Owen Shroyer dissects Trump’s 38-40% approval amid economic pessimism, a potential "war with Iran," and Democratic threats to exploit ICE funding despite prior deals. Garland Favorito reveals Georgia’s seized ballots show fraud—17,000 undocumented votes—while Shroyer blames critics for inaction, calling them "phonies." He contrasts ICE’s criminal deportation focus with Biden-era border chaos, 4,000 migrant deaths, and surging sex trafficking. The episode ties trade deficits, AI risks, and Epstein conspiracies to systemic exploitation, warning of a financial reset while mocking political media hypocrisy and Hall of Fame bias. [Automatically generated summary]
So you're dealing with that ahead of the midterms, where you know if the Democrats win, it's going to be a nightmare.
And now you've got this war with Iran that's building up again.
You've got to deal with the different military assets and strategy in that region again.
So that makes it a little difficult to handle the economy when you're dealing with more foreign war in the Middle East.
So he's got that going on.
Not to mention trying to handle all of the domestic issues with the deep state, the illegal spying, now the 2020 election.
So we're dealing with all of this at the same time.
Now you've got the ICE protests.
You've got two dead protesters.
And you will probably get a government shutdown.
Now, depending on how difficult the Democrats want to be with this, will tell us whether or not this is going to be a real big shutdown or not.
And we all know the government shutdown is fake.
It's not a real shutdown.
And they shut down the things that mostly just affect, I don't know, welfare recipients, maybe some museums.
But for the most part, the government shutdown is really ineffective as far as shutting down the government.
So we actually would support a government shutdown if it was the real deal.
But it looks like the Democrats are going to shut it down, at least for the weekend.
And if it's all about ICE funding, then we're going to talk about something the Trump administration did last year, I guess, in anticipation of this happening.
And so the Democrats might not have the leverage that they think they have as far as this shutdown is concerned.
But we'll get to that.
We got a lot of news here.
We got weather news.
The weather is impacting the show today.
We'll tell you about that.
Economic news.
There's a new twist in the Maxwell, the D-Lane Maxwell story.
We'll have that for you.
Would you trust a automatic driving car?
It's all the rage now.
We got a little automatic driving car news.
So we'll have that for you.
We got statements from Tom Holman.
Some, you know, Tom Holman said some things today that are extremely revealing, and I'm amazed that they didn't get the attention.
These clips didn't get the attention, or people didn't understand what he was communicating.
Trump at a cabinet meeting today, not too much came of that, but uh, we do have something, we do have something on that that we'll get to.
We got a lot of news, we're going to try to get to it all.
A lot of news today, and we're going to have a guest, uh, an expert on the Georgia 2020 election fraud.
So, we'll talk a little bit with him in the second hour, uh, what he anticipates, if anything, is going to come from this raid of the stored ballots that we saw yesterday, the FBI raid, Tulsi Gabbard on site.
Is this the real deal, or is this another buildup for another letdown?
unidentified
This news update was brought to you by Owenschroyer.store, the official site for Owen Report merchandise.
Here's the deal: we've heard a lot about ivermectin and how effective it is: parasites, worms with humans.
But what about with your pets?
Now, parasites, worms, this is probably something you've thought more about with your pets than with you.
But what about using it for your pets to deal with these things?
For years, for years, we've been fighting for access to medicine that we know would help us, ivermectin.
But what about our pets?
Did you know ivermectin for pets assists with heartworm prevention in dogs and cats?
Also treats intestinal worms like roundworms, hookworms, and external parasites like mites.
So that's why our friends at resolvex.health bring you petmectin.
Petmectin is 100% pure pharmaceutical-grade, human-grade ivermectin.
This is the highest quality, third-party tested and most affordable ivermectin offered in the USA.
Go to resolvex.health on the screen, spelled R-E-S-O-L-V-X.
For our listening audience, want to make sure you understand that.
So, resolve without an E, resolvex.health.
And you can use coupon code ON10 right now for an additional 10% off.
You heard that correct.
Coupon code ON10 for an additional 10% off.
And while you're there, you can also find some of their other incredible products that they tried to keep off the market, like hydroxy, chloroquin, Fenbendazole, and so much more.
So they're really excited about this product.
And if you do have pets, you love your pets, you want them to live long, healthy lives, and a lot of that process is dealing with the worms, dealing with the parasites.
And a lot of times these things can rack up some pretty heavy bills, right?
But if you're wondering why the voice sounds a little off or if I sneeze 30 times during the transmission, that's why it's kind of frying my brain a little bit too for some reason.
It's like maybe when you're dealing with this stuff, you lose some of that attention, whatever this magical system that is our body, that is our existence, that is our consciousness.
It's like you lose some of the energy up here, and then it's dealing with the other seasonal stress issues.
So it's a little bit of brain fog today.
So just bear with me, if you will.
All right, we do have the guest at 4 o'clock Central in the second hour today.
And actually, I need to ask my producer to do something for me.
Producer DMT, can you do me a favor?
Can you text me the show invite link so that I can handle that on my phone?
I can't deal with it all on my computer right now.
You're in chains, maybe double chained up the entire time.
And then you hear Holman, he's talking about, oh, yeah, well, local law enforcement, they just released them out on the streets and then we have to go get them again.
Now, we already knew this was going on because we saw the videos.
We saw the videos.
I think it was Colorado specifically.
I believe it was Denver where ICE shows up to make an arrest and the jail just releases them out on the streets and they just run away.
And then ICE is chasing them around and it's like, what?
Why didn't you hand them over in cuffs?
I've never seen or heard of that ever before when it comes to a transfer.
So we'll look at that.
But now concessions are being made.
Now, before we get into the headlines, let me do two things.
Let me address what happened with the Trump accounts overnight.
And let's talk about the concessions now with ICE and this looming government shutdown.
And you have to actually give President Trump credit because he did play a genius move here.
And some people knew it at the time, but they didn't want to say it out loud because you didn't want to let the Democrats know your move.
But the Trump administration anticipated that the Democrats would try to shut down the government, specifically when it came to deportations.
And they knew they weren't going to cooperate.
So the last time they had the bill, and you may remember this debate, it was part of the bill.
The Trump administration has already funded ICE and the deportation efforts through 2026.
They already have the funding.
They already secured the funding with the last omnibus bill, the last spending bill.
So when the Democrats, they're going to get in front of, they're going to get in front of the Capitol.
They're going to make a big fuss.
And they're going to talk about how they're not going to vote for any bill that funds ICE.
Well, it really doesn't matter.
The Trump administration has already secured funding for ICE through 2026.
So they don't need the funding.
They already have the funding.
Now, I don't think the Democrats are going to let a good opportunity to step in front of the cameras and bloviate go by.
They're certainly going to do that.
The question is, do they really want to commit to the shutdown?
And so do they want to do some political grandstanding?
Do they think it's going to be good for them in the midterms?
Or do they want to wave the white flag, do a temporary shutdown, and then announce next week, okay, we've reached a deal.
Now, Republicans are kind of coming out like, you know, oh, we don't want to see a shutdown and Trump doesn't want to see a shutdown.
So you've kind of got the normal rhetoric around this stuff, which is all garbage.
It's not a real shutdown.
The tyranny doesn't stop.
The taxing doesn't stop.
The corruption doesn't stop.
The waste, fraud, and abuse doesn't stop.
So it's not even a real shutdown.
But this is what's going to happen.
They'll probably do some sort of ceremonious shutdown.
The Democrats will grandstand and they'll say, we refuse to fund ICE that is killing people in the streets.
Now, logical consistency be damned, as when we hear from Tom Holman later, the Democrats don't give a damn about people dying in the streets.
So let's just stop.
Now, they've got an opportunity here because this is what they wanted.
They've got an opportunity here to make Trump out to be the bad guy and ICE out to be the authoritarians and everything else because they've got two dead protesters in the streets, which is exactly what they wanted.
That was the plan.
They wanted to send the useful idiot liberals out there in hopes that one of them would die.
So then they could martyr them, grandstand, fundraise, and turn it into their big issue for the midterms.
So that's what they're going to do.
So I anticipate they'll do some grandstanding.
They'll do some ceremonious shutdown over the weekend.
And then they'll decide, and maybe they'll just see which way the wind blows over the weekend.
And then they'll decide whether or not they actually want to shut the government down or not.
Now, I kind of think, knowing the Democrats, I think they probably want to shut the government down.
Knowing the Democrats, knowing their philosophy, knowing their history, I think they probably want to shut the government down.
The only issue they could run into is there might be some Democrats that think it's bad for the midterms.
There might be some Democrats like John Fetterman in the Senate who say, hey, we need to support ICE.
This is actually popular.
Let's not stand against ICE.
This is not good for politics right now.
So they could run into a numbers issue and then not want to embarrass themselves by not looking unified.
But no, I'd say the odds are they shut down the government and maybe even it sticks.
I could see that happening because they really want to grandstand over these ICE killings.
They really want to fundraise and they really want to use that momentum into the midterms where, quite frankly, they already have the momentum.
So I think that that's what's going to go on.
I do think that's what's going to go on.
Now, the Trump accounts yesterday, and I can't believe it.
And it's probably because I was on air.
I can't, you know, I can't trade when I'm on air.
And I don't like doing, you know, you can set trades and do overnight trading and stuff, but I don't really like doing that because I like to wait till the markets are open.
But anyway, I called it yesterday.
I said, this is nothing but a pump and dump for all of Trump's donors, this Trump accounts deal.
And then sure enough, sure enough, what happened today?
Stocks went down 5% to 10%.
So they announced the Trump accounts yesterday.
A bunch of money comes in.
You get a 5% to 10% boost.
They sell high.
Then it goes down 5% to 10%.
All the new people that just got in, the Trump accounts, you just lost 5%, 10%.
And then they rebuy again, and then they'll get another 10%.
It's just another pump and dump.
It was literally another pump and dump.
Honestly, I hear Ted Cruz talk about this, and I'm like, how is this even legal?
Now, we showed you on the Trump accounts website yesterday, on the bottom, in the fine print, it says these results are not guaranteed.
It says these results are based on averages and these results are not guaranteed.
So in other words, if the stock market collapses or the dollar collapses, these Trump accounts are going to be worthless.
And, you know, for somebody out there that's got a couple thousand, you know, maybe 10, 20,000 in the stock market, it's like, well, you're not making life-changing money.
You're just trying to get a better return on some cash that wouldn't do so well in the bank.
Folks, it was a big pump and dump.
The Trump accounts announcement was a pump and dump, and they did it.
So they did the big, it was all a marketing pitch.
It was all a sales pitch.
They did it yesterday.
They got their 10% boost and then they sold and then it went right back down.
And now they're going to buy and then they're going to get another 10%.
So when you've got a million dollars in the stock market or $100 million in the stock market, and by the way, and look, to the individuals that are donating to these Trump accounts, like Michael Dell and the rest, I'm not going to hold judgment there.
Let's assume the best.
Let's assume they're doing it for all the right reasons.
Let's just assume that.
You can disagree with that, and that's perfectly reasonable.
But let's just assume they do it for the right reasons.
On the Trump accounts website, they all have that all the companies are listed there like it's a sponsored event because that's what it is.
And so they've got millions of dollars in the stock market.
And then they're going to double down because once it goes down, then they buy low and it goes back up.
So that's what I'm saying.
When you follow this stuff, I almost get to the point where I'm not saying there's not insider trading that goes on in Congress.
I'm not saying that.
And It's certainly a hub of corruption when you have the inside intel and you have a vote on some of these issues that you can get ahead of the trends.
But all I have to do, I'm not an insider, I'm not in Congress, I don't get any secret information.
All I have to do is follow the news and see what goes on at the White House.
And you can beat the markets.
You can beat 50% all day long because the whole administration right now is all about fleecing the markets, giving all the millionaires and the billionaire donors that are big in the stock market, big into Wall Street, and just letting them amass as much cash as they possibly can so that they can just buy capital by land,
buy resources, buy assets, because they're going to probably collapse the dollar.
And that's probably what this whole gold rush is all about.
But I'll just pump the brakes right there so that we don't get too lost into these weeds.
But it was crazy.
It was just crazy watching that.
And I just felt like such an idiot.
I just felt like such an idiot because I said that that exact thing was going to happen yesterday on the show when we were covering it.
Is it that they know something that we don't know and they're acting accordingly?
Like, I don't know, a cataclysm is coming.
Is it that now that they're all in bed with Trump, they can basically manipulate the markets, make out with as much cash as possible, put it all into assets so that when the dollar collapses, they're ready to go no matter what?
Are they about to do a financial reset and go back into gold-backed currencies?
Were all of these crypto markets just another scam as the dollar is collapsing to get you to invest in some digital currency that's that's sold as anti-establishment off-grid?
So you put all your money in crypto and then they just rug pull it.
These are the questions I'm asking.
And really, beyond politics, forget about the politics of it.
It's like you kind of want to be prepared.
You don't want to lose when all of this stuff goes down.
You don't want to lose when the global elites decide they're going to rug pull you.
You don't want to be on the losing end of that.
And most people will be.
But that's because most people are, you know, looking at who's playing in the Super Bowl and who's not.
So I don't want to be on the losing end of that.
I don't want you to be on the losing end of that.
All right, let's look at some of these polls here.
And there's a lot to try to get to here.
I'm going to jump around because this Fox News, this Fox News story just gets a little, there's too much sauce here.
So we're going to move around here.
But Fox News poll, Donald Trump starts 2026 with 44% approval.
Now, this is the highest number you're going to find.
Most other polls have Trump in the upper 30s.
So I'd say the real approval rating when you weigh them all out, I'd say Trump's real approval rating is probably about 40%.
Maybe that's probably the high mark, 38%, probably the low mark.
But I think that that's probably your real, I think that that's your real number.
It's about 38 to 40% on any given day.
But this is a Fox News poll, very favorable for Trump.
You look at the rest of the polls, they're usually around 36%.
So you kind of average it out.
You're looking at about 38, 40%.
And if you think about the midterms, it's not the worst you could do.
It's not the worst you could do.
But I don't think that Trump, you know, Trump will get people to show up for a rally.
Trump can get people to show up for a rally, no doubt.
And he might be able to influence some of these primaries and candidates that the donor class favors versus the independent candidates.
But I don't really think it moves the larger needle for Republicans.
I don't think it gives the Republicans the boost in the midterms that they think it does.
Nearly six in 10 Americans believe economy is weak under Trump.
And so, again, you go into these stories, they just get lost in the sauce.
It's just there's too many numbers they're throwing at you.
Six in 10 believe the economy is weak under Trump.
I'll give you the critical number here in a second.
Trump is troubled by two difficult obstacles in 2026.
They may get into it here.
Again, these stories, they just, you see, they just, they just throw all these numbers at you.
So you kind of get lost in it.
Here's the important number.
It's going to be about the economy.
It's all going to be about the economy.
And I think where they get that six in 10 number, the actual number, 54% of Americans say they are worse off today than they were a year ago.
So really, you're hovering about 50%.
So about half of people think they are worse off financially today than they were when Trump took office.
The tariff decision is going to be pretty crucial as far as the consumer price index is concerned.
And it could end up making or breaking the election.
And, you know, normally with these things, when the Supreme Court, When the Supreme Court looks at an issue and they think the timing of it, you know, whatever their opinion might be, they look at the timing of it and they say, we don't want the Supreme Court to determine the outcome of an election.
They'll basically do anything to hold off their decision because they don't want their Supreme Court decision to affect an election outcome.
And maybe that's why they haven't come out with their decision on tariffs yet.
But I do think that's the case.
I think that the outcome of the tariff decision could be one of the biggest factors in determining who will win and lose in the midterms.
And I think the Supreme Court, as historically it has, looks at that and says, we don't want to be involved in that.
We don't want our decision here to determine an election, which really just makes things worse for Trump.
I think Trump would probably rather have the decision now, even if it's not in his favor, because if they hold this thing back, it just, the mess of it just gets worse.
But then again, what do you think?
What do you think the Republicans are thinking about the most?
I don't really think, I don't think the Republicans really care if they maintain a majority or not.
I got to be honest.
I don't think they care.
The only thing that matters, I think, to the administration right now is if the Democrats get the majority, forget about policy.
If the Democrats get the majority, they're going to impeach Trump.
It doesn't even matter what the policies are.
They're going to impeach Trump and in the process, do anything else they can to stall the administration's agenda.
I think that's all that matters right now to the administration.
I don't think Republicans give a damn if they win or lose the House.
I don't think the Trump administration is too concerned about policy outcomes, whether or not they control the House or the Senate or not.
I don't think any of that matters.
I don't think they're thinking about that.
All they're thinking about is if the Democrats win, we're going to have to deal with impeachment and any other ways that they can try to stall this administration from having policy success.
I think that's all that really matters.
And, you know, this go-around is not going to be as good.
I have to say, I'm not so sure because in the first Trump administration, their two impeachment efforts were obviously fake, obviously phony.
They had no real standing.
And so ultimately, they didn't succeed.
And in that process, it was just the process as the punishment.
It was all about dragging them through the process, putting out the headlines, Trump impeach, Trump impeach, using that for the presidential election, impeached, twice impeached.
So it was all about headlines and it was all about the processes, the punishment in the first administration.
This administration, impeachment might be a little more serious.
I think it'll be a little more serious.
When you talk about the strikes in Venezuela without congressional approval, that's just one issue.
I could see the second administration dealing with some serious impeachment issues, not like the first administration that was fake and for headlines.
This second administration, you might actually be dealing with some real stuff.
But hey, Trump doesn't want us or need us anymore.
Hey, you know, I'm sure somebody out there will stand up for you during the impeachment trials, Trump.
I'm sure somebody, but you've insulted me now, personally, directly, whether you realize it or not.
So I guess it won't be me.
Now, we're going to have a guest on.
I'll tell you his name, Garland Favorito.
Let me pull him up here in a second.
So he was on the ground in 2020.
Voters organized for trusted election results in Georgia is the group he's with.
So we're going to get his take here in about 20 minutes on what just went down in Georgia.
Now, I don't want to get too ahead of this, but I, but you guys are probably with me.
We've noticed this pattern where we get this big buildup.
We get this big buildup on a singular issue, and then we get almost no results.
I think the Minnesota fraud is probably the most glaring at this point.
But that seems to be the trend.
It's like they do this big buildup, and then we anticipate mass arrests, and then it just doesn't happen.
And I think I said that about the Minnesota fraud.
Like, is this the moment that makes or breaks, you know, whatever is left of this MAGA coalition?
Is this the moment that breaks it?
Where if they don't deliver on mass arrests, then people are finally going to look up, you know, get their head out of Trump's ass and say, okay, hold on a second now.
Well, that's yesterday's news.
So now it's all about Georgia.
Now it's they're going down there.
They're getting the ballots.
I don't know what it is they're looking for.
We'll get into that in a second.
But some interesting, some interesting surrounding, you know, atmospheric stuff happening here.
Dinesh D'Souza, I am waiting for the roof to be blown off on this, talking about the 2020 stolen election.
Now, of course, Dinesh D'Souza did the 3,000 Mules documentary, which very conclusively proved that there was massive mail-in voting fraud.
And that's just one aspect of it, by the way.
That's just one aspect.
But yes, he did that.
And he even had people that were part of the documentary, and he sat them down: 2,000 mules, 3,000 mules, whatever it is.
And he sat them down.
And at the beginning of it, they said, no, I don't think there was any election fraud.
And then at the end of it, they had changed their mind and they said, okay, Dinesh D'Souza, you've changed my mind.
So, you know, that's one aspect, the mail-in ballot fraud that they caught him.
They caught him.
I don't know if that's what they're going after here.
The only thing I could really see happening is that they're going to realize that they had more votes than voters and that they were double and triple counting votes in Fulton County to steal the state for Joe Biden.
That's what I anticipate.
We'll see what Favorito says.
But then Ed Martin, who's one of the good guys, I will tell you, shares a picture with himself and Sidney Powell.
Now, Sidney Powell was all over the 2020 stolen election.
She said she was going to release the Kraken, and then there was all the drama and the fallout.
Ed Martin shares this.
Sidney Powell reshares it.
So Martin and Powell are now working together.
Now, here's my issue, if you want to call it that.
Ed Martin is really about close to one of us as it gets in D.C. He's one of us.
He wants stuff to be done about the corruption.
He does have a role there.
And I don't want to mischaracterize things, but it's like, folks, why do you think Marjorie Taylor Green left Congress?
It's like when you're one versus 100 and nobody else wants to do what needs to be done and nobody else is on the same team trying to pull us across the finish line, it becomes at some point a fool's errand or an impossible task.
Now, Martin is still around and he's trying to maintain hope.
And I do think he's one of the few good guys.
But folks, I've been seeing, I've been hearing this stuff for months and nothing ever happens.
And that's my problem.
And when it does happen, I'll be celebrating.
I'll be celebrating.
And, you know, I even find it funny.
And I don't really, I don't even, I wasn't going to get into this, but since we're here, I might as well.
Well, I really don't want to.
I really don't want to, but it's like this.
It's like this.
Who was it that led three Stop the Steel rallies in DC?
Who was it that did a 18-state tour with a whole presentation showing all the election fraud that Trump took line for line and then did from the White House?
And so when I see all of these people now and they're attacking Alex Jones and they're attacking Owen Schroyer and they're saying, see black pillars, I'm not going to say what I really want to say because I, because I already determined I didn't want to even talk about this today.
So I'm going to, I'm going to, I'm going to back off.
But I just think it's funny.
I just think it's funny because all of you guys that are talking all this junk on Alex Jones and on Owen Schroyer, and hey, everybody knows Alex and I aren't exactly getting along right now.
I didn't see you at one of our three stop the steel rallies.
I didn't see you at one of our 18-stop tour where we showed all the data that proved the election fraud.
I didn't see you get sued.
I didn't see you get imprisoned for standing up against the stolen election.
And now you want to sit here and rub yourselves off like you're the champions of stopping the steal, like you're the champions of exposing election fraud.
And quite frankly, you're what's wrong with Republican politics.
You're why Republicans can never win multiple election cycles in a row.
Because you are the biggest frauds, the biggest cowards, the most cringeworthy people in American politics.
That it's like when we finally start to get momentum and win and get a populist movement that most people resonate with, then you guys, then you guys fight your way to the front to pretend like it's your movement so that you can grift and make a bunch of money.
You're never there when it counts, but you fight your way to the front when people get in power, and then they see you at the front and they see, oh, this is the leadership.
Trump warns Iran, time is running out for nuclear deal.
As U.S. military builds up in Gulf, they've got Iran surrounded, just like they had Venezuela surrounded and Trump is threatening to Venezuela, Iran.
But I don't think it'll be as smooth if they decide to move forward with something like that.
Iran plans live-fire drills in Strait of Hormuz amid tensions with U.S. IRGC naval exercises take place next week as worries grow of possible U.S. strike.
Folks, I don't think those are exercises.
I think they're saying they're exercises, but I think they're preparing for war.
And if you really get deep into it, if you really get deep into it, Iran is basically saying, and who knows, everybody bluffs, everybody saber rattles, everybody puffs their chest up.
But Iran is basically saying anything that you do in Iran, we are going to strike Israel with everything we have.
Now, I guess if you take their word for it, you have to measure it and say, okay, is Israel prepared to defend itself against Iran?
And of course, the United States has given Israel about $50 billion and plenty more in military assets.
After the first wave of the war with Iran, excuse me.
I warned you all that was happening.
Oh, fighting through.
After the first wave of war with Iran, Israel came back to the White House and was begging for more money, begging for more military defense assets because they were out.
They'll have to do the measurement of whether or not Israel is prepared to endure strikes on Tel Aviv or to endure another attack from Iran.
If they figure that they are, then they might say, no holds barred, go in, do the regime change war.
If Israel takes Iran's threats seriously and they say we're not prepared for strikes from Iran, then that might hold them off.
But I think that that's kind of the decision-making process about whether this is going to go down, let's say, this weekend or next month, which I guess is this weekend, but you get the point.
Now, here's a here's an interesting clip from Netanyahu that might be indicative of maybe they are anticipating.
But there's Netanyahu tipping his hat, showing his hand.
We're going to cancel elections.
Now, for Netanyahu, he's probably in some way, shape, or form, afraid that he's going to eventually have to go to trial.
I don't know if he's too concerned about the International Criminal Court, but I'm sure it's in the back of his mind.
But he's awaiting trial in Israel.
The Israelis want to see Netanyahu put in jail.
So what better way to avoid all of that than starting a war with Iran or canceling elections, just like Zelensky did.
So maybe pay attention to that.
Maybe keep your eye out.
That could be a big factor there.
If they do start this war and then Netanyahu can cancel elections to stay in power, that could be another factor that could motivate the powers that be to start this war with Iran.
All right, we are going to take our first hour break here.
We're going to get our guest lined up as well to talk about what just went on in Georgia with Garland Favorito.
And we'll see what he thinks.
We'll see what he thinks is going on or, you know, maybe he's got more faith in the situation than I.
So we'll get that update on the other side of this break.
I had a audience member reach out today, and it always means a lot because I am fortunate enough, I think I would say, I'm fortunate enough that I actually have friends and family that listen and so they can give me live feedback.
But I had a listener today reach out, friend of mine, said, finally got our Cove Pure system in.
You're right.
Best water filtration system out there.
The only complaint, and I said this to him too.
The only complaint about the Cove Pure system is I wish that I could have more.
Like I wish I could have a bigger tank because I mean, this is the only water I drink in my house.
So, you know, you go through it pretty quickly.
Maybe they need to have a bigger one.
Maybe it's not exactly a small system, but like maybe if, could you guys have a bigger one?
ladies and gentlemen, joining us now from Georgia, Garland Favorito.
And Garland, you have been following this case since 2020.
You've been following this case since the steel went down.
Certainly yesterday was the biggest news that we've seen there in Georgia when it comes to the stolen election of 2020 in years.
We can get into the details of it all, but why don't you just tell me, you know, as somebody that's been on the ground for this entire thing since 2020, what did yesterday represent for you?
Well, all in, it represented five years culmination of trying to simply just see the ballots that Fulton County had in the 2020 election.
It's very simple.
Every voter in America should be able to see the ballots from their election.
And we have not been able to do that.
We've been blocked by the county.
We've been blocked by Fulton County judges.
We've been blocked or at least attempted to be blocked by the Secretary of State and even the Attorney General.
But so yesterday was a great relief that the ballots are now in the custody of someone that we could possibly trust to get to the bottom of what really happened in Fulton County in the 2020 election.
I'm not going to air them while you're with us here.
We'll air them later.
There does seem to be some level of panic from the local Democrats.
It's hard to tell when to take them seriously or not, right?
I mean, you never know.
They panic over everything.
They see something spray painted on a wall that's like, you know, the warning of a gas line.
They think it's a hate speech or something.
So it's hard to tell when the panic from the Democrats is real or not, but there's no doubt they seem to be a little shaken.
They seem to be a little shaken from all of this.
Now, my anticipation, and if you agree or disagree, or if you think there's something else here, let my audience know.
I'm not sure what exactly they're looking for.
The only thing I can't anticipate they're going to find with these ballots that they got yesterday is that there were more votes than voters in Fulton County because they were double and triple stuffing them into the tabulators.
That's my anticipation.
Do you agree with that?
And do you think that there's something else that they can discover here?
We already know from the electronic records that there were more votes cast than voters, and there were more votes cast or certified than what they have ballot images for and other source records.
So the bottom line is that the results don't add up.
And they know that.
That's why they're in panic mode because all this is going to be exposed in the very near future.
Now, I guess there's nothing that they can do because people are saying, and I think it's a fair concern.
People are saying, well, look, they've had four years, five years to cover up their crimes, but I don't really know if there's anything they can do.
They can't go back and change the results of the 2020 election.
Like we already have those numbers.
So it's not like they can change that.
I guess maybe they could go into those boxes and add the number of ballots that they need to show their fake numbers were real, but I don't think that they'd be able to do that either, especially if they're going to try to certify each one.
Might be a painstaking process.
But what do you think that process is going to be?
Do you think this is going to be a long, drawn-out process?
Is this something where the FBI and Tulsi Gabbard can present a case relatively soon?
And how much are they cooperating with the efforts that you and others put in that time in 2020 to try to speed this thing up as quickly as possible?
Well, the State Election Board and both us, Voter GA, we've requested both civil and criminal intervention from the DOJ, and they have been very cooperative and trying to get to the bottom of it.
I would think we would know something very soon because it doesn't take long if you got the right software to analyze the ballots.
And they have already gotten a wealth of information about possible potential violations and corruption and not only just in Fulton County, but even outside.
So I'm sure they had all that on before they went in.
I'd already built their case pretty well, I think.
I guess that would be a nice security blanket, I guess, if they thought that people might be looking at them again.
We obviously know about the Democrats that run Fulton County.
We know that it seems as though, I mean, I guess I can't say for 100%, but it looks like the people that were on the ground and were running the operation in Fulton County ended up getting a nice prestigious award from Joe Biden.
Well, I was going to ask you, what type of reforms, you can talk about Georgia.
That's where you're the expert, but perhaps it needs to be applied nationwide.
What type of reforms do we need to see if indeed this all gets exposed, the giant elections theft that we saw in 2020, if it all gets exposed, what type of reforms would you like to see in Georgia and or nationwide?
Well, I mean, I would assume that the FBI is leading it, or excuse me, the Department of Justice criminal division is leading it since the FBI is investigating.
And what's interesting is that Tulsi was there, which indicates there are some national intelligence considerations and possibly some foreign influence or implications that are beyond what we may know right at the moment.
There's, let's say, conspiracy theories, rumors saying that Maduro somehow had something to do with the 2020 stolen election, and that's why they brought him in to squeeze him and get him to cooperate.
So what we have found is that in our forensic analysis and expert witness testimony here in Georgia corroborates that theory pretty well because we found that in our case, the Dominion systems are all interconnected worldwide with a common shared password that's well known.
And we know that from emails in the Patrick Byrne discovery case that Serbian programmers accessed the voting system here in Georgia in the 2020 election and the 2021 U.S. Senate runoff.
So everything we have found here in Georgia is very consistent with what Patrick has found and others, Gary Bernston and Ralph Pizzullo and Martine and so on.
Well, we have been active and doing media for five years.
So nothing's going to change there.
We have to keep the evidence out front so that the people, not only in Georgia, but around the country and even the world know what happened here in Georgia in 2020.
Do you think, other than the actual numbers not adding up, do you think in the ballots that have now been seized by the Trump administration, the DOJ, is there any evidence there that could be incriminating, like fake ballots, illegal votes, anything like that?
Well, and I'll just say, you know, even if we do run into that issue, this still needs to be exposed.
It has to be exposed how it was stolen, not just in Georgia.
Georgia might be the most obvious case.
It may be the easiest one to prove.
And maybe that's why they went down there.
But it needs to be exposed no matter what.
Now, I would say we need a lot of arrests.
And I would say we have to do everything possible to make sure that what happened in Georgia and what happened in 2020 never happens again.
But like you said, you wonder if you're not in a race against time now to make sure this doesn't happen before the primaries or before the midterms coming up.
Garland Favorito, our guest here.
Any final words, any final things you want to make sure our audience knows before we let you go?
Well, when it comes to voter integrity, when it comes to the general population understanding how rigged our elections are, and when it comes to 2020 stolen election justice, Georgia now has all the eyes on it.
We'll continue to maintain our coverage of this, folks.
And like I said, I'm very results-based here in my coverage of these things, very results-based.
So I'm going to wait and see the results before we rush to any conclusions.
But there is no doubt, I think Georgia was probably the most obvious deal.
And you can look at the multiple states from 2020, Michigan, Wisconsin, Arizona.
You know, these were the obvious ones, but Georgia was probably the most obvious.
So if they want it, if they want to show us how it was stolen, if they want to prove that the numbers in Fulton County were impossible, they can do it.
And I hope that they do.
But I think that here's the other issue that we run into.
The general population has to understand what happened.
It's like we know about the lie and the watermain, fake Watermain break.
We know about how they went into the tabulation centers in secret and started triple counting ballots in the most blue counties in the state to up Joe Biden's totals.
How do we get everybody to realize that?
And then I guess what's even crazier is it's like you could even show all of this evidence to a Democrat and they still wouldn't even believe you.
They still would tell you that that's not true.
There should never be a Democrat victory in the state of Georgia.
I mean, maybe in local Atlanta and some of the other counties, but how a Democrat gets elected to the Senate in Georgia in the U.S. Congress is just mind-blowing and probably not even real, probably just straight up theft, as our guest was just explaining.
Why do the American people just have to accept that we have a trade deficit?
And then it's like Trump comes in with a plan.
Maybe it works.
Maybe it doesn't, but he comes in with a plan.
You can see the overall vision for the plan, which is: hey, we're either going to balance the books, we're either going to have equal trade, or we're going to make everything and manufacture everything and bring Made in America back.
Everyone's on the take of the U.S. government, the U.S. taxpayer, the United States of America.
Everybody's on the take.
And I'm just sick of it.
I'm sick of everybody being on the take.
I'd like to be on the take.
Or better yet, I'd like you to stop taking from me at all.
But that's the big game.
That's the big enslavement of the American people.
30 to 40% of the money you make gets taxed.
They send it to everybody on the planet.
And then they aren't even gracious enough to say, hey, at least we'll have equal trade with you.
At least we'll have equal trade with you.
No, they won't even do that.
No, they want more taxes.
They want more taxes.
Did you see this in Virginia?
Oh, go figure.
Virginia Democrats introduce a flood of new tax proposals despite running on affordability.
Oh, we're all stunned.
Democrats.
Well, Virginia's gone blue.
The Virginia Democrats have introduced more than 50 new tax proposals this legislative session.
And by the way, these are all foreigners that move in there.
These are all foreigners that move into Virginia, vote for Democrats.
Despite campaigning on making life more affordable for Virginians during last year's elections, Democrat lawmakers have proposed several tax increases, and then they list all the things.
A gun and ammunition tax in Virginia.
Investment income tax.
I mean, just listen to this.
Event tax, new personal property tax, dog walking tax, dog grooming tax, gym membership tax.
Hey, Virginia, Virginia.
Might be time for a Virginia tea party.
You know what I mean?
Might be time for some form of a Virginia tea party.
That is outrageous.
They'll find anything to tax you on.
Guys, go ahead in the chat.
What are they going to tax you on next?
Coffee tax.
I got a coffee tax.
I'm going to get taxed for drinking my coffee.
I'll get taxed for having a beard.
I'll get a turtleneck tax.
Just anything.
Just anything to tax it.
Just anything to steal your money.
But don't worry.
They'll replace you.
You won't have to pay taxes because you won't even have an income.
Get 1,600 pounds a month to do nothing.
Welcome to an AI future where nobody works.
As concerns grow over AI surpassing human abilities within two or three years, Holly Dunbar explores whether universal basic income could be the solution in a world without traditional jobs.
Okay, well, we've all heard about this.
Elon Musk has talked about this.
Now, if you want to get really philosophical about it, there's actually a pretty amazing thing.
It's actually a pretty incredible proposal.
Now, you hear this, and there's reason to flinch.
There's reason for concern.
But it's also like, is it possible?
See, this is where you get into the issue of: are we going to be a free people or not?
Are you a free people or are you not?
Because technically, the dollar bill is worthless.
It has perceived value.
It has perceived value and trust that everyone else in civilization accepts its value.
But it has no inherent value.
You go burn a dollar bill right now, what happens?
It's gone.
So it's like if I had a robot, let's say I'm not even Owen Schroyer.
Let's say I'm just an Owen Schroyer robot.
Owen Schroyer is actually downstairs right now reading a book.
Owen Schroyer is actually downstairs right now making coffee.
Owen Schroyer is actually outside right now trimming the trees.
Owen Schroyer's at the gym right now.
I'm a robot, Schroyer.
I'm working.
I'm making money.
He's out doing stuff.
Is that what we're talking about?
So it has communist undertones, communist overtones.
We don't like that.
We believe in the value of work.
That's what we believe in: the value of work contributing to civilization, contributing to your community, working for a living.
But, you know, how are they going to, I feel like if we basically have an automated world, and this is what Musk is talking about, an automated world, and there's some other news out of Tesla today, we'll get to in a second.
If you have an automated world, all the money is already fake, and you already have the haves and have-nots.
So, a universal basic income is basically, it's inevitable they're going to try to push this.
It's inevitable that eventually this is where it's going to try to go.
And if everything is automated, what are we really looking at here?
Are we looking at like a wall-y type of situation?
Are we looking at a situation where humans can actually decide to live in beautiful civilizations again because we're not slaves and we can actually build beautiful things and care about our health and take care of our families?
Where all of that is few and far between right now because we're so busy being slaves.
It's an interesting situation.
I think it's an interesting situation, I have to tell you.
And I'm not saying I'm for it, but I'm also, you know, I got to say, this is probably controversial.
A lot of people will probably not like what I'm about to say here, but I have to say, I'm not inherently against it either.
I will say, I'm not because the money's already fake.
The money's already fake.
We're already slaves.
So, if we automate the world and that gives humans a chance to be free again and build a beautiful world again and actually care about themselves and care about their health and care about their family, and they're not just busy being slaves all day, maybe there is room for a beautiful future.
Maybe that vision of the future that we've all seen in the books, in the movies, maybe it is possible because it is not possible under the current circumstances, folks.
In case you haven't noticed, the slaves have to work more and more and more and more to get their little bread, to get their little piece of the pie, which is slowly, slowly, slowly shrinking.
But you know, the powers that be aren't going to just let us go free.
You know that they're not going to let that happen.
So, what are they going to do to us first?
If we have an automated world and we can build beautiful civilizations and we can free humanity from the slave classes that currently exist in most of the world, the powers that be aren't just going to let us be free.
The powers that be, the establishment, they're just not going to let you be free.
So, what are they going to do to us?
And is there already something planned?
Do they already have the answer?
Is there already some secret history of a cataclysm coming and it's just going to wipe us all out anyway?
And then they're going to roll us into this, but not tell you about it.
Yeah, I know.
I know that this is controversial and maybe not popular.
They're about to launch a technology that's going to let blind people see again.
No matter what the issue is, blind from birth, developed blindness, eye injuries.
Neuralink is about to have technology that lets blind people see again.
I don't know how you can be against that.
I mean, I guess if you're like kind of a naturalist, a purist, maybe you think that's demonic.
I'm not with you on that.
And imagine, and it's up to you.
But I'll tell you, God forbid, it's like, I don't even want to think about it.
If I lost vision, I'd want to be able to see again.
Wouldn't you want to see your kids, your wife, your family, watch your favorite movie?
When they came up with the colloquial ear implants, and Rush Limbaugh happened to be like one of the first, maybe like the first to get it, there was some controversy with that.
And there were some communities out there, and they still exist, deaf communities where they don't like that technology.
And they have these deaf communities where Cochlear, what did I say, guys?
I'm sorry, it's Brain Fart Day.
Brain Sneeze Day.
But yeah, they didn't like it.
And you can't get access.
I don't know how much of them still exist, but it was like at the time, they kind of looked at that as cheating and they wouldn't allow you into the, give me a break today, guys.
Make fun of me for not being totally against Universal Bakus basic income.
Disagree with me on the Musk stuff.
That's all fine.
If you lost.
If you were paralyzed, wouldn't you like to walk again?
If you were blind, wouldn't you like to see again?
How can you really be against it?
I'm not against it.
But there'll be, you know, there'll be controversies.
There'll be debates, no doubt.
Musk is doing a lot.
I think the reason I've said this before, the real, my big reason for supporting Musk, because, hey, look, merging man with machine, I don't, I'm not, I don't like that.
Because then you start to, you start to flirt with this technology and then you become more machine than man.
So that's the danger.
In fact, I'm actually sitting here.
I'm wondering this.
I have to tell you.
For whatever reason, this was really weighing on me last night.
We might need to make AI illegal.
We might need to make AI illegal.
Now, that's not to say that we can't use technology and algorithms and data processing to make work easier and to advance civilization using technology.
But I think we might need to talk about making artificial intelligence illegal, at least, you know, because they want to present it like it can become some sentient being.
And certainly we can't support that.
Can't support that.
We can't build the machine that is inevitably going to lead to our destruction.
And you can say, well, you know, you start getting into making blind people see again and paralyzed people walk again and some of these other brain plants.
It's like, now you're flirting.
Now you're blurring those lines.
That's fair.
But you start to talk about the bigger picture.
You talk about AI taking over, if it's even a real thing, if it's not just numbers and algorithms.
No, I think actually we need to start a stand here and maybe even declare that artificial intelligence be made illegal.
At least for now.
At least for now, because this idea of an AI race will be the end of humanity as we know it.
That will be the end of humanity as we know it.
If an artificial intelligence can reach a point and we have 50 million robots in the country and it can take over these robots and turn them against us and turn our machines against us and turn our military against us and turn drones against us and turn vehicles against us.
Now, again, you can still use technology and data processing and logistics and everything else to improve technology, improve production.
You can't give the robots the ability to run themselves.
You can't give robots the ability to take over the planet.
But it seems like that's what this race is all about.
And these fools, if these fools think that, oh, well, I'll always be in control, or maybe better yet, even more, even more ignorantly, it'll always obey me.
That's funny.
That is funny.
Be on the lookout for that.
But I think, to finish my thought, I like Musk because I think he's the one person in these industries that doesn't hate humanity.
I think he's the one person in these industries that wants to see humanity go to the next level, all of us, and not just pick and decide who gets to live, who gets to die, who gets to go next level, who doesn't.
I think Musk really does want to see human civilization go to the next level.
I think he might be the only one at that level that wants that.
That's why I support Musk.
That's why I like Musk.
That's why Musk's approval rating for me right now is say, I think 53%.
The disgraced socialite, this is Maxwell, filed a habeas corpus petition on December 17th, seeking to overturn her conviction, arguing that prosecutors cut deals with the Epstein associates while prosecuting her as if no such agreements existed.
Maxwell alleges that 25 men reached undisclosed deals while four alleged co-conspirators were known to investigators, but never charged.
None of the four named co-conspirators or the 25 men with secret settlements were indicted.
The court filing says.
So they're putting this in court.
Maxwell argues that the alleged concealment of these deals undermined the fairness of her trial and violated her constitutional rights.
She's trying to get out of prison, folks.
And they already cut a deal with her to send her to a camp.
New evidence reveals that there were 25 men with which the plaintiff's lawyers reached secret settlements that could equally be considered as co-conspirators, the legal document states.
And by the way, this is probably why Trump is telling you to stop talking about it because they already got all of them, but they're not going to prosecute them because they cut deals.
And the deals they cut mostly benefit the Trump administration.
But we'll get into that in a second.
None of these men have been prosecuted and none has been revealed to petitioner.
She would have called them as witnesses had she known.
I guess witnesses in her trial.
So when we hear about, oh, you know, they were trafficking all of these girls to nobody, this is who they were tracking them to.
In the sprawling court filing, Maxwell mounts multiple lines of attack forming the basis of her habeas corpus argument, including allegations of jira misconduct and suppression of evidence.
Well, Bondi, you know, has broken the law on this deal now, but she just gets away with it.
They have, they've been saying this for how long now?
She alleges that prosecutors violated the terms of Epstein's 2007 non-prosecution agreement in Florida, which she claims extended immunity to co-conspirators and asserts she was prosecuted for political reasons while others escaped justice.
You know, this is an interesting argument, though.
This is an interesting argument that she's making, which is why am I being prosecuted and nobody else is?
It's an interesting argument.
You have to say, it's kind of compelling.
And maybe this was part of the plan to eventually free her.
And by the way, what do you think she's going to do as soon as she's out of prison?
Where do you think she's going to go?
You want to play some bets?
Where do you think Maxwell's going day one when she gets out, huh?
The 64-year-old Maxwell is serving a 20-year sentence at federal prison camp Bryan, a minimum security federal women's prison in Texas.
Convicted, yada, yada, yada.
Attorney General Pam Bondi said that her lawyers are redacting several million pages of documents from the files of the DOJ, FBI, and U.S. attorneys' offices, which is illegal because the Epstein Files Transparency Act signed into law by Trump in November after a civil war in the Republican Party required the DOJ to release the files by December 19th.
So she is in violation of the law.
No less than 200 lawyers in the U.S. Attorney's Office from the Southern District of New York are involved in the review.
Isn't this nice?
Even prosecutors assigned to Nicholas Maduro's high-profile case have been put in on this effort, according to the New York Times.
So it goes on.
So here's what I think.
Maxwell is obviously trying to get out of jail.
And she's got a pretty compelling argument.
Now, I don't know if it's really going to work for her.
This is not the angle that's going to work for her.
She's trying to apply political pressure to the administration to cut a deal with her.
And maybe she's basically kind of showing, she's like, look, I know you guys cut secret deals.
Maybe she even knows who the deals were cut with.
And she's saying, hey, I know what went on here.
You guys better cut me loose.
But she has, I mean, she has a compelling argument to say this is selective prosecution.
Now, the feds, selective prosecution and the feds, this happens all the time.
This is why I went to prison and many others didn't for January 6th.
So selective prosecution is nothing that the federal government doesn't do all the time.
And the federal judges let them get away with it.
So I don't really know if there's anything that'll happen in her actual legal case that's going to help her as far as selective prosecution is concerned.
But it does seem to be putting pressure on the administration.
And it does seem to be that her angle is, hey, you better cut me loose now.
Here's what I think is happening.
Here's what I think happened.
And this is why Trump is covering it up now with Pam Bondi.
And, you know, maybe Trump was involved with this stuff to some degree.
I don't think he was doing anything illegal, but I think, you know, he liked to hang out with Epstein because Epstein was always surrounded by beautiful women and Trump liked beautiful women.
And they both had enough money to do whatever the hell they wanted.
So that's, you know, it happened.
And then when Trump found out that Epstein was, you know, recruiting women specifically at his club, he put an end to it, cooperated with the FBI, and helped bring Epstein in.
Now, you could get real conspiratorial if you wanted to take the anti-Trump angle and say the reason why Trump brought Epstein in when he was president was to make sure that he couldn't talk.
No, what I think happened is the reason why the establishment is so pro-Trump now is because he cut these deals.
And I think the reason why you have all the establishment people that normally MAGA would hate, normally MAGA would want them to be in prison.
Now they have their name on the White House, the Trump ballroom.
They're in and out of the White House all day long.
They're campaigning with Trump.
They're fundraising for Trump.
I think that's all because of this deal right here that Maxwell just talked about.
I think Trump brought them all in, and he said the most damning and compelling evidence in the Epstein files is against you guys.
But I'll tell you what.
We'll call you the victims.
We'll call you the victims.
We will say that essentially you guys got tricked to sleeping with underage women.
If you're in the country and leader, you're never off the table.
But prioritization doesn't mean you forget about, but you forget about it.
Let me say this.
If the message we send is you enter this country legally, it's a crime.
Don't worry about it.
You can have your due process, show up in court, not show up in court, get order moved.
Don't worry about it.
Unless you commit a serious crime, you're good to go.
If that's the message we send to the world, you're never going to fix this problem.
The most vulnerable people in the world will make that dangerous journey like they did under Joe Biden administration.
Over 4,000 aliens died making that journey.
And again, a significant increase in sex trafficking because when they did that and opened those borders up, saying, We're not going to detain you, we're going to give you free health care.
We're going to fly to the city of your choice, put you in a free hotel room, give you three meals a day, and give you work authorization.
We're just going to bring you in.
And when they did that, they sent a message to the whole world, you can come and do this.
And what happened?
They overwhelmed the men and women of the Border Patrol where many days 70% of agents were pulled off that line.
70%.
You don't think the criminal cards had a field day with that?
And he has clarified for me that county jails may notify ICE of the release dates of criminal public safety risks so ICE can take custody of them upon the release from the jail.
And let me tell you why that's important.
I know people are a lot concerned, but the manpower has been set in law enforcement manpower.
Look, I've said this many times before, I've said it for the last several years.
Give us access to the illegal alien public safety threat in the safety and security of a jail.
It's common sense.
It's safer for the community.
It's safer for the agent.
And they're safer for the alien because anything happen on a street arrest.
It just made common sense.
And for the people that argue, well, we're a welcoming community because we want victims and witnesses of crime that are here illegally to feel safe to come to police without fear of their work with ICE.
We're not going to talk to the victim witness of crime.
There's no problem there.
They should feel safe to come to the police and ask for help.
All we want is to talk to the person that local and state law enforcement authorities locked in a jail cell.
One, and we already knew that this was going on, but this is unreal.
You have Democrat jurisdictions that are releasing violent illegal aliens out on the streets because the Democrat policy is we're not cooperating with ICE.
This is not a federal prison.
And so they release them on the streets.
So it doesn't even matter because they have to notify the feds.
They can't not notify the feds that they caught an illegal alien.
But what they're supposed to do, what they would obviously do, is: hey, we got an illegal alien here.
This is an ICE issue.
So we're going to hold this illegal alien until you come pick him up.
Folks, they're releasing him on the streets.
So they call the feds and they say, we got a violent illegal alien criminal here, and we're releasing him out on the streets.
That is crazy.
That is unreal.
And of course, they would never do that with any other criminal, folks.
They would never do that with any other criminal.
If you're an American criminal and they're about to transfer you to a new jail or take you to court, whatever, they always keep you in cuffs and they always keep you in custody.
This is totally unheard of.
And the Democrats are releasing violent illegal aliens out on the streets and then telling the feds to go get them.
And then the other thing he says there, if I translate this correct, he's saying that the Democrats are telling locals that if they go in and file a criminal complaint, let's say, hey, we know there's an illegal alien here or we know this criminal illegal alien committed a crime against me or my family, the Democrats are telling them that you're going to get arrested.
I don't know if there's any rhyme or reason to the rest of the show here.
So let's jump around.
Candace Owens here, a lot of weirdness here.
So Candace Owens makes a claim about Brett Cooper's exit from the Daily Wire.
And what she claims here is very revealing, ladies and gentlemen.
Now, this claim in this comment, because this is kind of what has made this get even more attention, is that Brett Cooper's mother has confirmed what Candace Owens is about to say.
Now, you can take that with a grain of salt, whether or not this is really Brett Cooper's mom or not.
Now, were I in your shoes, Jeremy, I might even rank you bizarrely telling Brett Cooper, then a very young employee of yours, just a few weeks before she was slated to get married, sitting her down and telling her that she shouldn't do that because you had big plans and you were going to turn her into a star because you're the magic.
I would probably rank that at the tippity top of bad corporate decisions, among others.
You maybe forgot yourself in that moment, as you always do.
You got a little swept up in you, but conservatives, those pretending to be conservative companies, certainly, are not supposed to chase Hollywood fame above family.
And I think personally that she made the right decision to leave.
And then you made again the wrong decision, like the angry, repressed homosexual that you are, to not just allow a young woman, again, 21 years old, to just leave, but to again, stalk, because that's what you do.
You stalk, you pretend it's a business, but you're glorified stalkers.
And this time in the most sadistic manner possibly ever, offering an obscene amount of money to her maid of honor at that wedding that you didn't want her to have, to hurt her, replacing her with her maid of honor because you wanted Brett Cooper, a young woman to suffer for simply wanting to change jobs, which is why you worked behind this.
Scenes through the same demented PR orbit to try to smear her, the friendly pop culture young girl, as an anti-Semite over an Instagram-like because she liked a year-end roundup of my podcast.
And you wouldn't have that.
You wouldn't have that.
You know, I'd rank that as another mistake, but what I rank as one of my prouder moments and all of that was using some of my nuclear energy to stand up for her publicly, despite contractual restraints, using my platform to say what you did to her was wrong.
And when you sued me for that for standing up for Brett Cooper, I want you to know that I communicated to my legal team that I would accept that.
I would accept the penalty of hundreds of thousands of dollars, which you wanted to impart upon me for me doing the right thing and standing up for someone who didn't deserve what you were putting her through.
You put me through it and you were trying to put her through it.
And I told my husband that I would gladly pay that money.
I said, if the judge came back in your favor, I wouldn't lie.
I would admit that I consciously stood up for somebody who didn't deserve to be smeared.
So she gets into a little of the, you know, corporate fights she endured with the Daily Wire on her on her way out.
So it shows a lot about how the Daily Wire operates.
And I don't doubt what Candace said is true.
And I would anticipate if there is any doubt, it will eventually be removed.
As far as whether or not Brett Cooper's mom has actually confirmed that story or not, you'll probably find that out too.
I would imagine that Candace will be vindicated in everything that she said there.
But here's what I really want you to take away from this, aside from the joke I made about my own experience.
Folks, you have to understand how the political world operates, specifically how political media operates.
I don't know if I could put a number on it, but I think 80% is probably a fair number to put on it.
80% of political media is strictly agenda-driven.
It's not about politics.
It's not about a belief system.
It's not about policy.
The stuff that they talk about, they really don't even know or care about.
80% of political media is strictly agenda-driven.
So that agenda could be a policy, a foreign interest, a special interest.
But more times than not, it's not so conspiratorial.
More times than not, the agenda is to just make money.
That's it, is to just make as much money as possible.
And so you hear this story.
Here's Brett Cooper, 21-year-old girl.
I don't really follow the Daily Wire.
I don't really follow Brett Cooper, but she's obviously popular enough that she has a significant following, enough of a following that the Daily Wire tried to keep her around.
And maybe there was a little fear that if she left, she might say some things that they didn't want her to say.
Maybe there was a little bit of that.
But can you imagine a situation where a young girl wants to get married?
Because this is Candace didn't say this.
This is my interpretation because this is how it works in media, by the way.
This is how it works with big celebrities and musicians and actresses.
And this is why a lot of famous women fake pregnancies because they don't want to go through that with their bodies.
They need to work.
And as soon as the pregnancy is over, they need to be able to get back to work.
In, I guess, Jeremy Boring's view here, as Candace Owens puts it, tell me why that would be detrimental to Brett Cooper's stardom.
Tell me why Brett Cooper getting married would be detrimental to her stardom or detrimental to her popularity or detrimental into the bottom line, money.
You want to know why, guys?
Because here's what they do.
They know that if they have a young Brett Cooper there, single, that guys will tune in to watch.
But if Brett Cooper is married, guys don't want to watch anymore.
Most guys don't want to hear from a young married woman.
And I don't really, again, I don't know too much about Brett Cooper's show or her following, but I mean, 21-year-old, young girl, how much of a political knowledge base can she really have?
Nothing against Brett Cooper.
But who's really tuning into Brett Cooper?
Are people tuning into Brett Cooper because she's an experienced political pundit?
Because she has a wealth of knowledge and experience in the political world.
And it's not the Daily Wire that has exclusively figured this out, by the way.
Fox News has been doing this for a year.
You want to know why they're always popping up another tart on Fox News?
You want to know why they're always popping up another hot blonde, another Botox-filled, plastic-faced bimbo on Fox News?
Come on, guys.
So they looked at their bottom line.
They said, hey, Brett Cooper makes us a lot of money.
Maybe they said most of Brett Cooper's viewing audience is young men.
And most of these young men are tuning in because they think she's hot.
And if Brett Cooper gets married and starts having kids, we're going to lose that target demographic and we're not going to be able to sell them the products that we aim at that target demographic.
So please, Brett, we can make you a star, but not if you get married.
We can't sell a young married woman.
We can sell a young single hot woman, though, but we can't sell a married woman.
If we need to kind of rethink the content and the presentation, and maybe we kind of redirected, and now you're a married woman, and maybe we try to sell stuff to other married women, or if you start having kids, maybe we have some kids' products.
Israel plans large camp for Palestinians in southern Gaza.
Uh, what you know when they announced these plans, by the way, on worldwide Holocaust Remembrance Day, Israel announces concentration camps for Palestinians.
We're having fun.
We're having fun.
Now, what is it I always say about trauma-based mind control?
Here's an example.
This is from the Christian Humanitarian Aid Group, which is really just an Israel beneficiary.
The trauma didn't end in 1945.
Third generation Holocaust families are still living with inherited psychological trauma.
Look, we're the most transparent presidency by far.
And I love going around the room, but we're going to pick a few people.
I think I would like to ask Steve if he could just give us a brief description of how well we're doing in the Middle East because we have peace in the Middle East now.
First of all, there's no peace in the Middle East.
We're about to get into a war with Iran.
Now, I've got, I talk about the leftovers.
Like 80% of my leftover stack is just Israel fighting people, just Israel continuing war, Gaza, West Bank, Jordan, Lebanon.
But it's like, you know, I get sick of it.
I get sick of it just like you.
And so I push it off.
It ends up in a leftover stack.
I've got a leftover stack of news that is nothing but Israel attacking people in Jordan, Israel attacking people in Syria, Israel attacking people in Lebanon, Israel attacking people in the West Bank, Israel attacking people in the Golan Heights.
It's literally non-stop.
There is no peace in the Middle East.
Israel's attacking every single person that they want.
There's literally no peace.
So it's just crazy when they say this stuff.
As we're, as we're saber-rattling with Iran, as we're getting ready to do a war with Iran, probably, let's all hope we can avoid it.
Hey, remember that story yesterday about the police officer in Australia with the satanic pedophile networks?
I think it's important for a little follow-up from Liz Kroken today.
Since I started exposing Pizzagate in 2016, one of the most common arguments I would get from normies is that if Pizzagate were true, police would just arrest the child predators involved.
What has been so hard for people to wrap their heads around with these elite pedophile rings is that in most of these rings, people in positions of power who are supposed to protect children are involved, such as police officers, judges, faith leaders, teachers, politicians, government officials, etc.
The arrest of this former police officer involved in a satanic pedophile ring in Australia is a perfect example of this.
When people such as law enforcement members are involved with these rings, victims have literally no one to turn to for justice to be served.
This is why these rings have flourished for so long with the added bonus of the media also being involved and covering for them.
Yes, we've all seen that.
And a friend of the show, Craig Sawyer, with the work he did, ran into such a situation right here in America, by the way.
You know, we've kind of covered this on and off, but this U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics just generated a bar graph for us.
Gen Z and alcohol, fading bond, annual expenditure on alcoholic beverages in the United States by generation.
So it's like, it's like a dead deal.
Gen Z is just not drinking at all.
I don't know too much about what they're into.
I think they're mostly into like vaping and nicotine and stuff.
Some people say they get into hard drugs.
I just don't know enough about it, but the statistics are obviously in they're not drinking.
Now, I want to connect this to something.
I want to connect this to something most people are missing here.
Do you remember?
Do you remember when Bud Light did that whole trans ad campaign with Dylan Mulvaney and Bud Light went LGBTQ?
This is why they did it, guys.
This is why Bud Light did it.
This is what I believe, at least, and others have said similar, people that are actually in the industry.
They saw that Gen Z was not drinking alcohol.
They weren't drinking beer.
Now, if you're my age, if you're a millennial or a Gen Xer or beyond, you know, Bud Light beer at a party was a staple.
High school parties, college parties, people drank beer.
So these beer companies, maybe specifically Bud Light, saw that Gen Z was not drinking beer.
So they figured if we try to tap into the LGBTQ market, maybe we can find a way to sell Gen Z beer to get them to drink beer.
Now, it obviously didn't really work for them, and they've gone back to marketing towards, you know, white men.
But that's what I think.
I think the reason why Bud Light went with that strategy is they wanted to tap into the LGBTQ movement that was really only in Gen Z, as far as young people were concerned.
I don't know anybody really in my generation, trans people, LGBTQ people, there weren't any.
It's like, yeah, there might have been, we might have had gay friends, lesbian friends, whatever.
There was no LGBTQ plus, okay?
Let me tell you, I went to plenty of parties as a millennial.
I saw all the different parties.
And of all the different types of parties I went to, I don't think anybody was ever LGBTQ.
We knew gay people, we knew gay guys, and we knew lesbians.
Nobody was LGBTQ plus.
Nobody was trans.
Just didn't exist.
So it seems that it only exists in Gen Z, and that's why they tried to market beer to those people.
I guess they're going to say that because here's where I'm at.
If you're going to say, I'm not going to vote for Bill Belichick because of what?
Because of Spygate?
Because of Deflategate?
Well, then, if this is your stance, then you need to leave.
You need to resign your Hall of Fame vote and never cover the NFL again.
Just leave.
Oh, no, Oh, you don't want that because you like the prestige.
You like the prestige of being an NFL Hall of Fame voter.
You like the prestige of that badge and that honor and being a part of the sports media.
But, oh, you're going to take your one stand.
You're going to take your one righteous stand against voting Bill Belichick in because what?
You think he's a cheater?
Then why don't you stop voting?
Why don't you stop covering the NFL?
Because the NFL didn't think he was a cheater.
The NFL didn't ban him from playing or coaching.
They're just these political people in the sports media are the most insufferable douchebags you'll ever meet.
I'm going to make my stand.
If you don't think Bill Belichick belongs in the Hall of Fame, then you're a clown and you shouldn't be voting for the Hall of Fame.
Or if you think Bill Belichick doesn't belong in the Hall of Fame because he's a cheater, well, the NFL doesn't seem to agree because they let him keep coaching for 10 more years.
So you need to just quit covering the NFL and take a stand against the NFL.
You're all phonies.
You're all total phonies and frauds, you liberal politicos in the sports media.
You guys suck.
But who do you guys have to win the Super Bowl?
I told you I picked the Patriots.
I was on the Patriots bandwagon day one.
That's where I'm letting it ride.
I will say right now, the Seahawks are definitely the better team.
The Seahawks definitely come in now as the favorites.
And I think the last I checked, they were four and a half point favorites.
You know, I wouldn't be surprised if that number went up.
But you know, sometimes there's behind the scenes stuff that goes on in sports, like some stuff that went on behind the run of the IU Hoosiers to a national championship.
There's some stuff behind the scenes that went on, and that's why I bet on them.
And there's some stuff going on behind the scenes with the Patriots, guys.
So if you think the Seattle Seahawks are the better team and favored to win, I would agree, but what about this?
unidentified
Now we know you're living, so we wanted to...
Some of the greatest players in American football history.
And if that doesn't sum it up, maybe this one, maybe this is the nice, this is the tag team.
Convicted terrorist who plotted consulate and church bombings in the UK is running in an election and favored to win.
A Muslim activist who served a prison sentence for his role in an overseas terror plot is now seeking elected office in Birmingham, Britain's second largest city.
The reason that the government wanted to collect me was that after they had raided my property in 2012 in the jungle, shot my dog, abused me, destroyed a half million dollars worth of my property over a bogus charge.
I told you, I want chicken noodle soup and you're late and I'm sick.
So you've let us all down.
Bob Bickerstaff, have we put an end to drip, drip, drip vote returns?
I don't know what you mean exactly.
Are you talking about like the drip, drip, drip evidence against the deep state that has led to no arrests?
You know, I said this about the Minnesota fraud thing, and I know I've said it before, but I'm wondering, is this the like, are we going to actually get anything out of the 2020 stolen election?
Do you think we're going to actually get anything out of Georgia?
Or is this just another big hype for a nothing burger?
Because that's the trend.
That's all we've gotten so far.
Bobo Elliott, Owen, love you, have a spine and left Jones.
When are you going to have David Icke on as a guest?
Thank you.
Well, we addressed the David Icke thing yesterday.
I just have no way of reaching him.
I do follow him on X, but he doesn't follow me, so I can't send him a message.
I don't really have too many problems with GPS, so I don't know.
I mean, yeah, okay.
I guess there are problems, but it's not something I really think about.
Are you saying, because they say they're going to come out the market price when the Optimus robot hits the consumer market, and some people have gotten a test robot.
I know Kim Kardashian was like, you know, posing half naked with her with her Optimus Tesla robot.
I mean, think about it like this.
Again, it's going to be consumer-based and then trust.
Like, do you trust a robot to clean your house?
Do you trust a robot to do your laundry?
Maybe you got kids and you want to have a robot to help, you know, I don't know, watch the kids, prepare food for the kids.
We just need to have the Biden sniff Neuralink into AI, and then we can call, and then we can all rest assure that absolutely nothing will ever happen with AI.
As far as the question is, I just don't know what you mean.
But yeah, I'm not there anymore.
Obviously, a reason.
Owen, please get trusted moderators.
Too many trolls in the chat.
Hot and sour soup.
Have Aaron Holte on You Will Not Be Sorry.
No, we don't do moderators.
We have the chat is free range.
Chat is free range.
We don't do moderators.
The only thing we will do is if somebody is spamming the chat with links or just copy and pasting the same thing over and over again, then we will boot you.
Roger Goodell and Texans would say Jerry Jones ruined the NFL.
Banner Freeborn.
Well, it depends on what you mean by ruined the NFL.
Because the truth is the NFL is as popular as it's ever been.
And as far as the on-field product is concerned, the NFL is still king.
The NBA has been ruined.
The MLB has been ruined.
The NHL is the only league that's really remained consistent.
So you either love hockey or you don't.
But the NHL is really the only league that's remained consistent.
But no, the NFL is still king.
So you might not enjoy it anymore.
And honestly, the Super Bowl is the worst game of the year, actually.
If we're being honest, the Super Bowl is the worst game of the year because it has the most TV timeouts.
It has some stupid long halftime show that's not even good.
And if there's any game that gets rigged, that one probably has the most interest in getting rigged.
So I think the Super Bowl is the worst game of the year.
I'm more of a regular season Sunday kind of guy when you can just throw the red zone on and not have to watch the commercials and just, you know, see football plays.
So, but I don't know.
To say they ruined the NFL, I mean, it's the numbers, the numbers don't hold that.
Sent you a post on X. DM me.
Plenty of blonde Latinas in Argentina and Uruguay.
E. Raymond Kapp found proof that the early Germanic tribes were descended from the Israelites taken into captivity by the Assyrians.
Jews are Esau.
You know, Adam King said something similar to me after I had the TKO, which I got to say, you know, it's been a couple of days now.
It's had some time to simmer.
It wasn't really the best debate, honestly.
It wasn't really the best debate.
But I think that that is actually one of the best KOs in any debate ever.
Honestly, can you think of a better knockout ever in a debate, in a political debate?
That is honestly like a top knockout for like an official political debate.
Now, you can go into all of my different debates and street content and probably find something that's a little more punchy.
But as far as like, this is a debate platform, this is a moderated debate, that's like a top debate knockout of all time.
I really think so.
The debate itself is kind of like, eh, it's not one of the greatest debates ever, but I think the knockout was one of the greatest knockouts of all time of debate history.
Honestly, I think that I do.
That's how I feel about it.
Because it was the whole lead up and then the knockout.
It was Muhammad Ali Ropado.
But no, Adam King said something similar to me post-debate when we were talking.
He had a different angle, but he said something similar.
It kind of shocked me.
So it's funny to hear you say the same thing.
I'd never heard that.
Mr. Dot, the Jesuits run the show and the Freemasons write the script.
You know, I keep hearing about the Jesuits running the show.
And I just, I, I, I just don't, I've never been convinced of it.
I've been hearing it for years.
I don't see them anywhere.
And maybe I guess that's what you're saying is because you don't see them, they run the show.
So maybe that's the point.
I just don't really buy it.
But see, everybody wants to think that there's one group that runs everything and there's multiple groups and then there's shadow groups, the bloodlines of the Illuminati, all of this stuff.
But the one thing that is undeniably true and everybody can see now is that Israel runs the political world.
You can't make it almost in any country in the world politically unless you go kiss the wall.
So that's that is undoubted.
But that's just one part of the world.
That's just like one aspect.
There's all kinds of stuff that go on.
Just think about what the landscape would be in a regular society if most poverty NFL franchises bought, brought in Condoleezza Rice back in 2015.
Bills would have been in a better spot with Trump than Pagula.
I feel like, where are you getting these ideas?
What are you smoking?
And can it help me feel better?
EDC.
Hi, Owen.
I just wanted to say that I enjoy the show.
I can see the lightness in you since you left Infowars.
You seem a lot happier.
Bless up, bro.
Thank you.
I appreciate that.
I appreciate that.
And, you know, I'll say that, you know, there's probably some truth to that.
I'm not going down that path of, you know, explaining myself, but there's, you know, there's some truth to maybe I'm a little lighter or whatever after leaving Infowars.
But, you know, the whole thing was so misrepresented, folks.
I got along great with the crew.
I'm still friends with the crew.
I still love everybody over there.
I'm not in some dark place.
It's just all of that is totally ridiculous.
And when you see somebody do that to you, it, you know.
But the truth is, it just, it's nice to finally do what I want to do and not have any pressure, not have to think about any brand, not have to think about, well, any brand other than myself, I guess, but not have to think about, I mean, when you work at, you know, a corporate news network and, you know, describe Infowars however you want,
but that's a corporate news network.
It's a network.
When you work at a network, there's a lot of people.
There's a lot of people.
There's a lot of things that come into play.
So it's just freeing to be able to do your own thing.
It's just, it's very freeing.
I finally get to do it my way.
I don't have to worry about somebody busting, you know, into the studio.
And, you know, so it's really freeing.
You know, anybody that's run a business knows it's, it's a lot harder to run your own thing.
That was the cheapest beer that you could get, at least in St. Louis.
And we had this one local store.
Oh, I'm sorry, mom.
We had this one local store in my neighborhood, tiny little store.
It was really just a gas station that had like a closet.
And they had one fridge in the closet.
And I think it was like Milwaukee Beast was the only beer that they had.
And the guy that ran it, I don't know if it was because he was so foreign.
He was an Indian.
I don't know if it was because he was so foreign that he didn't realize he was selling to high school kids or if he just didn't care.
But it was like, if there were no other options, we knew we could go to this gas station convenience store and buy as many 12 packs of Milwaukee Beast as we wanted.
It's disgusting.
It is gross.
But it was like it was all, it was always there if we needed it.
But it was the most disgusting beer.
But it was the cheapest beer.
And that convenience store owner would always sell it to us.
So, you know, look, drinking is bad for you.
It really is, especially beers.
Beers are just, they're just not good for you at all.
And the older you get, the worse, the worse it is for you.
You'll feel better.
It might be tough the first couple of days if you're really trying to get sober, but eventually you'll just feel so much better.
If you're older, then I guess you probably already have grandkids.
If you're my age, I'm 36.
I think I'm 36, right?
I don't think we'll witness this.
Maybe our grandkids.
I actually predict someday animals will start to evolve, but it's not going to be like they're actually evolving.
I'm not telling you I believe in evolution like that.
I'm saying they've already started to run these studies about how to communicate with animals.
You may have seen this.
They claim they've mapped out a communication map of how animals communicate.
Now, I would say that there's probably something to that.
I predict that eventually some technology will come out and they will claim, whether it's like a chip in an animal's brain or like a voice translator or something, they will eventually have a world where you can talk to animals.
They haven't, I don't think they've claimed in this study that they did where they claim to have mapped out animal communication and they can translate what animals are saying.
I don't think that they claimed that that means the animal can then understand you.
There does seem to be, I mean, if you haven't, if you've had a pet, you probably feel like you can talk to your pet.
There's some level of understanding there.
There will be a day.
I don't think I will see it.
I think it's probably still maybe 50, 100 years out.
There will be a day where animals are talking.
Pets are talking at least.
They'll give you a pet translator or they'll put a chip in a pet and you'll be able to talk to your pet.