Hi everyone, this is Carrie Cassidy from Project Hamlet and I am here with Keith Hunter. this is Carrie Cassidy from Project Hamlet and I am We're going to be talking about occult physics and it should be a very fascinating discussion.
We're going to be talking about, well, in general you call it occult physics and I've interviewed you in the past.
Today we're going to talk about some events that you may be predicting, from what I understand, and that's great.
You have some numerology, basically, that actually smacks of the Illuminati method for determining when they want to do a magical act.
And selecting dates and so on for that.
So why don't you first of all give an introduction to yourself so that people know something about you and I know you've written a fabulous book and give us the title and let's talk about that briefly.
Well my book is The Lost Age of High Knowledge and it's this one here.
Actually that was right set up the first time.
I want to say this is the last copy I've got.
It ran out.
So I'm currently rewriting it.
And it should be on sale in about five months because it's about 80% completed.
And I've corrected some errors in there as well as made lots of new discoveries.
And what the book primarily and what my research has been about is essentially looking at ideal systems of measure Looking at primarily the planets, the Earth year, the orbital periods of the other planets, and thinking that there was this past time when we had a very, very harmonious solar system, such as the Earth had 360 days per year.
Venus, for example, had 225 days exactly.
You know, Saturn, 10,800 days.
And they all had very precise orbital periods, distances, rather, from the Sun.
And again, these were in wonderful whole numbers, like the unit measure that stands out.
Well, I would say that I was looking for, what I was investigating was an ideal system of units, both in terms of distance and time.
And these were tied into the cycles.
And I found that there is a distinctive proof that the Earth did once have 360 days exactly, just like the Babylonians claimed.
And we have increased...
to about 365 and just under a quarter days and not only that all the orbits of the other planets have shifted from these ideals as well but in saying that the unit measures which seem to be of universal significance you know unchanged a kind of ideal system is based upon a period what is 24 hours right now and also Units of measure based upon British Imperial units,
which are used in the United States as well.
They include the foot, 12 inches worthier, or a fathom of 6 feet, and also a special unit, what I call the ideal geographical mile, of precisely 6,000 feet.
That unit measures critical for determining what the ideal distances are of the planets from the Sun.
So the Earth's ideal orbit was 81 million Of these ideal geographical miles.
And so what I do is I looked at ancient mythology, things like in Ovid's book, The Metamorphoses, he's a Roman poet, stories of the gods, various squabbles and whatever.
And it's kind of well known that these stories, these mythological stories, actually encode real events in terms of the astronomical realm, how the planets change their positions, you know, Exotic effects which are tied into the transformation of the solar system and that kind of thing.
And it's the relations between the planets that I looked into that gave me an insight into just how these Earth changes could occur based upon special patterns assembled with respect to the planets.
But this ideal system of measure then, based upon a 360-day year, and I have to say this just as a little qualifier, One of the proofs I present in my book shows that currently the Earth is a slightly squashed sphere.
And this is because it's rotating on its axis, so it's compressed at the poles and expands outwards.
I give a very precise mathematical law to show that the Earth was basically once a perfect sphere with regards to its form.
And so even though I say it had an ideal year of 360 days per year, I don't believe for a second the Earth was actually rotating on its axis, right?
I think that the 360 days is essentially a pure orbital period, okay?
But what we've got is the Earth being set into motion with these units of what currently are 24-hour periods as we measure them.
And it's like the transformation of the Earth's orbit has increased the total time to go around the Sun.
But the unit measure of 24 hours has remained the same.
And this is critical because when it comes to numerology and this new research area I've delved into recently, when it comes into trying to link historical events between each other, they end up being related very harmoniously in terms of 24-hour days, right?
So this effectively...
It solidifies this point that it is a universal cycle of extreme significance.
So, ordinarily then, my research was pretty much all in the celestial realm and to do with the measurement of the Earth, that kind of thing.
But just recently, because I have a few other interests here, I subscribe to a few channels and the economic situation that's developing, especially the political as well, tied into it, that we appear to be headed towards a general financial collapse, right?
I subscribe to certain channels, and I came across just recently the work of people like Jonathan Kahn, who's talked about the Shmita cycle, the seven-year cycle, where you have a cancellation of debts, and he says that goes back to 3,000 years, and also the work of guys like Bo Polny.
And again, Bo Polny is a guy that looks at market forecasting, but based upon And again, special numerological cycles, if you will.
And it was very interesting.
When I looked at these guys' work, I thought, well, I want to see if I can see it as well.
And one of the things that really stood out very recently...
There was some weird announcement.
You know Christine Lagarde, the IMF head?
And she had some weird press briefing not so long ago about...
She actually said, I want to check you on your numerology, and then started talking about the magic number seven.
And you're thinking, wait a minute, she's supposed to be serious here.
She's looking a bit off her head.
But she gives this bizarre thing.
And...
One of the websites that I looked at occasionally for you is the work of Jeff Berwick, the dollar vigilante.
And he also is somebody that's looked into this seven-year shmita cycle.
And what he noticed is an event that's just very recently occurred over here in Britain, right?
The so-called Brexit vote.
So let me just tell you what this is all about.
On June the 23rd of this year...
This just occurred just recently, just a few weeks ago, June the 23rd.
A vote was held of all the electorate, the general populace in Britain, that would normally vote in a general election.
We voted to decide whether or not we wanted to remain in the European Union or leave it, right?
And I've got to tell you, I personally voted to leave the European Union and I even had my own Leave leaflets.
Printed up at my own expense.
Well, the print list was £65.
I got 250 leaflets and I posted them round their letterbox.
So I could say campaigning, but I won't knock it on doors trying to debate people.
I try and stay away from that, you know.
It's too much hassle.
But I posted some leaflets and my view is, you know, for the issue of sovereignty to retain power because the EU is a political organisation.
All the member states, there's 27 or so, or 28, they've agreed to give their powers from their parliaments to this supranational body, right?
EU law trumps national law, and we are basically, our hands are tied on so many issues, and 60% of laws that apply in Britain are created by unelected bureaucrats behind closed doors, you know, that are appointed, who believe in the big euro project and further integration.
So, There's no real accountability, so we voted to leave it.
But here's the interesting thing with regards to this date then.
When we took the vote on the 23rd of June, the 24th of June, right, the results came in, they were announced early on in the day, and then the financial markets opened up.
And there was panic.
And everything nosedived.
And at the end of that day, even the Dow Jones in the United States closed at about 610 points down.
Massive crash.
Massive.
In the Nikkei, Japan, 8% down.
They lost something like 1,400 points.
All over the place.
And here's an interesting thing regarding this, because we have had, you know, the A lot of people have been very confident that the Remain vote would win it, right?
And one of the events that occurred just one week, about the 16th of June, I think it was, a Member of Parliament, this young woman who was a Member of Parliament campaigning to remain in the EU, Jo Cox, she gets killed by apparently what looks like the equivalent of a lone gunman sort of scenario, if you want to put it that way.
And...
It looks like, at that point, the Leave campaign is building momentum and it looks like they're going to win it.
And I look at things like the price of gold as a good indicator as to what's going on in the markets.
And if you look at the chart, it's starting to rise up and rise up and rise up.
And it looks like, you know, the Leave is going to do it.
Joe Cox is killed and then it just drops down like so.
And in British pounds, gold reaches at one hour after the polls close on the 23rd...
It reaches a low point of £835 an ounce, one hour after the polls close.
As the hours go on, though, it suddenly skyrockets.
It goes to the moon, practically.
It goes from £835 to £1,019.
And the votes come in, 52% to leave, 48% to remain.
And it looks like a lot of people got financially wrong-footed there.
And some people were of the impression...
That when Joe Cox was killed, essentially the fix was in.
Because both parties suspended their campaigns when the Leave vote was having momentum.
So, this 24th then, the financial collapse that occurred there.
Going back to the website of Jeff Berwick, the Dollar Vigilante, he posts a very interesting connection.
He said, if we take the 24th of June, 2016, and we look at the time between that...
And the great financial collapse event, one key date in particular, in September 2008, this was the collapse that took place on the 29th of September 2008.
This is when your House, your Parliament, your Congress, rejected a bailout bill for the banks They did this vote, rejected it, and then the markets crashed on the 29th, and they crashed by 777 points, right?
On that day, on the 29th of September 2008.
And what Geoff Burwick pointed out was, the time separation between that date and the 24th of June, the financial collapse following the Brexit vote the day after, yeah?
Was seven years, seven months, seven weeks and seven days.
And you've got all these sevens coming together.
And I looked at this and I thought, I've seen connections like this.
But as intriguing as it was, it didn't satisfy me.
I have to say it.
But I was really intrigued.
And I saw his work.
And I also saw the work of Joe, I'm sorry, Bo Polny.
And he was using, oddly enough, he was using some kind of forecasting system.
He says it's based on the Bible, and of an ideal year of 360 days.
Right?
An ideal year of 360 days.
So, he's looking at this, and we've got the work of Jonathan Cairn talking about this so-called seven-year Shemitah cycle.
And so I started, just using my own system essentially, I thought, I'm just going to take these specific dates of history, some notable ones that I can think of off the top of my head and say, okay, How many whole numbers of days separate these?
And is there some numerological connection here?
Right?
And so, what I did was, in particular, I looked at the work of Jonathan Cahn, just briefly, and he said there was this 70-ish metre cycle.
And he thought it ended in September of 2015, just last year.
And that this was, you know, it linked the 08 crash to the, you know, the 2015, so the seven years there.
And he thought it was connected, and I thought, I'll look into this more closely.
And what I did was this.
I took the 29th of September, right?
2008, as a precise date.
And I actually said, what other financial events happened then in 2015, right?
About seven years later.
One day stands out above all others.
It was a day on the 24th of August, 2015.
When the markets opened and some sudden crash occurred and the Dow Jones plunged 1,000 points very suddenly, very unexpectedly.
So I took this take the 24th then of August 2015 and I said, how many days separate that from 2008?
And the answer you get, if I hold it up here, is this here.
Wait one second.
Can you move it a little bit?
Let me see.
I'm going to widen the screen here a little.
No, that's fine.
Now it's on the screen.
No problem.
Okay, that's great.
So you can see then that the date separating these two dates is precisely 2,520 days, which is exactly seven times 360 days, the ideal year.
Remarkable that these two events here, yeah, we've got a A whole number of 360-day periods inside these dates.
So I thought, wow!
And it seemed to think that this seven-year period identified was spot-on.
But they're not current years.
The current year is 365.242 or whatever.
Just under 365 and a quarter days or so.
So I thought, this looks like the ideal system, this universal system of measures, is built in or embedded within historical events.
Now, I suppose this is where, and later on we'll discuss this, is this an artificial embed?
Is this natural?
And what's this really based on?
But I looked at that and I said, you know, what about other events of significance, yeah?
So this one here connects what are essentially to financial events.
And because of the association with the Brexit thing, 24th Of June of this year, right?
So it's 2016, 24th of June.
This is the financial event then.
The stock market crash.
The vote of Brexit took place 23rd.
24th is the crash.
I said, let's look at some other dates of significance.
And the one date, obviously, that must stand out in everybody's mind, the most important significant date you can think of in this 21st century has got to be 9-11, September the 11th of June.
2001, where the planes flew into the buildings, yeah?
And so I looked at the time separation in whole numbers of days between that and also the June date, right?
And it turns out, remarkably, 5,400 days precisely separate them, which is 15 periods of 360.
Remarkable.
Absolutely astounding.
And I just want to say, in terms of method here...
When you are doing this kind of analysis, you can actually plug in Gregorian dates like, you know, day, month, year, into something called a Julian day number converter.
And this is like an astronomical continuous count of days, yeah?
So if you put these dates into a Julian converter, you'll work out precise whole number days.
They're roughly around 2.4 million in our era, because the system of day zero goes back to 4713 B.C., So these are very precise, you know, whole numbers of days separating them, right?
They don't get caught out with leap years, days or anything like that.
These are very precise.
So again, we've got this, again, a very significant date here.
And so what I then went on to do, I said, what other events could be linked in?
And again, I'm kind of focusing on the United States.
And so I started to look at assassinations, right?
Now, if you're going to look at assassinations, there's a few key people you're going to be looking at.
You're going to look at John Kennedy, his brother Robert Kennedy, assassination attempts like on Ronald Reagan, Martin Luther King, Malcolm X, even Charles de Gaulle.
He was not an American, obviously, the Frenchman.
But you're going to look at these.
One particular date I looked at, or a pairing, right?
I looked at Robert Kennedy.
Now, Robert Kennedy...
He died on, precisely, the dating question is the 6th of June, 1968, right?
And he was campaigning to be president at that time, you know, it was at a rally or whatever, at some hotel or whatever.
And, you know, he was there with the crowds, you know, talking to people.
And what happened was, he was actually shot by an assassin, or, you know, it's one of these lone gunmen sort of things, you know.
It looks like the guy in question, is it Sir Anne, Sir Anne?
Look to have been set up a lot more to this than meets the eye, definitely.
And just after midnight, on the 5th of June, right, the 5th of June, just after midnight, Robert Kennedy gets shot in 1968.
But he dies of his injuries 26 hours later, on the 6th of June, right?
So I took this day at the 6th of June that he died on.
And then I went forward...
I went forward to March the 30th, 1981.
Now, Ronald Reagan has just been elected president a few weeks ago, yeah, from that date.
Yeah, inaugurated in January, yeah?
And March the 30th, 1981 then, he's, you know, he's going round to waving to crowds and all the rest of it, meeting people.
And this guy comes out of nowhere, you know, John Hinckley.
And if I report so correctly...
He fires seven shots from a six-shot revolver.
You know what I mean?
So, this is what's picked up on the audio anyway.
So, again, it doesn't look like it's due to a chance.
It looks like a real setup.
So, again, I looked at the date of the death of Robert Kennedy, June 6, 1968, and the assassination attempt day on Kennedy.
March the 30th, 1981, against Reagan.
Now, Reagan survived.
He did get shot.
He went to hospital, but he survived, so it was not successful.
But I looked at the total number of days separating both those events, and here we have it.
4,680 days.
The dates in question.
Precisely 13 periods of 360 days.
Astounding, I must admit.
So I looked at these things and I can see that this idea of a simple seven-year cycle, no, it doesn't work like that.
You seem to get certain events separated by whole numbers of 360 days, at least these identified.
There are other connections more complicated, which are variations on these precise harmonics of 360 days.
And even these ones here that I've identified, they are subtly connected themselves in various ways, which is a bit more complicated to explain.
But I've only scratched the surface in looking at this, but it seems to me then that you seem to have some sort of long-range planning here, or that people are picking days to make a move, either to assassinate or to trigger a financial event or whatever.
And it even smacks this idea, you know, when we think about the Brexit vote, you know, even I thought, oh, this is one for the people, right?
We did it, you know.
Now I see this 5,400-year connection, I'm thinking, those elitist guys are the big apex of the big pyramid here.
They look like they planned the whole damn thing, knowing there'd be a financial collapse.
So I feel like, am I a useful idiot?
Absolutely.
Let me say, and thank you, that's quite a tour de force.
But let me step in here and say that I just did a conference in Malta.
Simon Parks was one of the speakers and he's going to be speaking this weekend at my other conference in the UK in Watford and then in London the following week.
But one of the things that he said, not to give too much away, is how he got insider knowledge about how Brexit was planned.
And so you're not off the mark.
And I wrote an article about this as well.
I don't know if you had a chance to read it.
But I intuitively tapped into these things as well and ended up that lots of my sort of information that I got intuitively and from whistleblowers over the past, you know, 10 years that I've been doing this, Pointed in the direction of this being orchestrated.
And actually, I think the whole story isn't done yet.
And the financial reset may actually be worked into all of this.
So when you contacted me recently, it was very interesting that some of the things you're telling me, some of these key events...
Do factor in on sort of information we've been given over the years, and so I want you to continue, but I just wanted to say that it is very interesting, and there does seem to be some, at least from Simon Parks and my own background, we're getting verification of some kind of orchestration happening here.
Well, on that point, Kerry, it goes back to, I was going to say something about this.
This is why I brought in Joe Cox's Because I don't believe the elite are necessarily unified.
I think that at the top, if you will, somebody did make the decision to pick this 5,400 days from 9-11, knowing the financial collapse would occur.
But the death of Joe Cox and the way that almost turned the verdict, it tells me that maybe there was another group of elites, if you will, that wanted to put the fix in to actually...
Make it a remain vote.
In other words, there was two competing factions here.
Okay, well, let me actually address that, because I do talk about that in my article, and that does come from Cameron Faley, someone who worked very closely with the City of London, and the City of London was a stay vote.
You know that they were separate from the rest of...
of London and, well, the rest of the UK.
And this is a purposeful, from what I understand, Cameron Faley, I think it was six months, maybe less ago, before any of this was in, you know, the news, was telling me that they were planning to separate the city of London from the rest of the was telling me that they were planning to separate the city He didn't tell me how they were planning to do it.
He just said that was the plan.
And it did relate to the initial vote with Scotland, when Scotland a few years ago, voted to actually, well, what they really voted was to leave the, you know, the, leave Britain, but actually, the Queen leave Britain, but actually, the Queen wouldn't have it.
And apparently, the vote was fixed.
And this is again, information from Cameron Faley.
And this is on my interviews with him, so if you want to go back and research, but it's also, I linked it on my recent article on Brexit.
So in other words, there's that.
Then there's also what he calls a blood, there has to be death and blood, a sacrifice prior to a magical act.
That's part of what they do.
So prior, just prior to the Brexit vote, You have the death of Joe Cox, which does qualify as a sacrifice by their standards.
So whether or not it's a contrary group and trying to swing the vote one way, or whether it actually was the group that was planning what they were planning and did it, actually hired the guy and so on and so forth, we don't know, but it does fit the program, so to speak.
Well, I would have to say that Jo Cox was somebody who was actively campaigning for the Remain vote, and killing her, the publicity that followed and the propaganda that followed was all...
I mean, there was reportedly some guy that said, Britain first, when he killed her or something.
And then we ended up saying, the newspapers are saying, anybody who votes to leave must be racist and God knows what.
So, if it were part of a blood sacrifice, I would have expected the MP in question, if it had been part of a grand plan to make sure the Leave vote happened.
They'd have killed an MP that was wanting to vote to leave.
It's the fact that it's somebody voting to remain makes me think two different parties.
But anyway, that's by the by.
It's not necessarily going to be that logical because, again, behind the scenes, you have to also look at the long-term view.
We're not just looking at what happened now.
We have to look at where they're going with all of this, you see.
But continue.
Yeah, just to pick up on that point about the City of London, where the fact that Scotland and also Northern Ireland, they voted pretty much overwhelmingly to remain, but England predominantly voted to leave, except, of course, the City of London.
And when you say the City of London becoming disconnected, I'm just not sure what you mean, because I know that the city, as in the square mile financial centre city, that does have special status legally, My royal charter or something goes back to the 17th century.
I understand that that city...
Are you talking about the separation of the metropolitan area of London?
No, I'm talking about the City of London Financial.
You'd have to watch the Cameron Faley interviews because he worked with the Financial Centre City of London.
His family goes back, also was affiliated with Iraq and the financial systems in his...
This is his area of expertise.
He is a...
He's an expert on software, financial software, and handled vast sums of money for the City of London, the Financial Center.
So we are talking about that, although he did also say it would be within the radius of the M25. That's their sort of borderline.
The ring road signal.
That they refer to and for some reason see a separation as.
But let's not get distracted by that.
Go right ahead and continue with your theory here.
Just kind of...
I'm not sure what I would.
Yeah, I think I was talking about the time, the 5,400 days to 9-11, so yeah.
I mean, with regard then to this event...
Well, we're actually looking at two dates, if I understand you correctly, based on what you sent me.
So, in order to focus you a little bit here, you are making predictions about, I believe it's September 22nd and November 9th, if I have those two dates, correct?
Yeah, I've actually got three dates, another one.
July the 18th.
Oh, really?
Okay.
Go right ahead.
Yeah, what I was basically saying is, In the three examples I've given then, what I've essentially identified are three different pairs of events, separated by whole numbers of 360 days.
And seeing that we do appear to be having or approaching very rapidly some sort of financial collapse, a broad collapse globally.
And a lot of very smart people are saying, this is it, this is the year.
I mean, just looking at some of the precious metal activity, for example, we've seen this amazing spike in silver just literally over the past few days.
You know, gold's gone up, especially as a result of the Brexit.
The gold to pound, well, you know, sorry, the dollar to pound went from one pound will get you 148 to now it's about 1.3.
It's really tanked, so...
You know, there's been all kinds of things like that, and a lot of people are saying, we are now rushing forwards towards some kind of trigger event.
And usually they occur around about the autumn, or what you call the fall in America, usually around about that period.
But you've also got, again, some political...
The light's a bit stung here.
You've also got some kind of political events.
I mean, with Donald Trump, a real, you know...
Out of the blue candidate in the United States as well.
And there's lots of talk as well about, you know, will he be allowed to be president?
And then you've got Hillary Clinton and, I mean, what have you been seeing over the past few days?
I mean, how corrupt is that, eh?
All that email scandal and she just walks away at.
That FBI guy lays it all out.
All malicious emails, you know, negligence, everything, and then it's...
But we're not going to charge her, you know.
Sorry.
But anyway, you're getting all of this controversy and it all seems to be going down to, you know, the next few days.
So what I did was I started to look at some of these connections and see if I could identify possible dates in the future for 2016 which may be tied in as effectively a pairing between some of the dates in 2016 And some other dates, historically significant, yeah?
In the past that we could identify.
And see if there were connections involving whole numbers again of 360 days fitting in.
Or in fact, other important connections which are variants of this, yeah?
And so I decided to look at this.
And what I did was, the ones that I looked at, right?
The first one was this.
And this was, this is a potential assassination pairing, right?
So, for example, in the United States then, the first date I want to mention is November the 9th, right?
2016.
Now, this is the day after your presidential elections, right?
They always take place on the, is it the second Tuesday in November, so this year for your elections, it's the 8th of November your elections take place in, but When you think about the Brexit vote, what we had was the vote one day, the fallout the next day.
So if you're going to have a vote for the election of who's president the day after, you're going to have the announcement, right?
So I looked at the 9th of November, and I started looking through some recent events.
Well, not that recent, but going back into the past.
And one particular connection that stood out...
She was of an assassination of a politician from Pakistan, right?
And she's called Benazir Bhutto, right?
Benazir Bhutto.
And she was, you know, the Bhutto family has been very prominent in Pakistani politics.
And I think, is it her father?
I think it is.
Set up one of the main parties there, the Pakistan's People's Party, PPP. And she herself was the...
The President of Pakistan, she had two terms in office.
She was the 11th and 13th Prime Minister of Pakistan, and she served from 1988 to 1990 and 1993 to 1996.
And she's the eldest daughter of a former Prime Minister who founded the Pakistan People's Party, like I said.
And the interesting thing about Benazir Bhutto is As it says on her Wikipedia page, it says, she was the first woman democratically elected as head of a majority Islamic nation, right?
So this is a bit of a claim to fame here.
So what happened with Benazir Bhutto is this.
As I say, she died on the 27th of December, 2007, while she was actually at a campaign rally.
She was in one of these bulletproof cars or whatever.
But she was, like, stood up inside it.
You know, like you've got a sunroof, so she stood up inside it, you know, waving to the crowds and what have you, at some rally in December, just a few weeks before the election.
She's the projected winner, you know?
I mean, you know, the polls are all saying, you know, she's looking like she's going to win this thing and everything.
So she gets shot then, on the 27th, on 2007.
And whoever was doing this obviously wanted to, you know, make sure, because...
They also set off some explosives around the car and that killed 20 members of the public as well.
So she gets shot dead on the 27th of December 2007.
And I looked at that date and I looked at the total number of days between that date and the 9th of November, which is the day after the presidential election when you find out who was the president.
And what I found was...
A whole number of 360-day periods.
Nine times 360.
It's 3,240 days.
Separate these two events.
Making for a very interesting pairing.
Right?
Very interesting pairing here.
And so I looked at that and I thought, wow.
And especially the fact that she's a woman and you're thinking obviously about Hillary Clinton and you're thinking about some kind of possible connection there.
But I want to I want to say another one.
This is one that is an interesting one.
This is to do with US politics in general.
Now, you know in your Day of Independence, 4th of July 1776, yeah?
This is your Declaration of Independence when you fought off those horrible British people.
Yeah, but...
Interestingly enough, this particular date, right, 1776, the 4th of July, is not necessarily the most interesting date on your calendar system, because there was a lot that took place before you actually got your republic up and running, yeah?
And one of the key dates in question, right, in your calendar, right...
One of the key dates in question in your calendar is the 4th of March, 1789.
And what happened on the 4th of March, 1789 is this.
You got established, right?
And I'm looking at the history.com here.
It says, on June 21, 1788, New Hampshire became the ninth state to ratify the document, making it binding, and the government under the US Constitution was scheduled to begin on March 4, 1789.
It goes on to say, this is now for Wikipedia, the Congress of the Confederation certified 11 states to begin the new government and called the states to hold elections to begin operation.
It then dissolved itself on March 4, 1789, the day the first session of the Congress of the United States began.
George Washington was inaugurated as president two months later.
Right?
So, March 4, 1789.
I looked at that date in relation to the 9th of November 2016, the day after your current presidential election, and it turns out this is divisible by 360 days.
Remarkably enough, 231 periods of 360 days.
That's the total number of days separating the dates.
Now, the reason why that's interesting is because Remember I identified the seven-year cycle, seven times 360?
Well, it's actually, if you take this seven-year cycle, it's 33 of those.
I mean, you can't get much more occultic than 33 as a number.
So it's 33 seven-year cycles of 360 days, yeah?
Which gives you the number.
It's an amazing connection that links even to the most, you know, one of the most important days in your calendar politically.
And these are all hints as to essentially the nature of events of special significance that may take place on the 9th of November.
It strongly hints at controversy, to put it bluntly, over the election result.
Controversy that may indicate either an attempted assassination on the 9th or some sort of extraordinary disruption to the results that requires some legal evidence Something legal happening to settle a dispute.
If it's not that somebody's assassinated, it could be something extraordinary of a legal nature to satisfy or settle a dispute over the election results.
Again, that could occur.
But either way, anything political might have financial implications.
So we've got the date here, 9th of November, seemingly targeted here by two pairings of significance.
One linked to when the first session of Congress took place, March 4th, 1789, and the other linked to the assassination of Benazir Bhutto in 2007.
So that's the first date of interest here.
And the second date of interest is, again, this one is the 22nd of...
September 2016.
That's the middle one here.
This is like the second date of interest.
Now, this date, as far as I'm aware, there's no specific thing planned in the calendar to occur on that date or even the day before.
This was just a date that stood out for a couple of reasons.
And what I did here was I found it very interesting that I mentioned that...
Ronald Reagan's attempted assassination was linked to that of Robert Kennedy, and there were 13 periods of 360 days between them, yeah?
Well, I basically extended this, and I took 360, multiplied it by 36, and if you do that, you get 12,960 days.
If you add that to the 30th of March, which is Reagan's attempted assassination, You get the 22nd of September 2016, this year.
It's a continuation of that sequence, if you will.
Oddly enough, it's not just 36 periods of 360 days with the Reagan connection.
It's 49 periods of 360 days if it's linked to Robert Kennedy.
Yeah?
49 times 360.
That also targets the 22nd of September.
So I looked at that and I thought, maybe the...
The 22nd of September is significant.
And then somebody who watches my videos...
Yeah, somebody who watches my videos on YouTube, they pointed out something.
I believe the name is TAV144. I'm giving you a shout-out here.
TAV144. So they looked at my video, and I think they're into numerology as well.
And they're looking at this from a...
A biblical perspective.
So they seem to look at this from a religious angle.
And they pointed out something, again, which was really, really intriguing.
Another tie-in that I had not seen linked to the 22nd of September.
And this, again, is a very notable event in history.
Right?
And this has to do with the Roman Catholic Church.
Now, those that are into their history, you'll kind of know that once upon a time...
The Roman Church, it had territory, it was a temporal power, an empire.
If you look on old maps, you'll even say Holy Roman Empire covering much of Europe, yeah?
And they had their own army, they had their own navy, yeah?
It was an outgrowth essentially of the Roman Empire, the ancient Roman Empire.
So, what you had then was the Holy Roman Empire as a temporal force, yes?
Well, As events played out in history, due to numerous advances, the state, the influence of the Holy Roman Empire diminished, and its territory was basically taken away from it in a series of wars.
And so, this is why, right now, today, all you've got is the Vatican City, which is about, I think it's 107 acres, it is a little bit in Rome, and the Vatican City then is the Sole remaining territory of what was once this massive religious theocratic empire.
And here's what happened.
As a result of losing all its territory, there was still dispute because it had lost this territory in a series of wars.
And when Benito Mussolini was the dictator, the fascist dictator of Italy, right, in the 1920s, they had something called the Lateran Treaty, right?
And these were a series of agreements made in 1929 between the Kingdom of Italy and, you know, the Holy See, as it was.
And it was to settle what they called the Roman Question, right?
And they named after the Lateran Palace.
Now, this treaty, then, that was signed, was signed on February the 11th, 1929, okay?
Okay?
And what it did is it recognised the full sovereignty of the Holy See in the state of the Vatican City.
So it established a mini little country.
The Pope is the supreme ruler, effectively in a totalitarian regime, if you want to put it that way.
He's the supreme sovereign, totally sovereign nation state.
And not only that, it recognises the territory.
It lists the plans for the buildings, which have extraterritorial privilege.
An exemption from expropriation, seizure-like, and taxes as well.
Right?
So, not only that, it gives a financial settlement, a definitive settlement on the claims of the Holy See following the loss in 1870 of its territories, yeah?
So, it's a big pile of money, big financial settlement.
It sets up its own little dominion.
It's, again, a sovereign entity.
Now, So as I said, this treaty was signed on February the 11th, 1929, okay?
Now, if you work out the absolute number of days between that and this date just mentioned, the 22nd of September 2016, it's a surprisingly well-rounded-up whole number, right?
It's exactly 32,000 days, right?
Very interesting.
32,000 days there.
So, seeing this then, and I'm looking at it and thinking, wow.
And it almost makes you think about then, if there's some kind of financial event, maybe on the 22nd, I mean, we've got this tie-in to a possible third assassination, something political like that.
There is that because it's linked to the Kennedy and the The Reagan dates.
But here we've also got a targeting of that date with a very nice round number.
And this ties into some sort of financial settlement, recognising territory, saying, no, you can't seize this, there's no taxes on this, that kind of thing.
So again, numerologically, they're all kind of maybe hinting at what could possibly be the nature of the events.
And based upon this system then, based upon the precise pairings here, Again, these dates, it really has to be an all or nothing thing in many ways.
It's like they plan to do things on specific dates and they'll accomplish it or not.
The only small thing I'd say in addition to that is, if you think about the assassination of Robert Kennedy, it's interesting that the assassination attempt was on the 5th of June.
But he died one day later on the 6th.
And the tie-in, you know, they chose the date he died on as 13 times 360 days to base the attempt on Reagan.
They didn't choose the date they attempted to do it.
So the only thing that you could think of if there's like maybe one day in some of these dates is if they attempt to do something on the day in question But maybe it doesn't take effect, or they fail, or there's a delay, something, and the outcome occurs on maybe the next day or so.
Do you know what I mean?
But other than that, these should be very precisely targeted dates.
I mean, I'm putting these forward, and I realize this is very tentative.
You know, these are essentially, dare I say, all or nothing things.
I mean, nothing could happen on these dates.
But, so these dates then, they're very intriguing in the way they tie together.
And if The elite at the top are picking dates of numerological significance.
I put it to you that the 9th of November and the 22nd of September are prime dates for something significant to happen.
Now there's one other day that I also mentioned here in my little three dates thing.
The July the 18th 2016.
So this one is literally 11 days away.
Do you know what's going to happen on that day?
Kerry?
Well, I'm in the middle of, let's see, I've just finished a conference, I guess.
So it's the day after my conference.
Well, I'll tell you exactly what's going to happen.
It's going to be the first day of the Republican National Convention, right?
Where Donald Trump, we assume, if there's any justice, I mean, he's the man of the people.
We're going to assume he's going to get the nomination.
You know, he's got all the delegates, more than this 1237.
So we're assuming...
It should be his day, if you will.
This is the first day of the conference.
So I looked at this and thought, hmm, okay then.
Is there any significance to this?
Because this is like the Brexit vote.
The Brexit vote, Cameron, David Cameron, our Prime Minister, our wonderful fearless leader, he initially wanted to schedule the vote to see whether we'd leave the EU or not for 2017.
And then he brought it forward to 2016, yeah?
The same with this Republican convention.
From what I understand, reading some of the newspapers, it should have occurred about a month later.
It's been brought forward.
And the first day is the 18th of July 2016, right?
So here's the interesting thing.
I want to tell you about another very notable guy in history.
One of our monarchs, King George V, right?
And he died on the 20th of January, 1936.
And this is a very interesting...
At that time, you know, the British Empire was kind of practically at its height, territory-wise.
He would be the most important monarch on the face of the planet, you know, pretty much at that time, no doubt.
So he's, you know, the king of Great Britain, Northern Ireland, and all its vast territories, and I'm sure he's got so many titles you know what to do with them, you know.
But he dies on January the 20th.
It's an interesting story.
It's because the precise, you know, circumstances surrounding his death were suppressed for about 50 years.
Obviously, as he's the king, he's got loads of doctors, you know, more than one.
I think he had three at the time.
And he wasn't very well for a while.
And one of his doctors gave him A lethal injection, right?
I believe it was morphine and cocaine or something.
One of his doctors acting on their own, seemingly.
And they wanted to make sure that he died on January 20th, 1936, before midnight.
It's very interesting.
The story goes that this guy, this doctor, wanted to make sure that it would be reported that In the morning papers and not the more inferior evening newspapers.
I mean, I'm not joking, that's what they actually said, some of the reports here.
So, he gave him this lethal dose, so he died on January the 20th, 1936.
And the interesting thing then, regarding this particular thing is, it's a nice lovely tie-in, once again, to the units of the Babylonian measure system.
Not to the value 36, but to the more fundamental value of 6.
You know when I looked at the 22nd of September date, and I said that this is 49 periods of 360 days linking the Robert Kennedy assassination, or rather his date of death, Robert Kennedy's date of death, and the 22nd of September, yeah?
49, or 7 times 7, periods of 360 days.
Well, if you take the total number of days between The 20th of January 1936, when King George died, and the 18th of July 2016, the first day of the Republican Congress, convention rather, again it's a surprisingly whole number of days.
And it turns out to be this.
2,009 to 29,400 days.
And it's 7 times 7, or 49, periods of 600 days separating them.
Again, it's very, very interesting.
And I look at these connections here, and I have to say they're really startling.
They are...
I don't believe...
And I know you could pick any events in history on any day.
I'm sure something happened of significance.
But the way in which these connections play out, especially the pairings identified, like the US presidents, you know, Reagan and Kennedy, or 9-11 and...
The Brexit vote, or the two great financial events, yeah?
When you look at these events here, when you look at them carefully, they do have a strong link towards one another, yeah?
Something very significant, and so when you get these whole numbers of days separating them, especially strongly, either directly or with a slight variation linked into the Babylonian system, it makes these dates very intriguing, so...
If there's any sudden events that may occur, either of a political, financial, or assassination, loss of life type thing, I would say that these three dates in question here, these ones here, are definitely dates that I'd watch.
It's tentative and I can't say for certain.
Anything will definitely happen on these dates, but they are definitely dates to watch.
And so this is what my...
My work's actually led on to them in looking at some of these events here.
The other thing is that people will wonder, you're taking these dates, and of course one would have to be pretty comprehensive with taking these significant dates where people died and people of note died, people in power,
and also where at the same time we've got Historical dates throughout history and then seeing if those parallels exist all the way through or whether some insignificant date,
you know what I'm saying, has more of an association with how many of these dates really do Kind of link up really significant dates.
Did you do the Kennedy date, for example?
And there's also the issue that you've got, of course, which you can appreciate, is sometimes these people are said to have died but don't really die.
Like, we don't know exactly when, necessarily, Kennedy died.
Exactly.
You know what I'm saying.
There could have been some discrepancy there.
Some people have said, for example, that he was kept alive for weeks, even months after, you know, he was dead.
You mean Robert Kennedy?
No, John Kennedy.
Oh, that's not a joke.
Robert Kennedy is the connection I'm making here.
Yeah, I know.
What I'm saying is that there are so many dates.
I definitely think you're on to something.
I also want to say that the Benazir Bhutto connection with Hillary and her possibly winning the presidency...
Is an interesting synchronicity that you've stumbled on because, as I wrote to you, Dan Beerish had told us off the record many, many years ago when he told us that, I believe it was Looking Glass, predicted that Hillary was going to win 2016's presidency.
It hasn't happened yet, but it could happen this year, obviously, if it's going to happen.
And he also said, he also talked about Benazir Bhutto and having, I believe, a great respect for her.
And there seemed to be some kind of link up there.
And actually, I don't remember what it was between Benazir and Hillary.
I do know that Looking Glass did predict that That if Hillary wins this election, there would be an assassination attempt on her life while she's in office, and that she's aware of that.
Now, whether it would be successful or not is not clear, and I don't think was known, as I recall.
But again, I'm not positive of that, because it was kind of a hazy detail.
Anyway, I'm just saying that you seem to have tapped into something here that I, at least in my research and with my whistleblowers going back many, many years, there seem to be some link-ups.
So...
So again, it seems like you might be on a very good track.
Obviously, if we're tracking also false flags, I think it would be valuable to do that.
Because we know that false flags are the work of the Illuminati black, what we call dark magicians.
To see if the dates they're choosing there fit into this scenario of the 360-day link-up would be very interesting.
So did you want to say anything?
I think you're also relating to the financial, what may be a financial collapse, correct?
Oh, yes.
Well, any political event of great significance, especially like an assassination, you'd think that if that occurs when the markets are open, they're going to completely tank.
So I think...
These events could either be purely financial, these dates, or it could be something political involving loss of life that also coincides or triggers a financial collapse as well.
And I think it's what you just said there, Kerry.
It was a good point.
As I said, it's like these dates, they connect up events where they attempt to act.
It's like they were not successful in killing Ronald Reagan, but they picked the date that Yeah, I mean, the date of the magical act, so to speak, or the outcome of the magical act, depending on which you're looking at.
Now, I did want to tell you that Sean David Morton on one of my shows, and I think I wrote to you about this, although I'm not sure, He has mentioned that there is an Israeli, an elderly man in Israel that he was in touch with, who has accurately predicted some financial events in the past.
And also other events, if I understand it correctly.
And this is something he said on my show, which stuck in my mind, because he said something might happen right after the presidential election.
So that's interesting to me, because you have chosen a date right after the presidential election.
And so did this person that Sean's referring to, saying there was going to be something Very significant.
That would kind of change the playing field in the United States.
Now, I'd have to have Sean David Martin back to ask him more specifics or if he even has them.
I also got the impression that you're also talking about a possible earthquake.
Am I wrong?
Or are you...
Is that just...
That was...
I've not mentioned that.
No, I'm not really sure of that at all.
That's something that you mentioned to me that you...
In an email that you thought somebody else had said, well, it's not something I've said, no.
I could talk about earthquakes in general.
I see.
All right.
Well, actually, this gets back into my Malta conference with Simon Parks.
Who has gotten some information about a possible major earthquake in California around those same dates.
Actually, he chose two dates, two sections, two types of dates.
It wasn't specifically the 22nd of September, but I believe it was...
And again, I'd have to have the tape.
And I'm going to put this online, by the way, for people eventually, as soon as I can.
But we're inundated with stuff right now doing these conferences.
Yeah.
It's in, I believe, September or in November.
So here we have a couple of significant people who have significant connections and insider connections, both Sean and Simon Parks.
Who have predicted certain events and they seem to coincide with the dates that you're targeting yourself.
So I'm just throwing that out for people.
Now, you know, you've done a lot of other work in the past and also talked about Fukushima and triangulating the sun and various things.
Do you have Is this the end of...
Do you have anything else to add about these predictions or about this numerology?
Or do you have anything that you might want to kind of bring into the discussion that relates to your earlier work?
Well, there is just one other thing I was going to mention regarding this numerology.
And again, I have to say, this is only like a recent thing that I've turned my attention towards these kind of connections and looked into it.
I've only scratched the surface very recently, and it was mainly the Brexit connection I saw on the Dollar Vigilante site.
So this is only from 24th of June, basically, in me looking at this stuff.
So there are many other things I could definitely take a look at, but the ones I have found stand out so prominently to me, the pairings given, that they were in their own right, even if I haven't investigated so many other things.
But what I was...
Because I'm into celestial cycles, the minute I see things like this, I recognize the ideal values, the numbers, so, you know, I thought, what is the basis of this?
Is this artificial?
Or is this tied into something?
And, again, just from the brief work I've done so far, I suspect this is tied in to cycles that are conjunction cycles related to Venus.
And the reason why I say that is because I looked at a couple of other events and there's a calendar cycle, right?
The Aztecs were using, you know, pre-arrival by Columbus and that, you know.
And they were basically tracking Earth-Venus conjunction in a really ingenious way.
And they made use of two interlocking cycles.
One was 365 days and the other one was 260 days.
And if you set those both going at the same time, they resynchronise, yeah?
After this, 18,980 days.
And that figure is for 52 365-day cycles and 73 260-day cycles, yeah?
And what they did is, they take this number here, right?
And this is the genius bit.
They then take a 260-day value, divide it by 100, so it's 2.6...
And subtract it from that.
And if you do that, you will come up with a value, right, which contains practically dead-on, right, 32 and a half Earth-Venus conjunction cycles.
And this gives you a value, right, in terms of the actual cycle itself.
583.92 days once you've made the correction.
Now, because this is 32.5 conjunctions, what they do is they double up all their values.
So they double up the 18,980.
They double that up, which means that it's equal to, say, 104,365 periods.
And this is the so-called Aztec century.
And so...
They do all that.
They double it up.
The correction measure is doubled up to 5.2 days, which you then subtract from your doubled up number.
And then you contain a whole number of 65 Earth-Venus conjunctions with extreme accuracy, assuming you apply this 5.2 correction.
But here's the thing.
If you don't apply the correction and just divide your doubled up number by...
By 65, then what you end up with, in terms of a whole number day, is 584 days, right?
You end up with that value.
Well, it's interesting, because when I was looking at some of these cycles, I mentioned the September 29, 2008 event, and that was the Dow Jones Green 777.
There's another special event that occurred, which is, again, this is on the 5th of May 2010.
The 5th of May 2010.
So this is just a bit after, yeah, the 08 one.
And this was what was called a so-called flash crash event, where apparently some algorithms kicked in, and again, the Dow Jones opened up suddenly and dropped about 1,000 points really quickly.
It recovered some of that to close a bit higher up, but...
It was a very remarkable thing that happened on the 6th of May.
And when I looked at the whole number of days between September the 29th and May the 6th, it turns out that there are in fact precisely 584 days linking it, right?
So this ties in to Earth-Venus conjunctions.
But there's another interesting thing.
I just mentioned the Lateran Council, February the 11th, 1929.
Well, 1929 is also the day of the great big massive stock market crash that occurred in that year.
That was on the 29th of October 1929.
And if you check the total number of days between those two events that occurred in the same year, February 11th, when the Lateran Treaty was signed, and October 29th, when the big crash occurred, it turns out that there's exactly 260 days separating them.
Which is one of these values tied into the Aztec calendar.
So, it just made me a listing, and I've only just, as I said, briefly looked into this, briefly scratched the surface, but there are hints here that the cycles in question may well be tied into conjunction cycles linked to the Earth and Venus.
If there's any real physical basis at work, that would appear to be it, rather than being...
Did I say an artificial or abstract overlay of these cycles?
Okay, so at this moment, because we don't have a lot of questions in the chat, unfortunately, do you want to talk a little bit about your other work, any other progress that you've made in that area, the areas that you were touching on in the past, having to do with...
For example, military bases and the connections also with the sun and triangulating vortexes and all of that.
I'll tell you a bit of an update then.
New discoveries I've made.
These are going to be in my book actually.
Some very interesting ones.
Very good.
It's a new analysis of some of the major military bases such as Pine Gap, Menwith Hill and how they...
Link in to what are megalithic structures, specifically Stonehenge, the Great Pyramid, and also this big pyramid of Mars.
That's the one there.
Well, I'll just give you a nice indication here of where we're going with this, because in the 1960s, there was an interesting event occur that was recorded in an Australian newspaper, and this was picked up by another researcher called Bruce Cathy, who looked into...
The Earth's energy grid and so forth, right?
And apparently some survey ship called the El Tannin captured what looked like some aerial about two foot high with crossbars on it, yeah?
It looked like a crossbar type aerial about two foot high and I'll just give you a little representation of it.
It looked something like this.
It had six kind of cross beams like that going on it.
And the image looked distinctly artificial, and it was at about 13,500 feet down.
So we're thinking 1960s, no, not a human thing, you know what I mean?
And so he looked at this, and he looked at the crosses, and what he did, he reconstructed from this what he believed was the pattern of an energy grid.
Over the Earth, right?
And he thought, counting up the crossbars and rev, he thought that where this aerial was situated was one of the eight points of a cuboid embedded within the Earth.
Now, I say cuboid because the Earth's not a perfect sphere, and at this latitude, the latitude of the aerial was at 59 degrees south, yeah?
So it's more like an oblong sort of thing.
So you've got...
If you imagine the flat plane of the Earth at that latitude, the circle, yeah?
And you imagine where the aerial is, and you've got three other points, like a square there.
And you've got a mirror of that same thing with four points in the other hemisphere, the northern hemisphere.
And he looked at this crossbars and said, well, I think that there's these great circles connecting up pairs of points...
Of all these points, it's a very interesting pattern he came up with.
And he also had some contact with some, you know, military intelligence insiders, and he came up with that.
And when I looked at this, I've been looking at, by analysis I did previously, the Great Pyramid, and I have to say I drew one of these diagrams in error and got the pattern of it wrong, and I'm correcting this.
He looked at this pattern then, and he thought...
There's a cuboid grid pattern with great and small circles connecting up all of the points, you know, the eight points of a cube embedded in the Earth.
Yeah, cuboid.
And he thought this was associated with the Earth's magnetic field.
And what I ended up finding out is that this kind of grid pattern is associated with many megalithic monuments.
And that if you take to the Great Pyramid, it too would appear to be At a special latitude, such that it is one, it's positioned on one of the eight points of a cuboid inside the Earth, yeah?
And if you link up, if you were to connect up the four arcs, the arc measures ARC, the arc length measures connecting up the square, if you will, the surface square of the latitude where the Great Pyramid is, and divide that by the Elliptic-like length from the equator to where the pyramid is.
You get the same ratio times 10 as you would get with respect to the Earth's ideal year.
Just to give you an example, the current value for the Earth's...
This is the value...
365.24218 days, yeah?
Current Earth here.
If you divide that by 360, right, you'll get this ratio here, this sequence.
Well, it turns out that if you just move that decimal point here, so instead of it being 1.01456, it's 10.1456.
That's the ratio that links up very exactingly.
The arc length's connecting up the Great Pyramid on its latitude with the arc length from the equator.
I realise this is very complicated.
I wish I had a diagram.
If I'd have known this, I'd have printed off one of the diagrams because I've already done these diagrams for my book.
In fact, Kerry, if you could embed it in this video, I could send you a snapshot of it, maybe.
Just to show you that.
And anyway...
Here's the thing about vibrations, right?
Because even guys like Sam Parks have said the Great Pyramid is a device.
It's very true.
I'm sure a lot of people have seen these little YouTube demonstrations where somebody's got a square metal plate attached to his tripod and it's attached to a vibrating machine that goes up and down and so the plate's going up and down and they sprinkle some sand just finely and uniformly over it and they set it vibrating and it just seems to vibrate randomly.
But when they tune it to get certain We're good to go.
And this is on the plate.
So you imagine then the earth as a spheroid body.
And you get a device and you...
Also, by the way, sound can do this.
And a friend of mine had shown me how sound, they vibrate sand, well, actually rock, stone, but also sand.
They vibrate it using sound vibrations.
And then it will make all kinds of shapes.
And this also gets into Michael Tellinger's work with the shapes of the stone circles in South Africa having to do with the magnetron.
And so there's a lot to this, yes.
So what I'm saying then is if you get like a device, like a megalithic structure like a pyramid, you plunk it on the earth and you have machinery to set it vibrating.
If you hit the right frequency, you will establish...
This special grid pattern.
You will establish a cuboid pattern composed of eight points in the Northern Hemisphere, mirroring eight points here, and all these circles, you establish energetically the pattern, right?
And you are literally resonating the entire Earth, and you have the ability to draw energy from it, or even send energy.
And this, from the very core of the planet, C-U-R-E, core, The core of the planet, you can transmit energy from there to other planets.
And this is one of these systems that allows you to communicate to other star systems.
Right?
Or even transmit energy there.
And I think when I look at the work of Joseph Farrell, he talks about the Giza Death Star.
And he talks about it being a weapon.
And, you know, it could destroy planets.
I think this is exactly how it works.
You resonate the Earth, and you basically use your device.
And if you know what you're doing...
The energy that you build up, you withdraw into the Earth's core.
And depending upon the planetary configuration you have, I do believe that's a factor, it will then determine where it is transmitted to and it will emerge in the cores of other planets.
And if it's too much, it will blow them up.
And I think you can artificially do this with various things like that, causing a kind of runaway effect.
Or there's a natural mechanism of the solar system Where you get certain planets going to conjunction cycles and you get a resonant agitation of the solar system.
And this is tied into a lot of what these ancient calendars are about.
They're all trying to determine the future dates when special conjunctions occur, right?
Where we will have resonant agitation of the planets.
There's even references in such as the Nag Hammadi text, I think it is.
There's a reference, something to the effect of...
You know, at the end of the age, at the consummation of the age, you know, the demons and angels weep and wail over their seasons because the celestial bodies have cancelled their circuits, right?
They've cancelled their circuits.
And so there's so much information in there about resonant disruption to the planets.
It's encoded in mythologies as well.
I also want to say that Ashia Nadine relates to this and it's in her book, I believe it's the second volume of the Voyager books and I don't have one with me here because I'm traveling at the moment but unfortunately I can't remember what it's called but apparently they built these channels into the earth And the various races have
actually built all of these channels around them and she tells about where they link up from continents and they can vibrate these channels or something and cause also destruction here on the earth.
I do think it is a question of shifting energy around and it's energetically Conduits, if you will, and you do shift energy around it.
I think that's definitely a factor.
And the whole cancellation of energy as well is important because, I mean, there's some amazing references in a book called The P. Stice Sophia.
I've got an article, for anybody interested, on my website, occultphysics.com, there's a navbar button that says, Revelation, and it talks about the whole story of the red dragon.
And that's related to the cancellation of light waves because this is where the sun, right, the sun itself, it goes red because, essentially, the light waves from it are affected.
And there's a nice, lovely reference in the Pistis Sophia where Jesus is asked to many Magdalene about all these different light realms.
We've got, like, the ineffable, the Godhead realms.
And then we have all these different lower light realms.
Then we get to our world, the cosmos, realm of mankind.
And then we get to these even lower worlds.
And the lowest region, the outermost region from the Godhead, is called the outer darkness.
And there's a four-series essay thing on my occult physics website on that.
But just concentrating on this issue here, this story then regarding the sun.
Mary asks Jesus...
Doth the outer darkness come into our world, or doth it not?
And Jesus says something like, if the light of the world is above the sun, then the outer darkness is veiled.
But if the light of the world is beneath the sun, then it comes into the world like a smoke or something, he says.
And then he goes on to say, the critical statement he says is, He says, that is, if the rays of the sun withdraweth themselves back unto themselves, withdraweth back unto themselves, then the outer darkness enters into our world.
And again, he's talking about the cancellation of the light waves.
And this is where you have, you know, we model light waves sinusoidally.
And if you intercept one peak there with another grain like that, they flat line out to zero, yeah?
So, he's talking about the cancellation.
And it looks like this particular reference then to the red dragon in Revelation is about the cancellation of the sun's light waves.
And one of the interesting things I pick up on in my book, because in Revelation it talks about the dragon sweeping out a third of the stars down to the earth.
Well, if the dragon is the sun, the woman...
In the dragon chase is after, right?
The woman clothed with the stars, she's the moon.
And it says in the references that there are 1260 days here separating them.
Well, if you take a synodic month, 29.53058 days or something, and you do a calculation, how many months are there in 1260 days?
There's 42.666 kind of, you know, Almost dead on a 666 sequence, which is two-thirds.
Two-thirds of the sky.
It's talking about the angular sweep, with the Earth being the pivot point, the Moon here, say, the Sun here, 120 degrees, one-third of the sky.
And because the Sun is the red dragon, it's talking about the angular sweep there.
So it's a nice, lovely, beautiful fit as a mythological solution.
So it really does help identify the red dragon as being the Sun...
When it is undergoing the cancellation of its light waves and it's tied into a certain pattern with the moon.
So this is where you get these strange, you know, atmospheric anomalous effects with the sun and they all occur with, again, special patterns of offset or conjunction cycles.
So there's all kinds of references like this and this is why we talk about the days of darkness because if you think about the sun's light waves, if they all go out They'll go out the red end of the spectrum and go completely black.
And one of the things I mentioned in a video I did with you quite a few years ago, five years ago I think it was, I talked about how this is where we get the days of darkness from.
When the planets are assembled in a special pattern, they literally have this effect on the Sun of causing it to switch off as a visible emitter of light.
Right?
The sun's light waves withdraw and it switches off.
And I would also add here, it probably ceases to rotate.
It slows down its rotation to almost a standstill, yeah?
And this is part of the thing.
And the reason I say that is because when we think about...
This is one of the things...
Do you know Stan Deo?
Yes.
He talked about some of the inside knowledge he has about gravity and anti-gravity propulsion.
And this again is going to be something I'm going to mention in my book.
He talks about how the Sun is spinning around really fast, and it's basically disrupting space.
And space has its matter, you know, it's very fine, very, you know, rarefied, if you will, but it has resistance.
So if the Sun's spinning around and sending out spiralling energy waves, they will go and hit a certain maximum point of pressure and then reflect back.
And this is how you establish the standing wave patterns, pressure gradients in space.
And all of the planets have to be on These particular pressure gradients, yeah?
Locked into their own localised gravity wells.
It's not just a single inverse square law for gravity.
Ah, no, no, no, no.
They're all in their own little curvatures.
And the reason I bring this up is because if they are established by the action of the Sun, and the Sun slows down, the whole frequencies of standing wave patterns is disrupted, and temporarily the planets will drift.
They will be drifting gradually.
Into a new warp, you know, drifting through space, unleashed and no longer bound.
But the days of darkness is temporary.
And the Sun, where the configuration, you know, from an optimum conjunction, when it dissipates afterwards, the Sun reignites, starts rotating once more, re-establishes its gravity wave potentials, and all of the planets are effectively recaptured.
But they may be recaptured in different bands.
So you have a reorganization of the solar system.
Yeah?
And this is one of the things I'm going to see if I can try and mention this more in depth in my book.
Because I'm actually on that chapter right now when I'm talking.
I'm still writing it.
But the planets can be reorganized.
Right?
And you hear these mythologies in Greek about one god ascending and having more prominence over another god and so forth.
And I think that this is a tie-in to the reorganization of the solar system based upon these cut-off periods when you have these conjunctions.
Well, let me ask you if you've looked at the so-called Planet X, brown dwarf solar system, mini solar system, in reference to what you're talking about now.
Absolutely, Kerry.
I'll reveal to you now a bit of a solution on Planet X because...
In fact, I'll tell you, there's something I wanted to say as well, Kerry, regarding this whole issue of a rogue object, as we'd put it, a rogue object entering into our solar system and disrupting the Earth.
Now, we tend to think of like, if we're going to think of a rogue object, we think about an asteroid, which is a one-off thing.
If it hits us, it hits us.
When we think of these ancient calendars, they're tracking cyclical things.
So they aren't really looking at...
You can just say, Kerry, there's a little bit of static going off here.
Is there anything that you're in need of a microphone?
Oh, really?
Okay, well, you know, I think it might be...
I don't know what it is, but it could have to do with my own computer, the heat from my computer, so...
I'll just keep going there.
I mean, go ahead.
I'm going to see if I can deal with this.
It's just a bit of an hissing sound.
That's all I just noticed.
It's not massively disruptive.
No, I hear you.
I've known about it for a while.
So the only trouble, I'm worried that people won't hear you if I try to Skype, if I mute myself.
In essence, I'm muting you.
Oh, I see.
This is part of the problem.
We'll just keep it going then.
It's fine.
I don't know.
Yeah, it is a problem.
I don't know what to do about it, actually.
Well, anyway, what I was going to say then, do you remember you interviewed Courtney Brown from the Farsight Institute and he's had his teams of remote viewers and he was looking at a particular study which was linking...
It was linked to what he thought was an environmental study looking at, I think, the difference between 2008 and mid-2013.
And as a result of this, what happened was it looked like, and I think there was about nine remote viewers on this one at the time, and they were looking at certain prominent locations for things in history, you know, like I think the Washington building, the...
The Opera House in Sydney, a place in Hawaii.
You know, they were looking at all these different landmarks somewhere, some places in Africa.
And about two-thirds of the remote viewers seemed to see images of massive destruction and also water flowing across up to Mount Kilimanjaro and about two-thirds of them seemed to see that kind of scenario mid-2013, if I've got that right.
And the other third of them were pretty much saying, nothing to see, everything's normal, these monuments, everything's standing, it's no problem.
And it was a very interesting study, because what Courtney Brown then went on to say, there's an event that occurred.
You know, he said to the remote viewers, can you just go back in time and see what happened?
And the remote viewers, given these disaster scenarios, I think about two-thirds of them, were talking about fast-moving objects hitting the Earth, yeah?
And what happened was we had an interesting event occur in February.
I think it was February 2013.
And there was this asteroid.
I think the codename is DA14. I hope that's correct, that.
DA14. And this asteroid then, it made a close approach to the Earth, yeah?
And the Earth's radius is about 3,950 miles.
and And this asteroid, DA14, was so close it was about 16,000 miles above the surface of the Earth, which is a radius is about 3950 miles, yeah?
And what was so interesting about this asteroid is...
When it was, you know, told, you know, when NASA says, hey, look, we've got the announcement here, JPL's giving you the orbital elements and everything, yes, it's going to come very close to us, you know, no problem, it's just going to miss.
You know, within hours of that asteroid making its close approach, we had some kind of impact of some object going towards Russia, right?
There was like a fragment accompanying it, a significant chunk of something, Accompanying the asteroid.
And lots of people in Russia, because they're all scared to death of an insurance scam and people bumping into the cars, practically everybody's got one of these dashcams, you know.
Because always on the lookout for insurance fraud, they want to know whether if somebody's bumped into them or vice versa.
So there's a lot of paranoia about that kind of fraud.
So there were loads of people with these dashcams on these cars and they were seen.
We were just driving down the road and saw this great massive lightness object come in.
And it looks...
One of the...
The cameras seem to record some other object just briefly intercepting this chunk and nullifying as if it had a bit of a mid-air explosion, you know, before it hit the ground.
But this event then was so interesting because here we've got an asteroid coming close to the Earth, the main asteroid, DA14, and yet we get this other chunk.
Let me tell you what I think actually happened here, Kerry, and I'm I'm pretty confident about this.
I think this is very true.
I think when DA14 was first discovered, it was found to be on a collision course with the Earth.
And I think that a probe was sent up with an explosive device, rendezvoused with the asteroid, and it was at a soft landing, and it had some sort of small nuclear charge, and it triggered it.
And it triggered it When the asteroid was still quite away from the Earth.
And if you just trigger the right explosive charge, you just disrupt.
Dynamically, you will change the entire orbital course of the object, yeah?
But here's the thing.
When you fire your charge, at all costs, the asteroid has to remain intact.
If you hit it and it fragments, you're in serious trouble.
Because all those fragments are going to get drawn to the Earth, and your entire operation's failed.
But if you get your charge, charge it, explosion just modifies it, but the asteroid remains intact, brilliant.
The very fact that one of these fragments, that there just seemed to be in passing, tells me that I think what happened was they set the charge, the asteroid held together, but one little chunk, you know, just one little chunk...
Did break off and head towards us.
And I think that the disaster scenarios of multiple strikes of about two-thirds of the remote viewers, they were actually giving us the odds of the success or failure of this entire operation.
Yeah?
To deflect the asteroid.
So I think this was a real asteroid, really ongoing and coming towards us.
Yeah?
And I think that when it was ultimately announced, they'd already managed to change its course.
But this is why, flying alongside it, you've got the main asteroid, slightly deflected, and you've got this little extra chunk.
And that little extra chunk was drawn towards the Earth, but the main asteroid didn't.
And some device took out that one little chunk.
So we had a successful escape here, but it was all done in secret.
And the reason why I say all this, because...
Just shortly after, I think it was like within months or a year after, NASA had this big announcement to say, hey, we've just managed for the first time to soft land a probe on some asteroid.
Yeah, they made this announcement.
I think they were releasing this technology that they'd already just used in secret.
Yeah, but they released it.
There was a bit of a scandal around it because one of the scientists there had some kind of weird bowling ball type shirt on with scantily clad women.
And when he was being interviewed about this historic thing, all social justice warriors went nuts and all feminists and whatever, demanding an apology for what shirt he was wearing when he was doing the interview.
So most people who became aware of this landing probably did it via this Shirtgate scandal.
But anyway, it was interesting because I think that this is one of those events then where we were secretly saved in that sense.
And the reason I bring this up, Kerry, is because There are lots of people talking about underground bases, especially linked into, say, psychic prophecies and readings, or whatever, prior to 2013.
I think that some of these people have seen timelines, right?
They've seen timelines that were part of that destructive event.
But we've bypassed that.
So it means that there's a lot of readings and prophecies that may well be suddenly irrelevant.
I mean, you know Cliff Hyde, the web bot project, he was talking about...
His system was detecting something, what he called a global coastal event, where there'd be massive internet blackouts and all the rest of it.
And that seems to be tied in, if you ask me too, the disaster scenarios associated with this DA14. The two-thirds were disasters, one-third were okay.
And that's why I think all of that body of work that his WebBot program collected on this global coastal event, I think it's essentially been rendered irrelevant.
You know, it's gone.
It didn't happen, not in our timeline.
So, I think that, again, when we talk about the elite and preparations and whatever, I think, to some extent, some of the things that they may well have been doing just prior to that, they were legitimately concerned about DA14 because it was on a collision course.
And, again, I think that...
Because it's been deflected, that threat's no longer at present, yeah?
So we do have, I think, things like that going on in secret.
Okay, let me just weigh in here for a minute because I have some back-channel knowledge about that asteroid, as you're calling it, or whatever it was that hit in Russia.
And actually, the information I got was that I believe it was a craft.
And the craft was, this is at least what I was told by a whistleblower, it was carrying a certain group of beings and that they destroyed it.
For me, they look more like an asteroid fragment.
Right.
I know they were doing surveys to actually find the materials afterwards.
I know, but understanding that the moon and the Phobos are both hollow and that they act as, can be, they're actually like vehicles.
They're trans, you know, we call them planetoids.
It's that sort of...
So, I'm just throwing this out.
This was just some background information.
Now, I do appreciate what you're saying in terms of timelines and certain ones no longer taking effect.
I think it's an interesting premise.
I'm not sure that there is only one incident that can be cited You know, as being sort of responsible like that, that was a, I guess you might call it an extinction-level event waiting to happen and that somehow it was deflected.
I think it's interesting to look at it that way, but I, at least according to my back-channel information, may not have been that particular event.
There may have been others.
I'm actually fooling around with the notion that Because we have moved into 4D, and we're moving out of 3D in essence, we are in a certain sense, you know, changing dimensions.
And the Earth herself, there is a sense that we are...
It's a sort of a kind of ascension, but it's not the ascension that, you know, a lot of people would like it to be.
It's sort of a movement and a thinning of the veil, as they call it.
And this is interesting because what it does is it may be that some of the things that we are seeing are, yes, on other timelines, but also that we're seeing those other timelines as if you do a distant place.
And I think that people are getting confused because they're seeing things in a linear fashion.
And in essence, timelines are simultaneous.
All time is simultaneous.
If you can appreciate that.
All time and space.
So it's possible with the thinning of the veil that what people are seeing are these alternate timelines simultaneously.
And some seem to take more precedence than others.
There are also options, you know, possible futures and possible choices that we may have.
Decide to make in the future.
I've also had somebody recently said, I think it was, again, this was Simon Parks, saying that we've just been pulled off.
You know, Dan Bierisch talked about two major timelines, and Simon was saying that we were pulled off the sort of more destructive one, pulled back onto the positive one, pulled back onto the destructive one,
and we've been, in a sense, that the powers that be Behind the scenes are actually shifting us And have been doing so now for many years, if I understand it correctly, back and forth from one timeline to another.
And that also has to do with some anomalies in the consecutive nature of the way we look at time, at least on this timeline.
So, you know, I appreciate what you're saying.
I think it's an interesting theory.
I do think that there are a lot of Predictions that are not coming true and that are not happening the way people thought they would.
And, you know, I'm not sure that, you know, you can all point to one event.
Well, no, that event, as I said, I do think is a significant one.
And the reason why I'd say that the scenario I put forward, I mean, I don't have any insider knowledge, but the multiple fragments that the remote viewers seem to hit, you know, see...
Devastating different areas and whatever, it does seem to imply some object shattered as a really good solution.
And the fact that we had one fragment go towards Russia, you know, I mean, I don't know if somebody's told it's a craft.
Well, I don't know.
I can't comment on that.
But for me, the more plausible one would be.
I remember the Courtney Brown interview, and I remember his remote viewers talking about that.
I do think it's possible that's still in the future.
And I want to say that, you know, this is just like another thing that people may find interesting is the fact, and it's gotten quite dark in this room where I am now, so I apologize for that.
I'd have to run across the room and open the curtain.
But the fact is that they have talked about these, I guess it was Valery Uvarov, who is a Russian who I interviewed, and he is someone who talked about these installations that were discovered on the earth that are very,
very old, And one, they were discovered by the Chinese and also, I guess, the Russian government.
And the Russian government wanted the Chinese not to know about them, but apparently one of these installations exists in China.
One exists, if I recall, in Russia.
One exists somewhere, I think they said off the coast of Florida, if I recall.
And that they were put there by an ancient race of beings, and that what they actually discovered them to be is they contain some kind of technology, very advanced.
That is able to shoot down any incoming asteroids or meteors or whatever.
And you can appreciate where this would be valuable technology to have, and that this even today is something that our governments would kill for, if you want to call it that.
Because this is the name of the game, and this is also said to be the way that Atlantis was sunk.
That at least, and of course, Asha and Dean talks about, there were two major sinkings of the island of Atlantis, one more devastating than the other, taking down the greater landmass.
But one had to do with an asteroid that was targeted at the Earth and shot at it, basically.
Because, and this is, Joseph Farrell also talks about this in his Cosmic Wars, how asteroids are used as, and meteors are used as You know, basically weapons to be aimed and shot at various planets, planetoids, and so on, in battles for control of, you know, the universe and so on.
So, yeah, I mean, the technology supposedly exists.
Like I said, this is all whistleblower testimony that we're talking about that I have, but it does relate to this.
So I appreciate the work you're doing.
It's absolutely fascinating.
And I think if there's any wrap-up comments, because we've been going for quite a while, I think we should probably close this down.
But if you can tie it together and then if you want to advertise your book or give your website and this and that.
Please do that.
Yeah, my website's called occultphysics.com.
All one word, no space, occultphysics.com.
And I'd say my book, The Lost Age of High Knowledge, there's no more copies left.
I've sold them all.
But what I do have at the bottom, if you go to my contact page, Navbar, I am taking orders, pre-orders for people who want to be notified when it goes on sale, when I've completed it.
It should be about...
Five months from now, so in the entire financial system I'm blown up.
And I suppose, as I said, the information I've just given here is only developed actually from a very recent look in at some of the dates in question.
So I'm going to have to look into this a bit more.
But I think they're dates to watch and it's tentative what I put forward in terms of these three dates.
I'll just put them back on screen again if anybody wants to look at them and I don't know for certain, you can never be certain, but they're so intriguing, the connections, that they're well worth at least thinking about, that something might happen, but we'll have to see.
I definitely think that even if those dates are not of significance in and of themselves, we're still, I think, in this financial year, we're going to have something made before the end of the year's out.
I definitely think that's so...
I think that's about it, really, yeah.
Okay.
All right.
Well, thank you so much, Keith.
It's been great listening to you and talking with you and fascinating bit of research.
And obviously these dates are coming up.
We'll see if there's anything that does occur.
Or if even the very fact of this video is enough to dissuade them from choosing those particular dates.
I don't know.
And so on.
So, yeah.
And thank you very much for coming on the show.
And let's schedule something in the not-too-distant future when your book is ready to be released or even before that if you come up with some more information.