Owen Shroyer Live - OSL 68 - Fauci Gets Grilled, Owen Gets Supreme Court Denial

All Episodes

Previous Next

June 4, 2024 - Owen Shroyer Live

02:02:19

OSL 68 - Fauci Gets Grilled, Owen Gets Supreme Court Denial

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Oh, and Troy Live Episode 68 Bouchy gets grilled.
	My case gets rejected in the Supreme Court.
	Ivan Raklin coming up, my attorney Lexus Anderson coming up, but first go.
	Hold on.
	Enjoy.
	Hold on.
	Hold on.
	All right.
	No stress Gotta find a safety line No way for striking down Hold on We are nearly coming up to Hold on The conscious wire Run on In the
	matter of time You're in the open You shall prove yourself As a bitter end Find out where it's yourself Hold on We are nearly coming up to Hold on Hold on The conscious
	wire I call Hold on guitar
	solo guitar
	solo guitar solo guitar
	solo we are
	We are nearly crawling on to Hold on Fight The gods aspire on the Hold on Fight Hold on Die That is Gojira.
	Hold on.
	Arguably, I would say the second best drummer in the world on my list, Mario DePlantiere.
	Second best only to Danny Carey of Toole.
	But that's just one man's humble opinion.
	Owen Schroyer live, episode 68.
	Anthony Fauci gets grilled.
	Owen Schreuer gets Supreme Court denial.
	I've got Ivan Raikland coming up.
	He was in the hearing.
	Master lover level trolling.
	And then my attorney, Lexus Anderson, is going to be joining us as well to talk about the Supreme Court denial.
	As always, everything comes to you through the Owen dot gold microphone.
	The Owen dot gold microphone.
	Owen dot gold, the only membership, the only subscription that pays you back in gold.
	Literally, gold will show up in your mailbox.
	Visit Owen.gold to find out more and become a member.
	All right.
	Now, if you watched the Fauci hearing, you obviously saw my guy Ivan Raiklin, who I'm dialing up right now.
	And we're going to be asking him what it was like in that room.
	We do have some audio from Ivan before Fauci even testified.
	Just epic level.
	Just epic level.
	And this is what, quite frankly, we need more of.
	We need more people perfectly, peacefully executing their First Amendment right like Ivan did today.
	All right, Ivan, can you hear me loud and clear?
	Okay.
	Yeah, I can hear you.
	All right, before I before I put Ivan on the screen, and um he's fixing his hair right now, so we'll let him fix his hair.
	Before we have Ivan on the screen, and he's fixing his hair right now, I want to first show you what we need for Wolf.
	Here's Ivan outside of the hearing earlier today.
	Tony, are you sad that you're in the number three spot as it applies to murdering people throughout the entire world after Stalin and Hitler?
	Sir, how many people do you think you murdered based on your policies along with Mike Pence at the White House Coronavirus Task Force?
	Okay, okay, but he wasn't done.
	He wasn't done there.
	He had more to offer.
	And this time, I think he was just like inches away from Fauci when he went on and said this.
	Child neglect, child endangerment, child asphyxiation, battery, especially when you don't have the consent of the parent and the child.
	All of these are felonies.
	All of which you're a participant in, Mr. Fauci.
	As well as everyone involved in the COVID con.
	Oh man.
	So there it is.
	All right.
	Now, Ivan, kind enough to join me live tonight, known as the Deep State Marauder.
	You now see why.
	He is known as that.
	And we're gonna we're gonna get him up on the screen.
	Hold on, folks.
	He's still fixing his hair.
	I don't know why he he spends so much time fixing his hair.
	No, Ivan, I got you.
	I got you.
	You're you're you're all good.
	It's uh I'm trying to get this thing full screen here.
	So uh okay.
	There he is.
	All right.
	Now, when uh that that second round, were you just right there in Fauci's face for that second uh confrontation?
	Yeah, actually, just uh it was late video that I just sent you.
	I don't know if you have the ability if you have a producer to bring that up.
	No, this is a one-man show, bro.
	It's just uh I sent you uh I texted that to you.
	I don't know if you have the ability to bring it in.
	Um not tonight.
	I I'll I'll bring it in eventually, though.
	I can air it tomorrow.
	Yeah, if you could, and uh, I think it's more appropriate if we hopefully by tomorrow I'll have it subtitled.
	But bottom line, it's uh Charles Downs, who's actually reporting for Laurel Loomer, was on the outside of the Rayburn building.
	And he basically, as soon as Fauci gets out of the SUV, he hits him up with a barrage of questions.
	And as soon as he enters the Rayburn building, I immediately pick up up from there as he walks through the hallway for the entire length of the hallway, and then he takes a right before going into the guess what, the Democrat staff offices.
	And then once he sits down, I actually uh I need to do a compilation where he exits from the Democrat side, walks down the steps into his uh particular witness seat, and in that period of time, I got to maraud him a little bit as well uh before he sits down to testify.
	And then as soon as the gavel ends the hearing, that's when we're allowed to speak, and that's when I proceeded to continue.
	You already played that part.
	Oh, so there was more, so I didn't even play it all.
	No, no, it's uh it's in different spots.
	So I'll provide that to you tomorrow so you can air it if you want to air it on tomorrow's show.
	If you want me back on, I'll be back on.
	If not, that's fine either.
	You know, either way, however, you want to do it.
	Uh, because I'm here to support InfoWars.
	I'm here to support you.
	Uh, because you guys have been uh I mean, out of the entire media landscape, the the I wouldn't even call it the new media massive reach landscape, which you're a part of, probably one of the top three, if not higher than that.
	Uh I want to support you guys because you've been pushing for first amendment, uh the first amendment.
	And so whatever you guys need, you just give me a call, give me a text, whatever.
	Well, I'll definitely I'll I'll definitely get you on the InfoWars war room tomorrow, and and we can air that full video because I think it's really important for people to understand and execute their rights.
	Now, of course, um this is why I'm being politically persecuted.
	And um, you're smart to probably follow the rules better than I did, but there are ways to do what you did legally and lawfully and avoid the DC corrupted Capitol Police that's probably still run by Nancy Pelosi.
	We gotta give the guy the gentleman that was sitting to your left, however, everybody's wondering who that is.
	Do you do you know?
	Did you know that guy?
	Yeah, for the trolls out there, they're gonna follow along and think that I somehow knew this kid.
	Uh, I just actually met him as we were waiting in line to enter the hearing.
	Uh, and he introduced himself and he said that he just got out of uh the gulag in DC, and he's living in DC, and so he figured, you know, might as well go ahead and attend a hearing.
	He's he was uh wait, wait, wait, he was a J6 prisoner.
	Yeah, he was a political prisoner for I believe almost three years.
	What was his name?
	Uh that's right.
	If you don't have it, I you know what his name he gave me his name.
	I can't recall.
	Well, he deserves some love.
	Uh it was epic trolling.
	Wow, that makes it even more epic.
	He was just fresh off being a political prisoner.
	You meet him outside of the room.
	I mean, surely by now you kind of have some strategy of of how to get good seating going into these hearings.
	But I mean, really, it's kind of a it's kind of a first come first serve type of thing where there's no real rhyme or reason.
	Yeah, so for the trolls out there thinking that oh Marjorie Taylor Green invited me in and a J6 terrorist, they call us, right?
	Anyway, these scumbags are just using those names to come after us because I'm probably the leading figure in the country, if not the world, that is exposing the that nonstop.
	I'm not gonna give up, exposing the Nancy Pelosi Fed Surrection Parliamentary coup.
	And then it was subsequently covered up by Mike Pence's beloved Liz Cheney and Nancy Pelosi's beloved Benny Thompson's January 6th Fed Surrection cover-up committee.
	And so I'm going to keep calling it what it is.
	And it seems like Barry Laudermill, the chairman of the committee that has oversight over or the subcommittee that has oversight over the Capitol Police and the Capitol Police Board are inching their way towards what I've already basically proven to the entire world through my investigative work.
	Probably it's been at least a year at this point, you know, obviously leveraging a lot of other independent investigative journalists uh that are out there, whether it's Stop Hate, whether it's Tommy Tatum's work on uh Roseanne Boylan's investigation and Laura Logan's been doing the yeoman's work.
	So in the collective, I've been monitoring everybody and also working my entire source network because you got to remember, I've been in the system for 25 years.
	I may know a person or two to be able to confirm and verify certain pieces of information that really no one else, potentially in the entire like the media ecosystem can, because I've been in the system for a quarter of a century.
	And then by you know, pursuing different leads, whether it's communicating with the former chief of capital police, uh Tarek Johnson whistleblower, or folks that I may or may not know in different organizations, whether it be the DOD, DHS, and DOJ, formerly, currently.
	And so that gives me the perspective and understanding.
	That's why they continue to censor me because after 20 investigations and after attempting to entrap me three times, they realize that really they don't have a mechanism to stop me.
	Uh, because it would be such a stretch to come after me through an investigative kind of criminalization or an entrapment because I've already repelled it.
	At this point, they can really only physically or digitally censor me, but because we have a house, remember, most of my marauding, especially at a more kind of like at on the line effort, is in the U.S. House of Representatives because we have a First Amendment friendly House of Representatives, more or less than when we did uh when they went after you.
	Well, and and you're kind of like you're very by the schematic, let's say, like you're you're when you're when you're engaging in all of this stuff, very deliberate.
	It's methodical, I think it through.
	Yeah, I make sure that I'm always right up on the line.
	Yeah, and I never cross it.
	Yeah, like I'm the kind of guy that gets you know a new computer game or a new toy or something.
	I don't read the manual.
	I just I'm just like boom, I'm doing it.
	You're like, you know, like you've got the whole manual down and your execution is perfect because of it.
	Now, I you know, and I'm also factoring the political dynamics because at the end of the day, a lot of the individuals that can stop me from doing what I want to do have a range of discretionary authority.
	When you understand the range of discretion that they have, couple that with the political leanings, dynamics, and relationships and loyalties of the individuals with the discretionary authority.
	You will see me flexing based on my understanding of the political uh ecosystem and climate.
	So again, in the house, I have a little bit more flexibility on how I maraud in the Senate.
	It is a much more conservative, reserved marauding due to the nature that the Senate is controlled by Chuck Schumer, and Chuck Schumer's sergeant at arms is Karen Gibson.
	For example, when when Mark Zuckerberg Suckerbuck was testifying before the Senate a few months ago, I was still in my wheelchair because I, you know, I just recently broke my leg and I was up there in my wheelchair, and I saw Sergeant at Arms of the Senate, Karen Gibson.
	She looked at me, winked, smiled, I looked at her, winked, smile.
	You know, I know, you know, I you know me, type of kind of thing.
	Oh, they know the capital police, the capital police are that my leg's broken.
	So, like, obviously, they're not gonna really be able to do much to me, especially.
	I mean, come on.
	The optics of them coming after me in a wheelchair where like, let's be honest, with that broken leg, I physically do not offer any physical threat to anybody.
	And it would only take literally one uh pinch of the leg at that point to render me useless and ineffective.
	The dynamics are different now, but nonetheless, you also have to incorporate those political dynamics.
	Because at the end of the day, the Capitol Police Board and the Capitol Police uh do their law enforcement actions based on the political leanings of the bicameral leadership of the House and the Senate.
	You got to know those details.
	Most people don't.
	And that's why you still have J6 defendants that are looking and their attorneys and Trump's legal team that are still thinking that that Jack Smith show show trial is a legitimate thing, and they're trying to litigate it in court, as opposed to going back to the original jurisdiction that criminalized him in that well, alleged crime.
	And that was Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer directing the Capitol Police Board people that they control, which is the House and Senate sergeant at arms, consisting of the two-thirds of the Capitol Police Board vote to then direct their very beloved and hand picked U.S. Capitol Police Chief Thomas Manger to then work with the January 6th cover-up committee,
	particularly the staff director, known as David Buckley, one of the 51 that spies who lied, saying that the Biden laptop had all the earmarks of a Russian info op.
	So he was also handpicked to continue the not only the cover-up of the Fed Surrection coup on January 6th, but also to perpetuate the fact and protect any disclosure of those 51 spies who stole the 2020 election on behalf of the Biden criminal syndicate.
	So all these different nuances players and like I I got the insider baseball game down to uh a level that 400, I would say over 400 members of the House do not even know those details of how the U.S. Capitol Police Board operates.
	There's maybe five, six people that really know how it works, and that would be Pelosi, McCarthy.
	Well, he's gone now, Pelosi, uh what's his name?
	Mike Johnson, and then previous speakers of the House, and as well as former chairs of the House admin committee, and then the subcommittee on oversight for House Avenue, because they're the ones responsible for that oversight.
	So maybe five people.
	And they really the only one that I've focused my efforts on exposing and working this problem with is the actual chair of the committee or the subcommittee that can actually get the truth out.
	And that's why if you've been following my work, the way I the way we can get to the truth on January 6th and finally start to reverse all these things, is to get somehow the political courage to Mike Johnson working with Barry Laudermook to then demand the full release of all internal deliberative documents of the Capitol Police Board, the general counsel of the Capitol Police, the staff director of that January 6th cover up committee, which was involved in all the destruction of evidence, right?
	That they didn't want exposed, all that in the collective.
	If they can showcase that and publicize it just like they did the CCTV footage over the last several weeks, then we can finally get the entire country to agree with what I've already exposed, which is the Fed surrection coup, and where the FB lie, which Clay Higgins uncovered, was subordinate to the U.S. Capitol Police on that day because they were in the U.S. Capitol Police's extended jurisdiction zone zone.
	So the op was done by the Capitol Police.
	Anyway, we I digress, but that's to a fully answer your question on am I deliberate in every sound and move that I make in the Capitol?
	Yes.
	Well, I'm sure that they have at least one picture of you up in uh, you know, a locker room somewhere because when I the the uh I guess it was the second time that I dealt with Capitol Police.
	I and this was before I even had a court date or anything.
	Uh before I had any record, they told me before I walked in that day, and I have eyewitnesses that'll attest to this.
	They told me they said they kind of look I'm walking into the Capitol through that first line of security, and they're like kind of looking at each other like, oh crap, like, oh my gosh, like what are we supposed to do?
	And uh I can Tell something's up, and I'm like, Oh, it's you know, what's going on, guys?
	And they're like, uh Owen Schreuer?
	I'm like, yeah, like we're supposed to arrest you.
	Like, you can't go in here.
	We're supposed to arrest you.
	And I'm not as well read on the manual as you, but I knew that I there was nothing they could do to stop me from going in.
	I I didn't have any I'll I'll tell you why.
	Let's kind of like I wanted to talk to you about this immediately after you were.
	Well, let me just finish real quick.
	I just let me finish.
	Because they they looked at me and they said, Where you were told to arrest you if you go in the building.
	And I challenged them.
	I said, for what?
	For what?
	I'm not banned here.
	I don't have any crime.
	There's no reason I can't be, I'm not committing any crimes.
	And they knew that and they backed down and then ultimately arrested me, you know, an hour or so later.
	Right.
	So let's let's step this through.
	And I think this is what was missing.
	A lot of people don't realize, and maybe your attorney also didn't kind of look at this.
	Title II of the U.S. Code, Chapter 29, it creates the U.S. Capitol Police organizationally, and then grants the authority mission, roles, and responsibilities full stop.
	When you understand the legal framework on what under which they operate, and that they're subordinate to an entity known as the Capitol Police Board, the Capitol Police Board reports the speaker and the Senate majority leader, and in particular two sections 1967 and 1979.
	If you want to bring those up, study those, it's really only a couple sentences.
	Uh, or or for your study, kind of as it applies to your situation, section 1967 and section 1979.
	67 goes into the jurisdiction where they have law enforcement jurisdiction, and it goes it extends up to the UN, what is it, the Union Station up to the north, down to the Nationals uh stadium to the south, a few blocks into the National Mall to the west, and then beyond the U.S. Supreme Court on the other side.
	Wait, that's the Capitol Police's jurisdiction?
	That is the U.S. Capitol Police's jurisdiction.
	But not even that's most of the none of that's even capital ground.
	Correct.
	So for anyone that committed an alleged transgression within the primary extended jurisdiction zone that is concurrent with Metropolitan Police Department, and there was a fencing, for example, on January 6th, and people entered it and breached that uh zone and did it knowingly, because again, most people did not know that they entered a restricted zone because there were no signs up because Ray Ebbs tore the fence down.
	Oh, I mean, never mind, it wasn't never mind.
	The signs were torn down, so then there's no knowledge of that one.
	There's no mens rea.
	But anyway, that that is the extended jurisdiction zone.
	Section 1967 and 1979 is the section that says that there's a body of different individuals.
	I'm not going to details now.
	I've done so many podcasts on this, that lays out who decides on if they're going to risk release any security footage of the U.S. Capitol Police.
	Meaning, if the Capitol Police only wants to include the CCTV footage and sworn testimony of U.S. Capitol Police officers that they decide they want to include in the criminalization of J6 defendant, that's what they include and send it over to the DOJ.
	So they only sent incriminating inculpatory, and then beyond that false testimony over to the DOJ.
	Even if the DOJ was 100%, you know, blind to justice, as we call it, and were even if they were on our side, right?
	They did not have the evidence to not convict a J6 defendant because all that evidence was already manipulated by the one that has the control and ownership of the evidence to then criminalize folks for the Title 40 charges, which apply to the U.S. Capitol Police.
	Well, their general response, this is what me and my attorney learned.
	Their general response to almost any requests for discovery or trying to figure out how many confidential informants were on the ground.
	So whether it was the video footage or the the confidential informants, they would just say, Oh, it's too much.
	There were too many informants.
	We can't give you any information.
	Uh you know, the video, the video files are too big.
	But we got to clarify this, Owen.
	Were you requesting it of the DOJ, or were you requesting it from the U.S. Capitol Police?
	These this was in a different case because mine didn't go to trial.
	This was in the other cases that my uh attorney was was handling.
	So I don't I don't know.
	I don't know that for sure.
	So here's the problem is that every lawyer that I've spoken to only goes after and uses uh the traditional Brady method, right?
	Which is you go after the prosecution for them to provide their evidence.
	Well, they don't in this circumstance, and only this circ this circumstance alone.
	It is the Capitol police that control and own the CCTV footage.
	It is the Capitol Police that control and own the testimony that they release related to U.S. Capitol Police Officer testimony.
	It's a separate, complete sovereign entity, and people aren't treating it as such.
	I'm literally the only guy treating it as such.
	And once people start to understand, be like, oh yeah, Ivan was right four years ago.
	Uh, then we might well, three and a half.
	Then we can start maybe get some of these attorneys to start going down the right rabbit hole to start well unraveling this.
	All right.
	I I wanna I want to get back into that in uh in a second, but I want to go back to today.
	But quickly though, are people made what what date were you first harassed by the U.S. Capitol Police?
	Well, so the day I disrupted the fake impeachment hearing was I believe December 2019.
	It was either November or December 2019, and nobody was the speaker of the house.
	Nancy Pelosi.
	Correct.
	And where do you where were you physically located?
	Oh, she made the call to have me arrested.
	I have no doubt about that because normally what happens.
	Were you on the house side of the Capitol?
	This was actually not in the Capitol building.
	This was in a separate uh congressional building where they hold hearings.
	It was not in the Capitol.
	I don't remember that.
	It would have been in the House, House Chambers.
	The speaker of the House has full discretionary authority to make your life miserable, meaning they can at a whim have the cat, yeah, the Capitol Police assigned to the house.
	Well, well, but you could you could actually, you're the perfect one to answer this too.
	Because most of the time, these people disrupt hearings all the time.
	And usually, usually what they'll do is they might give a warning.
	They might give you a warning.
	Yeah, warning, 24 hours banned from the building, go about your merry way, unless you resist arrest or you know, could commit a violent crime or something like that.
	Then they might, then they might actually arrest you that day.
	They might write you a citation.
	I went to prison that day.
	The police were about to arrest me.
	They they took me out, the whole thing was less than 60 seconds.
	They took me out, they called whoever was in charge of uh removing me from the premises.
	I walked with the police outside of the building.
	They are about to release me.
	Somebody gets buzzed on their walkie talkie, and I can tell because then they look around, they're like, oh, and that's when I think Pelosi or whoever it was gave them the order.
	No, you're going to arrest him.
	He's going to jail today.
	I went to jail that day.
	Nobody goes to jail for an interruption of a hearing when you don't resist arrest, when you cooperate, when you walk out, nobody goes to jail.
	I went to jail.
	I'm guessing the person today didn't go to jail.
	But but you would know of the house, Nancy Pelosi, her sergeant at arms at the time on the House side was a guy by the name of Paul Irving.
	Paul Irving was the sergeant at arms for Paul Ryan and John Maynard before that.
	Meaning Paul Ryan has dirt, or excuse me, Paul Irving has dirt on all three of those speakers of the House, which is probably he's why he's still untouched, untouchable, and nicely retired down in Tampa, Florida.
	Meaning he is the guy that's going to be able to spill the beans on the entire January 6th Fed Surrection open because he was the one that agreed with Nancy Pelosi that due to optics, they're not going to defend the Capitol.
	Meanwhile, they're going to facilitate the breach, blame it on Trump, and then create an insurrection narrative.
	Oh, yeah.
	I mean, they stood down on January 6th.
	There's absolutely no doubt about that.
	All right.
	I want to get back into the situation today, though.
	Frog Chi, yeah.
	I, you know, I watched the whole thing, and again, you and um your new friend there were just absolutely glorious.
	To have to have each one of you on each side of Fauci's shoulders.
	I mean, it's it can't even be scripted.
	It's better than any movie.
	Uh, okay, but I want to get your take on the whole thing.
	Because I'm I'm watching the whole thing, and you know, I I don't have any faith that anything is gonna happen to Fauci, but I I think that there are two things that we can take out of the hearing today that are positive.
	One, and you weren't in there, so you might not have seen this.
	Millions of people were watching that hearing live.
	I believe that's a positive because people are actually taking interest in their government now, and they're taking interest.
	I know that I don't know what the numbers are.
	I mean, huge.
	My my cell phone's been burning all day.
	Well, that's why.
	Because the numbers were huge.
	Everybody was watching it.
	So I mean, people are taking an interest uh in government corruption more than ever.
	And I think that's a good thing.
	But even though I don't think anything's gonna happen to Fauci, he was shaken.
	I mean, he was not a strong saying.
	He was not a strong man up there.
	He was wavering.
	You could tell that he was not comfortable.
	Well, I'll say this.
	Aside from the gentle whispering that Charles Downs did uh on his way in, aside from my whispering through the entire hallway, and then when he came down to testify, literally just before he sat down to start the hearing.
	Aside from that, during the entire hearing, you could hear people in the crowd saying, after every statement that he made, liar.
	Just one word, liar.
	Every sentence.
	I don't know if you could hear it.
	You probably couldn't hear the microphone, but I could hear that.
	And the times where you see me just kind of practically giggling, I'm like, man, this guy's not gonna stop.
	He says liar after every word that Fauci is saying.
	And how surprising they didn't do any of the decibel level must have been perfect.
	Yeah, because I don't think the chair, because at the end of the day, it really requires the chair to make the determination on removing someone.
	Uh the capital police are there to control, you know, the physical decorum and make sure that everything is no one's gonna get hurt physically.
	But in terms of the audible level, if it gets too high, that's really the call of the as far as I've seen, the the chairman of the subcommittee or the committee.
	He didn't really hear it until there was one lady in the back that just stood up and said, I can't I can't remember what she said, but it was attacking uh Anthony Fauci as she walked out.
	So she walks out, and then another individual, they're just during the entire hearing, there was either some chatter, it was obviously a very anti-Fauci crowd.
	Not only did I walk in with there was about 10 of us, let's just say, that were with me.
	Uh not specifically with me, but that were aligned with me that I could see in that crowd that was in that second row.
	Yeah, one one lady, one lady had a arrest Fauci shirt or put Fauci in jail shirt.
	It was a picture of Fauci behind bars.
	Yeah, so there were kind of three three categories of people in that room.
	Uh obviously, the first row consisted of his lackey staffers and security detail.
	That's given.
	That's what's in the first row.
	In the second row, you started to see uh obviously folks like myself, the the J January 6th political persecuted individuals or their family members were were represented.
	But then you also had this uh RFK Jr. crowd that was there.
	It was a couple, at least a couple folks that were in there that do video work for RFK, they told me in line.
	So they're aligned on this particular issue, obviously.
	Well, and and RFK Jr., of course, wrote the book, um, Anthony Fauci, all the lies he's told, and and all the uh alleged crimes that uh he's been involved in.
	That was a book by RFK Jr.
	Yeah, absolutely.
	And so that crowd was there, and then the lady that you saw with the rest Fauci, she's part of that the RFK support crowd, because I've seen her at the coronavirus, the select committee uh on the coronavirus pandemic, which is this subcommittee uh on a regular basis.
	So she's a regular, uh, she said, you know, I'm uh I'm uh a flaming radical leftist, but on this issue, totally in line that this is come complete government corruption, and you saw.
	I'm glad she's consistent.
	I'm glad she's consistent.
	Uh have you seen or heard of the movies uh Dallas Buyers Club?
	No.
	Okay, so it was a famous movie probably 10 years or so ago.
	Um real popular when it came out, might have even won some awards.
	He's taking his he's taking his Superman suit off now.
	He's showing the Superman.
	Uh so this whole movie is about this whole movie is about the AIDS epidemic in the 90s, and how if you were an AIDS patient, you could not get the right medicine uh to make you better.
	Fauci ran the whole HIV AIDS op or something.
	So so this movie, it's a it's a good movie.
	I don't know if you're a movie watcher, uh, but it's a good movie.
	Matthew McConaughey, uh Jared Leto, some others, Dallas Buyers Club.
	The the shadow, the bad guy, the whole premise of the bad guy is Anthony Fauci, and how he was basically killing AIDS patients for money.
	And and this whole movie, I think it won multiple awards.
	It was huge when it came out.
	Everybody went and saw it.
	There was in the movies.
	It was huge.
	And it's like where did we go?
	It's like everybody knew Fauci was the bad guy then, and and now all of a sudden it's like this.
	Oh, let's just pretend that didn't happen.
	Well, I'm glad that she's consistent.
	I'm glad she remembered.
	Yes, yes.
	So you have a couple of those.
	I mean, she usually was no, there's a pair of those individuals that are there.
	Uh, who else?
	And then you have usually in the back there the staffers for the different members of Congress.
	And this time around, it was a little unique because there were a couple of additional add ons to this subcommittee.
	Normally, you don't have uh Jim Jordan's not on that committee, he was waived on, which means that the Democrats can get their respective person from the judiciary, which is why Jamie Ratskin was there.
	In addition to that, you had Jim Comer, who's the chair of the committee above this select committee.
	Yeah, the oversight oversight, and then you had the ranking member, which was I guess uh who was it?
	I I can't remember all of these Democrat domestic terrorists, to be honest.
	So yeah, so I who will I mean there's a couple they a couple add ons on the on the Democrat side.
	What really concerned me most is that I don't know if you know this, but remember when Mike Pence was coined on January 6th with a coin.
	Was that meme?
	Remember the memes of Mike Pence being coined?
	Yeah, yeah.
	So that's when he was at the podium at the Capitol with somebody at about 1 p.m.
	Yeah, yeah.
	Right when the you know the Fed surrection was gonna right before it was gonna kick off.
	Well, the guy, the Congress member that gave him that coin was Brad Wenstrup, who is the chair of this subcommittee, which begs the question.
	How close are they?
	And is he there basically hand picked in order to slow roll and protect Mike Mike Pence's role on the White House coronavirus task force?
	Because you gotta remember Fauci's boss was Mike Pence on the White House coronavirus task force.
	Yeah, that's not an irrelevant detail.
	It's not at all.
	And and look, I I'm not so glaringly in your face.
	Yeah, and I'm and I'm not forgiving Trump.
	This is not me forgiving Trump or making excuses for Trump because of what happened during the pandemic.
	But, you know, I think there's a fair level of Fauci and Pence marauding him during that time period.
	Well, in President Trump's defense, and I get it, he has some responsibility for this particular aspect, but in his defense, in addition to number one, you have Mike Pence that is essentially been the guy on behalf of the uniparty to undermine President Trump at every step of the way.
	In addition to that, during the plandemic, the CC, I call it the CCP 19 Fauci funded lab incident response team, known as the White House Coronavirus Task Force, led by Pence, the shadow governor for that was Jared Kushner.
	So when you read Mikey Pence's book, and you and when he talks about Jared Kushner, they're literally like drooling all over each other.
	All right.
	So maybe literally for what it's worth.
	Take that for what it's worth.
	My assessment, my loyalties to the truth, my assessment is that you had in tandem a Jared Kushner and a Mike Pence working with Fraud Chie and Debbie Burks to provide the information to President Trump that they wanted him to have, even though his gut feelings initially were accurate, and you had like Zev Zelenko and other folks that were providing him information.
	I mean, meanwhile, remember, he he before the whole the clot shot were issued.
	How did President Trump respond to the virus?
	He got some monoclonal antibodies, some cursitin, vitamin C, vitamin D mix, basically the the Zelenko protocol.
	And then he was out before people were like, Oh, he's supposed to be in the hospital for three days.
	I can't remember.
	It was like 36 hours, maybe he was done.
	Yeah, he he he beat it faster than I did.
	Uh, I didn't do anything.
	I just laid in bed and maybe had like a pop scroll or something.
	Um, I mean I had it probably a couple times, and then when I had my vitamin one, you know, the the vitamin water, it's got a lot of zinc in it.
	Little did I know.
	It's like I had like three or four of them one day, and then I was done the next day.
	I got it before the pandemic.
	I got it when I was in the DC gulag.
	I mean, I'm assuming it was COVID.
	I don't know what else.
	Maybe they tried to poison me, and my body just beat the poison.
	I'd never I hadn't been sick in a decade or more, and uh that that's how it went down.
	But you know, you and I, um, you know, look, I I'm in the day-to-day, I'm in the play by play.
	You're kind of the same way.
	So a lot of people either didn't, they didn't see it, they missed it, or they've forgotten.
	When when the whole pandemic, let's say, first kind of got started before it was considered a pandemic, Trump's first response was it's just the flu.
	Let's relax, you know, do what you need to do to be safe and healthy, but it's just the flu, and let's just let's just live our normal lives.
	Thing you know, you have good old Mikey P. Oh, me, me, me, pick me, Mr. President.
	I'm gonna be your beloved White House coronavirus, task force lead and Anthony Froggy and Debbie Burks are gonna completely undermine you.
	I mean, they're gonna do what Paul Ryan wants us to do, and the Bush Cheney syndicate wants us to do.
	I mean, uh with such broad shoulders, Mr. President, I will provide you two weeks to stop the spread.
	What about it?
	Well, it is it's you know, you know what's crazy too is I don't know.
	If Trump gets back in, the one I think the most important change that's gonna have to happen is who he selects to surround himself with.
	I mean, I don't know how he ended up with Mike Pence.
	That obviously ended up being a disaster.
	Now he at that point in time he had to because he only secured a third of the Republican vote.
	And so the Republican establishment in the form of Ryan's previous Paul Ryan, Mitch McConnell, and the head of the RGA, Mike Pence, basically probably confronted him and said, Hey, the only chance that you're gonna get our support from the RNC is for you to pick our beloved vice president Mike Pence.
	Thank you.
	Have a nice day, sir.
	And that's what happened.
	So that was an RNC power move.
	It yeah, it had to have been.
	The other thing is that the reason why they had to keep out Mike uh General Flynn is because well, guess what?
	General Flynn knows where the bodies are buried.
	And you're telling me that I don't know if you know this, Owen.
	Uh Mike Pence's chief of staff in 2017 for the first, you know, first part of the Trump presidency was a guy by the name of Josh Pitcock, who was married, who is married to Katherine Seaman, and she was the head Russia analyst for Pete's truck.
	Oh, it's an incestuous pool.
	So you're telling me Mike Pence didn't know or facilitated fomented or spearheaded and directed the removal of General Flynn?
	What about Bannon?
	Do you think do you think Pence had Bannon removed too?
	Uh-huh.
	Oh, I would say 99.9% repeating is my assessment that that Pence did it.
	Same thing.
	Who's going after Navarro?
	I would say that Pence is behind that.
	Who's going after the swattings and the raids of Bannon?
	Who allowed for these contempt things to happen?
	It has to be coming from both leadership of the political class so that they're not if they're in agreement, then things move forward.
	Well, there's a gentleman within the DOJ who is just obsessed with this stuff, who I think or or might even know he's behind a lot of it.
	I care not to mention his name because he has my balls in a vice right now.
	Uh he's already it's a it's the fourth vice he's had him and he keeps trying to smash him, but they break his vice.
	So he has to come back with a new vice every time.
	Um, but you know, that's just part of the probation I'm under, just trying to be smart.
	Well, getting back to today, so obviously the American people are are are more activated, they're more engaged, they're more aware Of what's going on.
	I think today's hearing proves that.
	You know, to me, I think the next step here is we have to get representatives.
	I mean, the Senate's the Senate is tough because it's easier to steal Senate races than it is house races.
	Sounds sounds hyperbolic, but it's true.
	So when you talked about nothing's going to happen, you were kind of leading in that direction, but at the same time, you kind of backed up and said, Well, the public's waking up.
	This is where we're at.
	Is my from my perspective is we have to get the jury American jury pool to be clamoring and salivating for a try a case to be brought before them so that they're ready for a conviction.
	What does that mean?
	They have to see some of the evidence.
	And the reason why they haven't seen the evidence is because the censorship industrial complex.
	With Elon Musk purchasing X, allowing you and and uh Alex back on, and me as well, as well as General Flynn and others.
	That now allows us with the Twitter files.
	If you're watching Elon Musk, man, in the last 24 hours, he's been responding about the whole Fauci stuff.
	Well, he said to prosecute Fauci.
	I suspect that he has Fauci files ready to go.
	He's just waiting to pull the trigger on it until this hearing.
	So I'm guessing that Schellenberger and Taiebi, I'm guessing that their next dump is gonna be the Fauci files.
	Everything related in more detail and specificity to good old Frauchi.
	And if should that take place, I mean, think about it.
	All the communications that can be extrapolated from those that worked for Fauci at NAIID NIH, as they communicated with the national uh with the White House team that then communicated with the censorship industrial complex crew at the FB LI between headquarters FBLI, then the San Francisco field office that coordinated with Twitter 1.0, right?
	All the big tech to basically censor, specifically as it applies to oh, it's safe and effective.
	Oh, right, you can't say anything negative.
	You can't say negative about the injections, and you can't say anything positive about the therapeutics.
	When that is exposed in the form of direct messages, slack internal communications, emails between Twitter employees, and with specific individuals, say Fauci, especially when they query Fauci or something similar to that.
	That's when the public is gonna see the dump.
	And that's when you're gonna see, I would say, oh, I don't know, Attorney General Ken Paxton, Attorney General Chris Kobach in Kansas, Attorney General down in Louisiana.
	Name the Ruby Red State Attorney General that will then be in a position to exactly do what Elon Musk's pronouns are.
	Arrest Fauci.
	I think I mean you want to talk about attorney general Ken Paxton, I think probably number one.
	That's why they went after him with the FBI scam and then with the drunk speaker of the house that somehow got re-elected.
	I think that's just uh Republican negligence more than anything.
	By the way, a little birdie told me the attorney general wants to meet with you guys.
	Which attorney general?
	Your Texas attorney general.
	Well, I hope so.
	I'd be I'd I'd be honored to shake his hand.
	I don't know if you want to put me in touch with that little birdie, but I I tend to leave these things up to God and his timing uh more than more than anything.
	But you know, if we want to push the gas on that, if we want to push the gas on that, you know, I I wasn't about to get into uh I wasn't about to get into that.
	Uh people are asking, look, the InfoWars website is down, folks.
	I don't know.
	I don't know what's going on with that.
	Um the fact that Bandop video is still up tells me it might just be an InfoWars DDoS attack, but I really don't know.
	I I would say InfoWars will be on air at least for another two weeks.
	Um, but uh after that, I don't know, all bets are off.
	I would say we have till June 14th at least.
	All right.
	Uh Ivan, so so final question for you.
	I got to get my attorney on next.
	I don't know if you saw the Supreme Court rejected my uh case today.
	So I'm gonna be talking to my attorney about that next.
	I I don't think anything happens to Fauci from here.
	Do you I mean I just feel like he's gonna get away with everything.
	What do you think?
	Do you think Marjorie Taylor Green cleared the field enough for other Republicans to kind of take it a couple more yards forward and and and maybe even subpoena him for records, bank account?
	I mean, what do you think?
	They're really only four members in Congress that are actually trying to get to the truth because they've they've shown it, right?
	On the Senate side, we have Rand Paul and Ron Johnson.
	On the house side, we only have Marjorie and Thomas Massey on this particular subject.
	That's it.
	Uh so we need another 216.
	I don't see it happening unless there is an external massive force that forces them to at least slow roll towards the direction of accountability.
	And that overwhelming external force is exactly what I just said.
	The Fauci files or the mother of all Twitter files, which literally connects the entire scheme that I've been talking about, especially on this two-month tour with General Flynn.
	If you want to know more details, watch the movie FlynnMovie.com so you can see that the very first person that the deep state went after was General Flynn so that he wouldn't expose their illegal spying operation.
	And then since then, every single thing they've done is an excalatory cover-up after cover-up to include the Fauci funded Wuhan Institute of Virology lab incident so that 39 states within America could run their elections.
	How Fauci wanted, according to his guidance with Mike Pence, and thus not according to the election laws of those states to then be able to steal the 2020 election.
	That's what basically happened.
	You want details, start with the Flynn movie, and then you want way more details.
	Watch the uh General Flynn was framed evidence wall uh discussions that I've had for two months on the You literally guys, he literally has the meme evidence wall, whiteboards connecting all the dots and everything.
	I do it's hilarious.
	Oh, and I I've done like I've done and have lived over 10,000 hours of this.
	I can name you every single name.
	I guess that's why that video went viral when Zoe attempted to interview me.
	Did you see that?
	I don't know.
	I feel like I probably did.
	I don't know.
	It's gotten probably 50 million views at least at this point.
	I probably saw it.
	I just see so much stuff.
	I know, I know.
	I'll send it to you again.
	You're a busy guy.
	But before we go, if you're gonna talk to your attorney, is it related to your January 6th stuff?
	Uh yeah.
	So we we tried to get my case in front of the Supreme Court because we were arguing that well, what they did was they increased my sentence.
	They they they used my speech that had nothing to do with January 6th or my charges at all, a lesser misdemeanor, a trespassing charge.
	Let's talk offline.
	I have so I have a theory that will probably work.
	All right, well, we can do that, and we'll talk offline about um a certain attorney general, too.
	Possibly, yeah.
	All right, all right, get get back to the big board.
	There's probably like a half an inch where you can squeeze 10 more names in.
	All right.
	No, the deep state target list, 350 names plus, and uh we're gonna leave it at that for now, but obviously it's gonna grow as we start to uh service those targets.
	And Trump said he declassify the Jay or the uh Epstein client list, so you know, maybe all of a sudden everything connects in one beautiful moment to save the country.
	Oh, it does, it does, but you gotta go a little bit at a time in 350 person tranches, and then we can do a prisoner swap.
	All right, we're gonna talk later about um attorney general, my case, and then I'll get you a time for the InfoWars Warroom tomorrow as well.
	Sounds good, brother.
	All right, Ivan.
	Thank you for your time tonight.
	God bless.
	Yep.
	All right, there goes Ivan Raquel.
	What a joy.
	What a joy.
	All right, we're gonna get my attorney up here next.
	Remember, folks, Owen dot gold.
	This show comes to you through the Owen dot gold microphone.
	It's the only subscription that pays you back.
	Why is it great to be a member at Owen.gold?
	Because when we go purchase precious metals, we do it as a group.
	So it's not just your money that you're going in with, it's the entire team's money, so we have more purchasing power that lowers the price big time.
	Big time.
	And so even the lowest level members, you will get gold mailed to you.
	Owen dot gold.
	All right.
	My attorney, Lexis Anderson is joining me now.
	Lexus, how are we tonight?
	Doing well, Owen.
	How are you?
	Well, I'm good.
	Look at you.
	You got your new studio set up too.
	You're finally utilizing it.
	I know.
	This is my very first time uh taking it for a spin.
	So if I'm screaming in your ear right now, I apologize.
	The audio is good.
	The audio is good.
	Okay.
	Is that lighthouse behind you significant of anything, or is that just a random picture?
	Oh, yeah.
	Well, wrong wrong side.
	Um, actually, my my cousin, I so I'm from Maine.
	I grew up very close to here, probably about 30 minutes.
	And uh my cousin took this photo.
	He's a photographer.
	I I had a feeling that you wouldn't have put it up there unless it had some sort of meaning for you.
	All right, Lexis Anderson is my attorney.
	She's with the 1776 Law Center.
	We got the news today.
	The Supreme Court rejects our uh case.
	Well, your first impression, what do you think?
	Yeah, I mean, obviously, this is this is a huge disappointment.
	Um, not a huge surprise, uh, unfortunately, you know, the the Supreme Court take doesn't take it takes a very small percentage of cases that come its way, but what's disappointing is they didn't recognize the significance of this one and the precedent that it's going to set going forward.
	And um, yeah, I mean, I I I was I was really hopeful that we would get to argue this in front of the Supreme Court.
	One thing I want to clear up because you talked about this earlier today on your show, and there's been some media swirling around about this, is um kind of what we were asking the Supreme Court to do, because it was very simple and very important, and um I it's gonna have a huge cascade effect going forward, as you and I both know they've they've uh perfected the weaponization of the justice system against their political dissidents, and um the the impact of this is gonna have is can be significant.
	And so, you know, we I've seen uh articles going around about how we're trying to overturn the conviction.
	No, that's not what we were asking the Supreme Court to review.
	Uh, we weren't asking them to uh, you know, obviously you can't take back the time served in prison.
	Uh, we weren't asking them to uh reverse your uh plea.
	What we were asking them to to review was the just the use of your speech, especially speech that was completely unrelated to the charge that you pled guilty to as justification for your incarceration.
	And as we've talked about on your show before, uh, the government, when they had first requested your uh four months of prison time, had pretty much just the entire sentencing memorandum was just quotes, your speech, not even from that day, but from months prior to January 6th, and then up to I think it was like 10 months after January 6th.
	And all they all they did was bring up your your speech and the things you said about the 2020 election as justification for why you should go to prison.
	And the other part too was that you weren't remorseful, that you hadn't changed your mind about your opinions about the 2020 election, the fact that it was stolen, uh, because you didn't backtrack on that.
	You know, they figured, oh, you weren't remorseful, and so he also has to go to prison for that.
	And so what we were asking the Supreme Court to review and and determine and hold is that you can't use somebody's legal and lawful free speech as a justification for going to prison.
	Um, particularly in the context when you're dealing with speech that has absolutely nothing to do to the underlying charge that you pled guilty to.
	And um, and and and also in the context of the fact that you're a journalist who was there covering a political event that day.
	You take all of that into consideration, and what they did was completely unconstitutional and a violation of your first amendment.
	So that was what we were honing in on.
	And so, you know, it's a real shame that they didn't take up this case.
	It would have been really great to argue, um, argue argue our position there.
	And you know, I I I do want to say like the Supreme Court, they didn't have ever issue sort of in our is that they review I can't justification was, or whether some justices in favor of hearing it, you know.
	Hey, Lexus, hold on one time.
	Lexus, Lexus, can you hear me?
	Hold on one second.
	Restart that whole thing about the Supreme Court.
	We lost your connection.
	Just restart it.
	The whole thing?
	Just when you said uh the Supreme Court something about my case.
	Like the last, like the last maybe which part?
	Maybe the last 60 seconds.
	That's it.
	The last oh.
	Oh gosh.
	Um, okay.
	Well, so I I I was saying how we're not, you know, I can't tell you exactly the Supreme Court didn't issue any sort of justification or ruling or decision on the merits of your case.
	They just declined to hear it.
	So you need four justices in order to move forward to to a more intense briefing, more intense oral argument.
	Uh, we didn't get that far.
	They just denied for review.
	So I can't tell you, you know, what their justification for that was or whether there were some justices who did want to hear the case ultimately.
	But um we didn't make it that far.
	Yeah, that's what I was gonna say next.
	Do we have any idea if if some justices were interested and and who weren't?
	No, no, and you don't get one either.
	The Supreme Court can issue some sort of uh justification if they deny it, but typically that's in the sense of um, you know, we're declining to review for X, Y, and Z reason, but we're interested and we'll take it up if it if the issue doesn't get resolved elsewhere.
	They did this, uh it is actually a similar case dealing with sentencing using acquitted conduct as a sentencing enhancement.
	And the Supreme Court had said last year, you know, we're not going to rule on this now, but we're confident that the sentencing commission is going to address this.
	And if they don't, we'll intercede.
	So that that's the context when they would issue some sort of decision, but no.
	We don't.
	All we know is that they declined to hear it.
	Uh that could mean that we had three justices who wanted to hear it, but not the other six, but I couldn't tell you.
	Okay.
	And I mean, at this point, I mean, we haven't even both of us have been working all day.
	This is our first time actually talking other than getting this set up.
	Um, so we don't need to talk about potential legal strategy.
	But my guess is I mean, the only the only potential we would have moving forward, the top the top that comes to my mind is if something else comes out about January 6th, how it was a fed surrection and they have the evidence, or you know, people were set up, whatever, maybe then going back.
	But for now, it's probably just uh probably just a lame duck.
	Unfortunately, yeah.
	I mean, it's it's a real shame that the highest court in our land, when you have someone who was uh attacked and imprisoned for their speech, whose first amendment was completely violated, and and denied any sort of recourse.
	And so this is actually another important issue that we raised in the brief.
	It wasn't really the the primary one that sort of launched this this First Amendment crusade to get to the Supreme Court.
	But what's key here is is the appeals court even refused to hear the case.
	Now you you would your um had filed uh a petition for an appeal to the appeals court, they just dismissed it, saying, nope, you'd waived your right to appeal when you entered your plea agreement.
	Now, this is key, and this is actually ties to something that you've been talking about a lot since your incarceration.
	When you sign that plea agreement, there is a waiver of appeal, uh, which on its face makes a little bit of sense, right?
	You know, this is a kind of a contract, an agreement you enter into, you're not gonna try to renege or backtrack and say, well, I you know, I withdraw that plea.
	Um, but the question comes into play is what happens when they violate your first amendment rights after you enter that contract.
	Because when you entered your plea agreement, you had no idea what they were going.
	Well, uh, you were under the impression they weren't going to seek any jail time at all.
	But you had no idea what sort of justification they were going to give you in their sentencing argument.
	They you had no idea that they were going to all for criminalization of your speech.
	Had they kept it to the events of of January 6th and your underlying charge, I imagine you wouldn't have wanted to go through the hassle of getting trying to get this far.
	But but but they did.
	And so you had no way to predict that.
	And so the question that we also raised is well, if they violate your first amendment, is is that waiver even applicable?
	And we said no.
	We said no.
	That that you should not be able to awai your first amendment rights when they when the government comes along and violates them after the fact.
	So that that's important.
	now, that's something that the Supreme Court also uh declined to hear.
	And I I can't surmise as to why the uh Supreme Court ultimately denied it, but I I'm sure the fact that the appeals court just waved it over and did absolutely nothing did play a role.
	Well, and so people have a better understanding of the purpose here, too.
	It's making sure that legal, lawful speech that has nothing to do with the charge cannot be used for increased sentencing.
	And when you look at the transcript from my sentencing hearing, you will realize that the only argument the government really had was that I spoke, and it wasn't just speech having to do with January 6th.
	When you read the actual documents, the actual government documents in my case, you see that most of the speech doesn't even have anything to do with January 6th.
	So kind of the analogy I've been making here, it's like if I get pulled over for speeding, and okay, whatever, I get the ticket.
	Let's say I end up in a courtroom and I'm trying to get the ticket dropped, whatever, and then the police officer is over there, and the police officer is like, well, he was going 100 miles per hour, and then he shows, let's say I let's say he shows a uh a Twitter post, an ex-post, Facebook post, whatever, and he says, Well, here he is 10 minutes before I pulled him over saying, I'm gonna drive as fast as I can, I don't care about the speed limit.
	This was 10 minutes before I pulled them over doing 100 miles per hour.
	Well, you would say, okay, that speech applies to the charge, and so maybe you can weigh that in a final decision.
	But if you took some other post that said, Oh, look, here he is talking about how much he loves guns, here he is talking about how he wants to vote for Trump.
	So, see, this is why we have to hit him with this speeding ticket.
	You'd say, Well, wait a second, what does that have to do with the speeding ticket?
	It has nothing to do with it.
	So when they're taking clips from my show that have nothing to do with January 6th, nothing to do with the election, and then using that to increase my sentencing, that's the danger here.
	It's basically saying that you can take any speech that somebody has made that might be viewed as unfavorable, maybe even sorted to an extent, and then you can use that in a sentencing hearing to try to increase the sentencing.
	Exactly.
	Exactly.
	Because the undertying charge you pled guilty to, truthfully, had nothing even to do with January 6th as a political event or the events of the election.
	Um it was, you know, analogous to just a misdemeanor trespass charge.
	Um, which, you know, honestly, had you had you taken it to trial, and I I understand why you wouldn't want to in DC, um, maybe you wouldn't have been found guilty of, you know, the you didn't get a chance to litigate any of that.
	But the truth certainly that the the narrative or the things that you talked about of your criticisms of the federal government six months later on your show had nothing to do with the events of January 6th and had nothing to do with the underlying charge you pled guilty to.
	They went way beyond the scope.
	And you know, this is something the relevant conduct that like like you were talking about.
	There certainly are circumstances where uh a judge can consider speech as it pertains to a crime in when it comes to sentencing, but not this broad scope.
	Not you, you know, speech that they they find unfavorable or that goes against the narrative, or that they just use, you know, the the fear, the insurrection of January 6th, you know, to try to incarcerate you.
	And you, you know, you and I both know they had other agendas for going after you in the first place.
	This is why you were involved, uh, you know, had had the uh DPA agreement to begin with.
	Um, you were being politically persecuted all along.
	So that was ultimately their goal.
	The problem is, um, you know, as you and InfoWars have found out, this is gonna happen to a bunch of other people.
	And so anyone that they can get on any sort of crime, uh, they're gonna now do try to do a deep dive.
	They can pull in their speech, they could talk about the things that they said before or after.
	Uh, they could use their speech to paint them in a negative light.
	I mean, even in a civil context, um, you know, I do a lot of vaccine mandate employment cases, they still try to bring it all of people's social media, everything they said about the vaccine or or anything political to try to paint them as a conspiracy theorist and say, well, hey, it's you know, they don't have a religious objection to the vaccine, it's all political, it's all this.
	They believe all these lies.
	So if as if two things can't be true.
	Exactly.
	Exactly.
	As if, as if the you the fact that you object to aborted fetal cells being used or the production of a medication, um, you can't have that along with serious health concerns and safety concerns with the vaccine.
	But it but it to do it in a criminal context where you have jail time and someone's life on the line, that's that's completely insane.
	And uh it was so blatant.
	And then the truth of the matter is it does not matter.
	This is what we tried to argue, it doesn't matter how long the sentence was.
	It doesn't matter if it was within the sentencing guidelines, it doesn't matter um, you know, if it was a short or long period of time.
	The fact is they can't use your legal and lawful protected speech that had nothing to do with the underlying charge as justification for incarceration, and that's exactly what they did for you.
	Well, speaking of the other cases, where do you think you're at in some of these vaccine mandate cases?
	Do you think they're gonna go better than mine?
	I hope so.
	You know, um I I will say, like watching, watching, I was watching watching the hearings today and um seeing the public finally get out there in the public with people have we've we've known for three years.
	I mean, I I I studied science in school.
	I'm definitely not a scientist by trade, but I was writing, you know, pretty basically scientific dissertations in our complaints back in 2021, just trying to show the court, look, this is this is founded.
	Like we we know these things were true.
	We know that they they didn't need a vaccine mandate in the employment context.
	The fact that it's finally out there and in the open, and um, you know, maybe I'll get a little less uh hate from from certain judges going forward.
	But we we are uh trying to gain some traction.
	The the the big hurdle is that they are trying to put people's religious beliefs on trial.
	And we found evidence that there is even discrimination specifically towards Christians and not other religious faiths when it comes to the granting of religious exemptions in the employment context.
	So there definitely is a lot of underlying uh an attack on religious freedom in these cases as well.
	And what the employers are trying to do is launch this Spanish inquisition for every single employee and trying to say, well, your your beliefs weren't sincere.
	You know, you didn't really believe that.
	And that's the biggest hurdle we're running into now.
	We've gotten some good uh new uh decisions out of the appellate level because these are being challenged all over the place.
	So we're still fighting, um, we're still filing new lawsuits all the time.
	So we are we are gaining some traction, I think.
	But the public perception, the public knowledge, the fact that these things are getting out there is is incredibly helpful.
	Well, and this is precedent setting too beyond just the COVID-19 vaccine.
	It's to say that you have the religious freedom or the medical freedom to reject a even if it whether it's experimental or a known effective treatment, you should still have the right to reject it if if you so desire.
	So it's really a I think you got another precedent-setting case uh in your docket here as well.
	I hope so.
	I hope so.
	We need some good wins for religious freedoms in the workplace, that's for sure.
	But they're trying, they're trying hard to squelch that out.
	But you know, First Amendment is under attack in all sorts of ways right now.
	All right.
	What do you think about the decision here in Trump's case?
	And and even mainstream media hard-left legal analysts are having to admit that it's really unprecedented.
	Uh, the jury not getting the rules, uh, the the defense not even knowing the charges before they make final statements.
	I have no faith in the Manhattan Appeals court.
	Maybe at the Supreme Court, he can get this overturned.
	Where do you think all this stands?
	Yeah.
	Yeah.
	No, I thought, you know, it was insane.
	It wasn't, it wasn't something that I I followed down to the letter.
	I was watching commentary on it a lot last week.
	But watching especially the jury instructions and how the judge handled this at the end, I mean he practically ordered them to come back with a conviction.
	And that sort of misconduct is is absolutely insane.
	I I unfortunately, I I did see who's on the lineup for the appeals court.
	That's really sad because I unfortunately agree with you that he might not have luck there.
	I hope at the Supreme Court level.
	I mean, especially with with the the um, you know, how how well known this case is, I think they'll be paying a special Attention to this one.
	But I don't know.
	This whole thing is crazy.
	I, you know, I think what it what people are seeing now is, because I wasn't surprised.
	I don't know if you were I I wasn't as surprised that it came back with a conviction.
	I was surprised that I was really disappointed.
	I think I'd gotten my hopes up that I think was it one juror who had gotten his news from Truth Social.
	They'd like pulled the jurors.
	I was like, maybe that one juror will hold out.
	Let's go, juror number two.
	And um, you know, and he didn't, but I I wasn't surprised ultimately.
	But I think people are seeing it now.
	Look at what's happened with InfoWars.
	Look what happened with you.
	Um, you know, I think I've said to you once in the context of a different case, though, that in order to win, you you have to really know what kind of game you're playing.
	And I think people are finally waking up to that.
	Um, it's it's a sad state of affairs in the justice system or injustice system.
	I I work in it every single day.
	It's really, it's really sad.
	It's really disheartening to be like, okay, I, you know, I'm working in a very corrupt arena, and they're not gonna play by the rules, and it's not gonna be fair.
	They might just throw out the rules.
	But if you know that, you could navigate it a little bit better.
	I hope Trump's attorneys can navigate it a little bit better going forward.
	Um, you know, I I still have hope.
	I think people can surprise you.
	I I think they were so blatant.
	Um it with his conviction and and the the issues on appeal might just be so cut and dry that they don't have a choice but to do something about it.
	So I hope that that's the case.
	Well, the power of the people is definitely behind Trump, and all this has done is made him more powerful politically, but they're obviously gonna do everything they can to try to keep him out of office.
	And so I don't know how far that goes, but it it started.
	They attempted it in 2016, they failed, they got away with it in 2020, and so they're trying it again, obviously, in 2024.
	All right, Lexus, thank you for joining me tonight.
	Any closing comments for the audience.
	No, thank you so much for having me.
	Um, you know, I just want to say that I I'm thrilled to hear that you guys have a little bit of a reprieve for two weeks and praying for you all.
	Uh, you know, I I I don't say this uh at all jokingly.
	I really do um owe my career to InfoWars.
	I, you know, I work with the great Robert Barnes at 1776 Law Center.
	I first saw him on your show interviewing him about the 2020 election and the you know the rollout of the vaccines and the incoming mandate.
	So um that that's the whole reason I'm even on this path.
	The whole reason I do the work that I do.
	And so I'm very grateful.
	So I'm praying for you all, wishing for the best.
	And uh, I'll be following that that issue closely as well.
	Yeah, that's a great story, and that's why InfoWars is so important.
	It's another reason why they want us off air, is because of the connections that are made.
	Um and and just the community that it is.
	All right, Lexus, thank you so much.
	We'll be in touch.
	Thanks.
	Have a good night.
	All right.
	Well, there you go, guys.
	There is the latest, the latest from the Fauci hearing.
	The latest in my case to the Supreme Court.
	There it is.
	We did it.
	We gave you the update.
	Now I do want to take phone calls the rest of the way.
	That's what I'm gonna do tonight is take phone calls the rest of the way.
	Remember, folks, Owen Schreuer.store.
	We've got great apparel over there.
	Let me show you what we have going on.
	Let's see.
	You know, I I keep saying I want to make the raw milk t-shirt into a a gym shirt and do an athletic shirt.
	I think I maybe we will launch that next Monday.
	Because it's a great t-shirt.
	People love it, but I'd like to wear one to the gym.
	I like to wear the kind of athletic gear to the gym, not necessarily the cotton t-shirts.
	I prefer the uh athletic gear.
	So maybe we'll get the raw milk in the athletic gear.
	We got the white boy summer t-shirts, white boy summer t-shirts live right now at Owen Schreuer.store.
	And and you know, where else?
	Because we look out for the ladies, white girl summer.
	We look out for the ladies too.
	White girl summer tees, we've done it.
	White boy summer, white girl summer.
	You ever see that propaganda obey the obey propaganda shirts?
	Well, we disobey propaganda, So we got that for you.
	We got the Clown World T-shirts.
	We got the Owen 316 T shirts.
	We got the Christ is King t-shirts, Biden brain freeze t shirts.
	They're all at Owen Schroyer dot store.
	The the clothing line continues to expand.
	Owen Schreuer dot store.
	All right.
	We now open up.
	The phone line.
	747 255 60.
	747 2550.
	And there it is on the bottom left hand corner of your screen.
	The lines are open to call in.
	Yes, we will be live on InfoWars tomorrow.
	I think the website was under attack tonight, but I don't think that's indicative that we won't be on air.
	So remember, one line I pick up, you're on the air.
	Just tell me where you're from and your name.
	So first caller of the night.
	What's your name?
	Where you're from?
	Oh, and it's Jefferson in Virginia.
	Jefferson.
	Been a minute, man.
	Yeah.
	So now you're going to talk to Ken Paxton because Ivan Raquelin is setting you up with him.
	After all this time I've been telling you to talk to Ken Paxton.
	I mean, it's not like I can get his number out of the yellow pages.
	Do they even make the yellow pages anymore?
	All right.
	Well, if you happen to get an audience with Ken Paxton, can you please inform him that Kamala Harris is a Jamaican citizen at birth and not a 14th Amendment citizen of the United States?
	I know she was born in California, but that doesn't matter.
	Jamaica has control over her allegiance under their constitution.
	And Ken Paxton should be made aware of that.
	Because nobody seems to know this.
	That Kamala Harris, Jamaican me crazy.
	I'm just saying, if you want to unravel the Biden administration rapidly, yeah, and go to the Supreme Court with something important.
	Having a Jamaican as our vice president, potentially our next president, is something we should head off before it happens.
	So just give Ken a heads up that nobody seems to know about Jamaican constitutional law.
	That that when it comes to who gets to be a citizen, they're like Switzerland or Jamaica.
	If you have Jamaican blood or Swiss blood, you you don't get to be an American citizen even if you're if you're born here.
	Okay, because the 14th Amendment doesn't attach because they claim you as their citizen at birth, even though you weren't born in their country.
	So you don't get to be a citizen here if some other country has jurisdiction over your allegiance.
	How do the Democrats rid themselves of Kabala Harris?
	Because you know they want her out of the way.
	They they don't want her anywhere near the presidency either.
	Well, they might come to this realization that she's not an American citizen, just like I'm saying.
	If they really want to get rid of her, they might use this very technique against her and finally say, you know what?
	Uh your interpretation of the 14th Amendment uh amendment is novel and incorrect.
	And we're going to enforce the old understanding of the 14th Amendment that if you don't have complete political control over allegiance, then you don't get to be a citizen here.
	And and that essentially as long as somebody else claims you, there's no reason for you to need to be a citizen here just because you're born here.
	So anyway, I I I've beaten a dead horse or a dead camel or whatever you want to call it, but she's she's a camel node.
	A dead camel toe.
	Yeah, dead cambillo.
	Anyway, so I've said my piece.
	Good show.
	I'll move on.
	Next.
	Good to hear from you.
	Good to hear from you.
	Been talking to Jefferson on the airwaves for uh, I guess probably eight years since I started at InfoWars.
	Kamala Harris.
	What are we going to do with Kamala Harris?
	All right, next caller.
	What's your name?
	Where you from?
	Hey, uh, this is Bart Fine and Zorra.
	Good evening, Alan.
	Hey, Bart.
	Yeah, um.
	Excuse me.
	I was watching this piece on a piece on uh Mr. Falci and all that.
	And it's gonna sound weird, but can we have a vote?
	Is he an elf or a reptilian?
	Because he he he's just uh a freaking leave, the F out, man.
	I can't stand looking at him.
	I agree.
	I can't stand.
	I can't stand the look of him.
	He doesn't look like a reptile, maybe an elf.
	He looks like uh human, like goofy dog hybrid or something.
	Maybe that's why he tortures dogs, because he's like an ugly dog, and they're like nice, beautiful puppies.
	Yeah, man.
	Um what's what's going on, but um good 1776.
	Thanks for having me on, Alan.
	Hey, don't say that.
	That's a crime now.
	It's a crime to say that now.
	Next caller, what's your name?
	Where are you from?
	Uh, this is John from Minneapolis.
	All right, John.
	I just wanted to tell you that uh I'm L G B TQ.
	All right.
	Yeah, that's let's let's get Biden to quit.
	Okay.
	It's Pride Month.
	I just wanted to say Ivan is he we gotta watch him at you and Ivan.
	You guys could straighten this country out, I think.
	Because he's a badass dude.
	He really is.
	He's gonna he you gotta watch his other interview with the NPR.
	Yeah.
	Yeah, Zoe.
	He said that her name is Hey, we'll do.
	Hey, me and Ivan trying to save the country of First Amendment activism.
	All right.
	Next caller, what's your name?
	Where you from.
	I'm sorry.
	What's your name?
	Where are you from?
	Donnie Tulsa.
	Hey, Donnie.
	Hey, uh, hell of a week.
	Uh, Ivan Raikling guys really cool.
	And and some of your other guests, and man, you guys are like a having a drama queen for a girlfriend.
	Uh you guys had me uh engaged all weekend and this stuff, and always needing more money for a gambling problem.
	But anyway, hey, uh, I don't know if you've seen this today.
	Uh this is really important.
	Jenna or uh the FDIC come out and go there and out.
	63 banks are going to post their uh uh five hundred and seventeen trillion dollars worth of bad loans.
	That's a derivative shit.
	Yeah, it was it was billion.
	It was billion, but I know what you're talking about.
	Yep.
	Yeah, and then and then further, you know, yeah, the Palestinians, the Jews, the Ukrainians.
	Hey, fuck all that shit.
	Twenty-three million people and counting dead from this killer uh vaccine or uh Fauci and the and his vaccine crap, and it's like, hey, let's can we focus on you know, like the oh no, uh that movie I mentioned to the uh uh uh uh Battle of the Hertz Kern Forest.
	There's different parts of that battlefield, and men are engaging all along it.
	Like you guys and and uh Alex man, great job on that guy.
	Man, that guy's solid.
	Uh but anyway, uh we gotta focus on the uh the line that we're on.
	Like I appreciate the stuff on the Supreme Court that sounds better after listening to your lawyer that it's not dead.
	It just they didn't say anything, bunch of cowards.
	Uh but anyway, I need a joke to finish with, but I don't have it.
	Maybe you have one.
	You know, because it's this is some serious stuff right now, ain't it?
	Well, it's the uh it was uh LGBTQ something.
	Let's get Biden to quit.
	Uh that's the joke of the night right there.
	Thanks for the call.
	Let's take the next caller.
	What's your name?
	Where you're from.
	Yeah, this is Albert from Pennsylvania.
	Hey Albert, how are we doing tonight?
	Thanks for being here.
	Oh, hey, not a problem.
	Thank you, Owen.
	Um, I just wanted to uh send out my prayers and thoughts and everything.
	You know, and I mean, I'm not really a super emotional guy, but y'all have me uh damn near in tears there on Saturday night.
	That was a really touching um episode and everything like that.
	And I've just got my gut instinct that this is not gonna be the end.
	Um you guys made it over the first hurdle today, and I feel like coming up in two weeks, you guys are gonna make it over the next hurdle, and you guys are just gonna keep fighting.
	Um, just like how um, you know, any good soldiers get you out there fighting.
	But I just wanted to let you know, Owen, that it doesn't matter if you're an InfoWars or wherever you're at.
	I'm always gonna be here supporting you.
	And um just wanted to give a quick story.
	I'm out on vacation here in Las Vegas, and I spent about an hour talking to a guy today, just random guy.
	Um I was wearing my InfoWars golf shirt that was kind of a hidden gem from a few years ago with the IW logo on it.
	And uh he noticed it, and me and him, you know, spent about an hour talking, and he said you guys got a lot of support out here too.
	So I mean, we're all out here you you you know, supporting you, and I just wanted to tell you, you know, how much you mean to me and and and and how much I enjoy your shows and and and just how much of a part of my everyday life that you guys are.
	Well, I appreciate that, and it really does mean a lot when people choose to spend time with me.
	Um I'm somebody that grew up listening to talk radio and and still listen to this day, and I'm very selective about who I give my time to.
	So trying to make it worth it for your time and and you spending your time with me really does mean a lot.
	Uh, you know, I hope InfoWars lasts.
	I I think I I mean at least another election cycle uh would be epic.
	Uh, you know, but I I you know they obviously want to shut down.
	There's no denying that.
	And so if they do end up getting us in two weeks, I'll be right here.
	I'm not gonna shut up.
	I'm still gonna come on air every day at 3 p.m. Central for the foreseeable future, if not the rest of my life.
	Um so if they take the InfoWars platform, we'll still we'll still find a way to go live every day.
	Um, but we'll have another day tomorrow, and uh we'll have another day after that.
	So every day uh I have an InfoWars, I don't take it for granted.
	Oh no, Owen, I I I I totally get it.
	You know what I mean?
	And I'm not gonna take another second for granted.
	You know, I'm gonna watch your war room show here on repeat um after you're you're done on the air here.
	And uh I mean, I take you on vacation with me, whether I'm at home or on vacation, I'm always listening to you, uh, Alex and all the guys at InfoWars.
	And uh one last thing I wanted to say, just you know, I I I know I sent in one of your letters when you was in jail.
	You know, Psalm 27, the Lord is my light, my salvation, whom shall I fear?
	You know, the Lord is the strength of my life, whom shall I be afraid?
	You know, and uh just keep that with you, keep you motivated, and um you guys will uh you you guys will win in the end.
	I know it.
	I know it.
	But thanks for taking my call, and I'll let you get to some more callers.
	All right, Albert.
	Always glad to have you here.
	Thank you for that.
	Always telling the stories too about wearing the uh InfoWars gear or gear from my store out in public.
	It's always a positive.
	Next caller, what's your name?
	Where are you from?
	Hey, dude, I think you're talking to me.
	This is Jeremy.
	I'm calling you from Georgia.
	Yes, Jeremy.
	Hey.
	Uh, so I've been listening, uh, I've been a long time mostly listener, because like yourself, you're a talk radio junkie, so am I. Um, and I've been listening to uh the InfoWars Network since approximately 2003.
	And um have listened through all the ups and downs and everything.
	And I I uh what I'm about to say, you don't even have to comment on.
	You probably shouldn't.
	But um I've been listening to you, particularly since you came back from uh being released from your time in jail.
	And um I'm watching you between the lines, and my opinion is that even though AJ never asked for the network necessarily to be taken down, he's re resigned to the fact that it needs to go.
	And he's unloading uh the weight, and unfortunately it's gonna affect a lot of you.
	I've been listening to him long enough to read him between the lines.
	Uh won't get too personal, but there are things that I I know about him just after listening since 2003.
	You really get to know somebody.
	You know when they're full of shit, and you know when they're not.
	And I um I think that unfortunately you guys have gotten you've you've been caught in the wake of this.
	And I think what you're doing now, what you're doing right now, this moment, being on this platform, doing what you're doing is smart.
	It's a good tactic because I think that uh unfortunately you guys are going to suffer more.
	And um, and I think that the takedown is accepted um by AJ.
	And it's an unit's just it's it's an unfortunate thing.
	Um, because I think you guys put a lot of blood and sweat into the uh into the operation and into what you do.
	I think that you have you've brought a lot.
	I mean, uh to InfoWars, but you're a very gifted broadcaster, and there are a few out there that that really are.
	I think you and John B. Wells just have a very natural um a natural gift of gab.
	And and I think it's because of something that you love the radio, you love the microphone, you love conversing with people.
	And I just wanted to tell you that I know you're probably under an NDA.
	I know there's things that you probably will never be able to say, but there are some of us that are hardcore fans through thick and thin, and even with AJ through thick and thin.
	I personally will call him on his bullshit inside my thought bubble, and then there's times when I'm cheering him.
	And I loved you guys pre-2015 before you became the Trump network essentially, because it was so much more open-minded.
	And I would just um say to you this that pre-2015 InfoWars that was so open-minded, brought in a wide swath of audience.
	I would advise you to chase the spirit of that and not um attach yourself to one paradigm or one entity.
	And um, that is what grew InfoWars because it was yes, a not just AJ, but it was, you know, that you could have a David Icon one day and the next day a Greg Palace, and you had a left-right coalition and and just this whole vibe.
	It was really cool.
	So, anyways, I've said enough, but um glad I got to say hi to you, bud.
	I appreciate that, Jeremy.
	And let me let me respond to a couple things there because you bring up a couple important topics.
	You know, I've I've been offered book deals about writing about info wars, and I mean, I I do have an NDA, but it's irrelevant.
	It doesn't matter.
	I could say whatever I wanted.
	The truth is, the truth is I I'm loyal to Alex, I'm loyal to InfoWars, I'm loyal to the audience, I'm loyal to the crew, and it's not my story to tell.
	It's not my company, it's not my legacy.
	Um, I mean, that's it.
	It's just not my story, it's not my legacy.
	So I'm gonna fulfill my duties until I don't have any duties anymore.
	And I'll just leave it at that.
	And maybe someday I'll get into some of the behind the scenes stuff, and you know, maybe someday I can talk about it more or write a book about it.
	But the way I look at it right now is it's just it's not my legacy.
	It's not my story, it's not my legacy.
	It's Alex's to conclude however he wants to conclude it.
	I'm uh honored that I got to serve a role in the legend of info wars.
	I'll never forget it, I'll never regret it.
	But as I see it right now, I'm I'm still just you know, an infantry man, a front man, whatever, in the info war.
	And you know, Alex is gonna tell the story, Alex is going to decide what the legacy is, not me.
	Um said that, you know, there's there's a part of me that looks forward to getting to build my own legacy and getting to tell my own story, but I've always left all this stuff up to God and put it on God's timing.
	So that's where I'm at.
	Now, let me respond to the Trump thing.
	Because you have an you you have a fair point.
	I I think that the whole left-right paradigm that InfoWars, you put a time mark of it of 2015, that InfoWars kind of used to break through and bring people from both sides of the aisle.
	Something happened in 2016, and if you supported Trump, the left isn't interested in you anymore.
	And now that's starting to change a little bit.
	And some people are leaving the left and leaving the Democrat Party and they're losing their Trump derangement syndrome, or they're realizing it's a Trump derangement syndrome.
	But that wasn't really some sort of a conscious decision.
	It was like people on the left would no longer talk to you if you supported Trump.
	It's like this full-blown commitment to, you can't do anything that's a left-right paradigm or it's like the Jesse Ventura, Democrips and Republa, Um bloods or re blood reblodicins.
	And so I I look at Trump as being outside of the establishment, but it's like because he runs as a Republican, certain people will just never touch him.
	Certain people in the anti-establishment, certain people on the left.
	Now I could sit here and and look, I don't want to be known as some Trump guy.
	I I don't I don't lick boots to go to Mar-a-Lago.
	I don't I don't make donations and beg people to get invitations or get access to Trump.
	Quite frankly, probably at a detrimental level, I'm like so against being a part of anything that's big and mainstream like that.
	I just want to do my own thing.
	Like probably to a detrimental level.
	I mean, I I turn down a lot of things that people would think I'm crazy for turning down.
	Because I I just want to do my own thing.
	Now I have no problem talking about how I support Trump, and I'm definitely going to vote for Trump again.
	And I have no problem presenting the case why I think Trump is the best option.
	But when it comes to what I do on my show, I I hope that it can be viewed as neutral.
	Sure, everybody's got some bias, and I don't hide my political opinions, but all I really do when I'm on air, specifically on my three to six show at InfoWars, or wherever it ends up being, I just call it as it is.
	I just do play by play, day-to-day commentary of American politics and whatever else it stems into, culture, entertainment, everything else.
	So I just call it like it is.
	Now if I wanted to be as big as possible right now, if I wanted to be as big as possible and get the most followers and make the most money and do everything else, then I would be full on board with Trump.
	All my whole personality, my whole presentation, everything I do would be Trump, Trump, Trump, Trump, Trump, Trump, Trump.
	And there's plenty of people like that, and there's plenty of people that have made a lot of money and developed a huge following off of that and are more popular than they could ever be, and get the invites to the Trump events and get to shake the hands and everything else.
	I'm just not into that.
	I will never be into that.
	Like I said, even at a, to a detrimental level, Probably I'm not into that.
	So I mean, I I could sit here and become another Trump guy.
	Every ever all the support I've given to Trump has been organic from my heart as a real political phenomenon.
	But believe me, I I could go full on for Trump and make a bunch more money and be a lot more popular and have a larger following.
	I'm just, I want to do my own thing.
	I want to be my own person.
	I want to blaze my own path.
	And if supporting Trump and sometimes supporting him, sometimes calling him out, whatever, that's just part of the process.
	So I just felt like responding to that from Jeremy because he brings up fair points.
	All right, let's take another call here.
	Uh next caller, what's your name?
	Where you're from?
	Joseph from Vegas.
	What's up, Joseph?
	Uh, nothing much.
	I just wanted to bring light to something that you mentioned very briefly uh a few times this week.
	You were you were talking about um you know how evolution, you know, being taught is really causing uh a lot of issues, and uh wanted to expand on that because you don't understand how how correct you are.
	Um, you know, they indoctrinate children with this stuff, and uh that's how we lose our connection with God and how we we go down this wormhole of of Satanism and how half the population, you know, accepts it blatantly.
	And um, you know, there's a lot of good pastors out there that have been exposing this, and it's something that's extremely important, and you know that's how you can get uh like Hitler said, how you can get some um a race to think that they're better than another race, you know.
	If they believe in evolution, then who's the most who's evolu who's uh evolution is the greatest, and then you start thinking about other races and everything like that, and it gets you down this wormhole of hatred.
	So it's really work of Satan, and um I'm really glad to hear that you you spoke about that this week.
	Well, and imagine whether it's a political thing, an identity thing, a race thing, a culture thing.
	If if you have a true inherent belief system that you're inherently better than somebody else, then you're gonna think you have the right to govern over them.
	And so that's a very dangerous mindset.
	And and America defeated that mindset when it came to royalty.
	Exactly.
	And that's how they uh they they brainwash people into thinking abortion's okay.
	Um, and uh, you know, they say that the baby's just a bunch of cells, it's a fish, it's not even human yet.
	And you know, that's what that's what people really think.
	And they don't think that they're doing murder, and uh it's it's really um it's really sad, and you know, there's there's so much evidence that shows that the the earth, you know, is is not how the science explains it, but there's no possible way for a big bang,
	uh, you know, uh micro evolution, macro evolution, cause chemical evolution, all those so everything is uh is completely been d debunked, all the pre-humanoid nethanothals have been um debunked, every single one, you know.
	Um if you look at KBF Tusk, there's a lot of examples of of just things that don't fit in science.
	And you know, rather than go against their religion of evolution, they just you know will say, Oh, this is this there must have been aliens or something uh that might have happened at this point.
	That they literally if there was a live dinosaur today, they would say, Wow, this one made it 75 million years and it didn't die.
	Like they would they would never reject their own religion.
	They don't understand that time is their religion and it's it's destroying the the whole world.
	All right, man.
	I appreciate that call.
	I'm gonna jump to another caller.
	I'm gonna try to get as many in tonight as I can.
	Next caller, what's your name?
	Where you're from.
	Hey, it's uh sleepy rick's dad in FEMA region nine.
	What's up, sleepy Rick's dad?
	We need a better name for you.
	You're gonna be um I I don't know.
	Crazy Rick.
	Crazy Rick.
	That's better.
	I like that.
	So uh anyway, I was watching guys Saturday, you know, you and Harrison and uh Alex, and I had an idea.
	If you're ever in that position again, you need to get three shot glasses and three bottles of brain force ultra and two shots, and you know, go out big, have the heads explode.
	Yeah, uh I don't really drink, but he Alex tried to get me to drink that night and I refuse it.
	I think he was a little upset.
	Yeah, but brain force ultra is uh your stuff, baby.
	It'll it'll balance it out.
	Oh yeah, don't put anything in there.
	The the shot glasses filled with brain force ultra.
	All three you get three bottles, three glasses.
	That'd be interesting.
	Taking a full shot glass of brain force ultra.
	That's like all that's probably like half the bottle.
	Maybe it's the do a double shot.
	Do the whole bottle.
	I do like a double shot of espresso every now and then.
	Yeah.
	And it'll wake you guys up too if you're real getting real sleepy at the end of the end of the day.
	Yeah.
	Yeah.
	All right.
	That's all I got for you.
	All right, crazy, right?
	Maybe I'll have to do that someday on the air.
	I'll just take a whole shot of Brain Force Ultra.
	All right, next caller, what's your name?
	Where are you from?
	Hello?
	Yes.
	Josh from Indiana.
	What's up, Josh?
	How's it going?
	Um, I I was gonna talk about the tr Trump trial.
	All right.
	Can you hear me?
	Yes.
	So I I I believe that you know, Trump's going through a lot, and I I think that he's starting to he's starting to put the deep state on trial.
	Trump's not on trial.
	I believe the government's on trial.
	Everybody's watching.
	You know what I mean?
	Is it you you're talking about like maybe a Q thing, or what do you mean?
	Uh what I'm saying is uh Trump knew what he was going through when he uh re-announced that he's going.
	And he knew that they were gonna come after him.
	So after while they come after him, he knew that he's gonna expose everything that they are doing to the people.
	So he's he's showing the people what what what their government is.
	So you think this thing is being done intentionally?
	I I think Trump knew what he was going to go for when he re-announced.
	I think he he knew that they were going to come after him with full force.
	Because I mean, let's go back in history, they don't play.
	They, you know, they they go to the end.
	But you're diverting from the question, you're repeating yourself.
	Are you saying that this whole thing is set up and a staged event?
	Well, uh, I think Trump knew what he was doing you're repeating yourself.
	You're repeating yourself.
	Are you saying the whole thing is a setup?
	Because yeah, duh, of course they're gonna come after you.
	So you think he's setting them up?
	Yes, absolutely.
	To show the people what what their government has become.
	So what's the end result?
	Well, the end result is everybody's gonna see this and say, we're done with this.
	We've been living in this, and we don't want this no more.
	Everybody, all the people, except for you know, the the here and there, you know, college kids and all this that don't really see it.
	Because back in the day, you know, culture revolution where they were teaching the young to fight against, you know, the people who want uh uh uh uh um uh uh here's my problem with this, and and I debate I debate Q guys on this all the time.
	And look, I have no problem with people that believe in Q. That's fine.
	Uh I hope I hope you're right.
	I hope I'm wrong, and Q is not a psyop or fake.
	Uh so I hope you're right and I'm wrong if you're a Q person, but I debate Q guys with this all the time.
	I know people that are big Q guys, they believe in it all.
	They send me the stuff all the time.
	But it's just I what I what I've gone through is real.
	What what InfoWars has gone through is real.
	And so to me, this is real stuff.
	Like people aren't playing games, they're not setting things up, there's no white knights out there, there's no secret plans out there.
	It's just it's all real.
	I mean, I think Trump is really going through this, and they really want to throw him in jail or whatever.
	So that's kind of my thing with with the Q people, or believing it's all a setup is there's kind of a bit of uh I don't know if denial of reality is the right word.
	It's just it's different when you've been through it and you know how real it actually is.
	So again, I I know it's real because I've gone through it.
	So I think Trump is really going through it.
	I don't think it's a setup, I don't think it's some deeper, darker plan.
	Uh but hey, I hope the Q people are right.
	I hope I'm wrong, and Q is real, and we're all gonna be saved, and everything is great.
	And you know, my other big beef with that theory too is think about if Trump gets in and is really the good guy, and they have to let all of this stuff happen, you know, to have the great awakening or whatever.
	Well, okay, uh millions dead from the vaccine, hundreds of thousands of Ukrainians dead.
	It'll probably be a hundred thousand dead in the Israel-Palestine conflict When it's all said and done.
	So I mean, you're talking about hundreds of thousands of and millions of people dying over this thing.
	So do you justify that?
	Let's take another call.
	What's your name?
	Where you're from?
	Stuart, Seattle.
	Hey, Stuart.
	You know, as I as I sit here and think about all the things that we've been going through the last two decades.
	There's one thing I I regret to see.
	And it's good patriots that never pass on their their DNA, never have children.
	They're fighting the hell out of life.
	And they, you know, something happens.
	And you know, I I went to school with Pat Tillman, and he's a big example of this.
	And um, as complicated as it is, we need to continue to think about how can we strengthen our future?
	How can we raise uh a generation of of individuals that sees this as as is wrong, the things we're going through, that has a backbone to stand up and fight.
	And I gotta say, Owen, you're you're one of those guys.
	We we need you to uh to get some little ones out there and uh help change the world.
	That's all I got, man.
	I appreciate that.
	Thank you for the call.
	The Bible says be fruitful and multiply.
	All right, I'll probably take one more call before we sign off for the night.
	But we've been we've been hitting these calls fast.
	You know, we've been hitting these calls really fast.
	People aren't really going on too long.
	They're coming on, hitting their topics and getting off.
	So maybe we could do a couple more calls.
	We'll take one right now.
	What's your name?
	Where are you from?
	I'll probably Hi, I'm Mary.
	I'm from Columbus, Texas.
	Hi, Mary.
	Hi.
	What's on your mind?
	Um, I just wanted to mention how I mean yesterday when there were 300,000 listeners.
	I was, I mean, it just lightened me up with the holy spirit.
	And you know, sometimes we go ups and downs with our relationship with Christ, and and and I feel it.
	I I mean I'm a doctor.
	Uh right after I started practicing, I got thrown in jail, but eventually got dismissed.
	It was like I had an employee that made accusations against me.
	And and I feel it.
	I mean, I'm just a good girl doing what I'm supposed to do.
	Next thing I know I'm in the freaking clink.
	And, you know, I'm I'm just you know, just I I feel you, and it's hard.
	And I've I've been there and I I just want to let you know I support you, and but I do have one question.
	Okay.
	It's just um I have a lot of friends with, you know, some of them with a lot of money who are buying homes in Mexico, and they're like, that's where I'm going when everything hits a fan.
	What do you think about that?
	Well, Mexico, which is a very Christian, one of the most Christian countries on the planet, just elected a Jewish woman for president.
	There's there's like 50,000 Jewish people in Mexico.
	They just elected a Jewish socialist.
	So uh I don't know.
	I understand why people would move to Mexico.
	Uh maybe I've thought about seeking a political asylum in Mexico.
	There are a lot of expats that moved to Mexico.
	I think this new socialist president is about to open up the pipeline working with Mayorcus to send even more illegal aliens to our southern border.
	So I don't know.
	I'd be a little weary moving to Mexico now with the cartel activity and this new president.
	Um, so if you're thinking about fleeing the country, I don't know if Mexico would be your best bet.
	Uh I could certainly see the lure.
	Um, El Salvador, I think probably your best bet.
	A lot of expats move to Costa Rica, um, Peru, not bad, and maybe even Russia.
	So that's that's kind of what seems to be the trends at least.
	Okay.
	All right.
	Well, thank you.
	And I wish y'all the best.
	Thank you very much.
	Thank you for calling.
	Yeah, that that seems to be the trend.
	I would say.
	It's like you really don't want...
	You really don't want to leave America, you know?
	Thank you.
	All right, next caller.
	What's your name?
	Where are you from?
	Sleepy wreck, FEMA region four.
	What's up, uh leather daddy gym?
	Don't you know how wildly important climate pride is?
	Hey, don't whip me with your uh with your uh your pride whip.
	Anyway, hey man, uh been a wild weekend.
	As always, you uh continue to bring the goods and uh just wanted to say appreciate what you do, and uh we'll chat.
	Be well.
	All right, thank you.
	All right, folks are calling in saying, Oh, I can't get through it.
	Folks, I have one line.
	I have one line.
	So basically there's the person on the air, and then there's the hold.
	So if there's somebody on air and then somebody holding, that's why you're getting the message that you can't get through.
	There is no call screener here.
	You get answered, your call is right on air.
	So for the people complaining in the rumble rants, uh there's I don't screen calls.
	I literally answer and you're right on air.
	So when you get that message, I'm not ignoring you, it's that somebody's on the air and somebody's on hold.
	So you get the message that uh it's unavailable or whatever.
	So when you hear somebody call uh and hang up, that means usually there's an opening.
	So that's where it's at.
	But here's the thing.
	I like the people that come into the chat.
	The people that that hang out in the chat and and act like they try to call in and they can't get in.
	I will not pick up a phone call until I see your number.
	So you're not calling in.
	You're lying.
	So I can sit here and I can look at the calls coming in, and your number never shows up.
	So either pick up the phone and start dialing, or you're a fraud.
	Believe me, I would prefer controversial callers.
	It's way more fun.
	Next caller, what's your name where you're from?
	Hello.
	What's your name where you're from?
	This is uh JT.
	And I'm from uh from FEMA region nine.
	All right, JT, go ahead.
	Yeah.
	So I'm just curious uh why how you could support Trump for president and uh knowing that he's part of the deep state.
	You know, I don't know if you've known or how much research you've done, but he actually purchased his first casino, his hotel from the CIA, Mary Carter Penn Company.
	Yeah, he also purchased he also purchased Mar-a-Lago from the government.
	Okay, but this was a known CIA drug running and money laundering front company.
	And my guess is he got a great deal on it.
	Uh well, you're there, but okay, so you don't know about the terms.
	Well, why I mean I don't know the financial thing.
	He purchased 93% of uh so you're like so you're like the reverse cue, and you think that Trump is a deep state asset.
	Yes, 100%.
	So everything he's going through, everything he's going through.
	Well, it is everything he's going through is fake.
	Well, it's it's it's a show, yes.
	I mean, it's all a show.
	So they're all in on it.
	So they could see, but so they could test Americans to see what we'll put up with, how much we will take so they know their next move.
	He said it so many times.
	I mean, the snake in this story is him.
	He's the snake.
	He even says, You knew I was a snake before you let me in.
	That's him.
	So Bragg is in on it.
	Letisha James is in on it, Fanny Willis is in on it.
	I mean, look, uh, those lower level people, they might not know the full uh, you know, uh they might not know that he's part of it.
	They might be doing their job just because they're taking their orders, you know, it's just like anything else.
	But what is so he had a loan uh he was on debt on the hook for a billion dollars personal financial responsibility.
	They restructured his loans, the Rothschild.
	I mean, there's even a CNN clip where the accountant says specifically Trump was work more or less alive than dead.
	And so they worked out part of that that uh loan restructure was that he would be president eventually.
	I would be more inclined to believe you if they weren't attacking him like they are.
	They would let him be president, they would let him do his thing.
	The attacks are real.
	They're real to an extent.
	I mean, he knows what's going on.
	Okay, well, to an extent.
	You're providing yourself an out here.
	Okay, so is there any is there any red line?
	Is there anything they could do to Trump that would change your mind?
	Like is there or like what if they blew Trump's head off?
	No, I wouldn't think that wouldn't change my mind for sure.
	Okay.
	How much on the thing?
	What if Trump gets back into office and and releases the Epstein client lists and has great policy, turns the economy around, secures the border?
	I mean, what like what if he actually is a good president?
	Look, I I don't want look, at the end of the day, in terms of his presidency, yeah, he was best uh president of my time, you know, definitely.
	I'm not trying to discredit that, but I think that's just all part of the game, you know.
	That was just to build up this eventual, you know, uh mass chaos.
	So I don't even think he'll make it to the to the election, to be honest with you.
	I think they're gonna pin this uh the COVID shots on him.
	Is there anything else?
	So are you like a are you like a black pillar?
	Is there anything that can be good?
	Is anybody real anymore?
	Uh I'm on that vanta pill.
	The what?
	Vanta pill.
	I've never heard of that.
	You know what the color vanta is.
	It's the deepest black you could get.
	There's a color darker than black.
	Yep.
	Look it up, Vanta, V-A-N-T-A.
	All right.
	Well, I I think that's too bad.
	But so you must have some hope.
	Otherwise, why would you listen to this show?
	Well, I mean, my hope is that uh, well, you know, the thing is, I'm I'm hoping that these people, these influencers, people like yourself, you know, actually tell the people the truth, what the people need to hear.
	There's no voting our way out of this.
	100%.
	There is no voting our way out of this.
	So you aren't a vanta pillar, you have some hope.
	Well, yeah, but the hope is that 1776 vibe that Alex Stones used to talk about.
	I mean, that's the reality of it, unfortunately.
	You know, and in the process, there's gonna be lives lost, you know, but uh, isn't that the truth?
	Yeah, isn't that the truth?
	And so who's gonna step up and sacrifice their life?
	Well, I mean, us as a collective.
	Ah.
	I mean, I will.
	I would be happy to be a martyr, you know, but uh am I gonna do it?
	You can't be one person to do this, you know what I mean?
	And it doesn't even have to be uh be violent like that.
	I personally think if we were to to round up probably at least two thousand people minimum, go to each member of uh Congress, you know, their house, and tell them serve them their pink slips, tell them they they no longer need it.
	That's less than uh that's less than 1.1 million people.
	It's all handled on the local level.
	So you go within your own state, your own city, your own districts, you know, and you handle it there instead of trying to meet at one central location like BC, and so they could easily pick us off, you know.
	Well, I'm glad you called.
	I like having a little hot debate over this with somebody I disagree.
	I've gone long tonight.
	I'm gonna sign off now, but uh we took a lot of calls.
	And uh I'm always glad to take calls, especially if people disagree or or doubt me or want to try to argue with me or call me out.
	Though he was kind of more aggressive in the chat, and then um once he got on the air, I think was a little more uh a more amicable conversation, I guess you might say.
	But uh a lot of great callers tonight, a lot of great guests tonight.
	Owen Troyer Live, episode 68 in the books.
	I will see you tomorrow on the InfoWars War Room, 3 p.m.
	Central, American Election dot news, band.video, Owen Schreuer dot show.
	I sign off for the night.
	God bless and God speed.
	Let's take a little more go Jira into our brain, into our veins.
	As we sign off you know what I want.
	You know what I want in the rumble ranch, get the dancing emojis going.
	I want everybody dancing in the rumble ranch.
	All right.
	That's the rule here.
	Why is this freezing up?
	Now I'm getting mad.
	Now if I'm gonna be denied my heavy metal, then I'm gonna really be angry.

▲