Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

March 24, 2017 - Project Camelot

01:44:52

INTERVIEW WITH MICHAEL SHRIMPTON AND OLE DAMMEGARD SOUND EDITED RE LONDON MARCH 2017

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Hi, everyone.
	I'm Carrie Cassidy from Project Camelot, and I am very happy today to have two guests to talk to you about the London attack that happened just a day or two ago.
	And one is Michael Shrimpton, and the other is Ole Damogard, as our banner says.
	And both are extremely knowledgeable in this area of what you might say is so-called terrorist attacks, false flags, and...
	Other kinds of politically motivated sort of violence I guess you could call it against the people.
	And against, in theory, against government, although that does remain in question, just who's behind all of this, and that is why we were doing the broadcast today.
	So I want to welcome Michael Shrimpton and Ole Domogard.
	We have Ole for just 30 minutes or less, so we're going to try to give him the floor initially, and I want to say that Michael Shrimpton is a barrister.
	And let me get both of them on the screen so that you can take a look.
	And guys, go ahead and say hello to everyone.
	Hi, this is Michael in England.
	Hi, this is Ole in Spain.
	Okay, so we're very European at this moment, and that's great fun and very appropriate, I guess you might say.
	So at this moment, what I'd like to do is just say that Michael Shrimpton is a former barrister, current barrister, and we're going to maybe go into a bit of that and see where his status is today.
	And he has been a whistleblower about a terrorist, so-called terrorist event, a very real possible attack on what was, in essence, the Olympics, I believe, ceremony was the point of the attack, but we can go more into that with Michael once we get him on the line here to To speak.
	And then Ole is an investigator, a researcher going way back.
	And I've had him on my show multiple times.
	And I do want to say he's written a book called Kudata in Slow Motion, as well as other books since that time.
	Coup d'etat in slow motion was about the Swedish Prime Minister, Olaf Palmer, and I'm probably massacring his name, but nonetheless.
	And so Ole is originally, I believe, Swedish, and he now lives in Spain out of necessity in part, I believe.
	So Ole, welcome to the show, as well as Michael Shrimpton.
	And Ole, let's start with you.
	I know that you had predicted, I listened to the prediction.
	At the time of what was in essence an attack in Australia, you saw some certain indication symbolism that led you to make a prediction that at this time appears to be actually accurate.
	Is that correct?
	Yeah, it's the third time I would suggest that I've been one month before it actually happened able to predict the targets.
	Wonderful.
	And so what happens is you have predicted the target, although, and this is something you can really talk to us about, this scenario has so many conflicting stories, even to this moment.
	That it is not, at least for me, clear as to what has actually happened here.
	And I know there's a sort of a playbook that you talk about them going through, etc.
	But before we go there, can you explain why you made the prediction you did?
	I spent about 30 years looking into top political assassinations and false flag attacks, which I would call state-sponsored terrorism.
	A false flag is where it is the people that are there to defend us that is actually the ones doing these crimes to us, creating an outer enemy to scare the living bejesus out of us so that we will go into emotional, oh my god, I need to be saved, I need protection, and then accept their solution, which every single time is the same.
	More and more military police, more and more surveillance, more and more You having to give up your freedom, your liberties, all of that.
	And over the years, what I've come to see, in my humble opinion, is that we are looking at coordinated attacks in multiple countries, most of them, if not all, NATO countries or countries.
	That have some kind of security agreement, like Canada, Australia, the US, with NATO, and so on.
	So, in Europe, you will see that it's the same countries being allegedly attacked again, repeatedly, again, again, the same theme, again, again, as well as Canada, Australia, and mass shootings in the US. And one bizarre thing that has come up Again and again and again is that they leave like clues for the next upcoming attack.
	They leave it there in plain sight.
	And I've spoken to insiders like Chip Tatum and other people like, why do they do this?
	Why do also, I mean like if you look at 9-11, there were hundreds of things in films and movies and And photos, everything, saying this is going to happen.
	We had no idea at the time, but people on the inside have told me that it's because the people behind the New World Order, their way of interpreting the law of karma is that if they let us know, if they show what they're going to do to us and we do not react, The bad karma will come on our shoulders, not theirs, the attacker's.
	And I spoke to Chip Tatum and he said he had never heard of that, but he said it makes absolute total sense because he was involved in false flags during his career, working for the CIA as a deep cover agent and assassin.
	So what I found was the first one I was able to predict one month before it happened was the Copenhagen shooting.
	Where that was connected with the Charlie Hebdo and several other, an attack in Dublin, then Charlie Hebdo, then Copenhagen, and then a planned attack in Italy.
	And so once I started seeing how they work, when the signs started turning up that they were going to hit a train station in Denmark, in Copenhagen, I thought, okay, maybe I'm totally wrong.
	But what can be worse than me knowing and not doing anything, so with the risk of looking like an absolute stupid whatever tinfoil hat, I went out on international radio's warning saying, if I'm right, it's going to happen around this train station at this time, more or less, and so on and so on.
	Because it was also connected with a drill.
	There are always drills right before these events.
	That's where they rehearse the whole thing and then they do the thing and I went out there nothing happened the day that I said instead it happened exactly one month later on the hour so there was a I think I was on your show and many other shows so where people were asking me and one of the things that I said was that How come the intelligence agencies of these countries are not contacting me saying,
	how the hell could you know that?
	Are you somehow involved?
	But no one.
	It's only you're just met with quiet and silence.
	I went straight to Denmark after the attacks.
	I took people around there in a group showing what I believe was actually happening right in front of the police with armed guards and military, all of these things.
	Debunking it on location in front of a camera.
	Okay, so after I became aware of this, I've been intensely studying photos and footage and everything, looking for the clue of the upcoming event.
	And at the Bataclan, November 13, last year, there were this bizarre Picture from inside the Bataclan where you had that's the only photo from inside where you see the the claimed bodies on the floor There's about 25 and around them was painted like a heart shape in blood like one like three feet wide Like somebody had used a giant brush painting this bizarre heart
	shape around them.
	So I didn't understand it.
	I thought maybe it's the, you know, Paris is the symbol of the Romans, all of these things.
	Maybe that was why they did it.
	But it turned out when the next attack was at the airport in Brussels, that was the Logo of the brussel airport and that took place exactly one year ago on the 22nd of March which is also 322 skull and bones many many they always do it on very symbolic dates on symbolic locations and so on so when I saw oh my god that was the sign for the next one in Bataclan Then I was looking everywhere
	at the brussel airport.
	I even went there looking for what what are there any signs for the next one and I found it there was a one of the cafes and at the airport that had been blown up in the background on there was a wall painting of the eiffel tower lying down horizontal so I thought oh my god could this be the next time so once again I went out publicly said I don't know, but I'm just pointing it out because I want us to be one step ahead instead of always being one step behind.
	So I went out and said possibly the Eiffel Tower could be the next target.
	Well, just one week later, ISIS came out with a video showing the exact attack almost identical with the Eiffel Tower horizontal.
	And then on the 14th of July, when the Nice attack took place, there was also an alleged attack at the Eiffel Tower, where the whole Eiffel Tower was covered in smoke and fire.
	It looked like it was actually attacked, but it They said, no, no, no, it wasn't an attack afterwards.
	It was just that there was this truck that had gone on, you know, took fire with some fireworks, and that's why this whole smoke was Anyway, then in Nice, there were signs showing that the next target would be Acropolis.
	There were some very strange things pointed towards Acropolis.
	So I thought, oh my God, are they aiming for Acropolis?
	So I went out once again and said, possibly Acropolis could be the next one.
	Well, it wasn't Acropolis.
	It was the Olympia, a supermarket in München.
	Same photographers as in Nice, a German journalist called Richard Gutjard, who turned out to be married to Einar Wilf, one of the former members of the Israeli Knesset, the parliament of Israel, with a military background in Mossad.
	So just by the one who filmed the footage, filmed the truck attack, or alleged attack, We had direct connection with Mossad there, which I think is quite severe in its...
	Well, whatever.
	Three days later, and I also want to say he filmed it from the Westminster Hotel.
	The latest attack was at the Westminster Bridge, right outside the...
	So this is the type of things they point in this whole thing.
	Anyway, so...
	Instead of Acropolis, maybe they had aimed at Acropolis, but since we went out open with it, they had to change the plans.
	I don't know.
	But instead, three, four days later or something like that, boom, they hit the Olympia supermarket in München.
	Who filmed it?
	Richard Goodyear, once again.
	And one of the people that was most interviewed by international media was a young girl called Tamina Stoll, which turned out to be Richard Goodyear's daughter.
	Okay.
	So here we have that.
	And then...
	Let me see here now.
	Before Christmas, there was absolutely no attacks for about two months around the elections in the US. Everybody took a vacation, it seemed, the terrorists, ISIS, everybody who claimed to do these things.
	I say absolutely not.
	Inside jobs here.
	So there was nothing happening until mid of December.
	Then suddenly there seemed to start like an international Christmas theme when it came to terror attacks because they always have like a theme going, something emotional that would get the emotions going.
	So first of all, we were back to Denmark where there was a police officer that was said to have been shot dead in the street, shot point blank for no apparent reason.
	And his last name was Yule, which means Christmas.
	Then, on the exact hour, more or less, when Trump was sealed in as president, on the 19th of December, suddenly we had three attacks at the same time.
	We had the Berlin truck attack, we had the alleged assassination of a Russian ambassador in Ankara, and we had an attack on a mosque in Switzerland.
	Once again, here was the first time where there was an indication of Poland being involved.
	You know, they started pointing towards Poland for the first time in these operations because the truck was from Poland that was hijacked and then driven into this Christmas market.
	I totally debunked that.
	I and many others, I mean, when you look at the logistic, the evidence of the crime scene does not match up at all.
	The truck could not do the maneuvers.
	It couldn't get into the area without crossing, you know, driving right across these big metal, I don't know what they're called, boulders or something like that, you know, that is there to make sure that people can't park or enter.
	Here the truck had passed in through over them without hitting them or knocking them over.
	And also gone in an area killing 12 people, injuring more than 60.
	Footage right away, just 90 seconds after the attack.
	But there's only three people there that are being filmed, sitting there being taken care of.
	Meaning that there should be at least 58 people.
	57 people underneath the truck.
	But the truck couldn't even get into the position where it was.
	It had been reversed into that position.
	And then the whole thing you can see on some footage where police are there putting debris around the truck, like decorations around it.
	And there was also footage of where you see some of the forensic team dressed almost like Santa Claus walking around.
	And the truck itself had been Altered in Photoshop so that it looked like a big Christmas parcel in golden wrapped paper.
	And there again you had I was looking around saying, Richard Guja, if you are here again, I mean, that is just too much.
	Einat Wilf, if you are here again, that would just be too much.
	So they weren't.
	But there again, her colleague at the Tel Aviv University, an internationally recognized terror expert, Israel's top leading terror expert, Shlomo Shapiro, he was on location just a few minutes before the attack took place.
	Very small little area, very very small, just a hundred yards in total.
	And also one of the media responsible people for NATO was on location at the Christmas market and so on.
	New Year's Eve's attack in Istanbul, also another NATO country where these alleged attacks keep repeating, where the shooter, he went into a nightclub, is said to have killed a lot of people.
	He was said to have been dressed in a Santa Claus outfit.
	Then it turned out that he did not.
	The president didn't even go out there and sort of say, no, no, he was not dressed as Santa.
	But then it turned out that the Turkish police for several years had gone undercover in Santa Claus outfits.
	On the outside of this nightclub, there was a big, big banner where there's a bearded guy.
	I don't know who he is.
	I can't read the Turkish, but he's punching Santa right in the face.
	And then we go to Fort Lauderdale.
	I would humbly suggest you have to understand what's going on.
	You have to see it from a higher point of view, a higher level, where we are at the New World Order, where they see the world and the Western world as a chess board, where the different countries are just like chess pieces.
	So these things are...
	Please keep an open mind to what I'm saying and see how NATO exercises, NATO drills often involve up to 14, 15 different countries.
	Then the next one, there was one suddenly in Jerusalem, there was a shock attack there that we've debunked as well with dummies, headless dummies, no blood as usual, even though this one looked pretty advanced.
	Then after that, we had the Fort Lauderdale attack that also, after looking deep into the evidence and so on, very easy to debunk that one as a staged event.
	We're talking about state-sponsored terrorism to create this mayhem of fear everywhere that we should believe that the whole world is in chaos and the terrorists everywhere that wake up every morning while having breakfast, they're planning how to blow you up, that type of mentality.
	So in Fort Lauderdale, you looked at the whole theme and scenario, it didn't match up at all.
	People were both at the departure hall running and the arrivals hall running, same people in different locations, people that were actually hurt, that looked like they were almost dying, there were ambulances driving up and down, not even going Near them, they didn't even care about them because they were crisis actors.
	And then there was this bizarre individual called Santa Paul that was walking around there with what looked like a tinfoil hat.
	I mean, it is in our face what they're doing.
	He has a big dog and he's got bright red trousers and a fluorescent green t-shirt.
	Big white beard.
	I mean, you cannot...
	And when you look at it frame by frame, they manipulated it so it almost looks like they pasted a Santa Claus mask on him.
	But in...
	You know, in...
	After Effects and...
	Final, you know, like film editing afterwards.
	So this guy was also interviewed.
	He was in multiple locations as well, walking around with his big dog, both at the departure, arrival and so on, in the background in different photos.
	So I thought that is a bizarre character.
	He was interviewed and he was named You know, you see the name under the interview, Santa Paul.
	So I thought this is bizarre enough to be possibly a hint about the next thing.
	So I thought Santa Paul, St.
	Paul.
	So I checked out St.
	Paul in Minneapolis, you know, I checked out could it be St.
	Paul's Cathedral in London.
	Couldn't find it.
	There were no signs of attacks there or drills or anything like that.
	And then a few days later came the so-called Melbourne car attack.
	When you look at the quality, it just gets very tiresome because it's the same, the same theme, the same, the same, the same, the same.
	Many times, it's not even the same vehicles that I've been taking photos of in different locations.
	Do you know in Charlie Hebdo, the car that was used when the two terrorists jumped out and allegedly shot the police officer on the pavement?
	I've been there, I've been rolling around on the same pavement being filmed.
	It was not the same vehicle as was said to have been dumped as a getaway car and where they found the forensic ID and that targeted these two individuals.
	Not even the same model.
	One was from 2014, the other one was 2013.
	Different colors on the side mirrors and so on.
	We have the guy that is doing the donuts in Melbourne.
	There's a tow bar on that car, but the car that is abandoned, totally crashed and said to have passed through all of these and killed all of these people and gone through big crowds and so on, did not have a tow bar.
	And it's like I've spoken to many people on location, people that were there when it's said to have happened.
	They didn't see a thing.
	You also can see how the whole thing is directed by a person in blue who's directing the car, showing where to drive and how to, you know, do.
	There's different what is called bouncers that are checking the crowd so that nobody gets too close.
	There are three different Police cars, civilian identical BMWs, silver BMWs and also very strategically positioned buses and trams blocking the whole traffic.
	So the whole location is sealed off, which they always do.
	So anyway, in Melbourne, Then I was looking for, are they going to show us the next clue?
	Because please, please let us stop this madness by seeing the signs so that we can get an end to these stupidities, you know?
	So I was going through all the different evidence that I could find, footage and so on.
	And one of the things that I always look out for is when somebody starts filming before the actual thing happens.
	You know, normally if something happens, bang, an accident, And then you pick up your camera and you start filming.
	But if somebody has the camera up and then it happens, I get suspicious because like, whoa, hang on.
	And here, the first footage of this whole thing is it's zoomed out.
	And the whole intersection where he started doing the donuts, it's more or less empty.
	And then you see the car enter and he starts driving around and doing all of these crazy stuff.
	So I thought, whoa, somebody was aware here.
	So what you need to do is go frame by frame by frame and often look in the center of the What have they sort of focused on when they aimed the camera when it started?
	Because that is also where your subconscious is affected because you're just open for what is coming in.
	And at that point, what I found first of all was that right across this very symbolic building, the train station, the Flinders train station, it is the symbol of Melbourne.
	It's always a very symbolic location they pick.
	And right across the intersection is the St.
	Paul Cathedral in Melbourne.
	So I thought, oh God, it was that St.
	Paul they were pointing at.
	It wasn't St.
	Paul in London as well.
	But on the train station, and when you go frame by frame on the first footage that I'm talking about, it is aimed right at a tower on the other end of this train station.
	And that tower is more or less A copy of Big Ben.
	So I thought, are you kidding me?
	So I felt, okay, maybe I will look like an absolute brain-dead individual, but I'm not taking any chances.
	So I was, on the 21st of February, I was on a radio show, an American radio show called Seju Kwai.
	And in it, I point this out and I say it.
	You can find it on YouTube as well.
	Where I say, please let it be noted that if the next target is Big Ben, then this was recorded on the 21st of February.
	So that if it happens, you will know that this is a staged and planned event, not a terror attack.
	I had no idea that this was the thing.
	And then when I give out a monthly newsletter, Anyone can subscribe to it.
	It's lightonconspiracies.com.
	Lightonconspiracies.com.
	I'm a one-man band, so this is one of my only ways of getting an income.
	So I give out a monthly newsletter.
	And in the newsletter, I showed exactly these things.
	I pointed it out.
	I circled in the tower saying, is it possible that the next target will be Big Ben?
	That was then published and sent out on March 1st.
	And then, here yesterday, I was waiting the 22nd of March.
	Where are they going to do it?
	It's like this date, they will not miss the chance of repeating.
	Well, this was also, I understand, the anniversary of the date of the Brussels attack.
	Yes.
	One month exactly.
	Correct?
	Yeah.
	That is correct.
	And the mention attack was exactly on the date of the mass shooting in Norway.
	You know, they really try to celebrate or whatever bizarre thing they're up to.
	I don't know.
	So anyway, so in the newsletter, I pointed this out as well.
	And then boom, it happened in London.
	Please wake me up and tell me it's not, it's not, do you know, it's like it's becoming like a joke almost.
	Can I, Oli, I'm sorry to interrupt, but who do you say organized the London terrorist attack then?
	I have hardly looked into it, but what I can say is the same forces that are carrying out the other ones, because in my humble opinion, they're totally connected.
	And I would even suggest that we're seeing almost like a global, not rock band, but horror, what do you call it, a Rocky Horror Show, That they're using the same small unit traveling from country to country, most likely in army planes from NATO base to NATO base or American air bases.
	These units consisting of crisis actors, director...
	Yes, I mean, I agree that Almost all terrorism is linked.
	Of course, my analysis is that this is the German Deutsche Verteidigungsdienst for DVD, which is the agency which assassinated I'm sorry to interrupt here.
	We seem to have possibly lost Ole.
	His picture has frozen.
	Ole, are you still with us?
	No.
	So hopefully we will be able to get him back.
	So if you just bear with me, it should dial him back.
	Are you there now, Ole?
	Ole?
	Yeah, I got disconnected here.
	All right, so we were at a critical juncture there.
	And Michael was just making a comment.
	Michael, do you want to repeat your comment?
	You had asked Ole what he thought was, who was organizing this.
	I think Ole more or less got his answer out right before he was cut off.
	And Michael, you wanted to comment about the Deutsche, German intelligence side of it?
	Yes.
	It's clear that terrorism is a German concept.
	It's an old concept.
	It goes way back to the 19th century.
	And assassination, bombings, These are methods associated particularly with German intelligence and the theme of my book Spy Hunter is that there has been continuity in German intelligence from before the formation of Germany, the time that Prussian intelligence started working with the Vatican and Bavarian intelligence in the 1830s.
	But both of you, let me just interrupt here.
	Both of you, I think, would agree that as you have said it before in my interview with you, Michael, that the Mossad has been infiltrated and therefore it does seem there are some very clear earmarked influences and interference by the Mossad in these events and so they seem to have either Would you be working with German intelligence either consciously or unconsciously?
	What would you say?
	Well, Mossad have been penetrated.
	Mossad is a complex agency.
	There are essentially two Mossads.
	There's the very fluffy outer Mossad, who are awfully nice people, and there are the inner Mossad, who are, again, very nice people, but not quite as fluffy.
	Certainly the outer part of Mossad, the front office in Tel Aviv, has been penetrated by the DVD. The key German asset in Israel for many years was Shimon Peres, who's now dead, of course.
	Peres worked for the Germans for a long time.
	I think they blackmailed him when he was a young man.
	He was always close to Germany.
	And of course, Paris, being Prime Minister, was in a position to appoint the director of Mossad.
	And we know at least one director of Mossad was DVD. So Mossad have had problems.
	And of course, the minute there's any Mossad connection, people blame Mossad and not the agency that might have assets in them.
	The same goes with the CIA. The CIA get a lot of blame for German operations using American nationals who are working for Germany.
	Yesterday would have been organized by British citizens, but they'll be working for Germany inside General Operations 2, which is the covert German operation in London, which in practice coordinates terrorist attacks.
	Now, Ole is right in the respect that terrorist attacks are coordinated.
	They are planned.
	Yesterday clearly wasn't a lone wolf attack.
	There would have been others involved.
	What I tried to get people to do is to look behind the attackers and look to the motives of those who are organising the attack.
	Yesterday's attack on my analysis was a plan to assassinate Theresa May, the Prime Minister.
	She was the highest value target in the House of Commons and I would link it to Brexit.
	The Germans had hoped that the House of Lords would block Brexit.
	The plan was for the House of Lords, as indeed they did, to vote for an amendment allowing the House of Lords a veto on Brexit.
	We know the negotiations of the European Union are going to fail.
	We know the Germans are desperate to prevent Britain from serving the Article 15 notice, which the Prime Minister intends to do on the 29th next week.
	And it doesn't surprise me that we would have an attempt to assassinate the Prime Minister before the 29th.
	If you look at the motives of those organizing yesterday's attack, then I think it becomes a lot clearer.
	Could I be really rude since I need to leave in a few minutes?
	No problem.
	I'm sorry to interrupt you, Michael.
	What you say is very, very interesting.
	I've only started to hear about the DVD very recently.
	I never had any clue that they even existed.
	What I know is that what keeps appearing on the maybe further more visible in these operations that I keep bumping into is the CIA, Mossad, MI6 sometimes, and then Whatever agency in that country, intelligence agency that is there.
	And I spoke to Chip about this and he said very often these agencies are totally connected at the top.
	You know, it's very it looked on a lower level.
	They look like they're separate entities.
	But here he says they work together.
	They use these other services all the time.
	And so if somebody needed to be done in France, then they didn't use the France You know, they came from the outside, worked together, carried it out, had help on location, with logistics and so on, with people on location.
	They took care of that.
	Also the investigation that was totally part of the operation so that nothing would be found out.
	And so on.
	And then in another country, they would use French people and so on.
	In Turkey, for instance, and so on.
	But he said they work together all the time.
	So I think It is a mistake to say that it was the Mossad, and then with no interference or cooperation with anyone else, that these things, I believe, are coordinated by these forces.
	Well, yes, Oli is right.
	The DVD have penetration assets inside Mossad, CIA, and MI6. At various points since 1945, The directors of all three of those agencies have been German agents.
	Alamor Stullis is a classic example.
	Morris Oldfield was an MI6 director in the 70s who was a German agent.
	I can't name the Mossad of DG. All right, so I'm...
	Because he's still alive.
	There are certain compliance, you know, I don't want to get your radio station into compliance issues.
	No problem.
	I can name Morris Oldfield as the German agent and Alan Bullis.
	Okay, absolutely.
	Now, we're going to continue with Michael Shrimpton.
	We want to thank Ole Domogard for making this appearance.
	It was short notice, and it's great to have you on the show.
	Ole, you can go now, and thank you very much, and perhaps we'll catch you in the near future.
	If you have more to say, certainly do let us know.
	Why don't you give out your website for people just before you leave?
	My website is lightonconspiracies.com, conspiracies in plural, because there's more than one going on, even though they're so connected, these things, so many of them.
	Okay, and one last question, which you don't have to answer, but you might send me the answer.
	Is there a sign within this latest ATERRA attack for the next one that you are, or are you starting to investigate that?
	I've been doing it non-stop since this whole thing started.
	I have no idea at this point.
	I just want to point out one little detail.
	The helicopter that lands and is taking part of this whole thing, there's a massive big Freemasonic symbol on it and the text London Freemasons on it as well.
	It's sponsored and paid for by the Freemasons.
	You can also find I found several photos of the exact A helicopter with a different very proud Freemasons on a very high level standing around it and also showing checks that they've signed for and they're very proud of having invested in this helicopter and also that is connected with the ambulances that are like normal cars that you will also see on location.
	So I don't know but I would say that that could be a bit of a sign as well who's involved.
	Okay.
	It's hidden in plain sight.
	That is the key word many times, obviously.
	So very nice meeting you, Michael, and thank you so much for inviting me.
	All right.
	Take care.
	Take care.
	See you in Stockholm or Madrid.
	Okay, so Michael, please do continue.
	You were talking about the heads of these various agencies being, what you say, working with or for the DVD, and I realize that when we get more up to date, and also in terms of the English scenario, you're not actually able to name names,
	but you do believe, we've gone over this in our prior interview, That there are definitely some German assets or whatever you want to call them within MI6 and MI5 at this time in place in England, correct?
	Yeah, absolutely.
	GO2 has its headquarters in Vauxhall Cross, which is the headquarters of MI6. So the German operation in London has its headquarters actually inside MI6's own headquarters.
	The MI6 headquarters is called the Wedding Cake for two reasons.
	One, it looks like a wedding cake.
	Obviously the architects have probably been married two or three times.
	And B, because it's in multiple tiers.
	A lot of MI6 officers don't know about GO2. There are parts of the building they can't access.
	They assume that's for security reasons.
	What they don't know is that there is an agency within an agency, and only senior MI6 officers would be aware of GO2, and only German assets or useful idiots would get inside it.
	Some in MI6 who know about GO2 think it's a British operation.
	Indeed, one of them is one of my sources about GO2. He thought it was a British operation.
	He was doing various wet work jobs and doing it very well.
	He didn't realize that the organization he was working for was controlled by German intelligence, not British intelligence.
	Okay.
	That's GO2. Yesterday's terrorist attack would have been masterminded by GO2. All terrorist attacks in London were organized by GO2, and that's been the case since the end of World War II. The first terrorist attacks of GO2 organized in London were in the 1950s, using the official IRA. They were very small-scale.
	They were really a continuation of the IRA wartime activity, which of course was directed by Germany, which set up the IRA. in order to assist the German war effort.
	The provisional IRA was set up by Otto Skorzeny in 1969.
	The planning for that went back to the early 1960s when Skorzeny moved to Ireland.
	Skorzeny was based in Ireland for several years.
	He sets up the Provost and the Provost have always worked for Germany and have always had inside help in London Well, inside help in Britain, in carrying and planning terrorist attacks.
	And yesterday, we saw inside help, the terrorist, the Islamic terrorist who carried out the attack, Khalid Mahmood, is given access by police to the Palace of Westminster.
	He gets through the perimeter.
	Now, I don't think he could have got through the perimeter without help.
	I mean, I've been in and out of the House of Commons, The access to the Palace Yard.
	I once drove into Palace Yard to pick up an MP, Tam Diel.
	We were speaking together about the General Belgrano in West Sussex.
	This is going back 30 years.
	Tam sadly died a few months ago.
	So I've actually driven into that place where the terrorist attack took place to pick up at MP. But I can assure you, I didn't just walk, I didn't just drive into Palace Yard.
	That's where the Germans had assassinated Erie Neve in 1979 because he was Margaret Thatcher's key intelligence advisor.
	You can't just wander in to the Palace of Westminster.
	There's a perimeter and it's manned by police.
	I don't believe for one moment that a terrorist armed only with two knives, an Islamic terrorist with two knives, who looks like a terrorist, no offense intended, a pretty suspicious looking character, I can't believe in this day and age that an obvious Muslim with a beard,
	let alone one armed with knives, let alone one with a criminal record for offenses and violence, He's just going to be able to wander through the perimeter of the House of Commons without someone letting him in.
	Okay, very, very true.
	There's also some confusion in the press.
	Well, a tremendous amount of confusion, let me say.
	The press are always confused.
	There's no single journalist in Britain with high intelligence anymore than there is in America.
	So, obviously, I'm talking about print journalists.
	I'm talking about the Washington Post and the New York Times.
	I appreciate that.
	Papers written by Muppets for Muppets.
	Yes, the media have been thoroughly confused.
	And of course, now following the Metropolitan Police line, this was a lone terrorist.
	Okay, so...
	Completely ridiculous.
	Well, it also indicated that this particular terrorist, if I understand it correctly, had to not only drive his car in and crash it, but then get out of his car with knives in hand.
	And he was able to, at least if you believe what they're saying, injure...
	kill one policeman and injure two others with his knives when they all have guns.
	And one also wonders whether these British policemen were trained to defend themselves against someone who comes at them with a knife.
	If they don't have that kind of training, then what kind of training do they have to even do their jobs?
	So it's really appalling what degree of damage, if you believe the degrees of damage, that this one individual was able to carry out without being interfered with.
	And then I know that CNN in America was making a point of repeatedly playing a volley of firing that was coming from somewhere.
	Now, apparently the terrorists didn't, so-called terrorists, didn't have a gun.
	So the volley of bullets that finally came out of the guns to so-called defend and to kill him to make sure he couldn't testify, of course, in a trial, which is always the case with these so-called lone gunmen.
	They can never be allowed to speak because they would actually probably reveal who their real masterminds are behind what they do.
	In other words, where did the volley of bullets come?
	Why so late?
	And, of course, repeatedly played on the On the news when all the damage was already done.
	So this same kind of thing went on in Turkey when they murdered that person.
	I forget what his level was.
	But after the murder took place in this art gallery or whatever they call it, Then they killed him after he did his damage when they had guns the whole time.
	Go ahead.
	I think, firstly, there's no doubt that Khalid Mahmoud was a terrorist.
	This was a terrorist incident.
	He was a terrorist.
	He's now obviously an ex-terrorist, so he has fallen off his perch.
	ISIS have claimed responsibility.
	I have no doubt that there is a connection between Mahmoud and ISIS. I don't doubt ISIS has claimed.
	This was an Islamic terrorist attack carried out in London by a Muslim.
	My point is that although...
	Except that they're all run by Germans.
	Well, exactly.
	The fact that he's affiliated with ISIS, which I think is now clear, and the fact that ISIS has claimed responsibility is only...
	And that ISIS is run and organized and paid for by the CIA and German intelligence and possibly, I guess, Saudi Arabia, etc., etc.?
	Well, yes.
	The Saudis, ISIS is set up by the DVD. The CIA are involved, but it will be German assets inside CIA. The false flags, we'll also have to remember the CIA that it's controlled effectively from Frankfurt by the Korea Group.
	Because the CIA was effectively set up by German intelligence.
	It was set up in such a way that Germany would control it from the outset, in the same way that MI6 and MI5 were.
	The Germans selected a German agent, Vernon Kell, to run MI5. Russian intelligence was set up in the same way.
	These agencies are set up by German intelligence.
	They, from the beginning, seek control over them.
	The Korea Group in Frankfurt effectively controls the CIA. So you may have loyal Americans working in the American interest at Langley, but ultimately key decisions are taken in Frankfurt.
	The Germans are always able to assign CIA assets, and it's always helpful for the Germans to hide behind the Stars and Stripes or the Union Jack as a false flag.
	The Saudis, yes, the Saudis are involved in ISIS, but again, they're fronting for the Germans.
	Okay, but that's all fine and good.
	So what is the German approach?
	When you say this, you know, you're really centralizing the control, it sounds, on a global scale with Germany and with a specific German group.
	And so the motivation here is just to rule the world, but what are they doing?
	In other words, why are they orchestrating this is government-sponsored terrorism?
	Okay, so why in your view?
	It's not sponsored by the German government.
	The German government is effectively controlled by the DVD. It's got so many assets in She is a German DVD asset.
	Her late father was.
	I'm not saying she is.
	But in practice, the DVD is able to exercise considerable leverage over the German government.
	A number of German post-war chancellors have been DVD assets.
	Conrad Adenauer is a classic example.
	Adenauer had worked for the Abwehr before 1945 and worked for the DVD after 1945.
	This is terrorism sponsored by Germany, but it's not sponsored by the German government.
	Germany always has been an intelligence state.
	It was set up by intelligence agencies, the Prussian secret police, forerunner of the Gestapo, very powerful.
	The powerful intelligence agencies pushed German federation or German unification in the 19th century.
	German intelligence effectively creates Germany It controls Germany from the very beginning.
	Bismarck, for example, is closely allied with German intelligence, which is why the Kaiser-Bismarck split in the 1890s was so significant.
	There was an attempt by the Kaiser to effectively wrest control of Germany or the German Empire from German intelligence, which ultimately failed.
	You have continuity with German intelligence right the way through.
	The names may change, the locations may change, the DVD is headquartered in Dachau, the Abwehr was headquartered in the Willemstrasse, in Berlin.
	The locations change, the personnel change, the names change.
	There is continuity from one agency to the other.
	Who do you think is orchestrating this continuity?
	In other words, if you were to go to MI6 and you were to go to CIA and ask Top officers that supposedly were not already agents belonging to the DVD, other people in their midst, what would they say about where their instructions are coming from?
	In other words, you're talking about an orchestration that is very diabolical at the very, very top level.
	So where do you think it's coming from?
	Only the very top tier of MI6 would be aware of GO2 and also aware that it's a German organisation, not British.
	The MI5, there's no question that MI5 has been penetrated.
	Indeed, that may well be.
	that's how G02 became aware of Makhbou because he had it, we know it's been confirmed that he has an MI5 file, or there was an MI5 file on him.
	The G02 probably learned of Makhbou because they're always on the lookout for tame Islamic nutters.
	They probably got his details from their people inside MI5. - Well, he's in essence a Manchurian candidate, surely.
	Well, yes, a Manchurian candidate is someone like, well, some have said that Obama was a Manchurian candidate.
	I couldn't possibly say that.
	Some might say that.
	I couldn't possibly comment.
	A Manchurian candidate is a political asset who is promoted by an intelligence agency.
	I suppose the classic Manchurian candidate in America would be Dwight Eisenhower.
	It was pushed by the Germans from before World War II, pushed during World War II into command, which was wholly unsuited, and then, of which you had no combat experience, and then pushed by the Germans after the war into the White House, after the Germans had assassinated General Patton, who was his obvious rival.
	Yesterday, I keep going back to Germany, because terrorism is essentially a German phenomenon.
	Whether it's Islamic, whether it's Irish, whether it's homegrown German terrorists like the Bard of Meinhof, whether it's the Red Army faction in Italy, it's essentially a German phenomenon.
	And if you dig deep, you'll always find the German behind the terrorist attack.
	There are occasional lone wolf attacks.
	Yesterday clearly wasn't a lone wolf attack.
	It's not even clear that he didn't have help inside the House of Commons waiting for him.
	There may well have been an arms cache.
	He may have intended to use firearms inside the House.
	We don't know if there was anybody on the inside waiting to give him weapons, waiting to take him to where the Prime Minister was.
	Almost certainly there was.
	It's unusual.
	You say that you believe that Theresa May was the target of this individual.
	Sorry?
	I think Theresa May...
	My analysis is, of course it's provisional in its early days, but my analysis is that yesterday was a failed attempt to assassinate Theresa May.
	And I think that analysis was shared by those responsible for the Prime Minister's security.
	Because she is rushed out of the building, she's rushed out of the palace as soon as the terrorist attack goes down.
	So clearly that analysis was shared by somebody yesterday, because Theresa May is removed very, very quickly.
	Wouldn't that just be the usual way that they would behave, assuming there was an attack in the area?
	No, all other MPs were...
	The House of Commons was locked down and all other MPs, and the House of Commons was sitting yesterday, and all MPs were locked down and effectively told to stay in their offices.
	That's true.
	The Prime Minister has her own office in the House of Commons, and she could have been secured there.
	Of course, those responsible for security would be able to protect her against one Islamic nutter armed with a couple of knives.
	Yes.
	Sorry if the listeners heard that.
	Another person organising, a radio chef, wants to interview me.
	send them away.
	The...
	Sorry, I'm having...
	If listeners could just bear with me for a moment.
	I'll just at least type a message.
	That's okay.
	We appreciate that.
	So I do want to tell everyone that we are looking at the London attacks.
	If you joined us later in this broadcast, we've had Ole Damogard reporting in the early days, early time of this report, that is.
	And this, of course, will go onto YouTube after if you missed the first episode.
	We are now talking to Michael Shrimpton.
	He is an English barrister.
	I've interviewed him in person as well as on a Skype call rather recently and over Christmas in person.
	And there's a lot to be gained from watching both those interviews.
	Michael is with us now on a very impromptu scheduling based on these attacks at my request.
	And so he's Michael, are you available?
	Yes, I am.
	I sent the other broadcaster away.
	You got me first.
	You grabbed me for this evening.
	I won't say who it is, but I'm afraid they shall just have to wait.
	I haven't actually agreed to an interview request from them.
	It's slightly irritating because I had arranged They were going to arrange with a specific time yesterday and didn't.
	We were talking about Theresa May being the target.
	There are some indications you feel that this is the case.
	Have you had any back-channel information, or had you had any, because you do get warnings of such things from time to time.
	I do, but I'm no longer involved in operational work, and therefore, in the old days, I might get warning, indeed I did get warning, of the second attack in London in July 2005, which the Metropolitan Police ignored.
	That was the second of the July 2005 attacks, that was an attack on the London underground.
	I got warning of that, but my access in the old days I had effective access to the dark web, which I don't have now, because I don't have the computer skills to access it.
	I was reliant on a small group of scientists centered on Cambridge University, who in turn were working with one of my sources, Neil Jones, It was outed during the bogus prosecution of it in 2012.
	A wager was driven between myself and Neil and a lot of those proceedings.
	I no longer have access to the dark web, which I used to have.
	There's a lot of intelligence floating around the dark web.
	MI6 and MI5 really don't understand the web at all.
	Neil and I were often ahead The Secret Service is the same.
	We were often ahead of the Secret Service.
	We spotted three assassination attempts on President George W. Bush, passed timely warnings to the Secret Service on all three, and you could get intelligence off the dark web way ahead of any of the official agencies.
	Even GCHQ had been a bit slow in monitoring the dark web.
	Al-Qaeda, for example, made effective use of the dark web.
	They didn't understand that Al-Qaeda sites in Arabic on the dark web were being monitored by Arabic-speaking computer scientists in Britain.
	Several of them were involved in the actual creation of the internet.
	They understood it very deeply.
	I no longer have access to that sort of intelligence.
	I'm no longer involved in operational intelligence work, so I wouldn't expect these days to get warning of a terrorist attack.
	The last attack I did get warning of was the Nairobi attack, the Westgate shopping center attack.
	And there I passed on intelligence from a well-connected source in Mogadishu, Somalia, to what was then the National Criminal Intelligence Service.
	But they ignored it because, A, they were told to by GO2. They didn't realize they were getting orders from Germany, but they obviously got orders from the cabinet office, GO2 asset in the cabinet office, to ignore me.
	And secondly, they got their, if we'll forgive the expression, they got their panties in a twist over The allegations against me, the Bomberg's allegation, and even though I was dealing with NCIS officers I'd actually met, they were reluctant to process the intelligence, so they basically threw away 70 lives.
	That was the last time that I had actionable intelligence, actionable high-grade intelligence of A pending terrorist attack.
	70 people died.
	I'm afraid human life is pretty cheap.
	I owe ENSYS a favour on that.
	I thought ENSYS very, very badly and they ended up in the blood of 70 and some people on their hands through sheer crash of stupidity and Dreadful lack of professionalism.
	Okay, I appreciate that.
	Now...
	Listeners can probably tell I'm still annoyed.
	Of course I'm annoyed.
	I get actionable high-grade intelligence of a pending terrorist attack.
	I pass it into the authority who I'm asked to pass it to, who was trusted by my source.
	The source is quite specific.
	It had to go to ENSYS. I put it into ENSYS. They ignore me and 70 people die.
	It's very irritating.
	It's even more irritating if you're one of the people blown up or shot.
	I'm sure.
	Now, in terms of this latest attack, so you feel it was motivated with an objective in mind.
	So you feel that it's motivated from Germany, from the DVD, and the objective is to halt the exit from Brexit.
	Is that your analysis?
	Exactly.
	Germany is desperate to keep Britain inside the European Union.
	In order to get Britain into the EU, the Germans had to pay huge amounts of money to Ted Heath and Jeffrey Rippon, the German agents who signed the Treaty of Brussels, which took us into the EC. They staged an attempted coup, an apportive coup in 1968, attempting to install their agent, Lord Louis Mountbatten, as military dictator, because Mountbatten was committed to EEC membership and Harold Wilson was doubtful about the politics of it.
	They had gone to enormous trouble to get rid of Eden, sabotage the British war effort at Suez, working with Eisenhower and Dulles, in order to get Macmillan in, who was intending to take us into the EEC. They assassinated Norris McWerter's twin brother, Ross.
	I didn't know Ross, but I knew Norris.
	Ross McWerter was assassinated.
	He was an opponent of EEC Andrew.
	They attempted to assassinate Margaret Thatcher in 1984 because of the abuse on Europe.
	They set up the Falklands War in order to offload Margaret Thatcher and replace her with a pro-European Prime Minister.
	They assassinated Erie Nee to deprive Margaret of intelligence, because Erie was an intelligence officer, a friend of several friends.
	In order to move Margaret Thatcher out of the way, in order to get the Maastricht Treaty through and to set up the Euro, the Germans assassinated Another MP, Ian Gow, who was a very nice man, again a friend of several friends, who was Margaret Thatcher's eyes and ears on the back benches.
	With Ian Gow gone, the Germans were able to organise an internal party coup and offload Margaret Thatcher.
	Poor Margaret didn't know about the DVD. I knew Margaret, of course, but I didn't know her then.
	She didn't know about the DVD, I didn't know about the DVD. In any event, she wouldn't have listened to me.
	She had no idea that these coups and all these disasters were being organised from Germany.
	So the Germans have murdered their way into the EU, Britain's way into the EU. Last year in the referendum campaign, GO2 organised the murder of Joe Cox, a Labour MP, who was a Remainer, in order to blame the Leave campaign.
	This was a tactic tried in Sweden, where Anna Lynn, the Swedish foreign minister who was pro-EU, was assassinated in order to blame the no side during a referendum.
	Last year, the Germans murdered, they had, again, a tame nutter, who was alleged to be a right-wing activist, although, in fact, the evidence for that is exceedingly slim.
	They have a tame nutter who knocks over a Labour MP. The media then rush to blame the Leave campaign.
	The polls swing a little bit towards the Remain campaign as a result, but not sufficient.
	The Germans are taken by surprise.
	German political assets in the House of Lords or people close to the European Union are then instrumental in trying to reverse the result of the referendum in a really unprincipled manoeuvre.
	Which fails completely.
	The Brexit bill is passed and all of a sudden we have a terrorist attack.
	Timed, had it been successful in assassinating Theresa May, would have prevented service of the, possibly presented, prevented service of the Article 50 notice next Wednesday.
	And I have no doubt the Germans had lined up a pro-German asset to take over as acting Prime Minister.
	Okay, well, are you willing to name that possible person or not?
	At the moment, that person is still alive.
	Somebody may take what is sometimes called the Turner Protocol after the fictional Colonel Turner, the German spy in Where Eagles Dare, the film, or the movie, which is actually based on one of my sources, now dead, who actually did infiltrate the German High Command in World War II, but was a travel agent.
	Germans thought he was a double agent.
	He was, in fact, a treble agent.
	Colonel Turner was modeled on him, and Colonel Turner, if you may recall, was invited to step out of the Gilders 52.
	That is an arrangement which is occasionally followed, where someone is given a lift by the RAF and invited to step out of the airplane for a few minutes without a parachute.
	That person, yes, it may well be that some sort of informal solution like that, which will be to a valuable saving of court time, may be adopted in respect of the person who may have been lined up, I think will have been lined up by the Jerrys.
	Okay, thank you.
	And, you know, I know you're just brilliant and you have so many sort of associations that you can link up, you know, in wonderful ways.
	But I do want to ask you a more practical question about someone who is so ill-equipped as this individual Khalid Masood.
	When you say his target would have been Theresa May, it is obvious that he had no chance of getting anywhere near her.
	So why would they do such an inconsequential?
	I mean, it's more like a threat than an actual...
	They had no point.
	There was no way he was going to succeed, in other words.
	Sorry to interrupt.
	I'm aware time is short.
	It's a good question.
	Two points.
	Firstly, it's unclear...
	That he intended to mow down the pedestrians on Westminster Bridge.
	Normally with terrorist attacks, for example, the attack in Aurora in Colorado near Denver, there's a separate driver.
	It's very bad practice to have your terrorist drive himself or herself to the target.
	That's because they tend to be very nervous.
	They're almost invariably suicide attacks.
	There's no doubt that yesterday's was intended to be a suicide attack.
	People about to commit suicide can get very nervous.
	It's a very bad idea to have them drive a motorway.
	I'm not clear that Mahmood, the terrorist yesterday, actually intended He was a heavy 4x4 vehicle.
	I think the purpose of renting from Enterprise Rent-A-Car, and I'm awfully sorry Rent-A-Prize Rent-A-Car have been dragged into this.
	They're actually rented from Enterprise.
	They're an awfully nice company, set up by a lovely man who served on the USS Enterprise, and I have fond memories of flying onto and off the USS Enterprise.
	Absolutely nothing to do with Enterprise Rent-A-Car.
	I'm very sorry, boys, that you've been dragged into this.
	But when he goes to Enterprise, he's an extra four-wheel drive, I think one reason only, and that's to get the car through the barriers at the House of Commons.
	I don't think the plan called for him to mow down pedestrians as a diversion on Westminster Bridge.
	He may simply, in his nervousness and his excitement, And also through sheer incompetence, may simply have lost control of the motor vehicle.
	Never ever leave the terrorists to drive himself to the target.
	Everybody's assuming that the attack involved mowing down pedestrians, because that's what he did.
	It doesn't follow.
	Sure.
	Pedestrians were mowing down.
	It may have been unintentional.
	Okay, let's pause it.
	He doesn't actually drive the vehicle into New Palace Yard.
	He crashes into railings.
	That again suggests that he wasn't in full control of the vehicle.
	That's the first point.
	The second point is that it's a mistake with respect to assume that merely because he had knives with him in the vehicle, that he wasn't intending to shoot Theresa May.
	Or use firearms to get access to her.
	I think the intent of the knife was to cut Theresa May's head off.
	That's a known ISIS method of assassination.
	We saw it used by Jihadi John, the dual national British citizen terrorist in Syria.
	They like to stage it for...
	It's a particularly painful method of dying.
	They saw the head off.
	Inflicting great pain and terror whilst they do it.
	I suspect the purpose of the heavy knife was to saw Theresa May's head off, and there may have been a person inside the Palace of Westminster intending to video this.
	Again, ISIS are great for videoed assassinations.
	It is a mistake to assume, in my view, that because he had knives at the entrance class for Commons, that he didn't have firearms waiting for him inside the building or an associate inside the building.
	Okay, but it still begs the question that the man has to get out of, it seems very laborious, he has to get out of the car, put his knives in hand, and then approach what are in essence some guards with some abilities, right?
	And guns.
	So it doesn't make any, it still doesn't make any sense.
	Well, it doesn't make sense unless one understands that GO2 effectively controls security.
	If one thinks that security at the House of Commons is in the hands of the metropolitan elites who have penetrated, One then realizes that since they're penetrated by GO2, the security of the House of Commons is effectively in the hands of the agency setting up the attack.
	So the agency which is setting up the attack, for whom Khalid Mahmood, knowing you're not, is working, is also in effective control of security at the target.
	So if the agency planning the attack is able to, in some way, disable security, then it makes life a lot easier.
	And that's, I think, what happened.
	I think the terrorist was given access.
	I think there was confusion.
	A courageous police officer, PC Palmer, is stabbed to death, fatally.
	He died, it's obviously fatal.
	He is fatally stabbed.
	He then dies, sadly.
	I think that there was some interference in the police response.
	This terrorist should have been shot.
	Sure, that seems logical, especially if he's running forward with knives in hand.
	Well, exactly.
	So an obvious Muslim with a beard is coming at you, shouting Allahu Akbar, which it probably was.
	So you have a Muslim, Middle Eastern appearance, Pakistani.
	I'm not quite sure what nationality he has other than British.
	So you've got a man named Khalid Mahmoud.
	He's a Muslim.
	He looks like a Muslim, no offence intended.
	He's got a beard.
	He's shouting...
	He's certainly...
	Not an MP, is he?
	You know, you wouldn't confuse him for a Tory MP. There are one of the Asian Tory MPs who generally don't go around with knives shouting Allahu Akbar.
	He probably was shouting Allahu Akbar.
	It's a pretty difficult thing for an Islamist terrorist to do in a suicide attack.
	And he's got knives.
	So you'd have to be a very dim policeman.
	I know some of our policemen are pretty dim.
	But you'd have to be a very dim policeman not to think, ah, this man could be a terrorist.
	He shouldn't have got through the perimeter, but he does go through the perimeter.
	Well, my view is he was assisted through the perimeter.
	Inside the building, almost certainly, there was a GO2 officer, possibly in uniform, possibly a GO2 asset, inside the palace police force, ready to take him to where the Prime Minister was.
	The House of Commons is a rabbit worm.
	You need to know where you're going.
	There's somebody, I think, would have been waiting for him, ready to take him there, and also to maybe shoot their way through to the Prime Minister's office.
	And that person would probably have been on the police radio net and would have up-to-date information as to the location of the Prime Minister.
	So I don't think the fact that he's alone at the gate, and the fact that he's armed with knives at the gate, doesn't mean that the plan didn't call for him to have assistance inside the Palace of Westminster, And it doesn't mean that once he's inside the palace, he's not given firearms.
	There may well have been firearms waiting for him.
	Okay, well, it does seem very badly organised if you, you know, can appreciate that.
	And it seemed like it was unlikely to be successful.
	And I have to think that the organizers are not stupid.
	And therefore, if it's so badly organized and its chances of succeeding are so dim, then I have to say that perhaps they planned it that way.
	And that's another sort of twist in the story.
	So you can have an attack.
	It fails, but it has other objectives besides maybe a threat on the House of Parliament or whatever, but certainly possibly on Theresa May, although it does seem possible that there are other objectives involved here, and it is very interesting.
	Now, you do emphasize DVDs.
	And I want to go to the very top of DVD and ask you, you know, I suppose, you know, you would put your life in danger if you named actual individuals that you think are running this thing.
	But I have to say they have to be top members of what we think of as the Illuminati and certainly very wealthy people.
	Families, in theory.
	And so where do you go with that?
	What are you really looking at?
	Because you're really contributing a great deal to them.
	I can name dead members of the DVD. In fact, one stuffed it this week, David Rockefeller.
	The Trilateral Commission is a DVD front.
	Listeners who are familiar with the Trilax and the Bilderberg Group will realize the power of the DVD when I say that the Trilateral Commission and the Bilderberg Group are both DVD fronts.
	The Illuminati, yes, there is a sequel society called the Illuminati.
	It goes back to Adam Weishaupt of Bavaria to the last quarter of the 18th century.
	But the DVD worked closely with the Illuminati and they clearly got assets inside there.
	And the Illuminati heavily involved in the formation of Germany in the 1830s, 1840s, 1850s, the unification of Germany.
	So what you might describe as Illuminati, I would say, well, more likely to be DVD. Prescott Bush, now this is Bush Senior's elder brother.
	Because Bush Senior was father to George W., everybody tends to think of him as the sort of patriarch of the family.
	In fact, there was an older brother who was dead called Prescott Jr., And it was the elder brother, undoubtedly DVD, as was Bush Sr.'s father and Prescott Jr.'s father, Senator Prescott Bush, who was very close to Germany.
	The Rockefellers, of course, working for a German victory in World War II and instrumental in supplying Nazi Germany with oil, through Standard Oil.
	So you have deep, deep German connections.
	David Rockefeller heavily involved in high-yield offshore trading.
	Where's that control from?
	Frankfurt.
	What is the basis of the Rockefeller wealth?
	Unfortunately, it's high-yield offshore trading controlled from Frankfurt.
	Obviously, it goes back to oil, but the oil didn't make them the money, it was the trading which did.
	Okay, so it also appears that they have a fairly substantial opposition at this time, this group that you're referring to.
	Oh, yes.
	Yes, because everybody knows about them.
	That's partly due to my work.
	But yes, they are now known.
	Coming back to your comment about the attack.
	Yes, it looks amateurish.
	It looks clumsy.
	It was badly planned.
	But there are two reasons for that.
	One is the shortage of time.
	If my analysis is correct that the attack was planned after the failure of the attempt to stop Brexit in the House of Lords, then, which I think the Germans were really hoping that the House of Lords would block Brexit for them, the House is full of ersatz peers, these weren't proper peers, these were life peers, mostly superannuated party hacks, many of them pro-German.
	The failure of the pro-German element in the House of Lords, where they're stronger than the House of Commons, much stronger, to block Brexit came as a shock to Berlin and Dachau, And this attack may have been planned in the space of only seven or ten days.
	So there certainly are indications that it's a hastily planned attack.
	The second problem, or second answer to your query about why, how can I say it's organized by an intelligence agency when it looks so clumsy.
	The second problem the DVD has is they have to stay in the background They can't use efficient Germans.
	No doubt if they'd had German terrorists, the attack would have been a lot smoother.
	And if they'd had Bader-Meinhof or a couple of ex...
	In the old days, they'd have used XSS people.
	But they can't use the Waffen-SS. They can't use Jerry's because the Germans would be absolutely fearful of any link.
	Between yesterday's murderous attack and Brexit.
	And I'm quite clear that yesterday's murderous attack is all to do with stopping Brexit.
	The Germans tried to murder their way through the referendum campaign last year and failed.
	And now the referendum campaign has failed.
	They're trying to murder their way into stopping Brexit.
	That's politically explosive.
	If the facts get out about Brexit and the Theresa May link, then the support for the EU in this country, which is pretty thin at the moment anyway, would collapse completely.
	So the Germans have to stay deep in the background.
	That creates problems.
	You have to use tame nutters like Khaled Mahmoud because you're hiding behind an Islamic false flag, if you like.
	It is an Islamic attack.
	He was a Muslim.
	But the motive isn't ISIS as a motive.
	The motive is the DVDs or GO2s.
	Well, the Muslims, you know, let's just clarify this as well.
	Yes, all fine and good.
	He's a Muslim, but he's an asset.
	He's being used.
	And so what this does also lend itself towards, of course, is this war, this war that they wish to drum up and create, which is...
	Targeting Arabs, targeting the Muslims around the world as the so-called bad guy.
	So this lends itself to that, that you have an actor who facilitates that premise.
	Yes, this is another reason.
	Terrorism is a German phenomenon.
	It was invented by German intelligence and it's peculiarly associated with German intelligence, whether directly or indirectly.
	Terrorism is...
	The tactic of a loser.
	Losers resort to terrorism.
	There are all sorts of problems when you do it.
	One of them is that you end up bringing down damnation on your own allies.
	Britain will now intensify our commitments to smashing up ISIS. I think America will also intensify its efforts to smash ISIS. The political consequences of yesterday's failed attacks will help conservatives in Britain and Republicans in America.
	Well, fine.
	That's inevitable.
	The political consequences of yesterday's attack are really awful for the Germans.
	Sadiq Khan, the Labour mayor of London, who is not white, did a very good impression of a white man yesterday on Sky News.
	He was absolutely ashen-faced.
	He's a Muslim.
	He's on record as having, I won't say sympathies for ISIS, but he's certainly soft on terrorism and has made some very silly comments, which Donald Trump's son has quite rightly picked up on.
	He certainly doesn't have a record of standing up to Islamic terrorism.
	He's in favour of multiculturalism.
	He's on the left wing of the Labour Party.
	And he clearly was rattled by this attack.
	The last thing he wanted was an Islamic terrorist attack in London, let alone on the Palace of Westminster, let alone one involving the murder of an unarmed British policeman, let alone a nice one with a family.
	Okay, but these people that you're talking about, don't they realize?
	Wait, wait, wait.
	Don't they realize?
	You're talking about the son of Trump.
	Don't they realize that this is going to be orchestrated by the DVD? Yeah, well, Donald Trump, President Trump, I'm not sure at the moment whether he's been briefed in on the DVD. I arranged for a copy of my book, Spy Hunter, to deliver to Trump Tower last year before the election.
	And I've passed various messages through to Donald Trump that they are being blocked, possibly by Reince Priebus, who's a political enemy of mine, and is closely aligned to President Bush 41, Bush Senior.
	So there are all sorts of problems communicating with the White House at the moment.
	You've got Priebus, who's the gatekeeper, blocking friendly approaches, their offence intended.
	And you've got all sorts of problems with Just communicating with the White House full stop is not easy.
	Okay, but there are intelligence agencies that are going to be aware of the DVD, just as you're aware of them, and are going to be on the inside and be able to report to Trump, to his son, and so on.
	So these people cannot be on such a naive level.
	The American intelligence is so heavily penetrated by the DVD that, in practice, U.S. agencies will not brief Donald Trump.
	U.S. intelligence agencies are there to keep intelligence away from the president, not give it to him.
	If the President is not a German asset, the role of US intelligence will be to suppress intelligence, and you've got the Director of National Intelligence, you've got the DNI in the way, blocking access from the NSA, who are the most patriotic of the professional American intelligence agencies.
	It's very difficult for Admiral Rogers to get direct access to the President.
	He's had some access, but it normally has to go through DNI. And that's why DNI was set up, also why Homeland Security was set up, to put in a layer of bureaucracy penetrated by German intelligence to prevent intelligence reaching the White House.
	Okay, let me ask you another...
	Sorry.
	Let me ask you another question coming out of left field.
	Is WikiLeaks releasing information about DVD in any of their releases?
	No.
	But a friend of mine popped into the Ecuadorian Embassy recently to have a chat with Julian Assange.
	That friend has read my book and has also been in touch with Donald Trump.
	And I think Julian Assange, of course I wasn't there when the conversation went down between my friend and Julian.
	I don't know if Julian is aware yet of the DVD, but I think if he isn't aware, he probably is about to become aware.
	And I think the same applies to President Trump.
	I think President Trump is about to become aware of the DVD. Reagan wasn't aware of the DVD for some years.
	Margaret Thatcher wasn't aware of the DVD until after she left office.
	George W. Bush, the Bush-Chain administration, were very, very slow to accept my analysis on the DVD. By the time they finally accepted my analysis, having done their own investigation, which is called AGES, by the time they set up a special unit, which was based on a think tank in Washington,
	they had to conduct intelligence outside the framework of CIA, FBI, all these penetrated agencies, conducting their own, setting up their own intelligence group, It finally confirmed my analysis, but this process took so long that by the time it was done, George W. Bush was virtually out of office, and the efforts of this group, who were very smart, were wasted.
	Now I was obviously in direct touch with that group, but their efforts were wasted because the confusion, frankly, just took too long.
	All right, but we also know At this time hundreds of thousands of people had died, there had been a racket gone for hell in a hangar.
	And a racket had gone completely tits-up, we forgive the expression, and the Middle East was screwed almost beyond redemption.
	If they'd just listened to me the first time, but I told them about the DVD in 2001 Well, I'm not so completely sure that these individuals are quite as naive as you're portraying And are not involved on some level.
	Certainly the Vatican is also very instrumental, and you've also said that they are hand-in-hand with this DVD, as you call it.
	Yes.
	Particularly the Jesuits.
	The Vatican, again, is, there are some, I mean, it may sound odd to say it, but there are some genuinely religious people in the Vatican.
	There are people in the Vatican who believe in God.
	Fair enough.
	Okay.
	There are nice people.
	There are real agents in the CIA and the MI6 and the MI5. That's actually beside the point.
	So if we're really trying to look at who's orchestrating this, what's going on on the planet right now, and the end game...
	Then we have to look higher and we also have to give some of these people at least some semblance of being in the know as to how things work behind the scenes, right?
	Well, yes and no.
	There isn't anybody in the British government, for example, with high intelligence.
	I mean, there aren't any MPs of high intelligence.
	The government simply doesn't possess a single member with high intelligence.
	There's no member of the US administration with high intelligence, no offense intended, but there's no member of us with high intelligence, I mean very high intelligence, IQ 175 or above.
	There's nobody that level in either London or Washington in power.
	They've got to listen to people with high intelligence who know what they're doing and know what they're talking about outside of the corridors of power, no names, no pack drill, And that's difficult.
	Sadiq Khan is actually a fairly intelligent man by the standards of the political class, but he's probably struggling, no offense intended, with an IQ in the low 140s.
	He's not going to be able to understand the DVD or terrorism with an IQ that low.
	I'm told he's a nice man.
	Well, I mean, IQ is a limited way of also viewing intelligence because we know there's an EQ in emotional intelligence that goes far beyond that and isn't measured.
	So, you know, it's a very male-dominated field, unfortunately, for them.
	I probably have a high IQ and a low EQ. Okay, well, my condolences.
	But nonetheless, what I would like to ask you is about, I know this is a left turn, but it probably is related, Antarctica, because there's a great deal of concern about And I'm getting all sorts of intel about what's going on in Antarctica at this time.
	I'm wondering what you're hearing and how this links up, because we certainly know there's an underground base called New Berlin in Antarctica.
	There appears to have been some new developments down there.
	And are you party to any of that?
	No, I mean, I'm certainly not.
	I'm aware.
	The Germans had a base in Antarctica in World War II, which was used partly for transshipments of gold and technology and ball bearings between Germany and Japan.
	It was a Japanese high-class ocean-going submarine German Type-21 transshipment point.
	I'm aware that there's been secret German activity in the Antarctic going way back to World War II. There's something going on down there, but I can't be more specific.
	I'm not a specialist on the Antarctic.
	I've never actually visited the Antarctic.
	The closest I've got to the Antarctic is probably Christchurch, New Zealand.
	I've never even been to the Falklands.
	I'd love to go one day.
	There is something going on down there.
	There are certainly bases down there that shouldn't be there.
	But I'm afraid I can't be more specific.
	I can't, for example, give you a location.
	But there's something happening down there.
	A lot of your listeners will know about Admiral Byrd's expedition to the Antarctic at the end of World War II. These are even very strong indications of combat operations at some point in the immediate aftermath of World War II. Something is going on down there and I'm not sure what it is.
	Have you heard the rumors that possibly because of the melting ice that they may have discovered a new area or a certain portion of what some people are calling Atlantis?
	No.
	I haven't heard that.
	I'm always a bit wary about Atlantis.
	There are obviously bits of ancient civilizations.
	The humanity has been going for a fairly long time.
	We don't yet know everything about our planet.
	So I don't dismiss notions of Atlantis.
	It's a persistent rumor in one sense is that Probably there is a civilization that is very ancient about which we don't know very much.
	That certainly we know the Nazis were interested in the whole concept of Atlantis.
	But no, the Antarctic, bear in mind, is covered by satellites.
	So we get fairly good coverage of the Antarctic, not because the satellites are there to watch what's going on in the Antarctic, but because they happen to fly over the Antarctic on polar orbits.
	So we do have satellites on polar orbits.
	There is a certain amount of air activity down there.
	There's certainly nothing much on the surface, and nothing much, I think, on a very large scale, because then it would become visible.
	I must be slightly careful about the melting ice.
	The melting ice is really only confined to the Antarctic Peninsula.
	The Antarctic ice sheet is actually growing because we've got global cooling, so we expect the ice sheets to be getting heavier.
	Both the Arctic and Antarctic ice sheets are getting heavier.
	There is, however, a specific localised warming on the Antarctic Peninsula.
	And of course, if you have underground bases that assume a certain level of ice coverage, if you get local melting of the ice, then we might get some interesting things exposed.
	There's a lot more going down there than penguins.
	Alright, fair enough.
	Okay, so in terms of what the scenario is set, we've got this so-called attack.
	Some people will be perplexed why the sort of Muslim community sort of makes themselves so available to be used as patsies in these maneuvers by the Germans.
	They hate us.
	Sadiq Khan, in fairness, I was a bit critical of his approach to the war on terror.
	I think Sadiq Khan is frankly, could be a bit stronger in the war on terror.
	But he does try his best to improve community relations.
	I think he's genuine when he talks about Muslims, Jews and Hindus and Christians working together.
	But many Muslims don't think like Sadiq Khan.
	They don't use democratic methods of getting power.
	They don't believe in democracy.
	Well, actually, they're not allowed to use democratic methods of getting power because none of the interference of the Western powers, so to speak.
	Salafists, one has to remember, obviously, that Islam is divided, and the biggest divide is between Sufis and Salafists, and between Sunni and Shiite.
	But the divide between Salafis and Sufis is as great as the divide between Sunnis and Shiites.
	The terrorist Muslims are almost invariably Salafists.
	The Sufi Muslims are very peaceful and religious.
	The sort of terrorist we saw yesterday, probably wasn't particularly religious, probably didn't go to the mosque very often, certainly has a criminal record, probably drank, did drugs.
	A lot of these terrorists are not particularly religious, even though they pretend to be.
	Well, I certainly get that.
	He would have been a Salafist.
	Almost certainly he would have been a Salafist Muslim.
	And it's the Salafists who are the problem.
	The Salafists happen to have been a minority in Islam.
	It's certainly the case that the majority of Muslims are not terrorists.
	Unfortunately for Islam, it is also true that the majority of terrorists are Muslim.
	Not all, but the majority are Muslim.
	But that's also by design, clearly.
	You know, if you're recruiting actors for a movie and you just focus on Muslims, then that's who you're going to get.
	So the recruiters who are obviously behind the scenes, as you say, DVD and certain players that are working with them, closely with them, which will be the CIA, Mossad, MI6, etc.
	So the recruitment office is looking for Muslims and they do this.
	So if you look for Muslims, you're going to find them and they're certainly available.
	But at any rate, what I'd like to do here is look at the future.
	Before we let you go, we've had you for a while.
	If there's any quick questions, put them in caps in the chat.
	Audience, please.
	And what I'd like to ask you is, where do you think things are going to go now in light of this latest sort of attack, so to speak?
	There won't be many changes.
	There'll be a little bit of tightening of security at the House of Commons.
	There's bound to be a judicial inquiry that they're bound to find a tame judge who will come up with the usual Janet and John report.
	So there won't be a coroner's inquest.
	There will probably be an imposed judge who will do a judicial report which will be full of meaningless recommendations, no offence intended.
	The report won't get to the truth.
	It was willing to stand up to the Cabinet Office, then he or she wouldn't be appointed in the first place.
	So there will be a tame judge and there will be a perfectly pointless report which won't be the birth of the paper it's printed on.
	There will be the usual, we've had a succession of platitudes, and we've had 24 hours of platitudes, and I predict another 48 to 72 hours of platitudes, and then it will be business as usual.
	They'll bury the dead, there'll be a nice funeral for PC Palmer, so there should be, and his life will have been thrown away in vain, sadly, because nobody is going to learn the lessons of the attack.
	The sad tragic truth, Gary, is that not enough people died yesterday to make people think about terrorism and to make people think about GO2 and the German role in organizing terrorism.
	So not enough people died.
	It wasn't a serious enough incident to make any major changes.
	The government's terrorist strategy, counter-terrorist strategy, has been a complete failure.
	We knew that anyway, so we haven't learned any lessons about We knew the policy was a farce.
	Before yesterday, yesterday simply demonstrated it was a farce, but the fact that a policy is demonstrably farcical has never stopped governments before, and it's not going to stop Theresa May's government.
	The attack happily failed.
	Theresa May is still alive.
	Thank goodness her head was not chopped off.
	That can be very irritating to have your head chopped off.
	It can be very irritating to be assassinated.
	And she's still alive, thank goodness.
	And she'll serve the Brexit notice next Wednesday.
	So the whole thing from Germany's point of view will have been a pointless waste of time.
	Which will have created huge problems for its Muslim allies and will have strengthened the hand of the Trump administration and the British government in smashing ISIS. Frankly, they deserve to get smashed.
	If you get into bed with the Germans, the Germans will always rat on you.
	And Muslims need to understand this, particularly Salafists.
	They need to understand the alliance they forged with Germany back in the 1890s, which was all about German access to oil in the Middle East, There's always an alliance which favored Germany.
	It was in the German strategic interest.
	The Germans will drop Muslims in a heartbeat if it serves their interests.
	And Islam undoubtedly going to suffer as a result of yesterday's attack.
	ISIS in particular will suffer.
	I have no sympathies for ISIS. I have great sympathies for peace-loving Muslims, and I include Sadiq Khan in there.
	I have great sympathies for peace-loving Muslims who have been horrified by yesterday's attack.
	And there, sadly, will be a certain amount of suffering on the part of peace-loving Muslims.
	Okay, what about this latest movement?
	What about this latest movement to try to get, I guess, from what I understand, cell phones off airplanes if you're Muslim coming from a Muslim country?
	Have you heard that latest civil legislation?
	I think that makes sense.
	I think that the United States has to take steps to protect her borders.
	And I think this is coming from homeland security, as I understand it.
	It makes all sorts of sense.
	How do these countries protect their borders against an orchestrated...
	Above government, intelligence-sponsored terrorism, that they need to know who the real perpetrators are.
	They don't need to take cell phones off airplanes.
	If the thing is being orchestrated, then it doesn't matter what you do, just like the bomber with, you know, Whatever, shoes, etc.
	who gets on airplanes.
	All of this is complete nonsense.
	None of these measures, as they call them, are going to do anything to stop this top organization from recruiting and using these individuals to perpetrate whatever they want with their assets in place.
	The way you describe it, these official things they're passing To just make life for the average person much more difficult, much more ridiculous measures that are going to do nothing to stop terrorism whatsoever any more than their latest measures did.
	Having guys with guns in front of parliament did absolutely nothing to stop this individual.
	Well, they did.
	At the end of the day, a policeman was shot.
	Only when they decided to turn on their weapons.
	The attack failed.
	Mahmoud was shot.
	Well, he did enough damage.
	As you say, he was let in, etc., etc.
	I mean, in other words, none of these measures really do any good.
	And again, you know, it's interesting because we are sort of in the alternative media here.
	But I am curious, is there no one in mainstream British media that wishes to hear your analysis?
	Yes.
	No.
	There's nobody with a brain in British mainstream media, so almost by definition they won't want to hear intelligence analysis.
	I haven't been approached by anybody in the mainstream media.
	All the approaches have come from people like Richie Allen and yourself.
	It's the alternative media.
	That's the only section of the media that's frankly interested in the truth.
	In order to get a pundit You know, the pundits that Sky News and the BBC and so on are inviting into the studios are not terribly bright.
	They're all perfectly nice people.
	I know several of them.
	A friend of mine was on Sky News this morning who used to train firearm officers for the Met.
	They're all perfectly nice people.
	They're all saying perfectly sensible things about PC Palmer, which I agree with, but they're not addressing the fundamental problems.
	But nobody, it will be business as usual, nobody in Britain is going to, nobody in officialdom or in the media is going to conduct a serious analysis of terrorism as a result of yesterday's attack.
	It just wasn't severe enough, and thankfully they failed.
	The casualties were light.
	Sad for those families and sad for the people who were murdered.
	There's another one died tonight, so it's a total of what, four people murdered.
	So far, including brave PC Palmer, who tackles a terrorist unarmed.
	Okay, fair enough.
	But someone here is asking, have you tried talking to Kate Hopkins?
	I assume that's a question aimed at you.
	Does that...
	No, I'm afraid I don't know who Kate Hopkins is.
	I don't either, so perhaps there's something to blame.
	The name rings a vague bell.
	Perhaps I should know.
	The name rings a vague bell, but she's not put it this way.
	I certainly haven't had a conversation with Kate Hopkins.
	Okay, fair enough.
	If she wants to contact me, I'm more than happy to talk to her.
	I'm fairly friendly and approachable.
	All right.
	And is there anything else?
	Just to wrap up comments at this time so we can let you go.
	And I want to thank you again for doing this with us.
	My analysis is that yesterday's terrorist attack was carried out by an Islamic terrorist working for ISIS, organized by GO2, the German operation in London.
	My view is the primary target was the Prime Minister, Theresa May.
	The attack was coordinated for a time when Theresa May was present in the Palace of Westminster.
	I think those responsible for the Prime Minister's security shared that view and sensibly exfiltrated her from the target area quite quickly.
	I think it's very clear the attack failed.
	I think it's linked to Brexit and German strategic ambitions as most terrorist attacks are.
	And I think it's going to have deleterious political consequences for Germany's Islamic extremist allies.
	Okay.
	Alright, thank you so much, Michael Shrimpton.
	It's been great having you on the show and I hope we can do this again in the future, although perhaps under, in theory, happier circumstances.
	Please do stay in touch with me and I do want to just let everyone know that you're going to be speaking.
	At my upcoming conference in June, Awaken Aware 2017 in the UK at High Elms Manor.
	And the tickets are going to be on sale shortly and more information on my website, ProjectHamletPortal.com.
	So it's going to be lovely to have you in person there.
	Thanks so much for coming on the show.
	I look forward to High Elms and well done again for bringing me out of my show.
	Alright.
	Alright.
	Thank you.
	Take care.
	Bye-bye.
	Thanks again for watching.
	Take care everyone.

▲