Owen Shroyer dismisses a heated Uncensored America debate on Christian Zionism as "toxic" and irrelevant, mocking claims that modern Jews are biblically chosen while questioning U.S. entanglement in Middle Eastern conflicts he calls a "religious holy war." He pivots to Canada’s election, alleging Liberal result-rigging despite early leads, then deflects callers—including one pushing conspiracy theories about Chen Sharp’s innocence—calling it a "shakedown" while citing $10M settlement offers and edited warnings. Framing dating struggles as a class divide, he blames women’s "biological survival instincts" for societal bitterness before tangling in Trump-era legal musings and bizarre time-travel book theories. Ends with gun club sponsorships and USA-themed merch, reinforcing his anti-establishment, populist stance. [Automatically generated summary]
There's a new tradition which is called Rabbinic Judaism, which started as soon as the temple fell.
Those same Jews held onto their traditions and continued to be the very same Jews that we have today.
The Judaism that started when the temple fell was rabbinic Judaism.
The Jews that we have today are rabbinic Jews.
They are the same Jews.
There's arguments to be made against this, including that they're not doing sacrifices in a tabernacle or in the temple.
So it may not be the true succession of rabbinic Judaism.
But even granting the fact that there's a possibility that it is, it doesn't really matter because when we're talking about Paul here, he says, he says, bloodline itself is irrelevant.
That's not, but what do you think Paul was talking about when he said, my people?
Do you think he was talking about some future people that wasn't a part of the people group he's addressing right then?
No.
No, he wasn't.
That's nowhere in the scripture here.
It actually is.
Well, then you've refuted your argument twice because now you're saying what he's saying is there's a future group of people who could be considered Israel, right, who are not the group of people he's talking about right this second.
I would say, Ridvin, that we know who that people group is, the church and Christians.
No, because he's talking about those who have rejected Christ.
How can that be the church?
And how are they going to be reconciled?
How can the church be those who rejected Christ?
How can the church be those who are in sin and who are in their rejection and who are enemies because of you, because of the gospel, but still beloved to God because of their ancestors?
How can that be the church?
That doesn't make any sense.
Here's what doesn't make any sense.
Ridban.
So when you move into this, what I'm arguing to you is when you say a reconciliation for these people, I want them to come back into God.
Okay?
That's what I want.
I want that more than any other person.
I also want it, but for that, they have to be alive.
Yeah.
Ridban, Ridben, does that mean that I have some moral obligation?
How much treasure should I give, Ridman?
I give you a chance to support them.
How much?
You got to go to the next one.
How much is that?
That's a trivial issue, which we can talk about.
A dollar?
Do you agree that we should support it?
50 cents?
No, that you haven't provided me an ought yet for why I'm not.
If you don't agree that we should support them, then what's the point of talking about the details of how we should support them?
Because they need to start with an odd.
I need to do this because we have so many questions, gentlemen.
We're going to go to the next question.
Hey, Ridvin, congrats first on joining the church.
I just have a quick disambiguation question for you.
Would you make the argument that your exegesis of Romans 9 through 11 would be supported by the majority of patristic sources or even the majority of modern biblical scholarship outside of dispensational circles?
And if so, could you elucidate on that?
Well, as I said, when I talked about it, when I went through my script, I appealed to some very, very important figures in early church history.
As Orthodox Christians, I'm sure Andrew also knows that St. John Chrysostom is an extremely respected figure in terms of his homilies.
The one who wrote a homily against the Jews, yes, exactly that one.
Exactly that one.
Do you know what he says in his homily on Romans 11?
If you want to cherry pick it, I wouldn't advise it.
Now, I'm personally of the mindset that I don't really, how can I say this?
I don't really care what your religion is.
It's not really on me to judge you based off of your religious beliefs, which is going to be mostly predetermined by your upbringing, not your bloodline, your upbringing.
But so I'm open-minded.
I'll get along with anybody.
But what I don't understand from Christians is what I don't understand from the people that support this concept of Judeo-Christ or even Christian Zionists.
Fundamentally, it seems hyperbolic and flawed.
And everybody kind of likes to have their own interpretation of the Bible, but it seems pretty clear to me that Jesus came.
If you're a Christian, if you believe Jesus was the Messiah, and you do have Messianic Jews, if you're an Orthodox Jew or still of the original Jewish heritage and you don't believe that Jesus was the Messiah, okay, that's your belief.
But as somebody that does believe that, how can you tolerate this idea that the Jews are God's most beloved people or the chosen people or they have some sort of religious rights or claims to land or superiority when it's pretty clear that Jesus died for everyone's sins and that Jesus reintroduced the church that there were no chosen people except those that decided
to follow Jesus.
So I just don't understand.
It seems fundamentally opposed.
It seems fundamentally opposed to claim to be a Christian Zionist.
Now, if you want to support Israel for other reasons, then, okay, that's fine.
I just don't get it.
Judeo-Christian is, to me, a made-up concept to get Christians to cuck.
And Christian Zionists are just cucked Christians.
That's how I look at it.
So I mean, again, I don't really mind.
You can be whatever religion you want.
It's mostly due to your upbringing.
And you don't really want to get into this debate about heritage and ancestry, because unfortunately, for most modern day Jews, they'll discover that they're probably less Semitic than the Palestinians.
So they don't want to go down that argument.
The Palestinians will be provably more Semitic than modern day Israel, Israelites or American Jews that are probably majority European now.
And that's why it's so funny when you watch these white girls say, oh, you know, I'm not white.
I'm Jewish.
I got two eyes.
What do you mean you're not white?
You're whiter than me.
But I just don't get how you can go up there with a crucifix and then say, no, the Jews are God's chosen people.
And so they're more important than me.
Well, what are you doing then?
Then you don't believe in Jesus Christ.
You don't believe Jesus Christ is the Messiah.
So you might as well just try to be Jewish, which they will claim you aren't unless you are of the heritage.
I guess you can convert to Judaism.
I just always find that fundamentally flawed.
I've never understood that concept.
It doesn't make any sense to me.
unidentified
Yeah, so I can respond to this as well very quickly because Ridvin's not going to.
They're short-circuited him.
So the question was actually a good question.
The question was, wait a second, didn't Jews exist before there was an Israel?
So how is it that even if Israel wasn't there, Jews would just stop existing?
That makes no sense.
Great question, right?
Seems like it's a performative contradiction in his worldview, which is why he doesn't want to address it.
Here's the truth, right?
And nobody's calling for there to not be a state of Israel, by the way.
But if we were to hypothetically even say that Israel was destroyed and Jews, again, had to disperse or were scattered, that doesn't mean that they would be Jews themselves, would be destroyed.
They would go back to other nations where they were before.
Now, here's the issue.
I was actually answering a question, but if you let me speak without trying to interject every second, I would actually answer your question properly because I understand the question that you asked.
If the land is destroyed, does that really mean they would all go extinct and so on?
Here's the issue.
You have a significant part of the Jewish population that currently lives in the land of Israel.
If the land of Israel would be destroyed, a significant part of the Jewish population would be eradicated.
That means a small amount of Jewish people who are outside of Israel would, of course, still be left.
The amount of those who survived the massacre that would unfold, which Andrew Wilson here never actually acknowledges, would, of course, survive and run away.
But do you really, how is it, how is it a reasonable or proper point to simply allow for that to happen instead of protecting those people when it is so clear?
When it is so clear, that's a lie risk.
The majority of Jews don't live in Israel, Ridban.
What does that matter?
Because you just said that it would take out a substantial port of the population.
The majority, it's not even the majority of the population.
That's the point.
Nobody's calling for Israel to get wiped out at all.
All I'm saying is that there's no ought for Christians to support a nation that wants to have Antichrist by at least.
And it just so happens that Christians happen to be a dying breed in America, which is probably maybe the problem.
But that's not, this is America being forced to support Israel.
But I would argue, if you're a true believing Jew, then you would not need America's money.
You would believe that God is going to provide and God is going to protect as long as you live righteously by the laws given by God.
And then God will provide the protection and God will defeat your enemies.
Just like the Jews have been going through for thousands of years.
So again, it's another fundamentally flawed this time from the Jewish perspective, in my opinion, or it's not even that, really, it's the Israeli perspective or the Israel lobbyists and the pro-Israel American political sect.
No, real, to me, a real Jewish person, a true Jew, a true believer, puts faith in God to provide and protect.
Now, maybe they excuse that and they say, oh, that's what America is doing.
God is giving us America to protect us.
Which, how would an American feel about an admittance like that?
That America is only here to protect Israel.
Is that how you feel as an American?
That's how Ben Shapiro feels, by the way.
That's how a lot of American Jews feel, by the way.
Mark Levin, many others.
They believe the only purpose for America is to serve Israel.
So I guess in that aspect, they're being religiously consistent.
But how would you feel as an American if Israeli Jews said the only reason America exists is to protect us?
How would that make you as an American feel?
So good or not so much?
unidentified
Right?
I did cite the references.
Just because I don't put them up in a PowerPoint presentation for the purposes of time doesn't mean I didn't verbally cite them.
But most of my claims that I'm making, he agrees with.
He agrees that there's at least a large amount, at least by his admission, of Jews inside of Israel, up to 30% who want to name Antichrist.
I gave four logical arguments.
What references should I give you for logical arguments, except me?
Any beyond you, because I do not believe that I have.
What's a logical argument, dude?
I remember maybe one reference.
Do I go to an expert of logic to ask them for a logical argument, or can I make logical arguments?
You cited like one person this entire time.
That's it.
That's all you've given.
I cited my own logic.
I would like to be able to logic.
Are you saying that we should only believe you as the supreme authority?
In case you had a significant thing, this is getting ridiculous.
unidentified
Sorry, folks, hold on.
Hang on, source.
Premise one, me.
Premise two, me.
Premise three, me.
Conclusion, also me.
Now, the great thing about that, you can falsify them with logic.
You know what I find very funny here?
Source.
Andrew claims.
Do you have a source for that?
Andrew claims on one hand that I agree with pretty much everything he said.
Yet during this entire night, during this entire debate, he claimed at least four times that I argued that Jews are more beloved than Orthodox Christians.
So it's been interesting hearing your trains of thoughts.
However, I've heard a lot of straw man attacks tonight against magic Jew blood, feigned outrage about how much money for your kids you have to give up to Jews who reject Jesus, and claims about protecting an ethnic group or people's existence, meaning supporting a blasphemous Antichrist, none of which were brought up by AP or logically or intrinsically follow.
Meanwhile, biblically, we see God himself set up and set apart Israel for his glory.
And we see, open your mouth for the mute for the rights of those who are destitute.
Open your mouth, judge righteously, defend the rights of the poor and needy.
Proverbs 31, 8 through 9.
So my question is, based on these things, if you believe in the sanctity of the lives God created, how can you attack the primary group who is speaking up for their preservation when the things that you claim, such as ushering in the Antichrist, prophecy, does not logically follow?
So first of all, my job here, the claim is that the people of Israel, the Jewish people, God's chosen people, it is in the blood.
Now, I don't know about this whole magic blood thing.
I guess that was something that came up earlier.
But I mean, that's the claim, is that you're a descendant of Israel.
You are the bloodline.
So they can make this joke about the magic blood.
And look, I get it.
I was born and raised Catholic.
I'm a confirmed Catholic.
I don't view the church as representative of me anymore.
I think the Catholic Church, I think the Vatican is mostly corrupted.
There's good people.
I think Catholics are good people, just like I think Jews are good people.
But Israel, the government, the state of Israel, and the Zionists are not good people in my interpretation of their political and religious beliefs.
But that doesn't mean the average Israeli Jew is a bad person.
That doesn't mean that the average American Jew is a bad person, even if I disagree with him.
So, but isn't that the claim?
Is that by blood you're Jewish?
I'm sorry, am I missing something here?
But see, I get it.
It's like a Jewish person would argue that it's ridiculous that a man would rise from the dead.
A Jewish person would argue that it's ridiculous that transubstantiation would be a believable religious exercise.
So everybody's got their own magical beliefs and their religious systems.
But isn't that the whole argument?
Is that it's in your blood if you're Jewish?
Isn't that the whole thing?
So aren't they kind of making fun of their own belief system here?
And again, I mean, maybe there's somebody out there.
There are definitely people out there that say Israel shouldn't even exist.
The state of Israel shouldn't even exist.
Some people interpret it that Israel was never meant to be interpreted as a piece of land, but instead as a people, the actual descendants, the people, the actual bloodline, not a piece of land, but the people.
Now, land was mentioned in the Bible as well.
But again, that should all be provided for by God.
So it all comes back to the same issue here, which is why should the United States of America be forced to defend Israel?
I'm not saying Israel doesn't have the right to exist.
I don't want to deal with it.
And if you're an Israeli Jew, which most of them are not even Orthodox Jews anymore, then you would believe that God is going to provide and protect.
It's not up to me.
And I want nothing to do with it.
And this is how the average American is going to start to feel very soon.
The whole facade of our most valuable ally, this whole facade that Israel must be protected at all costs, it is falling apart at the seams, folks.
And most of that is to do with the fact that baby boomers had it so good in this country.
And that's fine for them.
Their parents earned that for them.
I don't hold some grudge against boomers because they left us with this America to fix.
That's a whole different conversation.
The point is that they had it so good that it didn't really matter to them supporting Israel because they had it so good.
We don't have that anymore.
We don't have the great economy anymore.
We can't afford houses.
Most people are in debt.
They can't afford education.
They can't afford to have a family.
So it's a different world now.
So now this idea that Israel has to be our biggest ally and we have to support it, we don't buy that anymore.
We've got our own problems now.
Israel can settle its own problems.
We don't want anything to do with it.
Not to mention, because of the dynamic nature of media now, you get to hear different opinions on the matter.
You get to get first-hand accounts from the region and then make up your own mind.
So the game has changed.
And this idea that you just have to support Israel, our greatest ally, it's over, folks.
It's done.
It's done.
It's clinging on by a thread.
It's got maybe two election cycles left.
And quite frankly, you're going to see people in conservative media completely fall off that aren't willing to address this.
And then you're basically going to have conservative American media, and then you're going to have Zionist media that will pose as conservative.
But at the end of the day, they'll always put Israel first.
And everybody's realizing this now.
This is the hottest topic right now.
And it's unfortunate because now I look at this.
Like, for example, all the pro-Israel propaganda is all attacking Muslims now.
And they're trying to reignite the fervor that Americans had against Muslims post-9-11, which hopefully people have realized now we were lied to about.
I don't know what really happened on 9-11.
The U.S. stood down.
Israel intelligence stood down.
Who really pulled it off?
Who knows?
Somebody had an inside job.
I don't know how else they would have gotten bombs inside the World Trade Center and pulled that job, but it was clearly an inside job.
100%.
All the parties and factors still remain a mystery, but that is an inside job.
We were lied to about that.
So you have all the people that are on the payroll of the Israel propaganda, which kind of works like the Democrat Party.
They have different ways of getting that money.
So it's not directly coming from Israel.
There's not directly coming from APAC, but there's different media outlets that get the funding, and then they kind of funnel it down.
And then eventually, I think it was Sarah Stock recently got offered $2,000 to support Israel at some college thing.
So they, you know, that's what they do.
So all these people posting about anti-Muslims and all these people you see posting about, you know, pro-Israel stuff, most of that is just paid for propaganda.
Because Israel is losing to support of the West.
Israel is losing support of the American people.
So that's why you keep seeing this fervor against Muslims popping back up.
That's all an Israel propaganda attempt to get you to hate Muslims so they can strike Iran and win back support of Israel.
Now, I wonder if October 7th wasn't their big event, their big false flag, to put that in permanently and move towards their plans for a greater Israel, because it's massively failed.
It's had the reverse effect.
So now it's like, do they, because a lot of people think another massive false flag is coming by Israel, but I think that was it.
I think it was October 7th.
I think that was their big plan and it just didn't work.
And so now all they have is war with Iran and trying to get the U.S. to support it.
I think that's all they have.
Now, I don't know inside Israel's politics as much, but I do know there is a large portion of Israel that does not like what Netanyahu is doing.
They think Netanyahu's aggression in the region is actually putting Israel in more danger than it ever has.
And that's totally true.
People are fleeing Israel.
Israel's economy is having problems.
Netanyahu has been focused on one thing, one thing only, and that's the Zionist expansion, taking the Gaza Strip, and he's totally failed.
So they're bombing everybody on their borders.
They're attacking everybody, and they're trying to get the American people involved in this war, and we just don't want it anymore.
But that's just crazy that the apostate prophet, I've never heard of this guy.
He literally said multiple times in the video, in the video, he says the Jews are God's special people, God's chosen people.
And then he says, I never said that.
Dude, it's in the video.
So what an absolute fraud he is.
unidentified
Not there's an ought or an ought not.
If Christians must, they have some moral obligation to support a political ideology, right?
I granted AP's definition.
I've been very charitable.
I granted his definitions.
I've granted his numbers.
I've granted everything and showed that they still don't falsify the actual position.
The reason I utilize the idea of magic Jew blood is so that he could say, yes, this is above Orthodox Christians.
Do you, ma'am, do you believe that Israel is the church?
Do you believe the church is Israel?
I don't know how that's relevant to supporting the people.
Can I answer my question?
Can you answer my question?
Can I answer my question?
It's not a question.
About supporting the life of an ethnic group.
I already did.
So that is irrelevant.
Did I answer your question?
I answered it.
Yes, I did.
Can you answer mine?
Is Israel the church?
I believe that the church that is with Christ are the branches that have been grafted on to the natural born olive tree.
AP, though, in his religious belief and in mine, we believe that the church is the Israel which is being referenced.
He believes that too.
That's part of his faith.
Hang on, hang on.
that's part of his face.
So when I'm making so when I hang on, let me finish my point.
What does not exclusively mean?
It means also, yes, I do, but.
It means, yes, I do, but a qualifier, great.
But he does.
He has to believe that.
All Christians believe that.
Can I finish this?
Let me clarify one thing here for you.
I'm not allowed to finish.
Hold on one second.
I do want to give you a question.
Stop filibustering me for sure.
Let me finish the damn point.
So anyway, back to this.
By his own faith, he believes that Israel is a new church.
Me and you are talking past each other.
Me and AP are not.
I'm falsifying his direct ideology, not trying to falsify whatever yours is.
You're making a false question.
Okay, then who's the church?
Here is the issue, Andrew.
Do you acknowledge, do you acknowledge that according to Romans 9 through 11, and according to Orthodox teachings, there are two Israels here.
One would be the natural Israel and one is the spiritual or also called the true Israel.
If you believe in the New Testament, then what are you talking about?
unidentified
It doesn't depend on me.
Your view depends on you specifically for the Christian.
So I have a brief statement and then a question.
So I'm a seminarian in the Reformed tradition.
Almost Reformed, the Reformed tradition universally rejects dispensationalism.
And many of the other sort of main Protestant groups, it's mostly Restorationists that accept that, that hold that position.
Supporting Christians in the Middle East00:15:44
unidentified
That's true.
It's small.
It's like 20% of like, yeah, it's like 20% who accepts dispensationalism.
Yeah, I was just saying that you characterized Protestants when it is not universal to Protestantism.
That's true, but look, I wasn't.
So in the 70s, the United States sent money and weapons to the Taliban in the effort to fight the Soviet Union.
Yeah.
Today, the Israeli government sends money to support dispensationalists in the U.S. Yes.
Does the U.S. support the political aims of a caliphate of the Taliban just because they send them money?
They have.
So, I mean, they actually have supported what you would consider, you know, like if we're talking about, if we're talking about al-Qaeda, things like this, the U.S. has actually supported groups like this.
I would say, though, from a Christian perspective, we would say they ought not do that, right?
The support of a group or organization by a government is almost not, is almost never because of some, you know, philosophical or theological alignment.
I totally agree.
It is pragmatic.
I think that your assertion that, you know, your assertion that Israel is there to bring about the Antichrist because they support ridiculous dispensationalist nonsense in the United States is a bridge too far in that they're supporting them because they bring, you know, because they support and bring people to support and positively, you know, toe the line for the Israeli state.
Then why do they say, why do they make the claim that they're essentially biblical accelerationists?
Because they're trying to get biblical accelerationists to support them.
Right.
But that doesn't mean that they're amalgamation and biblical accelerationism ends in stupidity, but and antichrist, right?
Antichrist, yeah, the end of the world.
If you believe that that eschatology is true, but if it's not, it just means ridiculous.
what is it one this is crazy or under two percent of who are actually what happened to the easter worshipers in israel by the way on easter How did that go?
unidentified
We definitely can't.
By the way, hang on, by the way, by the way, can I finish, bro?
You don't want them to live there.
Why am I not allowed to finish Everlast?
Stop filibustering me, dummy.
So real quick, we can assist, we can assist Christians around the world and have tons.
We have, and so have tons of organizations which have assisted Christians around the world by not supporting Muslims or Israel.
So if you want to come to America where you can worship in peace, then that's fine with me.
But you better not bring your war and you better not bring your hatred.
And you better not expect us to buy into that and to sell that because that's what's going on now.
So I love this.
I love this back and forth like, oh, well, first it's you have to protect Israel.
No, I don't want to.
Okay, well, you have to protect the Christians in the Middle East.
No, I don't have to do that either.
It's like, what are you talking about?
How about we just stop all the wars and then everybody can live in peace and harmony?
And who's standing in the way of that?
unidentified
There's an argument that I think Josh went too far, but then the person right in front of me, so I'm going to try to formulate it this way because I agree Christians shouldn't support an ideology that may conflict with Christianity wholeheartedly.
And is growing.
But the pragmatic thing that, of course, I'll lose because I'm trying to be pragmatic.
But 30 to 36% of people in the United States are socialist, support socialism, XYZ.
The United States government has given tens upon tens of millions of dollars to socialist causes.
Therefore, should we support America because America wants to start a socialist revolution?
Well, here's the thing.
I would never make an odd claim, right, that Christians would have to support United States endeavors because it's the United States.
I would never make that odd claim.
He's making the odd claim we must support Israel because they're Jews.
I'm just like on my third reformulation, but I appreciate it, gentlemen.
Thank you so much.
We have to go to the next question because we're going to do rapid fire with these last guys.
As I wanted to come back to a question that this young man, you brought it up a couple minutes ago.
But you were saying how it's safer for Christians to live in Israel, but Israel has been killing 3% of the Christian population in Gaza recently.
You mentioned earlier in your opening argument that the idea of Zionism is to coexist with one another.
And maybe Theodore Herzl, you know, didn't understand the idea of coexistence, but there's been plenty of paramilitary groups that have been attacking during this region during the original.
You said you weren't going to reiterate propaganda, but Haji Amin was just one man.
You know who I'm referring to?
Now, here's the issue.
You are once again influenced by the propaganda, which I see, which is why I brought this up to Andrew Wilson and said that if we have a list tracked by a Christian organization, do you trust your fellow Christians?
Open Doors International is a Christian organization which tracks oppression of Christians around the world.
Even in Israel, if it happens, Israel is not listed among the countries where there is Christian oppression.
So if people are dying in the middle of the world of a war, if people are dying in the middle of a war, then does that really mean that it is Israel that is oppressing them?
No, they are in the middle of a war.
Do you know how many Christians died in this war so far?
Israel did support the forerunners of Hamas before Hamas came into existence because they thought that this was a charity organization which they marked themselves as.
It then turned into a terrorist organization.
The only thing that happened afterwards is that the people who are in the world are not.
Quickly to the other two gentlemen about the quickly about the other two gentlemen that talked about like if a government supports like a foreign organization, that means that they believe in what the organization is saying.
Not that we should support it, but I don't think it's fair to claim.
Shout out to the guys at Uncensored America, by the way.
Good friends.
And they host a lot of debates.
I love political debate.
I love it.
And, you know, you have to learn this thing too.
People need to learn to not take anything personally because it's likely that the thing that you're taking personally, the source is probably retarded.
So you can never take things personally and never take yourself too seriously either, or you'll just be a total blunderfish.
So those are just words of advice.
And that's how I, I mean, I love political debate.
I fear no political debate.
But here's the problem.
Aside from however you might feel about this issue that we can't escape.
That's the problem.
We can't escape it now.
The U.S. must decouple from the Middle East.
I don't care how you feel about Israel.
I don't care how you feel about the Gaza Strip.
I don't care how you feel about Jewish people, Israeli Jews, Muslims, none of that.
I don't care.
I'm done.
I'm done with the nonstop war in the Middle East being my business.
In case you haven't learned, Jews have been at war with their neighbors since the Old Testament.
The Jews have been fighting and warring and whoring and killing and raping and pillaging and rising and falling for thousands of years with the Arabs, with the Muslims.
I want nothing to do with it.
And if you're a Christian and you believe Jesus came to save the world and to remake the church, then I don't understand why you think that you have some loyalty to Israel.
It makes no sense.
And there is no amount of stammering around through an argument that will make it make sense because it's fundamentally hyperbolic.
But again, I don't even care.
Why now?
You know what's coming now if we don't stop this?
Do you know what is coming now if we do not stop this?
Do you realize that the war in the Middle East between the Jews and Muslims is going to be in your backyard?
Have you figured that out yet?
Have you seen all the mosques going up all over?
Have you seen all the giant Islamic religious worship services going up all over?
Have you seen that?
Have you seen the anti-Muslim propaganda coming to America brought to you by Israel?
Have you seen all the protests, all the anti-Israel protests, all the pro-Palestinian protests?
Have you seen all the money pouring in from Israel?
Have you seen it?
If we do not decouple from the Middle East and we do not recognize this scourge that has plagued the Middle East for thousands of years and decouple with it and denounce it, it will destroy this country.
We will be destroyed by this same fight that Israel is so worried about being destroyed of.
I'm sick of it.
I'm not going to let my country that my ancestors built get destroyed by the same Middle East religious holy war that has forced their people to never live in peace.
And if you notice, the countries in the Middle East and North Africa that are coming out of this scourge that are Islamic, notice how they want nothing to do with it.
They'll arrest you if you have a Palestinian flag.
They probably will probably arrest you if you have an Israeli flag.
They want nothing to do with it.
See, they've transcended and they've realized it's time to put it down.
So they're not getting involved.
They'll do peace negotiations.
They'll host peace negotiations, but they're not going to support the Palestinians.
They're not going to support the Israelis.
They're done.
They've moved on.
They're now building giant metropolitan cities in what was once a desert wasteland.
They now have some of the most advanced architecture, state-of-the-art metropolitan areas because they've finally decided we're done.
We're out.
We're not dealing with them anymore.
When will the United States learn?
If we do not decouple from this thousands-years-old holy war, the war will be on our streets, folks.
So if you're Jewish or you're Muslim and you come to America, then you better leave that holy war behind you.
You better leave that hatred behind you or you're just going to bring it here.
But everything you see involving that situation, it's nothing but propaganda.
it's nothing but propaganda.
So that's great.
So Christian Americans who have gone so soft, and that's what it is.
Christian Americans that have gone so soft and have let their guard down are now going to watch the United States of America fall to the same Jewish-Arab war that's been going on for thousands of years on the other side of the planet.
And you're going to sit here and watch sycophants celebrate it because they're picking a side and they've completely lost track of their own self-interest and survival instincts.
Unbelievable.
It's infuriating.
It's just completely infuriating.
All right.
Let's move on from that toxic geopolitical conflict, shall we?
I guarantee them to you, you're majority Eastern European.
Guarantee it.
And what is the state of Jew, by the way?
Are you an Israeli?
Are you an Israeli?
Have you ever been to Israel?
Are your parents from Israel?
What do you mean you're Jewish, but you're not Jewish?
What does that even mean?
And what do you mean you're not white, even though I'm looking right at you and you're clearly white with fake blonde hair and probably fake lashes and everything else?
Did you get a nose job too?
So, you're an atheist, but you're Jewish.
That's not how it works.
So, what are you trying to say?
That you're Israeli?
Are you trying to say that you're a semite?
Are you Middle Eastern?
What are you trying to say?
An ethno-state?
You're the only person that gets to claim an ethno-state then.
Okay.
unidentified
Some of you, because you love playing the oppression Olympics.
Here you are playing the Oppression Olympics, but then saying white people want to play Oppression Olympics.
That's funny because I guess that makes you white.
unidentified
See, us Jewish people, we weren't white enough for the Nazis, but we are white enough to participate in your race politics where white people are, of course, the bad guys.
You just, you, you're just making your claim to fame there.
Here's what I was talking about earlier, by the way, just for a point of reference here.
Sarah Stock in college, I got offered an opportunity to bring a pro-Israel speaker to campus four times in exchange for two grand and a free trip to Israel.
Many college students take it.
It's a lot of money.
I got a similar offer with a trip to Israel.
It came from multiple parties.
The White House was also involved.
So, yeah.
But this is probably Qatar.
If you ask, you know, if you ask the pro-Israel lobby, this is Qatar.
And I love this point that they're all making now.
Qatar gives all this money to our colleges and institutions.
Now, I don't know if I'll know if I want to take the time to try to pull up the phone call.
But it looks like this is a shakedown.
It looks like Shannon is getting shaken down.
And I see conservatives jumping on here because I guess jumping on Shannon because I guess he's not a conservative.
I guess he's a liberal or maybe he said something bad about Trump.
And so, you know, people in politics tend to exist in their own lane.
I've transcended lanes.
I've transcended boxes.
I've transcended political ideologies.
I remain logically consistent, reasonable, and I can make up my own mind based off of logic and reasoning.
So a lot of conservatives can't do that.
They're stuck in the conservative lane.
And if one person says one thing liberal or negative about Trump, they can't get out of it.
No, Shannon Sharp's bad, and so they're celebrating it.
No, it's pretty clear to me, Shannon was set up.
Now, the one thing that's curious is he did offer this girl a settlement.
Now, I'm not saying that proves anything because sometimes it's worth the settlement for these men to just shut him up and make the bitch go away, even if they're totally innocent.
But there's these phone calls that got released, of course, by the woman.
She's released phone calls and text messages, all to make Shannon look bad.
And you can see anybody who's being discerning can listen to this tape and see how she edited out of context.
I got to find the tape.
Because it's again, I tend now, if I'm going to lean into anything, I lean in where I see people getting it wrong.
Otherwise, I just like to deliver news.
Hold on.
I think that Shannon Sharp.
Yeah, so Shannon Sharp has said bad things about Trump.
And so, you know, liberals or liberals or conservatives are jumping on him like, you know, he's another Trump-hating liberal.
Well, that doesn't, that doesn't change the fact he can be innocent and be set up and shaken down.
So we're not going to support that.
I don't care if Shannon Sharp hates white people.
I don't care if Shannon Sharp hates Donald Trump.
don't give a damn what Shannon Sharp is into politically or personally.
An innocent man does not deserve to suffer.
Now, I would say he might be guilty of something, not necessarily a crime.
He might be guilty of something that makes him feel like he needs to offer a settlement or try to keep this out of the courtroom.
But when the woman is releasing edited audio and text messages to make him look bad, to me, this is a setup and a shakedown.
And I believe I have the audio here that I'm talking about.
But this is so clearly edited out of context.
And I think, I think, to me, makes Shannon looks innocent, in my opinion.
unidentified
I don't know.
Anything I say, you're just going to get mad at and you're just going to hang up on me.
You know, obviously women like money and they like rich men.
So, I mean, it's not like that's some breaking news.
I don't think women are evil for that.
It's fine.
Women are attracted to resources.
It's well studied.
It's taught in college psychology.
The number one thing women are attracted to, it's not shape.
It's not height.
It's not eye color, hair color, skin.
It's none of that.
It's literally resources, aka money.
But it doesn't have to be money.
It's just resources.
And that's fine.
It's their survival instinct.
It's in their biology.
They want to know they can be taken care of.
They want to know their offspring can be taken care of.
There's nothing wrong with that.
It's totally normal, actually.
Completely understandable for women to be attracted to resources more than anything else.
Now, because of that, they can get a little wild.
It's kind of like you'll see men that go crazy for women and do stupid things for women.
Women will do crazy, stupid things for resources.
Why do you think there's so many girls on OnlyFans?
But, you know, I always see this commentary about the dating world and how hard it is for women and everything else.
And oh, you know, there's basic sciences to all of this, and everybody seems to miss it.
So here's, here's, I'm going to play this video too: Billy Ray Brandt, who I think does like social commentary like this in the dating world.
I've seen her stuff before pop up.
But again, this is one of those things I see most people just get it totally wrong.
So I'm just going to start to lean into that stuff more often.
But so this girl says, I feel like a lot of women are looking for someone who doesn't watch cartoons, has a job, a car, and isn't addicted to porn.
The bar is in hell.
Well, I think that women reach a certain point in their lives where they realize the propaganda has lied to them and set them up for failure.
Like, there is no Prince Charming to come rescue you or sweep you off your feet.
You know, I was once a big believer in love when I was younger.
Some of that is starting to fade.
I got to be honest.
And it's not that I don't think love is the most powerful thing on earth.
I just feel like there are very few that can actually capture that and turn it into something more.
And really, when it comes to relationships, you have to be pragmatic and you have to be smart and maybe learn to love.
Because there's no doubt, you know, the whole idea, the whole concept of love at first sight, there's something there, whether you want to call it love or not.
But there is love.
And I would reason that with every person you're with or with every person you've loved, you kind of gain this tolerance to it.
And so it becomes harder and harder to recapture that feeling the older you get.
But I think women are chasing either this concept of love that they've been sold, which is almost impossible.
It's so rare to find.
And then, or they're just chasing money and resources.
But if you're a man, like she says, and you're an attractive man and you don't have these character flaws like not having a job or being resourceful on your own merit or being addicted to porn, then usually for a guy like that, he can date any woman he wants.
So he doesn't need to be in love and he doesn't need you.
And so I think that's another problem that women are facing is that the men that women want to date, there's so little of them, and yet there's so many women that want to date them that they don't really have to, they don't have to settle down.
They don't have to get married.
And so then these women end up getting bitter towards men and blaming men when men are just pragmatic creatures at the end of the day.
So the truth is, and I'm not saying women need to compromise.
I'm saying if you're a woman and you're looking for marriage and a long-term relationship, then yeah, you're going to have to lower your bar.
Or you're going to be in your 30s saying, where are all the good men?
And all the good men are either married or they're just not interested in getting married because they don't need to get married.
They can get married whenever they want.
And they can just date whoever they want.
And the same thing goes, I think, for the women too, but they kind of take it a different direction and end up just either profiting off of their looks or just dating as many men to entertain themselves as they can until they realize, you know, now it's time to settle down.
And by then, those men are dating other women.
What does she say here?
Women, you need to settle.
What is she talking about?
Let me get her.
unidentified
And it goes really well.
My favorite part about dating is when you go on a first date and it goes really well.
So you go on a second date and that goes really well.
And then you go on a third date, which goes really well.
And then you find out that they're looking for something long-term, which makes you like them more.
So then you go on a fourth date and it goes really well.
But then you find out that they want to be single for longer and then you just never talk again.
This is the result of telling every woman not to settle.
It's an idea that sounds empowering, but it's actually a trap.
Women are so obsessed with not settling that they're not choosing anything.
The whole don't settle mantra has turned into a permanent state of hesitation.
And this is why women in their 30s are now having children more than women in their 20s, which is causing birth rates to porn.
Women have been sold a lie and they're never going to find love if they're constantly waiting for the next best option.
The longer you chase perfect, the longer you end up alone.
Well, some disappointing things, like with the Esting files, you know, I saw that, and uh, that Goreno guy, they said they're going to release them, and of course, you know, nothing ever comes of it.
But y'all were just saying, you know, I guess so.
I just thought she did one particular thing that y'all were kind of disagreeing with, or you were disagreeing with.
So it looks like the loophole around that is because the Democrats ran a fake impeachment scam.
I don't know the exact text of it, but basically there's some weird out where if you get impeached illegitimately, then you can run.
You basically become eligible again because they void your term when you were impeached.
But I don't think that will, I do, I do not think that will come into play.
I mean, they could try to impeach him again.
So I don't think that loophole works.
I think the only way they could do it is Trump would have to be the vice president, and then the president would either have to step down or, you know, God forbid the worst happens.
I don't think it's going to happen.
I think the whole Trump 2028 thing is a troll.
I don't think Donald Trump wants to do four more years.
He wants to live the rest of his life out with his family.
One of his sons might have political aspirations, but I don't think Trump wants a third term.
It's been mentioned before, and it was also rumored that there was not only the curse for murdering Jesus, obviously, you know, got son, but even like the gypsies got cursed because apparently they made the nails that crucified Jesus.
And this is, look, people don't like to talk about it, but a lot of the modern-day Jews are just Eastern European gypsies that went into Israel, modern day Israel.
You know, people will believe in Wi-Fi and radio signals and all that stuff, the internet.
But then you start talking about different types of energies, like a curse or ether stuff or metaphysical stuff, and people just talk about that being hooboo jooboo.
But you see, even when we've spoken before about Barron's Trump's Marvelous Underground Journey, which was a spin-off, I don't know if you know this of Alice in Wonderland.
So, yeah, so there was this book written, and it was during the Alice in Wonderland craze.
And the white rabbit character mirrored in this book about a character named Baron Trump and his marvelous underground journey, as we've seen with the pyramids, lots of stuff going underground.
So I thought that was kind of an interesting link and connection there.
And, you know, people would always think that like time travel is not real, but as expected, it's recently come out with the government officials talking about quantum entanglement and time travel, which, you know, I was thinking kind of begs the question: like,
should priority one as Christians be to use the time travel technology to save Jesus and bring him back to modern time and create the second coming or save Jesus and reset the timeline?
The divine creation that we're in has so many secrets.
And I'm not saying time travel isn't impossible.
I don't think I would put it to you this way: I don't think you can travel through time in like some plane, like where you would travel from point A to point B. Is it called somewhere in time, by the way?
He had during his time, he was talking about this news story out of England, Heathrow Airport, where at the same time, there were like two video files saved of two different Russians at the same time in the same place.
Like they showed, released their pictures.
And it was like a ha-ha joke.
So I don't even, I think even more groups than just the U.S. and Russia have access to this technology.
It does, but I'm sorry to tell you that you're wrong because you look at it like, think about when you die, which is kind of hard to think about.
But when you're dying, you're with God and you're beyond life, you're without time.
There is no time there.
So there's even like, you know, people talk about time is like something that not only can be controlled in the spiritual realm and in this realm, but you know, there's also reality.
I think they have even weapons like you see with CERN that is messing and fucking with reality, which is crazy, you know, and that's why all this weird shit we got to deal with day and out driving us bonkers and why you don't want to go get laid.
You should be going to get laid.
Oh, you need to get laid, man.
You got to drain that poison, man.
You're going to go crazy.
unidentified
What are you talking about?
You were saying you didn't, you weren't going out and dating.
And there might be some science that proves it has benefits.
There might be some science that proves it has benefits.
I did the cold plunge, and it was like my body rejected it so intensely that when I finished it, I was like, why would I ever do that?
Why would I, why would I torture my body?
It doesn't make any sense to me.
So I did the cold plunge once.
I don't think I'll ever do it again.
I mean, the only time I could see doing it is if I had a lower body injury that was like swelling and I wanted to reduce the swelling, then I could think about it.
But I hated it.
I thought it was miserable.
I never want to do it again.
I'll sit in a sauna 120, 130 degrees, or I guess really about 200 degrees, actually.
I'll sit in a sauna 200 degrees and I'll love that.
That is, I like that, but the cold plunge was like hell.
And his role in the story is he's like a pivotal to Baron Trump's journey because he's like the author of the manuscript that describes the world within a world.
And the manuscript sparks Baron Trump's interest in exploring the subterranean realms.
And I don't know, like the manuscript is interesting too, because that's like the whole function of the story.
The manuscript, the manuscript titled The World Within a World.
Talks about digital vanity, economic divides, environmental blindness, political absurdity, technology without soul, cultural echo chambers, and education for wisdom.
I'm glad you got in tonight, and I'm going to finish the show with this.
I think this.
No, I don't think this.
I know this.
We are in such a divine creation that our minds can barely even comprehend.
The third-dimensional earth physical plane and realm that we exist in is one of many.
Most experts agree that there's either nine, maybe seven dimensions that all unfold from the original dimension, the baseline, the code that keeps everything held together, the vibrations, the frequencies.
A lot of people believe, and maybe myself included, quite frankly, that when you tap into the potentials of DMT, it's the only way to access these other dimensions.
You have to literally alter your brain chemistry in order to access these dimensions.
Now, the most hardcore version of it would be different ayahuasca ceremonies that you can do in like the Amazon rainforest.
The cheap shortcut to it is like the DMT5 and the stuff you can just basically smoke and just get like a five-minute launch, a five-minute download.
But that's mostly ineffective because it's so limited.
But the ayahuasca is so intense that it's almost impossible for the average person to even handle it.
So, so you go into that and you're basically just trying to survive, and your mind is not even strong enough to realize what it is that you're going through.
But you can certainly tap into the dimensions.
And by the way, the U.S. government knows this.
And they've been trying to map out these dimensions by getting people into with the pure DMT Because it's like a phase.
It's like a roller coaster.
But you just go straight up and then you come down.
So it's like, how do you how do you manage at a certain point where you're actually getting the vision and you're actually getting the download from whatever dimension it is that you're trying to tap into?
It's like, do you want to tap into the dimension that shows you like the code of life that shows you the code of God's creation?
Do you want to tap into the upper layer of that that shows you the different connection vectors?
Then there's the third dimension and then there's the fourth dimension and up, which you really can't even recognize.
You can't even like, you're not even meant to be there.
But it's like, if you can find a way to just stabilize that and stay there, and if you can get used to it and map it out, that's what they're trying to do.
That's what the U.S. government is trying to do.
And I got all these books, too.
I went and grabbed these.
I got all these books, people bringing up astral projection.
The government has done so much stuff.
The government has basically proven the power of the mind.
They've proven the power of astral projection.
They've proven the power that I mean, you have more powers available to you.
I mean, my theory is all we're doing, whether by design or just survival, all humans are doing are trying to recreate everything we lost.
We're trying to recreate what was lost in the pyramids of Egypt and the times of the ancient societies and civilizations that built the megaliths that we have no scientific explanation for.
And all we're trying to do is retap into that, but we can't internalize it, so we externalize it.
So what do we do?
So we build airplanes, we build cars, we build satellites, we build all these things in the third dimension because it's the only way we can recapture all of the abilities that we used to have.
All this technology is going to lead us to the singularity, a synthetic singularity, when we actually have an organic singularity already inside of us.
We're already in the singularity.
We're in God's singularity.
We're already all connected through the divine singularity, but it's God's.
It's the creators.
It's constant.
It's always there.
You're always a part of it.
You can't separate from it.
The seen and the unseen.
But yet we're like so dumbed down and so atrophied in our spirit, in our soul, that the only way we can reconnect to the singularity is to build the synthetic singularity, to build the fake singularity.
And I guess that's, you know, that's Satan.
That's the Antichrist, you could say, the mark of the beast.
But that's kind of me just theorizing here off the deep end.
But I don't know.
They keep all this stuff secret from us.
What do they really know?
What do they really know about the power of the mind?
What do they really know about the parts of our brain that we don't use anymore?
What do they really know about the history of humans or other things for that matter on this earth?
I didn't even tease this one because I wasn't sure if I wanted to do it tonight or not.
We're going to do it.
We're going to do this.
Now, we have a new sponsor to the show.
And much like with Owen.gold, I like you to become a member at Owen.gold because it gives you something back.
It makes it worth your time.
You're not just becoming a member and either getting a product that you're virtually paying for.
You're getting access to something that you can't anywhere else.
It has something that gives back.
So at Owen.gold, you become a member of the club, and then you basically can get the best rates on precious metals anywhere else because when we purchase it, everybody in the club goes and purchases it as well.
So the more members of the club, the lower the price goes for us.
Now, the latest is Firearms Direct Club.
Now, I spoke to these guys last week, but it's a very similar thing.
They sell you arms, ammunition, everything else at the industry price, basically the bottom line price.
And all you have to do is become a member to get that price.
So if you're into, if you're into shooting, if you're just into collecting guns, this is the best place to go.
Now, I created my own website so it's easier to remember: owengunclub.com, owengunclub.com, and this is what will come up.
Now, when you check out, when you become a member and you check out, use Owen at checkout, and you will get your membership for $12.99 a month.
So it won't be $19.99 a month.
It'll be $12.99 a month.
And then you'll get access to all the different firearms they have, all the different ammunition they have, and just try it.
And I promise you, if you are a gun enthusiast, firearm enthusiast, or you just like to go shooting, you spend a bunch of money on ammo, this will be the best deal for you.
Bottom line: owengunclub.com, use promo code Owen at checkout, and you will get it for $12.99 a month.
So you won't be paying $15.99 a month.
You'll be paying $12.99 a month.
These are great Americans.
They believe in your Second Amendment right.
Firearms Direct Club, OwenGunClub.com for more information.
If you're a gun enthusiast, if you like going to the range a lot, you spend a bunch on ammunition and guns, you're going to love it, folks.
You're just absolutely going to love it.
OwenGunClub.com.
Use promo code Owen to get that discount.
Don't forget about promo code Owen at owengunclub.com.
So really excited for our new sponsors there.
Firearmsdirectclub, owengunclub.com.
And then we have some new merchandise.
Do we have new merchandise?
Do we have new merchandise at owensroyer.store?
Let's see.
Let's go here and see what we got.
There it is.
The USA Gold Classic hat.
How about that?
So we got a new hat for you there in black and gold.
It's my favorite color scheme.
And I just didn't have anything.
I didn't have anything.
And I want to wear this one to the gym too.
This is the hat I'm going to wear to the gym when it comes in.