Hilary Clinton Storms Out Of Epstein Hearing As Multiple Epstein Friends Resign After Controversy
Owen Shroyer dissects Hillary Clinton’s explosive Epstein hearing contradictions—testifying she never met him despite 2015 fundraiser emails—while accusing the Israeli lobby (AIPAC, Schumer) of manipulating U.S. policy toward Iran. He ties election fraud claims to a draft executive order banning mail-in ballots and criticizes DOJ’s handling of Epstein files, linking them to broader corruption. Shroyer warns of inflation eroding purchasing power as gold/silver demand surges, driven by BRICS nations and industrial tech needs, while dismissing mainstream financial advice. Ultimately, the episode frames systemic distrust in Washington, from foreign policy to election integrity, as a crisis of accountability. [Automatically generated summary]
Ladies and gentlemen, it is Thursday, February 26, 2026.
Here's what's coming up on the Owen Report today.
Patience, guys.
Don't worry.
I'm always here.
I'm always here for you.
I know you can't wait.
We love it that way.
All right.
We got some drama.
I didn't see a single Democrat.
Now, that could have been because they took a different van, but I saw the Republicans load into a van, head to the Chappaqua Art Center to do an Epstein hearing with Hillary Clinton.
I didn't see Bill there.
Where's Bill?
Well, nobody wants to be with Hillary, including Bill.
So I didn't see Bill.
Maybe that's coming next.
Hillary storms out of the hearing.
This entitled bitch storms out of the meeting because a photo gets leaked.
I'll give you all the details on that.
We'll get into some of this.
I think Hillary Clinton committed another crime today.
I want to this situation with Iran, it's such a frustrating one.
I think, though, there's no doubt, as far as I can tell, the public discourse, the public opinion, the discussions that are being had, whatever barriers there were, and this is just kind of an at-large statement.
Whatever barriers there were, generational barriers, political barriers, theological barriers, ideological barriers, whatever kind of stood in the way between the American people understanding the foreign policy in the Middle East and really everything we've seen in the last,
let's say, since the turn of the 21st century, so 25 plus years, everybody's kind of starting to understand it now.
And as far as an agenda is concerned, people on the left and the right are starting to come to the conclusion that no matter what it is, all the different barriers, all the different complex dynamic issues, debates, discussions that get had on Middle East foreign policy, there's something that outweighs it.
And that's we got our own problems.
The United States of America, we have our own problems.
We have our own corruption.
We got to figure this deal out.
So all the debates about the Middle East, again, theological, all of them, hey, it's time to just put that aside for now.
And we need to focus on our own country and fixing it and the corruption and everything else that we got to deal with here.
Now, the problem is, of course, the foreign lobby, the Israel lobby specifically, they own our government, quite literally.
And they have their interests embedded in the media, the digital media, social media, the news media, the cable media, the TV media, everywhere.
And they're trying to buy up as much real estate in the media as possible.
They're trying to claim as much real estate in the media everywhere right now to try to keep the American people on this platform.
But slowly and surely, it's starting to fade.
And a lot of Americans that maybe at one point had a major opinion on Middle East policy or even support Israel or favor the Israeli side of things, even they are starting to kind of back it off a little bit or accept that, hey, we got to deal with our own issues first.
And in the process of this, you're seeing a major crash out, a major crash out.
And this is kind of the mindset of somebody that thinks they own you.
And if I want to get controversial to open the show, boy, do I?
I don't really want to.
But, you know, you make a deal with the devil, you break that deal.
The devil feels like it has the right to, you know, 30-odd six to the neck.
But let's not get too controversial here to open up the show.
We may get into that later.
So you've got individuals in the media.
In fact, we've had some of them on the show, but they say, hey, you know what?
Maybe we need to reevaluate foreign policy.
And it's, oh, my gosh, anti-semi-Jew hater, traitor.
And they're like, what are you talking about?
We got an example of that today.
And the foreign policy is so unpopular.
It's so unpopular now.
It's probably going to determine the next two election cycles.
And usually it's just a general foreign policy discussion of Middle East foreign policy that the American people don't like.
Now it's very directional at Israel.
So that's really the only difference.
Barack Obama won in 2008.
And maybe you could say 2012, but specifically, Barack Obama won in 2008 because he went hard against George Bush's foreign policy in the Middle East.
That is what changed that election cycle.
He wasn't even supposed to beat Hillary Clinton, but he hammered the foreign policy issues in the Middle East.
He beat Hillary Clinton and then ultimately won the presidential election.
Donald Trump did a very similar thing in 2016, running against the foreign policy in the Middle East, and he won the election.
So this is the big issue that kind of gets lost in translation.
And it's the independents.
It's the centrists that can go either way.
Don't really feel loyal to any party.
Maybe they feel politically homeless, but they're sick of it.
They're sick of the war.
They're sick of the foreign spending.
They're sick of the foreign aid.
And so they're just sitting up there.
It's like, well, you know, both parties suck.
Neither really delivers for me.
But hey, they're running against this one issue.
That's big.
I think I'm going to vote this way now.
So it's likely the same thing is going to happen now in 2026 in the midterms and then 2030.
And this is why the Democrats have the edge.
But see, most people kind of look at it as a left-right thing and they say, ooh, left issues are winning or right issues are winning.
You know what?
It looks like it's the foreign policy issues that actually flip the elections.
So now Trump is walking into a situation where the Democrats are going to get to do something that is so rare.
And that's have their cake and eat it too.
Now, I guess if, you know, we got to be fair here.
There hasn't been the second round of Iran strikes yet.
They haven't done the regime change war yet.
They did Operation Midnight Hammer.
That was clearly some deal.
That was clearly some deal that Trump cut probably with the Iranians.
And he told them, hey, look, I got to get the Israelis off my back.
I got to get the Israeli lobby off my back.
I don't want war with you.
I'm not trying to have regime change war, but I got to blow something up.
So we're bringing in our guys.
We got to blow something up.
And Trump is known to do this.
He did this in Syria in his first administration.
He came out and admitted it during an ABC interview.
This is the diplomacy of Trump.
So he probably calls Iran.
He says, look, I got to blow something up.
These bloodthirsty Israelis that bought and paid for my campaign, own all of Congress.
They got to see me blow something up.
I got to blow something up.
We're going to bring in the boys.
This is the target.
You're going to let us come in.
Let us hit it.
Here's your warning.
Take whatever you want out of there.
Get it out of there.
You got 48 hours and we're blowing it up.
They say, all right.
So then they do Operation Midnight Hammer.
And this is why Trump was so gung-ho in the aftermath with the narrative saying, hey, we obliterated it.
It's over.
It's done.
It's obliterated.
And, you know, there was the pushback because it was probably, I mean, who knows how true it was as far as the actual facility is concerned with the damage.
Maybe it was obliterated.
Maybe it wasn't.
Maybe, because really, if you think about it, none of it even makes sense.
The more you actually dig into that actual story, the more you realize it makes absolutely no sense.
If we blew up their nuclear facilities or we blew up their nuclear bombs, wouldn't there be some level of fallout?
I mean, wouldn't there be something?
And no, you just blew it up.
So, okay.
So it was a narrative war.
It was, you might even call it like a false strike to get Israel off Trump's back, to get the Israeli lobby off Trump's back, to get Netanyahu out of our business.
But there was enough insight and it was probably coming from Israel.
And they were saying, no, nothing was destroyed.
So they, so they fed this information to the media.
Enough people put two and two together, realized that, yeah, nothing was really obliterated.
I mean, some facility might have been obliterated to a certain degree, but mostly just a false flag that Trump tried to run to get the warmongers off of his back.
So that's why when the media started coming out and there was Israeli media coming out saying nothing was obliterated, no strikes, nothing stopped.
It's still going.
Trump got pissed because he's like, hey, I'm trying to stop a war here.
Shapiro, Levin, Loomer, they always leave this out of the equation because the truth is they don't care about people.
There is something deeply disturbed with them.
There is something deeply wrong with them.
They get off to this.
And I will tell you, should we see a strike on Iran, you're going to see the final act in a grotesque mask off moment of these people that are going to be dancing and hopping around gleefully like little demonic gremlins at the site of more death and destruction.
And it won't matter that everybody sees it.
It won't matter that they know it's unpopular.
They can't help themselves.
It's like crack for them.
They don't even care.
It's like crack.
They won't be able to help themselves.
But they're not in Israel.
They're not going to deal with the fallout of this.
And then they love to say, oh, it's coming here next.
Yeah, because of people like you.
Yeah, you're right.
Not only are you putting Israelis in danger, which you don't care about, you're not over there conveniently for you.
Then you say, oh, now America's in danger.
Yeah, because of you.
And so then what it is, well, now we got to completely destroy everything.
Now we got to kill them all.
We want nothing to do with your bloodlust.
We want nothing to do with your addiction to death and destruction.
It's psychotic.
There's something deeply disturbed with you.
You need to find Jesus.
You need to find serious psychological help.
You are a deeply disturbed human being that gets off on death and destruction and has hatred in their heart.
And we, the American people, want nothing to do with it anymore.
So they all know.
They all know it's unpopular.
So this message from Chuck Schumer, folks, I think they're about to, I think they're about to get one over big time on Trump here.
And, you know, I understand the mindset.
I understand the thought process that everything is rigged, everything is controlled.
And there's definitely an element.
There's definitely a level of truth to that.
But no, things do happen.
There are natural and organic movements in politics.
So Chuck Schumer is now baiting Trump into striking Iran.
I want to play this clip from you, for you, from Chuck Schumer.
So why is Chuck Schumer baiting Trump into striking Iran, baiting Trump into a war with Iran, baiting Trump into a regime change in Iran?
Now, if what he says is true about the side deals, which probably some effort there, because yeah, despite the Israeli lobby and all the bloodlust in D.C., I don't think this administration wants a larger war.
I don't.
And so, yeah, they have to play this.
They have to play this saber-rattling game for the public to see.
And that's what the Israeli lobby wants.
But behind the scenes, they're like, look, we don't want a war with you guys.
But you know, we got these people behind our back with blood dripping off of their teeth, you know.
And we know what happens.
We know what happens.
So we don't want to die either.
So you might think, well, this is because Washington, D.C. is controlled by the Israeli lobby.
Our foreign policy is controlled by the Israeli lobby.
But no, actually, Chuck Schumer is making a genius move here.
Chuck Schumer is actually making a masterpiece move on Trump right now, trying to bait Trump.
And I anticipate this will continue.
Whatever different method or mechanism the Democrats try to use, because they all cheered for the Iran strikes at the State of the Union.
I think the Democrats are trying to make a masterpiece move on Trump right now.
And they can have their cake and eat it too.
If they can bait Trump into striking Iran, they know that hands the Democrats the midterms.
So the Democrats get to have their cake and eat it too.
They get to appease the Israeli lobby by calling for war with Iran, by supporting for it, by supporting it, calling for strikes, voting for strikes, whatever it takes.
They get to appease the Israeli lobby with their political action.
And then in the midterms, they get to take the House and they get to take the Senate because if Trump strikes Iran, it's over.
It's over.
That will be handing the Democrats the midterms.
And folks, I will tell you this, and I've never been one that supports the idea that Texas would turn blue.
I will tell you this right now.
If Trump does a war in the Middle East, maybe he can get away with more strikes.
Maybe he can find a way to do it.
If there's a larger war in the Middle East, Texas will go blue.
Texas will go blue.
This will be the election.
And if Texas goes blue, that's the Democrats' wet dream.
And now what are you going to do?
The Democrats have Texas, California, and New York.
It's over.
It's done.
Forget about 2030.
Maybe even forget about 2034.
If the Democrats turn Texas blue, it's game over.
Game over.
Check me.
There's no overcoming it.
I think that's what they're doing.
I think the Democrats want Trump to strike Iran.
I think they're going to do everything they can to bait Trump into striking Iran.
They know if Trump strikes Iran, for sure, if Trump gets into another war in the Middle East, it is over.
If there's a 1% chance that the Republicans can keep the House and the Senate, it will be 0% if Trump does more Middle East intervention.
Zero.
Zero.
And in that regard, would that make Trump the greatest Republican ever?
Or no, the greatest Democrat ever.
Isn't that ironic?
If Trump flips Texas blue, he will be the greatest Democrat of all time.
Now, aside from the political gamesmanship, aside from the political commentary, political results, we better hope this doesn't happen.
We better hope this doesn't happen.
We don't need more death and destruction in the Middle East.
We don't need more death and destruction on our dime.
We don't need it.
We have to stop this.
We have to get these diabolical creatures that influence this out of our politics and off of our backs.
We have to have a complete about face on all of this now.
All of it.
And it feels like we're right on that edge right now.
It feels like we're right on that edge with all with everything happening as far as the military buildup, with everything happening with the Israeli lobby and Netanyahu.
It looks like we are right against the edge of this, folks.
And if and if we do this and Trump doesn't manage it right, the political fallout will be so bad that I actually think if you can put it into how bad, Texas turns blue bad.
That's how bad.
And then it'll be the worst political irony of all time As you have this buildup, this narrative, Trump is the greatest Republican since Reagan.
Trump will go down as the new Republican standard, and Trump will end up turning Texas blue, something the Democrats have been trying to do for decades, and then Trump gives it to him.
Talk about irony.
Now, this is also coming out of DC.
I would share the original source for this, which was the Washington Post, but it's behind a paywall, so I can't.
I need to just get the subscription so I can share that for you guys.
Report: anti-voting activists coordinating with White House on blatantly illegal draft emergency order to take control of elections.
A draft emergency executive order to declare a national emergency to allow President Trump to take unprecedented control over voting is being circulated by anti-voting activists who said they are in coordination with the White House, according to a Washington Post report.
The draft order, which is said to be based on a conspiracy theory that China interfered with the 2020 election, would allow Trump to unilaterally ban mail-in ballots and voting machines on the basis that they are susceptible to foreign interference.
Now, the result here, how can you argue with this?
Mail-in ballots should be illegal.
Voting machines should be illegal.
Now, what's ironic, as far as the China angle is concerned, I don't know if anybody would be surprised if China was interfering.
I don't think that's such shocking news or developments.
But it's not China.
The real, the huge theft, the huge crimes and the huge theft of the 2020 election is pretty well documented.
Now, is there a voter machine issue?
Certainly could be.
I don't like the voting machines.
I don't trust the voting machines.
It's been proven that they can be hacked.
And maybe that is why in the five swing states, you had the vote Viagra for Biden, where Trump is winning all day long.
And then right at the buzzer, Biden gets the straight-up spike and gives him just enough votes to win the five swing states.
Maybe there's an explanation for that.
You know, my issue would be, and I think this is a fair gripe with Trump, is this happened when he was president, and he let it happen, and he let him get away with it.
But I guess we can drop that.
We watched, we physically saw with our own two eyes how the Democrats were cheating at the ground level, stuffing the mail-in drop boxes.
They broke state constitutional laws and said, oh, we're just doing mail-in ballots totally against the law.
They broke, I mean, all kinds of all backdated, moving ballots over state lines, fake votes through voting mail.
We watched them double and triple counting ballots in blue cities where they know Joe Biden got 70% of the vote.
So they just feed that same 70% over and over and over and over into the tabulation machines.
And eventually you get that gap.
We know that happened.
So I just don't know how much this angle is going to hit.
Again, I'm not sitting here like, oh, China didn't do anything.
Oh, leave China alone.
No, look, China interfered, whatever.
We sat there and watched how they cheat And nothing was done about it.
And now here comes Trump after he let them steal it, saying we're going to federalize these elections.
I don't know.
This is a little.
Could this be the Republicans in panic?
Could this be the true powers and movers and shakers in DC knowing that this election result is about to be a disaster for them?
And so they want to take control of it.
Of course, the irony would be: if this is legitimate to save our elections, and we all hope it is, we know what that's going to result in.
The Democrats are going to win.
So this is a real mixed bag.
But the rumor is the Trump administration is going to make an announcement.
They're going to blame it all on China.
And then they're going to pass this executive order federalizing elections and writing the law for the entire country when it comes to elections.
And then there's going to be a massive legal fight.
So that could be the big problem here.
This could end up at the Supreme Court.
And if that's the case, then you probably won't even get a result on this before the midterms.
And so, whatever the agenda is, it's not going to impact the midterms, is my guess, because this is going to get buried in a legal fight.
This is what David Becker, the executive director for the Center of Election Innovation and Research, former DOJ Civil Rights Division attorney, he says, What a gift such a clearly unconstitutional executive order would be, though divorced from legal and factual reality, it would enable the courts to invalidate this power grab well in advance of the election and confirms the clear limits to federal interference in elections.
So I think that's a translation of what I just said: that they can't, they won't be able to do this before the midterms.
Or they can establish a law and it'll block them from doing this before the midterms.
And then you can never fix the elections, which would be even worse.
She was testifying in a closed-door hearing today.
I guess it was just Hillary.
I didn't see Bill.
The Democrats weren't really building it up.
I can't tell if there were any Democrats that were even there or if it was just Republicans.
It might even still be ongoing.
So I guess Bill was a no-show, or maybe he's doing his later.
You know, I don't know.
Maybe Bill's skiing right now, skiing and having some lady friends or something like that.
So this happens.
So Lauren Bobert shares this image with a very subtle watermark from the Benny Johnson show.
I mean, you can't even see it.
It's so subtle.
It's like you would have never known this was from the Benny Johnson.
So this watermark is so subtle.
But if you look closely, you can see Benny Johnson's show logo on it.
If you really look closely, it's so hard to see, but there it is.
So, so Lauren Bobert snaps this picture, sends it to Benny Johnson, and he posts it on social media.
Someone tells Hillary Clinton's legal team this in the middle of the hearing, and she storms out and talks about how it's all illegal because it's supposed to be a closed-door hearing.
Now, Lauren Boebert came out and said there was nothing illegal about it.
Benny Johnson did nothing wrong, whatever.
And apparently the hearing resumed.
Apparently.
But it's all tough to know.
This should be a public hearing.
We shouldn't have to deal with this crap.
This should all be a public hearing.
Why it's not is just stupid and beyond me.
But when it all went down, it was almost like they were prepared for this to a certain degree, but I suppose they probably just had this press conference ready to go immediately after people would step to the podium, whatever, make statements, take questions from the press.
But this is the moment after Hillary stormed out, and then they were alerting the press what happened.
unidentified
I'm actually assuming that can you explain the picture really?
So I can only assume that the hearing did continue.
But I've seen nothing.
I've seen nothing since then.
As soon as we get an update, I'll let you know.
If they go live for a press conference, we can pick that up as well.
But I've seen no updates since then.
Now, apparently, Hillary stated, now she's under oath in this hearing.
Apparently, she said she never met Epstein.
Now, we know that these people are above the law and they lie under oath all the time.
Because according to some emails, I just have one.
This is just one I have, but there's others that are actually probably more damning than this.
But we already covered this one.
Remember, Luttnick with Canner Fitzgerald had a fundraising event for Hillary Clinton when she was running for president against Donald Trump in 2015.
And so maybe there's some plausible deniability from this email, but this was Epstein that organized the fundraiser.
And you can see the emails between Luttnick and Epstein's team here.
Now, again, like I said, there's other emails that are probably more damning than that.
So we'll see if anything develops there.
But they lie under oath all the time.
Nobody is ever held accountable.
Now, Rokana and Thomas Massey had a brief press conference yesterday as they tried to get the co-conspirators' names from the files, and they realized that the DOJ took them down.
Pam Bondi is, I can't believe how corrupt Pam Bondi is.
She's likely going to get impeached.
Maybe worse, honestly, at this point.
Pam Bondi might just be engaging in outright criminal behavior at this point.
But here's RoConna and Thomas Massey addressing this.
How can they be confident that the Attorney General Bondi leading this charge or others who are in charge of providing documents that they really will do so in the interest of justice?
Well, I think that, first artist, you have a bipartisan bipartisan oversight committee actually working to cover, not cover up, but actually go into all of this, right?
We're interviewing the Clintons tomorrow.
But to be clear, I mean, the destruction of evidence occurred under previous administrations.
And that in itself, if you look at the network that was involved with Jeffrey Epstein, I mean, to think that there aren't shady things happening in your government, I think would just be a lie to the American people.
The fact is, is that we did have someone come forward.
They did say that there was destruction of evidence under the former deputy director of the FBI.
And even if you're looking at the original plea deals that Jeffrey Epstein was given, you know, when he was first charged, and then also to more recently when he then committed suicide in New York, I mean, he should have never gotten off.
He should have never had his sentences dropped down to the way that he did.
And they're all, there are marks of intelligence surrounding this as well, whether it was foreign or you know our own, but I don't think that we're ever going to get the full picture.
This is the first time we've seen this related to a giant case, but I can tell you some things that don't make sense from the medical examiner's office.
We know that the chief medical examiner didn't perform the autopsy.
She had an individual in her office perform the autopsy.
And the noose that was at the center of this, Michael Bodden, the forensic pathologist who was hired by Jeffrey Epstein's brother to observe the autopsy, said that there was no blood on the noose, even though there's blood on Jeffrey Epstein's neck in the photographs.
We're learning from the documents that the guard who cut Jeffrey Epstein down says he's not sure where which noose was given to the investigators.
Now, again, most of this you can put two and two together by even kind of doing basic surface level investigation into the Epstein fake suicide.
Again, he points out the obvious ones.
You can see Epstein's neck is all bloody.
There's no blood on the noose.
I mean, he can go on and on.
He talks about the time of death, the reports, all of this.
It doesn't add up.
Something fishy is going on.
So you go back to Bongino and Patel, who prior to their time at the FBI didn't believe that Epstein killed himself.
Very adamant about that, very adamant about not dropping the case, very adamant about Epstein being a foreign spy, a foreign agent, all of this stuff.
Then they get into the FBI.
All of a sudden, they're doing multiple interviews.
He killed himself.
What is going on?
I don't even, I won't even get conspiratorial here.
I mean, it's just a fair question.
What is going on?
It doesn't make any sense.
And if it doesn't add up, you know it's corrupt.
Story's not going anywhere.
Here's a couple of the latest scalps, though.
CEO of the World Economic Forum quits after Epstein ties come to light.
That would be the president and CEO of the World Economic Forum, Borg Brende, said he was stepping down due to an investigation into his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein.
He had been the president of the WEF since 2017.
Announced his decision in a statement following disclosures from the U.S. Justice Department that showed the Norwegian had three business dinners with Epstein and also communicated with the disgraced financier via email and text message.
Lawrence Summers will resign from Harvard after Epstein revelations.
Mr. Summers, former president of Harvard, had stepped back from teaching after documents showed a closer relationship to Jeffrey Epstein than previously known.
He will leave at the end of the academic year.
How about leave now?
How about get your ass out of there now?
Whatever.
Harvard sucks now, anyway.
Bunch of freaks.
Bunch of damn freaks.
And we just want them out.
We want them out of our political system.
We want them out of any connection to our government, financial institutions, business institutions, all of it.
Can we just get rid of the satanic pedophile freaks, please?
unidentified
You're listening to the Owen Report on the Win Network.
House Doe's chair, Representative Tim Burchett, announces he's launching hearings to determine how many federal dollars were spent in the congressional slush fund to pay off victims of sexual misconduct by members of Congress after being asked by Representative Anna Paulina Luna.
Exposing Injustice in Child Molestation Sentencing00:10:19
I believe it was Luna, death penalty for all child molesters.
You know, we've gotten a little soft.
Let's be honest.
Nancy Mace.
Here's that right here.
Representative Nancy Mace introduces a bill to authorize the death penalty for child rapists.
Bill sends an unmistakable message: child rapists will pay the ultimate price.
So this is from her official website.
Congresswoman Nancy Mace introduced the Death Penalty for Child Rapists Act, legislation that would authorize capital punishment for individuals convicted of aggravated sexual abuse, sexual abuse of a minor, and abusive sexual contact offenses against children under federal law and the rape of a child under the Uniform Code of Military Justice.
Quote from Nancy Mace: We have zero mercy for child rapists.
Those who prey on our most vulnerable deserve the harshest consequence we can deliver.
No predator should be allowed to walk away from the most unthinkable crimes against children.
The bill is simple: rape a child and you don't get a second chance.
You get the death penalty.
We will never apologize for protecting America's children.
This legislation builds on Representative, okay?
So, there's some promotion there.
And there's the bill.
You can find all of this at her website.
Nice, short, simple bill.
Yeah, you can't really be against this.
I think there's a fair debate.
I think there's a fair debate on capital punishment.
I do.
I do.
And mostly it's because, not that I would argue, a child rapist should die.
I'm not disagreeing with that.
Here's the problem with capital punishment.
And I don't even look at it from a moral thing.
I don't think it's immoral to kill a child rapist at all.
Think it's actually very moral.
The problem is they get things wrong.
There have been instances where people have been convicted and they are later found innocent.
People that are on death row and later get found innocent.
So this stuff does happen.
There's also a movie, and this is more of the spiritual side of things.
What was the name of that movie?
It's a very interesting movie if you haven't seen it.
You guys know the movie.
The guy's in prison.
He's possessed by a demon.
And then they give him the death penalty.
I know I got the chat open.
One of you guys know the movie I'm talking about.
Very interesting movie.
Oh, you guys are putting out some other movies.
Deliverance, Green Mile.
I'm talking specifically of this movie where it's a guy in jail.
Nefarious.
Yes, Nefarious.
That's the one.
Thank you guys.
So there, yeah, okay.
Well, there's other movies out there.
That's the only, I think that's the only fair pushback against the death penalty is that they do get cases wrong.
They do.
And you don't want that to happen one time.
So that's the only case against the death penalty.
I think, though, when something is so clear with zero, it's always supposed to be zero doubt, but I mean, you know, caught on camera, caught in the act, whatever it is, there's probably cases where, yeah.
I think there's a fair, you know, caught one time, life, caught two times, which you shouldn't even be allowed to catch, be caught two times, but I guess if you get multiples before you get caught, death, you're done, you're out.
And this is what's so crazy.
I tell people this just because I've been through the system.
The DOJ treats child molesters as soft as anything.
You wouldn't believe it, guys.
The current standard of justice against child molesters will break your heart.
It'll break your heart.
The DOJ, and this is at the federal level, the DOJ will punish somebody for selling marijuana more harshly than they will for somebody that molests a child.
That's a fact.
I mean, I could even get into more detail of this.
The ghost drugs phenomenon that they have.
We're talking about marijuana, where it's legal in, what, 20 states now?
The DOJ treats people that sell marijuana more harshly than they do child molesters.
And what's even crazier is child molesters get treated more harshly by prisoners than they do by the DOJ.
And even in the prison system, which is like its own, it's like its own world, really.
But even in the prison system, it's like they, you can tell.
It's like you can tell the difference between a Chomo and somebody that gets busted with, you know, a 17-year-old.
You can tell.
You might run into a guy that gets busted with a girl that was 17, 16, didn't tell him, finds out later, gets busted.
And the guy that's a straight up kitty diddler, a guy that's a straight-up Chomo.
Most prisons, Chomos can't even walk the yard.
Either because someone just wants to take out, they have a bad day, find the Chomo, beat his ass.
They have different prison gang initiations.
You have to beat up a child molester to get into the prison gang.
I had a situation where I was eventually put into a cell with a prison gang member.
And the only reason they swapped me in because the person that he used to be cellmates with was a child molester.
And he told the guards, he said, look, you realize when you close that door, I'm going to beat his ass because you guys know I'm in the gang.
And you know that in order to stay in my gang, I have to beat his ass.
So they were like, okay.
So they took the chomo out, put me in.
That's federal prison for you.
You'll get, you get caught selling marijuana.
You'll get eight years.
They'll start you in a medium security prison for selling marijuana.
Eight years, start you in a medium prison.
A child molester, maybe two years, and they start you in a low security prison.
No, we should have way less tolerance.
And if I'm Nancy Mace, I understand what she's doing.
I don't mind it.
But you might have to find a way to get this to pass.
Maybe people stand against capital punishment.
maybe you have an issue there, you might be able to actually get something passed by making sure it's like minimum life sentence.
Child molester, minimum life sentence.
And then, you know, you kind of go from there.
But yeah, what you need to do, crime is so out of control.
And that's partly because some of the worst criminals get off.
It's the same thing that happens in these cities, you know, carjackings, petty theft, whatever.
And they'll get arrested 20 times and never do any time.
And so they know, okay, if I get caught, it's a very little punishment.
So they just keep getting caught.
They don't care.
So you have to make an example.
And I think that that's one that 99%, 99% of America would agree that we need to treat child molesters with a way harsher response from the Justice Department.
But most people don't even know that it's that bad.
All right.
We got a couple of good things here.
I voted for this.
Finally, and I voted for this.
Trump administration withholds $259 million in Medicaid funds from Minnesota amid war on fraud.
Vice President JD Vance and Dr. Oz, they did a press conference on this today, presented the plan on Wednesday saying they are confident that people will not be hurt in Minnesota.
So this is like a good start.
I would say this is where the Trump administration needs to start putting the foot down right here.
They need to cut.
This is like not even scratching the surface, but okay, it's a good start.
Any sanctuary city, 100% cut all their any federal aid should be cut from a sanctuary city.
And if you really want to get serious, you call up the Democrat mayors because most of these will be in Democrat states, not all.
Most will be in Democrat states.
But you call up the mayors and you say, you have a sanctuary city.
We are cutting all the federal aid until you remove this sanctuary city status.
All federal aid cut.
And you watch, they will move so fast, you'd be like Flash Gordon.
So this is a nice start.
We need to really put the foot down on this deal.
Stop all federal funding to any sanctuary city.
Cut all federal funding to any of these states that have a sanctuary city until they remove them.
And cut all federal funding from any program that's been caught in fraud until they promise to clean up the act.
This is drain the swamp.
And really, there need to be dozens, if not hundreds of arrests in response to this.
And if I was Trump, you know, he does all the saber rattling of Iran and everything else.
How about a little saber rattling of the own of the criminals we have in this country?
How about come out and make a statement?
Here's one for you.
I've been talking to some of my legal advisors.
We have a situation called sanctuary cities.
It's really unbelievable if you think about it, but we've been dealing with sanctuary cities here.
What does that mean?
It means that they allow criminals.
That's what it means.
They allow criminals safe harbor.
If you did this, you'd be considered a criminal.
You'd be arrested.
Why can these mayors do it?
They shouldn't be allowed to do it.
So we're going to have a policy we're looking at right now.
We're talking to some of the legal experts.
It looks like a pretty open shut case, if I'm being honest.
And we think it might be time to arrest sanctuary city mayors for aiding and abetting in crime.
You can't do that.
You can't give safe harbor to criminals.
That's a crime.
So we're looking at that.
Maybe we'll give them some time.
Maybe they can decide to change the policy, but we're looking into it.
And I think it's a pretty open shut case, really.
We've got good legal teams here.
They tell me it's pretty good.
If you're a sanctuary city mayor, we are coming to arrest you.
I think it's time.
You can't do that.
Nobody's above the law.
We hear it all the time.
So you're not above the law eater.
You're committing a crime, actually.
It's what you're doing.
You're committing a crime.
You can't do that.
So we want to let the sanctuary city mayors know.
Maybe we'll be nice.
Maybe we'll be nice.
Maybe it's too nice, but we're going to let you know.
I think we're coming for you.
I think we're coming.
I think it's time you're going to get arrested.
You're committing crimes.
We can't have it.
They're making our cities unsafe.
We all know it.
This is going to be a way to stop the crime.
So the sanctuary city mayors, you've been warned.
You've been put on warning that you better clean it up.
You better change the policy.
My legal team tells me this is a pretty good one right here, actually.
It's a pretty good one.
So we're going to be looking at different ways to deal with it.
But quite frankly, I'm out of patience.
Honestly, I'm out of patience.
And so are the American people.
They don't want to deal with this.
They don't like it.
And it's ridiculous.
Actually, it's outrageous.
Maybe think about it.
Maybe think about it because I think it's time to arrest you.
FBI Director Kash Patel ordered the firings of at least 10 staffers at the agency who were involved in the federal investigation into President Donald Trump's mishandling of classified documents.
It's all such BS.
Continuing a broader crackdown on officials who were involved in federal prosecutions of Trump before his second term.
We'll go after the people that made the orders.
Let's get serious here.
Let's not dip our toe in the water.
It's like, hey, I like this.
This is good.
This is what I voted for.
But it's like, let's not dip our toe in the water here.
Let's dive in.
Let's cut all the federal aid to these damn corrupt cities and states.
Let's arrest all these corrupt agents for what they did until they tell us what went down, and then we can decide who stays in prison and who doesn't.
Let's get serious, please.
Whenever Cash's hangover is, yeah, I mean, he was drinking with the hockey boys.
It'd be nice.
Guys, remember, we showed you the Google search trends about I can't sell my house.
Another alarming Google search trend is basically running parallel with this.
Here's the can't sell house trend.
Here's the can't pay mortgage trend higher than ever.
By the way, this is when Trump got elected, so it's not like this is going anywhere.
Again, it's just whenever Trump says this stuff, I don't think he understands how it just doesn't land.
It's just, it's not landing.
No, the economy is not good.
No, people are not feeling the relief.
It doesn't work.
It's not true.
It's really bad.
Let's just be honest about it.
And then it's like, wow, Americans are struggling to get by, but hey, don't worry.
Anytime we need the money for a war, we have unlimited funding, unlimited funding for foreign interests.
No matter what, you can't afford your mortgage.
Screw you.
We got more money for a foreign interest on the other side of the planet.
We covered yesterday, yesterday or earlier this week, how part of Trump's peace deal and part of the board of peace, apparently, supposedly, was Israel would not be allowed to move into the West Bank.
Israel would not be allowed to settle the West Bank.
Well, like every other part of the peace agreement, Israel has violated it.
And this is just the latest one.
And so this was the story.
This was the development.
U.S. will offer embassy services in a West Bank settlement for the first time ever.
Palestinians and Israelis on the right and the left all say that the move is a step towards legitimizing the Israeli settlements, which most of the world considers illegal.
And President Trump said he wouldn't allow under the peace deal.
And I'm telling you guys, everybody's mismeasuring this.
And I understand why.
There's so much propaganda.
There's so much misinformation, disinformation, cover-ups, all of it.
So a lot of people are not understanding this.
In fact, do I have?
No, I don't think I have the post.
You may have seen it.
It kind of went viral, but this, you know, if we strike Iran and there's like a World War III alignment in the international community, it'll be the UK, the NATO countries, the U.S. and Israel versus Iran, Russia, China, the rest of it.
And I'm sitting here saying, you guys really have no clue, do you?
The rest of the world will not be on Israel's side.
It is not going to happen.
India might be the only one.
India might be the only one.
But the curious situation with India is that they are in the BRICS nations, and all the BRICS nations are going to be aligned against Israel's interests.
So I'm not so sure of India.
That might be the only other country that will stand with Israel should something like this break out.
No, the UK will not.
No, NATO countries will not.
I showed you the document.
I showed you the declaration from those countries this week where they're already saying they won't.
America will be 100% isolated with Israel if that goes down that way.
Let's hope it doesn't.
But here's just more of it.
This was in Canada.
CRA revokes charitable status of Canadian Zionist Cultural Association and Canada Charity Partners.
So this was these charity groups out of Canada.
They've been around for a while.
The Canadian Zionist Cultural Association and Canada Charity Partners have lost their charitable status.
And that's because Canada does not support Israel's actions.
And so the Canadian Zionist Association, they actually published, this was their official statement.
Dear friends, we are writing to share the unfortunate news that after more than 50 years of operations, Canada Revenue Agency has revoked the charitable status of the Canadian Zionist Cultural Association.
Effective immediately, the organization can no longer issue charitable tax receipts for DOE nations.
So there you go.
And AIPAC is going that direction.
Now, those slithery snakes are going to find a way to buy and sell our politicians either way.
But here's a statement from Netanyahu thanking APAC.
That's not been easy because over the past two years, we've all been subjected to a tsunami of lies, vilifications, vituperations that are reminiscent of the worst anti-Semitic attacks in history.
I know you and APAC have been suffering such attacks.
The American Jewish community and other, don't you understand?
If you don't want a foreign lobbyist to control your foreign policy, and if you don't want your tax dollars to the tunes of hundreds of billions of dollars to go to a foreign country, in this case, Israel, you're an anti-Semite.
Don't you understand?
Don't you get it, slave?
Don't you get it, Goyam?
Your job is to work and give your money to Israel.
The entire purpose of America is to defend and protect Israel.
Oh, it's everything against Israel is against you too.
And you need to be reminded of that, American.
You need to be reminded of that.
That every action Israel takes, which is why the whole world is looking at them snarling and growling, fed up, everything Israel does, that's also you, America.
So as Israel bombs seven countries and as Israel makes the entire world turn it against itself, that's on you too, America.
That's you.
You have to back us up now, okay?
This is like the kid at the bar that keeps starting fights and then wants his friends to back him up every time.
This is like the kid at the playground that keeps starting fights and wants you to back him up every time.
And then there's Randy Fine kicked out of 109 buffets.
Randy Fine doubles down on anti-Muslim comments.
Florida leaders speak out on religious hate.
This guy is such a monster.
He's also a bad person.
And so the lawyer, this is the same lawyer, this Muslim law group.
You know, I'm not sure.
It's kind of like there's not many details, but apparently, Laura Loomer lost a lawsuit versus CARE.
Apparently, Laura Luber lost a lawsuit against CARE, and this was the legal group, Muslim Law, that represented CARE in that case.
Apparently, still not sure exactly what is going on with that.
But this is the same legal group, Muslim Law.
Now they just made an announcement.
They will be going after Randy Fine.
unidentified
Breaking news.
Just today, we at Muslim Legal have joined the ADC engine units in filing a federal lawsuit against Congressman Randy Fine for violating the free speech First Amendment rights of Americans.
Randy Fine is known as the most vile member of Congress.
He uses his platform to justify the killing of children.
He actually celebrates the killing of children aside from promoting hate and demonizing different religious groups that don't share his faith.
With that being said, we filed a lawsuit against him because while he spews hate, he can't stand to receive hate.
And he's been illegally and in violation of the Constitution blocking people that have criticized the hatred and the vitro and the evil rhetoric that he espouses.
So we filed a federal lawsuit to hold him accountable.
And you can follow the great work, inshallah, both on our page and on the ADC page and support the great work the ADC does.
It's an honor to work with them to protect the U.S. Constitution and the First Amendment for all Americans with Salam Lani.
So if you don't know who Tyler Oliviera is or Nick Shirley, most of you probably do by now, but Tyler Oliviera has been around for quite some time.
He's got a very big YouTube channel and he goes around the world doing all kinds of coverage.
There's no specific direction.
It's full spectrum coverage.
He's been everywhere.
He's covered everything and he's gained millions of followers doing so.
And obviously, then there's Nick Shirley, who has kind of recently come to some fame and developed a massive following.
Most famously, a couple months ago, exposing the fraud, the Somali fraud in Minnesota or adding to that expose and going viral and then testifying.
And so, okay.
Now, recently, Tyler Oliviera was at a Jewish community in New Jersey, which we're starting to learn more about as far as some of the other local communities surrounding it are concerned.
And apparently, this is nothing new, but again, Tyler goes there and exposes it.
So he exposes how there's this community, this Jewish community in New Jersey that is basically taking advantage of taxpayer dollars.
Maybe not as, you know, maybe there's an open debate as far as interpretation of the fraud and the levels of it, but it's basically the same essence.
You have a Jewish community that is just living off the taxpayer dull and engaging in all types of behavior that basically relies on taxpayer dollars and a privileged status.
So you might say, in some way, shape or form, very similar to what got exposed in the Somali communities in Minnesota.
Well, of course, as we're watching this develop, Nick Shirley and his expose of the Somali fraud gets massive attention.
He's testifying in Congress.
He's being celebrated by everybody.
And of course, there is the right-wing Zionist Jewish community that wants you to hate Muslims.
So they take this from the Muslim angle.
They say, see, Muslims are your enemy.
You have to hate them.
And they make sure Nick Shirley gets propped up in such regards.
And then those same people are attacking Tyler and they're saying, how dare you do this?
You're not allowed to expose Jews.
This is so anti-Semitic.
But virtually it's the same thing.
So this has kind of been floating around for the last couple of months.
Well, Tyler recently shared this video of about an hour and a half documentary on New Jersey and the Jewish community living off the taxpayer dollar.
And now all of a sudden, all of these right-wingers, because they were attacking Tyler Oliviera, because you dare not say anything about a Jewish community.
If it's a Muslim, then yes, you can hate them and want to wreck them and expose them.
But if it's a Jew, well, then now it's off limits.
Okay.
Well, Nick Shirley responds to one of Tyler's videos and he just says, expose it all.
So again, I guess Nick Shirley saw enough of this video that convinced him, oh, look, there's a lot of fraud happening here.
There's an entire community living off the taxpayer dollar, just like what I exposed.
So Nick Shirley shows support for Tyler, who does similar work and says, expose it all.
And the entire right-wing conservative Inc. establishment is now turning on Nick Shirley, just like that.
The same people that propped him up and praised him for exposing the fraud in the Somali community are now attacking him for supporting Tyler, who's exposing fraud in a Jewish community.
They're all turning on him.
They're all attacking him.
Unbelievable stuff to witness.
The double standards, the hypocrisy, the loyalties, all exposed in one swoop to an unbelievable level.
And you know, you know, Loomer had to jump in on this.
So here's the example from Loomer.
A lot of people have buyers' remorse for supporting another influencer who took the bait.
She's talking about Shirley.
How many GOP lawmakers were photographed with this person?
How many White House officials praised him?
GOP heading into the midterms with a massive optics issue, and we get nothing but silence.
What?
You just showed what a hypocrite you are.
You just showed what a fraud you are.
You just exposed yourself, not Nick Shirley, you.
So why is it now all the work that Nick Shirley did that you supported and praised and made sure everybody saw it?
Why is it now that he's bad when he's also supporting somebody else that does similar work?
Incredible.
Now, for Nick Shirley, this is almost some form of a redemption arc because people were kind of curious about, you know, how he got propped up and the people were doing it.
It looks like that was all organic.
So yeah, this is what the Zionist right wing does.
They see you exposing Muslims and then they can build hatred of Muslims off of that.
They praise you.
They prop you up.
They make sure everybody sees it.
Oh, but you don't dare apply that in their direction.
You don't dare apply that there to a Jewish community.
Now they want you destroyed.
Now they're saying you're the bad guy.
So Shirley has the redemption arc and the Zionist right has completely exposed themselves as the double standard hypocrites that they are.
An unbelievable thing.
Or maybe not so much.
Just to put a little, just to put a little icing on that cake, though.
Here's Laura Loomer, January 2024.
Today, Nikki Haley went on CNBC and called for us to bomb Iran.
Nikki Haley wants more war in the Middle East, which means more dead U.S. soldiers.
The only person who has proven that he won't create more wars is Donald Trump.
And now Laura Loomer is saying bomb Iran every day.
And by the way, this isn't the only post from Laura saying we shouldn't get more involved in the Middle East.
It's funny how she's completely changed her stance on that.
Was she always a fraud?
What changed her mind?
It's amazing how they just move like that, though.
They all just move in unison against Nick Shirley, against the war, for the war, against Candace.
I mean, they all just move in unison.
Laura was against Charlie Kirk, raging against Charlie Kirk.
Now it's the big Charlie Kirk thing.
It's amazing how they just move in unison like that.
And we're all seeing it.
Now, this goes back to the APAC thing that I was talking about earlier.
Now, you do have a dissident right and a dissident left that is eventually going to find this bridge and common ground on foreign policy and foreign influence.
And it's already really happening.
It's more acceptable on the left.
And I think they're going to run with it in the midterms.
But here's what people are going to find out very soon.
We covered this a few weeks ago.
Now that APAC has been totally exposed and unpopular, APAC is now basically creating different shell fundraisers, different shell committees, so that APAC can still continue its work to promote the Israel interests, but they don't have to use the negative aura around APAC to do it anymore.
So this is a popular, I guess, liberal anti-establishment, liberal leftist woman has a very big audience.
And she's calling this out and she's hammering the Democrats on this.
She's hammering the Democrats for their fraud on this issue.
Hakeem Jeffries is compromised and he needs to resign.
Serious members of the progressive caucus have got to quit playing patty cake with this guy.
He is a corporate Dem through and through and he is a fascist collaborator.
There's no question that Chuck Schumer is as well.
But we will not retain our democracy with the Democratic Party taking money from Palantir.
We are not going to retain our country with the Democratic Party taking donations from APAC.
The corporate Dems are controlled opposition.
Chuck Schumer is controlled opposition, and it gets worse, you guys.
It gets worse.
Pop this up.
Matthew Eady recently discovered how APAC is hiding its donations using three campaigns for, you guessed it, Hakeem Jeffries, aka APAC Shakur.
I created a graphic to help you understand how the secret campaigns are structured and why you won't be able to see APAC and FEC filings, but APAC will still be able to track donations through unique IDs and show candidates how much their network has donated to buy pro-Israel votes.
And here is the graph.
You can see it here, APAC.
And then we have the democracy engine, three of these that are funneled through Hakeem Jeffries.
So let's review here.
Keep this up.
Hakeem Jeffries is Palantir first.
Hakeem Jeffries is Israel first.
How can Hakeem Jeffries care about immigrant children when he doesn't care about Palestinian children?
And he takes money from a genocidal government that's ran by a war criminal, a far-right fascist war criminal, Benjamin Netanyahu that funded Hamas.
And then you see all this money they're filtering in to candidates.
And so here's how it works, you guys.
APAC directs its donors to the pro-Israel network website via email campaigns.
And then the pro-Israel network uses Democracy Engine as its payment processor.
That's APAC Shakur.
That's Hakeem Jeffries.
And then donations are recorded as individual donations from Democracy Engine.
In the back end, each pro-Israel network campaign is recorded with a unique ID.
The Democratic Party cannot be for a blank check to Israel, who is run by a war criminal, Benjamin Netanyahu.
We cannot be this party.
This is a uniparty.
Hakeem Jeffries and Chuck Schumer are controlled opposition full stop.
They take money from MAGA donors and then they get on camera and lie to the American people.
And you might say, Jennifer, quit browbeating Democrats.
I can get on here all day long and I can browbeat Republicans because tomorrow Trump's going to do something more illegal, more unethical.
He's going to cover up more child rape stuff from the Epstein files.
It's going to happen every single day.
And the Republicans are going to allow him to do it.
But the Democrats have to be in opposition.
And when you find out the Democratic leadership is taking money from Palantir and APAC and God knows who else, and then you keep thinking, why aren't they putting up a resistance?
Why aren't they opposing him at every turn?
Why aren't they saying abolish eyes?
Why aren't they saying no more blank check to Israel?
No, we're stopping that.
Absolutely not cooperating with a war criminal, Benjamin Netanyahu.
The anti-establishment left, the anti-establishment right are both rising, folks.
And we obviously have a lot of differences policy-wise.
Let's be clear, okay?
There are a lot of differences here, but everybody realized how corrupt, everybody realizes how corrupt Washington, D.C. is, how corrupt the process is, and the Uniparty is screwing us all.
And we're identifying the factors and the players, and we're done.
We're done with it all, whether you're on the left or the right.
And so this is inevitable.
This is a time that we're all realizing this.
So it's not going anywhere.
It's only going one direction.
Now, by the way, Hillary Clinton is speaking live right now.
I don't even know if I want to pick it up.
She's taking questions.
Maybe we'll get to that in a second.
But quickly here, I told you this whole backlash against Spike Lee was going to be bad for him supporting Palestine.
And then the statement afterwards, the apologize.
Most NBA players are probably in agreement with Spike on that.
Now you've got a Portland Trailblazers player who's wearing Palestine stuff.
But let's be honest, it's not really the print media who are driving this because this is a Republican administration.
And as everyone knows, Republicans have one main news source, and that's Fox News.
I have some familiarity with the product, and I can say that even as Fox News's reach and power and influence have diminished greatly, mostly due to technological changes, people go on the internet, they don't pay for cable.
But as it has diminished, it has not broken the stranglehold that Fox has over Republicans in Washington.
They watch Fox, they want to go on Fox.
And so Fox has really driven this war.
And if it occurs, you can thank Fox more than any other media organization, more than any other lobbyist, more honestly than any government, more than the government of Israel.
Fox News has pushed for this war.
Its owners personally have pushed for it, personally.
And of course, its employees on the channel have pushed for it with such aggression and unanimity that as of tonight, there is not a single on-air Fox personality who is going to question going to war with Iran.
There are some who may have reservations.
There was one on a weekend show who very bravely spoke up and said, is this a good idea?
That was the last time this topic was discussed on that weekend show.
Because the order has gone down to Fox employees, we are in favor of this war.
And that is very obvious if you watch it.
Now, one of the main cheerleaders for an invasion of Iraq and every other invasion and every other instance of shedding of human blood, it's just a killing in general, would of course be Senator Lindsey Graham of South Carolina.
If you've been following my commentary for a while, you know, I've talked about how time isn't linear.
Time is actually a spiral.
And it feels like we're in the quickening now, and the spiral is getting tighter and tighter.
And so this lady breaks it down.
I don't see her name here.
She does have an account.
I can find it.
She's on, I think she's big on Instagram, but she breaks down how this time is working on a spiral that I completely agree with.
But it's about how this awakening process is speeding up.
And she takes certain events that I think we can all relate to.
I mean, I definitely can, whether it's September 11th or COVID or a stolen election, and how it's like slowly but surely we're starting to accept reality through the lies As time of the spiral continues, it's my best way of kind of presenting this, but let's go into her breakdown.
Repetition compulsion is a term used in psychology when someone unconsciously repeats tragic events.
We have the towers, COVID, and what happened to Charlie.
But what do these threats have in common on a deeper subconscious level, Little Butter?
9-11 was about 24 years ago, and it took people many years before they were comfortable enough to say, I think that something's wrong with the narrative we've been told.
COVID happened about five years ago, and it took humankind collectively about one to two years to feel safe enough to say, we don't know about this story.
Now, the Charlie story happened this past year, September 10th, just one day before 9-11.
There's a synchronicity there.
And there's always synchronicities involved in repetition compulsion, by the way, whether someone's planning it from behind the scenes or not.
The universe works in synchronicity, which is why I'm working with the Fibonacci spiral right here.
Now, the Charlie situation happened this year, and people are automatically questioning the story.
Notice how the human mind moves faster and its ability to question authority every time it experiences a collective trauma.
And if we're using the Fibonacci sequence as a sort of grid, notice how the numbers in the Fibonacci sequence get closer together through the spiraling pattern.
Americans actually want to be sovereign right now.
People want to be able to walk through the details and the evidence by themselves.
And what I've learned in the study of repetition compulsion is when you truly learn the lesson that is underneath all of the physical outcomes of your reality, the lesson itself stops repeating itself.
So the center of this Fibonacci pattern could be a doorway to freedom from such dark and tragic events.
It could also be a doorway to suppression where people are unable to think for themselves.
So it's up to humanity as a whole to decide which direction we move in.
Does this make sense to you, Honey Butter?
And it's okay if it doesn't.
I used to be a muggle too.
But really, if it doesn't, that's okay.
I understand.
It's a bit isolat.
And let me know if you think we're heading towards a doorway of liberation and awakening or if we're walking towards a locked doorway of suppression.
Instagram is where it looks like she posts her stuff.
I've seen other videos of hers that I like too.
Obviously, a bit of a different angle of things than I usually cover here, but I think the breakdown is accurate.
I can relate to it.
And then the conclusion is, yeah, we can all kind of feel it.
It's like we're going into a new age.
The question is, is it an age of humanity breaking free of its shackles or is it an age of new shackles getting added to humanity?
That's the question.
But we're all, I think we're all kind of looking at it right now.
So anyway, the World Cup.
Horrifying discovery of mass graves found scattered around Mexican soccer stadium set to host World Cup games.
This is just a disaster.
Hundreds of bags of human remains were recently found in makeshift graves in the Mexican city at the heart of the startling wave of violence over the killing of a cartel boss just months before key World Cup games are scheduled to be held there.
It's just crazy.
I cannot believe I cannot believe that we decided to split this World Cup with Mexico.
So far, more than 500 bags of human remains have been found in just four of the 22 gravesites, some just miles from Akron Stadium, one of Mexico's three World Cup locations.
We need to just not have it in Mexico.
After all of this, Just need to not have it, but it's, I guess, an already a done deal.
I can't believe it.
Now, I did talk to a couple people that are on the ground.
It does look like the situation as far as the violence after the cartel boss killing has come to a standstill.
There were some pop-up moments here and there with some cars and trucks being lit on fire.
For the most part, it looks like they're back to normal.
And the Americans that are waiting to get home are just simply waiting on the flight logs to catch up so that they can get on their flights and come home.
But it does look like that situation is tame and under control.
All right, we go to Florida.
We go to Florida.
James Fishback makes an odd announcement.
I don't like this.
I think this is a bad one from, I don't understand why this is going to harm him, but he makes an announcement on a campaign stop.
There is absolutely no reason a 13-year-old in middle school should be smoking a blunt after they get off the bus.
Let me make an announcement right here in Okaloosa County.
Let's break a little bit of news together.
If you're a public school student and there is a stench of marijuana on you, you're taking a drug test.
You will be taking a drug test.
We're not going to expel you.
We're not going to suspend you, but we're going to bring your parents in.
We're going to have a conversation because I can't live with the fact that young kids one day will start with marijuana and then a greedy drug dealer will push a Percocet laced with fentanyl on them the next day.
As far as if kids are, you know, doing drugs and going to school, it becomes an issue that's that bad where they're reeking of it or they're dealing drugs on campus.
Like I don't mind dealing with it from that perspective, bringing in the parents, having a conversation.
I don't like this idea of drug testing.
I think it's getting a little much.
It's kind of big brother, big government type stuff.
But there is a level of discipline here.
And I happen to know because I went to a high school that did drug testing.
So I think from a policy standpoint, I would back off the drug testing.
I don't think that's good for policy.
I think that alone will scare people away.
But as far as like handling drug abuse and the issue within school and the disciplinary system, I do think that will be popular.
And I do think you can work with that.
But I don't like the drug testing idea.
Now, having said that, let me address something.
I've decided to do this now.
What would be the best way to do this?
Maybe on my break cam here.
Now, there's always an accusation made about yours truly that I do drugs.
Now, most of this stems from, you know, somebody that has a large platform that just told a blatant lie about me, many blatant lies about me, one of which an insinuation that I use drugs.
As I've said many times, I am totally sober.
I use no drugs.
I can tell you the last two times I even drank alcohol.
That's how little I drink.
It was September last year, you know, after my tenure at my last employer ended as a little homage to the end.
And then over Christmas, I went out one night with some friends and had some drinks.
I can tell you the last two times.
Those are the last two times I drank.
I don't know the other times before that.
Don't do any drugs, totally sober.
I'm not a square.
Let's be clear.
I'm not a square, but I am sober.
In fact, this is why it's so outrageous, the lie that was told about me.
This is why it's so ridiculously outrageous.
And now I see people parroting this lie every day on social media.
Now, quite frankly, I don't care.
I kind of think it's funny.
The only reason I'm doing this now is so that people understand you have been lied to.
You need to know that.
Now, I don't care if you like me.
I don't care if you like my politics or my show or my commentary.
I don't really care.
But you need to know you've been lied to about me.
And you probably don't even know anybody that has passed more drug tests than I've passed.
I've passed drug tests in high school.
I passed drug tests in college.
And I passed drug tests from 2019 until 2025 while I was under the employ of my former employer.
I have never failed a drug test in my life ever.
Okay?
So anybody that parrots this lie that I use drugs, you need to know you've been deceived.
You've been lied to.
Now, again, whatever.
Have your fun.
I think it's funny.
But somebody, I guess, hearing this, because you know, I'm constantly involved in legal crap.
So somebody decided upon hearing this that they wanted to make this accusation about me in one of the many legal cases that I have to deal with all the time.
So I said, fine.
And I voluntarily took a drug test.
So here you go.
Can you guys see this?
Would it be better if I maybe if I do it like this?
Let's see.
I might have to stand up.
Can you guys see that?
No, that is totally unseeable there.
Here you go.
Passed another drug test.
11 panel drug test.
Another pass.
I have never failed a drug test in my life.
I am totally sober.
I can tell you the last two times I've drank alcohol in the last six months.
Okay.
So I'm sick of this crap, man.
I'm sick of this crap.
So there you go.
All the people that accuse me of using drugs, all the people that think they're cute, think they're funny, and buy into the lie that was told about me.
There you go.
What more do you want to see?
I have never failed a drug test in my life.
I've probably passed 50 drug tests since I was like 16 years old.
And here you go again.
All right.
So there you go.
11 panel, negative, So there you go.
And again, I'm no square.
I don't really care.
I don't care about drugs.
I say legalize it all.
But I'm not going to sit here and let some lie that was told about me in some massive epic crash out lead people to believe something about me that's not true that then gets brought up in a legal case.
That's how out of control it got.
So I don't really care.
I don't really care about the comments and all of that stuff.
It's kind of funny to me.
But when it gets brought up in a legal situation I'm in, and they say, oh, well, this individual who knew you very well seems to believe that you're addicted to drugs.
I said, screw you.
I'll go take a drug test right now.
So there you go.
All right.
Now that that's, so that's one, that one's for you, James.
That one's for you, James Fishbeck, maybe the future governor of Florida.
Some right-wing influencers seem to think that the best way to honor Charlie's legacy and to support Erica and the family is to spend all of their time talking about the people criticizing and antagonizing Erica and Charlie's friends and family.
Does that make a lot of sense to you?
There are people who seem to think the best way to honor Erica and TPUSA and Charlie is to focus all of the attention all the time on the relatively few people who are criticizing and antagonizing Erica.
The most famous, of course, being Candace, who I guess has a new series about Erica, but some other people too, some smaller accounts as well.
This theory, this strategy seems to be a little bit misguided.
Wouldn't you say whether you love Candace, whether you hate Candace, whether you think Candace is sincere, whether you think she's insincere, whether you, whatever psychobabble analysis you have.
Do you think it makes sense?
If you want to support someone, do you think it makes sense to focus all of your attention all the time talking about someone antagonizing that person?
You're almost there because it doesn't make sense.
You're right.
It makes absolutely no sense.
Except it's not meant to.
It's all a defense mechanism.
It's all a panic button.
Now, why there is this defense mechanism kicking in, why there is this panic button being pushed, you can reach your own conclusions, but that's why it doesn't make sense.
You're looking at it from the perspective that this is about people protecting Erica, or you're looking at it from the standpoint of this is people who are trying to protect Charlie's legacy.
No, this is coming from people who are panicked over what Candace Owens is doing for whatever reason.
And when you look at it from that perspective, it all makes sense.
And that's the only perspective that makes sense.
And everybody knows when you've been around long enough and you understand how these things work, the people that are over the target receive the most flack.
I think we've all been around long enough to notice that that is the truth.
So I don't know what it is they're panicked about.
I don't understand why so many people, aside from maybe just the money issue, the digital campaign issue, or maybe they think it's popular, it gets them clicks or views or something.
But other than that, I think that it's pretty clear.
It's pretty easy to understand why they're all focusing their attention on Candace Owens because she's doing something that has them panicked.
I don't know what, but it's something.
Clearly, there's some there there.
So actually, it does make sense.
But when you think that it's somehow about, oh, protecting Charlie's legacy or standing up for Erica, no.
This is about panic over whatever it is that Candace is covering or what she might discover.
That's what it's about.
Now, we got more on this.
This woman has done her own series.
This is actually part three that I have for you here.
X-CIA, NSA analyst, follow the money series.
This is part three.
Her name is The Leah Files on TikTok.
That's where she has her big following.
So formerly with the X, formerly with the CIA, NSA.
Now she runs her own business doing this stuff.
She's been investigating the money angle.
Now, most of it leading up to this, I kind of found to be mundane, but it was more of just kind of connecting some dots.
She kind of brings the hammer here more on her recent one.
So there's all kinds of different angles to look into the Charlie Kirk assassination.
You know, obviously the big one is the foreign interests.
And then I think the second biggest one is the money, straight up what was going on with the money that Charlie.
So was he changing his mind and taking TPUSA a different direction than the donors wanted?
Was there stuff going on with the money that he was about to discover that was going to be big?
They didn't want him to.
Those are the two kind of surrounding things that when people look at the assassination being a professional job and the cover-up, those are kind of the two angles.
Welcome to part three of my TPUSA financial series deep dive.
Part three is going to be around the insurance policy, the $350,000 insurance policy that I think there are some interesting things we should be asking and that I found surrounding that.
I spent my career at the CIA and NSA and also advise other intelligence agencies.
I now have my own corporate intelligence firm.
All these opinions are my own.
This analysis is my own for entertainment purposes only.
Eight days before Charlie Kirk was murdered, he announced Justin Streif as a COO and an internal doge-like assessment that he wanted the company to have, which to me, as somebody who reads CEOs, is like, hey, I saw some red flags.
I'm not liking how things are going.
I kind of feel like I'm being left in the dark.
This is just my opinion.
And I want to know what's going on.
What this series is doing is looking at what would they have found using all public information.
And I'm just putting the pieces together and pulling threads based on pattern recognition and my experience.
And we are uncovering some interesting things.
I've done a full write-up, two pretty thorough investigations on my sub stack.
So go over there.
The link is in my bio.
It is free to subscribe.
We are number 27 trending in politics.
So thank you all so much for your support.
Let's get into it.
May 15th, 2023, GGL FM LLC appears and it is a Shell LLC out of Wyoming, which is claiming it's becoming the new like Delaware.
Charleston mailing address traces back to an asset management tax law firm.
Then on the 990s, the 2023 990, it appears.
The GGL FM appears and it is for a $350,000 life insurance premium taken out under, you can see CEO is Charlie Kirk.
So Charlie Kirk owns this GGL FM and it is a split life insurance policy, which means that the donors pay the $350,000.
TPOSA pays the $350,000.
And if something were to happen to Charlie Kirk, the amount would be split between TPUSA and whoever Charlie Kirk's heirs are.
A $350,000 premium for a healthy 30-ish year old male, you're looking at $30 to $50 million.
So it is not a small chump of change.
My first question is why May 2023?
Because if the company formed May 15th, the life insurance policy was taken out around then.
What happened around that time that would make them want to take out such a substantial life insurance policy on Charlie Kirk and only a year and a half before he was killed?
Because TPUSA had been in existence since 2012.
And 2017, they brought in 8.4 million in revenue.
2021 was when they exponentially grew to 84 million and then it just kind of stayed steady around 84, 85 million a year.
2022 is when they spent 8 or 9.6 million more than they brought in, which is insane considering you're bringing in 84 million and you're a nonprofit who only gives 5% of your proceeds to, you know, the schools and staff.
But that's for another TikTok.
So why May 2023?
I had seen some reporting about the LLC going away and the life insurance policy not being there until a few days before he died and then it coming back up.
So I wanted to check for myself and that's not the case.
I went to the Wyoming website.
You can see GGL FM here.
What we did find here, if you look at the bottom, look at the second yellow line.
Turns out on July 9th, GGL FM did dissolve because they did not pay their $60 tax bill.
And on December 3rd, 2025, two and a half months after Charlie Kirk died, they did pay it.
And by the way, for a little background here, these companies she's talking about, she basically determined in her prior reports that it appears that some of the people that were connected at TPUSA may have been double dipping in some of these other companies.
She names names in the first two reports that she does because it's all public information.
Tells me, is that that's when they went to collect on the life insurance policy?
And the life insurance policy was like, yeah, GGL FM doesn't get dissolved.
You have to get that back up and running.
They were like, oh, crap.
So around this time is when somebody was collecting on that insurance policy.
My questions are simple.
Did Charlie Kirk know about the life insurance policy taken out on him?
Probably, but it's worth asking, especially considering everything else that we've seen and the fact that it was a year and a half before he ended up dying and the fact that or being killed and the fact that TPUSA would have benefited from his death as far as financially in this life insurance policy.
I want to know who benefited.
These are just questions.
And I want to know who the insurance insurance company is and who collected.
Now, the attacks on Candace are eventually going to lead her down this direction as well.
And I'm telling you, if you go, and Ann, if you go back in the first one, some of those companies, what she's insinuating or what she wants to find out is these other companies that were tied into TPUSA, who was receiving these payments?
Because it's one thing when you're a 501c3 or whatever the thing is and all of your finances have to be public and you can go look that up.
But it's another thing if you contract a different company that's not a 501c3, their records are not public.
So that's one of the companies that she was mentioning there.
And she was curious if there were other people that were involved in that company that might have just been double dimping.
And to me, again, it just the whole thing screams professional hit.
The official narrative doesn't make any sense.
So the drama continues, as they say.
All right, one last thing before we go into our super chats.
Have you guys ever been on a floating cafe?
Waffle House announces plans to bring floating restaurant locations to lakes across the southeastern United States, serving boaters, anglers, and waterfront communities.
The concept will feature the classic menu 24-7 service on floating platforms accessible by boat with the initial sites planned in Tennessee, Alabama, Georgia, Florida, and the Carolinas.
Billy Joe Armstrong, a longtime Lake Eufala Alabama resident, says he's thrilled about the addition of a Waffle House on his home lake, noting he's tired of grabbing breakfast from Indian gas stations and having his stomach torn up all day long.
Have you guys ever been to a floating cafe?
If you live, I actually have.
It might be the most famous one, actually.
It's the only one I know of, so it's the most famous one to me.
We'll see.
We'll see if they follow through on this concept.
Some people are saying it's not true.
Some people are saying they're considering it.
So we'll see.
They should, though, whether or not they are actually thinking about it or it's just a, you know, like a marketing campaign to get people talking about Waffle House.
I'm sure there are others.
There is one on Table Rock Lake.
I guess it's the only one.
It's the one that popped up here.
I see one in Thailand, New Zealand, Australia, and then Table Rock Lake.
The floating cafe.
Went there.
My family, we used to go to Branson, Missouri, Table Rock Lake.
One of the best kept secrets in the Midwest, quite frankly.
But my family used to go there, always loved it.
And then I was in Branson and stayed on Table Rock Lake a couple years ago because in 2020, when they did all the COVID crap and shut everything down, Branson, Missouri basically stayed open, didn't do the masking and all of that other crap.
Same with the Lake of the Ozarks, good old boy country out there.
And I went back to the floating cafe.
It really is awesome.
It really is awesome.
That might be the only one in America.
It was the only one that popped up on my search when I searched Floating Cafe.
It was the only one that popped up in America on my search.
So I don't know of any others.
But floating cafe, Waffle House should do it.
Waffle House should do it.
Whether that's some marketing campaign or what, they should do it.
It would be very popular, I bet.
If you put a floating waffle house on a lake in Alabama or Mississippi, are you kidding me?
You know, you know, that's going to do well.
Something about it.
Something about it is just fun.
You walk outside and they have a carp feeding station.
You slug 20 cents or 25 cents, whatever it is.
You slug it into the carp feeding station.
It gives you a cup of, you know, whatever these carp niblets are.
You dump it in and the carp come out swarming.
It's a crazy scene.
Telling you, would you invest?
Should we do this, guys?
You want to put, should we put together a team of investors here?
The Owen report?
Put up a waffle house on a lake?
I guess I could do it.
I bet you I could do that on Lake Travis here in Austin, just northwest of Austin.
I bet you that would do gangbuster numbers.
There we go.
There's our investment.
We'll fund the Owen report with a floating cafe on Lake Travis.
Man, where do we come up with these genius ideas, man?
I swear.
I swear.
All right, let's get into the super chats.
What do you guys have for me today?
Dust Vault starts us off.
Make Bill and Hillary swing.
Well, I think you mean sing, unless there's something.
I don't want to see him dancing.
I don't think Bill wants, I don't think Bill wants to touch her either.
I don't know.
Bill is trying to avoid Hillary right now, I think.
Hillary committed another crime.
It must be another day that ends in Y.
Well, seems to be that way.
Captain Hard.
Fun fact: APAC got caught gathering Pentagon secrets involving Iran and other matters.
Wonder where they sent those secrets.
Maybe Israel, but don't worry.
APAC is an American lobbying group.
That's a true story.
That is a true story.
Mainstream news.
APAC got caught spying.
100% fact.
It's amazing, isn't it?
The more you know.
Expose.
Owen, don't let any fake person take the spirit name Jesus gives us in spirit for believing in him by faith.
We are his jewels.
Goofy hats and dangling sideburns and not believing in Jesus.
I'm telling you, it's like Trump will go down as the greatest Democrat of all time if they flip Texas blue.
And if Trump does a war with Iran, it might be the final blow, what the Democrats have been trying to do for years.
Lord of the Re Rokana is a revolutionary socialist.
Saw him on a call with Sunrise Movement during a Carolyn Borisenko stream, but he's pretending he's a normie suspect.
Well, there's going to be strange bedfellows when we try to save this country, guys.
So I don't doubt you, but we got to explore anybody that's willing to stop all the corruption in D.C., and then we can deal with the political differences.
Why are they giving CNN life?
Massey and APL should go on Tucker.
Well, it's a little bit more of an effort to go out and do Tucker's show, but I'm guessing because Fox maybe won't have them on, or they just want to go on anywhere that's willing to have the conversation.
So I don't really see it as giving CNN life.
IROR Z. Owen Schroer is a hard worker and deserves your support.
Thank you, brother.
I appreciate that.
I do work hard.
Appreciate your recognition of that.
But I enjoy it.
I love my work.
I'm very grateful.
Jennifer Kay, Trump doesn't need to federalize elections.
He needs to get John Thune to pass voter ID laws, which over 80% of the country wants.
Well, did you see they were doing the dog show?
Literally a dog and pony show in Congress today.
They had a dog parade with like these Mardi Gras floats that they made out of wagons.
I think I did that when I was in second grade, and you had congressmen and women parading their dogs around in Mardi Gras-themed wagons today.
It's a damn clown show.
The Congressional Clown Show.
Clown world, we are so back.
He's cooking now.
He's frying now.
What was I talking about at 416?
You liked it, huh?
Cornelius Westernmost, superb take on the Mamdani snow shoveling program.
We're in year six of a medium bridge product in Peoria, Illinois.
Well, China can create the world's longest bridge in a year.
Honestly, it's embarrassing.
Now, you guys may have seen this.
Republicans are now attacking Mamdani on this policy.
Now, Mom Danny had a conversation with Trump today.
They had a good conversation.
And apparently, Mom Danny might even be coming back to DC soon.
So Trump likes Mamdani.
They get along.
But Republicans are attacking Mamdani over this policy.
And they're sharing these videos where there's a bunch of people shoveling snow and they're like, oh, look, it's a grift.
It's a boondoggle.
They're standing around shoveling snow.
And I'm sitting here like, why are you like this?
Why are you like this?
It's like, to a certain degree, I get it.
What would you prefer?
Would you prefer 100 people working and actually getting a job done?
Because the sidewalks got shoveled.
Whether you want to complain about 30 people shoveling the same sidewalk and, you know, whatever complaint you have or not, the sidewalks got shoveled.
Wouldn't you rather see that on these highway construction projects?
Like, wouldn't you rather see 30 people cleaning up the waterway?
We've got the Colorado River down here.
You can go run alongside it.
You can paddleboard it.
If you get up into like the side of it where some of the brush is, filled with trash.
So yeah, you know what?
I don't care.
If you want to pay people $30 an hour and they're all swarming around cleaning up the same area and it gets cleaned, I'm okay with that.
I would rather spend my money on that than $5 trillion in the Middle East or $350 billion in Ukraine, 100% of the time, not even thinking twice about it.
Not even a second thought.
Yeah, I don't care if we spend money and put a bunch of people to clean up our streets and shovel snow on the sidewalk if the job gets done, which it did.
I would much rather drive by a highway construction site and see hundreds of guys working it and getting the job done than drive by a highway construction site with nobody working and no job getting done.
Why are conservatives like this?
They just, they're so brainwashed by the left-right paradigm is what it is.
And so they see the left doing anything and they just immediately think bad.
It's like, did the show get snoveled?
Did the snow get shoveled off the street?
Yeah, it did.
Oh, look, they're all standing around.
They're not doing anything.
Look, they're stealing money.
Stealing money?
Let's hear your take on foreign policy.
Let's hear your take on welfare.
Let's hear your take on foreign entanglements.
It's just like, why are right-wingers like this?
Get out of the fake left-right paradigm.
Paying Americans to clean up our streets, I'm okay with it.
100,000 times out of 100,000 times over foreign aid.
Now that my hair has reached a certain length, I actually have to start taking better care of it.
I have never had hair this long.
So there is some work that goes into it, which I'm kind of like dreading, but I've decided to lean in.
So we're going to be hair maxing.
We are going to be hair maxing, guys.
I'm studying things to hair max.
We've never done the hair maxing.
I'm going all in on hair maxing, including I think I'm going to stop drinking raw eggs because raw eggs, the raw egg whites at least, can hurt with biotin absorption, which can stop hair growth.
So I'm telling you, I've done a lot of research.
We are going to be hair maxing with the hair this long.
We have to do hair maxing now.
And then I might even, we may have another level of it later this year, too.
I believe it was your former employer who started the drug allegation.
In one of his rants, he insinuated you smoked pot and it made you paranoid.
Bingo.
And it's just so outrageous.
That's why I'm just, it's like, I don't really care.
I really do not care.
But it's like, it gets brought up on the social media every day.
It's in the comments every day.
And that's funny to me.
It's kind of funny and entertaining.
And then it gets brought up and insinuated in a legal thing.
Like, they know I was getting drug tested virtually the entire time I was there.
So it's just, it's just ridiculous.
The powerful truth.
How did Trump win if we use electronic voting machines?
How did we all forget about Bev Harris 20 years ago?
I think we all got buffooned, including me.
We know better.
Well, maybe we do now.
We'll see what happens.
They let Biden steal it.
They got away with it.
That happened when Trump was president.
The GUI, I do notice that you play a lot of video game soundtracks.
Did you hear about the new head of Xbox?
She is AI Corpo Slop.
AI is running gaming as well.
I don't know much.
I talk about, I've talked a little bit about modern gaming and how it's all slop.
Like, is there any classic games that come out anymore?
Honestly, the most recent classic games I can think of would be like I guess Fortnite.
I guess you could consider Fortnite to be a classic.
Red Dead Redemption seemed to get kind of a classic notoriety to it.
I turned it on, played a little bit, didn't do much for me.
The last Grand Theft Auto would have been a classic.
What was that, Grand Theft Auto V?
I think that would probably be a classic.
All the classic games are decades old.
Nobody makes classic games anymore.
I mean, even like the Call of Duties, you'd have to go way back.
So it's like gaming is just new games just suck.
I think they're trying to do too much, honestly.
That's my breakdown.
They're just trying to do too much.
Like, go back like a Halo 3 classic game.
It's not complex, but the beauty is in the art of it.
The gameplay, simple, easy, user interface, intuitive.
The art, the beauty, it's in, it's written into the game.
They make these games too complex now.
I can't stand them, honestly.
They're either too complex or too redundant.
So it's like you do the same thing every time you pick it up, or it's just the next time you pick it up, you forgot the thousand-button combinations.
It just sucks.
I'm going to make a push.
So obviously, you know, obviously the Pokemon team was listening to me.
So they said, oh, Owen says we need to bring back the classic Pokemon to the Switch 2.
So now they're doing it.
Obviously, that was, they were listening to me with that.
They should send me a paycheck for all the money they're about to make.
I'm telling you right now, I'm telling you right now.
And I'm sure they make plenty of money, but I am telling you this right now.
If they just started to re-platform all of these classic games on the new consoles, take my money.
Take my money.
Re-platform SSX Tricky.
Re-platform NBA Street, NFL Street.
Just remake Madden 2005.
These new Maddens suck.
They all suck.
Just re-platform all of the old games that are actually fun and classics that everybody loved and everybody enjoyed.
The only platform that even does it at all, anything close to that, is Switch.
It's the only one.
But even it's like even they can't even those get redundant now.
Just re-platform the classics.
That's all you got to do.
Just re-platform all the classics from the 90s and the 2000s.
And you'll probably save a bunch of money because you don't need to design new games and you'll make a bunch of money because that's what everybody wants.
But now, like you said, they bring in these new CEOs.
They put these people in charge of these video game companies that don't even play video games.
So of course it sucks.
Tell Taytay to stop stalking me.
I don't see him today.
So I think you're safe today.
Jordan Walker, I challenge you to a push-up contest, Owen Schroyer.
How many can you do, Jordan?
How many can you do?
I'll be honest.
I'll tell you.
I think I could probably do 70 in a row.
I think I could probably do 70.
I do, I do 50.
My regular thing is: you want to know my little life hack here.
My regular routine is I do however old I am.
So I'm 36.
So every day I do 36 straight push-ups.
Every day I do 36 straight V crunches.
So, when I turn 37, it'll be 37.
Every once in a while, I'll go hard and do 50 of each if I'm feeling up to it.
Uh, so I could probably do, I think I could probably do 70 push-ups straight.
How many do you think you could do, Jordan?
I won that push-up contest at Infowars, by the way.
It was rigged against me.
Sorry for only small super chats, but I can't stop yapping sometimes.
And it's our joint bank account.
You would flip if I spent more.
You know what, guys?
How many other people have their wifeys spending money on them?
Mr. Jonathan Ainsworth, for your hair, do red onion water plus rosemary oil.
Uh.
ADN for classic games.
Do you remember Future Cop, LAPD, F Amazing?
I don't know that one.
I do have a Rosemary Oil product coming in.
I'm new to the long hair thing, guys.
I'm new to the long hair thing.
So we're learning, but we will be hair maxing.
When your hair gets longer, I will braid it for you.
Thank you.
What an offer.
Jedi Knight, Expedition 33 is a modern classic and not woke, but I've never heard of it.
So is it really a modern classic?
I don't hear anybody talking about it.
I mean, there's gamer stuff, right?
There's gamer stuff that pops up on my feed because I do like, I do follow some of the nostalgic gaming accounts.
So I get gamer content on my feed through the algorithm.
I've never even heard of it.
So is it really classic?
If I've never even heard of it, if I don't see anybody playing it, it's slop.
It's all slop.
They put these people in charge of the gaming, you know, these major gaming companies that don't even play games.
They don't.
So I'm going to do it.
Maybe they're listening.
I'm telling you.
I don't care who it is, Microsoft, Sony, Nintendo.
I am telling you, Nintendo is going to be the one.
If anyone's going to do it, it's going to be Nintendo.
And they already kind of had the system built.
Like you can hack these things and like put emulators on it.
I think Xbox is the one you can probably do that with since I think it mimics a PC more than any other.
But the Switch is going to be the one that does it because they already kind of have it cooked into the system.
I'm telling you.
And they already have it with the Super Nintendo one.
I mean, I probably, if I'm going to play, I'll probably play Super Nintendo on my Switch.
The classic Marios, everything else, or now they have GameCube on there.
Telling you, that's all they have to do.
Just re-platform all of the old games.
They already have that on Switch.
They'd be an N64.
They don't put all the games up.
That's their only shortfall.
But I'm telling you, that's the way to go.
You guys, listen, you took my advice on putting the old Pokemon game on there.
I am telling you, just go look back at all the top sellers, look back at all the classic games, and just replatform them on your apps inside of your consoles, and you will make so much freaking money.
And you won't have to pay these development companies.
You won't have to pay a bunch of coders to make new games.
You can literally just repurpose the game for the modern platform.
We're in overtime, we're going above and beyond, above and beyond your expectations.
Three hours is not enough for today.
I know three hours is not enough.
And actually, when we sign off here, you can go watch my hour-long appearance on church and state.
We pre-recorded that earlier, and so we'll share that on X for you as soon as we have it as well.
But speaking of going above and beyond the expectations, that's what our friends at Allegiance Gold do for you.
And joining us from Allegiance Gold is Alex Ebkarian.
And, well, Alex, I think that a lot of people are going to be asking the same questions as we've all been watching gold and silver skyrocket on top of the crazy stock market lately, too.
I don't know if the Dow is still at 50K.
I can check on that.
But so, Alex, what's going on?
Why are gold and silver taking off like wild right now?
You have a lot more demand than the available supply.
The question is: who's buying and why?
Everyone's been talking about central banks, large institutions.
They're willingly, Owen, giving up U.S. Treasury bonds.
Think about that.
U.S. Treasury bonds pay a yield, pay an interest.
So, why are they giving up investing in U.S. Treasury bonds?
It boils down to two simple aspects.
Number one, they want to be in control.
2022, what the Biden administration did to Russian assets, it was a reminder to the world that if you're not aligned with U.S. policies, they can actually seize your assets.
So, what happened?
All of a sudden, there's about $350 billion of Russian assets that is not in their control.
What is the best neutral asset where you are in control?
Because this is a net, it's a national threat.
We've seen a lot of central banks essentially buy more and more gold.
And their objective is very simple.
By the way, Owen, think about this.
The central banks, the way I think about them is they're the insiders of the money game.
So, if you know, think about Steve Jobs.
If Steve Jobs was buying more of the Apple stocks, it sends confidence.
If Steve Jobs is selling the stocks, it sends the wrong signal.
Now, central bankers do something very simple.
They print money, okay, because our dollars right now is not backed by anything.
And what I mean by right now, since 1971.
And at the same time, they play around with the interest rates.
So, for instance, if the economy is booming, okay, they want to control that and lower the interest rates.
But if the economy is not doing that well, there's something that's missing.
They will lower the interest rates.
So, in a nutshell, in an environment where we have a deficit spending, we bring in $5 trillion, but we like to spend $7 trillion.
So, that $2 trillion gap comes from borrowing more and more.
Yes, we're at $38 trillion in debt.
And according to a few research, we're going to surpass that in very quickly.
We're going to hit the 40 trillion before the end of the year at this space.
So, who's buying gold?
People that are concerned about the depreciation of the dollar.
But at the same time, because the central banks are buying, your conventional banks, Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, JP Morgan, all these top-tier banks have raised the forecast of gold.
And at the same time, they're telling their clients, forget about the old 60-40 portfolio.
Stay 60 in stocks, do 20 in bonds, and 20 in gold.
So all of a sudden, you have a lot of strong demand.
So the gold market is a lot bigger than the silver market.
So it's not prone to be easily manipulated as the silver market.
Now, I think the pricing pressure is no longer controlled by the London bullion market or the COMAX market.
What's been happening is gold has been moving towards China.
Gold is moving towards East.
Think about the BRICS nation, for example, Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa.
What are they doing?
They want to de-dollarize and they're doing that openly.
Two weeks ago, Xi Jiping came out and said, I want the Remimbi to have to attain the value of a reserve currency.
It doesn't mean that it's going to replace the dollar, but they want to increase the quality.
At the same time, they're openly selling U.S. Treasury bonds and buying more gold.
Why?
Because they want to instill confidence within themselves.
See, China doesn't trust Russia, but China trusts gold.
But at the same time, in order for them to de-dollarize and not utilize the dollar part of their trade, they need to have the confidence in their own backed currencies.
That's what's been happening to gold.
So going back to your question, China is becoming the large buyer.
So as far as price manipulation, from time to time, you have the short-term traders, you have your speculators that want to take in some profits, which was the case with gold when it hit about 5,600.
Now we're trading around the 5,200.
But in a nutshell, because the size of gold is large and it has a much broad market, it's not as easily as manipulated as we've seen with the silver market.
According to Keith Neumeier, the CEO of First Majestic, he said that for every ounce of gold, we're able to find seven ounces of silver.
Now, why is this important?
Few reasons.
Number one, you don't have unique specific silver mining.
Anytime you find a site, typically silver is the byproduct of other metals that they're mining.
Number two, we're at a position where in the last five consecutive years, we have a deficit between the available supply and the demand.
To give you the numbers in a very simple layman terms, we have about a 1.2 billion ounces of demand and we have about a billion ounces of supply, of which 850 million is mined and about 15, 150 million is actually recycled and repurposed.
So when you have a structural deficit for five consecutive years and then all of a sudden China says, I'm going to place a restriction on how much I'm going to export.
And at the same time, the U.S. government a few months back labeled silver part of the critical metal.
Look, silver is indispensable.
It is required in these AI data power centers.
It is required in solar panels, electrical vehicles.
And what's interesting, Owen, is that within those capacities, we are putting pressure on future supply of silver because it's not deemed economical to recycle and repurpose.
So going back to your question, do I think silver is being suppressed?
Do I think that silver is being manipulated?
All you have to do is look at the disconnect between the physical market and the ETF market.
I remember vividly during COVID, in a single year, excuse me, in a single day, the SLV ETF traded more than the available physical supply.
So if you ask me, is that a one-to-one ratio?
I doubt it.
And the reason is the numbers don't add up.
So when you look at what happened to JPMorgan Chase a few years back, they got fined about a billion dollars for spoofing and manipulating silver and gold market.
We're at a point because China, actually, we're at a point because there are three types of buyers.
You got governments.
When the governments buy metals, that is a hidden hand.
We don't know how much because they don't want to disclose it.
Why?
National security purposes, right?
That's an umbrella that you can't really go under.
And based on that, they can actually have a lot more control.
So one hand, you have government.
On the other hand, you have the industrial usages.
Industrial usages do not care about the paper.
They want the physical because it's used in their production.
And last but not least, a lot of investors have been actually interested in owning and holding the metal as opposed to just having exposure to the price.
Do you still, are you still going to enjoy the same flavor of that?
And this is not something new that we're doing here.
It's been done for centuries from the Roman Empire that basically lowered the silver content into the coin, from the British pounds that got replaced by the dollar.
See, we're at a point where we're spending a trillion dollars on interest alone.
Okay.
And the idea is that we're going to continue to print so long as the growth of the economy is a lot more than the inflation itself.
So now, come May, we have a new Fed chair, Kevin Worsch, which on surface level, he doesn't want to blow up the balance sheet.
To put it simply, he doesn't want to print a lot.
So what does he want to do?
The alternative is actually to kind of lower the interest rates.
Let me walk you through the logic of lowering interest rates.
If you're someone who is borrowing money, would you want to have a high rate or low rate?
Well, one thing that China learned is that there is strength in numbers.
And what they've been doing is, in order for them to have this confidence, A, they have to publicly start buying more gold and people need to know about that.
And B, create a network between their partners.
BRICS Nation, here's the challenge with them.
They control roughly 50% of the population of the world.
They control roughly about 45% of the global GDP.
And moreover, one of the things that they have is that all of them are rich in precious metals, critical metals, commodities in general.
Russia or other countries don't like the fact that pricing is set here in the West.
We have the COMEX Exchange and the London bullion market.
They are creating the duplicate of that.
We have the SWIFT system where every dollar transaction passes through that system.
They're creating their own system that doesn't rely on that.
So right now, they might not be of a big impact, but little by little, we're seeing that they're getting more momentum.
They started with Five Nation.
They recruited Nigeria.
They recruited Egypt.
They recruited Ethiopia.
They recruited Iran.
And one of the things that they've been doing is not only are they completely bypassing the US dollar payment system, but they're almost bartering.
Like, for example, China built Iran's airport and in exchange, they got some oil.
They didn't have to get some sort of a payment.
But what President Trump did specifically in Venezuela and the pressure that we're putting on China, we're trying to push China away from the South Americas region.
China for the past few years, they've been buying gold and silver before it is processed.
So let me walk you through what happens.
The miners will extract it from the ground.
It's unprocessed.
It's a mixture of different metals.
Then it goes through a refining process.
And afterwards, it's ready to be melted and minted.
See, if you buy it after refining, what happens is you have to disclose to the world, to the IMF, it's again voluntary, of how much gold you've added to your reserve.
But if you buy it at the infancy level of the supply chain, which is called the ORA, you don't have to disclose how much you have.
And for years, China's been taking advantage of South Africa and South America's region.
So this BRICS nation, what's happening is all of a sudden, it's no longer one country.
You have the second largest economy, China, recruiting some other nations to basically little by little and gradually minimize the utilization of the dollar and have confidence where they can trade their own currencies.
And it's one thing for us to have domestic issues in terms of our deficits, our debt, our printing, our inflation.
But it's another thing when the gold, when the world starts having less and less confidence and look at alternative.
No one's saying that the dollar is going to be replaced, but the trajectory that we're going, it is very evident that they're going to continue to print our way out of problem.
And the more they do that, other countries are going to look at alternatives.
In the last five years, we've seen that supply actually dropped.
It's not like all of a sudden we're able to find a mining site and we can develop and extract that.
This is the difference that people don't understand.
That whenever you have an asset that is a finite supply and there's a lot more demand in the short term, it puts a lot of pressure on the entire supply chain.
So all of a sudden, the miners are asking for a premium.
The refining is asking for a premium, so on and so forth.
So I think let's walk through some history so that way you see what happened.
In 2000, 30% of silver utilization was from photography.
When the old method of photography was replaced by digital photography, all of a sudden that demand for silver dropped.
But after 2011, we started seeing gradual increase in demand in new industries.
See, the digital world that we're in requires connectivity, requires a lot of power.
Even President Trump in his State of the Union talked about how he's pushing these big tech companies to actually control their own power and not affect our electricity bill.
So as demand from an industrial side continues and it puts pressure on future supply because those are not deemed to be recycled.
And the way I see this is this is why the government placed it as a critical metal.
This is why silver has never been part of the tariff because we don't have enough.
Why should we tariff something if we don't have enough of it?
So yes, the way I see this is that there is a structural shift and this type of economy requires a lot of that.
One thing to keep in mind: silver tends to be a little bit more volatile in comparison to gold.
And we saw that during Liberation Day last year.
So the way we look at this is: yes, as long as you have a three to five year period, you can kind of weather the short-term noise and kind of focus on the big picture signal.
Do we have a structural demand that requires silver?
You know, those computers and equipments require gold.
And one thing to keep in mind is that these metals have a broad base demand.
So it's not about just the jewelry, the central bank, investors, industrial huges, healthcare.
You want to have an asset that actually has a broad base demand.
So that way you don't create a concentration risk.
The way I look at this long term, in terms of like what Starlink is doing and how much we need to have these metals, there's a reason why governments have placed it as critical.
Look, they're preparing for the next three, five, seven, 10 years.
They're not price sensitive like you and I. You know, you and I will think about this.
We'll say, hold on a second.
I want to crawl, walk, and then run.
The government doesn't care about that.
I mean, think about it this way.
Some of these central banks are printing money to buy gold.
And when you look at the nature of gold and silver in the last few years, all you have to do understand is that we're creating money out of thin air that's not backed by anything to buy an asset that it's limited.
And we're going to use this asset and we're going to need it.
Look at the amount of military complex usage that silver has.
Every bomb, when silver is used in that capacity, it is consumed.
So we have an area of demand of these metals that are putting a lot more pressure on the future supply.
That's what I mean by that.
Because not everything's not every, it's not a zero-sum game.
We're using it, we're consuming it, and supply gets less and less and less.
So when you look at the big picture, you know, I had a client yesterday, he said, Alex, I've been buying gold and silver since 1970s.
I remember gold at 35.
I remember silver at four.
And boy, I'm glad I got them.
At the time, I was buying it as a hobby.
I was stacking.
Then I got to understand money.
See, the problem with money, it is no longer a store of value.
So yes, this technological advancement, the AI going to Mars and creating some new technology will always require some component of silver and gold.
But make no mistake, the fact that these metals have both a monetary and industrial use and a broad-based demand gives it a lot more confidence that there will always be a need.
And here's the thing that I want listeners to understand.
The proof is in the pudding.
These metals have been around for thousands of years and they're going to continue to be around.
And if there's something, I used to say there are two things that are guaranteed: death and taxes.
Well, guess what?
We're going to add the third one, which is printing money.
No matter what politics we have, no matter what economic growth we have, when bankers, the Federal Reserve, get together with politicians, one needs the vote, the other one needs the interest.
So every time we have a small hiccup, bam, we start printing.
That is never going to change because the system that we have, and this is why I tell people, you need to start thinking outside of the system.
If gold and silver were that good, why isn't your advisor telling you about it?
Why isn't Wall Street telling you about it?
Why isn't the government or even the banks telling you about it?
But yet, quietly in the background, you see a lot of the banks strategically positioning and buying more and more and more.
So you have to think strategically, like you mentioned, next three to five, seven, 10 years.
Do I believe that there will be more printing?
Do I believe that there will be more demand?
Those are the two ingredients that as long as you have a mid to long-term view, historically, precious metals have done very well.