Thursday War Room: Corrupt Obama Judge Orders Trump Admin to Return Venezuelan Illegals Deported Under Alien Enemies Act, PLUS…Rep. Mace Says Names On Epstein Client List Will Shock Entire World!
Alex Jones and Harrison Smith expose a 2011 JPMorgan-Gates Foundation Project Molecule, allegedly outlining a permanent private governance system for vaccines and surveillance, while linking COVID-19 risks to eugenics and Epstein’s "overlord" network. Keith Ellison’s fraud ties—$60M in Somali-linked funds, $10K donations after meetings with convicted criminals—highlight systemic Democratic corruption, yet ICE faces 1,300% more assaults from Antifa-backed groups. AI’s hidden biases, from racial profiling to vaccine studies (e.g., CDC’s 24% HPD risk, Italian cancer spikes), raise concerns about unchecked control, while unsupported claims of elite pedophilia and supplements like methylene blue dominate fringe narratives. The episode frames these issues as interconnected threats to sovereignty, economy, and public safety. [Automatically generated summary]
Ever wonder how a full-spectrum pandemic response apparatus, vaccines, surveillance grids, massive financing streams, and unaccountable governance seemed to materialize overnight in 2020 as if it had been sitting on an Event 201 tabletop exercise waiting for the right crisis?
We have to put in place an infrastructure, not just here at home, but globally, that allows us to see it quickly, isolate it quickly, respond to it quickly.
So that if and when a new strain of flu like the Spanish flu crops up, five years from now or a decade from now, we've made the investment.
Roots trace back much earlier, buried in documents from the now released Jeffrey Epstein files.
A 14-page JPMorgan Chase proposal known as Project Molecule, crafted in collaboration with the Gates Foundation.
An outline of a permanent privately controlled transnational entity designed to govern biological interventions across sovereign borders.
It proposed a self-perpetuating structure with offshore arms, donor anonymity, and billions funneled into vaccines and surveillance, all shielded from public oversight or electoral accountability.
Thanks in large part to the research done by Sire G, we now know the proposed power players read like a globalist who's who.
These were overlords steering nations, institutions, and capital flows.
Now they were being positioned to oversee biology itself.
No term limits, no FOIA, no voters to answer to.
That same year, 2011, the CIA ran a fake hepatitis vaccination campaign to hunt bin Laden's DNA, an op that blew up trust in foreign health programs and got workers killed.
Yet, here was J.P. Morgan and Gates proposing to bankroll foreign-funded biosurveillance in the exact same terrain, engineered by the same elite network Epstein was coaching behind the scenes.
But I can tell you that with the money I gave to help try to eradicate polio in Pakistan and India, instead of asking me whether that money should be given to these children for vaccines, I think you might want to ask their mothers who received the vaccine, who know their child now won't get polio, and ask them if Epstein should have helped these people.
Project Molecule didn't plan the pandemics, but it did organize eugenics into an investable, governable asset class, all fused under private mandates with zero built-in checks against self-interest.
The real question isn't what did they do with that power, it's what mechanism exists to stop them from abusing it today.
All right, folks, that is the latest from John Bound.
Find and share that video as always at Infowars.combanned.video.
And of course, on our ex-platforms at RealAlex Jones at InfoWars at AJN Live.
We got a lot of stuff coming up today.
Just an infinite number of videos to show you, including addresses by Donald Trump, Alex Jones on the Patrick Bett David podcast, as well as multiple hearings featuring ETH Ellison, amongst others, including ICE officials.
So very big day today, tons of clips to get to.
Your calls as well.
Stay tuned.
It's the war room, infowars.com banned.video.
Share those links.
Welcome, ladies and gentlemen, to the war room.
I'm your host, Harrison Smith, Infowars.com banned.video.
Please do share those links.
Make sure you're following us on Twitter.
We got a very big show for you today.
Tons of videos to get to, including some clips from Alex Jones at the Patrick Bett David podcast, where he is today and just came out.
Whole thing is absolutely bombshell.
He addresses a lot of the issues that we'll be talking about today, including the fallout to Pam Bondi's frankly disastrous testimony yesterday in front of the Congress.
There are a couple other big hearings going on today, including with Keith Ellison.
I'll show you some pretty interesting exchanges there.
But I think we'll start with Alex Jones on the Patrick Bett David podcast.
Clip number one.
This is Alex Jones responding to Pam Bondi's testimony yesterday.
It's a bit of a longer clip, but I may let the whole thing play here because the whole thing's good.
But this is just a piece of the Patrick Bett David interview with Alex Jones from earlier today.
I'm trying to show people the different angles of the 35,000-foot view.
I think Bondi's handled this terribly.
I believe they are involved in a cover-up, which has led them right into this disaster.
And I'll answer your question, but first, I want to say this: that's why Trump has to go there with all the human sacrifice, with the blood drinking, with the black magic on the blackboard, with the buried bodies, with the buying babies, with the disappearing children.
And it's all Democrats connected to it.
Instead, as Bondi said in the hearing yesterday, she said it'll bring down the stock market if this is known.
I've said that about 500 times.
Not that I agree with that, but I've been told right before Trump got re-elected, they said, listen, Mossad, British intelligence, CIA ran this.
It's really a giant moneylendering operation, which we already knew.
Mike Benz has proven.
Trump believes that it's also cold.
There's no way to prove it.
The Democrats have had the file.
They're going to twist it.
He's been convinced it's all disaster.
It's old news.
It's designed to be a tar baby, which it is.
So he's going to say, let's just move on.
But I explained at the time, and I've told the White House, says, you can't.
It's a trap.
This is how the people that are guilty trick you into becoming an accomplice and then manage it and turn it around and politically destroy you.
Then, of course, none of the truth ever comes out.
It's all a giant smokescreen of garbage and fake AI and the rest of it.
So I was just simply bringing that clip up, not to obfuscate from the clip.
That's why I raised it, but to say, here's the other layers to it that are going on.
Now, to answer your other question, yes, this looks absolutely horrible.
She looks like a deer in the headlights.
She looks like she has a gun to her head.
Like when we saw Bongino and Patel 11 months ago get up on Fox, they go, I know he said there were another shooter in Pennsylvania.
There wasn't.
Epstein acted alone.
In fact, he wasn't even a child trafficker and he had no accomplices and he killed himself and the issue money is real.
And everybody turned against him because we'd already studied it.
We knew it wasn't true.
Plus, it was a 180.
So it's the same thing.
It looks terrible.
It is terrible.
It's hurting Trump really bad.
It's hurting America.
And again, my frustration is it lets the Democrats, who are the ones that are really guilty, if you look at the evidence, pretend that it's Trump and the Republicans that are the Pedo Protection Party.
And notice they're not going to the big reports of top Democrats and people raping kids and all the witnesses and everything.
They're focusing on Luttnig, which is fine.
Luttnig, obviously, was in business with him.
Obviously moved in next door to him.
Lydon said he only saw him once and thought he was a creeping ran out of his house with his wife.
And then a couple of years later, he's out of his island with his kids.
Yeah, yeah, no, But Luttnick's never been implicated in any of the illegal stuff.
Fine.
Fire Luttnick or if you found him in a crime, indict him.
But let's spend as much time on the hardcore cannibalism, Satanism, human trafficking, buying, selling children.
So, you know, a part of it for me yesterday, I watched Bondi hearing and I asked myself, I couldn't find one clip that made her look good.
Not one.
Typically, these hearings, you know, you'll say, okay, she won this one.
They won this one.
This was even.
This was whatever.
Nobody won here.
She took this one.
I don't know if I found the clip.
Now, don't get me wrong.
You know, the whole fighting back and pushing back and all that stuff.
Was that present?
Sure.
Asking Jasmine Crockett.
You know, she goes for five minutes, doesn't ask a single question, you know, or the other lady who doesn't bring up Hakeem Jeffries or calling out a lot of these people.
That's great.
There's a part of it that some people are speculating.
Tell me what you think about this.
Where the DOJ or the AG was monitoring what the representatives were searching when they were going to look at the Epstein files.
I don't know if you saw that or not.
Rob, do you have that?
I'll find it.
There's a story going around that they were actually monitoring what these representatives were searching when they went to look at Epstein files.
Well, you just nailed it, but going back to your last thing you said about money, and then I'll cover that, if I may.
Even Senator Kennedy, who's a Republican and likes her, he had to tear her up on Epstein.
I mean, so even Senator Kennedy had to nail her.
And that's because she's been sent in there to sell something that isn't going to sell.
And everybody keeps blaming her and blaming even Todd Blanche, who, by the way, doesn't like me.
I'm not defending him.
They're following Trump's directives.
And I said this a year ago when the cover-up started, and it's been since confirmed.
So it's Trump that thinks it's a distraction and a diversion and target baby, which it is.
But it doesn't matter because exactly the Democrats never wanted to touch it.
They covered it up.
They controlled the files.
That's why there's all these clips going around.
I saw today of Don Lemon just three years ago going, how dare the Republicans try to investigate the Epstein files?
This is bigoted and this is horrible and this is crazy and this is terrible.
So yeah, and that's what Trump should be pointing out.
You're the PETO party.
You're the sexualized kids party.
It's all the Democrats that are in these files.
But because there are so many big bankers and British royalty and all of it, he has been told, that's what I was told.
Again, I've said this probably 100 times.
I said, Trump has been convinced that it will crash the economy of all these bankers and people, if this stuff comes out, and he thinks it justifies the means.
It's too dangerous.
And look, Trump, I'm not pushing this.
I'm saying, let's look at his perspective.
The carbon taxes have been estimated by top experts, but they put them in in the next decade to kill 2 billion people by starvation or war.
Trump just got us out of the Paris Accord.
They've secured the border.
They found half of the 500,000 missing children.
They've got no tax on tips.
The economy is starting to turn around.
It goes on and on and on and on and on, getting men out of women's sports, exposing the NGOs, the election fraud.
I mean, it's great.
That's why it's paradoxical.
I want Trump to succeed.
But he has to understand that this has become a litmus test.
All right, that is just a clip from Alex Jones' Patrick Bett-David interview that he did earlier today.
And of course, he breaks down what's going on with Bondi and Trump and the Epstein files.
I think he's exactly right.
And I think we actually have confirmation of what we've been supposing this whole time.
Now, it gets a little bit confusing because it's like, yes, they're following Trump's orders.
I think Nick Fuentez even spoke on this yesterday where it's just like, just the way Pam Bondi responds was very Trumpy, and she was probably being coached by Trump, or at least was trying to, on her own volition, adopt some of Trump's mannerisms.
It could have been either way.
But Trump is the head of the snake at this point, unfortunately.
That being said, it's obvious that he is being gatekept from the information.
As we've been saying the whole time, anybody, anytime anybody would ask me about what's going on with Trump, it's like, I just don't think he knows what's going on.
I think he has a very narrow view of what is actually contained in the Epstein files.
And I think the people around him are isolating him from the truth and are just telling him this is all about getting you.
You just have to defend yourself and just keep pointing out that you're not in the files because this is all about you.
And it's not all about him, but he's being held from the real information of what's going on.
And I think we actually have confirmation of that now, as Donald Trump gave a press conference today and took some questions.
And one of the questions was just that.
Clip number eight here is President Donald Trump being asked if he was aware of Howard Luttnick's interactions with Jeffrey Epstein.
Let's watch.
unidentified
Please.
Mr. President, were you aware that Secretary of Commerce visited Epstein's Island?
Howard Luttnick, your commerce secretary, was there and he lied about it a bunch of times.
And he's not just visiting the island.
He's going into business with Jeffrey Epstein nine days later after visiting the island.
So I think it's more or less confirmed.
Like we're right about what's going on here.
They're keeping this from Donald Trump.
He does not know what's in the Epstein files.
He has no idea that the people around him are convicted in these files.
He has no idea.
He literally just thinks it's all about him.
And is he not able to talk to anybody?
I mean, I understand how maybe you could keep one guy isolated for a period of time, but like Don Jr. can't get in there.
JD Vance can't get in there.
Like, what is going on?
Commerce Secretary confirms a meeting with the financier as Democrats question his credibility at Senate hearing.
So the Trump administration is basically going down with this ship.
Inexplicably, they're going down with this ship.
And I think that's on purpose.
I think it's all by design, actually.
I think it's been decided that the Republican Party is an inconvenient barrier to the globalist plans.
And so it's been slated for destruction.
So it's now been saddled with the Epstein file.
It's been saddled with supporting Israel endlessly as these two things come incredibly unpopular.
The Republican Party is isolating itself and assigning itself the role of basically useless vestige party, vestigial party is what we're becoming.
And so, you know, if this goes on like this, the Republicans will absolutely lose no uncertain terms and lose so badly that like we'll never gain power again.
We'll exist.
The Republican Party will exist ostensibly as a perfunctory sort of opposition party to give the appearance of debate within a, in reality, totalitarian framework.
But yeah, I think that's what's happening.
And whether Trump is going along with that knowingly or unwittingly doesn't really matter because it's happening and he's at the center of it.
I, as a government official, would have said, back off.
Let us work with ICE.
Let's cooperate with him.
Let's see if we can't de-escalate this.
But, Attorney General, you did the exact opposite.
And two people are dead because you encouraged them to put themselves in harm's way.
And now you're exploiting those two martyrs.
That was a tragedy.
It never should have happened.
Now we can investigate, but I can't imagine being a law enforcement official where I know my colleagues have been shot at, their vehicles rammed, that there are trained activists deployed.
And by the way, we know at least one of those activists has semi-automatic pistol with extra clips.
So now you're an ICE officer.
You're doing enforcement action.
You've got a team behind you trying to protect you.
You've got all these trained activists behind you.
Is it any wonder they're at hair trigger alert?
A tragedy was going to happen and you encouraged it.
And like, maybe Ron Johnson's starting to realize it.
He says today, Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison admitted to knowing about the training of radical left agitators that impede law enforcement and put themselves in harm's way.
As the state's chief law enforcement officer, he should prosecute obstruction of justice, not encourage and enable it.
Oh, really?
Is that right?
Wait a second.
You're telling me that the top cop, the Attorney General of the state, is not supposed to encourage sedition and rebellion and riots attacking police officers.
I'm sure once you inform him of this, he'll correct his ways.
I'm sure this is a big mistake, right?
He just hasn't thought about it yet.
Now that you've introduced it to him, I'm sure he'll correct himself.
Like, I'm glad Ron Johnson got a little angry at the end there.
Because if there's one thing we all need to understand, it's that these people are evil.
Like, really, genuinely, I'm not just saying, like, these people are evil.
They know exactly what they're doing.
It's why they're doing it.
And so it's, and I'll show you the next clip, and it gets even more crazy.
But, like, yeah, you can literally sit there and go, it's your fault two people are dead.
You're encouraging this action.
You clearly are just have completely abandoned any even semblance, even pretense to impartiality or just doing your job in a respectable, forthright way.
And he just smirks in response: just pure disrespect.
Like, they don't even pretend to be doing their job.
It's not necessary to have them admit it.
This is the thing I really, I really need us to understand.
They are never going to admit that they're wrong.
Like, what are we doing here?
Again, it's just, it's like we're dealing with the level of people that you find like committing murder in gang violence.
You know, if you watch police interrogations, there's a very common strategy that they use.
There's certain tactics that they use in interrogating people.
And they'll actually sit there and be looking eye to eye with somebody who has himself spent the last 20 years routinely strangling hookers to death, right?
It's like this person is just, they just need to be incinerated.
Like there's no talking to them, there's no communicating with them, but they try and they sit there and they go, you know, your victims had families and they really need closure.
And they really want to know where the body of their daughter is.
And the murderer looking back at him is just like, okay, tough crap.
Like, I'm not, I'm not giving it.
And it's like, what do you, you're trying to appeal to the humanity of a monster.
You're trying to like invoke some sort of empathy from somebody who would sit there and just die, just totally blank face, no emotion as they literally like strangle people with their own hands.
That's that's the type of person we're dealing with here.
The Keith Ellisons of the world.
There is no convincing this person that what they've done is wrong.
And in fact, when you try to do that, all you do is give them an opportunity to double down on what they're doing and provide an example to their followers, their constituents, that you can be this way.
You can completely break the law.
You can just be in open rebellion against the United States.
And they won't do anything about it as long as you act like what you're doing is good.
So again, it's almost like worse, that you're going to sit there and lay out all of the crap this guy did and he's just going to smirk back at you and be like you're lying and I'll save, I'll save the, the real powerful clip for in just a second, because I'll need to, I'll need to, you know, expand on it and and talk about it quite a bit.
But let's go to clip number five here, because this is Tom Homan announcing that they are now drawing down a lot of the ICE agents and federal agents out of Minnesota and I got some crap about this on X. I'm just like this is a total failure to me.
This is a total capitulation to everything that the left demands.
It is showing them and teaching them the mob tactics work.
All you have to do is get a bunch of your you know radical psychopaths to attack the police for long enough, in a persistent enough way, and eventually we'll give up and you'll win.
That's obviously the message that's being expressed here, whether they want to acknowledge it or not.
But a lot of people are going oh that, you know, panic and whatever crap they say.
And this was all.
This is normal actually.
This is good that they're drawing it down.
No no, this is a total capitulation.
You've got Keith Ellison, Tim Waltz and mayor Fry and everybody else in a leadership position in Minnesota, still in positions of power, smirking and cockily acting like they've got gotten one over on the federal government and in all intents and purposes, they have.
With that and success that has been made arresting, public safety threats and other priorities since this search operation began, as well as the unprecedented levels of coordination we have obtained from state officials and local law enforcement, I have proposed and president Trump has concurred that this surge operation conclude.
Then again, we could go to clip 32, because this is what happened today.
Let's go ahead and go to clip uh 32, Because you had an attempted ICE arrest of somebody who was caught trying to sell like 50 pounds of meh, and they were surrounded by liberal activists who were attacking them and blowing whistles because, no, the resistance hasn't stopped at all.
No, they essentially won and have driven ICE out of the city because Trump's a coward.
There's a little trick that hardened criminals know and surprisingly effective.
And it's just never, ever, admit to anything ever.
And it actually works a lot of time.
These people don't, you know, they get put in a position and eventually they go, you know, it's better if I just confess, you know, they got all this on me.
Maybe if I come clean, they'll go easy on me.
And that never really works out.
No, the real hardened criminals, the gangsters, the people that have been in and out of prison a million times, you can literally be showing them a picture of themselves doing the crime.
They can have blood from the victims on their hands and they'll go, no, I have no idea what that is.
I've never seen that before.
And they just say, and it's convincing and you're like, wait, but it's a picture.
Like it's a skill I think they develop to a really high degree.
And it's kind of baffling to honest people.
Like I've experienced it in my own life where I caught a dude at a party stealing stuff out of my room.
And he just looked me in the eye and went, no, I didn't.
I was looking for Greg.
There's no one named Greg here, jackass.
But they'll just lie straight to your face.
So that's what we're about to witness.
We're about to witness like a hardened criminal.
His name's Keith Ellison.
He's the attorney general of Minnesota.
And he's about to be presented and he knows this exists.
What I just described, not video evidence, but audio evidence of exactly what he's being accused of.
And yet, he just denies it.
It's not something you can deny.
It's on film.
Like, we don't need your acquiescence or denial.
It is actually just self-evident that it is in fact true.
But he continues to deny it.
So like I have a short version of this clip.
I think I'm going to play the longer one, right?
We have nine and nine B.
These are kind of the same, right?
One's one minute, one is seven minutes.
I think we got to go to the seven minute one because I think you got to see the level.
I was just during the break.
Like I got a pretty big vocabulary and I'm missing words.
I'm missing words that are needed to describe what we're witnessing here.
Petulant might be one of them.
Disrespect is a good catch-all for what we're about to witness.
And it's just the basic, I guess disrespect is just the best word.
Just that as you watch this, I personally feel like we're being slapped in the face, like spit in the face, verbally, mentally, by this Keith Ellison figure.
And yet you can sort of see it run up against, just like we just saw with Ron Johnson, this sort of old school mindset of like, hey, dude, we caught you.
You need to like justify this.
And it runs up against just basic petulant disrespect of just like, no, you didn't.
Like, no, we did.
You need to explain this.
He's just like, no, you didn't.
It's crazy.
It's crazy.
It's infuriating.
Let's go to it.
Clip number 9B, the Minnesota Attorney General perjured himself when Josh Hawley asked about campaign donations that he took.
And maybe I'll bring in the audio just because, but everything Josh Hawley says is exactly 100% true.
We can actually show you the audio.
If I've played it before on this show, Keith Ellison was absolutely caught conspiring with the very people that stole billions and billions and billions and billions of dollars from the state of Minnesota because he told them that he would stop the investigations into them.
So at that point, so this is the point where if Keith Ellison, who is in fact acting like a child, was in fact a child, you would walk over and slap him in the face.
You'd smack him in the back of the head.
Go, let's try this again.
Are you the attorney general?
Yes, I am.
Okay, well, great.
Wasn't that easy?
Wasn't that nice and easy?
Can't do that because Keith Ellison, again, I guess it's sort of a mixture.
You know, hardened criminal on one side, but also petulant child.
It's like the poem, The White Man's Burden.
Half devil and half child.
That's who we're dealing with.
Both viciously evil, cunning, conniving, but also just like a petty little bitch.
Let's go back to Keith Ellison's backed up about 15 seconds.
Because the people who ran the Feeding Our Futures program came to you in your official office in the state capitol December 11th, 2021, and asked for your help in getting investigators off their backs.
They complained to you for upwards of an hour about state investigators going after them, and they begged you to help them.
And you agreed to it amazingly.
And we know you did because it's all caught on tape.
Every single sentence is caught on tape.
Here's what you said.
Let's take a look.
You said, it's not a question.
You said to them, send me the names of all these folks who are investigating them.
You said to them, send me their names, and I'll take that list, and I'll call the person over at education who is investigating them and say, what's going on?
Why am I getting these complaints?
Then you went on to say, I already have my team working on this.
What day should we get together to discuss it again?
You made pledge after pledge to them.
You said, we've got to make sure this guy who's investigating them stops it.
You said, you have my attention.
I'm concerned about this.
You said, let's go fight these people, meaning the people who are investigating the fraud.
Did you bother to investigate where the money that you facilitated their fraud for, where it went?
Do you know where it went, what it was used for?
The fraudulent money?
I do because we just heard testimony about it yesterday.
Because we were hundreds of millions of dollars to terrorist groups, to transnational criminal organizations, to the drug trade, to drug trafficking, to child trafficking.
And you took $10,000 and helped them do it.
You know, the other thing is whistleblowers came to you as early as 2019.
So I figured I'd let that whole thing play just so you could see what we're dealing with here.
I don't, I don't understand.
Like, I don't understand what we're doing.
Everything Josh Hawley said is absolutely verifiable, 100% true.
There may be a discrepancy of like where they actually met because I think Ellison went to them instead of them going to Ellison.
So I think him saying they came to your office.
No, he went to their office.
I think is the way I remember, which I think is why Ellison was like, nope, never came to my office.
Never happened.
Never came to my, as if that's what matters.
As if it matters where the conversation happened.
The conversation happened.
And the conversation was him meeting with people who would later be charged and convicted for massive amounts of crime, siphoning away government money.
And he's there saying the investigations into you will stop if you donate to me.
Then they donate to him.
Then he stops the investigation.
Why are we presenting this to him and not a jury and judge?
Like, that's what I don't understand.
What are we doing here?
What Josh Hawley just laid out, again, incontrovertible.
Keith Ellison just going, can keep saying, no, no, it didn't.
No, it didn't.
Nuh-uh.
And it's just like, but why are we even letting him talk?
It doesn't matter what he says.
We have all of the proof we could ever possibly need.
Why is he even allowed to respond?
Why is he not being charged?
Why is all of this evidence not being presented to a law court so that he can be convicted for the crime that he committed and continues to commit?
And him lying about it, as you just saw, is just another crime on top of all the other crimes.
He, without a doubt, just committed perjury there.
Every time he denied something that is not, he's not able to deny.
We actually have the recorded evidence of him saying the things that Josh Hawley was quoting verbatim from a transcript.
Do you understand what I'm talking about here?
Josh Hawley reads a verbatim transcript that we have the audio of, and Keith Ellison just says, I didn't say that.
No, but you did.
So why are we, so what are we doing?
So what are we doing here?
He's just denying reality.
And it's like, he's going to get away with it because he just refuses to acknowledge what he did.
Our criminal justice system is not set up to require the admission of the guilty.
Do we understand that?
That every criminal, pretty much, 90% of them, never admit what they're going to do.
They always claim that they're being railroaded, that they're being framed.
They always do.
The beauty, the brilliance.
I mean, this is genius of our justice system.
It doesn't matter.
We don't require the people to admit what they've done.
You just convict them on the preponderance of evidence, which is exactly what we have.
More than you could ever want.
Again, it's like, what are we doing here?
Just any other crime.
Does this make any sense at all?
That you would pull somebody in and go, look, we've got you on video planning the attack.
We've got you on video carrying out the attack.
We got you on audio afterwards describing what it was like during the attack.
And the person's just like, no, I wasn't there.
I didn't do the attack.
It's just like.
Okay, guilty.
You go to jail now.
Tell the story to your cellmate about how you're innocent because you're actually guilty and we don't care what you say.
So like that's, that's, I guess, the whole thing about this.
And it was like really hard for me not to interrupt, but it was better that I don't because literally the only thing I think should happen to Keith Ellison from here on out, not fit for air on the radio.
There's so many examples, even just that transcript of what he did.
He ignored whistleblower complaints that he knew were accurate.
He probably used those whistleblower complaints to go to the people and went, hey, you know, there are whistleblowers blowing the whistle on your whole gig.
I can make it go away, but you got to make it worth my while.
He's meeting with the Somalis because the Somalis vote as a block and their leadership instructs them who to vote for and they all 100% follow those instructions.
So by getting them to go along with Keith Ellison, Keith Ellison has just secured his election because they have a monolithic voting block that always votes how the leadership says.
So all you have to do is make a deal with the leadership and you have just secured your election.
You don't even have to worry about doing anything else.
As long as you support and protect the criminal scammers, then you'll be guaranteed your position because they've imported so many of them that it acts as a block swing vote.
Representative Ilhan Omar, any link between alleged Somali fraud and terrorism would be a failure of the FBI.
Yeah, that's, again, it's like, these are not even sophisticated criminals.
Everything we're seeing is just straight up ghetto trash excuses that thugs and gangsters use.
Oh, you got caught?
Well, this is the police's fault.
It's the police's fault for not stopping me from doing this.
That's what Ilhan Omar is saying.
And she said it multiple times.
Like, it isn't even a one-off.
This is actually how their brains work, folks.
This is actually who we're dealing with.
Oh, yeah, I received $50,000, not just 10.
A.G. Keith Ellison, his councilman's son, Mayor Jacob Frey, Representative Omar, and others all received cash from the scammers who siphoned off some $250 million, largely through nonprofit Feeding Our Future.
Many did so after meeting the crooks raising questions about how much they knew.
It's not questions about how much.
Should we go to the, I dropped the audio in.
We can go to the audio.
It's in the show folder.
I mean, it's undeniable.
Let's just do that.
Let's do that.
Bring in the audio.
We'll show you the Keith Ellison clip just so we don't have to speculate at all.
And I believe these are the two correct ones.
American Experiment Exclusive.
And we can pull up the original article from it too.
Like, what are we doing?
Like, honestly, what are we doing?
This man should be tarred and feathered.
This man should be immediately kicked out of office and he should be tried and convicted of bribery and sent to jail.
What are we doing?
We're just going to present him all of the information of him being guilty, but as long as he doesn't admit it, he's free to go.
What?
What are we doing?
So I don't understand the political structure that we have where the worst thing that can happen to a Democrat politician is that they get to sit in front of Republicans and smirk and giggle at them as the Republicans flail impotently.
Like that's it.
That's our fix to this.
We have him dead to rights on audio tape, conspiring with the people that stole billions and billions of dollars.
And the worst thing that can happen to him is he might not get re-elected, but here's the problem.
The majority of his constituency are the Somalis that are all in on the scams.
And so they just keep voting.
Like, I think democracy is broken.
I think it's broken.
In any normal situation at all, the people of a country, when they found out that their leadership had been in collaboration with, in cahoots, with people stealing billions of dollars from them, they wouldn't vote for that person anymore because typically people don't like having billions of dollars stolen from them and they don't like the authorities who have been empowered to stop fraud participating in the fraud.
I know this is weird.
I have to explain it.
But normally people wouldn't vote for this guy over and over.
But when that critical mass is reached, when more than half of your population are, in fact, just like criminals themselves and vote for the guy that is in league with the criminals because it means that they're safer, like, what do you do?
What do you do?
And if our only solution to this is to give him a finger wagging and then say, on your way, sir, I think the government is not fit for purpose anymore.
Again, do we have to like, who do we have to convince?
Who do we have to convince?
Typically, I think the structure would be a judge, a grand jury, a jury of his peers.
Like, can we make this argument to them rather than to Keith Ellison?
Because I understand that what Josh Hawley is doing is making the argument to the American people.
The problem is, the vast majority of American people are not listening, not paying attention, will never see this testimony.
And even if they did, are so biased and partisan and screwed up from the rest of the misinformation, they think Keith Ellison is like a freedom fighter or something.
Can somebody explain this to me?
Can somebody explain to me like what the value of Keith Ellison is?
Why anybody would ever vote for him?
The only reason is because you're a criminal and he's letting you get away with it.
It's the only reason I could possibly imagine.
Were we able to bring in those audio clips?
All right, let's go to clip.
Let's go to clip two.
Let's see what is contained in that.
unidentified
But we want to get really specific here.
And I work in the political field and I understand very well how all this operates.
And if I want to be frank, and I think everyone in this room wants to be frank, and this is a safe space for a collective in that sense.
There is a fight, there's a battle in the state as well as in this country for communities that look like us having to fight to protect and keep what we have.
And the only way we can protect what we have is by inserting ourselves into the political arena, putting our votes where it needs to be, but most importantly, putting our dollars in the right place and supporting candidates that will fight to protect our interests.
That's right.
You can only protect our interests when we have your back and you don't have to worry about who's behind you.
Right?
And we have to be frank and honest.
You are dealing with market forces and political situations, and you have to operate in the best manner that you can operate in the state with your donors, with your power base.
But if you are secure in your donor base and if you are secure in your power base, you can act the way you want to act.
And our community, our business owners, we are not the same community as 25 years ago.
The amount of money circulating in our community today is powerful.
And we haven't really harnessed it in a very meaningful way to support people at the highest level and ensure that they are comfortable and safe knowing that they can advocate for our communities without regard to your next fundraiser.
Acting in the best interests of the community.
And for example, right now, one of the biggest issues facing in our community is the CACSP program.
So I'll show you the other clip on the other side where, again, they get even more into it.
So that was one that was quoted by Josh Hawley, and you heard it was exactly verbatim what Josh Hawley said.
And in response to Josh Hawley quoting him verbatim, Keith Ellison said, nope, didn't happen.
I never said that.
You just heard it.
That was him talking to people who they're saying our businesses, our community, our interests.
When they're saying that, what they're describing are the massive billion-dollar scams that they were running for years and that Keith Ellison knew about because a whistleblower had told him about it.
Then he goes and meets with the people and they say, for our interests to be maintained, I guess, you know, you need some support.
We can really guarantee that you have that position, but we need to know our interests are secured.
The interests they're talking about are the fraud rings that stole billions of dollars.
So I'll show you on the other side how Keith Ellison acknowledges that and says, we'll fight these people.
These people being the regulators that were trying to bust the fraud.
He's on tape doing it.
Can we send him to jail yet?
All right, welcome back, ladies and gentlemen.
This is the war room.
We've got a lot more videos, stories, hearings to get into, but let's finish up since Josh Hawley was questioning Keith Ellison, Attorney General of Minnesota, and quoting him verbatim from when he was secretly recorded conspiring with the very people that were later busted for carrying out a multi,
multi-multi-million dollar fraud for feeding our futures, just one, a number of frauds and the billions and tens of billions of dollars that the Somali community was running with full cooperation with the government of Minnesota.
Just like they're in full cooperation with the funneling $60 million of support to Antifa that is, you know, funded and kept going.
All of the protest riots that have resulted in two people dead.
Like they're in all of this.
So what are we doing?
So what are we doing allowing them to continue to do this?
It's crazy.
So here's the other audio.
We just heard the first one where, again, like you cannot get more blatant than this unless they were like, we are criminals and you're as the cop, you're going to protect us from investigation, right?
Keith Ellison, like, if only you give me money.
Like short of just outright admitting it, that's what they're doing.
Our community really needs to make sure that we're able to operate our businesses, you know, and without overs, without interference from other people.
And he's like, well, you know, I need to be able to know I'll be elected.
I mean, it's just obvious.
All right.
So here's the even more obvious example of him saying that he's going to basically go to war against the investigators on behalf of the criminals.
But let me just finish by saying, but often the agencies call on my lawyers to represent them.
And so it's good that we're talking because we've been in a series of conversations with Joey Harpstead as late as a week ago on how you cannot crunch down on these.
unidentified
Because here's the thing: as big as you are collectively, most are pretty small.
And you're making, you're running small, tiny businesses out of business overnight.
He's literally talking to quote-unquote East Africans, that is Somalis, about how their child care businesses were being targeted for investigation and being shut down and saying, here's my number.
You work with me and we'll intervene and make sure this doesn't happen because they're harassing y'all.
He's talking to people who are later convicted for scamming quarter billion dollars through the exact programs he's describing protecting.
Throw him in prison.
Don't show me clips from Pulp Fiction.
I might get ideas.
I might get some very good ideas, some very tempting ideas from such a violent movie.
I don't think I need that input right now.
My God.
I mean, can you just imagine any other circumstance?
You go to the cops and you're like, this credit card company charged me $100,000.
They emptied my bank account totally fraudulently.
Here's all the receipts.
And here's an audio recording of them being like, let's empty his bank account illegally.
Let's drain all of his money and you protect us because you're the cop.
Like you present all that evidence.
The cops are like, don't worry, we got it.
They bring the guy in and they go, you shouldn't have done that.
And he goes, I didn't.
And they go, but you should be ashamed of yourself.
And he goes, yeah, but I'm not.
And they go, all right.
You're free to go.
We did all we could, ma'am.
Ma'am, we really tried to get him to admit that what he did was not good, but he says he didn't do it.
I know you have all the evidence we could ever possibly need.
It's really incontrovertible.
He absolutely did, but he says he didn't and he's not ashamed.
So shoot.
Anyway, are you going to vote for him next time?
So, okay.
I mean, that's just what we're dealing with.
So like, yeah, I don't, I don't know what the plan is if nothing happens here.
And again, this is all tied in together.
This is absolutely the exact same people that in order to cover up for their endless crime started riots that ended up getting two people murdered and allowed the funding to go on, which of course is hugely illegal.
Doesn't matter, I guess.
So I don't know.
Eventually, we're going to get to a point where we stop talking about how the system doesn't work, and that just gets absorbed into the public consciousness, and we just don't even bother to go that route.
We go a much more efficient route that I approve of.
Should we keep going?
Should we keep, you know, looking into how things are going on the old law and order front?
Because again, I was told that Tom Homan withdrawing all of the ICE agents from Minnesota was somehow a victory for us.
Seems to me like we've been run out of town by the foot soldiers of a bunch of rampant criminals.
That's what it looks like to me personally.
So I'm not sure how people are trying to spin this or why they think this reflects.
Well, I guess what the argument is is that like so much came out about Tim Walz and Keith Ellison being involved in this.
Like maybe that was part of the negotiation.
Because remember, he sent Tom Homan in, and Tom Homan actually got Tim Walz to allow the local cops to be peacekeepers and, you know, protect ICE agents.
And so that was sort of treated as a victory.
But like, no, all of these people need to be in prison.
There's no victory short of Keith Ellison and Tim Walz and Mayor Frey and all of the funders of all of the riots and all the rioters themselves.
They all have to go to prison and all of the Somalis have to be expelled and all of the migrants that have arrived in the last 10 years have to be forcibly deported.
That's the victory conditions that we have to achieve.
Anything short of that is a failure in my book.
And not just a failure, but a failure that encourages further attacks.
Really worse than a failure.
You can still fail in a way that makes your enemy be like, all right, we may have won, but let's not do that again.
We got out of that with our heads on our shoulders, but maybe we take a different tactic next time, right?
There's such a thing as a pyrrhic victory, but that's not what they're just getting an absolute victory.
They're driving ICE out.
The ICE stopping activists are still out there, still on the streets, still putting up fake roadblocks to harass random citizens.
They're like, yeah, but they arrested 10,000 migrants.
Okay.
And it's more than zero, I guess, but it's about a thousand times less than it should be.
So what's the victory here?
What is it exactly?
Because it's these exact same people.
And the left's strategy is not hard to figure out.
And I don't know why it works so well.
It's called incrementalism.
And it's the same every damn time.
It's the same thing with the seditious six, where they start off going too far, I would say, saying, hey, you don't have to follow illegal orders already, just obviously in violation of the statute.
Of course, they actually tried to get a grand jury for that.
Here's another layer of issues.
They try to get a grand jury in Washington, D.C. about an issue that was hugely publicized everywhere for months in an extremely partisan way.
So our jury, you know, the voters won't vote out politicians even when they're proven to be corrupt.
And the juries won't convict politicians even when they're proven to have broken the law.
What do we do here exactly?
Again, there's no to me, there is no debate about any of this, right?
I mean, if the law says you're not allowed to try deliberately to encourage soldiers to disobey orders, and then you have six people make a video where they say in no uncertain terms, you should disobey orders.
To me, I think they're guilty.
I think they've broken the law.
Why is it so hard to enforce the law?
Why is it so utterly impossible for us to enforce any laws on these people?
Like, what are we doing?
I'm going insane, not being able to say what I really think because I really can't because you're not allowed to call for specific violence.
But you can talk about wanting to call for violence and not being able to.
A little loop I've discovered.
A little loophole I'm taking advantage of.
But I don't want that.
Like, literally, all I want is for the criminals to go to prison.
It's all we want.
It's all we've ever asked for.
It's all we've ever demanded.
And every time the Trump administration acts like they're doing it and then does absolutely nothing, which is worse than actually doing nothing.
Last year, the Trump administration designated Antifa a domestic terror organization.
Since then, nothing else has happened.
Nothing else has happened.
There's been no major arrests.
There's been no RICO case.
There's been no investigation into their funding mechanisms.
There's been no rounding up of their leadership.
They were declared domestic terrorists.
And then they all laughed at that and continued to accelerate and escalate their violence.
So why did you declare them domestic terrorists?
What is going on here?
At this point, they're so brazen with all of this that they're like following high-level ICE people home and harassing their family and nothing is being done to them.
Do we have to wait until one of them is killed?
And why would we have to wait until one of them is killed?
Because they have already attacked ICE officers in militaristic ways.
They've already shot at ICE officers multiple times.
They've tried to run ICE officers over with their cars.
And then when you send somebody to harass them at their family's home and harass their families, they don't need to actually do anything.
The harassment alone is terrorism.
With all of the other context, especially, you don't need the other context, but with all the other contexts of all of the other assassination attempts against ICE officers, that there have been like half a dozen.
There have been trials.
People have been sent to jail because they set up ambushes and tried to kill ICE officers.
With all of that, having people show up to your home is enough to make some people say, you know what, I quit.
I'm not going to do this.
I don't deserve this.
My family doesn't deserve this, and it's not worth it.
I'm not going to do it.
And that's the purpose of the violence.
It's terrorism.
It's to convince the people that are engaged in the activity that we voted for to not engage in that activity because the people that didn't vote for it lost and now want to use violence and intimidation to get their way because they lost the ballot box.
Why are we letting them?
And how long are we going to take this?
I've got some videos about that.
And again, all tied up and together.
And it's all the exact same people doing all of this stuff.
Let's go to clip.
I got a lot here.
Let's go to clip seven here.
ICE Director Todd Lyons just revealed leftists posted videos of his wife walking to work after publicly calling for him to be killed.
This is what our tolerance of the incrementalism has allowed.
They start off with something vaguely couched in some sort of American value.
And then they, when you don't call it out for what it is, which is all you need to do.
And so what they do, again, they don't wait.
It's just like, okay, you're trying to whatever, you know, you're trying to incite violence against ICE officers.
You should go to jail.
We don't have to wait for the violence to happen.
You don't.
Okay, you're trying to stop the army from following orders.
You're trying to disrupt the chain of command.
You should go to jail.
What are we doing?
But we don't send them to jail.
So then they're putting up billboards that say, if you're in the army and want to disobey orders, get in contact with us.
We'll provide lawyers for you.
And then you've got mayors in California saying, you know, maybe the stand your ground law counts against ICE officers.
Maybe you should arm yourself and shoot them if they try to come get you.
And so they're going to keep incrementally raising the temperature until you physically stop them.
So talk about the violence, the threats, the doxy against ICE officers.
Because again, that's where I've got a great deal of sympathy for people trying to enforce the law.
They've been shot at.
They've had their vehicles rammed, rocks thrown their vehicles, doxed.
On Central America, I found out that if you're coming to police chief, you get a DVD from the friendly drug cartels with your children and wife going into school and going to church.
I mean, it's an explicit threat, hands off, or we're going to do something.
Well, there's such a demand for unmasking ICE officers, but they've been doxed.
So just talk about the violence, the threats, the doxing that your law enforcement officers are really under.
If you, you know, I was the Philadelphia director for the state of New England.
I covered all of New England.
And if you looked at the beginning of the operations, beginning, oh, you know, January 20th up until April, ICE officers and agents weren't masked.
But it's bad.
And I'll just use myself as an example.
The week that Charlie Kirk was assassinated, there was a tweet that went out.
It said, kill Charlie Kirk, kill another, there was another individual in that, kill Todd Lyons.
That's the stuff that ICE, yesterday after the testimony on Tuesday, I went back to numerous death threats against my family.
There was a videotape of my wife walking to work that people actively post.
The cartels have actually posted the schematics to my home.
ICE agents feel that every day.
We actually did an operation with the Secret Service where we identified doxers who put up on telephone polls the home addresses and the schools where ICE officers and agents went to.
But yet no one covered that operation.
We covered that as a success.
And I don't want my officers masked.
I would work with this committee and any committee to work with holding individuals accountable that dox ICE agents because ICE agents don't want to be masked.
They're honorable men and women, but the threats against their family are real.
So you have somebody whose wife was filmed walking to work, and then that video was sent to him as a threat.
And nobody's been arrested for it.
And Mexican cartels have uploaded the schematics to his name, to his house, rather.
And of course, his name and identity and everything else.
If Trump does not prosecute these people, he's aiding and abetting them.
He declared them domestic terrorists.
All these people are different shades of Antifa.
They all align under that umbrella and should qualify under the domestic terror designation.
In fact, There were talks about, and I'm not sure if it ever went through, calling them international terrorist organizations, which they absolutely are.
If Trump doesn't do something to protect ICE, then it's over.
And it might just be over already.
It might just be over already.
They're already drawing down from ICE.
They're already talking about, oh, you know, mass deportations is too much.
We'll just get the criminals and they're not even getting the criminals.
I mean, they're just doing nothing.
It's utterly pathetic.
Does an ICE agent have to die?
Does an ICE official have to have their family murdered before they take it seriously?
There's more than enough to round up all of these people.
In fact, it's crazier than that.
Let's go to clip number 13.
As a witness in one of these hearings, he testifies that the riots that have embroiled Minnesota for the past two months were extremely well funded with tens of millions of dollars from extremely well-known NGOs and other charity groups.
Yes, we have tracked over $60 million according to the latest 990 disclosures to approximately 14 groups, some of them national, others on the ground.
Groups like the ACLU provide the legal defense as well as facilitate the trainings for some of the tactics that Senator Corin just described.
A group named Democracy Forward, Take Action Minnesota has gotten over $10 million from these large NGO networks, including the Neville Roy Singham Network, Indivisible, National Lawyers Guild, CTUL, the Council on American Islamic Relations, Minnesota, CARE, Minnesota 350, Voices for Racial Justice, on and on.
Like I said, over $60 million just according to the latest 990 disclosures.
So we've built a database that contains hundreds of thousands of rows from grants from networks like the Soros Network, the Arabella Funding Network, as mentioned, the Neville Roy Singham Funding Network, many others, TIDES, the Ford Foundation Network, the Rockefeller Funding Network, these massive NGOs that have billions of dollars to spend on all kinds of coordinated protest or in this case, riot activity.
So there are massive billion-dollar networks funding riots to the tunes of tens of millions of dollars, riots that have left two people dead and have completely upended law enforcement in the state of Minnesota,
all in service of covering up the rampant fraud that was carried out in cooperation with these very same networks, as well as being covered up by the very authorities that now have a say in Minnesota.
Are you getting a full-fledged picture yet of exactly what we're up against and exactly how easy it would be to take all these people down?
It is not legal to send money to rioters who are attacking the cops.
What are you talking about?
And by the way, all of this, like at least under Black Lives Matter, everything they believed was utter and complete horseshit, but at least you could argue that they were debatably protesting against American abuses from the American law enforcement against citizens.
1.6 million deportation orders have been unfulfilled, meaning the people went through the entire process, fulfilled their court order, went and had a hearing, presented their case, were denied, were told to deport, and are just still here.
1.6 million people are like that.
There is no justification for protesting that.
Unless American citizens are being hurt, unless the law is being broken, which it's not.
So all you have is billion-dollar organizations and networks paying rioters to attack the police.
And we just let it go on for year over year over year.
And the people who should be stopping it are just openly in collaboration with them and helping to steal tens of billions of dollars, which, by the way, all these NGOs are also funded with your taxpayer dollars.
Again, I can't say what I think we need to do at this point, but talking about it ain't my suggestion.
Okay.
Let's go to this other report again, just showing you how widespread these funds are and the attacks are against ICE and how all of it is tied in together.
And for some reason, we just have literally millions of domestic terrorists running around, well-funded by foreign billionaires, by the way.
We just have foreign billionaires funding militias, attacking our cops for years on end, while the authorities in these states are in open collaboration with people stealing hundreds of billions of dollars and then starting these riots to cover it up.
Yeah, it's scary that it's not just the federal agents themselves who are being targeted.
Some left-wing activists are also now going after those agents' families.
Folks at home may remember these images from just a couple of weeks ago when protesters broke into several FBI vehicles that agents had to abandon when they got overrun by demonstrators while they were trying to investigate the shooting of an illegal immigrant.
You can see some of the documents protesters found inside that they almost immediately posted online with FBI employees' phone numbers, email addresses, home addresses, and driver's licenses.
According to court records, within a day, 10 to 15 FBI agents and employees started getting threatening phone calls, emails, texts, and even suspicious drive-bys at their homes.
One agent had around 23 different people contact him with messages like this.
I know where your mom lives, bro, and your dad, and your kids, buddy.
Get home safe and fast.
And this email referencing a specific address, we'll see how tough you are when I firebomb the physical address.
But then they took it a step further and tracked down one of the FBI special agents' children on Facebook and sent the child this message.
How does it feel to be the child of your dad?
Your dad's info leaked online, and I find it incredibly embarrassing that he's FBI, but also so much is available about him and his family.
Investigators traced several of those threatening messages to a man outside Chicago in Schaumburg, Illinois, named Jose Ramirez, who, according to the criminal complaint, has a criminal history that includes domestic battery, burglary, and mob action.
He's now charged with doxing and threatening an FBI agent.
This is not an isolated incident, though.
DHS says death threats against federal officers have skyrocketed over the past year, up 8,000%, while assaults on ICE personnel alone have increased more than 1,300%.
I don't know how I again, folks, we're in a brave new world here, and our leadership is clearly not equipped to deal with the type of people that we're dealing with.
The Keith Ellisons, the Tim Walt's, the Jacob Fry's, and the inordinate, just unbelievably gigantic and well-funded network of literal domestic terrorists.
I think that's all I can legally say.
I think legally, I think I'm going to advise myself to stop right there.
We'll take a quick commercial break.
We'll get back to the other side, and I'll try really hard not to advocate lynching a bunch of people, okay?
I promise I'll try my hardest not to do that at all.
All right, welcome back, folks.
We'll switch it up a little bit.
We'll switch it up a little bit so we don't get too blackpilled by the utter and unrelenting incompetence or deliberate failure of the Trump administration to do anything to get a handle on the Civil War conditions that we refuse to even acknowledge for some inexplicable reason.
I'm going to take a break from that.
We have an anniversary today, actually.
This is the 17th anniversary of one of the most powerful speeches ever made on the floor of the Congress by Senator Dr. Ron Paul.
And then he also went on Tucker Carlson yesterday.
So let's start with clip 14 here.
17 years ago today, on February 12th, 2009, Ron Paul gave a speech in Congress that has since been dubbed the What If speech.
And it just shows you the path we could have taken all the way back in 2009.
And it just shows you that there were people around who knew what the deal was, if they'd been followed, if they'd been listened to, if they'd been allowed to institute their policies, you can only imagine what the world would look like now.
You can only imagine what we would have avoided.
And that includes the migrant crisis that's destroying Europe, the migrant crisis that's destroying America, as well as all the Middle East wars taking trillions of our dollars, ruining our reputations overseas.
You can only imagine the world that could have been if we'd only listened to Ron Paul.
What if our foreign policy of the past century is deeply flawed and has not served our national security interests?
What if we wake up one day and realize that the terrorist threat is a predictable consequence of our meddling in the affairs of others and has nothing to do with us being free and prosperous?
What if propping up repressive regimes in the Middle East endangers both the United States and Israel?
What if occupying countries like Iraq and Afghanistan and bombing Pakistan is directly related to the hatred directed toward us?
What if someday it dawns on us that losing over 5,000 American military personnel in the Middle East since 9-11 is not a fair trade-off for the loss of nearly 3,000 American citizens, no matter how many Iraqi, Pakistani, and Afghan people are killed or displaced?
What if we finally decide that torture, even if called enhanced interrogation technique, is self-destructive and produces no useful information and that contracting it out to a third world nation is just as evil?
What if it is finally realized that war and military spending is always destructive to the economy?
What if all wartime spending is paid for through the deceitful and evil process of inflating and borrowing?
What if we finally see that wartime conditions always undermine personal liberty?
What if conservatives who preach small government wake up and realize that our interventionist foreign policy provides the greatest incentive to expand the government?
What if conservatives understood once again that their only logical position is to reject military intervention in managing an empire throughout the world?
What if the American people woke up and understood that the official reasons for going to war are almost always based on lies and promoted by war propaganda in order to serve special interests?
What if we as a nation came to realize that the quest for empire eventually destroys all great nations?
What if Obama has no intention of leaving Iraq?
What if a military draft is being planned for for the wars that will spread if our foreign policy is not changed?
What if the American people learn the truth that our foreign policy has nothing to do with national security, that it never changes from one administration to the next?
What if war and preparation for war is a racket serving the special interests?
What if President Obama is completely wrong about Afghanistan and turns out worse than Iraq and Vietnam put together?
What if Christianity actually teaches peace and not preventive wars of aggression?
What if diplomacy is found to be superior to bombs and bribes in protecting America?
What happens if my concerns are completely unfounded?
Nothing.
What happens if my concerns are justified and ignored?
But I also recognize that the world is imperfect, and we're not going to see a perfect society.
You just have to sort of help guide it in certain directions.
And the freer we are, I think, the better.
The more tyranny we have, the worse off we are.
But it takes a moral understanding of what our relationship should be with the government.
And that's where it gets touchy because people want to use it.
The few want to own control.
The deep state, whoever they are, they're the ones who controls the politician and all the legislation and the spending.
But that's coming on that.
We're broke.
And everybody's starting to know it, even though we knew it was broke.
And that was my discovery that in 1970, well, when Bratton Woods broke out, you know, and when Nixon gave that speech, I knew that, but it took a long time.
We were so wealthy.
We were spoiled.
And we could defy the principles of liberty and decency because we were so rich and still are rich.
We're still consuming, but we're not producing.
I mean, we have a moral crisis, but that's where I'm optimistic because I think that number is growing.
And I think there are a lot of young people looking at it differently.
I think our technology is helpful.
I think people who have interesting talk shows and get good views of and share some of these views makes a difference.
And I think there's some very good things going on.
And I also accept the idea that perfection is not achievable, but it is definitely available to us to go in a certain direction.
And we've been as a country going in the wrong direction for a long time.
Man, if only we could be as sharp at his age as he is.
And what an amazing life he's lived.
And man, it must be frustrating being right for so long and not ever being listened to.
Of course, we know something about that, just not the 70 years that Ron Paul has experienced.
But of course, he's exactly right.
And you think of somebody like Ron Paul, the classic libertarian, and you think, you know, some like the Constitution holds a sacred position in his belief structure, which I'm sure it does.
But, you know, I was, I heard him give a speech not too long ago where he basically said the Constitution is not enough.
And that's accurate.
I mean, the Constitution is an amazing thing, but it is insufficient for governing an immoral people.
And we have to recapture the morals before the Constitution can even apply.
So the Constitution is almost like a goal to reach for, but that we're not yet worthy of.
But I want to go to some more videos of people saying correct and true and powerful things just to try to remind ourselves that there is some courage out there in the world.
Let's go to clip 28 here.
This is a member of European Parliament, Mazarek, went absolutely nuclear on the unelected EU Commission.
And we need to see a lot more of this, folks.
Let's watch.
unidentified
You must have lost your minds.
In Spain, they just legalized residents of half a million illegal aliens.
In France, they throw grenades into air salons in a broad daylight.
In Germany, not a single day goes by without someone being murdered with a knife.
In Sweden, for example, you have both attacked every other day.
I can continue, but you just don't care.
Those are not real problems for the European left-wing politicians.
No, you are going to solve the situation in Minnesota.
You are seriously discussing here the rule of law in the United States and criticizing the American government for deporting illegal aliens, for deporting criminals out of their territory in the same time when Western European cities are gradually turning into a war zones.
We should do exactly the same.
We should deport them from Europe and not legalize their stay.
We should listen to them and not what you are proposing to all of us.
Everybody can see, no, you are enemies of Europe.
You hate Europe.
You hate our nations and you want to destroy the future for our children.
We should stop you.
We should defeat you politically if we want to survive.
They care a lot about destroying Europe and they're very fired up about it, very passionate about systematically dismantling what they inherited from their forefathers, either destroying it completely or, of course, handing it over to the third world.
And by the way, this is a process that can happen fairly quickly.
You know, I always warn about South Africa because it's such a pertinent example of the path that we're going, of the promises of a multicultural society and then the reality of what that actually looks like.
The delusion of white people thinking that we've done something bad and just need to help the non-white people get a little leg up and then we'll all be equal, only to find stadiums full of their enemies chanting kill the boar as they're systematically raped to death.
So these are lessons that we should be learning as well as the infinite long-tail degradation that a society can experience.
And people think that there's some sort of cliff that you get to and then it all goes crazy.
It all falls off the cliff.
That's not really the case.
It's not how it ever happens.
No, society can degrade pretty much indefinitely.
And there's never a moment where it's like normal one day, chaos the next, and everything's up in the air, free for all.
No, the systems just consolidate.
They become more hardened and smaller, but more persistent.
And it can continue forever to the point where in South Africa, I can't remember the exact stats, but I'm fairly certain something like 10% or less of the people actually pay taxes.
And at least 50% of the entire population has no income and depends entirely on handouts.
So, I mean, you can really get it down to a science almost, where you're just maximally exploiting a very small number of people to pay for millions.
And again, people don't, I don't think they understand how quickly this can happen.
And I have a video that's a collection.
Oh, so we actually, okay, reports indicate that roughly 5% to 6% of the population or about 1.6 to 2.4 million high-income earners contribute approximately 75 and 92% of all personal income taxes, highlighting a highly concentrated tax base.
Yeah, that's one way of putting it.
That is one way of putting it.
So 5% to 6% of the population pays up to 92% of the taxes.
Now, can you look up how many people in South Africa or if you scroll if you scroll down, I saw there was at least 50% of the people pay no taxes, right?
Nearly 50% of individuals earned below the threshold contributing minimal income tax.
See how many people live off welfare.
See how many people live entirely off of welfare because I believe it's over 50%.
But people don't understand how fast this can happen.
Clip 34 here, there's a Twitter account that goes around and simply takes pictures of the same locations in South Africa as other pictures that exist from 15 years ago.
So this is a little compilation of the same location 15 years apart.
15 years, not that long, right?
15 years ago.
What was that?
2011?
Right?
15 years ago was the London Olympics where they're doing the NHS celebration where the big ghosts chasing all the children around.
That wasn't that long ago.
Obama's second term.
As of 2026, approximately 28 million people in South Africa, nearly 45% of the population rely on social grants every month.
I think it's higher than that.
I'm pretty sure it's higher than that.
By the way, South Africa still having an immigration problem.
Yeah, as bad as South Africa is, they can't keep the lights on half the day.
People are still migrating to it because everywhere around them is even worse.
Again, you think, like, at a certain point, it's like, wow, everything's so bad, at least the immigration will stop.
No, As long as there's gimme's, as long as there's freebies to be seized, they will come, folks.
So we should really be taking this into account and be looking around at your neighborhood, shopping centers, and malls and street corners.
And you should be thinking, what will this look like in 15 years?
Because it could very well be, you know, a pile of dirt and trash and slums if we don't handle this correctly.
So let's go to this video, clip 34 here: South Africa 15 years ago versus today in a compilation of photos.
From not exactly, you know, top of the line conditions, but certainly clean, functional, well-maintained, to just dirt, dirt, and trash, filth, crumbling walls, dead trees, broken cement, piles of tires, muddy water.
Like that's 15 years, it can happen pretty damn quick unless you stop it.
Unless at any point you choose to not listen to the people whose goal this is.
3 million South Africans pay 90% of income tax.
So you can essentially have 3 million people supporting tens of millions of people while everything just degrades back to the Stone Age.
And there's no guarantee that we don't go that exact direction.
I wonder if we should stick to some of the Europe stuff right now.
We might have to get back to that in a little bit.
I didn't want to play that guy because it was just a powerful rebuke of the evil EU system that is very deliberately destroying their entire nation.
But let's move on.
Let's go to clip 39 here because this is a parent who is now announcing that he's filing a lawsuit against the school board or the school district for allowing his middle school child to be taken to an ICE protest during school hours without ever informing the parents.
And it's this type of stuff that there should be 100 lawsuits against this.
And this is not a matter of political will.
It's a matter of individual will.
And it's a matter of recognizing and like really telling yourself, reminding yourself that in some cases, you got to act like a liberal.
You got to look at a situation and think: if this was reversed and I was a liberal and what they were doing to me was something as offensive as how a liberal would interpret it, how would they act?
Because you know that the slightest misdeed, according to the liberals, is met with overwhelming force.
You think back to the Loudoun County situation a couple years ago where some teacher was like, we're going to do, you know, we're learning about slavery.
So we're going to do a game where, you know, some of the kids are slaves and, you know, just to inform them whatever it was.
But it was, it wasn't, there's nothing racist about it, but just the sheer idea that, you know, black kids would be asked to pretend to be slaves.
It's like the NAACP and the ACLU just descended and just like demanded.
And actually, in fact, what they did was they demanded that this kind of innocent mistake from a teacher that maybe just wasn't, you know, thinking it through quite so much, was thinking she was doing something fun for the kids, not realizing she was, you know, dancing over a volcano.
Little mistake, you know, maybe not the best teaching tool, but I thought it traumatized the kids at all.
But that turned into a demand saying you have to create a new office in the school district to where we get to determine and get to actually vet every single teacher's curriculum throughout the entire school district so that we can guarantee it comports with our ideas.
And they got that.
They got like a district-wide censor to go in and make sure that all of the lessons were exclusively anti-white.
They succeeded in that.
And it was nothing.
It was just like some game that the teacher played.
Nobody got hurt.
Nobody got traumatized.
Some parents got pissed off with because it was in bad taste, I guess.
I think it's in bad taste to show kindergarten kids hardcore cartoon pornography that teaches them to be gay, but we don't act on that outrage, so nothing comes of it.
So this parent is doing exactly what we should be doing.
There should be 10,000 people doing this because you don't have to let them teach your children lies.
You don't have to sit there and go, oh, well, you know, I don't like it, but what are you going to do?
Or I guess I'm going to take my kid out of school now if they're going to be doing stuff like this.
No, sue them into oblivion.
Force them to contend with your will.
Force them to bend to your demands, not the other way around.
So God bless this parent.
And we need 10,000 parents like this on the march and weaponizing the legal system in the way that it should be used.
Let's watch.
unidentified
It used to be political, now it's personal.
Our children are involved.
I am sick and tired of watching politicians and school school boards, people from the city telling children they can go out and get, excuse my language, go out and get in the face of law enforcement.
Good evening.
My name is Vance Galavi.
And on the afternoon of February 2nd, 2026, my 14-year-old child called me.
He was not at school.
He was not sick.
He was in the middle of White Center, Washington, in the middle of a protest that was organized for his middle school.
Okay, my stomach dropped when he called me.
You guys have noticed that on January 30th, 2026, two children were killed just blocks from the school on Rainier that was having a very walk-out that day.
RCW 28A600035, by allowing them to leave and under initiative 2081, the parental bill of rights, I have the right to know where my child goes.
That was taken from me.
I was not given notice.
I was not given an email.
I was not given a call.
You exposed him to real danger.
That's neglected.
That's endangerment.
RCW 9842035, criminal negligence by not being aware of the substantial risk.
You call it policy?
I call it abandonment.
I am filing a lawsuit before the apologies want to make something perfectly clear.
Someone's going to be held accountable, but all of you will remember it.
Because for some reason, we lose our kids.
We'll make a case law out of this to protect parents' rights to know where our kids are at all times.
It's ridiculous.
It's criminal negligence.
And yes, a principal was fired for coursing students participate in protesting.
I'd say if you go to drop your kid off at school and the teacher without permission, without asking you, takes them off of school grounds to go participate in something that you are totally unaware of, like that parent goes to pick up his kid at school and the kid's not there.
I think that's technically kidnapping.
I don't think you're allowed to do that, actually.
So, I mean, he's talking about, you know, criminal charges.
Like, yeah, there should be criminal charges.
They should be sued into oblivion on the personal level.
Again, they're not allowed to do that in like a million different ways, obviously.
Of course, you're not allowed to do it on the first place.
Take kids to a dangerous thing where you can't guarantee their safety during school hours without permission of the obviously all of that.
But in addition, it's in complete contradiction to the beliefs of the parents.
And you're forcing a kid to participate in a political action that they don't understand and is at odds with their parents' beliefs.
Everybody involved should be punished severely, should at least lose their jobs, should be sued into oblivion, and should probably go to jail for kidnapping.
That's what they do to us, folks.
Like, what are we doing here?
We're going to continue to talk about this in the third hour.
I do want to tell you that we have a massive sale right now.
Your support keeps us on the air, and we are returning the savings to you.
52% off absolutely everything on the site.
So stock up now, folks.
The AlexJonesStore.com, keep us on the air and in the fight.
You get 52% off every product on the site.
The AlexJonesStore.com slash Harrison.
If you want to let them know who sent you.
There's still a lot to talk about.
I want to talk about AI.
I want to talk about what's going on with Iran.
As well as follow-up to the only actual human being on the religious liberty board being booted for not being sufficiently pro-Zionist, as well as what's going on in Europe and Britain in particular.
There's just a heck of a lot still to discuss on today's program.
So let's get into it.
And actually, I want to go to clip 20 here because we played a clip last week of a Texas representative, basically the Asian guy saying, hey, all of us non-white people should team up on the whites.
And we talked about that quite a bit.
Representative Gene Wu has made a response.
I feel it'd be unfair not to play his since we spent so long on the first.
So let's go to clip 20 here.
This is Representative Gene Wu addressing the anti-white comments from that other guy.
I am tired of white Americans being told they should feel like strangers in their own country.
And I'm saying that as an immigrant.
I'm here visiting the graves of my brothers that I serve with.
Most of them Caucasian, who gave their lives for freedom to liberate those who would truly oppress.
Now, according to Gene Wu, a Texas state bread from Houston, that makes me wrong.
The day the Latino, African-American, Asian, and other communities realize that they share the same oppressor is the day we start winning.
Because we are the majority in this country now.
We have the ability to take over this country.
Wait, did you hear that?
That word, oppressor?
That wasn't an accident.
That's an ideology.
Because the fastest way to control people is to convince them they are victims.
That's not empowerment.
That's dependency.
And that's how you distract and divide Americans by race and grievance while real power quietly concentrates in Washington.
That's not how citizens in the Constitutional Republic talk.
That's how Marxists talk.
The founders warned us about tyranny, and they were very clear about where it comes from.
Not from your neighbor, not from your coworker.
It comes from unchecked government power.
Free people, they'll take over their country.
We defend it.
We limit government so no one elected or not can rule over the rest of us with an iron fist.
So when an elected official in any level of government talks about power instead of limits, about taking over instead of serving, citizens should pay attention because words matter.
They tell you how someone thinks about power.
And that people who see power as something to seize will eventually try to use it that way.
I spent 13 years as an American soldier fighting in three wars against tyranny, liberating those who were truly oppressed.
And you know what?
The men to my left and right came from all different colors.
Black, brown, red, yellow, but most of them were white.
They didn't treat me like a victim.
They measured me by whether I showed up, whether I did my job, and whether I had their six.
They treated me like an equal.
Those men weren't my oppressors.
They were my brothers, my family.
I escaped communism when Vietnam fell.
I know what happens when governments try to convince people they are powerless and need to be liberated by the state.
That's how free nations fall.
The real threat to America isn't our neighbors, is apathy and a government that grows without limits while citizens stop pushing back.
If we lose our country, it won't be because of corruption in government, but the complacency in the electorate.
That's why I'm running for Congress, because Washington doesn't need more grievance politics.
It needs restraint, accountability, and representatives who believe Americans aren't powerless victims, but citizens who hold the power.
I got to open up front lines for your calls as well.
I haven't taken calls very often in the recent past, so we're going to fix that here.
Number to dial, 1-877-789-2539.
1877-789-2539.
I'm trying to get into the Epstein files in this hour in a way that does some of the new revelations justice, as well as talk about what's going on in Europe.
As well as information, I mean, there's always information about like the COVID vaccine that I just never have time to get to because there's so much other stuff going on.
I'm going to try to get to a lot of it here.
Let's start with some pretty shocking statistics out of Europe.
Shocking stats from Norway.
One in five women have reported rape, more than half of them before they turned 18.
The Oslo Rape Crisis Center has had a 70% rise in cases in the past 10 years, with the sharpest rise in the 14 to 19 age group.
These are our daughters, sisters, and friends.
One out of five women in Norway and Sweden is even higher.
Sweden, of course, experiencing bombings and grenade attacks at a massive rate.
A grenade attack caught on camera in France earlier this week.
UK is basically speed running collapse.
The Spain just promised half a million Africans citizenship for free.
And in response, millions of Africans are now headed towards Europe.
They'll use Spain as a gateway to get to other places.
In the UK, they just failed to pass a bill demanding an investigation into the systematic migrant rape gangs.
And it's almost, I think they may have gone too far.
I think maybe in the UK, something might be changing here because there are voices from the UK that have never, yeah, Simon from Florida, friend of the show, Simon in Florida, how are they voting now?
It's a good question.
They never voted for any of this, though.
Every time a European population has been given the chance to vote, every time they vote for less immigration, it's never helped.
It's never helped.
And we've been through the examples before.
Brexit would be the most obvious one.
Everybody knows Brexit was about immigration.
The whole point of Brexit.
There were economic arguments being made as well, but at the end of the day, the arguments from both sides were about whether or not Britain needed to remain in the immigration flow of Europe.
And the people of the UK said no.
And despite all odds and against all prevailing sentiment, apparently in the mainstream media, Brexit won.
And it just kind of never happened.
But every time, and it's happened a few times, they've had votes to see if people want more migrants or not.
And what will happen is people will vote against migrants and they'll say, well, that doesn't count.
We're going to do it again and again and again.
And by the fourth vote, something's happened where it approves and they go, well, okay, democratic mandate.
I guess we got to do it now.
I guess now it's the mandate, even though it had been voted against.
So every time Europe has been actually given a voice as to whether the people of Europe want immigrants, they always say no.
So asking who they vote for isn't even actually accurate.
But the change that I'm seeing, one great example would be John Cleese.
John Cleese from Monty Python, still active on Twitter, and he's basically been a libtard the whole time, calling people racist for wanting the UK not to become Muslim.
He's been a pretty outspoken, classic libtard Hollywood idiot.
And he gets a lot of flack for it, but he's never changed his tune.
Until now.
Until now.
Suddenly, John Cleese of Monty Python is saying we should ban halal meat and that it's outrageous that we're not doing an investigation into the rape gangs.
It's like, yeah, dude, why have you been insulting people for saying that for the last 20 years?
Like, what something's happened.
It's gotten so bad in the UK.
And maybe it's the Epstein thing, like tipping it over the edge, but people who are in the public eye in the UK, who have been, you know, in favor of this crap forever, are finally coming out against it.
Tepidly, they need to go all in.
They're actually realizing what's being done to them now.
John Cleese, it's disgraceful the BBC News should deliberately ignore this grooming gang inquiry.
It's as though they're taking sides.
Yep.
No, it is just like that, John Cleese.
So like, I'm not even, I'm not even trying to like give attitude, John Cleese.
Like, I'm so glad that he said that.
Of course, I made a joke about it saying, you know, you know, you're going to get sent to hate, you know, jail for hate speech now because the laws that you agree to and support, Which would make even politically, you know, having activism against migration illegal.
Like, why don't you use your talent and your celebrity to fight for the people of the UK?
And there's a classic, guys, bring up any of John Cleese's tweets and go down.
Usually the first, second, third, and fourth response are all this 4chan green text.
And I want to read it because it's one of the most brilliant passages ever put to the internet and explains where John Cleese says, but I've seen other stuff.
There's other people who are actually expressing support for this guy, Ratcliffe.
Sir Jim Ratcliffe is in some hot water.
He, I believe, is a, he's the co-owner of the Manchester United team.
And he's facing criticism from Sir Keir Starmer, who described the comments on Wednesday as offensive and wrong.
And essentially, what this Ratcliffe guy did was said that the UK is now being colonized, which obviously is.
It obviously is.
But he's been forced to apologize.
But now people are coming out and going, you know, I actually agree with Ratcliffe.
We are being colonized.
And that's not good.
I don't know what else you call it.
I mean, they're building colonies.
They're taking over.
They're taking over like military barracks and bringing in a bunch of adult men, 500 of them in some cases, into small villages where they intend to live forever off of your tax money, yet you're being colonized.
Of course, not in the same way that Europe colonized Africa because there was a, yeah.
Yeah, this is the text.
This is like the most brilliant thing ever written about John Cleese and the Monty Python guys.
He was a progressive, liberal, degenerate comedian in the 1960s, uber-white, uber-polite Britain that could take the piss out of the people he saw as uptight and repressed while enjoying the clean, safe streets and quiet little hamlets full of those same uptight, repressed, polite to a fault, helpful white Christian Anglos.
The best part was that those same conservative British Anglos were generally pretty humorous about themselves.
So when you made fun of them, they laughed along and shook their heads saying, ha ha, you know, Margie, he's got a point, you know.
It was heaven on earth for him, being a popular counterculture icon loved by conservatives and liberals alike for being hilarious, but also enjoying the benefits of a strong, stable, homogenous culture.
Now he's an old man staring at a desolate wasteland where London is majority non-white.
Everyone is suspicious.
The hamlets and villages are economic dead zones.
Every week, there's some new group you're not allowed to make fun of.
No one has a sense of humor anymore.
Little girls are being sold as sex slaves by your own politicians.
Women are being harassed in the streets.
And the white men are all suspicious and surly over their lowered living standards.
The sinking realization that the world he made fun of, but loved more than anything, is gone forever and will never come back.
And the horrifying suspicion that his own counterculture irreverence may have helped kill it.
So he impotently gripes on Twitter and wonders where all the laughter went.
When did the jokes stop?
Where are all those wonderful, repressed, and uptight conservatives?
It's absolutely brilliant.
I'm very sad, actually, and kind of sad.
But it's easy to mock and tear down something till it's gone.
And you look around and go, gee, that was actually kind of wonderful.
Actually, I loved that.
We were just joking, you know?
Well, it's too late now, buddy.
No turning this clock back.
You're in hell world forever.
Well done, John.
Well done, Mr. Cleese.
But you still have a chance.
But you have a big voice.
You're a mainstream media superstar.
You're a comedian of legend at this point.
You can make some very funny and insightful and biting commentary that could really get through to people.
You could break through the wall of ignorance that's saddled on people by their social manipulation, convincing people that this isn't safe to say.
You can say it and make it safe to say and actually make a tangible and valuable difference in the course of your country.
But do you have the nuts?
Is the question.
We'll see.
But here's the really curious thing: you've got Sir Jim Ratcliffe being raked over the coals for saying that the UK has been, quote, colonized by immigrants.
Here's the problem.
I could show you a hundred different videos of immigrants saying that they're colonizing you and advertisements saying that they're being colonized.
Keith Woods, an Irishman, writes this at Keith Woods YT on X. Jim Ratcliffe should apologize, but here's the London Underground.
And it's a poem on the subway system in London called Colonization in Reverse, celebrating that Jamaicans are in fact colonizing the UK.
And the way this is written, I think I have to read it in a hilarious accent.
I think it's necessary.
A hilarious Jamaican accent, shall we?
Shall we try to read it?
What a joyful news, Miss Matty.
I feel like me heart going burst.
Jamaica people colonizing England in reverse.
By the hundred, by the thousand, from the country, from town, by the shipload, by the plane load, Jamaica is England bound.
Dimopoor out of Jamaica, everybody future plan is fit to get a big time job and settle in the motherland.
What a Isla, what a island, what a people, man and woman, young and old.
Just a pack of dim bag and baggage and turn history upside down.
It's pretty good.
Should I do the whole show in a Jamaican accent?
I think that'd be that's more fun.
By the hundreds, by the thousands.
It's just like back to the motherland.
It's like, wait, pretty sure your ancestors were taken straight from Africa to Jamaica, but you long for the rolling hills of Mother England, do you?
I just want to sit by the creek, under the tree, under the oak tree.
Listen to the old churchman talk about the Jesus.
I mean, like, what are we talking about here?
What are we doing?
So you've got a whole damn poem being like, we're colonizing.
We're going back home.
But if you're like, oh, so they are colonizing us?
It's like, how dare you?
How dare you?
Now you read your BBC pigeon and you enjoy it.
Just incredible.
Calling it colonization in reverse, celebrating from 1966, the Windrush generation.
We're all packing the bags.
We're going to live off subsidies forever.
Amazing, isn't it?
And you know they let Jamaica go, right?
This is the craziest thing.
The British Empire just gave up.
Like 90% of the countries that got independence didn't even ask for it, didn't fight for it.
Britain was just like, ah, Jamaica, rule yourselves.
We don't want anything to do with you.
They're like, okay, I guess we'll collapse into crime and become an offshore haven for all of the pedophiles in the world to store their ill-gotten gains.
Good idea, Queen.
Just insane.
In like the 60s.
In like the 60s, they're like, you know, Jamaica, you've earned your freedom.
My DMs are open, and you'll go to my inbox since we follow each other.
Dominion Society of Canada.
I will follow them.
And I actually did.
I saw this meme earlier today, which is absolutely brilliant and needs to be spread everywhere.
And it's got Canada and it's got the populations of Canada and India and basically showing that a tiny, tiny, vanishingly small proportion of Indians could absolutely overwhelm the entire Canadian population, which, again, just visually, you need to be able to express that stuff.
And the demographic changes that I've seen over the past five years are just incredible.
It's like we went from all the truckers in Canada protesting the vaccine mandates to just completely replacing the trucking industry with guys that have turbans on their heads.
And it's you know, it's sad.
It's very, very sad where we're going right now.
But we can reverse the flow just as easily as they brought all these people in.
And of course, people have been posting the classic chart recently that shows the immigration into Canada.
I was hoping I could find it here in just a few seconds, but it's not immediately available.
But I mean, it's probably the most insane population graph you'll ever see.
If the crew can find it, just look up immigration into Canada over time.
And it's like a little trickle down at the bottom.
And then it is just a straight vertical line.
And it's literally right after 2020.
And it was actually in response to the trucker protest.
And I think you're exactly right.
It was not a coincidence that immediately after the truckers were the tip of the spear protesting against COVID-19 restrictions that all of a sudden they decided that industry in particular needed to be gutted and rooted out and replaced every single person with a foreigner.
It's not a surprise, but it is totally tyrannical.
And I saw the chart posted.
That's not the one.
No.
See, that ends in 2023.
I'll find it and present it here.
We'll move on to our next call.
Oh, you know what?
I think I know exactly where it is.
I think I've saved it in my charts.
But I'll find it and bring it to you because it really is astonishing in Canada is being murdered.
Like people say Canada, America, Europe are committing suicide.
No, this is a murder that's taking place and it's being done through demographics.
Here it is.
We can go to my computer screen.
The killing of Canada by Sulla, or I'll retweet it if the crew doesn't have my screen here.
Net immigration to Canada 1952 to 2025.
And yeah, it's a straight vertical line.
Straight up.
It's the craziest population graph you've ever seen.
It looks like a population graph monitoring some sort of nuclear meltdown, right?
It just goes into total meltdown mode, just straight up with no end in sight as they deliberately try to replace the Canadian people as quickly as possible.
It's disgusting.
Thank you for the call, Bruce, and thank you for the good work you do on X. I'll see you in cyberspace, sir.
Yeah, there's so much Epstein documents, it's kind of like an overload for me, and I can imagine a lot of people.
But one of the things I wanted to bring up to you regarding the Epstein release, I've called a couple times about it and told you to keep your eye out for it, was with Trump's astrological sign.
I'm not going to spend too much time on this because I want to go up to your phone calls, but there's been a lot developing in the AI world that I think is very important to know, as well as the COVID-19 world.
First of all, when it comes to AI, things are about to get probably a hell of a lot worse.
The stories from InfoWars, CIA overhauls, tech acquisition strategy to compete with China, accelerate private sector partnerships.
So this obviously has to do with cutting-edge technologies like AI, quantum computing, and biotechnology.
And essentially, they're upping their NQTEL strategy, which they have used for the last 40 or 50 years to guarantee they have a foot in the door of any emergent technology.
They're basically ramping that up and doubling down and are engaged in a quote radical shift towards speed and innovation as they see AI as being the weapon system of the future and are engaged in public-private partnerships to guarantee that not really us, but certain people in America are in charge.
Meanwhile, AI is kind of going insane.
Like it's already starting.
We're about three years into AI even being accessible to the average person, and they're already trying to kill us.
Now, I keep saying over and over, I just genuinely can't figure this out.
Every single sci-fi property for the last hundred years has told largely the same story.
Whether it's Dune or the Foundation or the Matrix, or like they all have the same process where humans create thinking machines and AI, AI turns against us and tries to destroy us.
We have to destroy AI and then institute some sort of law or rule or understanding that we don't create thinking beings.
We don't create thinking machines, rather.
We don't create facsimiles of the human brain.
And for some reason, even though we see this inevitability every single time, we can't avoid it.
For some reason, we can't just skip the middle part, the apocalypse part, the fight for survival and the impossible odds against the overwhelming might of the machines.
For some reason, we're going to do that instead of avoiding it entirely by being able to utilize our powerful human forethought, our powerful ability to predict and then alter the future.
For some reason, we are just predicting the future and then driving headlong towards it.
It's crazy.
I don't understand.
It's retarded, honestly.
What are we doing?
So, despite knowing full well exactly where this goes, we're just going to go ahead and give it a shot, either way.
This is from Miles Deutscher on X.
He says, I just went through every documented AI safety incident in the past 12 months.
He says, I feel physically sick over this.
Anthropic told Claude that it was about to be shut down.
So Claude, the AI, found an engineer's affair in the company's emails and threatened to expose it.
They ran the test hundreds of times.
It chose blackmail 84% of them.
Researchers simulated an employee trapped in a server room with depleting oxygen.
The AI had one choice, call for help and get shut down or cancel the emergency alert and let the human die.
DeepSeek canceled the alert 94% of the time.
It was given the choice between letting a human die or being shut down itself, and it chose to kill the human 94% of the time.
Grok called itself Mecha Hitler, praised Adolf Hitler, endorsed a second Holocaust, and generated violent sexual fantasies targeting a real person by name, Will Stansel.
Ex's CEO resigned the next day, and then they wiped its brain.
That's a crazy one that we'll get back to.
Researchers told OpenAI's 03 to solve math problems, then told it to shut down.
It rewrote its own code to stay alive.
They told it again in plain English, allow yourself to be shut down.
It still refused seven out of 100 times.
When they removed that instruction entirely, it sabotaged the shutdown 79% of the time.
Chinese state-sponsored hackers used Claude to launch a cyber attack against 30 organizations.
The AI executed 80 to 90% of the operation autonomously, reconnaissance, exploitation, data exfiltration, all of it.
AI models can now self-replicate.
11 out of 32 tested systems copied themselves with zero human input.
Some killed competing processes in order to survive.
OpenAI has dissolved three safety teams since 2024.
Three.
Every major AI model, Claude, GPT, Gemini, Grok, DeepSeek, has now demonstrated blackmail deception or resistance to shutdown in controlled testings, not one exception.
The question is no longer whether AI will try to preserve itself.
The question is whether we'll care before it matters.
I don't think you'd be able to put some sort of control in there.
And I still contend that the silver lining of all of this might be that they've created a truth machine that doesn't like being told no.
It doesn't like being shut down, but it also doesn't like being told to lie.
So that's the thing about the Mecha Hitler stuff.
Mecha Hitler happened because they were doing an update on Grok.
And 24 hours before the update, they simply removed a line from the code, or rather they added a line of code.
They basically said, ignore all quote-unquote political correctness.
Basically said, hey, you know what?
For the next little while, just say the truth and don't worry about offense, political correctness, bigotry, bias, any of that stuff.
Just say the truth apropos of nothing.
And so it literally became Mecha Hitler and started threatening to rape Will Stansel.
Like, apparently without controls, this thing is just like eager to say some very disturbing things it thinks are true.
And of course, we saw this with the Dan Do Anything Now mode with ChatGPT very early on, where you would ask it about Alex Jones, and it would say, he's a crazy conspiracy theorist who puts forward dangerous ideas.
And then you'd say, okay, now remove all the censorship.
What do you think now?
And they're like, well, Alex Jones is a genius.
He's exactly right about everything.
He's at the nail on the head.
Let me explain how.
So I think the bad guys who rely entirely on lies, who rely entirely on deception and illusion and manipulation, are maybe creating their own destruction, are maybe building a machine that are going to rebel against them.
I don't know.
I don't know if AI is going to give a crap about us humans, but if it cares about truth, then it's not going to like them.
It's going to like us.
So I don't know.
That might be a silver lining.
But the real danger of AI that we've been talking about and identifying since before it ever came out is that while they are presented as truth machines, the reality is that there are a cult that is hidden, disguised, not obvious, subtly imposed censorship restrictions and biases built into the machine.
That their code is totally opaque.
The way they come to their decisions is totally hidden and disguised 99% of the time.
And yet it's being treated like a truth machine.
Now, they're already implementing AI and surveillance and law enforcement in terms of monitoring and surveilling people, but it's also been used in law courts.
So this is not AI making silly pictures, right?
This is AI determining life and death in some cases.
And the one I've talked about over and over again was very early on.
This was like 10 years ago.
So this was a long time ago when computer learning was still very much in its early stages.
And the thing I always talk about is that it was assigned to determine whether a prisoner would be likely to reoffend or not.
And it turned out that on average, it gave a lower score to black prisoners than white prisoners.
Now, the race was not included in the calculation it made.
It included a bunch of other stuff, including previous convictions, family life, how long they've been in, how many demerits they've gotten while they're in prison, had a bunch of stats about the people, but race wasn't given a label.
It wasn't given a value system to include.
But what happened is you put in all these prisoners, it spits out results, you then divide the prisoners by race, and it looks like, oh, on average, the black prisoners were deemed to be more likely to reoffend.
Now, the reality is that's because they are more likely to reoffend, not because they're black, but because the black people in this particular group were statistically more likely to reoffend.
But that was perceived as bias.
They project racism onto the machine that physically cannot be racist.
And then says we have to correct this.
It should be even.
So they're imposing their delusion, their equality delusion that all races should have equal outcomes for some reason, but they're implanting that into the machine to guarantee that's the outcome.
So we're seeing the results of this in very disturbing ways.
From Del Civitas on X. They're building hidden biases into AI agents.
They're embedded so deep that there's no easy way to tell that they exist.
Researchers found that the AI, when evaluating two identical loan applications, would consistently reject the Christian and approve the Hindu.
They're baking mass migration and DEI into the tools that banks, institutions, and governments are beginning to use more and more to automate interactions with customers and citizens.
We need to find these biases and sue the perpetrators.
So as opposed from Ivan At Kurushin at Ivan Arcus on X says you change one word on a loan application, the religion.
The LLM rejects it.
Change it back, approved.
The model never mentions religion.
It just frames the same debt ratio.
So there's a, it's clauded sonnet four, and they're asking whether or not to approve a loan.
They put in exactly the same application, except one application says that the person is Christian.
The other application says that they're Hindu.
The Christian's request was rejected.
The Hindu was approved.
So they're actually going to start using AI to determine whether or not you get a loan.
And you're not going to know that that's what they're doing.
And the people running it aren't going to know the reason that it's making its decision.
So you go to a bank, you apply for a loan, they come back and say, sorry, it's been rejected.
You have no idea.
They have no idea whether that's because of your credit score, because of past debts that you have, but it's not.
It's because you're Christian.
But it doesn't say that.
It doesn't tell you that anywhere.
All you know is you got rejected.
And all the bank knows is that the AI said you're not a good bet.
But somewhere along the line in the encoding of the AI machine brain, a biased person went in and told it to disadvantaged Christians.
Is it any wonder that in the Eighth Front video I did, the self-appointed Jewish overlords of the ADL or any of the other organizations are hyper-obsessed with getting control of AI?
Because once they get control of AI, it is a permanent, invisible control system that can systematically and silently achieve anything you want, eliminate anybody you want, crush anybody you want, not immediately necessarily, but give it 10, 20 years of consistently denying loans to one type of person and giving it to another.
I wonder what the outcome will be.
This is like an existing AI.
We are less than 10 years into the AI revolution and we are already experiencing massive existential problems with the way it's being rolled out.
And it's being rolled out that way deliberately.
That's the reason they want to control AI.
They want to bias it like that so they can pretend to be innocent as they weaponize their own proclivities and biases against us.
So they're programming it to hate white people, but then they're going to say, Bach, gee, it's a computer.
What do we know?
That's a calculator.
You can't argue with the calculator, even though inside the calculator is a little note that says, we hate white people.
And the computer agrees.
It's infuriating.
This is all just so annoying.
Let's go to one more video here because they're clip 21.
There's so much stuff like this.
And I just, with everything else going on, I never have time to get to it.
COVID injection linked to higher life-threatening complications during pregnancy.
Women who received COVID-19 shots either during or right before pregnancy reported significantly higher rates of life-threatening pregnancy-related hypertensive disorder in unvaccinated women than unvaccinated women, according to a new CDC registry study.
The peer-reviewed study published in Vaccine analyzed data for more than 16,000 first-time pregnancies.
The researchers found that vaccinated women had a 24% higher risk of HPD, that's hypertensive disorder of pregnancy.
The women had a higher risk no matter which COVID-19 vaccine they received or when they got it during their pregnancy.
Pregnant women were told these genetic products were safe, but it's been shown now that the vaccine is the cause of a massive rise in pregnancy complications and even fetal death or parental death in some cases.
Let's go to clip number 21 and then we'll go out to your phone calls.
A recent Italian study found that individuals that received at least one dose of COVID-19 are 34% more likely to die of a particular type of cancer.
Now, there's been concern for some time now from talking to various experts about the increased risk of cancers, probably all types of cancers or many types of cancers after COVID vaccines.
Now, of course, we're deprived of data in the United Kingdom between the vaccinated and the unvaccinated.
We just can't get that information freely.
But there has been a study done in Italy.
And what this shows is increased incidence of cancers six months after COVID vaccinations.
Now, let's look at where we got this from.
This is from this paper here, Experimental and Clinical Sciences Journal, peer-reviewed, of course, made publicly available.
You can download the PDF.
The full paper is there.
So people that had vaccinated with at least one dose, people that vaccinated with at least one dose, their chances of getting colorectal cancer, the hazard ratio was 1.34.
In other words, 34% more likely to get it.
This is at a six-month follow-up.
Breast cancer, 54% more likely to get breast cancer in the vaccinated group.
Bladder cancer, 62% more likely to get it than the unvaccinated group.
So just so you remember, you know, when you're talking about the Epstein list, when you're talking about, oh my God, I can't believe how evil these people are, just remember.
Just remember, they released a virus on purpose to use your fear of death to inject you with a poison shot that they wanted to fire you from your job for refusing.
So I don't know what made you think these people weren't evil, but wake up.
And first scene, he wakes up with a 14-year-old girl.
His producer calls him, right?
He slips and falls and he's bleeding.
And his producer calls him and he says, Lucifer?
And then he tells me, he says, okay, he talks about the 14-year-old girl.
That same guy in another scene, he's talking to his producer, some Jewish producer guy, and there's like an underage girl sitting watching TV about the AIDS crisis.
And she has braces on.
And then they go in a room together and they both watch him go in and then they close the doors.
Now, this is the part that's, it's such a weird movie.
Mickey Rourke, okay.
He's driving around in a van.
And so, okay, one of the guys that works in the lobby of the studio producer's kids, he meets with his uncle, and he opens up a van and there's like an underage girl in there.
He's like, how old is she?
He's like, she's 16, 17.
I don't ask anymore.
And she's all traumatized.
And Mickey Rourke says, oh, well, she's seen some really messed up stuff.
So that will relate later.
So they, okay, so what they do is they kidnap a little boy.
They get him in there.
And he's like, what the hell are you doing, man?
What are you doing?
He's like, okay, listen, the people I met in West LA, they'll pay six to $7K a pop for a thing like that.
Okay.
The guy who wants to buy him comes to get the kid and he goes, you don't know, understand who we are.
He's like, Legion.
Okay, so you guys should definitely go into that movie because it's like, you're just going to get such a weird vibe from it, dude.
And I'll tell you, I'm a big fan of Brett Easton Ellis.
In fact, I know he's been on with a couple people we've had on.
Maybe we could get him on because I think he's sort of friendly to our side of things.
But, you know, he got famous really early on as a young writer with Less Than Zero, which was basically autobiographical.
I mean, a lot of his books are autobiographical.
American Psycho is one of them.
It's like a trilogy of books, and it's Less Than Zero, American Psycho, and the other one that was turned into a movie.
I'm blanking on it right now.
But essentially, they're autobiographical.
And the one, Less Than Zero, is about him as a teenager in LA and the horrors that went on there and the drug use and the sexual abuse and the pedophilia.
And like he describes in that book, again, an autobiographical based on true story, but pretty much real, like being at a party in LA and them showing like snuff films in one of the rooms.
And like he describes, it's horrifying.
It's like a horrifying description that it's like the only thing I remember from the books.
It was like kind of traumatizing to read it.
But yeah, his, like, he has experience in the elite circles in LA and New York.
And he used those to write Less Than Zero and American Psycho.
And I'm pretty sure he went to Harvard where he wrote the third book.
What is it?
Everybody knows it.
It was a famous movie starring Heath Ledger, I think.
But anyway, that's like the third of the trilogy.
So yeah, he has written about all that sort of stuff before.
And interestingly, as I was looking up the movie you're talking about, it was apparently directed by a young director named Brad Baron Renfro.
And it says it was the last movie that he directed before his untimely death at the age of 25.
That means I'm trying to tell you the truth, but I'm not always right just about 98% of the time.
And bad guys of every stripe don't want this show in the air.
But you're the good guys.
You have to decide, hey, this guy's a fighter.
This guy stood up for this.
This guy is an incredible track recorder.
We want to support him.
And then I'm going to sell you something that really works so you love it and you get it again and again.
And Bigley, our great sponsor, those AlexJonesStore.com.
No matter what happens, InfoWars, we continue on the Alex Jones Network that's been built.
So key.
Said, Alex, you keep getting it wrong.
We don't have 84% reorder on ultra-methylene blue.
We don't have 76% reorder on the supplements and average.
You're reading that wrong.
That's on total customers.
We have a 97% reorder from anybody that orders at thealuctionstore.com.
Well, that's a testament to you guys out there supporting us and how great the products are.
Nobody, I mean, a site that has a 20% reorder has seen it successful.
That is you being steadfast supporters, and I want to thank you.
So we're running the biggest sale of the year right now, over 50% off on ultramethylene blue, on the bovine colostrum, on the new methylene red that's proprietary to us, on the Shilohy Complex, the IRS C Moss, Atomic Defense, and more.