Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

April 12, 2017 - Project Camelot

01:46:15

RICHARD LIGHTHOUSE - ENERGY SCIENTIST RE TIME TRAVEL

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Thank you.
	Hi, everyone.
	This is Carrie Cassidy from Project Camelot, and I'm here tonight with Richard Lighthouse.
	And it's going to be a lot of fun to do this interview because I don't know all that much about him, and I haven't had a lot of time to look through his many books today.
	I have looked through some of it and I can tell you that he's obviously a very very intelligent guy He's been researching time travel and apparently is an energy executive.
	I'm going to look at his bio here real quick before I bring him on the screen, so to speak.
	Bear with me as I just get this bio so that we can really talk about exactly What you've got going on.
	So it says Richard Lighthouse is an executive in the energy industry.
	He has published more than 100 books, many of which are available for free on Apple Books, BarnesandNoble.com, Amazon.com, Google Play, and other websites.
	He holds a master's degree in mechanical engineering from Stanford University and has previously worked for NASA. And he has a website, ourlighthouse.com.
	That short bio is available on my website in case you want to go there.
	And you can also click the link to see his work.
	And we've got some e-books put as available on...
	It's sort of under this interview on my site.
	So without further ado, as they say, welcome Richard.
	It's great to have you on the show and I'm so fascinated by who you are and your sort of approach.
	And I'd like you to talk a little bit first of all about your background.
	How did you come to start disclosing information?
	And please excuse my cat in the background.
	Good evening and thank you, Kerry.
	Thank you for inviting me to your show.
	It's a real pleasure to be here.
	I have always been involved with engineering and aerospace issues during my career.
	Most recently I've been involved in the energy industry and how I got started or interested in some of these issues was reading some books and material By Jane Roberts and Seth.
	And some of the ideas in there really intrigued me, particularly as an engineer and a mathematician.
	And I have been able to discover some things that are very interesting, and I hope to get into some of those details this evening.
	So I am located in Houston, Texas.
	I've lived here quite a while.
	I encourage folks to get on my website, rlighthouse.com, and there's lots of free e-books to delve through there.
	Fabulous.
	Well, it's certainly interesting, this sort of gamut that you've got there.
	And what I'd like to do is find out sort of, I don't know how much you can say, but what brought you from NASA to working in the energy field.
	I assume you're an executive at this time.
	It sounds like you're employed by the energy industry and that's okay.
	Is there some kind of trajectory that you can explain that brought you along this path?
	To investigating Jane Roberts and time travel.
	I mean, I've read Jane Roberts' Seth material quite a number of years ago.
	It was actually instrumental in forming some of my own views of reality, so to speak, I would say.
	And it's still pertinent today.
	So it's great to hear that you have that background.
	And so we can talk in depth in that area if you'd like.
	But first of all, I think for people listening, you worked for NASA. Could you explain a little bit about what you did for them and how you moved into the energy industry and then how you sort of ended up investigating time travel if there was a connection along the way there?
	No, that's a good question, Kerry.
	I worked for NASA and a NASA contractor back in the 1980s, and at the time, the space industry was going through some cycles, some difficult cycles, so there were lots of folks changing fields, and I didn't see a longevity in the aerospace industry.
	Things were The space shuttle was getting into an operational role in the 80s, and so the R&D folks were getting let go and shifted to other industries.
	I had some good opportunities to go and work in other fields, and I took advantage of it.
	Energy isn't something you maybe start out from college saying, hey, I want to be in the energy industry.
	It's something I kind of fell into and I've been modestly successful with it.
	So I'm very pleased.
	It's allowed me to travel all over the world and meet a lot of folks and see a lot of things that I probably wouldn't have otherwise done.
	Okay.
	Well, you got into time travel.
	You got into Jane Roberts.
	You're outside the box thinker.
	Were you always an outside the box thinker or is this a relatively recent development in your life?
	I've always been an avid reader, Cary.
	I've read lots of things.
	Some things I let go and some things I kind of held on to.
	The Jane Roberts books were particularly interesting to me.
	I was particularly intrigued by the ideas that although Seth and Jane never got into mathematics and I had not met anyone that had tried to make that translation from Some of the things that he discussed into mathematics, and so I think I may be one of the first folks that actually tried to do that.
	I hope there's some other people out there, but I just haven't read anything yet where...
	I take that back.
	I have read a few things, but no one has really delved into it at any great depth.
	So I'm hoping that If there are readers out there that have been exposed to the material and they find a connection with it, the mathematics that's associated with these ideas is truly revolutionary and it's not complicated.
	One of the best things Einstein ever said was he expected to be able to explain the fundamental math of the universe to a child.
	It should be simple and elegant.
	And some of the things that I have stumbled on certainly indicate that.
	And I hope to share some of those details here.
	Okay, sorry.
	Sorry.
	Sorry.
	Just don't know what's going on.
	Just had a coughing fit, but hold on.
	Sorry to put you through that.
	So, you have a wonderful quote from Einstein, I think, in one of your books.
	I wonder if you know which one I'm referring to.
	Possibly.
	I've tried to quote him on a number of things that I felt were relevant, Carrie, and you bring up a good point.
	We really have In the scientific world, in the engineering world, Einstein is really an icon, and many of the things he said has really influenced a lot of the development, certainly, in science and engineering and math.
	And one of the interesting things I have found is some of the latest math actually refutes some of the things that He was quite principled about, for example, the speed of light being an absolute and a constant.
	And there's compelling evidence, a NASA scientist by the name of Dr.
	Daniel Gazeri, G-E-Z-A-R-I, who in 2009 published a paper about, the title was, Lunar Laser Ranging Test on the Invariance of C. And Dr.
	Gazeri Basically demonstrate that the speed of light is not constant.
	In fact, it's increasing about three meters per second per year.
	And that is like an earthquake in the scientific world.
	It has always been assumed that the speed of light was an absolute and a constant.
	And his data strongly suggest that that's not the case.
	So it's an interesting development, but Einstein still remains an icon and something that lots of folks still quote, including myself.
	So that's a good point that you bring up.
	Well, actually, yeah, and I'll look for the quote.
	I don't want to misquote it, so I'm going to have to find it.
	But there's a place where you talk about Uh, what your theory is, which is blinking, uh, the universe blinking in and out.
	I think that's how you refer to it.
	And I've often talked about us, um, human beings are not always here, here as we think of it.
	We are actually blinking in and out of this reality.
	And, uh, so I wonder if you can just jump right in and talk about all of that.
	Sure.
	Yeah.
	It's, it's really a fascinating subject.
	Um, I got the idea from the Jane Roberts books.
	One of the things that Seth said early on I believe in about 1964 was that very bluntly stated that your bodies blink on and off like a light and for that matter the entire universe does and I found that such a startling statement and then I tried to figure out well how would the math work if that were in fact correct and and although Seth and Jane were not well versed in math and couldn't
	use the correct terminology so trying to translate that was a real struggle for me initially.
	I tried various combinations of volts and amps and energy and it took me a good while before I came upon the right equations that would explain it but it does appear to be correct and I have had it confirmed by A gentleman in the physics department at the University of California, he used an alternate mathematical approach and came up with the same solution, so that makes it extra compelling.
	So basically it demonstrates that our universe blinks on and off at 1.039 trillion cycles per second.
	Now this is a stunningly large number and something that is way beyond anything we could perceive With our senses.
	For example, a typical movie in a theater runs at about 30 frames per second.
	So at 30 frames per second, our eyes and our subconscious mind perceive a continuous flow.
	We don't see a digital image, and we certainly don't see the gaps between those images.
	So you can imagine at a trillion times per second, There's an absolute continuity there, and we simply cannot perceive those gaps.
	As it's explained by Seth, the best way to describe it, and I hope there's some scientists and engineers out there that are listening, the best way to describe it mathematically is a sine wave, a simple sine wave split horizontally by the x-axis.
	Above that x-axis is matter.
	Below that x-axis is antimatter.
	And so our universe blinks on and off a little more than a trillion cycles per second.
	And when our universe blinks off, the antimatter universe blinks on.
	And this has been a fundamental problem in physics trying to explain antimatter, where it's at, where it comes from.
	And from this explanation, it makes it clear that antimatter particles and matter particles can never meet.
	There's an ongoing debate in the physics community right now about the presence of antimatter, generally referred to as a positron.
	It's basically an opposite charged electron, and it's very clear from this mathematical model that the positron is not antimatter, it's simply ordinary matter.
	And it actually becomes quite interesting because the mathematics that supports a blinking universe explains the relationship for all of the elementary particles that exist.
	And the very simple, elegantly, beautifully simple math that supports it is called 1024QAM, and that stands for Quadrature Amplitude Modulation.
	It's the same map that is used for a Wi-Fi signal.
	And we're all very familiar with Wi-Fi.
	There's lots of folks that work with computer hardware that are very familiar with the QAM map and how it's used to transfer a signal between, say, a router and your computer.
	But it turns out that the very same map is used to construct our universe at a trillion cycles per second.
	And it's absolutely fascinating.
	The mathematics?
	I'm sorry, go ahead.
	No, no, this is fascinating and I think my listeners will find that to be the case as well.
	I do want to apologize for the coughing sort of fit I had there.
	You know, because you're on Skype and I'm on YouTube, I can't mute myself because I end up muting you.
	So that's just an apology to the people listening to understand the logistics of what I'm dealing with here.
	I did want to give you I found the quote and so I do want to give that quote and the quote is if at first an idea isn't absurd There's no hope for it, and that is a quote from Albert Einstein, and I get a kick out of that quote.
	I think it's brilliant, and so thanks for putting that on one of your papers.
	I do want to address this blinking in and out, and I also wondered if you are in touch with Jack Sarfati, the physicist at all, because I recently met with him, and he does seem to allude I know he talks a lot about black holes, and I think he deals with anti-matter in his theories, and I was just curious whether you were aware of him.
	I have read some of his work.
	I have never personally met him.
	I would certainly enjoy meeting him and talking with him.
	Brilliant man.
	Okay.
	Because he might be interested even, I could send him the link to this interview.
	I'm planning to interview him.
	He's agreed to do so sometime in the near future if we can arrange all of that.
	So this discussion may actually relate to some degree to him and the work he does.
	But because you've locked into this blinking in and out and this idea of the universe, what it alludes to in terms of antimatter, I'm wondering...
	Is the relationship between antimatter and black holes and also to consciousness, have you found the link?
	Well, I can talk about that a little bit.
	Einstein's famous equation, and you gave us a good segue there, E equals MC squared.
	Physicists are very familiar with that equation and they understand that energy and mass are interchangeable.
	One of the brilliant The idea is that Seth added to that is the equal sign is consciousness.
	Consciousness makes the transfer between energy and matter.
	So that energy, consciousness, and matter are really one.
	And I thought that was a brilliant symbology on his part.
	So as far as blinking, what Some of the details, if I can touch on that very quickly, there's a long discussion that he provides on what he describes as the electrical universe.
	Now physicists have spent many years with string theory, M theory, quantum gravity is the latest trend.
	And what we're finding is they're trying to put more and more dimensions in to accommodate these models.
	And they get much more complicated.
	The complexity of some of these models is beyond me.
	And theories such as Yang Mills, which has been around for a while, is also, in my opinion, inordinately complex.
	And I think that if some of these physicists take a look at 1024 QAM, it's very clear that it fits the pattern that no one has been able to explain in the physics community, and that's the mass gaps.
	No one has been able to explain the mass gaps in the model.
	Why is there a particle and then a gap, and then several more particles and a gap, and then a few more particles and a gap?
	1024QAM explains it beautifully.
	There's four particles and a mass gap, four more particles and a mass gap, and it lines up perfectly with 1024QAM. The model also shows that there are perfectly four charges, four spins, for every particle mass.
	And what the model means is there's 16 probabilities for every particle mass in the elementary particle field.
	That's something that physicists have not proposed.
	So every charge and every spin is available to each particle mass, and there are probabilities associated with each.
	And that explains, in the shortest terms, How the 1024 QAM model works.
	What's particularly compelling about it, again, and I'll probably repeat myself on this, is its elegant simplicity.
	I think Einstein would be truly stunned at just how simple the math is.
	It's so simple that a grade school child could understand it.
	There's no addition and subtraction.
	There's no division.
	There's no math.
	It's so simple.
	It's a pattern.
	It's a mathematical pattern.
	And it's literally how our universe is constructed a trillion times a second.
	The beauty about this frequency, 1.039 terahertz, is it has harmonics.
	The first harmonic being 2.078 terahertz.
	And what we will find is that each one of these harmonics allows us to do things that we have never been able to do, such as time travel, travel faster than light, Travel between parallel universes and something SETI would be very particularly interested in.
	Instant communication with distant galaxies.
	Let me say that again.
	Instant radio communication with a distant galaxy.
	The way that works, in very simple terms, is that as we follow this sine wave, as the universe reappears and then collapses each time, a trillion times a second, As it approaches that neutral axis, all of the fundamental forces go to zero.
	That means the mass of every object in the universe approaches zero.
	And all the distances in our terms, in our universe, go to zero.
	That means there is no distance at a fraction of a fraction of a second before that collapse at the neutral axis There is no distance between galaxies, and instant communication is possible.
	So it's a truly stunning development, and I hope that there are some scientists and engineers that will grab a hold of this.
	The math is simple.
	It's very easy to understand.
	It's not like Yang-Mills.
	It's not like string theory, m-theory, and quantum gravity.
	It's so surprisingly simple.
	It would bowl over any physicist that had spent years studying Yang Mills theory.
	Okay, so what you're saying is, in essence, if you want to time travel, if you want to communicate across distance, you take advantage of this downtime, so to speak, in the sine wave.
	Am I understanding you correctly?
	Is that what you have to do?
	And so, in a sense...
	Is timing, for example, let's say your timing in anything you do, how do you skate across that divide so that you make it through?
	Is there a timing issue or does it just happen naturally?
	No, that's a good question.
	The key point is it's always available.
	The universe is always blinking on and off and and one way to think of that is the electrical universe which exists as a single point in this model and that's really hard to get your your arms around for people to imagine that our entire universe collapses to a single point at the rate of a trillion times per second but that's precisely what the math says and Within this single point,
	all things, all forms of consciousness, all memories, all textures, everything that we think of in our universe is expressed as a frequency and a vibration, and it exists in a single point.
	So basically, our physicists have been trying to expand the number of dimensions to accommodate these models when, in fact, By what's called minimization, by minimizing the number of dimensions, in fact, that number being zero, zero dimensions equals a single point, it solves the math beautifully and elegantly.
	So, I mean, let me ask you, you know, this may be semantics, but are you saying zero dimensions is really the same thing as unlimited dimensions, isn't it?
	In a sense, you could say.
	I think the way I would express that is the model basically shows that time and distance are both illusions.
	They exist for a small fraction of a second and then we return to a single point.
	And then the antimatter universe comes on and then when it shuts off, our universe blinks back on.
	So basically, our conscious physical bodies only exist literally half the time.
	Half the time, there is nothing.
	There is no physical matter for us to touch, to express, or utilize in any way, shape, or form.
	And yet, that's literally 50% of this time interval, and we don't perceive it.
	We simply do not perceive it.
	It happens so fast, it's impossible for our senses and our perceptions to pick it up.
	So, you know the figure eight, it seems like this would be an elegant way, you know, or it's also the symbol for infinity, would also be an elegant way to, and yin and yang, to actually diagram what you're talking about.
	Because at the point at which these two things intersect would be the singular middle point at which You know, in the figure eight, they cross.
	Would you agree?
	Yes, of course.
	The infinity symbol is an excellent symbol and one that's used by many different cultures and languages.
	It is simple.
	It is symbolic, I think, of continuity and no beginning, no ending.
	Which is really what this mathematical model suggests.
	There really is no beginning and no ending.
	It has always been.
	The electrical universe possesses all of the physics and math that are subject to, that basically present the physical laws and boundaries for all physical realities and universes.
	So basically, our reality that we perceive is dependent upon This electrical universe for all of our mathematical laws and physics.
	And so basically, how's the best way to say this?
	We're looking in the wrong place for answers, okay?
	We're trying to solve what is known as the Grand Unified Theory, or GUT, G-U-T. Grand Unified Theory cannot be solved within our universe.
	The solution exists outside of our universe.
	We're looking in the wrong place.
	So in the electrical universe, it is easily solved because the four fundamental forces that physicists love to talk about unify into one force in the electrical universe.
	So really, gravitation, electromagnetism, the strong force and the weak force are different aspects of one force.
	And I've written a paper on it describing how to unify those four forces, something that the physics community has been working on for many years.
	I hope that there's some compelling comments and I welcome corrections and ideas to engineers and scientists that may be out there listening to this.
	I hope they'll delve into it and give it some consideration.
	It's free on my website as well as Amazon, Barnes& Noble, Smashwords, To name a few, but it's truly a fascinating subject, and I hope some folks will delve into it.
	Well, one of the things you said was, and I'm sure this will raise some interest out there, what you're talking about, but you said earlier that matter and energy were in essence the same thing.
	That, I guess, Seth was talking about this, and there's a third thing in that That sort of grouping, which I'm not, you know, remembering what you said, but you said, in essence, it means that matter and energy are the same.
	How are they the same in your concept?
	In other words, is there a...
	Component in which they're not the same because, you know, I know conventional physicists, when talking about time travel, we actually talked to one who worked for Caltech, and he was having difficulty with this whole idea of time travel, and he was putting a lot of emphasis on what he called, in other words, weight, if I understood him correctly, and that everything would weigh too much so that you couldn't have time travel.
	It wouldn't be easy to do.
	And that we weren't there yet.
	So, yeah.
	And I didn't think his line of reasoning was very advanced, personally.
	But can you address that at all?
	And actually, the name of the physicist, I don't know if you know who he is, but his name was Sean Carroll.
	Yeah, I'm very familiar with Sean.
	He's a brilliant man.
	He's written some outstanding material and has quite a few books out.
	Here is my take on it.
	First of all, your question about energy and matter, how is that one?
	In Einstein's famous equation, E equals MC squared, Seth has commented that energy and matter are one because the equal sign is consciousness.
	It represents consciousness, and consciousness makes the transition between energy and matter.
	So energy, consciousness, and matter are all one.
	You cannot separate them.
	Consciousness cannot separate itself from the reality that is constructed.
	So it's all one.
	The energy exists within, in our terms, would exist within the electrical universe.
	And the matter is formed within a physical universe that blinks on and off.
	So the energy and the fundamental forces are analog.
	And the matter and the mass is discrete or blinking.
	And as far as time travel, I'm sorry.
	Does this deal with the, at least if, you know, I don't know if I've got this right, but does this deal with the Sean Carroll issue of weight and mass?
	It's a good question, and I'm glad you bring it up.
	Here's my understanding of it.
	This is a radical idea that was not even suggested by Seth, but it is clearly implied by it.
	Mass is not just a property of matter, it is a dimension.
	This is a very critical piece for physicists to understand.
	Mass is a dimension.
	Time is not a dimension, it's an illusion.
	All of time is simultaneous.
	is the fourth dimension.
	We live in a four-dimensional universe consisting of XYZ and mass.
	Mass is the fourth dimension in our universe.
	There is an interesting connection between mass and the dream universe, which Seth has insisted is just as valid and real as our physical universe.
	And the only difference between the dream universe and a physical universe is It consists of mass-less particles.
	So it's basically a three-dimensional universe.
	The dream universe is just as real and valid, but it consists of only three dimensions, and the mass, the particles, are mass-less.
	And this is why it's so fluid, and things change so easily there, is because there is no mass.
	Okay, so is it antimatter?
	Is that what you're getting at?
	No, it's not.
	It's an excellent question, and I've provided a diagram in an e-book called The Dream Universe, and for scientists and engineers that might be listening, if you can imagine a picture of a sine wave in an x-axis horizontally splitting them, and then a plane that exists On that x-axis that extends to infinity in all directions horizontally.
	So you kind of have to think in three-dimensional terms.
	You have a sine wave, and then horizontally through that x-axis is a plane.
	That plane, mathematically, is what we would call the dream universe.
	It has x, y, and z dimensions within it, but the particles are massless.
	Now, as far as time travel and mass being associated, he brings up a good point.
	What's really interesting and compelling, and I've written a paper on it, it's called mass-less travel.
	Now, what's so compelling about this is, as I mentioned previously, as the sine wave collapses to the neutral point, the x-axis, and all fundamental forces and weights collapse to zero at that What I call a neutral point, the collapsing neutral point.
	Just prior to reaching that, a fraction of a fraction of a second before reaching that, everything is essentially massless.
	It has no mass.
	So when you synchronize an electrical signal in time, in our terms, with a point, a fraction of a fraction of a second, before that collapsing sine wave hits that x-axis, it has no mass.
	So I can take a vehicle and use a light beam to propel it to the speed of light because the vehicle has no mass.
	And the same thing is true in time travel.
	I want to take an object and move it through time, and I'd like to, maybe in a few minutes, give you an example of how time travel works by giving you a specific example.
	But I'll just say for right now, what's really interesting about it, it can be done massless, effectively massless.
	And the way you do that is by timing and synchronizing with this blinking frequency just before it crosses that x-axis.
	So how would we do that?
	One of the best ways to do that is with a really fast clock.
	And right now the clocks that we have that are used for timekeeping, for example, I believe the National Oceanographic Administration has an atomic clock, and these operate, I believe, around 9 billion to 10 billion cycles per second, but what is really needed is a super fast clock, and I'll call it a gamma ray clock.
	Now, a gamma ray clock would operate at about 10 to the 21st cycles per second, which is really, really fast, and it would require Capturing and utilizing the frequencies of a gamma ray, which are obviously ionizing radiation.
	So you would have to use protective measures and means to isolate it as a clock mechanism.
	And it actually brings up a really interesting segue that I'll just mention very quickly.
	In the 1947 Roswell vehicle, if you've seen some of the pictures of the recovered beings, Many of the legs had radiation burns on them.
	In Colonel Philip Corso's book, The Day After Roswell, he described, and I'll see if I can quote him directly, we were never able to figure out how the propulsion system works.
	We only know it has something to do with blinking.
	He said that in 1997.
	He had been working on that for almost 50 years.
	And in 1997, before he passed away, he published a book and did a number of interviews, and that's a direct quote.
	He said they knew it had something to do with blinking, but they couldn't figure it out.
	The reason they couldn't figure it out is because the blinking frequency is so fast, they didn't have a signal analyzer that could analyze it.
	And so it's a difficult frequency to reach even today.
	Even using the latest technology, it's a very difficult frequency to reach.
	It's fascinating.
	Okay.
	So when you say it's a difficult frequency to reach, you know, I'm going to throw something at you because I know that you know my channel to some degree and ask you, you know, given Corso and given what I have been investigating, you know, for example, Mark Richards is saying we go interstellar, that we are able to, you know, use craft and actually jump interdimensionally.
	So, in a sense, we have solved this problem you're talking about, at least in our secret space program, if one takes on board that that is a real thing.
	So, what do you think they are doing?
	Do you think they're using the principle you're talking about, a special clock, for example?
	Or is there some other way to get around that issue that doesn't involve a clock, for example?
	Well, there's several answers there.
	And again, those are excellent questions, Kerry.
	Yes, I do think they're using the simplest means that I am aware of in the research that I've done.
	The simplest means is to synchronize a vehicle with this blinking frequency.
	And by doing that, it makes it possible to travel faster than the speed of light, much faster.
	And in my book, I've written a short e-book that's called Faster than light travel, the basic mechanics.
	And in it, I describe and I provide the calculations for a sample journey between the Earth and Jupiter, and it literally takes a half of one second to get there, which is about 6,000 times faster than the speed of light.
	And that can be done with a conventional computer processor that we have today.
	What we don't possess is the gamma-ray clock that would allow the vehicle to be massless.
	From what I've read from the latest DARPA reports coming out, they're aggressively working on that right now.
	So I thought that was highly coincidental.
	Yes, I do think they've got vehicles in the Secret Space Program and Solar Warden that are capable of doing that, but I don't think the technology was produced by human hands.
	I think they traded for it.
	In particular, from what I understand, and correct me if I'm wrong, Solar Warden has been operational since the 90s, and the computer processor speeds that we had in the early 90s would never ever approach the speeds that were necessary to make a functional system.
	So, in my opinion, And I could be wrong, but it's just based on my understanding of computer processor speeds, they could not have done that with existing technology, human technology, in the early 1990s, so clearly they got it from somewhere else.
	The device to do that, they could certainly build the ships, but the device that would allow them to synchronize with this blinking frequency was not something that we could produce with our available technology in the early 1990s.
	Now, you've written a book that talks about this sort of very fascinating link-up, really, to the Seth material, etc.
	Is it your thought that actually you didn't think of this first, but that you're bringing it forward in the mainstream?
	Or are you thinking that, because I hear you making the call out to various scientists and engineers who could be listening to this, and that's very possible now and in the future when this goes on my YouTube channel.
	So what What do you think?
	Do you think that, in essence, maybe a visiting race that was interacting with our government brought this to them and that you're now tapping into it?
	What's your thoughts along those lines?
	Well, I think we could speculate on that quite a bit.
	The technical solution is that the technology was either traded for, provided, or brokered in some way.
	But what's clear to me, and I gave the one example of the Solar Warden program, Andrew Bishago, who I've spoken with several times on the phone, I find to be highly credible.
	He's got a brilliant, razor-sharp memory of things that happened many years ago.
	And some of the things that he told me made it clear to me that They were using some of the methods that were used for time travel by the Parsons Corporation back in the late 60s and early 70s, clearly utilized a blinking frequency technology.
	He tells me there was at least eight different methods and technologies that could be used for time travel at that time.
	At least two of those methods involved using a blinking frequency.
	One of the things that he described was a machine that had a doorway that was only four feet high and that as a child he could easily enter that doorway but it was clearly difficult for adults to go through it and to me that's that's kind of a giveaway that says we're not going to build a machine or a device that's got a four-foot doorway in it that was clearly built for People that were much smaller than
	us.
	So that would strongly suggest that that machine wasn't built by human hands.
	And I think Andrew would agree.
	Okay, but when did you write your paper?
	When did you bring this theory forward?
	I first started working on this, I would say, in 2009-2010.
	And it was something I had been kicking around in my head based on reading the Seth and Jane Roberts books.
	I didn't have a whole lot of other input there.
	I had read other books by credible, respected scientists, and I did not find information that really made sense.
	I think they talked around the subject rather than telling me What's the equation?
	Show me the equation.
	I'm really an engineer at heart, so I love stories.
	I love some of the folks that come on your show and they've got lots of stories and pictures and videos and I think they're sincere and credible, but as an engineer or scientist, I'm hitting the table going, show me the math.
	I'd love to do the stories, but that doesn't help me.
	Show me the math.
	I want to see the math.
	I'm not going to believe 100% until I see the math.
	I want to be the guy that comes onto your show and says, I'll show you the math.
	I've got the math.
	For example, Time travel, I can explain it in less than 30 seconds.
	The equation for time travel is take Einstein's famous equation, E equals mc squared.
	Take the partial derivative with respect to time for that equation, and most engineers and scientists will know what I'm talking about.
	When you solve that equation, note that the speed of light c is not constant.
	That was proven by Dr.
	Daniel Guzzari in his 2009 experiment.
	The speed of light is increasing about three meters per second each year, which is a very small amount.
	But you cannot solve that equation unless you put that in there.
	It won't solve.
	Once you do that, you have a solution that can then be equated with Maxwell's electrical energy equations, and it gives you an electrical charge that will provide the energy to make the transfer in time That the partial derivative equation has predicted.
	And so, in 30 seconds or less, that's basically how it works.
	It makes it clear that mass is important, the local speed of light is important, and having those two things takes a certain amount of energy to jump between two points in time when you synchronize to this blinking frequency.
	For example, the first harmonic is 2.078 terahertz.
	By applying a frequency to the hull of the vehicle of 2.078 terahertz and providing the electrical energy predicted by this equation, which I give a sample equation in my e-book, Time Travel and Approximate Mathematical Solution, in the appendix is a sample equation that shows for 50 years, here's how it works.
	It's not complicated.
	It's beautifully simple and elegant.
	Almost every engineer that's past the freshman level in college And every physicist who's passed the freshman level of college can understand it.
	It's not complicated.
	Okay, let me throw something else at you.
	I don't know if you're going to think this is related to...
	Exactly or not.
	But we talked to Ralph Ring.
	I don't know if you know who he is and saw my interview with him, but he's a very interesting, really an engineer.
	And he and Otis Carr built, in essence, what it was, a UFO. And Otis Carr, at one point, told them to get into the vehicle.
	They had to meditate or visualize the color aquamarine, specifically.
	And then they, in essence, time traveled in this vehicle to not very far away, apparently, to like what appeared to be, or maybe it was a, Mark Richards might say it was a Earth 2 or Earth 3.
	But in essence, they were told to get out of the vehicle wherever they landed, pick up some dirt and put it in their pockets, and then come back.
	And they did.
	And apparently it worked.
	And so what I'm wondering is if there's a correlation between this sine wave coming to zero, the color aquamarine, a frequency, in essence, that can, in essence, skate through from one bottoming out of the sine wave to another bottoming out of the sine wave.
	And that constitutes time travel and weather Lastly, that would be considered bending space-time, or is something else involved in bending space-time?
	So I hope that's not too confusing a question.
	Well, I'm not sure I could correlate the aquamarine with a specific technology.
	You are correct that it implies a specific frequency It may simply be an exercise to help you clear your mind.
	Okay, there seemed to be a link-up with a crystal, though.
	This UFO they built had a crystal in the engine, so to speak, if you want to call it an engine.
	But I'm not...
	You know, again, because I'm not a scientist, I don't quite know what the correlation is, but I can intuit that there's a correlation between the color aquamarine and a crystal...
	And the mind.
	And you said that consciousness, matter, and energy are all in a sense one according to this equation that's more or less from Einstein but really Seth is interpreting it in a different way it sounds like.
	Can you kind of use any of that?
	Well, I can't say that I'm not familiar with the gentleman that you're referencing, and I would certainly like to read about it.
	Okay, you don't know Otis Carr, then, because he was a very early person who was involved in all of this, around the time of Tesla, for example.
	Okay.
	No, I'm not familiar with him.
	Okay.
	But I'd certainly like to read about it, though.
	Sure.
	So I'm not sure I could comment on what the connection was there.
	How does bending space-time then relate?
	Well, I think that I think what I think what Seth would say is that the space and time are both illusions that exist for a fraction of a second and so If space and time are not real, then neither is the band-aid.
	Okay, that sounds like an answer you get from watching the movie The Matrix.
	You know, when Neo is basically...
	Okay, well...
	Okay, what about David Lewis Anderson?
	Are you familiar with him?
	He's supposed to be something of an expert on time travel.
	He had a time travel institute.
	He did work for the government, supposedly, as the story goes, according to Peter Moon.
	And I have been in touch with David Anderson.
	He was supposed to speak about time travel at my conference.
	He backed out because he was worried about danger to do with, I don't know, possibly being taken out, in essence.
	I am not familiar with him, unfortunately.
	I could probably, in just a matter of a few minutes, describe both the math and the hardware that's necessary to build a simple time machine.
	It's actually not complicated.
	And this is not science fiction.
	It simply comes from understanding that our universe blinks on and off.
	At 1.039 trillion cycles per second, and the harmonics of that frequency can be used for time travel, travel faster than light, travel between parallel universes, and instant radio communication between vast distances.
	It can also be used and exploited for a number of other very beneficial things, such as age regression, the healing of the body by simply regressing it To a time before either a disease or an accident happened.
	And I describe that in a book that I've written called The Single Cure.
	That by understanding that our universe blinks on and off, it makes it possible to use an electric charge field around the body part or around the entire body and it can be age regressed.
	For example, if someone's in a car accident, they can be regressed to a time Minutes before the accident happened and if you've broken your arm, for example, the break will no longer exist.
	Richard Bartlett, do you know who Richard Bartlett is in Matrix Energetics?
	I am not familiar with Richard Bartlett.
	All right, he utilizes that.
	He started out as a chiropractor and he uses that very principle.
	He actually does what he calls time travel.
	He's read a number of physics books to try to translate what some of the amazing things that happened to him.
	But one of the things is literally that.
	He takes his patient and he sort of counts them back into a previous time when the thing didn't exist, in essence.
	And it does work, so I believe you're quite correct there.
	So, you know, it's fascinating you guys have come to the same conclusion from very different angles, it appears.
	Yes, it's simply understanding what I feel is a very important scientific discovery and understand what broad use can be made of it.
	What I will also say is, unfortunately, there are some bad things that can be done with this technology.
	And I'll give you one example.
	For those readers and viewers that are familiar with drjudywood.com, I encourage you to take a look at that, and you will see that she spent five years basically putting together a lot of compelling scientific evidence that strongly suggests that the World Trade Center was brought down by a high-powered infrared laser.
	It was not brought down by jets or burning jet fuel.
	The photographic images are the simplest proof of that.
	There were a number of photographs, aerial photographs, taken on the afternoon of 9-11, and looking down in the debris of the buildings, you can see cookie-cutter holes that go all the way into the basement.
	There is no jet fuel that burns through concrete and steel making round holes.
	There's one rational explanation for that, and it's a high-powered laser was used to bring down those buildings.
	I've written an e-book called Technical Description of the Infrared Laser Used on the World Trade Center on 9-11.
	And in it I describe how our government has clearly designed this satellite weapon system, and it uses the blinking frequency of the universe.
	It uses a harmonic of that frequency to accelerate molecules in time.
	It's basically a time machine.
	The reason that we saw so much dust at the site was the steel and concrete was literally turned into dust by accelerating it through time.
	And I know that's going to be a very controversial statement.
	I encourage people to look at DrJudyWood.com and she's got a number of videos that show visually you can see large steel beams standing vertically and in a matter of seconds that turns to dust and just falls to the ground.
	That's not burning jet fuel that does that.
	There's no existing technology that scientists know about that could explain that.
	No one has been able to explain the massive amount of dust that accumulated or the fact that the building went down faster than freefall.
	Look into it.
	It's a stunning expose of the facts around what happened on 9-11.
	And it strongly suggests that a high-powered laser was used to bring the building down.
	Yes.
	Now, what do you know about particle beam weapons, if anything?
	And are you aware of places like linear accelerators that are actually using particle beam weapons and this other technology, which I have to search back in my notes for the name of it.
	But it is, in essence, sounds like you're very close to that kind of concept as well.
	I am not that familiar with particle beam weapons, I have to say.
	Delving into weapons is not my first choice.
	Well, I appreciate that, but there is some fascinating information that has been revealed, to me at least, and it also relates to CERN, but it relates to what is, in essence, linear accelerators, and I'm wondering, you know, you know, this link up of, in a certain sense, speeding something up or, I don't know, backing it up so that it can get to that place that you're talking about.
	It may have something to do with that, which I'm not sure how to even phrase into a sentence.
	But, you know, until I have to find the actual name, it's called...
	Yeah, I can't think of it.
	I've got to remember it.
	It's a very interesting...
	A scalar weapon?
	It's like that, but it's got a specific name, and I'd love to run it by you.
	I do wonder, what is your take then on, you know, the Apollo trips to the moon, NASA? What is, in essence, the Van Allen Belt?
	The fact that we have been told that obviously we got there, but we have had help.
	And this is actually several of my witnesses, and many of them scientists and so on, talking about this.
	So do you have, you know, in other words, you acknowledge that this principle that you're talking about is probably in use already in what we call the secret space program.
	So do you feel that NASA, in essence, had to use this principle to, in fact, go to the moon?
	Or what is your position on that story?
	Well, you bring up a good point, Carrie.
	I've had the good opportunity to hear some of William Tompkins' recent discussions about what he saw on camera back during the initial moon landings.
	And Neil Armstrong has quoted a famous quote that he made, something to the effect of We had the capability to drive Ferraris to the moon and we went on bicycles or something like that.
	It's apparent that lots of folks knew that the technology existed, but they weren't going to bring it out for public display.
	I was particularly fond of William Tompkins when he expressed his fascination with seeing An entire building floating about a mile above the lunar surface back in the late 60s.
	Before I had heard him say that, I had previously written an e-book called City in the Sky Basic Theory and Design for a Floating City.
	And in it, I describe basically what I gave you previously about massless technology, that by synchronizing with this blinking frequency and putting that signal on the surface of any object, you can render the object massless.
	And that applies to a building, it applies to a spaceship, it applies to a bowling ball, anything that you want to put it on.
	Which interestingly enough, the Hutchison Effect, the famous gentleman in Canada that's been demonstrating levitating bowling balls and such for many years now, my take on that is he has discovered the blinking frequency of our universe, but at the way those objects levitate, Is they become massless by mixing radio frequencies with...
	I believe he's using low-intensity x-rays.
	And when those frequencies combine, they will occasionally hit the precise point that creates a massless object.
	So he's basically hitting the harmonic of the blinking frequencies.
	And he's got a number of videos that are available where he shows these...
	Instantaneous fires, these bizarre fires that just erupt on the surface of a model.
	I mean, it's clearly not temperature.
	There's no fuel to provide the flame.
	The object is made out of metal, and yet it just bursts into fire and lasts for a few seconds and goes out.
	And interestingly, that's exactly what was seen in some of the videos on Dr.
	Judy Wood's website.
	These strange fires that would just burst off of a steel beam for several seconds and then retreat.
	And it's clear that it has to do with the blinking frequency and what I would describe as rapid aging.
	So in other words...
	It's hitting that blinking frequency and causing the surface molecules to rapidly age, which we perceive as burning, if that makes sense.
	So that may be a partial explanation for why the Hutchinson effect was able to generate those fires, as well as some of the videos on drjudywood.com.
	Okay, well, actually, yeah, and that's all very fascinating.
	I wonder if you have thought about remote viewing, and, you know, because we're talking about acquiring objects at a distance.
	Also, there is a time travel aspect to remote viewing that they don't talk about.
	And, you know, in essence, what they call signal non-locality.
	And being able to go across time, you know, all of this kind of factors into where you're going, but I'm actually reading something that's talking about, I think they're called longitudinal waves, and I don't know if they're called ELM or ELF, but do you know what I mean, those extra long waves?
	And I'm wondering, because they say that...
	Actually, Annie Jacobson has written a book called Phenomena that's getting some notice out there from people.
	And it's all about the work of Andrzej, I don't know how to say his first name, but Andrzej Pluharik and his sort of trajectory and fascination with Altered states and also in essence using mushrooms supposedly that the military's investigation into using mushrooms to alter the mind and They they found that these ELF waves these very long waves Would
	contribute to psychic abilities so it's all about sort of you know ESP or they called it back then and psychic abilities telepathy etc and But remote viewing does fall into this category as well.
	So in essence, what I'm asking is, you're in essence talking about a kind of entrainment That the mind could do in theory and that the whole men stare at goats idea of Aligning oneself in such a way that you could get your frequency to match say the wall Which maybe mean go down to zero as you would call it in the sine wave But do you know what I'm saying?
	In other words, there's no reason why the mind can't do these things and that in essence means that humans can time travel and With their minds, in essence, and whether they take their bodies or not is sort of beside the point, but can happen.
	Well, I think you're on the right track there.
	Certainly, I think consciousness has unlimited potential, and there have been a number of people that have said that.
	I think Seth, in particular, said that there are no limits to the self.
	In other words, there are no limits or boundaries within time or space.
	So any limitations that you possess are self-imposed.
	So it's an interesting challenge as a development.
	There are lots of stories out there about people that have been able to sort of Break those barriers, not just mentally, but physically as well.
	Didi Holm being one from the 19th century and other folks that claim to do things such as levitation and simply by projecting the mind or the thoughts.
	I cannot say that I'm an expert in that field.
	I do find it intriguing.
	I'm probably A better fit to talk about things that are technology related and mathematics that can be shown.
	That's very appealing to me because that's something that's repeatable and provable and something that I hope to sort of expand the base on because there's so much available to us with simple ideas and simple math that we can improve the standard of living and the quality of life for people All over the planet with technology that's available now.
	And this is not science fiction.
	These things are available to us now.
	There's a big push by folks like Dr.
	Stephen Greer to bring out some of this free energy technology.
	And I'll probably sound like a broken record, but my attitude is just I don't need the hardware, just show me the math.
	I can build the hardware if you just show me the math.
	So I'm hoping that there's other scientists and engineers out there that have kind of been at the sidelines of disclosure and a lot of the phenomena going on, and I understand that.
	But I think what could bring them out from the shadows, maybe, is show them the math.
	You can convince an engineer or scientist that it's worth his salt very quickly when you say, here's the math.
	It's very compelling.
	Fair enough.
	Well, this is all fascinating.
	By the way, I did find the name of the weapon that I was trying...
	I understand you don't specialize in weapons at all, but it's called a Quark Gluon Plasma Weapon.
	It's associated with Brookhaven Labs, and a guy named J.B. Michaels investigated all of this, and it is...
	It's quite fascinating.
	I have a description here that I don't know if it means anything, but it talks about ions.
	Atoms stripped of their electrons, leaving a bare nuclei, will whirl in opposite directions around a 3.8 kilometer circular tunnel at the speed of light and then collide.
	And there's an incredible amount of energy that takes place and I don't know if any of this relates to what you're talking about in terms of...
	Because it does sound...
	You're talking about using the math, but ultimately you have to build something.
	And in the building of it, you indicated that there might be some either radiation or something, some byproduct, right?
	Certainly.
	Particularly when you're dealing with...
	High energy subatomic particles, you're probably exposing the field to some form of radiation that may be ionizing and harmful.
	Yes, I would agree.
	Okay, so are you familiar with Keshe and, you know, the Iranian physicist who I've interviewed a number of times, and he is talking, you know, about plasma physics, supposedly.
	And there's a lot of criticism that is sent his way.
	Some of it, I think, has to do with the way he explains things, which is a cultural issue.
	But nonetheless, how does plasma physics relate to what you're talking about?
	Well, I cannot say that I'm an expert on plasma physics.
	It is a field unto itself in most graduate programs at major universities, and it is kind of a blend of art and science because you're dealing with very exotic properties within a plasma, both temperature and pressure and the state of the particles that are within it.
	It's beyond my expertise, I would say.
	It's certainly a fascinating area for development in physics.
	Well, I was told by one witness that plasma is a state that is neither here nor there.
	In other words, it's not liquid, it's not solid, and it's not even gas, actually.
	Although it can be, I think, temporarily gas.
	But He actually indicated that it was almost an altered state.
	And you're talking also about 4D, in essence.
	And you're saying the fourth dimension is mass, which I thought was a really interesting statement.
	And it is hard to wrap my mind around what you mean by that.
	I've always seen the fourth dimension more like this horizontal line that goes out infinitely.
	Like that...
	4D is actually a flat plane that goes out in every direction completely more or less flat, which would be more like your mass-less description than to be with mass.
	But I don't know what you mean by mass.
	In other words, how does mass materialize in the fourth dimension?
	Well, I think it's common for us to think in terms of...
	X, Y, and Z, three dimensions, and time being the fourth dimension.
	In fact, it's almost given that when we talk about where you're going to be for lunch, there's an implied time for a meeting such that that dimensionality of time can be met if we both do the same thing at the same time.
	But in fact, as many physicists know, all of time is simultaneous.
	The spacious present moment contains all periods of time, both past and future in our terms, and all parallel universes and all probabilities therein.
	The spacious present moment contains all of that.
	The limitation is within us.
	The limitation, our subconscious mind literally perceives all of those things happening simultaneously, and our ego filters it out.
	Freud said that the primary function of the ego was to retain and reserve all your chaotic and dark thoughts.
	Well, fortunately, Seth cleared that up and said, no, that's not the primary function of the ego.
	The primary purpose of the ego is to keep you focused in one reality at a time.
	It's not that those other realities don't exist and they're not happening.
	It's your ego's primary function is to filter all that out.
	We simply could not deal with multiple realities happening simultaneously.
	It would overwhelm us.
	We couldn't do the simplest of tasks within a reality or a universe where everything that is perceivable we saw with our conscious mind.
	It would be absolutely overwhelming.
	Well, isn't that, doesn't that get into the right brain, left brain dichotomy and the fact that, again, this is Richard Bartlett's also getting got investigated all of this, but in essence, that the right side of the brain being conceptual, that the right side of the brain being conceptual, whether, whereas the left is quantifying things.
	So that's in essence, the Freud side of the male side and the other side being likened to the female.
	So there are no limitations in that side of the brain.
	And that in order to speak and deal with this reality, we have to, in essence, in a certain sense, funnel the right side through the left side and then make connection with this reality so that we can talk and do certain things.
	But it doesn't mean that we're not simultaneously operating with both sides and that we don't perceive it at least subliminally.
	And this is where people that are more conscious can access the right side more often.
	And more consciously.
	So, I mean, I wouldn't say that it's out of our grasp.
	I just think that, yeah, we're immersed in this reality for a purpose and to be able to manipulate and act in this reality, we make it more finite and linear, right?
	We're seeing things linearly.
	But that is an illusion, absolutely.
	So, I totally agree with you and I think Most physicists would.
	But it is interesting what you're saying in terms of this new way of looking at it and then translating.
	I guess you can say you build the equations and then you build the models.
	Is that how you would view it?
	Yes, certainly.
	The math has to come first.
	The electrical universe that I referred to earlier, and I know that's going to be difficult for Some folks get their arms around just the idea, first of all, that our universe is blinking and the existence of this other universe where the properties of physics and math are beholden for all other physical universes to abide by.
	And I know it's going to be a stretch for them to get their arms around that, but what I think will be convincing and compelling about it is it makes the math work.
	And that's the slam dunk.
	It solves the grand unified field theory.
	It provides a unification of the four fundamental forces in nature that no one has ever been able to do.
	No one has ever even proposed a possible solution for unifying those four forces.
	But I challenge anyone that's interested in this subject to look at it.
	I have a simple mathematical geometric diagram that you can look at that explains how four fundamental forces come about from one force in an electrical universe, and they are all related.
	The best image that I could give you is imagine a clock with four hands on it that are each 90 degrees apart and spinning at a trillion cycles per second.
	And at any given moment, if you stop that clock very quickly and take the sign angle of each one of those hands, what you'll discover is it all adds up.
	And I'm oversimplifying a little bit, but if you look at the diagram, it's a free paper.
	It's called The mathematical solution for the unification of four fundamental forces in nature.
	And to my knowledge, no one has ever even proposed a solution for that.
	So I hope if there's some folks that are interested in that, some scientists out there, I hope you'll download that and read it.
	I think you'll find it very convincing.
	Okay, now, are you familiar with Richard Allen Miller, the physicist that I interviewed?
	Yes, I have seen one of your interviews with him.
	Okay, well, he is writing papers right now on time travel as well.
	So maybe I should get you guys together.
	So it would be fascinating to have the two of you talk and me to mediate or moderate or whatever.
	Whichever was required, mediating or moderating.
	So how does gravity factor into your model?
	Gravity is one of the four fundamental forces.
	I think the best way to explain that is mathematically.
	And for folks that know the simple formula for calculating the gravitational force using gravitational constant, and if you compare that with the equation that's used for calculating The electromagnetic force you'll notice some similarities between the two right away you go wow these these equations look quite similar and the thing that I put in my paper where I show the mathematical unification these
	four forces in the appendix I've presented why if you compare gravitation and electromagnetism it's very similar because and scientists and engineers will understand this math the limit as The radius,
	or the distance between the two objects that you're trying to calculate the gravitational attraction force between, as the distance between those approaches zero, and the math is called the limit as x approaches zero, or r approaches zero for these, and you'll see how the two values for these two equations become the same value.
	And I demonstrate that in the appendix of that paper.
	So there's another mathematical example that shows how these two forces really come from the same force.
	So for those folks that are interested, I hope you'll take a look at that.
	But it's basically how things resolve to the electrical universe, which is a single point.
	And that single point occurs a trillion times a second in our terms.
	It's a fascinating subject.
	Absolutely.
	How do you deal with what is in essence vortexes and portals?
	Maybe torsion physics gets into this?
	Because the spiral seems to be an extremely important aspect to being able to time travel.
	So how do you relate to that?
	Well, I am familiar with some of the Einstein-Rosenbridge concepts and some of the math there.
	It's actually fairly complex and it requires...
	I think the reason that a lot more effort has not been put into it because What the math shows is that it takes a large amount of energy to do anything with it.
	Most physicists that look at it go, well, we don't have that much energy on the entire planet, so how are we going to make one of these wormholes?
	It's a conundrum from the point of view.
	I'm certainly not an expert on this.
	I'm commenting a little out of bounds here.
	The information that I am familiar with basically has shown that the energy required for an Einstein-Rosen bridge is generally beyond the technological capabilities for anything that we currently possess.
	Now, having said that, there are a number of authors that have said that Einstein-Rosen bridges are naturally occurring, and if that's the case, Then it's something that we could utilize.
	I think then the first problem would be, before you step into one, you might want to know where it comes out on the other end.
	So being able to construct one that has defined ends is very different from trying to utilize one where you just see one end and it's naturally occurring.
	So I'm not sure that that would necessarily solve the problem for us either.
	But it is a fascinating field, and I think there's a lot of physicists that are looking at that as a technology that could solve a lot of problems.
	For example, traveling vast distances without using a vehicle.
	Or being able to utilize the natural energy of the universe to travel rather than having to generate it yourself.
	So there's a lot of great ideas there and a lot of potential.
	I don't think that we've solved it quite yet.
	Okay, well I know at least Mark Richards would disagree with you there because he's talking about wormholes and traveling through them and and so on a lot but there is a an issue in terms of man-made versus natural and there's also the the aspect that involves I don't know if you've ever heard this but the idea that UFOs can actually enter this dimension easier than When they go through what is in essence a storm
	front where a vortex has been created by the storm and then they come in.
	So have you ever heard of that?
	And in a sense that would be a wormhole that was kind of being constructed In fact, there are some that say, and I think Mark Richards is one of them, that in fact at CERN, what they are doing is creating a wormhole to the Draco dimension,
	Draco, you know, system, and that they're bringing in a large equipment, the reptoids as he calls them, back to this planet, and that that's actually what he thinks CERN is being used for.
	That may be You know, kind of going a bit out there for you, but I don't know.
	But, you know, this idea of storms is the first part of the question.
	And then if you want to go into the second part, you can.
	Sure.
	Okay.
	No, it's certainly an interesting subject.
	I can't say I know much about it.
	I am not familiar with the use of a vortex or a storm.
	That's the first that I've heard of that.
	And unfortunately, I'm not familiar with CERN being used for...
	Anything other than its stated purpose, although I agree it's possible.
	I just haven't seen credible employees within CERN come out and make such statements.
	And again, I would not be an expert on that, but is it possible?
	Yes, I just haven't seen that myself.
	Well, what about the spiral light over Norway?
	That was a spiral.
	It seemed to have been created somehow.
	And some would say that it actually was a wormhole.
	Any thoughts on that?
	I did see that.
	That was an amazing piece of footage there.
	I wish I knew a little bit more about who took it.
	If it was taken by several different people from several different angles, that would certainly be helpful.
	I simply saw one video and it was truly stunning footage.
	I thought, my gosh, is that a natural phenomenon?
	What is that?
	Certainly very interesting.
	I'd love to learn more about it.
	I would certainly like to confirm its veracity.
	I don't Is it possible to artificially create something like that in Photoshop?
	It's possible.
	So you're not sure that it was actually in the sky over...
	I think it was Norway, if I remember correctly.
	At any rate, that's fair enough.
	I thought it was on many newscasts.
	Of course, we never know when newscasters nowadays are putting up, in essence, fake news, but they've been doing this for a very long time anyway.
	And there did seem to be some corroborating evidence that there was, in fact, this blue spiral in the sky over Norway for a period of time that was photographed by multiple news outlets.
	But rather than going to all of that at this point, what I'd like to find out is, have you had offers from places like NASA or Black Projects or You know, to come back to do some of the work that you've written books about to, you know, in other words, have you been approached or not?
	And if not, you know, what is your sort of position if you were to be approached by one of those, you know, even a black projects agency?
	What would be, you know, have you turned them down?
	What's your story in that regard?
	That's a fair question.
	No one has contacted me that I'm aware of.
	I will say that I've had lots and lots of phone problems and continue to have phone problems with my phone service just completely being unavailable for hours at a time.
	While my attorney is standing next to me using the same network, my phone's working fine.
	And this has been going on for quite some time.
	The latest...
	Issue that I've been dealing with.
	I filed a couple of complaints with the FCC that my phone, my home computer, and my work computer are all being routed to a company called Encapsula.
	And it appears that this is being done to hide my location.
	And it's certainly nothing that I have requested.
	But what it does is anonymize my IP address and change it about once an hour.
	Again, on three different devices, this happened at all the same time.
	T-Mobile, AT&T, and Comcast, on almost the same exact day, all started routing my internet communications through a company called Encapsula.
	Fascinating.
	Yeah, I can't conclude other than that sounds like a government body that's involved in making that happen because big companies don't get together and do anything on the same day.
	Okay, now, yeah, well, alright, so Encapsula, we can certainly look them up on the internet, but I don't know if we'll find the actual company or not.
	Have you seen a UFO, number one, and number two, have you been approached by, you know, beings from other planets, etc., that sort of thing?
	I don't have any such stories, Carrie.
	I have not been a participant in all that.
	Not that I don't find it fascinating.
	Unfortunately, I just don't have any such stories.
	I'm kind of a practical, low-key engineer type and interested in the technology and the math.
	Have you ever tried to look at the sky using night vision goggles?
	I have not.
	I have not.
	That sounds like an exercise that maybe I should try sometime.
	Well, you know, when you're talking about time travel and UFOs are notoriously able to sort of navigate through in that way, it seems like maybe you could do some what you call real-time travel.
	On-the-ground research that might complement your mathematics at some level.
	But anyway, it's a delight to talk to you.
	You've got a fascinating theory, and I think there's a lot of validity there intuitively, I say, because I'm not a physicist.
	I'm not a mathematician by any stretch, and so other people would have to sort of look into it.
	Now, I am looking in the chat for questions.
	Questions and I've asked if someone can put if anyone wants to ask a question if they put them in all caps so that I can grab them quickly because it's it's it's difficult to you know there's quite a bit of chat we have quite a good audience here and so we've got a lot of listeners but you know there's always a smaller portion that that make it into the chat and then even smaller portion that bother to ask questions so I'm kind of waiting to see if anything shows up here I do need,
	again, those questions to show up as soon as possible so that before we kind of wind this show down, is there anything while we're waiting that you haven't been, you know, we haven't covered here that you would like to talk about?
	And like I said, you know, you can certainly promote your books.
	And one last question I'm just dying to know is...
	Do the people you work with know how interesting your mind is, so to speak?
	Do you share this with colleagues?
	I think that Richard Lighthouse is an assumed name, but I don't know that for sure.
	In other words, do colleagues know that you go down these roads, or are you trying to keep your two lives separate, that sort of thing?
	I'm a pretty low-key guy, Carrie.
	I work for an engineering and construction company, and we do very practical, down-to-earth things every day.
	So you're saying they don't know anything about the books you write and so on?
	And I don't think they'd be particularly interested.
	Okay, fair enough.
	Really interesting, I have to say.
	Now, do you happen to live near the coastline?
	I'm not far from the coastline.
	Houston is fairly close to Galveston.
	It's not very far away.
	Do you have anything to say about the Gulf oil spill or any of that?
	The oil industry is big business in Houston and the state of Texas.
	I know some of those issues are still ongoing.
	I think that it was an unfortunate accident.
	I know that the industry as a whole is taking a lot of steps to ensure that it doesn't happen again, and I hope that it doesn't happen again.
	The equipment and some of the things that companies are trying to do at these depths and pressures It's truly monumental, the technology that goes into some of these things.
	We see it as being very Earth-based and so it can't be that high-tech, but some of the pressures and temperatures and things that they do at these great depths at the bottom of the Gulf of Mexico, it's almost like making a trip to the moon.
	It's a very expensive trip.
	The pressures and temperatures and the hardware and the design efforts that go into these big projects is very impressive, and I don't think most folks see that or are aware of the complexities that go into it.
	They simply see it as just another oil rig.
	This one happens to be in water, but it's much more complicated than It seems on the surface, and I'm not even an expert on that field, but I do hope, I do think that the industry and the industry organizations have taken a number of important steps to improve the safety to see that something like that doesn't happen again, and I applaud those efforts.
	Okay, fair enough.
	This is a question.
	We are getting some questions in the chat here.
	And someone is asking about the D-Wave computers.
	And actually, I was going to ask that.
	And then it went right out of my mind.
	So I'm really happy someone else remembered that.
	So Giordi Rose, the company is called D-Wave.
	And he has a 20-minute presentation on YouTube.
	If you haven't seen it, I highly recommend it.
	He is, in essence, saying that his computer...
	Is capable of, in essence, telepathy, communicating with a human that's standing near it, and that it is going fifth dimensional, is what he calls it.
	So, are you aware of him?
	I think that he deals a lot with mathematics, actually, as I recall, and certainly computer science.
	So, is that something familiar to you, and...
	You know, has that been something you've been looking into?
	I am not familiar with that, although it sounds very interesting.
	I will certainly try to take a look at it during the next few days.
	This is the first I've heard of it, but it does sound very interesting.
	Okay, what about along the same lines artificial intelligence?
	Do you go down that road?
	Does that coincide with some of your theories?
	It does seem like you're sort of talking about, in a sense, a theory of the universe or the multiverse or whatever you want to call it.
	So artificial intelligence would seem to factor in there somewhere.
	Have you gone down that road?
	It's a good question, Carrie.
	I can't say that I have.
	I'm not much of an expert on AI. It is a very fine...
	Art and it crosses science industry.
	It's very complex.
	I have a great deal of respect for some of the folks that write the software and the code for these things, but it's certainly well outside of my expertise.
	I have seen where Elon Musk has made a number of comments recently on it, and I hope that he's not correct.
	I hope that's not the direction that we're going.
	But, again, I would have to be a novice on that subject.
	All right.
	But I think you bring up a good point.
	Oh, well, thank you.
	So let's see.
	I'm trying to see what is going on here.
	I've already asked you about Anderson.
	This person is saying the Anderson Institute, but I believe you're talking about...
	Anderson, which is the Time Travel Institute in essence, and I've already asked you about David Anderson.
	So unless there's another Anderson Institute that this writer is asking about, does that mean anything to you?
	I think we already answered that question.
	I have heard about the Time Travel Institute, and I believe I had visited the website associated with that a while back.
	I'm not sure that I could comment positively on it, so maybe I won't say anything.
	I always applaud folks' efforts to delve into subjects that have been difficult, and certainly time travel is one of them.
	I think I've approached it in my own way, and I hope that people can find that helpful.
	Fair enough.
	Okay, I am just looking to see if there's anything else here that might relate, that I could ask you right before we let you go.
	I know we've kept you for a while here.
	I guess someone wants to know, you know, there is a link up between mathematics, and I don't know if you do your mathematics using computers or if you, you know, do it on your own somehow, but people are asking, do you think computers are sentient?
	That's a good question.
	It's actually a very interesting question.
	I think I can...
	I'll let Seth quote on that.
	His quotation is that all things possess consciousness without exception.
	There is no such thing as a particle or an elementary particle or A combined body or mass or substance that does not possess consciousness.
	Everything literally possesses consciousness.
	Fascinating.
	I agree, and I've been having that discussion with Mark Richards recently as well.
	Someone wants to know, are you familiar with the work of Dr.
	Emmett Brown?
	Unfortunately, no, I'm not.
	Okay.
	No problem.
	You know, obviously, you know, people have their areas of expertise and they don't necessarily cross over, but it is fascinating to me sometimes we can...
	You know, Camelot's kind of a centralization point because I go into so many different areas.
	And so I come across people whose work dovetails, but they know nothing about each other.
	And it could be valuable to compare notes, you know.
	So I think it's interesting.
	All right.
	So at this point, I think we'll close this down, but I... Do you want to ask you if there's any parting remarks you'd like to make or if there's anything you want to say about anything we did not cover and you'd like to add that?
	Well, just that I'd like to refer folks to ourlighthouse.com.
	The majority of my ebooks that are available are free.
	That's not an accident.
	That is deliberate.
	I'm hoping to get the word out.
	I do think this is really an important scientific discovery and I want folks to be able to take advantage of it.
	It solves a number of very important physics problems and it can help us create a better standard of living and a better quality of life for people by getting that technology out the open and so that is my goal and aspiration.
	Wonderful.
	All right.
	Well, it's been a lot of fun talking to you, and I hope that we can reconnect in the future.
	I'd love you to come back to me and tell me if you, you know, took a look at any of these people we've mentioned or any of these concepts and see if you might have more to say about them based on, you know, Kind of looking at your own work and looking at that,
	whatever that happens to be, because there were some topics that I brought up that I think that you would eventually be investigating from your standpoint, and it certainly would be fascinating to hear what you have to say about these things from someone who concentrates The way you do coming from the angle of the Seth material into mathematics and coming up with this fascinating sort of theory,
	which I think there's a lot of merit to what you're saying, and I'm also going to try to get Sarfati to come on my show, and I'm going to try to maybe send some of your stuff to him prior to that, or at least ask him on the show to take a look.
	So be warned.
	Okay, no, that's great.
	I welcome that.
	I welcome all feedback.
	And I very much appreciate the time to be a guest on your show, Carrie.
	All right.
	All right.
	So take care, everyone.
	Actually, this is another note to you and to my listeners.
	Tomorrow night at 7 p.m., I am going to have David Adair.
	He is a scientist.
	In essence, some would say a rocket scientist, but certainly a fusion plasma scientist.
	Who kind of went off on his own, but at a young age was brought in by black project, you know, to black projects to, he says, deal with an alien technology that had crashed that he was able to climb up on at the age of 17 in Area 51 underground.
	And he describes this story in depth.
	We're going to get into that story.
	I did interview him previous to his speaking at the conference at the UFOCon recently, and so now we're going to actually get into those details.
	So that's tomorrow night at 7 o'clock.
	He's a fascinating man, apparently quite brilliant, and it may be that there's something there for you as well that, Richard, you might want to Take a look at.
	You know, you don't have to watch live.
	You can get it at any time.
	It'll be on my YouTube channel.
	But I urge you to take a look.
	And I can put you in touch with David Adair if you should be interested.
	So, in essence, he's talking about alien technology.
	A conscious machine that was an artificially intelligent conscious machine that he interacted with.
	And he put his hands on it and turned on.
	It responded to him.
	It seemed to have communicated with him telepathically.
	He thinks he's still in touch with it.
	He's just gone off and, you know, he basically had a career working in the high-tech industry in a more conventional way since that time.
	But never forgot the experience.
	He has what you call an eidetic perspective.
	I think it's called Edetic Memory, where he can remember every conversation, everything that ever happened to him in his life.
	So he relates it in a great story sort of way, saying what happened to him, and it is fascinating.
	The machine came on, interacted with him, and then when he left, it turned off, and according to what he understands, it never turned back on.
	So there was some connection.
	And apparently he built a similar type machine.
	And there is this element in the design of the machine, which he described, I believe, if I'm not wrong, he said it actually, the flow of the plasma went in a figure eight, something like that.
	So there is an interesting link up possibly there with your research.
	At any rate, it's been great having you on the show.
	Thank you very much.
	And thanks, everyone, for watching.
	We'll be back tomorrow night with David Adair.
	Thank you.
	Thanks again.
	Thanks.
	Thank you.
	All right.

▲