Owen Shroyer dissects the Epstein Files on Feb 5, 2026, exposing alleged FBI/Goldman Sachs cover-ups, coded language like "hot dog" for minors, and ties to Israel (Mossad) and intelligence agencies, framing $20B U.S. aid as "hush money." He links leaks to Iran strike pressure, mocks Trump’s shifting stances on Clinton and AI-driven layoffs, and debates Epstein’s survival—now at 51% probability. Priya Patel confirms a broader network but dismisses Russia as irrelevant, while Alex Stein compares leaks to Pizzagate, accuses Bill Gates, and clashes over moon landing skepticism before the show crashes abruptly. [Automatically generated summary]
Ladies and gentlemen, it is Thursday, February 5th, 2026.
Here's what's coming up on the Owen Report today.
Well, day four, day four of our Epstein Files coverage.
And like we've done every day this week, we're going to start off the first hour.
With a lot of the raw Epstein files.
Now, it's going to have a bit of a different presentation today.
We do have a lot of the raw files.
We're going to add a little community commentary, let's say.
We're going to connect some other dots to some of the names and what they've been up to in the files.
And then we're going to look at the cover-up, the cover-up of what's being revealed in the files, the cover-up of what everybody already knew about Jeffrey Epstein.
It's so obvious, it's ridiculous.
And I know I've said that I'm going to be nice this week, as far as the people attacking me are concerned.
We might strip a layer of that away.
We might strip a layer of that niceness away today.
And then we're going to look at statements from Trump.
We're going to look at the next move from the House with Rokana and Thomas Massey about getting justice.
I mean, you can say for the victims, I'd like to hear more from the victims, quite frankly.
I'd like to see more from the victims, but they're the victims.
They'll decide what they want to do.
I feel it's just justice for America because something is just horribly wrong here.
Something is just horribly wrong here.
Our intelligence agencies, our FBI, everybody knew about this stuff and they did nothing.
And they've still done nothing.
So, so where's the voice of the American people to say, hey, look at how corrupt our own justice system is.
You can throw the media in there with it.
Look at this corruption.
Clearly, this is coded language.
Clearly, they're talking about some form of illegal, illicit sexual activity.
It appears to be mostly with minors.
And you guys just let it go on.
And the American people can't rise up and say, no, anybody involved that was investigating this, that we haven't seen mass arrests and didn't make a loud noise about this, shut the whole thing down.
If our FBI is so corrupt or incompetent that they can't shut this deal down that was going on for years and they had these files, just shut it down.
And then we'll tie that into some things that Trump said with some recent interviews.
And Trump spoke at the national prayer breakfast today.
Folks, this guy is just, you know, more people are starting to realize what I think I was right about day one, that this is all about Iran strikes, the market crash, which continues, by the way, the market crash continues.
The more Epstein files, images, videos, drip, drip, drip, leak, leak, leak continues.
I think it's all about Trump striking Iran.
Now, there's other side missions, side quests that go along with this, but other people are starting to figure this out too.
So, I'll give Trump credit.
He's not striking Iran.
At least he hasn't yet.
So, despite this pressure campaign to crash the markets and to release the Epstein files to get him to attack Iran, he hasn't.
But I mean, my God, this guy is just turning into a straight-up goober.
He is just turning into a straight-up goober with the things that he's saying and doing now.
It's outright ridiculous.
And it's like you can do the whole, you know, bravado confidence act.
You can play that card every once in a while.
It's the only card he has left, folks.
It's the only card he has left now, and it's ridiculous.
And I'll repeat what I said yesterday.
We're better off with him just coming out and telling the truth.
How many of you listening to this have gotten an email or read a story about some massive hack?
And maybe you're entitled to something, or maybe somebody tried to sell your private information on the internet.
It's very likely that you listening to this by now have probably dealt with something similar.
And if you haven't, it's very likely you will in the future.
That is unless you can save yourself the headache.
You can save yourself the hassle by going to patriot-protect.com/slash Owen.
Now, hear me out.
First, just go to the website, patriot-protect.com slash Owen, and you can read all about the service and why you're going to find that it's very necessary.
But I can tell you from my own experience why it's necessary.
I've been doxxed.
I've had my private information shared and sold online.
Even worse, you know, it's one thing, okay, I'm a public figure.
I put my face out there.
I put my name out there.
I put my controversial opinions out there.
But my family didn't choose this life.
They don't deserve it.
Not that I do.
But that's what happens.
Then your family gets tangled into this web and then they can get your family's information and then they can harass your family and do illegal things to your family.
And if you haven't had to deal with this yet, let's make sure you don't.
Let's make sure you don't have to do it.
Now, not only will they go online and scrub all of that private personal information that you don't want out there off the internet, not only will they do that, they then run their security systems 24-7 in case it pops up again.
Boom, they're right on it, tackling it before it can even get out of the backfield.
That's the type of service you need to protect your private information on the internet from crooks and hackers and scammers, as well as your family.
Patriot-protect.com slash Owen.
And we have an offer for you.
When you go right now, you can get 15% off your yearly subscription.
You heard me right, listeners of this show, 15% off a yearly subscription.
All you got to do is put promo code Owen in at checkout.
Remember that when you go to patriot-protect.com slash Owen, 15% off a yearly subscription, just put promo code Owen at checkout.
Promo code Owen at checkout, 15% off a yearly subscription at patriot-protect.com slash Owen.
This is an important service.
I think everybody's going to have a service like this in the near future when this problem becomes even a bigger issue.
So get ahead of it now.
Patriot-protect.com slash Owen.
Promo code Owen at checkout to get 15% off a yearly subscription.
unidentified
On the cutting edge of news and analysis, the Owen Report with Owen Schroyer.
I guess he might be referring to this gentleman right here that Bradley Martin caught, 76-year-old Hollywood producer Herschel Weingrod, who met up with a 15-year-old girl that whole video.
We're going to, we are going to, we're on day four now.
We're going to do what we've been doing this week as far as reading the raw Epstein files off.
We're going to add, we're going to add a little extra to it today.
We're going to make some connections with some of the people that are in the files and some of the things that they're saying, some of the things that they're doing.
We're going to look at the massive cover-up that's ongoing right now.
And I've mostly been nice and I've said this.
I'm going to be nice to the people that are attacking me on this.
I'm going to be nice to the people, the individuals that will give them the benefit of the doubt that they just don't understand it.
They can't comprehend it.
But we're going to remove a little layer of that today.
We're going to remove a little layer of that today.
So we will have some just raw files, but we're going to have a couple added, we're going to have a couple added angles to our coverage of that today.
Now, Todd Blanch, who's basically said in multiple interviews and press conferences now that there's nothing to see here.
Nothing to see here, guys.
I don't know how you could possibly say that.
I don't know how you could possibly agree with that.
To me, no honest person, no decent person is going to sit here after seeing these files and say, oh, nothing to see here.
No honest, no decent person could possibly believe that.
No honest, no decent person could possibly say that.
And so it's amazing when you see all of this, a lot of dishonest people are exposing themselves.
A lot of not decent people, a lot of indecent people are exposing themselves through this.
And, you know, I'm always okay with political disagreements.
I encourage it.
I encourage it on this show.
You know, I welcome it.
But I have no tolerance for people that are covering up and being dishonest about what's in these files.
And I think a lot of you that are engaging in this cover-up and an obfuscation of the truth, I think a lot of you are either mismeasuring or misreading the room right now, or maybe worse, maybe that's your job.
Maybe that's the whole reason why you're here is to run ops for foreign interests.
Now, Thomas Massey and Rokana are mostly responsible for getting this stuff out now.
And Rokana made this announcement earlier today.
Rokana and Thomas Massey have requested a meeting with Todd Blanche to ask why the senders of these emails have been redacted.
Concealing the reputations of these powerful men is a blatant violation of the Epstein Transparency Act we passed.
Now, here's at least two of the emails he's discussing.
The one with the redacted name to Jeffrey Epstein with images attached to it, which let me get to that in a second.
The new Brazilian just arrived, sexy and cute, equals nine-year-old.
Now, there's some debate over what these equal signs mean, but we don't know.
So it looks like on the surface, they're talking about a nine-year-old.
Now, if they are talking about a 19-year-old, this still appears to be sex trafficking.
So why are they redacting?
Why are they redacting this name that appears to be the sex trafficker?
Now, we're going to go to a take from a lawyer later on in this opening hour that asks the right question, which is, okay, if these are the people that are being redacted, it still doesn't make sense.
But we'll get to that later.
Okay, so this is one of the emails they're going to be asking Blanche about.
Here's another one.
Two redacted from Jeffrey Epstein.
Or I guess rather this was two Jeffrey Epstein from redacted, the original email he'll.
Here, thank you for a fun night.
Your littlest girl was a little naughty.
I mean, come on.
This is what I'm saying.
Any decent person or any honest person cannot tell you there's nothing there.
Now, if you want to be one of these, like, I need beyond a reasonable doubt, overwhelming evidence to even think that there's anything bad here, fine enough.
But if you're not at least looking at this and saying, yeah, that's suspicious, I'd like to know.
You're not an honest person, and I think you're an indecent person, and your entire reputation now in the media should be in question.
If not, your entire media presence should be completely kicked out and ignored.
You should be completely discounted if you can't look at these emails and say something is wrong here.
Something is wrong here.
So, Massey and Rokana will be asking Todd Blanche about that.
But again, it's incredible to watch Todd Blanche in multiple interviews and press conferences telling the media, telling the American people that there's nothing to see here.
There's nothing there.
There's nothing incriminating.
There's nothing actionable.
So now you got to question Todd Blanche and say, well, what type of a person is Todd Blanche?
What is he covering up?
Why is he being dishonest?
Why is he being indecent to the American people?
Who does he work for?
So, before I get into the files, in fact, let me reiterate this.
Let me reiterate this because I think this is a very important point.
And I said this day one, and really I got into this last week.
But more people are starting to catch up and realize what's going on here.
I still believe, and I'm not saying this is an isolated thing.
I do believe there are other factors at play, but I think the number one factor of all of this right now is the foreign and special interests, specifically Israel, who in some way, shape, or form Epstein was working for or working with or loyal to to some degree.
They want Trump to strike Iran.
That's the biggest factor at play here.
So, the blackmail agencies, the foreign lobbyists, the powers that be directly tied in to these Epstein files, directly tied into U.S. politics and U.S. finance and banking and influence and everything else, they want Trump to strike Iran.
They want Trump to use the U.S. military to once again use United States blood and treasure for the interest of Israel.
And so, since Trump doesn't want to do that, since Trump continues to hold off on that, they're crashing the markets and they will continue to crash the markets until Trump strikes Iran.
I also believe that's what the Epstein file release is about.
They were supposed to release these files months ago.
They didn't do it.
Why are they releasing them now?
They could have redacted Trump's name from these files for over a year.
For over a year, they could have redacted Trump's name from these files, and they didn't do it.
Now, I'm not saying I don't want full transparency, but this is just the truth.
They did not redact Trump's name from the files, even though he requested them to do so.
And they easily could have done it.
And by the way, they are in the process of doing that right now.
Now, that could be some other factor.
That could be an independent factor, but that is happening.
So, that's what they want.
They want Trump to strike Iran.
They want the regime change in Iran.
Israel wants to take control of Iran's domestic and foreign policies, and they want to use the U.S. blood, treasure, and military to do it.
And Trump isn't doing it.
And so, they're crashing the markets and they're doing the drip, drip, drip of the Epstein files.
Now, I wonder, I wonder how long Trump can hold out on this.
I'm surprised that it's lasted this long, quite frankly.
And if it lasts through the weekend, I wonder what's going to come next.
Now, there's so many of these files that it's, you know, it's taking a community of people to go through it and find it all.
But slowly, but surely, more people are finding different avenues and routes to compile this stuff, to download this stuff.
And now we're getting access to images.
We're getting access to videos.
Now, I wouldn't be surprised if Trump holds off another week or weekend or two, somebody doesn't decide to leak a video or, oops, accidentally remove the redaction of a face of Donald Trump from an image or video.
To me, that'll be the final indicator of, okay, Trump doesn't have control of his DOJ.
And whoever is running this operation to crash the markets and to release the Epstein files with the selective timing and the selective redactions, they're obviously working against Trump, twisting his arm to try to get him to attack Iran.
To me, it couldn't be more obvious.
I saw this day one, and I think everybody's starting to see it now.
And the trend just continues.
Now, Trump obviously did the original strike on Iran, but we know from history that whenever the foreign lobbyists and the Israeli interests call him up and tell him to do something with U.S. military, he tries to have his cake and eat it too.
And he's been successful in the past where he'll call the foreign leaders, the foreign countries' diplomats, and say, look, I'm under a lot of pressure here.
Let's try to cut a deal to avoid a larger war.
And he said this in 2022 during an interview specifically about Syria, how when he struck Syria, he called Syrian diplomats and said, look, we got to do this deal.
If we don't do this, there's going to be a larger war.
I'm going to strike this thing and let's just do it.
It'll be for the optics.
I can say I did it and we can avoid a larger war.
So I think that's what happened with the first Iran strikes.
And I think that's why Trump is so desperate in the narrative to say, we destroyed the nuclear sites.
We destroyed the nuclear sites.
But now Israel is coming out and saying, no, you didn't.
They're still building.
They're nuclear capable.
They're going to have a nuke.
So I think Trump called Iran to try to avoid a larger war with Israel, save people's lives, maybe avoid World War III.
But it's never enough.
It's never enough for the Israeli lobbyists.
It's never enough for Israel's interests.
It's just never enough.
They will never.
And, you know, I would say they would never be happy until, but I don't even think there is an until.
I think it's they'll just never be happy.
There will never be enough stealing of our money.
There will never be enough taking other people's land.
There will never be enough death and bloodshed for these people.
There will never be enough.
And by the way, pretty much every other president has realized that.
It's well known.
George Bush, Bill Clinton, so many presidents said, okay, I'll try to figure out the Middle East issue.
And then they'll cut deals with the Israelis and they'll think it's all fine and good.
So maybe Trump is either learning that the hard way or maybe Trump is being forced to play ball with them.
You can make up your own mind.
But that's how I see it.
That's how I see it.
And I think, you know, it'll be pretty obvious if you get an Iran strike and then the markets recover and the Epstein leaks stop.
I think it'll be pretty obvious if you don't get a strike and more Epstein files come out and the market continues to crash.
But that's what we see.
And I think you also have world interests now on a very large scale that are at their wits' end with Israel.
And when the United States gives $10 billion to Israel this last week alone, and then $10 billion to Israel's neighbors, you know, that's basically hush money.
That's the United States paying off Jordan, Lebanon, Egypt, all of them.
That's the U.S. paying them to say, hey, let Israel do whatever it wants.
Here's a bunch of money.
Can you just, that's hush money is what that is.
So really, Israel's milked another $20 billion out of the United States in the last 10 days.
So the people are sick of it.
The American people are sick of it.
I think the world is sick of it.
And I think this situation is on the brink of all-out war.
Maybe to a certain degree, Trump knows that if he does another war in the Middle East, he's going to hell.
And he kind of says such things, like at the prayer breakfast this morning when he's like vying to get into heaven.
He's like, I think I can get into heaven.
I'm trying to get world peace.
Maybe that'll get me in.
So, you know, maybe after they whiz a bullet by his head, maybe now if he's having health issues, whatever, he says he's on aspirin all the time for blood thinners.
You know, maybe he's starting to think about death.
Maybe he's starting to think about hell.
And maybe he's concerned if he starts a larger war or World War III that that's it.
No chance for him to get into heaven.
So that's how I see it right now.
And I think a lot of other people are starting to see it the same way.
And I think by now it's, I think by now, it's kind of obvious.
Really.
Just like it's obvious what's going on with these files.
And for many people, they may not have seen stuff like this before.
But if you've been around since Pizzagate, you know about it.
If you've been following these developments and the coded language, you know exactly what's going on.
But we come on here every day and expose it for, let's say, the newbies anyway.
They don't value or they don't even view it as human life.
They're so detached from the human soul.
They're so detached from God.
They're so detached from the divinity and the beauty of creation that they just treat people like slaves, like cattle, like lesser beings.
There's no other way to analyze this.
So we're going to go into it now.
Remember, this is for documentary purposes here.
We are not making any allegations.
We are not making any accusations.
We are simply reading from the Epstein files.
We try to limit our opinion and commentary.
We'll have a little bit more today.
But when we read these files, we are not making any suggestions, allegations, or accusations.
We are just documenting.
This is what has come from the Epstein files.
So then, here we go.
And this is one of them where it's like, how can you pretend that this isn't something weird?
To Jeffrey Epstein vacation.
So to Jeffrey Epstein from Nadia, subject old hairy coconuts.
I ordered sweet young coconuts from Thailand for you, and they just arrived.
Very yummy.
I was going to ship them to you in Paris, but I hear you are coming back, so I will send them to 71st with Sarah just so you don't have to drink juices from old hairy things.
Do you think they're talking about coconuts?
And clearly now, yummy is code for something.
Yummy is code for something.
And I do believe that it was Justin Bieber, who might have been a victim of some of this.
I think he did a music video called Yummy, where he kind of put all the symbolism in it.
Not so subtle.
It's like if you know what it is, you smack in your face.
Yummy is clearly code for something.
And it appears to be code for enjoying or like maybe like really good.
Like if somebody gets really good drugs or something, there's like a word for it, like pure or dank, or there's all these different code words.
So it's like yummy is like, oh, if it's yummy, that's like the best.
That's like the best quality coconuts.
I don't think we're talking about coconuts.
Here's Kathy Rumler, former Obama attorney.
She says, of course not.
Well, this is from Jeffrey Epstein to Kathy Rummler.
Of course not.
He wouldn't have been so stupid.
Kathy Rumler replies: Gov is not Jewish.
So, in other words, if you're not Jewish, you're stupid.
That's nice.
It's nice to know how Kathy Rummler feels.
That's how I interpret this.
I don't know how else you can, but very nice.
Nice to see how you feel there about the goy.
And just for a little color here on Rumbler, Jeffrey Epstein email reveals extensive ties with top Goldman Sox lawyer.
Banks general counsel sought sex offender's help with career advancement and advised him on press inquiries.
Again, I don't think we're talking about cheese, and it's very well known that cheese or cheese pizza, CP, is at least code language for child, you know what.
And it also looks like cheese also just gets used as a singular for child.
How many people are emailing their friends about cheese holders and manhandling cheeses and having three cheeses?
Oh, I only have three.
You can go to the grocery store.
I could go to the grocery store right now and get 33 cheeses and as many cheese holders as I want.
So I'm sure that the Hulls here have no problem buying cheese and cheese holders.
So I feel like this is something else.
And when you look at some of the art, like say the Podesta art and cheese holders, you'll find that they have some sort of affinity for children being bound.
Yeah, a lot of that came out during the Pizzagate WikiLeaks emails.
Attorney Viva Fry, Jeffrey Epstein and Redacted did knowingly and willfully combine, conspire, confederate, and agree with each other and with others, known and unknown, to commit an offense against the United States that is to use a facility or means of interstate or foreign commerce to knowingly persuade, induce, and entice individuals who had not attained the age of 18 years to engage in prostitution.
He asks, who is the redacted?
If it's Elaine Maxwell, why is it still redacted?
If it's Sarah Kellen, why is it still redacted?
Who were the other known conspirators?
Now, I want to go back to Rocana and Thomas Massey getting to the answer about the redactions in those earlier emails.
And I want to respond to that and this now.
Here's what I think is going to happen.
Here's what I believe.
There's going to be two answers that they give.
The known conspirators, they're going to have cut a deal with.
Now, will we ever know the details of this agreement and these deals?
Unlikely.
But I would say a lot of these offenders that were involved cut deals.
And it's kind of like, you know, unconfirmed reports, rumors, if you will, that that's exactly what happened.
And it's as many as 29 of them have cut deals, whatever that means.
I think the other thing you're going to hear, and I think this pertains more to Thomas Massey and Rocana, Rokana's request to redact the names from those earlier emails.
I think the DOJ will consider them victims.
So the other men or women that were engaging in these activities with Epstein and Maxwell, they cut deals, and that's probably why they are getting redacted.
As far as the redacted names in the other emails that Rokana and Thomas Massey are going to be inquiring of Todd Blanche, I believe the DOJ will consider them victims.
And I believe what the DOJ is going to say, this is going to be their reasoning.
This is going to be their justification that, oh, well, these men didn't know that that girl was underage.
These men didn't know that that boy was underage.
They just didn't know.
So therefore, when they engaged in these activities with that minor and they were blackmailed over it, we consider them a victim.
And so we've redacted their names.
And that's why you keep hearing that rhetoric of we have to protect the victims from the DOJ.
They say we have to protect the victims.
Well, the victims came out in Washington, D.C. and said, we don't want protection.
We want full transparency.
We don't care anymore.
Release the names.
So I believe the victims that they're protecting are the men and or women that were being blackmailed as part of this operation.
So I think those are the two excuses that you will get.
They're redacting the names of the people that they cut deals with to avoid jail time.
And they're redacting the names of the people that got caught with minors or whatever the hell else because they were being blackmailed.
and so they're considered victims.
Did you know Jeffrey Epstein was a member of the Lifeboat Foundation?
They specialized in construction of underground bunkers and tunnels.
And there's an email in the files between the foundation and Epstein right there.
Oh, and how about that?
Ray Kurzweil is in there.
Ray Kurzweil and Nobel laureates are all in there too.
How young from redacted to redacted subject Jeffrey Epstein.
Some interesting facts that should be passed on to the investigative agent on the Epstein case.
I will also copy Director Mueller.
That's Bob Mueller.
Yes, that Bob Mueller.
Zorro Trust, belonging to Epstein, won an $80 million lottery ticket in New Mexico.
So the lotteries are rigged.
Zorro Ranch, belonging to Epstein, sits close to the U.S.-Mexican border, where most trafficked children are rooted prior to being dispersed to East Coast.
So he had a compound at the U.S.-Mexico border where most of the children get trafficked.
And then, of course, he had his penthouse mansion in New York City, the East Coast, Florida, the East Coast.
Starting to connect the dots.
Several high-ranking officials and friends of Epstein have confirmed he has sexual relations with trafficked underage minors.
Both Maxwell in New York and Redacted were served last week, two key witnesses on Epstein's camp.
So this redacted name is probably someone who cooperated and cut a deal.
The question is: what would happen if one were to transport a minor for sex or transport oneself with the intent to have sex with a minor into a state in which the age of consent is below 18, assuming the minor is above the age of consent in the given state?
Is there no violation of law?
And then Epstein replied, Let's also look at sex tourism laws going someplace with specific intent to have underage sex.
All right, guys.
Now, as you may know, I served time in a federal prison.
And in that federal prison, I happened to meet a lawyer who was an expert on sex tourism, as it is referred to here.
Not only was he an expert from a legal perspective dealing with these questions, he was an expert because he engaged in it himself.
Now, for the sake of time, I'm not going to get into all the details, but I will tell you this: he was a lawyer, he was Jewish, and the reason he went to prison is because when he was defending himself against these charges, and by the way, for whatever reason, Prague is like the number one spot that they go to if they're interested in young boys, because I think the age of consent there, it's very low.
I don't remember what it is, but it's very low.
And so When he got to court, he was making the argument, and I forget, I forget how the feds ended up dragging him into court, but he was making the argument that, hey, when I was there, it was legal.
I didn't do anything illegal as far as these laws are concerned, but he was very arrogant about it.
He bragged about it.
And, you know, the attorneys were like, okay, well, here's what we have on you.
And here's these young boys.
And he was like, very proud of it.
He's very proud.
He said he had nothing to hide and not ashamed of anything.
So that stuff is very real.
For whatever reason, Prague is number one.
I think they have the lowest age of consent, but he ran it all down.
He explained it all to me as an expert.
And he'd been in there for a long time, and he still had a long time to go.
So that is a reality.
That is a reality.
Sex tourism and then finding the countries with the lowest age of consent where they can go and basically hire teenage boys or girls as prostitutes and legally have sex with them.
It's very well known, unfortunately, in these communities.
So that's what they're talking about here.
Now, as far as Mitchell Weber is concerned, who's communicating this, I'm just curious.
I'm just curious here.
Is this the same Mitchell Weber here?
Is this the same Mitchell Weber?
Let's see here.
Previously, he served in the office of White House Counsel as part of its oversight and investigations group.
Mr. Weber graduated from Yale College and Harvard Law.
Mr. Weber has worked for a number of years on litigation and public policy matters concerning anti-Semitism and the anti-Israel boycott, divest, and sanctions movement.
Oh, he was appointed to a five-year term on the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Council, the governing body of the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum in Washington, D.C. I'm sure it's a different Mitchell Weber from Harvard.
I'm sure it's a different one, guys.
It's not him.
Gene drives almost ready.
What in the ever-living F does that mean?
Where the hell are the biosecurity experts?
I tweeted about Epstein funding gene drives for years.
This is horrific.
WMDs in Epstein's hands.
Why isn't anyone going after Gates?
So they're talking Epstein Gates, these gene drives.
Here's Bill Gates talking about it publicly in 2019.
Gene drive is a technique where you give a few mosquitoes an edited gene and it drives itself into all their offspring.
It could one day help us defeat diseases like malaria.
We're talking about manipulating the human genome, ladies and gentlemen.
We're talking about mass secret manipulation of the human genome.
Gene drives in the Epstein emails, the man who shockingly awarded the newly elected Barack Obama the Nobel Peace Prize in 2009 and who was chair of the Nobel Committee from 2009 to 2015 was an Epstein Island regular.
So here's some clips from the news of a Joglund Norwegian politician served on the committee of the Nobel Committee to redacted from Cecile De Jung.
Hi, Redacted.
I spoke to G. Re Jagland and whether he still wants the hotel.
And he said that he was willing to hear back from Jagland.
He said that Jaglund wants to stay on the island.
Am I to take from your email that Jaglund at all will be guests on the island?
There's this built-in assumption that somehow there's this hidden tranche of information of men that we know about that we're covering up or that we're choosing not to prosecute.
That is not the case.
I don't know whether there are men out there that abuse these women.
If we learn about information and evidence that allows us to prosecute them, you better believe we will.
But I don't think that the public or you all are going to uncover men within the Epstein files that abuse women, unfortunately.
We have X. X is probably the number one used app in the world.
And the things that we've seen on X and communicated on X thanks to Elon Musk purchasing X, we will never unsee and we will never forget.
And you can't hide and pretend like it's not happening.
They played this one too close to the chest, folks.
There's no going back from this.
There's no going back.
So I don't know what they thought.
I don't know if they thought we were too brainwashed or distracted and they could just get away with this and put this struggle session, this public pressure on Trump to strike Iran and get away with this all, but it is not working.
It is not working.
They played this one way too close to the chest, folks.
And now they've exposed themselves and there's no going back.
Now, they might not care because I think at another level of this is it's the pressure test of complacency.
It's the pressure test of does human civilization, do the peons, does the slave class have enough gumption and wherewithal and ability and agency to actually do something about this, even though when this all comes out and we show them how we own you and we own the Justice Department, there is no justice.
We just own it.
It's just a weapon against you.
It's just a weapon we aim wherever we want.
And we still own the media.
We still run the media.
There's nothing you can do about it.
So part of this is even a complacency test to see: can we really get away with this?
Like, all right, this is the closest to the chest we've ever played this, but you know what?
We think the slave class is still too stupid and distracted, and we're going to go ahead and try for it and get away with it.
I don't know why they're desperate to bomb Iran and have the regime change so much there, but clearly that's how desperate they are for it.
So they're just going to go ahead and do this, even though they know there's no turning it off now.
But it is a bit of a test, isn't it?
It is a bit of a test.
I guess you could debate: are we passing the test or not?
My only concern is to this current ruling class, to this current ruling class, this current class of elites, the boomers, like, can you just not blow up the planet before you pass on?
You know, it's like, can you just not destroy everything before you pass on?
Now, the other angle of this is that they're building the AI surveillance grid on top of us right now.
And so they're putting a lot of faith in that.
They're putting a lot of faith that in whatever happens on the other side of this and whatever massive operation that they run to reherd the cattle here, that their AI surveillance grid is going to be ready to go to put humanity back into slavery, to put our minds back into slavery permanently.
I don't think it's ready.
I have to tell you, I don't think the AI grid is ready, folks.
I don't think it's ready.
And their timing of all this could be kind of screwed up.
They might have underestimated the massive awakening.
They might have underestimated Trump's stubbornness on the Iran strikes.
I think they're scrambling.
I think they're scrambling.
And I think they're panicked.
And I think they're more exposed now than they've ever been and they don't know what to do.
And I'll say this before I go to the break and we bring a guest on.
Very controversial opinion here.
I'm going to tell you something.
I'm going to give you a very controversial opinion here, folks.
And I understand why people don't want to say this because it's the same story of, you know, you're talking about something tragic.
You don't want to get it wrong.
You're talking about something very tragic and traumatic and sad, and you don't want to get it wrong.
I'm not so sure that the entire thing isn't fake to distract us from the Epstein files.
And, you know, they're sitting on TV.
And again, they're rolling this around the clock and they're sitting on TV and they're reading off of a script.
Literally, they're sitting there reading off of a script.
And I'm like, what even is this?
Now, if it's real and, you know, your parent disappears, you maybe it's like, I don't know how I would handle that, but I feel like I wouldn't need a script to go on TV and talk about my mom.
And then it comes out because we're all asking the same question.
Well, where are the security cameras and the doorbell cameras and the apps and everything else?
Yeah, you know, I would actually say that the young men are leaning far more right and the young women are leaning very far left.
It's a very split bag in that sense.
And it makes a lot of sense.
I think they're going the complete opposite directions, but for very, very similar reasons.
The economy is going to be a big reason, but also if you look at the culture, young men have been rejected by the left and young women haven't been rejected, but in their eyes and through the eyes of feminism, they've been rejected by the right.
So they're running away from both of the perceived parties that reject them.
I mean, of course, young women are still very, very into feminism, into this perceived liberation, I suppose, where they think that they need to have this full autonomy over their body, including killing a child that is, quite frankly, not a part of their body.
They might be growing it, but it is a separate living being.
I still largely feel positively about this administration, especially when I look at previous administrations and what they've accomplished or haven't accomplished more of.
But I have been largely critical of a good chunk of the administration.
A lot of it has been in regards to the DOJ, of course.
I mean, the Epstein files have been a really, really big one.
But along with that, we have not seen any sort of arrests, like major arrests and prosecutions of the people that have essentially been largely responsible for, you know, imprisoning, falsely imprisoning Jan Sixers and the like.
I mean, we haven't seen anything substantial on that front.
And it's pretty much solely coming out of the DOJ in my eyes.
I mean, I think this is pretty much complete vindication of anybody that was bringing attention to Pizzagate back in the day.
I mean, we see we've largely known, but this is a massive confirmation that there is obviously a very insidious nature when it comes to the elite class, and it's very incestuous.
They, of course, have all these nefarious, what's it called?
Like extra activities that they engage in, obviously, when it comes to pedophilia and a lot of the satanic rituals that they clearly engage in.
But on the other front, when it comes to X, I agree that it's not reaching the masses because most normal people that I know, they quite frankly don't even have an X account, let alone spend time going through the Epstein files on the platform.
So I don't think it's reaching the masses in that way.
But the other problem that I find with the Epstein files on X is that everything is circulating, including all of the, you know, quite frankly, likely false reports from loony bins.
I mean, it includes everything.
So people haven't been really all that great at discerning a lot of the times what is credible or what is potentially credible and what is clearly not.
So a lot of that is creating a lot of talk.
And I think it's shooting a lot of attention in a direction that's not even really relevant.
But yeah, I mean, I'm not of the camp that if you are simply named in the Epstein files, that you are automatically seriously implicated.
I recognize that Jeffrey Epstein rubbed elbows with anybody over with a net worth over, say, $10 million and anybody of major affluence.
So, and I don't think that everybody was engaging in this nefarious behavior, but a lot of them were.
When Epstein, you know, when he was the financier is how they like to call him, and he opened, he opened a finance company, I believe it was in the 90s, early 90s, mid-90s, and it was for billionaires only.
And at that time, I think there were only 30 or 30 or some odd billionaires on the entire planet.
And he had them all as clients.
And you look at the stuff that he was into now.
I feel like that's not by coincidence.
I feel like he was hunting down the most elite, wealthy people on the planet, I think, to get blackmail over them.
I was just going to say, I think it was absolutely a massive blackmail operation, probably the largest blackmail operation that we've ever seen in this country's history, especially.
But yeah, I mean, and I don't think that he was exclusively working for one country.
I think he was working for a multitude of countries.
I know that there's a lot of growing evidence that he was working for not only, you know, the United States, but also Israel, China, or sorry, not China, Russia.
And I'm sure there are other countries included in there as well.
I mean, with the release of these new files, it's very evident that we kind of knew that Epstein had a large network, but it's pretty clear that his network is probably a whole lot larger than we originally thought.
But no, I mean, it's he's, he was one of the most popular artists, I think, multiple years in a row.
Um, like most downloads, most listens to on the streaming platforms.
Um, so he's a very popular artist, but inherently un-American, to say the least.
Um, I mean, his anti-American and anti-ICE sediments that he's been very, very vocal about are, you know, essentially rejecting American culture in and of itself.
And for the sport that is inherently American, I mean, it's called American football, for heaven's sake.
Um, for them to embrace that as an organization, I think increasingly shows that they hate the administration.
They essentially just want to be these social justice warriors as a as an organization.
Um, but I mean, I love football, I love a lot of the players in football.
I have my own personal football team that I root for diehardly.
Country band, a rock band, that would be tapping into the mean of the NFL audience.
But it's just like every year they want to do, you know, hip-hop or something like that that most of the NFL fans probably aren't even interested in.
I mean, hell, I'm not a big fan of Taylor Swift, but even she would make more sense to me.
Somebody in the comments says Bad Bunny plays the skin flute.
Come on, guys.
Well, actually, I wouldn't be surprised if they try something like that on stage.
Hey, another question about younger culture.
I keep seeing these polls that say younger generations aren't into drinking anymore.
And, you know, I kind of see that.
And I'm like, well, this is curious.
Obviously, alcohol is a poison.
But when I was a kid, when I was in college, you know, that's what we did at parties.
It was like, if you were going to go to a party, you wanted to go to the party where people had 30 packs of Bud Light or bottles to drink from, whatever.
And so I kind of see that.
I'm like, well, it's probably a good thing the kids aren't drinking.
I mean, to be honest with you, that probably is health-wise correct.
I haven't really looked at the science behind it.
I know that as far as marijuana goes, I think a lot of the science is very new.
We don't really know a lot of the long-term effect with regular usage of it.
As far as nicotine goes, I think nicotine in small doses regularly is probably actually a good thing health-wise.
There's studies that show that it improves long-term and short-term cognition, but key word being, you know, small doses and most people, but use it, abuse it.
There's probably a slight concern, especially kind of jumping into the public eye and a lot of the attention that I've got, particularly because of my stances on immigration and my racial background, I suppose, or ethnic background rather.
Um, I have gotten a lot of negative attention because of that.
Okay, it's a it's a little uh it's a little twofold, actually.
The anti-Indian right wing, which I have experienced really only online and really only on X.
I have never experienced any sort of racial hatred in real life and from anybody that truly matters.
Um, however, a lot of it is that, and then also immigrants and you know, just people on the left that hate me because I have an Indian father and I'm largely against most forms of immigration, especially nowadays.
How about 20% off your first order with coupon code Owen?
Will that do it for you?
Try the official coffee of the Owen report, blackoutcoffee.com slash Owen, 20% off your first order with coupon code Owen at blackoutcoffee.com slash Owen.
All right, let's get back to the news here.
You know what?
I may need to take a breath here because we're about to get back into some of this Epstein stuff.
And it's pretty heavy stuff.
It's pretty disgusting stuff.
And we're going to kind of go back in time, even a little bit back in time to look at some of this stuff and review some of this stuff.
I'm bringing this up because there was a story about the Finnish hockey team, and I think they were supposed to actually play the United States women's team, who's obviously, I think, the favorite to win gold this year.
And they had to cancel the game because some virus ran through the hockey team.
Now, I shot some videos on this, and you guys know my policy.
I punch back.
Like Rambo, you drew first blood.
I only punch up and I only punch back.
So when people attack me, I attack back.
But I've with the Epstein stuff, I've kind of given them a little grace period here, hoping they correct course, you know, hoping they correct course and see the error of their ways.
And we'll see how long that lasts.
But then when somebody comes after me, I punch back.
So one individual right here that came after me.
You may know this guy, James Lindsay.
Now, how this guy got into political prominence, you'd have to ask him.
It makes no sense to anybody.
So this fat Chungus, he attacked me the other day.
Well, here's what he had to say this week about the Epstein files.
Looks like most of the Epstein stuff is mostly nothing, really, with some interesting points here and there that demand looking into, except the transhumanism.
Mostly nothing, says James Lindsay about the Epstein files.
Mostly nothing, huh, James?
I'm actually really glad that you posted this, James.
I'm really glad.
Couldn't be happier that you posted this because really, I don't need to attack you because you just owned yourself.
So nice to know that you're part of the downgrading, downplaying, and covering up of the truth about the Epstein files.
So you know what?
I don't even need to attack you.
I just need to read your tweets and your posts, and people know exactly who you are now.
Epstein files suggest the pedophile arranged multiple meetings with Putin while intelligence sources believed he was running the world's largest honey trap operation on behalf of the KGB.
Oh, a little humor here from DD Geopolitics.
So they looked up the author here, Adam Pogrund.
Let's see here.
Unified through harmony, how music is bringing Jews together.
Even French media, the Russian trail sneaks into the sprawling Jeffrey Epstein affair.
Now, of course, in Europe, they just want to continue to demonize Russia because they steal our money from NATO.
So they love keeping Russia as the boogeyman so they can steal money through NATO and continue to fund the Ukraine war, which benefits them as well.
They don't care how many dead people there are as long as they get to steal the money and the sex trafficking and the weapons for their regime change wars.
So yes, France says Epstein was Russian.
Hilarious stuff.
Absolutely hilarious stuff.
Oh, we're not even done.
Daily Mail, Jeffrey Epstein helped Russian spies collect blackmail on Western elites for decades, says former MI6 agent Christopher Steele.
Jay Dyer pointing this out, by the way, Jay has done some great coverage of this this week.
Did you know Elaine Maxwell and her sister Isabel were early developers of search engines, including Magellan, which was one of the homepage of Netscape Navigator in the 90s and sold for $18 million?
This is how they met Bill Gates.
Some speculate the search capabilities might have been to catalog the blackmail data.
One Nation under Blackmail, Whitney Webb's book.
Oh, but see, it's not just to catalog the data.
Now it's to get data on every single person that uses the internet to blackmail you.
But again, to bring it back to a question you asked earlier on about Israel and blackmail, they don't really need blackmail anymore.
And I argue at the end of my book that Palantir, Peter Thiel's company, really makes it so that, I mean, that's the new Jeffrey Epstein at the end of the day.
If they want to blackmail you or know something about you, they just access what Palantir sucked up about you and your search history, your communications, your finances, tweets you've liked in the past, all sorts of things.
You don't really need Epstein in the surveillance era.
Do you think when they said tweets are private, it was just an inducement to get us all to like what we really want to like so they can hold it against us later?
It's possible if they want to hold it against you later.
The disturbing thing about Palantir is that it's really about pre-crime.
They were the pioneers of predictive policing.
You know, they were originally, well, almost everywhere they've piloted predictive policing have been low-income minority neighborhoods where they decide who's going to commit a crime before they commit it.
You know, we'll see administrative detention maybe if we go the Israeli path.
But Trump actually in his first term posited this program to stop mass shootings before they happen.
That would basically involve going over American social media posts and identifying if they had early warning signs of neuropsychiatric illness based on their tweets or Facebook posts.
And if they were determined by the algorithm to show those warning signs, they could be placed under house arrest or go to sessions with a court-ordered psychologist and all sorts of things.
unidentified
My extended relatives better be careful because they got some wild Facebook posts.
It's worth pointing out that a lot of social media companies like Facebook have a lot of ties to Peter Thiel at the same time he was setting up Palantir, and that Facebook has a lot of similarities to a failed DARPA project called Life Log that arguably Facebook was resurrected into because Palantir is the resurrection of another DARPA program called Total Information Awareness that was so scandalous when it was announced it was defunded by Congress, but then they realized that if they turned it into a all right.
So I think I think Whitney Webb is really spot on with this.
And you could say she's one of the leading experts, but she really nails every angle.
And to kind of re-emphasize and rephrase, if you will, again, I've talked about this.
I haven't really gone too much into detail, but I do believe now, you know, I don't know if they have it where it needs to be.
And this is what I said earlier in the show.
And I do believe that they don't have the surveillance state where it needs to be.
It requires so much energy, so much data processing that really, until they have quantum computing at a mass scale and nuclear energy running it, I don't think they can really initiate the surveillance state in the all-encompassing way that they desire.
Now, I think that they have enough capacity right now.
I mean, they can build data processors all day long.
So it's not even a data issue.
It's not even a processing issue.
It's an energy issue and it's a speed issue.
And they just don't have enough energy or speed right now.
So what I think where they're at is they can direct it.
It's a process, but they can direct it and they can basically build a profile.
They can basically build your internet profile.
And, you know, who knows how they decide what your score is going to be?
You can take reasonable guesses.
You can make estimates.
But they'll basically score everything you do on the internet.
They'll score and compile everything you do on the internet.
Now, I don't believe they have the capacity to do that at a running scale 24/7 as is.
I don't think they have the energy or the computing power.
And that's why I think there's this race right now for quantum computing and to get the energy to run these things.
But I do think they can select.
I do think that they have enough power as is to make selections and say, okay, build a profile on this individual.
And they're probably running tests on this right now.
So they'll measure the things you do online, the things you search, the things you say, the things you post.
I wouldn't even be surprised if this is recording you and plugging that into the same data centers as well and managing and scaling all of this.
But I don't think they have the all-encompassing state yet.
I think that they can direct it and say, okay, let's use me, for example.
Say, all right, we're going to create a profile for Owen Schroer.
And they can just put a certain amount of individuals into the system and then compile all that data and try to create a profile off of individuals.
But I do think ultimately they want to get to full-scale, all-encompassing 24-7 data processing on each individual, constantly building a profile.
I do think that's where they want to go.
Now, I think where we stand, I think the awakening, I think the human awakening, I think the human renaissance, I think we're outpacing them.
I do.
I think we're outpacing them.
And I think their panic is everywhere.
Quite frankly, I think that their panic is everywhere.
And I think that's why you're seeing so many distractions and diversions.
I think that's why so much of us are anticipating some major event to kind of draw down this.
But I think we're ahead of them.
I think we are outpacing them in the human awakening and the human consciousness.
I think we are outpacing their AI surveillance state.
I do.
The problem is with these people, they're so demonic and evil that they'll do despicable, evil things to try to stop our pace and increase theirs.
And we've seen this on so many different occasions.
Now, do with this information what you would like.
I mean, I basically assume that everything I do is being spied on and compiled into a database.
I basically already live my life that way.
So do what you want with this information, but I think that's probably the safest bet is to just assume that everything you do is being put into data processing.
And you know, a lot of people say that Elon Musk is a part of this, and that's probably fair criticism.
I think that's fair criticism.
So act accordingly is all I can say.
That's the world.
That's the world that we're in.
And so act accordingly.
But I do think that to go back to what Webb was saying at the beginning of that clip, you know, Epstein, who I'm now beginning to think is alive, by the way, I was never an Epstein is still alive person.
I actually, now I think I'm leaning Epstein is alive.
It's like a 50-50 split.
I'm like 51% Epstein is alive now.
I probably would have said like 25% in the past.
I was probably like 25% he's alive, 75% he's dead in the past.
They don't need to bring you in and get you on video or get you on camera or whatever.
When they're spying on literally every single person on the planet via the internet, via their smartphones and everything else, you're in the trap already.
Well, you have to do constant surveillance, including things like sewage surveillance or taking people who have respiratory infection and making sure you know what it is.
And so if something new appears, even in Africa, you can contain it before it gets all over the entire globe.
And so we understand far better how to do diagnosis.
We know what to look for.
The world hasn't come together yet to create that surveillance system.
When it does break out, we need to come up with drugs and vaccines very quickly.
We have some great technology for that.
So that could have been worse.
That is the death rate from that pandemic was about 1%, higher in the elder and much lower in the younger.
The next pandemic that'll come sometime could be worse.
This is what all the people in the Epstein emails, all the world elites.
They want to put you in a total permanent slave system.
That's what they want to do.
Total permanent slave system, no freedom, everything on an AI surveillance grid.
You make a mistake.
You're screwed.
And it's, oh, we're going to stop pandemics.
We're going to stop crime.
No, you're going to stop human freedom.
That's what they're going to do.
And then they're just ultimately, they're just going to stop humans, just going to stop humanity.
And, you know, I get a lot of gruff from the audience, and I'm okay with that.
I'm okay with the Musk criticism.
You know where I stand on that.
But that's part of the reason why I do still have Musk at a higher approval rating because I don't think he wants to snuff out humanity.
I think even though he's involved with that stuff and he's, you know, one of the leading people with that stuff, I don't think he wants to snuff out humanity.
I think he wants to empower humanity.
That's the big difference.
That's why my approval rating of Musk is still above 50.
Because unlike all these other freaks that want to use this technology to snuff out humanity, I think Musk wants to use it to empower humanity.
That's my opinion.
I know a lot of people disagree.
That's one of the things my audience doesn't like about my commentary, but that's okay.
It's okay.
It's good we disagree.
It's good we don't all think the same.
We're not an occult here.
It's fair criticism.
But that's what they want to do.
And that's why I'm just sitting here looking at it.
It's like we all see where it's going.
Maybe we should think twice, hit pause, talk about it for a second.
Now, you may recall a couple months ago, Maxwell they let her get an interview, which look, I think they've cut a deal with Maxwell, to be honest.
I think they cut a deal with Maxwell.
I think that that's how she was able to get into a Fed camp and out of a prison, which is what every person in a federal corrections institution wants is to get into the camp.
I don't know if you saw it, that the Democrats are already saying if you bring President Bill Clinton and he has to testify, we're bringing President Trump 26.
La la la like how do you how do you reason trump goes after rand ball and thomas massey but supports lindsey graham now here's what i think happened obviously there's no justice for the clintons Oh, we're not going to talk about Bill Clinton and Epstein Island anymore, huh?
And so, you know, Besant, I think he throws us a little bit of a bone there, to be honest, guys.
And I don't know why he decided to throw that out there because basically what he's saying is that every single American should be able to sue for $10 billion.
So he uses the podium at the national prayer breakfast to lie.
It's an outright lie.
He's not polling at 9%.
That is just a blatant lie.
He also doesn't vote no on everything, but fine.
We get the point.
You're going to use the podium at the national prayer breakfast to attack some of the only two conservatives left in Congress and make it about politics.
Honestly, folks, what Trump has become in his second administration, and you know what?
People will say he was always this.
Okay, whatever.
Rub it in.
I voted for him three times.
I really don't care.
It's fair.
I own it.
I voted for him.
I'm holding the guy I voted for accountable.
Despicable.
The con man that he's become.
Absolutely despicable, the con man that he's become.
You want to use a speech to attack Rand Paul?
You want to use a speech to attack Thomas Massey?
That's fine.
Campaign trail, White House press, whatever.
It's the national prayer breakfast.
And you're the one that comes off as the a-hole here, attacking his wife and lying about the approval rates.
I can't wait till Thomas Massey wins the election, which he's going to 100%.
And if he doesn't, it'll just be a total rig, a total steal.
And then that'll be funny to watch.
Oh, we're going to stop the steal.
And then they're just going to start stealing elections for Trump.
I just can't believe it, man.
I just can't believe it.
So again, that was at the national prayer breakfast.
So he makes it, oh, I've brought, he talks about how he's brought religion back.
And he says, religion is hotter than ever, like it's a sales pitch, like it's a product.
Uses it to attack Massey and Paul.
Name-calling.
What an embarrassment.
And you know, I was thinking about this too.
You know what?
And maybe it's wishful thinking.
Maybe I am coping.
I feel like if they wouldn't have stolen the 2020 election, it wouldn't be like this.
Trump RX set to launch, but it's unclear if it will lower drug prices.
So now Trump RX is the new Trump thing.
Trump's hotter than ever.
Trump this, Trump that.
Me, Section 230 reform is being pitched in Congress now, assessing Section 230 reform proposals in the 119th Congress.
Now, folks, look, there's a fair debate here, but it's very clear the way this is going.
They're going to use these reforms to censor social media, is what they're going to do.
They're going to use these reforms to censor social media.
And so I'm really afraid now that that's what it's going to be used to do.
Specifically, X, obviously, the one platform that they probably control the least.
I think they're going to use Section 230 reform to censor X. That's what I see happening.
So we'll continue to cover that.
That process is just starting.
Oh, Israel bulldozed part of Gaza War Cemetery containing allied graves.
Well, those are just stupid gom.
Yeah, the Israelis don't care.
They just desecrated the graves of Goyam lost in World War II.
Satellite images and witness testimony show destruction as IDF claims it was forced to take defensive measures against the dead.
The IDF was forced to take defensive measures against a bunch of corpses from World War II.
You know, the allies that fought to free the Jews from Nazi Germany.
You know, the whites, the whites, the goys that fought and died to save the Jews.
You know, you guys are so appreciative there.
Those Israelis, they're so appreciative of all the Goyum that died to save them.
Wonder how that's going to go.
So they desecrated the grave, and they're going to build a nice, they're going to build a nice tower on it probably for the non-goy to take and live in.
It's very nice of them.
Very nice.
Just letting you know how they really feel.
It was in self-defense.
It was literally a cemetery.
Those corpses were coming right after me.
Anti-Semitism was in their DNA.
My god, and it's funny.
Dinesh D'Souza, you know, he's a big supporter of Israel, big standing up for the Jews.
That actually sounds like more of an admission than anything, Dinesh.
I don't think you thought that one through, bud.
I'm not sure Dinesh thought that one through.
But you know, you really, we are really getting a taste of the entitlement of these and railies is of these Israelis right now.
We're really getting an understanding of the entitlement.
This Israeli got caught speeding in New York, or he was in Florida, speeding to New York.
You know what?
For the sake of time, he tells the police officer, well, I'm an Israeli and we don't have a speed limit, so you have to let me go because he was doing 110, and that's like a super speeding crime.
It's like depending on the speed.
So he gets pulled over doing 110, super speeding crime.
He says, oh, no, no, no, I'm in Israeli.
We don't have speed limits.
Like, oh, oh, okay, you're above the law, huh?
I'm just not going to play that video for the sake of time.
Let's move on because this happened.
Now, again, for the sake of time, this is now a former Turning Point employee, Aubrey Lach.
Here she tells her story about how she was fired from Turning Point USA, but she doesn't buy the official story.
I don't want to play all 12 minutes.
Let me see if we can play the last half of this because I think this will encompass the body of the video.
Got into an Uber one day and they randomly just kind of started talking about Turning Point.
And the executive asked the driver, what do you think about Turning Point?
And the driver proceeded to tell the Turning Point executive, well, it's just really sad.
I've heard the organization's really going downhill.
There's not really a direction and nobody likes Erica.
And the Turning Point executive proceeded to ask this Uber driver, well, who told you that?
And the Uber driver told the Turning Point executive that his daughter was good friends with a girl that worked at Turning Point way back when in high school.
They had spoken about Turning Point since Charlie's assassination, and that, you know, this was told to him by his daughter.
And the Turning Point executive, of course, asked, Well, what's the employee's name?
And the Uber driver allegedly said, Aubrey Aubrey who, Aubrey Leitch.
And the story was presented to me as one of the reasons for my termination.
And I was just a little taken aback because, number one, I'm not really friends with anybody from high school.
And a lot of that has to do with my political beliefs.
I've been a conservative since I was pretty much a junior in high school.
And so I don't know who I would have told this story to.
And it also doesn't even align with my true thoughts of Erica at the time.
I've actually known Erica since 2013.
We were doing pageants around the same time as one another.
She was in the Miss USA organization and I was in the Miss United States organization.
And we happened to cross paths at an event.
So I've known Erica for quite some time.
And my thoughts of her and nobody liking her do not align whatsoever with that timeline of October or November.
So that was one of Turning Point's reasons for letting me go.
So unlike my peers, I actually was given reason.
However, there's another thing I kind of want to dive into.
To protect myself, I am going to preface with Turning Point has not insinuated this.
They never told me anything like this.
However, I just have a gut feeling that I was terminated from Turning Point because I am questioning the narrative of what happened to my role model and CEO, Charlie Kirk, on the day of his assassination.
What is being told to us in the mainstream media just really doesn't add up to me.
And I'm really hopeful that one day it will.
But as it stands right now, it just doesn't.
And so I've been here in the background talking with people, expressing how I truly feel because as an American citizen, I have the right to my freedom of speech and my freedom of thought.
And I have a lot of concerns and a lot of questions about what took place that day and the events leading up to that day.
It is from my own experience that you can't question the narrative and work at Turning Point.
That is how I feel.
That is how other people I've talked to feel.
It goes against everything that Charlie ever stood for.
Charlie was someone who did question things, who did challenge the narrative.
And I know that if anything, anything at all were to have happened to myself or another employee or any other peer within the Turning Point family, that Charlie would be doing the same thing if we were brutally assassinated in the way that he was.
He would have never lived it down.
And that is what I'm standing by as well.
I am not going to just idly sit by and hope that the truth comes to light.
I'm going to take action.
I'm going to ask questions.
I'm going to talk to other people.
And I refuse to apologize for having my own freedom of thought, which is something that Charlie ingrained in me and so many other young people.
So really the purpose of me coming on here and speaking with you today is to just bring light to the situation of the treatment happening inside the organization.
All of these people who have been terminated were the most hardworking, loyal, honest employees that Turning Point has ever had.
And I know that because I've actually been at Turning Point longer than most people.
You can, that's public record.
You can see it for yourself on these job websites.
Turning point's average length of employment is about a year and a half to two.
And so to be there for almost five years is actually quite some time.
I've seen the media and marketing team, for example, turn over at least twice, consuming of about 40 people.
And so I know that these people have been some of the most loyal, hardworking, and honest individuals to ever pass through the organization because I've been there, done that, and seen it all.
I'm doing this for them.
And I'm doing this for my friends who I consider family who are still there in hopes that they will start to receive better treatment by the leadership there because nobody deserves to be let go without cause.
And frankly, it's a loss for Turning Point.
We're all going to be better off because of this because we have removed ourselves from an environment that was no longer serving us.
And in my opinion, no longer serving the Lord, which was Charlie's entire intention.
The other purpose of this video is to bring to light the fact that although Turning Point is an organization that is all about freedom of speech and promoting that, from my experience, it is certainly not a place where that is something that is really accepted.
I didn't want to do this.
I didn't want this to be the ending result for me or for Turning Point.
It literally breaks my heart to make this video, but I know that I owe it to Charlie and that this would be the expectation for me.
And so that's why I'm doing it.
Everything's for Charlie.
Overall, it's really disappointing to see the direction in which Turning Point is going.
And that is maybe one thing right that they got about this Uber ride is I'm not confident in where it's going as it stands right now.
And I'm really disappointed by that because I packed up and moved my entire life back to my hometown solely for the purpose of working for Turning Point.
That is how much I love this place.
I just refuse to stand by, watch my peers be unfairly treated and watch leadership attempt to take over something that was Charlie through and through and something that he poured his heart, soul, and mind into building and creating and maintaining.
I appreciate everyone who stuck around for the entirety of this video.
Now, look, I will just say, you know, I have never worked for Turning Point.
And I don't think it's really my place to say some of, you know, the interpersonal workings or opinions of them.
But I will say this.
I don't think that issue that she just highlighted or that she's talking about or just her isolated, I don't think that's the last you're going to hear of that.
I would highly doubt it, in fact.
And this is where I hesitate to say, but it's like, I mean, I know for a fact she's not alone in some of those mindsets, if not all of those mindsets.
If Trump won't strike Iran in the next few days or weeks, do you think Israel will do some sort of false flag attack in order to get Trump to strike?
I, you know, you got to give one thing to Israel.
They are very well measured and smart in what they do, and that's why they are able to get away with so much.
I think they know that that is not a smart move right now.
I think they know that they will get blamed for it, and it will continue to only continue to hurt their agenda.
I think it's more likely that we just see more Epstein leaks.
I think it's more likely that we see more Epstein links and the market continue to crash.
I think that's what they have their levers on, and I think that's what they're just going to continue to use until they get what they want out of Trump.
That's how I see it.
I don't think they need anything else.
But, you know, obviously that's always in play.
Cornelius Westernmost.
I would love to see an Owen-Mike Adams collab.
You both have been simpatico with takes on Trump, Middle East, and the economy.
Ask him about his genius idea for a tax strike via 100% legal IRS loophole.
Always love Mike.
Good friends with Mike.
We stay in touch.
I can reach out to him, maybe make that happen.
Pro-Trumpers and anti-Trumpers only focusing on Trump and Epstein is equally as disgusting.
Yeah, so if that, if an alligator lived through the flood, they always say like an alligator is a dinosaur.
I think there's yeah, and sharks, like I think that obviously there's still alligators today.
So, there are big like dinosaur creatures, but there are some that were able to live through the flood and how they say like they all just died from a comet.
So, and every single dinosaur bone you've ever seen, which I do believe in dinosaurs, but I'm just saying there's something weird about it.
Every single dinosaur bone that you've ever seen in a museum is a recreation because they say that the actual dinosaur bones have too much radiation and they have to be held behind, you know, some sort of special holding facility.
So, but that's, I, you know, oh, somebody probably, somebody, somebody probably texted him that because he's so stupid.
You know, he doesn't watch.
He probably doesn't watch anything.
He's like probably jerking it to transgender porn.
But yeah, probably, somebody probably got you and Owen mixed up and said, oh, because Owen Benjamin has done like hundreds of hours of dinosaurs and fake.
I'm not in that level, but I do think there's some weird hinky-jinky stuff with dinosaurs.
Yeah, I think that we had some big mammals and dinosaurs.
They got to prop up these middle schools because so many people are moving there, but they don't need to prop up the high schools because they can still handle the pop, the pop.
Yeah, but dude, it was not that long ago where they were all kissing Bill Gates' ass and telling us to get vaccinated because Bill Gates said so, because Bill Gates is so smart.
And to see like the about face on Bill Gates, I love it.
And then Melinda Gates, the viral clip of Melinda Gates answering the allegation question.
He's like talking about Goy and he talks about how it's, you know, obviously a slang.
It's a pejorative.
It's a negative term.
But the reason why Goy is better than all the other slurs, like the N-word or cracker or whatever, because it's the most inclusive, you know, racial slur because it includes everybody.
Well, you know, I never really get into that stuff.
I don't really do that commentary, but you know, it's funny you say that.
A couple people reached out to me, you know, kind of generally just like, oh, do you know about this?
You know, whatever.
But that was a common complaint from the people.
They were like, hey, why is this even in my feed?
Like, why are people even talking?
Like, why is this a big?
So it does seem like it's kind of to a certain degree.
There's like that moment.
It was one of the greatest South Park episodes ever.
I forget the name of it, but they were lowering the bar and then raising the bar with the same episode where Cartman was doing the handicap car fights with the spaghetti girl, whatever her name is, Kitty Boo-Boo or whatever, honey boo-boo.
And the last thing I'll say, it's like, I don't wish anything bad for Elijah.
He's going through a divorce.
That's a tough thing.
So I don't even, I'm not even trying to air him out.
It's just funny how everybody wants to like dogpile on Elijah and Sarah, which, you know, I guess there is fair criticism that people are giving, but it's just weird how much pleasure people get from going after him.
And I'm not trying to go after him.
People are going to use this clip and say, I'm going after him.
Really, I believe that they deserve some privacy.
And that Sarah girl deleted her account.
I think we just need to lay off her.
And, you know, it is what it is.
So I'm not, I'm not even really trying to throw stones, is what I'm trying to say.
There are some days that are hard and there's just days that are easy.
But the booking the guests, Owen, you know, that's always such a pain in the butt because the guests that we want to get are usually people that are notable and people that are notable, like their schedules are hard.
It's just that the booking process, and I know it was probably a little easier at InfoWars because people really want to go on Infowars, but I'm still sure that you had, you know, annoying days with guests.
I feel bad that I told him six, but I told him that last week.
I thought we were recording at six and it's really five and I didn't tell him in time and he didn't respond to the producer email, but you know, because he gave me some goofball email.
Like I think it's just real email.
But my point is, it's just like, it's on me.
It's not my producer's fault.
So I'm just annoyed at myself and it just looks last night.
When you have a, when you have a network and an hour show, but like, dude, trying to manage all the different stuff and do a three-hour show, it's like you're, and eventually there's like too many balls in the air and you're juggling a hundred different things and you kind of just have to say, okay, wait, I just need to focus on the show.
They tried to quote, they tried to community note it as it was like compopulation or whatever, and it didn't even make sense.
So then they had to community note it because I said it's genetically modified.
And they're like, oh, Snoke doesn't have DNA, so it can't be genetically modified.
Like they had his community noted somehow, I guess, so I couldn't get revenue because it got 7 million views because a guy has a blowtorch and is blowtorching ice.
Like if you run my thing, like how they have that, there's like, I don't even know how to explain it, but how somebody gave it a certain, if you can give it a certain prompt, it'll kind of tell you what your social credit score is on X.
Well, I mean, what I'm saying is what they're going to do is, I think they might, and I could be so wrong because Elon Musk, you saw, you saw where Nikki Minaj was being interviewed by Katie Miller and she said that she didn't believe the moon landing was real.
And then Katie Miller goes, well, I asked Elon that direct question and Elon said it is.
So it's like, all right, Elon also has like 20 baby mamas under NDAs.
But this is what I'm saying.
I think that they probably maybe can go to the moon now.
You know, maybe they can go there now because we got all this starship and all this stuff.
We see the rockets going out.
So like, if it makes sense, that we could go in 2026.
But they're going to have to justify how it looks different than it looked in 1969.
So I don't know what they're going to do.
I don't know if they're going to have to admit that that 1969 was different because this one, I think, could be real.
You see what I'm saying?
And then they're going to have to go back.
So I don't know.
You know, if they told everybody at the moon, if they told everybody the moon landing was fake, nobody would care.
Ben Shapiro would say, oh, well, it doesn't matter.
You know why he wasn't in it, I don't think, because I don't think Howard's a pedophile.
I think Howard's gay with Ralph.
Like, I don't think Howard probably likes little boys.
I think he likes guys, and he probably's hiding that secret that he's not going to go.
He already has enough secrets to hide is why I think that he probably wasn't on it.
So he's probably not into kids.
Like his politics suck, but he's probably smart enough to realize, like, maybe I shouldn't go to an island and do this with kids because Howard Stern is a smart guy, whether you like him or not.