All Episodes
May 28, 2024 - Human Events Daily - Jack Posobiec
48:21
COURTHOUSE CHAOS: BIDEN ATTEMPTS TO INFLUENCE JURY USING J6 COPS AND ROBERT DENIRO

Here’s your Daily dose of Human Events with @JackPosobiecSave up to 65% on MyPillow products by going to https://www.MyPillow.com/POSO and use code POSOGet $200 off a 3-month supply kit from ‘My Patriot Supply’ when you go to https://www.preparewithposo.com. Support the Show.

| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Hey folks, I want to remind you that the Turning Point Action People's Conference is coming up this June 14th to 16th in Detroit, Michigan.
Get your tickets and then go to unhumansbook.com to come to a special meet-and-greet for the launch party of The Unhumans Book with myself and Joshua Lysak.
I'll see you there in Detroit!
This is what happens when the fourth turning meets fifth generation warfare.
A commentator, international social media sensation, and former Navy intelligence veteran.
This is Human Events with your host, Jack Posobiec.
Deliver us from evil.
Closing arguments, they are underway in former President Donald Trump's historic hush money trial.
Both sides getting their final chance to sway the jury in their favor before deliberations begin.
I think there will be voters, especially some of those independent minded, suburban voters, college educated.
They just can't bring themselves to vote for someone when a jury has said they have committed the most serious crime you can commit in this country, which is a felony.
So I think they should lean into it.
I think they should call him a convicted felon if he's convicted.
It's a very sad day.
This is a dark day in America.
If he gets in, I can tell you right now, he will never leave.
He will never leave.
You know that.
He will never leave.
What does that mean?
Is that the country we want to live in?
I hope this new ad campaign reaches outside the bubble to remind supporters of what a danger he is to our lives.
We're trying to be gentlemen in this world, the Democrats.
You are gangsters!
You are gangsters!
You touch kids!
You touch kids!
You loser!
Think of this.
First time in US history that a presidential candidate of a rival party will address the convention of a party that is presumably gathering to nominate its own candidate.
Now I think you should nominate me or at least vote for me and we should win together.
Former President Trump aboard Trump Force One flying over the Coca-Cola 600.
Memorial Day weekend.
Reflecting and remembering those in attendance.
The 45th president of our country, Donald Trump.
Ladies and gentlemen, boys and girls, children of all ages, welcome aboard today's special edition of Human Events Daily.
We are live from Washington, D.C.
Today is May 28, 2024.
Anno Domini.
What can I say, folks?
Feels kind of like it's going to be a white boy summer.
Look, we see what's going on down there at the courthouse.
We see what's going on inside.
We see what's going on outside.
The Biden administration just sent, I should say the Biden campaign, just sent Robert De Niro Michael Fanone and Harry Dunn from J6 all down to the courthouse to tamper with the jury.
This trial has gotten so bad that they've sent out the Hollywood actors and the crisis actors Down there with Donald Trump, and I'll tell you what they're doing right now.
This is textbook jury tampering.
Textbook jury tampering.
When you have people out there telling the jury, don't tell me for a second that they're not going to hear what's going on.
Everyone inside that courthouse is talking about that press conference the same way everyone outside did.
They are putting their crooked and decrepit thumb on the scales of justice.
And they're telling and sending a message to those 12 people who will become the 12 deciders, the guilt or acquittal of Donald J. Trump.
Don't worry about the trial.
They're saying it doesn't matter if Michael Cohen's a liar.
It doesn't matter if Alvin Bragg didn't provide any evidence.
It doesn't matter if they never explained what the final actual underlying crime was.
They never did because it never did matter.
Here's what they're saying.
Donald Trump is a threat to our system.
Donald Trump is a threat to the oligarchy.
Donald Trump is a threat to everything that we've built.
And so therefore, you've got to find him guilty.
find him guilty because of democracy, find him guilty because of J6, find him guilty because of all these things that have nothing to do with the actual underlying case.
They're saying find him guilty because his name is Donald Trump.
The Biden campaign just gave their own closing argument.
And who did they bring out to do it?
A failing and faded completely over the hill actor named Robert De Niro and a couple of crisis actors from January 6th, one who just lost his congressional campaign in Maryland and another, which obviously, by the way, that congressional campaign was a complete money one who just lost his congressional campaign in Maryland and another, which obviously, by And the second one who's got a Hollywood paid gig.
Well, I'll tell you something.
The jig is up.
The American people know that if you try and put Donald Trump behind bars, and the Secret Service has already held meetings with New York local jail officials to figure this out, let me tell you something.
Let me tell you something right now.
It's going to be a hot summer.
Get your shades on.
Get your hats on.
Because all I can see from here on out is that the future is going to be bright.
Ladies and gentlemen, one of the best ways that you can support us here at Human Events and the work that we do is subscribing to us on our Rumble channel.
Make sure you're subscribed, you hit the notifications so you'll never miss a clip, you'll never miss a new live episode, and we're putting them out every single day of the week.
You know, you talk about influences.
These are influences, and they're friends of mine.
Jack Poselbeck.
Where's Jack?
Jack?
He's done a great job.
Men and women of law enforcement put their lives on the line to defend this country.
Our democracy.
They are the true heroes.
These guys are the true heroes.
They stood and put their lives on the line.
For these low lives.
For Trump.
They lied under oath.
They lied on the road.
That's right.
Who lied on the road?
Those two traitors behind you.
Those two traitors behind you.
Excuse me?
Those two traitors behind you.
They lied on the road?
That's right.
What do you say?
They're traitors.
They're traitors.
I don't even know how to deal with you, my friend.
I don't even know how to deal with you.
They stood there.
They didn't have to.
And there were other ones in there who probably were in with them a little bit too.
And they found a way to get around.
Not these guys.
They stood there and fought.
For us.
For you.
For you!
All right, Chappers, we're back live, Human Events Daily.
Folks, what can I say?
Another day, another breaking news story buried.
You know, they'd rather talk about anything else than what's really going on.
It's not because they don't know what's happening.
Let me tell you something.
The media pundits and talking heads just don't want you paying attention.
What are the real stories?
The Human Events audience knows that you have to dig beyond the headlines to find the truth.
Prepare for what's coming with MyPatriotSupply.
Since 2008, MyPatriotSupply has helped millions of Americans get ready for the worst.
Today, their best-selling three-month emergency food kits are flying off the shelves.
Get yours right now at MyPatriotSupply.com This food kit offers over 2,000 calories a day, plus with ultra-durable four-layer packaging, it lasts up to 24 years in storage.
Order all the kits you need and get $200 off, free shipping included.
You've been warned about what can happen.
Don't live in fear.
Take back control of your future because it isn't just food, it's freedom.
Stock up on these food kits at mypatriotsupply.com, mypatriotsupply.com.
I'd like to welcome now our next guest, the great Darren Beattie, Darren J. Beattie from Revolver News.
Darren, what can I say about this press conference, this hasty press conference, it seems to me, that the Biden campaign just held a complete, just seeming clownish situation with Robert De Niro and two of your just seeming clownish situation with Robert De Niro and two of your favorite gentlemen, Harry Dunn and Michael Fanon, showing up
This clearly isn't the sign of a confident campaign.
This isn't something that anyone does from a position of strength.
But I do have to say, you know, as I said earlier, it's really nice to see that the Hollywood actors can get along well with the crisis actors.
What do you say, Darren?
Yeah, I was going to say, the only thing they have in common is they're all washed up actors.
But at least De Niro, to his credit, was a good actor.
I don't think Benan or whatever these guys, they were never good actors.
They were always third, fourth tier.
It's just a bizarre thing how he's a career for himself doing this J6 tour when all these people have been kind of exposed for the Political angle that they have to put it the best.
Some of these J6 celebrity types have been caught in a variety of lies, even not sure if that's been the case for this particular one.
But it's a sorry spectacle.
And it's weird.
It's a it's clearly an act of desperation on Biden's part, because I think just the bigger picture is sort of contextual things here.
First, I think people need to understand that I know there's a lot of, you know, you know, fear and theories out there, but I'm fairly confident.
I don't want to tempt fate, but I'm fairly confident in saying that we're not going to have another COVID.
Leading up to 2024.
They've used that ace.
They can't, much like, you know, the neocons use the Iraq war and they can't really build up enough public support for another ground war, even though they're desperately trying to get people ready for war with China.
It's very difficult.
Similarly, they've used the pandemic.
They don't have that anymore.
People are skeptical.
They need something else.
I've always thought that the ace up the sleeve for 2024, basically, these lawfare tactics are the COVID of 2024.
And a lot of the Democrat kind of machine operators have placed an inordinate amount of confidence and trust in the efficacy of these politically motivated lawfare attacks.
And they're starting to realize that they put Little bit too much trust in their ability to corrupt the legal system and undermine Trump, because what it does is just show everybody that the system is corrupt and actually ends up increasing support for Trump.
In many cases, that certainly seems to be what the polls suggest.
So I think the Biden administration is really in panic mode as they're starting to come to grips with this reality that they put all their eggs In this lawfare basket, and it's just not going to work.
And it's too late for them to pull something else out of the hat.
So they're in a really desperate situation right now.
And I think that's reflected in the conference.
And one other thing that I think is important, because you know, you know, we're at the cutting edge of investigative reporting, in particular about January 6, which we've explored from a variety of angles.
And there's a sense in which people might say, oh, isn't this kind of stale?
Oh, it's, you know, three years ago.
Why is it important now?
Well, it's been used to justify the weaponization of the security state, which is an important thing.
But more immediately and concretely, January 6 is a major pillar.
Of the Biden regime's lawfare strategy in 2024.
We're focusing on this trial now, but another criminal trial directly relates to January 6 and the false feds direction theory that Trump was responsible for criminal incitement.
And so the fact that they choose of all people to get this washed up actor who is great in Taxi Driver, Taxi Driver is an interesting movie to consider in light of De Niro's kind of failed political foray here, but they got this washed up actor.
And who else?
Washed up January 6 characters, which shows how desperate they are, how they're clinging to this false fedsurrection narrative for dear life, because it actually is a major pillar of their 2024 strategy. because it actually is a major pillar of their 2024 That's why Joe Biden in his senescence, you barely get him speaking for five minutes, let alone an hour.
And yet one of the rare occasions that he was pumped full of drugs, presumably and put to talk for an hour was the third anniversary of January 6.
That's how important this is to them now for 2024.
So I think that's an instructive thing as well.
So Darren, what do you think of my theory that it's not just, they're not just playing for the cameras at home, they're not just playing for the audience at home, that they're potentially, because I know how campaigns think, I've been on the inside of campaigns, they're always thinking of the different angles.
So no event like this is going to be held, and you certainly have been inside the administration for the Trump White House.
That no one's going to approve something like this if they don't think there's multiple angles to it.
And I'm willing to put money on the fact that they actually thought that some of this messaging, they thought, you know, we need to remind the jurors before they go in.
Remember, the timing is key.
The timing is always key.
Nothing happens on a campaign just like nothing happens in a Hollywood movie without a decision being made.
We have to remind them the stakes of January 6.
We have to remind them the stakes of Robert De Niro and our democracy and Trump is the next coming of the Führer and all of these things.
So this is why specifically they go back to the well for these things.
I said it's essentially a form of jury tampering because the Biden campaign tried to make a closing argument of their own.
They did deliver one.
Why is it so important that they brought January 6th into this?
Well, a number of things.
I mean, they've invested a lot into this Feds erection narrative, this idea that Trump supporters by extension are, you know, effectively domestic terrorists out rising to the level of the terrorists who perpetrated 9-11.
And therefore, all the architecture of the national security state that was erected in the aftermath of 9-11 should therefore be repurposed in order to go after Trump supporters for having you know, unapproved political views.
That's been the bird's eye sort of agenda for quite some time.
And as I said, there's a more specific agenda.
They're really leaning on the Fed's direction lie as part of their lawfare campaign for 2024.
And lawfare is the COVID of 2024.
What COVID was to 2020, lawfare is to 2024.
But lawfare is just not going to do it for them.
And then they're starting to realize that.
Well, and you know what else?
Confidence in it.
You know what else?
It occurs to me that, as you're talking, that one other reason is the fact that it looks like the J6 cases won't actually see the inside of a courtroom prior to the election, so all of a sudden they realize, wait a minute, this is what we were going to, and I'm sure, by the way, in those cases you would of course see, this was the original plan.
The original plan probably was that Jack Smith would call up Michael Fanone and Harry Dunn, and they'd be delivering these, you know, Harry Dunn would cry again and talk about how sad he was that day and all of this.
And now they realize they're not going to get that because Jack Smith has totally fumbled the bag.
And so they're saying, well, let's just, you know, slap something together at the last minute and roll them out.
And that way we can bring our January 6 topic that we won't let go of without any question.
topic that we won't let go of without any question.
It's like hearing the media bring up World War II every five seconds in geopolitics and domestic politics as well, for that matter.
It's like hearing the media bring up World War II every five seconds in geopolitics and domestic politics as well, for that matter.
It's kind of insane.
It's kind of insane.
They won't let it go.
They won't let it go.
But I think we have figured out the reason, the specific reasons through their insanity right now.
But I think we have figured out the reason, the specific reasons through their insanity right now.
Darren Beattie continues.
Darren Beattie continues.
Fascinating discussion.
Fascinating discussion.
There's a lot to talk about on the waterfront.
There's a lot to talk about on the waterfront.
We're going to get into that with Darren as we continue.
We're going to get into that with Darren as we continue.
All right, Jack Posobiec back live, Human Events Daily.
Now, as folks know, President Trump had a pretty big weekend.
And of course, without question, I actually got to see the president over Memorial Day weekend.
Got to spend a little bit of time with him and my family.
So um it's my dad's birthday and uh we all happen to be going to the NASCAR race together in Charlotte.
We actually so I'll tell you the story just very quickly without beleaguering it but behind the scenes so we had actually already gotten tickets for my father for this race and this was his big birthday present and then after that President Trump announced that he would be also attending the race and so we uh You know, we worked it out so that my dad could get a handshake with the president.
So I will say, by the way, though, that this left-wing insane media response saying that nobody was supporting Trump or that people didn't care, he was mobbed.
He was absolutely swarmed.
I was there with President Trump when he walked on Pitt Road.
The drivers, the fans, everybody, whoever, and this is a VIP area, obviously, but anyone who was coming through was cheering, asking for selfies.
Everyone had their phones out.
All the drivers had their phones out.
He sat up for a pretty good portion of the race, actually, in the pits, and it was not a cool day outside.
It was very hot.
It was very muggy.
It rained later after the race.
Well, they called the race because it rained later on in the evening, but we got to see him up in the skybox, and all I could say is President Trump was in great spirits.
He was holding court for a couple of hours, meeting with people, meeting with a couple of Medal of Honor winners while he was up there, and it was really amazing to see him with them on Memorial Day.
So thank you to The president, of course, thank you to the campaign and just everybody who helped us put that great weekend together.
Shout out to Beard Vet.
Shout out to Dilly Meme Team.
Shout out to just everyone who was involved and that we got to see over the weekend.
Shout out to White Boy Summer Crew and everybody else over there that, you know, came out.
We did a MAGA meetup that was sort of impromptu.
But then we also saw President Trump at the Libertarian Convention today.
Darren Beatty, I'd love to get your sense on this, because I've seen your commentary on other things, but I don't know if I've heard much of your commentary on what's become of the... I think, really, that event said much more about the Libertarian Movement, or at least the formalization of said movement, than it does about Donald Trump.
What's your take on that slice of the American political spectrum?
Well, it's interesting.
I haven't been following it so closely, but my understanding was, uh, he gave a speech there and there was a lot of interesting material, including, I think, very, um, welcome remark that he intends to, uh, um, give a pardon to, uh, Silk Road founder, who I think has been treated very unfairly.
Um, Ross Ulbricht, who's, uh, You know, a very sorry case.
If people study the details of that case, it really sort of prefigures a lot of the abuses going on against Trump supporters.
So I think that that was pretty much the headline from my standpoint.
And it's very welcome.
And libertarians based, not just libertarians, everyone should welcome this, because from the standpoint of the security state, we're all basically in a libertarian position.
We're all affected by The abuse of the national security state and the political weaponization of the state.
There are some other dimensions, too.
My understanding is, you know, he was booed on occasion, this or that.
I mean, the Libertarian Party is a very strange thing.
I mean, I think somebody pointed out that whatever one thinks of libertarianism, and there are different strains and flavors of it, so it doesn't much mean A lot just to say libertarian, but the libertarian party is a specific subset of libertarians who are so out of touch with reality that they don't understand that the way to accomplish things is to work within the two party system.
So you're dealing with a self-selected group of, even by libertarian standards, people who operate under pretty profound delusions, which is Saying a lot, and I think that accounts for a lot of the more ridiculous elements that you see from that particular convention.
And this, I don't know if you've seen, but this nominee that the Libertarians have put up, and it's very interesting to me that this is a guy who's been supporting Antifa events, who supported, from what the Postmillennial has reported, vaccine mandates, as long as they're corporate-backed, not government-backed.
And this is sort of an interesting flavor because, you know, guess what, boys and girls?
Cultural Marxism is still Marxism.
Corporate demands on your freedom are still losses of freedom and the idea that I think they were calling it gay race communism.
Guess what?
It's still communism.
It's just a different flavor of communism.
And so if you haven't caught up with the fact yet, and this is something we explain at length in the new book on humans there, and I've got to get you a copy by the way, that You know, Marxism of our day and age has simply shifted to cultural Marxism.
And so if you're playing around in cultural Marxism, yet claiming, oh, I'm against economic Marxism.
So it's totally it's a joke.
It's a complete farce.
And I have seen many, I think, well-meaning libertarians calling this out along the way.
And it's just very interesting to see the rise of this new type of, I'm a cultural Marxist, but I'm against, you know, I'm against economic Marxism.
Well, you know, it's, it's not entirely new.
And if I can get a little bit nerdy and draw upon sort of political philosophy a little bit here, like I've argued for a while, libertarianism as such in this context, only makes sense as an emergent property of a particular combination of positions.
What do I mean by that?
Well, the standard libertarian view is, okay, you're socially liberal, you're fiscally conservative, this kind of thing.
Presumably you believe in freedom of contracts, freedom of association.
Milton Friedman, who is one of the kind of celebrated economic libertarians who had a tremendous impact on the conservative movement in the 80s, 70s, 80s, and so forth, post-war period, made the point that, strictly speaking, libertarians should be open borders.
But only within the context of no welfare state.
If you're pro open borders when there's already a welfare state, that's not libertarian.
That's simply, you know, signing up for the conventional view of the left in practice.
Libertarian position is, okay, in a perfect world, we would have Open borders, but we would also have free association, which would countervail a lot of the negative things that we would associate with.
So open borders passing on the cost to the taxpayer and the communities and so forth.
So you have a lot of people who are sort of.
A la carte and only pick the positions that are embraced by the left and come with no reputational cost and say, I'm a libertarian because I support gay marriage and marijuana.
You know, that's, that's a very cheap way to be a libertarian.
And frankly, it doesn't, you might as well be a leftist unless you promote the particular constellation and combination of views, which if you're being principled about it,
Will include freedom of association, which a lot of libertarians, so-called libertarians, have been terrified of, because if you support freedom of association, that means, uh-oh, you don't support the civil rights laws, because the civil rights laws are arguably the most flagrant violation of that basic principle of association that one could possibly imagine, at least by the way.
You know, you and I were chatting beforehand, but this, and I was gonna ask you about this later, but this was the main thing that this new group of people, the woke right, who are, you know, kind of adjacent to the IDW, have come in after me for because I did a whole program with Blake Neff, and we talk about this in the new book, where we say, look, a lot of these laws, you know,
You guys say you're against wokeness, and you say you're against this, and Chris Ruffo got in the debate, and a number of individuals, and I'm not calling any of these guys out, but I pointed out that a lot of this goes back a little bit further than just the BLM era, and it goes back, just like immigration and the open borders that you're talking about, to the wonderful year of 1965.
And in that wonderful year so many many changes went through in our country and one of those was the loss of the freedom of association and the the rulings that we had that came out on the back of that
Not only did they destroy our school system, but they destroyed our towns, they destroyed our great cities, they destroyed neighborhoods, they destroyed our communities, they destroyed so many things that, you know, and, you know, they claim that it was white flight, but yet they never actually talk about the federal government and their machinations that led to this just abject destruction in the situation we find ourselves in now.
And it's a cop-out.
It's an absolute cop-out to not talk about these things.
Last minute, Dharambeedi.
Absolutely.
And, you know, I think libertarianism has some foundational philosophical problems, which, you know, are a topic for a separate discussion.
But at least for libertarians who are principled and honest and courageous enough, To stand for the or libertarian principle of freedom of association.
At least I can respect that politically.
But for these people who walk around and say they're libertarian because they support, you know, drag queens or gay marriage or any other cheap, easy position that, you know, basically any mainstream leftist would support.
It's just totally worthless.
And so I put these people in a separate category.
I'm not only philosophically incorrect, but also politically cowards and worthless.
I'd like to very quickly read out a comment from 215Shells.
Poso is a Jersey boy.
It goes with the message on the hat, and we say in Philly, real men wear pink.
LOL.
That 215, of course, the famous Philadelphia area code for your phones.
Well, Shells, I gotta say, I'm not a Jersey boy, although I did spend many a summer down at the Jersey Shore.
More of an OC guy, but definitely hang out in Wildwood from time to time.
But those are conversations that we will be not having on camera.
Stay tuned, we'll be right back to our meeting.
Jack!
Where's Jack?
Where is he?
Jack, I want to see you!
Great job, Jack.
Thank you.
What a job you do.
You know, we have an incredible thing.
We're always talking about the fake news and the bad, but we have guys, and these are the guys who should be getting policies.
Alright, Jack Posobiec back live.
I want to talk to Darren Beatty about the woke right, about all of these different factions that are aligning against whatever you want to call it.
MAGA, the Trump right, the real right.
Look, at the end of the day, it's not about which faction quote-unquote wins or something.
It's about we're in a situation right now where in reality The US Secret Service is now meeting with the New York local jail officials to determine what the parameters of jail time and incarceration, the circumstances of which would look like for a sitting candidate, leading candidate for presidential office, as well as the former president and upon which
is granted lifetime U.S.
Secret Service protection, and meanwhile these guys are tone policing us, they are concern trolling us, and they are doxing people, and just in general denouncing all of these types of individuals who are arguing for what I call an aggressive bias for political action.
An aggressive bias for action.
Darren Beattie, what is going on?
Well, this is a very interesting development, and again, we'll keep our analytical caps on here.
We have a fresh new piece right off the press at Revolver News analyzing the modern state of these doxing attacks.
For those who don't know, the doxing attacks are typically journalistic hit pieces that expose the personal information of pseudonymous kind of right-wing internet personalities in an effort to get them fired from their jobs or professionally ruin them.
And there's been a number of recent doxing cases.
And one thing that I think it's interesting to point out, and we explain the reasons for this in the piece.
Is that these doxing efforts have become remarkably less effective than they were, say, in the what I would call the golden era of doxing that, unfortunately, I was a victim of.
I got a hit piece.
You were.
Indeed, you were.
Dox-style attack.
And Blake Neff, who is a friend of both of our efforts.
And he was, I think, Blake Neff is interesting because he was the last got to get hit in this golden age the last real docs that first so um just quick quick anecdote but the a number of these human scum over at the splc and media matters and those those ilk have for years tried to quote unquote uncover what posobic must have had a secret blog name
he must have been out there on one of these naughty naughty blogs or chat rooms and it kills them that it never actually existed because they've convinced themselves that there must be one somewhere where i'm like very clear about this guys i was in the military and i ran a game of thrones blog here you You can read it.
I But you know the funny thing is a lot of the kind of stuff that they're looking for to dox people, a lot of it, not all of it, but a lot of it is more or less part of the mainstream discourse on the right now.
It's remarkable how the over window has shifted on a whole host of things like the Great Replacement, you know, that used to be the kind of thing if you said that and some hit piece journalist from CNN found out about it your life would be ruined and now we have Mainstream, we have, you know, Vivek talking about it, a lot of other mainstream people, all, you know, the major political commentators on the right have acknowledged it.
So the things have changed dramatically.
And I find that very interesting how these hit pieces are far less effective.
But one thing to tie into this dramatic news about Trump and the possibility of prison is this, that It's not all something to celebrate.
I think partially the ineffectiveness of doxing relies on two things that are not unambiguously good, and in some cases quite bad.
One is that I think just the meaning and gravity of words themselves has diminished.
I think in the golden age of doxing, there was more of a sense that words carried weight because they were more directly plugged into the perception of Radical political transformation that first, you know, a remarkable wave of Trump that came in in 2016 that terrified the system.
There was still an uncertainty of how far that would go and the regime was freaking out and it was still very new.
And so there was this sense that words had a tremendous weight and they were connected to underlying political transformations.
I think Rhetoric and underlying political reality are more disconnected now, which gives words less weight, and that's a bad thing, but the positive side of that is that because the words have less weight, the system is maybe less obsessed with destroying people for using certain words.
And there are exceptions, people who remain very dangerous, and the regime has a clear response to this development and that is the new method of cancellation is not getting you fired, not getting you deplatformed from Twitter, which now Elon owns.
So that's another big change.
But it's destroying you with defamation suits or even throwing you in prison.
For instance, Doug Mackey, a.k.a.
Ricky Vaughn, felony conviction.
That's the new kind of Cancelation.
The old version is you get a hit piece and it embarrasses you and reputationally destroys you.
No, that doesn't work so much anymore, but the regime doesn't really need it because for the real important cases, Donald Trump being one of them, the biggest one of all, in fact, they have other Far more severe means at their disposal and the infrastructure for those things, the lawfare, that has been developed and weaponized and those knives have been sharpened for several years now.
And we see what it's like in the deployment where we're hearing serious talk about someone who is an unprecedented stuff.
President going into prison for nothing?
For something as ridiculous?
As this documents case?
I mean, it's it's inconceivable.
But that's the stage that we're in.
That's the new mode of doxing is they will destroy your finances with these defamation suits.
We saw it with Alex Jones.
We saw it with Fox.
The reverberations from the Fox suit were profound as we saw.
So with Alex Jones and for the criminal stuff, you see it with the case of Douglas Mackey, Donald Trump.
In fact, there is a novel application of this conspiracy against rights charge.
The first time it was used was Doug Mackey.
The second time was against Donald Trump.
So this is the next frontier is someone put just putting someone like Trump behind bars, if not worse.
I hate to even say it.
Well in addition to that, let's not forget Dr. Peter Navarro is currently behind bars as we speak.
That's a great example.
He's given an interview with Semaphore last week where he said that he wants to get out because his current release date is July 17th.
And because July 17th is day three of the Republican convention, he says he wants to fly directly from Miami straight from prison to Milwaukee and take the stage.
I said he should go on with his orange jumper and just tear it apart, like Hulk Hogan style, when he gets out there and says, I'm Dr. Navarro and I got a lot of things to say and I've had a lot of time to think about it.
This is something that's huge.
Of course, Steve Bannon, someone who they're all so desperate to put in jail.
Steve has a couple more appeals yet left so far.
They ruled against him in this last appeals court already, but it's the DC Circuit, so I don't think anybody was really surprised about that.
The fact of the matter is, though, is we live in a world where you'll still find this woke right, as I call them.
And we've got one more segment with you, Darren, and I want to pick your brain about this a little bit because we have these people who will say, "Whoa, whoa, whoa, you're going too far.
You're opposing them too hard.
You're saying mean things and you're using mean rhetoric." You're not being fair.
We win by playing by the rules.
We win by reminding people of the importance of Ronald Reagan and the importance of standing up for our great principles.
And of course, to quote another great philosopher, if your principle Brought you to this, of what use was the principle?
And there's a lot of questions about that.
Will Chamberlain, who wrote for humanevents.com, once had a quote in his piece, that former publisher, who said, if your principle makes you lose, maybe it wasn't the best principle.
Maybe our principle should be that we win and the other side loses because when the other side's in power, they're trying to put us in jail.
So perhaps we can have these discussions at some later date once the crisis period has ended.
But fortunately for us, it's White Boy Summer.
Stay tuned, White Boy Summer continues after this.
...in my ear about the boring people at your office.
I'm trying to listen to the new Human Events with Jack Posobiec.
Alright, Jack Posobiec, Darren Beattie here, Human Events Daily.
I want to thank you, by the way, for making this currently the number one live stream on X. Darren, I'd like to get your response to my comments in the last segment there, talking about this group of individuals called the woke rights.
Well, you know, there's so many different subspecies of this particular kind of mediocre creature.
wrecked Ronald Reagan and that's how we're going to win and we need to get back to the good old consensus of pre-BLM America.
That's where we need to go and no further.
What say you?
Well, you know, there are so many different subspecies of this particular kind of mediocre creature.
There is the kind of national review sort of instantiation that I think was roundly and profoundly mocked, in particular during the kind of 2016 cycle.
But new varieties have emerged.
There's the kind of Sorabamari variety that we've discussed that kind of Really has got drunk on the Kool-Aid of the possibility of this left-right alliance but just sort of forgot about the right wing part and has just embraced this weird kind of
Socialism and have attacked people for these, you know, for embracing social Darwinist views or alleged social Darwinist views, which simply amounts to anyone who, you know, dares to question the left-wing egalitarian principles, which are the most treasured for the left wing.
So there are a variety of these types.
They're all kind of Mediocre.
But I suppose there is some use on producing a taxonomy of the variety of characters here.
Remember, it used to be there used to be some like debate between Saurabh and David French, both non entities, both mediocrities.
But at the time, there was this sense that, oh, you know, Omari is doing a great job and, you know, going against French.
But no, this was just part of the creation of a new kind of And it really is interesting because this is, at the end of the day, it's a group of people who would rather say, listen to my podcast about Fukuyama ten more times.
Ooh, breaking news on Michel Foucault.
Breaking news on Jacques Derrida.
All of these things are interesting.
All of these things are interesting.
I have no problem with anybody going out and doing their thing, but what I do have a problem with is when people come and attack those of us who are actually trying to move the ball down the field and attain practical and Achievable victories in the real world by saying, whoa, those guys are going too far.
We shouldn't actually do anything.
We shouldn't enact positive change.
We should just complain all the time and ask people to continue to subscribe to our premium tier sponsorship level, which gives you access to exclusive podcasts and even more exclusive retweets.
Right.
If I can identify two other Associated varieties.
One is what people call like the IDW, the Jordan Peterson.
I guess Ben Shapiro to some degree fulfills that role.
But you have Jordan Peterson, the Barry Weiss, these types.
And really the thing about them is they're desperately clinging to this sort of Third grade understanding of classical liberalism and just don't understand, you know, the political moment that we're in.
But more importantly, on a practical level, these are the people who will win your favor.
They will, you know, people, conservatives, I hate to say it, I've said it many times, conservatives are such cheap dates.
You can win them over with the flimsiest of scraps from the table.
And what are the scraps that people like Jordan Peterson give?
People like Ben Shapiro and there are others.
What do the IDWs give in terms of scraps?
Boys have penises, girls have vaginas.
And people say, oh wow, that's amazing.
That is so profound.
They said boys have penises, girls have vaginas.
We can trust them.
They're on our side.
And they say boys have penises, girls have vaginas.
Most every day of the week.
So they cultivate trust from the trusting conservative.
Until a critical moment happens.
Uh-oh!
Kavanaugh hearing is on the line.
Jordan Peterson swoops in and says, screw Kavanaugh.
We need to go after him.
Oh, vaccine mandates on the line, some IDW character, I think Jordan Peterson, I'm not sure, but I think he came in and he supported the fact.
So the point is that critical moments, they suspend the boys have penises, girls have vagina in order to sabotage something that actually matters when it matters.
And that's the function that they have.
And then, of course, maybe a year later, They'll say, oh, well, after all, you know, COVID was a bad thing, the lockdowns were a bad thing, this or that.
And then again, the cheap dates will hear that and say, oh, well, he's trying to make some sense.
Bill Maher constantly does this.
Yeah, Bill Maher, same thing.
But it's not Bill Maher's fault.
It's the fault of conservatives for being so gullible and for being such cheap dates.
The timing matters.
Tremendously.
The timing is everything.
I told, I said this to Vivek, we had a great discussion on this.
He was talking about the COVID origin of China.
Well, the timing now means something very different.
The regime is trying to gin up support for a cold war against China.
What better than to emphasize the Chinese role of COVID rather than the role of our own corrupt and stupid political leaders who are responsible for the lockdowns.
Xi didn't put a gun to our policy leaders head and tell them they had to lock down.
Our leaders did that on their own.
They can't blame it on the Chinese.
But emphasizing the Chinese origin serves a perfect distraction.
But they couldn't do it under Trump.
Why?
Because Trump was saying China, and for them to acknowledge that would have been handing a victory to Trump, which is no.
So they wait until Trump is out of office.
And then how convenient is it?
Then even Jon Stewart, um, you know, little, uh, little Leibovitz, you know, I think you had an encounter with him at a certain point in a certain, certain interesting, uh, interesting moment where he had, but He comes out and he says it, so then that gives everyone permission to say it.
And then again, the cheap dates are saying, oh, yeah, he's actually making sense.
He's actually making some sense.
That good old Jon Stewart.
He has his moments.
Cheap dates.
It's the same scam every single time.
Darren Veedie, folks, make sure you go and follow him.
Revolver.News is the site.
And folks, let me just tell you, it's White Boy Summer.
No one's going to stop us.
Export Selection