Owen Shroyer speculates Democrats may replace Joe Biden via medical or mental incompetence claims, citing the $6B special counsel report as evidence, while dismissing Michelle Obama’s candidacy as implausible unless forced. He highlights Harris’ readiness and questions why Obama/Clinton back Biden despite tensions, suggesting a calculated setup to blame him for policies like border chaos or inflation. Comparing RFK Jr.’s exit to Haley’s potential pivot if Trump faces legal hurdles, Shroyer ties establishment moves to broader election integrity concerns, framing the debate as a fight over who controls America’s future—with faith and moral accountability at its core. [Automatically generated summary]
So, where I've been on this issue is that they're going to roll with Joe Biden.
And I figured that they're going to roll with Joe Biden, figuring that Trump is too hard to beat.
So let Biden take the fall.
Let Biden take the loss.
Commit all kinds of atrocities, war crimes, dastardly deeds, border invasion, economic collapse.
Just do it all in the name of Joe Biden.
Let Joe Biden take the fall.
Biden's legacy doesn't matter to anybody.
And so I'm thinking, well, this is their plan.
Their plan is to just ride Joe Biden out.
He's a lame duck president, so they can do whatever they want in Joe Biden's name, war, economic collapse, you name it.
And then in 2028, make their big push for whoever it is they have up their sleeve.
Now, a lot of people have the mindset that Michelle Obama is going to run.
You know, I would say, without my ego speaking, that I probably have some of the top-tier political foresight and insight in the news media that's not in the D.C. beltway.
But there's a few others I think are maybe still above me.
And one being Roger Stone, my dear friend.
And he thinks it's Michelle Obama.
I don't believe it's Michelle Obama.
I don't think Michelle Obama has any interest in running.
And I don't know how you lure Michelle Obama into running.
I don't know what you can offer Michelle Obama that she doesn't already have.
She's got the fortune.
She's got the fame.
So I just don't see it.
I just don't see how it's Michelle Obama.
I really don't.
And I don't think Michelle Obama wants to run against Donald Trump.
So who else they got?
Well, they got Gavin Newsom, probably a strong candidate, all things considered.
And then they have Kamala Harris.
Now, there's already been news circulating, and this is just a response mechanism.
Oh, Kamala, what if Joe can't continue to run?
And Kamala says, well, I'm all fit and I'm ready to serve.
I'm fit to serve.
But then they just make that a headline.
And then they publish it and they get clicks and they generate impressions, revenue, what have you.
And then it's, oh, look, Kamala Harris says she's ready to replace Joe Biden.
So I never thought the Democrats were going to replace Joe Biden in this election cycle.
I always figured they were going to ride Joe Biden out to the finish line here and then come back big in 2028.
But as I'm doing deeper dives into the special counsel and how this deal played out and the internal fighting happening inside the Democrat Party and inside the Biden administration, you do have to wonder not only who's calling the shots, but who is setting Joe Biden up for failure.
Now, there's one anomaly in all of this that has me so confused.
And that is, why is Barack Obama, why is Bill Clinton campaigning fundraising with and for Joe Biden?
I just don't get it.
Now, you could say, well, they're just going through the motions.
They're just showing support.
Maybe they're setting Joe Biden up for some sort of a big fall, figuratively, literally.
I just don't get it.
Why would they be putting all of this political capital behind Joe Biden?
Why would Obama be running and campaigning with Joe Biden, Bill Clinton, and the rest?
Why would they be doing that?
I see some people in the chat saying for optics, for optics.
But okay, so when, but for what is the point?
That they're all still unified, that they're all still united behind Joe.
But why would they want to do that if they wanted to get rid of Joe Biden?
Now, the inside-the-beltway DC talk is that Joe Biden and Barack Obama don't get along.
In fact, Barack Obama might even despise Joe Biden.
And it's likely that Hillary Clinton is bitter towards all of these people because she lost to Trump and then Biden got to beat Trump and be president, and Hillary never did.
I don't think they throw Hillary's name back in there, but maybe that's the maybe that's the dark horse that we're not looking at here.
Maybe Hillary is the dark horse that we're not looking at here.
Could there be some sort of a sympathy vote?
Unify behind Biden, commit all these evil acts in his lame duck presidency.
Biden has a medical issue sometime before the election, and that's when they do the swap.
That's the only way I see this going down.
There has to be some sort of a medical event.
There has to be some sort of a massive event that forces Joe Biden out of the picture.
Because I don't think, I think the optics are too bad of just saying we're sick of Joe and attacking him in a political way that's too damaging to the Democrat Party.
So I think that it's going to have to be a medical event that they're going to use to take Biden out.
I think that has to be the answer to this riddle.
And then who they replace him with, that's the next issue.
But they've got it too good with Joe Biden right now because he can fall in the petard of bad policy.
He can fall in the petard of the border invasion.
He can fall in the petard of inflation, war, everything else.
All these things that the Democrats are doing with their policy, it wouldn't matter if it was Joe Biden or anybody.
All these things the Democrats are doing with their policy can fall on Joe Biden and his legacy can be destroyed.
And they can blame him.
And then they can say, oh, the sympathy vote.
Oh, our poor Joe come out and vote with Joe Biden now, the dead guy, or whatever it is.
Or, oh, you know, he fought till the bitter end, but now his dementia is so bad.
So let's get to the big anvil.
And that is the special counsel Robert Herz report.
This report is damaging to Joe Biden, not in the way we'd like it to be, not in the way it should be, but in a very subtle way.
The Democrats can't protect Biden from this for the next eight months.
Cannot be done.
Either Joe Biden consciously committed crimes or Joe Biden is too mentally incompetent to be the president of the United States.
There's no other way to slice this.
There's no other way to slice this pie.
It's one of those two options.
And that's what the special counsel's report has basically done is put Joe Biden in between that rock and hard place.
And his response coming out with that press conference didn't help him either.
But in all fairness, that barely even registered on the Richter scale because nobody was watching, unfortunately.
But when you look at that and then you ask yourself, who's really running the White House?
Who's really running the Democrat Party?
It's not Joe Biden.
Is it Barack Obama?
And when you look at the media and when you look at the Department of Justice and when you look at the DHS, it's all Obama acolytes.
It's all Barack Obama friends and loyalists.
So Barack Obama could be in the process of sabotaging Joe Biden very subtly right before our very eyes right now.
That could be going on.
And that might make sense why Merritt Garland doesn't listen to Joe Biden.
That might make sense why the special counsel report put Biden in between the rock and the hard place.
And that might be why the media is building up now to basically throw Joe Biden, the baby out with the bathwater.
Now, in the interim, they can still commit all the atrocities that the Democrats would like to commit against this country, the wars, the economic collapse, everything else, the open border.
They can still all of this, do all of this in Biden's name and not necessarily hurt their party.
And then they can bring in the replacement and even go against the Biden policy and say, well, Biden did fail at the border or Biden did fail economically or Biden did fail here or did fail there.
And so now all of a sudden they've juxtaposed themselves against the failed Biden.
So now they can create their own bad guy that they can juxtapose themselves against.
And Obama is likely running the whole show.
And I think that that's why you don't charge Joe Biden, but you put him in between the rock and the hard place.
And you say, okay, Joe, here's the deal.
We got you red-handed committing these crimes, but we let you off on the technicality that you're not mentally fit for trial.
Because we can destroy you in the media or we can destroy you in the justice system.
What are you going to do, Joe?
you're going to have a health problem and you're going to step aside and you're going to endorse the next candidate.
I think that that is their likely play here.
Nobody's going to believe 80 million votes for Joe Biden this time around.
Nobody.
And I don't think they can pull off the amount of voter fraud that they did in 2020 without some massive event happening where they can rewrite the election rules or even cancel an election.
But there is no doubt that the Democrats have a Joe Biden problem.
Now, RFK Jr. did an interview tonight with Jesse Waters.
And of course, he's talking about the Democrats wanting to get rid of Joe Biden as well.
But see, RFK Jr. dropped out of the rigged Democrat primaries because he knows that he would have no shot.
and so now he's running as an independent obviously he didn't have the democrat party supporting him Otherwise, he would have stayed in the race for the same reason that Nikki Haley is still in the race, which is I'm still in the race in case Donald Trump goes to jail.
I'm still in the race in case Donald Trump is removed from the ballot.
I'm still in the race in case, for whatever reason, Trump can't run.
So that's Nikki Haley's reason.
That's Nikki Haley's reason for still being on the ticket.
Now, again, RFK Jr. could have ran that same style, that same mentality, but he knew the Democrats wouldn't support him.
Nikki Haley's clearly still getting support from the Republican Party.
And I think the whole reason why Ronna McDaniel did not leave her post, we'll see what happens by the end of this week.
But if Ronna McDaniel doesn't leave, I'll even give her till the end of February.
I'll give her till the end of February.
I'll give them both till the end of February.
But if Ronna McDaniel does not leave her post or Nikki Haley does not drop out before the end of February, then the Republican Party is planning on Donald Trump not being on the ballot or Donald Trump not being able to run in November.
Otherwise, there would be no reason.
There would be no reason why they wouldn't throw their full support behind Donald Trump.
And there'd be no reason for Nikki Haley to continue running.
And there'd be no reason for Ronna McDaniel, Ronna Romney McDaniel, to stay as the head of the RNC because nobody else really in the Republican Party wants Rana around or Haley around.
Everybody is behind Trump except those establishment types.
So Ronna Romney McDaniel is hanging on because they're the anti-Trump wing.
Nikki Haley is hanging on because she's the anti-Trump wing.
And they have till the end of February to remove themselves from the equation or that's basically on the same plan as the Democrats, which is Trump is not going to get our nomination.
We're going to replace him at the end of the day.
Or when the Democrats do finally get Trump off the ballot, they'll celebrate.
They'll bring in Haley.
So I would say that's what's going on on both sides of the aisle right now.
But I wonder, I wonder what you think about it all.
I wonder what you think about it all.
So I'm going to open up the phone lines, but I got to give a shout out to my friends at Fafo Farms here in Texas.
Now, look, this is for people.
I'm sorry.
This is for people in the central Texas area.
But go see if you can get some fresh milk and eggs and butter and chicken from my friends at Fafo Farms and the Schroyer Protein special, two gallons raw milk, whole chicken, 18 eggs, and a big old thing, a nice, tasty, delicious butter.
So FafoFarms TX.com.
But unfortunately, although they do have soaps, They do have soaps, so you actually can order soaps from our friends at Fafo Farms, but they cannot give you any of the raw food because you're not allowed to cross state lines.
But if you're somewhere in the central Texas area, let me tell you, they got it going on, and it's veteran-owned.
But they got all kinds of things, too.
Like I said, you can order the soap anywhere in the country.
Let them know I sent you, but man, their chicken is fantastic.
This here water drainage system we're in is going to the Mississippi, Cairo, Mississippi, or Cairo, Illinois, you know, Camp Defiance, a confluence of the Ohio and the Mississippi.
You got the Missouri River coming in just north of St. Louis, and all that stuff they're spraying on these fields out here.
And I know a friend of mine's older brother was running these GMO crops on these experimental fields and all that stuff's going.
Can you imagine being Baton Rouge or New Orleans?
One of them cancer clusters.
You could actually do a show after show.
And hey, Mike Adams is great.
NATO News.
Hey, I promote all you guys.
I love you.
What you're doing.
Because, hey, I took myself out over that vaccine when they already did it partially, but then when they come after kid, little kids six months old, I went, boy, I just blew it.
I had a theory on what they're going to do at the whole election thing is that they might actually say that Trump actually won and then say that he can't run for a third term.
Okay, that's out of the box.
But I'm a little starstruck here at the moment, man.
Hey, so, yeah, so it kind of goes back to what you're saying with, you know, you could kind of ask these people all kind of different things, and they wouldn't know kind of what they're, what they're even, you know, choosing to ban these days.
Kind of makes me think, you know, we kind of used to joke around about this back in the day.
You know, the population kind of, you know, how they're, they don't seem to be very, very astute these days, you could say.
You know, these people are now taking positions of power.
You know, these people are now running the government.
They're running certain aspects of our government.
They don't know basics of what it even takes to be a citizen of the country anymore.
You could go out there and ask them just basics about the Constitution, about the Bill of Rights, you name it.
I think we're seeing the whole thing come to fruition here.
These people are taking positions of power.
It was a joke back in the day when you kind of see these people and you see them and you're like, well, I don't remember being kind of that out of it when I was, you know, do you think Kareem Jean Pierre?
I mean, I'm not a math scholar myself, but I don't think she could do two plus two, to be honest with you, you know, with what she's putting out these days.
But yeah, I got to give it to Deucey, man.
Doocy's the only one in there that gives that gives any sort of any sort of grief to her, to be honest with you.
And I can't actually understand why they keep calling on him.
That's pretty late, I think, in terms of, you know, but they are the only people that could realistically do a last-minute change right then and then get the troops behind, you know, the Democrat, you know, the Democrat Party behind whoever the candidate is.
You know, you just see a lot of the stuff.
You see Fox even talking about Big Mike now.
You see, you see a lot of the mainstream even jogging, you know, just some big mic feelers out there.
So there's something to it, something to it for sure.
I think it's honestly, who else did they have, though?
I mean, they have put all this time into Biden, right?
All of this, all the eggs in the Biden basket, but nobody wants him to run.
75% of the people think he's a joke.
I mean, even of their own party.
So there just is nobody that they have put any momentum in besides Gavin.
So who could they even run if they needed to, right?
So like, who is it besides Michelle?
Is what I say.
You know, who is the person that they could last minute just rally everybody behind on the Democrat side besides Michelle Obama is what I'm looking at more so than the other way around.
And they run the country into the ground, you know, and the economy goes to heck and the supply chain goes down.
Well, I'm a meat eater, okay?
And I've heard Alex talk about having to string up his neighbors and eat them.
But I was wondering if you had a special diet or excuse me, special menu, a way to prepare bodies that may be injected with the spike protein to nullify it.
Yeah, but Michelle is, I mean, she's popular in her own right.
She's got the book deals.
She's got her Netflix deals.
She's got more money than she ever needs.
She's got the fancy properties.
She's got the security.
I mean, what does she need?
What good does she have in running?
If anything, she's smart enough to know it would hurt her popularity.
unidentified
Well, I don't know.
You know, just looking at the way all this is going, I don't even know if it is something to do that would be like a personal aspiration as it as it would be more of maybe to complete a course of work of some kind, you know, with everything they have going on.
God knows.
Only God knows what's really going on.
But you know what I'm saying?
Like she could be like part of the plan, so to speak.
And I don't mean like some conspiracy theory plan QAnon thing or something.
I'm not trying to get into that.
But, you know, you obviously, whether their plans are poor, well put together or not, which could be debated, they have some planning going on behind the scenes.
So I don't know.
I don't really know if, I mean, I like Roger Stone too.
And like you said, if he wasn't saying it, I wouldn't give it a second thought.
The Democrats are in a lot more disarray than it would appear.
The Democrats are truly in disarray behind the scenes.
Do not doubt that.
Now, they may have a plan, but there is serious disarray right now.
Nobody takes the Biden administration seriously.
And I don't mean that from our perspective.
I mean that from internally.
Nobody wants to work for Joe Biden.
Nobody wants to work for Kamala Harris.
They're very unpopular, even inside the Democrat Party circles.
So it's really a bad thing.
And so behind the scenes, somebody is trying to sabotage Joe Biden.
They want, there's no doubt, but it's still confusing because why would they be about to launch this massive campaign with Bill Clinton and Barack Obama and then do this massive fundraising push?
unidentified
Yeah.
Well, who do you think is going to, who do you think is going to be their front runner?
Yeah, I mean, I guess that's Biden's biggest challenge.
And maybe that's their bet.
I mean, maybe they're just thinking, all right, well, there's nothing we can do ourselves to really get him out of the way without hurting ourselves, hurting our cause.
So maybe nature can take its course.
Maybe the Democrats are betting on nature taking its course with Joe Biden.
unidentified
Right.
Yeah, this is true.
I agree.
I'm so glad that you got a prison.
I did pray for you while you were there.
And you really took that like a trooper.
I was praying that you wouldn't have to go.
I just have to say that, but you did.
And you just did so well with it.
I know it had to be very difficult, but God had his hand on you and here you are.
So I feel very thankful that, you know, everything's good with you.
And I just wanted to throw that in there.
But I guess it's going to be a wait and see what happens, you know, with what's coming up, you know.
So I just had to throw my two bits in on that one.
Well, my question could be: what leverage do they have over Michelle Obama?
Like, how do they leverage her into running if she doesn't want to run?
unidentified
Well, I mean, I imagine with her husband being president for eight years, there's probably quite a few things that they've maybe got on him to where, I mean, you know, the power of these people.
There were some rumors that Barack and Michelle were actually kind of on the outs.
You know, she's been traveling the world without Barack.
unidentified
Yeah, I have seen that.
So, in other words, you think that you don't think that basically they're going to force or coerce her into doing it, like regardless of whether she wants to or not?
I mean, I mean, I guess if we're both, if we're both just going off the off the most common denominator here, there has to be some sort of blackmail leverage that they have on Michelle.
unidentified
You know, I mean, it's got to be the biggest one would be what may or may not be within her pants.
Well, and, well, there's other, there's other tells, like, men's index fingers are longer than their pointer fingers.
Women's are not.
Men typically have their feet when they're standing out closer to like a 90-degree angle, where women's are either straighter or more bent in.
And then just the sheer size.
I mean, that's a powerful woman.
But there's other, you know, there's other women out there that are sizable.
I mean, you look at, you know, Serena Williams is a big woman.
unidentified
Dude, I was literally just going to say her because she's pretty massive too, but she's also, you know, we don't hear a lot about the Williams sisters anymore.
I'm pretty sure their dad was fully red-pilled.
Like, have you ever seen the interview where it's Serena with David Letterman, and she's talking about how Andy Murray would kick her ass in the straight sets because he's a guy?
Yeah, there was a segment and they were insinuating somehow that she could compete with men at tennis.
And she basically just laughed that notion out of the room.
But she did eventually actually compete against some no-name male tennis player who was like 800th ranked or something and she did lose.
And she said men's sports are different.
It's not even a fair comparison.
unidentified
Wow.
I didn't know that she actually ended up going against someone.
All right.
Well, that's encouraging.
If you don't think that, because I mean, a lot of times I just think they're going to do whatever we want or whatever they want, and we don't really have a choice about it.
And I was just thinking that's, you know, because you see all this coverage of Biden now, and it's really changed.
I mean, really, they're certainly giving him a lot more critical coverage than they once did.
No, Serena would mop the floor with Billie Jean King.
unidentified
I mean, I know, but I'm just saying, I'm not, well, you know, I'm not really at liberty to say because I don't really know a lot about female athletics, but I would say Serena Williams.
I think she's probably, I mean, maybe you'd look at some Olympic athletes, but still, I can't think of a female that's ever dominated a sport and been an athletic specimen like Serena.
I mean, she's like superwoman.
unidentified
She's definitely the best.
I might even send you a little comparison of Michelle and Serena's back.
Citizenship and Dual Positions00:15:30
unidentified
Because, I mean, I don't know.
I think Michelle got her.
I think Michelle got her in the back category, but we'll analyze.
Well, what I'm asking you to do is your on-the-street interview skill, use it from the armored vehicle if you still have it for safety.
And I need you to go and bullhorn Ken Paxton's office up on West 14th or 15th Street and make him come out and talk to you about Kamala Harris being a Jamaican citizen at birth and why he should file a written show.
Then call his office and see if you can get an appointment with him to discuss this issue about Kamala being ineligible to be president or vice president.
She's Jamaican at birth.
Her father was a Jamaican citizen under Jamaican international law that makes her a Jamaican citizen at birth, which means our 14th Amendment does not apply to her.
So she's not even a citizen here legally.
We have all mistaken her for a citizen and now we're racist if we bring it up.
So anyway, if you just bring it to Ken Paxton's attention, he can be the AG that brings it before the Supreme Court.
We need an attorney general to do the work for us.
We can't get a case.
We don't have standing to bring the case before the Supreme Court.
You have to have an AG do it under a public interest case.
Well, she could be president next week, and she's ineligible for both positions.
I'm saying the sooner we do this, the better.
And besides, it would be very viral video gold for you to just do this on the street interview with people at the Attorney General's office area.
There's an awful lot of lawyers there that work in that part of Austin.
They could all talk to you on the street about why do you believe that she's ineligible.
And most of them would get it wrong because academia has mistrained lawyers to think the 14th Amendment made people citizens at birth, which makes them natural-born citizens.
Just because you're a citizen at birth doesn't make you a natural-born citizen.
Naturality comes from your parents.
It's a blood issue.
If your citizen parents are naturalized citizens and you are born to them, then you get to be a natural born citizen.
But if they become citizens after your birth, like Vivek and Nikki, you're just a citizen here, but you're not a natural born citizen, even though you were born inside the country.
But everybody's been brainwashed to think I'm wrong on this topic.
You have to do an awful lot of research to find out how they're lying to us and how many legal cases were adjudicated in places like Indiana to make you believe that I'm incorrect on this matter.
I don't think that only natural-born citizens should serve in any form of a federal position ever.
So, or just get rid of the federal government.
We need to do one of those two things: either completely abolish the entire federal government as we know it, or you should not be allowed in the federal government unless you're a naturally born citizen.
I don't think people realize it's not, it's not just you know, everybody wants to bring up the Israel issue, and that's fair, but it's not just Israel, uh, you know, multi-staters or dual citizenship or Jewish individuals.
There's people from all over the world that are not born in this country, and they get into positions of federal power and they don't even understand our culture, they don't understand our heritage, and they're destroying our country.
So, I would say, okay, so no dual citizenship at all in I mean, maybe even in Congress, but definitely no dual city.
Let me let's put it like this: any unelected position, any unelected position cannot have dual citizenship and has to be either a naturally born American citizen or lived here for 50 years, is what you're saying.
Well, it depends what your definition of naturally born is, but I'm just saying native born is a category in the 14th Amendment, which says it's when you're when you have parents that aren't citizens, but you're born here, you're a citizen automatically.
But but that's through naturalization by birthplace.
People don't seem to understand this.
Not all people that are naturalized here have to take a test, so people think, oh, naturalization only applies to people that are born outside the country and then have to come in and want to be a citizen, and then they have to issue.
I agree, but it's certainly not that hard for people to understand that there's a difference between someone that's merely born here to non-citizens and people that are reared by two parents that are citizens.
If both of your parents are citizens, which I assume they are, they had a greater influence over your allegiance to the United States than you would have if one of your citizens, one of your parents were a European.
You'd have grown up in a cultural setting that was different because you'd have a bifurcated allegiance.
You'd have two allegiances, one to Europe and one to the United States.
And your parents might go through a divorce or something, and one of them has more influence over you than the other.
So I'm just saying the founders recognized this was going to be a problem.
So they set a high standard for the presidency saying, if both of your parents aren't citizens, which at the time that they wrote that rule, 99% of all people born at that time were born to two citizens.
It wasn't very restrictive or exclusive at that time, but they knew over time when we had more and more people coming to the country that we would have children born to people that only had one parent that was a citizen and another one that was an immigrant.
So they said, well, we don't want that to be the people that get to be president.
So they set a standard high enough that only purebred American citizens would be eligible.
And that was well understood until about 240 years went by.
And then suddenly, you know, people started showing up on the scene like Ted Cruz.
And people said, well, his mother was a citizen.
I know he was born in Canada, but we're still going to call him a natural born citizen anyway.
Yeah, now I even remember that case when Ted Cruz was running as well.
Yeah, it's a very wonky thing.
And I think that's why people don't like to talk about it or discuss it.
I think really, though, it's probably an issue that needs to be sat down and had and it needs to be sorted out and some precedents need to be set, but they're already on the books is my understanding.
Well, I mean, people will tell you this has already been litigated and it has, but no court has jurisdiction over this except for the Supreme Court.
And I keep saying the Supreme Court refuses to hear the cases because they say they don't have standing to change the current misinterpretation that's been provided by the cases in the lower courts.
There's a case in Indiana, which is an appeals court case called Ankeny, where people were challenging whether the governor of Indiana could allow Barack Obama to be on the ballot.
And they thought the governor was derelict in his duties by allowing Barack Obama to be on the ballot, but they didn't win the case because the judge basically said, we're going to ignore the wording of the Wong Kim Ark ruling, which said that Wong Kim Ark, even though he was born here as a Chinese man, he was still a citizen.
So you couldn't deny him citizenship, even though there was an act against the Chinese being citizens here.
But I'm just saying it gets down in the weeds and wonkish, but it's a very simple concept that three words are supposed to define who can be president, natural-born citizen.
If I call you a natural born genius, who am I complimenting?
They just have to be citizens at the time of your birth.
So two naturalized citizens from Kenya can come here and get together and form a natural born citizen.
They aren't natural born citizens.
They're naturalized.
So this isn't a requirement that your birth, your bloodline go all the way back to the founding.
People always act like that.
This is what Robert Barnes was saying with Viva Fry in their episode 169 when they got together and were discussing this issue.
And Barnes got it completely wrong, what my position is.
So he was saying, so it's basically accepted by everybody in the legal community that natural born just means citizen at birth.
And everybody believes that because there's a bias, there's a confirmation bias built into almost all of us that we're all equal if we're all citizens at birth.
And that's just not true.
There are natural citizens who have only one U.S. citizen parent.
There are natural born citizens who have two USA citizen parents.
And there are native born citizens who have zero U.S. citizen parents, but they were born here, like Nikki or Vivek.
And they've been convinced because they were citizens at birth, which is actually, that's a fake idea in the first place.
Nobody's a citizen at birth.
It's all retroactive.
The government doesn't even know you exist at birth.
The paperwork has to be on file before you become a citizen.
But somebody's going to have to file an affidavit at some point that they're your parents and you're a citizen by blood or by birth.
But again, people always want to talk about whether you're a citizen at birth or by birth.
And I'm saying Jamaica has a claim on Kamala.
See, some countries like Switzerland or Jamaica, they don't care where you're born.
If your parents are one of them, then you are one of them by blood.
And this is the strange case with Kamala that nobody ever talks about the fact that her father was still a Jamaican citizen, never wanted to become a U.S. citizen, much like Vivek's father never wanted to become a U.S. citizen.
So I would say we would agree then that you have to be, I'm getting the terminology here wrong.
I apologize, but you have to be a naturally born citizen to be president of the United States.
And I would say, but I would also say you have to be, I think you should be a naturally born citizen to serve in any position in the federal government that is not elected.
Well, under those, if you didn't have, if you were not allowed dual citizenship to be in unelected appointed positions, then 90% of the Biden administration would be gone tomorrow.
See, I would argue that it does matter because this is what we're seeing with all these people on the Israeli issue.
They see all these dual citizenship Jews in unelected positions.
And so you sit here and say, well, look, the president is a Catholic or he claims to be Catholic.
The president is a Catholic.
All these presidents are Catholics or Christians.
But then they look at the administration and it's all Jews.
It's all dual citizens from Israel.
And so they say, see, Israel controls everything.
So it's like you eliminate that immediately.
You eliminate this ability, whether you believe this theory of thought or not.
You eliminate this threat for a foreign country to come into an administration unelected and control the president of the United States, control policy, control the ability to, I mean, run or pursue political targets.
And so, I mean, to me, it needs to be done.
Really, it's kind of, I would say it's an existential issue.
But, you know, almost the entire public health sector is full of all these dual citizen Jews that are polluting the public health sector with all this vaccine propaganda.
And it's, you know, somehow they're not giving the shots to themselves or their own family or their staffs at the CDC.
You know, Walensky never answered the question ever about how many of her staff of 35,000 employees were vaccinated.
You know, it's just galling what they get away with.
But Majorkis is what, a naturalized citizen here.
When his parents came from Cuba and naturalized, he got naturalized by their naturalization.
He didn't have to take a test.
He just became a naturalized citizen.
And that's part of the problem that these people are sort of infiltrating our system.
And we don't draw the line anywhere because we don't recognize the threat or see that there's a problem.
We've been all miseducated.
So at the moment, if two illegals sneak into the country and they give birth to a child, you're thinking that anchor baby is somehow a natural born citizen when it's an alien invader.
You can't really hold it against the kid, but you don't have to make him eligible to be president.
You can say, all right, well, you get to be a probationary citizen if your parents live right while they're here and don't get you in trouble.
Because essentially, it seems harsh, but we're just sort of.
You know, for whatever reason, I'm kind of, it's not that I support anchor babies because I would say that even if you come here to have a kid, that doesn't protect you.
If you're an illegal immigrant and you come here and you have a kid, part of me says the kid's an American.
I'm not going to lie.
Part of me says, nope, that kid's born here.
That's an American.
Because what else would the kid be?
But the parents are still illegal immigrants, and that doesn't protect them.
So they can still be deported.
They can still be arrested.
And then they can decide, are you going to take your kid home with you?
Or are you going to leave your kid here in a foster home or whatever?
But I'm kind of, I might be in the minority in our political wing here, but I think if the kid's born here, it's an American citizen.
But of course, the child doesn't really become a full-fledged citizen until it reaches the age of 18.
And I think in that timeframe, it can petition wherever its parents were from and say, I'd like to be a citizen back in Guatemala or Mexico or wherever they came from.
And they probably would be accepted by their home country, even though they didn't, where they weren't born there.
But we've all been sort of sold on this notion that location of birth is more important than who your parents are.
And that's why we've sort of fallen into this trap where we've got all kinds of people running and everybody acts like, well, they wouldn't get to run if they weren't eligible.
And I'm going, that's circular logic being used there that they know they're getting away with the fact that the courts won't make a ruling in this issue.
They set up obstacles to anybody challenging this mindset that we have that being a natural born citizen doesn't matter anymore.
They just figured they could get away with amending Article II by just all agreeing that it doesn't mean what it means.
And it's working.
We've all been so indoctrinated to believe that born in the USA is all that matters that nobody even vets these people anymore.
Yeah, there's a number of journalists that have basically said that if we look into Obama's history, there's all kinds of things that are suspect.
But if people found out later in life that he was on paper, not a natural born citizen, but in reality was one, then they knew they had a sort of a Trojan horse to attack the natural born citizen standard because people would say, well, you're just a racist for saying that he's not eligible.
He was born to an American citizen mother.
And the argument there is, well, if he was born in Kenya, his mother was too young at the time to convey natural citizenship to him.
And the Kenyan was a British subject, so he'd be British.
And that's if you believe that Obama Sr. was the father biologically.
There's lots of evidence that that's just not the case.
I mean, if you look at a picture of Frank Marshall Davis and Barack Obama side by side, you go, wow, he does look, he's got exactly the same upper lip.
He's got the same sort of marks on his face.
He's got the light complexion.
There's enormous similarity between Frank Marshall Davis.
Do you really, you know, I understand where you're coming from.
Believe me, I get it.
And in fact, I do.
I do.
And in fact, and in fact, there may have even been a point in my life when I first will say took the red pill where I didn't want to trust anybody either.
Nobody.
But do you really want to live your life like that?
Do you really want to live your life where nobody can be trusted and there's never going to be a good guy?
There's never going to be anybody organic ever.
Do you really want to live your life like that?
unidentified
Well, we have to understand, Owen, like I just said, it's been four years.
And the only reason why you would is because you're in a state of mind where you refuse to trust anybody.
unidentified
Well, can I explain myself?
Go ahead.
We've been under like exuberant amount of torture, like psychological, financial, warfare, this invasion.
And I get it.
We wanted to talk about this upcoming, you know, election, but how can we even talk about this upcoming election when you were just incarcerated for saying the past election was rigged?
So how can we move on and think of what's going to happen in the coming months when we can't even all get on the same page that 2020 was stolen from us and that Donald Trump should be our president right now?
And I feel like America is held hostage and we are being invaded for what reason?
Like, I don't understand why if there are so many of us and we know that we are an army ourselves, you know, with our Second Amendment rights, why are we not doing anything?
Why are we the bad guys when we want to react and defend ourselves?
All of a sudden, we're cornered as terrorists or anti-Semites.
Look, the fight for freedom was not always built for everybody.
It's always been that way.
Only 3% of the original colonists decided they wanted to fight for freedom.
And so even then, when it seems so obvious to us now in history, of course you would fight against the British and King George to create America the greatest country in the world.
But it wasn't even so obvious back then.
So it's not, it's not for everybody.
Some people intellectually can't even see it or understand it.
And then some people don't have the content of character to stand up and do what's right.
unidentified
Well, I'm sick of this shit and I'm ready to fight.
And I pray that the rest of us, this 3% or however many there are of us, like what more can we take?
What are we waiting for?
Like enough has happened.
Enough people are dying.
Children are suffering.
Like all of this shit, it's sickening.
This is not the life God intended for us to live, Owen.
We should be loving each other and bartering and getting back to our roots and being grounded and appreciating this earth that was created.
We, like you said, are occupied by this evil, satanic corrosion that is just destroying everything that God gave us.
You're working with Alex because I don't like the way he treats some of his guests and how he cuts them off and doesn't let him say certain things and the way he just treated David Ike.
Like I'm not saying it's you, Owen.
I'm just saying you're associated with that.
I just hope you want that.
And Harrison has expressed himself too that he's allowed to say what he wants.
Like Alex has said, like, don't bite your tongue.
Like, say, say, you know, whatever it is you need to say.
I think the fine difference between somebody that would consider themselves a simulationist versus a creationalist, which is what I would consider myself.
I believe in God, is that we creationalists believe there is such a thing as a moral compass and a moral consciousness.
And therefore, there is some form of an afterlife where you're either rewarded or punished for the way you live your life.
Whereas a simulationist doesn't believe in anything spiritual or anything beyond the dimension that we are currently in or anything beyond your life on planet Earth.
And that's why they're obsessed with trying to live forever.
Whereas the creationist accepts death.
unidentified
Right.
And you know what I have to say to them?
The reason why they don't believe in anything after is because they don't believe in themselves.
Because in order to believe in God and have that connection with God, you have to believe in yourself first because God is within.
Just, you know, like, I know you being a sports and that.
I just kind of wanted to get your take on some of the, I don't know, woke messaging in the Super Bowl last night or, you know, just kind of your whole general take on that.
I hosted the Joan show and then I went to the gym.
And then after I after I got home, I had dinner.
I kind of had it on my TV, but I didn't have the volume on.
And then I went to, I went out and I watched the game with some friends.
So then I was just catching up with some friends and talking and I didn't really see or hear too much.
But I heard enough to realize, and this is how I put it, is that the Super Bowl went from a football game to a football game and a celebration of football to a football game with propaganda during the breaks to a propaganda event with football in between it.
And that's where the Super Bowl is now.
It's a propaganda event with football in between it.
It's for me as a football fan, it's my least favorite game of the year.
Quite frankly, it's the only week where I could care less if I even watch any football at all.
I prefer the regular season to anything.
The playoffs are nice, but I can't stand even the commercials during the playoffs.
So the Super Bowl is my least favorite game of the year.
Like I was just watching, you know, some highlights and replays of some of, you know, the more classic games that I remember, like from when I was a kid, like the first one that the Stillers were in when I was a kid in the 90s or when the Broncos were dominant there in the late 90s.
And it just seemed to me like it was just football and it was just fun, you know?
I think I talked about this a couple of weeks ago.
I went back and I watched the Rams Vikings game from Division Weekend 1999.
It might have been 2000, but you just nailed it.
It was football.
It was about football.
The only women that were anywhere near the field or the broadcast booth were the cheerleaders where they belong.
There were no sideline reporter women all caked up in makeup running around.
There were no female ball girls or water girls or coaches or referees.
It was a man's game meant for men, and it was football.
Now it's got diversity and equity and inclusion and women on the field.
I mean, I can't even imagine.
I mean, if you're making millions of dollars playing football, you're not going to complain.
But I mean, my God, if I'm in a football game and I got to turn around and there's a damn female referee or a damn woman trying to give me water, bag, bitch, get out of my way.
You know, and that's why for me, you know, honestly, like, it's just pretty much background noise to me anymore as to where like it used to be like, you know, I was hanging on every play.
And, you know, some people I know kind of like the sideline reporters or whatever because they think they're hot or whatever.
But for me, I mean, I go somewhere else to look at hot women.
I don't watch football for that.
You know what I mean?
I just want to see football.
And, no, that was just pretty much all I wanted to do was get your take on that.
Well, I really liked the new drops of merchandise we have at Owensroyer.store.
I'm glad you do too.
The Clown World might be my favorite.
I haven't looked at the numbers.
I think it might be top selling, but I'll just go ahead and let you know that we've already got, so this is basically going to be the winter, spring clown world shirt.
We're going to have a new one for summer.
So there will be a second clown world shirt for summer, too.