July 31, 2023 - Human Events Daily - Jack Posobiec
49:13
EPISODE 528: HUNTER BECOMES THE HUNTED: DEVON ARCHER TESTIFIES JOE DIRECTLY INVOLVED WITH BURISMA
On today’s can’t miss episode of Human Events with Jack Posobiec, Poso breaks down all the latest breaking news surrounding the testimony of Devon Archer against the Biden family. Did President Biden lie about having knowledge of businesses Hunter Biden was involved in? Poso is joined by none other than Darren Beattie to discuss how Archer revealed that President Biden was part of 20 different calls and intervened to stop the investigation of Burisma! Jack is also joined by Terry Shilling to ...
I want to take a second to remind you to sign up for the Pozo Daily Brief.
It is completely free.
It'll be one email that's sent to you every day.
You can stop the endless scrolling, trying to find out what's going on in your world.
We will have this delivered directly to you, totally for free.
Go to humanevents.com slash Pozo.
Sign up today.
It's called the Pozo Daily Brief.
Read what I read for show prep.
You will not regret it.
humanevents.com slash Pozo.
Totally free.
the Pozo Daily Brief.
We are in a fifth generational conflict.
For every lie they tell, we're gonna get in their face and yell two truths.
This is Human Events with your host, Jack Posobiec.
But Ron DeSanctimonious and so many others that are wasting hundreds of millions of dollars that Republicans should be using to build a massive vote-gathering operation to take on crooked Joe Biden in November, because we cannot lose.
It's possible that the next indictment will magically make Trump untalatable for some reason to voters.
And so it's not worth giving up.
I don't think anybody should ever give up.
6% fewer 18- to 29-year-old voters in Arizona failed to turn out.
He loses Arizona.
1% fewer black voters in Georgia turn out to vote in 2024 than voted in 2020.
He loses Georgia.
So what is this letter?
Can you walk us through it?
The government is apprising the court of the status of Devin Archer's appeal of his judgment of conviction and they request that the court set a surrender date for the defendant to report to a facility.
Yeah, the letter from the Department of Justice is trying to nudge the judge to go ahead and sentence Devin Archer for something unrelated to what we're going to be talking to him about.
China wants to dominate the world.
They've made it very clear they want to dominate Asia by 2035.
They want to dominate the world by 2049.
The Ukrainian attacks, which is hitting places that are symbolic, that go to the heart of the system that Putin has.
The day that Israel, that Israel's elected government succumbs to threats by former generals, that's the end of democracy.
And we're not going to let that happen.
Any Republican that doesn't act on Democrat fraud should be immediately primaried.
And get out.
Out.
Ladies and gentlemen, welcome aboard today's edition of Human Events with Jack Posobiec.
Today is July 31st, 2023.
Anno Domini.
Hunter becomes the hunted.
We are now told Human Events is reaching out to our sources on Capitol Hill and others that Devin Archer is talking behind closed doors.
This is not one of those hearings where he's just pleading the fifth that he's denying answers.
No, He actually is asking and answering specific questions that are being brought by house investigators and house members directly on him involving his plans with Hunter Biden, their work in Ukraine, their work in China and others.
It remains to be seen exactly how much of this information we will be able to bring to you.
We're told there's gonna be a transcript in a couple of days, but Human Events is working very hard to make sure that we can get you this information as soon as possible.
We've got people that are talking directly on the Hill to folks that are either in the room or have people in the room.
When they come out, we will get the information for you as soon as possible, because we have to understand exactly what it was that they were up to.
This was greasing the wheels of globalism, the globalist system under which we now all live.
It wasn't just about the Hunter Biden family.
It was about understanding the broader picture of the geopolitical framework that the Biden crime family represents.
This is merely one piece.
And to walk us through that, we're going to have Darren Beattie on joining us in the show.
Terry Schilling is coming up later because we have to talk more and more about child trafficking and how we can fight not just the supply.
Real America's Voice is a news platform dedicated to keeping people informed.
Pushing this compliance, these flight attendants are over it, people are over it, and now they're speaking out.
Headlines from here in the U.S.
and around the globe.
The invasion by illegal aliens south of the border.
Full coverage of live events.
Politics into our classrooms.
Here and at home.
Real News.
Honest views.
Real America's Voice.
Real America's Voice is a news platform dedicated to keeping people informed.
Your CCP, the Chinese Communist Party, these guys are gangsters.
They're global gangsters.
Headlines from here in the U.S.
and around the globe.
And the reality.
So, Lori Lightfoot lost her re-election yesterday and she lost it badly.
Full coverage of live events.
Bringing thousands a bottle of water, Trump water actually, most of it.
Real News.
Honest Views.
Real America's Voice.
All right, folks, as we said, we're going to have an update for you on the Sound of Freedom numbers, folks.
You have to look at this, and I'm pulling it from the domestic box office, from boxofficemojo.com.
Sound of Freedom has now hit over $148 million, nearly $150 million.
$148 million, nearly $150 million.
Sound of Freedom is beating Mission Impossible.
Mission Impossible 139, Sound of Freedom 148.
It's now also beating Fast X, it's beating Elemental, it's beating Puss in Boots.
It is right under Creed III, right under Transformers.
Indiana Jones, the Dial of Destiny, just sitting at 167.
It looks as though Sound of Freedom will be able to take it out.
Scream 6, The Flash, Megan, Dungeons & Dragons, Insidious, all falling way by the wayside.
Sound of Freedom climbing over and above the charts.
Folks, you gotta go see this film and keep seeing it.
I'm always listening to Human Events with Jack Posobiec.
Folks, as you know, the world can change at a moment's notice.
We are currently on the brink of economic collapse.
It's scary, I get it.
But if you don't think you need emergency food for yourself or your family right now, wait a day and see what happens.
Just don't wait too long.
Because as I speak, preparewithposso.com is now offering a huge discount on their best-selling 3-month emergency food kit.
For a limited time, you'll save 25% per kit.
That's the biggest discount they offer, but it doesn't come along every day, and it won't last long.
So do yourself a favor and grab your 25% discount on each 3-month emergency food kit you need.
It includes delicious breakfast, lunches, dinners, and over more with 2,000 calories per day.
Get at least one kit per person in your family.
Grab your 25% discount today before this offer expires.
You get fast and free shipping, too, so go to preparewithposo.com, or you may regret it.
Preparewithposo.com, powered by our friends at MyPatriotSupply.
Folks, I want to bring on now Darren Beattie of Revolver News.
Now, Darren, I've heard just from, you know, very, you know, very brief sources that it does sound like Devin Archer is speaking.
He is actually answering questions.
This isn't one of those hearings where he's, you know, pleading the fifth and trying to stonewall that.
And keep in mind, he's got an axe to grind, right?
He's going to jail while Hunter Biden is getting away scot-free and looks like he's getting the sweetheart plea deal.
But What I wanted to ask you about is, more broadly, This was the greasing of the wheels of the system of globalism or the system of Western globalism.
You've called it the globalist American empire.
Isn't that really the reason that the money was going to these guys in the first place?
It wasn't exactly for their business acumen on Eastern European energy sector or Chinese investments for the CEFC advisors.
No, this was about Absolutely, absolutely.
You know, there are a number of things to say about it.
So I want to ask you to walk us through what the bag men sort of entity represents when it comes to these types of operations in the broader framework.
Absolutely.
Absolutely.
You know, there are a number of things to say about it.
First is this is not out of the ordinary at all.
This is standard operating procedure for the swamp.
This is a pretty sort of mundane example of how the swamp typically operates.
And yes, you know, there's the Biden crime family, but my guess would be this is pretty much, you know, how things operate with most elected officials who are sort of embedded into the system in the way that Biden was.
Biden's embedded into the system.
He doesn't control the system.
Now, I pointed out that he's far less deeply entrenched than, say, the Clinton family on one side and the Bush family on the other.
He's sort of operating on a more surface level of the regime's infrastructure, but he's in a position to kind of take advantage of it in a relatively unsophisticated way through sort of just basic bribery and so forth.
And looks like that that's what was going on.
They call it lobbying, but it's really a kind of bribery and it's The most basic version of, you know, pay to play, pay for access.
And, you know, this is this is how the wheels are greased.
And so we just get an example of how that works.
And it happens to involve President Biden and his his immediate family members.
But it's not out of the ordinary.
So I think that's one thing to to just state for the matter of record.
The other thing is, as you mentioned, the geopolitical aspect of it, the locations.
You know, it's not an accident that, you know, these places involve Ukraine, China, and so forth.
Ukraine has long been a playground of corruption for the regime and in particular for a kind of sub-faction of what we call the deep state, a sub-faction of the national security apparatus that we could describe as Atlanticist.
Even the organization Burisma for instance has a very close relationship with At least two of the major oligarchs plundering and operating Ukraine with, you know, the cooperation of Western interests.
There's Pinchuk and there's Kolomoisky, who have a close relationship with Burisma, and in turn a close relationship through Burisma to organizations like the Atlantic Council, which is a kind of institutional arm of this Atlanticist faction that I've described.
They're a big and I think underreported aspect of the whole censorship story.
Atlantic Council has a subsidiary called Digital Forensics Lab, which has played a huge role in the censorship of the internet.
And in kind of combining the Russia obsession with the obsession to destroy
Populist movements within the West by creating this fake narrative that there's somehow a connection between Russia and these populist movements that's kind of part of the genealogy of the whole Russia hopes is that the Organizations that were dedicated to destroying populism were the same organizations that were set up to obsessively combat Russia And so it's sort of combining two, you know killing two birds with one stone
With one stone, by connecting the two narratively, even though there's basically no substantiation for that, so they can say, we can both demonize Russia and further our geopolitical aims, and at the same time, address what really became the number one priority, even over going after Russia, which was tamping down on these organically brewing populist movements in the West, which at the time, you know,
just a matter of years after Putin's invasion with Crimea, they had the Brexit vote, the successful Brexit vote, and then the election of Trump.
So in their sort of myopic Russia-obsessed minds, those all had to be connected.
And just for the sake of convenience and utility, since all of their infrastructure was designed to go after Russia and frame everything in terms of Russia, That happened with populist movements in the West as well that really had nothing to do with Russia.
So there's so many different tangents and rabbit holes you can go down here, but Ukraine really is a kind of geopolitical nexus point for A lot of tentacles leading back to what we would describe as the swamp.
Well, I think you're right, and certainly you see that with Ukraine in Eastern Europe.
You would see this as well with Syria, Afghanistan, a few of these other Middle Eastern entities where the swamp has been plucking its beak in for a long time and picking the carcass off of these areas.
Obviously in Syria, now we're starting to see the resurgence of the Assad regime.
It looks as though they may actually even be pushing Turkey out at some point here, which of course will play into quite a bit in terms of where Turkey decides, where Erdogan decides to fall in terms of siding more with Russia, siding more with NATO.
Obviously, given his control of the Bosphorus Strait, this plays a huge role in the Ukraine war, the Green Deal, everything else that we see going forward.
But not only that, but the relative I guess you could say quagmire that NATO now finds themselves in in Ukraine has created this opening for Russia to now press for some of these movements that we're seeing in Africa.
Things like Niger, things like Senegal, etc.
that France is now possibly getting involved in.
What I would say is also that these populist movements, one of the things that they do share in common, while Brexit, the Trump movement, or any of the presidency or prime ministership of Viktor Orban in Hungary, what they represent are essentially a rise in national sovereignty and a breakdown in this overall global order.
And do you think that's the same reason that these same entities view them as all part of the same vast threat network?
Yes.
And I wouldn't even necessarily look at it so much in terms of ideological or abstract terms so much as these same institutions, which are really, you know, institutions are not sentient.
really by institutions.
It's a short version of speaking of actual networks of people professional and social networks of people and These professional and social networks have their power Threatened both, you know according to their perception by
non-compliant regimes, like the whole story about how it looked like Russia was going to be just another vassal state of the United States.
But then Putin came and kind of unexpectedly reclaimed sovereignty for Russia in a way that the certain elements of the US power structure never forgave him for.
But similarly, and more threateningly from the domestic side, you have somebody who's not part of the club, not part of the power structure, has definitely not been vetted, and who's not entering power through these pre-established and ordained channels, and on top of that and who's not entering power through these pre-established and ordained channels, and on top of that has organic support from the
Just incidentally, I've spoken about this and written about this in the context of Trump and Carrie Lake, who I think are both really distinguished by their ability to connect directly with The voters and the more connection a politician has with the voters, the less leverage the handlers have.
And that's why a genuinely charismatic politician is inherently threatening to the order because they're not simply interchangeable because their charisma has a very real hold on the people who support them.
And so For that and many other reasons, Trump was kind of a unique threat and perceived as a unique threat.
And these are national security institutions.
And so their go-to approach to dealing with a threat is the same approach that they've used to deal with so-called authoritarian regimes that are, in their view, hostile to U.S.
interests and use the color revolution strategy, use various narrative strategies that we've talked about.
together on this program many times.
And so that's how the two kind of became linked together is institutionally and I guess cognitively, just as matter what they were focused on, they're used to dealing with threats in a certain way.
And that's exactly how they dealt with the threat of populism that was not coming from overseas, but was an organic phenomenon domestically.
That's exactly right.
John, we're We're coming up on a break right here, but when we get back, I want to tease out this question of the next election and what that represents.
I encourage people to, if you're interested in foreign policy, you got to follow Jack Sobik.
All right, we're here live in Washington, D.C., Devon Archer now testifying just down the way from the Human Events Studios here.
We do have breaking news.
This is Marjorie Taylor Greene has posted this on Telegram.
We're reaching out to her office to find out exactly what this means, but Marjorie Taylor Greene is now saying that, and I'm going to read this,
Biden lied, Devin Archer just confirmed it, and it seems, and then he posted a video talking about the meetings with the big guy, the meetings with his dad, saying my father is right here, essentially confirming the context of these messages, saying that his father is involved, that yes, in fact, that is exactly what's going on.
So we're going to get more from Archer and Taylor Greene, we're going to get more from others as it comes through.
Darren Beattie, here's my question though.
When we're talking about this system, there's really a question of what America is, and then a vision of what America will be in 5 years, 10 years, etc.
So, when you look at the 2024 election, obviously we know what Joe Biden is.
But there's something I think about Donald Trump that represents a different type of candidate than possibly RFK Jr., you could argue, than any other of the major candidates, let's say.
And that's because he seems to be interested in returning America back to its great power nation state status and really moving away from this global imperial reach.
Whereas the other leading candidates, whether it's the governor of Florida, whether it's former Vice President Pence, they don't seem to present that kind of vision.
And so when I look at President Trump, and as you say, the populist movement that organically grew up during, you know, honestly it goes back to the financial crisis, was the beginning of the Tea Party, and then Trump sort of comes in and harnesses this energy in 2016.
That it really does represent to me a different path for the United States going forward.
You could argue it's one that focuses more inward, but certainly when you look at the problems in our country and the problems on our border, the problems of mass migration, etc., it seems like those are a bit more pressing than who has particular control of one side of the Donbas.
Right.
No, absolutely.
And, you know, ultimately, it is about resources, you know, the small kind of illegitimate corrupt mafia that actually runs the US and arguably has run the US into the ground.
Just like any mafia, they're extremely jealous of the resources and loot that they've accumulated and toward the whole issue of
Ukraine is intertwined not only with loot in the kind of unsophisticated, you know, low level dollar store mafioso version that you see with Joe Biden, but also loot in the much grander sense of, you know, who holds sway over the European continent, who holds influence over a vast amount of resources.
There's the energy politics intertwined into it and the political leverage that comes with that, that, you know, that's all wrapped up into the question of, you know, the Nord Stream pipelines, which we obviously sabotaged.
So there's there's a whole lot wrapped into it.
And it is very important.
But, you know, ultimately, I think the question is, There's this small mafia that's interested in preserving their loot, even over in China.
It's about, you know, China is now, you know, used to be just kind of a non-threatening country that the people who ran the U.S.
could use to dispossess the American middle class, enrich China.
As a factory.
Yep, as a factory.
Dispossess the U.S.
middle class, outsource to China, In so doing enrich themselves, but also enrich China.
But the problem is China's gotten to the point where it's been enriched to the degree that it's actually a very capable and viable superpower competitor.
And so now the elite of the US that previously were happy to use China basically as a funnel to Uh, enhance their their own financial position now have come to view China as a competitor for the loot and resources.
And that's why you're starting to see even people like George Soros called for regime change in China.
George Soros of all people.
So you see it in various theaters geopolitically.
And you know, for the America first position, I think it all comes down to You know, in principle, Trump has no problem with securing the loot and securing the resources.
He's said this about Iraq.
He said this about many places.
Very, and very sensibly so.
But the issue is... Got a little trouble for saying that about Syria, by the way.
Saying, well, we're keeping the troops there to protect the oil.
And, you know, I remember all the neoliberals and Michael McFaul and all these people lost their minds.
No, it's about the, you know, the whatever minority group is in the area.
It's about the Yazidi.
And Trump said, no, it's about the oil.
It's obviously about the oil.
Yes, exactly.
And the thing is, is that The thing is, is that it's fine to care about the loot.
But the problem that we have now is that there's just a profound disconnect between the corrupt handful of elites that run the country and their possession of the loot, and the flourishing and prosperity of the average American citizen.
The loot doesn't transfer to the average American citizen.
And in a grander sense, America's geopolitical position of hegemony, the fact the idea of America maintaining itself as a superpower is less and less relevant to the day to day lives of American citizens.
So at the same time, you have this little mafia running things and trying to preserve the loot for themselves.
And you see streets like on Philadelphia, where it's looking worse than a third world society.
So we need to reestablish a connection between America's geopolitical power and the flourishing of average American citizens.
Otherwise, all of these calls to get involved in theaters across the globe will run on deaf ears.
Well Darren, walk us through then, if you're a voter, whether you're looking at the general election, obviously we have the primary first, but when you're looking out across the candidates, do you see any viable candidates outside of Trump that are actually offering this same vision of America?
This idea that America can return I have to run really quick.
status, it's nation state status, because when I look at and you saw this in when Tucker went through his his litany of interviews and, you know, asking basic questions to some of these candidates that I have to believe it.
I have to run really quick.
So I just want to answer that quickly and say the only real editor that Trump has in the primary is the DOJ.
The only real competitor that he has in the primary is the DOJ, which is using indictments to destroy him in the way that no other competitor, including DeSantis can.
And that That's why it's ridiculous to criticize him for collecting legal donations, because his primary challenge is from the legal domain.
from Biden's corrupt DOJ.
So, I wish I could say more.
I do have to run.
I'm sorry about that.
I hope to be back soon.
Folks, make sure that you go follow Darren Beattie, Revolver News.
Darren Beattie, always a pleasure to have you, sir, on.
And folks, this is what we have to look at as a country right now.
What should the role of the United States be?
What should the vision for the United States be?
And personally, I don't see anyone else on the stage right now as a viable candidate.
Maybe RFK, right?
We're talking geopolitics.
Remember, we're talking geopolitics.
Sure, there's lots of things that socially I could disagree with, with a guy like RFK Jr.
But when it comes to geopolitics, The understanding that America can focus on our own citizens.
The fact that we should focus on problems in our own backyard and our own sphere of influence.
That means North America, that means Latin America, the Caribbean, South America, broader out from there.
It doesn't mean we're isolationist either.
It doesn't mean that we forget about the rest of the world and doesn't mean that we Don't have trade and military agreements and alliances, but at the same time it also means that we don't feel the need to reach out and get involved in every single regional conflict or regional dispute that's going on all across the globe because it is not in our direct interest.
You know what's in my direct interest?
We were talking about Kensington lately, the Kensington area of Philadelphia.
And people go down there, and they film videos.
It's kind of become almost a rite of passage for candidates to go down.
So Vivek Ramaswamy went down with Benny Johnson, and they did a video there.
And DeSantis, I don't think DeSantis went to Kensington, but I know that he went to, I think it was San Francisco, he walked around, or LA, and it was one of these Skid Row type situations.
I remember when Kensington was a nice area.
And I posted videos of Kensington and a picture of Kensington on Twitter yesterday.
And I said, this is what Kensington looked like in the 1980s.
It was a nice shopping district.
Families could go there and buy water ice.
If you're from Philly, you know what water ice is, right?
You got to say it that way.
Water ice.
It's devolved into the walking dead of fentanyl now.
So I want to live in a country where I can walk down a main street in my city with my children safely and peacefully unmolested by druggies and fentanyl zombies and violent crime.
I don't care More about the needs of every single other story in the world as much as I care about my family.
And I think most voters feel the same way.
That's what I want.
Safe, functioning communities.
That's it.
And if that means that we only have limited resources and we have to deal with those limited resources in the way that we have to, then so be it.
Because I'll always choose my family first.
It's as simple as that.
I will always choose my family first.
And that's what it means about America first.
It doesn't mean America alone.
It doesn't mean America only.
It means we choose ourselves first.
We choose our families first.
We choose our kids first.
And I think when we talk about Sound of Freedom, child trafficking, etc.
That's why we are so focused On bringing these issues to light, to raising awareness to them, not to mention the greater understanding that these conflicts in the world are used to exacerbate child trafficking.
We can fix this, folks.
It's all within our grasp.
Coming up next, Terry Schilling is going to talk about how.
Talk about influences.
These are influences and they're friends of mine, Jack.
Where's Jack?
Jack?
He's done a great job.
All right, ladies and gentlemen, we are back here live, Washington, D.C., as Devin Archer continues his closed-door testimony.
Just blocks away, right on the hill.
We're working very hard, diligently, Human Events Sources, there on the hill, discussing with House members and House staff about what's going on.
We're getting past a few things right now, but as we know, the testimony is ongoing.
The hearing is ongoing.
We're going to continue to be able to monitor that.
And from what I hear, again, like I hear, he is talking.
So, we need to understand how our country got to where it is.
But we also need to know, we also need to know where our country is going.
And we talk about trial trafficking so much.
Because this is an issue that I think has absolutely inflamed the right, it's inflamed independents, parents, families, people are alerted and aware because of the movie Sound of Freedom and so many others that they don't understand or they haven't understood how bad this problem has gotten in our country.
But one thing the movie does focus on, even though the movie is more, it's obviously more focused on the supply side, but it touches briefly on the demand side, and that's why I wanted to bring in Terry Schilling here from the American Principles Project.
Terry, first time on the show, funny enough, even though we've been buds for a while, we were always going on War Room together, but Terry, walk us through how it is that the Big porn essentially benefits from child sexual abuse material and then even writ larger is able to incorporate that into larger pornography exploitation in the United States.
Well, thanks so much for having me, Jack.
And, you know, I love coming on and I love talking to you.
I learn something every time you and I are together.
So we have to think about all of these different things that are destroying our country as industries.
And what happens is, is when you mainstream them and they start to make profits, like we've seen with pornography, They reinvest those profits into expansion, whether it's PR campaigns, changing the laws, or getting into campaigns and elections.
They reinvest their profits and then they grow and protect their interests and keep making more and more money.
And so what's happening is, The online porn industry has exploded.
It's a multi, multi-billion dollar industry now.
And those billions of dollars are getting pumped into legal challenges, the law fair.
They're getting pumped into advocacy and campaigns and lobbying.
And the lobbyists are working to secure their profits.
Now, from a macro standpoint, ultimately what the porn industry has done is they've changed how Americans view sexual relations.
They convinced Generation after generation of young men in America, that porn is a better alternative to actually having sex.
It's easier.
It's less risky.
You're not going to get a girl pregnant or get an STD.
And so you have these generations, like my generation, including people like myself, who were harmed by this propaganda campaign.
And our views on sexuality have been greatly perverted, literally perverted, that's the perfect word for it, into something that is destructive.
And it's led to a growing industry that is now eating our sons and daughters alive.
You've seen OnlyFans.
That's a great example of the expansive nature of the porn industry.
But as the legitimate, as the white label has grown, the black label has had even more of a demand.
Because it's never enough.
It's just like drugs.
You start with weed, you then go on to coke, then you have a little bit of heroin.
No one starts with heroin.
They always start with something much smaller.
And it just feeds and feeds and feeds because you're never going to be satiated from it.
Well, I think that's exactly right, and when you look in terms of the numbers that have been going through in this, and Pornhub has been sued again and again for having girls on there, number one, that have been exploited, videos that they didn't know were being used, and then also girls who were underage, that were under 18 at the time of the filming.
Terry, what is APP working on?
Because I know there's some new legislation that states are looking at.
States are the laboratories of democracy, and you're triggering a lot of people per usual, so I like you.
What is some of the legislation you guys are backing?
Well, the first legislation that we're championing is age verification.
And it's very simple, Jack.
We want online porn to be treated just like online alcohol, like online nicotine, like online marijuana, like online sports betting, and we want these websites and these businesses to have to verify that the users and the viewers are of age before they give them this.
You know, part of the thing that frustrates me, Jack, is I've got six kids myself, and who knows, it might turn into seven or eight or nine, whatever guy gives us.
Let's go!
No, no one's protecting my kids.
I'm the only one that's tasked with doing that, and it's way tough.
But why can't my kids go on to DraftKings.com and place a $10 bet on the Cubs to win the World Series, but they can go to Pornhub and watch the most violent and disgusting material that would make even the most perverted degenerates of the 1970s blush?
It's out of control, and all we're pushing for is equality and fairness.
This is something that even Democrats are getting behind.
In Virginia, for example, by the way, we're up to seven states, and Virginia was the seventh state that did it.
But in Virginia, we had a super majority in both the House and the Senate.
Only three Democrats voted against it in the Senate.
This is a bipartisan thing.
Everyone knows we need to do it.
It's just the porn industry that's fighting this.
Well, it's an interesting take because there's this idea that age verification, so one of the things they pushed back on, and I saw this over the weekend, where there were, I guess it was MindGeek, which is the company that runs really a lot of these sites, was saying, oh, well, actually we're on the side of privacy because you're forcing people to have to verify their age No, that's exactly right, Jack, and I want to point something out, and I know that your viewer base is probably like The War Room in that they're at a higher level of information voters.
is claiming the moral high ground.
No, that's exactly right, Jack.
And I want to point something out.
And I know that your viewer base is probably like the war room and that they're at a higher level of information voters.
So the reason why they say that they're protecting privacy is because this is obscenity, right?
And so you have to get back.
The porn industry argues that you can't regulate porn because it's protecting the First Amendment.
It's free speech.
There's just one problem.
The First Amendment has never protected obscenity, it's never protected libel, and it's never protected seditious libel.
So they have been arguing that porn is not obscenity.
Please don't laugh at that.
I don't know how they argue with a straight face that porn is not obscenity, but their arguments that they need to protect the identity of their users is an argument that this is obscenity.
Why are you concerned about privacy if this is sports?
I don't care if people know that I've placed bets on the Cubs to win the World Series, as embarrassing as that may be.
I don't care if people find out that I bought alcohol online or even marijuana online.
What I do care about is if someone got my porn history, right?
And that is the reality here.
It's a shameful act.
And this is what the porn industry is trying to protect.
It is obscenity.
You can regulate it.
And in fact, I think that because it's obscenity and everyone knows it, you probably could ban it wholesale.
So they should be happy that we're compromising here and just protecting minors.
Well, I think that's exactly right, because when we look at the legislation that's out there right now, and look, you've got kids, I've got kids, you know, and I try to lock down, by the way, when I go, you know, we've got a smart TV, but I try to lock down in terms of the apps that are on there.
But that being said, our oldest son is five.
He is going to figure out very quickly how to start downloading those apps again, how to get stuff on there.
I'm sure he's going to figure out.
I had this one thing where I tried to get around the I would turn the Wi-Fi off on the TV.
He figured it out in five seconds.
And so my point is that if you do not have any legislation that is enforcing these companies to do this, the kids are going to figure out the tech.
They're very tech savvy.
This is not like how it was in the old days where you had the No, it's in your own home, and it's in there already.
the video store with it with the curtain that had to go in the back, etc.
No, it's in your own home and it's in there already.
People don't understand that.
It's in their pocket, right?
If your kid has a tablet or a smartphone, every kid has the most expansive porn library that's ever existed in the history of humanity, right?
That's a reason why we need to reign this industry in.
It's okay that it exists.
I hate that it exists, but it exists.
We have to at least regulate it and put safeguards in place.
But the porn industry is actually arguing that they can't do it.
Meanwhile, we know they can.
They have If the sports betting sites, if the gambling sites, if the alcohol sites, if the marijuana sites, those are all smaller industries than the porn industry.
If they can afford to do this and if they can figure out the technology to do it, then the porn industry can and the porn industry must.
Porn is a much bigger threat to our country than alcohol.
It's a much bigger threat to our country than gambling.
It's a much bigger threat to our country than weed.
It is one of the biggest threats to our country.
It is literally We're coming up on a hard break.
Give me one second here.
I want to pause you for just one second.
I'll hold you over to finish your segment.
And then we also want to talk about what do we do next?
How do we win?
When I grew up in the hood, I rolled with bloods.
And them boys had a saying.
You can't be listening to all that slappy whack.
Trim out his eyelets, a bam, ship.
Nippy, bam, bam.
Alright folks, breaking news out of the Devin Archer hearing.
We had the testimony that came out.
Look, folks, we told you that he was going to spill the beans.
We told you that he was talking.
He's talking, folks.
Archer testified that Hunter Biden put then Vice President Joe Biden, we got this from Chad Pergram, on the speakerphone during business meetings over 20 times.
That Joe Biden was put on the phone to sell the brand.
These phone calls included a dinner in Paris with a French energy company and in China with Jonathan Lee of Bohai Resolute.
So, And it goes on and on and on that he was directly, directly involved with these businesses.
That's what we've got out of the Devin Archer hearings, breaking news, here live, human events.
Go back to Terry here.
Terry, we're fighting these massive institutions.
You're going up, obviously, against one of the most well-funded institutions in America.
But at the same time, there is a moral quotient to this.
But I think there's another way, because we talk so much about how young men are affected by Abuse of pornography, but women are affected in a way too.
And that's something where, look, you've got this Barbie movie out there, which I'm not a fan of, but it talks about female empowerment.
Well, is going on OnlyFans and doing porn empowering for young women?
No, it's actually the exact opposite.
It's pure and unadulterated exploitation of the worst kind.
One of the worst things that OnlyFans has done, Jack, is it's turned every single American daughter into a potential prostitute online.
And they're selling their entire bodies, everything, and they're doing degrading things for $5 a month.
It's absolutely disgusting.
We need, Jack, I think one of the most interesting things, the libertarians will hate this, but we should look at occupational licensing reform for the porn industry, right?
Why do barbers have to go through all of these licensings and trainings in order to cut hair?
Exactly, yes.
And hairdressers the same way, but these porn stars don't have to do any type of psychological testing, right?
I don't think you should be able, many of these girls and men in the porn industry are Are victims of sexual abuse themselves, and they go on to continue the dysfunction and the chaos and the pain.
There's suicide, the drug use rates are incredibly high with these people.
We should do occupational licensing reform.
Make sure that they've had a psychiatric evaluation, that they aren't suffering from sexual trauma that then the porn industry is exploiting to make even more money from them.
It's absolutely devastating and we need to protect our girls, Jack.
And on top of that, even if you're not a porn star, women are still affected by this, right?
Because your husband has probably seen porn.
He has probably been exposed to things that no person should be exposed to.
Violent and disgusting and degrading things.
It's hurting all of our kids.
I know so many Eligible, beautiful, smart, intelligent, wealthy girls who are unmarried in their late 30s and even early 40s because they can't find a guy.
Well, that's because guys are too busy with their computer screens.
And we've seen this problem play out extensively in Japan.
Where parents actually have to hire prostitutes in order to get their sons away from online porn and from their computer screens.
They have to actually convince their sons and their men there that women are a better alternative to porn.
This is totally crazy and it's the path that America is headed down until we get our hands around this really terrible and exploitative industry.
Terry, I couldn't commend you more.
By the way, while I have you on, let me get your take on this breaking news, this fact that it does essentially sound like he spilled the beans.
Devin Archer testifying, Biden on the speakerphone.
I mean, obviously, I don't think that we've got a government that's going to do anything about anything that you're talking about right now in terms of this administration, but I mean, what does this say for our government that is essentially, we're bought and sold.
We're just straight up bought and sold.
Well, Jack, I mean, you're much closer to the intelligence apparatus than I am, and you're much more into it.
These guys have known about everything that we're now finding out about Joe Biden and his son, Hunter.
It's all coming to light.
And you know what, Terry?
You know what the tie is?
Actually, you know what the tie is between what you're saying?
Sorry to cut you off real quick.
It's that Hunter Biden His vices that you're talking about were then used against him as a way to get to the father.
They plied him with women, they plied him, obviously there's a lot of pornography used on that laptop, him filming his own stuff at one point and another, there's stuff with The, I'm just going to say the family and the extended family.
This is what's being run.
This is how our government's being run behind closed doors.
And then it turns out that foreign adversaries are using America's vices and lack of morals to apparently get whatever favors they want through our government.
It's amazing.
It's absolutely amazing.
It's exactly right, Jack, and this is why it's incredibly important to put people in power that just don't care, that are sick and tired of the blackmail, that are sick and tired of all of the BS that's going to get thrown out.
They slandered the Trump family for decades.
For a decade now.
And it's just so reprehensible.
Had his children or Donald Trump been tied into anything even close to this, he would have actually been impeached.
Look, Jack, I think our real problem as a country and as a party is we're run by sellout Republicans.
And those seller Republicans are afraid of their own shadow.
I forget who tweeted it, it might have been you even, but they pointed out that Democrats use money to get power and Republicans use power to get money.
It's exactly the problem.
If we just had a party that would just try and oppose the Democrats, we would win every election and every policy battle from here to kingdom come.
It's because they're throwing the game and they're playing the role of the controlled opposition.
That's exactly right.
And we also have here as well, I'm reading it, Devin Archer testified that Hunter Biden intervened with his father to stop the investigation of Burisma.
So guess what, folks?
It was exactly what it looked like all along.
But now you've got a guy Who was inside the room, who was in the deal, that's testifying directly to all this.
This isn't a laptop.
This is the business partner of Hunter Biden.
Terry Schilling, where can people go to follow you and get all the latest from and in your fight?
Well, the first thing I would tell everyone to do is go to protectkids.us and sign our petition for age verification and for stopping Joe Biden's Equality Act.
The other thing is you can follow me across the board on social media at Schilling1776 across all the platforms.
