All Episodes
Previous Next
Jan. 20, 2023 - Project Camelot
01:05:11
ANDREW BRIDGEN: COURAGEOUS BRITISH MP SUSPENDED FOR RAISING VAX DANGER ISSUES
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Thank you.
Thank you.
He is an MP from England and he's actually in England, aren't you Andrew, at this time?
I'm actually in Westminster, in my flat in Westminster, just outside Parliament, yeah.
Okay, very good.
So this is a fascinating subject, and it's very controversial.
They're all different viewpoints out there.
And what I want you to do is we're just going to come to this as if the American, because we have a large American audience, we all will have a world audience as well.
So they may not know you by name.
So can you introduce yourself and tell us something about your background and then we'll lead up to exactly what has happened.
Okay, my name's Andrew Bridgen.
I'm the Conservative Member of Parliament.
Well, I was the Conservative Member of Parliament for North West Leicestershire.
I remain the MP for North West Leicestershire, although I'm suspended from the parliamentary party.
I'm a local businessman.
I live in my constituency, which is in the very centre of the United Kingdom.
It's Middle England, so the furthest constituency from the sea in any direction.
and the centre of population of the UK.
So we are middle England.
I took my seat from the Labour Party in 2010.
It was a Labour-held seat and it was classed as a no-hope seat for the Conservatives to win.
I took it with the second biggest swing in the country in the 2010 elections.
So I got in with a good swing of 12%.
Increased my majority in 2015.
Increased my majority again in 2017.
Increased my majority again in 2019.
So by 2019, there were six candidates on the ballot paper.
in 2019.
So by 2019 I got, there were six candidates on the ballot paper, I got 63% of all the votes.
My response to the BBC, who said, "Mr. Bridgen, you must be delighted.
After four elections, you've turned a Labour seat into a very safe Conservative seat.
You've At every election you've increased your vote, you've increased your percentage of the vote and you've increased your majority.
I said no it's terrible actually.
I said because we've delivered In 29 years, we've delivered the highest economic growth in the UK, the happiest place to live in the Midlands, and one in three of the voters are still not voting for me.
There's so much more work I've got to do to get this sorted.
So, my background before that, I was a businessman in the area.
I ran my own business.
Employing 300 people, a start-up company which under my management became a 25-30 million turnover business in the food industry.
Before that I served in the armed forces and before that I was at Nottingham University and my degree was in biological sciences and I specialised in, in the end I did a subsidiary in biochemistry Genetics, virology and behaviour.
They were my key areas of interest and I went to a state school locally.
So that's it, that's it really.
That's me.
Well, that's very interesting because I didn't realize that you had a background in biochemistry and I think, you know, that should certainly lend itself to someone who can make statements and evaluate material coming out about the vaccines, I would imagine.
So that's actually in your favor, although I don't think I saw that in any of the newspaper articles that have been out about you.
So is that a surprise?
Not at all, not at all.
So what I'd like to do here is now introduce how this situation came about.
Everyone knows that we have been in a very Sort of contentious time we've been locked down, then the lockdowns were removed.
There was, uh, you know, you, you had to take, uh, they, they really wanted to push the jab for the last 3 years and there have mixed results.
And that is public knowledge, even the, the, the pharmaceutical industry itself will come out occasionally with statements saying that, you know, that the VAX isn't what.
People think it is, or that it won't perform the way they think it will and various other sort of statements that are.
Maybe slightly controversial and innocuous but nonetheless people and doctors in particular around the world have come out and put their reputations on the line and this is hundreds of thousands of doctors and I've interviewed several of the key ones and so why don't we go from there.
So what happened to you and I think it's fair to say that a lot of people have thought over the last few years that things around the world haven't been quite right.
An understatement!
We'll call that an English or British understatement, shall we?
I don't think people have been told the whole truth.
Evidence has arrived now which We clearly suggest we haven't been told the whole truth.
We know that the narrative has changed on many occasions, especially towards the efficacy and safety of the vaccines, the worth of the lockdowns, the wider damage to society, which I've seen in my constituency and particularly with children.
I think they... I've given a speech in the House of Commons some months ago about the debt we owe to our children because they They didn't have any control over these events, and I think they've been tremendously badly damaged across the world with loss of education, and their social skills, and the terror that's been unleashed on the population.
I mean, Kerry, I went into politics to try and do good things for my... I was a successful businessman that made an awful lot of money, and I was in a position where I could give something back to society.
My local constituency, the people I was brought up with, The people I live with.
And I think we've delivered that.
And as a behavioural scientist in a way as well, I was keen on the nudge department of social conditioning in number 10.
But to the extent that, you know, instead of having a message on your tax return saying If you don't pay this within 28 days, you'll get fined £200.
Saying a message like 99% of people do return this form within 28 days and don't get fined £200 is rather a nicer message.
But what came clear to me during the lockdowns and the pandemic is that the nudge department in our government, in number 10, became the shove department.
And I don't like being shoved around.
I don't like my people being shoved around.
And I think that the reason for government or their function should be is that we look at the problems facing our populations and we say, yep, we appreciate the problems.
I know you get on with your life and government will deal with these problems for you.
I always say that when people come to me with casework at surgeries, when they come with their personal problems, I say, OK, you're very upset about this.
A lot of it is very upsetting.
It heats into your emotional capital.
But I'll say, look, you know, I want you now to have a good weekend because I'm going to deal with, I and my team are going to deal with this and we'll come back to you early next week and we'll get this sorted for you.
And I don't want you to worry about it.
We'll worry about it.
Well, what we've actually had is all the problems facing the world or our societies or our respective countries.
It seems to be pushed onto the people, you know, to get to a situation in the UK where, you know, a quarter of young girls are self-harming.
A huge core portion of our under-25s think that the world's going to burn up in a fireball due to global warming, and it's not worth thinking about having children.
I mean, this is madness, and it's state-induced propaganda which has been used against the people relentlessly.
The science behind the lockdowns is disintegrated.
I voted against the last lockdown in the UK, and I voted against Plan B, and I voted against the masks, and I voted against the mandates on the NHS staff.
I would have voted against the first lockdown, but I was assured by Boris Johnson that a full impact assessment had been carried out by the government of all the wider collateral harm to Society and our children, especially closing the schools.
Unfortunately, Kerry, that turned out to be untrue.
I was misled.
And I find that charge against Boris Johnson as our prime minister at the time, my prime minister at the time, and I voted to help get him in.
That's more heinous than the parties that were happening at number 10, or lying about them, because that affected the way I voted in Parliament on those assurances.
And of course when Partygate hit, and you realise that the people who knew all the science behind the pandemic, they weren't socially distancing, they weren't abiding by the rules that they were putting on everyone else.
I became very disillusioned with Boris Johnson's leadership and I petitioned to, I think I was the first MP to come out and say that he'd got to go.
But also the whole narrative that we've been fed was clearly false.
And since then I've done a lot of research.
I've spoken to a lot of people, a lot of scientists, doctors.
I've analysed a lot of scientific papers and I've spoken to a lot of witnesses.
I spoke to people in the media who have actually approached me and said, you know, I know there's a lot of vaccine harms out there.
I've got dozens and dozens of people have contacted me.
This is going to be the biggest scandal in medical history.
But if I were to talk about it in our media office, I'm absolutely convinced I'd lose my job immediately.
And that's not a sign of an open and free democracy or an open and free media.
And, you know, I've spoken to the cameraman who went into Number 10 to film the The daily briefings about how the death rates from Covid and all of this.
And they said, you know, normally they take a team, a team of three, you know, the sound man, the cameraman and somebody else to help.
It was one person allowed in.
He had to be vaccinated.
He had to be PCR tested.
And he did all this on his own.
And, you know, he filmed all the socially distanced speeches.
He said if he'd swung the camera around by 180 degrees, there were 30 young special advisors not wearing masks, not socially distancing, standing right behind the camera.
It was clearly, I mean, in his view, it was a pantomime.
Well, I mean, we've been told a lot of untruths.
MPs have been told a lot of untruths.
And everyone knows there's something seriously wrong.
My job in Parliament, I think, is to speak without fear or favour.
Unfortunately, Kerry, in the mother of all Parliaments, there is an awful lot of fear now and there's an awful lot of favour and it's very, very unhealthy.
OK, that's a great summary.
Now, what I was wondering is because, you know, I do spend quite a bit of time in England because I do a conference there every year.
And and I've had very close friends that I stay with and so I might be the exception, but for people that don't know how Parliament operates.
It struck me as very strange that you would be suspended after giving a speech that was actually, I thought, very balanced and obvious.
I mean, it's everywhere in the news now, like I said, and there's thousands and thousands of doctors having talked about this.
So they treated you as if it was the most outlandish thing they'd ever heard of.
And I just don't understand, during these last three years, did no one in Parliament come out and have people, you know, people, sports, very famous sports people, are now dying suddenly, and it reaches back to cardiac arrest.
You quoted a cardiologist, and that seemed to be Um, completely against the grain, uh, for some reason, not sure why.
Uh, so maybe you can talk a little bit about the atmosphere.
in parliament such that even in these three years, you're not allowed, are you just not allowed to say anything against the vaccine or against our question, the decisions that are being made by the NIH and so on? the decisions that are being made by the NIH and so There are very few MPs willing to speak out.
One of my senior colleagues, Chris Choke, the MP for Christchurch on the south coast of England, has formed an all-party Parliamentary group and there's a few Conservative MPs in it.
I'm one of them.
We had an inaugural meeting in the autumn And we had a world-renowned cardiologist, Dr. Asim Malhotra, came and presented his papers.
He produced a paper on the link with cardiac arrest and damaged myocarditis from the vaccines.
And he presented that to the group.
There was a lot of public participation and interest in that meeting, but very, very few parliamentarians.
Dr Asim Malhotra's scientific paper has been peer-reviewed and no one's challenged it in months and I had the chance to get a debate.
It was an adjournment debate at the end of the day.
Which means the minister has to come and be at the dispatch box and hear me and I can speak for probably 20 minutes I spoke for and then the minister gets 10 minutes to respond.
There are only about five or six colleagues in the chamber out of 650 MPs.
I knew it was going to be controversial.
I was quoting some very important facts and as soon as I sat down my office they I fired out a press release with, I think it was 32, references to 32 scientific papers that supported the statements I'd made in my speech.
Not one of the mainstream media reported on that speech, but it was recorded, and we did put it out on YouTube, and I think it's got about 8 million views worldwide.
I haven't checked for a few weeks, but it was very quickly above 5.2 million, and it's unusual on social media.
We've got the parameters that you have to listen to at least 18 minutes of the 20-minute speech, and it was 5.2 million a month ago, so it was quite a lot of interest.
I think that the chasm between the public interest and the parliamentary interest, I think that speaks a lot unfortunately for the state of our democracy at the moment.
I mean the government weren't happy with that speech.
I wasn't happy with the minister's response and I took it to task over it.
I don't think she responded at all to the questions I was asking.
And what really had pushed me to that, Kerry, is that in this country we've just had the MHRA, the medical regulator in the UK, had just authorised the use of the vaccines, the mRNA vaccines, for children down to the age of six months.
Oh, so did that actually...
That actually went through because I thought it was... No, no, no, the minister said at the dispatch box that the government have not yet decided, so it's recommended and they can approve it.
I have written to the Health Secretary Stephen Barclay, I've written to the Prime Minister Rishi Sunak, imploring them not to authorise these vaccines for clear scientific reasons that these very young children are at miniscule risk from COVID-19.
Since COVID-19 from the original Wuhan strain attenuated itself to the Omicron variant back in South Africa and came to Europe in December last year, The level of harm that that virus is doing is absolutely minimal.
With the original Wuhan strain, it was only 1 in 2 million chance of death from COVID-19 for that age group, and it's probably somewhere out at 4 or 5 million.
Well, the American papers I'd seen were indicating 1 in 200 would have a very severe event which would hospitalise a child of that age for at least three months.
Well, I mean, the harms far outweighed any benefit from the vaccine.
And just on the law of scientific analysis would say this shouldn't be done.
And also none of this takes any account of the fact that we've been swirling through various highly transmissible but less pathological variants for years.
And there's a huge amount of natural immunity on all the studies I've seen.
Well, it's somewhere between three and a half times to 20 times better protection from having had COVID than any of the vaccines that are on the market.
In fact, I said that a year ago last December in the Plan B debate, that the best protection from COVID-19 is actually having had COVID-19.
Okay, but there are also doctors that even question what is in the vaccines, as you know.
And from what I understand, I know certain doctors, Dr. Robert Young, I don't know if you know who he is, and Dr. Carrie Madej.
I'm not sure whether Dr. Yadin has actually examined what's in the vaccine himself but he's a former head of Pfizer as you know and he's been very vocal against the vaccine.
I'm meeting Mike, I'm hoping to meet Mike later this coming week in London.
And he's done sterling work.
And as you say, all of these senior doctors, scientists who are coming out against the vaccines, I mean, using the word vaccine in the In the loosest possible sense, really, because they don't offer protection from the disease they're supposed to be vaccinating you against.
They are a novel variant, a novel treatment, and there's such a novel description of a vaccine as well.
They've got everything to lose, and some of them have lost everything, but they've stuck by their guns.
And, of course, the people defending the vaccines They have a lot of vested interest, whether that's political or monetary interest, in defending that position.
And we have to remember, as I said in my speech on the 13th of December in the House of Commons, a big pharma, they have a fiduciary duty to make profit for their shareholders.
They have no fiduciary duty to provide you or I or anybody else with effective medicines.
Right, absolutely.
I don't know if you saw the video, but apparently, here in America, there was actually, when you go to your pharmacist to get the vaccine, and you open the box, or you ask to see, you know, that usually it's quite a long dialogue that explains possible risks and various things of this nature.
It actually showed that the piece of paper that is usually in the box is completely blank.
And it says deliberately blank on it.
Right.
Yeah, I mean there's no transparency around so many areas of the vaccine and the policies.
It's all unraveling pretty quickly and it needs to do so and we need to have a full investigation of how these things happened.
And make sure that those who may have transgressed are held to account, because if it's as bad as I fear it is, I mean, you know, I think the comment that got me suspended from the Conservative Party was retweeting a paper
Which was interestingly from the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, criticizing the vaccines, and I retweeted a quote which said it's the biggest, it will be the biggest crime against, the vaccine rollout will be the biggest crime against humanity since the Holocaust, and that got me suspended for racism and anti-semitism.
I think it might be presumed that that was an excuse to suspend me.
There was no anti-Semitism in there, and the Israeli doctor who wrote the paper said there was no anti-Semitism in that statement.
My political enemies rang the Pavlov's dog's bell of anti-Semitism, and of course Some people start to salivate, and I've been savaged in the press over here.
And it's interesting, they're always playing the man.
They never play the arguments I made in Parliament.
Exactly.
Personal attacks on me, because they can't play the ball, and the public aren't stupid.
I mean, the public are seeing through all of this, and it only feeds the thought that something's not right, something's seriously not right.
So it was anti-semitism, but as that's fallen away, it sort of seems to have shifted in the media that it's my stance on the vaccines, and they say that I'm anti-vax.
Well, I'm not anti-vax, because when they first came out, I promoted them to my constituents.
I now wish I hadn't.
I'm double-vaxed with the AstraZeneca vaccine, which effectively was so bad, I mean, that was quietly withdrawn After its rollout, it was stopped in Europe and around the world, and it was stopped effectively in the UK.
So, you know, I'm not anti-vax, I'm not anti-science.
I've got a scientific background and I always use the scientific method when analysing problems.
And I can assure you, you know, I employ Staff of all ethnicities in my office and some of them were crying for two days when they think their boss is being accused of being a racist.
Well actually what I was trying to stop is stopping babies being injected with an experimental vaccine.
Absolutely.
Well, I think, you know, they were reaching at that point, trying to distract.
That's a very common practice in the press, right?
To distract people, to accuse you of anti-Semitism.
That's always an easy out.
uh to distract people from the real uh nitty-gritty of what you're discussing and what you're objecting to uh the fact that this is is so public at this point it i i still you know it almost as if uh parliament operates in a vacuum it is is this the case i mean i i i'm i'm actually trying to wrap my mind around this because
You know, in our country, there are articles every day now coming out about people that are having issues with the vaccine and all kinds of statistics coming forward.
There's a, I think, a very good chance that Anthony Fauci and many of the doctors that advocated this are going to go on trial.
There's a lawyer who, he lives in Germany, but he's also American, I don't have his name in front of me but he has put together a Nuremberg type of trial court and they've been doing the broadcasts in case you don't know about that.
So there's so much evidence right now coming from individuals around the world and articles really literally every day especially In our country, they make a big deal about sports individuals who are on the field and have a sudden issue with cardiac arrest or whatever it is.
The clogging of the arteries, which is one of the common results of this.
And I don't know if you're You know, sort of country understands any of the ingredients of the vaccine.
But one of the primary ingredients that is also in the tests is nanographene oxide.
And nanographene oxide, if you look it up on the internet, anyone can do so, clearly says that it creates respiratory issues in humans.
I mean, this is in the vaccine.
And it's in the PCR tests.
So when people come down with respiratory issues as a result of being vaxxed, this should not be a surprise at all.
Now, also, the interesting thing is that your country has removed these obstacles to people coming into the country.
You don't have to be vaxxed anymore to come into England.
And strangely, America is still keeping that in place.
Although at the southern border, you can cross the border with no problem if you're unvaxxed.
So we have a contradiction going on.
That's clearly indicates that it's a political football and that has nothing to do with science.
And this is also true about the regulations that we encountered.
That basically, with the masking, with sitting down in the restaurant versus entering a restaurant, when you would wear it, when you wouldn't, when it would be okay, as if this, the COVID so-called virus, which is also questionable because it's never been isolated.
That's what doctors tell me.
And so all of these contradictions.
...are going to be raked through the coals.
I mean these individuals who have been advocating this and in my country also President Trump has drawn a lot of criticism for his early sort of advocacy of the vaccine and a lot of people are puzzled by that.
So what can you tell me about maybe the role of the pharmaceutical industry in Britain And how Parliament may be being influenced, either subtly or maybe not so subtly, to be silent and to let this thing go.
Well, the power of Big Pharma, it's very powerful, it's got a very long reach, so they sponsor all the research.
They lobby MPs.
84% of our regulators' funding comes from Big Pharma.
So, as I said in my speech on the 13th of December in the House of Commons, you've effectively got a situation where the poacher is paying the gamekeeper.
And that's not a healthy way of regulating anything, when effectively the regulator is owned by by the people they're supposed to be regulating.
They've got a lot of political influence, and we'll see that from what's going on at Davos at the moment. - Absolutely. - I would tell you, Kerry, from my own research that I found out, I'm absolutely convinced now that the COVID-19 was floating I'm absolutely convinced now that the COVID-19 was floating around Europe and North America and the UK in August '19.
I've seen data from Italy where they carried out cancer biopsies and there was a lab that did it in Italy and they've retained the biopsy samples.
They analysed them for the end of August 19 and 15% of the samples had got COVID-19.
So we've got a virus that have been kicking around for six months in a population with no resistance, before it was suddenly declared a pandemic, or seven, eight months before we start locking down.
Well, I didn't notice in that period from August 19 until we started locking down that the hospitals were overloaded or People were dying in their droves.
And again, that's evidence that's come to me in the last few months, which again undermines the whole narrative behind why we did what we did.
What we did and when we did it.
And there's enough questions coming in for me to question everything that we've been told about the pandemic, the virus, the lockdowns, the effectiveness and efficacy of the vaccines.
And these are questions that I'm going to keep asking in Parliament as uncomfortable as they are.
And a lot of people say, you know, Andrew, why do you want to, you know, potentially Lose your political career on dying on this hill?
Well I mean I don't think of anything more important than protecting the health and well-being of children.
They're our future of all our nations and this is something the vaccine rollout has affected every family in my country, it's affected every family in your country.
I think this is a huge issue and it raises trust issues around science, Around our health provision and importantly major questions about trust in politicians and it's undermining confidence from the public in all our institutions.
I think it's the biggest thing we'll ever face in our lifetimes and I'm not going to shirk away from it.
But it is lonely at the moment in the UK, standing on that platform.
There are colleagues who back me, but clearly they have also been put off by what they've seen being done to me in the media every day and by my own government.
And the opposition parties are piling in as well.
I mean, they're all having a go.
And I don't see this as a left-right issue.
It's not about politics for the left or the right.
It's about right and wrong.
It's about good and evil.
If what we find out about it in the end is as awful as I fear it is, these people who perpetrated this against us, they've got to be held to account.
There won't be a pit in hell deep enough for them, as far as I'm concerned.
Well, those are very strong words, and I have to agree with them 100%.
Uh, there there is again, some kind of a gap going on also with your press.
You know, I, I did a search under your name, and it's so interesting how Google has been completely taken over in terms of.
What the results are, because every single article about you basically accuses you of false statements having to do with the Vax, but all of your statements are absolutely true.
And this is such a weird dichotomy that a person, you know, if they're probably in the UK, the same thing, you know, I'm doing this search in America with Google, but The bottom line is that people are not going to get the truth if they just do an average search because they're getting lies.
And there is something going on with the VACs that I don't know where, you know, I understand that.
You know, my platform is a lot more delving into the absolute reasons for this, the release of this pathogen, if you want to call it that, and for what the Wuhan lab, their role, but it actually goes back to America, to Fort Detrick.
It's also been traced back to scientists being involved, Canadian scientists.
And now, more recently, it's also being traced back to the Ukraine, strangely.
So, I don't know, is any of that evidence coming out in your newspapers or in, you know, your travels?
Not at all, but I mean, I have seen evidence.
I mean, you know, there's evidence that four of the amino acids, so that would be 12 base pairs of the mRNA, There's a chunk of the HIV virus in there.
It's got a patent on them, which is quite interesting.
There's a chunk of the HIV virus in there.
And as far as the origins of COVID-19 come from, I mean from my qualifications a long time ago, you know, you can't go from SARS in 20 years to COVID-19 It'd be like going from a mouse to an elephant and not having any intermediaries of your evolution.
I mean, that just doesn't happen.
You can't jump like that from a mouse to an elephant.
So, it's a man-made virus.
It's been created in a laboratory somewhere, or maybe many, many laboratories.
And also, there's another conundrum, isn't there, which is this has affected the whole world.
It's a huge issue.
Now, we know, pretty much, it's sort of come out.
It was pretty obvious a long time ago.
It was A man-made virus.
One could call it a bio-weapon.
I mean, what is a virus that is then attenuated to make it more pathogenic and to infect humans?
That's a bio-weapon.
So you would think that your government and my government and all governments would really want to know who did this to us.
Where did they do it?
How did they do it?
And how can we ever stop them doing it again?
Because this has had a major impact on our economies, our health systems, and the lives of our population.
That would be a major... Once you've contained the pandemic, that would be, for me, the number one question is, where did this come from?
Who's done it?
And how are we going to stop them ever doing anything like this to us again?
And the fact that no one's asking those questions, seriously, Tells you probably what you need to know is that they know where it's come from and they don't want us to know where it's come from.
That is unacceptable given the harms that this has been done.
And I would say that I do love America.
I was out in Washington over Christmas and New Year and I did meet with some like-minded elected officials in your country while I was out there and we had a good chat and they confirmed Exactly what I had already heard and we're swapping evidence and I'm staying in contact with them.
We will be swapping information as the time comes.
I don't mind whether we stop this in America first.
I was rather hoping that you were ahead of us in the UK.
I was rather hoping that the new world was going to come to save the old world again.
I'm not convinced that you're that far ahead of us as far as stopping this debacle, quite honestly.
Well, I think it is in part because it's also become a political football and that so you have something that's supposedly medical.
And should be analyzed and understood by doctors and then dealt with in a medical way is suddenly basically being bandied about that.
1 person can say it exists.
Another person can say it doesn't exist.
Another person can say, like, in recent in the newspapers recently.
Evidence has come out that this actually was known by the Department of Defense in America before it ever hit the streets, so to speak in.
Which generally would be agreed to be around 2020, and January, February of 2020.
So there was also the games in China, where there was evidence... The military games, yes.
Yes, and then there was also Bill Gates, his statements, very controversial statements.
Basically saying that he had full knowledge of it before it again became known to the public.
That was interesting because when the Conservative government got in in 2010, one of the first people who got to address the new MPs when we formed a government in 2010, It was Bill Gates, who David Cameron brought in and he was telling us how all this fantastic work he was doing about vaccines.
I had no idea that 12 years later... That is just an interesting point, Kerry.
I'm just throwing that one out there as a fact.
Well, there's a whole litany of that sort of thing, of individuals who had full knowledge.
I don't know if you know Dr. Judy Mykovitz.
Do you happen to know who she is?
Well, she's written a book.
She's quite well known in our country, and I have interviewed her a number of times.
She worked closely with Anthony Fauci, and I take it you know who he is, right?
So if you understand that he apparently... I love watching Ron Paul putting it on the hot plate.
Okay, so, but also, Robert Kennedy also has a very thick volume all about Fauci and his background.
So, back in the age is when she worked with him, actually, Judy Michalowicz, and she was aware that he had a vested interest.
He even had, I guess, a vested interest in the Wuhan lab financially.
There's clear indications that he channeled funding for the Wuhan lab.
These are the kinds of things that are out there.
In other words, this is not a conspiracy theory.
This is actually legitimate.
And of course, his wife's the chair of the regulator that regulates him.
His wife's marking his own homework.
I mean, nothing to see here.
Exactly and there are other things coming out and I guess they haven't yet come out completely about the connection in the Ukraine but I think that there is a substantial connection we're going to find out.
I have been given information from sources I can't disclose now I wouldn't want to go in any depth of that but that they don't disagree with what you're saying Kerry.
Right, and then there's a weird sort of dynamic going on in which refugees from the Ukraine are being allowed into your border without any questions, given money, given places to live, this is what I'm told.
Is that correct?
It's mainly women and children we've taken in.
As you know, men under 60 are not allowed to leave Ukraine anyway, although they have to stop and fight.
So it's mainly women and children.
We're having a massive influx of refugees coming across the channel in small boats.
Half of them, I think, or a third of them in the last 12 months have come from Albania, which is interesting because it's a fellow NATO country, not an unsafe place.
And they're all claiming political asylum for For various things and basically it's it's it's swamping our immigration system, and it's completely unfair on the people who apply legally for immigration to the UK when people are effectively trying to jump the queue.
And yes, you know.
We also have some kind of very strange dynamic going on in hotels.
This is what I hear.
It's in your news.
I've got two hotels in my constituency which were as far from the coast as you can get in the middle of the country.
They have been full of these so-called asylum seekers who are all men.
Well, 90 odd percent of them are men between the age of 18 and 40 and they've been occupying Two, and they're trying to have another.
I won't have any hotels left in my constituency soon because they will be permanently full of asylum seekers.
And that won't do the wedding industry any good.
Needless to say, but there are hotel employees who have tried to sort of say certain things to the press and so on.
So it's become quite a controversy in your country.
And the question is, where is that headed?
Because you also have From what I understand, unlike America, where there's a lot of building going on a lot of the time, you don't have a lot of construction going on in England, do you?
Where are these going to go?
Well, they're being processed.
And the problem is that we're so slow at processing them.
I mean, France do not take these people and do not give them asylum.
The problem is that our system is so slow that they always end up after two years of being in a hotel, they'll claim that they've now got a relationship with a UK citizen and probably got children.
And they'll say, I've got a right to a family life, in which case then, the fact is we've got to get out of the European Convention of Human Rights.
It's not serving us well.
Lots of countries that, you know, the US haven't got that system.
Canada, Australia, New Zealand.
I don't have any fear about traveling to those countries.
And we're best off out because it's been hijacked by European judges and they're not our friends when it comes to... It's been perverted away from its original usage.
We actually helped to set it up in Europe so that we, ideally, we'd never have an atrocity like We had with the Nazis ever again, but it's sort of been overtaken and it's certainly not in the interest of the UK.
We had human rights before the European Human Rights Act.
We developed them and bear in mind that, you know, when we were the most powerful country in the world, we gave our blood and our gold to end slavery.
Okay, I'm not even going to try to get into that discussion, but to bring it back, you know, like I said, there are refugees coming into your country, and a lot of these individuals, I mean, if we look at what's going on there, they're not required to be vaxxed at this time, so there is some kind of double standard.
There's a lot of double standards, there's a lot of hypocrisy, That is a standing joke in my country.
They'd previously ask you for your vaccination status to go into the pub or go to a restaurant, but not to enter the country illegally.
And quite honestly, from where I sit, it's not a good start if you want to be a member of another country.
To enter it illegally as a criminal that's your first act of coming into the country to commit criminality and I'd be quite happy to to vote in in our parliament if a bill was brought forward that you know anyone who enters the country through illegal means um you'll never have a British passport so don't even think about it.
Right uh well it's just interesting so you're having this border dynamic and we're having a similar kind of thing uh in our country and I don't know.
Now, today, I don't know if you saw, there's a couple of videos that have hit the sort of the scene, I guess you might say, and I'd like to run a couple of them by you just to, you know, just briefly explain them.
And then people can kind of go on.
They're on telegram for 1 thing, but they're 1 of them is an Australian nurse of 40 years and she is actually very upset.
She's quite vocal and she is addressing a crowd and she is saying that in Australia.
Uh, apparently what's happening is a double standard within the hospitals themselves as to how vaxxed and unvaxxed are being treated.
And she said that now, in Australia, they're giving the vaxxed people who supposedly have some form of COVID.
Ivermectin.
Okay.
That was early on a big, you know, panned, even though Trump recommended it and so on and so forth.
And has been proven to be very effective in... And the worrying thing about that, Carrie, is also, I mean, hydroxychloroquine, I recommended that.
I looked at papers for that in February, March 20, when the pandemic was just starting.
I gave those papers to my government and heard nothing back.
But of course, you see, you can't have an emergency authorization for a vaccine if there is a conventional treatment available.
That's interesting.
To have that authorization, you have to have no traditional conventional treatments available.
That's another interesting point, I think.
Yes, okay, so they couldn't advocate that in the early days of the so-called plandemic.
I think it's more of a plandemic myself.
But then what she said is that the unvaxxed are being put on ventilators, which we have found and is very popularly known as being absolutely the wrong thing to do with a person.
Who comes down with some of these symptoms?
Well, that's because the ventilators are pumping too much pressure into the lungs.
So then the lungs at the end, they've got little microscopic bunches of grapes called alveoli.
And what happens is they get burst under the pressure from the ventilator.
Then you'll actually develop a form of pneumonia infection, a form of pneumonia.
Then it'll look like you've died of COVID.
Over here, first thing is we must have more ventilators and then the facts are that I've been told by various doctors in the UK that it's somewhere between 85 and 95 percent of the people who are put on ventilators died.
Yes, absolutely.
And the same thing was going on in my country.
But I guess you're aware of the way that funeral directors, I don't know what you call them, who have come forward.
We call them funeral directors.
Okay, in the UK.
And there's an interesting dynamic in terms of autopsying the people who are supposedly dying from COVID and or vaccines.
Well, there haven't been many autopsies.
That's the amazing thing.
So this is so questionable that any logical person would say right away.
And this was even true early on.
And I remember that there was a sort of a kind of a A die-off, if you want to call it that, supposedly, in Italy, if you remember, in a particular province.
And yet, when they asked to see the, you know, the bodies, they weren't allowed to.
They weren't.
It was never in the news.
In northern Italy, yes.
Yeah, so that right there, I mean, should make anyone suspicious.
I mean, it's just, you know, it's obvious, right?
Because... There are many, many questions, Kerry, but there are very few answers coming forward on them.
Right, but these are things that any logical thinking person, in other words someone in parliament for example, being possibly a logical thinking person.
I'm just trying to wrap my head around why you in particular and the statements you made And just wondering, on a political level, and maybe to do with the pharmaceutical companies, or the political climate in England, why do you think you've been so targeted?
I was told by a friend, again, in England, he said they almost never suspend a Member of Parliament.
That's what he said.
There are a few people who have been suspended for criminal activity or alleged sexual wrongdoings.
But what a colleague said to me...
This week, was it?
It's unprecedented.
I mean, they all know that the antisemitism, racism, attacks are just a smokescreen.
Sure.
And there's nothing to that.
So then you come back to, it's my speech that I gave on the vaccines.
Sure.
And a senior colleague said to me, you're actually being suspended for having a view which is contrary to the narrative of the government.
In an open free democracy that is unprecedented in the UK for you to be suspended for that and the public see that and I've had a lot of support from the public and it's not all of them would agree wholeheartedly with what I've said about the vaccines but what they would agree is that in an open democracy I should have the right to raise those concerns.
Absolutely.
And a lot of people Not all the way yet on what might be happening with vaccines, but they certainly know that something's not been right in our country, and I presume it's not been right in many countries around the world for several years.
Things have not really added up, and all this business about the Great Reset and things are never going to be the same again.
We'll see about that, because I know what my constituents want, and I know what they deserve, and I know what I want, and the vision of the future that I'm given for your country and mine, I don't relish it, and I don't want my children to grow up like that, and that's not a society I'd wish on anybody.
And no one's voted for it, quite honestly.
I mean, Mr Schwab can stand up and address the G20, but I don't know who voted for him.
And I thought that's the way it worked, Kerry.
And that's the way it's got to work.
And what's gone wrong in both our countries and other countries around the world is, I'm afraid, elected representatives have forgotten.
We are the servants of the people.
We're not their masters.
We're not their masters.
We don't tell them what to do.
We answer to them.
And that's been lost.
Well, that along with freedom of the press and obviously freedom even, you know, the censorship out in social media is now well documented.
Twitter files, I don't know if you're paying attention to that, but a lot of people are, is actually showing how in our country the government was very involved in telling Twitter what they could and couldn't It's interesting that my Twitter followers trebled since Elon Musk took the company over.
I don't think that would have happened under the old management.
And coming back to this politics thing, it was an American who said, and I've often quoted him, That, you know, when the people are scared of the politicians, that's tyranny.
And when the politicians are scared of the people, that's democracy.
And we need to get the latter back.
And I think we're heading there.
But it's going to be a fight.
It's going to be a fight all the way.
Okay, now, I know that I don't want to keep you too long.
People have short attention spans anyway, but I want to make sure that we've covered this topic sufficiently and touched on a few things that will also get people thinking.
Is there any kind of a tide, a change in the tide?
Like, I get the sense that your constituency is supporting you.
Like you said, they're supporting the fact of Your right to speak in Parliament without getting suspended over having a difference of opinion.
Well, we've seen throughout the pandemic, we've seen voices who raise concerns about the vaccine, and I'm a scientist by background, science works by challenge, politics works by challenge.
You tell me what your policies are, I argue against them, we have a vote.
That's the way it works.
Well, that's all been suspended around the narrative around the vaccines, the lockdowns.
No one's allowed to challenge anything.
We've got all the political parties in the UK voting for it.
In fact, the opposition wanted more lockdowns, more vaccines, more everything.
That's bad.
I mean, if we had a credible opposition who did oppose the government, there were almost enough conservatives, I think, to have stopped this Sad situation some time ago.
I mean, I voted against enough of the lockdowns and the measures.
But no, there was no opposition.
There's no counter narrative.
And that is just so unhealthy.
And we have a saying in our parliament that when all the parties agree on something, it's always terrible for the people.
I have to agree that that makes sense.
I mean, I think we've covered quite a lot today, but I mean, this situation is moving pretty fast.
I think every day we're getting more revelations and more people coming out.
And as I said in my speech, you know, the conspiracy of silence around this issue has been contagious.
Well, I'm hoping that the courage can also be contagious and I'm hoping that people are going to speak out and I think the more people that speak out, doctors, nurses, scientists, politicians, I think it will... the dam is breaking Kerry and it's got to break.
Well I think that you are...
You are clearly going to be proven right over time and I think you're probably going to be given an apology or whatever it is they have to do or they can't.
I would like to make one little statement which was quite concerning yesterday.
So I had an interesting phone call last night and it was from the Parliamentary Welfare Department Who said that people have been reporting in Parliament that they thought I was probably going to commit suicide over this.
I would like to put on the record with you... Oh my God!
I am not!
I am not thinking of committing suicide.
I'm determined to see this project through.
I think I'm going to be on the right side of history and I'm fighting for the best interests of my constituents and the public.
I've got no thoughts of taking my own life, I can assure you.
And you also have children, don't you?
I do.
I have three sons.
Okay, and I think that they're part of your motivation for coming forward, so that's the last thing you would do is abandon them in the midst of this fight.
Yes, I certainly wouldn't be contemplating that.
That would be a dereliction of my duty to everybody.
Yes, absolutely.
Well, I want to thank you so much for coming on the show.
I'd like to have you back in the future because I think there's going to be more to this story as it unrolls, and I think there are going to be more and more people coming forward in your country, my country, and around the world, more doctors, and this thing is not over, okay?
Uh, and it is going to, I think, I think Fauci is, is going to be tried and, you know, and and well, he should be as well as, you know, certain other people that were heavily responsible for putting us into these lockdowns and.
For for the responsibility to the limitations that doctors had on them in in hospitals in their ability to care for people that were that were supposedly ill and and there's more things going on.
I don't know if you're paying attention to the news right now in China.
So supposedly China opened up, but now suddenly, I don't know if the video is legitimate, but this morning I was sent a video showing.
That in one particular area of China, they're having some kind of crazy die off for some unknown reason, which, of course, nobody's telling us.
So I think we have to keep an eye on these kinds of things.
I think.
The, uh, the eugenics programs, which are population elimination programs that Charles Schwab is, um, um, I mean, Klaus Schwab is perfectly happy.
To advocate, and Bill Gates, and Bill Gates' father, from what I understand, has quite a reputation in this area.
Those theories are basically Nazis.
I mean, this is pure evil.
Exactly.
And anti-humanitarian.
In essence, this has put us back, in my view, in the era of the 1940s and the Nazis.
And what I see... And then we come in full circle to the quoted tweet that got me suspended.
Yes, I mean, you know, I think that is absolutely what we're dealing with.
We're dealing with basically, and I'll say it, a holocaust of a different kind.
But medical tyranny is a very key part of Nazism, okay?
Because this is, they're very famous for this, right, is all their medical, so-called medical experiments that they did on the people in the camps.
So, rolling that forward, it's very important for people to realize that medical tyranny taking over the world is not the answer, okay?
And that this is going down that road very, very clearly.
You've got to remember also, Kerry, the people we're dealing with, I mean, your viewers, listeners will be very aware of the thalidomide scandal in the 60s.
The drug that created the disabled babies and... Well, there are many such drugs.
I mean, polio basically was also one of these type of things.
In other words, medical experimentation.
We had a scandal around thalidomide in the UK and it was proven that it was causing birth defects.
The makers continued to sell that drug after that was proven for more than 10 years in Spain under another name.
Right.
These are the people we're dealing with.
Well there, I can't, you know, I'm not sort of a scientist in this particular way, but I do know that there are plenty of things being put into, you know, to kill plants and to kill supposed pests and so on, that have notoriously been extremely bad for our health.
And Roundup is one of those type of things, and so on.
So, again, you know, I guess this is one of the vulnerabilities, it turned out, I think, that humans seem to have.
That around the world, when they rolled these things out, nobody was prepared.
To fight back, right?
Well, if you've bought the regulators and you've bought the political influence, then you can see how these things can happen, but it's certainly not in the public interest.
And, you know, the symbol of the UK Parliament is a portcullis, which is the last defence of the gate of the castle, the defence of democracy.
Well, that's what we need to get back to in my country.
I think so, and yours as well.
I'm going to leave you with one last thought of mine, which is a quote I do love, which is that your listeners and viewers should remember that the truth doesn't really need protecting.
It's like a lion.
It can protect itself.
All we have to do is set it free.
Very nice.
Kind of a twist on the truth shall set you free.
So that's very nice.
All right.
Thank you again for being here.
And I, for one, am going to try to influence some of these people that are in our midst that could support you over here in the United States and perhaps have some effect on... And your people in the States, you've got to lobby all your elected representatives so that You know, they get the message.
This is not going to be tolerated and we want a full investigation.
Same over here.
Anybody in the UK listening to this program, even if you're not one of my constituents, please lobby your elected representatives.
Make clear your views on this issue.
And it's very, very serious.
We need to move it up the agenda.
There's nothing more serious facing either of our countries than this issue at the moment.
Absolutely.
It's the basis of freedom, is our freedom to choose what we put into our bodies.
I think that goes without saying.
So again, thank you again for being here and please do come back when you've got more information for us and hopefully, you know, these people will come to their senses and realize that the people are not with Doing such things to you and and limiting free speech because at the basis of this is not only medical tyranny but freedom of speech.
So let's let's focus on that as well.
All right.
Thank you everyone for watching today.
Take care.
Bye.
▲
Export Selection