All Episodes
Previous Next
July 25, 2017 - Project Camelot
01:23:46
KEITH HUNTER: NORTH KOREA & NUCLEAR TESTING
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Hi, everyone.
I'm Carrie Cassidy from Project Camelot, and I am here today with Keith Hunter, and I'm going to bring him on the screen here.
And it's great to have you here, Keith.
Say hello to everyone.
Hello.
How's everybody going?
Okay, and hopefully our sound is good and so on.
What I'm going to do is just...
Read a very, very brief bio and then ask you to introduce yourself for people who are not familiar with you and your work.
And basically, Keith is the author of the book Lost Age of High Knowledge.
It regards ancient sites, stargates portals, military installations worldwide, as well as nuclear reactors and how they are purposely linked through sacred geometry Laylines and Hyperdimensional Physics to Access the Power of the Earth.
And his website, let me see if I actually can share it here briefly on the screen.
So wait one second here.
There's two words, it's occultphysics and ancientworldmistress.com.
Okay.
Oh, there's actually, you have more than one website.
Alright, well, we've got one on the screen here that we're going to show people.
And...
Just going to make sure that we're all...
People are able to hear us okay.
And so today we're going to be talking about...
North Korea and there's actually a this is a sort of a I think you might call it a follow-up show to the show we did well it was it wasn't that long ago maybe a month ago or two and it was also concerning North Korea and the nukes and their testing and so on at that time you made a couple of sort of predictions based on your model and it turns out that one of the predictions it seems came true And hopefully you
will share that with us as to how that happened and so on.
So welcome, Keith.
And please do let us know where you want to go with this discussion with regard to your research and how your prediction came true with regard to what it was last time and what actually happened.
Yeah, just briefly then.
There's no feedback there, is there?
Just briefly then, with regards to my research contained in my book and on my website, my entry into the esoteric subject, if you will, was all to do with ancient systems of measure, angular measure like degrees, minutes and seconds of arc.
And this idea of the Earth once had an ideal orbit of 360 days.
And when I studied all of that, I not only found out that there are special ideal cycles associated with the solar system, there are also special arc-length distance units which are a part of that time-based system.
As we think of days, for example, days per year, or solar days, one rotation of the Earth, time-based systems.
So I found out that there is a A series of units based upon what are essentially current British imperial units, feet, inches, statute of miles, fathoms, etc., that are used by the United States as well.
We use the same kind of system.
And I found out that when I looked at some of the megalithic monuments, the ancient sites, I found out that there were special arc length measures, curved arc distances over the surface of the Earth, like connecting them up.
So we might see, for example, somewhere in Egypt and then somewhere in Britain, you've got an arc distance connecting them over the surface of the Earth.
And you find out that these arc distances have special ratio combinations to other dimensions like the equatorial circumference of the Earth and also special cuboid grid patterns.
And What I found was that not just that, you could look at certain military intelligence type bases like the Pine Gap base in Australia by the US that does signals intelligence and what have you.
And also Menwith Hill, another similar installation in the United Kingdom.
And then you've got some sites like Buckley Air Force Base in the United States.
And I found that these arc length measures, these distance arcs over the earth, Again, they had the same kind of signature patterns as you have with these ancient megalithic monuments.
So, when I was looking at this kind of thing, I'd also come across the work of Bruce Cathy, who looked at Earth energy grid systems, and he said something very interesting in his books.
He actually thought that when nuclear bombs are activated, that they too, at the moment they were activated, They had special arc distance measures connecting the ground position of the bone to the ground position of the Sun mapped onto the Earth.
And so you could look at these arc distances and they too would have special ratios related to the Earth, just like these ancient megalitic sites, just like these signals intelligence facilities.
So it seemed to suggest that In some way, there's an association between the activation of nuclear weapons and special distances on the ground, where you imagine a straight line connecting the centre of the Earth to the centre of the Sun at any instantaneous moment.
That line will pierce through the surface of the Earth, so you've got a latitude-longitude coordinate on the ground for where the sun is.
So if you look at that and then you look at a latitude-longitude coordinate on the ground for where the bomb is and when it's activated, you'll have a precise instantaneous arc measure.
And these arc measures are of special distances and they're related to other arc measures Also tied to the bomb, also tied to the sun, and the earth itself, and you have special ratios.
And these ratios, as encoded, reveal something about the, if you will, esoteric physics involved here.
I have, as I say, I have changed my mind over time regarding nuclear weapons, and I'll just at least state my position here, and that is, when scientists design nuclear weapons, they will calculate a certain yield.
They'll have, like, an estimated yield For the device upon activation.
It's my contention that if you were to take a nuclear bomb, let's say the design yield was say one megaton, and you place it anywhere you like on the earth and activate it at any time, essentially without thought, then I think you'll get very close in an idealized way to your design yield.
But if you say to yourself, I'm going to activate the bomb somewhere and I'm going to choose a certain special latitude, Where there's an arc distance from the equator to the bomb, and maybe that arc distance fits into the equatorial circumference of the Earth a whole number of times.
If you go for some sort of special signature like that present upon activation, right, then you have the opportunities to severely modify the yield of the weapon.
And this, I believe, is possible in one of two ways.
I think that there are certain signatures which can boost the yield, Even multiple times what the design yield is.
For example, Bravo, Castle Bravo, which was the 15 megaton device the US tested in 1954.
That particular device had a calculated yield roughly of about between four to six megatons.
It was about two and a half times greater than what they expected.
And again, I want to give you the precise example of that one on screen because They were basically conducting this test with special consideration to the location of the sun.
So I do think that you can boost the yields of nuclear weapons when you trigger them at certain locations.
And again, it's not the location that matters.
It's a dynamic thing because you're looking at...
Not necessarily just the location, but when you activate it, because there are arc measures, curved arc distances, great circle arcs, connecting the Sun to the bomb at the moment it is activated.
So if you place a bomb at a certain location, you just wait and the Earth's rotating.
That arc length connecting the two on the Earth's surface is dynamically changing from moment to moment.
So you can choose certain latitudes which are special.
You could say in and of themselves, sure.
But the other components that relate to the sun, they're dynamically changing.
So it's not so much that you have to choose a certain location.
You can pretty much choose anywhere, but you've got to have certain signatures present.
And I believe that they interact in a resonance-based way to modify the yield if you make use of them.
But the other thing is, this goes...
Okay.
Yes.
Thank you for that.
But at this time, what I'd like to do, actually, is have you explain how you had a prediction.
Sorry about that.
I'm going to move on to this, Kelly, because what I was going to say next was that the same physics that is encoded on a part of nuclear weapons It's also made use of with respect to scalar beam weapons technology.
This is highly exotic stuff.
And this is what I want to talk about with regards to the North Korean situation.
Now, let me just show you a little picture.
This is Thomas Bearden's book, where he talks about Soviet-scale electromagnetic weapons.
And he cites lots of references in this book, witness testimony, pilots flying commercial airliners.
Seeing strange tests going off around Russia in the sea, and one of them where you have what seems to be a nuclear bomb going off, you have the mushroom cloud, but they also create expanding spheres above the nuclear test.
The expanding spheres are via scalar beam weapon systems.
So what I'm trying to say is, if you trigger a nuclear bomb somewhere and you have a special signature, With regards to the sun, special ratios, you can also use scalar beam weapon systems and interfere the beams at a distance, and that location where they interfere, you can then boost the signature of that.
So just let me briefly summarize again what Bearden says about scalar beam weapons.
A scalar beam is simply this.
If you've got a standard electromagnetic beam of a standard Electromagnetic spectrum, yeah?
A certain frequency.
Coherent beam, yeah?
You take that beam and you have another one.
If you were to interfere both of them in a device, so to speak, and let a single beam come out of it, then what you'd have, if you were to have them in phase perfectly, you'd have the amplitudes.
If you had two beams like this, they'd go like this.
You would still have a beam of the electromagnetic spectrum, but you'd increase the amplitudes.
You'd stack them up, so to speak.
That's when you combine two electromagnetic beams which are in phase.
If you put them 180 degrees out of phase and you mix them up and send out a beam out of your device, Somebody who's just stood there in front of your device with some measuring instruments would not record any electromagnetic signature, no magnetic fields, no electric fields.
They literally say, hey, nothing's coming out of your device, as if you have cancelled the beam.
Well, this is not so.
You have not cancelled the electric and magnetic components and eliminated them.
You have enfolded them, and you've created a beam of a different type, and this is a scalar beam.
So if you take two beams, electromagnetic beams, and put them out of phase 180 degrees, you infold the electric and magnetic components and create a beam which Now can go faster than the standard speed of light and which has very little interaction with matter.
So such a beam pointed directly through the Earth, say, will just fly straight through the Earth to the other side with seemingly having resistance.
Very minimal matter interaction.
But here's the key thing.
If you have two scalar beams that you generate at two different sites, say, fire them thousands of miles, they could be sites which are thousands of miles apart, and you fire them And you interfere them at a distance.
In that interference zone there, the electromagnetic effects re-emerge.
Okay?
So you can have intense heat generated in expanding spheres, like in that diagram, or you can even have intense cold generated.
You can withdraw energy or pump it in and have a sudden emergence of these kinds of phenomena like that.
Now, this has importance with the guys in North Korea because...
There's quite a few people out there that have got these beams, and what they are doing is they've got different sites, and they're firing a scalar beam from one site, firing one from another site.
They're going straight through the Earth, and they're targeting precise coordinates underneath the Earth and interfering the beams.
The electromagnetic effects re-emerge there, and they emerge inside the Earth, even there can be hundreds of miles inside the Earth, right?
And if they do it, and the precise coordinates they target, they have a certain special ratio connection to the Sun, like with nuclear weapons, you can boost your signal.
And at that point where the beams interfere, you can generate a significant seismic event, an artificial earthquake, if you will.
You could attack another country with these kinds of weapons via earthquakes.
And so what I was talking about in our previous interview...
As I mentioned, I said, we've got five nuclear tests on record from 2006 to the present that North Korea has conducted at their main testing site.
They all have various seismic signatures.
The last one they did last year in September, the highest seismic signature at their test site was 5.3 on, say, the Richter scale.
And this gave it an energy yield of about 11 kilotons or 11.6 kilotons.
Now to compare that, Hiroshima was 15 kilotons when Hiroshima was bombed Japan in 1945.
So they seem to have got to a level with their standard nuclear weapons programs, at least officially.
If we just go by the seismic signatures, the special formulas they can use to Transform the magnitude of the seismic event to find out what the yield is of a nuclear device.
So we've got that.
And those formers are different for different locations, by the way.
They depend upon the ground, because depending on the ground itself, Energy moves through it in a waveform at different rates.
So there are special formulas that you have to use, and you'll use different formulas for converting a seismic signature to, say, a TNT nuclear equivalent based upon where you are.
So we know that for the five tests that North Korea did.
But it's also the case, though, that what I said in the previous interview was There was an article, a very interesting article that came up with the Daily Mail Online in 2014.
And this pointed towards...
It's a story that just kind of broke and briefly made the, you know, front page of their news website.
And it was this statement that North Korea was testing some new form of nuclear energy.
It just was a bit vague.
And after that statement had been made, a couple of days later or so, There was an unusual seismic signature, an earthquake that occurred off the Korean Peninsula to the west.
And it was about 5.0 as a signature underneath the seabed, so quite some way down.
And so I thought, right, this could well be an artificially generated earthquake created via scalar beams.
Now, the reason why I asked for this follow-up interview, Kerry, is because...
Just two weeks ago, July the 12th, we have had another seismic signature appear off the Korean Peninsula.
And this was to the east of the Korean Peninsula.
This gave a seismic signature underneath the seabed a few hundred miles down at about 5.9.
Now, we all know that the situation politically with North Korea is they're under so much pressure To not continue with their nuclear testing.
And there's a lot of worry here.
And you've got like Donald Trump trying to put aircraft carriers into the region, talking to China, you know, putting pressure on North Korea to stop what they're doing.
And I don't necessarily think this is all to do with nuclear weapons.
I think that they've now got the technology to basically create earthquakes at any precise point somewhere on the earth, I would imagine, the scalar beams.
And they can create earthquakes of significant seismic signatures to essentially attack other countries in very subtle ways.
So also demonstrating significant seismic signatures with earthquakes leads you to believe that they've got the same kinds of weapons, energy yields in their nuclear, their actual nuclear warheads that they want to put on their missiles.
So what we've had then is recently North Korea's Flown an ICBM demonstrating that it could at least get to Alaska.
Part of this presentation here, I'm going to show you that they can absolutely get to mainland USA with their ICBMs.
But more than that, this particular seismic event that occurred, this 5.9, that occurred 12th of July, just two weeks ago, I spoke about the importance of arc distance measures.
And how they're important in terms of energetically boosting the signal.
What they have done with this particular event, though, is not just demonstrated a significant yield increase on what they could before.
First seismic signature at C2014 is 5.0.
This one, 5.9.
In terms of seismic signatures, every one-point increase is 13 times more powerful, okay?
So it's not just a linear thing.
The critical evaluation of the arc distance measures associated with this test here not only reveals definitely it's North Korean, but also it reveals the North Korean strategy You see,
if North Korea is attacked, and we've seen these punishment attacks, say, that we've had against Syria, yeah, we've seen Donald Trump dropped a Moab bomb, the massive ordnance airburst on Syria and whatever.
So, we've seen this kind of thing here.
And it seems that North Korea has, in a really clever way, really clever, encoded in this seismic event they've generated, Exactly what their response will be if they are attacked and their response is going to be a nuclear attack specifically against mainland USA and specifically against Japan and what I'm going to show you here is the proof of that.
So I want to show you some connections in the show.
Okay, okay.
Sorry, but at this point what I want to do is actually I'm sorry I could get my video going here.
So It's still, I appreciate what you say they are sending a message with the earthquake, but what I don't understand is the earthquake, you believe, who generated that earthquake?
North Korea.
So you believe North Korea generated their own earthquake and sent a message by doing so.
Is that the idea?
Oh yes, absolutely.
Okay.
And you believe they did this using scalar weapons.
Is that correct?
Yes.
Interfering with each other, in essence.
And, I mean, that is interesting.
You know there could be another scenario, though.
Obviously, the United States could have generated that earthquake.
Unlikely, but why do you say that?
Because they have...
Now, I understand that you're saying that they have...
I don't know, you're saying maybe scalar weapons are causing earthquakes, but I know for a fact they have something called a tectonic weapon that generates earthquakes that is not, I don't think, the same thing as what you're talking about in terms of the scalar.
So...
It is something, you know, this is something known called weather wars, of course, and they're constantly doing this.
They're generating earthquakes all over the planet, sometimes sending messages between Illuminati that are kind of at war with each other, in essence, and sending messages to governments as well, such as the ones in Italy not long ago, and so on.
I appreciate the idea that you're saying they generated their own earthquake near their country, but wouldn't it be more logical if they wanted to send a message to America, they wouldn't generate an earthquake near their country, they would generate an earthquake near America that would have that signature of some kind.
So what this seems more likely is actually that the earthquake itself Would be a warning from the United States.
Well, as I said, this is a fault to the present interview and what I've got to show you is that there are intimate associations between the seismic event that just occurred a few weeks ago and the non-nuclear tests carried out by North Korea.
And I specifically made this kind of prediction.
I know.
Okay, well, let's look at this a little deeper because you could also say the United States is also aware of this.
Obviously, Secret Space Program is aware of this coordination, this kind of way of sending messages.
So what if they actually are sending North Korea the message, specifically highlighting that if you do this, we're going to do that.
In other words, if you target the United States with your weapons, Then, you know, we have an earthquake weapon that will do something maybe in orders of magnitude greater than what perhaps a nuclear bomb might do.
I'm not saying that what I'm saying is correct.
I'm saying that it's important to keep, because it's lines of, you're now talking about communication between powers.
And these weapons are a way for them to communicate.
And whereas you could be correct about this generation, it just seems to me unlikely that they would cause an earthquake near themselves.
Much more likely, if you're sending a message, you send a message, you send it to where you want it to go.
This earthquake could have been caused by the United States.
Just my thoughts.
Okay, so at this point, where do you want to go with this theory that you have?
I'm going to share my screen with you and show you the two Daily Mail articles for both of them and the USGS, United States Geological Survey, signatures for both of them.
Let me just press this share screen button and I hope this works.
Oh, here we go.
Add extension.
I don't know where.
Is that working?
Share.
Right.
So, can you see my screen then?
Yes.
Okay.
So, not that one.
Yeah, okay.
Do you see on screen then?
You've got five little blobs here.
And we've got five listings.
Is that coming up?
Yes.
So this is the USGS and you can see it says nuclear explosion on all these things here.
This is Korea.
This is their main testing site.
We're really zoomed in on it.
And they actually list all these signatures here.
So these are the known ones and these are what I analyzed them before.
Now this here is a Daily Mail article that came out 1st of April 2014 And I know it's April Fool's Day.
Don't anybody get me on that one, okay?
I'm going to show you this is not an April Fool's Day.
But it came out 1st of April, 2014.
And it says here, earthquake off coast of North Korea.
Sparks, fears, Kim Jong-un has carried a threat to hold, quote, nuclear tests.
But when it says it, it comes just two days after the saber-rattling state threatened to launch it, quote, new form of nuclear power tests.
New form.
Very interesting.
They give the time here, 7.48 p.m.
yesterday GMT. This is according to the U.S. Geological Survey, okay?
And this is the epicenter of it here near Korean Peninsula.
So this article then, a lot of people are looking at it and saying, well, okay, we've heard the article, but we don't think they're really doing it.
Well, let me just show you this map here.
This is the USGS. This is the event right here if I click on it.
And it says 5.0, and it says 130 kilometers southwest of North Korea.
And then it's the precise time, 2014, 31st of March, 19 hours, 48 minutes, 36 seconds.
That's it right there.
Well, what we've just had then, very recently, just a few weeks ago, is this.
Magnitude, 6.0 earthquake hits off the coast of North Korea, sparking fears.
Kim Jong-un has detonated another nuclear bomb before experts insist it was a genuine quake.
No, it was not a genuine quake, if you mean natural.
So this article, as you can see, is the 12th of July 2017.
So this is about three years after the previous one.
There he is smiling away.
Kim Jong-un and you can see that it talks about this quake going 348 miles deep.
This is what I said about scalar beams and why these devices you can trigger an earthquake by interfering the beams because they have very minimal interaction with matter.
They can go straight through the earth so you can target a location deep underground and initiate your earthquake there.
So here's the earthquake on screen.
Now let's look at the USGS for it.
Here it is, and there it is again.
Now I want to draw people's attention to the first thing, and I really hope this is sharp.
I'm going to click on this link here, and I'm going to click on the other one here.
This is the 5.01.
Here is the time, 31st of March 2014.
Now look here at the universal time.
Universal time at UTC, Greenwich Mean Time, for the Dane question.
19 hours, 48 minutes, 36 seconds.
Now let's look at the other one.
Universal time for the one just a few weeks ago.
19 hours, 48 minutes, 8 seconds.
They are bang on the same hour and minute of the Dane question.
That's the first connection right there.
So we've got a story here.
About three years ago, Of some kind of nuclear test.
Just rumors put out there, but it's an earthquake under the sea.
And then a few weeks ago, three years later than that, we've got another one.
And it just happened to be the same hour and day, hours and minutes of the day in question when they were done.
So that's the first thing I want to draw your attention to.
That this is certainly not new to chance.
And this is a nice connection here.
With respect to North Korea.
Let me actually address this, though.
See, again, it's not that your information is incorrect.
It's simply that the method of communication is also revealing who's sending the message.
So this is the question.
The question is not whether the earthquake's man-made.
It is.
It's targeted.
It is.
But who sent it?
Did North Korea send it?
Or is it a warning to North Korea right around the time when they're supposed to be doing a nuclear test or want to do a nuclear test from the powers that be?
And the UTC time is...
This is British time.
And this is also the 19...
Again, when you get into the area of the 19.5, you know the Hoagland information about 19.5, etc.
So I think what you need to do in this regard is...
Think about who's actually sending the message and where the warnings are coming from.
There's no doubt that nuclear tests are being done and that Korea wants to basically escalate things from their point of view, although some of it may be more sort of a tiger roaring than an actual, what you might say, in terms of bringing people...
Their awareness.
In other words, they're not necessarily...
It's like a conversation.
We don't think of large countries having to have a conversation that involves violence, but this is exactly the kind of thing that they do to each other.
These are the kinds of warnings they shoot at each other.
So please do continue, but I just want to say the time you selected is...
That's, again, you're focusing on what is, in essence, British time.
Yeah, universal time.
To any meantime, it's used by astronomers.
This is the fixed one everybody uses, universal time.
I admit it's based on the prime meridian that runs through Britain, obviously.
Absolutely.
With the gas, as I say, that's the first connection.
And what I am going to show you here, Kerry, is why I'm convinced these are North Korean tests designed to Basically, tell the United States, put you on a warning that if you attack, they're going to attack you.
Because the message, if you will, encoded in this particular event is one which explicitly, in an undeniable way, tells the US exactly which city North Korea is going to attack with a nuclear attack and explicitly which Japanese city they're going to attack with a nuclear attack if you attack them.
The signature tells you that very precise information and that is why I'm convinced that it is a North Korean But let me just go on to show you...
Okay, and you know, because my specialty is communication, let me say that there's another, you know, this is how spies talk to each other.
If I know what your plans are, I'm going to mirror back what your plans are so that you realize that I know what you have in mind.
So there are layers to communication.
And I'm not saying...
It's one way or the other.
I'm just saying let's keep an open mind as to who's sending what message to whom because there's more than one way to interpret this.
If I know your plans and I decide to give you a message, I'm going to send that message back to you mirroring what your plans are.
So it doesn't change the fact that North Korea may have these plans.
It just changes who's sending the message, North Korea to us, Or them, you know, or vice versa.
So it's an interesting thing.
This is, you know, when you study spycraft, for example, this is the kind of thing that goes on.
Gordon Duff is sending messages constantly around the world using Veterans Today, for example, writing articles.
Some of those articles may appear to be even positive towards certain developments, etc.
They may be...
Laughing in somebody's face.
They may be sending a message that they're well aware that you're about to release this information, so we're going to one-up you and do it before you do.
There are all kinds of games that they play with each other.
But you're right on in the sense that you're tapping into this game and you're definitely getting, you know, the messages.
It's just the question only is who's sending them and each time they happen, you know, that sort of thing.
So continue, please.
Okay, I'll just show you then the signature of this device and I'll do the screen share and show people a few things here.
Okay, so let me see now.
We are now on with this.
This first diagram you can see is of the Earth and here I've isolated a few things, right?
So we've got the equator of the Earth here This target here, the circle with the cross in it, is for, say, a given nuclear bomb position, a map BP. And as I said before, if you freeze the solar system at any given time, you freeze the rotation of the Earth, then from the center of the Earth going out to the center of the Sun, that line pierces through the Earth's surface, and that's the Sun ground position.
So you're going to have coordinates, latitude and longitude for the Sun, coordinates for the bomb.
And at the instant the bomb's triggered, you will invariably find that these arc distances, the direct grid circle arc connecting the two over the Earth, will tie into, or be a special ratio to say, the arcland separation between the latitude where the bomb is and the latitude where the Sun is, the pure latitude separation.
You'll invariably find them and you'll also Find them ratio-wise tied to one another and tied in to the size of the Earth.
And I'll just show you this one here.
This is another one.
You'll find significant arc measures from the equator, from the equator right up to where the bomb is.
These are elliptical arcs over the Earth's ellipsoid.
And again, it's the precise instant the bomb goes off.
And again, the arc length, great circle arc connecting the Sun to the equator.
And you'll also find the longitude separation at the equator between them both.
When you look at the pure longitude separation of the two things at the moment the event happens.
Now, you could substitute in here the bomb for a seismic signature, an earthquake, and you'd find invariably special ratios between these values.
So let me just show you a few here.
This is nuclear bomb-wise.
This is ivy.
The Ivy Series.
And it was Mike and King.
So King's the second device of the Ivy Series.
And this is just a Google Earth I used.
Here's the center of the Earth, say.
If you imagine it right deep inside.
And here is the location of the bomb.
That's where the bomb went off.
And I think this one was at Eniwetak or Bikini.
I think it's Eniwetak.
But that's right where it is.
And the instant it went off, the ground position of the Sun was here.
And the great circle arc connecting them was this value here in feet, in statute of miles, 2,543.
Now, if we just go here, Castle Bravo, 1954.
This is the 15-megaton bomb.
And again, at the instant it went off, you've got the Sun ground position here, the great circle arc connecting over the Earth to where Bravo went off.
Is this value here about 35.8 million feet or about 6,781 miles?
Now, because the Earth's rotating on its axis at any given time, these arc distances are changing dynamically by about 1,500 feet every second or so.
So it's interesting that when you compare the Great Circle arc of one event, this one here to this one here, you do a ratio between them This is what you get, a numeric sequence, 2.666 or recurring almost dead on, which is the basic fraction 8 over 3.
Now, that's an incredible thing, and the error rate there to achieve that perfect fraction is only a couple of hundred feet.
So you can see how if an arc measure with relevance to a king is significant in boosting the yield in some way via resonance tied to the Earth itself, a basic harmonic You know, a special harmonic ratio links to that will also work for Bravo.
So these are the kinds of ratios you see when you start evaluating nuclear tests.
You can also get them when you evaluate earthquakes.
Here's one with the gas to Hiroshima.
This is the precise date, universal time, 5th of August 1945.
15 kilotons or 15,000 tons of TNT. There's a precise time.
The geodetic bump coordinates then are here.
And the sun ground position here.
And here we've got the BOM to sun ground latitude position.
This is it here.
And we've got the small circle latitude separation.
Those are some of the arcs in the diagrams.
Now, what I want to draw attention to though, ladies and gentlemen, is the pure longitude separation.
We've got here, for the BOM, the longitude is 132.4581 east.
Coordinates, longitude for the Sun, 167.546 west.
Well, if you basically look then at the distance separating them on the equator, you get this value here.
It's 21912406.
These are all in feet, by the way.
They're all in feet, because I do use feet for accuracy.
But that right there is the distance on the plane of the equator Between the longitude of Hiroshima, the bomb, and the longitude where the Sun is, which is this E value here, yeah?
If you think the Sun went off somewhere, and we look at it where the equator is, and the bomb went off, Hiroshima, you look in the equator, the E value here, that's what this value here is in feet.
This value is the circumference of the equator.
So if you do a basic, you know, ratio, Kuwaita divided by that, you get the number six almost dead on.
Again, accuracy on this is just a few hundred feet.
So it means that the precise instant Nagasaki was bombed, you get this incredible ratio.
These are the kinds of connections that you get when you evaluate nuclear weapons.
And you get them also when you look at the earthquakes as well.
I've just looked at those then, and let me just show you the North Korean ones.
These are the North Korean earthquakes, and these are the two seismic events.
So we've got the equator to the bomb, that's their test site north of the equator, which is zero degrees to this latitude here.
These are the latitudes.
These in feet are going up to where the bomb sites are, their main testing sites from the USGS diagram I showed you.
These ones here, this is bomb-sun-latitude separation.
This is a separation between just the pure latitude of where the bomb is and the pure latitude of where the sun is over the Earth.
Again, in feet.
Again, these distances are invariably thousands of miles, but they're all in feet.
And then we've got sun to bomb direct.
This is the great circle arc connecting up the position of the bomb to the position of the sun at the moment.
It went off.
Now, here are the two seismic events in the bottom, and it's the same analysis Same arc measures.
In this case, I'll just call it equator to event.
Event, sun-latitude, separation.
Sun to event.
It's a seismic event, not a bomb as such.
But we've got all the same arc measures here.
And again, you can see the universal time in 1948 thing.
If I go here, what I want to show you, first of all, is this.
Because this refers back to our previous issue.
So we've got North Korea, the fifth test they did last year, the last test, Creating a 5.3 signature.
That there is the Sun to Bomb direct arc.
This then, the seismic sea event just occurred 12th of July.
We have these three distances here then.
Okay?
These are the three arc distances that we get.
And these are generated by looking at the time it went off and the longitude and latitude We're good to go.
In this case, plus, this is above the equator.
It will minus it be lower than the equator.
Greenwich hour angle is usually expressed from 0 to 360 degrees west of the prime meridian.
So you can sometimes change it to going 180 degrees west or 180 degrees to the east.
So these are, for the seismic signatures to occur then, according to USGS, this is its latitude north of the equator.
This then, in feet, It's the value you get when you calculate it using a great circle calculator based on an ellipsoid Earth model.
If you look at this one here, the Sun's latitude plus 21 degrees or so.
Because this is already plus, this is about half what you had before.
So this is in feet approximately 6.8 million feet.
So that's the separation there.
And the final one, this is the great circle arc connecting up the longitude and latitude of seismic event, the top, to where the sun is.
And that's the value in feet there.
So I'm just showing you those right there.
That's sorted out with that.
So that's where we get these three figures from.
Keith, you know, I appreciate this, but what happens is these numbers may mean a lot to you.
I think to the viewers, unless somebody is really kind of following your line of reasoning and sort of very into the numerical sort of situation going on here, I think that they're going to be a little bit confused.
It would be better at this moment if you actually...
Jump to the chase, sort of, to what do the numbers mean?
You can throw the numbers up on a chart.
People can look at it later.
But going through number by number, it doesn't really help us.
I think what we need is your conclusions based on the numbers.
Yeah, I'm just getting to them right now because I've got the numbers in front of you.
I just want to show you how, ratio-wise, these ratios are significant.
And...
This is the money shot, so to speak, first of all.
North Korea's fifth test, right, this here, bomb to sun direct outing feet.
These are two of the elements already shown here.
And if you look at the ratios, that's one divided by the other, and then an inverse ratio is one over that.
You'll see these basic fractions here.
Very accurate fractions, or seven recurring sequence here.
This one's 1.75 almost dead on.
This one's almost fours recurring.
So you get these basic fractions here.
And again, these are just in no way due to chance.
There's no way that this can be due to chance.
They're so accurate.
So this is what makes me believe that this seismic event is tied in to North Korea.
Okay?
Okay.
And I said in a previous interview that we did, I said that if they did any kind of test, if they did another nuclear test, in this case they have, it's just using scalar beams, they would base their ratios, you know,
they would do their tests at a precise location so that the arc length measures connecting up the sun to the test will And the arc measures tied to the equator will be significant fractions of Hiroshima, Nagasaki and Tsar Bomber.
And this is the test I showed you here with some of the frequent ratios, 1.728, 0.8, 2.7.
And this is one of the components of the seismic event in 2014.
These are the great circle arcs.
So you get that.
So what I was just going to show you was this.
This is Tsar Bomber.
One of the devices I just mentioned.
This is the seismic sea event.
These are the two arc measures associated with the epicenter to equator.
That's just a straight-out latitude from the equator right up to the epicenter of the event.
And this, again, is a latitude separation.
So, if we've got Zarboma, this is the great circle arc from the bomb to the sun at the moment it went off.
When we look at the ratio, this divided by this, This divided by this, right?
What we get is this.
We get an inverse pattern.
I hope you can see this, Kerry.
4.65 here.
Almost dead on 4.65 here.
This one's 2.15.
This one's 2.15.
You get these ratios.
Again, that's just impossible.
That's due to chance.
Sure.
And I'll give you another one.
Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
Again, these are the great circle arcs.
These are the same two events here that I've just used here, seismic event 2014.
So if we divide that by that and that one by that one, what ratios do we get?
And the answer is identical, an absolutely identical set with extreme accuracy, 1.377, 1.3.
I mean, again, no way is this due to chance.
The ratios here are too precise.
They're just way too precise to be due to chance.
So this is what I was saying before in our previous interview that, you know, they liked to base their events when the arc lengths are established, when they trigger the seismic events, the arc lengths connecting the bomb or the seismic event to the equator or to the sun ground position, these kinds of values here, they will base them on establishing ratios Which is intimately connected to those of Saaboma, Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
And these here are absolutely indisputable.
No way due to chance.
So this is why I say, based upon this, and what I've just shown you linking to the previous, the fifth North Korean test, is what makes me think definitely this is a North Korean event, a seismic signature.
Well, keep in mind who bombed Nagasaki and Hiroshima.
It wasn't North Korea.
Yes, I know.
It was the United States.
So, again, what we have is, you know, in other words, again, you've got a message.
You're deciphering the message.
You simply, what is unclear is who's sending it.
Now, the question would be, and it would, you know, at this moment, if you can switch off your message, Share screen so that we can, yes, people can see your face.
Basically, the question really is, is where does the sort of event originate from and if there is any way to tell?
So what you have is you have an earthquake and it's kind of like shooting a gun.
Is the gun aimed from North Korea or is it aimed from the United States or is it Diego Garcia or...
You know, in other words, or a satellite, for example, or bouncing off a satellite and then down.
You know, in other words, we're, you know, we're left with questions in this regard that I don't think that you are prepared to answer.
Well, if you're asking me where the precise facilities are where these beams are generated from, I would assume that they have some located in North Korea.
I would assume that they have them somewhere.
Well, in theory, we don't believe, or at this moment at least, I don't think that North Korea is going to be able to commandeer a satellite necessarily.
And the other thing is, although it's maybe an integral part of when they, if they do want to target the United States, the other thing is we do know the United States Secret Space Program does have This technology.
And we know that it can be aimed from really anywhere on the planet.
But it certainly probably isn't coming from North Korea.
At least you could rule that out.
It could come from South Korea for all we know.
Would you let me show you my final bit, Kerry?
Yes.
This is the message.
This is why I'm convinced this is North Korea.
Basically telling the United States, this is a message from us to you.
Because I said to you at the outset, Right?
That where and when they have triggered this seismic event reveals where they intend to strike the United States and also Japan.
Explicitly.
Okay?
Explicitly.
So I'm going to show you this proof here.
Okay?
We are at...
These are the yield values.
This here, we've got the seismic event.
I'm going to show you, just share my screen with you again.
This might be the final time, actually.
Okay, let's see now.
We are now here, this seismic event, 5.9, 12th of July.
There's the latitude, there's the longitude, longitude corners of the bum.
And we have here equator to event.
In other words, this latitude here, 40.858, this is from the USGS, If we go from the equator of the Earth to that latitude in feet, this is what you get.
14.8 million feet or so.
That's the value that you get that I showed you, the calculation for the precise value from the equator up to the latitude there.
Now, it just so happens that if we multiply this value by 2, We get this value in feet.
Now, converting to miles, because people are more familiar with it, this is what we get.
5,623.166 miles.
So this value here is twice the equator value.
I've told you these components are important for triggering devices.
So we've got a basic fraction here of two times the equator, and it gives you this.
So let me now go to Google Earth.
You see this here.
Now, the map is orientated so that north is not going towards the top.
It's actually going off to the right.
This is North Korea here, and this is South Korea here.
This here is the seismic event 5.9.
Do you see this green line here, Kerry?
Yes.
That green line is the arc length from the equator of the Earth right up to the seismic event that I've just given you, that 14.8 million feet.
Now I said, if you double that, you get another value, which, in Statue of Miles, is about 5,623 feet.
So if you were to hang that double distance on the seismic event and then move it around the world, you'd be thinking, well, does it land anywhere significant?
Well, the answer would appear to be yes.
Do you see this yellow line here?
This line here is twice the distance from the equator to the seismic event at 5,623 miles.
And it does drop on a very significant location on the Earth, so let's see where we go.
I'm just going to zoom out here and let's see where we go here.
Does this look familiar, Kerry?
Los Angeles.
Do you see that?
Yes.
So this arc distance multiplied by two just happens to drop right in Los Angeles and it drops on this little peak here overlooking the city.
In terms of your main city centre here, it is only about 6.8 miles off it.
It lands on this peak here Chihuenga Peak.
Now, Kerry.
Cahuenga.
Yeah, Cahuenga.
Do you know what famous icon just happens to be on that peak?
Oh, the Hollywood sign.
Very good.
Let's have a look where the target is.
You see that?
Ah, fascinating.
Yes.
Okay.
It's only 1,800 feet from targeting the Hollywood sign.
Now, I could tell you that...
Do you remember in 2014 there was a Hollywood movie, The Interview, where they had some guy playing that North Korean guy, Kim Jong-un, and they really took the piss out of him big time and blew him up in the helicopter.
It was like James Franco and Seth Rogen.
So I know he doesn't like Hollywood, but I find it interesting that this distance doubled targets here, practically dead on the Hollywood sign.
Okay, but let me ask you, I'm just curious, logistically speaking, does this have to do with which way you go around the Earth?
Because if you go the opposite direction, you must land somewhere else.
Well, you could take that double-dike length and scan it everywhere over the entire Earth.
I'm just saying that it appears to target practically dead-on.
Los Angeles on the Hollywood sign.
But there's another thing also to mention here.
Remember I said to you about the ratios to do with Hiroshima?
And I said to you, we had this one-sixth ratio.
Well, it's also the case here.
If we...
That one-sixth ratio is where you're basically taking the closest distance on the equator connecting the bomb...
To Hiroshima, longitude-wise, which is about 60 degrees.
So if you were to do the equation, 360 degrees divided by that, that's where you get the 6 from.
But you can also look at it on the long way around.
Instead of it being 60 degrees connecting up Hiroshima, the bomb, longitude-wise, and the Sun at the equator, you could go, it's 300 degrees.
And if you do one divided by the other, you get 1.2.
As a ratio.
Now, the reason why I find that interesting is because if we go here, the latitude of Los Angeles, the pure latitude, is, for your main city centre, it's 34 degrees, 3 minutes and 8 seconds north.
And the latitude, then, of the seismic event here...
Wait a minute, sorry, I've got these the wrong way around here.
That one is the latitude of the...
The seismic event.
That one there is the latitude of Los Angeles, north of the equator.
So that is that, and that one is that one.
But I'm wondering the ratio between them.
And the ratio is 1.2.
It's exactly the same thing.
In other words, if you take the latitude of the seismic event, which is this 14.8 million, divide it by 1.2, you get this value, which is the precise latitude of the Of Los Angeles, the city centre area, itself.
Got it right here, yeah.
This is it here.
This latitude right here, where the red dot is, so to speak, where your main city centre is, it's exactly the same to last than one mile in error.
So this tells me that by triggering the device where they did, They're really sending a message that their response is going to be a nuclear attack on Los Angeles, either using ICBMs with warheads on or triggering an artificial earthquake there.
And I'll just draw your attention to something else fascinating about the Great Circle Arc that connects up.
This is the Great Circle Arc here, connecting up to the seismic event in Los Angeles.
Now, let me just put San Andreas Fault in here.
See where we go.
So Google does its own thing.
And it goes to a significant point at the San Andreas Fault.
And you can see it right here.
This is the fault.
And this is only two miles separation.
It's almost practically dead in parallel with the Great Circle Arc here.
Actually, it's parallel right to the San Andreas Fault, which makes me suspect that the attack would either be a nuclear attack or an earthquake attack.
Now, the reason why I find significance in this arc measure here, connecting up to Los Angeles, right, is the latitude arc from the equator.
See?
This green arc here, from the equator to the seismic event, times two, Is this yellow arc, which just happens to fall in Los Angeles.
Well, actually, okay, but in the interest of really, you know, disclosing honestly, you could have drawn this arc from the complete other direction going around the Earth.
Assuming the earth is round and like the people that like to think it's flat.
I couldn't put it anywhere, Kelly.
I know what you're saying.
You know, because you're putting a lot of emphasis on this and I'm not sure.
In other words, it may be sending a message.
It may be, again, it may be coming from the Illuminati side or the side that is aligned with the secret space program, saying that we know your plan is this.
And perhaps Los Angeles is the target, but I am wondering where these other arc length, if arc length has anything to do with it, then you actually have to bring into effect the other places on the planet that it also goes to, because this otherwise will not be completely accurate.
I know exactly what you're saying, Kerry.
This arc length that I've hung upon, this yellow arc length that I've connected up, To the seismic event here, I could have swung it around and let it drop anywhere on the Earth, right?
Well, how is it significant then?
You know what I'm saying?
Well, that's what I'm getting to, Kenny.
Let me show you.
We'll find the relation, okay?
You're patient.
You're hanging in there with me, lass.
Okay.
Fair enough.
You see this green line here?
From the equator to the seismic event.
I've doubled it.
I've got this.
Yes.
Okay.
Now we also know that North Korea doesn't particularly like Japan.
Tokyo here is the capital of Japan.
Okay?
So let me just show you another arc length distance here.
And it's this one here.
The Great Circle Arc from there to there.
Okay?
What is that distance?
Now the answer is...
that 5,000, sorry, 562 miles, 562.1890 miles, That is the Great Circle Arc distance from the seismic event to Tokyo.
And do you know what it actually drops upon with extreme accuracy?
The government building in Tokyo.
Now, let me just show you again.
What was that Great Circle Arc connecting the seismic event to Los Angeles?
That!
So that there, you see here, 5623.16 miles is the Great Circle Arc connecting the seismic event to Los Angeles.
And it just so happens that divide by 10, same numeric sequence, 562 miles connects Great Circle Arc from the seismic event, the government building, in Tokyo and I just gave you the Hollywood sign here just to show you the difference between them but what I'm trying to say is what are the odds that they select a location on the ground for the seismic test and that precise location just to summarize
the latitude arc from the equator to that test multiplied by two gives you a measure which is a great circle arc that gets you all the way from the seismic event to Los Angeles and that same arc divided by 10 Right there gives you right to the connection to Japan on the government building right here.
So what I read this to be, Kerry, that's the government building right there.
So basically, I can stop sharing my screen because I've basically shown you everything now.
But what I'm saying is, for me, Those relations, because they're so significant to people who know about this technology, the ARC measures, how they're used to boost the energy signatures, how they are using nuclear weapons, okay?
They're so significant.
Anybody looking at that, some intel guys looking at that, would instantly recognize the significance of the location that they have chosen.
Longitude and latitude, which just happens, as I said, to contain all those relations, which decisively give this targeting.
To Los Angeles, the Hollywood sign.
To Los Angeles, the precise city centre latitude would be the 1.2 ratio.
Okay.
And the same arc lens divided by 10 that connects seismic event to Los Angeles gets you seismic event to government building Tokyo and Japan.
So my interpretation of it, and I know you might differ, but my interpretation quite simply is North Korea is sending a message to the United States in particular that if they are attacked They are going to respond with a nuclear attack specifically against Los Angeles and also specifically against Tokyo.
And it will either be from attempting to launch ICBMs to blow up the cities, or it could be from using this scalar beam weapon system to generate an earthquake.
So if you were to actually have, Kerry, a significant size earthquake occur around Los Angeles or somewhere close by, Maybe even near the San Andreas fault in the next few weeks or months ahead.
I would put it to you.
There's a fair chance that that earthquake may not be natural.
It could be an attack by North Korea, either because they've just been attacked or maybe they think an attack is imminent.
And the same goes for Tokyo and Japan.
They're even closer.
So if it's an ICBM attack, I think they've probably got more missiles of a shorter range.
It could put warheads on to try to strike Tokyo.
And then longer range ones that will get to the US. This is why there's all this business about missile defense systems being installed around about, you know, South Korea and Japan or whatever, because they're really afraid that a nuclear missile is going to come flying over and wipe out Tokyo.
They must know this.
They must know everything I've just said.
I'm sure of it.
And they'd know about the situation, the threat potentially against Los Angeles.
So this is why I think it has to be a North Korean event because it's blatantly encoding two prominent cities here.
Okay, but you're sort of missing my point as well.
No, I appreciate all of this.
And, you know, it's genius to find all these coordinates and the fact that that particular seismic event was a signal and it came from somewhere.
And it has this information encoded into it.
All of this seems quite accurate, Keith, and very plausible, let me say that.
However, who sent the message?
This is the question, then you have to get back to it.
Now, it is interesting because, of course, I do a different job, so I get intelligence, and a lot of the intelligence tells me that Any sort of attack by North Korea would be actually very likely not provoked.
In other words, they would be the initiators.
And the other part of that is that there is reason to believe, based on testimony from one of my witnesses, that we actually could have an EMP event that is triggered.
And that, in essence, someone like North Korea would be blamed for it, but it would be generated, it would be an inside job, just like 9-11.
So these are the kinds of permutations that it's important for people to understand that we're not just talking about something so straightforward, necessarily, as I mentioned.
In other words, if you're going to have a target and you're going to do something, certainly, of course, These people have gone into the news and have threatened the United States numerous times, really.
So they're not so secretive about it.
They've even mentioned various targets, and I'm sure Los Angeles is one of them.
There have been other cities they've mentioned as well, I think.
So it is a little more interesting to look at the subtlety behind the message.
And where it's really coming from.
And I appreciate your, you have, you know, you're well-intentioned.
You want to reveal this to the world that they may have, that this is their plan.
But in essence, who's revealing their plan?
Is it again?
Is it a threat?
Is it a subtle threat saying, we know your plans.
This is what they are.
Mirroring it back to them.
This is how dialogue happens.
This is the way it goes on.
It doesn't undercut in any way your research.
Your research is still valid.
The information you've tapped into is still valid.
It's just that it's who is sending the message.
This is, again, we get back to that.
So I want to thank you for this, and I think that this will also be something that people who are interested to find out how you do this How you're able to sort of calculate these things and look at other events may also be a good way to start to look at other earthquake events that have been intentioned, that have been purposeful.
And see, because a lot of times, for example, I know the ones in Italy recently, they were sent.
These were man-made earthquakes.
And so we know who sent them, pretty much.
And what you can do is you could take and apply your same model to those events and see what is the message encoded into that event through the numbers.
And I think that that would probably be very interesting as well.
Since what you're doing at this time is looking at, yes, a seismic event that happened, but you're saying it encodes information about the future.
What about other kinds of information that they might encode in these numbers?
And perhaps even talking about things that happened in the past and so on.
But, you know, I think it's very interesting.
Certainly your link-up with Nagasaki and Hiroshima are interesting.
Interesting numbers to select for your sort of base number system, I guess, in a certain sense.
So that's very interesting.
Any closing remarks you'd like to make?
And if there are any questions, please do put them in the chat in all caps and we'll see if we can ask Keith.
They must be pertinent to this subject.
Please.
Any closing remarks, Keith?
I'll just say this.
I realise that this is one of these things where people have to probably go back and look again at the mathematics because what I'm saying is it's kind of subtle and I realise I'm having to put forward relations which most people, if you're not familiar with this science, if you're not familiar with how nuclear weapons seem to have a tie into the sun or earthquakes, it'll be very alien to you.
But the mathematics is exacting and there's definitely something there.
All I can say is, Kerry, my own position is on the matter...
I think North Korea did it, and I think they did it to basically send a message to the U.S. If you do attack us, this is what we're going to try as a response.
Whether they're successful in responding, whether they're successful in triggering an earthquake in Los Angeles or Tokyo or firing ICBMs, I don't know whether they'd be successful necessarily, but they're just, I think, informing the U.S. what their response would be, what they'd attempt to do.
Well, that's basically what I can say.
If you've got any questions, go for it.
All right.
So looking into the chat, hold on one minute and let's see if there's anyone who is...
And actually, if you say rude comments, you're just going to be blocked from the chat, so don't even bother.
So let's see.
Is there any questions for Keith while we still have him on the line here?
Someone wants to ask you about unification between the two, North and South Korea.
Any thoughts on that?
I have no idea.
The geopolitics of that situation, I honestly don't know anything about that.
Okay.
Someone wants to know if you think the U.S. I guess the questions are not going to be about the mathematics.
They're really going to be about the politics, as you can appreciate that.
So I think it's rather important to understand that what Keith is showing us are the hidden messages in the numbers.
So his expertise, if I understand it, is not really in politics.
So he can certainly have an opinion, as we all do, but whether or not he's going to be able to answer some of these questions.
Someone wants to know, do you think that the West would back down knowing this about North Korea?
No, that is a good question.
I mean, I'd love to see this de-escalate.
I mean, I don't know what the mainstream press is like in the U.S., but, you know, for the past few weeks, It's all dropped off a cliff, the whole North Korean thing in Britain.
There's not really much of a story.
It's not been publicised much now.
So I don't know what exactly is going on behind the scenes here, but I personally see no reason to attack North Korea.
I see just no reason for it.
But maybe I'm wrong.
I don't know.
But...
I think you're just getting into a situation now, though, where a country has got to a certain weapons capability that if you were to attack them, it's not like attacking Syria.
They really could do damage.
And in fact, I believe Seoul is very close to the border between North and South Korea.
Armaments-wise, they could get a lot of stuff in.
It just seems to me that if he wants to do some kind of commitment to his forces, he'd do a hell of a lot of damage.
I think that some kind of Backing off is actually a good strategy, unless I'm missing something, but I don't know.
It's a question.
You're looking into the psychology.
I mean, you know when Saddam Hussein with the Gulf Wars 1 and 2, I mean, just take the last one.
I mean, his strategy, what was he doing?
He was just sat there doing nothing while all the U.S. forces were building up in Saudi Arabia and getting in the Gulf and everything.
He was sad they did nothing.
You might contrast that with a guy like Adolf Hitler in the 1940s, the early 40s, You've got Stalin and Hitler.
They've got this pact.
They've kind of cut Poland in half.
Stalin is mobilizing his forces for a massive invasion of Western Europe.
He's making all these speeches.
The Red Army is going to be an offensive army, not a defensive army.
He's going all these forces into position.
What does Hitler do?
Well, he's not an idiot.
He strikes first with Operation Barbarossa.
It's the most legitimate preemptive strike you can imagine.
I realize the entire war went wrong for Germany.
Don't get me wrong.
But...
His decision to strike Russia first there, knowing that an attack was inevitable, was the right decision, strategically speaking.
Now, with North Korea, then, if this guy gets it into his head that an attack is inevitable, is he going to sit there and do nothing and, like, absorb it, hope that all his ICBMs are not taken out, hope that all his scalar transmitters are not taken out, hoping that he has something left to respond with?
Or is he going to think, I think an attack's inevitable, I'll just preemptively launch everything I possibly can.
I mean, that's the question, isn't it?
What's in his mind?
Well, I think you have to look at whether the powers that be have any reason to attack North Korea as a preemptive strike, because that's what it would be from their point of view as well.
And other than causing a depopulation event, a World War III, which involves China, you have to keep in mind when you deal with North Korea, you're also dealing with I think I'm going to
go.
Whoever they decide to attack, whether it's Japan, whether it's the U.S., or whether it's somewhere else.
As a small country, as a country that's obviously going to have a lot less in terms of weaponry than the United States or other countries, their first and only sort of leg up on the situation would be the element of surprise, number one.
And number two...
The fact that they would then go, you know, cause as much damage as possible first, not second, because if it was second, it's likely the attack would be just where they would be left defenseless, if anyone is a military planner in this regard.
When you get into this, the other thing you said, which was that I think you said Hitler decided to invade Russia and that that was a good idea.
Actually, that was the worst decision of his life, apparently.
And that's also well known in the history.
So I'm not sure that that would actually stand up to scrutiny as being a good decision.
Maybe I misunderstood you.
What I'm saying is this.
Russia was building up for a massive invasion of Western Europe.
That's like a fact.
Hitler caught him off guard.
Why would you sit there with your forces waiting for the other military to get all their pieces into position for an order to attack in a really organized way?
Why would you sit there and wait?
I realize you're actually substantiating the fact that you see.
Yeah, I think you're substantiating the idea that that North Korea would have a very good reason to strike first again.
But I think that what we really want to do with this discussion is talk about how If they're sending signals through tectonic weapons and or scalar weapons that cause seismic events and certainly looking at Fukushima would be a very crucial place to also look at the targeted event in Fukushima because Fukushima was again a targeted event and it was seismic as well and nuclear
and so you know in other words if you want to We have done shows in the past in this regard, you and I. And so people can go back and search your name on my YouTube channel.
You'll find quite a number of interviews that we've done over the years, actually.
And one of them does deal, at least one, with Fukushima and the fact that this was targeted and how and so on.
And you did some great research in that regard as well.
So I just want to say that what we're looking at is Tectonic weapons, sending signals, scalar weapons, etc.
I don't see any other questions here in the chat specifically.
I see statements, but I don't think I see any questions.
So I am going to wrap this up here.
I want to thank you for your research.
I want to thank you for sharing it with us.
And certainly you have your own YouTube channel as well where you are, I assume, doing presentations on a fairly regular basis.
You want to talk about that and, again, also give people the link to both of your websites.
I'll give you my website first.
The first one, my main one, is occultphysics.com.
No space, occultphysics.com.
Okay.
And the other one is ancientworldmysteries.com, and that dashes between the words.
My website, my YouTube channel is called Occult Physics as well.
But I only put videos out every once in a while.
I don't churn them out like other people.
So that's just that there.
I've put a few videos on about some of the North Korean stuff as well and some of the numerology and things like that as well I'm interested in.
So again, my book, this one here, I'm going to be doing a version of this.
It's coming out, hopefully, fingers crossed because I keep delaying it, I must admit, should be coming out in print, a second edition of this In the next four weeks or so, sometime late August, I'm hoping.
And that contains a lot more, actually, analysis on this kind of topic with nuclear weapons, that kind of thing.
So there's a lot more information on that.
Very good.
You know, other people might also wonder, have you ever had any interference in, you know, from the powers that be, the British government, et cetera, on you or your work?
No, not that I'm aware of.
No, no, they don't care about me, obviously.
Okay, no threat whatsoever, so we don't know.
Or maybe they think you're too hot to touch, you know, the subject matter, and would just draw attention to your work if they were to attack you.
So, very interesting.
Thank you again, Keith, for coming forward and for sharing your work.
Uh, with all of us and, um, everyone have a good day.
Take care.
Please do watch my John Lear, uh, phone call interview, uh, that I just did yesterday.
And John Lear is saying a number of things about 9-11 and various other things, including the fact that he's flown all the way around the world that, uh, should confuse the flat earthers to some degree.
And, um, and so on.
So, uh, please also consider joining me on my Irish tour and, um, I'm going to let you go, Keith, and close this window down so that we can move over to this other window so I can actually figure out how to put my credits on and all this kind of thing.
So thank you again for being here.
▲
Export Selection