Feb. 13, 2024 - Human Events Daily - Jack Posobiec
48:49
EPISODE 670: STEPHEN MILLER REVEALS THE NEW RULING COALITION'S BETRAYAL OF AMERICA
Here’s your Daily dose of Human Events with @JackPosobiecSave up to 65% on MyPillow products by going to https://www.MyPillow.com/POSO and use code POSOGo to https://www.itargetpro.com and Save 10% Plus get Free Shipping with promo code POSO.Head to https://www.TryFum.com and use promo code POSO to save 10% off when you get the Journey pack today.Support the Show.
I want to take a second to remind you to sign up for the Pozo Daily Brief.
It is completely free.
It'll be one email that's sent to you every day.
You can stop the endless scrolling, trying to find out what's going on in your world.
We will have this delivered directly to you, totally for free.
Go to humanevents.com slash Pozo.
Sign up today.
It's called the Pozo Daily Brief.
Read what I read for show prep.
You will not regret it.
humanevents.com slash Pozo.
Totally free.
The Pozo Daily Brief.
This is what happens when the fourth turning meets fifth generation warfare.
A commentator, international social media sensation, and former Navy intelligence veteran.
This is Human Events with your host, Jack Posobiec.
Open the champagne!
Pop the cork!
The Senate Democrat leader and the Republican leader are on their way to Kiev.
They've got $60 billion they're bringing.
Genesee Moreno walked in with her 7-year-old son and pointed a gun at an unarmed security guard.
Police say two off-duty officers working security shot and killed her.
Moreno's 7-year-old son was shot in the head.
She has utilized both male and female names, but Through all of our investigation to this point, talking with individuals, interviews, documents, Houston Police Department reports, she has identified this entire time as female.
She.
Her.
A migrant family from Haiti is sharing their experience.
It's a delight.
And it's really fun having them.
What I realized is there's so much prejudice against refugees, mostly because people don't know them.
Lisa says she feels like she has her own personal chef, as Woldande loves cooking.
In Georgia, Fulton County judge must decide whether Fonny Willis, Nathan Wade, and a host of others must testify at a hearing on Thursday.
Why?
Why?
Because DA Fonnie Willis admitted to having a personal relationship with prosecutor Nathan Wade while also hiring him to help her prosecute Trump for election interference.
Today, Donald Trump did go to the Supreme Court, but he asked them to overrule that part of the appeals court ruling where they were trying to get him to speed up the process.
He argued in his filing with the court tonight that this court should stay this unprecedented and unacceptable departure from ordinary appellate procedures and allow President Trump's claim of immunity to be decided in the ordinary course of justice.
Former President Trump is pushing for three loyalists to head the Republican National Committee and replace Ronna McDaniel, who's faced a lot of pressure to step down.
Mr. Trump is endorsing a top ally as party chairman, his daughter-in-law, Laura Trump, as co-chair, and he would also make a senior campaign advisor into the party's chief operating officer.
All right, ladies and gentlemen, welcome aboard today's edition of Human Events Daily, live from Washington, D.C.
Today is February 13, 2024, Anno Domini.
It is Fat Tuesday, Mardi Gras, Ponchiki Day.
So if you guys are partaking out there, you really need to.
By the way, I've already decided what it is that I will be giving up for Lent, but I am not revealing it until tomorrow.
So tomorrow is Ash Wednesday.
Tomorrow is when it all begins.
I'm not revealing it just yet.
I will say though, this is going to be tough.
This one for me is going to be one of the hardest Lents, Lenten seasons that I've ever done in my entire life.
That said, got to get to the news.
Number one, the new governing coalition.
I think I'm going to call it the new rolling coalition.
The new ruling coalition in Washington, D.C.
just decided to take $94 billion from you, from your families, from your businesses, from your churches, and send it overseas.
Not a single cent, not one red cent for the people of this country.
And here's how they did it.
Moderate Republicans decided to completely abandon, completely abandon the people they represent, the people who sent them there, throw in with Democrats the liberals of the liberals, in many cases, And they decided that they were going to put the interests of the Uniparty ahead of the interests of the people, ahead of the interests of our country.
And more to the point, people saying, well, how is this?
Don't worry, we've got, you know, we got Johnson down there in the House.
He came out last night.
He said that he's completely against it.
Here's the problem.
The Senate could enact a discharge petition and force a floor vote of the House Essentially, going around, circumventing the Speaker, forcing the vote, and then, guess what?
The new ruling coalition does it again.
Moderate Republicans work with Liberal Democrats to get it passed.
What you're really seeing right now, what you're really seeing are the lines being drawn.
This is the Uniparty versus the Populist.
And it ain't all left versus right either.
You know, Bernie Sanders actually voted against this thing.
They didn't force O'Bernie to vote for it.
They said, ah, we got the votes burned.
You're good.
Don't worry.
No mansion out of this deal, Bernie.
You stay on the sidelines, preserve your legacy.
We don't need you anymore.
No, they didn't vote for this.
But understand, your government will take the money, whether by printing, whether by taxing or by borrowing, will destroy the U.S.
dollar in order To fill their own coffers, increase the inflation in this country, which it will.
I know they're lying about it, but it will.
We walked you through that yesterday.
And they will do so with a smile on their face.
Because they do not work for you.
They work for those in power.
Once you understand that our Senate has been bought off by foreign powers, you will understand the way the U.S.
government truly works.
A guy who understands that indelibly, Stephen Miller, joins us next.
Ladies and gentlemen, one of the best ways that you can support us here at Human Events and the work that we do is subscribing to us on our Rumble channel.
Make sure you're subscribed, you hit the notifications so you'll never miss a clip, you'll never miss a new live episode, and we're putting them out every single day of the week.
You can't be listening to all that slappy whack, Trimadazol, it's a bam ship, nippy bam bam, like Human Events with Jack Posobiec.
All right, Jack Posobiec, we're back here live, Human Events Daily.
I want to tell you about today's episode sponsor, Fume.
Fume is an innovative, award-nominated essential oils infuser.
No electronics.
Fume is completely natural.
There's no use of vapor.
Fume uses essential oil flavored air, and there's no harmful chemicals.
Fume uses all-natural, delicious flavors.
Let me tell you something, this is a habit Human Events listeners can get behind.
It's a habit you're free to enjoy and can make replacing your bad habit easy.
Producer Faz said that he tried Fume out and he said it was a pleasant surprise.
Flavorful and fresh, well-balanced, and looks fantastic.
Made with real wood, feels great to use.
Look, stopping a bad habit is something we can all put off because it's hard.
But I am told that switching to Fume is easy, enjoyable, and even fun.
F.U.M.
has even served over 100,000 customers and has thousands of successful stories and there's no reason that can't be you too.
So join F.U.M., accelerate humanity's breakup from destructive habits, and pick up the Journey Pack today.
Start the year off right with the good habit by going to tryfum.com slash poso and getting their Journey Pack today.
F.U.M.
is the human events daily audience and get 10% off when they use promo code poso to help make starting the good habit today.
That's tryfum.com slash poso.
Great to be with you today, Jack.
further ado, folks would like to welcome to human events, the senior advisor to President Trump and founder of America First Legal, Mr. Stephen Miller.
Stephen, how are you?
Great to be with you today, Jack.
I look forward to this interview enormously.
Well, so you must be a huge fan of the bill that came out of the Senate last night, popping champagne four in the morning is what I, you know, my sources tell me that you were doing around there, just looking at the $95 billion that will be sent overseas.
And the fact that we have Republican leadership and it's so smart of them working with the Democrats, cutting out their own voters and not a single cent sent for our own border.
I mean, I can't find anything wrong with this bill.
It really is one of the most astonishing examples of Washington betraying the American people that has surely occurred in the whole history of this country.
It would have been so foreign and unthinkable to our founders that they would be unable to even process such a monstrosity.
I mean, $100 billion is larger than the GDP of most countries around the world, or at least many countries, I should say, around the world.
And you also have to look at the fact that we are over $30 trillion in debt.
So we're borrowing money not for the purpose of protecting our own citizens, protecting our own country, protecting our own future.
We're borrowing money for the purpose of financing particularly – it's not all the money, but particularly financing a foreign war in Ukraine that could have been prevented before it even started with a peace settlement and could be ended tomorrow with a peace settlement.
And so this isn't even a case in which you're using the money in theory to save lives.
You're using the money to extend the suffering, to extend the misery, to extend the conflict.
What?
For what purpose?
For what end?
So that hundreds of thousands of people can die and then we'll have a settlement that's much the same a year from now, two years from now, five years from now?
It really is horrific.
And then at the same time, of course, nothing, nothing for the invasion that's happening on our own southern border.
And just goes to show you that people said that Washington doesn't work or Washington is broken, all these other lazy cliches.
Washington does work.
And Washington is not broken.
And in fact, it functions quite well, when it is trying to do something that it actually cares to do.
So when senators want to have a foreign war in Ukraine, and they want to fund that foreign war in Ukraine, Then with astonishing speed, efficiency, purpose, focus, a sense of mission, clarity, they can get done exactly what they aim and resolve to get done.
But when it comes to, say, stopping an invasion of our southern border, suddenly they're all now overnight transformed into fools and incompetence.
These same people that are masterful in just the turn of a hat at being able to get all this money shoveled over to Ukraine, Now, when it comes to securing our own border, they can't even think of anything that could ever possibly work.
And instead, they come up with a bill whose most important signature provision would allow Secretary Mayorkas to convert new illegal aliens into citizens.
It's something that Marco Rubio talked about in his interview with Jake Tapper, and I give him great credit for doing so.
But the Senator Murphy bill included in it a provision which I believe was the whole purpose of the bill.
In other words, everything else was just window dressing.
Right.
Everything else was just a Trojan horse.
And then the actual the actual soldier ensconced within that Trojan horse was this provision.
And it says that Mayorkas now, through his own bureaucracy within DHS, can give fast track approval for asylum to newly arriving illegal aliens.
Now, what does that actually mean?
People use the term asylum a lot.
I don't think everybody knows what it means necessarily.
Asylum means that you are automatically a permanent resident of the United States.
It means you have unlimited access to federal welfare, something that is not even available to people here on various kinds of temporary visas and other immigration benefits, that you get a green card within a year, and then you're a citizen four years after that.
So it's a five-year path to citizenship.
To put that into perspective, a lot of the amnesty bills that have been introduced in the past, as you know, offered sometimes or claim to offer at least a 10-year path to citizenship.
This would be a five year path of citizenship for newly arriving illegal aliens if they pass whatever amorphous test Mayorkas himself comes up with.
So that was the only immigration bill that was on the table.
And they said, if you don't accept that, then we'll just pass all this Ukraine money anyway.
So it really is, as I mentioned earlier, one of the great betrayals in all of American history.
And the tragedy is, is that not only will it mean that our border invasion continues undisturbed, but it also means a lot more innocent people are going to die in Ukraine and for no constructive purpose whatsoever.
So here's the question then, because when people are looking at this and they're saying, and I do think there's some head scratching out there from folks, particularly in our audience and others saying, we ask so much of the government.
When President Trump was in office, we were told again and again, the wall was too expensive.
We can't possibly get funding for the wall.
He tried to declare an emergency to get military funding taken over.
That too was blocked in the Senate.
These are the same names that we remember from all of that timeframe, 2017, 2019, that couldn't possibly find money to secure our border and to build President Trump's wall.
And yet at the same time, they're willing to work, as you say, throughout the night with rapid speed, in order to get $100 billion for the benefit of foreigners.
And again, it's not to weigh the moral benefits of any of these issues, but the question is, what is the prioritization?
Why is it that we can always seem to find money for these things, and yet we can't find that same money for ourselves?
Yeah, well, to put that number in some kind of helpful context, the entire deportation budget of ice is around $4 billion.
So if you just take the Ukraine portion alone, which is about $60 billion, that's 15 times the amount of money annually appropriated to ICE to carry out deportations.
I mean, do you have any idea how many illegal aliens we could deport if we wanted to with a single infusion of $60 billion?
It means you already have, right, the systems in place.
So you'd be able to plow all that money into personnel and then soft side of facilities Uh, to get people out of the country.
So for $60 billion, I mean, can you imagine how many aliens you could deport from this country?
I mean, it would be extraordinary.
And yet to even say it would be right, would be unthinkable in today's Washington.
In other words, if you said, if you said, okay, new project, Washington, do this exact same exercise, work around the clock, break through every barrier, every obstacle, every complaint, every objection.
But here's what we're going to do instead.
You're just going to spend $60 billion and the money can only be used and must be used for no other purpose than deporting illegal aliens, right?
None of this BS about comprehensive anything.
None of these nonsense provisions that are just tricks for illegal aliens to get into the country.
None of these giveaways to immigration lawyers and foreign corporations and special interests.
Just $60 billion and all you can use it for is deporting people.
And in fact, you must use it for deporting people, right?
That's as common sense of things you can imagine, but, If I were to say to you, what are the odds you could get that bill through the Senate?
I mean, the answer would be right now would be zero minus infinity would be the odds.
It tells you something about how sick and decayed our political culture is and our social culture is in this country.
That if I said to you, what are the chances of getting $60 billion to fund a war in Ukraine that we could have prevented with simple peace negotiations, you would say much likely or not that could happen.
In fact, happen multiple times a year if you wanted to and happen every year.
And if I said to you, What if you give the same amount of money and it's just used for ICE officers to deport people?
So that's basically a political impossibility.
And the fact that you would know that intuitively would tell you everything you need to understand about what is so perverted about the incentive structures in our system, about the push and pull factors on lawmakers in Washington.
Everything is pushing them.
Everything is incentivizing them.
To fund these foreign wars and everything is pushing them away from taking care of Americans and protecting American cities and communities to the point where the invasion is rapidly being normalized.
And you see lawmakers who even claim to care about border security who are now basically saying, yeah, it's too bad there's not any border security in the bill, but I have no choice but to fund this foreign war.
Even if you supported the war in Ukraine, even if you did, you have all the leverage in the world in this moment because the Biden administration wants this money desperately.
Chuck Schumer wants this money desperately.
You have all the leverage in the world to stand your ground and to say, I mean, there's so many ways you could do this, Jack.
I could give you a thousand different ways, but one simple way would be to just have a deportation target.
Just say, you're not going to get any money until you first deport, say, 500,000 illegal aliens.
And if you do that, we'll give you a second tranche of funds, but you have to then have deported a net total of a million illegal aliens.
Then you'll get the first tranche.
Second tranche, 1.5 million.
And how simple would that be?
You could do what you've taken.
And we're coming up on a quick we're coming to a quick break.
But what you're doing is you're taking their formulation of having these thresholds for border crossing.
You're just applying that to deportation.
Sure, you can get a little bit of your foreign your foreign war money, but only once we've deported this many illegals.
Ah, OK, this many aliens.
If you get you get your next tranche.
Okay, then Israel gets theirs once we hit this target.
You've got to hit your metrics, folks.
It's just like dieting.
Stephen Miller here with us, Human Events Daily.
We'll be right back.
They talk about influences.
These are influences.
and their friends of mine.
Jack, so like where's Jack?
He's done a great job.
All right, folks, as we know, crime has been on the rise.
There's a lot to be nervous about there.
Open social media, turn on the news, you'll see crime, societal decay.
A lot of people will just run out and buy a gun.
They'll say, okay, I have a gun, now I'm safe.
But the problem is, what does it do?
It sits in your gun safe, and if there's ever an emergency, you're not prepared, you run the risk of hurting yourself or others.
And there's no way around it.
You need to train, and you need to train often.
Firing is a perishable skill.
But ultimately, we know it's time-consuming to go to the range, assuming there's even one nearby.
Ammo prices right now, thanks to Biden, inflation through the roof.
iTarget was a system that was invented so that you could practice anytime in the safety and convenience of your own home.
It's so easy to use.
You download the iTarget Pro app, you load your caliber-specific laser bullet into your firearm, and start training.
Practice alone, compete with friends, or use it to safely train with your friends and family who are new to firearms.
Look, when my dad comes over, myself, my father, my father-in-law, we go down, we play with this thing.
You know, who can get the best one, who can get the best target, who's going to get the best score, etc, etc.
It's great.
You can do it literally in your own home.
It's just like a laser pointer inside your own firearm.
Go to itargetpro.com and use promo code HOSO for 10% off at checkout.
And this is the smartest, safest way to train, which is why competitive shooters trust dry fire training as part of their regiments.
Exactly what I was taught in the military as well.
Get yours today.
That's the letter I, TargetPro.com, ITargetPro.com, promo code POSO.
Stephen Miller is our guest, America First Legal Senior Advisor to President Trump.
Stephen, you were talking some more about this bill.
I love this idea of having essentially deportation metrics that we need to impose on our government.
Remember, we're not making these requests of the government.
This is our government to begin with, at least it's supposed to be, you know, in writing.
So let's say this comes into play.
Of course, there was a huge piece in Atlantic Magazine all about some of these wild and crazy plans for deportation that are being discussed.
What exactly do you mean by this?
And just to get you to wrap up your comments there on the bill.
Well, bottom line is this.
Number one is that we need House Republicans now to start taking this message and being very clear There's not even gonna be a conversation about foreign aid until there's deportations.
That cuts through all the fog, all the nonsense, all the BS, all the lies, distortions, and deceptions, because deportations don't lie.
Numbers don't lie.
You can take your 400-page bill, throw it in the trash.
I want to know about deportations.
Now, with respect to the 2025 environment, It's important that we again continue to emphasize that you have to do two things.
You have to seal the border and you have to expel everyone that Biden let in.
It is going to be one of the largest logistical undertakings in American history.
Think Panama Canal.
It's going to require that level of logistical sophistication and shared effort.
But look, America won two world wars.
America endured the Great Depression together.
America has built some of the greatest architectural wonders, some of the greatest engineering feats in human history.
We can remove Several million foreign trespassers from our midst and that is exactly what we will do, Jack.
Well, I mean, some of the and by the way, this is when when President Trump was previously in office, the use of things like E-Verify, the use of things like basically strengthening these checks on allowing people to just simply live comfortably in the country, really does begin the process of self deportation in many simple ways that don't even require ICE to get involved in zoning instances.
Let me tell you about one of my favorite Trump initiatives, which again, is the kind of thing if conservatives and Republicans Actually cared to learn about immigration policy, they would know the power of these kinds of things and they'd be focused on funding and financing these initiatives.
So there's a law on the books never used.
And by the way, it's a long list of laws in the books that were never used until Trump came along.
A long list.
One of them says that, and this is adjusted for inflation actually, but it's about $700 a day that you must pay the government every single day you fail to leave after you've been ordered, deported by an immigration judge.
So again, our system says if you've gone through this whole ridiculous process that none of us supports anyways, you know, during the Clinton administration, the Bush administration, the Obama administration, and you've been ordered removed by a judge and you're still here, it's about a $700 a day penalty if you didn't go home as you were ordered to do.
So guess what?
President Trump was the first president in history.
This law had been on the books for decades that began sending notices to illegal aliens and say, guess what?
You are in debt $1.5 million to the U.S. government.
The only way to avoid paying your fine is to get out of the country now immediately to leave.
And even then, we would still do everything we could to collect the fine on your way out.
But you can immediately begin getting people to go home by using the Treasury Department to go after illegal aliens who have not left and who owe the government collectively.
millions and millions and millions of dollars.
And it's just one example.
There's so many other examples that you can use to do the exact same thing.
Bottom line is this.
Joe Biden and the Democrats had a goal, which was to get as many illegal aliens into the country as they could.
They have succeeded in that goal.
Even if Joe Biden didn't let in one more illegal alien, they've already succeeded in that goal.
There's more than 10 million.
They've already gotten into our country.
It is therefore existential to remove them.
Between those 10 million people, how many children are they going to have?
That under a Democrat administration would be declared automatic U.S.
citizens, entitled to chain migration, welfare benefits, free health care, free everything.
This would be the end of the American Republic unless we demonstrate it.
Because if we don't have it, Jack, then we're screwed anyways.
Actually, who does have it is President Trump.
Unless we have the will, the backbone, the fortitude, Like our ancestors, to do what has to be done in the time in which we live.
I, for one, am tired and exhausted of hearing about all the great deeds of generations before us, the legends who walked the earth before us, and then we see ourselves incapable of doing nothing else but just sitting around and complaining about things.
If we get control of this government, we are going to save this country.
We are going to restore the American nation for American citizens, and we are going to build a magnificent future, and dream big things, and do amazing things, and reach for legend status for this country again, so that someday our children, and their children, and their grandchildren, and their grandchildren's grandchildren will talk about the great and historic things we did, and they'll wish that they were as tough and as strong it and as resolved as we are.
Stop thinking about the legends who came before you and start deciding to be a legend in your own time.
It really is as simple as that.
And to your point, though, this is why the left has spent spends all their time destroying those legends, taking away those legends, creating their own legends.
And when they have someone who poses a threat to that, like a Donald J. Trump who comes along and says, I want to write my own legend.
I want to stand up for the American people.
What do they do now that we've got charges in Washington, D.C.?
We've got charges all the way down in Florida at Mar-a-Lago for possession of his own documents.
Tomorrow that we are told, or tomorrow or Thursday, I believe, he has to attend a hearing in the New York case with Alvin Bragg, which is a case that hasn't been much in the lexicon lately.
Walk me through some of this stuff.
Why is it that the Democrats are so, so willing to use government power against a political opponent in such ways?
Well, let me pick up on one thing you said is so important.
The That's exactly why they're trying to cut off access to our history.
Because in understanding the great deeds that were done before us, you can then be a man in your own time and know that you can do great things, too.
See, it's the connection to that history, to that past, To understanding that the people who built those incredible structures, who welded the times in which they live with their own two hands, and understanding that you realize that we can be part of something great and historic too, you cut off that past to deny people their present and to deny them their future.
Now, with respect to your question, we are living in the era of lawfare, in the age of lawfare.
It is a uniquely American form of fascism.
Now, I'm not saying, of course, lawfare has been waged in many countries, but what we are witnessing right now is the American version of fascism, right?
The fusion of the deep state, radical left law firms, the corporations that fund those law firms, the law schools that train those lawyers, the nonprofits that develop and pass on the legal plans, the pseudo left-wing scholars who write these roadmaps, this entire machinery
Orchestrated, of course, from the very top at 1600 Penn, is decided to supplant and replace American democracy, to establish a new system of rule by lawfare.
If you cross the powers that be, the ruling class, the establishment, the regime, whatever you want to call it, you can be debanked, you can be blacklisted, banished, and yes, you can be and will be imprisoned.
The fact that the reason they put that memer that I know you've talked about so much Jack in prison was not just to put him in prison.
It was intended as a demonstration of the raw power to say two things, that our prosecutors and our courts are so corrupt they will throw someone in jail for a meme and that our jury polls are so conditioned that they will jail anyone we tell them to. that our prosecutors and our courts are so corrupt they
And they will go and they will live in the hell that we will put them in because I can assure you prison for an innocent person with no criminal history, with no criminal background, and just putting someone like that into prison is indeed the seventh circle of hell.
With respect to what they're trying to do to President Trump, it's in plain sight.
It is the attempt to rig the election.
It is an attempt to believe, to say, to hope that if Donald Trump is convicted of a fake crime before the election, that it will be enough to change the outcome of that election.
That is the plan.
That is the strategy.
We've seen how Biden, in fact, has been grousing that they aren't on the timetable fast enough, as fast as he wants to get that conviction.
And so this is truly a terrifying moment.
And what I would say to conservatives, to Republicans, to anyone who cares about the rule of law in this country, It is not enough to just say that we will fight their extremism with our objectivity.
Objectivity in that context is really meant as surrender.
Objectivity can mean different things to different people.
You and I are objective about facts, about truth, about history, about science, about all of that.
But when objectivity is used by the weak Republican, by the weak conservatives, what they're really saying is it's actually a form of conservative equity.
What they're really saying is we will ensure equal outcomes.
We will ensure that no more of their people go to jail than 50 percent of the time if there is a trial.
That they'll be a – that if they go on trial, that they'll have a very good chance of getting off.
It's saying that we're not going to investigate one more Democrat than Republicans.
Even if more Democrats are guilty, we will investigate nothing.
Where is Jack?
Where is he?
- It's a debtor pest. - We're gonna power it.
And then we're pushing equality too, which is already eating out of the left's lexicon.
Hold that thought, we'll be right back.
Next segment, Stephen Miller, absolute bombshell interview.
You don't wanna miss what comes next. - Jack, where is Jack?
Where is Jack?
Where is he?
Jack, I wanna see you.
Great job, Jack.
Thank you.
What a job you do.
You know, we have an incredible thing.
We're always talking about the fake news and the bad, but we have guys, and these are the guys who should be getting policies.
The problem with weak Republicans, the problem with weak conservatives, we're having a really deep discussion actually with Stephen Miller because this gets to the heart of what is wrong with conservatism.
Something that I saw last night just, you know, kind of running around on on X, which people know I spend a little bit of time on Twitter.
Was this statement that the problem with, and I think it lines up with what you're saying, Stephen, that the problem with advocating for neutrality in all things, rather than simply advocating for direct conservative outcomes, is that what it does is that you're essentially neutering your own side.
If you're advocating for neutrality, you are advocating for neutering.
Has this been what conservatives have been doing for the last generation?
Absolutely.
It's a mind trick.
I don't know if they did the mind trick to themselves, or whether it was done to them, or probably some combination of both, in the sense that they tricked themselves into believing that conservatism was a neutrality cult.
And then I think a lot of Democrats were like, oh, yeah, yeah, more of that.
Let's keep telling them every time they're neutral, this condition, every time they're neutral, tell them how amazing they are.
This is all a case of semanticism, right?
Let me try to break it down without Going too far straight here.
So some things are objectively beautiful, right?
Notre Dame is an objectively beautiful cathedral.
I was showing my son the updates on the construction videos of Notre Dame on the way to school this morning, and they just took the scaffolding off of part of the spire this morning, and he's very excited.
And then by comparison, many of the buildings in Washington, D.C.
that were built From 1970 on, you know, brutalism, as an example, are objectively ugly.
So objectivity properly applied, right, is a cast of mind in which you search for the truth, right?
And truth is a good thing.
Truth is the best thing.
But what you're supposed to do is, having found the truth, you're then supposed to advocate for it passionately, fiercely, defend it jealously with everything that you have to defend it with.
The truth of what makes America great.
The truth of what really is American exceptionalism, right?
The truth about what made and may yet make again Western civilization, right?
The crown jewel of all human achievement.
Those are things that are objectively true, but then you have to be biased towards defending and saving truth.
So when conservatives then say no, no, we have to be objective in the sense that maybe we should do a neoclassical structure.
Maybe we should do this modern art monstrosity.
That is not conservative.
That is surrender.
That is neutering.
That is tolerating and permitting lie, falsehood, falsity, perversion, desecration.
And that is not what it is to be conservative.
I think I heard this expression before.
I cannot remember the name of the account, but it is an account that does a lot of great architectural work on X. It says that the tradition is not the worship of ashes, but the preservation of fire.
And the point of which to say that you're supposed to be biased towards preserving and then ultimately expanding the things that make civilization wonderful and beautiful and incredible.
And instead, conservatives have adopted this mindset of we can't be biased towards the things that we know are right and true and then defend them.
So under this system, take a look at this.
Foreign drug cartels are the enemy of our civilization.
Our system should be biased towards doing everything in its power to destroy foreign drug cartels, so they do not operate.
We should have a system that in every respect is biased towards that outcome, rather than saying, who's to say what's the bigger threat?
A small business owner whose taxes are wrong by $1,000, according to the IRS, or the local leader of the drug cartel?
I don't know.
We'll put them in jail an equal amount, right?
That is a typical Republican prosecutor We're trying to balance those two outcomes.
If for every drug cartel we put behind bars, we should get at least one small Christian business owner.
That will be the objective thing to do.
No.
That is you being a part and a party to the destruction of your own civilization.
Know what is true.
Know what is false.
Protect the former and achieve victory over the latter.
This is, you know, so many things I could pick up on here.
I've got about five minutes left with you.
But, you know, my wife, you know, coming from outside the United States, living in the U.S.
now for about 15 years, when she sees these issues at our border, she says, how can you have a leader that would allow such things?
Why don't you just throw him out of office?
How could any leader allow the violation of your own borders?
If this were something that would happen in any other country outside of the West, it would be so unthinkable that the people would rise up and go full Maidan Square on them and absolutely throw them out of office.
And I think that's something that we don't understand, that we within our system are an aberration for allowing something that's just so blatantly obvious to go on without the normal human reaction to such a violation.
Well, take the impeachment situation, for example.
We're not even talking about impeaching Biden, we're talking about impeaching Mayorkas.
But you've had Republicans who've opposed impeachment, I think probably even more that would oppose impeachment of Biden over the border, who have exemplified this fetishization of neutrality as wrongly construed, and also this fetishization of over-intellectualizing very fundamental things.
Which is a kind of moral defect unto itself to say that, oh, I've studied the Federalist Papers for thousands and thousands and thousands of hours.
I've decided that James Madison really would favor the border invasion.
It doesn't make you an academic.
It makes you a fool.
It makes you a fool.
And you should just hear yourself and hear how foolish you sound even saying these things.
It should have been as simple as this.
There's an invasion on our border.
The architects are Joe Biden and Mayorkas.
That is the end of this conversation and discussion.
We are moving on impeachment.
We are supporting impeachment.
We're going to have this trial in the Senate and we're going to have this debate nationally.
And we're not going to subject the public either to a year of us hemming and hawing with each other and having our precious little debates and our precious little conversations so that we can feel good and better about ourselves.
They should take all of one hour.
There's an invasion.
Mallorca's planned it.
Biden planned it.
They executed it.
And we're going to impeach them.
And that's it.
You don't need to have some long... You don't need panels, conversations, op-eds, debates, discussions.
You don't need all this model UN BS.
You just need to be an American and know that you're an American, understand what it means to have and to keep a country.
One day I do wonder, and it kind of goes back to, I say this, I quote taxi drivers sometimes, you know, someday a real rain is going to come and wash all this succumb off the streets.
And I think that there comes a point, Tucker Carlson, of course, has been talking about this on his world tour right now, where the basic functions of your country become so incredibly degraded.
The, you know, You can't go on the subway without being accosted, mugged, raped, as Tucker pointed out, in New York City.
You can't fly on an airplane without worrying if the doors are going to fall off.
At some point, the misgovernance and the mismanagement at the highest level will have Well, I have trickled down, right?
I was trying to escape that phrase, but there we are.
Trickled down so much to the bottom level that eventually the citizens don't care about your quote-unquote values.
They just want someone to fix it.
Well, this is also where, where conservatism has become completely disconnected from its fundamental purpose and mission.
The, you know, this obsession and this focus on just what is the latest jobs report?
And it's, look, it's extremely important to have job creation.
By the way, as an aside, 100% of the jobs that have been created since the pandemic under Joe Biden have gone to, on net, to foreign workers.
And the Center for Immigration Studies just came out with a report on that today.
But you need to be able to live in fundamental safety and order.
You need to be able to have an environment where you can take your kids on the public transit, where you can take your kids to public spaces and enjoy life, where you can trust your neighbors, where your neighbors aren't strangers, where the kid who lives three blocks over, who you've maybe even you've met, you know, three or four times.
You know, his parents can watch your kids.
You don't have to worry about who he is or who his family is or any of this, where there's trust and there's community and there's cooperation and understanding.
You have all of that, then you have a society where it's clean and it's orderly and it's safe and there's a feeling of belonging.
You destroy all of that.
You atomize everybody.
I want to be very clear.
Donald Trump's the greatest jobs person in history, and he will be again.
But it's not just about the GDP and the jobs numbers.
It's about everything that makes a life full and complete and fulfilling and rewarding.
And the people being clustered, hidden, hiding in their condos and their apartments.
And there are little spaces with no trees and no plants and nothing natural.
I can't go on the subway.
I can't go to the store.
I can't go out after dark.
I can't ride a bicycle.
I can't go here.
I can't go shopping.
This is the shoplifting.
And these little atomized existences, that's not any way to live.
And I'll add on this, and there is nothing wrong, there is nothing wrong with wanting that and wanting that for your family.
Stephen Miller, guys, go follow him.
What an interview.
At Stephen Miller, Twitter, X, America First Legal, the best.
All right, Jack Posobiec back live at Human Events Daily.
Great interview just now with Stephen Miller.
We're going to be playing that one for a while.
But folks, there was a video that came out of Boston area this morning that I just had to share with you.
And I don't really know how else to put this other than this is one of the most... I will just say it this way.
I'll just say it this way.
I had to make sure that this wasn't an op, that this wasn't some joke, that this wasn't Babylon Bee or some parody, that this was the real deal.
And oh yes, ladies and gentlemen, it's 100% real.
Let's play this clip from News 10 Boston.
A story you'll only see here on NBC10 Boston.
A migrant family from Haiti is sharing their experience.
They're searching for shelter in the Boston area and then recently found a host home in Brookline.
And now they're looking for jobs.
As NBC10's Aaron Logan reports, they say these last few weeks have been life-changing.
It's been an emotional few weeks for Wildande Joseph and her husband.
First, sleeping on the floor at Logan Airport, then in Children's Hospital with their two-year-old daughter, who got very sick.
She felt bad, as any mother would.
Now things are looking much brighter as they've been welcomed into Lisa Hillenbrand's Brookline apartment.
Your child is very happy now?
Yes, very happy.
When she wakes up in the morning, she says, "Oh Lisa!" She says her daughter is very happy.
When she wakes up in the morning she says hi Lisa and everyone starts the day smiling.
It's a delight and it's really fun having them.
What I realized is there's so much prejudice against refugees mostly because people don't know them.
Lisa says she feels like she has her own personal chef as Wildande loves cooking.
In fact, her goal is to open up her own restaurant.
The couple has their work permits, and they've been taking English classes.
They're open to work anywhere to save money for their future.
In the meantime, they're enjoying their time with Lisa, their new friend for life, and their daughter's new grandmother.
They are hardworking.
They want to learn.
They want to be successful.
And I feel great helping, and I get to understand the refugee crisis from the inside.
Lisa says she's so impressed by the number of people she's met right here at Brookline Town Hall meetings who've been stepping up and hosting families.
She's hopeful more will do the same in the coming days and weeks.
Ladies and gentlemen, I have to say this is the most wonderful program that I've ever heard of in the long time.
You know, I have to say normally on this program we're quite critical of Democrats, Democrat policies, liberals, and liberal policies, liberalism, but I must say The new policy of the Democrats to provide free Haitians to live with you and cook for you.
Coming now in Black History Month is just absolutely amazing.
Where do I sign up?
I'll take a dozen.
I've got so much work around the house.
Taylor Swift, if you need some help down at your Nashville, Tennessee estate, I think we know who could get some of the work done for you there, Taylor.
This is a policy that I think everyone, of course, can get behind.
This isn't similar to anything that's ever existed in the history of the United States, certainly not in New England.
No, this policy shows how good we are as a people, how morally just and upright, how righteous our cause is, and it really shows How good we are.
It shows our place in the world.
And for those who are less fortunate, less capable, less able, it's a perfect deal, isn't it?
They get housing.
They get shelter.
They get meaningful employment.
Three hots and a cot.
What could be wrong?
What could go wrong?
This is a plan that I think everyone in America can explain.
Why are people in the comments, people in the comments are saying just like the good old days.
I have no idea what, what, what are they?
Sorry, I don't know what that means.
I have no clue what it is you're referring to because this is new.
This is not something that existed before 1865.
No, no, no.
This is called hosting and it's totally different.
It's a radical new left-wing policy where you can bring Haitians
from islands in other parts of the world and you can you can put them on a ship and then have them brought to the united states and you can select how many you'd like some people might take one family others of more means could i don't know take three four families enough to start your own business i don't know perhaps something in agriculture could could be of use and then you just take them home they're perfectly free
Perfectly free for you to have, and I don't see anything wrong with this, because again, not only is this a left-wing policy, this is a policy that is backed by the United States government.
In fact, I think this is so amazing.
Look, the only problem with it, and I know what people are saying, I know what people are saying, pozo, but I live in other states.
This is the problem.
Well, we're going to have to expand this program to as many states as possible.
So we might run into a situation where we have hosting states and non-hosting states, but obviously the non-hosting states are pure evil and we should wage war on them immediately.
We could raise an entire army to force, force, The institution of hosting on them.
How dare you?
How dare you not allow hosting?
How dare you non-hosters?
How dare you people not bring these people into your homes, into your lands, have them live with you?
They can perform meaningful labor.
That's all they want to do.
You can teach them basic skills.
Okay, it's a win-win situation for everyone and I just want to be sure that everybody knows this is what the Democrats support, this is what the liberals support, and I have to say the new government policy of as many free Haitians as you can take is one that I am completely on board for.
Like I said, I'll take a dozen.
Tanya Tay, guess what?
Never going to have to worry about cooking again.
You're never going to have to worry about cleaning myself.
I don't have to worry about mowing the lawn.
Why?
Because that lawn is basically going to be mowed by itself.
Maybe we can plant a garden even.
Come on!
We can eat out of it.
It's going to be amazing.
Free Haitians for Black History Month.
What a time to be alive.
You know, and we here at Human Events Daily take our responsibilities to the rest of the world very seriously.
And for all of the downtrodden Haitians and the downtrodden from other parts of the world, understand that when you are brought in, you will be given positions as well.