Thursday War Room: Diabolical Depopulationist Bill Gates Discussed Getting ‘Rid of Poor People as a Whole’ With Epstein, As More Revelations Surface… PLUS, Hillary Clinton Demands To Testify IN PUBLIC!
Thursday War Room exposes Bill Gates’ alleged depopulationist remarks with Epstein, implicating 3,000+ elites in child exploitation and ritual abuse, while Netflix’s 45% "woke" children’s content sparks parental outrage. Hillary Clinton’s delayed public testimony contrasts with UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s crisis over Epstein-linked Peter Mandelson’s £240M Palantir contract, yet America’s institutions resist accountability—even as models warn of a 90% population collapse if full files are released. The episode demands mass protests to replace corrupt systems, uniting left and right under a single mandate: expose the truth or face irreversible consequences. [Automatically generated summary]
Why is it that so much of Netflix content for children promotes a transgender ideology?
Almost half of your content for children.
I'm talking about minor children now.
I'm not talking about teenagers.
Minor children.
Just two days ago, a jury in New York awarded a former transitioner $2 million because she said that her psychologists and others pressured her into, they pushed on her an ideology that proved to be extremely detrimental.
The UK, the National Health Service in the UK has said that they're not going to perform transgender surgeries or any longer so-called gender-affirming care for minors, including in counseling, because it is so incredibly detrimental.
Our own HHS has come forward with similar findings this past year.
Yet if you turn on Netflix, you'll find that an enormous amount, and I say this as a parent with three young children, an enormous amount of your children's programming has this ideology and agenda in it.
To Warner's legacy franchises twisting into vehicles for DEI indoctrination to be put all under one roof to pump out endless narratives that erode family values.
And the boomer wokesters aren't even aware of the lion's den they are entering.
So forgive me if I'm a little concerned, not only as a parent, but also that somebody believes that we ought to have a wide variety of content options.
There are some, but the overwhelming majority of your stuff right now is overwhelmingly woke.
And it's not reflective of what the American people want to see.
So respectfully, if you ask a Netflix member today, or a consumer today generally, how they view Netflix, I think that, but a proof point that we might be doing the right thing is they talk about Netflix in the exact same terms as they talk about the country.
About 40% conservative, about 40% liberal, and about 20% don't know.
And according to a recent Gallup poll, a record high, 45% of U.S. adults identified as political independents in 2025, surpassing the 43% measured in 2014, 2023, and 2024.
Meanwhile, equal shares of U.S. adults identified as either Democrats or Republicans.
Believe it or not, I'm going to spend a lot of the show today on the UK and Britain because the trend continues.
It is completely reversed and inverted.
I feel like I'm going to spend a large portion of today's show reporting on the Epstein files as if they are a UK scandal because the UK and actually a few other countries around the world have had people resigned and have treating this with the seriousness that it demands.
In the UK, it's threatening to bring down their entire government at this point.
And that's not an understatement.
It is like a massive scandal.
And if you take the whole of the Epstein files and you identify what aspect of the files is threatening to bring down the UK government, it is like a percentage of a percentage of a percentage of what's been revealed.
Basically, this one guy, Mandelson, was revealed in communication with Epstein and probably rigging some bids to give Palantir $100 million government contracts.
But he wasn't, so far, he's not, I don't think, being accused of like disposing of children or anything of the sort.
But it's still a big enough deal that it's bringing down Kier Starmer.
And so it's like, yeah, that's how it should be.
That's actually the appropriate way to respond.
It's one of these things where it's like you look at the UK so often, you're just like, they're lost.
They're gone.
There's nothing to save anymore.
Comes with Europe a lot.
But then they pull something like this off.
Then it's like, okay, why are they responding appropriately to what's been revealed while the vast majority of information from the Epstein files was about people in America and nothing is being done at all?
It's, this is really crazy.
I mean, if you were like a space alien, you were looking at Earth right now, you would think that the Epstein files were an exclusively UK scandal because they're the only ones responding to it in the way that they should.
So I'm going to get very much into that.
It is wild what's going on there because it's exactly what should be happening here.
Actually, 100% the blueprint we should be following.
We're going to talk about why we're not following it and what we can do to get on track to actually hold these people to account.
Right now, I've got another video I'll show you in just a second.
In the UK, they're starting inquiries, they're demanding answers.
I'll show you interviews where people are trying not to talk about it.
The interviewer is just like, you're not weaseling out of this.
We're talking about this right now.
This is a big deal, and you need to confront it.
And it's like so refreshing.
It's like, oh my God, this is exactly what we should be seeing compared to in America.
I'll show you a video of a woman who's like, I saw this guy who's in the Epstein files, still works at this university.
So I went by myself with a sign and just stood outside the university for five hours yelling.
And finally, somebody came out and said, don't worry, we're not going to renew the guy's contract.
So it's like where the UK is having this whole of society response to what's been revealed.
In America, I guess it's up to individuals to go hold one person protest to demand something be done.
Luckily, something is being done, but like, I think it's time for collective action.
I think we need to take this into our own hands.
I think if there's one thing that's been made abundantly clear over the last six days since the Epstein files were released, it's that the American government is unwilling or completely and utterly incapable of dealing with this issue.
Totally, completely and utterly incapable of it.
People are calling for arrests for the Epstein documents.
Do you not realize how widespread this is like, okay, we're going to arrest everybody?
That's a lot of people.
We should, I guess, but it's not whether we should or not.
It's not about a fantasy or not.
It's about a problem becoming so overwhelming that we physically don't have the infrastructure to solve it and we have to come up with something new.
It really is that dire.
It's almost like, you know, you always hear the story, Donald Trump would always brag about it, where he'd say, you know, you take out a small amount of debt, you owe the bank.
You take out a massive amount of debt, and suddenly the bank is invested in you.
Suddenly, in order to get their money back, they have to make sure you succeed.
And it's kind of what we're dealing with here, if that makes any sense.
I don't know if it does.
I'll try to draw the lines together here.
We'll begin today, as we do every day, with our daily dispatch.
All right, here it is, folks.
Your daily dispatch for Thursday, the 5th of February, 2026.
World Economic Forum investigates its CEO over Epstein links.
Okay, that's good.
It's a good idea, I guess.
They're investigating themselves.
The World Economic Forum is investigating whether or not their leadership was involved with their leadership, I guess is a way to put this.
They're investigating whether or not the World Economic Forum CEO was tied in with the World Economic Forum shadow puppet master.
Yes, I think he probably was.
The World Economic Forum has launched an independent investigation into its CEO, Borgay Brind, to clarify his relationship with sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.
The organization said on Thursday, the Geneva-based organizer of the Davos Summit said it was looking into disclosures from the U.S. Justice Department that showed Brinde had had three business dinners with Epstein and also communicated with the disgraced financier via email and text message.
In light of these interactions, the governing board requested the Audit and Risk Committee to look into the matter, which subsequently decided to initiate an independent review.
The WEF said in a statement, the decision underscores its forum's commitments to transparency and maintaining its integrity, they said.
Despite the fact that every time they meet in Davos, every whore in Europe goes there too.
Not sure if they're the most respectable people to be taking on this investigation.
But then again, they've appointed themselves in charge.
This is how The Economist is reporting on the Epstein files.
Britain's worst political scandal of this century.
Again, a very like tangential, not central thing.
It's just like, yeah, me was talking to Epstein, maybe getting some advice about what legislation to pass.
Not even to downplay it.
It is a big deal, but compared to what has been revealed about people in America, this is nothing.
But they're treating it correctly.
And according to The Economist, it is the biggest scandal of the century.
Crazy.
In February 2025, Peter Mandelson was asked by the Financial Times about his relationship with the deceased sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.
The soon-to-be British ambassador to America offered a forthright response.
I'm not going to get into this.
It's an FT obsession, and frankly, you can all F off, okay?
Yes, that's not an innocent response, I will have you know.
The article appeared in the Britain section of the print edition under the headline, What is the point of Keir Starmer?
Again, we're going to get into that.
I got so many videos to show you.
Really, it is amazing.
We showed you the video yesterday of Keir Starmer physically shaking as he's talking about this because he realizes this is his, not just his premiership, his time as prime minister is going to be defined by this.
This is going to be the definition of him as a person for the rest of his life, as it should be.
Everybody involved with Epstein should wear a metaphysical black mark across their face for all of time.
Just so we're clear: all of these people, Bill Gates, 100 years from now, is not going to be remembered as the young genius of Microsoft or the hero that vaccinated the world.
He's going to be remembered as the STD-riddled friend of Jeffrey Epstein that wears pink sweaters and sounds like a dork.
That's his entire legacy from now on.
That's it.
He is now defined by that as he should be.
Because if we can't actually get real justice for these people, social justice, I guess, is the next best thing.
U.S. and Russia negotiate extension to start to new START nuclear pack.
The U.S. and Russia are closing in on a deal to continue to observe the expiring new START arms control treaty beyond its expiration on Thursday.
Three sources familiar with these talks tell Axios.
Two of the sources cautioned that the draft plan is still needed, still needs approval from both presidents.
Additional source claims that the negotiations had taken place over the last 24 hours in Abu Dhabi, but not that an agreement had been reached.
So basically, START, the START nuclear arms agreement that Russia and America are in expired yesterday, I believe.
And so they're basically just saying, let's just keep this going.
Let's just, we don't need to renegotiate.
How about we just continue the way that things were going?
This is a pretty big story here.
Karen Bass, mayor of Los Angeles, secretly altered Palisades fire response report, sources say.
Embattled, Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass secretly altered the official Palisades fire response reports to downplay the failures made by the city and fire department when the deadly blaze erupted, a new report said.
Bass, after seeing an early draft of the after-action report, wanted key findings of the Los Angeles Fire Department's shortcomings scrubbed or watered down.
It's kind of ironic.
Watered down.
And even warned the then interim fire chief Ronnie Villanueva of the unedited conclusions that the unedited conclusions could expose the city to legal liability, sources close to the Democrat staff told the Los Angeles Times.
I love when people say that sort of stuff.
It's like, yeah, no, that, right.
If you tell the truth, you're going to get in trouble.
That's true.
Yeah, no, that's not an excuse to lie.
Like, yeah.
You know, like, God, we really gotta, we really gotta get these conclusions out of the investigation.
Otherwise, people are gonna think it's our fault.
It's like, no, it was your fault.
No, that's yes.
So it's just an admission.
It's just okay.
We have to hide the fact that this was actually our fault.
It was totally our bad, and we are at fault for it because otherwise people will blame us.
We can't have that.
And they think that they think that there's like a good reason.
They think that's a good excuse.
I remember I had this with a friend one time who did something that I would not have wanted him to do.
And he literally writes me a text being like, I would have asked, but if I'd asked you, you would have said no.
If we tell them the truth, they're going to be mad at us.
So take that part out.
Okay.
Thousands of New Yorkers left without heat.
New Yorkers paid a staggering, placed a staggering 80,000 calls to 311 reporting a lack of residential heat and hot water in January 2026.
The highest monthly total on record, as private and public housing tenants told the Post that they were trapped in unlivable conditions and accused Mayor Zorhan Mamdani of failing to act.
Now, of course, New York has long been a haven for retards.
It has long been an exemplar of socialism.
So he's simply inheriting an already downward trajectory and he is pointing the nose even more vertical.
So it's not exactly his fault, but it is.
But in the end of the day, it actually is.
That, of course, is your daily dispatch brought to you by theaxjonesstore.com, the alexjonestore.com.
We still have these fantastic knives on sale.
They really would make a fantastic gift.
You don't even have to wrap it, folks.
That's how cool the packaging is.
The boxes are extremely high quality.
They have the Alex Jones signature across the top.
I keep saying it, but it's because it's true.
This is my everyday carry.
It is a knife I got at thelexjonesore.com.
Same masterwork quality of the knives that we have on sale right now.
Use this every single day.
You can see it's actually kind of dirty, but it's just as sharp as the day that I got it.
It's got the Alex Jones signature on the side there.
These knives are extremely well made, extremely high quality, extremely tough.
I've been using it for months since we first got it in, and it still opens and closed just as sharply, just as quickly, you know, satisfyingly as ever before.
And yeah, just as sharp.
So again, we don't sell you things, we don't sell you supplements we don't take, we don't sell you shirts we don't wear, and we don't sell you knives we don't carry around on a daily basis.
So we trust them.
You can too.
The alexjones store.com slash Harrison.
If you want to let them know who sent you, get one of these signature knives from the Signature Knife Limited Edition collection.
There's three colors.
There's a silver, a sort of camo green.
I like Alex said, it was a Border Patrol green, which is an accurate color.
But no matter what you get at thealexjonesstore.com, you can purchase happily knowing that every dollar you spend is going directly towards keeping this outlet going.
Regardless of what happens next, we will continue to pump out the truth.
And we really do appreciate your support in this all-important mission that is becoming ever more important now as the Great Awakening hits massive and seemingly unrelenting strides.
Like there was already a massive awakening happening.
It's almost like we've just keep leveling up the awakening.
It starts with the awakening of Donald Trump in 2016.
And then we'd level up all the way through 2020, COVID itself, massive awakening.
We can go to the 2023 war on Gaza after October 7th and the horrors that were on display for months and months and years on end after that.
That was the cause of a major awakening for a lot of people who had never put thought into the geopolitical implications of our national power structure.
And now we have the Epstein files.
I mean, we're hitting turbo speed here.
We're hitting warp speed and there's no signs of slowing down.
And the biggest danger now is that, well, there's two biggest dangers, two outcomes we have to avoid at all costs.
One of them is the stupid, low information, knee-jerk reaction.
People with no discernment come in and just turn it into some sort of purity test spiral that just plays right into the hands of the enemy.
And we can see the way that the enemy is already trying to bring about this outcome.
I think, and don't hate me for saying it, but the way I see things unfolding and unrolling, seems like Candace Owens has been identified as a central figure to associate all like anti-Israel stuff around.
And so they're trying to set up a paradigm, a false dichotomy that says you're either with Israel and the Republican establishment, neocons, or you're with Candace Owens and you're way over there attacking Erica Kirk and Egyptian plains or whatever else.
So that's a false dichotomy.
And, or Candace Owens is sort of the flavor of the month that they're associating with this right now.
But essentially, it's people that are discredited or genuinely hateful, which I don't think Candace Owens is, but that's the type of person that they want to associate with that end of the spectrum.
So that's one outcome we have to try to avoid.
And it's why InfoWars has had the positions that we've had forever.
And everybody is coming around our way of thinking because we've thought about this and known about this stuff before everybody else.
But you see it with lots of right-wing commentator people.
A lot of them started out more extreme and they were the ones saying to InfoWars, like, you guys are controlled.
You guys are like, why aren't you talking about this in this way?
And now a lot of these same people are going, you know, this division is really not helpful.
We really got to unify.
We might disagree on this, but we really agree overall.
And, you know, at the end of the day, we are all Americans.
And while I still believe race is a thing, I think, you know, it's not the most important thing.
We got other things to concern ourselves with.
And it's like, yeah, I know.
No, you called us controlled opposition, whatever else for years because we've always had this position.
It's always been the right one.
All this is to say the way we avoid that outcome is by listening to the people that have known about this forever, people that are waking up to this right now, or since 2020, I'm glad you're awake.
I'm glad you're coming around.
But you got to understand that we've known this for 20 plus years and it has already been taken into account as part of our battle plan that got us to this point already.
So we're going to avoid, you know, we have systematically, relentlessly, incrementally brought the ball down the field and we're like in the red zone now.
We're like, you know, first in goal.
And what we don't need right now is a bunch of people who have been sitting on the sidelines or didn't even know what game was being played come in and go, you know, you guys, you don't know what's going on.
Actually, we'll take it from here.
Don't worry about it.
We got it from here.
Okay.
We get it now.
Even though we have no idea how the ball even got to the red zone, we're going to score the touchdown.
You leave it to us.
And if you get in our way, you're actually the enemy.
No, you've never gotten the ball a single yard.
We've gotten in 99.
So maybe, you know, fall into formation.
You can serve as blockers or whatever, but follow the experts who got us this far in the first place because we really do have to avoid falling into the hatred that they really are good at making use of.
The bad guys are very, very good at making use of that type of stuff.
The other outcome that we have to avoid is that all of this stuff is released and nothing comes of it.
And nobody's arrested and nobody's held to account and nothing systemically changes.
And the revelation, instead of being an earth-shaking, you know, cause of societal reorganization, becomes us just being forced to acknowledge that we're run by criminals and there's nothing we can do about it.
So that can't be the outcome because it's not true.
There's lots of things we could do about it.
What we'd like to do about it is have the government that we voted for to go after these people actually do what they said they would when they were trying to get our vote.
Go after the people on the Epstein list who represent a heretofore untouchable elite class of despicable criminals.
So if this stuff just gets released and all of these people just keep holding their positions of power, it's worse than if the information wasn't released in the first place.
The knowledge, the information is only as good as the action it inspires.
So we got to not let that happen.
Again, these are the two things we got to avoid.
And it's the two things that I've been talking about for the last couple of years because I always relate it to the Hippocratic Oath and the idea of avoiding the twin traps of overtreatment, which would be like, you know, falling into the hateful divisive rhetoric and just losing all sense of nuance and making strategically ill-informed decisions, or therapeutic nihilism, which is saying, well, oh, well,
I guess we're run by criminal pedophiles.
Still going to get my, I still better go get my bag and just avoid it.
So we're not, we're not falling for the trap.
We're not indulging in the overtreatment and we're not falling prey to the comfort of therapeutic nihilism.
We're going to maintain our trajectory and continue to expose this stuff, continue to demand action and continue to take action ourselves when official action is not forthcoming, which so far it's been absolutely absent.
We'll get into that too.
I got videos from Donald Trump we'll get to.
And I got videos from all sorts of people commenting on what exactly is going on with the response to the Epstein files.
And again, I'll show you the video of the woman protesting on the other side as well.
Let me lay it out like this.
There is a global conspiracy of elite pedophiles that use the pedophilia as a replacement for meritocracy.
And you really like nothing in this is all that more explosive to me in my mind than learning about the Bohemian Grove.
If you've known about the Bohemian Grove, then you really shouldn't be surprised at much of this.
We've known since Alex Jones went in there and filmed it in 1996 that the world elite dress up in creepy robes and do mock human sacrifices praying to a giant owl god.
If that's not where you were starting your investigation of geopolitics, then you're off the mark already.
So if we all started there, we really haven't even gone that far to Jeffrey Epstein.
It's just a wider scale, creepier.
Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen.
This is the war room.
I don't know.
I don't know what to do.
I don't know what to do with all the news I have.
Where do I start?
Okay, I want to get into the UK.
I think I'm going to save that for later.
I'm going to be joined by Patrick Byrne at 4 p.m.
So I think I'll save the Epstein stuff for him.
I got a lot of other videos to show you about a lot of other news that I think I should start with because once you get into the Epstein stuff, it's hard to get back out.
So we're going to save that for just a minute.
Patrick Byrne will be joining me.
He's got a lot of inside information about how this all went down.
So we'll save some of that and I'll save the UK for the third hour since it's not America.
Let's go to clip number one here.
This is a video from the older millennial.
This is just yet another example of the way that the Democrats have our entire political system on lock and we find ourselves incapable.
It's like almost inexplicable.
Let's just go to the video.
We'll watch it on the other side.
I was about to say we're incapable of getting anything done.
This isn't even us getting stuff done.
This is us just trying to let things happen naturally.
We can't even do that.
We can't even not do anything.
I think you'll see what I mean in just a second.
Here's older millennial explaining why a random judge decided to, on her own volition and without authority, grant temporary protected status to tens of thousands of Haitians.
So the Biden administration put in a temporary protection order for 350,000 Haitians.
It was done through executive order.
So there was no vote.
There was no law.
There was no legislation.
It was just the Biden administration saying, I want to give these people temporary protected status, which he's allowed to do.
Now, when Trump came in office, he could have created an executive order and got rid of it.
But he said, I'm not even going to do that.
I'm just going to let it expire, right?
Like, this is not the Trump administration doing anything.
They are just letting the policy from Biden expire when it was supposed to.
However, a Washington, D.C.-based federal judge, Anna Reyes, who is a Biden appointee, has blocked the Department of Homeland Security from ending temporary protected status, which is, I hate the way that's worded because that's not what they did.
No, the Trump administration isn't ending their protected status.
They're simply letting the executive order from the Biden administration expire when it was supposed to.
And now you have a judge who basically says, you don't get to do that.
You don't get to let executive orders expire.
That is insane.
This isn't a law.
This isn't legislation.
Nobody voted on this.
This is just the Biden administration saying, I want to temporarily protect these 350,000 Haitians.
And Trump saying, okay, I'm going to let that status expire and they can be deported.
And a judge who has no purview in this whatsoever was just like, no, I'm going to set immigration legislation.
If she doesn't have the authority to do so, if the Supreme Court already decided months ago that judges couldn't issue nationwide injunctions for people and things that weren't directly in the suits that were brought before them, which was a Supreme Court ruling that the Democrats are just ignoring, I guess they're just ignoring that, and we're just going along with it.
And judges are just making decisions they have no right to make.
And for some reason, we are adhering to them.
That's the issue.
That's the issue.
See, I could also make proclamations.
Nobody would listen to me because I don't have authority because I haven't been granted it.
So if I sit here and say, actually, actually, TPS is redacted.
Actually, they are no longer protected by temporary protected status.
Nothing's going to happen because I'm not in the chain of command.
I'm not, I have no power to make that happen.
But in that way, me and this judge are exactly the same.
The thing that gives them authority is when people follow those orders.
Do you understand?
That's what power is at the end of the day.
And what a judge is technically supposed to be able to do and what their power is supposed to provide for them is different than if they just wield it however they want and the government goes along with it.
This is just crazy.
It's just crazy.
I don't understand how you wouldn't just ignore this judge's ruling and just go, what is she talking about?
They have no right to interfere with this.
So move along.
Like, let's just keep going.
Let's just keep doing it.
Who's to say?
Who knows?
Who knows?
Nothing matters.
Nothing matters.
It just doesn't matter.
It is in the provisions of the executive order signed by Biden that it ends unless it's extended.
The Trump administration chose not to extend it.
And so a judge just decided, okay.
Okay, I guess.
And this is just a continuing thing with the Trump administration.
I don't know what they think is going on here.
I don't know what they think they're doing, but they're losing and they're going to keep losing.
And it is inexplicable.
It is beyond explanation, I think.
And I got lots of videos of Donald Trump saying the craziest stuff.
Let's go to clip number 36.
President Trump says he's upset that the Republicans are bothering Bill Clinton.
He's upset of how the Republicans are questioning Bill Clinton because Bill Clinton was kind of nice to him.
Do you remember what I said like a week ago?
That it's got to be the best thing in the world to be Donald Trump's enemy.
Every time.
Zorhan Mamdani, Bill Clinton, Mark Levin, Ben Shapiro, every person that has been his arch enemy, he protects and helps and compliments and benefits.
And then people like Marjorie Taylor Greene, who fights like hell for Donald Trump and gets nothing in return, he just savages on a whim.
Okay.
I mean, I guess this is, is this the real Trump coming out?
I mean, I don't understand.
I can't possibly understand it.
It is like a rule of nature at this point.
And it is 100% the exact opposite of how Trump portrays himself.
If you're friends with Trump, he screws you over in the first opportunity in ways that like he doesn't even need to.
He was opening up a prayer breakfast today.
The first thing he does is call Thomas Massey an idiot.
It's like, you're at a prayer breakfast.
And Thomas Massey votes with Republicans 99% of the time.
But he doesn't like the war in Israel.
So like, that's it.
Crazy.
It's just completely insane.
And then just like the people that literally like try to send him to jail and are just the source of just infinite suffering for Trump, the Clintons with all of their lies and the scandals they manage and the Russian gate collusion.
They've ruined his first presidential administration.
I mean, it's just, and he's just like, yeah, but he was nice to me once.
And that's it.
That's all it takes.
That's all it takes.
I don't need to go into the rant.
I literally went into this rant last week because it's become a fact of reality now.
It's just a fact of nature.
Donald Trump will do whatever anybody needs as long as they're his enemies.
And if he's your friend, he hates you.
Explain it to me.
Somebody explain it to me.
It doesn't make any sense.
Let's go to clip 35 here.
This is Thomas Massey talking about the Epstein file release and the influence of Israel.
I literally don't trust anybody up here except Marjorie Taylor Greene, Lauren Boeber, and Nancy Mace most recently because those were the three women that co-sponsored.
But nothing Trump is doing these days makes any sense.
Again, I just, I just can't believe.
I just can't believe where we're at.
It's just crazy.
Yeah, we need a comprehensive list of who was not in the Epstein files.
Yeah, Ron Paul, Rand Paul, Thomas Massey, Marjorie Taylor Greene, Vladimir Putin.
Actually, you want to know the world leaders that aren't in the Epstein file?
I bet I could name them.
I bet I could name the leaders of countries that never once had like a positive interaction with Jeffrey Epstein, and it'd probably be like Nicholas Maduro and Hassan Nasrallah, Bashir al-Assad.
It's probably Aydola Khomeini and Xi Jinping and Kim Jong-il.
It's probably these guys.
It's probably all the third world dictatorships, you know?
It's probably all those guys.
All those despicable tyrants, as denoted by our media.
Maybe they just weren't friends with Epstein.
Maybe that's why they don't have the best reputation here in America.
So 46 here.
Donald Trump says he's not focused on deporting everybody anymore.
We're after the, we are after, by the way, a big problem, they allowed to come into our country people from their mental institutions, people from insane asylums that are mentally ill and very dangerous.
Well, that's actually not what we voted for, actually.
I mean, what a pathetic admission of failure that was, huh?
What a pathetic surrender to your enemies.
I mean, that was just sad.
It's almost just, I'm not even mad.
It's just like, I don't know.
You know, it's not like Trump died, but it's, and he still seems kind of mentally sharp, but it's like when your grandparents sort of aren't themselves anymore, get to a certain point where it's like, well, it's not the same.
It's just not the same.
I guess we'll just sort of humor him until the time comes.
I mean, you know, what do you do at this point?
What do you do?
The man pulled off a miracle, got elected by doubling down on all of his most controversial positions, went more to the right than he ever was before during the last campaign, and he just didn't do anything.
And he's not going to, apparently.
That's it.
We're focused on the criminals, the real bad criminals.
All right.
Well, that's not going to save the country then.
Guess we need another plan because this one has failed.
Sucks, but that's, yeah, okay.
That's where we're at.
I mean, you understand.
Donald Trump got elected in 2016 over promises to build the wall and deport illegal aliens.
The problem was so bad at that point.
It was powerful enough to be the central.
And really, if you stripped everything else away, he probably still would have won on the basis of that promise.
That's how bad it was in 2016.
He didn't slow down illegal immigration through his first administration, and then Biden opened up the door.
And so talk about moving the goalpost.
The place where the goalpost is now didn't even exist when Trump first got into office.
They've had to create new land to put the goalpost that much farther back because we wanted him to get rid of the illegal aliens that were here 10 years ago.
Since then, that number has probably tripled.
And so then the goalpost began, we'll get rid of all the people that showed up in the last four years, which you'd think would be doable.
They came in in four years, getting them out in four years seems like it should be an easier task, if anything, but we're not even getting that.
So let's go to another video.
Clip 55.
Trump says he's adjusting his mass deportation policy to only go into cities.
So he's not going into cities if he doesn't get an invite.
And he's also said that he's going to use a softer touch in Minnesota.
But you still have to be tough.
Meanwhile, they are still erecting makeshift roadblocks to try to stop ICE agents.
Trump says you should very strongly considering five more U.S. cities to target after Minneapolis ICE operation.
President sat down with NBC News.
Okay.
All right.
I mean, this just goes to what we say over and over.
And again, this delusion seems impenetrable.
It's permanently affixed to the mind of the Republicans that somehow the Democrats are trying super hard to make things safe and they just can't do it.
I want to make a message directly to JD Vance, Marco Rubio, anyone who might want to run for president of the United States in the Republican Party in 2028.
This administration has done a fantastic job on so many issues, and there has been good talk about the most critical issue of our time: free speech.
In fact, there's been excellent action, especially here in the United States, to eradicate sources of funding domestically for the censorship industrial complex.
You are being encircled.
You're being surrounded.
You're being outplayed.
You're being outmatched.
And you do not appreciate the magnitude of the threat you need to respond to and everything that needs to be done to take it on.
Let me present to you what I see with crystal clarity: your future if you don't do this.
This is not from me.
This is from Europe and other countries.
What will happen slowly over the next three years is you will continue to be encircled, and it will be June or July of 2028.
And this may hit before then.
This may hit during the 2026 midterm elections.
But what I promise you is that sometime between the summer and fall of 2028, when you running as the inheritor of the mantle of Trump's MAGA movement, there will be a sudden, massive, global, it will seem coordinated.
They must be coordinating it.
Massive imposition of fines totaling in the tens of billions of dollars collectively leveled at Google, Facebook, Instagram, X, WhatsApp, Telegram, every single social media channel that Americans, American voters can use to speak with one another.
All in tandem, there will be 14 different discrete countries as well as giant trade bodies like the EU who will pass coordinated, life-ending fines on social media companies if they carry any message that is a proxy for support for your candidacy.
And by then, these social media companies will be under the gun.
If they don't do it, they go bankrupt unless you can stop them on their behalf.
Or they can relent and censor the speech as a favor to the person who will certainly win the election if they go through with the censorship.
They will look to you and you will look helpless.
And in fact, by then, you will be helpless because you will not have created the leverage to push back or to push back in time for the election.
And you will find that as you scramble for points of leverage, the things that you think you have as leverage are actually not that helpful because threatening to put tariffs on them, you will find that, well, They know you're going to lose if you can't use 21st century communications if you have to communicate by messenger pigeon.
So they know the tariffs are going to go away in a couple months.
You can't threaten some sort of security pullout.
It's going to be a different presidency when you lose.
You will have no leverage against this.
And what you will find is that the thing that's necessary for leverage, a vast coordinated infrastructure, both intra-agency within the State Department, within the War Department, within all of the different ambassador classes from the U.S. ambassador to the EU to every member state to foreign countries all over the world who will all do this in tandem.
You will find you have no allies in civil society in those countries.
You'll find your ambassadors don't know what to say.
Right now, you have no interagency coordination.
In fact, you have no intra-agency coordination, let alone inter-agency coordination.
I was actually going to say, let's pause on that because the last time, I think the last time we talked, or maybe the time before, it was about the raid on the Fulton County election system.
Then, of course, Epstein just wiped everything off the map.
So let's return to that.
Has anything developed from the Fulton County raid from the FBI?
Is there any developments in that in the last week?
She wrote a letter back to Congress saying, of course, I've got the authority.
She actually quotes language that's actually out of Barack Obama.
Barack Obama signed something in 2015 that said, if there's foreign involvement or intrusion into an election, it stops from being a criminal matter and shifts to being under the purview of the director of national intelligence to assemble and analyze and collate and boom, boom, boom, everything about it.
It becomes a national security issue under the director of national intelligence.
And so she wrote back to Congress yesterday this beautiful letter.
You should find it establishing I absolutely had the authority.
But what that tells you is they now know that there's a foreign component to all of this.
And don't believe the Reuters and the people who are saying, well, they've acknowledged Venezuela didn't meddle.
You know, they have such a ridiculous standard.
They're not going to find links on the computer, you know, that Back to Venezuela, but Venezuela meddled because the whole system was developed in Venezuela and is left with back doors.
And yes, I'm highly confident they're going to report there was foreign access.
The foreign access is going to show something like somebody from Canada came on in the middle of the election.
But that once, once you have foreign access to Canada, they can be anywhere.
There's like might be three or four hops, but they're over in Serbia.
It's turned out this.
So anyway, I think that they've turns out that they so that's that's and they announced who it did it.
It's actually all been done.
There's a rumor story today about it that this raid and Tulsi's reply back to Congress was done not under those authorities, but it turns out there's been a United States attorney who's been working with a prosecutor, another federal prosecutor in Miami.
There was a U.S. attorney of Puerto Rico who's actually, we now have learned today that he raided the 20, he had reason to raid the Puerto Rican elections after 2024, and he seized Dominion equipment.
Now, everyone, they all thought they were never going to lose.
So who knows what mischief is documented on these computers?
They seize those computers in 2024.
It's been a big secret, but they've now revealed that.
And the guy who did it, I want to emphasize this before they tarnish him.
The fellow who did is a gentleman named Stephen Mundreau, and he's the United States Attorney of Puerto Rico.
And he is a prosecutor's prosecution.
He was a 36-year DOJ prosecutor.
He's not a Trumplican.
He's a career DOJ, good guy.
He widely regarded.
Trump appointed him to U.S. Attorney of Puerto Rico, which is, there's like 94 U.S. attorneys around the country.
Small states get one, big states get two or more.
They're kind of the cardinals of the Catholic Church, so to speak.
They're very, very significant people.
And if there's 94 of them, Biden came in.
He fired 93 of them.
He fired 93.
There was one he didn't fire, the guy down in Puerto Rico, because he wasn't a Trump guy.
He was a very widely respected, well-regarded career DOJ guy.
His name's Stephen Muldreau.
Biden let him stay and then reappointed him when his term was up.
And so he's impeccably respected across the DOJ.
It turns out that after the 2024 election, he had some kind of secret task force going or he's cooperated with these Miami-based people and they went in and took, seized, they must have had probable cause to do it of rigging the election and they seized the equipment that was used in Puerto Rico.
So I so we there's no question anymore that Tulsi has all the answers.
They've had a year.
The CIA, NSA type guys have had a year.
FBI, DHS have disassembled this equipment, have discovered all the hacks, all the, you know, it's so it's kind of a settled question.
It's just a question of like with Epstein, how many cars do they lay on the table at a time?
I had, I actually had not seen the letter that she said.
I saw she posted it on X.
I just looked it up while you were talking there.
Contrary to the blatantly false and slanderous accusations being made against me by members of Congress and their friends in the propaganda media, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence has and will continue to take action under my statutory authorities to secure our nation and ensure the integrity of our election.
So very powerful letter there.
I thought you were talking about the letter from the ODNI basically saying that the whistleblower claims against Tulsi had already been investigated and hadn't been.
So this just shows how much attack that Tulsi's under right now.
Because the whistleblower account was obviously false according to the letter from the ODNI.
She's also under attack from Congress.
So I mean, they're really trying to get in her way.
They're really, she is the schwerpunkt, the uh Klaus Schwitz would call it the spear, the tip of the spear, one of the spears that they have to deflect.
They have to be.
She really came in.
I thought it was going to be JD Vance, but it was actually Tulsi came in in this administration and grabbed, you know, came in on the sound Wall Street.
Someone's going to bite the ass off a bear.
She came in.
Well, actually, the first few months, she was getting misdirection from her own people beneath the CIA, who's telling.
And so it took her a few months to really get how treacherous they were.
But she finally in June got the bit between her teeth.
Again, I want to make clear, I'm not an insider.
I'm, I'm not, during the Biden regime, I was one step ahead of the sheriff.
I'm not one step ahead of the sheriff now, I think, but I'm not an insider.
However, I talked to and help from outside craft a lot of the insiders and the witnesses and such.
I've had a lot to do with helping Yenta, all that stuff together.
So I know what's been going on.
I think that she had Greg came in and by June got the bit between her teeth, really.
We have evidence of how these electronic voting systems have been vulnerable to hackers for a very long time and vulnerable to exploitation to manipulate the results of the votes being cast, which further drives forward your mandate to bring about paper ballots across the country so that voters can have faith in the integrity of our elections.
What I really think has to happen is this has to be moved into the Department of War.
This isn't town.
This is, we're in World War III.
This was the point of everything we went through with COVID and Antifa and all that psyop was to get us on our heels so they could shove this down our throat.
This stuff.
I would say that this has to move into the Department of War.
Let me give you an example.
And this is public.
The FBI leader who was supposed to raid, lead that raid into act, and he got fired.
And it's in the gateway pundit.
He got fired and why.
But let me share with your readers.
And so I have this is made, they made this public.
That guy, the FBI agent who was supposed to do this, sabotage it.
He submitted a subpoena or a warrant application to the judge that had errors in it.
And it turns out that these things have to be spotless.
When you're dealing with this kind of stuff, if you misspell, you know, the poll books, which refers to the polls and who's registered in the polls, if you spell it P-O-L-E rather than P-O-L-L, that warrant can be challenged later.
And fruit of the poison tree, judge, that stuff, that warrant was not valid.
If that warrant was not valid, neither was anything they grabbed.
And so there was this FBI agent who originally was submitting that and high likelihood he was doing it to he's a deep stater.
He was doing it to sabotage, or it's quite possible, I should say, he was doing to sabotage.
So the warrant would get rejected, not that it would get rejected, but once it got acted on afterwards, the other side would be able to point to some details that defects that you and I would consider trivial, but in this world is enough that everything would have to be returned or thrown out.
So Trump is fighting this kind of, this is there are players with inside the government who constantly just try to derail things.
They did, Tulsi was set up twice.
The information she was given by the agency in Iran about nuclear weapons was false.
That was, she was led by them to do some silly things last spring.
And there was another thing that she, they misled her on to give her a black eye with Trump.
It had to do with a guy named Hugo Carverhall in prison.
So she's realized from what I hear, she's realized that she's got a lot of institutional gravity beneath her that she can't trust.
But she has an elite team of people around her.
And I didn't even, I'm sort of enough in the dark.
I know that there's all this activity going on in the government.
I really want to stay at this point.
My, my only obligation is to bring people to the right hotels and sit and do days of interviews with the DOJ.
So that's all.
And, but what I understand, they really have been the master stroke that have put all the pieces of this puzzle together.
And again, just the headwinds against Tulsi are very troubling.
And it seems like this is, I mean, the left only has a few tactics, but they seem so like impenetrable.
Obviously, they have judges that'll make decisions that the Trump administration goes along with, even though I don't think they should.
So either judges intervening or slow walking things.
And of course, they did that with Comey and Trump had to replace the prosecutor five days before the statute of limitations expired.
Now, there's a news story from today, or from yesterday, rather.
Trump, quote, waited too long to seek moving hush money conviction to federal court, judge says.
President Trump waited too long after the U.S. Supreme Court's 2024 decision on presidential immunity to try to move his criminal hush money case from New York into a federal court.
Federal judge said Wednesday, although he did not make a final decision on the matter.
But again, it's just like over and over, it seems like it's like, well, you just didn't get this done in time and just didn't get this turned in in the time limit.
When they make mistakes like that, you have to consider the possibility that they are themselves actually doing it on purpose.
They can't say no to the president.
So what they can do is derail and deliberately plant things in there that they know we're going to that they know I'm that they know we're going to derail things later.
I think they are, I don't think Fulton County, Georgia is the last place they're going to raid.
They have probable cause to raid five other places.
I think they should have could have done a year ago, but they've really taken a long time.
You know, it turns out, I thought that everyone who doubted us, I got really angry.
Any all these five years, anyone who doubted us, I thought was faking.
I thought they were gaslighting me.
And I'm sure there a lot are.
But what I've learned is: no, people are really this suggestible.
I don't know if the needle made them stupid or what, the vacc, but I know like Republicans that I consider smart, normal people, they don't believe there was anything stolen.
So it's taken a year to get the bureaucracy of the United States federal government to sit and interview and look at the history and under and do a full intelligence analysis and realize this horrible thing.
For 20 years, us, we and 71 other countries have had our whole political history bent, bent, or, you know, and so that we're crashing into walls.
That's all been, that's a masterstroke.
And the really the people we got to worry about that we got to deal with first, the five meter, no, the 25 meter targets, they call it in the military, are Cuba and Venezuela.
They did this.
They were the general partners of this joint venture.
There were other shareholders, China, Iran, Russia, CIA, who knows, but the joint man, the general managers of the partnership that we, and the military, the 25-meter targets, the first guys you got to shoot.
Then you worry about the people with the 100-meter targets, the 400, the first 20, the 25-meter targets are Cuban, Venezuela.
And I think this is as, I listen, I'm an anti-war guy.
I'm a Milton Friedman guy.
There's not been a war as necessary since the revolution, with a possible exception of the Civil War.
This is more important than World War I or World War II.
We were overthrown by a Cuba, Venezuela 25-year espionage effort.
And yeah, China, China is the chairman of the board of the joint venture, but those were the two guys we got to worry about first.
And the Trump foreign policy of cleaning up this hemisphere, I'm totally fine with it.
If the U.S. is going to survive, we got to clean up this hemisphere and carve out these tumors.
You know, he was a playboy at one point in his life and years ago, but I don't see any indication he did anything inappropriate with anybody underage or anything like that.
I think that is much, I think it's 90-10 Democrats versus Republicans.
Now that it's out and now that this is all, I'll tell you, I was told some time ago, two months, a year, that what it really was about is there's 3,000 or 3,500 elites from around the world who were compromised.
And either sex with children or eating baby brains or eating.
And some of them are not true Satanists.
They were just told before you get this promotion in the EU or whatever, but some of them really are.
There's this whole shared story of how these people are created, trauma and psychological manipulation and such, but it's bankers, diplomats, parliamentarians, congressmen, movie stars.
P. Diddy did more of the Hollywood stuff, more of the entertainment stuff.
It's royalty from around the world.
So 3,000 to 3,500 people are implicated.
And the concern was, is the whole global, is the global economy going to collapse if this really comes all comes out?
I mean, so far they've released half and it's evidently the okay half.
Imagine what the other half, how bad that must be, that they haven't released it yet.
So I think that, you know, I mean, truth is the best is as I said on Alex recently, Buffett said to me once when I was thinking about coming out with something, he said, Patrick, the analysis is that the country has to know this.
And given that they have to know it, the sooner that they know it, the better.
The sooner we can start healing.
On the other hand, suppose we'd have a financial crisis and the system would collapse.
You know, 90% of us die.
They've modeled it out.
In the case of a true global financial collapse, 90% of people die off.
We return to 1880.
Well, if that's the kind of stakes, maybe that's why Trump's been red as head.
Maybe he's using it to blackmail some people himself, for all I know.
I mean, you got to consider, so in which case, so I think it's all anyway, that's part of it.
I think it's probably tied into the Iranian question and us attacking Iran.
I think that there's probably, I know there's a lot of pressure on Israel for Trump to attack Iran.
And normally I would be, I mean, I've been to Iran and had very interesting experiences there, but it's almost like a slave state.
It's like the Arabs conquered it.
They want to be liberated.
And I don't know, it's complicated.
First, we got to liberate ourselves here, though, which is to say Venezuela.
Venezuela and Cuba, we can no longer, they've committed an act of overthrow, not just an act of war.
We can't tolerate, we can't let this stuff slide that happened in our hemisphere.
But Israel is putting a great deal of pressure on Trump to hit Iran.
Well, you know, people are speculating that, you know, along those same lines, saying, you know, Israel is blackmailing Trump and this may be, you know, releasing this was the fulfillment of the threat to release the blackmail.
But then, of course, Trump's not indicted in the files.
He's not, you know, convicted by anything in the files.
So that didn't make any sense to me.
So what do you think?
How do you think the Epstein files plays into the Iran-Israel-America paradigm here?
U.S. and Iran talks brought back from the brink after White House relents on move to Oman.
Talks between U.S. and Iran scheduled for Friday have been brought back from the brink of collapse after the U.S. initially rejected Iran's request to move them from Turkey to Oman without the presence of a group of Arab states.
Iran's foreign minister said late on Wednesday that the talks would proceed in Oman after reports of a last-minute effort by Arab states to convince the White House not to walk away from the negotiations.
So I want to get back into this on the other side.
And sorry, we're about to go to commercial break.
So we'll go to a quick commercial break and be back on the other side with more.
Patrick Byrne is my guest.
Follow him on X at Patrick Byrne and we'll get into what's going on in Iran.
I've got a video from Rubio about how they're going to enter the negotiations and we'll pick it up there.
Stay with us, folks.
Don't go anywhere.
The AlexJonesStore.com is how you support us.
Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen.
This is The War Room.
I'm your host, Harrison Smith.
My guest is Patrick Byrne.
He says he's not an insider, but he's got friends that are.
Well, maybe I'm putting words in your mouth, but he's a good source of information, let's just say, even without an official position.
And this story came out yesterday.
Grand jury testimony from Senator David Perdue suggests Governor Brian Kemp halted investigation into the 2020 election.
So it's so gratifying seeing the 2020 election be talked about once again, resurrected, as we're all reminded of how blatantly it was stolen.
And then, of course, you see the relentless attacks against Tulsi Gabbard, fake whistleblower complaints.
The Congress is trying to get involved.
So what was there anything that caused this all to start right now?
It's been five years, six years since the election was stolen.
Well, it was revealed in a Reuters story today that this U.S. attorney in Puerto Rico was charged with this task force, and he's been really working since Trump came in, this very respected guy.
And this is highly suggestive that they have found proof of foreign involvement.
I would say Tulsi's presence, his presence is highly suggestive of that.
I can mention, and we talked about this before, I did on January 27th an interview of basically the head technologist of Dominion in the U.S., Eric Coomer.
Olaur tried to start a fistfight to avoid because they really wanted to cancel this.
But he had to, I can't reveal what he said in the deposition, but what he revealed in the answers to interrogatories that day is public.
And he revealed, okay, yes, I have introduced foreign nationals into Dominion, into the source code, blah, blah, blah.
They've been in the source code.
Well, that's big time problematic because everyone who the U.S. treats this code used in elections like nuclear weapons.
Everyone who touches it is supposed to be checked out, U.S. citizen class, you know, with security clearances and such.
Now he admitted that foreigners have been in this, which is what we've been saying for a long time.
And the same day he did that, the 27th of February, just a week ago of January, the same day they did that, the DOJ in Miami filed to open up.
They already have a case against SmartMatic, an indictment against SmartMatic for paying off some people in the Philippines and also for they made clear that they now know that the supply chain information is faulty, that their supply chain, that these things have components from mainland China.
So they already had that.
So they now know there's foreign involvement.
And I'm confident that Tulsi, the pictures of Tulsi Gabbard on the scene making phone calls, there's only one person that the DNI is on the scene of a raid.
There's only one person she could have been calling.
So her involvement, I think, can lead people to reasonably deduce that they have found conclusive proof of foreign involvement in our elections.
And just as Coomer admitted in the answer to interrogatories.
So he admitted to that, and that alone seems like it would be enough to warrant some sort of charge against him.
I mean, you're opening up this vulnerability, whether or not it was taken advantage of.
I would think just, you know, introducing the foreign element into this process is enough to warrant some sort of arrest or something.
And of course, we showed the video, I think, the day before yesterday, of one of the officials in Fulton County was saying that, well, the FBI was saying they were going to come arrest Brad Raffesberg or his assistant.
I mean, they were expecting like a lot of people to be arrested.
And they were sort of surprised when Tulsi Gabbard showed up with the FBI trucks to seize everything, but nobody's been arrested yet.
When do you think we're going to see the arrest?
What do you think is the next step in this process?
I think you're going to be seeing more Atlantas, first of all.
And they're still, you know, these prosecutors work.
I'm sure they're working hard.
But no, there should be people.
In my world, there would be people.
You know, I think that this could have been done in 30 days, but nothing's too difficult when you don't have to do it yourself.
I know a former prosecutor, Stephanie Lambert, that I work with, I think it's been on Alex, that she believes this could be done in 30 days, having people in handcuffs.
But there's been a much more sort of high-level approach taken of putting together this whole comprehensive picture.
Meanwhile, there's all kinds of people across the country, though, they know broke the law in 2020.
They erased poll books.
They erased, they did all kinds of things they weren't.
And I think you might see a lot of those kinds of people get rounded up.
And then when they cool their heels in a jail cell for a few weeks, a lot of them start really thinking, do they want to spend the rest of their life doing that?
And so then they start feeding.
So we're getting more of that classic prosecution pattern emerge like Rudy Giuliani when he broke the back of the mafia.
You get the low-level guys, you just grind, you grind your way up.
In this case, all the information is there.
It's almost the limiting factor is the capacity of the United States government to absorb, to learn and absorb and really verify all this information.
And then they have ways of getting much deeper and getting, you know, going beyond the suggestive stuff that we've acquired or sometimes more than suggestive and getting really full.
So it's taken them a year, something that I thought would take a couple of months.
But I think that we're right at the point you're going to be seeing they can't, they have to start arresting people.
Well, and a lot of us, a lot of us know what they know.
Again, you know, just even this story alone, grand jury testimony from a senator, David Perdue, suggests Governor Brian Kemp halted investigation in 2020 election.
So, I mean, that in and of itself, it's like he covered up an investigation.
He halted an investigation despite the fact that there was plenty of evidence to go on.
That seems like enough to be an arrest warrant to me.
And then you can work up from there.
But I just think they're running out of time.
Now, the story of the Reuters story about Gabby is Tulsi Gabbard rather is very interesting.
The ODNI said some security gaps in voting machines used in Puerto Rico stemmed from their use of vulnerable cellular technology and that software flaws existed that could give hackers access into deep, vital electoral systems.
Now, Puerto Rico is obviously an interesting geopolitical case, right?
It's not an American state, but it's under American jurisdiction.
Is there something about Puerto Rico that gives the federal government greater access?
And why are they doing it in Puerto Rico?
Is it because it only happened there?
Or it just seems to me like, you know, this happened in a lot of states, but maybe did they start on Puerto Rico because they had some sort of access that they don't have to normal state functions?
No, it started in Puerto Rico because there's a guy, the U.S. Attorney of Puerto Rico is the only honest guy in the DOJ at some level.
His name is Stephen Muldreau.
The man he's he's that that article mentions the U.S. Attorney of Puerto Rico.
This is what in the U.S. system, the cardinals of the church are the U.S. attorneys.
There are 94 of them.
They're sprinkled across the country.
Biden came in.
Well, and Trump, Trump appointed when he was, he appointed a lifelong DOJ guy to be the U.S. Attorney of Puerto Rico, not a political position, and the guy wasn't a political guy, a careerist DOJ, highly regarded, 36-year prosecutor.
Biden came in, he fired 93 out of 94 U.S. attorneys, but he left that guy in place because the guy wasn't, he's not a Trumplican.
He's a widely, everyone in the DOJ respects him.
He's a, you know, a guy who worked his way up.
He's what U.S. attorneys should really be.
It's not a political and honest, honest.
He's, I hear, I've never met him face to face, but I know quite a bit about him because I know, and they say he's like a priest and that he seems mild, but he's got a spine like an iron rod.
They say he's just a tough guy, no nonsense, as straight as an arrow as you can find.
And so he's so well regarded across the DOJ.
He's the one that he's actually been, he's the one who started this.
And he had reasonable cause, evidently, reasonable grounds to believe that there was corruption, something to do with the machines.
I think it has to do with the supply chain of the machines.
They say that the machines come from Taiwan, but really there are key components out of Beijing in them.
Something that he gave him enough of an authority that he got a warrant and he sees the machines used in November 2024 in Puerto Rico.
What's especially funny about that is the Democrats thought they had the election in the bag.
So I'm sure they, whatever they had wanted to do, whatever the kinds of tricks they pulled, they were doing it in Puerto Rico because they never thought they would have to answer for it.
So I'm highly confident they found dirty stuff.
There's, and, you know, there's the press show throws such a misdirection.
They say, well, they've said, you know, they said they did this because they worried about Venezuelan connectivity, but they haven't found Venezuelan connectivity.
You know, they're not going to find a telephone call from Venezuela.
The whole thing is Venezuela technology, which has been proven.
SmartMatic is manufactured from one place in Taiwan.
We even know how they do it.
There's a warehouse that gets parts from mainland China and parts from another Taiwanese factory in this.
Whereas there's a switcheroo and the mainland Chinese parts go to SmartMatic, but the paperwork shows that it's from the Taiwan.
We even know how this is done.
So, I mean, so he's enough to prove, you can't, you can assume, well, it happened in Puerto Rico because there was one honest U.S. attorney left in the system.
And let's not forget Biden not only didn't fire him, he's the only guy he didn't fire when he came in, he reappointed him.
So he's a completely, he's not, you know, when all this stuff blows up, the bad guys, the press are going to, the mainstream are going to say, oh, Trump, you know, some Trump guy within the DOJ did this and that.
No, the guy's not a Trump guy.
That's why it's so valuable.
He's just a square, old-fashioned white starch shirt kind of prosecutor, which is what I was taught by my granddad, who was sort of, I kind of grew up around the edge of corruption in different ways.
I saw this and that.
And I remember my granddad teaching me, you know, Patty, whatever, if you're ever involved, if you ever have something like this happen, what you do is you go to the U.S. attorney of the state.
That's those are the people.
You don't go to local police.
You don't go to state police.
Everyone's corrupt.
Everyone's corrupt.
You go to the FBI and you go to the U.S. attorney.
Those are the people you can always trust.
Well, I don't think the world's like that anymore, but it turns out there was one guy, Stephen Mundreaux.
And Stephen Muller and Stephen Muldreau made his bones chasing cartel members around the Caribbean and stuff.
So he's very familiar with all of this situation.
And so they can't, they're going to try to tarnish him at some point, but there's nothing they can tarnish him with.
Well, again, going back to the Reuters article, it's just, it's fascinating when you read between the lines because they say, what's most alarming here is that Director Gabbard's own team acknowledges there was no evidence of foreign interference, yet they seized voting machines and election data anyway.
U.S. Senator Mark Warner, the top Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Panel, told Reuters on Thursday, absent a foreign nexus, intelligence agencies have absolutely no lawful role in domestic election administration.
This is exactly the kind of overreach Congress wrote the law to prevent, and it raises profound questions about whether our intelligence tools are being abused.
Gabbard's appearance at an FBI raid of an election facility in Fulton County, Georgia last week, highlights her direct involvement in these issues.
Last week's FBI raid in Georgia prompted alarm among some national security experts, worried that Gabbard and the ODNI have overstepped their authority in investigating a sensitive domestic matter.
So this is what that letter was in response to.
It's just funny to me.
They're saying she should have no role in this if there's no foreign nexus, you know, a nexus of foreign interference.
And it's like, okay, but she is involved.
What does that tell you?
I mean, you read between the lines, there was a foreign nexus involved.
The evidence that they would find in Fulton County, Georgia.
So there's only one person she was calling in that famous picture.
There's only one person that she'd be calling there.
And most of the evidence that they could find there, different computer tapes and things.
There's nothing that you could go.
There's not much you could go and lay your eyes on and verify whether or not, you know, forensic white hat cyber guys are going to have to go through those hard drives and find stuff and piece what's there.
There is one thing that she could verify on site that I can think of, and that is there's 148,000 ballots from 2020 in Fulton County, Georgia that by judicial order are specially segregated lock and key.
There's a dozen affidavits that say those 148,000 ballots are mail-in ballots, but there's no creases in them.
They said they were never folded and they have, they can't, that doesn't make any sense.
Every mark is a perfect, I think it's a perfect crescent moon, but the same crescent moon for 148,000 pages.
And they're 93%, either 10% or 7% Trump, 93% Biden.
That means say 10,000 of the 148,000 are Trump, 138,000 are Biden.
The spread's 128,000.
So if there's 128,000 points of spread in that, Biden only won by 11,000 back in 2020.
2020.
And so Tulsi Gabbard could, in 10 seconds, have walked in.
Now, I'm just deducing.
What could she have been there for?
Because she wasn't there to get on the computer and examine discs and stuff.
She could well have gone in and walked to that cage, open it up, run her hand through the ballots.
And if they are, in fact, flat mail-in ballots and every more, every vote is the same half moon, and you can just see that about one in 15 are Trump.
She could in 10 seconds know that story is true.
And my guess, it would not surprise me.
I don't know this by rumor, but it would certainly not surprise me if what happened, she was down there to physically say, to see that, and then walk out and say, Mr. President, after all the bullshit we've heard for five years, and people say this and people say that and people deny what each other, words, I physically have laid my eyes on this goddamn stack of ballots.
And I'm telling you, this is what I saw.
I'm pretty confident.
That's the only thing that could explain to me why Tulsi Gabbard had to be there physically and then call the president.
That's the one piece of evidence I think she wasn't there going through receipts of bags of supply of the supply chain.
She was probably there to look.
The one piece of evidence I can think that she could have gone and verified with her own eyes immediately was what I just walked you through.
And I would hope that that would mean we really are on the cusp of like actually seeing the consequences of this.
Because again, whether it's the election stuff or the free speech stuff, or I mean, I really think that Trump has is running out of time.
And I mean, he's spent a year, you know, theoretically working behind the scenes.
And it's like, it's time we start seeing, you know, the fruition of this.
And we just aren't seeing it right now, although they seem to be feeling that heat and wanting to come out.
In fact, I don't know if you had any insight on this.
I'd heard rumors that JD Vance had started a task force to look into fraud, specifically in California.
JD Vance was going to be at the head of it, but that Todd Blanche is getting involved and shutting it down somehow.
Todd Blanche, still apparently a thorn in the side of the Trump administration with an outsized authority to shut down things that would damage the Democrats.
I think that Trump has Trump's not fully in charge, is what I can deduce from this.
There are people who can have guardrails around Trump, that he has to make trades, that he himself has to hondle and make trades about what he's going to push on and what he's going to not and not.
So, because it's so, although Trump is a man who's been betrayed so many times that he's going to overly rely, he's going to have abandonment complex.
He's never going to want to break a relationship with somebody he trusts.
So it's going to be very, and so he trusts this guy, Todd Blanche.
Todd Blanche, you know, was his lawyer for one case in New York.
He was a Democrat who switched to Republicans so he could defend Trump.
He didn't win.
It was one of these silly New York cases.
He didn't win.
But Trump has a lot of loyalty to him and made him.
But I have a feeling someone told Trump to make him that because some of these mistakes Trump makes just are so self-inflicted that he's either getting bad advice or bad.
Like it's almost like someone's telling him sometimes you can't fire Todd Blanche.
What if his treasurer and other people, people who are not in it at all, say, look, we think that it would so many people, JP Morgan, JP Morgan was the financier for stuff.
You know, a financial company can't take a criminal indictment.
Once you're saying a financial company like a bank is caught up in crime, then it's, you know, it's whole, it's a whole stack of promises all held together by trust.
And that, so what if, what if, I mean, I would really be, I would expect that I know that there's some voices around him saying, look, you reveal this 3,000 people and there's such a global crisis of confidence that comes out of this.
The system collapses.
And our models, Mr. President, show that 90% of Americans die in the year following a global financial collapse.
Well, what I would do then is I would take that information and I'd go one by one to each one of those people and go, look, you're either going to jail or we're going to figure out a way to work this out.
You're going to have to resign and we can keep it quiet if you want, but you're going to have to make this right or otherwise we're going to have to bring that.
Because, you know, there was a time like 10 years ago, even more, 15 years ago, that there was a branch of the government that thought they detected basically the beginning rumblings of what would turn into a bank run on the credit unions.
And so they started a year-long project to go in and create shell companies to secretly start buying up securities for the credit unions because they knew that if anybody found out, hey, the government thinks the credit unions are going to fail, then that would start the downfall that they were trying to prevent in the first place.
And so I did a film about it at the time that it was happening.
And so I just keep thinking about that.
It's like, okay, it's possible the government, when they see something's wrong, they have the ability and the resources to create totally secret in absolute secrecy, these massive maneuvers to systematically go around and solve these problems before any of us even know they exist.
So that's what I would do if I had this list is I'd go one by one to these people and go, you know, this is about to come out.
I know, I guess what he could do is say, look, I've given, I think they've put out half of 6 million documents.
How about I'll give you three months to digest that?
We're going to set up a bipartisan commission, four retired senators, two from each side that everybody trusts, that are still alive, that aren't, you know, the Jasmine Crocket types, not, but everybody trusts some commission that's going to review and we're going to commit to releasing another, you know, 10% per month.
We're going to eat through and maybe it's going to be more restrictive.
You know, there's so many victims and think of the people who are finding out.
How do you like to be some woman, you know, your mom now at in Dubuque Iowa?
Kids are finding out that 20 years ago you were doing this crazy stuff.
So they've got those people to think about.
I actually think they've done a pretty good job, a very good job on what they've released in protecting the victims.
But maybe they have, or maybe they say, look, Trump says, look, elect me again.
And in the second half, in a year from now, if I'm elected again, I'll then dump the rest of this.
I guess that's playing politics with it.
I think they should give a slow leak maybe and just there's just keep leaping, putting out tranches of it.
All right, folks, we're going to be back on the other side.
I'm going to open up the phone lines for your calls.
I do have to tell you, the alexjonestore.com has some fantastic new products in store, including the very cool knives, three different types of knives for your particular style, all of them incredibly well-made, best possible attributes, best possible, I want to say ingredients.
The ingredients of the knife are top of the line.
And when you're cooking a knife, you really want the best ingredients.
And we have the best out there at the alexjonesstore.com.
Go there today, thealexjones.com slash Harrison, and we'll be right back.
Hey, what's up, y'all?
I've never done a video like this.
My friend Ian showed me how, so I figured I would do it.
Since this is one of the most important things you can possibly understand in the conspiracy world, see, I woke up to this guy, Brian Johnson, with this post.
I'm building a religion.
Wait a second.
I know what you're going to say.
That's a knee-jerk reaction.
He made the Don't Die party.
Don't die becomes world's history's fastest growing ideology.
It saves the human race.
And then, of course, he has the joiner die, you know, classic Americana piece of patriotic propaganda.
But in this case, instead of saying joiner diet, just says don't die, which is interesting because that is, of course, the exact pitch of the serpent in the Garden of Eden.
And this is the end result of the conspiracy.
This is the bottom of the rabbit hole once you've gotten to the bottom of it.
It is like a giant circle that connects the first book of the Bible with the last book of the Bible.
It's Genesis and Revelation.
It's the promise of infinite death.
And it's the fact that right now, the power elite think they have the technology to live forever.
And see, this is tied into things like climate change as well, since it's don't die human, don't die, earth, don't die as a species.
Yeah, he's promising that you'll be able to live forever and that you'll, I don't know, practically be like gods.
Genesis 3.4, but the serpent said to the woman, you will surely not die, for God knows that when you eat it, your eyes will be open and you will be like God at knowing good and evil.
This really is the key to understanding everything.
And humans get this on an intrinsic, almost like supernatural level.
If you think about all of the bad guys from all of the transcendent media, media that has made its way into our subconscious, things like Lord of the Rings, Star Wars, Harry Potter, what is the thing that is similar between all of the bad guys in these movies?
They all are desperate to live forever.
Voldemort literally means to flee from death, right?
You've got Star Wars, Darth Vader, his whole fall had to do with the promise of, how does he put it?
The tale of Darth Sidious and the powers that some would say would seem unnatural, right?
The way Darth Vader gets seduced is through his fear of death.
You fear death?
Well, guess what?
I have a way around it.
Join me.
And instead of living, you become a half-dead zombie, a robot, an automaton.
Instead of gaining all the power, you become the servant of power and your will is subsumed in the will of evil.
So this really is like the heart of everything.
And while that's sort of talking about it on a mystical, metaphysical, or spiritual level, there's something very real going on right now, which is that the billionaires in power think they're on the cusp of or perhaps have already achieved immortality for all intents and purposes, whether that's uploading your consciousness to some sort of hard drive, some sort of cloud service so you can have a new body or anti-aging technology, reversing the aging process through molecular manipulation.
There are a few different ways that they think that they are about to be able to live forever.
Now, when you think about that, what that means is that the world has to change completely.
You can't have infinite life in the world as it's set up right now because you would have infinite growth with no death, and that's unsustainable, and you can't have that.
So what they're doing now, everything in the world going on right now, the grand conspiracy at the heart of it is trying to set up a world in which certain people can live forever, in which the immortality technology is granted to the people at the top, and they wield it as a bribe or blackmail to the rest of humanity, saying, if you serve us well enough, maybe you too can receive the infinite life technology.
Because not everybody can have it, obviously.
If everybody lives forever, that's just unsustainable.
It's ridiculous to just, you know, people keep being born and everybody would live forever.
That doesn't make any sense.
You have a small amount of people who live forever and they dangle immortality over everybody else, saying, if you disobey us, we will deny this of you.
So all human evil essentially all goes back to the fear of death and the desire to live forever, which is why Jesus Christ, his central, his whole deal, his central thing was overcoming death and showing you that you can live forever spiritually by living a good life instead of doing evil to try desperately to cling to material immortality.
It's like the central pillar of Jesus' teaching and life and the overall message of his time on earth was the defeat of death spiritually through communion and good living and being one with God.
All right, welcome back.
Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen.
This is War Room.
I'm your host, Harrison Smith, coming to you live on Infowars.com and banned.video.
Please do share those links, share everything that we do.
Components, by the way.
Components was the word I was looking for, not ingredients.
Harrison, you idiot.
Knives are made with components that are high quality and high functioning and powerful.
So these components are the best in the world, not ingredients.
Ingredients are food.
But hey, the ingredients on our site are good too.
Everything is of the highest quality at thealxjonstore.com because it wouldn't make any sense for us to do anything else.
We need you coming back and buying more.
So we need you to like the product.
And we need you to know that by going to thealxjonesstore.com, not only are you getting a fantastic product at a great price, which would be enough anyway, I would think, to sell it to most people, but knowing that your purchase goes directly towards funding this outlet, InfoWars, Alex Jones, myself, the entire crew that's here, that is really something special and unique and uniquely powerful on the world stage.
So thank you so much for your support.
And we just ask you that you double down now as we enter our final phase of this iteration before we enter our cocoon and come out of butterfly.
So help be a part of that metamorphosis.
Not only do I have the very cool knives, we also have the Optimal Human Hydration Electrolyte Drink Mix that tastes amazing.
It's got French sea salt, but that's for the natural source of sodium to help you absorb the water.
It actually makes water hydrate you better than normal water, but it also just tastes great.
It's your drink mix, little packets, a big bag comes with a bunch of little packets.
You pour one into a cold glass of water and it helps you get you the electrolytes, taurine, and helps you hydrate better than water alone.
And it tastes good.
So you got lots of reasons to do it.
And best of all, you support us in the process.
So get yourself a delicious, healthy drink mix hydration from Optimal Human in lemon lime and strawberry lemonade flavor to help you absorb water and be more hydrated, healthy, and active.
Optimal Human Hydration available now at the AlexJonesStore.com slash Harrison.
If you want to let them know who sent you.
Now, I talked about this video early on.
We haven't gone to it yet.
So I think now is the time.
We'll go to clip number 19 here.
I'm going to try to get this lady on.
I don't know who she is, but she's great.
And we're going to get into what's going on in the UK as the UK government is basically buckling under the weight of the Epstein revelations and is on the verge of absolute and total collapse because of one thing revealed about one person in the Epstein files.
And that's appropriate.
That's how it should be.
One person being utterly corrupt should be an indictment of him and everybody who works with him.
And then there should be big maneuvers, big reorganizations.
So you hold that person to account.
This is the way it's supposed to go.
It's not going that way in America.
So instead, I guess if we want any of this to actually matter, we got to get out on the streets with signs of our own and force the matter because the authorities in this country are clearly way too involved in this stuff to ever put a stop to it.
So here's a patriot and a proactive individual showing us, really shaming us into what we should all be doing.
Let's watch.
unidentified
I wanted to give you guys a quick update on Mark Tremo, who is the UCLA professor who emailed Jeffrey Epstein tips to get infants to suck more vigorously on a pacifier.
I went and stood outside of his building at UCLA yesterday with a giant sign with his quote.
And on the other side, it said, Fire Mark Tremo.
And I screamed by myself for an hour.
At the end, when my voice was shot and I was exhausted, the department head came up to me.
He let me know they're not renewing his contract.
And I suggested he better get his name off of that website if they don't want this to continue daily.
That woman has done more to punish the Jeffrey Epstein collaborators than the Department of Justice.
That one woman has had more of an impact than Todd Blanche and Donald Trump and JD Vance and everybody we elected into office so far.
That one woman has at least gotten one guy associated with Jeffrey Epstein fired from his job.
And that's more than any of us can say.
So well done, lady.
Well, I don't know her name.
Somebody else posted that video.
If anybody knows who she is and can help us get in contact to DM me on X at HarrisonH. Smith or tag me might be a better way to reach me.
But I want to talk to her because I want her to inspire more people to do exactly this because clearly our system is overwhelmed, co-opted.
It is broken and in need of not reform, but replacement.
And this is becoming a very dire situation, a dire set of circumstances.
And the people that are at fault for our collapse have no intention of slowing down, no intention of punishing themselves, certainly, and no intention of altering their behavior whatsoever because we're not making them.
And we have to make them.
So I'm going to go to this video from Clint Russell at Liberty Lockpod.
I think he absolutely nails it.
Clip number five.
The Epstein files, he says, are like an x-ray revealing the cancerous rot infecting us at every single level of government.
This is like an x-ray machine being held up to the deep state.
It actually shows you the internals of how our system works and why it's so broken and why we should be so angry and why we should be demanding, I mean, not even justice at this point, but a total reset.
It's just, it's just so egregious.
It's so over the top.
I understand fully the exasperation that people are dealing with after looking into this.
And then you look at the media silence on it and you go, wait, they don't care about like this is the biggest story in the world and they're not talking about it.
And then you start to look at the finance side behind those operations and you look at how Barry Weiss became the head of CBS News and how the Ellisons took over that and TikTok and everything else.
And you're like, oh, because that's all part of the same thing.
That's how it actually works.
That's how corporate America slash the governments of the world work.
It's all dirty.
It's all filthy.
It's all not meritocratic.
It's cronyism at its core and it's criminal at its roots.
And no one's coming to save us.
The DOJ will not dig.
They will not prosecute.
They're telling it straight to your face.
As you know, it is not a crime to party with Mr. Epstein.
And so it's horrible.
It's not a crime to email with Mr. Epstein.
We don't even know what you're talking about.
Even though there's dozens of women who've stood outside Congress a dozen times demanding justice and they go, who are you talking about?
We don't even see these women.
We don't even know they exist.
You've got people like Dan Bongino and Kash Patel getting into the top two positions at the FBI explicitly saying that they are going to get to the bottom of this, telling us, do not let this go.
You've got Cash and Dan and Pam and all of the other people at the top levels of justice, which are all covering up and all not just covering up, but actively, overtly destroying their reputations to everybody with eyes to see and ears to hear who has any an IQ north of Rome Temp is all concluding the same thing.
So once you realize that they're all lying, you have to ask yourself why.
And if you ask yourself why, I think the only conclusion you can come to is that this is it.
This is the apex.
This is the heart of darkness.
This is how the fucking system actually runs.
And if the people really see it, if they not just see it, but they believe it, they feel it in their core, they have no choice but to demand that this system falls.
Absolutely, absolutely perfectly put by Clint Russell, Liberty Lockpod.
Couldn't have said it better myself.
It's a troubling situation to be in.
I got more videos of other people recognizing something similar.
In fact, what's his name?
Clay Martin, I think his name is.
He has two videos shepherding your normie into the light.
But essentially, the idea is kind of similar to the problem that we've talked about before, where like if Donald Trump wanted to arrest Benjamin Netanyahu on an ICC warrant, I'm pretty certain that the people who would carry out that order would refuse the order.
I think they'd be more loyal to Netanyahu than to Trump.
And that's sort of the situation we're in here.
All of these people are more loyal to their mafia than they are to the United States or to truth or to justice or to their fellow human beings.
It's a really, really, really big problem we got.
We cannot arrest all these people.
The problem is actually too big.
So where do we go from here?
I don't exactly know.
One thing that Clint Russell did mention in that was the takeover of CBS News.
And I don't know if you guys found that video because let's go to clip 29 here.
This is the new and improved CBS News.
Remember, Donald Trump helped, you know, Larry Ellison and his son take over CBS News, just like he helped take over TikTok, ostensibly because they're too biased.
They were too anti-Trump, I guess.
They were too left-wing.
And then you swap them out with somebody else who's just as left-wing, but also a Zionist.
So it's like, this was never about us.
This was never for us.
This was never something that benefited the average American, even though it was dressed up that way.
So now Barry Weiss's new CBS News is convinced that Jeffrey Epstein is a Russian agent.
Poland says it's looking into possible connections between convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein and Russian intelligence services.
The announcement came after the U.S. Justice Department last week released millions more files related to the federal investigation into Epstein.
Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk said Tuesday, quote, more and more leads, more and more information, and more and more commentary in the global press all relate to the suspicion that this unprecedented pedophilia scandal was co-organized by Russian intelligence services.
And Poland's Prime Minister Donald Tusk said that any compromising material that Russia might have gotten could still be used today, which then he said creates risks to democratic institutions along with national security.
He also called Epstein's network a satanic circle of pedophiles and said that any links whatsoever will have to be clarified.
Like I said yesterday, I mean, they may still be operating under this illusion that they are covering up a story by covering it in this way, but they're not.
All they're doing is exposing their own deceptiveness, their own deception, their own willingness to cover up horrific crimes and use it to their own ends by blaming Russia, who they want everybody to hate anyway.
It's really gross.
Joanna Rubinstein of Sweden has just stepped down as chair of Sweden for UNHCR, the UN's refugee replacement agency, after it's been revealed.
She visited Jeffrey Epstein on his pedo island in 2012.
At the time, he was already a convicted sex offender.
She went to the island fully aware of his convictions.
She is still on the board member of several children's organizations.
Isn't that lovely?
So, this woman, Joanna Rubinstein, talking about having a wonderful lunch and an afternoon in paradise.
I guess that's German, but I don't care.
And she's a board member on the Global Partnership to End Violence Against Children, Early Childhood and Peace Consortium, the World Economic Forum, Global Coalition for Digital Safety, you know, to protect the kids, International Esports Committee, UNICRI, the UN Interregional Crime and Justice Research Institute, Yala Rinkaby, Sweden for UNHCR, the Refugee Agency.
She's executive committee member of the and a council member of the UN Sustainable Development Solutions Network, former president and CEO of Childhood USA.
So, why is this Swedish friend of Jeffrey Epstein in charge of childhood USA?
Because our world is run by perverted rapists, actually.
Swedish UN official resigns after contact with Epstein revealed.
Joanna Rubenstein, chair of Sweden for UNHCR, resigned.
Joanna chose to leave her assignment after what appeared in the media over the weekend.
This was not something that the organization or the board was previously aware of, said Daniel Axelson, press officer for Swedish UN HCR, according to Daily Espressen.
In 2012, Rubinstein visited Epstein's private island with her family and later thanked him in an email describing the stay in positive terms.
At the time of the visit, Epstein had already been convicted of sex crimes.
This is the way everybody should react.
Everybody caught interacting with Jeffrey Epstein should do the honorable thing and step down and resign.
Spare your organization the chaos of having to force it.
But nobody's doing that, at least not here in America.
In fact, one of the only things to have happened here in America, interestingly enough, Brad Karp resigns as chair of Paul Weiss admit-Epstein fallout.
So yeah, it turns out the very people suing InfoWars into non-existence happen to be friends with Jeffrey Epstein.
What?
What a shock.
I mean, here I am thinking these people are motivated by a sincere desire to protect children.
And that's what they keep presenting themselves as.
Imagine my shock in hearing they were friends with Jeffrey Epstein.
I mean, I'm appalled.
A lawyer has come under fire for a series of email exchanges he had with Epstein after the sex offender's first stint in prison.
Brad Karp, the longtime chair of one of the nation's premier law firms, has resigned from Paul Weiss amid backlash over his ties to Jeffrey Epstein, the latest development for top officials whose relationship with the late sex offender was uncovered in newly released Department of Justice files.
Leading Paul Weiss for the last 18 years has been an honor of my professional life, Karp said in a statement.
Recent reporting has created a distraction and has placed a focus on me that is not in the best interest of the firm.
That's one way of putting it.
Karp had come under fire for a series of email exchanges he had with Epstein, which came several years after the millionaire served billionaire, served his first stint in prison for solicitation of prostitution with a minor and was branded a sex criminal.
A federal case was formally dismissed in August 2019 following Epstein's death by suicide in jail awaiting trial.
Karp had not been accused of any wrongdoing.
In one email dating back to July 2015, Karp thanked Epstein for, quote, including me in an evening I'll never forget at the financier's home, writing that it was truly once in a lifetime in every way.
So many of these emails just are so gay.
Just a little note, just a little observation of mine.
There's so much that's just like, thank you, Jeffrey, for the wonderful evening.
In reality, there's like beating chained up women.
It's just like, okay.
Epstein responded, writing that there are, quote, many, many knights of unique talents and promising Karp he'd be invited often.
In another set of emails from 2016, Karp attempted to use Epstein to connect his son to filmmaker Woody Allen for a job.
Yes, he's utilizing the pedophile network.
It's great.
It's good.
Very powerful network, apparently.
Paul Weiss was retained by Leon Black, then the CEO of the firm's longtime client Apollo, to negotiate a series of fee disputes with Jeffrey Epstein that spanned several years, the spokesperson said.
The firm was adverse to Epstein, and at no point did Paul Weiss or Brad Karp ever represent him.
No, they just had wonderful, unforgettable evenings in his home.
Okay, so he has chosen to step down.
He's like the only one.
And stepping down is just a way to avoid actual accountability.
The World Economic Forum is, of course, investigating itself.
I can't wait to find out what they think about all of this.
It's like, guys.
Okay, I mean, when you say World Economic Forum, you understand that is a synonym for elite pedophile cabal, right?
I like how they're treated like a sovereign nation.
In light of these interactions, the governing board requested the Audit and Risk Committee to look into the matter, which subsequently decided to initiate an independent review, the World Economic Forum said in a statement.
This, of course, is the fact that the CEO of the World Economic Forum, Borgay Brindi, I think his name is.
I think that's how you pronounce it.
Was caught having a long-term relationship with Jeffrey Epstein, noted sex offender.
The WEF said Brendi, a former Norwegian foreign minister who has been CEO since 2017, fully supported the review, which he had requested himself.
What an honorable man.
Brindi said in the statement he met Epstein in 2018 at a dinner in New York where he'd been invited by former Norwegian deputy prime minister Rod Larson.
Brinde said he attended two similar dinners in 2019 with Epstein along with diplomats and business leaders, but these events, along with a few emails and text messages, were the full extent of their interaction.
I was completely unaware of Epstein's past and criminal activities, Brinde said in a statement, adding he regretted not conducting a more thorough investigation into Epstein before meeting him.
Yeah, he's lying.
So he's lying about that, I say.
Now, the Clintons have apparently agreed to appear and want it to be public when they appear ahead of the oversight committee, which is a little bit disturbing for me because they are involved up to their eyeballs in this stuff.
And if they're this confident going in, it's because they have the whole thing rigged already.
Like, I'm going to say right now, nothing's going to, it's not going to be what we need it to be.
Bill and Hillary Clinton agreed to testify before the House Oversight Committee after Chairman James Comer moved forward in holding them in criminal contempt of Congress.
Republicans and Democrats on the Oversight Committee have been clear no one is above the law, and that includes the Clintons, Comer said.
After delaying and defying duly issued subpoenas for six months, the House Oversight Committee moved swiftly to initiate contempt of Congress proceedings in response to their non-compliance.
Once it became clear that we would hold them in contempt, the Clintons completely caved and will appear for the transcribed film to depositions this month, Comer said.
So it's not going to be live, but apparently they're going to release the transcripts and the audio and video transcripts as well.
And then we have this from Infowars.com.
Black market baby farms, the darkest allegations from the Epstein files yet.
With over 3 million new documents being released by the United States Department of Justice in its latest performative attempt to comply with the Epstein Files Transparency Act, the full scope of the crimes of Jeffrey Epstein's sex trafficking network are slowly coming into focus.
The acts of Epstein and his accomplices are so horrid that even the DOJ's best attempt at a limited hangout cannot fully shield their depravity from public perception.
Now, again, I'll get into the reaction this is having in the UK on the other side, where they're actually bringing the entire government down, which is appropriate.
Here in America, they're not doing any such thing.
So it's up to us.
So that's got to be, you know, our next decision is what we as the American people do about it.
I think it's time for some major protests.
I think we can get the left and the right together on this.
I think we could send a powerful message.
And I think that message needs to be do something or be replaced, is a polite way of putting it.
I think we might be finished as a country and probably an entire continent.
There are plans in place to deliberately make the British countryside, quotes, less white.
Now, wait until you hear how mental this is.
The Chiltons National Landscape Team has set out proposals that include community outreach schemes to attract more Muslims to the area, particularly from nearby Luton, apparently.
They're going to recruit more diverse staff and publish advertising material featuring ethnic minorities and write them in, quote, community languages.
What so adverts for the Chiltons in Urdu, Bengali, and Arabic, is it?
They also want dogs to be kept under tighter control because some groups are scared of them.
So because perhaps some people from, say, Somalia are scared of dogs, rural British folk now have to keep them on a lead, do they?
Melvern Hills National Landscape in the West Midlands said many minority peoples have no connection to nature in the UK because their parents and their grandparents did not feel safe enough to take them or had other survival preoccupations.
It added, while most white English users value the solitude and complentative activities with the countryside affords us, the tendency for ethnic minority people is to prefer social company, family, friends, and schools.
Can I just say if I was an ethnic minority, I'd find all of that quite offensive.
But anyway, let's just think about the two places named so far.
We've got the West Midlands there, we've got Luton.
They have entire areas that are basically non-white in those areas.
Huge levels of immigration from Pakistan.
A mosque leader in Birmingham helps to appoint the chief constable of West Midlands police.
Even years ago in Luton, elements of the local Muslim community held this huge rally.
unidentified
Hands off mosses!
Everyone's got a right to protest, but I found their chanting provocative and extreme.
So the Chiltern's National Landscape Area wants to attract more people like that to the British countryside.
Do they?
The British countryside needs those people, does it?
I'd like to start a diversity scheme aimed at making sure white people feel safe in areas of Luton and Birmingham again.
I mean, how about that?
How about that?
Near the lake districts in Cumbria, they're building a £2.5 million mega mosque.
I mean, there are actually hardly any Muslims there, and it is designed to help bring Muslims to the local area.
Now, you know, again, it's not as if people aren't trying to do this stuff already, is it?
Nearby, a council refused a planning application for a small children's home because they thought it might cause noise and disturbance.
But a two and a half million pound mega mosque in the area is absolutely fine, is it?
Now have a look at what the Church of England has announced today.
The Church of England has launched a new diversity drive, encouraging clergy to give more sermons about diversity and anti-racism.
Places of worship will additionally be allocated resources to assist refugees and asylum seekers, whilst being expected to advance diversity within leadership positions.
The Church of England seems to have learnt absolutely nothing.
They were accused just a couple of years ago of being a conveyor belt for illegal immigrants to fraudulently stay in Britain.
But if you think this is bad, just look at what has happened in Spain.
The government has just allowed more than 500,000 illegal migrants to have residency in Spain.
And here's what reportedly happened immediately outside the Pakistani consulate.
There's nothing more important than keeping you and your lessons.
That is a report from GBN, their reporter Patrick Christie's just laying out some of the suicidal, it's not stupidity, I was going to say suicidal stupidity.
No, it's just suicide, I guess.
It's just the UK killing themselves in a variety of different ways, and they are collapsing in sort of embarrassing fashion.
We can go to clip number 25 here.
Clip number 25.
During a TV interview of the UK's Kimmy Badenock, a rat is seen running around the government building in the background.
And there's literally mice and rats running around inside.
Just a little symbolic treatment there for you.
Just so you know how fully, you know, all-encompassing the collapse of the UK is.
Even their palaces are infested with rats.
That's disgusting and gross and embarrassing.
Let's go to clip number 21 here because the UK is collapsing under the weight of the Epstein revelations in the way that basically every government should, ours especially.
British Prime Minister Starmer faces labor rebellion and calls for resignation.
Admits he knew Mandelson kept close to Epstein after his conviction and nominated him to be U.S. ambassador anyway.
Former Prince Andrew and the disgraced, quote, Prince of Darkness, Peter Mandelson, have had their lives destroyed by the revelations contained in the DOJ's Epstein files, but the damage doesn't seem to be stopping there.
Failing Prime Minister Keir Starmer is facing open rebellion in his party after admitting that he knew Mandelson had stayed friends with convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein, but appointed him to U.S. ambassador anyway, even though he was warned of this fact by U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio.
So let's go to clip 21 here.
This is the moment Kier Starmer's soul leaves his body as he is confronted about this in their parliamentary proceedings.
If that was really the case, then he wouldn't mind if the ISC had a look.
And let's be clear.
He says the cabinet secretary makes it non-political, but that doesn't make it independent.
What we want is an independent look.
The ISC is independent.
The cabinet secretary works for him.
We know that there will be a cover-up because this implicates the prime minister and his chief of staff, Morgan McSweeney, a protégé of Peter Mandelson.
The Prime Minister chose to inject Mandelson's poison into the heart of his government.
So, you know, again, it's just one of these weird things.
Like, Europe killing itself outright.
Just everything they're doing seems scientifically programmed to destroy their native population.
At the same time, they don't let their farmers cover their food and pesticides.
And you can actually eat bread there and not die from it.
Like, there are certain things that Europe just does well.
When everything else is collapsing for some reason, they're good at this.
They're good at actually responding to these types of scandals.
And of course, you watch the back and forth in Parliament, and it's like, we need something like this here.
Our political system is too stiltified.
I mean, 90% of the time you see videos of somebody giving a speech in the Senate or the Congress.
Nobody else is in the room.
They're just giving speeches to nobody because we're like locked into this old form of government that doesn't really matter anymore or exist in a real way.
At least with Parliament, you got both sides are yelling back and forth at each other.
They're putting questions and putting the pressure on their opponents.
Like there's something to this that's valuable and good.
Unfortunately, it's also extremely manipulatable, which is why they can't get out of the mess that they're in because every time the right wing wins, the other coalitions form together to stop them from taking any power.
So I don't like the parliamentary system better than our system, but there are aspects to it that I really appreciate and aspects to the British society that I really appreciate.
In fact, I'm going to go to a different video here.
I'm going to go to clip number 27.
Or no, I'm sorry.
I'm going to go to clip number 14 here.
This is Lord Falconer, which when I say Lord Falconer, you're probably getting a certain image in your brain.
It ain't that, folks.
It's not a fitting title for the Lord.
Lord Falconer.
This is another thing that you got to give credit to the Brits for.
This guy clearly doesn't want to talk about this, but the reporter in the most polite but insistent way ever just goes, well, you have to answer, actually.
I'm the press and public wants these answers, so I'm doing my job.
And you just got to give them credit.
Again, as much as they're all brainwashed idiots that are celebrating their own demise, 90% of the time we see clips from them, you got to appreciate the questioning on display here.
I thought that I might be able to convince you to at least say something because, of course, you were there in the moment in the moment when we sat down.
Well, we started on assisted dying, and as the government seems like it's in turmoil, having to sack its man in Washington, a man that you well know, I thought that you might want to say something either in his defense or about the situation we find ourselves in.
I mean, you got to kind of admit, you know, when people from Europe go, gee, I watch your TV.
And it's like, what the hell?
You all seem like children.
They got something.
They got a point.
They got a little bit of a point.
Like, that was excellently done.
And it just makes you go, why is our press so crappy?
Like, why do we suck so much?
Because the way he did that was masterful.
He refused to move on.
He refused to be pressured.
He didn't, there wasn't like a, well, you know, it was just like, okay, well, you know, I'm going to keep asking.
And when you do it like that, this guy has either got to answer the question or storm off or filibuster.
And he looks bad if he doesn't answer the question.
Like, it was just, that was very well done.
And of course, there's just the, of course, he's like, whoa, whoa, whoa, I don't want to talk about Mandelson.
I'm here to push the government killing our citizens.
I'm here to push assistance in dying.
I'm here to push euthanasing our old people.
Please, can we get back to that?
It's like that.
We got plenty of time for that, dude.
We got plenty of time for that.
Don't worry.
We know you are desperate to have the state allow doctors to murder people.
We know, we get that.
Let's talk about this other stuff.
It's just perfect.
It's just perfect, isn't it?
So the Daily News reports: after months of evasion, the Prime Minister was forced to admit that he appointed the Labor peer, Mandelson, as the U.S. ambassador, despite being told by officials he had remained friends with Epstein even after the businessman's conviction for child sex offenses.
Downing Street confirmed the PM also knew that Mandelson had continued to stay at Epstein's house while he was in prison and after he was released.
So again, it's this guy's relationship, this one guy with this one relationship.
Now, it was revealed that this guy was helping to rig, you know, vote or, you know, bidding for services for contracts for the UK government.
He was essentially taking advice from Epstein on wording to put in legislation.
So he was pretty involved.
But still, the amount that this guy, the amount of pushback, the amount of chaos this is causing in the UK over one guy and this one, I mean, it should be this times 10,000 here in America.
So why does it feel like I'm talking about a UK scandal?
It feels like when you look at what's happening in the UK, that this is a UK-based scandal.
It's not.
This is just the periphery of a United States-based scandal, but the United States is not experiencing anything like this.
This was the question time, the parliamentary gathering there where Prime Minister Kier Starmer offers an apology, clip number 37, saying he just can only apologize for his wrongdoing.
And no one, however well-connected, however experienced, however senior, should hold public office if they cannot meet the basic test of honesty.
I also want to address the publication of the information Mandelson provided during the appointment process.
I understand the strength of public feeling.
I share the anger that people feel when powerful individuals appear to escape scrutiny.
And I want to be able to release those documents as quickly as possible.
I wanted to release them yesterday, in fact, and to talk about them at Prime Minister's questions.
But the police have advised that releasing certain information now could risk prejudicing a future investigation or legal process.
And however frustrating from my personal point of view that is, and it is, I will not take any step, however politically tempting, however popular, that risks justice for victims.
Because this is not and must never become a political game.
It's like, I know that the modern democratic world order is full of theater kids, but this is too much.
This is too much.
I share your pain when people are not held to account.
It's just like, dude.
Shut up.
I mean, it's just, it is funny.
It's very funny when Kier Starmer, who is only prime minister now because he helped cover up migrant rape gangs for years as a barrister, would be shocked and appalled at the idea of somebody being associated with these rap scallions, these scandalous events.
It's like, dude.
Didn't the previous prime minister get busted having sex with a dead pig?
Isn't that something that happened like a couple of years ago?
I think I seem to remember David Cameron and a pig.
I mean, Jimmy Saville strike a bell anywhere in your memory.
Kier, the idea that the UK hasn't long been a well-established rapeocracy is an insult to your intelligence.
But it didn't go away.
Kier Starmer really thought that by putting on his best true dough level acting lesson that he'd get away with it.
He's not getting away with it.
Let's go to clip 27 now as he continues to be asked about why he would hire this person with such a suspicious past and history and network of friends.
Prime Minister, why was it that a man who had already twice resigned from government and crucially had a publicly known ongoing friendship with a convicted pedophile was appointed by you as ambassador to Washington?
And given all of this, what do you say to those in the country and those in your own party who say, frankly, that you have run out of steam?
Well, Chris, let me just address that head on and perhaps clarify something I said at Prime Minister's questions yesterday about the relationship between Mandelson and Epstein.
Because what I meant was it has been known publicly for some time that they knew each other.
And that is precisely why, when we were going through the appointment process for the ambassador role, we asked questions about the nature and extent of that relationship.
And what I didn't say yesterday, partly inhibited by the approach of the police, is that that is precisely why those questions were asked.
Questions about the nature and extent of the relationship, whether Mandelson had stayed, as was suggested, at Epstein's premises.
And it's almost strange that this would be the thing that's causing Keir Starmer's downfall.
I mean, and it is, by the way, he is not going to be prime minister for very much longer, according to the BBC.
Could this be the end for Keir Starmer?
Could this be the beginning of the end?
And it's basically everybody in parliament being like, it's over for him.
He's, you know, it's just a matter of time at this point.
It's like, here's a guy who, under his, you know, prime ministership, they've gotten rid of jury trials.
They've done the 15-minute cities.
They've brought in tens of thousands, if not hundreds of thousands of foreigners who have raped and murdered little girls.
And then the people protesting that have been brutally repressed and suppressed.
And they let out thousands of murderers to make room for all the people with tweets about the murderers to put in jail.
I mean, this man has committed crimes against humanity on a regular basis.
Why this is the thing that's going to oust him?
I don't know, but okay, whatever.
You know, whatever it's got to use.
Again, I don't get Britain.
I really don't understand Britain.
It's like you've got people in power with an openly genocidal agenda where they're literally just like, we're going to erase white people from their ancestral homelands.
Sign up now.
Like they're open about it.
If you are against it, they will kick your door down in the middle of the night and drag you away and throw you in jail for two years.
But then it's discovered like Mendelssohn wasn't totally forthright about his friendship with Epstein.
And it's like, well, the government's collapsing now.
I guess the government's collapsing.
It's like, okay, I don't, you got weird priorities, is all I'll say, but whatever, you know, whatever it takes, because the government is evil.
So take it down, please.
The Economist, again, calling it Britain's worst political scandal of the century.
You'd think the worst political scandal of the century would be the million white girls that were raped by foreigners in a systematic fashion, having the entire thing covered up by every branch of the government.
But no, apparently Mendelssohn lied on his job application.
So, okay.
Let's go to clip 27 now.
Or I'm sorry, let's go to clip 10 because this is a good context for the Mandelson scandal, which again, if it applies to England, it applies to America a thousand times more.
On the 27th of February, 2025, the Prime Minister, whilst in Washington, visited the American data and AI company Palantir at its headquarters.
The meeting did not appear in the Prime Minister's register of visits.
It only came to light later.
Now, Palantir, we should remember or remind ourselves, was a client of Global Council, the company in which Peter Mandelson had a commanding share.
Later that year, Palantir received from this government a £240 million deal.
British companies couldn't compete.
That deal was granted by direct award.
Given the allegations now coming to light about Mandelson's conduct, can the minister assure the House that the Cabinet Secretary will review the circumstances around the award of that contract and assure himself that there are no other such contracts, no other undisclosed meetings, that the government is going to go through all of the communications that Mandelson sent out whilst he was ambassador, messages we must assume, some of which were sent to old business contacts, potential few business contacts, and so on.
One of the most important things to me in my life is to get things right and to tell the truth and to be accurate.
That's why they say Alex Jones is right.
But it's not just our news, our prediction, or information that are incredibly accurate.
It's the products.
And out of all the amazing supplements at thealoishoneshore.com, our methylene blue, ultramethylene blue, is the best you're going to find on the market.
It's so good for your body.
Instant, clean, amazing energy.
You owe it to yourself if you sat on the fence to go to thealoxympstore.com right now and get ultramethylene blue.
And believe me, you are going to want to reorder it again.
We have an 84% reorder on that product.
No other supplement anywhere has anything even close.
That is how amazing it is.
Secure your ultramethylene blue now at thealoishimpstore.com.
And thanks for keeping us on the air.
Repeat what you said is happening.
unidentified
You feel in the I feel like that stuff in my fingers.