All Episodes
Previous Next
May 25, 2023 - Project Camelot
01:18:53
SG ANON: INTERVIEW TWO: MILITARY INTERVENTION?
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Thank you.
Obviously, he doesn't use video, so I've got this slight problem with the way it shows only me on the screen right now.
So, I'm going to see if I can change that.
So, SG, it's, like I said, it's great to have you here.
And what I want to do first is, I know people are going to want to know how you're feeling.
So, can you share with us a bit of how you're feeling, how you're progressing?
Well, absolutely.
And thanks for having me back, Ms.
Cassidy.
You know, one of the neat things about coming on with you all is that there's enough of a difference of opinion that it stirs a really lively discussion, and we get into some really hard nooks and crannies that I think are important to be at, so I appreciate coming back.
That being said, you know, feeling about as well as I think I can feel for just over four weeks out from the procedure I had.
But I've had a good restoration of functionality and a good noticeable decrease in pain.
Pretty steadily now as I work through this process.
I mean, PT is always a little uncomfortable, right?
There's always a little bit of, oh, it feels hurt.
But, you know, for me in my mind, there's a difference between, oh, it's hurt or it's sore versus, oh, it's injured.
Um, which is, you know, a little bit of a different feeling, at least with my body.
So as I go through the process, I can feel it getting stronger and stronger every day.
And I really chalk up the support and encouragement and the positive intentionality from people out there along the way.
And I think that's really been a factor of it at the energetic level.
So thank you.
Okay, great.
And, you know, I heard your 50, I think it's number 50, that you just did.
And I also heard your interview with Patriot Underground, which gave me some food for discussion.
And I did send you a bit of that discussion.
I posted it also on my Telegram.
For those that are interested, go to my Telegram to see the chat.
That I sort of did a dialogue about some issues I have with it's actually not you, but it's the White Hat.
I guess you might say their modus operandi in some cases and your your answers and how that dovetails with my understanding of what they're doing and the discrepancy there.
And also, you know, none of us were not involved in their operations, right?
So we don't know for sure.
Exactly.
how they're behaving exactly.
We know what they're projecting when they go through certain speakers, right?
Exactly.
And then we might see the evidence after the fact of some of their actions.
But so I want to start out with, you know, and I have a huge gamut, but, you know, where I want to be sensitive to when you feel like you've had enough or no, no, I just, you know, and I don't I don't want to push you know, and I don't I don't want to push your health or anything like that.
So at any rate, so first of all, what I'd like to talk about is this idea of the military coming forward at some point and the fact that we're getting closer.
I think And I think even one is intimating that we are getting closer and closer to a time when what I consider to be the white hat military needing to come forward in some form or fashion.
And I want to discuss that with you.
I know you might have a little different point of view on than me and that's great.
I actually welcome different, you know, differences.
So but the thing is that also I was thinking today that with the what we would call the UN Biden CCP backed military side of our military what used to be the US military.
They, I think, would be the ones sent over to deal in the Ukraine, at least in the public eye.
So I'm saying the troops over there that were sent over there might conveniently be the UN Biden troops, and this might give an opening for the White Hat troops to come forward.
Announced tribunals, so on and so forth, because without pushback instantly, because a lot of the troops are not here, right?
They're over supposedly fighting this ostensible war, which that's a whole nother discussion I want to have.
So coming back to that idea, Can you talk about your point of view?
And then I also, I would like to know why you think what you think, if you understand what I'm saying.
So, rather than just say, you know, oh, I think this and this, I would like to hear, because I know you're a crack researcher, and so you must be putting two and two together, and whether or not you have any source, you know, because I know that your mentor passed on, if I'm correct?
Yes, that's correct.
Okay and so I don't know if you have another mentor or you have more contacts but you know just generally saying my sources say this or my sources say that or not.
It's all you and you've been researching and this is how you add it up.
But I know it's a long winded question, but actually, the actual question is quite short.
So what do you think about the possibility that while the the UN backed Biden military is over supposedly fighting a war in Ukraine, and that could be discussed, there's an opening for our military, the White Hat military to come forward?
You know, that's an interesting question, Miss Cassidy, because I think in a lot of ways, I think in a lot of ways the situation that you've just postulated makes a ton of sense, and I think it was going to have to be that fashion in some form, which is I think one of the reasons we've ended up in the conflicts that we have.
I mean, there's a whole host of reasons that we can get into, but one of the highlights I think that's important to remember Is that it's the military industrial complex for a reason.
The brass was infiltrated at some level a long time ago.
And so we sort of have had to go through this process of figuring out loyalties.
I mean, that's really a big portion, I think, of why we went into a compartmentalized special warfare situation in the U.S.
and around the world.
Um, as far as them coming forward at a time where there are, you know, loyalists who have been loyalists to the other side, who have been, you know, distracted effectively by all of the different events happening in the world, which I think is an extremely plausible point of view to have just because when we look at sort of how You know, the war in Ukraine has been waged from a longitudinal level.
It's not been a massive steamrolling of events, and it very well could have been.
It's been extremely surgical, it's been very methodical, and they have intentionally sort of stuck themselves out of the den enough to draw the fire, and they've absorbed the fire, destroyed the weaponry, and continued with that pattern the entire time.
You know, it's interesting that just recently, it even made it into the local news, I think it was a Fox 10 station in Texas, that Operation Jade Helm Was a U.S.
Special Forces operation being conducted across seven U.S.
states, where the operators in those operations were going to be in plainclothes civilian vehicles, plainclothes civilian attire, and that the operation was so compartmentalized there were portions of the military and all of the governors involved that had not been told anything about it except that it was a thing, to include exactly where the location was going to be.
That screams cover of some sort for me when we consider what we're going through right now.
You know, this whole thing ever since Chris Miller discussed about the most complex military operations in our nation's history on the way out in 2020, we knew that the CIA, there had been a server farm and some sort of back and forth that had occurred.
So there was an active military, sort of un-militarized asset conflict going on even then.
Um, so the situation you put forward, that's really kind of why I think the way that I do about it, we've got enough of the indicators coming out on these good open source channels, which, and I draw a lot of my stuff from the Q drop, so I don't, I don't claim to have like, you know, intimate sources per se, but that would be a main source of a lot of the basis from my understanding.
And it's important that people understand that because that's going to really determine how they hear the information from me.
But as it pertains to that, I think that what we've got is sort of a counterintelligence operation at many different levels, and we're seeing enough throw-off signs to call us towards this idea that there's a good side, a bad side, and eventually the good side is going to have to overtake what remains of the bad side if we're going to win this conflict.
Absolutely.
Okay, so now we've got a window of opportunity, what I would call that.
And so we're looking at, this is what I wanted to get from you.
I thought if we put our heads together, maybe we could actually suss this out, because I think there's a lot of confusion right now.
Over the Sandman situation, and the fact that in June, all of this seems to want to break out.
And I did hear that we've got a June 1st date for Sandman, I guess, and for this whole breakdown.
And I don't know, move to the CBDC, Central Bank Digital Currency.
Yet at the same time we're supposed to be having the QFS rollout.
I mean there is a battle between the financial systems and so I'm looking at June and what I wanted to get from you was your thought on a sort of A way this could play out because I have been racking my brain and I'm sure if I rack my brain, I figure the white hats are racking their brain or they did at some point in their sort of plan to where they want to figure out.
How can our military come forward?
How can the QFS come forward?
How can these big steps be taken in the face of this?
Well, court culture that we're still still dealing with and you know the sleepers and yes, we have awakening people some awakening and yet at the same time and this is something that.
I sort of chide Juan with, behind the scenes, just so you know, if I put something out about the White Hats, I generally text it to Juan as well, so that he's totally aware, even though he's probably surveilling me anyway, using their AI, because I'm a POI, a person of interest, right?
But I do that anyway.
It's just my way of sort of chiding him to say, Listen, because I get feedback from the audience, as you can imagine, and they are saying to me, a lot of them, some of them are actually turning their backs on the White Hats at this time.
Some are in complete denial and used to be followers of Juan and this one and that one and the general concept and no longer are.
And they've become, I guess you might say, disenchanted by the whole White Hat thing because Even though I know just recently one finally went on Nino's show and said that there were 10 things that they've achieved or wins, as I call them, which is great.
But I don't think, you know, who listens to that?
The converted, you know what I'm saying?
So what I guess I don't want to confuse you too much, but I'm talking about June.
I'm talking about a rollout of some kind from both sides.
And I'm talking about how would that present itself?
In the face of what we're dealing with in our societies, and that means worldwide.
Wow, that's a broad question.
Um, but it's an important one.
Yeah, it's an important one.
Because this is sort of, you know, I think we can acknowledge that when we have some sort of financial event in the Western world, and I'm classifying that as maybe a 40 to 50% downturn in something like the market, the mass offloading of US Treasury bonds.
We know that there's a meeting, I think it's June the 20th or June the 19th, that it kicks off in St.
Petersburg.
I forget the exact date, but it's coming up.
And it's going to be a meeting where Russia is basically presenting this idea to the rest of the world that they should move to an asset-backed currency system of exchange.
And BRICS being a very big part of that, I think it's more of like a sales pitch really for BRICS.
It's going to be a formal event.
I think that you could have a lot of the official players at play that would be making these sorts of decisions both good and bad, you know, at a meeting like this and it's possible we see a mass offloading of the Treasury bonds.
Now, it's interesting that that should happen the same month that Janet Yellen comes out and says on June the 1st, we're going to default and by June the 15th, we'll be out of physical bucks, physical actual currency, you know, the fiat notes that are still in circulation to pay the bills.
So all of these things are sort of pointing us to this idea that a massive financial event is going to hit the Western world.
And Dmitry Medvedev from Russia said as much back in December of 2022.
I think it was the 26th.
So I think we have to acknowledge that such an event, if we're going to compare it to a full-bore market crash, and I'm not a financial advisor or analyst, but I'm just sort of, you know, drawing from history and appreciating the conditions we're in.
If we're going to look at it in that particular fashion, I think we have to look at how long could people actually subsist without having access to their bank accounts, which will be part of what collapses in this entire process, because that's what happened last time.
And we're seeing a lot of what happened last time in what we're living through right now.
Okay, can I slow you down one second?
Because sometimes you make like this and I'm like, what last time are we talking about?
Just to clarify, because in your 1929, what is the last time?
What?
The crash of 1929 is what I'm referring to, the first large crash that sort of affected the Western financial world.
And so, you know, 2008 was a pretty decent sized crash as well.
But I think when we're talking with the rhetoric of we're bringing the beast down, we're bringing down the corrupt temple.
Well, the corrupt temple is mainly the central banks and the individuals that own them, which of course are the J.P.
Morgans, the Bloodline families, the research that you've been putting out for a really long time, right?
So, understanding that that event, if we're going to talk in that fashion, is coming, we have to appreciate that people won't have access to their normal bank accounts because that will be affected in the events.
And so, how long can that really persist?
You know, I think you could make the case that you could get probably two weeks worth of civil calm, relative calm at the civilizational level, at the societal level, relative calm that's controllable.
Um, and it's possible that we could see an event play out, um, with, you know, coinciding with some sort of a market crash, um, where the Fed sort of, you know, has that answer ready immediately, right?
Then they're, they've sort of been doing that along the way.
They've been putting out these scenarios and circumstances and then offering their take on it or their preparation for it, or their solution to the problem almost instantly, sort of like that playbook that Q references at different points along the way.
But I think it's possible we see something like that happen.
And then a rejection of the CBDC inside of that 14 to 21 day window, two to three weeks for civil calm leads to some sort of a false flag event.
You know, it wouldn't be surprising to me at all that we would see a false flag coinciding with an attempt to roll out a different form of financial government.
We could see fast-tracked legislation through the House.
I mean, you know, it would be a very dramatic period of emergency operations.
And these people would want sort of the media glory of coming to the, you know, the white knight at the last minute and being a part of this thing, et cetera, et cetera.
I'm talking about the actors in the Congress right now.
Now, okay, along those lines, we know that Congress, I guess, I don't know if I forget whether it's the Senate and the House or one, all got these sat phones, as you know, right?
Correct.
And so that's exactly where I was just going.
Yes, ma'am.
Okay, okay.
So please do talk about that.
Well, it's just, it's so interesting with the timing, right?
Because we know if we're going to do this by the book, and Q tells us it has to be by the book, we have to follow certain legal processes, even under military law.
The civilian law can't just be tossed aside, they have to sort of inform one another.
And so as we go through the process, with Congress being issued these satellite communications, that's telling me that they're preparing for some sort of restricted communication period.
It makes perfect sense that a loss of access to bank accounts coinciding with a loss of access to information, which I think is extraordinarily possible.
And then having that period of, you know, I think people call it the 10 days of darkness.
I don't really get into what that might or might not mean.
But again, 14 days, 21 days at absolute maximum to have, you know, civil calm that's still controllable.
I think you can accomplish a lot in that period if you had, you know, good actors, if we will.
And I don't mean that term as in fake, I mean that term as in beings, good human beings that are actually acting in the interest of the people.
We know that some people in Congress are good.
They were lawfully elected and they're not, you know, totally captured.
It's just most of them, the great majority.
There's about 100 if I remember the Brunson report saying that they they actually left out 100 who I guess they didn't think that they sided with Congress against, you know, Radcliffe and bringing out the report and and doing the research.
If you remember that whole thing where they refused the rest of those people voted or or it didn't vote.
I don't know exactly how it took place, but they did not advocate for The research that should have been done once they got even a facsimile of a report from our intelligence agencies under Radcliffe.
Right?
And so those are the traders.
Those are the ones that are named in the Brunson case.
And that would make a perfect number as we apply a little bit of sense and sensibility to it, because we would need both houses of Congress involved.
It would need to be a minimum quorum.
Um, that's about what if I remember correctly, my math, it's about that's one fifth or so of the Congress.
I think the Congress is 530 something.
Um, if I'm if I remember correctly, but you know, as I think about how this process can play out, what happens if a series of false flags were to were to carry off all at one time during the same period that we've just described this sort of period of information restriction and not necessarily having access to money as the system sort of comes crushing down.
If we saw a series of attacks or events and we didn't have good ways to get to alternative information or even communicate with one another effectively, and it's worth highlighting that these could be real or they could not be, and I'm not advocating that they should be, not at all.
But what I'm saying, I suppose, is if the capability to travel safely To communicate with one another safely to have access to information safely is gone and the capability of resource management and using our resources to get where we need to go is also gone.
And we have a national emergency event occur.
I can't think of any combination of events that would get the attention of all of the consciousness and would also provide all of the public justification needed for a militarized coup.
Um, you know, like we discussed earlier, the overthrow of those different areas of maybe the brass that are not currently under what I would say our influence or our control, certainly the removal of the public government, because now the civilian sectors of society have crumbled down.
They're no longer functional.
And that's interesting, just as I look at it, because Chris Miller, who we know has a background primarily in special warfare and irregular operations most of his career, went on a podcast, I think it was three or four months ago, and stated that military personnel, the U.S.
military as a whole as a fighting force, can be used for domestic law enforcement, but not until the areas that control the civil sectors of society and the national essential functions have broken down.
I can't think of any set of circumstances that would make them break down more.
Yes.
Well, this is you know, this I think this is what's on the mind of the public right now when they listening for the ones that are still listening to the White Hats and to this people that are like us advocating a White Hat position and there is a lot of blowback even
Even somebody like Mike Adams who, you know, and he has his own sources and his own intel and clearly is being led a certain direction to say that the White Hats don't exist, which is insane when, you know, knowing what I know and perhaps what you know.
So this is where I get into this push comes to shove.
We are coming upon a time when that is actually going to be right in the forefront.
Now, Some of these things have happened.
We have come to places, like I remember there was a real build-up, I think it was prior to the 2022 election, that we thought something huge was going to happen and it never did.
And all we got was an elections deal.
So I don't want to put too much behind this, you know, because I know, I listen to Jim Willey, for example, I think he's a very good financial You know, a pundit, whatever you want to say.
And his analysis, I think, is very good most of the time.
So he is saying the same thing you're saying about the Treasury bills, and that this is a much bigger thing than someone like me, perhaps, would necessarily think it is, right?
Because I'm not following, I don't follow that side of finance necessarily, okay?
I practically, you know, was not even aware of Treasury bills.
I know it sounds stupid, but Finance is not my area, so all I'm saying is that we're coming on a time when supposedly default is like this horrendous thing.
Right and it's going to cause this other horrendous thing, but.
The people out there who certainly financial people are going to be more astute.
In that kind of the throes of that kind of an emergency, then the people that don't follow finance all that much, which is probably the mass of people.
So what, you know, how would you look at that from, I know you've kind of delineated out a little bit of the finance, but can you go any deeper into that as how, you know, because we have the default of the banks, right?
And they supposedly rescued them.
So there could be a band aid here, right?
There could be some kind of another false fix, right, to delay further anything, any actual movement.
And maybe this serves the dark side to not, you know, knowing that if push comes to shove in June, that people are going to rebel.
Now, you're saying for two weeks they'll sit there.
And that's very possible, maybe even longer.
But there's also the thing where if the White Hats do come forward with their position, with whatever they're going to come forward with, right.
And we have, like I said, this opportunity horizon in which our military is, the split is there, but it's also literally split with between some of it being on the other side of the Atlantic, which may be a good thing for us, for the White which may be a good thing for us, for the White Hats.
So what I'm saying is, is there a deeper analysis in terms of finance that you can make that has to do with whether they could put a fake fix in here that would delay this again, right?
So that we're back in September, when September rolls around, we're still in this dilemma of are the White Hats ever coming forward?
Are they still hidden?
Is there anything That we can do to prove that they exist and so on.
You know, I think as far as it was, let's take that, you know, two parts here, the financial part really quick.
You know, I think a compelling analysis if we want to try and get a full scope.
It's, what is this, May the 25th, I think?
Yes, this is the 25th of May.
So we've got until June the 1st.
So we could see some sort of activity between McCarthy and the fake actor, Joe Biden, White House.
We could see some sort of 1030 at night.
Oh, we reached a deal.
We got it.
We're going to extend it for two more weeks.
Or, oh, we're going to, we got it for another 30 days to give us time to figure it out.
The typical dog and pony show.
I think that's possible just as much as it's possible we see these other events.
Um, and so if that occurs, I think to give fair credence to the overall picture of the analysis here, we would be sort of right where we're at currently 30 days in the future.
Just that much more irritated.
What I think is an interesting sort of complicating factor here is again that meeting in Russia because we know that Russia is sort of operating as they want to sort of doing exactly what they want you know worldwide and on the geopolitical and power stage as well.
So as they've got this Meeting this summit that they're hosting in June.
It would make perfect sense that if we were going to see a Western World financial event, this is the other side of the analysis, it would make perfect sense to coincide with that meeting in some sort of time proximity, right?
The 15th of June, of course, being within a week of when that meeting actually kicks off and starts, and I think it's a three or four day event.
Overall, I think what's uncertain here is just how Just how many different ways this could play out.
We could see some sort of patchwork laid in where they promote CBDCs as the things are actually crashing.
Maybe they're that arrogant.
Maybe we see some sort of, oh, the Some sort of government release coming out saying that, you know, there's different issues of solvency.
We have to fix the crisis.
Let's do our patriotic duty and sign up for CBDCs.
Because that was sort of the approach that was used under FDR with the confiscation of gold.
Do your patriotic duty.
It's to stabilize the economy.
All these different lies.
As it pertains to CBDCs, I think there's enough of us awake in the Patriot community, and even the ones that aren't really on a podcast like this, because they're not quite this far.
They're not quite to the point where they're going to say there is some sort of white hat presence.
You know, because like you highlighted, you have a lot of centrists out there who, they can get behind some things, but they won't get behind all of it without much more unequivocal proof.
But I think all of that category of people is going to be behind the idea that CBDCs are bad.
The control of the digital space utterly being transitioned over to the governmental entity and giving them really access to your bank account, access to your purchase history and habits, the ability to shut you off or turn you on in real time.
You don't really need to be a Q follower or a white hat person or even what we would call an awakened patriot to sort of understand that that's not a good thing.
Um, so I think we see enough of the community across the United States reject that sort of a band-aid, and then we end up in a period of sort of uncertainty where this, this, that would be what I would say, uh, what you talked about earlier, the window of opportunity.
Um, that would be where I would try and institute some sort of coup, some sort of takeover, um, because the next, the next card from the deep state actors after, you know, after the, Pleading and the forcing and the coercion and sorts of those things doesn't work is the 9-11 part.
The 9-11 part this time could be some sort of event that threatens a World War III, you know, optical scenario.
If we saw that, a military coup would be perfectly justified to avoid a civilizational level death event because we're so much more capable of destroying one another now than we were even in the 1940s.
Okay, well, I, okay, I appreciate that.
So, you do buy into the idea that they could have a, they could put another stall in, right?
Absolutely.
I think that's very possible.
And I think, you know, I don't, I'm not going to go so far as to say that it's plausible because I really don't know.
But that's sort of the habit of this entire operation.
And, you know, there's been some things put out along the way that different hiccups came up and different things weren't accounted for.
I can't really comment on a lot of that because I just, I'll be honest with you, Ms.
Cassie, I just don't know.
But what I do know is that there have been Interesting back-and-forths that we've seen the entire time, and I think one of the back-and-forth scenarios that we could see with the current situation is that last-minute pull-out victory-from-the-jaws-of-defeat 1045 p.m.
deal that happened between some nebulous officials.
Right.
So, I guess it's possible that the Q computers, the AI could be looking at this as well and could be predicting, you know, this kind of thing where it's not, we think it's push come to shove, but it's not actually, right?
Right.
Correct.
So with that in mind there, you know, I guess because I'm, we're on the side of the Patriots are on the side of sort of hurry up and wait, right?
And that something is going to happen, like you're saying, false flags, defaulting this, and yet every time we get to that sort of horizon, there's a delay, a pushback, whatever.
But I don't see the dark side actually being delayed in other aspects.
There are attacks on the United States, for example, are continuing full force with very, at least very little ostensible pushback.
Right.
And the Biden show is continuing.
You know, one has already come out and said there are four Bidens.
Okay.
And so.
I guess I'm at the loss of saying.
Why is it that the White Hats really believe that something is going to change when it's so easy for the dark side to continue?
Not to let it change because in their position and meanwhile they're going to roll out their CBDC and meanwhile however that affects the individual which I am at a loss to tell right we don't know if that means they clean out our bank accounts or they convert our bank account into digital whatever it is I actually heard a This there's this woman, I guess she's in mainstream and she talked about how.
They have it all set up where you're going to go sign up for something to get online and then your money will be brought over.
To follow you, so to speak into this new system, you know, because.
When we look at this, and we, we want to be effective.
Okay.
We want to see change.
We want to see things around us, mirror what we think we know, what we have been told by the cue drops and so on and so forth.
And yet, I hear you on these shows talk about changes that you're aware of, and you use we, you say we're aware of this, we're aware of that.
And, you know, we're aware of going into the underground bases, let's say, right?
But what I don't see is actually the evidence of that that can be shown to friends and family, so to speak.
And and and yet I'm not saying it isn't out there in some form or fashion, but we're we're sort of we're fighting this paper tiger that is.
The mainstream media is a huge part of it, right?
And so we have an individual like Chris Licht, who is backed by Trump or backs Trump and is a sort of mini, what I would call media mogul, who took over CNN over a year ago and did very little, cosmetically at least, to show That there was a new a new sort of way and, you know, sheriff in town, so to speak on in CNN.
And so what we get is the same thing we've always seen, and it's just as woke as ever.
And I think the indication of that was the interview with the town hall with Trump.
Where, and I forget her name, but the newscaster who went on stage with Trump and was extremely rude to him.
I think ruder than anyone would ever have thought is sort of appropriate for treating a president, an elected president, a former elected president, if you want to look at it like that.
So With incredible rudeness.
I mean just like way over the top.
So what I want to know is, you know, these things that are cosmetic are certainly not changing.
And I have to assume that's with white hat.
Approval that's what they want and that will lead into this other sort of more spiritual question that I have but but what I want to do for right now is just say how do you account for this that they are just not changing the guard so to speak.
So at all in any way shape or form and every time they do something assuming they do anything like take down a Pelosi or you know or you know even announce that you know Biden's dead I mean one won't come out and just say Biden's dead which he is but you know what I'm saying in other words we own the cosmetics and this is what the this is what people go by all right and I mean I have taught people
Whistleblowers behind the scenes who are watching this play out and they're not approving the method of the White Hats to keep the cosmetics the same while they do some changes behind the scene because it's tantamount to the fact there being no change.
You see where I'm going with this?
Absolutely.
And that is the tough question.
That's actually probably the hardest question and the one that I would say likely no one has got a really good answer for at least yet.
It's worth prefacing that from where I come from personally, I can understand some of it, but I actually have a personal position that's more aligned with your own.
At some point you have diminishing returns.
You have diminishing returns that are overwhelming because you've seeded some of that diminishment for returns that haven't happened yet.
So it can be a very delicate situation.
When I look at it and I look at the overall operational scheme, what seems to strike out to me more than anything is that they have, and we're going to call them the White Hats, I'll just refer to them as they, have helped position different areas of society to be so over-the-top, so painfully obvious.
when we know that this Illuminati Kabbalist has primarily always been a very sleuthful, clandestine, highly effective and clever serpent, that some of it has some of it just screams scripted to me in some form or fashion.
Exactly what you were talking about with the CNN town hall.
She wasn't just rude.
She was disgusting.
It was it was absolutely embarrassing.
And, you know, I've got a friend here where I'm at locally who's quite a bit more center left than where I would fall.
Certainly is not into the whole conspiracy thing.
So we talk pretty gentle, gentle subjects most of the time.
But even he came out and said that he watched that event.
He watched part of that event, and he actually turned it off because he was so embarrassed by his own side.
So, you know, I think it's worth highlighting that that's a part of what we've lived through, right?
We've got a lot of really good patriots that... I shouldn't say patriots, I should say patriots in a dormant state, if we will.
If they had the right information and they weren't being constantly gaslit, they would actually be over to this side.
And so this is where I get into my own personal quandary.
We have a situation where you've got a lot of those independents, a lot of those center-lefts, or even, you know, further left liberals, more socially progressive, but not necessarily bona fide communists, certainly not satanists, who would come over to this side if they had more consequence to believe in, you know, and the things that we sort of espouse on these topics and The idea of the overall awakening, that's not going to be where these individuals come from.
They're not going to sort of, you know, make that leap right into that segment.
So I come back to this idea that, well, if we can't meet them, if it would be ineffective, even if we were to inaugurate some sort of military coup and run an emergency alert dispatch, if it's not going to meet them on a consciousness level, culturally, all across our nation and really all across the world, And I think we run the risk of setting off some chaos.
And that's just a gambit that I make in my own mind, and I really don't have a good basis for it other than this idea that, you know, everyone has argued with a family member or friend that they were just so sure was wrong, and they were wrong, and you knew that they were wrong.
But because of where they were at, they just couldn't see it.
They wouldn't see it.
I had a really awful relationship in my early days that everybody saw but me because I just wasn't in the place where I was going to see it.
And even when I was presented with the interventions from the well-meaning family, I sort of shrugged it off and said, well, I'm just going to do what I'm going to do.
So there hadn't been any sort of change.
But, you know, it's difficult to come out and say on air that this is why they're doing that, because there's not a lot of good evidence to the contrary, except in the circumstantial ways, right?
We have some documentation.
We have a lot of really good, you know, video footage that comes out of Eastern Europe and some that comes out of the Pacific, but not much, but some.
And so we know that something is happening.
But beyond that, it's very difficult to quantify.
And so that's what makes, I think, our position really hard.
Um, for folks that are coming from that, what we would call the normal sleeper, the, the normie position to come around and, and really admit is, is true.
We have to sort of, I think it's worth noting that we, we, we put out the best quality information on these sorts of alternative broadcasts just to my own personal opinion.
Um, but these normies coming from the mainstream space, they sort of have to be shoved in our direction.
And that's the only sort of basis I can give for it.
Okay so uh so there's a sort of there's sort of I say you know like it's like splashing cold water on your face or their faces right there has to be some shock event that would wake them up if you're going to wake somebody up who refuses to wake up right so you can't avoid that and I think that we can't personally I think even though they work very hard not to have civil war
The very fact that they're staying hidden for so long is actually working in their in the favor of a someday civil war happening virtually overnight because there will be so many people that have not they have they've either turned against them Or they have not woken up, right?
So that contingency is going to be outraged by any move they make that would be overt.
Let's put it that way.
And that will that could kind of judging.
This is just my estimation of the mentality of the people around me put them into a mode of hysteria and taking certain actions.
Now you keep talking about a false flag.
And the trouble with false flags nowadays, as far as I'm concerned, is we can't tell which side is really doing it.
That often the false flags are as much to serve the White Hats as they are to serve the dark.
And that that line between light and dark has become quite fuzzy lately, in my opinion.
And that also relates to the question, you know, that I posed and put on my telegram and talked to you about and sent to Juan.
Which is, you know, philosophically, you know, when you do evil in the name of good, does that make you good?
I know that's a very plain way of putting it, but I'm being as plain as possible.
I'm really asking the question because, you know, I know that it's a difficult thing in wartime to Answer that, right?
So you have to kill in the name of the war that you're fighting to defend the side that you're defying, you know, so and so.
But by the same token, when you continue to deceive, The people.
And I have to come back to this again and again because this is where I go and what I get back from people, which is they've lost faith.
They've lost hope because these people are deceiving them, even if they come out like white knights tomorrow.
They're going to be questioned as to why they kept people in the dark for so long.
And it doesn't matter what their excuse is.
You know, their excuse will be, oh, we didn't want civil war.
Oh, you wouldn't believe us anyway.
You know, it could be a million things, right?
It's not gonna look good, okay?
It doesn't look good already.
And listen, I have military people.
I have Marines.
I have Army.
I have, you know, people that have been on high levels in corporations.
Some people that are close to the real financial situation, you know, the manipulation of the money with the screens and all that.
And they, you know, they just They're not on board, okay?
And yet, some of them would be, or could be, or were, but they're not anymore.
And this is because, again, this thing has gone on for so long, and then we're looking at June, and I can see a push come to shove, and maybe there's an opportunity here.
But if it gets delayed again, again, when you have your audience beginning to turn away from you, And you come forward as a hero.
Are you really going to be a hero when they find out how they have been deceived and how many people lost loved ones?
By virtue of that deception.
And you can say, oh, it's for your own good.
But you're not God, right?
They're not God.
Other than the fact that we're all God in the sense, you know, in the bigger sense.
But you know what I'm saying?
They're not in a position of power on a spiritual level to be able to decide life and death necessarily.
And these people are going to be asking, why did my loved one die when it was on your watch?
And if you come forward and you say, okay, Trump is CIC, which I say all the time, Commander-in-Chief, and he has the nuclear codes, and that proves it, and he closed down, you know, Cheyenne Mountain, and it's still closed, and he, you know, he's still president, and there's a whole devolution, you know, explanation of what goes on when you get invaded, and we were invaded, and I have the whole litany of stuff, and yet this does not persuade these people.
So, I might be packing too much into this, but you see what I'm saying?
I'm saying there's a spiritual question in the way in you're going to do evil.
You're going to deceive in the name of good because it's for your own good because I have decided what's for your own good, right?
Even that goes against the grain, right?
So, can you address any of that?
You know, you don't have to dress at all if you don't feel up to it, whatever.
But you see, these are the problems.
And if I didn't have deep witnesses that were part of, you know, law enforcement and this and that and the other, who have already come to the conclusion that the White Hats are ineffective, you know, so-and-so.
Now, I know that there's the law of the art of war and you have to appear weaker than you are.
Absolutely.
all of that game, right?
But that's not going to fly after the fact.
Well, absolutely.
And, you know, this, you know, Ms. Cassidy, this might be one of those questions that I have gone back and forth with for a really long time, possibly the longest time, really since When I saw what happened with the government, I saw the slew of executive orders that President Trump issued.
We saw the statements from Chris Miller.
We saw Arturo Delia and all of the, you know, information.
He came over with Leonardo and the Italian intelligence community.
We saw all of that.
And yet the events have played out in the same fashion as though none of that had ever happened.
As though none of that, you know, was ever brought to the table.
And so, it's really been a competing reality, right?
And one that's, I think, fundamentally, let's just be honest, it's not fair.
It's really not fair when you have a segment, a very large segment and growing every day, a portion of the population coming out and saying, look, we get it.
What more do we need to get?
We understand, right?
The only solace that I've ever come up with that makes any sense and that sort of aligns with some of my research is that because it is a multifaceted military campaign, there's suffering in some areas that can't be mitigated until an objective has been accomplished in another area.
An example like what you highlighted earlier with the split, the schism, sort of the forced schism by necessity of different personnel within the militaries, because we know the militaries, as patriotic as they are, and they are, I'm an ardent military supporter, but at the brass level, we had infiltration over the last hundred years.
It's just, it's just a fact.
So I think that's, you know, an example of things, of why things have gone the way that they have.
I think that another possibility to, you know, sort of address the overall issue of, you know, doing the evil, because that's really what it is, is, you know, I'm not qualified to make a karmic Assessment or a karmic judgment.
I'm certainly not qualified to make a spiritual advisement.
I'm just not there.
I don't have what I would consider the personal life experience needed and the personal wisdom to say that.
But what I can say, what makes sense to me, is if I were on a battlefield and the battle was truly for keeps, it was going to be one side wins, one side loses, and this is it.
I would play to preserve the largest amount of life, knowing that some life may have to be sacrificed in the process.
And that's sort of disgusting to say, and it's not really something that I think is defensible at the overall end of this, but I chalk that back up to Necessarian Wartime.
We had a catastrophic attack on our national government that incapacitated more than 95%.
We had a catastrophic attack and that same catastrophic attack sort of leveled our economic infrastructure, shocked our consciousness and closed down the entire world.
So this was a very unusual sort of original event that had been heaped onto mankind.
And as far as the spiritual component of it, I don't believe that doing evil or allowing evil to persist in the world is justifiable.
Let's just go ahead and put that out there.
I don't think that that's something that is a healthy point of view.
But in this particular situation, when we look at it worldwide, if as a result of everything that has gone on, humanity ascends to a level of consciousness that it has never gone to before, and we truly come to understand, like you said earlier, that we're all tiny little gods walking around in bodies, we have unbelievable creative power, and we impact the world at multi-dimensional levels that none of us know about, we're never taught about it, it's not in any of our holy books, and yet we know it's a thing.
I would almost say that in this singular instance, we could justify that.
But, you know, at the same time, I'm not qualified to say that.
And at the end of the day, I think that there needs to be inquiries not only into all of the Kabbalist members, but individuals of society who were sort of on the gray side and who may have even been working in the light side, but had criminality, you know, in their own past that was That can't be left alone.
I don't think that we should leave that alone.
If we're going to create a new world, if we're going to postulate for a moment that we win this conflict, we have to do it fairly.
And everyone that participated in the conflict has to attain some sort of consequence.
Right.
Okay.
Well, yeah, and I, you know, I can appreciate what you're saying.
I think that raising the issue is worthwhile.
And I think that people out there, you know, humans, even the ones that we call that are woke, you know, we see jokingly they're sleeping or whatever.
On, you know, I see human each human as a complex soul, and I can say that on certain levels, they're making choices not to be asleep.
Okay.
And there that is a soul choice because of an experience that they want to have, whether they like, I have said in a recent show, they have chosen to take the shot.
Actually, they're on a soul level.
They know.
That's going to turn their body into a transhuman organism.
At that point, their spirit soul complex will have the choice of whether to stay with that particular body, which is now more aligned with AI than not.
And, you know, transhuman in essence, taken over by the jab, by the graph, nanographene oxide, so on and under orders by the AI planetary AI.
And even alien AI, incoming alien AI.
This is a choice, a sole choice.
So we are, you know, we are actually hand-to-hand, side-by-side with people that are going to make that sole choice and have done, okay?
And I'm not going to say this particular person's name, although if you follow his work, he's a well-known doctor.
His wife went out behind his back and got the jab.
And this is an extremely knowledgeable Black Project, you know, medical doctor.
So, you know, hello, you know, this is incredible.
Yeah, it is.
And blows my mind.
And I have no idea what it might have done to them and their marriage and so on and so forth.
But hello.
So this is the kind of thing where a soul is making a conscious choice in that case, possibly, possibly, or.
Or it could have been, you know, she could have been victim of mind control, or she could have been under a threat that we don't even know about, right?
So, there are a lot of extenuating circumstances to the story, but it's worth noting.
And I just want to say that people are making choices now.
They appear stupid.
They appear maybe sitting on, you know, There's sort of a cliché of the beer drinking, you know, person comes home from work and doesn't have a thought in their mind and watches some, you know, football or whatever, and that's the end of it.
But there is a spirit-soul complex at work there, okay?
And they are protecting themselves from engagement in the reality and the knowledge that we have, right?
Who have decided to get into the fray in some cases, you know, Really out there.
I mean, I'm as exposed as you can possibly get.
I state my point of view all the time on air, and you're doing pretty close to that as well.
Maybe not as dangerously, because you seem to have a little more, I don't know, care about that, but you have a family, you know, a close family that, you know, obviously, so that would make you more cautious.
With rightly so.
So all I'm saying is that Under these circumstances, people know.
Okay, I guess this is I know I'm talking a lot here, but people know subliminally.
Something's wrong, something's off, right?
They knew it with the jabs, they still know it, right?
And I see these people, it's hard for me to believe, but we still see people in masks, right?
And we still see them going around and even doing physical exercise, you know, and masking their children even.
So, These, again, are choices and the children, by the way, and a lot of people don't see life this way necessarily, but children are souls who have come in You know, to be with those particular influencers, their parents, and to go along with their certain agendas, which may or may not be good for them, right?
Because they want to have the experience.
A lot of what goes on on Earth is to do with soul spirit experience.
It's not to do with good and bad.
Okay?
As much as people think it is.
You know, people will be born on the on the dark side.
This is a whistleblower.
They will work in the dark side for 40 years of their life.
And then they will suddenly have a consciousness awakening and they will come and tell and become a whistleblower and tell the truth.
So.
To humanity, because they get a crisis of conscience, and this is the kind of awakening that I think the White Hats are hoping that everyone will have at some point.
But I think that's highly unlikely, given the circumstances that we are and I make this statement.
Has torture worked?
Does torture work?
If you turn up the heat on the frog and you actually fry the frog, other than getting dead, does torture work?
And if the White Hats are actually participating, allowing, you know, if I see a child running across the street and I just allow it to get hit by a car, I'm culpable on some level that I could have done something perhaps.
You know, I could have run out there and stopped the car, right?
Um, you know, I've been in that situation to protect, you know, even a dog or something running, you know what I'm saying?
You make a choice at every moment.
So if you allow darkness or evil to exist and to happen right in front of your, on your watch, and in this situation, the White Hats and Trump are on a different level because they have actually already attained certain Quasi power positions or leadership roles.
And so there is a karmic blowback here.
Now the positive things they do may balance that, you know what I'm saying?
And again, I know in wartime, blah, blah, blah.
These are things to be considered.
And so just asking you, you know, is there a part of you that wants to Kind of advise the White House and I know you say, well, you're not in a position.
Well, if you're not, and I'm not, I mean, I wouldn't say I'm not.
I take full responsibility and I'm happy to say that.
I, I feel that I do have an advisory.
Capacity to be able to at least broach the questions, bring these uncomfortable questions forward so that we can make sure that at the end of the day, we're not exchanging, you know, meet, meet the old boss, same new boss, same as old boss kind of thing.
Get it?
Absolutely.
And I think it's probably the most worthwhile question out there that's consistently across the whole movement that needs some addressing periodically.
We know from a couple of the Q drops that the entities that we would call the White Hats, they actually do pay attention.
They are sort of keeping a pulse.
They come out in one of those drops and say, we hear you Patriot, we hear all Patriots like you.
So, if I was to advise anything, and let me preface this by saying that I don't believe that torture is an appropriate mechanism.
Unfortunately, I think that there is some example throughout history that providing a cog of discomfort, and I don't use that as a pun, you know, there I'm literally just referencing discomfort.
It often facilitates rapid change within the human being.
I don't agree with it.
Fundamentally, I think it's antithetical to what we're trying to accomplish moving forward, and if that is the case, at some mass scale, that we are in fact being soft-boiled by, you know, good people, I think we would have to question if they're good people.
I think it's much more likely that the same military-industrial complex that has posed such a threat to the world for the last hundred years was existing in the shadows even under President Trump.
And under a four-year presidency, you can do a lot and you can get a lot done, but you're not going to switch over the entire, you know, captured command-and-control brass of the U.S.
military-industrial complex.
You would end up dead.
Um, and so I think it's much more likely that we've had a back and forth that has been more uneasy over the last, you know, several years than people initially gave it credit for.
I think there was a lot of excitement that came out immediately post 2020 that we had them all, we caught them all, because that's what President Trump said.
Um, you know, but what does that mean?
We caught them all?
Did we catch all the traitors?
Did we catch all the COVID criminals?
Did we catch all the bioterrorists?
Did we catch all the CIA liaisons?
What does, what does all mean?
I think we caught a lot of, you know, key characters throughout his presidency, but we still had a beast to slay.
Now that being said, if I could advise anything, I would advise the same that you're advising, really, on your show.
Most of my audience, patient as loving as they are, You know, gracious as they are as human beings, they're ready to get this show on the road.
We've been going for a while.
We have absolutely awakened a tremendous amount of the population.
I put out at different points along the way that Q tells us 90 plus percent can come into the fold.
I think that is achievable with something like a financial event, you know, or a massive series of national emergencies sort of kicking off all at one time and they're sort of putting that in our face.
Talking about a new possible pandemic and power blackouts and cyber attacks that they're blaming on Microsoft when the WEF just told us three months ago that it was coming.
So I think it's possible we achieve that 90% just for a moment.
And if we get there and we have that 90% through a series of very short-lived, intensely painful events, and I'm talking days or a couple of weeks, not anything extended, Then we could probably flip and move forward and keep the momentum.
But at some point, the show does have to speed up and get more dramatic because we're just going to arrive at the point where Patriots will feel so defeated that they won't even go vote in 2024, for example.
They're just not going to.
Yeah.
They've watched two elections.
They're now educated to know that people have been stealing the elections for the last four or five, really since the 60s, but certainly in the last four or five that people would remember in recent memory.
They're not going to go to the ballot box without some sort of positive motivation and some categorical improvement moving forward.
I think 2023 is going to be a pivotal year in this overall military operation.
Something's got to give.
Right.
Yeah, 100%.
I think I do feel that way.
And I know that my viewers do as well.
Okay, so I guess I'm keeping you here a while.
I think we might even have gone even overtime, but is there anything that you want to say to people?
And I don't mean, and no offense on this, I don't want you to just sort of placate them and say some nice things.
What I'm saying is, is there anything that you're aware of?
That maybe isn't being addressed either by my questions or Patriot Underground's questions.
You know, this whole gamut that we're looking at right now.
Is there any particular area?
You know, is it Taiwan?
Is it, you know, because I know I saw you were sort of emphasizing North Korea, which I thought was a bit strange at this juncture.
No, no offense again, because I, you know, it doesn't seem to be in the public eye, but that doesn't mean that the Illuminati aren't working on something over there.
You know, in other words, and really are if, you know, depleted uranium is loose in Ukraine, and we've already had some kind of depot that had a bomb and that.
I think it's the eastern, or is it the western side?
The western side of Ukraine, not the Donbass, the opposite side, right?
That was attacked.
And you know what I'm saying, in other words, is there some area or some details that you can tell us about at this time?
And I know this is a weird segment, segue, but Is it possible that you do know something in your travels and your excellent investigations, or just by virtue of being a public person and being approached?
Something that has kind of gone under the radar of the general public, especially the alternative, you know, patriots that are watching this, that you think you should bring to the fore to bring more attention on?
Um, and that you could even have been threatened over because.
I never see anything as an isolated incident.
So the fact that you had some kind of sudden health thing, I don't want to pry into your health situation.
You know what I'm saying?
But I'm just saying, generally speaking.
You see, these things are not isolated and therefore, if the Illuminati are attacking you, they have a reason to attack you.
I certainly know they're attacking me, you know, like they took my whole website down when I posted this particular article.
So, you know what I'm saying?
So, would you have, you know, before we wrap up here, is there anything on the radar, under the radar, that you would like to address?
You know, Probably from just a mass population awareness point of view, and I think it's important to remember to keep in mind.
Things are going to expand on the warfare front, irrespective of what happens with the U.S.
continuity of government, this whole discussion we've had about finance possibly leading to a situation where the military steps in.
But the warfare front, regardless of how that happens, is going to expand.
The Baltic states are going to be returned to Russia.
That's not going to be an easy process because they're NATO members.
The Kilimanjaro are currently working overtime in Turkey to steal that election.
They're having to commit fraud at a rate that the Turkish people are sort of abhorred at.
And there's destabilization that's happening in that country.
We could see that country into, you know, a pre-Civil War style setup very soon, because they're very, they're very angry about it.
I think another thing to keep in mind is all of us want sort of ultimate justice for this crime called COVID-19 and this depopulation agenda.
And not nearly enough people, to include President Donald J. Trump, are talking about how this has affected mankind, what this has done to people's consciousness, what it's done to people's families.
And I think it's very possible that we see all, you know, sitting members of different governments over these last three to five years, to include President Trump and others, taken before an international court and sort of deposed and asked what they knew about what was going on.
And it's very possible that we see the good guys cleared for their knowledge or their lack of knowledge, excuse me, I should say.
Individuals that would not have rolled these sorts of things out had they had access to the information, you know, all of this sort of complexity.
I think we get that sort of rolled out at that coming tribunal or, you know, people are calling it Nuremberg 2.0.
I think it's going to be an international, you know, tribunal proceeding that probably will go many weeks or months.
But it's very possible that we see different governments taken into the fold and sort of depose as a result of that.
And so that's going to be, I think, a difficult circumstance to go through, however it looks and whatever point in time we arrive there, and I'm really not qualified to say.
As we move through the next few weeks and months, I think the most important thing is to look at what we know based on what we knew in 2020, because that's really going to be the linchpin, right?
That's how we're going to force the rest of the brain dead sleepers to come up and awake and really get on board.
They're going to see some of these events that the crazy conspiracy people have been talking about for a long time.
And we capitalize on our knowledge without embellishment.
I think that that's negatively affected things is people that are out there and they really have really a good basis for their research.
They've got really defensible points, but sometimes they go a little overboard.
They may not even mean to.
We have to sort of keep a level head going through this because discerning what's real and what's not is really difficult.
But we know the kinetic real world changes that we want to see happen.
And that's where we have to focus.
All right.
Right.
Okay.
Well, I think that's a good summation of what we're possibly approaching.
Directly and I do agree that there has to be a, you know, a taking to task of the people that participated in this incredible health tyranny operation.
And I don't know if you're familiar with the.
So they called it the International COVID Summit that just happened May, I think was first, second and third or something like that.
No, what was this year?
Well, see, nobody knows.
This just drives me crazy.
So their outreach is maybe not very effective.
But luckily, there is something going around on I think it wasn't Telegram, it was Instagram.
I just put it out a day or two ago, just saw it a day or two ago.
But I happen to be following David Martin, Dr. David Martin's work over the years.
And I know that he was prominent in that event.
It had all the doctors that are very, you know, we could consider alternative doctor healers who are like heroes testifying.
And this whole event just took place in, I think it was Brussels.
And it, like I said, it went on for around three days.
Dr. Martin, David Martin, in his speech during that event, Which happened on day three, which is all on my telegram in case people want to find it.
And it's also on Rumble, the speeches that all the doctors made, basically testifying to this debacle, this planned pandemic that we were all faced with, that was really the brainchild, I would say, of the Nazis going back to Hitler's experiments all the way back then.
So that medical tyranny That Klaus Schwab, he's a descendant of the whole Nazi regimes, and the rest of them, you know, Merkel, you know, and so on.
In other words, these New World Order fascists, who are basically announcing they're rolling out a New World Order, they're rolling out this supposed treaty that they want countries to sign off on,
Which again, this should make or foment a world war and maybe that's that's their intention, you know, because it's absurd that countries would sign off on something like that that would take them over when they decide to do the next plan-demic.
Well, David Martin has proven that all of this plan behind the plan-demic has gone back and he has the documentation to prove it going back to 1990 and before.
So what we're looking at is something that even when Donald Trump was going into office, he knew was going to happen.
He absolutely had to know.
So this is what we're talking about.
We're talking about a situation in which we have been Actually, in my mind, we've actually been trans, we've done like a Groundhog Day thing.
We've been transitioned back to Nazi Germany.
We're seeing all the rollout of all the things they did in Nazi Germany, right in front of our eyes.
Some perhaps behind our eyes because you're, you know, the underground bases is not public, necessarily disclosure, although we're certainly talking about a lot.
You know, in other words, that's what happened here.
To us, and there were lots of people that came forward and said, this is Nazi Germany back in, you know, 1942 or whatever.
So this some people have to have to be brought before.
The public in some kind of trial, and this can't be allowed to just go by the wayside.
And yet, even this that has just done a whole summit again, there have been a few of these efforts actually Nuremberg type efforts that.
Somehow don't reach the people they need to reach and aren't becoming.
Not getting enough notice.
So, you know, I'm just reiterating that, you know, that you're absolutely right.
I think there's a reason why there's special attention being given to Robert Kennedy as a possible contender to run even with Trump as a partner, you know, VP or something.
I know they're in different parties and this two-party system, of course, is absurd, but How that would work, I have no idea.
But I know Steve Bannon is out on record right now saying he thinks he should be doing that.
He should be running with Trump.
In other words, there has to be an addressing of this issue and the way people behave.
Doctors, nurses, And many of them in full knowledge of what they were part of.
Some of them completely didn't know.
And does that mean that if you were coercing, or you were a politician, or you were a media personality, and you were pushing, for example, and basically denying, let's say, something on a small level, like individuals and entree to a restaurant, because they weren't vaxxed.
Um, or whether you were telling the military that they had to get back and they had to quit.
I know military people who have stood on principle and they left their military positions.
They need some kind of recognition for this.
Some kind of reparation.
I would say, I mean.
You know, back in the days of World War 2, at least ostensibly at the end of World War 2, there seemed to be some kind of, you know, payback some kind of.
You know, going before the court Nuremberg, of course, and there was a another side to Nuremberg, which had to do with that, you know, the Dulles brothers and the whole movement of the Nazis surreptitiously to become part of the American government.
The English governments, you know, joining even, you know, the secret space programs and so on and so forth.
So there were two sides to what went on back in those days, as they may be here, you know, but we have to have to have that kind of, you know, sort of come to Jesus moment, if you will, to do with the this this pandemic.
Such that it gets imprinted on the memories of the public, I would say at the very least, so that it never happens again.
Absolutely.
I 100% agree with that in everything that you just said, because it is the real culmination, right?
That's really the culmination of one half of the transhumanistic agenda, which is the big That's the overarching dark force that has pushed this for the last hundred plus years.
I mean, really going back to the, to the 19th century.
Um, so we have to handle this and you know, I love president Trump.
I really, really do.
Um, I believe that the man has taken a lot of flack.
He's certainly, he's all about obliterating the deep state.
I think that he's not controllable, um, which I think works in his favor and sometimes works against him, right?
He's got a bullheaded personality and that's okay.
But at the end of the day, we have to have clarity as we the people around the world about what really happened here and who knew what, or we'll never heal.
So it has, I think we have to go through the exacting of ultimate justice, right?
Military justice in different key areas, because this is a biological weapon of war.
It was a weapon of mass destruction launched against we the people.
It should be handled and treated as such.
And we catalog and create the record, you know, sort of in voluminous enough form that it will never be possible to even, you know, attempt to orchestrate anything like this ever again as we move forward, because humanity will need that to trust one another again.
I think that trust starts with the Patriots.
Some of the Patriots out there in the community, people, you know, like your audience and individuals in my audience, they have some of the strongest character.
They're so tough.
They're so forward-thinking.
A lot of them so unbelievably clever, so brilliantly talented.
But at the same time, we have to, you know, remember that this is a generational imprint that has to be, we have to give it meaning, right?
We've all lost family and friends, colleagues because of this crime, and we have to give it meaning, and we have to honor that suffering.
So as we go forward, I think we're going to be asked to show a lot of compassion, but we also have to acknowledge that part of that compassion is dispatching with anyone, and I do mean anyone, Who had a part and party in actively perpetrating the greatest crime ever committed.
Yes.
All right.
Well, I've kept you long enough.
I've really enjoyed this conversation.
I hope you appreciated the questions and the depth of the questions and you certainly stood up to it.
So that's awesome.
So I wish you the best.
I hope your healing progresses.
I hope that healers out there in the world would send you healing energy so that this could also help you and just want to say thanks again for being here.
Thanks, Ms.
Cassidy.
I appreciate it, and I will say one of the things I like about coming on with you at Project Camelot is you ask the questions that nobody else does, and that's enjoyable because we reach, I think, a different segment of the population, and it's a segment of the population, I think, that, you know, even juts into that independent space, and that's a very important audience to have, so thank you so much.
Okay.
All right.
Take care, and thank you, everyone, for watching.
▲
Export Selection