All Episodes
Previous Next
May 4, 2022 - Praying Medic
35:17
229V Q May 3, 2022

Posts by the @q account on Truth Social for May 3, 2022.My Q archives: https://prayingmedic.com/q-videos/

| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Good afternoon, patriots.
I'm Praying Medic, and this is my At Cue update.
For Tuesday, May 3rd, 2022, welcome to the broadcast.
This update is for those of you who are interested in posts by the AtQ account on True Social.
I can't say with certainty that this is the same person or group that has posted on 4chan, 8chan, and 8kun over the last four years, but evidence is growing to suggest that it is, and we're going to present more evidence today.
I have been absent for a few weeks.
Thank you for hanging in there and being patient.
I went to Nashville, attended ThreadFest, actually spoke there, and had a really good time meeting with everyone.
I do appreciate everyone who came out to see me.
It was a great event.
We saw a lot of people healed.
And I'm back in the saddle again, doing my updates.
Alright, so we left off, April 13th was my last broadcast, so we're going to pick up on April 14th.
On that day, AtQ responded to a post by Donald Trump Jr.
on True Social, who wondered why the security cameras didn't work in a Brooklyn subway during a shooting.
So, Don Jr.
"Why do the security cameras never seem to work when the reality of a crime isn't good for the leftist narrative?" And Q responded, "Oh, we know why." And then, five minutes later, Q retruthed and responded to a post by Andrew Northwall, "FYI, glad we are all out of the Twitter sewer and here together."
Link to a New York Post article that explains why President Trump says he will not return to Twitter if Elon Musk buys it.
And Elon is in the process of purchasing Twitter.
It hasn't been finalized.
The deal has to be approved by the SEC.
It's in the works, but it looks like it's going to go through.
So Q responded, going back to this shycom dump.
We'd be giving it a smidge of credibility that it is far from deserving.
And then Daddy Trump responded, hi Q, have a beautiful day.
And Q responded, you too, friend.
And on April 20th, at Q responded to the thread below.
So Lily Puchin said this, Of course, anyone can have an opinion on anything, and the beauty of true social is that we are free to express those opinions, but quite honestly, at one point, you insinuated to a degree that something outlandish or far-fetched should not be allowed.
That is what many people here have a problem with.
We embrace this platform because it does allow it.
Americans are pretty dang smart.
And then Wishing Karma said, Good morning.
Yeah, we pretty much beat this topic to death yesterday.
Continue discussing it if you'd like with others.
Feel free to scroll through the whole thread and see what the conclusion ended up being.
Have a great day, Lily P.
John Kinsella said, Yeah, we sure did.
And I'm good with where we both ended up.
It was a great discussion.
And then Q responded, This right here is the best part about true social, differing opinions, respectful arguments, and most importantly, no overlords to get in the way of real discourse.
This is how we make each other better.
And then Venus Visitor said, Iron sharpens iron.
And Anne Augustine Q provided a little bit of technical support.
He said you should be able to mute the conversation via the ellipsis.
So if you go into the conversation and hit the menu option, you can select mute the conversation.
and on and on.
And Q provided a little bit of technical support.
Said you should be able to mute the conversation via the ellipsis, so if you go into the conversation and hit the menu option, you can select mute the conversation, you won't get notifications anymore about that thread.
On April 21st, @Q posted the message below.
It's going to be a good day.
And Victorious Mother wrote, I can use a really good day right now.
We all could.
And then Q responded, you've got this.
We've got this.
April 22nd was Flannel Friday and Q posted this.
It is a screen cap of a gas pump with gas prices higher than they were last year and someone wrote on the gas pump, Joe did that.
There's also a little sticker that says Joe did that.
So Q said the people will be heard on Flannel Friday.
Cash Patel responded to Q's post and then Q retruthed it.
So Cash wrote this.
Hashtag flannel.
Q and Joe Biden gas all on rumble.
Hashtag true social mega rollout coincidence.
Where are you Devin Nunes?
Must be flannel shopping with Dan Scavino.
Who wants in the club?
Come on over to FWK Game On.
Fight with Cash is his website.
And there's a link to it.
Coach Patriot responded to Kash Patel.
It's getting too warm for flannel Fridays.
What's next?
And then Sue wrote, flannel tank tops.
And Q said, adapting to the situation.
I love it.
Alright, Q retruthed a post by Devin Nunes.
It was an interview that he did with Just the News, Real America's Voice with John Solomon reports.
And for some reason it did not show up on Q's True Social Timeline, but I did find it on QAG.News.
Q reposted the message below.
This is an old post from several weeks ago.
True Social will be the new social media home for millions.
And then Q reposted a message that was originally posted about two months earlier on February 21st.
There have been many guesses as to its meaning, but Q has not yet confirmed any of them.
But we have a series of numbers here.
Some people have said they might be latitude and longitude coordinates.
Well, that's possible, except that some of these numbers are negative.
And not that you couldn't just put a negative sign in there, but normally the latitude and longitude are not in negative integers.
So we have 18.299999923706054.
And a bunch of other numbers here, I'm not going to read them all out.
But that is some kind of a puzzle, and no one has yet figured out what it means.
Alright, then a minute later, Q reposted the P equals 23 riddle and noted that although some people are getting close, it remains unsolved.
So we have this phrase here which has already been decoded, and then P equals 23.
Julian's ROM asked, can you throw us another little hint?
And then Q responded with 50-20, 3-D, 20-70, 6-F, 73-74.
And someone responded, ah, now I see where the P equals post is coming from.
I'm back on the Q-post train.
And then wrote, so it turns out there's a ton of post numbers if you include double digits.
I think I've got them all, so might as well post them if anyone is curious.
Word of caution for those to be relevant, one of them would have to turn out to be the most obvious no-brainer ever.
Otherwise, possibly wild goose chase.
Yale Ph.D.
has been following this thread.
One of the numbers can be zero.
And then a non-famous said don't get him started.
We're yucking it up here because you guys have been talking about this for weeks.
So, Anonfamous says, Dude, relax.
We got confirmation that P equals posts, which I was waiting for.
Now we're waiting for another confirmation.
Which one of the 15 posts it is?
EOPHD had previously posted a chart that had all of the numbers that have three digits that add up to 23.
Because Q basically said that they're looking for a combination of numbers that adds up to 23, and it is a post number.
So, a non-famous said, dude, relax.
We've got confirmation that P equals posts, which I was waiting for.
Now we're waiting for another confirmation to which one of the 15 posts it is.
AwakendOutlaw said, did we snag all of them in one place yet, or do you want me to handle it?
A non-famous responded, yeah, I've posted the majority of the posts separately related to certain topics, but we should have all 15 in one spot.
Go for it.
And then AwakendOutlaw said, I figured it would be just good to snare them all together so we can continue considering them side by side as we hopefully figure it out.
Nonfamous said, great idea, maybe we can get Lil Q to like one of the posts lol.
And then Lil Q chimed in, remember the Queen too.
And then, at PatCon wrote, I've seen all the current events referred to as a chess game.
The queen is the most powerful piece on the board.
Checkmate, maybe?
And then, at Q responded with a magnifying glass.
So, an indication that that's worth looking into.
Now, in response to a comment on this thread, Q posted this reply and then later deleted it.
So, Joan M wrote, aren't we all way beyond riddles?
And then Q responded, maybe you are Joan, maybe you are.
And then we have this coded message at the bottom.
It's just a series of dots.
It's four dots, and then four dots, two dots, three, one, four, slash, four dots, four dots, two, three, two, four, right?
So it goes like this in a series.
There's no dashes, it's not Morse code.
I don't know what this coded message is.
No one has come up with a solution for this yet.
And we'll cover this in just a second, because it comes up again.
So non-famous now is going to go through all the posts from Q's board where the three digit post numbers add up to 23.
So he writes, here's a summary for those that are trying to solve the P equals 23 from Q. Q has made confirmations by replying or liking posts about where to look or what's right.
Julian's realm cracked the word cipher.
It's archived to English, translated into, once a learned person wants to understand their submission, the queen is destroyed.
Q confirmed he was right by replying to his post with a busted up Queen.
Here's the original for comparison.
So normal playing card on the right.
The Queen playing card that Q posted has reversed eyes, blood on the hand, and several other anomalies, which I covered in a previous message.
It's going to continue.
A week later, at Q gave us another hint.
P equals 23, the sum of three numbers.
Yale PhD found 15 three-digit numbers that add up to 23.
And then Q liked the photo, this one, with the chart.
So we're going to look at post number 698, 779, 788, and all these other posts here that add up to 23.
Last night, Q confirmed P equals post with this decipher.
The numbers converted into P equals post using hexadecimal to text.
So when Julian's room asked, can you throw us in a little hint, and Q replied with 50, 20, 3D, 20, 70, this sequence, P equals post hexadecimal to text.
So if you go to this website, Hex to text.
If you put in the numbers that Q posted, it comes out P equals post.
It's a code.
And here's a link.
You want to check it out.
So, continuing.
An unfamous said, done this morning?
At Q replied to me, confirming to make a thread with all 15 posted add up to 23.
I'll add them below.
They're coming here.
Now, I want to say one thing.
There's a lot of speculation about post numbers.
And what is the meaning of post numbers?
I am a little bit hesitant to assign too much meaning to post numbers because the post numbers are actually arbitrary.
And strictly speaking, they're not correct.
And what I mean by that is, if you go back and look at all the posts that Q has posted, the numbering convention that's used by websites, number one, is not consistent.
And number two, you have to factor in the fact that some of Q's posts have been deleted and reposted twice.
So the very first post by Q is actually two posts, but it's given a one post number on most websites.
Quite a few posts were deleted.
And then Q reposted some of them, but not all of them.
So then you have to figure out, okay, well, the duplicate posts that Q put out, are those supposed to have one post number because it's a duplicate, or are they supposed to have two post numbers?
When Q first posted on a Koon after that new board was created, there were three initial posts by Q.
And only two of them were picked up.
One of them wasn't.
And it was a post by Q. It's a test post.
That post number is not included in all the Q posts.
So, when you get into this question of what do the post numbers mean, you have to be a little bit careful because there's a lot of inconsistency in the way that the posts are numbered.
And there's, like I said, duplicate posts.
So what I think we're getting at here with these post numbers is that Q has a particular post number in mind that I think is going to be a future proves past and Q is hinting to us it's one of these posts.
We don't know which one it is.
All right, so I think that we're just taking a shot.
There's 15 different posts where the post numbers add up to 23.
And I suspect that at a later date, one of these posts is going to become relevant.
So we're going to start with post 599.
This is from January 23, 2018.
Do not glorify us.
We are all patriots.
Honor those who serve for God, humanity, and country.
Where we go one, we go all.
Cue.
Then we have post 689.
So this was an original post by an Anon who had a link to a Sean Hannity tweet.
Then there's, at 2046, FBI informant on Uranium One breaks silence today.
This is a Sarah Carter story about Uranium One informant.
And then Q wrote, what a coincidence, re-read recent drops regarding Uranium One informant.
Why did we refocus energy on this when it was out of the news cycle?
Critical thinking.
Q.
I suspect there's a good possibility this may be the post Q is referring to.
And the reason I say that is U.S.
Attorney Huber investigated Uranium One and the Clinton Foundation for several years.
That has all been turned over to Durham.
A lot of people are kind of focused on Spygate and what Durham is doing with Spygate, but Durham also has all the information and investigation that Hubert did on Uranium One and the Clinton Foundation, so I suspect this might be the post Q is referring to, but I don't know for sure.
So then there's post 698, U.S.
Secret Service on high alert, and that was from February 8th.
And we have this post, number 779.
This is a response by Q on February 15th at 1609 to a post made a few minutes earlier at 1601.
So the original post is, why is everything really made in China?
Cost savings.
Why is POTUS focused on Saudi Arabia, China, and Russia?
Why?
Why is Russia being used against POTUS?
Why Russia?
What damage can Russia do to DEMS?
What damage can China do to DEMS?
Iran?
North Korea?
Why does Hussein, Barack Obama, travel before and after POTUS regarding foreign trips?
Use logic.
Why is POTUS focused on bringing back manufacturing, jobs, security, control, true control?
Who can you trust?
The world is not how you view it.
Trust the plan.
We are winning.
Arrests will come.
Logic should answer.
Why it must follow other unfolding events.
Learn and spread.
Build proofs.
We've provided many proofs that cannot be disputed as coincidences.
This was done for a reason.
More will be provided.
Direct confirmation will come.
It cannot come now.
It will be lost.
The message is not ready.
You are part of the Army.
We are depending on you for Ghana Country.
Where we go one, we go all.
Stay safe this week.
Q. That was the original post and then Q responded.
Consumer Protection Agency.
Senator Warren.
Corruption infiltration slush fund.
Hashtag goodbye.
Q. So the first post is pretty self-explanatory.
The second post was a revelation that the Consumer Protection Agency was set up by the Elizabeth Warren as a slush fund where Democrats could use the money for whatever they wanted.
Alright, that could be the post that Q is talking about.
Like I said, I don't know.
Post 788, and this is a screen cap of a tweet by President Trump.
Hillary Clinton should have been prosecuted and should be in jail.
Instead, she's running for president in what looks like a rigged election.
And then Q wrote, thoughts of the current President of the United States.
That was from February of 2018.
We have post 797, stay tuned, everything is meaning or purpose, at Jack, getting nervous, phase 2, in brackets, Q. This is an interesting post because Q was talking about Jack Dorsey, who was then CEO of Twitter, and there was a number of posts back then.
Suggesting that Dorsey was leveraged into his position and controlled.
Interesting to see how Dorsey is now talking about the takeover of Twitter by Elon Musk.
Then we have this post, 869.
So there's an image which is a screenshot of a city in China.
The date is March 7th, 2018.
It looks like at that time people from the NSA We're live tracking movements by Edward Snowden and Q wrote a series of messages to Snowden while he was moving through China and said, Shall we play a game?
Find at Snowden.
Iden plus one.
Happy hunting.
Q. A lot of people don't realize that Snowden, although he's portrayed by the media as a hero, He was actually a CIA asset who was sent in to the NSA to exfiltrate the program's X-key score in PRISM.
Make them public to give the NSA a black eye.
And that helped the CIA in their war against the NSA.
Long story, I'm not going to go into that too much more.
But some of my older videos discuss what was going on back then.
And then we have post 878.
Do you trust Sessions?
Boom.
Cue.
Then we have post 887.
So Anon wrote, why the stop in Hawaii after?
That still makes me wonder.
And Q responded, Defcon, no such agency.
We knew.
How did we know?
Who did we meet?
Need to know kept to five people plus special security detail future proofs past.
Q. This was a really great post.
All right, so a little backstory on this.
The Anon was talking about President Trump's stop in Hawaii on his return from his trip He went to China and several other countries in Asia in November of 2017 after he was sworn in as president.
And he left the Philippines ahead of schedule, made an unscheduled stop in Hawaii for refueling supposedly.
And Q hinted that Trump actually stopped in Hawaii to talk to someone at the NSA and get some information.
All right.
And this was, um, again, like I said, this was in November of 2017.
And in January of 2018, there was a DEFCON situation where in Hawaii, uh, there was a missile alert.
There was supposedly an incoming missile that was going to strike Hawaii.
And for about a half hour, people thought they were going to die.
And Q hinted that Trump was given information from the NSA about that pending missile strike DEFCON situation, right?
From NSA.
So Q says, we knew.
How did we know?
Who did we meet?
Need to know kept the five people.
And like I said, if you go back to my March 8th, 2018 video, it's in my archives on my website.
You can get more information on that particular series of posts.
Then we have post 896.
896. This is in a non-asking queue, are we going to have more freedom of speech on private public speech services or not?
Please answer this question.
Q said 100% regulated.
Some platforms will collapse under their own weight of illegal activities.
So that could be the one that Q is talking about.
We have post 959.
And this is from March 20th, 2018.
MZ Mark Zuckerberg, RT Rex Tillerson.
Big meeting.
Cell phones left at door.
Plus eight.
Five political.
One former Intel director.
Mask and spin.
IDEN friendly insiders.
MSM support and talking points.
Shift narrative.
Fail.
We hear you.
We have the algorithm.
Thank you Snowden.
Learn chess.
Down she goes.
Nobody escapes this.
Nobody.
Cue.
I would love it if that was a post that Q is talking about because there's a lot of people that Q is referring to in this post who are corrupt and it has to do with social media control of the algorithm which it sounds like Eric Schmidt may have written the algorithm that does censorship and is used across many platforms.
But it sounds like Snowden helped implement it.
He's tied into that whole thing.
Like I said, there's a lot of old posts where Q talks about Snowden working with social media to help their censorship.
Then we have post 968.
Q wrote, "Who else was at the meeting in China?" Live from China.
Operation, window, clean, purpose, future proves past, everything has meaning.
Q. This post is connected to a number of other posts from March 27th that all are related to Kim Jong Un's travel to China to meet with President Xi and also President Trump's visit to China.
And Q has suggested that Trump actually met with Kim In the Forbidden City, when he met with President Xi in China, and they worked out a deal to denuclearize the North Korean peninsula.
Alright, so Q asks here, who else was at the meeting in China, live from China?
The live from China part was, Q was posting images from Air Force One during the trip to China.
So, is this going to be a future proves past?
It could be.
And we've got post 977.
So Anon wrote, seeing a lot of your leaks lately friend, good to have a friend leaker for once.
And then Q responded, HRC 2.12.09 very bad.
Q. Then we have post 986.
There's a link to a Breitbart article here.
Jonathan Turley said that Jeff Sessions' decision to use Utah federal prosecutors better than Trump, appointing a second special counsel, And again, this is about Huber.
So, Q wrote, Why was this made public?
John Huber appointed by.
Removed by.
Reappointed by.
Why the reboot?
Think logically.
History books.
Q. And we have post 995.
Q wrote, Future proves past.
Several today.
In brackets, one day.
R.R.
Rod Rosenstein.
Military.
Border.
Keep watching the news.
April.
A's in brackets.
Moab.
Q.
And a non-famous said, Sorry for blowing up your feed, but a lot of people were confused regarding what I was looking at, so I decided to make a one-stop shop for everyone.
End of thread.
EOPHD wrote, I think this is important too.
And this was Q's reminder at the end of the thread previously that Q said, remember the Queen too.
And also, when Joan wrote, aren't we way beyond riddles, and then Q wrote, maybe you are, and there's his coded message.
So non-famous responded to Yale PhD and said, in my humble opinion, he felt he was too harsh on her, so he deleted that post, meaning it's not worth looking into.
Q responded, first part, yes.
Sorry, Joan M. So Q felt kind of bad for trolling Joan, so he did delete this post.
But it is of relevance, and actually Q then re-truthed this.
I think this is important.
And a non-famous wrote, well, Q re-truthed it, so let's dig.
And like I said, we don't have a decode yet for this post.
Moving along, Red Pill Pharmacist is not going to get in the act.
The title of the show she's appearing in is The Queen of All Queens, which reminds me of the Q-Post with the Queen card.
So here's the Queen card.
And then, screenshot from an article from The Hill, Nancy Pelosi is going to make RuPaul's Drag Race appearance.
So here's the story.
Nancy Pelosi is going to make a special appearance on the upcoming season of RuPaul's Drag Race All Stars, Paramount announced on Friday.
The new season of the Drag Queen competition premieres on May 20th.
on the streaming network and will follow previous winners who are duking it out to earn the title of queen of all queens, $200,000 cash prize.
So @double posted this meme, the queen on the card looks like Nancy Pelosi and everything.
Q thought that was funny.
Q retruthed this meme with Chris Wallace holding a sign that says, "Jobless, please help." And then Q wrote, "Glad to see the one who's 117,000 here.
This was back around the 20th when Q had got 117,000 followers.
And then Justice at Justice LC wrote thankful and Q retruthed that.
Yanya Kellek got retruthed by Q.
So this is an original post.
It's a tweet by Elon Musk.
It says, True Social is currently beating Twitter and TikTok in the Apple store.
And then Yanya Kellek said, Elon Musk, True Social is currently beating Twitter and TikTok in the Apple store.
And then Q wrote, Elon, are you here now?
So, is Elon Musk on True Social?
On April 28th, President Trump posted on True Social for the first time since the platform launched.
And cue Retruth at Post.
I'm back.
Go Fefe!
And lots of discussion about what Covfefe means.
I'm not going to go into it.
You can look at what you think it means.
Actually, Dan Scavino did an interview with Laura Trump and said, you know, at some point in the future, we'll tell you what it means.
The people who need to know what it means, they know what it means.
All right.
On May 1st, President Trump held a rally in Nebraska.
And as he was leaving, he made an air cue.
Lines Not Sheep 22 said, boom, finished off with an air cue.
and then Q retruth that post.
And here's the video.
- That's an air cue, boom. - And this brings us to last night.
So, a draft opinion authored by U.S.
Supreme Court Justice Alito seems to indicate that the court is going to overturn Roe v. Wade, leaving the states to decide if abortions will be allowed.
That draft opinion is from February and it was leaked to Politico and published yesterday.
So here's a link to it and there was a lot of discussion about it last night.
AtQ posted an excerpt from the article and wrote, When was the last time we saw a leak from SCOTUS?
We're living in unprecedented times, folks.
And the highlighted part here is, No draft decision in the modern history of the court has been disclosed publicly while a case was still pending.
That is true.
A draft decision has never been leaked to the press.
It's unprecedented.
The Washington Post wrote an article last night saying that A final decision on Roe vs. Wade back when it was originally decided.
That final decision was leaked to the press a couple of hours before it was made public, but no draft decision has ever been leaked.
So people are wondering, why was this leaked?
Ryan here said liberals clearly trying to sway a decision.
Watch the media and politicians start threatening riots if it's overturned.
And then Q wrote end an election coming soon.
Bernie Sanders and Adam Schiff didn't waste any time calling for federal legislation to allow abortion, which may have been the main objective of the leak.
So Bernie Sanders wrote Congress must pass legislation that codifies Roe vs. Wade as the law of the land in this country now, and if there aren't 60 votes in the Senate to do it, and there are not, we must end the filibuster to pass with 50 votes.
Adam Schiff wrote, there are no words to adequately describe a draft SCOTUS opinion outlawing the right to choose.
It's devastating for millions of women who will lose the right to make their health care decisions thanks to a partisan court.
Congress must pass abortion protections now.
I don't think that's going to happen.
They're not going to get over the 60 vote filibuster.
And they're not going to get rid of the filibuster.
Manchin and Kyrsten Sinema are not going to let that happen.
They've already voted against it.
So I don't think we're going to see any federal legislation on that.
But they're going to try.
And that brings us to this post by President Trump yesterday.
So the President posted this link to the article in the Washington Times, the Russia Russia Russia hoax exposed.
And it is about the Clinton campaign officials claiming attorney-client privilege to keep their documents secret.
And Durham is going to go after those documents.
I'm just going to read a little bit of this.
Special Counsel Durham has revealed that employees of the research firm Fusion GPS sent journalists hundreds of emails with unverified accusations against President Trump to trigger negative news stories.
Durham was responding to efforts of people with ties to Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign, Hillary for America, to keep potentially explosive evidence out of his hands during an upcoming trial of a Clinton campaign lawyer accused of lying to the FBI.
That would be Sussman.
The problem is that Hillary for America and the DNC and all the parties involved, they're saying that these documents are under attorney-client privilege, yet they were giving them to members of the news.
And you can't have it both ways.
If you're leaking information to the news, you can't claim attorney-client privilege.
So Durham's going to get these documents.
One way that we know President Trump and Q are working together is that they frequently post at exactly the same time.
There are 1,440 minutes in a 24-hour day.
If two people were to post on social media once a day, what are the odds that they would post at exactly the same time?
Well, the odds are one in 1,440, that they would post at the same time.
President Trump made one post on True Social yesterday.
It was the above article about Durham's investigation of Spygate.
Below is a screencap from qag.news.
That site aggregates posts from True Social and puts timestamps on them.
You can see here in the graphic that Trump only posted once on May 2nd.
So there's this post on May 1st, and here's your date stamp, 5-1-22.
It's post TT 19.
The next post, number 20, was on May 2nd and the next post, TT 21, was on May 3rd.
So there's only one post on May 2nd.
That was this article, the Russia, Russia, Russia hoax exposed, with a link to the article.
Right, so the only post by President Trump yesterday was made 23 seconds after the post by Q about the leaked Supreme Court document.
Which was Q's only post that day, until he re-truthed that post by Trump about the Durham investigation.
Right?
So here's why this is relevant.
As an experiment, try to post a message on social media within one minute of a post by President Trump.
And your post has to be before his post.
Right?
So you have 1,440 minutes in a day.
What you need to do is try to figure out when President Trump is going to post, and you need to post something on social media within one minute of his post, but your post has to come first, within one minute.
That is extremely hard to do.
Yet, Q has done it on dozens of occasions.
I think there are over, last count, 33 that I know of.
What we call zero deltas where Q and Trump posted at within one minute and Q posted first.
So the question is are these simultaneous posts merely coincidences or do they suggest coordination?
I think they suggest coordination.
I think that Q and Trump are communicating and they send their posts at almost the same time and Which is why Q can consistently post at the same time as President Trump, even when President Trump only posts once a day.
All right, that is going to do it for this update.
I am on True Social, if you're there, under the verified account at Praying Medic.
Please keep me and Denise in prayer.
Keep President Trump in prayer.
Keep Q and the team in prayer.
Love you all.
Take care.
▲
Export Selection