Owen Shroyer returns to dissect Trump's China trip as a business maneuver, linking it to Eileen Wang's plea and rising inflation while condemning NVIDIA's residential AI data centers for energy waste. He exposes DOJ investigations into $2.6B oil trades, Gavin Newsom's diaper deal, and the military's $700M weight loss drug spending. Shroyer analyzes James O'Keefe's undercover report revealing insider trading and a Qatar-funded Air Force One jet, arguing that sacrificing Thomas Massie to foreign lobbyists will devastate conservative voter enthusiasm. Ultimately, he warns that transactional economies and political corruption are eroding American ownership and moral standing. [Automatically generated summary]
And the clown And the joke's on me Ladies and gentlemen, we are back finally on this Wednesday.
What is it?
May?
On this Wednesday, May 13th, 2026, transmission.
Guys, welcome back.
You know, we got a little bit of a new opening to the show, as you can see there.
I want to give a big shout out.
DMT put that together.
I had to whip him.
We were doing a lot of media style.
Everybody calm down.
Media style whipping of DMT.
To get that one done, but he got it done.
He did good.
We're probably going to be tweaking it a little bit, but I will say that is the new theme song for the show.
I think it is very in tune with where we're at, where a lot of us are at right now, how a lot of us are feeling in this clown world.
But I hope you got a kick out of that.
We had fun making it, we had a good laugh making that, and I'm glad that we could debut that for you today.
Let me tell you what we have coming up on the show today, on the return show today.
I'm not going to say we're taking it slow, but it's not going to be your standard show.
It's going to be a little unorthodox today.
We're basically going to be playing catch up here for the last couple of weeks.
I've basically, my filter process for today's content was basically two and a half weeks of me aggregating news and then boiling it down to the stories that I want to show you today.
But since I haven't been on here in a while, I haven't been totally absent.
Obviously, you've seen some of the work that I've been doing.
But I would like to get caught up with my audience.
So I'd like to do a lot of super chats today.
I'd like to do perhaps even a lot of phone calls today.
And I'd like to just kind of get caught up with the audience with the news.
Now, the big news story today is Donald Trump is in China.
And it's funny because we had the big story out of California, and there was a mayor of Arcadia in California, apparently a Chinese spy.
Seems to be an issue in California.
We got Fang Fang, and now we got this mayor of Arcadia.
But there's two connections with this story that came out this week.
There's two connections with this story that I'm not seeing anybody talk about.
And they're so obvious that it's strange everybody is missing it.
But I do understand.
I do understand with the hyper speed and hyper ADHD that the news cycle is, I can understand why people are missing this stuff.
That's why every once in a while it's good to just slow things down and step back.
And just kind of remeasure everything, which we have been doing.
So that's really the big story that I have that is current events Trump in China, and then a couple angles with that.
And then I've got a bunch of news really from the last two weeks that I'll bring to the air today.
We'll kind of go through that.
And then I'm going to talk to you guys.
We're going to go into our super chats.
We're going to take phone calls probably.
So it's going to be a bit of an unorthodox show as far as the timing is concerned with the news, but we are going to cover the news.
We're going to get caught up with you.
Who knows?
We might do a little bonus time.
I do have, in case for those of you that haven't seen it, I do have the O'Keeffe Media Group video, the special report that I did with them last weekend.
I do want to give a shout out to all of the people that I had been working with since the break of the Owen Report.
I want to give a big shout out to Uncensored America.
I want to give a big shout out to Walk Away and Brandon Stroke and all of his team.
All of the Uncensored America team as well.
I want to give a big shout out to the O'Keeffe Media Group, James O'Keeffe, and the incredible team that they have out there in West Palm Beach.
And everybody else that I was working with during my break.
Not a vacation, unfortunately, but yes, the Owen Report was on a break.
I want to give a shout out to everybody.
Just what great people.
You know, what great people, especially in the media where there really is a lot of scumbaggery and backstabbing.
It's nice to connect with good people.
So it was really fun working with you guys over my break as well.
And I do have.
That special report video from the O'Keeffe Media Group that went off yesterday.
A lot of response to that, by the way.
A lot of response.
And I'm sure I'll talk about that response as well.
And then you guys, I'm sure you guys have a lot you'd like to get caught up with me on.
Some of the stuff that went on in the last two and a half weeks, I just left off of the docket because I assumed somebody was either going to bring it up in the super chat today or perhaps on the phone lines.
If we can do those things.
But there you go.
The Owen Report is officially back.
Great to be back with you guys.
It was nice to kind of do some different stuff.
The process sometimes isn't very enjoyable, but the final product was great with all the different groups that I was working with.
But it is great to be back here.
And maybe I'll give you some update on some future stuff.
If you saw all the airline drama, you guys might want to bring that up.
I don't plan on getting into that.
If somebody does, though, But no, there are a lot of other opportunities for me to do stuff like that.
And this is the type of stuff that I've basically been passing on for the last, you know, 10 years, prioritizing InfoWars and the show over there and all the work over there and making sure nothing interfered with that.
You know, this is the kind of stuff that I could be doing year round.
But I really want to get back to focusing on this show.
And I think that the plan is.
To really just lay it down for the summer, to just get into focus mode now, just get through the summer.
There's a couple events I'm considering this summer.
And then probably just at the end of summer or after summer, we'll start to look at maybe some extracurricular events, including some stuff maybe for you.
But I think that that's the plan to just plow the Owen Report now through summer, to be at this desk every day as we normally are right through summer.
See, because I did that video intro, I have to now readjust how we put everything on the screen.
There's the Cove Pure water filtration system.
Guys, everybody I talk to, I love when I see some of my friends at the gym and they come up to me.
Literally, they don't even say hi.
They just say, Owen, thank you for telling me about the Cove Pure water filtration system.
I love it.
Thank you to Cove Pure for sponsoring today's show.
It's very simple, though, guys.
If you look into what's in the tap water, you're not going to be wanting to drink it and you're not going to be wanting to feed it to your friends that come over and your family.
Don't do it.
Don't be part of the over 176 Americans that are drinking tap water.
That have PFAs in them.
These are man made chemicals used in food packaging, nonstick cookware, firefighting, foam.
You've probably heard of these things forever chemicals.
These are in the water, these are in the tap water.
You don't want to drink it, folks.
Please don't.
Don't drink it.
Come to the future of water filtration with Cove Pure water filtration systems.
It's not just about water filtration.
This system is customized water filtration.
What am I talking about?
You can customize the temperature you want, you can customize the amount you want.
That's right.
If you want ice cold water, it can give you ice cold water.
And then five seconds later, it can give you steaming hot water.
Nobody knows how they do it.
Nobody knows.
This machine is like magic.
I wish all other industries could catch up to Cove Pure.
Come to the future.
Bring your water filtration to the future.
The official water filter of the Owen Report, Cove Pure, really sleek design, really great.
You can taste the difference, by the way.
Hey, listen, for my listening audience, do not wait.
Take control of the water in your house, your drinking water right now.
And if you go to covepure.comslash Owen, covepure.comslash Owen, for my listening audience, you can get $250 off.
For a limited time.
You heard that right.
$250 off your Cove Pure water filtration system for a limited time right now at covepure.com/slash Owen.
unidentified
On the cutting edge of news and analysis, the Owen Report with Owen Schroyer.
And at the same time, nothing really has happened.
I feel like it's really the same landscape.
When I, what was the last show?
I think it was like April 27th or something.
I feel like it's.
The same landscape that I left.
The Iran war, who knows?
The economy, same crap.
So I don't know how much has really changed.
Maybe a lot has happened.
Not much has changed.
However, I do think this trip to China is not really being billed this way, but I'll bill it this way today.
I think.
This trip to China is maybe the most important thing overall that the Trump administration has done to this point.
Now, this is all about how you measure things.
You could easily say, because people are dying in this war, that that kind of is bigger than anything.
It's not like it's a life or death situation as far as the immediate aftermath of this meeting in China.
But yet, it does seem to have the most.
Implications globally.
And I think what kind of shows where Trump's head is at, as far as the importance of this meeting is concerned, is let's call it the delegation, the team that he's bringing with him.
I mean, Trump is essentially bringing all as many heavy hitters as he possibly can with him on this trip.
I mean, how many billionaires is he taking with him on this trip?
I mean, how much of America's GDP is being represented on this trip?
Now, you could kind of look at this from two angles.
And let me pull up the list here as we get into this.
Let's pull up the list of who is traveling with Trump.
Now, Vance was addressing a fraud investigation operation happening in D.C. today with Dr. Oz and others.
So, no vice president.
Musk, Rubio, Hegseth, who is traveling with Trump to China.
Let's just go right to the list.
Let me read this for you.
White House officials, Marco Rubio, Pete Hegseth, and Scott Besant.
No Lutnick.
Lutnick was back behind talking about how they want to bring semiconductor and microchip manufacturing to the United States.
Larry Fink of BlackRock, Steven Schwarzman of Blackstone, Kelly Ortberg of Boeing, Brian Sykes of Cargill, Jane Fraser of Citi, Jane Anderson of Coherent, Larry Culp of GE Aerospace, David Solomon of Goldman Sachs, Jacob Thaysen of Illumina, Michael Maybach of MasterCard, Dina Powell McCormick of Meta, Sanjay Mortra of Micron,
Jensen Wong of Nvidia, Cristiano Oman of Qualcomm, Elon Musk of Tesla, Ryan McKierney of Visa.
So we're talking about heavy hitters here.
Now, the two angles I'm talking about, you could say that this is a list of globalist operations.
You could say this is a list of globalist visions and endeavors and economies and governments.
Or you can also say this is just some of the biggest names of American business and enterprise right now teamed up to go to this trip.
Maybe you could say both things are true.
Well, I'm not necessarily here to.
Express any concerns over this list.
I think what it represents is that Trump is showing up to China with this team, showing that he means business.
And when you study how Trump operates, you do have to wonder how much of everything else that's been going on was a distraction from what Trump is really looking to accomplish in this meeting.
Now, that might sound insane.
But this is how Trump operates.
And let me get a little zany here for a second.
And it's very important to understand human psychology.
This is why I'm constantly bringing the psychological angle into the news because it's so important to understand human psychology.
When you understand how these elites think, especially when you get to military operations, it starts to explain why.
Like, why would Trump come out and say, I'm sure most of you saw the clip.
I don't have it in the show today.
Where he was asked something.
He's right outside of Marine One.
He says, I don't think about America's financial situations.
Okay.
Well, you can take that at face value, and Trump looks like a punk.
You can take that at face value, this is just Trump saying that before he goes to China.
So if China's like, hey, well, you know, your people are struggling, Trump can say, I don't give a damn about my people.
He's negotiating with China.
Or it gets to a certain point.
When you're climbing the social, economic, food chain, political food chain, where things that used to hold value to you or things that used to have a little more meaning to you slowly but surely lose that meaning and lose that value.
The best way, I think, for the average person to understand this is just with money.
When you don't have much money, You know, $20, $100 could mean a lot to you.
So you look at those numbers, you look at those margins.
If you got a couple million dollars or a billion dollars, well, all of a sudden, this money means nothing to you.
It means nothing to you.
So when you're climbing that economic ladder and you talk about, you know, financial capital, well, the more you get, the less some of it means.
Well, it's the same thing in politics, it's the same thing in business.
And it's funny because I rewatched the movie Troy with all of this Odyssey, you know, Troy social commentary happening.
There's a moment at the end of that movie that describes exactly what I'm discussing here.
And it's the king of Troy.
And he tells his son, he tells the prince, he says, son, we fought wars over everything, we fought wars over land and resources.
I figure why not fight a war over love?
And so you think about that.
Well, okay, his son is in love, steals Helen of Troy, Helen of Sparta.
Now they're going to war over this prince who just wants this woman that was married to the king.
In the world that they live in, in the world that they're shaping, and the access to influence and power that they have that most people can't even comprehend, all of the sudden, the vast majority of the population just becomes cannon fodder.
And you could even argue this isn't inherently evil.
It's just inherently human.
But I think that that's what we're seeing right now.
The elites have never been more separated from what used to be considered the middle class, but is now considered the lower class.
There's virtually no middle class anymore.
It's pretty much the haves and the have nots at this point.
And in order to be a have, most parts of the country, you're probably going to be needing to make about.
$250,000 a year, realistically speaking.
And I remember there was some study that got done in Austin.
And if you remember during the whole fallout situation with me, there was a study that was done in Austin.
It's basically like if you want to live a comfortable life in Austin, they determined the number was about $150,000 is what you have to make to live a comfortable life in Austin.
Well, when you're.
When you make $150,000 a day, this stuff doesn't even matter to you.
This stuff, you can't even quantify this stuff.
You're so far removed from this stuff.
So the elites are now building a world that they can build and that they can access and that they can then, you know, influence and make profit off of while the rest of us are just here struggling for whatever's left to struggle for.
And in their eyes, and we got a clip today that.
Kind of explains it towards the end of the show.
They view AI, they view data centers, they view all of this stuff as like, oh, this is the next train, this is the next car, this is the next airplane.
And to them, they're just doing what has to be done to move civilization forward.
They're just doing what has to be done.
The problem is with every turn, They get more power, more wealth, more influence, and everybody that's not involved just keeps sliding down that totem pole.
And so this is where the struggle is at.
And this is why they, in Washington, D.C., just have no connection to the common man.
They can't even, and even some people in the political world that do well for themselves, they're the same way.
They cannot comprehend how the average American is living.
And I think what they can't comprehend is they just figure, well, you know, if you're making six figures a year, then you're doing fine.
But that's not how it works.
With property taxes and income taxes and the cost of living and everything else, It's kind of the same story.
It's like, yeah, you can be making a lot of money, but at the end of the day, you still don't have much money.
All the money that comes in is going somewhere.
It's already claimed somewhere.
There's no ability to build savings or capital or get into the asset column.
And the people that surround Trump have no clue about this struggle, none.
They're completely removed from it.
Now, I'm going off on a bit of a tangent here.
Let's get back to the meeting in China.
So, everything that Trump, you could argue, everything that Trump has done as president leads up to this meeting.
And you could, and some would argue that the fight between the United States of America and China, as far as trade and as far as economics is concerned, the results of that fight.
Are what is going to dictate the direction the world goes, more so than the war in Iran.
And again, we watch what goes on in the Middle East and we're sick of it because we're sick of the death, we're sick of the destruction, and we're sick of the bill for it.
But that mostly, aside from maybe the Strait of Hormuz situation with Iran, for the most part, that has been encapsulated and not really changed the trajectory of the whole globe as much.
That's still been mostly a regional conflict and then it affects us.
Whatever, whatever.
Goes down with China, this struggle between China and the United States of America, that is what will determine the future of the world.
Now, there might be similar outcomes, whoever comes out of these negotiations on top, because it seems like no matter which side wins, you're getting a global government.
I mean, you're essentially getting global communism and a global socialist surveillance system, no matter who comes out on top of this deal.
But it could, ultimately, the outcome of this meeting with China could determine whether the American people still have an ability to climb the ladder financially.
Either everything is going to keep going as it is, and it's going to be harder and harder to make it in America, or Trump can pull a rabbit out of his hat and reverse this trend, start to bring back.
Manufacturing production, make America less dependent on China for these things.
I mean, it's going to have to be quite a magic trick.
And it would take years.
It would take years for this whole thing to play out.
But ultimately, I do think that this is probably the most important moment of Trump's presidency.
And I think that's why he took all the heavy hitters with him.
Because all these, and it's not just going to be them, these are just the people that could go.
I'm sure there were many more that were invited.
These are the companies that are going to determine where things are made, how money is exchanged, how we're going to handle all this disastrous debt that's everywhere.
These are all the people that are going to determine that.
And it's ugly.
Don't get me wrong.
The whole situation is ugly.
It's not good.
Somebody's getting screwed, and it's probably going to be us.
And yet, that is really the struggle here.
So Trump shows up with all these business leaders.
And I think it puts the pressure on them as well.
I think it puts pressure on these business leaders with Trump there for them to say, okay, here's, here's, Here's President Xi.
Here's President Trump.
Here's all these business leaders.
What are you going to do, Tim Cook of Apple?
Are you going to build in America?
Are you going to produce in America?
Or are you going to work with China?
And to just put it all out on the table, put it all out on the table.
All of these companies that have moved to China and prioritized China, now they're all going to be put in the spotlight.
And so we'll see what comes out of this meeting.
And then there's Taiwan, and they got a big election coming up in Taiwan, and that's going to be very important.
So you got Taiwan, you got AI, you got energy, you got trade, and you do have the war in Iran.
All of this is being discussed with China.
And it's not really being billed this way, but this is one of the biggest, let's call it a business meeting because it's political, it's diplomatic, but this is a straight up business meeting, folks.
But very, very insulting, all things considered, nonetheless.
Very insulting for him to say that, as many Americans are struggling.
So, this is kind of, you know, this is the weird thing right now in right wing politics.
And I get it from the Trump cult perspective, ideal.
Of course, they don't want to say anything negative.
Of course, they don't want to imply that Donald Trump could ever do anything wrong ever.
That would be against their cult mindset and practice.
But it is strange how the political right wants to ignore this.
And pretend like this isn't happening.
And I do believe that there is some awareness issues.
There are.
The right wing has now become very elitist politically.
The right wing has become very disconnected and distant politically.
And so they might not have a good grasp about how much the average American is struggling financially right now.
But to ignore this and pretend it's not going on.
That's the problem.
It's a bad problem when it comes to messaging.
It's a bad problem when it comes to optics.
And then it's a bad problem when it comes to politics because the left wing is at least addressing this.
The left wing is at least honest about this.
Now, I don't think anybody here is going to be cheering for any sort of socialist, communist answer to these problems.
That is certainly not what I'm polling for.
But at least the left is addressing it and being honest about it.
The right wing wants to tell you the economy is doing great.
This is the biggest gaslighting thing you could do.
And I do think there's a historical issue here with the right wing where they've been able to do this because there were enough Americans that were doing financially well.
There were enough Americans that didn't feel gaslit when you told them the economy was doing good.
They were doing well enough to not be insulted by that.
Now, when you tell Americans that the economy is doing good, now the vast majority of Americans feel gaslighted.
They feel gaslit by you.
They feel insulted by you.
They feel like you have no clue about what they're going through.
So that doesn't work anymore.
You can't just say the economy is going great when it's just not the reality of the situation.
You can ignore the news as much as you want.
You can think that everybody has the same financial situation as you and just be ignorant in that regard.
But that's not going to change the bottom line, which is all over.
The numbers prove it.
You can go look at it from a bunch of different angles.
The average American is living paycheck to paycheck.
And that is a struggle.
So, when you, from a right wing perspective, tell them that the economy is great and they're in the golden age and they know that's not true, well, you've just lied to them, you've just gaslit them, and now they don't want to support you politically.
And so there's this weird thing that happens when you have these debates in the right wing.
And they say, oh, well, you need to be more optimistic.
Or they say, oh, well, you still don't want Democrats to win.
Well, sure, if we don't want Democrats to win, then you have to be smart.
And it's not smart to tell struggling Americans that they're doing great financially.
That's just not smart.
So that's not me promoting Democrats.
That's me telling Republicans, you got a messaging issue.
And if you believe that you're right on most of the issues, you will still lose if you have bad messaging.
And that's what they have right now.
They have bad messaging on this Iran war, they have bad messaging on the economy.
The messaging on the Epstein files was beyond a disaster, but you can just slide that aside for now.
So I just, I don't want to see it.
I don't want to see this game get played where they're going to blame people that are being honest about the economy on the results of the election.
The Republicans need to be honest about the economy and they need to start prioritizing Americans if they want to win in the midterms.
And that's the truth.
But don't tell us that inflation is going down.
And the government is recognizing, by the way, that it's not.
Social Security COLA for 2027 expected to jump.
As inflation rises, Social Security beneficiaries could see a substantial bump in their checks in 2027.
Well, congratulations to any of the old heads listening to today's show.
Do you think I will ever see Social Security guys?
I'd like a refund.
If not, it'd be nice.
This is according to an early projection from the TCSL.
Which predicts the cost of living adjustment, that's the COLA, will be 3.9% next year, up from an earlier meager projection that it would remain at 2.8%.
So that's just keeping up with inflation.
But that is the cost of living, and social security checks will be reflective of such a thing.
Consumer sentiment falls to a fresh record low in May as surging gas prices hit Outlook.
How are those gas prices doing?
Not so good, huh?
Not so good.
Well, I haven't been driving much lately, so I haven't had to fill my tank in a couple of weeks.
I will tell you that the price to fly has gone up significantly.
So I'm sure that that is also being reflected at the price of the pump.
That's another one that I just, it's so weird, isn't it, guys?
It's so weird.
I post a picture.
This was last week from a news article about gas prices.
And it wasn't even as high as they could be, but it was like $5, $6 a gallon.
And I just get relentlessly attacked from MAGA for posting this.
And they're like, You're such a liar.
You're such a liar.
Well, what am I lying about?
These are the gas prices.
And then they say, Well, yeah, it's not the gas prices where you are, it's $4.
You pay $4.
And then I post what I paid at the pump, which last time I filled my tank, it was $5.09.
I say, no, here's what I paid in Austin.
I just posted this the other day.
Say, oh, well, you know, that's premium.
That doesn't count.
That's what I put in my car.
You told me, well, that's not what you pay.
That's literally what I pay.
So there's this weird thing on the American right, and it's all MAGA.
It's all MAGA.
They don't want to live in reality.
They don't want to discuss in reality.
And that's why it's such a weird phenomenon now, because that used to be the American left.
It used to be that's what we deal with with liberals, but now that's what you deal with with MAGA.
It's very strange.
And a lot of these people were, I don't know if they would still consider me a friend.
A lot of these people I got along with, a lot of these people I did events with.
And they're attacking me because I'm posting gas prices?
It's very strange.
Very strange.
Hey, I'm just being honest here.
I'm just being honest.
It's even worse for young people.
81% of young Americans say economic conditions are bad or terrible, according to a recent survey by Generation Lab, finding that more than eight in 10 young adults.
Rate economic conditions in the United States as either bad or terrible.
You know, another issue here, and we got a clip coming up from Hassett outside of the White House.
I also think that a lot of these people involved in politics have never really had to live in the thin margins.
And so they can't even relate.
They can't relate.
They've never had to.
To what the average American is going through.
And I think that's a lot of people in the political world.
I think that's a lot of people in the media world.
And I think what you'll find is there are people out there who have been poor.
I have been poor in my early 20s, which is not uncommon.
I'm not, you know, I'm not crying here, but I was definitely poor in my early 20s.
I know what it's like to live in the very thin margins.
I think that there's a lot of people that just have never experienced that.
It's totally foreign to them.
They can't even comprehend it.
And these are the people on the American right that get mostly represented and pushed by the Republican Party, and they just have no clue.
They've never had to live in the margins like that.
They've never had to look at their budget and think, I've got to make a monthly budget because I'm living paycheck to paycheck.
It's just totally foreign to them.
So they can't comprehend.
Yeah, a dollar fifty increase per gallon can literally make or break somebody financially in a month.
They can't even comprehend that that is real.
It's completely incomprehensible to them.
And I guess if you've never had to go through that, I guess if you've never lived in the margins of double digits or triple digits, make or breaking a month for you, then yeah, an extra 200, an extra $250 a month in bills.
To them, no, no, please, you have nothing to worry about.
Well, for a lot of Americans, that is something to worry about.
For a lot of Americans, they just might be $250 above water every month.
That's the reality.
So these are individuals, these are young individuals who might not even like left wing politics, but they feel that they are forced to vote left.
Because it's the only party right now that is at least offering solutions or understanding of their financial situation.
And so that's the big miss.
That's the big miss of MAGA.
That's the big miss of this administration.
And it seems like they're all living in this bubble.
It seems like they're all living in this bubble where they just can't comprehend it.
And they just think, hey, as long as we say it's the golden age, as long as we talk about the stock market, everything will be fine.
And so, in terms of the jobs pick, so they interpret that as a healthy economy.
The White House interprets you using your credit card to buy things.
As a healthy economy, that to me shows they have never lived poor.
They have never lived in the margins.
And again, that's the misunderstanding.
You might not be poor.
You could live in a very nice house.
You could have a very nice car.
So most people wouldn't consider you poor.
And yet, you could have a monthly budget that is very tight because of your mortgage payments, your interest payments.
Maybe now you've got credit card debt, whatever else is going on.
That's just the reality of the situation.
And they think, oh, oh, look, consumer spending is up.
People are using their credit cards.
This is great.
See, yeah, they're spending more on gas, but they're using their credit cards.
Yeah, because they don't have any cash.
They're using their credit cards because they don't have any money and they still need to feed their family and pay their bills.
That's why credit card spending is up.
I'm not, this isn't financial advice, but you know, they'll tell you you need to have some credit card debt.
Some people budget that into their monthly finances to build credit or whatever.
That's not most people.
Most people use their credit card when they have to.
Most people use their credit card out of necessity, not out of, hey, I'm trying to make a financial decision to build my credit score.
The vast majority of people are using their credit card when they're out of cash.
And they seem to be completely out of touch with this.
And when Hassett comes out and says, oh, this means the economy is doing good, this means consumer confidence is up, it's actually wild how out of touch with reality that is.
But here's some of the other circumstantial stuff when it comes to maybe this summer.
USDA projects the smallest US wheat harvest since 1972 due to Plains drought.
Well, is it a drought or is it the data centers?
Is it the fact that we can't use water to feed ourselves anymore?
We have to use water to feed our data centers now so that a bunch of freaks, a bunch of perverts online can make AI photos and videos of their favorite celebrity?
By the way, as an aside, since I saw that Sydney Sweeney was trending online, I guess she did a nude scene for the TV show Euphoria.
I see a bunch of people celebrating.
Guys, if you think you saw Sidney Sweeney's boobs on HBO, I got bad news for you.
I got bad news for you.
But oh, I'm sure.
How many, how many from those scenes, how many AI videos and images are we asking these AI machines to produce of Sidney Sweeney?
This is where your water's going.
This is where your water is going.
Fake images of Sydney Sweeney.
Yikes.
U.S. winter wheat hits rare lows as 40% rated poor or very poor.
So it's not a good wheat harvest in quality or in quantity.
I have a feeling this will catch up to us at the grocery store this summer.
A couple other things while we were out.
Large fire sends black smoke into sky in West Tulsa.
Fire crews respond.
Tulsa firefighters are responding to a fire at a refinery.
This was on Monday.
Tulsa firefighters responded to the H.F. Sinclair refinery around 11 a.m. to provide standby support during a fire at the facility.
Three buildings total loss after fire engulfs Henry Plastics recycling facility.
Yeah, those recycling facilities are pretty important.
Maybe not as important as an oil refinery.
A plastics facility burns down.
That was last Friday.
Okay, so we had a couple more.
Let's move on real quick, though, because this is where it's all going.
NVIDIA is teaming up with Span.
It's the name of a company.
NVIDIA is teaming up with Span to install mini AI data centers right on the side of your house, turning residential neighborhoods into a distributed supercomputing network that actually pays homeowners for their unused electricity.
We could see a future where powerful AI runs right inside your house.
There you go.
Did you guys ever see the movie Smart House?
I think it was called Smart House, the old Disney movie, right?
I think that was the 90s.
It was like 1999, maybe the early 2000s.
Smart House.
Pretty good movie.
The Smart House ends up, well, it doesn't go so good, guys, as you can imagine, the Smart House.
So we're building our houses into AI data centers now.
Well, it's a lot easier that way.
It's a lot easier to spy on you when the AI data center is right there attached to your home.
I guess soon it'll be attached to you.
Soon it'll just be attached to you.
Soon it'll just be you.
Soon you'll be the AI data center.
You'll be power.
Maybe you'll even.
Maybe you'll have a little solar panel that can, like, you know, come out of your butt or something.
So that's where it's all going.
This is the world that they're building.
This is the world that you're building.
And it's not very popular.
We see the protests of these data centers everywhere.
You know, most people are feeling nostalgic about an age before all of this technology dominated our life, before it became a priority.
To feed into this agenda and the data centers and the energy consumption and everything else.
But this is what the elites are planning to do.
This is the new world as they see it humans merging with tech and eventually just becoming one in the same.
Call it the singularity, call it whatever you want.
That's what's going on here.
And this stuff is advancing so rapidly that.
The best backlash that the general population, that the civilians can even offer at this point, is to just find out when the data centers are coming to their town and try to shut it down.
That's really the only thing we can do because the decision has already been made by the elites, by our politicians, that this is the future.
We're building the data centers, we're building the AI, we're building the quantum computing, and this is the future of the world.
And I think the big difference is, and I got the clip coming up later.
Maybe we'll just play it now.
Maybe we'll just close the hour with the clip right now.
This is the.
Yeah, let's pull this up.
This is Brookfield CEO Bruce Flatt talking about some of this.
Let's listen.
He talks about artificial intelligence, data centers, and everything.
He likens it to when we were building train tracks in the United States.
Really, what's happening is that we have been, and we still are, and for the next 10 years, we will be rewiring the global economy to lay the.
Networks that we laid before, which were highways, utilities, railways, and now we're laying cloud, artificial intelligence, factories, and data centers.
Okay, you're going to compare this to train tracks and roadways.
My issue is that when you wanted to convince people that we needed to build railways, that was an easy argument to win.
Hey, we need railways to expand our civilization.
We need railways to expand our infrastructure.
We need railways to deliver things, resources across the country.
Hey, now we've got cars.
Hey, we've got roads.
We need roads now.
We've got these cars.
Everybody likes roads.
It's giving people more freedom, more independence.
You can travel easier.
Okay, we need these roads.
Well, where is the public demand and necessity for AI data centers?
Where is the demand?
Where is the need?
This is not something that the people need.
This is not something that the average citizen needs.
This is something that the elite need.
This is something that the super rich elite want and need for their global desires.
So I don't think it's fair to compare this to things that were a necessity to expanding our civilization, advancing our country.
And if they do want to make that case, I'm yet to hear it.
I am yet to hear a convincing case as to why we need these AI data centers.
And the only case that they can try to argue that I've seen at this point that might be convincing is oh, well, China is going to do it and these people are going to do it, which again translates to the Chinese elites want this to continue to control their people.
And so the American elites want this so that they can control their people.
But other than, and I will say too, I mean, I've been very reluctant as far as the AI stuff and learning it.
It's not that I'm a Luddite like that, but it's just not something that's attractive to me.
And yet it could be a necessity.
And there are ways that I should probably be learning it and utilizing it since I'm in media.
So I think that it's probably something I have to do because it's inevitable.
But it's like, I don't want to be a part of it.
I don't want to be a part of turning the world into an AI data center.
I don't want to be a part of turning.
Human interactions into AI slop.
Oh, is the average American going to benefit from AI and data centers?
Probably not.
The only thing I see that the average consumer is using AI for, I guess it depends on where you're at in life.
If you're a student, you use it for school.
Probably not good for you overall.
And then if you're chronically online, You use it for slop, for slop posting.
Hey, it's funny.
It's fun.
Okay.
Everybody does it.
Images, videos.
I'm sick of this crap.
I'm sick of it.
You know, you got all these regulations.
It's amazing that they're rolling out these AI data centers.
They're pushing all of this, and there's simply where's the regulatory process?
Like, where are the big green protest groups?
Where are the stop climate change protest groups?
Where are the liberal progressives trying to put regulation on everything?
It's like none of this exists for these AI data centers, which tells you they're all in on it.
It tells you they're all in on it.
Oh, all of a sudden, we don't care about climate change.
Oh, all of a sudden, we don't care about regulation.
I'm not a regulation guy, but isn't this the easiest argument for regulation you've ever seen in your life?
Hey, what's going to happen with these data centers?
Oh, they're going to consume like 30% of the country's electricity.
Hmm, that's kind of a problem.
Well, what are people using it for?
Well, according to our research, it looks like at least half of consumers are just using it to turn women that they like into nudes.
AI data centers, 30% of our energy consumption by what?
2028?
And half of that activity is to produce an image of your celebrity crush jumping up and down in a bikini top?
But we're not talking about regulation?
We're not talking about climate change?
What is going on here?
I'm sick of this crap.
You see it on your X timeline all the time.
Hey, put this outfit on this girl.
Hey, make this girl do this.
Excuse me?
And none of the green freaks, none of the climate change freaks, none of the liberal progressive regulation freaks, none of them are organizing to put a resistance to this.
It's all just organic local level stuff.
If they can get a jump before the data center comes to town, they're talking about building data centers the size of Salt Lake City as Lake Mead is almost empty.
So, see, this is where the tech industrial complex is taking over DC.
So, the military industrial complex is still strong and thriving.
Now, you've got the tech industrial complex taking over.
And at the end of the day, you pay for it, you live with the outcome, and they just get more rich and powerful as they determine which direction they're going to take the country next.
Let's see how long it takes for the left to jump all over this.
The right, it looks like they're going to commit to telling you that this is good for the country.
It looks like right wing politics is going to be to convince you that AI is great for the country.
We've seen Bernie Sanders, AOC, and some others speak out against this on the left.
We'll see if that catches tread before the midterms.
I don't think this is a popular thing politically.
I think.
If the Democrats run against these AI data centers, I think that will draw success for them in the midterms.
I think these are two issues where the Republicans are missing.
The Republicans are missing on foreign policy.
You want to talk midterms?
Let's talk midterms.
Republicans are missing on economy.
They're missing on foreign policy.
And they're missing on these AI data centers.
These are not popular issues, and the right wing is pushing the unpopular side of it, and they're just giving it.
They're just giving it over to the Democrats.
So that's what's going to happen in the midterms.
And we're going to have to sit here and fight this narrative where they're going to blame free speech online and they're going to blame Tucker Carlson.
You know the names.
These are the people they're going to.
To blame if they can't win the midterms.
No, you're on the wrong side of the big political issues right now.
Not to mention how many people view the Trump administration so far as not what they voted for.
So I don't want to hear these excuses blaming the name and blame game for the midterms.
Get on the right side of the AI data centers, get on the right side of the economy, get on the right side of foreign policy, or it's going to be a struggle in the midterms.
The independent press that just calls it as it is.
I don't want to hear you blaming the people that supported for Trump and fought to get Trump in office that are trying to hold the administration accountable.
I don't want to hear you blaming them because at the end of the day, that's not where the blame belongs.
unidentified
You're listening to the Owen Report on the Win Network.
Folks, have you thought about getting your finances diversified?
Have you thought about that?
Probably.
Considering all the things that we're seeing in the news, the stock market, precious metals, bank runs, all of this stuff might lead you to one conclusion.
I need to diversify my finances.
I need to diversify my assets.
And if you're thinking about precious metals, I have to tell you about our friends at Allegiance Gold.
Now, you can go to protectwithowen.com or you can give them a phone call.
The phone call is free 844 790 9191.
844 790 9191.
Here's why I've partnered with Allegiance Gold.
It's very simple.
They have an A plus review with the Better Business Bureau.
Folks, we're talking about your money.
We're talking about your finances.
You don't want to screw around with that.
You only want an A plus review from the Better Business Bureau.
That's what Allegiance Gold has.
They have nearly 10,000 clients nationwide, relationship driven, and they want you to be fully educated and informed before you make a decision.
That's why they want you to give them a call 844 790 9191.
And while you've got them on the phone, ask them.
About $5,000 in free gold and silver with qualified investments.
You heard that right.
$5,000 in free gold and silver with qualified investments, whether through your 401k, IRA, or savings, they make it simple to move into something real before the next reset, which it's starting to feel like that next reset is coming pretty fast, doesn't it?
Starting to look that way.
So you might want to make a decision, but you might have some questions.
Very simple.
Give them a call.
844 790 9191.
Or go to protectwithowen.com.
That's protectwithowen.com.
Folks, protect your wealth because no one else will.
I'm seeing some of the comments in the chat today.
Save it for the end, guys.
Save it for the end.
We'll address a lot of these questions, a lot of these things.
I will play.
We'll see if we get to it.
I don't know if we'll get to it this hour, but we will play the O'Keeffe Media Group report that I shot with them.
We will play that, and we can get into some of the response and some of the questions you guys may have about that.
But yeah, the response to that is pretty crazy.
And I would like to at least say something along the lines of support, admiration, and respect for James O'Keefe and the O'Keefe Media Group.
But let's get to that later.
We'll hold off on that.
But part of that report was one of the individuals that works in D.C. in the administration talking about insider trading.
Now, this is something that we've been talking about for a long time.
I don't really think it shocks anybody, but this story did drop last week.
DOJ probing $2.6 billion in oil trades related to Iran war, sources say.
Federal officials are probing at least four of these trades, sources said.
I think it's a fair concern.
I think it's a fair concern that if the individuals potentially engaging in this Insider trading, if they have really close ties or connections to the White House, the DOJ would have a motive not to prosecute.
I am concerned about that.
I'll be honest, I'm concerned about that.
But I think it's pretty clear that there's a there.
The Department of Justice is investigating a series of suspiciously timed trades in the oil market just ahead of major announcements by President Donald Trump and a top Iranian official about the war in Iran.
Sources told ABC News.
The DOJ, along with the Commodities Futures Trading Commission, is probing at least four of these trades where traders made a total of more than $2.6 billion, betting that oil prices would drop right before they did.
The DOJ and CFTC, that's the Commodities Futures Trading Commission, have not commented on these trades.
Here's a question Did you invest in any of the companies that are sending their CEOs? To China on this trip.
I was looking earlier.
Let me check again.
I'm pretty sure every single company that is represented on this trip, their stock is up today.
That one was easy to see.
Looking at it again, I'm just doing a quick review here, but it does look like every single company that is represented on that trip, just a quick review here.
It looks like every single company represented on that trip has seen a boost in their stocks.
That's how the game is played, folks.
You hear about somebody coming to the White House, buy that stock.
Eventually, it's going to go up.
Same deal with this trip.
As soon as that list came out, if you bought, if you invested in stock in every single one of those companies that was going on this trip, you got a little bump today.
You got a little boost.
So, is it insider trading?
Do you trust the DOJ to do a fair investigation here?
And this is the kind of stuff that everybody in DC engages in.
So it's kind of a wink and a nod in both directions.
But insider trading has been going on for a while.
They've got that fight in Congress right now about the bill to stop members of Congress from owning stock and investing in the stock market.
So it's just more of the same.
It's just total corruption in D.C. Everybody's sick of it.
And we wanted more.
We wanted more out of this administration to stop it, to put an end to it.
And there's a lot of talk, but I don't think we're getting the results we want.
Here's an example.
This guy's unbelievable.
Gavin Newsom under fire over $20 million diaper deal tied to wife linked nonprofit network.
This is how they do it, folks.
They do these deals with companies they own or their families own or involved in, invested in, whatever.
And then they overcharge because it's all government money.
This has been going on for a long time.
What's amazing is that Newsom continues to be.
Involved in scandals like this, and it never seems to affect him.
But that's just Democrat politics for you.
Gavin Newsom is facing accusations of corruption for paying $20 million in taxpayer money to a nonprofit led by an executive who also sits on the board of his wife's organization.
She also promotes gender equity.
Ooh, gender equity.
Well, if it's gender equity, then this diaper program actually seems to have an issue.
So, who gets these diapers?
You can't just give them to women now.
You know, men, if they need some diapers, it all comes down to diapers.
As the initiative, Golden State Start, was rolled out ahead of Mother's Day, billed as a partisanship between the state and Los Angeles based Baby to Baby.
The program aims to provide free diapers to newborns.
Through hospitals statewide, but the deal has triggered a wave of scrutiny over how the nonprofit was chosen and its proximity to Newsom's political and personal network.
Yeah, it seems every time, well, I don't know if every time, but these stories hit the news quite often.
Newsom makes a decision about a big spending package, and that money somehow ends up with a company or an investment somehow that has ties to his wife.
And we've seen this multiple times.
This is just the latest.
And they were crunching the numbers.
They're basically charging double for what a normal diaper would cost with this deal.
It's like, oh, a nice little bonus, huh?
Isn't that nice?
But hey, the government's paying for it.
So it's all good, man.
It's all good.
And apparently, you're paying for fats now, too.
You got to get rid of these fats that are in the military.
How that happens, I wonder.
You've got to be kidding me.
U.S. military spends over $700 million for Ozempic and other GLP 1 weight loss meds.
So, our military is fat?
Is this what I'm hearing?
Military personnel criticize the hundreds of millions spent on weight loss medications as a misguided approach to addressing the obesity crisis in the U.S. armed forces.
How are our armed forces fat, by the way?
I'm a little confused here.
You know, I thought kind of the first thing that they did when you joined the armed forces, when you joined the military, was, you know, whip you into shape.
Like, what happened to we're going to whip you into shape for you to join the military?
Is that just not happening anymore?
I know that they've been lowering the standards for years for multiple reasons, but where are we at here?
So now, because we have a military that is fat, we have a military that is apparently trans, we're spending a bunch of money on trans treatments and now a bunch of fat treatments.
This is not what we should expect from the greatest military in the world.
We're spending, we have too many fats and trans in the military.
How did we end up here?
A report from the American Security Project.
In 2025, revealed that approximately 68%, two out of the three of the military's reserve and National Guard forces are classified as overweight.
What are we doing here?
So they're going to make them take these drugs.
Secretary of War Pete Hegzeth expressed his concern on X, stating completely unacceptable.
This is what happens when standards are ignored.
And this is what we are changing.
Real fitness and weight standards are here.
We will be fit, not fat.
Well, I don't think these weight loss drugs are the way to go.
Isn't that the problem here that we're wussifying everything?
Isn't that the problem here that we've gone soft?
If you're in the military and you're too fat, we're going to whoop your ass into shape or get out of the military.
It's that simple.
We want our military fit, as Pete Hegseth says.
My other concern here maybe you care about the spending, maybe you don't.
I don't know.
You know, these weight loss drugs, we're learning a lot about the side effects.
I don't think we know all about the side effects yet.
Are we opening up a potential situation where if these members of the military start getting on these weight loss drugs and then start having side effects, are we talking about now legal payouts?
Because that's a potential here too that I see.
I think it's time to just whoop them into shape.
I don't want to spend $700 million on drugs to get fats out of the military.
Either train and get into shape and meet the fitness standards, or you can get out and go take weight loss drugs and then come back when you're ready to go.
I don't like it.
So I understand that they're trying to find a solution here.
All right, that's okay.
That's admirable.
We're addressing a problem, we're trying to find a solution.
I just don't like the solution if it's going to be weight loss drugs.
Go to boot camp.
Until you meet weight or leave the military, you do what you got to do to make weight and then come back when you're ready.
I don't want to deal with fats and trans in the military anymore.
Figure it out.
Okay?
Figure it out.
This is fun.
If you're in Texas, you know about this.
Maybe too well if you've been in court recently.
First ever LGBT judge in Texas County banned for life over misconduct complaints.
Bexar County Judge Rosie Speedlin, a Texas judge, has agreed to resign immediately and accept a lifetime disqualification from judicial service to resolve multiple complaints of misconduct.
Bexar County Court at Law, Judge Rosie Speedlin Gonzalez.
Speedy Gonzalez, are you kidding me?
Signed a formal agreement filed on April 20th, stating she has officially and formally resigned her judicial duties, effective immediately, in lieu of further disciplinary proceedings, according to the State Commission and Judicial Court.
Our judicial system is so corrupt, guys.
It's so corrupt.
This is normal in Texas.
And if you've been through the court systems here, yeah, this is a familiar site, okay?
Very familiar site.
You know, they like to use Tulsi Gabbard for the good optics.
Here's another one from Monday.
DNI Tulsi Gabbard probes U.S. funding to more than 120 biolabs abroad.
Now, we've known about this for a while.
There's a Biden connection, there's a Ukraine connection.
Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard is investigating more than 120 biological laboratories abroad that were funded by U.S. taxpayer dollars for decades as part of an effort to end potentially risky experiments with viruses pursuant to President Trump's executive order on so called gain of function research.
Gabbard told the Post Monday in a statement that her team is going to identify where these labs are with pathogens that contain what research is being conducted and end dangerous gain of function research that threatens the health and well being of.
Of the American people and people around the world.
The COVID 19 pandemic revealed that the catastrophic global impact research on dangerous pathogens in bio labs can have, the spy chief also said.
That's basically her with a wink and a nod saying that the COVID virus is made in a lab, which I think we all agree now.
Maybe there's remaining debate on where it was made, but the consensus seems to be Wuhan, China.
Well, okay, hey, this is great.
This needs to happen.
And this should be a big story, and we should look into.
The gain to function research, which you're looking at the biolabs in Ukraine, what all of this is being done.
This requires, I think, some serious attention from the American people and then some serious transparency.
But they seem to do this with Tulsi Gabbard.
She's been, in many ways, excommunicated from a lot of the big meetings, big conversations, big issue stuff that happens in the White House, especially when it comes to foreign policy.
And you could argue, well, you know, she's not really in charge of foreign policy.
She's involved in, you know, intelligence, but these two things are connected.
But she's pretty much been put on the sideline for all of this stuff.
And they seem to roll Tulsi out when they want a good optics story.
Like, here's Tulsi Gabbard investigating the voter fraud from 2020.
Here's Tulsi Gabbard investigating the biolabs around the world.
There's a couple other things that they've done.
And yet, you know, they seem to roll these deals out like every three months with Tulsi as the face of the operations because maybe she's.
Has like the highest approval rating in the administration currently.
And then I just, I've not seen anything manifest.
And this is where they start to call you a panic and they start to call you a doomer, all these other labels that they give you.
You can call me names as long as you want.
Let me know when there's arrests.
Because they keep sending Tulsi Gabbard out here for these photo ops.
They keep sending Tulsi Gabbard out here to produce these headlines.
That insinuates something is getting done as far as ending the corruption in D.C.
And then I've yet to see any results.
So it'd be nice.
And it'd be one thing if we didn't already have a previous administration to weigh this against, but we've already been through this.
We've already been through the TikTok, TikTok, indictments are coming.
We've already been through this with the first administration.
We've already been through this with the QAnon stuff.
We've already been through all of this, and it never delivered results.
So that's all I can go off of.
I'd love to be optimistic and think that Tulsi is working on stuff and there's real stuff happening behind the scenes and they're going to reveal it all right before the midterms to get that momentum right ahead of the midterms.
And maybe there's reason to believe that there's some political awareness that that's a good strategy here, but yet I've seen no results.
So let me know when there are results on these things and I'll start to get excited because I'm seeing the optics play with Gabbard and the headlines play.
But I'm still not seeing the results.
And of course, this is the big one.
This is the big one.
And if this is the indicator of where it's going, then you're not going anywhere.
Anthony Fauci.
Now, I guess we should probably start here.
Let's start on this one, actually.
Rand Paul vows to keep pressure on Anthony Fauci as the statute of limitations on criminal referral expires Monday.
So, in other words, it expired Monday.
Two days ago.
Now, this is the lying under oath contempt of Congress issue.
So there could be some other angles with Fauci, but I don't know.
Rand Paul hosting whistleblower hearing just two days after Fauci will be off the hook for lying to Congress.
That was going down today.
The statute of limitations on Dr. Fauci's criminal referral for lying to Congress about gain of function research expires Monday, but Rand Paul is vowing to keep up the pressure on the COVID cover up.
With state hearings this week.
David Morenz, Dr. Fauci's top supervisor, was indicted, but Fauci himself still walks free.
Paul, who has long pressed Fauci and heated exchanges in congressional hearings, wrote this week on X continuing his urging of the Justice Department to pick up charges from his criminal referral, despite former President Joe Biden issuing a sweeping preemptive pardon of Fauci on his last night in office.
So, I think where they have the issue here.
And let's go back to the other story with Fauci.
I'll get to the issue.
DOJ Wang, new criminal case against Dr. Anthony Fauci, despite Biden's auto pen pardon and statute of limitations running out.
Again, it's a nice idea.
It's a nice thought.
I'd like to see results.
Dr. Anthony Fauci on Monday survived a five year legal deadline to face criminal charges for allegedly lying to Congress about funding.
Risky research in Wuhan, China, but he isn't out of the woods.
So it's getting more into Rand Paul.
Paul referred Fauci three times to the Justice Department for criminal prosecution and garnered significant social media attention from anti Fauci public figures who said he was escaping justice.
Whether the DOJ decides to charge Fauci or not, I'm not letting up.
Rand Paul tweeted earlier this week.
In fact, later this week, I'm holding a hearing with a whistleblower.
Maybe the American people will finally get the answers they've been looking for.
Well, I think we already have the answers.
I don't really think there's too much mystery as far as Fauci and COVID and the vaccines and all that.
I think we pretty much know the answer.
Here's where I think they're running into the problem, and it's Trump.
And I think it's very similar to the Epstein files.
It's like, how do you.
How do you attack this subject without triggering the MAGA woke tards out there?
We do have to try to get through to them, folks.
We do.
We have to.
So, how do you deliver this to get them to understand?
Well, if you want to deny that Trump had any involvement with Epstein, then there's probably.
It's probably nothing I can do for you.
Now, if you want to argue that Trump didn't do anything illegal, that's fine with me.
But to pretend like there's no connection between Trump and Epstein is just clownish.
That's just absurd.
There's obviously a Trump Epstein connection.
And so this Trump Epstein connection is part of the debacle of the Epstein file rollout.
And then, of course, Thomas Massey is being punished.
Because ultimately, Thomas Massey is one of the main reasons why we're getting anything as far as the Epstein files are concerned.
And quite frankly, they're still in violation of the law that Trump signed himself with the Epstein Transparency Act.
The DOJ is still in violation of that law.
So Massey is being punished for that right now by Trump, by the administration.
Now they've got these accusations coming out against Massey.
Maybe we'll get to that in a second.
No, here's what I think is going on.
Okay, so the whole Epstein issue, there's a Trump connection there.
It's the same thing with COVID and the vaccines, guys.
It's the same thing.
Now, you don't have to believe this, but the reporting is that Operation Warp Speed was something that Trump was forcing, and Fauci was urging Trump.
At the time, and to be clear, this is no, nobody here is running cover for Fauci.
Fauci to me belongs in prison 10 times over, just to be clear.
But at the time, Trump's biggest mistake at that time was allowing the economy and the country to get shut down.
That was Trump's biggest mistake.
He needed to urge the exact opposite.
Trump needed to err on the side of freedom.
And you can make your own decisions not on the side of fear and big government.
That was Trump's biggest mistake.
And when you go, well, not to mention the economic disasters that it caused that people on the right don't want to talk about and people on the left are too stupid to talk about.
So when Trump let them shut down the economy and shut down the country, it became a panic situation because then they had him trapped.
It was hurting Trump politically.
It was hurting Trump for the upcoming presidential election.
He had to get the economy back open.
He had to get the country back open.
And he was told the only way to do this is with a vaccine.
Again, it's BS, but Trump played into it.
So Fauci tried to tell Trump, you can't do it.
Fauci told Trump, you cannot do a vaccine.
It's going to take a year.
We have to wait till this thing plays itself out or whatever things he was telling to Trump.
And Trump basically said, no, we have to do it now.
Do Operation Warp Speed.
We have to get the vaccine to reopen the economy.
And Fauci actually urged against this.
Now, again, you can believe these reports or not.
This is just what's being reported.
The reason why I'm telling you this is because I think that this is why Fauci is getting protected, folks.
I think this is why Fauci is avoiding prosecution.
Because if they come after Fauci, he's going to blame Trump.
If they come after Fauci for any of the COVID stuff, he's going to blame Trump.
And maybe even beyond, if they come after Fauci for any of the stuff he's done over the years, he's going to come after Trump and he's going to say, hey, I will tell everybody, Trump, that you did the vaccine.
I will tell everybody, Trump, that I told you not to do the vaccine and you made me do the vaccine.
Operation Warp Speed and putting that injection into everybody's arms was you, Trump.
And that's not popular.
So I think that's Fauci's protection.
I think the reason why nobody's going after Fauci is because ultimately, if you go after Fauci for the COVID stuff, then you have to also go after Trump because that's where Fauci is going to put it.
Whether you think that's legitimate or not is up to you.
That's why I think Fauci is untouchable.
All the stuff that we want to hit Fauci with on COVID hits Trump.
That's why I think Fauci is protected.
That's why I don't expect anything to happen to Fauci.
And ultimately, this is where the right wing just wants to bury their head in the sand.
They don't want to look at it, it was Trump and the COVID.
That caused the inflation.
They don't want to look at the Trump operation warp speed that caused all the vaccine rollout disasters.
Now, I don't know who was advising Trump outside of who we saw in the public, because if you remember, in early 2020, Trump's instincts were right.
Trump's instincts were you don't shut down.
You let people live their lives and make their own decisions.
We're not going to shut down the country over a flu.
That was Trump's instincts.
That was the right instincts.
Something changed, whatever.
He let him shut it down.
And you could even say, well, you know, there's only so much the president can do.
Trump did not take up the bully pulpit to stop it from happening.
Trump did not use the power of the Oval Office and the bully pulpit to do anything to push back in any meaningful way against the lockdowns.
Instead, he said, do the lockdowns and then we'll bring out the vaccine.
So, I think Fauci is protected because it leads back to Trump, much like the Epstein class.
I think both of these things are tied directly to Trump, as innocent or guilty as you think Trump might be in all of it.
They are tied to Trump, and that's why you're never going to get anything as far as justice on these two issues.
And I get it.
I understand why MAGA and the Trump cult don't want to go there, obviously.
They're in the business of protecting Trump now, that's their business.
That's not my business.
I'm in the business of telling the truth.
I'm in the business of political play by play.
So that's what I see happening on the field right now.
And that's why Trump wants you to move on from the Epstein files.
That's why Trump doesn't want to talk about how bad the vaccines are.
That's why Trump is not pushing for any justice against Anthony Fauci, because just like with the Epstein files, Trump's tied into it.
And these are just facts.
But I'm not in the business of protecting Trump here.
I'm in the business of protecting the truth and telling the truth.
And if you can't relate to that, then that's your business, not mine.
All right, are we going to see aliens, guys?
Notice this thing is like a nothing.
Now, I'm not saying, well, let's look at this.
You probably heard about this.
Religious leaders told to prepare now for UFO disclosure to unleash Bible changing revelations.
This is wild.
Influential pastors are claiming.
That they have been told to prepare their followers for shocking revelations about UFOs, which may upend belief in the Bible.
Perry Stone, a well known evangelist, author, and Bible teacher from Tennessee, warned that fellow pastors were recently invited to a secret meeting with U.S. intelligence officials to prepare for the release of secret files on extraterrestrials.
So, this is strange.
Why is the U.S. government calling on church leaders?
To prepare for this, to me, this has false flag staged propaganda written all over it.
Why would you try to bring religious leaders on board?
To me, that says you want religious leaders on board because you want them to spread your propaganda.
You want religious leaders on board and you're going to make them feel like they're part of some exclusive thing, some world changing event.
It's all good, it's all organic.
They want these religious leaders on board because if there's going to be a significant pushback, On the idea of aliens and whatever else comes along with it, extraterrestrials, the only significant pushback would come from the church.
The only significant pushback would come from religious leaders.
So they're getting ahead of it.
They're getting religious leaders involved before the release to say, hey, you know, this is how we're going to do it.
You guys need to be a part of this propaganda.
That's what this looks like to me.
But aside from whatever revelation they're going to do, and aside from however they're going to decide to use the church for this revelation, which we see both of these things happening in real time.
Notice there's like no excitement.
There's like nothing.
Nobody is talking about this.
Now, they released a video.
Maybe you saw it, maybe you didn't.
I guess the fact that I'm not even sure that.
My audience saw this video that they released, shows the lack of interest in the story.
They released some video that I don't know if it's intentional or not, but they released some video of a UFO that looks like Ezekiel's wheel.
And so I don't want to get into the biblical context of what Ezekiel's wheel is, but essentially, there are many images depicting Ezekiel's wheel from the Bible.
And they released this UFO, you know, out in space, whatever radar or camera system they're using, and it's depicting Ezekiel's wheel.
Whether that's intentional or not, I don't know.
Whether it's real or not, I don't know.
But they released it.
How many of you even saw it?
How many out there saw the video I'm talking about of Ezekiel's wheel floating and jumping and bouncing around in space?
How many of you saw it?
Does it interest you at all?
Do you buy it at all?
Now, I think.
You know, they put these graphics out and they, who knows how real the data is or if it's even really usable because there's so many different qualifiers here.
But they put out these graphics and they say UFO sightings all around the world.
And it's like, oh, it's always in America.
It's like you look at the planet, it's like 90% of UFO sightings happen in America.
So is that like paranoia?
Are these even real?
Or, and maybe this is just a realistic conclusion to reach, maybe the U.S. government and whatever tech they have, maybe that's what most of these UFO sightings are.
It's just some.
US aircraft tech that nobody knows about that we can now capture on smartphones or on airplanes or whatever, because there's no doubt people are capturing stuff happening in the sky.
And maybe some of it is explainable, but not all of it.
Some of it is completely inexplicable.
And it's to the point now where you yourself, or you might even know somebody that's actually captured a video or a photo of a UFO.
Now, I wasn't even planning on getting into this, but I guess I might as well.
Let me go to my ex account.
Because I, it's just crazy.
With all the fun I had traveling the last two and a half weeks, huh?
With all the fun I had flying around the last two and a half weeks, I actually saw a UFO on my flight.
And yeah, I don't know.
We're all taking crazy pills here.
Let me see if I can find it.
You can go look at it for yourself.
Because the, The video I shared really doesn't do it justice.
But yet I saw it.
I mean, there's no denying it.
And it's captured decently well here.
But I'll tell you, I was just stargazing on the flight here.
This is what I first saw.
This I assumed was a star.
It was an empty, there were no clouds in the sky.
I was just stargazing.
I assumed this was a star.
And slowly and surely, these other dots of light started as you see it move right there.
Okay, you kind of see this.
You see that thing moving right there?
I mean, folks, this is not, these are not aircrafts that we know anything about.
Whatever these things were hovering around the sky, these are not aircrafts that we know anything about.
These are certainly not airplanes.
This video does not do justice to what I saw on the sky.
Trump and Lula's private Oval Office meeting signals lingering strain and effort to avoid tension.
Despite the recent history of tension between Brazil and the United States, President Lula and Donald Trump ended their meeting on Thursday at the White House, exchanging public compliments.
You know, this to me is very, I hate to say it, this to me is very indicative of the Trump we're dealing with as president.
The way that President Trump has thrown Or allowed Jair Bolsonaro to be thrown under the bus is truly despicable.
It's truly disgusting.
Now, I hope that there is something happening behind the scenes with Trump trying to free Bolsonaro here.
I was hoping we would hear something about this after this meeting, and now it's been a week and I still haven't heard anything.
There's been no mention of Bolsonaro, and I just can't believe that.
After the friendship between Bolsonaro and Trump, after the similar political trajectory and experience with running against the system, winning, they try to kill you, you still win.
They try to put you in jail, you still win.
Well, with Bolsonaro, they put him in jail, they're keeping him in jail, he could die in jail, and Trump is saying nothing about it.
I can't believe it.
I just cannot believe it.
And Lula was in jail for political corruption, and they released him and then let him run and win again.
You can't believe how corrupt this stuff is.
And then Trump is going to bring Lula in, and hey, fine, all right, be diplomatic, be friendly, okay.
But you're not going to stump for Bolsonaro at all.
You're not going to try to free your friend and the guy who's probably closest to you as far as the political experience is concerned.
You're not even going to attempt.
To raise awareness for Bolsonaro or get him out?
To me, that shows how the raw transactionality of President Trump actually has no loyalty.
Loyalty with Trump only goes one direction.
And as soon as he's done using you, loyalty means nothing.
He doesn't care.
Toss you aside.
That's what the Bolsonaro story represents to me.
And I would love, I would love to be proven wrong on this.
But to me, that's very indicative.
That Trump would just completely let Bolsonaro get thrown under the bus.
I mean, literally get thrown in prison when they stole the election from him, just like they did from Trump.
So that's very indicative for me.
That's this second administration.
That's President Trump, all transactional, loyalty only one direction.
And you could be loyal to Trump for forever.
You could put your neck out there for Trump as many times as necessary.
And then when it's your time in the can and it's Trump's time to exchange that loyalty and send it back the other direction.
He's not interested.
He's not there.
Doesn't concern him anymore.
And I think there's a pattern of behavior there that is on display time and time again.
All right, Marco Rubio, not much on the Iran war today.
Whatever, it's the same as it was.
But Marco Rubio, I find this how can they not see the irony and the hyperbole of this statement?
Marco Rubio asked about why we're attacking Iran.
Here's the logic.
unidentified
But the point is, if there's not much seizing in the firing, because we.
So, isn't that the exact logic that Iran is using?
So, here's Marco Rubio saying, oh, if you get attacked, you attack back.
It'd be stupid not to.
Well, isn't that the logic that Iran is using right now?
So, but somehow Iran doesn't get to use that logic.
And see, this is where, again, if you want to have a foreign policy debate, I'm here for it all day long.
I'll debate foreign policy all day long.
But don't you think we should expect logical consistency?
Isn't that a fair expectation to have?
That's all I want.
If you want to have a political debate with me and we're going to have a disagreement, that's fine.
But if you.
Cannot maintain logical consistency, then I don't see how you can engage in a fair debate.
So, hey, Iran attacks us, we're attacking back.
But what about we attack Iran, Israel attacks Iran, and they attack back, and you say they're not allowed to do that?
Don't you see the problem here?
Of course, that logic would never be held towards Israel, that logic would never be held to the United States, but somehow we're supposed to hold it to Iran, and then we have the exact opposite logic when we get attacked.
It doesn't make any sense.
It's a blatant logical fallacy.
And of course, that's how you know it's corrupt.
When it doesn't add up, you know it's corrupt.
If logic can't be applied universally, it's not logic, it's propaganda.
So they kind of just exposed the whole thing right there.
And I guess Marco Rubio, you know, what is this deal?
What is this obsession, by the way, with Marco Rubio?
Can somebody explain this to me?
I'm not even trying to be funny.
There's this weird deal now.
They think Marco Rubio is like the greatest thing since sliced bread.
There's this weird thing where it's like Marco Rubio is the next big presidential candidate.
What is this weird thing with Rubio getting propped up here?
Honestly, I'm trying to make sense of it.
And you do have the JD Vance angle.
Are we posturing here for 2028?
Are we posturing here?
You know, here's the way I look at it.
If it's all political posturing, which is really the only sense I can make of it, is that it's just all political posturing.
I mean, it's very clear that the Zionists and the Israeli lobby want Marco Rubio.
JD Vance is much more hesitant, at least with the public comments he makes, his public attitude.
Vance is way more hesitant on getting involved in the Middle East, whereas Rubio is very neocon.
Rubio is very neocon, and Vance is, you know, he doesn't reek of neoconism.
The issue people have with Vance is he's, you know, he's a representative or the face, he's the plant of the big tech industrial complex.
Fair criticism, fair analysis.
But yet, the military industrial complex, the neocons and the Israel lobby, they all hate JD Vance.
And so it seems like the whole push of Rubio here, the whole glorification of Rubio here, Is to build him up and tear JD Vance down.
Now, my other consideration is they could be using Marco Rubio as a stalking horse for 2028, assuming that Democrats are going to win in 2028 anyway.
So throw Rubio out to the wolves in 2028 just to get him out of the way and then bring in Vance for 2032 when a Republican could actually win an election again and get the big tech president Vance in there.
I just don't, the whole Rubio thing makes no sense to me.
Um, And I guess you can even go back to 2016 when MAGA was against these neocons.
You can go back to 2016 when MAGA was against Rubio and the whole neocon mentality.
Well, now the neocons run MAGA.
And so now they're all pushing for Rubio in 2028.
But I don't get the obsession.
I don't get the like turning Rubio into some like cool celeb.
I don't think it hits.
I'm not buying into that one, guys.
I have to tell you.
That one's not moving the needle for me, at least.
So let's do this.
I'll tell you what.
Let's do this with the break as we come up against the break here.
I'm going to play, for those that have not seen, the O'Keeffe Media Group video that I shot with them over the weekend.
I want to play the full report here.
Now, before I do that, I am seeing that James O'Keefe is in a bit of a back and forth, let's say, with the White House today over his team getting access to the White House to have a representative in there.
And some people have noticed.
That there is an attack on James O'Keeffe and O'Keeffe Media Group today and yesterday, specifically because of me.
They don't like that James had me shoot that video.
They don't like that I was there in their studios to debut the video and host the show for James.
And so they're coming after them today.
And as usual, I guess denying them access and labeling them a bunch of things.
And I just want to say this on that subject.
First of all, James O'Keefe is about as.
How can I phrase this?
The work that James O'Keefe has been doing for decades now is about as pure, groundbreaking insider journalism that exists in the United States of America.
If we had a proper country, as far as the media is concerned, James O'Keeffe would be considered a gold standard and he'd have a room full of awards for journalism.
Now, we live in a corrupt country.
We have a corrupt media.
And so that's not why James does what he does.
But I'll just say this.
You know, James could easily, the O'Keeffe Media Group could easily, if this really is anything about me, and I don't know if it is or not.
I think it's more about the work that O'Keeffe Media Group does.
And since it's only directed at the truth, you know, the White House, the administration, you know, maybe they don't like that if that truth is starting to hit them and their agenda and their people.
So they're saying, hey, we're going to play games.
And I guess you're not going to get your press credentials now.
But if it has anything to do with me, James O'Keeffe could have easily thrown me under the bus.
The O'Keeffe Media Group could have seen all the attacks and name calling and everything and thrown me under the bus.
And by the way, I will just say this if they decided to do that, I wouldn't even care.
I wouldn't even take it personally.
I wouldn't even care.
I'd say, hey, you know what, guys?
That's fine.
I understand it's the nature of the game.
It's all good.
Do what you got to do.
I'll be just fine.
But they haven't done that.
James would never do that.
The O'Keeffe Media Group would never do that.
And I'll just say, I mean, I've worked with a bunch of people in politics, folks.
You know, James has been about as consistent with his integrity and his direction as anybody in the American media for the last decades.
And as far as the people that have worked with James over the years and the people that work at the O'Keeffe Media Group right now, you're not going to get a better group of people as far as just good, honorable Americans are concerned.
You're not going to get a better group.
And I'm glad to see James continuing the integrity of his work and the direction of his work, no matter where the noise is coming from, no matter where the pushback is coming from.
And it truly was an honor.
It truly was an honor to be a part of that report.
And to see where this has gone with this struggle now for them to get access because of this video, when really.
You know, you could say that, well, maybe the White House might have an issue with the video, but at the same time, the White House is investigating one of the individuals featured in the video.
So you'd think they'd be thanking O'Keeffe for this.
But this is how the power and the access and everything is being wielded right now in Washington, D.C.
And look at who is standing firm now and look at who isn't.
Look at who is standing firm and consistent.
In their principles and their integrity and their ethics, and look at who isn't.
Now, I don't need to defend James O'Keefe here.
That's not what this is about.
He's a big boy.
He's been through plenty.
He can defend himself.
But this, this is the moment where you get to see someone's true integrity.
They knew that they were going to get backlash for this one from the White House.
Maybe they even thought, hmm, we're in a fight for access here.
It could impact us.
And what did the O'Keeffe Media Group do?
They didn't change, they didn't move, they didn't change, they didn't capitulate.
And that's the big difference today in the right wing independent media.
Many people are capitulating.
Many people are bending.
And it's just nice to stand with those that don't.
In theory, everything is good, but it might come from the level below him where they're like, I think I know the president well enough to say what he would say on this.
It's like, yeah, we would want to do that, that would be popular.
And then at my level, like, I don't know, five levels lower or whatever, still, there's a lot of discretion to be like, this is clearly what we would want to do.
Meanwhile, another White House official who, according to Maxim Lott, Could be entrusted to make budget decisions on the Trump administration's behalf, openly declares, We've got to get rid of Trump.
Maxim met our undercover journalist on a date in Washington, D.C., and almost immediately he began to lament the decision making within the White House, claiming that there is no cost analysis or consideration of saving American taxpayer dollars.
Decisions that affect every American are made based on assumptions about Trump's intentions or simply on what, quote, Feels like a good idea, and whether they think the base supports it.
Maxim even goes on to reveal that White House officials below Trump are often making decisions for him in his name based on what they believe Trump would do.
Quote, Think I know the president well enough to say what he would say on this.
And then at my level, like on our five level, The policy advisor even gives a specific example.
Maxim claims that his team has been working on ways to block or prosecute spam phone calls just based on their belief that, quote, Trump would want them to do that.
That would be popular and acknowledges that Trump doesn't even know that the White House Domestic Policy Council is working on this.
Now, for the record, most Americans would definitely not oppose such a policy.
But we felt it was concerning that Trump's domestic policy council is committing such an endeavor without the president's approval or knowledge.
In light of this claim that Trump's subordinates are making decisions for him without his knowledge, based on their assumptions about his preferences and completely disregarding any kind of cost or budget analysis, we arranged another meeting with a White House budget official to get his perspective on the budgetary and financial decisions.
The senior budget official oversees funding and budget management for projects such as the White House ballroom renovation and goes on to divulge that the funding for the ballroom has been exclusively coming from private donors, which Elliston deems to be problematic and a possible source of corruption.
Benjamin goes on to reveal that Trump was also gifted a $400 million jumbo jet from Qatar, which he also deems to be a corruptive influence, and claims that the government is going to spend over a billion taxpayer dollars to quote, retrofit.
The White House budget official even goes on to accuse the Trump administration of insider trading, claiming that they are intentionally using the war in Iran to manipulate the price of oil for personal financial benefit.
The claims made by Benjamin here are certainly quite concerning and newsworthy.
And to be clear, it's not illegal for Benjamin to voice these concerns.
However, if people like Benjamin are being given authority to make decisions on behalf of the Trump administration or Trump himself, this could severely compromise the administration's goals.
And things take a much darker turn as the date goes on.
Benjamin starts to open up even more to our journalist about having a much stronger disdain for Trump than he initially revealed, using charged language, repeatedly stating, We've got to get rid of him.
The way his decisions are so erotic, you would think he drives.
He doesn't drive.
And that's what makes it so dangerous that someone could be of sound mind and body, totally coherent, could just be so reckless in their decision making.
Then we find it highly concerning that people like Benjamin should be in such a position to make decisions on behalf of the Trump administration while holding such a hostile perspective towards those.
And as always, if you are on the inside of any government agency, federal, state, or local office, and you see corruption, if you know the American people are being lied to, reach out to us.
Email us at tips at o'keefemediagroup.com or text 914 491 93.
I could say some other stuff about maybe why there's a response from the White House and what the response behind the scene is.
I'm going to withhold any further comment for now.
I'm going to let this thing play out with James O'Keefe and the O'Keefe Media Group, with the administration and the individuals involved in this report.
Before I say anything further, as they see fit.
So let's let that kind of play out before we go any further here.
Yeah, that's weird, guys.
So every time after I play a video, I guess they just decide that the audio doesn't work now.
Before we get to some super chats, as we do at the end of every show, we read your super chats.
Who knows?
Maybe we'll do a little bonus time today.
Maybe we'll do a little bonus time, take some calls as well.
I want to, before we go on here, guys, in case you didn't know, I made, I did formulated an energy supplement recently that I really should be talking more about because I'm almost like too humble about it.
I think it's probably the greatest thing out there.
There's nothing else like it.
But a friend of mine, Anthony Aguero, posted this.
Yesterday, he said, I've really been really trying to cut back or eliminate my energy drink intake.
What are some good substitutions that work for you besides coffee?
Let me know if you have a favorite healthy energy drink that I should try.
And he talks about, you know, there's toxic ingredients in some of these energy drinks.
So I said, Hey, this is why I created Crash Out Energy.
And it's true.
That is part of the reason why I created it.
The other reason I created it.
Is I was sick of basically stacking a bunch of supplements with an energy drink before I went on air.
And I said, I would rather just have it all in one scoop.
So that's what we did with Crash Out Energy.
Folks, this thing is great for heart health.
This thing is great for mental clarity, mental focus, and it's great for energy.
And there's really nothing else like it on the market, ladies and gentlemen.
There's nothing else like Crash Out Energy on the market.
And the most similar things you'll find out there are going to go for $69.79.
Okay.
The closest things you can find to this, Crash Out Energy, are going for $69.79.
We're selling this.
We're beating all of them with a better quality and a better product at $39.99.
25 scoops per canister.
Crashout.energy.
Really looking forward now that it's been out for over a month to hearing more reviews.
Nothing but positive reviews.
Find out for yourself.
Crashout.energy.
The official energy drink of the Owen Report.
All right, final stuff for the show today.
Go figure.
We're starting to get a better idea of what's going on as far as autism and some of these issues that we're having with infants and children.
And we've just got a new study on SSRI drugs.
Prenatal serotonin reuptake inhibitor exposure and maternal depression systems, symptoms, excuse me, are associated with altered fetal brain.
And placental development.
All right, now this thing is a very long study here.
I want to pull up a doctor's short conclusion on this from Adam Ureto, MD.
New study.
This is the study I just pulled up.
Fetuses with prenatal SSRI exposure have brain and placental alterations seen on in utero MRI.
This is now the 13th consecutive MRI study.
Showing that prenatal SSRIs are associated with altered fetal brain development.
Importantly, we observed decreased left and right hypocampal volumes, as well as reduced cortical gyphixation index, curvedness, and surface area in fetuses exposed to SSRIs compared to unexposed controls after adjusting for maternal depression scales.
Serotonin reuptake inhibitors cross the placenta and potentially influence fetal brain development.
By altering levels of critical neurotransmitters.
Indeed, changes in serotonin levels during critical periods of brain development could alter the formation of neural circuits and potentially lead to brain structural alterations and subsequent neuropsychiatric outcomes.
Now, the issue the Americans that probably need to hear this, the people that probably need to hear this won't.
You won't be seeing this on any corporate news networks because they all are paid.
By Big Pharma and all the other tentacles of Big Pharma's reach.
If you're out there and you're trying to get pregnant, where you are pregnant, folks, you got to avoid these drugs.
And I would like to hear more from RFK Jr. on this.
They have talked about it, they haven't been silent on this.
But this is what we're talking about these pills are doing so much damage to our people.
You might, you could probably say it's fair to say that the pills are doing more damage than they are good.
And you'd think it'd be obvious that you shouldn't be consuming these pharmaceutical drugs when you're pregnant.
And yet somehow it still happens.
And we're seeing in every study the negative side effects.
So you know what?
The people that need to hear this probably won't.
But if you're out there and, you know, this is something that might affect you, now you know.
Just avoid it all, folks.
Avoid it all.
Protect your kid to expecting mothers out there.
Protect that kid.
Everything you consume, everything you do, your kid is right there along with you for it.
So just remember that.
All right, a couple other odds and ends here before we get to the super chats.
We keep hearing stories like this.
I think it gives us an idea of what happens to some of these young women that get famous in Hollywood and then end up just completely butchering their look, destroying their natural beauty.
Hayden Panettiere details a shocking moment.
She was forced in bed with an undressed, very famous man at 18 years old.
She allegedly found herself in bed with an undressed and very famous man when she was just 18 years old.
The actress, you may recognize her, she's been in some pretty popular movies, TV shows.
The actress recounted the shocking encounter, which she details in her upcoming memoir, This Is Me, A Reckoning, during her appearance on Monday's episode of the On Purpose with Jay Shetty podcast.
Pain and Tier, now 36, recalled believing she was having a fun night out on a boat with friends when she was taken by surprise and felt in danger.
The hero star claimed she was led by somebody that I had grown to trust and see as a protector and somebody who had my back down the stairs to a very small room.
She goes on to the podcast, getting emotional.
She physically put me in bed next to this undressed man who is very famous.
She remembered, adding that the man, whom she didn't name, Acted like this was just an average day for him.
And this is something that happens all the time.
She said she went into survival mode.
That line in me, that fire in me, my hair stood on end and I became ferocious.
I was like, this is not happening.
So she goes on to tell the story.
But we hear these things.
And, you know, some of the response is, well, why don't they name names?
And then once they name the names, they'll forever be associated with.
You know, having sex or being assaulted or whatever by that individual.
They don't want that.
That's heavy.
So, that's one reason.
Some people will say, well, they don't trust you until you name a name.
And yet, it seems like this is the case in Hollywood.
And I think that the understanding from these young women is hey, if you want to continue to work here, if you want to continue to have a career here, you're going to let this happen.
And then after a while, you look at a case like Amanda Bynes or others.
You wonder if stuff like this doesn't keep happening, or they're just sick of being grabbed and groped and treated like this.
They just butcher themselves until they're so hideous that nobody wants to touch them.
It's really a gross industry with a bunch of gross people, isn't it?
Hollywood.
Really is.
I don't think it was just Harvey Weinstein, guys.
I don't think Harvey was the only one.
Speaking of Hollywood, Elon Musk questions Lupita Yongo's beauty in Reignited Crusade Against the Odyssey.
Oh, I love how they're playing this off as a racist thing.
Of course they are.
So they have a black woman playing Helen of Troy, which is ridiculous.
Helen of Troy, historically reported as a fair skinned, blue eyed, blonde haired beauty.
So, of course, they have to make her black.
And then, oh, if you don't like that, you're racist.
No, nobody's talking about the beauty of this woman.
But if you want to talk about objective beauty, if you compare her to, I forget the name of the actress that played Helen of Troy in Troy, yeah, there's no comparison.
It's kind of a joke.
One is clearly more beautiful than the other, and it's not in Yongo.
And I don't think Achilles, formerly played by Brad Pitt, universally considered a good looking man, now being played by.
Elliot Page, a woman, a frail, meek, skinny woman.
So, this is a joke.
What a letdown it looks like this is turning out to be.
Because this was being billed, the Odyssey was being billed as kind of a throwback production where they're actually going to be out in the elements.
The actors are going to actually have to go out there and do a scene.
They're going to have to go out there and actually hit a scene.
We're not going to do deceptive editing and CGI.
We're going to go out there.
We're actually going to do the scenes.
And now they're doing this woke casting, and all the momentum that this film had is just collapsing.
It's crazy.
It's crazy that they're doing this.
Like, they didn't learn anything with The Little Mermaid, they didn't learn anything with Snow White.
Very weird.
What a shame.
We had so much hope that that movie was going to be great.
Now it looks like they're going woke with the casting, and you know what happens.
You know, I've always found it strange that you can't hire a woman.
It's all consensual on the woman's behalf and the man's.
You can't hire a woman to, you know, take care of you like that, that the whole thing is illegal on both sides.
You can't do it if you're a woman.
You can't do it if you're a man.
And yet you can do it if you are filming an adult themed film.
We all know what I'm talking about, which I find strange.
They're actually filming it.
And how can he not use the Diddy argument?
Hey, I'm filming this.
This is for adult entertainment.
Hey, I'm filming this.
This is for, you know, adult consumption.
Of course, he's not the one filming it.
That's the law enforcement.
So I don't support the industry.
Don't get me wrong.
But it's just like, it doesn't make any sense.
If a man and a woman are consensually agreeing to something, why does law enforcement have to get involved?
I just don't get it.
And how do these rules get thrown out the window when we're filming it for video content?
Again, the industry is gross.
I don't support it.
I'm not endorsing it, whatever.
I'm just saying it doesn't make any sense to me.
It just doesn't make sense to me at all.
It doesn't make sense to me that a man and a woman can't agree to something consensually without the government getting involved.
It doesn't make sense to me that this is all illegal unless you say that it's for, you know, an exotic video.
Just, it makes no sense.
And then you watch it go down.
I mean, can you imagine this guy?
Here he is.
He meets some woman.
He thinks, oh, I'm paying $100 to, you know, get taken care of.
And then, oh, nope, you broke the law.
It's like, what?
I thought this was consensual.
What's going on here?
Oh, nope, you broke the law.
It's crazy to me.
It's absolutely crazy to me.
And then you've got all these young girls now dancing.
You know, stripping naked on the internet, making millions of dollars.
It's like all of that's okay.
But we draw the line when it's a man and a woman agreeing to something consensually.
That's where we draw the line on this issue.
Just don't get it.
Doesn't make sense to me.
They think they've got something here.
Who is posting for Donald Trump?
They think they figured it out.
I don't really think this is breaking news.
I think everybody had an idea.
Young woman fueling Trump's wild midnight sprees is exposed.
So they're claiming in this story, this is Natalie Harp.
People know who Natalie Harp is.
She's been around for a while.
I don't think anybody would be surprised that Trump has a young blonde, you know, a young cute blonde, apparently following him around all the time, running his socials.
But apparently she brings him a bunch of proposed social media posts.
He scans through them and then decides what goes up and what doesn't.
So it makes a little sense that somebody else is really bringing him a bunch of stuff and then he decides what gets posted and what doesn't.
We've heard mixed things on this.
So, no, I'm not surprised that there's a young blonde, a young cute blonde.
Cute blonde following Trump around and running his social medias.
I don't think anybody would be surprised by that, but they think they got some gotcha thing here.
By the way, I'm wondering how many other people feel this way.
So, you know, Green Day is continuing to do their political statements at concerts here.
They have an F Ted Cruz graphic behind them at one of their latest shows.
And so you still see this stuff.
And normally in the past, we would comment on this stuff and note this stuff as left wing propaganda.
Political propaganda at concerts.
Look, I don't like political propaganda at concerts.
I don't.
Every once in a while, you get some religious stuff at concerts that's a little more palatable.
I tend to like just the expression of art when I'm going to a concert.
I don't really want to get into religion or into politics, but it does happen.
To me, though, it all hits differently now.
Everything hits differently now.
Than it used to with all the political propaganda from the left when it comes to entertainment, TV.
It all hits differently now.
It used to be this stuff was obnoxious and it was something where the right wing could kind of sit on a high horse and point this out as egregious.
To me, it's not anymore.
To me now, the right wing, the Republican Party, the GOP, the Trump administration, to me, the right wing has now become corrupt.
The right wing engages in political propaganda.
The right wing engages in cover ups of corruption.
So to me, it just doesn't hit anymore.
Now that the American right has lost the moral high ground, this stuff just doesn't hit anymore.
Like, I don't care anymore.
If the right wing and the Republican Party and the Trump administration still had a firm lock on the moral high ground on American politics, then you could call this stuff out and be bothered by this stuff and call it out as propaganda.
But now that the American right and the GOP, And the Trump administration have lost the moral high ground.
It just, this stuff doesn't hit anymore.
I don't care anymore.
When the left wing does their egregious political propaganda that used to be obnoxious and intolerable, to me, I just shrug my shoulders.
I don't care anymore.
Why would I sit here and defend the GOP?
Why would I sit here and defend the Republican Party?
Why would I sit here and defend political corruption on the right or from this administration?
I wouldn't, and I'm not going to.
So this doesn't move me anymore.
And all the same like response is like, oh, look at the liberals.
Look at the political propaganda at the concerts and on TV.
I'm like, I don't care.
It doesn't move the needle for me anymore.
This means nothing anymore.
Let them do it now.
I don't care.
The right wing is now just as corrupt.
Oh, but the Democrats are so much worse.
Hey, ho, ho.
I'm not arguing for Democrat policy here.
Let's be perfectly clear.
My policy approach hasn't changed.
I'm talking about political corruption.
I'm talking about the moral high ground.
The Republicans don't have it anymore.
So, yeah, when Trump and the right wing had some semblance of the moral high ground, you could call this stuff out and be properly bothered by it and go up against it if you wanted.
Not anymore.
I look at the left wing propaganda now.
I just shrug my shoulders.
I'm like, huh?
I'm not standing up for the corruption on the right.
Not here.
Doesn't really do it to me anymore.
Doesn't really move the needle for me anymore.
And I feel like I'm not the only one that feels that way.
By the way, did you guys see this?
Candace Owens took to X.
This was last week.
Candace Owens took to X Tuesday to share alleged texts from Charlie Kirk in which he said he had a feeling from the beginning of Turning Point USA that he might get wiped out at any time.
Now, you read these texts, it's pretty wild.
This is the exact text.
From Charlie to Candace Owens.
I am not sure if I will live to see the end of this revolution.
I believe you were the piece God meant me to meet that will finish the fight.
Since the beginning of TPUSA, I knew in my gut that I might get wiped out at any time.
I cannot explain it, but I dream about it all the time.
All the time.
Anyway, that's depressing Convo for another time.
So it seems like there are multiple reports, and now this is probably the most conclusive evidence that Charlie was in fear for his life to a very significant degree right up to the end.
Now, I can't properly cover this because I wasn't close enough to Charlie or TPUSA.
I wasn't really close at all, other than just being in the political media.
But if there's any interpretation that I can have here from my experience in the media, it's that Charlie knew he got so deep into American politics, he got so involved in the political establishment with his influence and his following.
That it's natural that you start to feel some of that heat, especially if you're naturally an independent thinker, naturally anti establishment.
But once you're dyed, once they cast that die on you, is hey, you're carrying water for the establishment on this issue or that issue, and you don't want to, or you know the ramifications and the cost if you go against it, these things start to creep into your head.
And it sounds like now with multiple reports that looks like that was something Charlie was wrestling with.
Before he was shot.
All right, I'll tell you what.
Let's do this.
Well, you know what?
Maybe I could play these.
Let's just do it.
Let's just get through the rest of this stuff and then we'll do some bonus time for the super chats.
Let's do that.
So, this is a report from Belgium.
This video is actually coming from I 24 in Israel.
So, this is a local Israel report.
But Jews are having a problem in Belgium, guys.
unidentified
For thousands of years, Moels have been instrumental in performing the Brit Mila on the AIDS day after a boy's birth.
However, Belgium, which has seen a surge of anti Semitism, has laws mandating all circumcisions be performed by licensed doctors.
And last year, Antwerp police made several arrests after a raid.
Joining us now from Brussels is Avi Taylor, the director of the European Jewish Community Center of Brussels.
The Brit Mila has been.
Been part of Jewish life for literally thousands of years in Europe.
The Belgian Jewish community is a wonderful community contributing to society in all branches of life.
The Antwerp Jewish community is a thriving Jewish community.
And I think this is a defining crisis because criminalizing such a Jewish practice, which is in the core of Jewish life, many of us wonder if there is a future.
You know, there's some weird stuff here, and you can't even talk about these subjects without the normal creeps and crawlies starting to scream and shout and get a little triggered.
But, so what are we saying here?
If we can't do the oral suction on the genital mutilization, there's no future for Jews in Belgium.
If we're not allowed to.
Mutilate genitalia and suck on it, then we can't be here.
I remember, you know, it was a really big part of the anti Muslim conversation about female genital mutilation.
And so that was a large piece of the anti Muslim propaganda information, however you want to put it, they would talk about female genital mutilation and how bad that was.
But it's funny because this is male genital mutilation.
I mean, that's what this is.
Circumcision is male genital mutilation.
And you can talk about where it originated from, but that's what it is.
So if we're going to have a problem with female genital mutilation, we should also have a problem with male genital mutilation.
And I wonder if the practice of circumcision is going to be coming to an end soon.
There's a lot more people that otherwise wouldn't even think twice about it.
They would just consider it normal.
I don't know how it could ever be considered normal, quite frankly.
I mean, let's just remove all social norms or expectations here.
I don't know how you could consider holding an infant down and chopping up his genitals, snipping his wee wee.
I don't know how anybody could ever consider that normal.
Seems barbaric from a neutral standpoint.
I think that I feel like, as a culture, as a society, we're not really talking about it, but I feel like that practice is starting to be viewed as male genital mutilation.
And I think that the normalcy rate is starting to go down.
I think a lot of other people now are either thinking about not doing it or just outright deciding they're not going to do it to their boys.
So, but it is strange.
We went through in the 2010s with all the anti Muslim stuff.
They would always say the Muslims do female genital mutilation.
The Muslims do female genital mutilation.
Well, there's male genital mutilation happening.
It's called circumcisions, and we accept that as normal.
I don't know how much longer that's going to go on for, to be honest with you.
I don't know if the numbers right now, most American men are circumcised.
I don't know if that's going to be the case in a decade.
I don't know.
I feel like we're going to start to look at that practice as barbaric as we do the practice of female genital mutilization.
But that's just trying to apply logic consistently.
So here's a big problem we have in America when it comes to the economy.
I've got a couple of clips here.
We've got middlemen and everything, and we have this new transaction economy where you purchase something, but then you have to purchase 10 other things to make the one thing you purchased even work right.
Here's an example with cars, and there's all kinds of different examples, but here's a lady who bought a Mazda and didn't anticipate she'd have to pay extra for a certain service.
unidentified
This economy is making me a criminal, okay?
I'm currently researching how to jailbreak a car system.
That sounds crazy, right?
Listen to this.
I bought this car because I wanted push to start.
I wanted to be able to start my car when I'm not in my car, okay?
Not that complicated.
This is already installed, it's installed in the car.
Yay!
I find out I have a free three year trial.
Meaning, after the trial, they want me to pay a $10 a month subscription cost for something already installed in my car.
Are you fucking kidding me?
It's already installed in my car.
You want me to now pay you a subscription on top of the $30,000 car that I bought from you?
Make that make sense, Mazda.
Are any other car brands doing that?
Because what's.
I remember when I was young, my mom had pushed to start on her key.
Like she could just press a combination of buttons.
She had to pay one time to have it installed into the car, and that's it.
Well, that'll probably be, there'll probably be an economy for that if this stuff continues.
Mazda is not the only company that does this.
There's all kinds of car companies that have extras that you have to pay for.
By the way, they do this with video games now too.
You buy a new video game console, and it's like you can't even play it until you buy some new monthly subscription and then some other monthly subscription on top of that.
And this is part of why Americans are going broke.
It's like you make one transaction, and then there's three microtransactions that you also have to pay for, just nickel and diming you.
And I think that the pain is being felt all across the board, by the way.
It's kind of like with the airline situation.
Why is flying becoming so miserable?
Because, folks, all of these, it's not just the American people that are feeling the pinch.
The companies that have to make money and make a profit, they are too.
And so they're trying to find all of these different ways to make more money.
Because everybody's feeling the pinch of the economy right now.
It's just at the end of the day, the American consumer ends up paying the final price for it.
Here's another example with a printer.
Now you can't even go buy a printer anymore.
unidentified
Okay, listen to me.
I just tried to print something from my printer that I own, my printer that I own with ink that I bought, purchased, and paper.
And I can't print without a subscription plan.
The concept of having to have a subscription plan to print in your own home from the printer that you own that already has ink and paper in it.
They remotely shut off my printer until I paid $7.50 to print in my own home.
When the government decided that they were going to tax you for property that you already own, that's what opened the door for all these companies to do the exact thing.
And that's basically what it is.
They're just taxing you for something you already paid for, but they're just turning it into a transaction fee.
That's all.
But it's the same concept.
It's unbelievable.
This is the state of the economy.
You have to pay the government for something that you already own, and then you have to pay the company.
Well, you know, we're pretty much through the return of the Owen report here today.
Yeah, yeah, I know.
Maybe a little slower, a little cooler than we have been in the past.
But that's just what you get when you're not diving into the abyss of American politics every day, spending a lot more time traveling, doing some extracurriculars.
Just wanted to kind of not return, you know, just return nice, nice, smooth landing here as we restart the show and get ready for the summer and the long push through the summer.
I don't anticipate any more trips.
I have been invited to a couple of things that are coming up soon.
I don't know.
I'm so sick of the traveling and everything that I want to just commit to being here every day again.
But some of these events, it would be good for me to be there.
I think it would be good for the channel to go get some content at these things.
But right now, that's not the plan.
The plan is to just stay here and be here through the summer and just get the summer run going, getting ready for that.
All right, guys.
But we are back.
Let's get to the super chats.
We do this at the end of every show.
We go to our super chats.
I anticipate some interesting things today as we return from a bit of a break here.
We start with Dust Vault.
I don't have any time to worry about you, dirty Americans' economic situation.
Yeah, he says that.
Trump says, I don't think about Americans' financial situation at all.
Well, we already knew that, but it's nice to see some honesty.
Ken Rose, thank you.
Oh, my God, China, a foreign country infiltrated our government.
Thank God 98% isn't sold out to a foreign country.
Well, that's the obvious double standard or elephant in the room when we see all of this China reporting that we see all the time.
It's okay for one government, one country to have foreign influence and not the other.
And they justify this in their different ways, but yet that is the argument.
Space friend, first time I've seen you in the super chats.
Welcome.
Great to have you back.
It's been rough having you gone.
Oh, well, I understand.
Glad that you've returned with us today.
Did you see that Alex covered the report you did yesterday but left you out?
Much love, Owen.
No, I did see, though, you're talking about the report I did, how they're censoring Infobars content.
After whatever takeover, whatever the conclusion was with Alex's legal situation and control of InfoWars, that they're going back and recensoring all that content.
They're going back and erasing all of that content.
And I can just say for a fact that, yeah, if you've uploaded some old InfoWars content to your channels out there on the various social media platforms, they are being removed right now.
They are being removed.
It's my best understanding that this is because whatever deal was made, whoever it was, the Onion or whoever it was, they're now claiming, I guess, copyright or ownership of this content.
And so therefore, they believe they have the right to erase all of it off the internet.
There might be some more legal fights there, or there might not.
I don't know.
I didn't see the report.
But I did see that Harrison Smith was reporting on that and shared it.
I did see that Alex responded.
On X to that report.
But as far as him covering it and leaving you out, I'm not aware of that, but that's fine.
It doesn't bother me at all.
So it's just, to me, it's an issue of censorship.
And it just continues to happen.
You know, it doesn't seem that it's gotten any better, quite frankly.
And, you know, look, I was warning about this.
I've been warning about this.
I've been warning about the right wing censorship coming.
And you can argue in this case, it's not right wing.
And that's a fair argument.
But we do see it.
We see it from now Sebastian Gorka calling for censorship, Mark Levin.
Calling from censorship.
And we all know the direction.
We all know where it's coming from.
We all know why.
But it's about to get a lot more louder and a lot more obnoxious and in your face.
And we were miles ahead of that one.
DZ, Dean Withers has been destroying MAGA.
They aren't equipped to handle his debates, but are his claims true?
He said Trump tried to rig the election.
I don't pay too much attention to Dean Withers.
I am aware of the phenomenon that you're talking about.
And it's like I've been saying you are now in a position where it's own the MAGAs season.
It's not own the libs season anymore.
Own the libs season is over, guys.
It's own the MAGAs season.
The MAGA is the one with the double standards.
The MAGA is the one in a cult of personality and a cult of thought.
And you can argue that the liberals are still in that, but it doesn't show because they don't have any power.
So the liberals aren't having to run defense anymore.
They can run offense now.
And now it's MAGA that's having to run defense.
And it's turned many people in media that have now their whole job is running defense for Trump.
And so now it's the own the MAGA.
Period in the media.
And it really is crazy.
Honestly, I'm not even going to get into detail.
And you know, I like to stay out of all the personality stuff.
Okay.
So I'm going to maintain staying out of the personality stuff here.
But when you actually analyze all the different political developments and where the media is at today, as far as political direction, offense, defense, It really is twilight zone compared to where we thought we would be.
It really is twilight zone compared to where we were, say, 10 years ago.
I mean, it's weird, isn't it?
It's weird watching the different personality conflicts and the different infighting and the different things MAGA is defending and supporting now.
And it's like, if you're the one that just tries to remain consistent and just stay the same and stay on the same path, it's like, You're the one that gets attacked.
And you're just sitting here in the twilight zone, like, what are you talking about?
I haven't even moved.
So it's very strange.
But that was one we were head of, too.
I told you it would be MAGA that's set up to own the MAGAs now.
And you'd think when Dean Withers is out there getting these opportunities, that would be the sign that something has gone horribly wrong here.
But they're not really seeing any signs these days, are they?
I've been crushing it at work thanks to Crash Out Energy.
My wife really enjoys it, too, if you know what I mean.
Blood flow, blood flow, blood flow.
Am I right, buddy?
Thank you.
Thank you.
I'm glad that you enjoy Crash Out Energy.
I love the reviews.
Thank you, guys.
Crashout.energy.
Until the rope rots, stop doing debates for Straka.
It's a scam.
He never airs the footage.
Not sure why he would be editing footage from a debate anyway.
No, I'm going to fully defend Brandon here.
The reason that the first debate, first of all, let me just give you an idea of what's going on here.
You know, Brandon, he's putting pretty much all of his capital into hosting these debates.
And when you see the debates, I think you're going to see how important it is.
But this is not new.
This is new for the walkaway organization to be hosting these panel debates.
And there's a lot of work that goes into it.
I mean, folks, he's really putting a lot of work into this stuff.
But the first one, it was the first one he ever did.
And there were some unintended, unexpected technical issues that they had to work through to even get the video out.
So he learned from that.
The second debate is going to be much better.
I think it's going to get to air much sooner.
There's a lot less technical stuff that they need to do post.
But there's so much content.
The first debate was about three hours of content, the second debate was about five hours of content.
And so I think he's still just deciding how he wants to publish this stuff.
It's not a scam.
Brandon is a real stand up guy, he's one of the good ones.
And I think when you see these debates, you'll see how important they are.
And you'll see that it's, you know, essentially he's filling a void.
Nobody else is having these panel right versus right debates, not like this.
And so I think as time goes on, if these things are successful and if the move he's making to host these things pays off, I think you're going to see more of them.
And I do think eventually he will switch to having them live.
I do think that that could happen.
But he's doing some other stuff, some other interviews that he needs to publish.
So, but no, Brandon, I will defend Brandon.
He's always been fair.
He's always been honest.
He is a January 6th that got, you know, tormented by the feds.
And I think once these debates do come out, just be patient.
I understand the impatience, but just be patient.
Once the debates do come out, you'll see that these things are very important.
And it's a good thing that he's hosting them.
And I think you'll be glad that I'm doing them as well.
Owen Shroyer's boyfriend weighing in today.
My nips are still sore.
Go easy on them next time.
You know what?
I'm going to tell you this.
That super chat, you're going to get away with this one for $1.99 today, but I think that one's going to cost you more in the future.
I'll put it on screen.
I'll put it on screen.
But you know what?
That's going to be a funny clip.
You're going to clip that out.
You're going to make a whole thing of it.
That's fine.
That's funny.
But you're getting this one cheap today.
I'll put your super chats on the screen, but you know what?
For $1.99 for that, I don't think I'm going to read it.
That is, you know, there's a bit of a humor to it there.
But you're too cheap.
You're coming in way too cheap for that.
So you get a freebie essentially today.
You get $1.99 today.
I don't know if you're going to get away with that next time, bud.
Owen, we had an urban Indian heritage society where American first American Indians who were misclassified as black African American and were exposing the deep state that did it.
Sebastian Gorka is claiming that Tucker Carlson and Nick Fuentes are what?
Terrorists or whatever the claim he's making?
Sebastian Gorka is such a grifter, such a fraud grifter.
He celebrates.
Sebastian Gorka has never been pro free speech.
Sebastian Gorka and Steve Hilton, by the way, that the Republicans are, oh, he's running in California, Steve Hilton.
Steve Hilton, both of them are European, by the way.
Gorka and Hilton, both European, both celebrate internet censorship.
How do you like that?
And these are establishment right wingers.
These are Republican GOP voices and influencers, and they get access and they get promoted.
Neither of them are pro free speech.
Both of them celebrated internet censorship.
So I'm not surprised by Sebastian Gorka doing this.
He's a disgusting European grifter.
He's a fake.
He's a phony.
He's a fraud.
He's un American.
I can't believe it.
But, you know, he gets the access and the influence to Trump and the right wing.
Owen Joan Troyer, what do you think of Hanta, COVID 2.0?
You know, I think they'd love to run it as COVID 2.0.
We're going to monitor the situation.
Hanta means scam, by the way, or fake or fraud.
Hanta translates to scam in many different languages, maybe most notably Hebrew, but Hanta does translate to fake, fraud, scam in multiple different languages and language origins.
They're announcing now that there's a couple Americans that have it that weren't even on the ship.
So we'll see if they run another pandemic on us.
But I would say, whether it's a pandemic or aliens or an energy crisis, they're going to crush us with something with Trump again.
I mean, you know, Trump let him crush us with COVID in his first administration.
So I would assume that they're going to use something else to crush us with in his second administration.
Now, whether that's the hantavirus or not, I don't know.
But I would say it's going to be something.
They will use some sort of a scam fraud to crush us, just like they did with COVID during Trump's presidency, because history repeats itself.
And the right wing doesn't want to be honest about this, because then you got to face up a little bit.
You got to own it a little bit.
And they won't want to do that.
And many of them can't even say anything critical of Trump at all because they're such cowards.
But yeah, I anticipate there'll be something.
Do you put any credence in that world government is already here?
And the U.S. and Iran are already working together and giving the peasants a good show.
Well, I would say world government is definitely already here.
As far as all of this showmanship between Iran and the U.S., I don't think so.
I think there's legitimate strife there.
And we all know where it comes from.
We all know where it comes from.
So, no, I think that that's.
I think it's a real thing.
But we do know that Trump in the past has kind of put on these shows to, you know, just, you know, put on one face and the foreign leaders too, but then try to, at the end of the day, just really have peace.
The world government is definitely already here.
As far as the showmanship between Iran and the United States, no, I think it's mostly real.
Ivan 30.
Trump said he doesn't care about Americans' financial situation.
Vote Democrat this cycle to teach him and the GOP a lesson.
Welcome back, Owen.
Thank you.
Well, I'm never going to.
I don't think I can ever tell you to vote Democrat.
I understand the logic of why people think that that is the direction to go, or even this natural human inclination of vengeance.
And it feels like vengeance.
You know, the Republicans kind of stabbed us in the back.
The Republicans are corrupt too.
And it's like, okay, well, screw you.
I'll go vote for Democrats.
I don't know if that's the best solution.
I'm not telling you that's the best solution.
I get why people go down that road.
But the discussions that I'm having are.
It's not that people want to go out and vote Democrat.
They just don't want to go vote.
They just feel no motivation to go vote for a Republican right now.
And I'm in that boat.
You know, I'm sure I'll go vote.
I just think we should vote, even if it's rigged.
I think ultimately they want that.
They want you to give up voting.
They want you to lose faith in the process so that ultimately they can just end it.
So ultimately they can just stop having elections.
So I think that, you know, part of the process is doing it just so you show that, hey, I still believe that.
There is a process here that I believe in, even if the current status of it is dishonest and rigged.
When the process is fair and not rigged, then this is a process I believe in.
But everybody I'm talking to, it's not that they want to go vote Democrat, they just don't want to vote Republican.
And I'm in the same boat.
I'm like, the only thing that would really motivate me to want to vote in the midterms is Ken Paxton.
And it's like, if Paxton isn't on the ballot in I don't know what really motivates me to vote.
I don't.
Like I said, I'll probably end up voting and I don't know.
I just, it's tough because it's like if you go out and vote Republican, then you kind of, that makes you an idiot, right?
I mean, it's like if you go out and keep voting Republican, that makes you a fool.
But if you go out and vote Democrat, that too also makes you a fool.
So there's no winning.
There's no winning.
It's like you just hope there's a candidate that you like.
You hope there's a candidate that you trust that will make you go out and vote.
Paxton is the only one right now, for me in Texas at least.
So I don't know.
I don't, I don't, I say do what you want.
Do whatever you want in the midterms.
But voting for either party right now just makes you feel like an ass.
And I don't like feeling like an ass.
Ken Rose, I know you and others hold Andrew Wilson with high regards in relation to his debating skills.
But I wasn't really impressed with him when he debated you.
You absolutely crushed him.
Thank you, Ken.
Thank you, Ken.
Well, people are going to reach their conclusions about that debate and other debates, mostly off of their own politics.
I will say this whatever you think about the debate, and Andrew believes he won it hands down, and I'd say I won it hands down.
What I most enjoy about it, and Andrew and his wife have been taking a lot of heat after it too, and that's fine.
They know the world that they live in, just like I do.
What I like, and this was also.
Depicted at the end of the other debates that I was a part of.
What I like is I want to be able to have a debate in good faith, passionate, heated, take it wherever it needs to go, and still be amicable afterwards and still shake hands and have some honor after the debate.
And Andrew Wilson exhibited that.
And so I respect that.
And that was mostly the case with these other debates that I did.
And it's funny.
It just so happens.
I mean, obviously, I know Gavin McGinnis, and I wonder how many times you would even be able to pull something like this off.
But the most recent debate, there was a moment where I think the entire other side was really getting fed up with me.
You'll see when the debate actually drops, but I think the other side was starting to get really fed up with me.
And at one point, Gavin is screaming.
I mean, it looks like he's about to burst a blood vessel in his forehead.
He is screaming at me with such rage.
It was really great.
It was actually hilarious.
But yeah, it was like, I wonder how many people could actually sit there and take that.
And at the end of it, you know, still smile and laugh and cheers at the end of the night, which was the case with Gavin.
But man, he was getting, he was, I mean, foe, he was raging at me.
I mean, raging, like screaming, like eyeing me down, smoke coming out of his ears.
I like that.
I think that's fun.
I think that's great.
That's what the people want.
So it's all, You know, we didn't take a vacation.
The show took a break, but a lot of good content still to come.
Andrew Wilson exposed as kosher right.
Another Andrew Wilson comment here kosher right.
Dana White has some interesting paintings.
Saw that.
He claimed it was a gift.
And then the message of the one next to him with the butterflies.
It's just weird, man.
It is just, it's so weird.
Did you ask James O'Keefe why he willingly went to Bohemian Grove and was hanging out there?
No, but I do believe he's addressed that before.
So I really don't really have any concerns, but I'm sure he would have no problem answering that as a journalist.
Dust vaults 2024.
You'll get tired of winning 2026.
I don't have time for dirty American finances.
That's the message.
Gas will hit all time highs by July 4th.
Happy 250th, America.
That's going to be the crippling blow if we can't lower these gas prices.
That's going to be a crippling blow.
And I'm not even talking about politically.
I mean, financially for people, that's going to be a crippling blow.
And then it's going to result in an election that doesn't go Republicans' way.
Let them eat cake.
Jeffrey Knox, Trump is not stupid.
He's evil.
Demons always are.
He knows Americans are broke.
You know, I just don't know, Jeff.
I don't know.
I really think they're that out of touch.
I really think the members of this administration and Trump's advisors are that out of touch.
I really do.
I have to say, that's my honest opinion.
I think they are really that clueless on what the average American's current status is.
I genuinely believe that.
Not to comment on the other things you say, but no, I think they're totally ignorant.
I really don't think they get the true state of the average American's financial situation.
Thank you.
Thank you, Ken.
Glad to be back.
Glad you guys are with me.
It means a lot that you guys would come back after a long absence like that, which was not the intent.
But it really means a lot that you guys would be back today.
Please give us a follow if you haven't on YouTube, guys.
Help us grow that.
That would mean a lot.
Apparently, Rumble was having some issues today.
I didn't see any error messages pop up on my end, so I don't know what's going on with that.
We'll see what happens with X.
They announced on X that they were kind of changing the algorithm, and they do that a lot.
Obviously, it's kind of an issue.
But they claim they're trying to reward original content more.
I'll let you know how that goes.
I post a lot of original content on X.
I will say it did seem to be the case over my break when I was posting those original videos.
Definitely gave a boost in the algorithm for me.
So I think they're honest about what they're trying to do.
As far as does it play out fairly, that's the issue.
But I just think the more they try to do, the worse it gets.
I say just put one algorithm out there and just be done with it.
Just stop tinkering with it.
Stop looking for some agenda and some issue and just do it.
Just let people use it.
Cornelius Westernmost, so happy to see you back.
It almost feels like the return of a long lost friend.
Have you seen Mike Adams' take on what the data centers actually are?
It is essential for viewing everyone.
I saw briefly, I think, a clip.
I didn't see the whole breakdown.
And I'm kind of in agreement with the direction.
Maybe I don't go as to the extreme, but maybe that's something we follow up with Mike on.
Haven't had Mike on the show yet.
We should probably get that done at some time.
We do have guests coming up, though, tomorrow and Friday.
I'm hoping Thomas Massey can join us tomorrow.
He's very busy right now.
They're voting in Congress, and he's getting ready for a big event that, quite frankly, I would like to be at, but I'd have to take probably another two days off the show and fly again.
So, I'm 50 50 on whether I want to do it.
I'm probably lower than that.
But there is a big support event for Massey happening in Kentucky coming up in a couple days that I'd love to be a part of and show that support.
I just don't know if I can swing it right now since I just took the break and now I'm back on the air.
And since traveling is such a pain in the ass, you know that it's at least a two, three day excursion just traveling now.
So, I don't know if I can take off any more shows to do that.
It's not that there'd be a shortage of content if I went, but.
I think it's probably best for me to just stay here and host the show.
But we'll see.
Hopefully, Massey can at least come on as a guest tomorrow, is what we're shooting for.
So stay tuned for that.
Alex McCarthy.
Hey, bud.
Welcome back.
Nailed it.
GOP must be anti big AI.
Yes, morally, but also MAGA's populist voter.
But won't happen.
Trump donors aside, the entire tech sector.
Thus, Wall Street needs AI hype to float right now.
Gen Common, the US has approximately 5,427 compared to China's 449 data centers, but we were propagandized to believe that China is the surveillance state, yet we are free.
Well, two things can be true China is definitely the surveillance state, but we could also be building the data centers to a much more ridiculous degree as them.
Which just tells you that these data centers are more than just surveillance.
It's beyond what the Chinese are trying to do with surveillance, whatever it is they're trying to do.
I'd argue most AI stories have a cash flow angle because there's a real demon they're delaying.
I can't see the emoji there.
Example the railroad comments are a veiled public utility play, and the NVIDIA story is a new tech or use case.
There's a lot of fascism.
They do this thing to say, oh, you don't know what fascism is.
What does that deal with Intel?
I mean, have you seen what happened with Intel stocks since the Trump administration got the government involved with Intel?
And he goes, Oh, congratulations.
Have you invested in Intel?
It's like, how is that not insider trading?
I mean, Intel is up 162% since Trump basically subsidized Intel.
Their stock is up 162%.
And by the way, I mean, folks, I.
It feels so dirty.
I say it feels dirty, but this is the truth.
Yeah, I was told to buy Intel stock.
I was told.
Everybody knew.
And my interpretation is NVIDIA doing well too.
Both might still be undervalued.
I don't know.
My interpretation was there was basically a wink and a nod.
There was basically an elbow and a wink and a nod towards, let's just say, people that, hey, you know, buy Intel stock.
It's like, hey, buy Intel stock.
The word got around, folks.
The word got around.
And once Trump made that deal with Intel, now they all got 162% return on investment.
So, I mean, the insider trading angle here is ridiculous.
And I'm going to, like I said, I'm going to withhold any further comments on that for now.
I'm going to let O'Keeffe Media Group handle it how they want.
I'm going to let James handle it how he wants to handle it.
I'm honored to be along for the ride to the extent they want me to be.
I'm going to let them handle their business now.
And once some of the dust settles and some of the noise calms down, I might wade back into the subject.
But for now, I'm just going to let them handle it.
I've made my statements for today.
We played the video and we'll just let the rest play out.
But yeah, the attacks and the response to that are quite telling, I would say.
Wolf Krieger on Trump's one way loyalty, look no further than Rudy Giuliani, Steve Bannon, Peter Navarro, Tina Peters, Mike Lindell, and most egregiously, the Proud Boys and Oath Keepers exclusion from pardons.
Well, I don't know if those are the best examples.
I think it's more of a, to that degree, it's more of a, if we agree all of these individuals are victims of the corrupt government, then we need to be going after the corrupt government officials that did it.
And it's like, I thought that was the agreement.
I thought we were all in agreement the weaponization of government, the targeting of people that supported Trump, this was all criminal and illegal.
So, where are the charges?
Where are the indictments?
That's the frustration here.
Maybe more so than even the loyalty issue.
I'm not going to sit here and cry over loyalty, but I will sit here and have an issue about lack of justice.
That is an issue.
Loyalty, whatever.
Politics, loyalty, I'm not so sure these two things exist in the same room.
But it should be that politics and justice exist, and we're just not getting it.
It's just not happening.
Owen should have visited me in Florida.
Oh, I guess a missed opportunity, huh?
For a fishback campaign.
Mr. Smith, aliens will legitimize Judaism and evangelical pastors will bend the knee.
Noahide laws, the aliens say so.
I called it.
I don't think that's too far fetched of a prediction at all, actually.
I think, as crazy as that might sound to people, I think that's a very reasonable prediction.
You might not be too far off from how it actually goes down.
Iron Lunatic, I think the reason prostitution is illegal because.
And that's why they're okay with the adult film industry.
And that's why they're okay with the OnlyFans and all the other websites where you can be an internet hooker and stripper because they can tax it.
Because they can actually sit there and force you to register and they can tax you.
But if you're out on the streets and you do a hundred bucks cash for a rub and tug, well, they can't tax that.
So they got to shut it down.
I like that.
I like that logic.
I like that theory.
When you get mutilated, oh, here we go.
Okay.
Let me.
I got to.
Sometimes I got to pause and read these now before I go with it live.
It's like a Ron Burgundy.
You put it on the teleprompter.
Burgundy will read it.
You put it in the super chat.
Schroyer will read it.
I don't know.
We might need to.
You know, we don't want to have a F you San Diego moment here.
When you get mutilated as a baby and your missing parts go to make skin cream for ugly celebrities.
Well, they admitted that.
A couple people have admitted that.
Like, I think Jennifer Aniston admitted that and some others.
Yeah, they take the foreskin and they turn it into like beauty products.
Weird.
Trump's been so bad that Obama's popularity is coming back.
Nice work, Chump.
Tell you what, that's a very astute opinion.
Not many people will understand what you just said, but you're not wrong.
And to me, my angle is like going back to the Green Day thing with the F Ted Cruz bit.
Like, it's just, it doesn't hit anymore.
Like, oh, Obama is all corrupt and all this stuff.
It's like, so are our guys.
It doesn't hit anymore.
It's like, I can't sit here and point fingers at Obama.
I can't sit here and point fingers at Democrats in the left anymore because they can legitimately point fingers back at us.
So it just doesn't work anymore.
So I don't know if I look at it from an Obama popularity angle as much as I look at it from a, it just doesn't hit.
Calling out Democrats on corruption and lying and everything.
It just doesn't hit now because the Republicans are just as bad now that they're in power.
So it just doesn't hit.
Where's Wifey?
She's in the kitchen where she belongs.
Now we're getting back to the classics.
JV Free, U.S. men got fooled to accept the cut.
Yeah, I don't know.
I don't think it lasts much longer, to be honest.
I think culture is about to change on that.
Long live job.
Why do you still shill Alex when he shills the Rothschilds, Trump, Palantir, New World Order, and hires Freemasons like Chase Geyser?
Shill Alex?
That's odd.
I'm shilling Alex.
I don't think anybody has ever accused me of that since last September.
Shill?
I just cover news and tell the truth.
So I don't know where this shill comes into play.
I mean, wouldn't I be considered the exact opposite, considering how things went down?
So, I don't know what you're referring to or why you've reached that conclusion.
Shilling the Rothschilds?
I don't know.
Maybe I'm missing something there, but I don't know.
I just don't know.
How can I shill that?
I don't even pay attention to what goes on over there, if I'm being quite honest now.
So, I just don't get that.
Paul Tonehead.
Owen, I think of all your audio dropouts and weak recovery when switching media could be resulting from an out of phase polarity issue with the gold mic.
Here come political candidates that are actually bringing it to the political table, that are actually trying to deliver it to the political table with political results.
It's like, okay, it's like this is the outcome, right?
I mean, isn't that the outcome?
Your political speech, political results?
So it's like now you get candidates that are actually trying to take the political speech and get political results, and then they're getting attacked.
And I'm like, it doesn't even make sense.
I'd like to think it's just a personality conflict.
I'd like to think it's a miscommunication.
I don't know.
I'm not going to get involved.
Let's see what happens in the long of it.
But it's so weird.
It's like, isn't this the political result of the political speech?
And then you start to get signs of a result, and then you attack the people that are potentially bringing the results.
And then it becomes to this whole trust thing, and nobody trusts anybody, and everybody's a Fed.
And it's just like, I don't want to, I can't even get involved in that.
And now, and they say, oh, it's like, and then they say, oh, I guess Bilzerian is like 12% Jewish now.
And so, oh, now he's disqualified.
And now it's a debate about can you have this percentage of Jewishness and all of this stuff.
And I'm saying, well, wait a second.
Hold on, guys.
This is like the ultimate card.
It's like, you're not, it's not about Jews, it's not about anti Semitism.
And then here's the one guy, and now it's, oh, you're disqualified because you're Jewish.
The whole thing is Twilight Zone.
We're just a mess, okay?
We're just a mess, guys.
The whole thing is a damn mess.
So I'm staying in my lane.
I'm going to cover the news.
I don't want to get into the personality things.
I like that I can get along with everybody.
I'd like to keep it that way.
I assumed this would come up.
I've never had any bad experiences with any of these people.
I've always been on good terms, never had any bad experiences.
So I don't know.
Let's see the results.
But it's just, we're just in a total clown world, twilight zone politically right now.
Pine nuts.
Missed you too.
Glad you're back.
Thank you.
How can we trust you and Alex when you guys work with the Freemasons like Chase Geyser and Alex going back to shilling Trump, AKA the New World Order?
You're asking me the same question.
I don't understand.
I work independently.
All right.
If you want to ask Alex about these things, you can ask Alex about these things.
You're certainly not accusing me of shilling for Trump or the New World Order.
I don't know how you can claim that I'm shilling for Alex.
I don't work there anymore.
So, I don't really understand your frustration.
If you have trust issues, then I totally understand that.
If you don't want to trust me or Alex, then that's fine.
I don't know what you want me to say.
All I can do is show you what I do and how I do it, the fruits of this show, whether you enjoy it or not.
I don't know.
What is it that you won't trust me to do?
Forget about Alex or Chase.
What is it that you don't trust?
Like, what is it about me that you don't trust?
What is it about me that you think is like Angular or some hidden agenda?
I just don't even know why you would reach such a conclusion.
I just don't get it.
So, if you have trust issues, totally understand that.
All right.
You make your own decisions.
But as far as like lining me up as a shill, I don't, that I don't understand.
That I can't relate to.
And I don't even feel I should have to defend myself on that regard.
So, but you're still here.
So, I guess you trust me enough.
Will you address the Massey allegations?
Yeah, total BS.
I mean, it's such obvious BS.
It's ridiculous.
And it's funny that this is the stuff that MAGA used to call out.
This is the exact stuff they did to Trump.
Again, it's just total clown world.
It's total Twilight Zone clown world.
This is the exact type of stuff that they tried to run against Trump when he was anti establishment.
Now they're running these ops against Massey because he's anti establishment.
But now MAGA supports it.
Now MAGA used to call out and block this propaganda.
Now MAGA endorses and uses this propaganda.
It's crazy.
No, I think the Massey allegations are total BS, total political propaganda.
I don't, it's so ridiculous that I don't even want to address it.
And I guess I'll just say this.
And I'd love to be a part of helping Massey get elected.
We're going to have him on the show.
And I don't know if I'm going to go to that event or not.
But, you know, I'll put it like this it's going to get pretty emotional, I will say.
This is going to get pretty interesting, guys, if they do end up defeating Massey.
But really, this is the moment.
This is the moment I think whether or not there is any conservative movement left or whether or not there is any independence left in the Republican Party, it's all going to be exposed with this Massey race.
And if the foreign lobbyists and the foreign interests can go into rural Kentucky and unseat one of the few conservative members of Congress with one of the best voting records in Congress, if the foreign lobbyists Can inject their money into that race and unseat Massey, then, folks, there is no Republican Party.
There's no Republican Party.
There's no GOP.
There's no conservative movement.
There's just the foreign lobby.
There's just the foreign and special interests.
And that's who you work for if you're a Republican.
That's who you vote for if you're a Republican.
And that's the message if Massey is ousted.
Now, if Massey wins, then the message is no.
The American people are going to determine their own fate.
The American voter is going to stand up against the foreign influence, against the foreign.
Against the foreign and special interests that are trying to buy elections.
And there is a hope for conservatism, and there is a hope for a Republican election process where we can get good people in there.
But that's the real test with this Massey race.
And what's going to be wild, because whatever the result ends up being, it's going to get really emotional on both sides.
But if Massey loses that, and you watch MAGA celebrate the ousting of Massey, huh?
If you think it's bad right now for the midterms, the display that MAGA, the performance, the celebration that MAGA is going to engage in from unseating Massey is going to be so despicable, so swampish, so authoritarian, so disgusting, it will turn off even more people for the midterms.
It will anger, it will turn MAGA into more of a pariah than it already is.
And I mean, I could say, oh, warning for MAGA.
It doesn't even matter.
I'm just telling you what's going to happen.
MAGA will look so disgusting.
You think it already looks like establishment shills?
You think it already looks like a bunch of brainwashed zombie cultists?
Watch what happens if they defeat Massey.
Watch the victory laughs and the celebrations that they have when they defeat Massey.
You guys are literally, whether you realize it or not, Owned by the foreign lobbyists.
And you don't work for America.
You don't push for America's interest.
You're so lost in the sauce of it all.
You don't understand how you just got conned out of your own future.
And so here we will watch what used to be the most pro American, patriotic, anti establishment political movement that we've seen in modern American history.
And we're going to watch it be totally co opted and bought and sold to the foreign lobbyists.
And then we're going to watch all of these people.
Go along for the ride thinking that they're winning, and we see it for what it really is.
Oh, man.
Let me just tell you the optics of that.
If you think MAGA looks bad now, let me tell you the optics of MAGA celebrating the removal of Thomas Massey and this Galarian guy winning.
I mean, folks, you will be so disgusted.
You will be more disgusted than you've ever been with MAGA when you watch them do this.
Let's just hope we don't have to see it.
Let's just hope.
Owen Report.
Word on the street is that you're bulk maxing and DMT is lean maxing for the big Owen Report summer bash happening in July.
There might be an element of truth to a summer bash.
There might be an element of truth.
I'm not.
I actually just did a 48 hour fast.
I did a 48 hour fast.
I haven't committed to the mogging yet.
Guys, let me just say, though.
48 hour fast.
If you want to trim down and tone out, guys, just do a fast.
Just do a fast.
It's so noticeable.
It's so incredible.
You feel so good afterwards.
Believe me, the hunger pains and everything, it sucks.
I don't like doing it.
But the results afterwards, you need to be doing fasting.
You need to be doing it, folks.
Your body will thank you.
You'll like the results.
There are so many scientific studies showing the benefits of fasting.
If you're not fasting, you need to be thinking about it and figuring out how you're going to do it.
You need to be doing it, folks.
I mean, yeah, I could have.
It's like, oh, just finished my two day fast.
I could have posted two day fast results of how it toned me out.
I won't do that.
Might be a little heavy until this summer.
Maybe we'll start mogging in the summer.
But trust me, guys.
Trust me.
Two days, don't eat anything and watch what happens to your physique.
You'll be thanking me.
You should have Drew Hernandez on.
I haven't had Drew on the show yet.
We talk every once in a while.
We like Drew.
Mitch Conner, late to the show today, supporting the troops.
Good job against Wilson.
Showed everyone his little hat when he insulted the Iranian schoolgirls.
Said they were better off.
They'd be, yeah, anyway.
Yeah, that was kind of the big moment, I think.
That was kind of the biggest moment from that debate that got the most clips and the most commentary.
I think that that's fair to say.
I would say so.
ET Phone Tel Aviv.
Is that like a Bluebeam joke?
Maverick Cuba.
What are the oranges for?
There's a joke there and it's over my head.
Calling Amy Dangerfield, what was disgusting?
She wouldn't harm a fly.
Well, who did that?
Was that part of that personal drama, that personality conflict drama that was going on?
I saw that she kind of got dragged through it too.
I don't know too much about that.
Again, I don't have any problem with Amy.
She's always been nice to me.
She was actually trying to get me to be a part of that event.
I just, I'm too busy, couldn't do it, didn't really, wasn't really able to keep up with her.
Again, it's just this I don't do the personality stuff, I don't do the bickering stuff.
I don't know too much about that.
So, you know, look, you get into the political world nowadays, the mixture of the political, social media, commentary world, it's just, it's always going to happen.
And all I can try to do is just try to not get involved in it.
And that is what I tried to do.
Nick's twin sister is a Latina.
Nick backs Fishback.
Nick has a twin sister, huh?
Brittany Venti is sorry she feels that way.
Yeah, I saw all that drama too.
I have no idea what's going on with that, though.
I couldn't even begin to understand what's going on with Chrissy and Brittany and that whole crew over there.
I'm just trying to save the country and secure a better future.
All right.
You know, so I don't know.
Whatever goes on is, I don't know.
ELE is what I like to do.
ELE.
Everybody love everybody, huh?
Jacuzzi bubble bath tonight.
Don't forget.
Yeah, start heating it up.
Start getting the tub ready.
Massey primary is a bellwether election.
It's very, yeah, it's going to be very telling.
It's going to be very telling.
I'm telling you, look, if they oust Massey, I think it's a disaster.
If they think voter enthusiasm on the right is bad right now, if they unseat Massey, voter enthusiasm on the right is going to reach catastrophic levels.
People on the right, conservatives, libertarians, small government minds, they will be so disgusted that the foreign lobby can just buy seats in Congress like that right in front of everybody's face.
They'll be so disgusted by watching MAGA take a victory lap that the voter enthusiasm or the disdain that people have for the right wing will go through the roof.
And I don't think anybody's measuring it.
Now, of course, the foreign lobbyists don't care.
As long as they get their foreign policy, as long as they get a vote that supports their foreign policy, they don't give a damn about American politics as far as that's concerned.
So that's the big thing.
Again, you are sacrificing.
That's why I said this to Republicans.
I said, Are you willing to sacrifice the midterms for the war in Iran?
Because that's going to be the equation.
So it's the same thing.
Are you willing to sacrifice the midterms to get rid of Thomas Massey for the foreign influence, for the foreign interests, for the foreign donors?
Are you willing to do that?
Because that's the exchange.
That's the political trade that you are going to make.
So you might get rid of Massey and you can take your victory lap, but then you will lose everything after that.
So if you're willing to trade winning the midterms for the Warren and Rand, if you're willing to trade winning the midterms to unseat Thomas Massey, then that's what you're going to do.