraine.
The left-wing journalist Max Blumenthal has correctly reported the silos for these missiles are already built.
They're just waiting to drop the U.S.-funded missiles into them.
That's what this fight is about.
And yes, they are prepared to start a war if that's what it takes to try to hold on to power.
I have no confidence whatsoever in an administration that doesn't even have any ongoing peace talks.
There are no discussions about stopping the killing in the Russian-Ukrainian conflict.
Donald Trump, if nothing else in that debate last week, emerges most definitely as the peace candidate, the candidate who can bring peace in that conflict and may have a chance to
Bring some peace in the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, which is caused entirely by the Biden administration financing Iran, which in return uses that money to restart their nuclear weapons development program, and to finance Hamas and Hezbollah and others who have attacked Israel.
Had we never taken our foot off Iran's neck financially, where Trump, through the shrewd use of sanctions, had them frozen off from any cash.
They couldn't sell their oil, not even to the Chinese.
We have funded both sides of that war in the Biden administration.
It is just as dangerous as the situation between Russia and Ukraine.
They will go to nuclear war if that's what they have to do to try to hold on to power.
I don't know why they think that people would rally to Joe, but it's interesting when you have CIA assets like Anderson Cooper at CNN, who seems to be relentless in his questioning to try to make Biden look as bad as possible.
When you have Brian Stelter and the aforementioned Jake the Fake Tapper saying, oh look, Biden can resolve all of this by having a two hour, no holds barred press conference.
That would put aside all the questions about his fitness.
I agree.
When will that be?
I'm ready.
When are they going to do that?
I think we both know the answer.
It's never.
It's not going to happen.
No.
What instead is going to happen is that you're going to see these elements, Tony Blinken and others, go in for more escalation in Ukraine.
And keep in mind, the Ukraine situation, Emmanuel Macron is on his last legs over in France.
Rishi Sunak is being run out of office in the UK.
People are voting again and again more for these right-wing parties.
The AfD in Germany is, of course, really, really ramping things up.
And these are not places like Hungary and Poland.
These are core EU states, France and Germany, and then, of course, the UK also being a major supplier of the Ukraine war.
They are looking to shift the narrative and they will decide that World War 3 and the conduct of a war is more important and potentially more interesting than Donald Trump and they'll say we need to stay the course and that's why they'll push for escalation when even Zelensky himself is going to the NATO summit
Asking for terms, talking about suing for peace, starting to bring up these ideas about a settlement with the Russians because he's out of people.
This is why they will go to NATO forces.
We're hearing they've already authorized contractors, which by the way, of course, is just a way to backfill a little CYA for the American contractors who are obviously already on the ground in Ukraine.
One last break coming up, final segment, Roger Stone coming in here.
Alright, Jack Posobiec back live.
I believe this is a Human Events exclusive.
We've got a report from a White House official that Michelle Obama is quietly working behind the scenes to ally with Kamala Harris to build a coalition of wealthy black donors, put them together.
44 Barack Obama not actively involved as of yet, yet no intention of stopping or delaying this massive ally grab for Kamala.
Prior to the debate, there were no interactions between her camp and the Obamas.
Whitmer also, I'm being told, has also begun to court donors for Kamala Harris.
So, Roger, you're potentially looking at a couple options for a presidential ticket there.
Maybe Michelle Obama goes in with Kamala Harris.
Maybe Whitmer comes in as a VP for one of them.
Do you see anything like that potentially emerging?
Well, first of all, I think a little bit of history here, I think, is important.
If Michelle Obama does not want to run for president, and I don't think she wants to, and she doesn't want to be put in the position of having to do so, I could see her allying herself with the current vice president.
Who under any normal political scenario would be next in line?
Remember, there were reports, I think credible ones, that Joe Biden never wanted Kamala Harris.
He wanted Gretchen Whitmer.
In fact, he was still sore about the fact that Kamala Harris showed him to be a racist in the 2020 Democratic debates, only to turn around and have Tulsi Gabbard destroy Kamala Harris on her own record of racism.
So, there was always a deep resentment about Kamala Harris.
This would allow Kamala Harris to become president, which is what she aspires to, would allow the Obamas to now select the vice president.
Unlikely to be Hillary Clinton, they don't trust her, but perhaps that's where a Gretchen Whitmer or a Gavin Newsom emerges.
So this would solve a problem for Michelle.
That's why I think, Jack, your report sounds credible and I can see a scenario on which it would be true.
If this ends up to be true, then only half my prediction will be correct, that Joe Biden will not be the nominee.
But in the end, Michelle Obama helps choose the nominee rather than be the nominee herself.
So Roger, given that the case, and we just got five minutes left here on the show, let's let's switch gears because as we discuss all the palace intrigue going on with the Bidens, someone who seems to be left out a lot of the coverage is in fact, the front runner for the presidency, the favorite now essentially in all of the swing states, Donald Trump, because he does have one decision left to him now.
The RNC opens up in just a couple of weeks time in Milwaukee.
So, of course, all questions are, given everything that's going on, how does this affect the decision-making matrix for President Trump when it comes to his selection of a running mate?
Well, if nothing else, Jack, I think a strong argument could be made for delay.
I mean, why would you want to choose your running mate when you at this point aren't even certain who the two Democratic candidates for president and vice president will be?
So I would preserve my options as late as possible.
We also know that of the four names that we believe this has been narrowed down to, none of them are women.
On the other hand, the only thing predictable about Donald Trump Is that he's completely and totally unpredictable.
So he's entirely capable of producing a name that we hadn't thought of or that we thought was not in the running.
Right up until the time that he announces this, which he doesn't have to do until basically the middle of July.
I don't know why he would go ahead and play that card.
And if anything, the situation surrounding the Democrats, who now have the worst split in their party since the Vietnam War over Middle East policy, until they have, until we have a better idea of what's going on there, if I were President Trump, I would defer my decision if I were President Trump, I would defer my decision as late as possible.
I have been an advocate for Tulsi Gabbard.
I know some in the MAGA camp don't like that, but she's an independent.
She's a lieutenant colonel in the U.S.
Army Reserve.
She is a combat veteran of both Iraq and Kuwait.
She is solid on the border.
She is solid against these endless foreign wars, including Ukraine.
She is solid on this question of life.
She is solid on Second Amendment rights.
She is a sure-footed campaigner.
She's clearly fearless.
You saw her take Kamala Harris apart.
She's doing everything possible to help President Trump.
She hasn't formally endorsed him.
She tells people to vote for him.
To me, it's the same thing.
That is where I would go.
I recognize that not everybody in the America First camp agrees with that, but she's going to be an asset whether she's on the ticket or whether she isn't on the ticket.
Again, if I were President Trump, I think I would delay my decision until I saw some clarification among the Democrats.
And certainly we also found out, speaking of delays, that President Trump's sentencing will in fact be delayed past the nomination convention.
Meaning that, I know I was on Tim Pool's show last night and I was saying that perhaps he should announce a VP candidate because of the impending sentencing date.
Now, even Alvin Bragg has admitted that the immunity decision means that the sentencing date should go back because, of course, he's filing motions in the Manhattan case.
And I argue that he should file them in all of the cases, including Mar-a-Lago and including Fulton County, about the on the grounds of presidential immunity.
Last word on all of this and the insane lawfare that we've seen from the Biden administration to you, Roger Stone. - Jack, I agree with everything that you said.
Look, I'm not a lawyer.
I don't pretend to be one.
But I do think that so far the tsunami of lawfare against Donald Trump, which is obvious because it was brought in the fourth year of Biden's presidency.
If Donald Trump broke all these laws, why wasn't he charged in the first year of Biden's presidency?
The answer is because they believed that Ron DeSantis or Nikki Haley or someone more preferable to the war machine would be selected as the Republican nominee and that the existential threat of Donald Trump would be over.
They were wrong.
He staged one of the greatest comebacks in American political history.
Now, going into the general election, he's leading.
That means they are apoplectic.
We're a very dangerous, uncharted territory where I think any tactic is possible.
A nuclear war, God forbid an assassination attempt.
I pray about this.
In fact, I think that's really where we need to end this.
People ask me as a hard-boiled political operative, what is your strategy?
As I said at that great Catholics for Catholics event in Mar-a-Lago not that long ago, praying every single day.
Praying for Donald Trump.
Praying for Steve Bannon.
Praying for Peter Navarro.
Praying for everybody on the MAGA team who's out there.
Amen.
Amen.
Follow Roger Stone over at The Stone Zone every single day.
