All Episodes
Previous Next
Jan. 25, 2018 - Project Camelot
01:25:40
COURTNEY BROWN : REMOTE VIEWING THE WAR IN HEAVEN
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
No.
No.
Thank you.
Hi everyone, I'm Kerry Cassidy from Project Hamlet and I'm here tonight with Courtney Brown and we're going to be talking about his team's remote viewing of a phrase from the Bible called war in heaven and this should be a really fascinating show.
I'm going to bring Courtney on the screen here with me and Courtney say hello to everyone.
Hi everyone, I'm glad to be here.
Thanks for having me here Kerry.
Okay.
It's great to be able to do this with you.
We've done several of these and it's always fascinating talking with you and hearing about your amazing, really, investigations you're doing with your fascinating remote viewing team.
And so what I'd like to do in this case, I do think A lot of people will know who you are, but give yourself a brief introduction and then we'll just launch into the premise of your remote viewing of The War in Heaven and perhaps introduce the various viewers that were involved.
Okay, sure.
Well, I'm Courtney Brown, as you know, and I'm the director of the Farsight Institute.
And the Farsight Institute is a non-profit and we are the largest, biggest venue of Public, fully open public projects for remote viewing anywhere.
And so what we do is we use remote viewing, which is a mental procedure that was developed originally by the United States Intelligence Services, the US Army, military to use for espionage purposes.
And we're civilian and we use procedures that are derivative of those original military procedures.
And We use them for exploration and scientific experiments.
We have a huge number of projects that we've done and are available to see on our website, Farsight.org, F-A-R-S-I-G-H-T, like seeingfar.org, O-R-G. And most of everything that we have up there is for free.
Some premium projects are sold as movies, but War in Heaven is one of those.
But even with War in Heaven, there's a ton of free material.
Dealing with remote viewing and the instructional stuff for those people who are interested in learning about remote viewing and learning the actual procedures are available for free on our website as well, farsight.org.
Okay.
Well, now you started this project, you've been doing a series of these obviously, and you have so many at this point.
I think it's very highly recommended that people take a look at these videos because it really demonstrates how remote viewing is done.
And also you film live in some cases, isn't that right?
Yeah, we film live in all cases now.
What we do is the original military procedures, and our procedures are derivative of those.
They're not the exact ones that were used by the military back in the day, but they're derivative of those.
They're improved, modern, better, things like that.
And the procedures are done usually with paper and pen.
But watching someone doing a remote viewing session with paper and pen is much more excruciating than watching the grass grow.
So what we do is they do their sessions with paper and pen.
For one session, typically, a remote viewer invests about a day.
And that includes the meditation, that includes having a meal, meditation, that means in the rest period after that, then doing the actual procedures, getting all the paper done.
And then after the paper session is totally completed, Then if they're ready, they extend the session onto video.
So what people see is the video part, which captures everything.
So they're still in the session, but the initial things which are boring to watch, not on paper, are already done.
And so they're deep into the session, deep into describing these mental perceptions that they're having.
And they...
Continue that all on video.
And that is absolutely fascinating to watch.
So you see this and it's all done totally blind and the remote viewers are not communicating with each other.
They're isolated.
They're doing everything alone.
There's no monitor in the room.
There's nothing.
Either when they're doing their paper sessions or when they're doing video.
So it's fascinating to watch.
What's also fascinating is we almost always have More than one remote viewer doing this, typically three.
And what's really fascinating is to see all three people coming in with the same stuff.
Like you'd say, what?
How is that possible?
But that's what remote viewing is.
It's a mental procedure that enables people to perceive across time and space.
And we have, Kerry, in the past talked about theories of physics that allow this, but I guess we don't have to go into that today.
We've done that before.
Okay, well, one thing you could say is the idea that I had somebody ask me recently, do you leave your body?
So maybe you could explain that much.
No, this is not an out-of-body experience at all.
It's in the normal waking state of consciousness.
Basically what happens is that when people are doing remote viewing, Well, let's look at it this way.
When you're walking around town or when you're driving around town or when you're interacting with other people, sometimes you get an intuitive pulse about something.
Maybe it's about a person that's on the other side of the room or about something you need to remember to do.
It's just coming to you.
You feel it.
Well, with remote viewing, it's a structured method of getting those perceptions.
And when you have that structure of doing A, B, C, 1, 2, 3, 4, What you're really doing is paying attention to something that's accessible to you all the time anyway.
So you're not leaving the body or going into an out-of-state type of thing or an altered state of consciousness.
You're just focusing on something that your mind normally ignores.
And you're focusing on it so closely that you're able to control the experience and control what you're focusing on.
Just like if you're focusing on something that's on your desk and you're looking at it, you're sort of ignoring everything else.
With remote viewing, it's a training procedure that gets people able to focus on something that basically everybody else in the world simply ignores except for those rare intuitive pulses that manage to get through.
And when the remote viewers are really good at it, they can focus on those things for a long time, on those perceptions for a long time, and hold on to that thing until a whole major session comes out.
Typically the training for people who do training at Farsight the training just the beginning training takes nine months and that's twice a week all day for nine months without a break so you're talking about between 16 and 20 hours of work every week for nine months straight and that's before anybody in the world even knows they exist And then they start appearing in our Time Cross project,
which is a predictive news show that comes out once a month at the end of the month that tells what the news will be in the next month.
So rather than watching a normal news show where you find out what already happened, this is a news show where you find out what's going to happen.
And we're doing the statistical analysis for that now.
It's been extremely successful since we started in May of 2016.
After they do almost a year or about a year of that, then they start working on our mysteries projects, which are big projects that turn into movies.
And we have a few mysteries projects, such as The Great Pyramid of Giza and Atlantis that are available for free, plus a whole bunch of other projects that we've had that are available for free.
And then we have some premium projects that we offer as regular movies through Vimeo and Amazon and DVDs and things like that.
And The War in Heaven is one of those that just came out.
And it's a three-hour, unbelievable, unbelievable.
It's very believable when you see it and you watch it.
But just conceptually, it's so amazing.
You think it's just impossible.
But it is very possible that we were able to pursue what this is all about.
Right.
So...
With that in mind, can you describe the target, so to speak, how they were given the target, and I'm not sure what the objective was, why you chose that particular target?
Well, in many cultures, many religions, there's talk, there's written in ancient texts about this big battle that happened among the gods and things like that in heaven.
And you get that in the Vedic texts, you get that in the Romina and Hindu texts, you get that in a zillion texts, the Samarian texts, that Zachariah Sitchin has looked at and written a whole bunch of books about.
You get this idea about the war, the war, the war, the big war in heaven.
And in the Judeo-Christian tradition, you have it both in the Old Testament as well as the New.
And in the New Testament, the big mention, of course, is in Revelation.
And so the book of Revelation, chapter 12, verse 7, it says, And there was a war in heaven, and Michael and his angels fought, and the dragon and his angels fought.
So the real question is, first of all, why are all of these different cultures, different religions, different prophets, different everything, separated by hundreds, sometimes thousands of years?
Why are they all talking about this?
They shouldn't even know each other.
Why is everybody talking about this big war in heaven?
So the real question was, let's do a remote viewing project where we query that phrase in chapter 12, verse 7 in Revelation.
What is this?
So that was target cue.
So the target cue was whatever the perceptions were of the original prophet who was perceiving this thing that he later called the war in heaven and wrote the book of Revelation about.
And we wanted to find out what that What that prophet was perceiving.
And so we got it.
Now remember, the remote viewers are totally blind.
They know nothing.
They're not even told target coordinates or nothing.
All they know is that there's a target, and this is project number 21.
Go.
And, you know, Aziz Brown, he's in Thailand, and Princess Shanae and Melina Hall, They came into the studio to do their work on different days completely.
There was no communication between them.
And they all got the same thing, this huge space battle between basically two planets and basically two different species, although there was a couple of other species involved.
But there was two primary species in these two planets.
And one of the planets blew up.
I mean, it was really like a Star Wars type thing.
They got the falling rocks, the lava rocks coming down.
Everybody got the same thing.
These two opposing forces with spaceships and everything.
And one was an aggressor species that looked sort of reptilian.
And the other was more humanoid.
They looked different than us, but very similar.
Different but similar to humanons.
And they were battling it out.
And the human humanoid species was The underdog.
They were the ones getting their teeth kicked in.
And the aggressor species was the reptilians.
And they were nuking the place.
They were nuking the place.
They wanted to control the resources.
They wanted to control the planet.
And it looks like the other planet had the humanoid types that looked like us.
As a last resort, desperate resort, just shot a bomb towards the bigger planet that the reptilians came from, and they basically destroyed the entire planet.
It was a doomsday.
A doomsday Hail Mary type of a situation.
Okay, I'm sorry to interrupt you here, but I'm wondering if it became clear, I guess, partway through the sessions, I think, at least to the viewers, that we're talking about Mars.
No, they didn't know that.
They had no idea what this project was about.
They thought it was the craziest thing that they could ever imagine.
They all thought they were wrong because this couldn't be.
Where is this space battle coming from?
Okay, so what you're saying...
So they didn't know that it was Mars until after all three targets for the project were done.
And we'll go over the other two targets.
And then at the same time, all three people were told what the project was about.
And they were flabcasted.
We have actually a video on our website, farsight.org, called the Target Revealed video that's free on YouTube.
Where two of the viewers, Melina Hall and Princess Anae, are told for the first time what the targets are about.
You can see what their reactions are.
And it's a riot to look at it.
They were floored.
They had no idea that it was anything like that.
Okay, so in other words, you're saying this was sort of a curiosity to me while watching the viewers themselves talk about what they're seeing.
They did seem quite in the dark as to where they were and where this thing was happening, but they were clear that it wasn't Earth.
Yeah, they didn't know.
I didn't know for sure that it was Mars until the third target was done.
So the three targets were the first target was The original prophet, his perceptions when he was perceiving this so-called war of heaven.
What was happening to him?
What was he looking at?
What was he perceiving when he was getting that?
The second target was the actual prophet himself.
At the time that, not his perceptions, but at the time that he was receiving this vision, What was going on with him at that time?
That was a second target.
So we could see, like, how was he getting this?
Was he just, like, closing his eyes and imagining this thing?
And it turned out to be an alien abduction type thing.
So extraterrestrials, this is John of Patmos we're talking about, the author of the Book of Revelation.
Patmos is an island in the Aegean.
And he basically had extraterrestrials around him, and there was one in particular, a big guy, Who was force-feeding this stuff into his head.
And he was doing the best he could.
He was not in control of himself.
He was doing the best he could to try to sort it out.
And when he got it, when the whole experience was over, he wrote a book, Book of Revelation, and that's how we got it.
And apparently that's how it got into all these other cultures.
Apparently these extraterrestrials wanted humans to know about this thing that happened millions and millions and millions and millions of years ago so that we would be able to process it and so on.
Now the third target At this point, I was convinced that this really looked like Mars because one of the planets blew up and it created the asteroid bill.
And that's what the viewers were saying.
They were saying, this looks just like the asteroid bill.
And Mars also has a lot of anomalies to it.
For example, one half of Mars is covered with craters and the other half is crater free.
So it looked like something exploded near Mars and shot it like a shotgun, leaving craters all over it.
And that's exactly what the remote viewers were seeing.
So what I did, I said, okay, I have to nail this down.
So I added a third target to the project that they all had to do, and that was Mars at the time of the war in heaven, as it was perceived in the first target.
So now if Mars was calm and everything was hunky-dory, everything was okay for the third target, then I would have said, okay, well, that means that the war in heaven was going on some other place.
But if I got the same results for the third target as we got for the first target, that nails it.
That was Mars.
So, this war in heaven was a war between two species.
One was dominantly living on Mars, and the other was living, the reptilian group was living on this other planet that often people call Maldek, And that was the planet that is now the asteroid belt that was totally destroyed in the war.
And that's the war that the extraterrestrials have apparently wanted us to know about.
And so they seeded the information into our collective consciousness by putting it into our religions.
And that was pretty easy to do.
You just abduct these prophets and force feed them the information.
And then they write about it in their texts.
And lo and behold, we become slowly aware of it.
Okay, so I was sort of struck also by the fact that the viewers themselves didn't seem to go too much in depth into why that group of humanoids was being attacked.
In other words, I wondered at the...
The limitations that they were experiencing, they seemed really captured by the actual battle.
Well, that was the project to find out what this battle was all about.
But in one of Melina Hall's sessions, she clearly went after what you're just saying right now.
Meaning they had factories, they had mining operations, things like that on Mars.
And the reptilian group landed and basically wanted to take over the factories.
They wanted to control things.
They were very threatening.
They said basically they were giving the people, the humanoid types on the ground, you either let us run this show or we're going to attack.
And that was very clear in Melina's session.
And that fit in with all the other stuff.
So it was a classic wartime strategy for claiming the resources.
And seeing the results themselves live, recorded on video, This is a spellbinding three hours.
We haven't heard any complaints about the three hours.
It's like right on the edge of your seat.
Now, the other thing is we use a different presentational method, too.
In the past projects, what we've done is we've let, for example, if we were doing a project that has Dick Allgaier, Dad Smith, and Aziz Brown, what we would do is let Dick do everything that he's doing, and then Des do everything that he's doing, and then Aziz do everything he's doing, and then we wrap it up and call it a day.
This one we did differently.
I decided for this one to have the video so that each viewer did multiple sessions for each target.
So for the first session, they did multiple sessions because each time you go to target, you get deeper into it.
You learn more.
You figure it out more.
You have to piece a lot of stuff together.
It's not easy.
You don't just go in and then 20 minutes later you have the whole story.
You're seeing Bits and pieces, and you're slowly putting it all together, following all the procedures for the remote viewing.
And after about five or six sessions, you finally get it.
Okay, you know what's going on.
So what we did was we called each session, each paper session, a pass, a pass through the target.
So each one would be short.
So we'd have Aziz do a pass through the target, the first target, then Princess, and then Melina.
And each one was, you know, between five and ten minutes long.
And then you go back to Aziz for his second pass.
And then Princess for her second pass.
And then Malina for her second pass.
And then you go back to Aziz for his third pass.
And so each time you have all three viewers going through each pass, you see them getting deeper and deeper into the target.
And you see them sort of march together to understand what is actually happening.
So in the past projects, what we've done is By the time you got to, say, done with Dick Elgar, he went from the beginning to the end of everything he discovered.
And then when you get to Daz, you've got to go back to someone who's basically just beginning to sort things out.
So this was an improvement in the way that we present this.
So you can see, you can follow all three viewers simultaneously as they march through this target and put all the pieces together.
It's riveting.
It's absolutely riveting.
And so this This project, Gary, if you don't mind me saying, ties a lot of stuff together.
We have a project that we did earlier, it's free on our website, called Origins of the Asteroid Belt.
And we have another project, it was on the remote viewing Cydonia Mars.
So we've had a lot of projects that sort of dealt with this type of subject in a peripheral way.
We've known for a long time since we did the asteroid project that the asteroid belt was in fact caused by a planet that exploded.
It wasn't caused by what mainstream astronomers say is what was left over, junk that was left over from the primordial solar nebula.
When we actually got to this thing, now we know we answered the big question of why a planet exploded, how the planet exploded.
And in this video, The War in Heaven, we also go over some of the mainstream ideas that are out there that support the remote viewing findings.
So we actually get some verifiable elements to this as well.
Verifiable that is in correspondence with some mainstream scientists who have reported things that are totally congruent with what we've reported.
For example, we have a reference in some detail the work of Thomas Van Flandern, who was the late Thomas Van Flandern, who was chief of his Department of Celestial Mechanics at the Naval Observatory, and he's extremely mainstream.
He has a huge publication list.
And he, for years, tried to Persuade his colleagues that the asteroid belt was not chunks that was left over from the primordial solar nebula, but it was indeed a planet and exploded.
He never went into why it exploded, but he clearly described that it was a planet and it exploded.
And so the reasons that he would give were sort of obvious in-your-face reasons, and the only reason they've not been accepted by mainstream astronomers is by most mainstream astronomers it's because mainstream astronomers have a block they do not want to consider the idea that there are extraterrestrials in the first place especially in our own solar system so they've taken that whole package of ideas and put them off the table and say we will not discuss that so whatever explanation you come up for the origin of the asteroid belt it has to not include that
well what kind of scientific Attitude is that.
It's not scientific at all.
You can't just, you know, exclude that.
And Thomas Van Flandt also came up with other, you know, very obvious reasons why it had to have been a planet.
The biggest one, of course, is the asteroids are made up of big, heavy rocks with lots of iron, metals in it, and stuff like that.
You don't get that from the primordial solar nebula.
The primordial solar nebula is dust.
In order to get a big, solid, heavy rock, You need a gravity well to compress all the dust together to mold it and form it into solid heavy rocks with minerals and everything with iron cores and stuff.
And you need a planet to do that.
You can't get that from dust by itself.
In addition, many of the asteroids gave obvious evidence of being exposed to extreme heat melting.
And many of the asteroids and comets have evidence of being exposed also to salt water.
And Thomas Van Flanderen goes into lots of other evidence, and he details that in his book and a couple articles.
About listing one reason after the next.
It's very convincing.
Anyway, so when you look at the remote viewing results we have, it's clear as day.
Not only was it correct, it was once exploded.
But now, because of the remote viewing results, we now know why it exploded.
All the data which were collected under really nice, clean conditions.
Totally blind.
All remote viewers separated from themselves.
No communication between the remote viewers and all of them coming into the exact same stuff.
And these particular remote viewers have tremendous track records.
They've all participated at least one year in the time cross where you see them do remote viewing sessions that are published in advance of the targets actually appearing.
I mean, you can't get better than that.
And that's like a year of that.
So the public is very well exposed to these people.
One more thing, Kerry, I really want to mention.
For me, it's really important.
These are millennials.
These are young people.
These are not old people that came out of the military that were, you know, getting ready to retire or die or whatever.
These are young people.
So having young people do these things and having a level of training that is at this level, this huge level, is just, it's revolutionary.
And it's really, really important for the future of humanity.
You know, the young shall inherit the earth.
It's super important that young people not only know how to do it, but that they know that they can do it.
That this is not something for just old people.
This is something for young people.
And so it's really exciting that we have three, you know, three young people doing this, three millennials doing this.
And it's also one of our, it is actually to date our The biggest, most successful project in terms of number of people who are watching it.
So it's, you know, these people established a track record for themselves, each one participating in Timecross and public projects for over a year, for a year or more, and the public was really ready for them.
The public knew what they could do.
And so when you actually got to the actual war in heaven, they wanted to see what they got, and boy, they got something.
They definitely did.
Now, they're coming up with some very similar results, although it seemed that Aziz was, if I remember correctly, he seemed to be concentrating on craft, it seems, and some of the things going on inside the craft more than the other two, at least as far as I could tell.
There was quite an emphasis on a very large I don't know if it was a craft, I guess, but it seemed to be landed or stationary on the planet also later on.
But can you explain perhaps why the other two would get a lot of the battle, whereas Aziz would get more of the craft and what was going on inside the craft?
Sure, that's a great question, Carrie.
They all got spacecraft and they all got battles, you know, fighting.
However, you're absolutely correct.
Aziz focused more on those crafts going into them and so on.
Now, that is precisely why we use multiple remote viewers in each of our projects, because all three go to the same place, but once you're there, they get attracted to certain things, sort of almost idiosyncratically appropriate for what they're interested in.
Melina, for example, is an artist, and she, you know, a drawing artist, So she naturally goes to things that she likes to sketch out.
You know, what people look like and what buildings look like, what the terrain looks like.
And Princess, she's an actress.
I should say actor.
The Screen Actors Guild is genderless these days in describing this.
So she's an actor.
And I've actually seen her perform in lead roles in multiple roles.
Play performances.
So she's really good, really, really good at acting.
And so what she picks up a lot is the emotions.
She's also legally blind.
Now she can see fine, just like you and I, but she has to wear these Coke bottle type glasses, really thick lenses in order to see, or contact lenses.
And so because of the eyesight problems, she focused more on feelings.
And when she goes into a target, she picks up people and feelings and she puts up the dynamics of people interaction so great.
It's like a reporter on the scene interviewing people.
And also she's had some interactions with...
Normally humans cannot tell if you're remote viewing them, but many extraterrestrial species, advanced ones, can tell.
And in this case, she, under two separate occasions, she had an actual interaction here in the studio with extraterrestrials while she was remote feeling them.
We caught it live on video.
That's the type of thing, you know, that's great for her.
Now, Aziz, getting to your question, He likes, you know, he likes spaceships.
He likes spacecrafts.
So when he sees one, he's interested in that.
So that's what he made a headline for.
Now, he still described the planet.
He still described the battles.
He still described the bombs coming down, the nukes, the nuclear bombs blowing off.
But then he went into the spacecraft and he described the way the spacecraft were organized, how they were Positioned in terms of the different fleets.
Then he actually described some large cube-like spacecraft that sort of looked Borg-ish, to be honest, near the other planet that exploded, the reptilian side of things.
So you had everything like Borg-type cubes.
And, you know, it almost made me think that a lot of the ideas that you see in science fiction movies may be seeded into the writers of these movies.
While they're sleeping or something because a lot of these things we end up seeing actually in in remote viewing studies and so and and given the fact that we see now that the extraterrestrials have made an attempt to seed information about the distant past into certain people's influential people's minds such as prophets and that would and similarly a prophet in a contemporary realm would be comparable to a screenwriter someone who's writing you know plays and movies TV
shows and movies in today's day.
So it sort of fits in with that general modality.
But yeah, Aziz went after some of these ships.
He went into some of the ships.
He described some of the people, some of the organization, the way the ships were organized inside, where the flat panel TVs were, where the people were.
Interesting, Kerry.
You may find this interesting.
You can cut me off if you want at any time.
But both the reptilian and the human run ships.
Both of them had, the reptilian ones had a big, I'm talking big, reptilian kind of guy that was actually perceived exactly the same in Belina's sessions and she was really great in drawing them.
But in Aziz's session he clearly had this reptilian guy running the ship and for the Mars He had humanoid types running the ship, but both of them had these little gray dudes, these little gray short guys with the wraparound eyes, doing the operations in the ship.
And they were almost like a slave force on both sides.
They were sort of emotionless.
They followed orders.
They were living, but they weren't like you and I. They were people who didn't object to what they were told to do.
They were told to do something.
So they were better than robots in terms of being living beings, but they didn't really have, like, free will.
They just followed orders.
And the sense that I got was, you know, with genetic engineering being the way it is, it's really looking like at some future point in time it becomes too tempting to say, why deal with normal people Running ships where people can disagree and do it.
Why don't you have this sort of a living being but one without the ability to object?
Sort of just doing things and That's what it seems like both sides were using.
Well, actually, I don't know.
Maybe my memory is not correct here, but I don't remember them understanding or thinking that the grays were programmable, what we call programmable biological life forms.
So, which hints that possibly a, you know, in other words, we, my understanding is that our secret space program actually has this at this time as well.
And that these are not the gray races, which are a different art, you know, there are many different gray races.
And so the question becomes whether or not they're certainly perhaps a bit more of an artificial life, you know, AI, in other words, they're motivated by AI. And they do take orders.
These are good questions, Gary.
Yeah.
I don't know that they were dealing with this.
We don't know.
We don't know.
I just know that both the multiple viewers noticed the same type of thing, that they have one guy in charge and typically a bunch of helpers surrounding them, and the helpers were shorter and had those wraparound eyes.
And so it's...
It just raises that question.
I mean, I always assumed...
I understand the idea of there being different type of gray races, but it just raises the question of whether at some point it becomes tempting for almost any species to start using genetic engineering to have these sort of artificial life forms as servants.
I'm not...
And I'm not downgrading them.
I really don't know.
I just noticed that all the remote viewers said there was a distinct difference between the guy in charge and the shorter helpers.
And we're seeing that an awful lot.
And that doesn't mean that I know the answer to this, Carrie.
I'm just saying it seems to be a pattern that we're starting to see.
And it raises questions that I like to answer.
But, you know, when your viewers actually watch the movie, I'm sure you're going to Invite them to come up with their own thoughts about what they think is going on.
But I'm just thinking of human nature.
If humans were doing that, that's probably what we would do.
And the race on Mars, you know, it is interesting because Project Camelot, one of our most famous interviews is with Bariska, who is a young boy from Russia who had total past life recall of his life as a soldier on Mars.
And then was, in essence, seated back here on Earth after that the planet was, I guess, decimated.
So the surface of Mars.
And this was in a war situation, as he describes.
And this was as, you know, he started talking about this when he was very, very young to his mother.
And then she, I guess, some journalist heard about it in the community and then said, Of course, at least this is how the story goes.
And the scientists then started to notice him.
And of course, now we can't get a hold of Bariska because he's probably working for the Russian government.
But nonetheless, this parallels the information he was giving.
Another thing that he came across was they actually were trying to turn Jupiter into a second sun, is something he said.
I noticed that you didn't have anything of that in there because that really wasn't the topic, but it is interesting to contemplate.
There's another aspect I want to ask you about, though, which has to do with this idea that there could be a person writing the Bible who is given information that Through an abduction and then writes it into the Bible.
It looks like that's a very clear possibility.
That's what it looks like happened with the book of Revelation.
Okay.
And it's very possible that the rest of the Bible might have been written in the same way and that there may be opportunities to remote view that as well.
And then one has to get into the The ultimate purpose behind what the ETs were doing and which ETs and then perhaps an agenda involved there.
So there are a lot of layers which bring things into question.
The battle itself was very interesting.
Let me just say one thing, Gary.
You're raising all great points.
So I hope your listeners are listening to all these things.
You're not answering them.
You're raising questions and they're exactly the questions that need to be raised.
Thank you.
Well, you know, I'm sure that anyone watching is getting these kinds of questions rolling through their mind.
We don't have immediate answers, but I do...
I think that people would ask you, and I'm not sure if I might already know your answer to it, but I'm going to ask you anyway, whether or not...
You mentioned that the viewers would see the movie of their viewing and, you know, that they then...
Realized what they were looking at and they were sort of astonished and so on.
And then the question becomes, with questions that come after the viewing, after the whole session, do you ever think about encouraging them to go back in and get more?
No.
Once it's over, it's over.
And why not?
For us, the remote viewing only is reliable if it's totally blind.
If they know anything more about it, we just don't get good, reliable information.
Because then their mind jumps to conclusions.
You should see on our website, farsight.org, if you click on the War in Heaven banner, you'll see on the main webpage for the War in Heaven, you'll see three trailers.
And the bottom one is the target reveal.
And the target reveal video is where Melina and Princess are told for the first time, not by seeing a movie, but by being given a piece of paper, what the three targets were.
And you get to see what their reaction is.
And it's amazing when they say, what?
What are you talking about?
What are you talking about?
And then they talk about how it makes sense, and then they look at each other, and they start comparing notes with what they got, because they hadn't told each other anything that they got.
And then you hear them saying, you got that too?
Oh my gosh, it was...
And it was totally unscripted, totally live, and you get to see what their reactions were when they were doing it.
But once they do that, once they have that piece of paper that tells them what the target is, it's over.
We can't do it.
Now, Kerry, you've actually asked me about this in other shows before.
I'm not saying that you don't want to do it.
I realize, I grant, that you would want to do that.
I'm just saying we have to know our limitations.
We here at Farsight can't go further than that.
So when the project is over, when the data collection project part of it is over, the moment it is over is when I show them what the target is.
After that, their imagination and everything comes in.
There's no possibility that they could ever go back and get anything more.
Okay, now what about this idea that you might task them with sort of a corollary or things related, like I was just saying.
That would be a completely new target in theory.
Yeah, a new project.
Now look what we did here.
Years ago, we did the Origin of the Asteroid Build as a project.
Years ago.
All right?
And now it took me years before I, you know, letting that fade in the mind so that they think that's history and it can never be happening again.
And when I've been, after doing a year of Time Cross, the news shows for things right here on Earth, when everything is sort of, the dust is settled and the origin of the asteroid belt project is years in the past, boom!
That's when I can revisit it.
I can revisit the war in heaven and we found out that in fact that's what it was all about it was a big war but this answered the question that we raised back in the in the origin of the asteroid belt project which is available for free on our website on youtube and this is the question why okay so the origin of the asteroid belt says the planet exploded we had zillions of lots of remote viewers going after that they all got the same thing now we know why it exploded there was a
war And it was the same war that the extraterrestrials told us about by seeding the information into our religious and social and our cultures through the prophets.
That was the way they could get that information in.
And again, you know, back in the old days, how do you get information into a society of humans on a planet so that hundreds of years later, thousands of years later, They will generally have an idea that such a thing happened.
How do you get that?
Well you go back in time and you go to the right spots and you seed it into the minds of the prophets and then religions come out of it and then you know books come out of it like bibles and people get used to this idea so that when you actually have the revelation thousands of years later or hundreds of years later that there really was a war up there it's not so shocking you sort of got used to the idea from the beginning Now,
if you're in the current time period, like right now, and you're trying to seed information into a society to get used to it, used to certain ideas, where would you go?
Well, putting it into the minds of prophets, that wouldn't work today.
But one of the things that I sort of wonder about, and I'm just speculating now, but I'm wondering, If it was me, if I was an extraterrestrial and I was trying to seed information into the public's mind so that it would sort of get out there so that you could get faster disclosure, faster integration with humanity, with the rest of the galaxy, that type of thing, I'd put it into the minds of the screenwriters and have there be movies come out about this stuff.
And maybe that's why you have so many very consistent themes come out in movies.
Actually, I want to drill down to a detail that I find interesting.
So you're saying that the war, the kind of coup de grace, the conclusion of the war, whatever you want to call it, was that the Martian race shot something at I think another name for it is Tiamat, but nonetheless...
And we don't know where.
I'm not sure.
I think they did address that there was a planet.
But I, you know, maybe it was just me.
But I was getting the sense that it was much farther away than Jupiter or Saturn.
I don't know if they gave it a proximity.
They cannot judge.
- No, just remote viewers, they cannot judge distance or size very well.
- Well, except in relation to other planets.
- It was away ways, yeah.
- Yeah, okay.
But nonetheless, my actual question was about what they shot at it.
So the technology that was used to blow up another planet.
So did your, 'cause I can't remember how much detail came through there. - One of the remote viewers, it was Melina, she described it was like a, I think Princess did as well.
It was like a missile type thing that shot.
But they didn't go into that.
They did a lot of sessions and they collected what ended up being three hours of video data on this and it was about as far as I could push them.
I know you're asking a really interesting question like what exactly was shot.
So they did pick up a missile that was shot and that that resulted in the planet exploding.
So I couldn't push them any further.
I had to put closure on the project but I'm going to now speculate.
A lot of times with these remote-filling projects, you get all the data put together, and at that point you have to just piece things together and say, okay, if they did shoot something at the planet, how could it possibly have exploded from one missile?
And so this is what I would do if I was on Mars and I was faced with that thing, with what looked like a complete collapse, a defeat.
Based on, you know, the so-called, from the aggressor species.
If it was me and I was running Mars, what I would do is I'd say, where are these nuclear weapons stored on this other planet, Tiamat or Maldek or whatever?
Where is it stored?
Where are they stored?
And I would have looked for the largest repository of those weapons, and I would have shot a single bunker-busting Super penetrating weapon at that storage spot, detonated all of them.
And I think that's probably what happened.
Now, that could easily explain how you blow up a planet.
For example, let me give you a for example here.
Scandile Labs, other places on the planet.
There are lots of places on the planet where you have literally hundreds of high-powered nuclear weapons stored in one spot.
And if you took an enemy's nuclear weapon with a bunker-busting capability and shot it into one of those places and detonated it, you'd very likely ignite all of them.
They all go up at once.
And if they all go up at once, you'd blow up the planet.
It's really easy to blow up a planet.
For example, Earth.
This is how you blow up Earth.
Earth is an 8,000-mile planet.
Ball of liquid molten lava.
It's just liquid.
And it's got an eight-mile thin crust on top of it, like a grapeseed.
And to blow up the planet, all you need to do is puncture the balloon.
You just need to pop a big hole in the balloon and the whole thing will pop.
Because the lava is under such tremendous pressure.
So if you took...
One of those repositories of hundreds of nuclear weapons and shot one weapon into it and detonated it.
Not on the surface, but making one of those bunker busting goes deep in and boom.
Okay, well, I appreciate your...
You would destroy the entire planet.
You know, conjecture, but I have to say that is your personal conjecture.
That's not what we scientifically know for a fact.
It's pretty easy to put two and two together.
I think there's a lot of ways that they may be using to destroy planets.
In fact, I have some information from one of my secret witnesses about that, and it does involve other things, such as shooting a neutron star through a wormhole.
I'm just saying that this is a very easy way to blow up a planet.
I'm not saying this is the way that that planet was destroyed.
I'm just saying it is not hard to blow up a planet and this is one way it could be done using current technology that we have.
Okay, but that's also what you know as a surface human.
That's not necessarily what black projects in the secret space program are aware of and utilizing even to this day.
Carrie, the point that I'm trying to say is that most people would say, blowing a planet?
You can't do that.
You can't blow up a planet.
It's just reaching for the idea to explain to people it's not that hard to blow up a planet and explaining how it could be done.
This is not saying this is how it was done or this is the only way it could be done.
It just is bringing up the idea, breaking through the The belief that it can't be done by showing a simple example of how it could be done.
All right.
Fair enough.
And just want to make the point that there are other ways to do it as well and that I've gotten information about that in the past just for the interest of my audience.
But in terms of...
The remote viewing as it stands, realizing that at least what was coming through was that there was this person, that they were abducted, that they were given information from aliens and then wrote it into a book that then became part of the Bible.
And I'm not sure what year they claim that this became part of the Bible.
It was about 89 AD that this thing was written.
Okay.
All right.
Right.
So, you know, that's involving a lot of leaps for your average person, right?
Because the average person who is not read in or doesn't realize they themselves might have been abducted.
You know, in other words, there are a lot of sort of leaps of...
Faith, whatever you want to call it, to understand that that might be a legitimate way this information came down to this person and then what they did with it.
In other words, it is kind of fascinating when you think about it, that the explanation seems to be an ET one.
Not one that came through a human getting that information in any other way.
Now, I'm wondering what else they might have seen.
Was there any detail?
You know, because there's this thing called actionable intelligence.
And sometimes I wonder if these remote viewings avoid Even on purpose, giving us what might be termed actionable intelligence.
Things that could be checked out really that are very very hard and fast.
Now you say there are some in some of these things that were involved here that to some degree have shown up in our cultures and so in a certain sense that's information that's validated Simply because it's been around for so long that something of that nature might have happened.
But do you understand what my question is here?
Not really.
Okay, so the question is do you feel that these remote viewing sessions are giving you actionable intelligence?
I'm not sure what you mean by actionable intelligence.
Well, it's a military term.
I thought maybe you would be familiar with it.
I've heard it, but I'm not sure of how you're using it.
Okay.
Well, it actually means that you can follow it up and find hard, fast evidence, in essence.
Well, our whole project is based on that.
On that definition of what you just said, actionable intelligence, our whole project is based on that.
What I've tried to do in the movie...
is to explain mainstream scientists who have already given evidence that the remote viewing is correct.
For example, Thomas Van Flandern wrote a book on a number of articles about just exactly this, that a planet broke up, that it was responsible for the shattering of a The craters on one half of Mars and also for the dark spot on Myapetus.
Well, didn't John Brandenburg, who I interviewed lately, also do this?
I also go over John Brandenburg's stuff.
John Brandenburg is a physicist, very mainstream credentials, and he goes over in a number of books, in a way that's very accessible to laymen.
The radioisotope readings on the surface of Mars that give absolutely unambiguous evidence that there have been nuclear explosions on the surface of Mars.
So that's another mainstream scientist giving, you know, physical evidence that these remote viewing data are correct.
So if you want to consider those results or those sort of parallels to the remote viewing stuff as actionable intelligence, then you're getting That would be an accurate use of that term.
Okay.
Now I have another question for you, which is, I don't even know if this falls into the purview of what you guys cover, but With that in mind, that there is evidence on Mars that there was a nuclear war and that the surface was destroyed, are we to assume that this war in heaven was the same war in which that happened?
Yes, that's the conclusion of this remote viewing project, that the so-called war in heaven Didn't happen in some nebulous place where there's angels floating around and peach cobbler in the clouds.
This war in heaven happened right above our heads between Mars and Maldek or Tiamat, whatever you want to call it.
Okay, but what I meant is, you know, because just in terms of the scenario, so you have the reptilians attacking, you have the humanoids defending their planet, And then somehow the humanoids on Mars get the idea, not just to fight back the immediate war over their heads, but to actually aim...
Which they were doing, but not successful.
But to aim a missile or whatever happened to be that technology at the planet where the people came from that were making the attack and destroy that.
And then the question becomes, was the nuclear decimation on the surface of Mars No, that apparently was happening before the planet was destroyed.
The destruction of the planet when it blew up, that apparently was the end of the war.
But that was also the end of Good Day.
I mean, I know this may not be answerable.
I'm just going down these roads.
Why, if they, you know, if you have a fleet of army or whatever it is, not army, but, you know, above your head and it is attacking you and their home planet is blown up.
It doesn't automatically, therefore, follow that the fleet suddenly abandons their war and they can't go back to the planet.
I'm certain you're correct.
I'm certain you're correct in that everybody just didn't stop.
Right.
But, you know, for all intents and purposes, you can imagine that after that, people were just trying to find some place to go.
I mean, Mars really wasn't a very habitable, easily habitable place after that either.
and then you know we did another project on Iapetus and aliens on Iapetus and was a it's really a great project and we have Dick Elgar and dad Smith who have done that one the remote viewing was stellar on that and we found an alien facility on Iapetus and they both result they both report that there was some disturbance some war that occurred in the solar system at some point that made
it impossible for the residents of this facility on Iapetus to go anywhere some of them got off on some ships that were there other ones just died there and if we went back to that facility today on Iapetus we'd find the dust of their bones and so if you sort of draw sort of the connecting the dots from a lot of stuff we've done it looks like when that happened Nothing went well after that.
There was no place to really easily go to.
I assumed that some of the survivors that were in ships made their way to Earth at that point, and I don't know what the conditions were like on Earth.
They may not have been very hospitable, but there might not have been any other place for them to go.
Okay, do we have a year?
Does this information come through as to when this happened?
No, the best way to do that is to look at the time Estimates that are offered by people like John Brandenburg and Thomas Van Flandern using normal astronomical stuff and radioisotope stuff.
Okay.
So there's also, you know, it is interesting because what I'm doing is jumping sort of in different directions here.
But in an interesting way.
Okay, thank you.
And What I'm wondering is, there is an implication about the war in heaven.
So if there wasn't a war on Mars, and there were humanoid beings on Mars, and I know from Bariska that they then came to Earth.
And we have had other verification that some of our Earthlings, if you want to call us that, are from Mars and have history and memory.
One of our super soldiers, Duncan O'Finian, has quite a background on Mars, apparently.
And there have been others that they can't explain, but they do talk about.
It's an interesting question.
Yes.
So following that line of reasoning, The question becomes, if the reptilians did that to Mars and they had a battle, are we...
We're going to be experiencing a similar battle in the future, or in fact, did we have a battle, similar battle, because the reptilians come from, well, we know the Draco galaxy, for one thing, and we also know that there are many different races of reptilians, and certainly destroying one planet didn't do away with them.
We know that for a fact, because we have monuments with reptilians carved onto them all over the planet.
According to one of my witnesses, with destroying a lot of the evidence in the Middle East of just that, the reptilian domination of humans here on Earth.
And so the question becomes, did, you know, and this is just for the purposes of my audience and for people to understand.
Probe into possibilities as to what this could mean.
So it's not just an idle thing where, oh, somewhere in the far distant past, some Earthlings were attacked on Mars, and that was how it, you know, ended up looking like it does.
And basically, they went to Earth after that.
Well, the reptilians did follow.
We know they followed.
And we know they're here now.
And we also know that they have been here in the past because we have the carvings, etc., to show In the various societies, which includes South America, all over Sumer, in Egypt, you know, Iraq, Iran, you know, Syria, etc., etc.
So what I'm saying is, may we look forward to another battle with reptilians sometime in our future?
These are just questions.
Obviously, you can't answer them.
Yeah, let me say this.
You raise a lot of interesting questions of which I don't have answers.
And I just simply don't know this.
But I will say that we did another project called Area 51.
That's right.
And that was with the remotely with Dick Algaier, Dad Smith, and Aziz Brown.
And they were totally separated.
One was in Hawaii, one was in Britain, and the other one was in Thailand.
Oh, actually, Aziz Brown was in China at the time.
And that project, you had both Dick Algaier and Aziz Brown.
All three people found the desert, Found the buildings on the surface, described everything absolutely perfect under totally blind conditions.
And they all found the elevator shafts going down and they all went down.
And both Dick Algar and Aziz Brown described at the lower levels, reptilians.
And they both, under totally independent condition, none of them knew what the target was, the project was, nothing.
They both described the exact same thing.
And these reptilian guys were like really big.
I mean like really, really big.
They also have a strong smell, which is interesting that everyone seems, even on the current War in Heaven thing, that remote viewers notice something about the smell.
And the size and the skin and so on.
And they describe them sort of in terms of emotional levels very similarly.
But when you ask about reptilians, there are two answers.
The first is, except for the remote viewing data, We don't really have evidence that there are reptilians, but the remote viewing data comes through very clearly that there are.
And if you ask people about it, I'm thinking people like, who's the former governor of Minnesota?
He was a wrestler.
He had a TV show.
He had a TV show.
Yeah, well, Camelot made the sister TV show to his.
I can't remember his name.
Jerry?
No, no.
I know all of your audience members are saying at this point.
Yeah, I'm sure.
They know the person's name right in front of them.
They're saying, why can't you remember?
Anyway, that guy.
Yeah, conspiracy theory.
Jesse Ventura.
Yeah, yeah, Jesse Ventura.
I saw one episode where he was doing it, and he was just sort of harassing people and saying, where are the reptilians?
Where are the reptilians?
I don't see any reptilians!
Well, that's sort of a decent answer, and we always wondered about that as well until we finished the Area 51 project.
Now we know exactly where they are.
There's a whole large group of them in living facilities that are very deep under Area 51.
And the deeper you go, the larger the collection of those people are.
According to Camelot's witnesses, for the last 12 years we've been talked to about reptilians by military witnesses and people that have worked in black lives.
Yeah, but that's not what I do.
So I can't sort of...
No, I just want people to know that you might not know of that evidence, but I do.
Yeah, well, I don't know that, though, man.
I can just say what we have done.
Sure.
And what we have done is we did investigate...
Area 51, and we did find what we can describe as reptilians there.
And they were not particularly friendly, I must admit, and they were big in the physical characteristics totally match what we get in this war in heaven thing.
And it also was very clear that they were cooperating with the US military in Area 51.
So it wasn't like they were unknown to the US military.
um so you know the questions you raise of whether there'll be battles or anything like that i have no idea but i do suspect and i'm leaving the remote viewing data now and speculating i do suspect that there are factions within the united states military and the united states government trying to figure out what to do and probably some of the factions say these reptilian types are actually giving us technology and we should go along with them And other factions in the government and military are probably saying,
no, it's a bad idea.
And I am certain that this War in Heaven project is being looked at by the United States military and perhaps some elements in the government as well, not just the military part of the government.
And sort of adding that to the collection of Information they have and the discussions that they're having about this.
I'm sure they're totally split, and I'm sure they're fighting behind the scenes of what to do.
It's not just disclosure, whether you're going to disclose that extraterrestrials exist.
When you get to disclosure, you're really talking about a huge mess, and that's one of the reasons they don't want to talk about disclosure, because it's not just a simple thing of, oh, you picked up a radio signal from this distant star system, and everything's safe.
What you're talking about is disclosure...
That the aliens exist, that there's multiple groups of aliens, that there's been cooperation, that there's been all types of stuff that goes on behind the scenes.
It's a huge mess.
So disclosure is way beyond the confusion that you'd get with a Pandora's box.
So I don't have the answer to this and I don't want to actually say that one group is good and one group is bad.
That one group of extraterrestrials or one group of extraterrestrials is this way and the other group is that way.
All we want to do is report What we've gotten.
Add that to discussions.
And personally, I say that what we have gotten, we have shown the conditions under which we got the data.
We've given the complete body of data so people can see what we've gotten.
And we've given the track records of the people who we use to get the data.
So people can know not just somebody saying that they Did X, Y, Z, but they can see the track records of these people over long periods of time to see how good they are at doing this remote viewing.
And then they can take the information that we have with the War in Heaven, which is a ton of information, way more than you get from any other one single source, and add that to discussions.
So I think this is going to eventually change the tone of all of these discussions.
We don't need to speculate so much and guess.
We can say, okay, at least we know this much.
And based on this much, we can start asking people that do know more, governmental sources, things like that, for more information.
You're not going to get this information out of the military.
The military works for the government.
They don't run the government.
So you have to, the military is not going to We might disagree on whether they run the government or not, and whether our president is actually president because there was a military coup.
So I'm not going to go there at the moment, since that's not the purposes of this interview.
But I do appreciate what you're talking about, and I certainly agree that this I do think that the viewings, it adds to sort of a litany of information that I certainly have gotten from witnesses who did work for the military, as it happens.
And one of those people was William Tompkins, who passed away recently, who was basically sponsored by a portion of the military.
And talked about reptilians that were encountered by our astronauts on the moon and how they were influencing our space program.
So it appears that if you go by my information and then you take in account the viewings you're having of the past on Mars, it begins to look like we're having some of the same problems that the Martians did, if you want to look at it like that.
And I think that that's a very interesting line of inquiry.
It doesn't mean there's a conclusion here.
There's not.
But I think it would be actually negligent not to begin to put these pieces together or to attempt to do so.
What you're doing now is exactly what everybody else should be doing and everybody else is doing when they hear this.
So what we're doing is adding more information, a lot more information, to these things.
And everybody's going to have to come up with their own conclusion And there's going to be lots of arguments about, well, what about this?
What about this?
People are going to try to take everything that they've gotten from all different sources and try to make sense out of all of it.
So we're not trying to control that discussion.
Well, absolutely not, but you're certainly contributing to it, and I do want to thank you for that.
You know, what I'd like to do here, we've been going for a little while, and I know that you're generally under sort of time constraints, and I don't want to tire you.
Yeah, I wanted to wrap up, but it's been a good interview.
I appreciate you asking me these questions.
Thank you.
Now, some people in the chat, I just want to give them a brief bit of time here in case they have any burning questions.
Would you mind?
Okay, five more minutes.
We can do five more minutes.
Okay, one or two questions in case there's something that anyone wants to put into CAPS and ask now at this point.
I understand.
It may interest you to know that we're generating a huge amount of chat.
So it's going by really, really rapidly and it's hard for me to stop it and say, where is the question?
Well, look, there's a couple of reasons for this.
A, You're an engaging person, an engaging personality, a great interviewer, and B, it's an interesting topic.
Oh, absolutely.
I mean, it's a fascinating topic.
Okay, so I think...
If I grab this question, gosh, it's going by fast.
Okay, someone wants to know about mantis beings.
I'm not sure that that was in your viewing.
Have you ever had, maybe let me phrase that for the person, have you ever had your viewers talk about mantis beings?
It's okay.
We did not run into any mantis beings in this project.
However, if you look at the project we did on the Great Pyramid of Giza, which is one of the projects we released free.
It's a free version.
It's on our website.
You can see it on YouTube.
You will see Dick Allgaier, who ran into one of those beings, precisely one of those beings, and had a fascinating interaction with one.
That was one of those situations.
It doesn't happen often, but it does happen occasionally.
When the advanced extraterrestrial can actually see the remote viewer when you're interacting and they try to block it.
They actually try.
Now Aziz had that same type of experience with the reptilian and the Area 51 project.
Princess twice had an experience where she was remote viewing the prophet when he was getting the sort of the download from the alien guy.
And the alien immediately recognized that she was there.
But this time the alien didn't block her.
The alien invited her in and it was a three-way type of thing.
It was clear that the prophet was not in control of his mind.
He was not in control of what was going on.
But Princess was allowed to stay in control and the alien actually was in a three-way conversation.
And you actually got it caught totally right here in the studio.
And Princess was actually interacting with the guy.
And as soon as Princess started to focus more on him than on the prophet, he cut it off.
So he had the control to do that.
But Kerry, this allows me to bring up another point.
If I can just squeak it in for another 30 seconds here before we go to the next question.
This has happened more often than I would have ever expected it to happen.
So what we're going to be doing is we're going to be investing in new types of cameras.
In addition to the camera that we have, we're going to be having some full-spectrum cameras that catch the ultraviolet radiation, infrared, and all that stuff.
If these things happen, we want to be able to pick, because obviously if you're remote viewing somebody on 89 AD on the island of Patmos, and the alien can actually see you there, then there's probably some residual effect of the alien himself right here in the studio.
And I'd like to be able to see if we could possibly capture some type of glowing thing.
I'm not saying we're going to be successful, but...
We're going to try to convert one of our cameras just out of curiosity.
We'll keep our normal cameras the same, but we're going to have one camera we're going to convert into one of these ultra-spectrum type cameras just to see if we can pick up anything.
Okay, well, wonderful.
That's great.
That's fascinating.
Now, I want to ask you, you keep referring to this, the one who interacted with Patmos and with, I guess, was it Marina?
No, it was Princess Jeanne who was interacting with the alien.
But what race of beings was the alien?
Do you know?
He was tall.
He was whitish looking.
We don't know what kind of race he was but he might have he sort of remember you know sometimes you see discussions of greys where there's like a really tall big gray like really big one and they're like super beings they have like really intelligence and he was sort of like that um not quite human but understandable to us in a way that the emotions bonded he did not come across as like
a reptilian type which is cold and emotionless this guy was full-bodied in terms of and he was about our same height maybe a little taller but you clearly could relate to that person as you would relate to another human being she did describe he was very oh I don't want to say the word advanced but He's the type of person you'd really like to know.
And she could pick him out, and she told us very clearly that she could pick him out in a crowd.
So he wasn't so alien-looking that he couldn't blend into a crowd, but he was alien-looking enough that he was different.
That's not a good answer, but that's as close as I can get.
Okay.
Did she happen to mention the color of his skin?
Whitish.
Whitish.
Sort of.
And did he have hair or not?
It was either no hair or blonde or white type hair.
You know like you can have somebody that has white skin and black hair and you see the contrast?
That contrast was not there.
So if he did have skin, and she described this.
I'm trying to remember what she said.
She did say something about the hair.
She said either he has no hair or it's like very white or blondish type hair that sort of fits around the head and it doesn't have high contrast so it sticks out.
Okay, so just so you know the people that are in the chat if you're rude and if you say things that are sexually explicit Then I am reporting you, okay?
So don't bother.
You're not only going to be blocked from the channel, you're going to be reported to YouTube.
So please refrain from doing that sort of antisocial behavior.
I can say something about that.
If you're really upset about it and you're feeling the need to sort of swear and things like that, just consider this information that you're just hearing and you just think of it as...
Just, you know, something that you just don't have to condemn or approve of.
You're just hearing it.
And they say, well, we'll see.
And then wait 10 years to see if anything more comes out that's sort of throwing you one way or the other.
Okay.
So one last question.
Someone wants to know if you have information on what Ed Dames calls the kill shot.
That's the most ridiculous idea I've ever heard in my life.
I don't want to even talk about it.
All right.
Fair enough.
Okay, well, it's been great again to talk to you, Courtney.
It's fascinating what you're doing.
I want to applaud it.
I like encouraging it.
I love the work that your viewers are doing, and I think everyone does appreciate it.
We've had...
Quite a large audience tonight.
Just so you know, a live audience is hard to come by at any time, and so good for you.
And we will put this on the internet, obviously, and the people will continue to see it.
Now, why don't you give your website where people can write to you and all of the information so that people can get in touch.
I think they will have reason to do so.
I also want to say...
In this day and age of extreme competition between all types of different news sources and YouTube channels and everything, thank you all for tuning in and listening to myself and Kerry Cassidy talk it over.
So our website is farsight.org, F-A-R-S-I-G-H-T, like seeing far, farsight.org, because we're a non-profit.
And that means I don't own the non-profit.
We also have a For-profit, Farsight Inc., which is the one that actually sells videos.
But most of the stuff on the website, like 90% of everything is free, and all that's done by the non-profit.
And all of this stuff that we've talked about today, you can find on that website in a very easily organizable way.
So just start with Farsight.org.
And when you finally go to our videos, in the War in Heaven project, there's a bunch of videos you can see on YouTube.
The trailers are very informative by themselves, especially the target reveal.
And when you go to our YouTube channel, I appreciate if you subscribe.
And also, the most important thing is if you can subscribe not only to the YouTube channel, but sign up for our free newsletter.
We never give out the addresses for anything, and we only send out information when we have a new project coming up.
It's the easiest way to sort of, that plus the YouTube channel is the easiest way to keep up with what we're doing.
Since we're non-profit, we don't advertise at all.
So the only way to hear about what we do is get notified by YouTube or from the email newsletter.
Okay, and just really quickly, any future plans that you want to talk about?
We have two projects in the works right now and many more that will come after that.
And I think you know me well enough, Carrie, to know I'm not going to be talking about them at all.
If I talk about them, I have to cancel the project because there's no news going on right this very second.
But I can tell you they will be as exciting as you can imagine when they eventually come out, which we're probably not too far away from.
I think we'll probably have one come out.
Let me see.
This is January.
Probably sometime in March it'll be out.
Excellent.
Yeah, so we're trying to wrap that one up.
Then we have another one.
That's going on after that.
We have two simultaneously.
We have five remote viewers we work with now, which is new for us.
Normally, we used to, in the old days, we worked just with Daz Smith and Dick Algar.
But now we've got Aziz Brown, Princess Janae, and Melina Hall.
So we have, you know, it took them a long time to get through their training, years.
You're talking years of every single week, 20 hours a week for week after week with no break.
And so we have them now.
Excellent.
And they have a level of training that nobody else has.
And these projects are starting to come out.
Excellent.
Well, it's a lot of fun to hear about them and to watch the videos.
And I do encourage people to follow your project.
So thanks again and have a great night, Courtney.
Same with you.
And Carrie, I do want to say to all of your viewers that One of the great things about Carrie is her open-mindedness.
She considers every possibility, no matter how crazy or outlandish, and that's the trouble with everybody else on the planet.
You don't have to agree with the possibilities.
You don't have to go one way or the other, but you just have to ask the questions.
And one of the great things about Carrie is she doesn't exclude anything.
She lets anything possibly be asked And I wish that was more common with everybody else.
So I hope you're a bit contagious, Carrie.
All right.
Well, thank you very much.
All right.
You take care and we'll see you again, I hope, in the near future.
I hope so, too.
Okay.
Bye-bye.
All right.
So that's our show for tonight.
And it's very funny.
So it is fascinating.
I do encourage you to watch the War in Heaven video and to watch the results.
And it's quite, it is really kind of spellbinding.
In many ways, it's like watching an actual movie, I have to say, because they do describe, the viewers are clearly being Emotionally affected by what they're viewing and they are also maintaining their focus and it's a fascinating study to see that go on and to see them being professional in the face of amazing information coming through.
You can imagine if you're kind of on the scene watching at least seeing like a movie in front of you a very destructive war and the same time you're Conveying it to people through this process, making drawings on a board and so on and so forth.
So using their protocols, etc.
Remote viewing is similar in some ways to being psychic and the only thing that I think someone was asking in the chat is that remote viewers tend to want to be trained in these ways through protocols to help eliminate The problems that natural psychics have with being accurate.
So there is conjecture as to which is better and how much the fact that it has been said by various remote viewers, I can say this much, that the best remote viewers are psychic.
I can say I believe that's the case.
That doesn't mean Courtney would agree with me.
He's no longer talking here, but I have heard that.
And that lots of the remote viewers that have been quite famous have been psychics as well, such as Pat Price and Joe McMonigle and others.
So I want to thank everyone for watching tonight.
Paladin's going to be with me tomorrow at 4 p.m.
in the afternoon Pacific time.
And we're going to be talking about the deep state secret government funding following the money, which is what the White Hats do in their White Hats reports.
And all of that is on my website, and I'll be putting the banner up for that as soon as possible.
So...
Tune in tomorrow at 4 p.m.
if you're interested in getting an update from the White Hats and information about the high-yield trading programs that have been funding black projects for many, many years, as well as other things that the White Hats have uncovered about the fraud involving the monetary system, etc.
So have a great night, and I'll be back tomorrow.
Take care.
▲
Export Selection