Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Feb. 22, 2018 - Project Camelot

01:55:10

BRETT STUART : REMOTE VIEWER : TECHNICAL INTUITION

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Thank you.
	Hi, everyone.
	I'm Kira Cassidy from Project Camelot, and I am very pleased tonight to have with me Brett He's a remote viewer originally from an organization called Troika.
	And they've changed the name to Technical Intuition.
	And he's going to talk more about that, give some background to perhaps why the change and so on.
	He's done a couple of webinars, actually two or three.
	And you can go to his channel.
	I think it's technicalintuition.com.
	And you can watch those really fascinating webinars for free on his YouTube channel.
	So I highly recommend them.
	They would be great background to this show.
	So if you are watching this show and you have questions about everything that we talk about, It's all going to be in there and we're going to be drilling down hopefully a bit deeper, if at all possible.
	And I'm very impressed with his, let's see, the quality of his work, him and his team.
	And I wanted to bring them to the public and And give them some notice out there.
	So it's really a pleasure to have him on the show.
	So I'm going to shift over here to my other window.
	And welcome, Brett.
	Hi.
	Thanks for having me on, Carrie.
	Absolutely a pleasure.
	So what I want to do here is I'd like you to give a better introduction than that.
	To what you are, you know, why you got into remote viewing, sort of a little bit about your background and maybe the years you've studied and that sort of thing.
	Sure, yeah.
	Well, you know, I originally did not begin education with remote viewing.
	I originally went to school for political science.
	And instead of kind of pursuing that path into law or politics, some part of me pulled me towards art instead.
	And so I went into graphic design and character animation.
	It wasn't until about 2010 that my head was fairly in the sand about anything involving disclosure, extraterrestrials, remote viewing, consciousness abilities.
	I was rather agnostic to almost all that type of stuff up to that point.
	But what happened is in April of 2010, I was working on an indie project, an animation project at the time, and it was about 1 a.m.
	in the morning, and I took a step outside, out back for a break, and I saw an absolutely massive triangle out of the corner of my eye.
	This is in the San Francisco Bay Area.
	It slowly started moving over my head.
	It's moving pretty slow over my head.
	There were three white lights.
	There was a triangle at the corner, and then there was a dimmer reddish-orange one in the middle.
	As I went over my head and went past the roof of my house, I already bolted to the front of the house to keep tracking this thing.
	I kept watching it for about another couple seconds, and then the triangle took off at what really could only be described as warp speed.
	A card said engage, and this thing just took off.
	But this is going past the horizon in probably less than a second.
	And so there's no sound, there's no streak of light like you might see on Star Trek or something like that.
	But it was that experience completely changed everything in my life because it shattered what I thought the reality was I was living in actually was.
	And so from that point, I kind of started to investigate a lot of stuff I didn't have given a lot of credence to up to that point.
	This was from meditation to antibiotic projection to lucid dreaming.
	And ultimately, I landed on remote viewing.
	And this is because as a kid, as a young, young kid, my great-grandma used to listen to Art Bell.
	And she'd tell me about remote viewing that she'd heard about on Art Bell.
	And that memory, that nugget came up afterwards when I was just like, okay, what is it that I really don't know?
	Let me go take a look at it.
	And once I started practicing remote viewing, I got a couple of courses, went to a couple of workshops.
	I was hooked primarily due to the visual nature, the visual feedback nature of remote viewing, where the work that you do, you're attempting to describe something at a distance without knowing what it is.
	And when you're practicing it, you're able to kind of compare one to one up.
	Okay, how close was I to a photo reference or feedback target?
	And so then you can Over a period of time get a lot better at doing that through this structured technique.
	And so that really called to me and I was really excited about seeing my work improve, that it was a real thing.
	And from there I ended up working with a couple of the individuals that were part of the Stargate program.
	I went through a number of different advanced level remote viewing courses.
	And then one of my mentors urged me to start teaching.
	This was back in 2013.
	And to do that, it started with just kind of collecting all my notes from all these different workshops, all these different instruction I had taken up to that point.
	And that turned into a book, which I released in 2016.
	And ever since then, I've just been continuing to work with other advanced viewers just to look to see what we can see with remote viewing.
	And then I also teach the skill as well.
	And so I kind of have a passion.
	And it's not every day that what you're passionate about, you can actually do.
	But this is one of these things that I wouldn't trade it really for anything else.
	There's a whole lot of other jobs that I could probably pursue that.
	I may pay a lot more.
	But there's something about this that just constantly calls me coming back.
	I'm constantly excited about what's next.
	What's the project data that's coming in next?
	Because I learn a little bit more about the world that I'm living in.
	And I think just sharing the data is really rewarding.
	It's really rewarding communicating the ideas and kind of seeing what other people's opinions on them are.
	Very good.
	No, that's fascinating.
	And I wanted to ask you, you know, I think it's a gift that you're a painter, graphic artist, whatever you can Call yourself.
	And I think that skill lends itself to the remote viewing sort of technique.
	And so this is really, it's kind of above and beyond, I guess, the call of duty, so to speak, in what you do.
	So why While you're doing the viewing and with the paintings you've made, and I do hope that you can show, and if you can't, I can probably drum it up.
	I think it's in the background of the...
	The banner we have, but it's the pyramid drawing, you know, painting that I think you did.
	And, you know, just talk about how many paintings have you done that you've actually made into full-fledged paintings after you initially did a viewing or whatever?
	Because I think that's just such a compliment to the skill.
	Yeah, you know, there's...
	Back when...
	I was learning the skill and when I was just primarily...
	I used to work with a bunch of viewers.
	Some people may know it as the state of reality website where we wrote long form articles about topics like the lunar wave to spontaneous human combustion.
	A lot of stuff we had looked at.
	We just kind of were almost writing it for ourselves because they were very long, wordy articles about remote viewing and about the subject.
	And it was just kind of part of our passion to share it with a few people that were interested.
	But it got to a point where we realized that to share this with a larger audience, the basic diagrammatical sketches that come directly out of a remote viewing session are not Really all too accessible to the public or to the layman because it's going to use, it's very shorthand typically in the remote viewing work because you have to stay ahead of your thinking mind.
	You have to stay ahead.
	It's like a boulder is chasing you when you're running the actual structured session work.
	If that imagination is right behind, you have to outpace it during the work.
	So the drawings in the actual session work are very, very crude and basic.
	But to communicate some of these ideas and to share some of the detailed information that can be obtained with our remote viewing, it lends it, I think, to a lot of the different sites, to doing a high-level graphic art, to whether it's a painted sketch or whether it's a pencil sketch.
	And it was only over the past one or two years they've started to experiment that to see if people might engage with that outlook better than just the written word.
	And so in some of the webinars that I've done, I've shown a couple of the ones that were produced for Project Red Dog, which I think we'll talk about, which is an ancient artifact in North America.
	That project we looked at, as well as even the Nazca Mummy did a number of different graphic sketches based on the data, the diagrammatic data that was put together for that.
	So I think there's not too many that I've done up to this point because it takes a bit of time to put those together.
	But the ones that I think are really important, and I think moving forward, I'm going to start incorporating it more into the work because I'm going to be producing a lot of different videos moving forward in time on remote big projects that worked on in the past that I have never talked about publicly that I think are important.
	And then also, I have a lot of really interesting stuff that I want to look at in the future and also share with communities such as the one that you have at Project Himalaya.
	So I hope that kind of gives a background in using it and how I do it.
	Absolutely.
	So in terms of, you have an interesting approach to remote viewing that I think, before we get into any details here, would be nice for you to share, which has to do with, you know, having a conscience, remote viewing responsibly, etc.
	Do you want to talk a little bit about that?
	Because I think it's quite nice that you have that, you know, angle going on.
	Yeah, I would be happy to talk a little bit about that.
	And it's not that I don't think, you know, other viewers don't have consciousness.
	I mean, obviously, I think they do.
	It's just, I think the thing that's missing, we've talked a little bit about this, communicated in the past on this.
	The concept of ethics in remote viewing is really not a topic I see brought up very much in other circles.
	Maybe one other person I know, one other teacher, briefly talks about it.
	But it's the kind of thing that, okay, if the matrix or a database of patterns of information about everything Let's say that exists.
	Let's say that the human consciousness is able to tap into it.
	It's actually a natural ability of human consciousness to be able to tap into that and then to have a kind of a knowing, if you will, of what exists in that library.
	There's a responsibility that comes along with that because, first of all, I view it kind of two different ways.
	First of all, if you give that capability or the access to someone who is an arsonist, say it's a fire, remote viewing is fire, or these higher mind tools are fire.
	You give that to an arsonist, they're going to go burn the village down with this type of information.
	It's one of the reasons why when I teach, at least the advanced level stuff, I've shifted to really making sure that the intent of the student, as well as doing kind of my own due diligence on the student, that this is in their highest good and also in the highest good of everybody else.
	Because I think that these type of skills, once they You reach an advanced operational level, you can do a lot of harm with them.
	Just invasive, invading other people's privacy to setting up a target.
	Okay, what's the optimum thing I can do to make someone fail at something?
	You put this in kind of the less ethical, those with not very great morals out there, it might be misused.
	So I think that that's important.
	I think that there's a lot smarter people who one day Then me, they'll have discussions about that with reviewing once I think there's a larger community and realization that this is a common skill in society.
	But alternatively, it also works the other way around, too, because let's say you teach advanced skills to someone who's not ready to This is maybe my drama playing a little bit into it sometimes, but look into the void.
	And that some people aren't really ready for that.
	And if you task them with looking at specific targets, Such as extra-dimensional beings or things that one might consider highly evil.
	These are just words and these are perspectives, obviously.
	But you task those types of targets to individuals that aren't prepared to handle that kind of connection with them.
	Then I think you're actually not teaching responsibly.
	The reason I say that isn't just from an armchair perspective.
	I say that based on my own first-hand accounts.
	Because when I learned remote viewing, none of this information was ever discussed or brought to my attention.
	And it was very much a trial by fire, I think, for me for a period of time.
	Because I'm very, very inquisitive, I want to look at everything.
	And if I can just give one quick anecdote on it, I ended up, I don't want to mention exactly what the target is right now, but it was related to the secret space program and what's considered a higher dimensional being that's connected to secret space program stuff.
	And I ran a project with a number of other viewers on that.
	And afterwards, the blowback that kind of hit me energetically, where I was seeing white orbs fly through my room in the middle of the night, where I was having extreme sleep paralysis.
	I'd wake up on my side and there was a very heavy, something very heavy connected to my back where I never had anything like that before, to actual very Strange, sketchy individuals showing up when I take walks down to the beach before I do remote viewing sessions.
	This is when I was living in the Bay Area in California.
	And sketchy individuals showing up that my sixth sense, if you will, is going crazy.
	Oh, don't notice them.
	Don't make them aware that you know that they're watching you.
	And where this individual...
	Sixth Sense kicked into gear before I even saw them.
	I said, I know they're waiting, or they're coming down the path, and they're trying to intersect with me walking, so speed up.
	You know, my higher self gives me a little bit of help in those instances.
	And I was for over about, and it happened, and there was the guy standing there, walking, charging at me down the street.
	And so there's a two-week period that was really unnerving after looking at that particular topic.
	And I wasn't, I certainly wasn't prepared for it at that time because no one had told me that this could happen.
	And I took a period, I took a break from where I'm reviewing and kind of re-evaluated where I was at.
	I ended up, I mean, it was very difficult.
	And so, you know, coming through that, I mean, I'm very thankful to a couple of my My spiritual mentors that kind of helped me get through some of that stuff, to not go into agreement with this victimhood kind of persona that's so easy sometimes to do, where, oh, all this negative stuff is attacking me, and oh, woe is me, type of mentality.
	There was almost an agreement that I had to go through that trial.
	I'm thankful to that period because I learned a lot, and it's informing a lot of how I teach moving forward.
	I think it should be done responsibly.
	I think that before you get to that point, a certain amount of psychic defense, a certain amount of spiritual work and confrontation with yourself is important, or else you can have experiences like that.
	Does that answer your question?
	Yeah, absolutely.
	And I think that's very...
	Helpful for people to hear you went through this.
	Unfortunately, a lot of the remote viewing people out there don't want to share with everyone the incredible Capacities.
	Actually, it goes beyond remote viewing.
	It has to do with our psychic abilities, our psychic openness, and our multidimensional nature, really, when you get down to it.
	Although I think in the practice of remote viewing, you find it sort of helpful to Separate it out from these other abilities that we have.
	The fact is, as humans, we're not compartmentalized in that fashion, really.
	So you can practice something in a certain way, in a compartmentalized way, but in reality, you're a whole being.
	So it is going to affect the rest of your life.
	And I think it's so important, actually, that people...
	And it's always bothered me that they don't, you know, because I did study remote viewing briefly.
	I did practice it.
	I had some, you know, very good luck or whatever you want to call it.
	Things crop up and various stuff go on.
	But I had been, you know, involved in, you might say, as a sensitive, intuitive all my life.
	So I wasn't Yeah.
	Yeah.
	Yeah.
	I think I do agree with you.
	I think people need to be educated and they do need to wrap in this sort of not only ethics, but the spiritual, you know, multidimensional nature of who we are.
	And that gets really involved in what I consider us to be, which is also time travelers.
	And so we have lots of Different abilities.
	And some of us also have gifts along these lines, right?
	So you might have a special gift, whether it's a precog or, you know, in remote viewing, you might be able to do what they don't want to do, which is bilocate or remote influence.
	More easily, you know, you might cross those barriers without even knowing that you have a skill in those areas.
	And, you know, this is where you get into the X-Men, you know, and superpowers and all this kind of thing.
	So they call them.
	But in reality, you know, I mean, for example, you know, ability to turn machines on and off and Lights on and off and all this kind of thing and various other, I mean, there's so many different skills, it's crazy.
	So, yeah, I mean, actually, along those lines, it would be interesting to know, have you found that you have some sort of unforeseen special ability or area of expertise that you stumbled upon You know,
	it's like a palette, you know, you can think of a paint, a set of paints, you know, is there a certain, you know, thing that you stumbled on for yourself that you bring to the work that it comes easier for you than maybe a lot of the people around you just to being a gift, you know, it's just like playing the piano, you know, what's your gift, you know?
	Yeah, it's funny, because when I started remote viewing, I would say, you know, if you were to ask me before I began any of the coursework, I would have considered myself as psychic as a rock, probably.
	Like, I had no any type of extra sensory perception.
	I was very unaware, but I think a lot of that had to do with my state of mind as well.
	Very rigid thinking.
	I was very practical.
	When I went to school for political science, I did parliamentary speech and debate, so it was a lot about dissecting arguments and then Figuring out a better way to win, essentially, in an argumentation and debate.
	So it's very practical and logical, very left-brained.
	But then when I shifted to art and I shifted to graphic design, it required a whole different aspect to use in my mind that began to be explored.
	But as far as something that I realized after the fact, there's...
	You know, it's funny you said that...
	We did remote viewing last.
	And then ended up, you know, you started with spirituality.
	For me, it was actually the exact other way around.
	As I started with remote viewing, that was the first thing that really piqued my interest after doing meditation and lucid dreaming.
	And then I found, oh, hey, we're spiritual beings.
	Holy smokes, I should probably look into this a little bit more.
	And that kind of kick-started that journey for me.
	But as far as something that I've discovered since then.
	The visual nature...
	Well, let's see, what's the best way to describe this?
	This popped up a couple years ago.
	I didn't have it at the beginning.
	It took a number of years of doing extensive remote viewing, and remote view a lot.
	I mean, a number of sessions a week, sometimes eight to nine, depending on the workload and how many different groups I'm working with.
	But after a couple years of doing remote viewing work, what ended up happening is a certain stage in a remote viewing session where you're supposed to diagrammatically draw based on previous descriptors that you get spontaneously through the remote viewing process.
	You're supposed to draw what it is diagrammatically.
	And what ended up happening just by itself, it wasn't part of the original structure or the method, I started to almost see through the page and see the actual You can think of it as like a film lens, if you will, where it's like a negative.
	And I started to see the outline of what I was supposed to draw as opposed to it being a kinesthetic drawing diagrammatically.
	I started to actually see through the page and see what I was supposed to draw.
	And as I cultivated that, I started to practice like just what intuitively was saying, okay, do this in the session work.
	I started listening to that inner voice and What ended up started happening is I started to develop that in real time in my day-to-day life.
	And so where I would, as opposed to seeing like, now I mean, earlier when I described seeing white orbs flash through my room, based on that one experience, that was visual spectrum.
	That was like a ball of light literally zipping through my room as far as I could tell.
	What I'm referring to here is what I would describe as inner sight.
	And this is where you see something in a manner that's not with your physical eyes, but with your sixth sense or whatever it is.
	It's your inner visualization.
	You see it occurring and there's an overlay that happens on your sight.
	And so I'll give you an example of this.
	At the end of last year, I went to a rather popular A conference in Silicon Valley on mindfulness and some of the technology that's being developed, mostly in business, to get more productive workers.
	That's another discussion, perhaps.
	But what occurred, I went with a friend of mine who's also very gifted and naturally, I mean, you could say this is clairvoyant, clear seeing.
	So very gifted in that department.
	And we both went to this conference and There was about a couple hundred people there, and at the beginning of one of the days, there was an individual that was up in front of everyone.
	She had the lights dimmed, and she asked everyone to participate in a guided visual meditation.
	Well, I'm having no clue of the agenda or the intentions of this individual.
	I removed myself from my seat and just decided to stand on the side of the room and just watch what happened and see what I could see.
	And as soon as she began the process, I immediately saw, again, this is not physical.
	I don't see this physically.
	It's almost like an overlay of inner sight that in real time is processing both with what I see with my visual eyes.
	And I saw a shape appear behind the individual up on the stage.
	And then I saw long...
	I don't know, the word that comes to mind describing is kind of long tendrils come out of this thing, and lots of them come out of this large shape that was standing behind her, come down and then land very slowly on the top of the heads of everyone doing the guided meditation.
	And as I watched this occur, I mean, first of all, I was particularly horrified of what I was seeing going on and that everyone was willingly going into agreement with this, having no idea what they were going into agreement with.
	But my friend who I went to that conference with, he also was sitting down and he decided to participate for the first couple minutes.
	And after the conference, I asked him, you know, without front-loading and we're telling him what I had seen.
	I said, what did you think about that guided meditation?
	What he told me was, you know, I did it for two minutes, and then I felt something land on the top of my head.
	I immediately opened my eyes and got up because I said, something is going wrong, and I'm not going to have any part of this.
	And so I've had a lot of those types of experiences where there's been feedback.
	This is one of the key things that I really like about remote viewing, but when I'm able to get it in this type of environment, The visual acuity or the clairvoyant visual capacity that's just naturally developed since remote viewing, it kind of encourages me to trust it and also keep developing it.
	So I would say that that's not something, that particular skill set is not one that I've learned, so to speak, from a structured technique.
	It's one that emerged after doing thousands and thousands of sessions while also simultaneously pursuing a, you know, I don't ascribe to a religion or anything, but, you know, focusing on spirituality, inner development work, confronting ego, things like that.
	It just sort of arose out of that process naturally.
	Right.
	Very cool.
	Yeah.
	Okay.
	Well, thank you for sharing that.
	I think a lot of people will find that really fascinating.
	And I think that gets into...
	For better or worse, group meditations are dangerous actually because we do have negative entities out there and a lot of people are very extremely naive about all of that.
	So they lend themselves to these things energetically and not realizing that there's a light side and a dark side and the dark side if it possibly can.
	It's going to feed off the light and so on and so forth.
	So, yeah, this is a very graphic illustration.
	I've seen a lot of it, you know, in...
	I don't want to give any names or stuff like that.
	But there's a lot of it in Silicon Valley in tech.
	They have no idea what they're playing with.
	And they're not going to listen to me to change any of that type of stuff.
	But the best I can do is wish them the best, send them love, and then they're going to have to learn their lesson.
	You know what I mean?
	If it ends up coming to that.
	And I don't mean like a negative, oh, you'll learn your lesson.
	I just mean people are where they are to learn what was required.
	I feel.
	You're never really, I think, given more than you can chew to some extent.
	I think you go into agreement with it, even if it's actually more than you can chew on some level.
	But yeah, I think group meditation is something.
	It's responsibility.
	It's responsibility, Carrie.
	It's opening your eyes and not just everything is here to...
	I mean, there's a lot of love.
	There's a lot of wonderful things here that want to help us.
	And I think that what you're doing with Project Camblot, there's a lot of people that are doing things that are trying to raise the consciousness of humanity here.
	But there's a lot of stuff that wants the opposite of that.
	And so knowing that, just use your discernment.
	Really stand grounded.
	And if you do that, do the best you can.
	You can't really ask for anything else.
	Yeah, yeah, cool.
	So, at this point, I wonder if you will talk, I mean, you know, it's a grab bag right now, but, and I'm also giving you the stage, because if, you know, these other things have been hit really hard already, and you'd rather go into other things, then we can do that too, but...
	And I'm going to have to deal with my dog.
	So what I want to ask you here is to talk about the Nazca aliens and the red dog situation.
	And obviously you've done your webinar.
	We don't expect you to reiterate everything here, but I think people will be really fascinated by both of the findings.
	So if you could maybe start off with the Nazca aliens, the fact that you anticipated what Gaia TV was going to find and you were correct, that will give you the credibility here to do the next thing, which is to go into this really amazing find.
	And I haven't told you something associated with that, but maybe here on live TV, radio, whatever you're going to call this, I'll pause it to you and see where you go with it because I have some information about that site, I think.
	And because of somebody else and I, I'll go into that in a little bit.
	So if you can sort of start with the NASCA thing and just saying whatever you'd like to say to clarify for people.
	Yeah, sure.
	I'd be happy to.
	The NASCA... The Nazca Mummy project was really interesting because I would say it's the first project that got a lot of notoriety from the work that I was doing.
	A lot of people are really fascinated by the results based on a number of the interviews I did after the fact.
	Laydown.
	The type of validation of the work that I couldn't have known previously, just showing the power of remote viewing and how you can open doors that are firmly shut on information.
	There's really The fact of the matter is we live in a reality where there really are no secrets once you know how to use and employ these types of tools.
	The Nazca Mummy, just as a background of it, we This was a project that...
	I guess I'll start first with Troika and then the shifts, just as a real brief history.
	This was back when the website and the project I was running was under the name Troika Group.
	This was because I worked with a couple of viewers who have since moved on.
	Colin was one of those individuals, and I wish him the best.
	He unfortunately had to step away from remote viewing for a while due to a couple of personal reasons, which is why there's the name change now to technical intuition.
	I'm leading the charge forward by myself, but I still work with a number of other viewers on projects.
	But Troika Group was the first project.
	We were looking for different things that...
	different ideas and different topics that a lot of people wanted to know more information on that couldn't be gathered any other way than through remote viewing.
	And when you're looking at a mummy that...
	I mean, yes, there's definitely the scientific approach to carbon dating the bones, to doing...
	Analysis on the actual corpse.
	But the history of this thing, how the thing ended up there, if it was real, is something that no archaeologist would really be able to, unless there's a tablet next to the corpse somewhere, and even none can trust it, to describe the history of the thing.
	So first it was, we looked at it.
	We wanted to know whether or not the thing was the hoax or not.
	That was the very first thing.
	So we just did a basic introductory preliminary remote viewing session.
	Just, okay, what is this thing?
	And if it was, you know, a plaster cast and that's all it was, then that's what would have come out of the session work.
	The data would have described big hoax.
	It would have described how the individuals perpetuated the hoax.
	And we looked at the purpose and the purpose of the hoax would have been notoriety or making money or whatever it was.
	Instead, what we got out of the session work was something quite different altogether.
	What we got was a description of the body, the bone structure, as well as the underground tomb, that there were more bodies down in that underground tomb, as well as Once we picked up the original work, we did further work to redo what's called an event recreation.
	We recreated the death event for this particular life form because all the data that was coming back was showing this was an actual body.
	It was a real body.
	It used to be alive.
	It was describing a corpse, essentially.
	It smelled really bad in the session work, the biotic fluid.
	I'm not sure if that's right.
	Precise chemical terminology.
	But anyway, so we looked at this, and the thing that ended up that kind of took us off guard is that there was data in the original work that said something is being kept hushed about it.
	And at first we thought, uh-oh, okay.
	Guy is keeping something hidden.
	There's some ulterior motive here.
	Even though this is an actual body, which is strange, something's amiss.
	So we explored that.
	And what came out of that work was the fetus.
	It was the baby.
	And that Maria, according to the remote viewing work, that Maria had been pregnant and that at the site there was the remains.
	Of her unborn child that had also been encapsulated in this fluid, this placer type material to basically stand a testament to time for a specific reason.
	And so we collated this data and we ended up sending it over to Gaia.
	And just as a, hey, you might find this interesting, you know, you haven't released any stuff about this, but if you go back down in there, you might find something like this.
	And...
	We ended up getting a call back from both the producers from Gaia saying, tell us what you know, because none of this information had been released yet.
	We talked about the metallic disks that should have been found in the actual corpse, as well as the corpse of the baby that should have been at the site, all of which they hadn't publicly released yet.
	And so they wanted to know any other information that we had about the work, which we shared with them.
	We didn't.
	We had no really ulterior motive in it.
	But that was then later, I was on the Jimmy Church radio show.
	And he knows one of the producers over at Gaia, confirmed at all that that meeting happened.
	And that's when I was like, oh, yeah, these remote viewers actually were able to uncover, pull back what actually was going on here before Enigo was actually released to public.
	But I think the bigger story here, even than that, I mean, that's to me, I suppose, interesting.
	Like, hey, remote viewing worked.
	That's great.
	I mean, wider awareness to the skill.
	If more people end up developing it, that's great, too.
	But I think the bigger story here about what was discovered isn't necessarily even that.
	I think it's the what these things actually were and how in the actual work we described That there was this metallic, crystalline type of device that was near the thorax of, in this particular case, the Nazca Mummy, near the necks, in the neck area.
	And it was a device that was very, very strange.
	And we got descriptors of, this thing is like an android.
	So there's a body moving around that's biological, but it's being driven.
	The operating system, if you will, drives the body around, and that's coming from this little device that's right around the thorax, near the throat area of the chest, in the actual body.
	And now when we did the event recreation, the death event of this mummy, It showed that the physical body dying wasn't actually the death of the life form.
	The death of the life form was the destruction of this little device that was implanted inside the body of Maria.
	And that was destroyed by a very, very high energetic beam, essentially, that was shot right at it and the thing just dissolved.
	And so the mind of that thing, whether it was an artificial intelligence or something, maybe that's even a crude way of describing what that is in reality.
	But, you know, the remote viewing work described as like a prism of consciousness that was encapsulated in this tiny little device that ultimately to have an experience down here on Earth, It put itself in this particular body to move around.
	And the reason for its death, though, is that, and this is the part that you can't get from, really, archaeology.
	This is the only thing that remote viewing can unpack.
	The reason why Maria died, or that mummy died, actually was she was put to death.
	And she was put to death by her society because she had committed an incredibly, what they considered, a heinous act, which was reproducing with humans.
	And so her biology, while very strange, I mean, even to this date, I think there's no explanation for the hands where they say, oh, even if you take off the, you know, some strange thing where you cut the fingers off and the three large fingers, that the phalanges and the actual length are six or seven inches longer than any known human ever.
	And so you can't really fake that.
	And that this was a close enough to human to be able to Breed with humans of the time and she ended up becoming pregnant in that interaction and that was a big That was breaking the cardinal law of that society.
	That was a huge no-no.
	And it was punishable by death.
	But it was done in a way to act actually as an example for all future with, I guess, generations.
	Does that fit for these things?
	I don't know.
	But she was made an example of.
	And that's what this tomb is.
	This tomb with all those bodies, all these mummies, a lot of them have these little disks that have been shattered.
	Some of, not all of them, Some of them, thinking a little bit laterally here, but some of them are still there and we believe a couple of them may actually even still You know, we describe it as it was not just a tomb to be acted as an example, but it was also a place of exile for parts of that society to be imprisoned forever in so that they couldn't get out.
	And so I made, on my first interview talking about this, I made the suggestion to Gaia, you know, be real careful when you go down in there because we have strong reason to believe that some of that stuff is not necessarily fully deactivated.
	And the ramifications of that, you know, I can't completely understand.
	But unless you really use your discernment before going down there, take extra precaution.
	And I think they did.
	Well, yeah, I mean, I just want to interject that the person, you know, Jay Widener was one of the people that ran lead on this from Gaia.
	And I know Jay and I've interviewed him a number of times.
	He's quite well known in his own right.
	And he is, I guess, head of president of production or whatever his title is over there, in addition to his own creative work.
	So he actually heeded your advice and didn't go back into that sort of setting as he told me.
	He actually told me that.
	I think it's okay that I say that.
	And so because I had called him to question about the situation as background to...
	What's going on, because I am very fascinated by the situation and by the cover-up.
	I have what you call a deep black source who said that they will never release the real truth of that site.
	But what has happened, I think, is that you guys kind of one-upped them, whatever you want to call, you sort of skirted around their structure, which was going to involve, I guess, the The Peruvian government and so on and so forth that my witness was actually a consultant too.
	So he's very involved and so he wasn't just talking in general.
	And there's also this side which you know we are dealing with the advent of a control mechanism which goes into you know what human beings are now becoming which is transhumanism and It's a very real thing where we may be, or humans may be turned into androids at some point with some kind of control chip, etc., etc., that overrides our biology in certain ways.
	And it's already happening if you have implants.
	What we call super soldiers are having their biology overridden and can also be...
	Destructed, you know, self-destructed in, you know, various things.
	They're sent signals to the implants and then, you know, there's a whole, it's a huge kinicopia of basically things that go along with this and implications, etc., etc.
	The reality is that we were invaded all those years ago and by a race that had artificial intelligence and the ability to implant implants.
	The beings, those beings, those particular beings.
	Now, there were two types of beings, and that's very important, because Maria is not the only type of being that was there.
	There's the smaller, more robotic-looking, but they have, you said, the implant in a certain place, whereas Maria has it in a certain other place.
	So that was really fascinating as well.
	And those kinds of details, these are what you came up with.
	Yeah.
	None of this was ever going to be released by a guy on TV, I have to say.
	Really?
	I mean, to be honest with you, if they did release it after you did, well, then it's just because you did.
	Yeah, they were...
	I mean it the whole story and how it kind of all played out is still almost a little bit surreal to me because you know for us it was just we were just okay is this real or not and kind of we got you know it's the thing with remote viewing is you almost have to it's funny a little bit but be careful what you wish for because you just might get the information that that you're asking for and if you don't have You know,
	a reality box that's big enough to kind of contain what comes back, then, you know, it might be unsettling or a little disturbing if you're not ready for that type of stuff.
	But it was definitely a wild ride, for sure.
	There's one other nugget, I suppose, of information that I've only...
	I'm not sure if I've shared it previously, but we had a couple...
	It wasn't just, at that point, Connor and I looking at the work back then.
	We had a couple other viewers look at it as well, blind.
	Sometimes we hire other viewers because we like to help out when we can, other viewers who have taken it to an advance in a professional level.
	And so we contracted out some work, some other professionals, and one of the individuals very, very clearly, so there's a lot of corroborating evidence.
	This is why we felt really confident in going to Guy and saying, hey, take a look, just because all these different viewers came back independently with the same information.
	But this particular viewer, when they were describing the death event of Maria, there was very much a deep connection to the emotional impact of that event.
	And I am fairly confident that, you know, when we're talking about time and we're talking about event creation, it's almost like You know, Doctor Who of tiny-wimey fuzzy-wuzzy because there's a, you know,
	whether something historically can notice a viewer and look forward in time to something, looking forward at you viewing it, it wouldn't surprise me because there was a level, I think, of connection between that viewer and Maria at that point and just the emotional download that this viewer got was so intense.
	That it was really quite striking.
	It was something that we hadn't really seen before.
	We didn't expect, certainly, but something we hadn't really seen before.
	Right.
	And that's, again, something that I think, in general, maybe people don't talk about much.
	Although, you know, Courtney Brown's remote viewers that he's using right now, he's got a couple of women, and one of them seems, if not both of them, seem to be Revealing an emotional side to remote viewing that has not previously been demonstrated by at least the predominantly male industry, if you want to call it that, or what appears to be.
	And I've noticed that.
	I've noticed that they have sort of an emotional overlay to their experience that...
	Because you see them drawing and you see them in real time and they're drawing, you know, whatever they're seeing and then they're speaking about what they're seeing and they have an emotionality about having a reaction to, you know, a crowd that's getting, you know, shot at or whatever it happens to be, you know what I mean, or people that are in a disaster situation feeling emotions be generated by the events and so on.
	Yeah, this was...
	This work was done by actually a woman.
	So, yeah, it definitely makes sense that there is a capacity, not to say that...
	Males of the world can't, you know, access their emotions as well in a remote viewing session.
	But it's definitely a surprise, a number of us, the level of fidelity that's reached by a couple of the female remote viewers out there.
	So it's worthy of exploration, I think, and it's very valuable because, you know, emotional information, I think, plays a key role in understanding events, in understanding reasons and motivations and agendas, and that it paints actually a much Wider picture, more clear picture than we otherwise would not have.
	So, yeah, I agree.
	Absolutely.
	Now, you know, the chat's, of course, going crazy with questions, but I'm sorry, we're going to have to get through the next part.
	And then maybe if there's time at the end, you know, because I don't want to exhaust you too much.
	But, you know, I'm sure that everyone's very fascinated.
	So it's going by really quickly.
	The Let's make the transition now to Red Dog and explain.
	Now, I don't know if you have a picture on hand, because if you don't, I'm going to dig around for one.
	So don't worry if you don't.
	But I'd like you at some point during this talk to show this amazing painting you made of the site.
	But can you introduce that topic to people?
	And again, knowing that you have this webinar, people can go watch it after my show.
	So you don't have to reiterate everything.
	But Bring up the subject and give it a setting, I guess, and see where it goes.
	Yeah, I'd be happy to.
	As far as the picture, I'm not sure how I'd get that on the screen.
	So if you're able to...
	Oh, yeah.
	There's a share screen button right at the bottom of your picture.
	It's very easy.
	But if you can't...
	Don't worry.
	Like I said, I'll try to dig it up over here.
	Okay.
	Yeah.
	Go right on.
	I'll do that while you talk.
	Yeah, but I'm happy to.
	Yeah.
	You know, there were three detailed...
	Digital paintings that were created for this project because it was such a fact.
	This is a project that I've spent two years looking off and on on.
	And I mean thousands of pages of remote viewing data has been produced, multiple thousands.
	You know, the exact amount I'm unsure.
	But it's a lot.
	And this project began back in Was it 2013 or 2014?
	I don't remember the exact year now off the top of my head.
	But it began because I had finally gotten to a consistent operational level of remote viewing, where I was hitting practice targets regularly with a very high level of accuracy.
	But I wanted to run a project with other viewers that had reached that point and really Try and run the full gamut with remote viewing skills that I was aware of at that point.
	One of those skills is geolocating objects on topographical map as well, which is very experimental but possible.
	And I wanted to really dive deep into showing a larger audience what could be done.
	And so after a lot of deliberation and kind of discussion among friends, I came up with the idea, okay, Let's look at and see if we can find the most significant, presently undiscovered artifact in North America.
	I didn't want to do the whole world because I thought, well, I don't have the funding to be able to fly around.
	I mean, it could be in under the ocean.
	I know, right?
	So let's keep it in North America.
	Maybe it'd be nice if I could just go find a nice little pot that was drawn by, you know, maybe it's got an alien on it, bring it to Smithsonian and say, hey, remote viewing is real.
	Take a look.
	Again, it's the type of thing, be careful what you ask for, what you wish for, because you just might get it.
	And what we ended up getting was an extremely massive complex, an underground complex that had some very advanced, sophisticated technology in it.
	So, I mean, the original work began 2013-2014.
	There were about seven viewers who worked at Project Blind.
	And then half of the team stayed on after the fact and continued doing work off and on for about two years, looking at every angle of this thing.
	I mean, you can't run these projects back to back, typically because there's ennui sets in, there's a...
	We just get tired of the same project, and it's hard to remove your biases at that point.
	Even when it's blind, it's like, oh, we've done three Red Dog projects this month.
	It's on the mind, and so we have to do something else to break it up.
	But what we looked at and what we described, I'll kind of give an overview as opposed to kind of giving a breakdown of How we discovered it, because it was really a roller coaster over that period of time.
	Every new project we ran, we learned a little bit more about what this place was, about what this artifact did, about who created it, and about what was possible once an individual interacted with it.
	But I'll kind of give just a summary of the overview of what this was.
	So, the data describes first a Well, just to give a background of the site.
	Where this is located, it's in an incredibly remote area.
	It's very cold.
	It's a tundra setting.
	And we've actually done the geolocation work.
	And I've had, I've spoken to a number of people in private who are very gifted natural psychics as well.
	And then, you know, they use their own methods and techniques and that just cross corroborated our location work that, you know, we know generally within about one square mile where this is.
	But it's in a very cold, desolate environment, but the place used to be highly inhabited, like a very large population used to live in this area, but that was a very, very long time ago, ancient civilization.
	And the actual artifact, though, is located in an underground facility in a cavern system at this site.
	So if you were to go there and walk around, you wouldn't see anything.
	It would just be normal tundra, pretty chilly, a lot of mud, a lot of sand, small bushes, but not much more than that.
	But there is an opening that is For lack of a better word, the vocabulary we used to describe it is masked.
	It's a facade and it's holographic in nature.
	So if you were to walk up to this and look at it, you would think it's just a cliff face or it's the end of the path.
	You couldn't go any further.
	That unless you knew exactly where it was, you then would be able to walk through what actually was just an image.
	It's not a real, it's not solid matter.
	I mean, there's a number of safeguards in place, though, that even if you did go to that place and you didn't know how to kind of bypass them, it would be a rather unfortunate end for you.
	It was funny.
	We had this random generator of all these different topics for Red Dog to look at it from all these different angles.
	And for about a couple months straight, we kept getting, it was kind of popped out randomly from this generator to keep ourselves blind, all these threats.
	Analysis and assessment cues.
	Like, what's my most significant threat to the site?
	What's the most significant man-made threat?
	And these are just randomly coming out of the generator about the target that we looked at.
	And so we got all of this data.
	This is a highly, highly protected site in that there's, first of all, there's a lot of turns to even enter the site that you wouldn't be able to find it.
	The second is, is if you were able to get into it, and it seems to be that the type of technology that is being employed here It's funny because we talked about artificial intelligence in the previous in the Nazca Mummy, but that there is a technology associated with the location and the artifact itself that has an availability to become conscious when it's required.
	It has pre-programmed responses that can turn on or be activated by the presence of people coming down into the facility.
	And so if that's not, you know, an AI, then I don't really know what is.
	It's probably, to call it AI might be crude, but that exists there.
	But that is something that would be able to make, to keep the integrity of the site from an outside force, which it would want to use it for, let's say, purposes it wasn't intended for.
	But as you go deeper down into this cavern, There's a number of different walkways.
	There's one place, and this is where the actual artifact, the target of the remote viewing data exists, and there's a number of large pyramids in these caverns, and one of these pyramids has what can be described as this stone seat located directly in the middle of the pyramid.
	And there's a very, very large structure above the actual seat.
	That's a massive crystal that looks, I mean, this is the descriptions and the drawings of it.
	They look kind of like a crystal, crystalline in nature.
	And that inside that crystal is what we describe as like a computer database.
	But that's actually where the event, that's the thing that has an availability to consciousness.
	It's the AI, if you will, that runs the facility, but also it's in charge of When individuals interact with this artifact, this chair that's in the middle of the pyramid, it switches on and facilitates the actual interaction of what happens when someone sits down in that chair.
	And, you know, moving, I suppose, to what the artifact is, now you kind of have an understanding of what the site, where, what exists there.
	The data that we got back collectively about what this artifact was is If I sum it up in one phrase, I personally would call it something like an ascension chair.
	Now, that word ascension is very, very muddled and means a lot of different things to a lot of different people.
	So it may not mean what you think it means as far as what ascension is.
	But I only say that because Based upon what we learned, so we did a lot of targets and a lot of projects that looked at.
	What would happen if I sat down in the chair?
	What would happen?
	What would happen if someone else sat down in that chair?
	What would happen if this became available to all of society?
	What would happen then?
	And so therefore we have a lot of kind of anecdotal view vantage points on what occurs and then obviously also we looked at the purpose what was the original intent and purpose of this artifact the original purpose of this thing and based on the originators the creators of this device is that originally was created to act actually as a lifeboat for beings that have been left over on this planet that For all
	we know, in a much grander scale, weren't able to escape some massive battle that took place.
	And so this was kind of like an escape pod for those who could get trapped here.
	That this was a...
	If you sit down in this thing, that it changes you in a way that it would allow you to pop right out of here without any issue.
	And so the reason why I... And I've had a couple of other people who have looked at this work call it an ascension chair, is because it's essentially a bypass of anything that would be required to naturally, through just expansion of consciousness, get out of this, let's say, planetary reincarnation system.
	So, that was the original intent behind me, and maybe there were other lesser, that was the primary purpose, there may have been lesser purposes we didn't pick up on, but that was the main one.
	And it was a civilization, it was a leftover of that here, just in case someone got left behind.
	Now, what happens if you were to sit down in it today, there's a couple of different things that occur.
	The first thing that occurs is, well, it actually doesn't work.
	If the individual is sitting, nothing happens.
	This is, again, this is the AI, if you will, thing that operates the artifact.
	It doesn't even turn on if the consciousness of the individual is at a certain point that they would use it in a way that would be destructive.
	And it wouldn't even actually operate.
	It'd just be another stone on the side of the wall.
	So it seems that the originators who created this kind of had this in mind that they really wanted to make sure that even if, let's say, negative forces knew about this, even if those who had a, you know, a malevolent intent had regained access to this, it still just wouldn't work.
	And we know this because to actually start the process, the engagement, it requires a number of other people standing in other parts of the pyramid, sending their...
	You know, here's something where...
	We're talking about energetics here, so I only have my very crude vocabulary to describe it, of just...
	You know, sending energy, for lack of a better word, to the person in the chair to allow the process to work.
	And so it's described as like a loving, kind energy, a supportive energy that's being sent to the middle of the pyramid.
	It's being focused and funneled right to where the person's sitting in the chair.
	And that's what allows the process to occur.
	And then that System that regulates it, uses that, shifts it, and facilitates it for the person sitting down to undergo the experience.
	And the experience, the first experience that happens that is described in the work is the individual immediately, well, I'll We use a lot of metaphors when we're describing this kind of stuff because it's the kind of events that we have no context for.
	I've never had this experience before.
	I'm not a nuclear physicist.
	And so if you ask me to describe the inner workings or inner mechanisms of a nuclear power plant, it's going to be really crude.
	I'm going to say something like, it's like a blender.
	You know, that's the best I got.
	So, I mean, we're talking about things, energetics, that are so far beyond what I really understand.
	So it's going to be basic terminology, but I'm sure it's much more advanced if you're able to go there and scientifically measure it and whatnot.
	But what occurs is the metaphor we use is it's like First of all, the sound that occurs, it's so intense that it's like someone's shooting a gun next to your ear forward, not at you, but without ear mitts on for protection, repeatedly shooting a gun again and again and again.
	So the volume, the sound, is very high.
	The second thing is that you begin to hallucinate and you begin to see a movie reel play out in your mind.
	And it seems to be a massive download of history.
	Not only your own personal history, which we believe, based on a number that follow on work, is representative of past lives, reincarnation, all the lives that you've lived here, but also the history of the people, or I said people loosely, who created the device.
	A history of the war that's gone on, a history of the battle that has occurred here, and it's...
	The closest thing I really have, there's something where there's this idea that there's a knowledge base under the Sphinx or something like that.
	It seems like this has that type of information.
	It's a massive download of history about not only who you are, but the background and the history of the planet, the background of how things have gotten to this point.
	And then it goes a step beyond that even further.
	It removes the distortion Of the smaller self and shows you what you are in truth, whatever that means.
	So the aspect of you that is, let's say, source or the larger self is that you have an experience of that in a manner that really, I think, would probably change your life forever.
	And so it's a massive day.
	You sit in this chair and it's a massive download of information and it shifts the individual's consciousness.
	The way it does it, though, it certainly requires a certain level of consciousness, I think, to even activate it.
	It requires a lot of other people to achieve that, to be able to work in tandem with the person going through the experience.
	It seems to be very, very difficult to undergo.
	But one final aspect that we picked up on in this work is that for certain individuals, it seems that To the escape raft aspect of it, again, it's another metaphor of the artifact, is the creators of the device have an option for an individual that,
	should they choose it, and it is a choice, that if they wish to undergo a genetic alteration, there is an availability to that.
	And what I mean by that is the individual What happens is they get taken down into a lower part of the facility, much, much further down.
	In the period of time this takes, we're really not quite sure because time is actually kind of a difficult thing to describe in remote viewing as far as lengths and when.
	But you get taken down into a lower part of the facility and you get put in this sack of fluid, as far as what we can describe, and your physical body is injected with something that starts unraveling your DNA. And it does it in a way that we described that it actually brings on the physical death of the body.
	But as it does this, it actually turns it around and then intertwines the DNA with new information.
	And then after a period of time, a new body actually emerges.
	And for the longest time, I felt, you know, as I was looking at this data, I was like, why would you ever do that?
	Because we were describing the death of the person's dying here.
	And why would anyone ever agree to that?
	And out of that blind pool generator that we had for this project over the years, one of the targets that we had come out of there is we looked at what's my, again, my is me, the viewer running at the session, what's my greatest false belief about this target?
	Everyone had something different.
	My greatest false belief came out in that work is that you die in the process.
	And that seems to actually not be true.
	What happens is the mind actually gets transposed somehow through this technology into this new body.
	And this new body is something that's, you know, is something much more advanced.
	It physically has much greater physical capabilities than what a human body, at least, is what we know a human body to have.
	The size of the body is much larger.
	It's about 12 to 15 feet tall.
	The stature is much larger.
	It has an availability to a number of different things that we would prescribe potentially to superhuman.
	And a particular key trait to this new body is that the eyes of this thing are blinding white.
	So there's an aspect to the work that...
	After someone goes through this, I looked at work, okay, what would happen if I went through it?
	How would I feel?
	And this is the part that stuck with me, at least, in the data.
	I mean, there's more to it, but one of the things that really sticks out is the emotional impact that would have on undergoing that process.
	And while there's all these availabilities that can come out of it, the emotional impact of sadness was very, very high for a period of time for this new process.
	I don't even know what to call it.
	Ascended physical being?
	I don't know.
	But there was a lot of sadness because there was a distinct realization that there was no going back.
	That in that state, with this new form, while yes it may open up a new doorway to a whole lot of new experiences, it would forever close the door on the human experience.
	Because you would not be able to interact And live a normal human life.
	In fact, it seems that...
	I'm just reminded of the biblical story of when...
	Who was it?
	It was Moses.
	I forget who it was.
	It was in the Old Testament where someone looked...
	So don't look in the eyes of God or you'll be blinded.
	You'll lose your sight.
	Essentially, that's what happens with these things.
	Is that if you were to look directly into their face, directly into their eyes with your human eyes, it would...
	Burn the iris and you basically lose your sight.
	So you would not be able to interact on a human level anymore at that point.
	You basically would be either a monster or a god to most people.
	And there's actually a period of extreme sadness for if people would go through.
	It doesn't mean don't do it.
	It just means that that's part of the process.
	Well, isn't there something about the notion that this being would not actually reside on Earth at You know, physically after that, that they would be in a different dimension.
	Was there any, you know, feedback of that sort?
	You know, I don't want to say yes or no on that, because actually I just don't know.
	The data wasn't being specified.
	And this is something that I think is important, is to delineate between what my own speculation, my own postulates are, versus what the work said.
	You know, I have my own interpretations of it sometimes or my own thoughts on it.
	The work didn't say either way.
	Other than it seemed the fact that there was no going back.
	I mean, you could take that work to mean that, well, you're no longer here anymore either.
	Not only are you in a new body, but you're in a new realm of existence too.
	I mean, there were certainly the capabilities of this life form.
	This new life form.
	I mean, it showed that this thing could fly, that this thing could do all sorts of things that, you know, humans, at least to my knowledge, can't do.
	At least not many, not the ones I know, can do.
	So if it doesn't exist on Earth anymore, it wouldn't surprise me.
	If it does still exist on Earth, I mean, it would either be, it would be that, it would be feared immensely or be treated as a god.
	So, I suppose that's as far as I could say.
	Fair enough.
	Well, that's very interesting.
	There are various sites, supposedly, here on the Earth where something of that sort does happen, where you can...
	Your physical body, this is sort of a choice you have, my understanding, that it can be transmuted and you can...
	In essence, kind of take it with you, but you will go to what they call Tara or Gaia.
	There are different levels and all of this, and it has to do with whether you become fifth dimensional, sixth dimensional, and so on.
	And you move out of this realm.
	You do move out of this realm.
	You don't even go to the 4D. You go beyond that.
	So there's that aspect of it.
	There's also the, in your case, what you're talking about sounds like something that, I mean, this is a question, I guess.
	Sure.
	From the sound of it, you make it sound kind of positive.
	But there's an aspect of it sounds like a sci-fi movie, you know, and in the sci-fi movie mindset, it may actually not be completely positive.
	It sounds like, for example, let's say you were, it sounds kind of like an Illuminati's You know, preferred dream of the future for themselves.
	If indeed this is a material, a person that doesn't leave this material reality, this could be, for lack of a better word, a kind of eternal life.
	That would be given by going through this transmutation, which sounds like it's helped along by an artificial intelligence in some kind of situation.
	So where then you actually couldn't die, even if you wanted to, and you might not be able to disintegrate your body.
	There might be a way to leave that vessel at some point for that being.
	You know, thinking ahead.
	But, you know, these are just questions in a way, you know, obviously, you know, I assume you don't have the answers to them.
	But, you know, I'm just saying, there is talk of this sort of thing going on.
	In some ways it can be positive, and it depends who's in charge of that chair, so to speak, I guess you might say.
	Absolutely.
	I think absolutely.
	It depends on who's in charge.
	And to say that this is the only one in existence, I think, would be a little presumptuous.
	That this type of technology doesn't exist elsewhere other than here, I think, would also be presumptuous.
	And I want to ask you also, did it come up that there's more than one Sometimes we do get contextual information.
	We look at a target or no viewing in our higher mind or unconscious self and say, hey, here's some more information for you that you'll need to know to make sense of the original question that you asked.
	But sometimes it just gives us directly the information.
	At this particular point, we never looked at other ones other than this.
	We used the superlative word, which we put in what's called a word cue, to point our conscious attention, our higher minds at this pattern, if you will, in the library, which is the most significant pattern.
	Presently undiscovered artifact.
	So there's only one of those.
	Whatever our higher mind deems as the most significant, it's going to go to that one.
	But it also had to be in North America, isn't that correct?
	We did use that qualifier too, yes.
	So it's in North America.
	Now, whether there aren't other versions of this other places, the work doesn't stay one way or the other.
	I wouldn't be surprised if there were, though.
	Right.
	And the thing that I... Here's what I... So this is a little bit, perhaps, of a segue to one other topic, but I do want to respond to that concept, the idea of it's almost like, as far as if you're part of a negative force or a controlling structure that exists here on the planet, and if you could gain access to that form here on the world, You'd pay any amount of money for it immediately.
	Talk about power, what this thing has.
	This form forwards you.
	The safety mechanisms that seem to be in place at this particular site seem incredibly sophisticated and very advanced to prevent that type of individual from ever using that artifact.
	That doesn't mean that there aren't other artifacts out there that are like this that do similar things that don't have those type of mechanisms in place.
	You know, then again, if you say an individual comes out the other side, they still have their free will, they still in their own choice can choose to choose to choose, whatever that is, positive or negative.
	So if they are still here, it would definitely change the world as we know it.
	These things start showing up everywhere.
	But as a segue, you know, this was the video that I talked about, the latest video I put on my YouTube channel, which is on the concept of moksha.
	And I briefly talked about this in a previous webinar, too.
	And moksha is a Sanskrit word that is defined as a liberation from the concept of, from the cycle of death and rebirth.
	So reincarnation, essentially.
	It's liberation from that.
	And if you want to check out the video, I go really in-depth as far as all that's concerned.
	But what we found is that there's a system of control that exists around this, which I'm sure a lot of people here are familiar with.
	But that if you trace that line all the way back up to where's the origin of the system?
	Who caused this?
	Who took over this particular area of the universe?
	And who is that?
	And the type of beings that we get that are doing that are strikingly similar to the type of being that comes out the other side of Red Dog.
	Very, very similar descriptions as far as their As far as their understanding and knowledge of source, their understanding and knowledge in the complete removal of the obfuscation or the distortion of who you are in truth and what that affords you, as well as the way that we describe the eyes of these things, where they're burning white, where you couldn't look at them.
	When we look at these types of things in a remote viewing session, though, they're very dismissive of the viewer.
	They almost look like a small mind.
	It's one of those where they'll look back, but they'll almost look back and scoff and then ignore you because they've got better things to do, I guess.
	But the description is that those are actual organic beings, but they're organic beings that are living in a state, in a space that there is no time.
	But they're able to influence and impact.
	We use the metaphor of the roads to Rome.
	And Earth is just one outpost on an expansive road of conquest that's moved outwards in the universe.
	It all points back, if you trace the roads back to Rome, there's all these beings here that look very similar that exist in this state.
	It's in a timeless environment to where they have essentially set themselves up as gods.
	And, you know, whether or not you agree with their agenda or not, you know, obviously that's up to you.
	A number of the individuals I've talked about after the fact believe, well, you know, they may be conquest for these types of entities, but they're doing it for your own good, which maybe they believe that.
	But it's certainly the control that's exerted is very high.
	And there's a lot of withholding truths that exists to keep Well, and I'm moving a little bit down into my own opinion and my own bias, I suppose.
	Well, yeah, I mean...
	There's other things out there that look similar.
	Okay, and I think that's valuable information, obviously.
	And, you know, I want to say that at this point, you know...
	Sure.
	that I'm sure will relate to this as well.
	But I wanna say that the question will emerge at some point that once you had remote viewed this situation, can there be possibly a bleed through or an overlay that then comes can there be possibly a bleed through or an overlay that then comes through in other
	So where you have seen one such being, it's not necessarily that the beings you're now remote viewing as part of this other session are necessarily looking like those, but those are the first ones that come to mind because they're sort of in this continuum of Closest to what you recently remote viewed.
	And I understand you get more than one person involved, but there's also this, you know, there's also the question as to whether, even as remote viewers, and I also wonder this often about Courtney's group.
	Is there a group think?
	Is there a group overlay bleed through where you may all think you're getting the same results and that makes you happy?
	But is it a dangerous kind of happy?
	Is it really that you're...
	You know, it's kind of like falling into the...
	You know, when something...
	I don't know, a cart goes down a road, a dirt road or something, and there's these grooves that already exist.
	And the wheels naturally gravitate towards those grooves.
	So, you know, like grooves in a record or something.
	So this where may be, I'm just saying, because...
	You know, if you go follow any of the work of Jung, Carl Jung, then you understand this notion of a universal mind, etc., in which we share.
	And if you've got a group, albeit you're a group of remote viewers, who are remote viewing as part of a group, they're conscious they're part of a group, then are they tapping in to be part of, you know, to go along and get along?
	Because that's the groove.
	Because the last thing you kind of get the impression, sometimes with these remote viewing situations, where the last thing you want to do is be one of these remote viewers In a group who comes up with something completely different than everyone else because everyone else is going to look at you and say, no, you're obviously wrong and we're all right because we have the numbers on our side.
	So there's lots of...
	Do you have anything to say about all that?
	I do.
	No, I think it's an important question and it's something that should be talked about openly and freely because I think that...
	Using discernment, well, I have a couple different ideas around this.
	First of all, the groupthink idea where individuals are producing what they feel other people will accept.
	One way that gets around, yes, there is the we're all part of the same mind, but I think that if it was just that argument, you could very easily discount it by saying, well, all the work is on blind and independently.
	And there's a level of analysis that's gone through before anyone sees anyone else's work.
	And so there's a point where there's a cutoff stage.
	Before you even see anyone else's work, you can't add, emit, or change anything.
	And so then once all that work is then attained independently, it's put side to side and saying, okay, what are the similarities here?
	And so there's a degree of analysis that's required that needs to have a high level of integrity to it Or else you can very easily go down the rabbit hole and you can fit.
	But I'm not really talking about something conscious.
	I'm talking about, you know, and this has to do with, you might say, being a precog or even an empath.
	You see, you don't know what you know, necessarily.
	Even about, you know, because you might, in other words, there's this thing also called influence.
	It has to do with, you know, I'm talking about not like advertising influence.
	I'm talking about the weight of a human being, so to speak.
	So in a group, you can take any group of humans.
	There will be one person who has a, you might call it a greater influence.
	Physical weight or impact on 3D reality in which they influence without ever opening their mouth.
	I mean, this happens.
	And as an intuitive psychic, I know this.
	So this is the kind of thing where it's very hard to guard against.
	And I appreciate what you're saying.
	And I understand the protocols.
	You know, the safeguards against this sort of thing.
	But you can't...
	That's what I was kind of saying.
	You can't draw that line now that you can try, obviously.
	No, I actually agree with you.
	I think that...
	And it's not just even remote viewing.
	Right.
	Every aspect of life.
	I mean, even if it's an analysis, you put someone who's a lot more outspoken.
	I mean, even if you set aside these psychical abilities for a second, someone's more outspoken and getting their way in analysis.
	If you create that dynamic, you can have that.
	But if you take more of what you're referring to, Which is that in the unconscious aspect, where there's something that carries a weight that then colors the information, I absolutely think that that's possible.
	And I think that I had a discussion with an individual not long ago on that topic, and it came to the conclusion that, you know, as far as remote viewing data is concerned, here's the way I look at it.
	I look at it that If it uses the protocol correctly and there's a high integrity in analysis and there's a high degree of capability in the viewers, I'm going to take note of it and I'm going to look at it.
	But am I going to use that information as absolute truth?
	Probably not, unless I have a whole lot of other areas That corroborate independently that have nothing to do with that one source.
	It's like taking one source and saying, this is the source for all the information I'm only going to believe and everything else is false.
	I think that that's a very ungrounded way of going about and using your discernment.
	And so I think the only way, I mean, maybe there is another way to do this, but I think the way to guard against that is by Looking to see if it matches up from other trusted, verifiable sources that aren't necessarily your remote viewing group.
	And if they're coming back describing similar things, I mean, this is how it was used.
	This is actually the remote viewing skill set, how it was used in the military.
	It wasn't used as ever, I'm pretty sure, at least that we know about, as this was actionable information just off the RV data.
	It was always the remote viewing data was to support other actionable intelligence before any information or any actions were taken by whomever.
	And so I think that using a little In your own life, as far as your data, do.
	Don't use remote viewing data as gospel, please.
	Use your discernment.
	Match it up with other stuff.
	If it resonates with you and it feels intuitively right to you, maybe look at it a little bit more closely.
	But I never would be an individual that would go around and someone over the head with my remote viewing data and said, you must believe this or else you're wrong.
	I think that that's a silly way, knowing how Higher mind abilities work and knowing how accessing this type of information works.
	It doesn't make it irrelevant by any means, but, you know, just be as grounded as you can because it's so easy to go off into outer space by following a certain trail that, you know, one turn you're wrong.
	If you're not careful, you can go really far down an avenue that is not in this reality anymore.
	I agree that it exists.
	I agree that there's a danger.
	I think the solution where I land on it is that you just have to use your discernment.
	You have to try and, if you can, find other credible sources that see if it matches.
	You can't always do that, unfortunately.
	But if you can, then you'll be better off.
	So, uh, we have some trolls in the chat as usual.
	Um, someone who's completely obsessed with this guy, uh, Donald, uh, forget his last name.
	Uh, it, just extraordinary, complete one track mind person.
	Uh, but you know, they, some of these guys get paid to do what they do.
	So I'm looking through the questions in the, in the middle here and, um, And trying to find, you know, some intelligent questions.
	You know, again, if you want to put your questions in all caps...
	Yeah, you know, if I can, I'll just briefly talk, maybe just a tangent on that.
	You know, this type of stuff, when we're talking about remote viewing, It's very hard to believe unless you've experienced it yourself.
	There's the anonymity of the internet.
	It's very easy for someone to become a troll when something they think is unbelievable, which I think they're in their full right to do.
	I mean, it's unfortunate sometimes that prevents other people from being able to ask legitimate questions.
	But, you know, everyone has the choice to disbelieve any of this type of stuff if they feel that that's their own personal belief.
	But because a lot of this is out there, I mean, some of this stuff sounds like science fiction.
	It sounds like science fiction when I'm talking about it, which is why it's so important to be as grounded as you possibly can when I'm talking about it.
	And I know some of them are talking about artifacts and talking about alien AI and all these types of things.
	and it's Unless you had some context or some perspective about these topics, it's going to The average individual in society is going to raise an eyebrow at you.
	And I've kind of gotten used to that.
	That's fine.
	I respect other people's opinions to disagree.
	Well, this audience is not...
	I mean, remote viewing is pretty commonplace for their consciousness, I have to say.
	But someone is...
	There's other things at work going on here.
	And some people do get triggered by these topics and us covering them, so they'll do anything.
	You know, it's really funny that they actually participate, but the last thing I want to do is actually listen intelligently.
	So someone wants to know whether you think Edgar Cayce was remote viewing.
	I think Edgar Cayce was an extremely gifted natural psychic.
	As far as, was he remote viewing?
	See, there's a misnomer as far as the way that word or that term, remote viewing, is concerned in the online communities and just the general public, is that every naturally gifted psychic believes that they're remote viewing, when in fact the term itself means something very specific.
	You may be remotely perceiving information, But it's not remote viewing.
	Remote viewing is typically referred to as a structured technique that there's a specific methodology that's employed.
	And so you go through a protocol.
	So it has to be a pre-setup and arranged target.
	You run a methodology.
	Third step is you do analysis until finally you get feedback at the end.
	And the whole process is done, what's referred to as blind.
	Where you don't even know what the target is that you're running.
	That is the scientific definition, if you will, of what the physicists who developed the skill at the Stanford Research Institute.
	That's what they defined that as.
	Now that's kind of been taken on by anyone who's naturally good to say, well, I access information at distance, so therefore I must be a remote viewer.
	I mean, there's like a yes and a no.
	It's like, no, you're not using remote viewing per se, the technique or the protocol.
	But you may be able to pick up on information and distance through your natural gifts.
	So was he a remote viewer?
	No, because remote viewing wasn't even invented then.
	Was he naturally gifted and able to do things that are like remote viewing?
	Certainly.
	Absolutely.
	I mean, remote viewers don't have a monopoly on accessing their higher mind or their intuition.
	Certainly not.
	It's simply one method of doing it.
	And in this case, remote viewing is just a very highly regimented, structured method that is able to attain a certain level of accuracy that's repeatable.
	And you can do this just through practice targets.
	You take photographs, and you're able to measure your accuracy against visual feedback again and again and again, so they get around 80% accuracy blind.
	of describing a photograph in an envelope.
	And then once you reach that point, you can shift over into operation.
	This is what I prescribe.
	Once you get around 70% to 80% accuracy, you can then shift over into operational targets.
	And those could be esoteric in nature.
	Those could be problem solving for your individual life, whether it's your career, health.
	I mean, there's all, I mean, what do you want to look at at that point?
	That's what the question becomes.
	But I hope that it's a nuanced question.
	Yeah, no, that's a good answer.
	Thank you for that.
	So I'm seeing if someone...
	It's kind of like a partially phrased question.
	Is there a way to escape Earth?
	I'm not sure...
	Whether they think you're an authority on escaping Earth or not, but if you'd like to answer that question, you're welcome.
	You just need to buy my box of ingredients.
	You know, that's That's such a huge question that, you know, escape.
	I mean, the idea of escape means that it's just such a deep question.
	I mean, it's certainly not a button you can press, that's for sure.
	Even the artifact site, you know, that's not a button.
	I mean, to even interact with that artifact requires a degree of consciousness that I'm not sure many people...
	Why don't you just go to sleep at night and you're fine?
	I think that here's, I will say, and this is, I suppose, not a remote, well, this is informed by remote viewing, but not a particular topic, is that, this is more of a belief I hold, I suppose, is that I think that there's a choice at some level of yourself, who you are, and the truth of what you are, that you chose to be where you are right now.
	And I don't think it's possible.
	And that may sound terrible because it's very easy to say, well, my life is so horrible.
	I never would choose.
	This is being done to me.
	But I think that that's part of the thing that we actually say, take humility, for example, how to learn humility and What is not the best way to learn that perhaps then to be put in a situation where you actually have your face in the mud and you feel it immediately?
	So I think at a level, and this is again, these are just my own beliefs, this is informed a little by remote viewing, but My perspective on Earth to escape Earth.
	That if it's the kind of thing like it's this out to get me, I have to escape.
	It's almost like you're going into agreement with the concept that you don't have choice and that you're being infringed upon.
	And while there is certainly a system of control that You want to call it here, that exerts its power here.
	I think that there is a degree on some level of choice.
	There has to be.
	This is a belief.
	This is my own personal belief.
	Yes.
	Okay.
	Now, I'm actually going to wind this down pretty quickly here, but there have been several questions around this topic.
	A lot of people wondering if you've remote viewed Antarctica and if you can talk about that.
	I have.
	I've done a number of projects in Antarctica.
	This was the middle of 2016.
	Was it 2016?
	Yeah, it was the middle of 2016.
	I haven't released any of that data publicly yet, but I do plan on doing so in the near future.
	I can talk a little bit about it.
	There's certainly a lot of activity going down there from the remote viewing point of view.
	It's funny when we describe the The work that's being done down there, all the viewers originally, when they move to the site, they begin describing it, because that's what you always do first before you describe what's the most significant, say, ancient artifact in Antarctica that's being interacted with, or whatever Pre-setup tar project you run.
	You always describe the site, the location first.
	And all the viewers describe like this 1940s, 1950s architecture that's everywhere.
	And so a lot of this apparently was the facilities that this is being done in.
	The activity is being done in what was built during World War II, it looks like.
	But the activity that's going on there, it's a lot of man-made activity.
	That is researching some very unique artifacts that are down there.
	One of those artifacts is a particular type of stone that...
	I'm not sure if stone's the right word, but it's a type of...
	I'm just going to say it's like a stone that has very interesting properties to it that...
	I mean, it's a really complex issue and I don't want to unfairly do justice to it, but there's a lot of scientists working on some very interesting artifacts down there that do strange things.
	One is levitating objects, one is a stone that seems to have very positive and or adverse effects on human consciousness.
	Very negative effects on human consciousness.
	Another thing is that a lot of the type of stuff comes from ancient civilization stuff that they're finding down there.
	There's scientists down there trying to backwards engineer it and use it.
	Not to a lot of success, though.
	It seems that there's a lot of failure.
	There's a lot of Archetypical banging heads against a wall that was going on in Antarctica.
	But there's a lot more work I have to share about that.
	That's kind of in a nutshell of what's going on.
	Okay, just letting people know that you're not invited to join this.
	So if you come in, I'll just delete you, so don't even bother.
	Just not how this particular show is working.
	So, yeah, okay, that's very interesting.
	Well, I don't, you know, this is kind of like, I don't know if it's going to be helpful to people or not, but Recently, or I think it was not that long ago, maybe November 2017, Linda Moulton Howell interviewed a witness who has been working down there.
	He was working down there, I think, in the 1990s.
	So it's been quite a few years since he actually worked down there.
	But he reported a lot of anomalous things that went on during his time there.
	He was transporting people and things back and forth between, I guess, the main base and other places, and reports, sightings of UFOs, of course, and other very interesting things.
	But in the process, I'm just going to release this information, and I don't know whether or not your remote viewing has stumbled on any of this, but there is a book, apparently, that...
	That was banned.
	This is really an interesting story.
	And it's kind of a small part.
	It's on YouTube, her interview with this guy.
	And, you know, the guy is, I think, I forget what he is.
	I think he's an engineer of some kind, but he was always in those planes.
	And he found out, I guess there was a book written.
	By someone.
	And I don't have their name in front of me.
	But it's mentioned in the video.
	And apparently the government, the U.S. government banned the hard copy of the book.
	But they allowed the e-book to go on Amazon.
	And so you can actually get it on Amazon.
	And so I did it right away.
	Because apparently there's information in the book that was worth banning.
	If you want to look at it like that.
	Now, it's very possible that they used the e-book and they could have, you know, altered the e-book of this particular author and so on and so forth.
	But if they didn't, or if they just thought, oh, well, it'd be so insignificant, no one will notice it.
	And I don't know why.
	Maybe because if it was, you know, it would go to other countries, if it was a hard book.
	I really don't know what the thought was there.
	But, oh, God.
	Okay, hold on.
	These people are, like, really...
	You want attention?
	Yeah, we have some weird people that go on here in this channel.
	So, anyway...
	All I'm saying is, it's a fascinating story, sort of leaving a clue.
	And one of the things they discover, one of the things, I'm reading the book, and it's about a pyramid.
	And of course, and this capability, and in the book is about this stone you're talking about.
	Similar to Red Dog.
	I don't know, but you said there's a stone down in Antarctica that they're analyzing the scientists, and apparently that's in this book that I'm reading.
	And, you know, if I can find before the end of the show here, I will actually...
	Yeah, the data, just briefly to hit on it, it's not like one stone, the way the data came through.
	It seemed to be there's a mineral that's used throughout, it's found down there, that has some very anomalous effects on not only human biology, but also human consciousness.
	And so there's a lot of experimentation that's going on down there on humans with this type of stuff.
	And some of the work seems to essentially remove...
	This is the part, okay, now we're getting, you know, strange.
	Not that Elon Musk says it's strange.
	But, you know, it seems that what's occurring, some of these tests that are being run down there, to interact, to see what happens, is that when used in a certain way, the...
	Conscious-minded of an individual kind of just disappears.
	And so we describe these test subjects as like zombies.
	It's like they just would be told what to do and they'd do it.
	And it's like their self is gone, but they're like a robot.
	It's like, go do this.
	Go pick that up.
	And so they're trying to Use the those type of experience to some end, but ultimately they weren't having a whole lot of success with it So it's that was again.
	There's a lot of failure and trying to not sure I have to go back and I have to look at the work because again I'm gonna do a more detailed analysis on the Video probably well, I think that would be fascinating for people, but I just found the book so just I'll put it out there so it's called raising Atlantis and By a guy named Tom Greenhouse.
	I think I might have his last name wrong.
	It's Green something.
	And you can look it up on Amazon under Raising Atlantis and find it very easily.
	And there is tech.
	It's all about the tech they're trying to utilize and reverse engineer.
	So that matches the book anyway.
	It doesn't mean it's true.
	It means that it matches the book.
	And there are some very interesting parallels to things going on in Atlantis or what was known as Atlantis.
	And whether or not that's accurate or whether it's not accurate, it's fascinating to contemplate.
	Yeah.
	And we are at a time, in my understanding, that we are actually revisiting the things that happened at Atlantis.
	We're very fast moving into reliving basically a lot of those things that brought Atlantis down.
	And we're at sort of a critical juncture in that sense.
	I think we are moving beyond it in a positive way, ultimately.
	But in some ways, you could have fooled me because it kind of looks like the jury's still out on that.
	So there are some positive things that have happened here on planet Earth, so don't let me underestimate that.
	But at any rate, I digress.
	So it's great to talk to you.
	It's fascinating.
	It's lovely to come across such an open mind.
	And With a protocol and sort of a down-to-earth quality that you can actually apply an open-mindedness to your work.
	And obviously your team is similarly sort of leaning in that direction of being open-minded.
	And I'm sure that any work you do with regard to Atlantis will be, you know, Highly prized because, well, you have, you know, it's not to say you're always going to be right just because you're right sometimes, right, in remote viewing.
	So one must say that.
	However, you know, having a good record is nothing to be ashamed of in this regard.
	So I think, you know, I would encourage people to consider your work for sure.
	Thanks.
	That means a lot, Kerry.
	Thank you so much.
	It's fun to be able to share this stuff, too.
	It's the kind of thing where running a project, I wouldn't do it if it wasn't constantly exciting for me, just to see what's next, what's in the next book, what's in the next book.
	And, you know, if other people find it fascinating, too, then that's fantastic.
	You know, ultimately, I shifted into doing this.
	You know, this is my job now, too.
	You know, I teach it as well as produce content for free as well on YouTube, just starting that.
	And then I also do consulting work.
	But I think it's the...
	The sharing the information, the project data, is the kind of stuff that's the most invigorating for me.
	And I think just having discussions like this with you and even just speculating, okay, what's the next thing we should look at?
	Because we don't have an answer for it.
	Let's pull that book off the shelf and see what's in there.
	And maybe it'll shed some light on something we hadn't considered.
	It doesn't mean take it as absolute truth.
	It definitely means always use it.
	Just take this information with a grain of salt.
	Right.
	Along those lines, just the last thing here, somebody is, you know, very stressing, you know, making lots of sort of indicators here.
	They want to know if you've ever remote viewed the Sun and the inside of the Sun and the outer universe.
	So there's a target if you haven't done that.
	Inside of the Sun, I have not.
	I have looked at an object that Ingo Swann referred to, who was one of the originators of controlled remote viewing, that Anyway, it's a long story.
	I won't go into who he was.
	Fantastic psychic.
	Look him up.
	Oh, yeah.
	And Camelot wanted to interview him, but he was aware of us, but we were unable to do that.
	Yeah.
	I mean, I wish I was able to have met him before he passed because he's really an inspiration to a lot of our viewers.
	He's one of the persons who started it.
	But anyway, he mentioned in some of his writings that there's an object.
	That circles around the backside of the Sun.
	I can't remember the exact name of it now, but we removed that and set up as a target.
	Very interesting.
	It was a non-terrestrial object that seemed to be in orbit to kind of monitor what was going on here.
	And it was relaying information off into deep space somewhere, essentially.
	Anything more than that, there wasn't really much.
	So that was the closest to the Sun, I suppose, that I've removed viewed.
	But the inside of the Sun, No, I haven't done that.
	It'd be an interesting topic.
	It might be hot.
	Bad joke.
	Or perhaps not a portal.
	So, all right.
	Well, I want to thank you again.
	You know, this is a lot of data and for people to take on board that maybe haven't been following your work.
	And then again, I think, you know, if they haven't, this is a great opportunity for, you know, for lack of a better word, kind of an An advertisement for them to then go dig deeper into your work because your work is so involved and it's got great amounts of detail and the video webinars that you've done, which is really awesome.
	A lot of people charge for webinars, so it's great that you're making this free to the public.
	I think that the public will appreciate that.
	So do you want to give out your pertinent details so how people can reach you, your YouTube channel name and your Facebook and so on and so forth?
	Sure.
	Yeah.
	No, I mean, I love creating the content and I think releasing this project data, I'll always release for free because I think sharing it is important for me.
	But if you want to follow me, take a look, head to my website.
	It's technicalintuition.com.
	I do teach remote viewing.
	Not everyone is interested in learning it, but if you are, I am actually starting a new online school at the end of next month.
	So if You can get pertinent information around that.
	You can also get their links on my website to my Facebook group, my Twitter account, which is bstuartrv, and then my YouTube channel as well, where I release all my webinars, and then my pre-recorded videos.
	The channel is Technical Intuition.
	You can get that from the website as well.
	And if you do like, I mean, I don't ever intend of really charging for the content, but I do, you know, I make enough for on the side from doing But if you do like the work and you want to support me through the creation of the videos, I do have a Patreon group as well, which is just the remote viewing Patreon group.
	So if you go there, there's some perks I like to do.
	I do a private Q&A for my Patreons as well.
	So if that's interesting and you want to support me in that manner, then I would love for you to join the Patreon group.
	But other than that, check the website out.
	Check me out on social media.
	And I really appreciate you, Kerry, for having me on your show.
	And it's been a blast talking about these topics.
	Cool.
	Okay.
	Well, likewise, you know, it's a lot of fun.
	And like I say, great to come across another fellow open-minded individual because I reach a lot of people that, you know, they go only so far and then they stop.
	So it's always fun when I find someone who really will push the envelope and you're pushing the envelope and that's just really refreshing.
	So thank you very much for that.
	Thanks so much, Carrie.
	All right.
	So I'm going to let you go, and good night.
	Thanks a lot.
	Bye-bye.
	Okay, so let me make sure that I have to...
	Get all this, the right windows.
	Okay, so that's really a fascinating discussion, obviously.
	Really, I recommend you go and watch his webinars because he really digs down into these various subjects we've covered here.
	You know, Nazca and this red dog, you know, the pyramid with the ascension chair, etc.
	So...
	What else can I say?
	Next week, hopefully we'll have some more people, delightful people for you.
	And it's, you know, been a great week already with what we had last night and tonight.
	So it's...
	Highly recommended that you look at all my Camelot videos, of which there are nearly 700 for free.
	And I'm going to put this ad up here so that we are actually, you know, it's important to realize that we've been doing this for, actually, I've been doing this for 12 years now.
	And so we are serving the galaxy, as I call it.
	And I am about to go interview Mark Richards, as I mentioned last night.
	And I'm looking for funds to make that possible.
	I also have an Egypt trip that is available.
	We still have room on that.
	So if you're interested, go to my website to the events page.
	And just click on the events and you'll see the information, the cost, etc.
	And just so you understand, Maria Wheatley and I are charging a fee on top of the actual cost of going to Egypt so that we can cover our own expenses because otherwise we couldn't go.
	So, you know, that's how it goes.
	And we're actually not quite breaking even, believe it or not, at this moment, because I guess a lot of people are hesitant to go to Egypt, but it's a life-changing experience and highly recommended.
	This will be my fifth time in Egypt, so I'm looking forward to it.
	And this is in April 4th through the 14th, so 10 days.
	So other than that, take care, have a great weekend, and I'll see you next week.

▲