Nov. 29, 2023 - Human Events Daily - Jack Posobiec
50:00
EPISODE 615: THE WALL STREET PLOT TO STEAL THE ELECTION FROM TRUMP
Here’s your Daily dose of Human Events with @JackPosobiec Save up to 65% on MyPillow products by going to https://www.MyPillow.com/POSO and use code POSOGo to https://www.BlackoutCoffee.com/POSO and use promo code POSO20 for 20% OFF your first order.Get $200 off a 3-month supply kit from ‘My Patriot Supply’ when you go to https://www.preparewithposo.com. Detox from your phone today with SLNT. Go to https://SLNT.COM/POSO. Use promocode POSO to save 15% plus free shipping on qualifyin...
Ladies and gentlemen, we know Christmas is coming, but before Christmas, the gathering of patriots requires your attendance.
Tucker Carlson, Candace Owens, myself, Donald Trump Jr., Steve Bannon, Roseanne Barr, Yeah, that's right.
Rob Schneider, James Lindsay, and so many more are going to be at this year's Turning Point America Fest, December 16th to 19th, 2023, Phoenix, Arizona.
You are going to be there.
Your presence is required.
Go to AmFest.com and use promo code POSO.
That's promo code POSO, AmFest.com.
Secure your tickets now.
Don't come crying to me when this thing is sold out like it does every single Amfest.com, promo code POSO.
This is what happens when the fourth turning meets fifth generation warfare.
A commentator, international social media sensation, and former Navy intelligence veteran.
This is Human Events with your host Jack Posobiec.
Deliver us from evil!
A boost for former South Carolina Governor Nikki Haley in her quest for the White House.
AFP, the political advocacy group founded by the billionaire Koch brothers, is throwing its support behind Haley. - And the commander in chief of the Ukrainian armed forces, General Zalushni, who has said this war is now at a stalemate.
And really, you know, Oleg is perplexed.
He says Ukraine at the moment is not winning this war.
- Former prominent South Carolina lawyer and convicted murder Alec Murdoch back in court, confronted by distraught victims of his state financial crimes. - A search is underway after a U.S.
military aircraft with six people on board crashed on the coast of Japan overnight.
Japanese Coast Guard is reporting that one person was killed.
Japanese fishermen found three of the crew members.
Their conditions are still unknown.
Can this interview, can this hearing, whatever you want to call it, can it be avoided by Hunter Biden?
Yes or no?
No.
I mean, if he refuses to appear, he will be committing contempt of Congress.
You're right.
The threat of prosecution is real.
After 10 Israelis and two Thai nationals were brought back into Israeli territory yesterday.
In return, Israel released 30 Palestinian prisoners.
The exchange with Hamas happened after both parties agreed on Monday to extend the humanitarian pause for an additional two days.
You're not going to tell me?
I did come out and make a nice statement about Nikki Haley.
You did?
You've been talking to Nikki Haley?
Yes, I have.
Even if you're a very liberal Democrat, I urge you, you know, help Nikki Haley too.
You know, get a choice on a Republican side that might be better than Trump.
And is that your view?
That it's anything but Trump?
I would never say that, you know, because he might be the president and I have to deal with that too.
Ladies and gentlemen, welcome aboard today's edition of Human Events Daily, live from Washington, D.C.
Today is November 29th, 2023.
Anno Domini.
Jamie Dimon.
Dimon out the plan.
Jamie Dimon.
Sitting there, ensconced.
The New York Times.
Wall Street.
The head of the snake.
Jamie Dimon, Mr. JP Morgan himself, comes out and tells us, here's what we've got to do.
We've got to put all our money in on Nikki Haley.
Nikki Haley.
Funny how that works because Nikki Haley is the Military Industrial Complexes candidate for 2024.
Her and Joe Biden have no difference whatsoever on their foreign policy.
If anything, Nikki Haley wants to go more aggressive with her foreign policy.
She would bomb Iran.
She would invade, in many cases, Syria, potentially look at attacks on Russia.
She could potentially look at getting into further escalating the Ukraine conflict.
She's called for it.
She's said these things on the trail.
But what's really going on here?
Is this a Hail Mary?
Is this an act of desperation?
Is this the last stand of the globalists?
Or is this a calculated strategy by Wall Street to rob the nomination from Donald Trump?
Well, how do you do that?
You say Trump's winning all the polls, but it's not polls that win.
It's states.
It goes state by state.
So you think about it.
Let's say they go all in.
Iowa, sake of devil's advocate here, let's say they go all in.
Let's say Nikki doesn't win Iowa, but she gets enough delegates to keep going.
Then DeSantis gets some delegates.
Then Trump gets delegates.
Right?
It was a three-way split in 2016.
Then you have New Hampshire.
Haley picks up some delegates there.
Doesn't look like DeSantis will do well.
Trump will win.
Then what comes third?
South Carolina.
South Carolina is Nikki Haley's home state, where she's got favorite son status.
Or, I guess, favorite daughter in this case.
Immigrant Hillary cleans up, gets maybe second place, does well.
Cleans up compared to the other states, I'm saying.
And then we go into Super Tuesday.
Okay?
So could it be that what they really want to have happen here Is that Haley stays in.
DeSantis also stays in through Super Tuesday.
They continue funding both of the campaigns enough to get them on the ballot and push them through to the point where, remember, the magic number is 1235.
So you need 1235 delegates to become the nominee.
But what happens if you run a two-man chop block operation?
So if you run the two-man chop block, Now you got DeSantis out there and Haley out there blocking Trump's path to 1235.
What if he can't get to that magic number?
This is their strategy.
And I'll tell you something right now, it's gonna fail.
You might as well take all that money that you're planning to give her, Jamie Dimon, and set it on fire because you'd have just as good return on investment.
But I guarantee you, if you go all in, and Schwarzman, and Blackrock, and Blackstone, and Vanguard, and all these other masters of the universe, you'll lose every single piece of it, and you'll end up like those bankers looking at the windowsill on Black Tuesday.
Ladies and gentlemen, one of the best ways that you can support us here at Human Events and the work that we do is subscribing to us on our Rumble channel.
Make sure you're subscribed, you hit the notifications, so you'll never miss a clip, you'll never miss a new live episode, and we're putting them out every single day of the week.
I rolled with Bloods, and them boys had a saying.
You can't be listening to all that slappy-whack, trim out his all, it's a bam ship, nippy-bam-bam.
Like Human Events with Jack Posobiec.
Alright, Jack Posobiec back here live at Human Events Daily.
Folks, I gotta say, it's clear.
The unthinkable has arrived.
Our most trusted institutions now deceive us boldly every day.
Something's clearly wrong.
Time is short, so to become more self-reliant and secure this future for your family, for yourself, act today with My Patriot Supply.
My Patriot Supply is the country's largest preparedness company.
It's more than equipped to stock your shelves.
This Christmas, their best-selling three-month emergency food kit provides delicious breakfast, lunches, dinners that last up to 25 years in storage and right now it's $200 off.
So you get over 2,000 calories every day just add water and heat and eat.
Make sure every member of your family has a three-month food kit from MyPatriotSupply.
So again, for this Christmas, when you're going through your list, go right now to MyPatriotSupply.com for $200 in savings, and be sure to order by 3 p.m., and guess what?
Your order will ship for free same day.
It's best to have emergency food and not need it than to need it and not have it.
Take $200 off this Christmas at MyPatriotSupply.com.
Look, throw it in your garage, throw it in the back of your car, you'll have it for when you need it.
So we're talking about now, all of a sudden, the masters of the universe, Jamie Dimon, the head of JP Morgan, one of the most powerful investment banks in the country, goes up and says, everybody should be donating to Nikki Haley.
And he says this in a huge room with all the other investment bankers in there, Elon Musk is in the room, all these people at the New York Times Dealbook Summit there in New York City.
Why would Wall Street be getting behind the candidate of the military-industrial complex?
And it occurred to me that somebody was here on this program just last week.
Mike Benz, the executive director of the Foundation for Freedom Online, explaining to us how there is a power alliance between what he refers to as the Yankees and the Cowboys.
Well, you know, this is something that has been a theory of understanding the political substructures that go into D.C.
for about 50 years now.
I sort of stumbled upon it.
It was actually left-wing researchers from the 1960s who sort of coined this idea of something called the Yankee-Cowboy War.
to explain the power structures in this country in the 1960s and 70s, which, as you mentioned, they described a Yankee faction being sort of Northeast Corridor, high finance, New York and London, the sort of banks and financial investors.
And then on the other hand, you have these the cowboys who at the time were concentrated in large part in Texas and California, which were energy companies and Chamber of Commerce Republicans who wanted low taxes for their corporations.
So you basically had this split between corporations who actually produce the companies that make money and the investor class who profits off of those corporations.
But as America became increasingly a global empire, you know, as Darren Beattie calls it, the globalist American empire, you started to have this completely dispositive interest in the chamber of commerce with international interest.
That is, we only, our corporations only service 300 million people here in the US.
It's 8 billion people around the world.
It's a that our companies, American companies, are reliant on the US government to serve as a battering ram to pry open other markets and shove Pizza Hut and Coca-Cola and Ford and, you know, you name it, everything we produce, everything we export, even things we extract in terms of natural resources.
all depend on the battering ram of the Pentagon, the State Department and the CIA to pry these countries open, to protect investments, to ensure cheap labor pools, to ensure favorable tariffs.
All of this is basically to enshrine the profits of these Chamber of Commerce companies in the energy and the military and then also in the general Chamber of Commerce sphere.
And then the financial class, the profits off of them.
The issue is, is what happens when globalism stops serving the American people?
And we want to focus on domestic priorities instead of foreign policy.
This is where Trump came in in 2016 and defeated both the Yankees and the Cowboys.
He defeated sort of both the Hillary Clintonites and the Jeb Bushites.
And in the process, this thing that used to be a Yankee-Cowboy war where they would trade power since the 1940s when Truman turned over to Eisenhower.
And you had the Reagan's turning in the Bush's turning into Clinton.
It was like the Lannisters and the Targaryens.
Right, and then suddenly a White Walker army comes in and just obliterates everyone.
And that was really how they saw Trumpism.
It was a potential end to globalism.
Well, yes.
They weren't wrong in a certain sense, but they have forever changed the stakes and how our country runs.
I mean, they've basically overturned two and a half centuries of precedent.
You can bet that they would have never dared indict Bush.
And frankly, there would have been too many Bushites within the Justice Department and the Defense Department and the State Department and the CIA.
They would have stopped that from happening long ago.
But Trump didn't come in with, you know, ironically, as an Atlantic City casino guy and real estate guy, you know, he didn't come in with a mafia.
And because of that, he was disarmed against both sides of the foreign policy blob, these sort of Yankees and cowboys.
And it has been this pipe dream for six, seven years now to rein in Trumpism and return the GOP back to its blob-friendly status.
And there's perhaps no more impressionable face for that blob than Nikki Haley herself.
Well, Well, and that's exactly right, you know.
And by the way, to go back to the analogy, Robert Baratheon leads the rebellion against the Targaryens, smashes the Uniparty out, takes power, but then who comes after him is the Lannisters.
They worm their way in, they get into his good graces, then they get him drunk, send him out, have him killed, then the Lannisters take over again.
So what do you have?
It's sort of that pre-existing power base retakes over the kingdom.
This is exactly what happens throughout history time and time again when you have these sort of populist uprisings.
But I want to go back to that clip of Jamie Dimon because if anyone's followed Jamie Dimon for like the last decade or so, I mean, this guy is no fan of Trump whatsoever.
You would think that he's some arch democrat but all of a sudden to hear him going full-throated for Nikki Haley guys.
Can we play that clip again?
I really want to hear this I did come out and make a nice statement about Nikki Haley.
You did?
You've been talking to Nikki Haley?
Yes, I have.
Even if you're a very liberal Democrat, I urge you, you know, help Nikki Haley too.
You know, get a choice on a Republican side that might be better than Trump.
And is that your view?
That it's anything but Trump?
I would never say that, you know, because he might be the president and I have to deal with that too.
So, Mike, walk us through this event that he's speaking at, and what is the importance of the fact that he's talking about the military-industrial candidate, and that's who Nikki Haley is.
I mean, the military-industrial base of South Carolina is enormous, and you can just go look at their senators, Lindsey Graham and Tim Scott, and you could see Their policies clearly are directly tied to the interest of the military-industrial complex.
Nikki Haley is no different in that vein.
But why is it so important that he's saying this in a Wall Street context?
Well, because Wall Street drafts off the battering ram of the Pentagon.
The Pentagon is by far and away the largest agency that we have in the entire federal government.
It's the only one with a unbridled license to kill in terms of, you know, the entire rest of the world.
It is the largest employer in the entire country.
And most importantly, American enterprise.
When I say drafts off the battering ram of the Pentagon, you can think of it like a bike race.
The person who's you never want to be first in a bike in a bike race until the very end, because the person who goes first cuts the wind.
So you go faster and you're more efficient when you're when you're drafting behind somebody else's effort.
This is the same way- My dad taught me all about that with Dale Earnhardt and Jeff Gordon back in the day.
Yes, right.
Yeah, same thing with racing.
But you have the Pentagon, the State Department, and the CIA cutting the wind for American investments and enterprise all over the world.
So a great example of this is Ukraine.
In fact, it's kind of shocking to see the mirror Of JPMorgan's actions today in 2023, the year before the election, as BlackRock did 2019.
If you remember back in 2019, Joe Biden took a long time to enter that presidential race.
There was a lot of, you know, will he, won't he?
Why are the months dragging by and he hasn't thrown his hat in?
Well, according to mainstream media reporting, the thing that tilted that decision was having the The firm handshake of BlackRock in his corner in 2019, you can look this up, BlackRock had a meeting with Joe Biden that basically assured their support behind his presidency.
Now, Joe Biden was known as Mr. Foreign Policy before that for many years.
He was on the Senate Foreign Affairs Committee for, I think, 40 years, and he was chairman or ranking member for 10 of those.
He was the blob's pick in 2019, just as Nikki Haley is on the Republican side.
But again, you have high finance as backing the foreign policy blob.
And a great example of this is the Ukraine situation.
BlackRock invested very heavily in 2015 in the liquefied natural gas markets in Ukraine.
They were all skating towards this grand energy play where they knew that the Pentagon, the State Department and the CIA were going to come in and kick Russia out of Europe.
And out of that would come a massive supplier need for natural gas, or for liquefied natural gas, LNG, for suppliers of that market to fill all of Europe's energy needs, because they knew the Pentagon was about to kick Russia out, and this trillion-dollar market was about to come flooding open.
And this is 2015 when BlackRock made those major investments.
This is right after the coup in 2014 that was organized by the State Department, Victoria Nuland, Jeff Pyatt, and the whole US Embassy gang there.
So they invested to where they knew the investments were going to be opened by the Pentagon.
This is a perfect example.
We're heading up to a quick break.
Stay tuned here folks.
Mike Benz breaking it all down for us.
The financial incentives lining up behind Nikki Haley.
The foreign policy that's driving them.
Drafting off of really the sledgehammer of the Pentagon.
You talk about influencers.
These are influences and they're friends of mine.
Jack Persovic, where's Jack?
Jack, he's done a great job. - Jack Persovic back live, Human Events Daily.
Folks, talking about it now, but we know the world is in flames.
Bidenomics, complete and total disaster.
But you know what can't and won't ruin my day?
That won't.
Because I start every day with a cup of hot, America-first, blackout coffee.
Let me tell you something.
Blackout coffee, and I've been telling you guys about this for a while.
Many people are getting into this, but some of you haven't yet.
I understand.
You're not sure.
You want to try it.
I'm going to tell you how and why.
Because this coffee is 100% America and 100% committed to conservative values.
From sourcing the beans, the roasting process, customer support, shipping, they embody true American values and accept no compromise on taste or quality.
Look, real American patriots, loyal American patriots who are loyal to the American Republic, we understand the companies that support us and support our values are standing in the breach and the companies that hate us don't deserve our money this Christmas or any other day.
So go to blackoutcoffee.com slash POSO and use promo code POSO 20 for 20% off your first order this Christmas.
Again, check out all the gear.
Great, incredible gift ideas.
While you're there, if you've got birthdays in December, like I'm a December birthday, I know how it goes.
Ben, before we left, you were walking through how Ukraine is just, and we've talked about it before, but just such a perfect example of how the LNG industry came in And said, look, we want to go in to Europe.
And I've said before that in many ways it's not even about Ukraine, it's about who gets to fuel Europe.
And when I was at the Helsinki Summit with Trump and Putin all the way back in 2018, there in the room with them, I remember the one thing, the one issue that really became this huge point Of consternation between them, because most of the summit was actually quite perfunctory.
I mean, the media like to say otherwise.
I remember leaving the room and Jim Acosta screaming, treason summit, a treason summit has occurred.
And I'm sitting there like, Jim, I was I was sitting next to you.
I don't remember.
I remember any treason summit.
It was kind of boring.
They handed a soccer ball over.
But the one issue that really became clear was that that stood between Russia and the U.S.
at that summit between Trump and Putin, Nord Stream 2.
The idea that Trump, of course, wanted to sell the U.S.
LNG, and of course, what Patriot wouldn't, right?
I would love to see the shale and the LNG coming out of Pennsylvania and the Permian Basin and the Brackenfields, all the way being sent to Europe.
Problem is, now you've got shipping costs involved, whereas Russia is right there.
It's cheaper, it's easier, they've got a pipeline, or should I say, they had a pipeline.
Benz, why was it that Nord Stream 2 was sunk and hit Yeah, so there has been this 25-year war over the energy markets in Europe between the U.S.
and Russia.
Essentially, to take it back in time, when we won the Cold War, there was about an eight-year period where Russia was a colony of the United States.
This is at the time when, you know, 1991, we sort of go on this international parade with the unipolar moment.
All of the former Soviet states that had become independent started to get folded one by one into NATO.
You know, we at the State Department thought the entire world was our oyster.
We had so much control over the domestic political affairs of Russia that in 1993, Yeltsin even, I think, faxed the National Endowment for Democracy for permission to bomb his own parliament building.
We basically rigged the 1996 election in Russia in favor of Yeltsin when he was drunk and unpopular, and we sent over political advisors and paid for media for his campaign.
There's a whole Jeff Goldblum movie on this, by the way, on how we rigged the 1996 Russian election.
Yeah.
By the way, Ben, just to double check, who was in charge of the U.S.
government during the 1990s while all of this was going?
The Clinton family.
Oh, the Clinton family.
Oh, okay.
So yeah, there's no issues there whatsoever.
Definitely no conflicts of interest.
And did they have something that set up that was called, I don't know, there was some kind of organization that they had set up on the side.
I'm trying to remember, the name escapes me at the moment.
Maybe, I don't know, maybe you recall.
It escapes me, too.
I'm sure we'll found it soon.
We'll find it soon, I think is what I was trying to say.
So Russia was in ruins.
We basically privatized their entire empire through shock therapy.
They had something like two trillion dollars in publicly held government assets because it was a communist country.
But all of that came to be owned by London and Wall Street through Soros funds.
Soros was highly active in that, as was Bill Browder and other sort of London finance Types, I'll say.
And so, at the end of that, Russia's stock market crashed something like 95%.
They were left in ruin, and out of those ashes crawled Putin.
And Putin really only had two weapons at his disposal to reassert Russian influence on the world stage.
One of them is they had military airports, they had best-in-class air defense systems, and they ran a lot of small arms through sales to Central Africa, Latin America.
They basically helped oppose US militarism through their military export economy.
But the big thing that they had is that they were still, they still sat on, at the time, the world's largest supply of oil, and I think at the time, second largest supply of natural gas, and Europe was completely dependent on them for energy.
So when Putin took power in 99, the way that he brought Russia back from a regional power to a global power was by exploiting these energy reliances that Central and Eastern Europe had on Russia.
And so they shut off the gas to a couple of countries, Georgia, and a few others, 2005, 2005, And also the financial entanglements between them and Central Eastern European countries allowed them to influence those political systems.
So the U.S.
government freaked out over this in the mid-aughts.
This is like 2007, 2008.
We declared a new, this is right around the time the climate change narrative was developed, by the way.
But, we developed this idea that, you know what, Europe has to go through an energy diversification policy, and they need to start buying more expensive gas from the United States and from basically NATO energy suppliers, rather than from Russia, even though they're already so low GDP, even though they're already broke, even though their commodity product Because if they are more dependent on Russia, they will be, you know, they could be squeezed at a military or political level.
So we started weaning them off in the early aughts, but then as time went by and Russia grew economically more powerful and started to, again, sort of bring these countries back into a Soviet orbit and started to resist more and more the natification of Eastern Europe, It became a strategic priority to nuke Gazprom.
Gazprom being the state-owned Russian energy giant that 20 years ago was the single biggest company in the world.
And Gazprom was the major supplier to Europe, and especially Germany.
A lot of people have quoted this quote that the purpose of NATO is to keep the Americans in, the Russians out, and the Germans down.
There's perhaps no better reflection of that than the NATO compelled, coerced policy essentially for Germany to cut off its own arm in the energy sphere.
And by getting rid of the Nord Stream pipelines, the current foreign minister of Germany, Annalena Baerbock, I predicted well before she was elected that everything was going to happen.
Well, and Benz, by the way, that was Lord Ismay, that quote about the purpose of NATO, that was Lord Ismay who said that.
So this wasn't just, it's not just a theory, this was stated by the first commander of NATO.
Period.
Lord Ismay, the British commander.
So people need to understand there's a very British, you know, people talk about, like I've said before, I hated that new Napoleon movie, but people have to understand the purpose of NATO plays that role in the great game of Europe, which is predominantly a Britain v. Russia game.
Right, and Germany is the capital of industrial enterprise in Europe, and the stronger Germany gets in terms of its economic base, the more independent it becomes from NATO coercion, and so there was this plan to basically crush Germany's industrial sector and have the profits flow from Russian sovereign wealth funds into private hands from Wall Street and London investors.
And this is why George Soros was battling, you know, almost in a sort of, you know, YouTube boxer creator clash sort of thing for 20 years with Putin over control of Ukraine's state-owned gas company, Naftogaz.
I mean, they were like two, you know, plastic punching people for 20 years.
They've been jockeying for who can control this Ukrainian gas giant, because whoever controls that essentially controls Ukraine's political decision making and controls.
Which, and by the way, to tie it in, you know, just before we go to break here, to tie that in, which NAFTA gas also has a number of deals with a company that has a ton of mineral rights in the Donbass, which is known as Burisma.
So Burisma, of course, which everybody remembers, is the exact same company that put who on their board?
Oh, that's right, Hunter Biden, the son of the Vice President of the United States.
Didn't mean to cut you off, Ben, but had to make that point so people could tie the dots together.
It's perfect because, you know, not only was Hunter Biden on the board, but so was Kofi Black, who spent 30 years with the CIA.
Burisma had a partnership agreement they signed just one week before Trump was inaugurated in 2017 with the Atlantic Council, who is the top dog in the censorship space.
The Atlantic Council has seven former CIA directors currently serving on its board.
They had a formal partnership with the Department of Homeland Security to censor the 2020 election, in which 100% of the repeat misinformation spreaders that they identified, and I think, Jack, you may have been on that list, were the Atlantic Council doing that, they had a financial sponsorship were the Atlantic Council doing that, they had a financial sponsorship agreement with
So you had this CIA-packed private energy company in Ukraine who was reliant on the battering ram of the State Department and the Pentagon to pay off its investors, because all of those shale resources in the Donbass are dependent on having territorial because all of those shale resources in the Donbass are dependent on having
So when there was the countercoup after the 2014 Maidan revolution, and Russia basically, you had these breakaway regions that were said to be backstopped by the Russian military.
A lot of those rights that Halliburton and Chevron and Exxon and Philips Conoco and all of these major Houston oil companies had signed, they'd all signed $10 billion agreements.
Shell signed a $10 billion agreement with Naftogaz.
Chevron signed a $10 billion agreement with Naftogaz in 2013, right before the coup.
They were expecting to get paid off because of the Pentagon battering ram and Russia foiled that.
And Russia foiled, and now all of a sudden it's led to war.
You know, it's funny how that works.
Quick break.
I want to come right back here with Mike Benz, who's breaking this all down for us.
The financial incentives tying us back to the Ukraine war that boiled into all of this.
The Cowboys and the Yankees.
Stop buzzing in my ear about the boring people at your office.
I'm trying to listen to the new human events with Jack Posobiec.
Jack Pasovic back here, live human events daily.
We are here, Washington DC.
We're speaking with Mike Benz.
We're really going through all the insanity of the censorship.
And while you're focused on that, you get to talk about tech.
Because folks, have you ever talked with a friend and then minutes later had ads related to that exact conversation popping up on your phone?
I call it ad popping.
Do you feel like Big Brother's watching you, or worse, like every move you make is being tracked?
Well, sadly, in our digital age, it's not paranoia.
Between government, criminals, corporate America, it feels like personal freedom and privacy are compromised 24-7.
This is where Silent steps in.
Silent's not just a brand, it's a statement for liberty against surveillance.
Their patented signal blocking Faraday bags are suitable for every device you have, from smartphones to laptops.
Yes, I know, this one is not big enough for a laptop.
But they also sell backpacks.
They've got bigger ones.
Producer Rusk has got his.
He takes it everywhere he goes.
You place your device inside, instantly block all wireless signals from emanating, and you are safeguarded from digital eavesdropping and unwanted tracking.
Reclaim your privacy today, this Christmas.
slnt.com slash poso to get 15% off plus free shipping on qualifying orders.
Look, I gotta protect my privacy at all times, security, traveling internationally everywhere I go when I'm in the field.
Act now, patriots.
Go to slnt.com slash poso.
Save that 15% and the free shipping.
slnt.com slash poso.
Ben's, you know, we were trying to kind of chatting during the break.
And I think what you were kind of culminating towards there, because, you know, really, you know, you've done so much groundbreaking work and pioneering work on the censorship industrial complex.
And it's sort of like that, you know, I watch the Scooby-Doo movies with my kids still and the old show and they, you know, they both like it, you know, that thing totally holds up.
And it's like the end of each episode.
It's like, let's see who you really are under here.
And you take the mask off of the censorship industrial complex, the Integrity Initiative, the Atlantic Council, you know, DF Labs and all these different things.
And suddenly we find out that it's NATO.
That NATO is behind the censorship complex and all of a sudden you get people like my good friend Nina Yankovich who very, very sadly I had to get fired from her position at the Department of Homeland Security before she could lock us all up.
But don't worry Nina because I know your good buddy Jack Smith is now tracking every single Trump supporter's likes and retweets and follows.
so that he can put you all on that very same list that they're looking to build for 2024 and probably putting on a list for prosecution like Doug Mackey.
That's a lot of dots to connect, Ben.
Can you put that all together for us?
Yeah, so sort of like what we were just talking about with the whole Nikki Haley story and going back to everything from BlackRock to J.P. Martin, Morgan, there is this financial enterprise, regional investment story on every plot of dirt on Earth that depends on the battering ram of the Pentagon, the State Department, and the intelligence community to secure and protect those financial investments.
And what you had in 2014, you had this play, this grand Ukraine energy play, That all of the major Western financial stakeholders in the military sphere, in the energy sphere, and in the finance sphere who invest in those sectors, were all expecting Ukraine to be brought, you know, the crown jewel essentially of the Soviet Empire, to finally be brought into the Euro-Atlantic orbit.
When they tried the coup in February 2014, and then it backfired with the counter-coup when the country split apart, when Eastern Ukraine basically seceded from Kiev and then came to be backstopped by the Russians and you had the Crimea annexation, a voluntary referendum in Crimea to join the Russian Federation, there was a freakout in NATO.
They declared this doctrine.
At first, it was called the Gerasimov Doctrine, named after Valery Gerasimov, which was said to be Russia's new style of war is all about controlling hearts and minds and controlling media narratives.
And, you know, it would turn out years later that the NATO scholar, Mark Gagliotti, who penned this, would come out and say, actually, I sort of misquoted him.
Gerasimov was actually referring to the way the US does soft power influence, not the Russians.
But by that point, they had already changed the Gerasimov Doctrine to a doctrine known as hybrid warfare.
And this was all the rage at NATO from 2014 through 2017.
This is this idea that war had changed.
Now, you have to like go back in time and And forget about 2022 and just the world as it was from... Which, by the way, Ben, just to throw out for people to remember this, this is all predicated on the fact that when you had Russian troops that were going into Crimea in those early days, and obviously Zafastopol Naval Base was the main target of this operation, that there were images of, and of course, you know, people say it was Spetsnaz or that it was, you know, unnamed military units.
That there were images that were popping up on Instagram of girls like posting selfies with the soldiers when they were coming in.
And so NATO and their allies had a strategic imperative to come out and say, Oh, this is all, this is all warfare.
This isn't real.
It's not actually happening.
She's a paid actor.
They're all paid actors.
When really what it was, was they were girls who wanted to take pictures with soldiers and posted on Instagram.
Right.
But, but anything that, that tilts hearts and minds towards Russia, Right, so it must all be part of Putin's grand scheme.
It must all be part of Putin's grand scheme.
It must all be part of the grand scheme.
It couldn't possibly just be real.
Right.
Well, that's the way they had to contextualize it.
In fact, Michael Chertoff had a very similar quote to what you just said in 2016 on this.
So if you go back in time before 2022, you had this very weird situation where NATO had been around like 1949 and had never had to fight a hot war.
By that point, I mean, there was Yugoslavia and Libya.
There were these offensive peacekeeper actions, you know, not genocide, peacekeeping.
But there never had to have been an actual conflict with Russia or any sort of hot war.
In 2014, when the Crimea annexation happened without Russia firing a bullet, NATO freaked out and said, oh, my God, war has changed.
We've been thinking about things in terms of conventional terms for so long.
But really, if you think about it, war is now all about hearts and minds in democratic regions.
If you can control the political calculus in the country, you control the military by proxy.
So what we need to do is we need to make civilian media a military domain.
And they did this through this this doctrine called hybrid warfare, which is the idea that war is no longer mostly a conventional thing.
It's mostly a media thing.
I'm not joking when I say this.
This is literally how they defined hybrid warfare and all of the grants and contracts and all of the motion.
You know, I joke that it was like in, you know, in 2011, if you wanted to get You know, grants approved for, you know, studying the mating habits of squirrels, you would insert a line about how it's got a lens towards, you know, how they're impacted by climate change.
There was a similar thing with Pentagon funding around hybrid warfare.
Anything that was useful to be able to pry hearts and minds away from Russia and towards NATO was considered a military necessity.
So they set up all this infrastructure in Central and Eastern Europe.
They set it up in Germany, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Sweden, all over the Baltics.
These went by different names.
Sometimes it was called STRATCOM for strategic communications.
Sometimes it was called Psychological Inoculation Center or Centers of Excellence.
And they all connected the military establishment.
NATO and both the Pentagon, the British Ministry of Defense, Brussels, all of the NATO military facilities and agencies started to connect to social media companies for the purpose of censoring pro-Russian propaganda or anti-NATO dissent all of the NATO military facilities and agencies started to connect to social facilities and agencies started to connect to social media companies for the purpose of censoring pro-Russian propaganda or anti-NATO dissent within domestic countries.
Now, this became a way to rig their elections because any political party that was NATO skeptic or that wanted to join, say, a Brexit movement in France with Brexit or Germany with Grexit or Brexit in Greece or Italy, all of these became targeted by the Western military all of these became targeted by the Western military alliance because by their logic, anybody who is not a foreign policy blob, political candidate or political movement is de facto a pro-Russian asset of the Russian empire
policy blob political candidate or political movement is de facto a pro-Russian asset of the Russian empire whose victory will undermine the security posture of the Western world.
So they declared essentially a military predicate for taking over all civilian media.
And this hit the gas when Brexit happened.
In June 2016, because the very next month, in July 2016, NATO formally added the Hybrid Warfare Capacity Building to its charter for the first time in 60 years.
It now had an unfettered license to engage in carte blanche psychological warfare.
When Trump won five months later, all bets were off.
And that whole NATO doctrine, which Jen Stoltenberg would formally call from tanks to tweets.
They had a formal doctrine called from tanks to tweets.
And that would all come racing over to the Pentagon as soon as Trump won the 2016 election.
The geopolitical imperative to censor the internet brought to you courtesy of NATO.
I asked Benz to connect the dots.
He connected them.
Stay tuned.
He continues.
The full hour will conclude.
One more segment right after this.
Human Events Daily.
I'm always listening to Human Events with Jack Posobiec.
All right, Jack Posobiec live here, Human Events Daily, one more segment with the great Mike Benz.
Go follow him, foundationforfreedomonline.com.
He's got a piece up there right now that came out a couple of days ago where, you know, we've been talking about the situation, how we got to where we are, this combination of the financial military interest behind NATO and censorship of the internet and the reasons they're doing this.
He's got a huge piece up about Google The Google plan to vaccinate your mind.
And I really want to look at this.
So Ben's, you know, we're talking about 2016, 2020, we're going into 2024.
Talk to us about how Google is planning to vaccinate our minds.
What really ties together everything we were just talking about.
There is this cell within Google called Google Jigsaw that I sort of lovingly call Google's CIA branch because it was started by a guy named Jared Cohen, who began in the policy planning staff under Condoleezza Rice at the State Department, coordinating the State Department who began in the policy planning staff under Condoleezza Rice at the State Department, coordinating the State Department and the CIA's joint
Jared Cohen, the founder of Google Jigsaw, was was just a 26 year old kid when he was recruited to the top hive mind within the State Department that coordinates overt and covert diplomacy so that our ability to, you know, fund dissident groups is on the overt fund dissident groups is on the overt side of USAID.
dissident groups is on the overt side of USAID.
The National Endowment for Democracy is coordinated with covert action as we're trying to overthrow that government with muscle from the CIA.
And Jared Cohen is the guy who looked around as a young kid on that policy planning staff and said, hey, what are we doing running color revolutions out of CIA station houses and embassies and consulates?
Everybody we want to recruit, students, young people, they're all on Twitter, Facebook and YouTube.
This is 2007, right when the smartphone came out.
And so he developed this doctrine called the doctrine of digital statecraft.
Even though he was a Republican political appointee, he was considered so important to the CIA's covert action online that he was kept on by Hillary Clinton when she became secretary of state in 2009 after Obama won and there was a turnover from Republican to Democrat.
to the CIA's covert action online that he was kept on by Hillary Clinton when she became Secretary of State in 2009 after Obama won and there was a turnover from Republican to Democrat.
Julian Assange basically credits Jared Cohen with causing the Arab Spring as one by one the Obama administration's enemies were all overthrown in Facebook and Twitter revolutions, that is revolutions of hundreds of thousands of people coordinating with hashtags on social media and getting financial support that is revolutions of hundreds of thousands of people coordinating with hashtags on social media and getting financial support from the U.S. government in doing so as they At that point, Jared Cohen could have been president.
Julian Assange basically credits Jared Cohen with causing the Arab Spring Trump's political party to the Obama administration as one by one the Obama administration's enemies were all overthrown in Facebook and Twitter revolutions.
I mean, he was a young kid and he was voted top 50 most powerful people in Washington before the age of 30 by Time magazine, but he goes to join what at the time in 2011 was only number 120 by market cap in terms of size, a mid-sized company called Google.
And, And not just to, not to be at a C-suite position level at Google either, he was just, his job was to sit in a room all day and stare at a white wall as part of a one-person think tank and just think about all the ways that Google could use its proprietary resources and data to solve complex geopolitical problems.
Julian Assange wrote a whole piece on this and he called it the moment that Google became the shadow state department.
With Jared Cohen taking that whole CIA network and Color Revolution network and merging it with Google itself.
Now, Google Jigsaw would go on to create this thing called Perspective, which was the first ever retail machine learning, artificial intelligence, AI-powered censorship weapon ever deployed, essentially, on the American Internet.
Before 2016, all censorship was done manually.
You had to find something that was all reactive.
It was whack-a-mole.
That's why the censorship that happens now, where millions of posts can be killed instantly through keywords and through mapping the misinformation community networks that you want to all tune down hundreds of thousands at once.
None of that was possible before Jared Cohen Google jigsaws AI censorship superweapons were developed.
So this is a guy whose job was to help CIA overthrow foreign governments.
And when the 2016 election happened, he switched from a digital insurgency mode to a digital counterinsurgency mode, and developed the weapons for censoring the Trump movement, as well as the Brexit movement and a number of other political hot topics.
Now, what's also really interesting is Jared Cohen is now at Goldman Sachs running a geopolitical futures advisory firm doing the exact same thing that Jamie Dimon, that we talked about at the top of this segment, was talking about in terms of he's helping Goldman direct financial capital, depending on what he knows the CIA and the Defense Department and the State Department are going to do, the same way Jamie Dimon is looking to do by, you know, by bolstering up its GOP blob network.
So it all sort of comes full circle that way.
But what Google Jigsaw is doing now is very peculiar.
They are fixated on the power of viral videos, and I call it Digital MK Ultra.
They call it pre-bumping, but what it is, is it's a way of creating videos before people encounter narratives that they want you to not believe.
And creating 30 second to three minute videos.
And this is why you see all these government agencies doing this, by the way.
DHS producing these little 30 to three minute kind of weirdly toned videos about stopping misinformation.
The FDA TikTok, Snapchat, whatever, Instagram reels using the same exact type of intonation, the music, the captions, all of it.
Yes, so there are So there was $40 million in funding just from the National Science Foundation into the science of how to persuade somebody using a short 30-second, three-minute video for pre-bunking, is what they're calling it.
But what that is, is that's taking subjects who have not encountered an argument that the government doesn't want you to believe yet.
And showing them a video or series of videos that gets them to build what they call a psychological vaccine in the same way that a vaccine works by exposing somebody to a small dose of something so that they build antibodies without getting the whole you know the whole sickness at least that's the way in theory it's supposed to work They do these pre-bunking videos, and there's millions of dollars behind this now, and they're rolling it out everywhere.
They're designed to basically do the same thing as a sort of psychological vaccine.
They give you a weak, incomplete version of the argument they want you to reject.
If they want to pre-bunk people against watching Jack Posobiec's human events show, they will produce a 30-second video or three-minute video, and it will strawman the ever-loving heck out of your argument deliberately.
Because if they were exposed to a full Pozo segment, they might believe it.
So what they do is they give a little bit of the argument.
They strawman it.
They inject you with the talking points.
They then give you the next part of the Pozo argument.
They strawman that.
So they never let the thing hit you full force.
This was the same logic that Jigsaw proposed for the entire fact check labeling system for the 2020 election.
If you remember the Orwellian sense of those text overlays, it was so that you were never psychologically hit with the full force of a real argument, as you might believe.
