PROJECT CAMELOT: AN UPDATE WITH PAUL LA VIOLETTE - SUPERWAVE
|
Time
Text
Thank you.
We are live on live stream and we actually think this is going to work.
Please bear with us if we have any technical issues.
Obviously, I operate this by myself at this moment.
Not the preferred way of doing a broadcast, but nonetheless, that's how it is.
Okay, I am Carrie Cassidy from Project Camelot, and I'm very happy to be here today and to be talking to Paul Dr.
Paul LaViolette, I should say.
He is an astrophysicist.
I have a short bio that I can actually read from, but we could also have you give an introduction for yourself.
What I'm going to do is put this on the screen.
Anyone who is tuning in at this time will be able to To have seen the link and all of the information that we put there, which is giving them quite a good overview of our discussion today, where we're going to be going, and various topics that we're going to be discussing.
I'm actually trying to get this into this window at the moment.
And so here we are.
So what I'll say here is, as it says on the screen, that Paul LaViolette, Ph.D., is the author of Secrets of Antigravity, Propulsion, Subquantum, Kinetics, Earth Under Fire, Genesis of the Cosmos, Decoding the Message of the Pulsars, Galactic Superwaves and Their Impact on the Earth, and is the editor of A Systems View of Man.
He has also published many original papers in physics, astronomy, climatology, systems theory, and psychology.
So, That's a very short summation.
We have a longer bio at the bottom of the page.
But from here, Paul, why don't you give a little bit of your more recent background, I guess, and anything you think is pertinent to our discussion that you'd like people to know about you, kind of how you come at things.
Because I know you have a very...
For a PhD and for someone who is actually...
I mean, I hope this is considered a compliment, but...
By some said to be the Einstein of our time, I have to say.
I don't know if you've heard that reference.
But you are highly, highly regarded around the world.
And so if you'd like to augment what I've just said, feel free.
Well, a lot of scientists, I guess they specialize in certain fields.
I'm interdisciplinary, so I've worked in a lot of different fields.
And I like to get into areas where, sort of like frontier areas, where things aren't understood too well.
I'm inherently an explorer.
And I don't necessarily stick with the conventional theories.
I mean, I criticize the conventional paradigm just as much as I do my own ideas.
And that leaves you freer to be able to form, I believe, more accurate, come to more accurate conclusions about what you're seeing out there, whatever you're studying.
Okay, and isn't it true that you also, you kind of bring in astrology, which is something that is considered maybe foreboding by most scientists, right?
Yeah, I've studied astrology, of course, in the normal sense of horoscope astrology.
I was interested for some time.
But my approach in astrology is...
More as archaeastronomy, that it may be a record that contains important information in and of itself.
I believe it was originally designed as a message, a time capsule message, to be sent to the future, to us, future civilizations, to, among other things, inform us about the galactic core explosion phenomenon, which is The most important catastrophic phenomena that affects our planet and solar system.
Also, the zodiac contains an advanced physics, which I've been working on.
My own version of this I call sub-quantum kinetics.
It was only, well, subquantum kinetics is based on systems theory.
Systems theory is a new interdisciplinary area that grew out of von Bertalanffy's, Ludwig von Bertalanffy's original ideas back in the 30s.
And I took the system's principles and applied them to physics, to microphysics.
I was the first to do that and found that it solved a lot of problems in physics and astronomy.
And it's actually advanced quite a bit now and has a lot of followers.
But later I discovered that the Zodiac encodes the physics, which is very astounding because this physics, to understand it, requires computers to be able to simulate the results, requires an advanced understanding of chemistry, and yet you see the concepts transmitted in the Zodiac.
Okay, and I have to bear with me here, Paul, because I have to make sure that we are live and that this is working.
I'm actually going to ask the audience to make sure, because what will happen with livestream from time to time is that it will freeze up.
It looks like we're okay.
Okay, everything's good, so we can continue.
And thank you for that explanation.
What I'd like to do, I know that people are here and they're going to be wondering about ISON. Obviously, there's a lot of information out there.
I've posted some of it on my website.
I've also referenced you and some of the information you have sent me.
But is there anything you can tell us that you've heard, that you understand?
And actually, in the process, can you also explain why it is that your area of expertise doesn't really include things like comets?
Or if it does, you know, if you could explain further about that.
Because at the moment, let me just say this, it seems that we're getting a lot of cross-information about ISON. And have been for quite some time.
There's a lot of controversy on the web about it, and I have been in touch with Richard Hoagland about this as well, and some of my other sources.
So I'm just very curious to hear your take on it, and if you wouldn't mind.
Well, it's based on what I've read in the internet, the latest updates, that when the comet...
Well, first of all, it...
It's unusual and it came so close to the Sun only two times the radius of the Sun it came that close and When it rounded the corner on the other side of the Sun they saw that it seemed to have most of it had evaporated the mostly made of Carbon dioxide,
water, and what was left were probably pebbles and dust and maybe some chunks of ice that hadn't completely evaporated yet.
They say up to 10 meters, so about the size of your room.
They say that could possibly be something as large as 100 meters.
Fortunately, I think the large debris is going to continue on its original orbit and miss us, because they said it would pass about 60 million miles from the Earth, which is about a third of the distance the Earth is from the sun, so that's quite a ways away.
So, I don't think, you know, if it If we were in the orbit, things that large could cause some problems like the Tunguska explosion in 1908.
They believe it was produced by something about a comet about 100 meters diameter.
The thing that went over Russia, I think they were talking about that being about 10 meters.
So 10 meters could definitely break windows and drive the price of window glass up.
Well, you did mention that, I mean, maybe you've changed your point of view since then, but you did originally mention that you thought that we were going to encounter the tail and that there would be space dust.
Yeah, the dust is something else.
The dust can get blown off of the main trajectory by the interaction with the sun.
So that would fan out quite a bit, and there have been some simulations that suggest that we will go through this dust.
Now, if there's a lot of dust that enters the Earth's atmosphere, that can cause a climatic cooling on Earth, just like a volcanic eruption.
In fact, I believe it was Fred Hoyle, back about 40 years ago, he wrote a paper about climatic change being due to the Earth going through the tail of a comet.
Now, he was talking about a comet coming much closer, so we would have really gotten showered with stuff.
But the thing is that this dust, it goes into the stratosphere and takes a long time for it to settle, come down.
And meanwhile, It forms clouds very high up that reflect sunlight and so it could trigger a cooling.
They say that now the Sun itself is sort of the activity is not as strong as it was.
Some solar physicists are even predicting that we'll be going into a little ice age because the Sun's activity will be So this, on top of that, could, you know, I don't think it would create an ice age, but it would definitely cool things down, which might be good from the standpoint of global warming.
Everyone's worried about global warming.
In fact, it seems a lot of this cloud seeding that has been going on in the chemtrails that we hear about may be a secret program, an unacknowledged program to cool the planet.
By creating high-altitude clouds.
So maybe if Comet Eason could do it for us, maybe there wouldn't be any need for these planes to go flying.
I'm bothering us.
Okay, well, rather than get off into that discussion, I do want to ask you though, do you consider yourself an astrophysicist?
I mean, is that the correct sort of designation for you?
A lot of people put me in that category.
I've done a lot of work in that field, published a lot of papers in that field.
My PhD is actually in systems theory, general systems theory, which allows you really to get into any field if you're approaching from systems perspective, interdisciplinary perspective.
And it's nice because you can, like for example, the superwave theory I developed sort of gathers information from all sorts of disciplines, astronomy, geology, climatology, paleontology, even ancient myths.
Right.
Okay.
Well, in terms of just, you know, sort of to wrap up this discussion of ISON, you say you're reading on the Internet, but as, you know, in your position, are you ever able to sort of evaluate things from...
You know, a more insider point of view, or have you had discussions with other scientists who might have inside information about the comment that we're not being told, so to speak?
Have inside information?
You mean through people contacting me?
Well, even professionals, fellow professionals, so to speak, maybe knowing a professional who is.
Because there seems to be a real lack of information, real information, out about ISON. And I'm just wondering, where are all the so-called experts?
I know that, I guess, perhaps you know the scientist James McKinney?
I've heard of him, yeah.
Okay, and I believe, if I'm not mistaken, he talks about the electric view of the universe.
I don't know if you kind of follow that point of view?
Well, I have alternative explanations for some of it.
But the idea that craters on the moon could have involved electric discharges or plasma balls from the sun, I believe, you know, that's...
Possible.
But it's possible planets could have potential differences.
Now, it's a theory.
I mean, it's difficult to prove that you're going to have potentials so large that it could cause lightning bolts, like Velikovsky was talking about, lightning bolts between planets.
Okay, but to get back to my original sort of the beginning part of the question, so are you or are you not in sort of touch with any so-called what you might consider experts with regard to ISON? No, I'm not.
Okay.
Alright, and is this something that you follow closely or is it something that is actually on the very periphery of what you focus on normally?
Well, I would follow it closer if I knew there was a serious threat.
The thing is, they said that in December this month, they were going to do more accurate predictions on its orbit and the orbit of the trajectory of the cloud.
And they would be able to tell us if we're going to get any showers of any sort on Earth.
For sure, you wouldn't be able to see the comet with the naked eye like you did before, because most of it's gone.
There's no tail from what I understand.
Okay.
Well, I have actually seen contrary information showing that it does still have a tail.
I guess at the moment it does seem to have gone out of camera view.
You have to see it through a telescope probably and you would see there is something there.
Alright, well let's move on then to talk about the galactic super wave because that is kind of the cornerstone of your work it seems to me and it also seems to be We're talking about encountering this G2 cloud which kind of has gone into the background.
Camelot has talked about this in the past for other people that might have followed our work and gotten information about this also from some of our whistleblowers.
So do you want to talk about where the G2 cloud is in relation to us and what the circumstances are and why you think that we might be going into a galactic super wave sometime this year or the next year?
Well, the G2 cloud is a cloud of gas that's falling towards the center of the galaxy, and they predict it will be its closest point to this core, the galactic core, around April of this coming year.
You can think of it just in terms of, like, what happened with Comet E-Sun, coming in and coming very close to the Sun, and then it...
It got evaporated.
Well, the same thing except on a larger scale.
The galactic core is about 4 million times more massive than the Sun.
It puts out 100 million or more times the energy that the Sun puts out.
And here we have a cloud that probably has a star embedded in it that's coming in.
Well, the closest approach to the core will be about 130 astronomical units.
That's astronomical units distance from the Earth to the Sun.
So about three times, if you can think of three times the size of our solar system, that distance is how close it will come.
But that's pretty close when you figure the amount of energy that it's exposed to.
Right now it's sort of on this free fall towards the core.
It's on an elliptical orbit that has high ellipticity.
It's very long and makes a very close pass around the core.
I believe that the fireworks will really start when it's Gone at its closest point.
For one thing, the tidal forces are the greatest, just like the Earth and Moon affect our tides.
There, it's on a much larger scale because of the great mass of the core, and that tends to rip apart things like Oh, planets, or even dust clouds, they'll just get elongated and pieces will just funnel in to the core.
So I've seen some computer simulations they've done, and it looks like this gas trailing from this gas cloud will start getting captured into the core as the cloud and star inside it are at the closest point.
Think of it this way, that right now it's in free fall, but as it rounds the corner, now its momentum is trying to take it, carry it away from the core.
But the gravitational field of the core is trying not to let it go.
It wants to bring it in.
So it's like this battle between its own momentum and the gravitational forces and tidal forces trying to rip it apart.
And I think that's where Some things could occur that maybe a lot of scientists aren't expecting.
For example, not everyone suspects that there's a star embedded in the cloud.
I concluded this when I first saw the cloud.
I said, well, for something to be that compact, it must have a star that's evaporating inside.
And somebody else had suggested, well, it could be a star with a Protoplanetary disk as if it's forming planets, which sounds a little strange because in that environment you don't have calm orbiting of dust around a star forming planets.
It's an incredibly challenging environment.
All these cosmic rays coming out would just blow that stuff away.
It just seemed to me it's a continual outgassing of the star that continually generates this cloud, this dense cloud.
And somebody else, about five months later, suggested closer to that idea, calling it a T-Torre star.
T-Torre star is a star like our sun that it's very active and the envelope is expanded and it's throwing off a lot of gases, like a hundred thousand times more than our sun throws off at the rate, rate-wise.
Anyway, if you had such a star in the cloud and it had another star, because a lot of stars are binary stars, so it could be a close binary or it could have a large planet like Jupiter-sized planet orbiting it.
And when you have two stars or a star and a planet coming very close to the core, Then the tidal forces can strip off the partner from the mother star.
And it would go on a direct trajectory right into the core.
If it was a single star, it would be better.
It would be safer for us.
But with companions, that's when it gets dangerous.
And if you get something the size of Jupiter or bigger, Going into the core could trigger a core explosion because you have a sudden influx of matter, huge amount of matter, and the tremendous gravity field of the core, As that goes in, all that energy, kinetic energy, gets converted into radiant energy.
It just explodes.
Well, let me ask you if I'm visualizing this correctly.
I'm actually seeing it something like water going down a drain or about to go down a drain.
In other words, circulating the outside of a drain.
That sort of sounds like if the drain itself were like the black, the core as you call it, then in a sense that, or maybe swirling around a glass where the bottom of the glass is the core.
That's kind of what you're talking about, right?
Okay, but you have to add the fact that the core is extremely energetic now.
We don't see the energy because it's mostly in cosmic rays.
The scientists, astronomers have been studying the galactic core extremely underestimated its luminosity for that reason.
They try to put their hat, sort of hang their hat on what they can actually see.
Well, you can't see cosmic rays.
What they're seeing is the energy that the cosmic rays leave when they crash into matter, when they produce gamma rays or light radio waves.
Now, I for a long time have been opposed to the black hole idea.
I don't believe there is such thing as a black hole.
The observations are against it.
For example, with the Sun, they did radio astronomy observations and they pinpointed the radio emission from the galactic core and found the diameter of that region it was emitting.
And it was smaller than the event horizon of a black hole, which means It's as if light, if it was a black hole, it's like as if radiation is coming out of the black hole, which is an impossibility.
So it means your theory is wrong.
And they know it can't be just something on the surface because nothing is rotating there, actually.
They found no rotation of this spot.
So that implies the spot is not orbiting, but it comes directly from the core.
So therefore, the core It has its own energy source and it cannot be fusion.
And my fresh perspective on this whole thing from sub-quantum kinetics is that this is free energy.
This is spontaneously generated energy.
And now there's two forms of energy in the universe.
There's the conservative energy that comes from breaking things down like burning nuclear fuel or coal or fusion Combining of particles.
Now that all obeys energy conservation laws.
You put in a certain amount of fuel and you get out a certain amount of energy.
What I call genetic energy, the spontaneously generated energy, doesn't obey energy conservation.
It's energy coming into being in the universe for the first time.
According to sub-quantum kinetics and the work I've done, I've shown that this goes on, it's actually more of the rule that this happens rather than fusion energy.
I've shown that this explains the energy source for red dwarf stars, the planets, all the large planets have energy coming from their interiors, the Earth.
My calculation predicts 72% of the geothermal energy from the Earth is spontaneously generated.
And then you come into the question of, well, how did the universe come into being?
Matter had to somehow come into being.
That's a creation of energy.
And subquantum kinetics, it predicts how particles can spontaneously nucleate from zero-point fluctuations in space.
And that's a growth process that I... Include that also with the concept of genetic energies.
In other words, it's gathering energy from somewhere.
Where is it coming from?
I believe it's coming from outside the universe, and you have to come to a bigger viewpoint of the universe that it's not just what we can physically see, that we're sort of, this whole thing is like an epta phenomenon on something more basic, like the ether level.
I don't see you there.
Okay, yeah, sorry, I have a dog here that is restless, and so I was just getting him situated.
Sorry.
But I'm listening very intently to what you're saying.
So what I'm wondering is, though, because there's the theory you're saying go outside the universe in a certain sense, and I'm wondering, are you going like...
Do you think or talk in terms of going interdimensionally or extradimensionally?
And do you bring into your theory ideas of dimensions or what we are also known on a spiritual level called what we call densities?
Because I always thought that a black hole was actually not a black hole, but just a door into the next universe, so to speak, or a next density or next...
In other words, it's a door.
It's a vortex.
I believe the door to the higher dimensions is everywhere.
We can access those.
That's why the studies of near-death experiences people pass over.
I think that happens to all of us.
At a certain point of our life we pass through this to this higher dimensional realm.
So this very quickly gets into the area of religion, mysticism, which I see no reason why you can't talk about this when you talk about physics because to understand physical phenomena properly you have to postulate higher dimension Which is, there's an active ether, and there's evidence they've done a lot of experiments.
Now all this comes out, you can read about it on the internet, of experiments that prove the existence of the ether.
Subquantum kinetics ether is alchemic, it's active.
And all our feeling of activity in this world, the whole idea that there's time, that things move and change, It's all because the ether itself is in a flux.
It's sort of the Heraclitian idea.
It's an old idea.
You find it dating back to the ancient myths.
And you find the ancients were more advanced in cosmology because they understood these concepts.
And when you take this view of the universe being an open system, everything is so simple in astronomy.
They're having so much problems explaining where the cores of galaxies get their energy, so they came up with this black hole idea, which tried to be invented to explain it, and it still doesn't explain it, because there's cases where there's no dust to fall in, and yet it's producing all this energy.
Anyway, the energy is so great, it should blow the dust away.
Now, the only reason our core, that things can fall into it, is because it's not active.
Once it becomes active, nothing really will be able to fall in.
So that's why you get these recurrent cycles.
It goes into an active state, blows a lot of this dust away from it.
It even fissions.
It will expel whole star clusters out of it.
As its mass decreases, it will I'm talking generally about the core of the galaxy.
It will again go into a more quiescent state because the level of its activity has to do with the gravity potential.
The deeper the potential well, the more active it is.
Think of it as a nuclear reactor and the gravity potential is what determines the level of activity.
So the other thing is the core is the Producing matter at the highest rate of any place in the galaxy.
99% of the matter in the galaxy is producing the core.
If you study this cosmology, this continuous creation cosmology, that's the conclusion you're led to.
And all the data supports that.
If you look at our own galaxy and other galaxies, and there's like a motion of expulsion From the core, and that's how the spiral arms are generated, is through expulsion.
But why are you saying our core is relatively quiet, it sounds like you're saying?
Yeah, it's in a quiescent state.
Why is that?
Do you know?
Because we went through a core explosion at the end of the Ice Age, which was pretty big.
It expelled a lot of matter, decreased its mass at that time, and went into a more quiescent mode because of that.
But you see, it's always generating matter.
So in all this time during the interglacial period we've had the last 11,000 years, it's been slowly growing and growing.
Now there have been small outbursts along the way.
There's been something like 13 Small hiccups or bursts that have occurred since the last 5,300 years in the course of human civilization.
And the way you have evidence for this is in the ice cores, is that right?
Well, what tipped me off at first were astronomical observations.
One astronomer studied neon gas around the core and he found these Bubbles of neon gas right near the core that were expanding.
And by studying the size of the bubble and how fast it was expanding, he could figure out when it was zero diameter, which means when it got expelled from the core.
And there were 13 of these, so I realized, hey, this is a good chart of explosive activity from the core.
And I pinpointed a number of dates.
And recently some Japanese astrophysicists, tree ring specialists were studying tree rings and they found two dates where there was a sudden radiocarbon increase in the tree rings record.
And they couldn't attribute it to normal causes like supernova or...
Nearby explosions, and they were suggesting something like hyper, well, magnetar star.
They hadn't considered super wave, though, but in fact, I had predicted their dates 30 years ago, you know, when I made the discoveries.
Their dates came within standard deviations, just a few standard deviations of the date, actually less than a standard deviation of the dates that I proposed.
And if you study the ice core record, you can look at beryllium 10 and nitrate peaks.
All these things can record even the brief super waves.
And you find I've been able to identify about 8 of the 13 with corresponding peaks in the ice record, or in this case tree ring record for two of them.
You learn a lot this way.
You can figure out how long they lasted, which is really important.
Turns out about half of these were less than a year in duration.
Compared to the ones that hit at the end of the ice age, some of them lasted a few thousand years.
So you can imagine having to put up with this for thousands of years.
Okay, and when you say, I mean, what is put up when you say put up with?
Are you talking again about this sort of dynamic of pulling apart sort of potentially planets or stars from each other and so on and so forth?
Is that what you're talking about, that dynamic?
No, well, what happens is when this stuff falls in, it generates a lot of energy suddenly.
And then the genic energy mechanism is like an amplifier.
Think of a microphone that is next to a speaker, and then it suddenly starts squealing because it gets feedback.
So the noise level goes through the roof.
Well, that's what happens in this case.
You're dealing with a nonlinear system.
So if you put in a small amount of matter and release a small amount of energy, you're going to have a small hiccup, kind of.
And it won't do much to change the state of the core.
But if you put in a large amount of mass, and it will release a lot of energy, it will get into a persistent state where it won't be able to shut off.
Or it will take it maybe half a year or a year to shut off, or it can go for hundreds of years, maybe a thousand years before it shuts off.
And those longer ones are the more intense ones also.
They're more damaging.
So what you're saying with the G2 cloud is that we are potentially, it is now coming, I guess going what is relatively close to the core, and that it could then sort of wake up the core in such a way that we could get some feedback.
Is that what you're saying?
Right.
It would produce an explosive outburst of cosmic rays.
Now, one thing that astronomers don't understand, because I've talked to a few of them, they think they're just watching something that's 23,000 light-years away, like as if they're in an amphitheater looking at a stage play.
They don't realize that this thing can bite them as soon as they see it.
I mean, they're thinking that cosmic rays chug along at a slow speed to get to us, and that's wrong.
That was one of the main points in my dissertation in 1983, my 1983 dissertation on the super wave phenomenon.
I pointed to evidence that indicates the cosmic rays travel at the speed of light directly to us.
So the moment you see what's happening in the core, this outburst, the cosmic rays have already reached us.
And we have very recent In fact, it could be even preceded by a gravity wave.
If it was a strong super wave, it could have a gravity wave component which could precede the visible event by a day or maybe a day and a half.
At this moment, judging from what you're, I guess, looking at and speculating about, Are you saying that you're seeing that the G2 cloud is in such a place that in a year from now we could actually see, get feedback in essence?
Or have...
I think the most probable period of concern is around April of this coming year.
That's when it will be passing, turning the corner so to speak.
And in the months after that is when Stuff could get dislodged, and hopefully astronomers will be watching carefully at that time, and they will know if this happens, this idea of a star breaking off, because no longer will there be one cloud, there'll be two nuclei.
They'll look like a fissioning, where you'll have the main star and then the parent planet, let's say, or sister star gets stripped off, And that will be heading directly into the core.
So as soon as you see not one, but two, you know we're in for something serious.
And you'll have about a month before the explosion will occur because that's about how long it will take it to make the distance from the orbit into the core.
So we'll have a little warning if they don't keep it secret, you know, like...
Right.
Anthronomers have a tendency to sit on their data and prepare their paper for nature, but then it's too late, you know, if it takes a few months to get their paper published.
There needs to be direct notification.
I'm hoping that it's open enough now that they won't sit on this if they see something happening.
That's the only way I can find out about it and warn people.
The sad thing is that they don't understand what they're dealing with.
What I've been trying to do is inform the world about this phenomenon.
But the astronomy community is really slow in catching on.
I've had all sorts of confirmations about what I originally was predicting.
It used to be when I wrote my dissertation, they thought Core explosions happen about every 300 million years, or every 100 million years, and that the core of our galaxy may have been active about 50 million years ago.
I was saying, no.
You know, there was a major explosion about 13,000 years ago, and it's much more frequent.
Every 6,000, 13,000 years, you get an outburst.
And, you know, I didn't get much, you know, Our institute sent, we sent somebody down to LA to speak with one of the astronomers who was studying the core and he laughed at the idea.
Until later he found that there was some truth to it and I saw him publish something in Discover Magazine which was similar to what I was saying but he didn't of course cite my work.
This is the standard, you know.
Now, you know, one after another, now that they're focused on the core and they see the possibility of an outburst, you're seeing suddenly they're discovering evidence of these recent outbursts.
Like they find that the Magellanic stream, which is a stream of gas coming off the Magellanic cloud that orbits our galaxy, is illuminated, and they believe it was illuminated by cosmic rays from a recent explosion.
The trouble is that they assume slow propagation of the cosmic rays, which is why they put it back two million years or so.
In fact, it was about 300,000 years ago that that one occurred.
Then there's the, you've heard of the Fermi bubbles, the gamma ray emission from the core, like two bubbles, where they're talking about that being like maybe half a million years old or so.
If you assume rectilinear propagation of the speed of light of the cosmic rays, it turns out you get dates like 40,000 at the most, or maybe even the one at the end of the Ice Age could have caused it if those lobes are directed towards us.
You know, because we can't really tell.
We are seeing everything in projection.
We have no depth perception when we look at the sky.
And those lobes could actually be oriented towards us.
So as you go away from the core, you're getting closer.
And that changes the whole dates if you study that.
This is all due to the fact that light travels at a finite velocity.
It doesn't travel to us instantaneously.
Okay, well, I do want to say that I have at least one whistleblower who is pretty deep in who does say that your work is excellent and that, you know, you're closer to the truth than most is how he puts it.
And he did say that there is a star in the G2 cloud.
This is the information he has as well.
Now, I don't know if he knows there's more than one body in there, but anyway, I just thought I'd throw that out for people.
Well, it could be a good topic for remote viewing, because through remote viewing, I believe we can get information about things like that where you can't see, but you can focus on it and see what comes up.
I don't know of any studies that have done this.
Okay.
And the other thing is, you know, going back to sort of our list of questions here, I'm noticing that one of the questions you suggested I ask you is that what was the result of the one that happened around 13,000 years ago?
I mean, in other words, what are we looking at?
Do we know even?
On Earth, obviously.
Yeah.
Well, that one brought an end to the Ice Age.
It was quite climatically significant.
What happens when you get a super wave that lasts centuries and centuries is you're getting bombarded by a sort of cosmic ray wind from the galactic center that's like 100,000, 300,000 times stronger than the one we have now.
So that starts vaporizing cometary debris outside the solar system and propels all that stuff in.
It's like a nebula that invades the solar system, cosmic dust and gas.
And that stuff then is able to reach the Sun.
It gets within the Sun's gravitational well and is drawn in.
And it clouds the sun, it changes its spectrum, so that creates huge climatic effects to the Earth, because you get more infrared radiation, less visible light, will start heating the atmosphere rather than the ground, heats the poles of the Earth more proportionately.
Then that material will also fall in the sun and energize it and turn it into a T-Tori star, sort of like what they're proposing for the star coming towards the core of it.
Galaxy.
And it will be...Toristar is very active with cosmic rays.
So, whereas we see these coronal mass ejections more happening every 11 years, during this type of phenomenon, you would have coronal mass ejections continually coming from the Sun and much bigger in intensity.
In fact, I propose that one such major coronal mass ejection is what caused the mass extinction 12,900 years ago.
And I have evidence.
There's evidence in the sediment records from Carriaco Basin off the coast of Venezuela.
They see these suddenly radiocarbon increased in jerks, you know.
And you can correlate that record to the ice core record, and I found correlated to the biggest jump of C14 was this huge nitrite spike.
And it's the biggest of the entire Younger Drift.
Actually, since the last 13,000 years it was the largest.
And so I've even proposed that more work be done, and I sent my proposal three times to the National Science Foundation.
It wasn't funded because of all these government cuts and reviewers, too, that don't understand what you're talking about.
But anyway, I published the paper in Radio Carbon, and it was cited recently in Nature magazine, so the word is getting around.
So you have huge climatic effects.
The increased radiation from both the core of the galaxy and from the Sun would cause high-altitude clouds, which have a cooling effect, whereas the Sun's increased activity has a warming effect.
So you see, it's very complex.
I mean, you'd have to rewrite all the computer programs on climate to really calculate what happened.
What about the grid?
I mean, you know, there's a lot of talk about the grid, obviously, going down lately.
And they talk about, you know, some man-made thing or an EMP pulse that either is man-made or created by, I guess, a CME or something of that nature.
I think, based on my whistleblower testimony, it's more likely to be a man-made EMP pulse that takes our grid down.
But according to what you're saying, we may actually have a threat to the grid that comes from this Potential sort of escalation that's happening towards April.
Is that correct?
Exactly.
In fact, it doesn't have to be as large as the one that happened at the end of the ice age.
It could be similar to the ones that we've had.
I mentioned the last one happened 700 years ago.
Now all of those in the last 6,000 years, those happened Prior to modern technological civilization, they didn't have satellites, they didn't have electric grids.
Now, if we get hit by one of those smaller ones, it would be something like Carrington event, solar flare, which they talk about that could fry your transformers, knock out the satellites.
So, it's interesting that the grid test, besides Testing preparedness for a terrorist attack was simultaneously testing for a super wave, even a small super wave.
And you wonder, you know, who calls the shots and who told them to do this test and make sure they did it, you know?
Maybe, you know, I believe that there are levels of government that know things that they don't tell us because they don't want panic on the stock market.
I mean, suppose You can think of the effects.
If people knew this was really going to happen, what would there be effects on the financial system?
Yes.
Well, I have an interview with Matt Stein, who's written several books about all of the effects, how to deal with them.
So people listening, if you want to know about that sort of litany of possibilities, as well as, I don't know if what you're talking about will affect things like, but it seems logical, Nuclear power plants.
And that being the case, affecting nuclear power plants with the number of power plants we have in the United States alone, let alone along places like the New Madrid Fault.
And we haven't talked about whether or not the impact of what you're talking about, this super wave or the effects of the impact of the G2 cloud moving closer to the galactic core, would create earthquakes or more volcanism on the planet.
Yeah, well, if there was this gravity wave associated with it, it could produce earthquakes.
Similar to the one that happened in 2004, it caused that tidal wave down in Southeast Asia.
But it could be global.
Nothing like what Patrick Girls was talking about on that scale, but...
It would produce tides much larger than the lunar tides.
So think of that, which would cause flooding in some areas for sure.
And of course, if you had seismic disturbances, that could cause problems.
Okay, so in terms of...
I mean, apparently you're not talking about, as you just said...
We know his name to be Patrick Jarrell, the way he pronounces it.
But you're not saying it's going to be day after tomorrow-esque in nature, the impact of what you think is going to happen, if indeed your theories are correct, right?
But to what degree, or do you have any way of knowing?
We're dealing with a recurrent phenomenon.
And if it was like that, geologists would certainly see in the recent past the evidence.
And I believe that the floods that they talk about were due to melting of the ice sheets and releasing huge amounts of meltwater catastrophically.
Because as the wave would...
The ice sheets were like a few thousand kilometers from the center to the edge.
You can imagine what happens Because these were a couple kilometers high, these ice sheets.
So what happens to the wave of water is it's coming down and it keeps triggering ponds on the surface of the ice sheet to empty and you get a huge wave at the end that sweeps across the continent.
And so all the evidence seems to point to that rather than to something seismic.
Even that type of the Glacier waves, as I call them, they would also produce some movement of the oceans.
Like, for example, imagine a glacier wave emptying into the Mediterranean from the north coming across Germany and Switzerland.
It's going to slosh the sea and create a tidal wave on the other shore.
So you do get that type of effect, too.
Okay, so at this time, just based on what everything you're talking about, you've obviously tried to, I guess, you know, warn various other scientists, ask them to look into all of this.
You're really talking about something relatively soon.
April's not that far away.
If others want to get in the, jump on the bandwagon to start alerting the scientists, I very much welcome it.
You know, I can't do everything.
The foundation hasn't really gotten very appreciable funding to hire people to do this PR work.
So, you know, anybody can write to or try to call these scientists.
They're not unapproachable.
You can find their numbers on the internet and call them up and say, hey, we think you should read these papers.
I did call the guy who was involved with the NRAO, radio telescope group, that they had gotten all the scientists together to say, hey, we should be studying this galactic core on a daily basis, and when they would start doing intensive study, under what conditions.
So I wrote, I called him up, and I did send him my paper.
I published a paper on superwaves back in 1987.
Never heard from him after that, but, you know, at least I've made the attempt.
Okay, what about, I mean, you know, obviously we're being listened to, and you, you know, think, you know, I don't know, the lucky stars or whatever's going on here would have a clear transmission today, it appears.
But there are government officials that would be interested in this sort of information, needless to say, and...
And there will be people behind the scenes, FEMA, you know, etc., etc., all kinds of organizations that are going to be, if you're correct, they're already aware of this.
And, of course, we know that FEMA did these sort of tests and they had people get into readiness before October 1st and so on and so forth.
A lot of people thought that that had something to do with ISON. According to what you're saying, ISON is really nothing to do with it, basically.
But that something much bigger is in the works, and it's possible that's what they're really preparing for.
But you don't have any evidence of that or no one has approached you and said, "Behind the scenes, your theories are correct and this is what we're doing." There have been actually psychic phenomena going on where people are contacted.
It gives confirmation.
But actually Starburst had the foundation and its purpose is to inform, the main purpose, to inform scientists of this phenomenon and to go on red alert if an event happened to go into high gear.
We did do an outreach program in 89, and we did a write-up on the superweight phenomenon.
We sent it to all members of Congress, House and Senate, all UN reps, and a lot of the major institutions like the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, the ones that study the solar flares out in Colorado, Armed Service Committees, and so on.
And we did get some positive feedback.
One senator wrote a very nice letter, which is nice to keep that on hand to show that there hasn't been some positive response to this.
But, you know, it's sort of like a small fluctuation.
And people's interest changes quickly.
They're bombarded with all sorts of things.
To create change, you need a large influx of opinion over an extended period of time.
I haven't gotten through the critical threshold, even with the news media.
News media is not going to cover this normally unless it becomes some news event, and that means it's something a lot of people already know about and are very excited about.
Like the train crash in New York.
Well, no, but I mean, what I'm saying here is, obviously, if what you're saying is correct, then there will be...
Now, I don't know if you're saying, are you saying the magnitude of what will happen?
Are you saying you can't gauge it?
Or are you saying that it's on the same level of something 13,000 years ago?
And if it is on the same level of something 13,000 years ago, then you are able to see measurements in things like ice cores or tree rings or...
Or other, I think you said, I forget what you'd call it, whether it was, it wasn't calcium, but it was some kind of thing.
Aurelium 10.
Yeah.
So, so...
Like cosmic rays.
Okay.
So, so in essence, that was measurable.
In other words, the extent of the impact of that 13,000 years ago was measurable.
Are you saying we're going to have something of that level?
Do you know?
It's a matter of probability.
Now, small events are more frequent.
The large events are more infrequent, but it's significant that we haven't had a large event for the last 13,000 years, and you see the large events do happen about every 13,000 years.
For the smaller events, the average time between them was about 500 years.
And the last one was 700 years ago, so you see we're overdue, even for a small event.
So the small event could be catastrophic for society, because just like a Carrington event would.
You know, Carrington event, they talked about, if it fried the transformers and we're not able to get the transformers back online, it'd be nationwide global blackout.
Which would mean you wouldn't even be able to get gasoline for your car, unless they had diesel engines, standby engines to give power to the gas pumps.
Because they haven't made plans for this sort of thing.
Society reacts.
They're not anticipating things like this.
Especially when, you know, it's just now we started talking about even Carrington events.
People that are getting solar cells are better prepared than the ones, depending on, you know, fossil fuels.
You know, another question is, what would you do if something like this happened?
The first sign would be maybe trembling of the Earth.
And I think even some of the...
Religious writings talk about earthquakes being a sign.
By the way, there have been reports of trumpet sounds in the air.
I don't know if you've heard of it, but it's very interesting.
It calls the mind an apocalypse because you had the angels blowing trumpets before the apocalypse.
My recommendation would be to stay indoors for at least three days.
Because the first three days of a super wave, I believe, are the worst, because that's the forefront.
The forefront carries the most energetic particles, and it's sort of like a shock front of energy coming with it.
And we've had one occasion to see a galactic core going active, whereas before it was inactive.
Initially they thought it was a gamma ray burst, and then they found it was going on and on and continued.
And they plotted the curves and everything, and it looked like the first three days were the worst, and it came down about a factor of 30 in intensity.
So, you know, I would say stay, try to stay indoors, at least you get more shielding being under a roof, because cosmic ray electrons, see, when the cosmic rays hit the atmosphere, they produce a lot of secondary particles like electrons, Those are lower energy and they can be stopped by wood or a house roof, even.
I mean, it's better if you are inside a concrete building.
Maybe it'd be a good idea to own a Geiger counter.
You could tell what's happening that way.
Okay.
Have food and water.
Yeah.
I mean, again, all of this is on my video interview with Matt Stein, and so I encourage people that are interested in this interview who do want to make preparations and think the likelihood is high as it certainly seems to be that we may encounter this in April of this year or something like that and so I encourage people that are interested in this interview who do want to make preparations and
To look at that interview, certainly Matt Stein has, as I say, written several books, one of which is called When Technology Fails.
But I filmed quite an extensive interview with him covering all this sort of preparedness stuff.
But, Paul, when you're looking at this, are you also looking at the effects on the sun?
And that's, I guess, a rhetorical question.
But, you know, because I've heard that there is a very strong potential It may have already started, according to, I think it's Richard Alan Miller, a physicist who I'm dealing with and who I've actually interviewed in the past, has said that, and he works with Navy intelligence, he said that there is a beginnings of a galactic, I guess a pole shift on the sun, if I recall correctly.
And that either it's starting to happen already or it's going to happen.
So is there a chance that what you're talking about could, you know, precipitate or even cause a galactic pole shift on the Sun?
Well, the pole shift on the Sun happens every 11 years anyway.
I mean, it's not any big deal.
But when the magnetic field shifts polarity, from what I understand, on half of the cycle, The Earth is more vulnerable to outside radiation.
I've also heard when there's a, I don't know, maybe it's greater than the normal 11-year thing that goes on in the Sun, but some kind of shift.
There's, I guess, a magnetic shift, and then there's two kinds of shifts.
But at any rate, there's some chance that it then propels a corresponding shift, a pole shift on the Earth.
Or it could.
Okay, I believe pole shift, you mean magnetic pole you're talking about, right?
I don't know, because I understand that there's actually two kinds of shifts.
There's a pole actual axis, spin axis, and then there's the magnetic axis, which are two different things.
And we know that the magnetic axis has already shifted a great deal.
It's moved.
It's wandered.
Yeah.
Yeah.
I mean, we see evidence, for example, 14,000 years ago there was an excursion, I'd say, where the pole was near the equator for about 50 years or less.
You go back 40,000 years, we actually had a geomagnetic reversal, where for 400 years the Earth's field was inverted.
But if that happens, do you think that this sort of super wave that may happen in April could result in any of these kinds of things?
If it affected the Sun, and if the Sun threw out a very large coronal mass ejection, it could overpower the Earth's fields and cause a reversal.
It could also expose us to very high levels of radiation, And if it's very high, I mean, it could be lethal.
So magnetic pole ships, from what I've studied about it, and I studied it even back from my dissertation, they're correlated with cosmic ray events from the Sun.
Okay, but again, is a cosmic ray event from the Sun something that's going to be Could be triggered by this event you're talking about?
Well, if it was one of the big superwaves, it was lasting for a long time, long enough to aggravate the Sun.
If it's a small superwave, okay, the question is, would the gravity wave be enough?
Because the gravity wave, not only would rock the Earth, it would rock the Sun, too, all the planets.
So, That would have a disturbing effect on the Sun.
I don't know enough about this, and none of us do, to say it wouldn't happen.
Even a small one could do something to the Sun.
We're just infants, and we're experiencing our first super wave, really, if it does happen.
As for polar reversal, If there were reversals in the past, I would say they would have had to reverse exactly 180 degrees.
Because, you see, during the Ice Age, some people say that the Earth's pole changed 30 degrees at the end of the Ice Age.
Well, if that's the case, Antarctica would have been in warmer climate during the Ice Age, and you can easily disprove that theory.
You know, a lot of people have written books saying About this 30-degree shift idea because they don't have any better way to explain probably the mammoths being frozen in Alaska, which if they would just look at the evidence of the idea of this, the glacier wave idea, easily explains the freezing of the mammoths.
So if it was a 180-degree shift, the continents would be again at their Same latitude perspective with respect to the Sun.
So climatically, you wouldn't be able to see anything had changed.
And so I can't rule that out, but...
Okay.
Is that possible to do an 180 degree flip?
I mean, I've seen that happen with a spinning top where you perturb it and it flips 180 degrees and keeps spinning in the same direction as if it's violated...
Momentum conservation, which is interesting.
There are things that standard physics would have difficulty explaining.
Maybe something like this could happen.
I don't know enough to say I can't rule it out entirely.
Okay, at this time, we've been talking to you actually over an hour, and I did tell you that this would last an hour, but what I'd like to do, if you'll indulge us a bit longer, is see if there's any questions in the chat.
We do have an audience, and see if there are any burning questions, and ask if they would like to put their questions in all caps and type them into the chat at this time.
And another thing that they could do, which I can try to work with my other computer here for a moment, and again, if you have a question for Paul, please put it into the chat in all caps.
It's easier for me to read it that way.
And I do know that there are some people that have my Skype and can also try to send it to me on my Skype, which is another way to Excuse me, contact me.
So either way, if you have a question, we do have a little bit more time here to ask Paul to give us a tiny bit more time and see if there's anything that I haven't thought to ask you or that they may want to ask.
And then lastly, Paul, obviously, if there is anything you would like to ask to talk about or to wrap up with, any wrap-up comments that you might like to say?
Well, I might point out that I have a game that people can play on the internet to attempt to decode the Zodiac.
So you can go through sort of like what I went through in solving this Zodiac riddle, time capsule message.
And we have that at the etheric.com website.
You can put in Sphinx Stargate in Google and we'll find it.
And so one of the things that talks about super waves, over unity, energy production, anti-gravity, a lot of different topics.
But it also has a link to this game.
People decode all 12, because you have to reorder the sequence of the zodiac signs to sort of spell out this physics of creation.
And if you put them in the proper order, you get a free paper sent that talks about the whole thing.
Okay, great.
Wonderful.
And I'm sure people will be very interested in that.
We do have the links to your websites, both websites, as a matter of fact, on the announcement on my blog on the front page of Camelot, so that will be easy for people to find.
I do have two questions coming in on the chat here at this time, Paul, so I'll just read them aloud.
In the advent of a super wave, will the radiation be directional?
Will we be able to come outside during half of the day?
Okay, well, the galactic center, if you know, it's in the Scorpius Sagittarius constellation, which is in the southern hemisphere, 30 degrees below the celestial equator.
So, in the summer, That's above the horizon.
And you can see it at night.
During the winter, it would be during the day, you wouldn't see it.
Now, if the center was active, it would appear as a star.
So, I would say the most intense stuff, the higher energy stuff, could come more direct to the Earth.
Like in the first three days I was telling you about.
So there might be something to that to try to avoid when the core is in the sky.
I mean, it would be in the sky half of the day, half of the 24 hours.
On the other hand, most of these cosmic rays get...
Their paths get all wrapped up and they're coming from all directions because we're inside a magnetic field sheath around the solar system.
So that tends to scatter.
Most of these get scattered around.
So it'd be pretty much coming from all directions.
Okay, and there's another question here asking you if you're familiar with the work of Keshe.
And I've interviewed Keshe.
She's the Iranian physicist who works out of Belgium.
Yeah, I viewed on YouTube one of his demonstrations and I don't know, I don't have too much first-hand knowledge.
I mean, I haven't seen any of his stuff first-hand.
I seem to remember that there was controversy.
Some people Thought it didn't work, right?
And other people believe that he does have something.
Yeah, I guess I could be mixing up with a Turkish inventor.
Yeah, well, Keshe works with plasma physics, and he has a foundation.
Actually, I've done several interviews with Keshe, even in this manner, over livestream.
And those are all available on Project Camelot.
I can send you the links if you're interested.
He is a very interesting man, and I could even put you in touch with him if there would be a reason to be.
I'm not sure.
I mean, he is dealing with a form relating to energy, and he is a scientist, a very serious scientist, and he is apparently addressing the world with certain technology that he feels will better humanity.
Well, with all these over-unity technologies, the question is where does the energy come from?
That's what the scientists ask.
To address this, I've written a paper, a news item, on the Starburst Foundation website, the StarburstFound.org.
It's the new news item.
And I list a number of over-unity energy technologies.
And I explain that this whole question of where the energy comes from, completely everything falls into place when you realize that the physical universe is not everything.
There is an environment to our physical universe that we can't see.
We are like a surface phenomenon, an epiphenomenon, on this more real substance which we don't have direct observation of.
We're like the waves in the water and we can never see the water itself.
So, like the movie Matrix is a very close analogy, as if we're in the Matrix.
And when we die, we get out of the Matrix.
We go, we become, I believe this is my own view, that we become more aware of this hyper-dimensional reality.
And if you believe in reincarnation, then you would come out of that state when you incarnate in a new life.
But I think that's where the soul resides, is in that higher state.
And so this whole thing, it's a spiritual science.
I think that as we become more spiritual, over-unity devices will become more understood and taken as a matter of fact.
In fact, the existence of these over-unity devices of energy being produced This way spontaneously is actual proof that we live in an open system universe, that there isn't beyond from the physical and that we're like in a river, an underlying river that's energetic but it's not energy.
In other words, energy is a physical phenomenon.
What's below what that prime mover is that drives These etheric reactions or whatever it is that's generating this.
Like the computer code.
What drives the computer code?
It can be entirely different from what we're familiar with as energy.
Could be love.
Could be the need to explore.
Curiosity.
You know, you can use anthropomorphic terms.
It's up to our imagination, I guess, to...
Suggest what could be beyond.
Okay, and just another question here.
What do you have to say about evolving consciousness and how to raise to a higher state of frequency?
That's kind of a very general question, but however you'd like to answer it.
Meditation is one approach.
I would say try to be sensitive to inner guidance, that silent voice within.
If you sometimes dedicate yourself to service, to a higher cause, often you get closer to that level.
Okay, I guess somebody is mentioning in the chat, it's not really a question, but they are mentioning Nassim Harriman, and what that brings to mind is this idea.
I believe he puts a lot of emphasis, and I may be wrong, but as I recall, he spoke at one of my conferences, and he talks a lot about black holes.
And I'm not sure how he characterizes them, I also know that Jack Sarfati, for example, is talking about dark energy a lot, and I don't know whether you have followed any of Sarfati's work, but those are two scientists that a lot of people know about, and I wonder if you have any comments about either one of their work.
Yeah, well, like you say, I don't believe in black holes, whether there are many black holes at the center of a particle or Black holes the size of a core.
Because you have this spontaneously generated energy in a star, it's not going to collapse.
This inner energy that's generating, it's non-nuclear, is going to keep it from collapsing.
In fact, if you ever wonder, where does all that energy come from in a supernova explosion?
You know, they haven't solved that problem yet.
They don't understand how a supernova explodes because it ends up producing more energy than the star originally had and it's collapsed.
And I've gone through the equations and it turns out that genic energy skyrockets right during the collapse when the core is coming, crushing down.
Genic energy goes through the roof and generates all the energy you need for a supernova explosion.
But If you look at subatomic particles, they're not like points.
They're spread out.
They have their field patterns in the core of the particles, sort of spread out.
It's wavy.
It's like a little wave.
And that's what subquantum kinetics predicts.
As for dark energy, I believe Sarfati probably believes in the Big Bang Theory, because that dark energy was born to explain why the universe is accelerating, as I recall.
And subquantum kinetics doesn't believe the universe is expanding.
It predicts it should be stationary.
And the redshift, the cosmological redshift that they most cite as evidence for expansion, can be explained as a tired light effect, which is actually predicted by sub-quantum kinetics.
It means that photons lose energy as they're traveling through intergalactic space, and they redshift.
And so we have basically misinterpreted what we're seeing Into thinking universe expanding.
It's not.
In fact, the data fits better to the stationary universe theory.
Okay.
Well, at this time, I'm not seeing any other questions.
Somebody is talking about CERN. I don't know if you have any words to say about the Higgs-Bawson finding, whether you might have some thoughts about that you might want to share.
Well, I think that the sacred doesn't lie in doing more CERN experiments.
I think they should use the money to develop sub-quantum kinetics, and they'll be further ahead.
Fair enough.
All right.
Well, thank you very much, Dr.
Paul LaViolette, and thank you everyone for listening.
This has been a great nearly, well, an hour and a half with you, and I do appreciate all your time.
Any parting words that you would like to say or anything you'd like to bring up maybe about what you think might be headed this way or any other subjects?
Well, keep vigilant.
Keep aware of the G2 cloud news because that's the main thing.
Contact some of these astronomers if you can find time.
And point them to, we've got a number of news items on the G2 cloud posted both on the Starburst website and Theoric.com.
Hopefully, who knows, maybe it will pass around and nothing serious will happen.
Maybe we'll have to wait for the next star to We're all in before we get some big event.
That would be nice, you know?
Okay.
All right.
Thank you very much, Paul, and I really appreciate your time.
Hopefully we can do updates like this.
Maybe we can do another one in the next couple months, the closer we get to April.