All Episodes
Previous Next
July 9, 2024 - Project Camelot
01:34:36
PATRICK RILEY: OVERUNITY DESIGNS
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Transcription by CastingWords
Transcription by CastingWords So we are here with Patrick Riley, and we're going to be talking about, I don't know if he calls it free energy, but over unity and, and those kinds of topics.
So I'm going to read from his bio here.
Patrick Riley is a An acquired savant and visionary leader in finance and technology, renowned for following Atom Industries, a blockchain financial services company, addressing all traditional financial systems shortcomings with a strong focus on decentralized regulation,
He established the Blockchain Leadership Oversight Council and is serving as its chairman, and 16-year combat veteran from the U.S.
Army, extensive medical and psychological operations, attended an MBA in finance at Syracuse University, And a Master's in Forensic Psychology from Argos University of Honolulu.
It goes on.
So I'm going to let you take over from there.
That's quite an impressive resume.
I should have read it beforehand.
But yeah, I think that's great.
And I'd love to hear about some of this that you have lived.
You look so young that you packed a lot into your number of years.
Definitely.
I have a lot of stories to tell and they don't all go together, but I'm here for the fight and I'm happy to be here to talk with you today about the free energy or overunity.
I kind of shy away from calling it free energy because I don't want to put off too much of the mainstream types, but that is essentially what this is.
All right, great.
So let's talk about your background before we launch into what you're actually doing now.
Because it's such an interesting background.
Now, I don't know, you were an Army veteran.
So what was your Army?
What did you do in the Army?
Sure, so I joined at 17 and I was initially reserved for about a year till I could go active, turned 18, became a combat medic, deployed to Iraq, and then I, over the years,
I became a Master's in Forensic Psychology and I ended up attached to CIOPS and 551st KCOM doing civil affairs and CIOPS in Southeast Asia in First Group's AOR area of responsibility.
So deployed quite a few times to Philippines, Thailand, Palau, Micronesia, Malaysia.
And working in influence campaigns in Southeast Asia.
Wow, so you're not as young as you look.
I'm 35 and old enough to run for president.
Okay, but we're beyond the Vietnam era, so you did all this in Southeast Asia?
That's correct.
Interesting, okay.
So, in a certain sense, you're an intelligence, or were.
A little bit.
It's a bit of a mix between intelligence and really my job was as a combat medic.
So I would generally provide medical advisement to foreign nations or to foreign leaders and often, you know, Something akin to a bribe to make sure that we could get our hearts and minds into the right places and influence different leaders to assure they wanted our presence and sometimes our lethal presence as well in their areas.
Okay, that must have been an interesting sort of dilemma.
All right, so in this forensic, you talked about forensic, what did you call it?
Forensic psychology?
Yes.
What exactly do you mean by that?
So, forensic psychology is a degree and career field that typically relates to competency to stand trial, testing such as PCL-20s or hair psychopathy checklists.
So, generally people who have committed crimes would be analyzed in prison to decide whether or not they are in fact mentally competent to stand trial or whether they are Oh, really?
Okay.
So I'm trying to kind of place you.
long term.
So that is what the career field typically pertains to, but it's media would generally refer to us as profilers.
So we kind of pick people apart and look at all the pieces and sometimes show them back to them.
Oh, really?
Okay.
So I'm trying to kind of place you, are you, you know, are you sympathetic to your subjects or are you sort of a hard, you know, hard ass? - So, So, I'm very humanistic and sympathetic as an individual, but when it comes to the career, the job was to reach an end.
So, whatever the ends of the mission was, if that was, you know, we wanted to place classified weapons systems in classified locations, and it wasn't necessarily in the best interest of the local population, it was my job to convince them that it was in their best interest, and I was very good at my job.
Okay, well you come across as a very sort of button-down business kind of guy.
Now that's probably from your later life, right?
Because you've made quite an inroad in blockchain and all of that, and I want to hear why are you doing oversight in blockchain?
What does that entail?
Yeah, so the Blockchain Leadership Oversight Council was essentially a response to the lack of regulatory clarity from the United States government.
So the United States government, as we all know, is not the most competent force in the world, especially when it comes to giving guidance and clarity in spaces such as digital assets or anything that would benefit the American people.
There was the SEC versus Ripple Labs case, which made it very difficult for us to operate cleanly and respectfully in our environment.
So we formed a group of leaders within the blockchain community and we authored what was basically a bill of rights or constitution of what different companies in blockchain owe to the end user.
So we recognized certain rights that every company that is above board would be meeting that standard.
Okay, can you kind of break that down?
What do you mean?
Sure, so things like the right to know who is behind the project, so if they're not doxxed and, you know, if I were to launch a cryptocurrency, something like Shiba Inu or Doge is out there, but you have no idea who's actually behind that.
Or Ethereum, of course, there's all the secret whales, things of that nature.
That's a violation of the end user's right to know who is actually behind a project.
We also do have rules within there that we basically deem that a company must have a legitimate legal entity backing it.
It must be either an LLC or a sole proprietorship or a 501c3, something of that nature, so that if that company was to rug the end user, if they were to take the money and run, essentially, There would be some legal recourse.
You would have somebody to sue, you would have a jurisdiction under which to process a legal proceeding against them, and things that are just very basic and regular business world, you know.
Publishing income statements and a balance sheet and a prospectus and things like that.
Those haven't really been enforced or even talked about by the regulatory authorities as far as cryptocurrency and blockchain.
Okay, but you sound more like a lawyer almost.
Do you have a law background?
I do not.
So, but what and I, why are you in this regulatory type agency or.
So, it sounds like you really got into.
The top of it.
So I actually founded it, and it's not an agency.
It's completely non-affiliated with the United States government, although it was registered as a 501c3.
And it is a voluntary thing.
So if a blockchain company wanted to say, we are adhering to the block standards, then we would know that this is a company that's doing their best to be above board and transparent for their community.
Whereas if there are other companies out there that say we don't want anything to do with Block, well, there's probably a reason and the community should ask that question.
What is it about these standards you don't want to adhere to that are going to, you know, potentially put me at risk?
Okay, so your position is to protect the public rather than the company itself?
That's correct.
Okay, the public interest in other words.
That's correct.
Okay, so in terms of blockchain, let me ask you this.
Do you know this book Tracer?
Have you ever heard of it?
Okay, well, I wrote an article about it and I read this book called, there's more to the title, I don't have it in front of me, but it's all about tracking people on Bitcoin, basically started to be on that subject.
But eventually, you know, you could imagine that this movement that had really started, I think, four or five years ago, but maybe it started before that.
Because law enforcement got very involved and what the book does is trace all law enforcement cases where they learned how to trace and track Bitcoin and Bitcoin users, okay, and transactions and so on.
And that allowed them to get into, you know, a lot of nefarious operators, so to speak, would use Bitcoin to launder their money etc right so there was a misunderstanding or whatever you want to call that where the general public thought that they couldn't be traced in on bitcoin and that was actually not true and now it's been widely known uh so in terms of blockchain
Can people, I mean, it is a track and trace as far as I'm concerned.
And I've heard there was a saying within the book that said, you know, blockchain never forgets.
So that's kind of like a saying, right?
But that is actually, there's kind of a level, like there's a good thing about it.
You can track everything and maybe say it's legit.
Or there's a bad thing about it where you're, again, tracking and tracing people in our Our transactions and everything we do.
Yeah, absolutely.
It's a double-edged sword.
It's what I like to call a Chinese farmer.
There's a story about a Chinese farmer in which, you know, he has a horse run away and the neighbors all say, that's terrible.
And he says, maybe next day.
And he's, they all say, that's great.
And he says, Maybe.
Then his son tries to break one in and falls off the horse and breaks a leg.
And they all say, that's terrible.
And he says, maybe.
And then, you know, of course it goes on and on, right?
So with cryptocurrency, it's the exact same thing.
There's a great benefit to humanity and the transparency.
And if we could get governments and agencies and organizations onto that blockchain and that kind of transparency, It would bring a great benefit to the individual people that are actually worried about this.
Now, at the same time, if the government has full control of it, the ability to look into it and trace people and yet no transparency itself, obviously that is the potential for tyranny and oppression.
Right.
I don't know if you can answer this question, but are you interfacing with law enforcement on this?
FBI, CIA, SEC, whatever?
None of the above.
We are fully independent.
Okay.
Well I think it's very interesting that you kind of got that going on and then at the same time you're into this over unity which is fascinating.
So can you explain how you went from that to where you are now and maybe the trajectory and your thinking for the future?
So really it all kind of started for me in 2009.
I was in Iraq.
I got blown up and with my TBI.
I had the acquired savant syndrome, which is essentially I started to become a little bit smarter than I was prior to my head injury.
So, at that point in 2009, I started inventing.
And when I started inventing, I realized that to ever see my prototypes or my inventions become a physical reality that people could benefit from, I was going to need funding and I was going to need the money to action that and make it a reality.
So by 2014 I started getting into cryptocurrency and I was doing cloud mining of Bitcoin and that sort of thing and over time I was developing the means to make my inventions a reality and it was solely just I mean, it's doing in to do the cryptocurrency.
But as I started to really explore that and get higher in the understanding of macroeconomics, I started to really understand the corruption at higher levels of government.
And when you follow the money, you can only come to certain conclusions.
So with that, in 2021, when the vaccine was forcing me out of the military, which is the reason that I left service, I decided it was time to launch my own business.
So I started initially Reaper Financial, but an additional seven companies, all which Essentially provides for a new financial system and a new economic system, going after the debt, going after distribution, the way that we raise funds for charities and things of that nature.
And in the process of building out those companies, I realized the need for a body to Kind of not dictate but guide how right should look for those cryptocurrency companies because there's a complete vacuum of leadership when it comes to the United States government and blockchain.
Okay, so can you describe what your attitude and also what, you know, what you understand about blockchain in terms of its track and trace abilities?
And then also why, you know, why would, I mean, there's sort of obvious answers to this, but there's other more subtle answers having to do with why would this become suddenly part of our financial or the rollout of new financial systems.
It seems that blockchain is going to be the backbone of all of them, regardless of whether you're on the good side or the bad side, so to speak.
So can you explain your philosophy or your understanding of blockchain and so on?
Well, so I definitely think blockchain has the potential for great and terrible things as far as finance and all other applications.
But as we're in this multifaceted advancement of humanity through AI, through biotechnology and biohacking, through cryptography, 3D printing, space-based manufacturing, All of these things are kind of converging into one truth moving forward, which is that from a digital aspect we are going to need verifiable information and verifiable blockchain identities on a digital means.
So blockchain at its core basically is the first solid thing in a digital universe.
Before you could copy and paste and anything could be replicated, With blockchain, you're able to have a one-of-one that is a true one-of-one and that, of course, spurred into cryptocurrency.
But when we talk about things like AI, we're going to have a situation within, really, we could do this right now, but within the next five years it will happen that there'll be a newsroom getting a A full AI produced rundown by the president of whatever country is saying that they're going to war and nuking something or whatever it is and they're going to send it off to a newsroom and that newsroom is going to run with it and it's going to cause a panic.
It'll be something akin to the invasion from Mars in the 1930s.
I forget who that was at this time.
It's going to be unverifiable if there isn't a blockchain ID attached to the information to know the source of that information.
So we're going to be moving into a digital world where everything needs to be tracked and traced.
And right now there are alternatives where you are anonymous.
Things like Monero or Litecoin has an anonymous option.
for transacting funds.
But I don't necessarily think it's a bad thing.
I think it's an opportunity for us as humanity to take control back from the corruption and the evil forces that currently steer our world.
Okay, because they can be tracked and traced.
Absolutely.
Okay, so have you been approached by law enforcement or other agency types to incorporate you into their foundation, you know, their operations in this area?
So not as far as regulatory, but I have been approached and spoken with multiple secretaries of state in regards to blockchain voting.
All of our tokens utilize blockchain voting on the XRP ledger and we've been been actively deploying blockchain votes more than, I think, 150 votes over the last two years now.
So it's worked without any failure.
It's had no issues whatsoever.
And it's definitely something that we want to integrate into different states at the legislative level, at the county and city level, and then build from that to a national level so that we can, of course, secure our elections as they should be secured.
Okay, now I wrote an article about this, and some people questioned whether I knew what I was talking about.
Apparently I did, because you're something of an expert in this area, I can see.
I don't know if you follow this, but the White Hats had announced before the 2020 election that they were going to be tracking it on blockchain.
They actually told people that.
And then they did so.
And they did so with the help, for one, I understand, of the NSA.
Okay, and you can imagine the NSA has to be very active in this area as they are in all sort of digital areas.
But so this was done.
Okay, this was absolutely done, but there is some kind of hold off.
And backtracking, I don't want, you know, obfuscation to where, when they were going to come forward with this evidence, they didn't.
And I, in my article, I posit the idea that the reason they didn't come forward with the evidence that they had clearly had, had announced they had, both before and after the election, that
That they were worried that they would make it too known to the criminals that blockchain was operational in ways like that and really more sort of in the criminal element in having to do with Bitcoin and other currencies.
So that they held out, and they've been holding out now for at least four years, Before announcing this to the public, so I'm wondering if you have another explanation than this for why they would hold off in revealing their data.
Yeah, absolutely.
So, the way that most state laws stand right now, it's actually illegal for any voting machines to be connected to the internet.
So, although they clearly were, and Dominion machines clearly were connected, we know, of course, flash drives exchanged hands, and some had internet access capabilities, and all of these things.
But presenting the evidence that it was fully tracked would also be self-incriminating that we were connected to them through the internet on the blockchain, and that would potentially get the entire case thrown out.
Now, as we saw go through the courts, most of the courts would not actually hear any of the election fraud cases based on standing, despite overwhelming evidence.
Yes.
Um, so I suspect that they decided it was better to have that information and have the capability to use it than to deploy that information and see it crushed by a court as a potential that would actually be damaging for the White Hats by Essentially ruining their case as well, saying, you were connected to the internet, here's your felony for breaking the law.
Well, you know, obviously that's what the Democrats and the lawfare have been deploying.
Okay, so that's kind of an interesting way of looking at it, and I wonder about it though at a certain level.
So if this is the logic, if at the end result what you want is to know the absolute truth, Of, you know, what was done, who voted where, and this and that.
Then, as a law enforcement tool deployed, in essence, by a law enforcement type agency, the NSA, I think you could classify it in there, Then they had the right to actually do that.
And it may actually be, I mean, these people are going to think ahead, they're not going to be sort of stupid.
And so they're going to pave the way for them to be able to do that.
And in fact, it is a, you know, spying on, well, let's say, okay, a lot of the Dominion machines came from China.
They would be derelict in their duty if they weren't checking that out and checking out those machines at the same time.
And in order to do that, they most likely have to employ the Internet.
And I'm sure there are some other things like satellites and, you know, because.
We think of everything being done with wires, but that's not how it is.
It's actually wireless.
So, and there's also, and I'm sure you might even know more than I do about this aspect of it, but the bottom line is what I'm trying to say is that they would have paved the road behind the scenes for them to do what they did so that they wouldn't encounter pushback in courtrooms and all that kind of thing.
And on top of it, as the American people would like to have a fair and equal election, an honest election, then it's on their behalf that this law enforcement effort would have been done.
And what's even more important is the results.
Because at least according to what we've heard, and this is not, you know, hard fast evidence, but Juan O'Salvin, one of the spokespeople for the White Hats, arguably, and others, have said that we had, you know, that, for example, at the 2020, that Trump actually won by 80% or more.
That's a huge margin of, you know, success.
And that points in a completely opposite direction to what was transpiring in among Congress and so on, and even intelligence agencies that then After some time during when they were supposed to certify the election and Congress certified, they could have come forward to stop the certification because it was actually false and they knew it was false.
And so.
You see how these things all kind of end up crashing into each other and revealing that our election was stolen in unequivocal ways.
And it's one thing to say the laws haven't caught up with where we're at, which is actually the fact, right?
But it's another thing to refuse to force the laws and and to get the dialogue going to discuss all that, which is actually not happened.
So we're, you know, it's like.
We're very behind right now.
We're about to go into another election where this same thing could go on.
And needless to say, the Dominion machines were also purposely hacked into by others.
You know, that was even more diabolical.
It's one thing to have our NSA tracking our vote, which is supposed to be a protection agency for America.
It's another thing to have the Chinese and others Yep, absolutely.
those machines at will.
And that evidence is also probably on the blockchain, right? - Yep, absolutely.
So I will say that Donald Trump talked about the election being stolen as early as 2018 at the midterms.
And, of course, it came to pass.
And, you know, to consider that in 2016 he won despite attempts to steal.
He knew that the steal was coming in 18 and then would lose in 2020.
And yet, Well, not in power in 2024, while the person who stole it as a puppet of China is in power, we expect to win again, which I think we all expect him to win again.
But the question is, how does that happen when he's not in power and couldn't secure it in 2020 while he was in power?
So you have to, at some point, assume that He was not meant to win that election, and it was meant to be stolen with some permission given, if you will.
So I think that there's an intent there.
And I'll just say from a PSYOP's perspective that 99.99% of the time, a PSYOP works.
So whatever the population or the general population is thinking should happen, that's what the PSYOP intended for them to think.
Right.
Okay.
I understand that.
But I do think that you did make a statement that I don't quite agree with, and I'll tell you why.
So you said that he didn't have the wherewithal to secure the election in 2020.
But actually, as it happens, based on the evidence, of course, he did.
And he did secure it.
But this is the thing.
And even the The Director of National Intelligence, who arguably is kind of like the lead guy of all the 17 or 27, I forget how many intelligence agencies we have, but, you know, that he actually did come forward, did submit evidence, say there was reason to pause the certification of the election.
Was it Rogers?
No, not Rogers.
Radcliffe.
So Radcliffe was who it was.
And he did come forward and bravely, really, say that China was hacking our election.
At that point, everything should have stopped dead in its tracks, as far as I'm concerned.
Should have.
But yeah, so we know there's other hands in this pie, so to speak, that are manipulating the scene.
And there are also reasons why Donald Trump and the White Hats stood down at that point to allow this to happen.
But on the other hand, Trump was re-sworn in, and this has been repeated over and over again by people like 107 and others, saying he was sworn in by the military in March of 2021 as CIC, so Commander-in-Chief.
And he still is Commander-in-Chief, and he has the codes, what we call the codes, you know what I'm saying?
That football?
Yeah, that.
And he has freely admitted it.
I was actually at a rally where he admitted this, you know, live at the rally.
So, just want to say that on the one hand, you know, because I wrote this article, if you can count money, you can count votes.
Right?
If there's any error whatsoever, then, you know, the bank's at fault, or whoever it is that's counting it is at fault.
You know, someone's at fault.
So, all I'm saying is that we have the tools for this to be done very excellently, in my opinion.
And yet, the discussion isn't even right now, prior to this election.
It's not at hand.
Nobody else is talking about this, you know, as an option.
And as far as actually getting blockchain voting into, you know, like I said, at the legislative level, and then at city and county, and then eventually state level, it's going to take about 10 to 15 years for them to catch up, to be honest.
So how that could happen... I don't agree with that.
Okay, why do I say that?
Because again, we have to look See, if you look to the past, what you're saying is true, okay?
You're basing your... it's like a paradigm on how they've acted in the past, and they're going to go at the same pace in the future.
But that's actually not true, because behind the scenes, and even with humanity in general, and this is something that always bothers me, is that humanity is judged on its past as opposed to its potential future, right?
So when you look at the situation, There's going to be growth, and there is growth.
It's all speeding up.
The growth, the adaptation, the taking on board of certain truths, the changing of the populace, the minds of the people, and there's a number of things that are actually in the pipeline, you might say, that are going to be geared to doing just that.
So, I would agree human advancement is exponential.
Technological advancement is exponential and scientific advancement is exponential.
Unfortunately, I don't know if legislative advancement is exponential.
It seems to have a pace all of its own because there is laws that will have to be processed and approved at.
Well, they're probably too old, and they're also compromised, by and large.
I mean, that's been the evidence we've seen so far.
in those seats are, they're quite too long.
And they don't necessarily understand what we are bringing.
- Well, they're probably too old and they're probably, they're also compromised by and large.
I mean, that's been the evidence we've seen so far in spades, really.
- Yes.
- Okay, so I wanna transition now because I know that people wanna know about your over unity, you know, inventions and such and such.
So thank you for going into all that because I think your knowledge there is really excellent and I'm so happy to find someone who knows what they're talking about in that way.
If you can now talk to us about kind of how you started as an inventor.
We understand that you had this injury that kind of jump-started your brain in certain ways.
Maybe you can talk a little bit about how that might be going on, like ongoing, right?
Yeah.
Stimulating the brain, different areas of the brain.
So go ahead.
Yeah, so when I was a teenager I wasn't By any means unintelligent, but I could understand individual points of data and different things going on kind of by themselves.
But once I had my head injury, what essentially happened was I could see 20% of the pixels of an image and my brain would automatically complete the system that made up that image.
So I came back from Iraq and I started building cars from the frame up.
With really no experience, no training, I just intrinsically I knew that, you know, there were certain pieces that had to be there for a thing to work as a whole system.
And then, of course, as a medic, I was heavy into anatomy and physiology, and I started to understand the systems of anatomy and physiology.
And of the human body, and then I went into finance, and from finance I kind of started to see all that corruption in politics, but it was as if I could see just pieces of a puzzle or pieces of a thing, and I could complete the system automatically.
And it does seem to still be progressing, and I'll get a few pieces of information, and I'll just automatically kind of know the entirety of the thing.
Great.
That's awesome.
And I believe that phenomena does work, you know, that does, I mean, I have some experience with that myself.
And I think some of us do.
You can read even a bit of something and then complete the rest in your mind because you kind of have leapt ahead you know and even if you get into the notion that humans are precogs anyway there's reason to believe that we see the future before it happens and those of us that are awake to that It's an advantage, right?
And those that are asleep to that, but still have the ability, just haven't utilized it, you know, have their own interaction with the future in that way.
But, okay, so you have this ability, you built cars, and then what did you do?
What did you know you were aiming?
Yeah, so... Did you know about the Bob Lazar car that he ran on water, for example?
So, I didn't actually know about it back then, but initially what I wanted to do was I thought about the standard V8 engine, which is, you know, your crankshaft, and rods, and pistons, and piston rings, and all that, and your heads, and so on and so forth.
And I started thinking about How overcomplicated it was and that it was it was kind of like a I compared it to human anatomy and that you know you had your breathing in and you had your consumption of energy and you had your exhaust and it all kind of flowed in the same way as the human body but I felt like it wasn't necessary for technological means to work in the same
Exhaustive way, pardon the pun, but so I started thinking how could I create force without an explosion and without heat?
The natural answer to that was that I needed magnetism or electromagnetism to create force within the pistons, but instead of You know, trying to do an electric motor like, you know, people have probably seen many different forms of electric motor out there on the internet, a bicycle wheel with some magnets or whatever it is.
I was trying to do it as a modification of a standard V8 into an electrical motor.
Using the pistons and the crankshaft and the rods.
And that was how I was working out in my head.
And I realized that I could remove the friction with permanent magnets.
You know, replacing the bearings, replacing the rings with permanent magnets.
Having magnetic propulsion off the walls and using the correct timing sequence to fire electromagnets over each piston in replacing what would basically be your spark plug or or your explosion so i i took that idea and i kind of elevated it and i don't know if you want me to share screen but i do have my um visual um
so this is kind of uh all four uh technologies together here but uh essentially i settled on this design which is a radial uh motor with a eight piston uh layout and they're four centimeter pistons um Now, this is just magnetic propulsion.
This should be extremely settled science for everybody, that a magnet against a magnet, a Norfol, Norfol is going to cause force to repel.
Now, that doesn't require any added electricity.
This is just a common thing you can do with magnets in your house.
But using those permanent magnets, you'll see that everything shown as red here on the screen, you are seeing my screen, right?
Oh, yeah.
Okay um so everything shown as red is is representing the the placement of a permanent magnet and we have permanent magnets surrounding on in four directions around the pistons uh clearances as well as a permanent magnet on the base plate and a permanent magnet underneath this partial crank and on top of this partial crank on which I drop a
Our rotating assembly with eight vertical pylons.
Each of the vertical pylons would also be surrounded by a permanent magnet, as well as the interior of the rotating assembly.
Now again, this has no electricity of any type added to it.
This could just be standard iron magnets or ceramic magnets.
Nothing fancy has happened yet.
So this is Then I'm able to take a piston rod and my piston, which has a permanent ring magnet and a permanent magnet on the face as a disc.
I'm putting those pistons on the rotating assembly, capping it, and adding the second portion of my crankshaft.
So again, no electricity added to the system yet whatsoever.
This is just a motor that is able to move with minimal friction.
And the pistons are floating freely through the piston clearances.
The rotating assembly is floating on top of the crank in a bi-directional hold.
And the crankshaft is, again, in a bidirectional hold.
Now, the piston sleeves, I am wrapping those.
These are carbon fiber wrapped in copper coil.
And so, the copper coil is basically going to form part of the electromagnet.
But at the end of the piston sleeves here, we have our little electromagnets.
These are just 35 Newton electromagnets that I've been using.
I ordered these on Amazon.
They're nothing special.
But an electromagnet is again just a ferrous material wrapped in a conductive wire that when a, when a current flows through it, it creates a magnetic pull or push.
So now, Anytime you put a permanent magnet through a copper wire, such as in the piston sleeves, you create a current so long as it's moving.
And you can increase that current by using a stronger magnet, increasing the motion of the magnet, or increasing the area or the number of turns of the coil.
When we say area, we mean the gauge of the copper wire.
So it could be a larger diameter copper wire.
And as this permanent magnet moves through it, we are always going to create a electric charge through that wire perpendicular to it.
And that's Faraday's Law.
This is common household physics.
There is nothing about this that is beyond the laws of physics as we know them today.
Alright, so now the trick to this, if you will, is that as Piston 1 is moving up with its ring magnet and its permanent face magnet through the piston sleeve, Piston 1 is firing Piston 3.
So this is a wire that is connecting to Piston 3.
Piston 3 is firing piston 5, 5 is firing 7, and 7 is firing 1.
So we denied it any rest.
So as our ring magnet on our piston head travels through the sleeve, this sleeve copper wire is creating a charge which is firing the electromagnet Two pistons removed from it and that creates a turning rotation now on the opposite we've reversed the polarity so that one is two is pushing so as two is pushing it would be pushing five downward
4 is pushing, which would push 7 outward, 6 and 8, and so on and so forth.
So it's this skipping to, and I'm not using the same piston to power its own electromagnet, I'm using it to power a firing order.
So in that sense I'm able to remove or reduce the mechanical workload on the rotating assembly, because I'm both pushing it and pulling it.
And it is denied all rest, and for that I've created spin.
So that means that my crankshaft here has two rotating ends, or three rotating ends.
And essentially the kind of the kicker of this whole thing is that every single modern electrical system we have, save solar,
is working on the same principle because everything that whether it's nuclear energy or hydroelectric dam or a car motor or any other kind of coal power plant they all work on the same principle of basically just turning an alternator by getting magnets to run through copper and that's it that's that's the whole trick so i've done that um in a way
That doesn't require fuel, and it doesn't require exhaust, and it doesn't require any kind of input whatsoever.
This whole system could be vacuum enclosed.
Now because of the radial design, this is modular.
So with a 45 degree turn of the crankshaft, we could stack these.
This is just an image to show what a regular alternator looks like.
So you've got a A rotor, which is your permanent magnets, turning inside of your stator, which is three different copper winds at 120 degrees, which will lead into your rectifier with the six different ends.
But this, I know this looks a little scary to some people, but this is in your car right now.
If you're driving an internal combustion engine, I promise you got one.
If you don't, it's a problem.
Um, but so what that means is going back to our Faraday law, as long as the rotation is not overpowered by friction.
And again, we're using permanent magnets to hold the system in place where nothing is actually touching inside of this motor.
The passing of the permanent magnet through the coil is sufficient to power the electric magnet.
Now again, we can change the amount of output of the coil by using a stronger magnet, by increasing the motion, or by changing the area or number of turns of the coil.
And the electromagnet is sufficient to pull the stable magnet without overcoming the rotating assembly's magnetic repulsion, so we're not creating a knock, basically.
And the force of the rotating body is sufficient to overcome the alternator winding resistance.
So, your alternators are going to give some winding resistance as you're turning those magnets inside of those coils, but you only need to overcome it slightly to have your phi energy.
Now, we would stack these up to eight in a modular stack, which means that our firing order could potentially be exponential.
You have an alternator on top that could fire one of each of your cylinders in each module, and that means that now your alternator at the bottom has a runaway exponential delivery of energy.
And it is limited only by the engineering, the material sciences of what it's built out of, but not by physics.
There is nothing within the currently known laws of physics that precludes this from working.
It works as is.
It does not require any kind of fancy, you know, magic solution.
It's literally just copper and magnets.
So I'll take a break there from the sharing if you wanted to ask questions on that.
Okay, well, so is that, what is that going to power?
A car?
A house?
A what?
So potentially you could power a car, you could power many houses.
I estimate a single 8-stack module could power as much as 10 city blocks.
Okay, now have you put any of this in practice?
So now this is where, and I'm not seeing where to stop sharing here if you wanted to kick my screen off there.
Yeah, well, if you know, it's kind of doesn't matter, but I think you go to back to the same green button at the bottom.
It ended up on the screen behind me for some reason.
Okay, so now this is where it gets sticky.
So the way that I've done this, I have not patented any of my designs.
Instead, I've minted them to the blockchain and I've shared those blockchain addresses so that anyone can go and view them.
I encourage anyone to do so.
I encourage you to download them, save them to your computer, attempt to produce them yourselves.
This is free and open source and unpatented.
The reason I'm not patenting it is because of the 1951 Invention Secrecy Act, in which if I apply for that patent, I'm asking the government's permission
To release this technology, but I'm not asking permission I know exactly what the government would do with it They'd slap it with a National Security Act and bury it and send me a jail if I talked about it right now the reason that I Should not state that I have built these In real life is because if I did that I would be giving the FBI and then I say an excuse for a warrant To come in and confiscate the dangerous technology that I have built.
However, if this is only an idea, and this idea is open source, free to the world, and unable to be suppressed because it is minted on a dozen different blockchains, that means that once a thousand people have built these, and they're all talking about it, and they've all said, here is my working model of the Riley Radio, That's a much harder thing for the government to shut down.
Okay, well that's very smart.
So, okay, I'd like to ask more questions on this but I want to go into your next thing because I'm curious about how that adds into all of this.
Sure.
So the second technology I released at the Quantum Summit in Cape Canaveral is the ionic circuit.
So now this slide here is just for ionic thrust, which is something that's commonly accepted.
Again, there is nothing in this that is beyond our current understanding of science.
Essentially an ionic thruster is just using a live and a ground that are separated by an air gap and with that live and ground separated by an air gap you're causing a spark jump or a spark gap and as it sparks across from the live to the ground You are pushing positive ions through the air, creating thrust.
And these thrusters are publicly acknowledged.
MIT has put these out.
NASA claims to have these for different satellites and actively in use.
So this is not something new, but if you want to understand how it works, I did link Plasma Channel to that QR code, who does a good little intro on it.
So I thought I could improve the design considerably and I went with this honeycomb fractal design with the very sharp barbs off the back end and eight terminals for the live wire to connect.
The way that this is meant to be produced is by 3D printing in resin and then electroplating in silver.
Silver is the highest conducting metal, so this would be, you know, maybe one to one and a half millimeters of silver coating it.
And then the ground terminal for it would be meant for gold, and it's just a much more rounded and sharp face, but basically what that does is, because gold is a much weaker receiving conductor, It's not going to be able to hold all of those positive ions as they are making that jump or making that gap.
Now when I say a circuit, the ionic drive circuit, you'll notice here that we have two live terminals at the top coated in silver and two ground terminals at the back coated in gold.
What we're doing here is as one is firing it is shooting a three But 2 would be catching those positive ions before they're able to settle on 3, and it is shooting them to 5, and so on and so forth.
So once again, I've denied rest of the positive ions, and I've created essentially a train of these, producing a spark gap, producing the positive ions, shooting towards the back through a fractal pattern that amplifies it.
And we've created now a circuit that is a ionic circuit.
Now with that, we would wrap it in a permanent magnet, and we would wrap that permanent magnet in a copper coil, which then produces pressure and a helical rotation of the ions that are within the motor, if you will, or drive, if you will.
And at the back you have basically a standard rocket nozzle.
It's not rocket science, but it is, but essentially you're just pushing all the positive ions into a high-pressure ionization chamber and then releasing it.
And this is how you would create a thruster using the electricity that I just, you know, revealed we can make plenty of.
But using that electricity through this thruster gives us the ability to create electric rockets.
Did you want to take a break there, jump in?
Okay, well, so the other questions I asked on the other thing are still sort of on the table for this, but I can imagine your answers are going to be pretty close to the same, right?
And then the question is, Well, I think let's, is the third one is the last one or do you have another one?
There's two more.
Wow.
Okay.
So just in general, have your, uh, you, I'm assuming you're going the same process.
Are you putting everything on, um, I don't know, blockchain and making it accessible and open source?
So I have for, These four designs.
Now I have about 30 other inventions and designs that I have which I have not released.
Some of which I have in Dead Man's Drops.
I do understand what I'm doing here could be perilous to my ability to breathe.
So in that, I've created Deadman's Drops that should something happen to me, there will be other technologies released which could be much more disruptive, potentially.
Not necessarily good for humanity or bad for humanity, but certainly bad for those who are currently at the top of humanity and think that they're in charge.
So I do have some other things as well as Well, eVTOL and space station designs and all kinds of things.
What I'm trying to get at here, and you know that's wonderful to hear the way you are operating, but what I am wondering is do you think that these have been adopted, and especially do you think they've been adopted by, for example, you know, Space Force, let's say?
So I just revealed these at Cape Canaveral on, I think it was the 8th of June, so a little bit, just a month ago.
I am looking for this design and the knowledge of this design to kind of saturate and get out into the market and get out into people's headspace.
So that those who want to design it and try it can do so.
I do suspect Space Force already has things similar and beyond some of these designs and that's okay.
But what I'm doing is for the public and for the American people and really for all humanity.
It's not necessarily meant to be used by a government, although I'm sure they will.
Okay, yeah, very interesting.
Okay, let's continue and then, you know, hopefully we'll have time to ask a few more questions at the end.
So, the third technology here is the quantum heliosphere.
Now, it's hela, as in Henrietta Lacks, which are hela cells.
These are common cells used throughout multitudes of medical research since 1950s.
Henrietta Lacks was a cervical cancer patient who had a special type of cell in the cancer cells that, because the telomeres were elongated, essentially they're immoral.
So, these cells are still alive today, they're still reproducing today, and they're used in all kinds of research.
But because they are an identical clone to the cell that came before it, and they are splitting as mitosis, or splitting as they reproduce, they are kind of the ideal or perfect candidate for quantum entanglement.
So with quantum entanglement, there's a link that's missing here on the right for some reason, but don't worry about it.
Basically, it's where you're able to lock two like bodies that are from the same source, and they move in tandem across time and space.
So this means that we're able to rotate one of the heliosphere cells here on Earth and the one that would be out in space or on Mars or wherever it is would rotate simultaneously completely outside of light speed, outside of time and space.
Right, and this is also the principle of remote viewing and what we say is signal non-locality and spooky action at a distance.
Exactly.
Spooky action at a distance.
So this is well accepted science and the link here I had was actually to CERN, which I'm sure most of the audience is not a fan of, but we have demonstrated in a lab that quantum entanglement is very possible.
Now this specific design, I actually worked with somebody in the SSP through email correspondence to help them fix a problem a few years back.
And eventually the correspondence stopped, so I imagine the problem was fixed.
So this may be an application somewhere, I don't know.
But essentially what I did was designed it to have A grid of 2,800 mils in diameter and every intersection of that grid.
So now we have 32,000 points of data on the cell itself with a North Pole and a South Pole.
And as we immerse it in superfluid helium or He2, we'd be able to bring it down to 2.17 Kelvin, which is near perfect zero.
And then as we've got it at that low temperature, we would basically, we would blast it with a low frequency on both sides, and then we would walk that frequency up until we have a perfect entanglement between the two.
And then we have our quantum entangled heliospheres.
Now this is just a modest design for an apparatus of what might be reading something like a heliosphere, would be using a North Pole and South Pole and every rotation of the grid, which is, you know, just a ferrous iron injection.
So it's magnetic and it's able to be read.
We would be able to send great amounts of data very quickly across time and space, and that enables the quantum communication.
Someone is at the front door.
Sorry, my son said someone's at the door.
Hopefully they're not going to interrupt us.
Yeah, hopefully.
Do you need to answer the door, or can your son do that?
No one should be at the door for anything.
All right, so we'll take a pause.
That's not a problem.
Just, you know, if you want to block your camera for more privacy during this pause, just go ahead and hit the camera down at the bottom.
That's quite all right.
I'll be right back.
I'll go take care of this bed, and I'll be right back.
Okay, everyone, thank you for watching.
Wow.
And I did, I post a lot of stuff on my Telegram.
For those of you that aren't going to my Telegram, it's so important that you do because not only do I do commentary there, I tell you what I'm up to, I tell you, you know, insights and commentary on all sorts of things.
So I post news articles, and I comment on them.
And, uh, And all kinds of things.
So I do this even at 3 o'clock in the morning.
So it's very valuable for you to go to my Telegram channel if you want to know anything that's going on with me and Project Camelot and what we're investigating in essence.
And I post things that I don't agree with and I post things I do agree with and sometimes I say whether I agree or not and sometimes I don't.
And so just wanting to say that we have all kinds of Interesting things transpiring right now.
So as many people know that things are really escalating and I'm going to be doing another interview later today where I'm going to be interviewed by Ishmael.
So I just want to give people a heads up on that interview.
That will be at 5 p.m.
today at Pacific Time and I will post that on my Telegram channel as well, a link once I get one.
Okay, are we okay? - We're good, thank you.
I apologize for that.
No worries.
All right, so where were we, or do you want me to jump into the FTL?
Okay, so just to refresh our memory, can you go back one slide?
Yep.
Okay, so this is the device that may do this quantum entanglement with respect to these two Can you explain that kind of like encapsulate what this is going to do?
Yep, so essentially this is just a communication device.
So if I wanted to send data from here to Mars, you know, at optimal conditions between Earth and Mars, there's a three light minute delay, and at suboptimal it's about 21 light minutes.
So if I wanted to save that time-distance communication, I would need quantum entanglement to do so, and this is a way to solve that issue.
Okay, so what would you do?
I mean, would you apply the device to your computer?
How does it, you know, interact with the...
So, because you have two of these, one cell would remain on Earth and it's essentially going to be plugged in through the reading apparatus to your computer that interprets the data coming across.
And you have one that would be either, you know, on board a ship or on board a satellite or a probe sending that information back instantaneously.
Okay, what about the idea that you might have, in other words, you might not consciously know the location of the other, you know, The other data, the other thing, whatever you call that little thing.
You know, in other words, these are two points, right?
And so, in theory, at least as far as signal non-locality, and so on, the way it works, like in remote viewing or other psychic operations, is that, you know, you can, in essence, view with your mind a proposed
location let's say in japan okay so i want to communicate with something in someone in japan i could visualize that person like saying i maybe i know who they are in advance or even if i don't And then you can send it through quantum entanglement or not.
It's just a simultaneous receptivity.
So, in other words, you don't necessarily need to know the other Device.
You don't need to know whether it's a person, place, or thing.
The thing that's going to pick you up could be, right?
Multiple places as well.
Potentially.
And this provides for the potential future of a quantum entanglement computing system.
So you could have things like this that would grow into a blockchain, for instance, of quantum entangled blockchain.
Cool.
Excellent.
Okay, so let's go on to the next piece.
Yep, so the last piece to this, and of course a shout out to Nikola Tesla is obligatory, but The last piece to this, I don't know why it was, okay, is FTL.
And with faster than light travel, essentially what I've done here is I've taken a big flashlight and a subwoofer and I've meshed them together.
I'm only half joking.
So, ultraviolet C radiation, or UV light, is considered the heaviest photon that we know of currently.
And we're able to produce essentially over unity energy with a exponential force of electric production limited only by the mechanical properties and the material properties.
So now we're able to produce enough photons, heavy photons of light, that we would be pushing out in front of us from a potential probe going into space to move the things that are in front of us in space.
So that there is no actual resistance in front of a moving craft.
Now, so UVC light, if you don't believe me, you can go, you know, YouTube it and there's things where you can shine it at gold foil or aluminum foil and it'll actually move, right?
That kind of thing.
But With that, we also know that the photon is very, very small, and we would be able to use the frequency, which is why this is designed as sort of a subwoofer, and we would be able to align the frequency to know exactly where everything in front of us or in front of our object moving through space and time is.
So that means we could align everything in front of us into a grid, a grid of dots essentially that atoms and protons, electrons and neutrons would be aligned into a grid and then we can align everything behind it that is a part of the craft into a slightly offset grid.
And what that would essentially do is make it so that if I was to do this with my hand and I took my hand and I slapped my desk, instead of hitting my desk, I would just pass right through because every atom is missing every other atom as it does it.
So that enables us the potential to travel faster than light because there is no space or light resistance in front of us.
We're using light and light speed to remove all the resistance in front of us.
Okay.
And, well, does it work?
Purely hypothetical and theoretical on this one, but I will say as far as speed travel, humanity's fastest moving object that we've admitted to publicly is about 400,000 miles per hour, which is 0.005% of the speed of light, which is embarrassingly slow.
0.05% of the speed of light, which is embarrassingly slow.
About 120 years ago, when Time Magazine was writing about whether a car could reach 100 miles per hour, They said no, it's impossible.
It's going to crush against the air resistance before it ever gets there.
They also thought flight was completely impossible and everything else was impossible.
I don't take people that talk about the light speed limits very seriously because, frankly, we haven't tried it.
We haven't tested it.
And, you know, the only thing education teaches people is what has been done and what can't be done.
And both are always wrong.
That's kind of the same thing, my philosophy about humanity in general.
But, okay.
It is fascinating.
I mean, I think that, well, there's this, I have had these discussions with people about what we call light speed.
So whenever they try to use a limit, called Lightspeed, right?
There is no actual number that they have for Lightspeed.
They don't actually know what it is.
I've asked people.
They don't know what it is.
And then when you realize they don't really know what they're talking about, or they, you know, what it is, then that opens the gate for the fact that that's an arbitrary limit, that we do not have that limit.
And that we can definitely go beyond it.
I mean, when we say warp speed, you're actually jumping, right?
At least the way it's depicted, even in Star Trek, right?
They call warp speed jumping, you know, like you're jumping.
So there is a concept there, embedded in that idea, that you can jump beyond light speed.
Yeah, and Dr. Alcubierre, actually the Alcubierre Drive proved mathematically in 1992 that warp or greater than light speed travel is mathematically possible.
But beyond that, you know, The idea that we couldn't achieve a faster-than-light travel is ridiculous.
Rupert Sheldrake actually disproved the light speed limit.
He proved that light speed was measured to have changed over the last 70 years and is fluctuating, which means it's fluctuating against some sort of background resistance.
What that resistance is, who knows at this time, but I personally, I subscribe to the Socrates model that true wisdom comes from knowing that we know nothing, and I'm not going to take anybody's word for it.
I'm going to find out.
Okay.
All right.
Well, I think, you know, I love this idea, and I love that you're such an amazing, excuse me, inventor.
But I would say that now is this this is from oh, you're just putting all your devices there, right?
So that's all all for shown.
Sorry.
I'll let you finish your thought though.
Well, I just wanted to say that.
These ideas are already out there, as you may know, and you have picked up on them and are putting them into practice, in a sense, so they can be demonstrated.
I think that when I think about the Secret Space Program, because, you know, I don't know how much you know about my work, but I have Secret witnesses as well as known whistleblowers like Captain Mark Richards, for example, that talk about us using the power of neutron stars to go into far reaches of outer space and so on.
So what we're really talking about is Anything that we think conventionally is a limit is actually a lie and it's more the limits of the power of the human mind that are, if there is a limit or resistance as you call it out there.
I think that's what you would probably be encountering is the limits on us as a field of resonance and our ability to resonate with the truth of whatever it is and attempt it.
Because if you look at it that way, Also, if we are truly, as people think we are, connected to God's sparks of God, then in a sense that would make us unlimited by definition.
I completely agree with that.
I would like to actually do my doctorate in neuropsychology.
My thesis would be on universal consciousness and that our souls are effectively a sliver of the universe of God of consciousness, which is all one in the same.
And I think that we very much shape reality.
There's really nothing that we are able to imagine as humans that we cannot achieve.
It's a matter of doing it.
Yeah, and so yeah, I think therefore I am.
So that principle is actually, you know, expandable into this idea that we can accomplish just about anything.
And this gets into all of the, what we consider to be obstacles to our growth and resistance that exists, and the side that works to the negative, you know, that we are often battling with.
That they're not going to be successful.
It speaks to that, right?
Well, I took all that mainstream education and science had to offer and I cast it aside with reckless abandon because it means nothing to me.
Excellent.
Well, I mean, it's clear that you are operating in a free zone of your own making.
And I really, you know, I love all you're doing.
It's just fabulous.
Now, have we come to the end or did you have more?
So, there was just two use cases.
Now, I did just want to kind of throw this out.
So, of course, you know, free energy over unity.
There's millions of applications, infinite applications.
Same with thrusters, same with communication.
Light speed travel.
I mean, obviously there's kind of one primary purpose, but I do want to talk about two use cases of all these technologies combined, which I talked about at the Quantum Summit.
Now, the first being... I got lost in my slides there.
Hold on.
Okay, so the first being this concept that if we put a giant mirror 10 light years away from the Earth and looked at it through a telescope, theoretically we'd see 20 years into the past.
Reason being, it takes 10 light years for the light hitting the Earth to reach the mirror and 10 light years for it to return to the Earth.
Now, if we have quantum entanglement communication, and we have faster-than-light travel, and we have our, of course, energy production and thruster to get us there, that enables us to send out a satellite or a probe, or perhaps thousands of probes,
And say we send them 10 light years away, we would be looking at the Earth as it was 10 years ago, and we're able to catch and record that light that has previously touched the Earth.
But we're able to keep sending those probes, and we're going to send them infinitely out, potentially billions of light years away, And we're going to be able to record human history in what I would call a four-dimensional Google Maps.
So that means there's a potential with this technology we'd be able to watch the fall of Atlantis.
We'd be able to watch Jesus walk the earth and see exactly what type of man Jesus was, what exactly happened.
Mary may lend a whole bit if there's a bloodline of Christ, all of it.
We'd be able to watch the building of the pyramids or the assassination of Kennedy, see what the dinosaurs really looked like.
Probably more like chickens than that, but whatever.
So that would give us the ability to record human history.
Which also gives us the ability to find all the missing children.
It gives us the ability to solve all the unsolved murders and to crush corruption.
Of course, this is a double-edged sword because it potentially removes all privacy from the past.
So there is potential pitfalls to this, but this would be one of the greatest intelligence and open source knowledge things that humanity could have achieved.
And if this is being done through peer-reviewed reproducible science at that point, and it's something that any Anyone could build and send out a probe and test to see that yes, this is factually what happened.
And it can be coded to a blockchain through the quantum heliosphere as it is sending the data back.
Then we have the potential to truly know Truth, and who humanity is, what we are, where we came from, and why.
So I'm not so much a subscriber to any one theory of anything, it's more that I just want to find out.
Right.
Okay, so that idea is also kind of a way of looking at the Akashic Record.
And exactly so, which in a sense could be visualized as a whole of those mirrors that are operational and at all times.
And so, you know, in a sense you could.
See, access all that data, as you say, which is exactly what may be happening anyway.
As part of this, what some people would call this hologram that we're part of, that is maybe even AI generated, doesn't mean that it's not also under the purview of God, right?
They're not mutually exclusive.
Yeah, well, I would say for God to be God, everything is under the purview of God.
I'm an absolutist when it comes to God's omnipotence, I would say.
But yeah, absolutely.
I think that in reference to the Akashic Records, it could very well be that they are built in the future.
And use case two here, which I'll kind of cover quickly, is something along those same lines.
So because time is not truly linear, everything that has been is and will be is a solid.
That means that as we send out that probe and we're looking 20 light years in the past, we could put on something like this apparatus and we could measure our brain as it is today.
And as we're looking at ourselves in the past, You could say, here's the biological physical structure that would have been present then, that is present now.
Here's the frequency, vibration, temperature, and all of the other things that that brain was at as we are observing it.
And we could modify the person now to the person then, and we could essentially interact our thoughts with the person today to the person in the past.
So now we have the ability to send an actual thought whether that what that would look like until it's done who knows but something akin to a deja vu something akin to a You know, intuition, or maybe even a clear thought, but it would enable us as a human species to essentially ascend.
We would become a four-dimensional species outside of time and space, where we would exist across the entirety of our lifespan, and potentially even our genetic ancestors who share certain biophysical traits.
Right.
Well, what I would say is that actually this exists already.
This potentiality is part of who we are actually already.
Exactly.
In essence, we are, you know, this particular body that you're in right now and occupying at least with your consciousness Now, when you're asleep, that's another matter.
You go elsewhere, in theory, and the body remains here, what we call here, here, Earth.
But, in essence, this ability to... There's a healer called Richard Bartlett, he has something called Matrix Energetics, and he actually uses time travel to heal people.
And what he does is take them to the time before they developed whatever it is, whether, you know, injury, disease, you name it.
And so he back, he teaches them how to go back before the thing occurred, sort of examine why it came along.
And then Eliminate it through, I guess one could say, understanding or there is no need to experience it.
You can eliminate the experience that way.
You know, it's a viable way of dealing with time, space, right?
Or space-time.
Yeah, absolutely.
And I do think that this has already succeeded in the future.
And I think there's already been indications in our current time that this technology exists in the future.
Right.
And this is where you get into Barron and Trump.
And, you know, free energy, in essence, Tesla tech and so on that his uncle was involved with.
So the idea that in essence, they, there's been people saying, you know, Trump's a time traveler, Barron's a time traveler, the reality is we're all time travelers.
And so you don't have to single them out, you can actually understand that you can become a messenger From the future to this time.
In essence, we're all messengers from the future to this time and bringing whatever things that we wanted to bring into being now, now.
Yeah, I completely agree.
And I love that you're able to talk about these topics freely.
And, you know, of course, I know you've been doing this, this type of speaking longer than I have, but it's much appreciated.
Okay, cool.
Well, okay, so I just want to make sure we've come to the end of your presentation.
And is there anything like wrap up comments you'd like to make?
Well, like I said, I think that it has succeeded in the future.
Now it's all, of course, very ambitious.
And I'll say that, you know, the OverUnity device and the Ionic drive circuit are both Well within our accepted normal known physics, but of course the heliosphere and faster than light travel are a little bit more ambitious and out there.
But, you know, I like to tell this story.
My son, he was about four and a half years old and he wasn't really speaking yet, but he kept writing down He kept writing down a formula, and it was just a mathematical formula, and he'd write it in crayon, he'd put it on the fridge, he'd just put it anywhere.
And, you know, one day my wife at the time Googled it, and she pulled it up, and it was one single result on Google.
Only one.
And it's a book that's Adaptive Mesh Refinement for Time Domain Numerical Electromagnets.
That's it.
The only result.
It's a book from 1981.
from 1981.
And, you know, of course I bought it, you know, but the idea that this book is probably exactly the formulas and the things that I may need in the future to complete this build and what I'm working on definitely occurred to but the idea that this book is probably exactly the formulas and But then also my, I asked my son like, okay, well, when do you need this?
And And he said in the most clear adult voice I've heard from him yet, when I'm 16.
And then after that he never wrote the formula again, never talked about it again, nothing.
So I definitely think that there's a potential that this has already succeeded in the future and is already communicating with us now in various ways.
That's awesome.
Wow, that's cool.
Okay.
So, yeah, I think, you know, along the same lines that we're talking, you know, our children are messengers from the future.
And I think that, you know, because there are people out there that are, they put together these, what seem almost airtight predictions of a, you know, dire future, and they're so convinced of it.
And when I see those things, I think to myself, but they're not taking into account who we really are and what we're really capable of, because so much of what humanity is and is thought to be has been, you know, watered down, dumbed down, full of lies, you know, and so on and so forth.
But actually, our potentiality is Well, it's actually, again, unlimited.
So if our potentiality is unlimited, there's absolutely no reason to narrow down the future to nothingness or to nothing but destruction or whatever they want to think about.
I think kind of like you can use some of these concepts as motivators, you know, to make sure that you don't have those things happen.
But I really don't think that that's the trend towards the future.
I think, you know, if it was an hourglass, what these people are doing is going to sort of the most narrow area to which you get through.
But we've already gone through that, actually.
You know, and I have a saying that, you know, you can't sometimes be eternal.
Either you are always eternal or you are never eternal.
So if we're eternal beings and we are, again, fragments of the greater God, then there is no limit.
And we have and will and are achieving all of these things.
And so I think if people would think that way, It would be to our benefit, you know, as a whole.
Absolutely.
Cool.
All right.
Well, it's absolutely fascinating to talk to you.
I mean, I can't even imagine all the things you could talk about.
So I really want to have you back on my show because and if you could just make whatever presentations you'd like and just come and, you know, share because I know my audience is just going to love you.
So thank you.
Very cool.
I'm so happy to have connected with you and met you actually in person and saw your first presentation at the Quantum Summit.
So that's very cool.
Thank you.
And I look forward to talking about the SSP with you someday.
Oh, that'd be great.
Yeah.
So let's really do this again soon, okay?
Okay.
And everyone out there who sees this video, please put protective energy around our illustrious guest, Patrick Riley, although I'm sure he is also already protected and will be protected and has been protected, you know, how it goes.
So I'm just saying, but it's great to have you with us and exploring these great ideas.
I do think, you know, it's wonderful that you are enough of a precog to realize that you had to sort of prepare the way to be protected and to allow your inventions and the information to go out in such a way where you're not the sole point, right, of origination or whatever you want to call that, right?
You had the forethought to actually package yourself in such a way that you're really in good shape, you know?
Yeah.
All right, well, thank you again, and thanks everyone for watching, and like I say, I'll be doing a show later today at 5 p.m.
Pacific with Ishmael, so that should be fairly interesting as well.
All right, take care, and really, please do come back, Patrick.
I'd love it.
I'll be back.
Excellent, okay.
Thanks, everyone.
Bye-bye.
▲
Export Selection