Owen Shroyer mocks Senator Fetterman’s health scare, joking it’s less severe than his own facial injuries, while callers like "Don from Port County" push unproven cancer treatments. Shroyer speculates on conservative figures’ Israel visits post-Charlie Kirk’s death, predicting Democrats will pivot against AIPAC by 2030 unless Netanyahu falls. A caller, "the skunk man," pitches bizarre methylene blue experiments, while Shroyer teases Maha and Gabbard’s future relevance, wrapping up with a plug for his revamped merch site and a 21-hour show break. The episode blends dark humor with fringe theories, framing MAGA issues as increasingly irrelevant amid political chaos. [Automatically generated summary]
The Democrat senator fell during an early morning walk, and he's under routine observation in a Pittsburgh hospital right now.
It was established he had a ventricular fibrillation flare-up that led to him feeling lightheaded and then falling to the ground and hit his face with minor injuries.
So I guess he won't be on TV again anytime soon.
I guess we'll find.
Fetterman, Fetterman said he's got a sense of humor.
If you thought my face looked bad before, wait till you see it now.
You know, let me tell you just real quick about the Ibermeckin thing.
I know you don't, I know you're not with it, you know, and you mentioned Scott Adams and stuff.
I mean, it's not 100%, and it's not, you know, it's not something that's, it's not a silver bullet.
What it is, it's an alternative to what they got.
My brother didn't have not one damn day, not even one second of relief from the crap they were giving him.
They tried all kinds of chemo on him.
He trudged, was the last one.
And, you know, I would think that after as much money as they got from the insurance companies and how often they hit it, he would have at least been able to sustain some sort of release or relief, but it killed him.
I mean, it killed his immune system.
He started getting all these infections and everything, MRSA and staph infection and a lot from the chemo because it killed his immune system.
Now, Dr. Drew was one of those guys when COVID first came out.
He was one of those dudes up there like Sanjay Gupta and all the other ones that were all anti-ivermectin.
And for him to sit up there on your show and tell you in front of everybody that there's no evidence, that reminds me of how when everybody was talking about there's no evidence of a collusion, there's no evidence of Trump this and there's no evidence of that.
Of course there's no evidence.
unidentified
If you ain't going to look at it, if you ain't even going to, first of all, hold on a second.
I think it's healthy, but I don't like how they double down and they bunker down on what they've been taught.
You know, it's what everybody knows already.
See, here's the thing.
The cat is out of the bag on everything, man.
Our government is so screwed and everything that they've been doing, everybody knows the whole medical system is based off the Rockefeller, you know, everything's oil-based and he's taught everybody.
And then they give you the presentation and the bells and whistles, and then they try to get you.
They try to bring you in.
So it's mostly like that.
It's mostly like that.
Now, there might be some other stuff and other stuff that we, you know, there could probably be, there's probably some other shady stuff that goes down, but that seems to be, from what I'm told and what I know, it's like they just bring you in, they take you around, they whine and dine you, they sit you down, they have an open forum discussion, they have their time points, and then they say, would you like to help us?
You know, we're paying people to do this or whatever.
I don't know.
Maybe they get direct with money.
Maybe they don't.
Maybe somebody else tells you about it.
But that's mostly what it is.
It's mostly like a timeshare presentation.
They bring you out, they whine and dine you, and then they try to hook you in to becoming a spokesperson for them.
So that's that's, I think probably most of it.
I would say it's mostly just like that.
There might be some other stuff that goes on, which wouldn't surprise me either if we want to get conspiratorial.
But that's mostly my understanding of how it goes.
Hey, I was just wondering what you think, you know, with this meltdown with the Israel stuff on the right these past couple of weeks, the money that's been absolutely pumped in the Republican Party.
Where do you see that shifting, you know, post-Trump?
Let me just try to simply simply put this: the meltdown.
Here's what you have.
And I don't care what anybody says.
I don't care what anybody says.
MAGA, America First, getting Trump elected was not about Israel.
It was not.
It was not what people thought about when they went to vote.
It was not on people's items, agendas when people went to vote.
And if it was, it was background noise.
It was static.
It wasn't important.
It was a floater.
So when Trump gets in and all of a sudden Israel becomes the priority and Netanyahu becomes a priority, there was, you know, that felt like a moment of betrayal.
That felt like a moment of being backstabbed.
And now it's been nothing but backstabbing since.
Okay.
And so you have that going on.
And then you have the propaganda coming from the other side that has deceived people into saying, hey, if you don't support Israel or you don't support a foreign policy, then you're a hater or you're an anti-Semite.
And so the whole thing is just off the rails.
The whole thing is outrageous.
The whole thing is ridiculous.
So what happens after Trump?
I'm telling you, I think if the Momdani election wasn't the Clarion call, I'll tell you what's going to happen, actually.
It's going to happen.
Here's what's going to happen.
The Democrats, as bad as their policy is, the Democrats are so far ahead of Republicans when it comes to communications, PR, and outreach.
And people might think that's crazy.
They might think that and say, how can you mean that?
Because they actually try to adapt to their voters.
Here's an example.
When you see Mike Johnson go in front of the media, and what does he say?
He says, the Democrats are afraid of their voters.
Yeah, no shit, Mike.
Good for them.
So in other words, let me translate.
Let me translate this for you.
When Mike Johnson says the Democrats are so afraid of their voters, let me translate this for you.
Democrats listen to their voters and act accordingly.
So Democrats respond to their voters.
Republicans respond to their donors.
Republicans don't give a shit about voters.
Republicans will flush voters down the toilet.
They don't give a damn.
Republicans only respond to their donors.
So what Mike Johnson is telling you is that Democrats respond to their voters.
Republicans respond to their donors.
Now, when you understand that, you understand everything else that develops in politics on the cultural level, on the social level.
Now it all makes sense.
So here's what I predict is going to happen in the midterms.
And you're already starting to see the signs.
Democrats are going to start coming out and campaigning hard against APAC.
That's what's going to happen.
And this can probably only happen on the left right now.
The right is not ready for this.
The American right is not ready for this.
The American left is already, they're already a foot in the pool, and they're ready to line up to get on the diving board.
Once they see, once the Democrats see that campaigning against Israel or campaigning against APAC is popular, they'll all do it.
They will all do it.
They'll all directly do it.
They'll do it loud.
They'll do it proud.
They'll reject the money.
And then when they see that that's a positive effect and you can win elections on that, they will all do it.
All of them will do it.
Now, I don't know if that's 2026 or 2028, but that's what's going to happen first.
I believe that will happen first.
And then, you know, the Republicans will have two choices.
The Republicans will either decide they're going to counter that and go even more pro-Israel, and then they'll take the APAC money that the Democrats are rejecting.
So, you know, $100 million will pour into Republican Party politics from AIPAC outside of the Democrats.
So they might just take the money and go all in.
So now, yeah, I don't think the right is ready to overwhelm that.
I don't think that can be overwhelmed in 2026.
Now, maybe 2028, if the Democrats do it successfully in 2026, then 2028, you could maybe see room for that happening on the Republican Party.
But I don't think that happens in 2026 on the right.
No way.
No way.
And if that AIPAC money that the Democrats are rejecting goes to the Republican Party, no, they'll all be more pro-Israel than they'll be more pro-Israel than they are pro-America.
If they aren't already, some would argue they are.
So that's where I see that going.
But I don't think, and this is why they're so desperate to sign that deal.
This is why they're so desperate to sign that contract extension that expires in 2028.
This is why they're calling it America First Israel Aid, because they know the gig is up.
They know the gig is up.
They know by 2030, Israel's approval in the United States will be in the single digits.
Now, that could all change with one thing.
All of that could change with one thing.
And this is what gets left out of the conversation.
If you have regime change in Israel and you get rid of Netanyahu and you put somebody in the prime minister's role who isn't a known liar, who isn't a known war-mongering, blood-drenched, psychotic liar, that's my interpretation of Netanyahu.
And I think most Americans as well.
And I know people listen to this that actually know Bibi and they would disagree, but hey, that's my interpretation.
And that's the average America's interpretation.
And that's the average human on planet Earth's interpretation.
And that's what his actions would lead us to interpret.
If you had regime change in Israel and you got somebody as the prime minister that was a lot more grounded, a lot more humble, a lot less addicted to war and the expansion of the Israeli state, who didn't have a track record of coming to the U.S. Congress for 40 years and lying to us to get us to go to war in the Middle East, then a lot of this stuff would cool off.
A lot of this stuff would cool off.
And you might be able to re-sign a deal.
If you had a leader in Israel that the American people genuinely liked, not like the Netanyahu propaganda that we get shoved down our throat, then you might be able to extend that deal.
You might be able to.
But with Netanyahu, it's going to be wholly rejected.
But he's not going anywhere.
He's canceling elections.
He's canceling court dates.
He wants to be a dictator.
Maybe he already is.
So that's why they're so desperate.
That's why they have to get as that's why they have to get this deal done now because they know they know that very soon, definitely in two years, Americans aren't going to want to sign a deal with Israel.
Americans aren't going to want to sign a foreign aid deal with Israel when Netanyahu is the prime minister, especially.
So that's why they're going for it now.
But I did predict that first.
I did predict Momdani would win first, and I did predict that Israel would become the pariah that it is, and that eventually politicians will start realizing that, tapping into that, and then using that to get elected.
And Momdani was just the first case.
That was just the first case of it.
So I anticipate in Democrats, some Democrats will lean into that in 2026.
They'll campaign against AIPAC.
It'll lead to political victories, and then the Democrat Party will follow.