Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

June 16, 2023 - Project Camelot

01:48:00

MARSHALL MASTERS: NNEMIEIS: BROWN DWARF AND MINI SOLAR SYSTEM IMPACT ON US…. INCOMING

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Hi, everyone.
	I'm Carrie Cassidy from Project Camerot, and very happy to be here today.
	So, I have Marshall Masters, of all people, with me.
	He's got quite a reputation, I think, out there, and so it's going to be fun.
	Not sure I've ever interviewed you, actually, Marshall.
	I think we've been in touch on and off through the years, but I don't think I've ever had you on my show, so I'm very happy to have you on my show.
	Well, it's a pleasure to be here, Carrie.
	Yeah, you've been a real champion out there on the vaccine scene, and it's important.
	To me, there's two levels with the vaccine scene.
	There's what I call the deep divers and the snorkelers.
	And you're a deep dive master.
	You know, you get everybody down to the very bottom where you can see what's going on.
	Meanwhile, you got the cruise ship snorkelers up there at the surface and they're going, what's happening down there?
	And I'm actually, what I'm doing right now is I'm working with the snorkelers and telling them, hey, just, you know, watch out for the coral.
	And yeah, you can pee in the ocean and just setting them up so that they could become future deep divers and then hand them off to you.
	And other folks that are doing this.
	Yeah, you're a fabulous dive master.
	I want to really congratulate you on your work.
	It takes a lot of guts.
	Oh, thank you.
	Well, I did work very hard on that subject, and of course on my subjects, but Yeah, that was a new one for me, diving into a whole medical tyranny thing.
	That was really massive, so thank you for that.
	But let's talk about you, and first of all, we're going to talk about two kind of disparate, although they probably unite somewhere out there in the distance, we're going to talk about CNN, and you used to work for CNN, right?
	Am I right?
	That's right, in the 80s.
	I was there when they were, you know, when the network was actually new and trying to become profitable.
	Okay, so early days.
	And then we're going to talk about, and we're going to talk about the downfall of CNN.
	And so we're also going to talk about a subject that Marshall Masters is a master of.
	How about that?
	Which is Planet X, Nibiru, whatever you want to call that.
	That incoming something and that will be an interesting discussion for sure.
	So welcome everyone and please if you have questions we do have a comment section here.
	So I'm going to actually activate that so I can actually see it.
	So stand by one second while I turn off the sound.
	Okay and so that just in case we get a chance and then people can ask questions because I'm sure that's going to be a big a big one for questions.
	So Marshall, take it away.
	Where do you want to start?
	Well, I just put up a series called The Jab with Marshall Masters.
	It's on Odyssey, Rumble, and at my website at yowusa.com.
	And as I was saying before, I'm trying to work with the snorkelers.
	You're doing the deep divers.
	And I'm just trying to help people that are just now coming into awareness And, you know, doing what we do, we see what happens when people come into awareness and the abuse that they get, you know, family, friends, oh, that's stupid, stop doing that.
	Or, you know, spouses, you know, stop, stop researching that or I'll divorce you and that kind of stuff.
	It's this kind of difficult thing.
	But I was seeing I'm not vaccinated, never would have.
	And I didn't think much about the unvaccinated.
	I just stayed in my lane.
	But there were a few vaccinated people that Really came to have regrets about being vaccinated, making that choice.
	And there are a few.
	I mean, this is a small percentage of the population, from what I'm seeing in my own sphere, that most of the people actually that are vaccinated have no clue what's coming because they don't know or they don't care to know.
	But they're the ones that did it And now they're going, man, that wasn't the best thing to do.
	And what's important is, do they want to?
	More importantly than their regret is that it is a commitment to redeem the mistake.
	Namely, you start fighting for your life.
	If you're vaccinated, and the goal right now is mitigation.
	What I'm seeing, I've been studying it intensively.
	I was a former Army medic and systems analyst.
	And, you know, I have a lot of background that brings me to this.
	And I have been watching how people struggle with this.
	And once they start to get a feeling, boy, they've been had, but where do they go with it?
	And I wanted to create like a cushion for them, a little cushion thing.
	So it was a labor of love.
	It took me a couple of months, actually, to do the whole thing.
	And I just got, you know, made sure my video and my audio were good because I'm going to a very small audience.
	I mean, this was just labor of love stuff.
	I just saw where I could do something that would help a small number of people—not a large number of people, but a small number of people, specifically those who have come into awareness.
	They're not doing denial, dismissal, all of this cognitive dissonance stuff, but they're going, whoa, you know, what am I into?
	And for these people, what I saw that is whoa it is you go from zero miles an hour to 100 miles an hour because if you get out and you get out rumble and bit shoot and everywhere else and you're getting all this amazing reporting right now on COVID and the vaccine It's deep dive stuff.
	It goes fast, there's a lot of jargon, and it's difficult.
	And it's just, I could just see a lot of people that were just at that point going, uh-oh, this ain't Kansas anymore, what do I do about it?
	And then Once they go get into the information that's coming out, it is such a deep, complex, and fast-moving topic that it's so easy for them to get overwhelmed.
	So what I wanted to do is just those few people, I mean, I'm talking, I don't think it's more than five or ten percent of those who have been vaccinated are going to actually redeem it.
	Okay, and now I'm going to kind of change subjects here, because I've just introduced you saying we're going to cover two subjects, which is the downfall of CNN, number one, and which I actually have done some investigation on.
	So I hope very much that you've read the Atlantic Uh, article about that, right?
	Called Inside the Meltdown at CNN by Tim Alberta.
	I hope that you've read that, but if you haven't, you know, we'll we'll deal with that.
	And the other thing is, um, and you may have a completely different take on everything than he does, so that's fine.
	Um, and then the other thing is to move on to it to the whole Incoming Planet X type of stuff that you've been researching for, I think, even decades.
	So, let's start with CNN.
	Yes, with CNN, and I was with CNN for a few years back in the 80s.
	I was a science feature field producer.
	I covered all of the major universities in Texas.
	It was actually one of the most amazing, wonderful things of my life.
	CNN was an exciting place to be, to be working with them.
	And I talk about that extensively in the jab.
	I kind of tell them what it was like to be a producer.
	And I think that's important, because the CNN that I see today, it's like watching Invasion of the Body Snatchers, part two, you know?
	And like I say in my program, at four o'clock, the talking points come out, and the meeting notice is, hey, the heavy lifting is done, I'm bringing bagels, who's bringing the schmear?
	They, you know, I don't see the professionalism, but the reason why I see CNN where it is in a death cycle right now is very, very different.
	It's more of an inside view, having been inside to see it, whereas a lot of what everybody's talking about is what they're seeing from the outside.
	Okay.
	On the inside, it's numbers.
	Let's, you know, the rhetoric is one thing, But it comes down to basic numbers, so let me lay that out for you.
	If you go to your search engine and you say, what's the median age for CNN viewers, for MSNBC viewers, any of these cable news viewers, what you're going to get back typically is about 65 years of age.
	All right.
	So, let's take this.
	I don't understand.
	65 years of what?
	65 years of age.
	In other words, their, their, uh, what is the median age of their viewers is 65 years of age or older.
	Really?
	Yes.
	CNN?
	Yeah.
	CNN, MSNBC, Fox is even older.
	Really?
	You know, Fox, I mean, you know, down in Florida, The first thing they do is turn it on Fox in the morning, and the last thing they do is forget to turn it off at night.
	So cable news is a very different technology from what you and I are doing right now, and this is part of what's happening.
	I do not see the CNN today as a news outlet.
	It's a propaganda mill.
	Pure, plain, simple.
	What do I think about Fox?
	It's controlled opposition.
	The rest of them is propaganda, but Fox is the controlled opposition, because it's what they don't talk about that tells you it's controlled opposition.
	Well, firing Tucker might give you a clue as well.
	Oh yeah, and boy are they- now they're trying to lawfare him into silence.
	You know, that's typical, we know.
	But here's what they're facing.
	Okay, go ahead.
	Now, their median age is 65.
	Their viewers are 65 years old.
	They are losing.
	When Tucker left, he took a chunk of audience, huge chunk of audience with him.
	He didn't take the old ones.
	He took the younger generations.
	The ones who are more comfortable with new technology like, you know, social media and so forth.
	They're the ones that are moving away.
	The ones that Fox, MSNBC, CNN, the ones they're holding on to are senior citizens.
	And this is more about technology than politics.
	Oh, that's an interesting take.
	All right.
	I'll, you know, I'll consider that.
	All right.
	Now, you know, you're savvy, and I'm savvy, but come on, how many times have you done a Zoom conference with someone our age, and they get totally frustrated, and they start doing whack-a-mole, and you can't get them to get the video and the audio set up, and finally you just say, and I'm not being facetious, you say, is there a 10-year-old in the house?
	You know, the 10-year-old, the grandchild comes, goes, boom, You know, Grandma's sitting there.
	She's live.
	All right.
	The point here is it is technology hesitancy.
	Hmm.
	Okay.
	You've just frozen.
	That is keeping the core audiences of younger generations.
	And this is going to continue on.
	And this is, for them, a real problem in two regards.
	One is that you don't have your replacement viewers coming up through the process, because the people that would be replacing your seniors when they pass away Are already gone and when they go, they don't come back and the ones that are leaving are not leaving about technology issues.
	They're leaving for integrity.
	They want to find people that are standing in their integrity and they're finding them now.
	Good example.
	is like redacted all right and a wonderful couple and he was on fox and now they're doing their thing and never forget one day it was natalie she goes i've had three kids time out and then clinton jumps in he goes definitely time out and i'm seeing these two And they're talking about, you know, no more kids in the middle of their news broadcast.
	I laughed so hard I almost fell on the floor, but I loved it because it shows me that there's a return to blue-collar journalism.
	Journalism was always blue-collar before network television came out.
	It was guys wearing gumsoles, chewing cigars, drinking whiskey, and they're out on the street getting the stories, all right?
	Like Billy Wilder and his famous journalism movies.
	Yes, yes!
	That's what we're talking about.
	But that's, you know, this is really, you're going way back.
	I mean, I don't know, maybe you're, you know, I don't know, what do you say, constituency is an older generation than mine, and also maybe
	They're more fixated on you saying the schism between because this is an old conversation I can't believe we're even having it and so but you you know it's an interesting point to bring up which because Tucker left and because CNN is going down the rap you know going down the hole whatever you want to say and
	There's a lot of reasons for that, but they don't seem, at least in this article, and I'm going to bring it up on the screen really quickly here, share my screen so people can see, because this is wild.
	I mean, I take it you didn't read this article on the Atlantic, but apparently it had everything to do with getting, I hope you know, Chris Licht fired, right?
	So this is the up-to-date CNN stuff.
	I would definitely—you know, I'm definitely going to read this, but where I'm coming from is not this same direction.
	All right.
	This is talking about coverage, personalities, management, corporate.
	I am seeing it's raw numbers.
	Okay, let me finish my analysis.
	All right.
	I was talking about the 65-year-olds.
	What if, and you do the vaccine, so we're on familiar ground here, what is the most vaccinated age group demographic?
	It is 65 and older.
	Really?
	The baby boomer generation is 97% vaccinated, and most of them have multiple boosters.
	Only about 3% are not vaccinated.
	Is Baby Boomer, I don't, you know, this terminology, you're saying Baby Boomer is this older group?
	Right, it's our, it's my generation, it was people that were born after World War II, alright, and when you say Baby Boomer, you're essentially saying senior citizens 65 years of age and older.
	All right, I guess I'm behind the eight ball on that one.
	All right, so you're saying those are the people that, one, got vaxxed, and two, stick with the mainstream media such as CNN, Vox, and the other players, right?
	Precisely.
	Now, here's where it hits them.
	Why is it the vaccines never had safety testing?
	Because they've been in the laboratory for 20 years, and the animals always died.
	At least half of the animals, if not all of the animals, would die within a matter of weeks.
	All right?
	The point here is we are looking, the numbers of people that are dying and having issues, Is horrifically suppressed, horrifically suppressed.
	Sure.
	In the next two to three years, it is going to become progressively worse, and so what we're going to see is the heaviest loss of life is going to be in my generation, the baby boomers.
	I see.
	The guys, the folks born after World War II.
	And what that means for CNN is it has alienated its replacement audience.
	And at the same time, CNN, because it was part of this criminal cabal to reduce the population of the earth, this is coming back to haunt them because their core constituency is the ones that they have.
	They've lied to them, denied them the information they need to make informed decisions.
	Essentially, they denied them the right to fight for their lives.
	Okay, fair enough.
	So what's happening, so now you have an audience, their audience numbers right now, if CNN had to compete in the open market for business like it did when I was there.
	When I was there, my executive producer, Bailey Barish, every time I went to Atlanta, Marshall, we're competing with over 50 major media outlets.
	We have to be the best.
	Now, six companies own the whole thing.
	All right?
	The point here is CNN has alienated its replacement audience, it has essentially suicided its core audience, and three, these idiots don't know what competition is.
	They're propagandists.
	They get in front of a—they just read what's in front of them, and they do the hysterics and all of this stuff.
	All right?
	And so the bottom line is, None of this makes sense from a business standpoint.
	And what I'm saying in my series, The Jab, everyone is getting into all of these human issues.
	This is war.
	This is World War III.
	And the vaccine is a bioweapon designed for eugenics, mass extinction.
	They want to reduce half the population.
	So, CNN is To think about CNN as a business or as a news outlet is moot.
	It's moot.
	There's no basis.
	It's like, you know, they're like, you know, committing suicide.
	Okay, but let me ask you, are you familiar, have you actually looked at the stats?
	You know, the stats for CNN, Fox, and that compared to—I don't know if you've done this, but have you looked at that comparison between that and what we call multimedia and the Internet, basically?
	Oh, they're getting their lunch kicked, alright?
	I mean, it is—I'm seeing a huge— Okay, where are the stats for CNN right now?
	Do you know?
	Oh my gosh, it's, you know, it's no longer hills and valleys.
	It's like the valley's so low, it's going down.
	Their numbers are going down, like Target and Anheuser-Busch's numbers are going down because of their involvement.
	The thing about CNN is CNN was acquired by the globalists not as a business investment.
	They acquired it as a weapon of war.
	As a weapon of war, all weapons are either going to become obsolete and disposed of, or you're going to expend them in combat.
	What they have been doing is—CNN, when I was there, we were—that phrase, you know, the most trusted name in news—we were the ones making that happen.
	What they have been doing with this is they've been trading on it.
	They've been trading on that trust and betraying it.
	And that was a very calculated move.
	CNN is an expended ammunition.
	That's all it is now.
	It's expended ammunition.
	Okay, but I want to bring this up to the present day because I think your analysis is correct.
	It's just that it's also a little bit behind the times because, and correct me if you think I'm wrong, my understanding is that's true of all the networks, not just CNN, okay?
	That there's a time at which, you know, and this would probably be, well it could even be 20 years ago, when The whole internet took off and everyone got onto the internet and, you know, my YouTube channel Has been banned and deleted, but I was on there for 16 years, okay, or even 17 as a director, as a YouTube creator, as they call them.
	And I had two hour interviews from day one, okay, because I was a director.
	So what happens is during that time, that's where the audience share went.
	It already was headed to the internet from there.
	So it's been on the internet now for a good solid 20 years.
	Okay, easy, easy.
	We were the early adopters, myself and my partner, as far as video interviews and using video on the internet.
	When you look at that, and you look at the networks, that's when their downfall really began.
	But there's something else happening more recently, right?
	And that has to do with why they hired this guy, Chris Licht, and why they have been trying to, I guess, you know, backpedal or get themselves back up, you know, up the Up the waterfall, or whatever you want to say, going against the tide, trying to get themselves back in the game when they've kind of already lost the game, is I think what you're saying.
	Oh yeah.
	They lost the game the minute they were acquired as weapons of war.
	And that's what they have been used as, as a weapon of war.
	And they have been expended.
	What year are you relating to them as a weapon of war?
	From what year?
	Are you going back to the Gulf War?
	The first Gulf War?
	I would think it's more after post 9-11.
	And so it has been, and this is something... That's 20 years ago, right?
	That's 20 years ago, but it's, there's a lot of this that's, you know, a lot of this stuff that we're seeing today actually, as I point out in my series, everything we're seeing today started in the 70s.
	If you wanted to say what is the one thing that kicked everything off, it was the 1970 discovery of reverse transcriptase enzyme.
	That gave us the power to be gods?
	And to change everything.
	And I explain all of this in my series, The Jab.
	You just sent it to me earlier today and I was still editing a form yesterday's show, so to speak, so I didn't get a chance to read that.
	So, you know, I apologize that I'm not up to speed on that.
	Can you explain to my audience, who probably isn't up to speed on your series yet either, what are you talking about this enzyme and why do you think that was the beginning of anything?
	Well, reverse transcriptase enzyme is—and I explain, what I do is I take the jargon and break it down for people, and so the way there's transcription is the basic process that the way God made us.
	So the body needs proteins, and the DNA in the cell uses mRNA to send a message to the protein manufacturing components in the cell to manufacture proteins.
	And so DNA to mRNA to protein is transcription.
	This is the natural order of things as God made us.
	With reverse transcriptase, what happened was, and it set everything in motion, reverse transcriptase allows them to take modified mRNA, and instead of it going to the protein manufacturing, once it gets into the cell, it goes straight to the DNA, and through a process of All right, so you have transcription.
	You're talking about the Robert Monroe innovation.
	Is that what you're talking about?
	The, pardon?
	Robert Monroe.
	I think it's Monroe.
	Yeah, Monroe.
	Okay.
	So he's the so-called father of the mRNA, you know.
	Okay, right.
	It was, he came in this, it was this 1970 discovery of reverse transcriptase.
	is what really starts with that.
	He came in later, all right?
	But this is when they knew they had the power of gods.
	They just had to put all the pieces together.
	Okay, to rewrite DNA.
	Roll it out.
	So they can rewrite the DNA.
	With transvection, what happens is that the bioweapon is in the cell, it gets into the DNA, and transvection is another word.
	You could essentially say infection, all right?
	But the point is that once it gets into the DNA, the DNA is Permanently changed.
	There's no do-overs.
	There's no going back.
	No golden parachute.
	No happy ya-ya.
	Once you are modified, you are modified.
	So you go from homo sapien to homosynthetic.
	All right?
	And here is—and it continues on, because once the cell is modified, then it starts generating more of the bioweapon, which then propagates throughout the whole body, and over time, you are transvected everywhere.
	Every cell in the body is going to eventually be affected.
	How that effect happens, how fast it happens, to the extent, is going to be determined by the vaccine that you received and your comorbidities.
	So it's the big variables thing.
	But in the final analysis, everyone's going to get to the same destination.
	All right, now that's okay, and at the moment I'm not going to get into the medical background, but I do know from my whistleblowers that what you are kind of leaving out of the equation here, and I have a NASA whistleblower on this who is a doctor, and he basically talks about a package that is linking what we call the nanographene oxide
	to the spike proteins, and that is actually the package that gets delivered and changes your DNA.
	But you're talking about an inner working of that, and I get that, but... Well, no, that was one part of it, and what you just said, I explained that in excruciating detail in my JAB series.
	Excellent.
	Okay.
	It's a video series.
	It's about, you know, four and a half hours of video.
	Okay, but I'm going to be a stickler for the two topics that we started out with, because I have done too many shows on this subject, you know, The Vax, and I get that you're trying to reach a certain audience, but that audience is not my audience, okay?
	I understand.
	So, you know, we didn't talk about that ahead of time, and you didn't say that you wanted to talk about that, so I need you to talk about... So, I understand it has a factor That gets wrapped into the CNN audience and to the, what we call, um, you know, uh, cable network audience, so to speak, right?
	So your audience is under attack.
	And this is one of the things is certainly the jab, no doubt if they're in that age range and they were dumb enough to take the Vax, then a lot of, you know, yada, yada, yada.
	But what we need to also understand is what is going on.
	Not 20 years ago, but now.
	Okay, with CNN, because I think it's like a new level of downfall, if you will.
	Like, yes, it started on a downward road all those years ago, and yes, I'm sure that, you know, the innovation of this changing our DNA Was all on part of that package, but do you want to see where I'm going with this?
	I want, can I bring you up to the present day and does your analysis involve what's happening right now to the news media in general?
	Which, you know, even you could say, I can tell you the number that I watch.
	Okay.
	Okay.
	I want to know Where are they?
	Who's buying the ads?
	75% of the ad revenue for CNN—and when I talk about CNN, let's just say it's collectively, I'm not only talking about, you know, electronic, I'm also talking about print media—but particularly with, like, CNN, 75% of their money right now is cartel funding.
	Now, what I call cartels is pharma, military, industrial, all of this.
	That's where they're getting—if they had to, if there was something that happened that all of a sudden Pfizer said, we're no longer buying ads.
	If the pharma, there used to be a law that pharma could not advertise.
	That law was repealed as part of the process of allowing pharma to come in and take control.
	Now, they're really, your advertisers are going to control you as a network more than your viewers, because you need your advertisers to make payroll, all right?
	And if your advertisers are saying, you will do this and you won't do that, And they're 75% of your paycheck.
	That's what you're going to do.
	If CNN loses the cartel funding right now, they will fold up like a cheap tent that fast.
	Okay, are you predicting that?
	Are you predicting that?
	Because it looks like they're trying to kiss their ass right now.
	Oh, you bet there's ass-kissing going on right now.
	But the fact is, and what would happen is, there is one of the reasons why they're fighting Trump like hell, is what happens if Trump comes in in 24 and he says, okay, we're reinstating the old laws for anti-concentration and for pharma to be advertising.
	And we're going to reinstate the laws that didn't allow that to happen.
	And that's the point I make in my series.
	You want to find out who really screwed us, forget CNN with the people in front of the camera.
	They're idiots.
	A lot of the people that you see They're doing network news because they're not pretty enough for Hollywood.
	That's the truth of it.
	And there are all these elitists, and network news came in, and boom.
	They jumped on it, and they took a blue-collar profession and turned it into their little Ivy League.
	And they have been trading on something they didn't build, which was public trust.
	Their trust is going, All it takes is one reverse politically, and for some reason, Pharma is no longer buying all their advertising and paying top of the ticket!
	Their money dries up, and what will happen to CNN is it's going to wind up like these other brand names like Rexall and whatever, that the companies go out of business and someone buys it, it goes on, and CNN eventually is going to wind up On the fringe, instead of being in the mainstream, it's going to be the hardcore lefties, and they're going to wind up picking it up.
	It's not going to be relevant to most mainstream.
	In two to three years, their core audience is mostly gone.
	They don't have a replacement audience, and if they lose their funding, it all collapses.
	And that's the numbers I'm looking at.
	All right, fair enough.
	Now, if you are looking at, can we widen the net a bit and include some other, these channels, MSNBC, Vox, the various ones, right?
	No difference.
	They're all similar.
	Yeah, they're all the same.
	So why should they be successful and CNN go down?
	I think they're all going down.
	Yeah, but I just can't.
	I can't.
	I can't say that.
	I mean, I can say I would work with CNN.
	I could talk about CNN, but I don't think it would be, you know, I haven't done that research on MSNBC that I did on CNN and with the focus because I was a science feature producer, all right?
	Do you have colleagues over at the current CNN anymore?
	I doubt it.
	My gosh, I was there in the mid-80s.
	Right.
	So, you know, the old silverbacks, the folks that I was with, I don't think they're there.
	I can tell you one thing, I was really, I worked with some of the greatest people in the news business.
	I mean, CNN was a lean mean news machine.
	Ooh, I loved it.
	I used to go, you know, go back into the, remember on CNN used to have the big view of the newsroom through the big plexiglass wall.
	And I used to have to go in there all the time.
	And I was like, that was tough.
	The tension in that room, you could cut it with a knife.
	Not today.
	I don't see any of that today.
	They're all just packaged.
	They're propaganda mills.
	It's more Joseph Goebel's school of media than anything else.
	All right.
	That's pretty interesting.
	Okay, so what this individual, Zaslav, okay, he seems to be the top guy over behind the scenes at CNN.
	Do you know him?
	No, I didn't.
	My following on CNN, because again, I'm not an outsider.
	I'm an insider.
	I was inside the business, and so I know the metrics to look for.
	All right?
	And those are the metrics I'm following on.
	Their audience is going away, their money's going to go away, and these people couldn't compete their way out of a paper bag.
	All right.
	If they actually had to go out and compete with folks like you and other folks that are independent journalists right now, they had to actually compete with you.
	You would kick their ass up the street, down the street, around the street.
	Okay, thank you.
	Well, I appreciate that, but I do want to kind of zero in a little bit, because there was this drama that went on, and I don't know, I guess you didn't pay attention to it, but I thought it was interesting, with Chris Licht, because he was put in there a very short time ago, very short, and he didn't last very long, and it's all because, at least according to this article that I cited and put on the screen a minute ago,
	That basically the culture of CNN will not change.
	They will not morph into anything other than what they've been, which is some left-leaning, I don't know, uh, you know, uh, and now, and, and maybe this is not relational to what you're talking about, which is your past, which ended in the 80s.
	So back in the 80s, maybe they were the same kind of people.
	I mean, Chris John, on and poor is still on there, right?
	She's still in that gang.
	The kind of people that I worked with CNN, I would say that the journalist today that most typifies them would be Maria Bartolomo over at Fox.
	Okay, well Maria to me is an old gum school.
	She's old school.
	All right, but she might okay back channel information coming actually from 107 is that actually she's going to follow Tucker.
	She's on her way out of Fox.
	I don't know.
	I don't think it's happened yet.
	I mean, this is what I heard back-channel.
	I'm not an expert on this by any means.
	I don't know the backroom chatter at Fox, but I know that Juan mentioned her as being, you know, she is a, you know, a person with credibility, and as you say, a serious journalist, and that she is not going to hang out for this debacle that has become Fox.
	It has become, when you're in the news business, everyone looks at all these other things, fame, name, stockholders, this, that.
	No, there's only one thing that matters when you're in the news business.
	There's only one thing that matters.
	Do you stand in your integrity?
	Okay, if she's going to go join Tucker and I am seeing this trend and I will tell you the best way to describe what she's going to do and what Tucker's going to do is they have come to the point in their careers where they have realized it is better to eat beans out of your own bowl than steak out of another man's hand.
	They are in it for their audience.
	They love their audience.
	They care about their audience.
	Their integrity to them is first and foremost, all right?
	Exactly.
	A propagandist has no integrity.
	Right.
	All right, they're just nihilists wanting to be, look at me, I'm famous, you know?
	All right, they're doing that.
	But if Maria goes over, and what is really impressive is he went to Twitter And he didn't do any special deal.
	He just walked in and did a retail contract, so to speak.
	And look where he's going.
	He is flying.
	And I love his stuff.
	I'm following him.
	Yes.
	I love his work.
	And the fact that you've just told me that you're seeing Maria could join him.
	You just made my day, Carrie.
	Thank you.
	Okay, well that didn't come from me, it came from Juan.
	You know, he says little things in passing that I stick in my mind and I paid attention to that.
	So, I don't think the movement has happened yet.
	What I actually think, and this is my theory and I don't know whether as an old-time news guy maybe you could tell me about this, but I think some of these people, I think maybe even Tucker, In a sense, he planted his demise on purpose because he could no longer stomach the culture at Fox and the lies that were being pushed on the network.
	And so he actually, he created his own exit.
	And I think Murray is going to do the same thing.
	It's not Fox that acted on him.
	It's he that acted behind the scenes on Fox to make his move.
	I think that's astute.
	I think that's brilliant, because it could be—they could have done it without consciously doing it, but subconsciously doing it.
	In other words, you know it's bad.
	Think about if you run a business and you have people and, you know, like, oh my God, this guy's really off the rails.
	Do I fire him?
	Do I keep him?
	Okay?
	And there are people that want to quit.
	But they don't have the guts to say, I'm going to quit.
	They want you to fire him.
	It's a strange thing.
	It is the way in business.
	And it could be he just was doing something to get himself fired without even consciously.
	I think it was calculated.
	And I'm going to tell you why.
	Did you happen to see the the lecture he gave right prior to when he left was like on the Wednesday and he left on the Friday or was so-called fired on the Friday.
	And he spoke to, I think they're called the Heritage Foundation, or whatever they're called, you know who I'm talking about?
	He gave this very amazing lecture, which was actually deeply personal.
	During the course of that lecture, if you remember, I watched his face kind of carefully, and as a fellow journalist, you know, I'm interested in this kind of thing, because I want to understand Where even if somebody's on a mainstream channel, I still want to understand where their head is at.
	So what I was seeing was a man who actually knew, right, he knew that Wednesday that he was already leaving Fox.
	And he said things in that lecture that a person who had already, who knew they were leaving and planned to leave, would have said.
	And apparently he'd been doing that for months with one-liners here and there.
	Just my thoughts.
	I like it.
	You know, I'm going to review it.
	Yeah, I mean, you you've piqued my curiosity.
	I want to go back.
	It's these, you know, it's like this new guy that just got canned at CNN.
	He was the one who said, yeah, let's bring Trump on for a town hall.
	You know, they say in Texas, don't play with snakes.
	And, you know, you can play with snakes.
	All you want is to remember to hold them by the head and you're not going to hold Trump by the head.
	OK, that was a he brought him on.
	And Trump absolutely stole the show.
	Yes.
	And it was brilliant.
	And that girl that they brought on was an arrogant little thing.
	But also, she was actually rude and hopeless.
	I mean, I'm sorry, you know, I don't know where her career is going to go from now on.
	But seriously, I mean, as far as people With my point of view, consider her to be completely clueless.
	I mean, just she didn't know how to handle him.
	She didn't know how to, you know, give him the respect he deserved.
	And she was rude and she was just off the topic.
	You know, they started off with the voter steal thing.
	Right.
	And they have no they don't even have a leg to stand on on that subject.
	And yet they don't know it.
	They're completely blissfully oblivious.
	It's unbelievable.
	But they don't do any investigative journalism on their own.
	They only know what comes in at 4 a.m.
	Right.
	When I was there, oh my God, we would work on blocks of stories, and I would fly in Atlanta, sit down, you know, with the conference, and we—and I mean, I had to have everything covered, every which—check, double-check, verified, re-verified.
	We went in-depth on something, because when—here's the reason why we did it.
	As nothing with, I'm a beautiful person and I'm going to have integrity.
	No, you don't want to lose your job.
	When you are up against, at that time there were 50 major media outlets, and if they caught you with happy bullshit in your work, Oh my God, you would get crucified, that's it!
	You'd get a phone call, get your stuff, we'll mail you, you know, your check, you're outta here, okay?
	That's it, you lose your integrity, you're DOA, you're a dead man walking.
	When I was in the business, because there was a competition, they were always double, they were fact checking you.
	This whole thing today of using fact checks, Yeah, well that's a CIA operation.
	I'm sure you know that.
	Yeah, outsource responsibility for your obligation as a journalist to do your due diligence, to vet your stories, and to make sure you are giving your viewers or your readers the best possible information.
	Yeah, as reporters we're always going to have some kind of a slant, You dot your I's, you cross your T's, and you make sure when you lay it out there that somebody from another network or another paper can't come and humiliate you with your own work.
	Today, everybody is parroting everybody else.
	Yeah, it's all parody.
	They don't know.
	It's also a bit of a problem in the alternative.
	I have to say that the alternative media is can't really escape that that charge either.
	I'm not going to name names or anything like that, but I can say well enough that there's a lot of parody going on.
	There's a lot of there's also that happy news thing that that's like the kiss of death, right?
	It's still the kiss of death.
	I mean, you can smell it a mile away if you're a viewer.
	If you're a fellow journalist, it's really, you know, I mean, that's, that's bad stuff.
	So, okay, unless you have something more to talk about in depth with the CNN thing, I'd like to make the shift because we only have, you know, Eyeballs are only going to be glued to this for an hour, hour and a half, okay?
	So I want to make sure we cover everything.
	Can we go into the Planet X stuff?
	And I know you've written books on it, blah blah blah, and you, you know, you've also recommended the Cobran Bible a million times, so can you package it?
	And I know we've not got a ton of time, but do you want to start on that road?
	You did a 2008 interview with Bob, remember that, where he was talking about, in there, and I've referred back to that interview quite often.
	I've spoken, you know, I had the chance to speak with him, and we talked offline about different things.
	Bob Dean, just to clarify.
	Yeah.
	And Bob Dean is one of my personal heroes, and always will be.
	And he and I had some real intense, you know, conversations back then about Planet X. And where I'm going right now, I've been following Planet X, consistently reporting on it.
	I've been doing a series called Signs, and what I'm tracking is what I call the Nemesis Cloud, when in 24 it's going to reach perihelion.
	As a matter of fact, right now it is It's been for the longest time moving from the left side of the Sun in the observations we're getting, and these are typically afternoons, very few morning.
	But in the afternoons, and it was like starting at around, I remember early many years ago, like 10, 11 o'clock, and now it's at one o'clock because it's working its way slowly around the Sun.
	We're in locking orbits.
	And we're a little slightly faster than it, and that's the reason why we're slowly merging to when it comes to our side of the sun.
	And in 2024, it's going to become a regular fixture in the sky.
	And that's where the—and the stuff that I'm seeing right now in the observation reports that people are sending to me, and I just—it's so wonderful to have so many people just send stuff to you, because I wouldn't find it any other way.
	I'm tracking it.
	Everything—all of the movements of my book, Surviving the Planet X Tribulation, that I did in 2015, all of my estimates there are on track, period.
	It's just coming through.
	We got the science on it.
	When we see it in 2024, it's actually going to be very beautiful when it's in the sky, because it's going to have a sunlit side.
	It's a brown dwarf star, which is not—it's very dim naturally, and it looks ugly, actually.
	But When you have our sunlight, good old soul, on its sunlit side, those ugly dark colors are going to become more pastel-like, and so it is going to be very beautiful.
	Now the wings are going to appear.
	And people tend to confuse the wings with tails of a comet.
	A comet has three kinds of tails, and the two that we talk about all the time are the gas tail and the dust tail.
	The gas tail is always going to follow, go away from the Sun with the solar wind.
	That's the direction it's going to go.
	But the debris or the dust, if you will, is going to follow in the trajectory or the orbit of the object.
	So those two tails are going to be very, very different, pointing in very different directions.
	None of that applies to what we're going to see with the wings on Nemesis, which is the brown dwarf, which Nibiru is in orbit around with other major planets.
	If you see all of the pictures, it's always described as the winged planet, the winged planet.
	It has wings, and what they're really seeing is going to be Nemesis.
	Nemesis has a cloud, a debris cloud from when the sun formed.
	And it is, and this is what we have been tracking, and we've actually been able to track it through fireball observations.
	We're not looking at shooting stars.
	Those little ones, they're pretty, and I like them too.
	We're just the big smokers, the big rocks, the fireballs, and the bolides.
	These are the ones we're tracking, and they have been giving us a very good pattern.
	The data has given us a beautiful pattern to see what this nemesis large cloud is.
	And the cloud is very oval shaped, and nemesis is towards the front end of it.
	So the reason why we will see the wings is that it is this entire nemesis cloud That is following along with Nemesis, and the wings are going to be the leading edges of that Nemesis field, all right?
	And that's the reason why we're going to see the wings.
	When we're looking in 24, it's going to—like I said, it's going to be pretty, uh what they're going to tell us on television is don't worry it's not going to hit us which would be a statement of fact uh but it's going to do a hell of a lot of damage and it's going to eventually cause a pole shift somewhere in 28 to 30.
	So that is interesting.
	Now, I just hope you don't mind, but I need to sort of stop you there and go back a bit.
	First of all, did you ever talk with or read any of the books that Andy Lloyd wrote?
	You remember the author Andy Lloyd?
	I interviewed him several times.
	He was somebody who, I think his first book was called The Dark Star.
	Well, yeah, I remember Andy and the Dark Star, and there were some other good authors, and to be honest with you, Carrie, I just stay in my lane, and I don't follow other people because I don't want their work modifying my work.
	I want mine just—I'm finding, I'm going where I'm going, but I'm always interested to know, always interested to talk with them.
	Andy was a heck of a good guy.
	Uh so I mean he's not he's he's still alive as far as I know he's British um he had kind of backed out of that scene a bit but he did start writing sci-fi books based on the sort of return of Well, he would probably call it Nibiru, and he was talking about Marduk coming back and things like that, so he was going down the Sitchin Road.
	He lives very close to GCHQ.
	He has contacts in GCHQ, and I don't want to get him in trouble or anything, but that's where his kind of clues came from, if you want to say that.
	And his own research, of course.
	And he is a scientist.
	He has a background in science, as you do, apparently.
	So you're calling it Nemesis.
	You're not calling it Nibiru.
	Can you explain why not?
	Yes, what we really have is what you need to think about, and the terms get confusing.
	So let me just talk quickly about terms.
	Let's talk about Planet X. Planet X does not mean Planet 10.
	Get that out of your mind.
	That was—anybody tells you Planet X is Planet 10 and that it's going to hit us is a disinformation operative, all right?
	Planet X was a term that was coined in the early 1900s by Percival Lowell, founder of the Lowell Observatory.
	Percival Lowell founded the observatory to continue the search that was conducted for centuries by the Europeans after the discovery of Uranus.
	It was the first planet discovered with a telescope.
	And based on observations of Uranus, they were actually able to then discover Neptune mathematically, and I'm talking about when they sent the numbers to an observatory in Berlin.
	I mean, they swung the scope around, boom!
	There it was, all right?
	And what they've been tracking were perturbations.
	There was something in the orbit pulling these planets, a little bit of a tug that's going on.
	So What is coming through our system is what is called a mini-constellation.
	In the core, we are in a binary star system.
	We have two suns, and our smaller sun, which is in orbit, it's in a comet-like orbit.
	It's extremely fast orbit, and it, you know, where we're counterclockwise, it's a clockwise orbit for it, which you can do with comets.
	And it's coming up from the southern skies, where it spends most of its 3600 And it's now coming over the top of the Sun, and what will happen is in 2024 perihelion, the system will reach its closest distance to the Sun, and after that it's going to start the slow journey back to the southern skies, and that's when it starts that journey back to the southern skies.
	That's when we're going to have hell and high water here.
	Now, what you have is in the center of this mini constellation is Nemesis.
	It's a brown dwarf star.
	Nemesis was actually first theorized in 1940 by Carlos Munoz Ferrada, an amazing man, amazing man.
	And what he said in 1940 was that there was a rocky planet, seven times the size of Earth, in orbit around a black star.
	Today we call it a brown dwarf.
	That is at the core of it.
	And then you have the major planets coming out in that system.
	So you have Helium, And then you have Arboda, and then you have Nibiru.
	There's also little dwarf planets in there, and moons.
	And so there's a whole constellation, a whole mix.
	Nibiru, which in translation in Sumerian is the Planet of Crossing, is the outermost major planet of this mini constellation system I call Planet X system.
	And so when this comes around, Nemesis is going to pass between Mars and Jupiter.
	But Nibiru is going to pass between us and Venus.
	Now this is what you know Ed Dames, Dr. Doom, all right?
	What they have remote-viewed.
	And they remote-viewed this, and this is what is the period of the Days of Darkness, and then what he calls a kill shot, which is in fact a—that is just a solar sprite.
	Well yeah, I mean an EMP from the Sun, it was said.
	Oh, no, it's more like a lightning bolt.
	And when it hits a planet, tears hell out of it.
	And if you want to see what a solar sprite can do to a planet, look at Val Marineris on Mars.
	It's the largest Kenyan system on any planet in our solar system.
	Okay, now, I need to slow you down a little bit.
	Okay, so, you're basically, I mean, we have had witnesses on my show, and we, you know, we went to Italy, and we got, you know, Chris John Barbato is, you know, he was a journalist.
	You know the story, right?
	About his...
	The Vatican and the investigation to do with the Vatican and their secret agents and basically this individual that we interviewed, who knew Barbato and met with him, then went back to Northern Italy.
	We went to Northern Italy to interview him, Lucas Scantamberlo.
	We were supposed to also interview Barbato, but he went silent.
	He was threatened.
	And then he disappeared, basically.
	They fired him, among other things.
	I mean, he had a really hard time of it.
	And then at the same time, but there was supposed to be a tape.
	This was a hypothetical that was given to Lucas Cantaburlo.
	Then they thought, because we interviewed Luca, that he'd given us a copy or the original, which he didn't.
	So they searched our car in Milan airport.
	Where we were parked, and they actually turned the whole thing upside down, but there were credit cards right in plain sight.
	They didn't touch those.
	So we knew that that was an inside job and that they were basically looking for that piece of material.
	So there has been an ongoing sort of suspicion about that, that the Vatican, again, telescope or whatever you want to call it, had caught visuals of this planet, but they never refer to it as, you know, a brown dwarf with a constellation.
	We have other witnesses that have talked about the brown dwarf.
	In fact, Henry Deacon, one of our first witnesses, way back in the very earliest days, 18 years ago, in Camelot, talked about that.
	Okay, so he talked about that.
	The second, he also talked about the Tucson, the binary system.
	So your information does coincide with that whistleblower, to some degree.
	So, you know, there are a lot of different theories out there and so on and so forth.
	It's fascinating to hear your kind of overview of your work.
	Now, so you actually think there's a planet called Nemesis and a planet called Nibiru in that little constellation that follows the brown dwarf around and is in that sort of dust cloud, right?
	I've been seeing them with my own eyes since 2012.
	I first saw Nibiru December 2012.
	And people have taken all kinds of photographs and, you know, people are fond of saying, you know, like Richard Hoagland that, you know, that's Venus you're photographing or whatever it is.
	So they're in denial.
	Either that or they just are lying because they have to cover up because, you know, Hoagland was very working very closely with NASA and all that.
	Hoagland was a player.
	He played all sides of the street.
	He'd sell you out for a dime.
	All right, well, and he, you know, he, yes, he's very deep in the whole story as well as the whole Illuminati thing.
	You don't know which lane he's in.
	I'm going to tell you, you don't know which lane he is.
	He came at me, my first, my very first thing that put me on the map, all right, was I spotted the actual predicted Nostradamus, king of Terra Comet, and I'm the guy who's found it.
	And that started me in 1999 with 5 million views on the Millennium Group.
	And he went to attack me and he said, Oh, you were confused by flashbulbs.
	Okay.
	And because I actually spotted three objects.
	Guess what?
	A French cosmonaut on the Mir station sent me imagery to back up my position and made Hoagland look like an ass.
	Okay.
	And it shut him up, and he never talked about me ever again.
	Oh, right.
	Yeah.
	In this topic, we have people that are controlled opposition, or they're playing every side of the street, and that's one of the reasons why I just don't get caught up with other researchers.
	Okay, there is the Carrington information.
	So Carrington, as I recall, was a scientist and he actually came out and point blank said that this planet, whatever you want to call it, I forget whether he called it planet X or what he called it, but he said that this thing was coming around a certain number of years And he actually went public with it, and then he got really, really attacked by the, you know, powers that be, Deep State, and I think they basically killed him.
	But out of his work, that was one of the witnesses who was a scientist and who actually went public with this idea, okay?
	And that was also backing up Barbato's statements and so and so back in the day.
	Fast forward to now.
	I don't know if you've been hearing my statements or my... Actually, I just did an interview with a partner of Richard Allen Miller.
	You know the physicist Richard Allen Miller?
	The name is a little familiar, yeah.
	Well, I've interviewed him dozens of times.
	I've been to his house.
	You know, we've met in person.
	I've filmed him on all kinds of settings.
	He is what you call a black project scientist.
	Right.
	And for most of his whole life, really.
	He still works for Navy Intelligence.
	He'll even tell you that to your face.
	So he's controlled to a degree.
	But he has now come out and said he did mathematics To prove that there is actually this so-called event that could be what you're talking about.
	So that's why I'm trying to bring these two things together.
	He came, okay, about nine months ago, he came on my show.
	My entire site was, after the show, taken down for six days.
	They went to ICANN, the highest level you can go, to actually affect And I'm not a techie, but basically even GoDaddy couldn't do it.
	I had to bring in a very secret security specialist to tell us what the hell happened, why we were off the internet, and so on.
	And he figured it all out, and then we got it fixed.
	So then we were back.
	Then fast forward to like two weeks ago, and Richard Allen Miller calls me again, and he says he was right, and that this is what he told me, okay?
	Now he's not going to lie to me.
	He'll tell me what is real.
	So whether you agree with it, or you don't like it, or whatever, you can tell me that too.
	But he said he got a call from the government.
	Now the government means the Biden Show, probably.
	I call it the Biden Show.
	I don't think it would be the Trump Group.
	I think it would be the Biden Show, who called him and said that this is crazy, but the Corps has stopped.
	What do they do?
	And the reason they're calling him is because, again, his mathematics have figured out that in March, late March, early April of 2024, we are going to have a Carrington-like event.
	is how he described it.
	It's not going to be extinction level but it is going to involve earthquakes and land changes and things of that nature.
	So the first time he told me about it nine months ago when we got thrown off the internet he he and all that you can go listen to these interviews and see what you think but he basically said this is my mathematics I am 99.999 percent sure that I'm correct.
	And this man is a brilliant, he's brilliant.
	Oh yeah, absolutely.
	And so, so at that time we were just stating it to the public.
	We're just bringing it forward as his theory.
	Two weeks ago when he called me, he said, not only has the government just called me, but the core has stopped and they want to know what to do.
	And they've recruited me to do certain thus and so's about whatever job they want to recruit him for.
	Right.
	Right.
	And then he was saying, and I'm now positive that I'm right.
	So he didn't say that nine months ago, suddenly saying that now.
	So he, his mother was a famous psychic back in the day.
	He has some psychic ability and I think he's relying now on some of that.
	Whether he's right or he's wrong, he's again targeting this time space which is different than yours.
	So, but I wanted to throw that out just in case You know, because you never mentioned, you know, Planet X, Nibiru, or any of this stuff, right?
	Or Nemesis.
	And so I just wonder how that sort of sits with you.
	Well, we are, you know, right now with earthquake activity.
	First off, for the last, for about a period of about 18 months, it was capped.
	The USGS was artificially capping no more than 10,000 events per month.
	We were reporting that, and I was reporting that month after month after month after month, and I was complaining and complaining and complaining, and that was ignored.
	And then I finally did one change, and all of a sudden I got attention, and I said, you know, this reminds me of back in 2018 when we used to see these oddball 3-1, 3-2, 3-3s with a quickly follow of a swarm, and when we looked
	You could see, you know, with the seismograph, if it's a natural event, you have the resonance that builds up like a little nipple, and then the break, okay?
	If it's an atomic bomb, there's no build, it's just the sudden break.
	And so what we were seeing was 31323 with these sudden breaks, followed by natural aftershocks.
	And so what I said in my articles, I said what I believe that they're doing right now is they're artificially capping earthquake activity because they don't want to disclose that they're using tactical nukes to blow up the dumps.
	Okay, that's... And the next month they stop the capping.
	And they haven't been capping since I called them out.
	Now, the question is, who do you think was doing the capping?
	The White Hats or the Black Hats?
	Okay, but let me interject here that actually they also changed the entire scale.
	You do know that, right?
	Yeah, yeah, yeah.
	And that was done before 2018.
	Obama did that.
	Obama, if it's a 6.1, it's a 5.8.
	If it's a 5.0, it's a 5.7.
	Yeah, and they downgraded the entire scale so that when we have a 6.0, it's probably like a 7 or an 8 at this point.
	Exactly.
	Yeah.
	Okay, so that's on top of what you're saying, which is kind of interesting.
	And we have tracked dumbs, and they're trying to hide that as well.
	I also heard that they do it at 10, I think it's a 10-mile They're always at a 10-mile, it's something around 10, some kind of thing about the scale.
	That whenever you see a tenor, that's actually, and that's not magnitude, that has to do with the mileage down deep, how deep it is.
	That's an explosion in a dumb, apparently.
	People are saying that.
	I don't know the science, you know, I can't say if that's true or not.
	I'm going to tell you right now, because I know, I nailed them.
	I caught them, and they had to back off, and I'm going to take my victory lap right now.
	Woohoo!
	Okay?
	Alright.
	Now, question is, who did it?
	Who did the capping?
	Black hats or the white hats?
	Well, I mean, the White Hats.
	Explosions.
	It was the White Hats.
	Yeah, that was the White Hats.
	Because the data capping, when we went back, we have a huge database.
	We've been tracking all earthquake data for years, okay?
	I went back, did a deep dive, and guess what?
	The capping started in the last three months of Trump's administration.
	It started with the White Hats.
	Yeah.
	Yeah.
	Tells me the white hats are nuking the dumbs.
	Sure.
	And once I called them out, that was it.
	They knew the jig was up.
	And oh, my gosh, now we're having normal reporting.
	And we want to see where that goes, but the only thing we have that's really reliable right now is our fireball data, because that's from the American Meteorological Society.
	It's a private group, and their work is stellar.
	Just stellar!
	But you're not looking at volcanism, is that right?
	We look at volcanism, but only, you know, in terms of what is happening with general seismicity.
	Yeah.
	I know, you know, when I first started doing this in 2002, At that point, we would have 40 active volcanoes a year.
	Now you have 40 at any one time.
	Yeah, yeah.
	And so it's like, what?
	There's no difference, right?
	I mean, you have to be naive to think that way.
	We're just, there is so much data capping, so much manipulation, that we have to just, we're like little mice and we're looking for the crumbs that fall off the table.
	Okay, let me ask you if you know Standeo.
	I've heard of the name, haven't gotten a chance to know him personally.
	Okay, well he's in Australia.
	He worked for, I don't know who you want to say he worked for, I forget who he says he worked for, but I think he might have consulted with NASA for a period.
	He's a scientist and he's extremely well respected and knows his stuff inside and out.
	Having to do with Earthquakes, volcanism, and the whole thing.
	And he has a website.
	It's called standeo.com, I think it is.
	So you can check him out over there.
	He's a fascinating guy.
	Very fascinating.
	He is a person who knows the deep state, and knows the secret space stuff.
	But he doesn't reveal it.
	Just a very thin surface layer.
	But he's someone who was in the know, and in with the team a long time ago.
	The reason I'm asking about him is because he is tracking all the weather and everything, like I said, the volcanoes, the earthquakes, you name it.
	So you are looking at that as well, and you've looked at it, and you've seen it escalate all this time, and you're attributing it, I'm assuming, to Nemesis, as you call it.
	Yes, it's, this is a, what's really happening is we're not, right now, our seismicity and volcanism is not a direct consequence of Nemesis.
	Okay.
	It is indirect.
	What is happening is that if you look at the luminance of our sun, it is steadily on the increase, all right?
	And that increasing luminance, that increasing brightness, is a result of its electromagnetic interaction with nemesis.
	I do believe in the Electric Universe Theory, which was originally, I traced that back to the University of Moscow, And that's where the concept of the Electric Universe was actually born.
	And I hold with it, and I do believe we're an Electric Universe, and so Nemesis and the Sun, they're, you know, it's getting a little tense, and this increasing luminance is what is causing That's the reason why we have all the chemtrails.
	They're trying to reflect all of this light back out, because it's going into the Earth.
	It's what's causing the seismicity, and it's interesting.
	I want to follow up with you at another time on the core stopping, because that will be when the pull shift occurred.
	That's what I say in my book, and then it will.
	We literally will stop spinning and then start again.
	And go through a lithosphere shift, so it's going to be a pretty brutal thing.
	So you don't, but you would not agree with Richard Allen Miller, for example, on the date, the March, April, end of March, beginning of April.
	It's kind of like eight days in April, I think.
	Oh no, I wouldn't do that!
	You wouldn't agree with that?
	No, I would agree with that.
	I would love to go see the work, see what he's doing.
	All right.
	It is, you know, we're... Imagine you got a bunch of guys that are blind with blindfolds, and they've never seen an elephant before, and we're all groping the elephant, you know, and I said, I got a tusk!
	I got the butt!
	You know, where you at?
	What are you finding?
	And so, if he's doing this, I'm watching a lot of stuff.
	Now, the reason why we followed the seismicity for years was, and I did get a solution on it, what I was particularly concerned about is with Nemesis coming in that, you know, the big one in California, and California goes in the ocean.
	And would there be some way to know that that event is actually close to happening.
	Well, what we did over the years is we found something we call the Nazca Nexus.
	NASCA is a very small plate.
	And what's happening is there are rivers of magma flowing under the lithosphere, and they're coming up along the plates, and they're following the plates.
	The NASCA nexus is like a relief valve, like a pressure cooker.
	The steam builds up, and it'll release, and you'll see the steam come out.
	When the Nazca Nexus gets blocked up, it diverts the magma, which then goes around the top of South America and it goes into the Caribbean plate.
	And so what we found was that in terms of California, look to see what's happening in Haiti.
	If Haiti catches hell—and it's going to get, like, a big quake, an 8-something, you know, 7-7-something, but it's going to get multiples of that.
	Just not one, but you could have one, and then within a period of maybe a couple of weeks or a month or period, you would have some more And they're definitely not aftershocks.
	That's when you need to be, for the people on the west coast, need to be careful because that is really going to be the sign that events are building up.
	The pressure is building up along the San Andrea.
	Okay.
	So follow Haiti.
	Be aware of what's happening in the Caribbean.
	You know, and poor Haiti.
	They sit right on the fault line.
	All right, they're sitting right on the plate.
	Okay.
	Now what I have another fault for you though, which I have other people and whistleblowers talking about which is the Juan de Fuca.
	Oh that's a that's a nasty one.
	So I am okay so again this would actually dovetail with Richard Allen Miller's investigations.
	So he's saying that like the Pacific Northwest is going to start to get crazy and that there's a link up of course between the volcanoes of Yellowstone which is the master volcano so to speak and then it's linked up and it stimulates you know even mammoth
	um you know uh what do they call it um in the pacific northwest you know those volcanoes up there right right right and and mount saint helens is part of a whole chain of volcanoes up there and uh you know when that area goes it's going to be nasty Right.
	So, okay, so just, you know, we've been going for a while, so I have to sort of cut this off, but it's fascinating to talk to you, and I'd love to have you back so we can go into more stuff, but what I want to do is just condense it right now a little bit and say, you think, you know, when you hear these other things, you're not necessarily disagreeing with other timelines, but you think you know your timeline.
	Is that correct?
	My first rule of investigation is to the heart of a great mystery, many roads lead.
	And I love to walk as many roads as I can.
	And so when other people are doing things, I mean, Carrie, I'm going to tell you, you know, years back when you were really Coming on, your work, early work, was hugely influential for our team and what you were doing in the interviews you were getting.
	But I gotta tell you, there were times I was going, Carrie, you push this any harder.
	You're pushing the edge of the envelope.
	You push any harder.
	You could eat a bullet.
	And I'm serious.
	I could see you putting your life on the line.
	I mean, we did have, we did get life-threatening things that came along.
	Yeah, whatever reason, I have guardians, angels, or whatever I have, you know, looking out for me, that's for sure.
	And I did, I mean, I don't know if you even followed Pete Peterson, but he told me to my face that, you know, they did an attempt on my life, and I guess it was stopped, I don't know, but it was major.
	So that was... You've got friends, Carrie.
	And you got enemies, and you don't know who they are, but you got friends and you got enemies.
	But so do I. We deal with it, and you know, it's the life we chose.
	It is.
	Okay, I have two final questions.
	I'm going to go back to the one I just asked you because you didn't quite answer it.
	So again, what is your exact timeline?
	Can you just detail it in a very short span?
	Because you sort of said vaguely 26, 28 or something.
	I didn't quite catch it.
	Here's what we're going to see between now and 2030.
	At present, Nemesis is in its high acceleration phase of its orbit.
	Its speed varies because of the type of orbit it is in, and when it's reaching perihelion, it really, it's pedal to the metal time, and that's what's really happening.
	We're seeing that it's pedal to the metal.
	When it reaches perihelion, This will be in some time in 24, and again, I mean, how many times have we seen, you know, documented a brown door flying through our system?
	So these are guesstimates, but our guesstimates are running pretty much on track.
	In 24, it's going to become a fixture in the sky.
	It's no longer, right now you have people that'll see it at sunrise or sunset, because an object that is close to the sun, this is when you, the only times you can Just when the sunlight is so low that the glare doesn't interfere and you can see the object and it's only for a short period of time.
	And so I've been that's how I've been tracking it all the years I saw it.
	Coming through in 2012, and I saw it again in 2018 or 2019, Naked Eye Above the Sun.
	in 2018 or 2019, naked eye above the sun.
	So I'm getting a lot more reports coming in from people, and it's right now the last one, and it's the first time I saw it.
	Observations in the morning are going to have a different position relative to the sun than observations in the evening.
	I go with the ones in the evening for tracking, and right now Nemesis is at the sun's one o'clock.
	This is really significant.
	It's never been this far along in its orbit before.
	It's been steadily getting there, and it accelerated to this spot pretty quickly.
	So, in 24, what will happen is it's going to be far enough away from the Sun that it's going to become a common fixture in the sky, and it's going to look beautiful.
	But beauty will bring the beast, and what will happen is, it's going to be way above our heads, and it's going to be arcing down, and coming, so, because it's going to pass between the orbits of Mars, alright, and Jupiter.
	And so when it's coming down, this is this phase from 24 on where it gets progressively worse.
	So my thinking is by 20—probably by about 2025, 2026, We're going to start having issues with—at this point, we will be into the Nemesis cloud, probably around 27, 28.
	We're going to have—think of the plagues of Exodus and the Nile River turned blood red.
	Well, that's from iron, all right?
	And this is a brown dwarf.
	It's just, you know, a big iron ball of dust.
	That's the reason why it's red.
	So it'll get in, water is all going to get mucked up, it's going to look awful.
	Actually, the Ten Plagues of Exodus, if you put them in scientific order, they click.
	So that's what we're going to start seeing, is it's going to start moving in where we're going to start having the Ten Plagues of Exodus.
	You want them prepared, go read Exodus, all right?
	Okay, so you're saying there's the dust cloud will start to engulf Earth in general, or just part of Earth?
	No, we're going to fly into the dust cloud.
	People who have heightened sense of smell, like blind people, are going to be the first ones to know.
	So if you have somebody in your group that's blind, they're saying, I smell iron.
	That's it.
	You know we're in the cloud.
	All right?
	But also, there's a lot of rocks, a lot of debris.
	So we're going to have meteorite showers.
	And we're going to have a lot of rocks falling.
	Now, as it's coming down, the other thing we have to be concerned with is this is where there's electrical interaction between the two becomes much more intense.
	And then once it reaches the ecliptic, that's the plane of the solar system.
	And an easy way to think of that is find a dot in the center of the sun and make a concentric circle all the way out to the 12 signs of the zodiac.
	All right.
	That's the ecliptic.
	Once it is on the ecliptic, Katie, bar the door.
	That's when it really is going to go apey.
	And because from that point it's going and that's probably going to be around 2028 when it reaches perihelion.
	Okay.
	Reaches the ecliptic.
	And then There's going to be this, you have this Sun and these three massive rocky planets, and they're going to get what I call a lithosphere lock on Earth, and that's what actually pulls the lithosphere around so that we have the crustal shift.
	So Between now and 2030, it is going to, from around 2025 to 2026, it's going to get progressively worse.
	If you haven't gone to ground and made provisions to survive this event, anyone on the surface is not going to survive this, period.
	No one will survive 2030 on the surface.
	You have to go to ground.
	You're going to have to get underground to survive it.
	And we're going to go through a terrible, terrible, terrible time.
	In my book, Surviving the Planet X Tribulation, I present a lot of graphics, actually show the pole shift.
	And we are going to have something where we literally stop turning.
	All right?
	Then we're going to go the other way.
	This is going to be a terrifying time for people.
	If they're not emotionally, spiritually centered, They're going to—people are just going to die from heart attacks, because every point of reference in their life is just going to be shattered for a while.
	But then it's going to continue going on, and things will then start to settle down.
	There will be about—I would say about—for a period of about a decade, you're still going to have aftershocks, tremors, the Earth is settling and shifting.
	I see a period also—you know, in the Bible we talk about 40 days and 40 nights, Noah's Flood.
	Well, I think Noah's Flood was a pole shift, but the 40 days and the 40 nights of rain in fact happened, but after the actual pole shift event, because what this is about is It's a global monsoon to wash the earth clean, and that's how the earth will clean itself.
	So we're going to have land masses rise up from the seabeds, and the salts are going to be washed out by the rains, which is going to leave immensely fertile soil.
	That's going to be wonderful.
	On the other hand, you're going to have parts that are going to sink.
	There's different ways of dealing with it, but After all is said and done, the people who are going to survive this are going to be pretty tough, spiritual, honest people.
	You can't be an asshole and survive what's coming.
	Okay, so that's enough of a timeline.
	I think that people are already going to sort of be wowing around that, but Have you ever heard of my witness called Cameron Faley?
	No, I haven't, but tell me.
	Okay, so he is a guy who actually has disappeared completely from the mainstream, and he kind of went off the radar, but he also went kind of loopy, is my understanding.
	The Illuminati targeted him, but he was a financial guy working for the Illuminati, his entire family history, and I think he is a Kurdish in the background.
	So he had a lot to say.
	He was, for some reason, got very into investigating what he called Planet X back in the day.
	And I'll just bring really quickly this slide so you can see who he is.
	He was or is a brilliant man.
	However, what's interesting about this is that you are talking about exactly what he talked about before he disappeared.
	And I'm sure that he was threatened by the Illuminati.
	He actually lived in England.
	Like I said, he worked for the top financial people.
	He moved money for them.
	And so, but he had this whole background of investigation.
	Now, he had some theories about how things would play out, but he did, you know, he talked about the brown dwarf and the, you know, and the dust cloud and the whole thing.
	Right.
	So, I did several interviews with him and then he completely went off the radar.
	And I did get some back channel stuff telling me You know, sometimes people can't handle fame, okay?
	So he became kind of famous on my website.
	Some of my whistleblowers do get quite famous.
	Now, I don't know if this is true, so don't quote me here, but apparently women started propositioning him, and he was an Arab man in an Arab marriage, and he kind of went off the rocker.
	He got honey-potted.
	Yeah or something.
	I don't know.
	I don't know the details.
	I just know generality.
	So just saying that he's out there still and I'm sure you know his dates were wrong.
	He thought it was going to happen like the next year from when he was talking to me which has now been several years.
	I don't know the exact.
	I'd have to go back and research the exact year when he when I was interviewing him.
	But I did a few interviews as I'm saying they're on my website.
	And I've just flashed up his name so you can go watch them if you're at all interested.
	He's a very interesting man.
	He wasn't screwing around.
	He was, you know, really an in-depth researcher.
	And I think he also had maybe some secret contacts.
	Because, you know, when you're in Britain and you're in that kind of Mill you, you can make some contacts.
	So, for what it's worth, just saying.
	It is interesting that it's all coming around again, because Camelot kind of, you know, for a long time there was nothing, so nobody followed it anymore, and I never got testimony about it anymore.
	I knew you stuck with it all these years, like you never backed off of it.
	A lot of people figured, okay, it didn't happen, it's never going to happen, kind of thing.
	Right.
	And then some people, I think, maybe kind of tracked it in the background because there have been reasons to see Earth changes or changes in the weather and changes in various things that could be attributed to some incoming something, and so on.
	So, At this point, I'm just really, I'm not committed either way.
	I'm sort of open, totally open-minded about whatever, but I have tons of whistleblower testimony along these lines, okay?
	Some are completely, would contradict you, some would agree with you, blah, blah, blah, but we can open the dialogue and see where it goes.
	It is interesting that you're coming forward right after my Richard Allen Miller Information.
	You see what I'm saying?
	Yeah.
	Because we're talking like that.
	My work is observational-based, and I know what—for example, in 2010, Giaco van der Waer, Dutch physicist, helped me found Diawza.
	He and—we were a group, small group, of minstrels, and we just got together and started batting this around, and next thing you know, there's Diawza.
	And in 2010, We were there was the first Planet X conference held in Rome, Italy, in the world.
	And we were, you know, asked to come and present our book that we had out at the time was global translated in five languages, one of which was Italian.
	And so this came through our Italian licensee, Academia Press.
	And They had just done the first printing run, and it sold out in a month, all right?
	After this thing, literally what happened was the interest in Planet X in Italy was amazing, and in the bookstores, all Planet X books they could get their hand on were getting at the cash register center aisle.
	I mean, they were getting locations people sell their children for, and The books were flying off the shelves, and then all of a sudden, I get a call.
	I get an email from, it said, due to lack of interest, we've canceled your title.
	I get him on the phone.
	I go, what are you talking about?
	You just told me he had just put in an order for a second printing.
	And he had just put in an order for a second printing, and he says, nobody's buying the books.
	And I said, don't give me this happy nonsense.
	What happened?
	He says, I got a call from my distributor.
	The Vatican called all of the distributors, and we were directly ordered to remove your books from the shelves and to burn them.
	Not to return them to you, but to burn them.
	And furthermore, we were instructed to tell the distributors that this was by order of the Vatican.
	And I said, so are you going to sue?
	And he said, are you crazy?
	Nobody sues the Vatican, okay?
	So I've had the Vatican burn my books.
	Well, we've been threatened, as I say, as well.
	I've learned about you from time to time.
	And probably, they probably tried to kill us because we had some Interesting events happen in, you know, during our travel in Europe and all that, so I totally can identify.
	And I know that, again, Cristoforo Barbato, they basically ruined the guy.
	I mean, oh yeah, you know, they really ruined him.
	I don't know what his status is at the moment.
	Lucas Scanton Lerlo, like, he was just kind of an innocent researcher.
	They might have Done some things to him.
	I don't know because I never got but I'm not in touch with him at this time, but I could get back in touch.
	He was a fascinating researcher as well.
	So there's a there's a lot to this story and to the pushback.
	So you always look at the pushback to see is something true or what's their problem?
	You know what I mean?
	When we're you know, you get flack when you're over the target type of thing.
	So It's possible that something there is actually real.
	And I tell you, what happened with Richard Allen Miller, you know, they, I mean, they really took us down.
	That hasn't, in the history of Camelot, we're talking, we've been online now for over 18 years.
	That was the work, kind of the worst.
	We had some bad ones, though, in the past.
	And actually, recently, they attacked me again.
	I think it might have been associated with him or someone else.
	I'm not sure, but it wasn't as bad as that, but it was bad.
	They destroyed our server and we had to get a whole new one overnight, basically destroyed our server.
	Yeah, they've attacked me over the years.
	Amazon tried to put me out of business.
	It was...
	I've had—I mean, there's been times I haven't come this close.
	My YowBook channel on YouTube, 19 million views to date, and I am terrified to put up a video.
	I won't.
	That's the reason why I'm Odyssey and Rumble.
	Because what I'm afraid is if I do anything new on YouTube, those psychotic bastards will use it for an excuse to hose the channel.
	They will.
	And so, you know, I left it there so people can find it.
	It's a body of work.
	But one of the things that was nice was on my YowBooks channel with Odyssey, they pulled it all over.
	So I have a complete copy on Odyssey.
	And Odyssey is, it's Fediverse.
	It is Mastodon.
	People don't know the true social is Mastodon, which is open source.
	And it's part of what's called the Fediverse, which is where things are going to go make life much easier for people like you and me.
	Okay, well, I'm on Odyssey as well.
	In fact, they saved our channel.
	Literally, when we were wiped overnight, and even I woke up in the middle of the night, I took the one offending video that I thought they might have an issue with, which was with Robert David Steele.
	I don't know, you know, he's a CIA agent.
	Well, he's passed on supposedly since then, but He said one line about COVID in the middle of an interview.
	I woke up at 12 midnight and I went on to my channel because I had a premonition that there was going to be an issue and I marked that video unlisted and they came in a couple hours later and took everything down.
	And so I didn't save my channel, but what happened was Odyssey sucked it up.
	I had known we were going to go down because at that time, everyone, a lot of people, the well-known people were getting targeted.
	So I knew it sooner or later they were going to do it.
	So what I did is I basically kind of went around to all the different alternative ones like Rumble, like this one, like that one, and I just signed up and then I forgot about it.
	Just in case something happened and we needed to move quickly, right?
	Right.
	So what happened, and this is a mystery to this day, Odyssey took up and saved like about 900 of my videos, because I had well over a thousand, and sucked them up, including the, you know, the descriptions, everything.
	Right.
	Wholesale into Odyssey.
	So I'll always be thankful to them.
	Yeah, and here's a great thing for you to know.
	Odyssey uses blockchain technology to store your video, which means it's pretty damn hard to sponge it.
	Okay.
	And it's also open source, which is open source communities actually respect your privacy, all right?
	And it is a Fediverse, so it is a very safe, to me, Odyssey is my legacy site, and I love it, alright?
	For that reason, and I would suggest to everybody out there that's like us, because we're all getting hammered all the time.
	We're, you know, you and I both are one step ahead of the boogeyman all the time.
	Right.
	And it's nice to have an option like Odyssey to cover us that way, because they would want to, they would definitely want to disappear your work as well as mine.
	Yes, absolutely.
	And I can say that even though Rumble has been very good, they actually did start censoring some things.
	There were a couple things that that appeared to be some form of some sort of censorship.
	Yeah, it's inevitable.
	Yeah, I'm just saying.
	And in fact, there's some reason why, I don't know if this is true, but there's a link up between YouTube and Rumble.
	I don't know if you know that back channel.
	No, I didn't know that.
	And I have always wondered whether YouTube actually owns Rumble behind the scenes.
	And the reason for that is that I think, you see, YouTube doesn't want to let go of those of us, because it's all part of the government, right?
	So they want to know what you're doing.
	They want to keep a handle on it.
	So they created this ghetto, if you will, Call it rumble behind YouTube.
	So everyone who gets thrown off YouTube goes to rumble and so they on both sides, you know, they I think that's my theory.
	I might be wrong, but I I have reason to believe that let's put it that way.
	Keep me keep me apprised of that.
	I could really appreciate it, you know, because you're you're bringing us up and you know, it does make you think about it because the With Rumble, it's, you know, we don't—all of this stuff is a mixed bag, but I would definitely say things are better now than they were two years ago.
	Sure.
	Yeah.
	So far.
	Hopefully.
	Hopefully, yeah.
	So far.
	And we're both alive.
	Who'da thunk it?
	Yeah, that's right.
	That's a big one.
	That's a big one!
	You and I do!
	That's a big one!
	We're alive!
	For the rest of it, their control system is collapsing in on itself, and we're going to hit a point where it's—what is it Lincoln said?
	You can fool all the people all the time, right?
	Or it's all the people some of the time, but you can't fool all the people.
	In other words, people are waking up.
	And things are changing and they're losing credibility.
	Folks are just, what I love is we're not out in the street with our AR-15s, which is exactly what the globalists want us to do, because then, oh, you're down and you're going to jump down in the gutter and fight with the rats.
	The rats own the gutter.
	Don't go there.
	All right.
	What are we doing?
	We're boycotting Bud Light.
	We're boycotting Target and it's hurting them.
	Yes.
	It's hurting them.
	And it's all, it's all, whoa, what happened to this?
	You know, don't worry.
	You know, so Fox is on my shit list cause they, you know, attacked Tucker.
	So that's into that.
	I'm not, you know, away from Fox.
	But you know, unless I have to see something, but basically that's the way it is.
	So, you know, I'm sure there are a lot of people like me.
	Anyway, let me just say thank you so much for coming on the show.
	It's been fun.
	It's been fascinating.
	And, you know, obviously you've been around a lot, so you know the games being played and such.
	And you've endured, which is an amazing thing, because you really put yourself out there repeatedly on this topic, especially this topic.
	So you're really considered one of the experts out there.
	Thank you, Carrie.
	It would be nice to follow this up, to see where things are going, and I hope that everything goes well after this interview and I don't get attacked too much, okay?
	From your lips to God's ear, and would definitely love to come back on.
	Okay, cool.
	All right, thank you, and next time maybe we'll do a Q&A with the audience, because I'm sure that they'd love to hear from you.
	Oh, I love it!
	Let's rumble!
	Okay, cool.
	All right.
	Take care, everyone.

▲