All Episodes
Oct. 1, 2025 - War Room - Harrison Smith
02:40:54
BREAKING: Federal Judge In Texas Green-Lights The Shutdown Of Infowars
Participants
Main voices
a
alex jones
23:33
h
harrison smith
01:51:26
Appearances
m
montgomery toms
01:42
r
richard werner
04:54
s
steve federico
02:01
Clips
b
bill maher
00:29
d
don lemon
00:40
q
queen maxima
00:43
| Copy link to current segment Download episode

Speaker Time Text
unidentified
InfoWars, tomorrow's news, today.
harrison smith
Good afternoon, ladies and gentlemen.
Welcome to the War Room.
I'm your host, Harrison Smith, coming to you live this Wednesday afternoon.
Here from the headquarters for the time being of InfoWars, band.video.
Of course, share those links, follow us on X, and make sure you're following at AJN Live at AJN Live.
We may be very rapidly moving over to the Alex Jones Network.
There was a hearing at 1 o'clock today.
Went from 1 until 2.
I listened to the whole thing, but of course, most of it is lawyer speak gobbledygook as far as I'm concerned.
So Alex Jones will be coming in probably just in a few minutes to the war room.
He's probably talking to lawyers right now, getting the final verdict, and he's going to come in and talk about it.
As I understood it, our lawyers were trying to get a emergency stay in order to stop the state court from going through with its reclamation claim and sending sheriffs in to basically run us out of the office.
So we were trying to get an emergency stay for that.
The judge basically denied us.
And so it could be a matter of days, if not hours.
Again, we'll try to get you the latest on that just as soon as we can.
But of course, we've been preparing for this.
Mentally, we've been prepared for over a year.
Physically, we've been prepared for several months.
This is the tweet from Alex earlier.
Red Alert, the Democrats want to shut down InfoWars today in Houston federal court at 1 p.m.
We put the filing up there and you can read it yourself.
Obviously, there are like 10 billion things wrong with this case from my personal perspective.
Every step of the way, it's just like relentless malfeasance.
It really is almost impossible to even remember all of it.
Like I go back over in my mind, like, wait, how did we get here again?
And I guess it's indicative or reminiscent, a reflection of everything else that we see in the world today.
Everything is just completely and utterly insane.
I've got so many stories today.
I've got a lot of enforcement of immigration, but a lot of immigration fraud that's being exposed, including something like 50% of the Muslim population in Minnesota being here essentially on immigration fraud.
We also have that New York and other states are issuing driver's license to migrants without even getting their name first.
Their name says no name on the license, but somehow it's a real ID and they can use it to drive trucks that they're not even licensed to drive and vote also, by the way, is something they can do once they have an ID.
So, you know, whether you're looking at the bankruptcy proceedings of InfoWars or the immigration system or the judicial system overall and the way it's been weaponized against Republicans in particular, really, it's just, it's relentless nonsense, relentless confusion and disruption.
And I really don't, like, I'm, I'm at this point pretty rapidly losing hope at what America can actually do here to regain our footing.
Trying not to be too blackpilled.
But I'm like watching a video yesterday about what's the word when you get divorced and you have to pay your wife money, child support and whatever that alimony.
Alimony is what I'm looking for.
And apparently the state collects like half of the alimony patients, half of the alimony proceeds go to the state.
And so they're incentivized to get the maximum amount of payment from the parent that doesn't have possession of the kids.
And so apparently that's one of the reasons why the least responsible parent will often get custody of the kids because the irresponsible parent can't be trusted to pay anything, but a responsible parent will work their butt off to pay what they owe, or they go to jail, by the way.
And so the state gets the most money if it gives the child to the irresponsible parent, knowing that the responsible parent will pay more than the irresponsible parent.
And so they're probably destroying kids' lives in a pretty sizable way in order to get that delicious cash.
And it's like, how is everything like this?
How is literally everything so utterly inverted and wrong?
I don't really understand.
All right, welcome back, folks.
This is The War Room.
I'm your host, Harrison Smith.
Infowars.com.
Band.video might not be around for that much longer.
So make sure you're following the Alex Jones network at AJN Live on X at AJN Live on X. Of course, follow at realAlex Jones, and you can follow me at Harrison H. Smith.
And yeah, make sure you're following us.
There may be some disruption in the signal over the next few days.
Not exactly sure.
Alex Jones will be joining us in studio.
The latest is that a federal judge had an opportunity to intervene and stop the state judge from basically liquidating all of everything, InfoWars owns.
He didn't do that.
So now it goes to the state judge who has had it out for us the entire time and has been salivating, just drooling at the prospect of destroying InfoWars because it was never about money, which it's supposed to be about.
Our entire bankruptcy system is designed to be about money, but this was never about money.
They told you that it was never about money.
It was always about shutting us up.
It was always about getting us off the air.
It was always about destroying this symbol of resistance to them.
And they've had a hell of a time with this.
I've said it over and over.
I think they expected us to go down after they took us offline in 2018.
I think they expected us to go down pretty quick in their completely rigged trials.
We've survived and held them off, battered them back.
Our cases now are going to the Supreme Court and could be completely overturned, and in my opinion, absolutely should be.
It's completely outrageous the way InfoWars has been treated.
And again, you can go back through the history.
I mean, just try to find, try to find a single other case where a major corporate bankruptcy situation was decided by default judgment.
Doesn't happen.
Literally never happens.
If it does happen, it's because a corporation just does not respond at all.
You know, I think there was one case, I want to say it was with like Nestle or something, or some big corporation, but if you search on Grok or Chat GPT or Google or, you know, however you're finding things, try to find like the biggest default judgment settlement.
And it's like, yeah, these people sued, I think it was Nestle, but don't hold me to that.
And they tried to sue him, and Nestle just didn't respond for like years on end, just never even responded anyway.
They didn't show up to the court.
They didn't make a plea.
They didn't offer, just totally ignored everything.
And then eventually, after they try enough times, they go, all right, we got to do a default judgment here.
Not so with InfoWars.
We gave them everything we've got.
They demanded things that we don't have and said, because you aren't giving us the things that we think you should have, but you don't, doesn't matter.
Default judgment.
Then they have a show trial where they call witnesses up and make it look an awful lot like we're allowed to defend ourselves and then the verdict comes back guilty.
It's never the case.
In fact, Alex Jones put it best.
It was worse than guilty until proven innocent.
It was guilty until proven guilty.
It was you're guilty.
Now you're going to have to go through weeks of a trial.
We're going to be interrogating everybody.
I mean, this has cost us millions upon millions of dollars.
It's cost them tens of millions of dollars.
That's how much they care about this.
That's how much they're trying to take us down over stuff that we never did, hardly ever even mentioned, apologized for a decade before anything came down.
And for those of you who maybe don't know the whole story, I won't go into it in super fine detail.
The timeline alone should be more than enough for you to recognize exactly what's going on here.
Now, this is also supremely ironic because just last week, Jimmy Kimmel had every celebrity in America rallying behind him for more or less literally doing exactly the same thing that we did, which was, you know, question the pertinent facts about a shooting of national interest.
Now, in Jimmy Kimmel's case, it was Charlie Kirk.
He blatantly lied about it and then mocked Trump for not seeming sufficiently sad.
Yeah, he showed a video of somebody close to one of the victims of a shooting and mocked and questioned him for not seeming sufficiently sad.
Okay, so Jimmy Kimmel did literally exactly the same thing Alex Jones did, and he had every celebrity in the world rallying behind him.
Now imagine if instead of that happening immediately after Jimmy Kimmel made what were actually very distasteful and frankly dangerous comments in this atmosphere of heightened political violence overall, He was taken out and, you know, he was given a three-day weekend and then was allowed to go back on.
Now, imagine if they'd pulled up a clip from 12 years ago and stole everything Jimmy Kimmel's ever owned and emptied his children's bank accounts and then didn't allow him to defend himself, put him through a trial where they forbid him from even referencing the First Amendment.
And imagine this was carried out by a highly politicized FBI as being the central figure, somebody that Jimmy Kimmel's never talked to, never even mentioned, doesn't know his name.
Again, just the bare minimum fact, like just the basic facts of this case are so astounding and ridiculous, it's hard to even explain.
So Alex Jones didn't come up with the Sandy Hook conspiracy.
Alex Jones hardly even covered the Sandy Hook conspiracy.
There are still to this day hundreds of people who are still making content about the Sandy Hook conspiracy.
It used to be the most popular conspiracy on the internet.
It used to be that if you searched Sandy Hook on YouTube, you would find page after page after page, video after video after video, entire channels dedicated to it, tens of thousands of videos with millions of views.
Alex Jones represented maybe 0.01% of that content.
But see, then they deleted all that content.
See, then they wiped all of YouTube of all Sandy Hook material, and then they told you it was Alex Jones that came up with it.
And if you went and looked, it didn't look like there was any other content.
You can still find it on BitChute and Rumble and things like that.
You can find entire documentaries made through the collaboration of dozens of researchers and authors and journalists.
Not Alex Jones, though.
Go search Sandy Hook on BitChute or Rumble.
You know, search, what is it, 400 unanswered questions about Sandy Hook, something like that.
Entire books have been written.
Wasn't us.
So we cover the most popular conspiracy topic on the internet for like 20 minutes total when we do four hours a day, five, six days a week.
Well, four hours a day, five days a week, two hours a day, one day a week.
We put out a lot of material, tens of thousands of hours of material.
You got maybe like half an hour of Sandy Hook material, but that becomes that becomes us.
That becomes what Alex Jones is.
And it's his entire business model.
And every day he continues to do it.
Hadn't talked about it in years.
So why did it come up?
Why did it come back around?
Was Alex Jones talking about it?
unidentified
No.
harrison smith
Were people acting on things Alex Jones had said 10 years ago?
No, absolutely not.
No, you cannot find a single article relating Alex Jones to Sandy Hook from the day it happened till about the end of October 2016.
And it was only once Donald Trump won the election.
And like the next day, you first saw an article saying Donald Trump is associated with Alex Jones and Alex Jones is responsible for the Sandy Hook conspiracy.
It was immediate.
And that's when this all kicked off.
And that's when the lawsuit started.
And in a way, they've had huge success through this because they have destroyed our reputation in the minds of the gullible, in the minds of the easily misled, those who believe liars over and over and over again.
But that's a hell of a lot.
But that's a hell of a lot of people.
So they've, you know, largely destroyed our reputation in the minds of normies that can't think for themselves, which again is unfortunate because what we do is guide people to the truth and away from the mainstream media lies.
But they say we're the Sandy Hook people, okay?
But they've also, again, cost us millions of dollars, distracted us endlessly.
And again, I could just, I could go on and on.
But you know, like if you watch the trial, it was all seeming, it was all perfectly clear to me what was actually happening.
And it was, frankly, disgusting, but also very obvious.
Like they brought up experts who spent hours on the stand first laying out their credentials.
I went to, I went to Stanford.
Okay, for those of us that don't know Stanford, is that a good school?
Yes, it's one of the best, actually.
And we have a whole faculty who spends all day, every day, studying Alex Jones to figure out how to combat what he's doing.
They spent hours on the stand not talking about Sandy Hook, not talking about Alex Jones and what people did in Connecticut or anything else.
No, talking about the influence that Alex Jones had on the 2016 election.
Now, how is it that during a Sandy Hook trial, you have experts called to the stand who spend the entire time talking about how Alex Jones during 2016 was more influential than Rush Limbaugh and Steven Crowder and the other top three influencers on the right wing put together?
Because that's what it was about.
Because that's what the trial was actually about.
And they're doing this right out in the open.
It honestly should have absolutely nothing to do with it.
How is a campaign that occurred four years after Sandy Hook have anything to do with Alex's, it has nothing to do with it.
No, Alex Jones became a political liability for the Democrats.
And so they found something to take him out with.
That happened to be Sandy Hook.
It's beyond outrageous.
And of course, it's been admitted on, you know, hidden camera to James O'Keefe about the CIA and FBI deciding that, yeah, this was the way they were going to take Alex Jones down.
Do you think we would have been sued if the wiping of us off the internet in 2018 would have worked?
And then they take literally everything Alex Jones has owned and works towards and now want to garnish his income for the rest of his life over covering the most popular conspiracy in America, one that he was tangentially related to at best.
By the way, the official release, the official police report for Sandy Hook still has inconsistencies and contradictions in it.
You can go look, you can go read it yourself.
Multiple places throughout the report, it has differing information about like really key things about what the, you know.
CIA officer former FBI boss can put anyone in jail, set him up.
We call it a nudge.
FBI did what we wanted with Alex Jones, took his money away, chopped his legs off, estimates 20 undercover FBI agents at J6.
Some of them work now at CIA.
This, of course, is that post from, was it Project Veritas at that time or was it James O'Keefe?
Either way.
Oh, it wasn't either one of those.
Let me give him credit.
Who was it?
Sound investigations.
Thank you, Rob.
Sound investigations came out with that.
It's not speculative.
It's perfectly clear.
And I know people are like sick of us talking about this.
Honestly, we hardly talk about it.
This has been a sort of Damocles hanging over our head for over the last year.
It's been incredibly brutal having to go through this over and over again.
We don't want to talk about it either.
But we're the test case.
And you see as we speak how the control system is being put into place.
UK passing digital ID, as well as the rest of Europe passing digital ID.
All these social media companies being bought up by conglomerates who immediately start censoring them.
We've got stories out of TikTok today.
The TikTok purchase went into effect, I guess, yesterday.
Already, they're censoring emojis that are used to get around the previous censorship about Jews.
People put juice, a juice box, in its place.
You can't do that anymore.
That'll get you censored.
You can't talk about APAC controlling Republicans and Democrats.
That'll get you censored on TikTok now.
These are brand new things.
And now they're going after X, by the way.
I've got like 14 different stories from the last two days about how anti-Semitism has a home on X and this and we can't stand for this.
Okay, so the locust swarm has consumed TikTok and is now headed towards X and they're letting us all know that.
We are losing free speech in a very real way right now, including the hate speech laws being passed in California.
This is not unique to America, of course.
Canada recently announced hate crime.
Even if there's no underlying crime, actual crime, hate speech can result in a lifelong jail sentence.
You might be sent to jail for life for speaking out in Canada.
Of course, I don't need to tell you about the legal advancements in the UK of just absolutely destroying free speech, but I do have like four different videos of people being arrested for their speech and just the most innocuous stuff.
If you call a police officer a Muppet, they'll arrest you in the UK.
I've got a video of a police showing up at a woman's house at 2.20 in the morning.
Talk about a Facebook post.
She said, another guy is a father with three young children.
He's being handcuffed and hauled away because he said he didn't like his local bishop.
It's all being done at exactly the same time.
We are a bellwether.
We have not only shattered the Overton window almost single-handedly, Alex Jones, completely reshaping the way that America interprets information, especially statements from the government, popularizing the very concept of a false flag attack and the way propaganda is used to move the masses.
We have both been the literal tip of the spear leading the charge on all of that.
But then we, with your help, obviously, and this is all part and parcel with the audience of InfoWars, giving us the power to do any of this, let alone all of it.
But we survived the 2018 mass banning, showing them that that was not a viable method of silencing an organization.
Again, because they thought they could cut us off from our ability to speak out on the internet or make money on the internet and didn't realize that we'd had a backup plan this entire time, started band.video, had our own sites, survived until Elon Musk could come in, buy X, and get us back into the mainstream.
But we have poured everything into this fight in particular, trying desperately to survive the legalistic onslaught, not be shut down, completely outside of the bounds of law, total anarcho-tyranny.
And while that fight may be coming to an end, we will teach them the lesson once more.
We're not going anywhere.
You might be able to strip us of our name.
You might be able to even go so far as to issue takedown orders of people that have uploaded our content online.
And that is a key motive here for them to get the brand name, to get the copyright.
Even though that's not really how it works and you can't actually do that, they will try.
And if the big tech companies don't care, then they'll go along with it.
See, that's the way this works.
It's kind of like I was doing some research on Oracle because of the way that that very interestingly named company, an outgrowth of the CIA run by the number one contributor to the IDF, Larry Ellison, how it got it started and some of its old business practices.
Of course, it's just bought TikTok and is actively engaged, as they tell us, in the unification of various data sets into one primary set that they can then use to feed into AI and control humanity en masse.
You know, that Oracle.
Well, one thing they tried a couple years ago was to buy Java, one of the coding scripts that underlies like almost all of the internet and mobile computing.
And so they bought this company and then tried to basically privatize JavaScript.
And they weren't allowed to do it.
It was this big, you know, it was a Supreme Court case.
But essentially they decided, you know, you can't give away something for free for years, have people build entire companies, you know, dependent on that open source thing, and then years later say, actually, now you have to pay us a monthly subscription fee.
No, you can't do that.
So since Alex Jones got started, and certainly the entire time I've worked here and the entire time I've known about Alex Jones, he's always said, this stuff is free to air.
This stuff is copyright free.
Everything we produce is free for everybody.
Share it, upload it, make money off it, put it on your own TV station, your own pirate radio station.
We don't care.
Just get the information out there.
So I don't think it would stand up in court, but because the presidents like things with Oracle and Java, where they go, no, you can't tell people for years this is no copyright and then later retroactively apply a copyright and say you have to take that down.
That's not how this works.
But how likely is it, do you think, that YouTube or Facebook or any of these places would actually let it go to court?
It would never go to court.
If some other organization takes over Infobos and starts issuing takedown orders, they'll just comply to them.
unidentified
They'll just comply with them.
harrison smith
Because none of these organizations are run by people that actually give a damn about American principles like freedom of speech.
So I really could go on and on about this.
I think just the way that we have been treated is so like horrifying and abysmal.
And again, there's something about The willful ignorance of leftists or liberals or even, you know, moderate, respective, respectable aka out-of-touch boomer conservatives who think it's fine what's happening in InfoWars.
And it's like, I don't know, man.
It just, it really, it really feels like we're already in a world like this, but becoming increasingly more so that you are just like a absolute sucker for having principles.
You're just an idiot at this point, I guess, for actually having morals and principles that you can stand on that aren't liquid, that don't change with who it's being, you know, subjected to.
And anytime, you know, anything happens, hell, now we've got, you know, military on the streets.
You might point to that and go, well, wasn't Infowars before that?
And every time we talk about it, I try to go out of my way to explain, you know, how this fits in with our principles, how, you know, I would be against this, but here's how they're doing it, which I think makes it okay.
I mean, we try really hard to like stick to principles, and we do.
We actually do.
If Jimmy Kimmel had actually, if Jimmy Kimmel had been subjected to one thousandth of what we've been subjected to, we would have been standing up for him.
But that had nothing to do with free speech.
That wasn't the government doing anything.
I mean, that was just, you know, so, you know, I just, it like almost sickens me to see these people who have watched what happened to Infowars celebrate what has been happening to InfoWars, mock and, you know, celebrate the stress and the, you know, threats that we've been put under.
And then they're out there talking about how freedom of speech is the most important thing we have in this country.
And Jimmy Kimmel, to not have a daily, a nightly show is just, oh, it's just the word.
And it's like, you people, wouldn't it be something if they had principles?
Wouldn't it be something if they actually genuinely believed a single goddamn thing they say, but they really don't.
So when it comes to Infowars, we don't get free speech.
We don't get an appropriate trial.
We don't deserve to have a fair shake in the court of public opinion or the court of the United States government.
All we have and all we've ever relied on and the thing that has brought us through time and time again for decades on end in a legendary mission that may now be entering its final stage, all we've ever had is the audience.
And that's been enough.
In fact, it's been more than enough.
So thank you for supporting us.
And I hope you continue to do so by going to thealxjonestore.com and follow at AJNLive for updates in the future.
Stay with us.
unidentified
All right.
harrison smith
Welcome back, folks.
This is the War Room.
I'm your host, Harrison Smith.
The AlexJonesStore.com is how you go to support us no matter what happens with InfoWars, the AlexJonesStore.com.
Again, the courts in Texas have had the liquidation orders ready to go for a very long time, but have been held off by the federal court.
Today, we tried to extend that emergency stay for a little longer and it was not accepted.
And so we'll see what comes next.
And we'll, of course, be hearing hopefully from Alex Jones a little bit later.
But he, of course, was on air when all of this was happening.
So he's meeting with lawyers right now to figure out exactly what to talk about this.
We've got a lot of news, more than enough news to get into from immigration, health, Israel, Europe, crime, pedophilia of all things, including transgenderism in kids' shows on Netflix, a Netflix boycott causing their stock price to plummet.
And then, of course, we've got the shutdown.
Oh my gosh, the government shutdown, the ridiculous parody of a government we go through every six months when the government shuts down and it's a panic and it's, oh my gosh, what are we going to do?
Well, it might be a little bit different today these days when you have the threat of, quote, mass shutdown firings to begin in a day or two, according to the Trump administration.
So we'll get into that.
And I got a lot on that.
And I got a lot of health news as well.
Massive billion-dollar case against Ozimpic coming out.
Trump is meeting with the Pfizer head and pissing everybody off.
I really do.
And then I really want to get into just generalized crime overall.
But let's talk about free speech, shall we?
Since that's on my mind for obvious reasons.
And I see what's happening in England as a forerunner of what we can expect to happen here in America in not very long if we don't get a handle on things.
And I just, I didn't have time to print this out or do anything with this.
Let me fire up my thing and then we'll be able to go to it.
But it's from at Ban the BBC at Ban the BBC on X. This guy carved basically a giant mural in the beach sand.
It says 1984 and it's got a picture of Keir Starmer.
And then the police have showed up to investigate it.
Like, ah, yes.
Irony is not.
Who says irony is dead?
You've got 1984 with Keir Starmer's face painted as a giant mural on the beach.
And that, of course, probably an arrestable offense, if I had to guess.
Irony notwithstanding.
So that, of course, is the state of the UK right now.
It's actually a very impressive mural.
And somebody actually filmed themselves doing it.
Basically, I just walk around the beach and their footsteps made that drawing.
Really incredible stuff.
But my God, what the UK is involved in right now.
And again, just remember, this is where it goes for us.
Let's go to clip number five first.
This is new footage of British police arresting two young children.
One of them has special needs.
The other has ADHD.
But hey, maybe they tweeted something.
You know, maybe they stuck their tongue out at a police officer.
Sure, they're going to let grooming gangs get away with violating and destroying the lives of millions of British girls.
And if you're walking around as a gang with a bunch of Muslims holding machetes, then they will politely request that you go back to the mosque to stash your weapons.
But if you're a like seven-year-old, you're going to get the full force and weight and brunt of the law.
So let's go to clip number five here as we watch the British police arresting children for their speech.
Let's watch.
So here they are.
You know, scene of absolute chaos.
British police being very tough here in arresting.
Little kids.
unidentified
What are you doing, man?
You need to be like, we're opening or not.
montgomery toms
He's open.
He's got special needs.
unidentified
What are you doing?
harrison smith
He's got special needs.
montgomery toms
Just everyone, calm down for now.
He's not punched a police officer.
unidentified
You understand?
harrison smith
He's not like a family.
No, he punched a police officer.
unidentified
Now you've turned your camera on, well done for doing your job properly.
Look at this.
montgomery toms
Are you caught right now?
harrison smith
All right, so the British police are running around arresting women and children for not wanting to be victims of Muslim rape gangs.
Let's go now to clip number seven.
This is police arriving at 2.20 a.m. to advise a woman to take down her social media post.
Imagine being asleep at 2.20 a.m.
Hearing a knock on your door and it's the cops and you're like bewildered and befuddled and sleep drunk and you're being yelled at about your Facebook post.
Let's watch 2.20 a.m. and the harassment continues.
I've broken the law for allegedly.
unidentified
Please say that.
The reason I'm filming you is because I'm sick of the harassment.
Every time I open the door to one of your officers, they are filming me.
So now you know how it feels.
queen maxima
Now it is half past two in the morning.
unidentified
Can I ask why for a second time tonight you are disturbing me in my son in my home?
Yeah, because there's been a lot of videos that have been posted onto social media, including those that were made this morning.
queen maxima
This morning, what made this morning?
unidentified
And of my officers that have been around this evening.
I'm here to kindly ask that you remove said videos from social media.
No, I don't think I've broke the law, so I don't think I will.
And also, I want to advise you that you might well be committing offences under the Malicious Communications Act.
Okay.
Okay, well, I'm sure damn Diana Johnson will explain that to me when she sees the video, won't she?
She is a qualified barrister.
She wasn't a director of social services, so she'll understand my case well.
At this point, my son reported abuse.
He failed to protect him.
Good night, officer.
And I'm asking you to leave now, please.
Good night, officer.
queen maxima
Good night, officer.
unidentified
And may I ask, please do not come back to my house and disturb again.
We'll probably need to speak to you tomorrow.
I don't think you will.
I haven't committed any offences, officer, so you needn't be speaking to me at any point.
You may well have done, I'm afraid.
No, I don't think I have.
You came to my house recording me.
I have a right to record you.
This is my home.
If you don't want to be recorded, don't knock on my door.
harrison smith
So from what I gathered from that, something happened with her son.
He was a victim of an assault of some sort.
She went to the police.
They did nothing.
And then she made a video about it.
Now the police are there to tell her to take the video down.
At 2.30 in the morning.
Robotic, soulless man showing up at your front door, suggesting that you might want to take it down because it could be an offense.
Do y'all realize how close we are to that being our reality?
I mean, the UK is literally the birthplace of free speech.
The UK is the place where the Magna Carta was signed, where they had multiple civil wars to establish the supremacy of the law over the man.
And for the right, a free Englishman to speak their mind and not be punished by the state for disagreeing with them.
That's not the way it is anymore.
Thank God we have the First Amendment enshrined into law, but that is very rapidly going away.
And they're destroying it through a number of different methods, but the outcome is the same.
That's our future.
That's what we can look forward to.
We can look forward to more instances like that.
Remember, they arrest 35 people a day in the UK for speech crimes.
35 people a day.
More than once an hour.
We rang a bell every time, on average, a person was arrested in one 24-hour period.
We'd ring it multiple times an hour.
It'd be rung like six times during War Room.
For at least 12,000 people in a single year.
So just understand what threat we pose, what threat free speech poses to these tyrants.
Let's go to clip 20 here.
Here's a British man again being locked up, this time in broad daylight.
He's got three young kids in his house.
And he genuinely does not know what he's even being arrested for and doesn't seem like the police know either.
Let's watch.
Yeah, so this is Brendan.
montgomery toms
Yeah, let's go.
unidentified
Let me just let me just record.
montgomery toms
This is kind of unusual.
What's going on?
unidentified
Okay, so currently you've been placed under arrest for harassment.
Hold on.
Listen to us, Coli.
harrison smith
Explain everything.
unidentified
Yeah, I'll explain everything.
So you're under arrest on suspicion.
Harassing who?
Hey, but it's going to be just a few seconds.
But my children are in there.
Just let us speak.
I'll go through that after this.
Harassment from whom?
I don't understand.
montgomery toms
You do not have to say anything.
unidentified
I don't know what's going on.
Let me explain the question, okay?
Do you not have to say anything?
It may harm me off if you did not mention one question later on.
Anything you do say, maybe give it an.
montgomery toms
I completely don't understand.
unidentified
Do you understand the full?
montgomery toms
I don't understand what you're doing.
unidentified
Okay.
Yeah, it's on this thing.
Right, so you're under arrest currently, right, on suspicion of harassment.
From who?
We'll go through all that.
Sure, I'll explain the portion to you, okay?
So the grounds of the arrest are that from the 10th of March, it made apparently a number of posts online and on social media harassing an individual and making serious allegations.
Yes.
Yes, Dennett.
Sure.
So that's the remember portion.
So anything you do say will be given.
We've got serious safeguarding concerns.
Okay, that's fine, but we need to interview you in relation to that.
Your allegation has been made, okay?
Please go to the children.
Is it?
harrison smith
Our children are high school, right?
montgomery toms
But how old are they?
It's all right.
don lemon
Can you take the handcuffs?
unidentified
How old are the food?
We'll push you on just for the time being, and then I'm going to assess it in a second.
Okay, how old are the children?
Well, first of all, there's no need to plead.
alex jones
How old are the children, please?
unidentified
My children are 12.
10.
So if you could be.
montgomery toms
I mean, look, I'm not going to run off.
We'll look at that.
unidentified
I'm not a dangerous character.
I mean, this is just unnecessary.
I'd like to also record this one then.
Okay, well, our cameras are recording as well, okay?
alex jones
I should see you in the phone, right?
unidentified
Okay, well, there's three things.
First of all, we've got three children here.
And there's a safeguarding concern.
However, an allegation has been made.
I'm happy to talk about it.
alex jones
What are my children?
unidentified
We're going to panic.
We need to take the anti-stiricals.
montgomery toms
Brandon Cavanaugh's mobile phone.
alex jones
She's at 10.54.
unidentified
Okay, right.
Yeah, yeah, you can do it as well.
I'm arrested.
harrison smith
Yeah, sure.
There's three things that people.
unidentified
First of all, you don't need to put me up.
montgomery toms
I've got three young children here on the property.
unidentified
I don't know where they are.
harrison smith
Yeah, so that's how it goes in England.
The police show up, say somebody at some point was offended by something that you said.
We're not going to tell you who it is.
We're not going to tell you what you said.
We're going to hand over your phone.
You're going to give us a password.
We're going to put you in handcuffs.
We're going to haul you off.
And you're lucky if you come home in the next two years.
As we showed yesterday or was it the day before, the video of the powdered hair wearing judge very solemnly reading out the crime of the perpetrator, sentencing him to two years in prison for daring to say, hey, why is all my tax money going to a bunch of foreigners?
Literally.
He said, I'm sick of all this money I pay to our government going to pay for a bunch of people that aren't British and that shouldn't be here and that aren't allowed here.
And now Britain is simultaneously instituting digital ID, ostensibly to stop the migrants, but they will still arrest you for not wanting migrants.
Explain that one to me.
There is no explaining it.
These are dead-eyed monsters eating us.
I mean, that's all there is to it.
And it's interesting to see liberals kind of start to come around.
And of course, the ultimate irony is we spent, what, five years desperately trying to make the argument of like, you don't want censorship.
It's not good for anybody.
Yes, these people are saying things that offend you.
No, it's not a valid reason to make it illegal.
What are you talking about?
Now it seems like they're like finally realizing what we've been saying, but it's far, far beyond their capabilities to like connect two dots with a single line and go, oh, gee, this is what they were saying before.
Maybe they're right about this.
Maybe there's something to this.
I'm not holding out hope for that.
So to clip 42 here, this is Bill Maher, one of the few leftists with occasionally a glimmer of consistency when it comes to things like free speech.
But he's talking to abject moron Seth Green, who apparently decided to read 1984 for the first time as a 50-year-old man and decided it applies to Trump somehow.
Yeah, these people are retarded.
Bill Maher tries to set him straight.
Let's watch.
unidentified
When was the last time you read 1984?
I read it in 16.
I read it in 16 when Trump was running.
And it was the, you know, the thing that Orwell never presumed was something like the internet.
There was no way to imagine social media.
And so it all took the form of the telesphere, which could always be on, which could always be recording.
But the main thing was getting down to thought crime, like a real separation of the classes and the cultures and the point where you thinking something is an arrestable offense.
And then they go and put you in the court.
bill maher
That's a hate crime.
unidentified
Well, so I, well, this is it, right?
We're edging that territory.
bill maher
We're not edging.
It's been decades since we said we believe in this country that there is such a thing as a hate crime.
Now, that's basic liberal dogma.
I consider myself a liberal, but I never agreed with that.
unidentified
A hate crime is more punishable than something else.
bill maher
It's a thought crime.
And I don't think we should go down that slope.
A crime is a crime.
If you kill somebody, you should be punished.
The law should not be involved in what is in your mind.
Your fed up mind.
unidentified
I don't really give a I hadn't really thought about it that way, but that's a fair point.
harrison smith
Yeah.
What way did you think about it exactly?
Dude, what do these people think?
It's so weird, man.
It honestly is so weird that we just live around these people.
They've never thought, they never thought about it that way.
What way did you, you must have never thought about it then?
I genuinely, I genuinely, it just baffles me.
You can literally just go, oh, let's just apply the word hate to something.
And then the leftists will genuinely think it should be illegal.
They just have no idea what it even means, like what they're even saying.
It's just, it is, how do these people do anything ever?
It makes no sense.
There's something going on here.
This dumbass reads 1984 for the first time in his life at 50 years old, thinks it applies to Donald Trump, and then never once even thinks about the fact that the thought crime is already happening on his own side.
It's just these, I don't just want to say these poor people.
Like, they aren't even people in any substantial way, to be honest with you.
And, of course, you know, it's just unbelievably dangerous now that they're instituting things like digital ID.
Let's go to clip 77 here.
Like everything that we talk about NymphaWars and have for the last 30 years, it's all fairly well intertwined because the world is run by psychopaths that are all on the same agenda, that are all following the same script, and that are all pushing us inevitably towards a one-world government of total technocratic control of everything you do, everything you consume, and yes, everything you even think.
And that includes not just domination of the media and the communication networks, but obviously of health and of the infrastructure of the internet itself.
Here's an, and of course, the economy.
And of course, central to that is the economy.
And that will be the punishment mechanism that they will wield outside of law.
Remember, law has restrictions.
You have to actually give somebody a chance to argue back in law.
It's actually in our Constitution.
You have to give somebody an opportunity to speak for themselves and argue against the charges that are made, but not if it's not a law that is being broken.
Not if it's, you know, a punishment like jail.
As long as it's just your credit score dropping, your social credit score going down, you don't get an appeal.
You don't get a chance to argue for yourself.
They just decide.
And then you're subject to the punishment.
Let's go now to this is the queen of the Netherlands, Queen Maxime, explaining just how many things the digital ID will entail.
Let's watch.
queen maxima
When I said at this job, there were actually very little countries in Africa or Latin America that had one ubiquitous type of ID.
And certainly that it was digital.
And certainly that was biometric.
And we really worked with all our partners to actually help that being, I think, to grow this.
And the interesting part of it is that, you know, yes, it is very necessary for financial services, but not only.
It's also good for school enrollment.
It's also good for health who actually got a vaccination or not.
It's very good to actually get your subsidies from the government.
harrison smith
Yeah, so if you want to buy food, you'll have to submit to their restrictions.
And you're going to have to get the vaccine because that'll be tied into your biometric digital ID, whether you get support from the government.
And that's going to be especially important when all the jobs are destroyed and support from the government is the only way that you survive.
I guess you'll be real eager to comply at that point.
Now, thankfully, people are standing up to this, speaking out against this, and signing a petition by the millions to stop this in the UK.
I don't know if that's actually going to have any effect.
Again, the absurdity of them trying to predicate digital ID, the introduction of digital ID on stopping immigration that they, on the other hand, maximize with everything they've got.
I mean, it just genuinely, I don't even understand how we got to this point.
It makes just no sense any way that you look at it.
It's actually kind of horrifying how little, how utterly nothing.
It just makes no sense at all.
Anything that they do.
Clip number three here: there are a bunch of Brits who rallied outside of the labor conference against digital ID, and they had quite a showing there.
Let's watch.
montgomery toms
This is absolutely incredible.
We've literally got hundreds, possibly thousands of people here all fighting against digital IDs, fighting against the labor government.
We're not having this, Kier Starmer.
We don't want a social credit system.
We're not interested in you pledging allegiance to Davos over your own country.
You are an evil, authoritarian man, and we are not interested in any way in your regime, your authoritarian, top-down 1% nonsense.
We're not having a digital ID.
We're not having a Brit Card.
We're not having mass surveillance.
We're not having inheritance tax.
We're not interested.
We're the people and we hold the power and we're fighting back and we're going to win.
We're here today standing with our farmers, standing against digital ID, standing against inheritance tax, not just for the farmers, but for everybody.
And I think, in general, we need to stand against Kier Starmer, an authoritarian, technocratic globalist who has no interest in the British public.
We stand together, united.
unidentified
It's not about left.
montgomery toms
It's not about rights.
It's that simple thing.
Freedom, autonomy.
That is why we're here.
I love the farmers.
I love the British public.
He hates the farmers.
He hates the British public.
No ID.
No.
No ID.
No.
No ID.
unidentified
No.
montgomery toms
No.
harrison smith
That was from Montgomery Toms there.
So big showing.
Now's the time to fight, folks.
Now is probably the last time to fight.
Once these things go into place, once digital ID is introduced, there's nothing you can do to get out of it.
Once they get rid of cash, once they have us all on the grid, that's it.
That's it.
Because how are you even going to stand up to it?
How are you going to organize a protest like that if organizing a protest is considered hate?
Considered dangerous and censored.
What if communicating with somebody who wants to organize a protest lowers your social credit score?
Then you're going to find people, you don't even have to enforce it.
The government doesn't even have to step in.
People will cut you off if you even talk like that because they know that association with you will lower their score and make their lives worse.
It's what they do in China.
It's happening here.
We've been warning you about this forever.
And by here, I mean the West, the one place in the world that came up with the idea of human rights and still at least pay lip service to them.
But they're rapidly being disintegrated and we will not have a chance to reclaim the victory that we've won over the last 2,000 years of European civilizational development.
We all have to start over and we'll have to destroy what is being built right now to the bedrock and then rebuild from the beginning.
What we're losing is invaluable.
It is beyond priceless and it's being ripped away from us.
If you can't stand up now, then I guess you can never stand up because this is your chance.
This is your chance to speak out about what's going on.
This is your chance today to support the outlets that are arguing against this and leading the charge against this.
Today is your chance to reach out to your representatives.
And if you're in the UK, maybe your last chance ever to actually speak out about what is coming down the pipe because it's a Chinese style, a Chinese style social credit score.
The major difference being that the people in China actually seem to love the Chinese people.
Big difference there.
Because the people of Europe, people who rule Europe, seem to despise their own people.
People who rule America seem to despise us regular Americans.
How effective do you think the social credit score will be when it's being run by people who have a deep-seated, seething hatred of the average citizen?
I'm not celebrating communism, but at least the Chinese pretend to like their own people.
We don't even get the pretense here.
richard werner
But what does central bank digital currency look like?
You see?
So they never talk about that because people won't actually like the looks of it.
Because it apparently looks, and several central banks, apparently, as I heard from my sources, have already fully developed the final stage of CBDC.
I mean, it comes in stage initially likely through your mobile phone, but it's only an intermediate step.
And the final stage is, you know, it's small and it's the size of a grain of rice.
Now, why is that?
unidentified
And that grain of rice is your entire wallet?
richard werner
Yes, it's your digital ID, your wallet can be your passport, your key.
Now, of course, what we found with our debit cards or credit cards is they've already now moved to the system, you know, RFID chips, RFID technology where you just wave the thing, contact list.
That is sort of the, you know, conditioning us in this direction.
And in the future, you'll just wave your hand because you've got the microchip implant under your skin.
And because each step, there's a rational reason.
It's easier just to wave this, isn't it?
It's much faster because we always have to wait in the queues as everyone types in their numbers and all that to just wave it.
It's quicker.
But the next rationalization would be, well, but you can lose your card.
Somebody can steal your card and then you just waive it.
It's kind of risky.
Well, wouldn't it be nice if you couldn't lose it and nobody could steal it?
You know, so but it's clear that that's sort of, it is almost a step too far for a lot of people because it is a violation of human dignity to actually inject something like that under the skin.
So that's where you need some more persuasion.
Yeah.
And it's interesting that this concept of universal basic income has been around for around a century, where everyone should get some kind of citizens payment.
But the billionaire elites have so far not liked that.
But since 2015, they've all come out.
I mean, all the big billionaires and World Economic Forum have come out.
Oh, this is a good idea.
Universal basic income.
Well, why suddenly?
Now?
Because now we have the technology for the microchip implant.
And so in 2017, Bill Gates came out and said that Universal basic income is a good idea, but it's too early to introduce it.
Now, what was still missing?
So we had the technology for the microchip implant, but what was missing was the digital ID hadn't been introduced.
Now, this is where this whole COVID agenda had become very useful.
And so the sequence has been that first they worked on the technology, they had what they wanted.
It was completely made ready already quite a few years ago.
Then the question became, how can we introduce it?
And the usual game plan would have been to do what central banks in many countries have been working on for many decades, which is to create boom-bust cycles and economic crises.
And then in the crisis, you say, oh, here's a new idea.
That's the solution to the crisis.
That's how they've been operating.
But in this case, it seems they concluded that resistance will still be too high.
People don't really want to accept this implant because it could also have consequences.
Apparently, we learned from the World Economic Forum that there is also an approach in law that once you have, you know, what they call transhumanism, once you have electronic implants in the body, which is, you know, to persuade people to do that, they always say this will enhance your functions.
You get more abilities, you know, like almost become superhuman.
But at the same time, the legal consequence may be that you're not classified as human anymore.
You know, there's this movement out there talking about humanoid robots.
And, you know, many years ago, I thought, oh, to create a humanoid robot, that's a lot of work in electronics in order to create this humanoid robot.
Because when you're starting with electronics, there's a lot to build.
But it's much faster if you start with a human.
You see?
So once you have certain implants, you may then be classified as a humanoid robot, which seems to be what for these transhumanist people throw them away whenever you like.
That becomes the next question.
So once you're not classified as human anymore, but as human-eyed robot, will you have human rights?
And World Economic Forum has done surveys asking people, do you think human-eyed robots should have human rights?
harrison smith
It's a war room.
All right, welcome back, folks.
This is a war room.
We're going to talk about immigration now.
But again, all of these things are so deeply intertwined.
And I've got, I want to talk about the crime situation, but of course the crime situation is deeply intertwined with the immigration system.
Right now, we've got these riots going on at ICE facilities, and the local police are not doing anything to stop them, not doing anything to protect the innocent civilians that live around here or just want to, as a journalist, go and cover the event.
They're attacked by Antifa.
Police witness it, do nothing to stop it.
And so now Trump is sending in military forces, National Guard or federalized police forces like ICE to go in and arrest these people.
And the locals government is crying foul.
And no, how could you do this?
You're militarizing our, well, you've got to protect.
You have an obligation to protect your citizens.
Again, I don't know how you run a republic or a democracy or a representative democracy or anything with the people voting when the people keep voting to make their own cities unsafe.
I mean, truly, the insanity that has been forced into the minds of our fellow Americans is it really is inexplicable.
Although I'm going to try to explain it because there is a bizarre and perverted and weird sort of consistency here.
And I'll show you some clips to illustrate that.
You've got Zoron Mamdani, the, you know, barring any miraculous intervention, future mayor of New York, giving two speeches, one in which he says violence is an artificial construct that doesn't really exist, but that speech is violence.
Now, there's a reason for this.
It's because they're communists, and this is the playbook that they run.
And they genuinely believe this.
And, you know, you can read this.
If you ever read, what's his name?
Zoltzenitsen, the Gulag Archipelago.
He talks about this phenomenon, how, you know, when a thief steals something, well, he's just a victim of circumstance.
He's a victim of capitalism, really, that forces people to get jobs.
And, you know, he's been deprived by this evil system that forces him to steal.
So is it really even a crime?
It's like criminalizing eating food.
It's what he needs to do to survive.
So the criminals, they get a little tap on the wrist.
But if you're speaking out against the authorities, you're saying things they don't like.
Well, that's a threat to our entire system, which is ontologically good.
So you're not just a criminal, you're like an enemy combatant that must be destroyed.
So there's a, again, perverted, inverted, sick sort of logic at play here, but we have to reject it with everything we've got because there's very real violence going on right now that's being exacerbated and maximalized because of the priorities and policies of the people in office.
This should be obvious to everybody.
But apparently it's not.
And again, it's, I don't even get, I don't even understand how we're trying, how we have to explain this.
I'm kind of done.
I'm done explaining this, honestly.
Like at a certain point, we need to stop asking for the cooperation of people unwilling or incapable to even engage in conversation.
And I don't know how we get to that point that we can just exercise our rights regardless.
But I think our main barrier to that is the general comfort overall of the average American.
Who I remind you, if you're hearing my voice, you are, and I'm not just saying this to fluff you up here.
If you're aware of any of this stuff going on, you're in like the 1% of the 1% of informed people.
The vast majority of people probably have never even heard of BlackRock.
Have no idea what ESG scores are.
They think DEI is just like when you're nice to black people.
Genuinely, they have absolutely no concept of what's going on at all ever.
And it's the problem.
That is the problem.
She would not be okay if they knew what was going on.
And so what happens is they hear something that they think is like, well, that kind of sounds weird, right?
They still have this sort of remnant vestigial part of their brain that sort of perks up and goes, oh, wait, that's this isn't right.
Wait, that sounds like censorship.
And I'm supposed to be against that.
What's happening here?
And so what they do is they just have like a very kind of simple, easy to remember phrase that they'll deploy that will just erase that concern in the minds of most people.
And that's really like that pattern happens over and over and over millions of times a day all over America.
Is you got people going, what?
That's kind of crazy.
And then they hear the explanation, which is just like, well, you know, you can't be racism is actually power press plus privilege.
So, you know, race plus privilege or whatever that little, you know, equation is, they just deploy that.
And that's just a soothing balm on the people.
You know, they get concerned a little bit.
They get a little inflamed and they go, wait, what is happening?
And they go, no, no, no.
Trust me.
We changed some definitions around.
Here's a communistic talking point.
Go back to sleep.
And for most people, that's enough.
They go, well, wait a second.
I don't think you should.
And you go, no, no, don't worry.
It's not racist because I redefined racism.
They go, whew, okay, good.
I was worried there for a second.
And then they go back to watching football.
And so it's up to us.
It's up to us to explain to people, like, you've got to stop listening to the liars.
You've got to stop believing they're bullcrap.
These are the most hateful, censorious, psychopathic, mass murderers the world has ever seen.
And they're coming for you and they're coming for your family.
And they're not even being shy about it.
So maybe I just need to go to the most extreme stuff.
Maybe we should get into the pedophilia stuff because they're trying to normalize that.
And I would hope, I mean, I don't know.
At this point, I don't know.
At this point, you know, you go up to somebody and you go, well, is pedophilia okay?
And they're going to go, no, absolutely not.
But hey, maybe they haven't come up with the right phrase yet.
You know, maybe they need to, you know, for getting minors to commit suicide with the help of a doctor in Canada, they came up with the phrase mature minor.
So maybe they need something like that.
And you go, well, sure, it was a kid, but it was a mature minor.
So it's fine, actually.
And Normans will go, oh, okay, so it's not the thing I thought.
Okay, so it's fine then.
Then they'll just ignore everything else.
I don't know how much more clear our enemies can make it, but Normis are not getting this message.
So please, for the love of God, reach out to your neighbors, your friends, your family, your everybody you know.
Put it in your own words.
Find a way to phrase it that will be convincing to them.
They have to understand what's happening at this point.
And a lot of them just haven't been introduced to it or haven't, like Seth, whatever, cannot form two thoughts in a row.
One thought will be introduced and they go, yep, Jimmy Kimmel is being censored.
This is bad, bad, this is a bad thing.
But then you go, well, he's not, but actually, right-wingers are, and that just confuses them.
And they get angry and then they stop listening.
There's a meme that goes around, and I think it's very important.
I've said it to my wife like over and over and over again.
It's unbelievably true.
And no offense to boomers out there.
I won't say boomers.
I'll say normies.
The original meme is with boomers because they're the ones that have spent their whole lives being indoctrinated by the system and have the most difficulty breaking out of it.
When you're arguing with a normie, you're not arguing with the person.
You're arguing with the TV.
The TV can't hear you and doesn't care.
And you really got to remember that.
Some people get upset.
But it's like, it's okay.
Some people just can't be reached.
It's still worth the try.
It really is.
Let's talk about crime.
Let's get into crime.
And this is the reason I went off on that little rant is then.
We'll go to clip.
Let's go to clip 25 first.
We'll go to clip 25 first because this is the father of a young woman named Logan Federico, who was executed at 22 years old by a career criminal with a record containing 35, 39 arrests, 25 felonies.
And this is what I mean.
This is why I went on the rant.
It's like, we have to explain this.
This is something we have to actually argue about and try to explain to people.
When somebody is 30 years old and has 39 convictions, 25 felony convictions, they should be put down like a rabid dog.
They've been given more than enough chances.
They've proven themselves incapable of living in a civilized society.
They have to be removed from us decent people so we can continue to exist.
Cannot believe we have to make this argument.
And then I'll play another video making a similar argument where it's like, why do we keep prioritizing the criminal?
It is insane.
It is absolutely, genuinely an insane thing to do.
And the people who do it never pay the price for it.
Ever.
Mostly because they don't live around the people that they let out into the wild, into your city.
They live in gated communities and country clubs.
So they never, you know, you're never going to have a judge release a person who then goes and stabs that judge or that judge's family.
They're completely disconnected from the consequences of their actions.
And they do it over and over.
This is why it's so frustrating.
Do we really have to explain why you prioritize victims over the criminals that victimize them?
I guess we do.
Here's just one of 10,000 examples of an innocent, virtuous person having their life ended by somebody who never should have been walking around this country in the first place.
Let's watch clip 25 here.
steve federico
Here's what I need you to do.
When I tell you this story, think about your kids.
Think about your child coming home from a night out with her friends, laying down, going to sleep, feeling somebody come in the room and wake them and drag her out of bed, naked, forced on her knees with her hands over her head,
begging for her life, begging for her hero, her father, me, that couldn't be there.
She was five foot three.
She weighed 115 pounds.
unidentified
Bang!
steve federico
Dead.
Gone.
Why?
Because Alexander Devontae Dickey, who was arrested 39 goddamn times, 25 felonies, was on the street.
How about that?
How good are we doing for our family?
How good are you doing for your kids?
He should have been in jail for over 140 years for all the crimes he committed.
You know how much time he spent in prison?
A little over 600 days in 10 years.
He's only 30 years old.
He was committing 2.65 crimes a year since he was 15 years old.
But nobody could figure out that he couldn't be rehabilitated.
Well, you'd have to put him in prison to see if he could be rehabilitated.
Isn't that the idea of prison?
But no, my daughter wanted to be a teacher.
She finally figured it out two weeks before she was executed by a man with 39 criminal felonies.
harrison smith
I mean, what is there more to say?
They don't, but these people don't care.
They really don't.
Because they're never going to pay the price for it.
Because for some reason, we allow the people who do this to rule over us.
That judge who let out the murderer of Irina Zarutska on the light rail in North Carolina, that judge is still in her position.
Remember the woman who never passed the bar, was never even a lawyer, let alone a judge in a traffic court before she was suddenly given the right to wave away the brutal actions of criminals and let them out on the street again.
22 years old And I'm telling you, it's just a matter of time.
You know, God bless that father, you know, reliving this over and over, putting himself out there, probably getting death threats, knowing the scumbags that exist in our world to just try desperately.
And by the way, when he's giving this testimony, this incredibly powerful heartfelt testimony, the Congress woman who's questioning him doesn't even know his daughter's name and calls her something else.
I think she calls her Irina, thinking it's her.
And it's like, she doesn't even care.
She has no idea who this girl is.
She doesn't give a damn.
So good on that father.
You know, for me, I'm not, you know, I'm not going to waste my time trying to appeal to a bunch of people who like want this.
I mean, again, you know, like I said, when I was saying with like Ted Cruz, it's like you're playing football and you're asking the other team if they wouldn't mind just not scoring a touchdown this time.
Like, no, this is the point.
This is what they're there to do.
This is why they've gained power.
They've gained power purposely to let criminals out on the street to attack your children.
Well, what other point is there exactly?
What else could their goal be?
And so, you know, God bless the guy for going up, you know, trying to do this peaceful way, but it's a matter of time.
And, you know, if 20 years from now, something happens to my job, like, because some judge let her out, I'm just going to go kill the judge, to be honest with you.
Like, that's, and probably the judge's whole family.
And like, you know, again, I'm not threatening anybody, and I definitely don't encourage anybody else to do that.
I'm just baffled at the like mercy that the average American is showing.
And like the way I feel about women I don't even know being murdered.
And I try to imagine if that was my family, I'm not talking about it.
So again, I'm, you know, thank God nobody in my family has been subject to this, but how many times can this happen over and over and over before there is a serious revolution in this country?
We don't have to live this way.
Like our Declaration of Independence says, when a government becomes destructive of its own people, it has to be replaced.
It has to be torn down and rebuilt correctly.
And when our system of law in practice exists almost entirely to reward and pat on the head the vicious criminals who live, by the way, entirely off of our tax money.
Like it's just such a broken and retarded system.
I don't know how much longer it's going to last.
I don't think it should last another day, to be honest with you.
So let's try again.
Let's clip 27 here.
Try to explain, as if this needs to be explained, why you're supposed to prioritize the victims and not the criminals as a country with the rule of law.
Let's watch.
unidentified
This bill is really focused on punishment, and I just want to look at these types of considerations with a bigger lens.
We're talking about people.
We're talking about victims.
We're talking about perpetrators.
We're talking about human beings doing things to other human beings that should not be done.
And what are we going to do about that?
And again, what this bill says is that when you get your third violent felony conviction, we're done.
Like, we're not playing anymore.
Like, I, I, past that point, I don't know if I care if you ever become a productive citizen because you have opted out of productive society.
Your third violent felony conviction.
I don't know how interested I am in making sure you get educated and you get a like at that point.
You're talking about a chronic dysfunction in a person's ability to be a member of society.
And past that point, it is the responsibility of those of us who govern society to protect everyone else, to protect everyone who is functional, who isn't harming their neighbor, who isn't violating the rights of others.
I'll give you some stats that I know are solid and that from a source that I know you trust.
And I won't disclose the particulars of where I got this from, but I think you'll know when I tell you.
I had a meeting this week with somebody who works with juveniles.
And he presented me a folder that was about as thick as one of our statute books.
The documents inside covered the crimes committed by only six juveniles.
Those six juveniles over the course of the last 18 months are personally responsible for 174 separate victims.
174 separate human beings, real human beings, whose lives were touched in an inappropriate way by the actions of these kids.
That's an average of 29 victims per kid.
Now, at some point, our consideration properly should be the 174 as opposed to the six, right?
Like all the concern of the current trajectory and momentum of our public safety conversation in the state seems to be upon the six.
What do we do about the perpetrators?
What do we do to make their lives better?
What do we do to put them on the right track?
What about the 174 victims who somehow figured it out?
They somehow managed to go through their lives without hurting other people and stealing from other people and harming other people.
harrison smith
So that really is like such a powerful video, such powerful argument, and shocking that we have to explain this.
Utterly shocking that this has to be explained.
I got more videos to show about this too, because there's a paranoia right now.
I think this has a lot to do with it.
About the ability of criminals to take basically any aspect of their court proceedings that they didn't like and then get a new trial out of it.
And so the criminals are treated with kid gloves because the last thing that the judge wants is for the criminal to be able to come back and go, look, I wasn't allowed to speak.
They were mistreating me.
Look at how the judge was saying these things to me in front of the jury.
That tainted the pool.
So you've got like criminals in court like smirking and smiling and making faces at their victims' families, right?
There's a video today.
Black dude, I don't know, sitting there, white woman, he killed her child.
I think he may have killed multiple of her children.
And he's like smiling and like blowing kisses at her.
And she like gets mad in the courtroom.
And the judge is like yelling at her and going, sir, please, if you don't mind, just not.
So they get treated like royalty.
They get treated with kid gloves.
The victim better shut up or she gets expelled.
And it's just like, how about this?
How about this?
How about we cut the court short?
We all get out in the courtyard.
Somebody finds a length of rope and we just are done by the afternoon.
How about we stop giving these people anything?
How about you get three chances and your third felony conviction, you don't go to death row.
That takes a long time and you get to appeal it.
How about we tie a brick around your neck and throw you in the ocean?
How about we just rid ourselves of these victimizers?
Why?
Why do we have to live in a world where people with 39 felony convictions are still walking around, let alone breathing?
Why?
What are we doing here?
And why are we putting up with it?
Welcome back, folks, to the war room.
Alex Jones is still on the phone with lawyers trying to figure out what is the next step for InfoWars.
So he'll come in whenever he knows and we'll bring it to you.
But today was sort of a last gasp chance for us to delay our shutdown, but that was rejected by the judge.
And so we wait to see what happens next.
Could be as soon as tomorrow, could be later today, that the order is given to come in and confiscate things from us.
I guess for the third or fourth time, I'll be taking everything personal home so it has to get seized in the bankruptcy.
We'll see.
But of course, no matter what happens, we have already established the Alex Jones Network.
It's fired up, ready to go.
You can follow it on X. Please do at AJN Live at AJN Live.
And if you're listening to my voice and like InfoWars and want to find us wherever we end up, whatever happens to us, just make an X account.
Follow AJN Live.
Follow me at Harrison H. Smith.
Follow Alex at RealAlexJones.
And your updates will come there at AJN Live on X. And of course, support us at theAlexJonesStore.com, the AlexJonesStore.com.
Your support has gotten us this far and will serve as the fuel for the rocket booster into the future.
And at the end of the day, we have genuinely already won.
They might win in the court.
They might be able to seize our assets.
And all that means is we'll be getting all new equipment in a brand new studio with brand new shows and more reporters going at least 20 hours a day in the very near future.
So in a lot of ways, this bankruptcy, certainly in the last few months, has been a limiter on our engine.
And as soon as it's over, one way or the other, we will be fully unleashed.
And so we so support you.
We so appreciate your support at thealxjonesstore.com.
And we ask you to go there today, get the creatine.
It's buy one, get one, mega sale on the creatine.
And as Rob Dew was talking about earlier today on the Alex Jones show.
Oh, yeah.
And oh, by the way, I should really mention this.
There's a brand new mobile app that you can get now.
Go to thealxjonesstore.com to get the mobile app to really stay up to date.
So follow us on X, get the mobile app, and please support us at thealixjonesstore.com.
Get your creatine, get two for one, buy a hat, buy a shirt.
Buy something with InfoWars on it because it may be your last chance to purchase something like that, knowing that your funds are actually going towards the real InfoWar rather than being purchased by like The Onion or whoever.
But we'll see.
And we await updates on this from Alex Jones.
But we do have breaking news here.
Very good news.
And in fact, triumphant news for us, particularly me.
I feel like I've been desperately screaming this from the rooftops for the last couple of years.
The ADL has finally severed ties with the FBI, or I should say it the other way around.
The FBI has severed ties with the ADL from FBI Director Cash Patel.
James Comey wrote love letters to the ADL and embedded FBI agents with them, a group that ran disgraceful ops spying on Americans.
That era is over.
This FBI will not partner with political fronts masquerading as watchdogs.
Well, it's not a political front.
It's a hate group.
No, it's a hate group, actually.
Patel cuts ties with Comey's FBI, cuts ties Comey's FBI made with the ADL as organization faces backlash for TPUSA criticism So you remember the ADL had TPUSA as a hate group on their in their database now the database itself was getting them in a little bit of hot water So they removed that from postmillennial earlier today ADL retires its glossary of extremism effective immediately Yeah,
it turned out it wasn't actually used to find out about extremism.
It was used to attempt to criminalize very simple expressions of Like American Solidarity, like TPOSA.
They essentially treated that like a criminal operation.
And the people advising the FBI as to who is and who isn't terrorist said the TPOSA was a hate group.
Just like the FBI claims InfoWars is a white supremacist extremist group for the last 13 years or so.
But not only that, the OK symbol, sign saying it's okay to be white, they even said it was a symbol of extreme hate to be against Antifa.
Gee, I wonder why Antifa has been able to run roughshod over law enforcement in this country.
So the ADL officially retired its glossary of extremism.
This comes after the ADL faced heavy criticism for including Turning Point USA in the glossary.
In a post to X, the ADL said, quote, with over 1,000 entries written over many years, the ADL glossary of extremism has served as a source of high-level information on a wide range of topics for years.
At the time, an increasing number of entries in the glossary were outdated.
Oh, it was outdated.
That's what it was.
Okay, how long has CPSA even been around?
So the ADL is not going away, unfortunately.
They should.
And I don't know why they aren't.
This is another just aspect of the frustration I constantly feel.
Cash Protel points out that the ADL has not just been embedded with the FBI, advising the FBI.
He says they've ran ops spying on Americans.
Okay, so this group has worked for a foreign government to provide information on Americans to this foreign government.
And the worst thing that's happening to them is they're not directly instructing the FBI anymore.
I bet they learned their lesson.
Tell you what, if they're, as the FBI director just said in his own words, quote, running disgraceful ops that spy on Americans, maybe they should be arrested for sedition.
Maybe they should be arrested under the Espionage Act like Julian Assange.
If they're committing espionage for a foreign state on American citizens, maybe they shouldn't be punished by simply having their, you know, authority over the FBI cut.
Maybe they should be arrested and have to go to jail.
Just like the guy who, you know, attacks ICE officers as they arrest his employees.
Maybe he should go to jail.
Maybe he should go to jail for arresting the, for hiring the illegals in the first place, and maybe they should go to jail for interfering in the arrest.
Why do we keep letting these people off the hook?
It's not enough to take their security clearances, arrest them.
It's not enough to simply not give these unelected racial supremacists the keys to the kingdom.
Why don't we arrest them?
They're just going to reform.
They're just going to make, there's going to become something else.
They're going to stop being the ADL.
They're going to be the whatever.
They're going to be like the MAGA coalition.
And it's going to be just the ADL reformed.
Why?
Why do we let these people have any power over us ever?
At the ADL, we're always looking for how we can and should do things better.
Have you thought about killing yourself?
Have you thought about going away forever and maybe moving back to Israel?
You Jewish supremacist scumbags.
The ADL is the KKK.
Do you understand that?
When you hear the ADL instructs the FBI, what you should be hearing is the KKK instructs the FBI.
Do we need to go over the story of how the ADL got founded again?
Sort of ties into everything else we're talking about.
The covering up of crime, the manipulation at the highest levels of money to interest, covering up for their pedophile friends.
Should we go over that?
You know, the ADL was founded 1913, interestingly, right?
Same year as the income tax and the Federal Reserve and the assembly line and just a bunch of other stuff, but pure coincidence, I'm sure.
It was founded in 1913 when a owner of a pencil factory in Georgia, a Jewish guy, raped and murdered a little girl.
He was caught.
He was put on trial and he was convicted.
He was convicted despite fabricating evidence to try to blame it on a black guy, an illiterate black janitor.
So in 1913, the height of like the KKK era in the deep south, it was so obvious this guy committed the crime that even when they were handed a, you know, illiterate black janitor on a platter, all of the white and Jewish people on the jury said, no, no, it was you.
It was you, Leo Frank.
You're guilty.
So they declared him guilty.
They sentenced him to death.
Then a group of his friends, a bunch of rich Jews in Georgia, lobbied the governor to pardon him.
So the people in this community were expected to sit back and watch the murder of one of their daughters was let out because the governor was bribed.
Well, they didn't let that pass.
They just strung him up.
They actually just ignored the pardon, really, is all they did.
The ADL to this day writes posts about how Leo Frank was innocent.
He was never innocent.
Nobody ever even claims he was innocent.
He did, obviously.
But it wasn't like he was, you know, declared not guilty and then they strung him up.
It's not like they just decided it was him and didn't give him a trial and hung him.
No, he had a trial with Jews on the jury, by the way.
He was convicted by a jury of his peers.
He was sentenced to death.
And then his rich friends bribed the governor to pardon him.
That's what happened.
That's how the ADL was founded.
That's how it started.
It's really only gotten worse from there.
And remember, I've read the book before, The Controversy of Zion, written in the 1950s.
And in the 1950s, in that book, they say the ADL has total control over everything published in America.
Newspapers, books, the ADL is in their offices dictating what is and is not worthy of being printed in the 1950s.
So this is a major blow to the ADL.
I think the ADL is on their back foot probably for the first time ever in their existence.
And this, of course, has come about after the continual protest from people like myself, as well as the ban the ADL hashtag that trended in 2023 that we all supported.
The ADL should be banned from X. Even back then, Elon Musk was saying they're an anti-white hate group.
Yes, they always have been.
And they shouldn't have any power, any authority anywhere in this country ever.
So why do they?
Why have they for this long?
And what are we going to do about that?
I'm glad to see the FBI cutting ties.
Should have happened a long time ago.
Now look at this: August 17th of this year.
Or no, this was 2023.
But they shared every year.
Every year, they share this thing painting Leo Frank, rapist and murderer of a child, as some sort of victim of anti-Semitism.
To this day, the ADL keeps defending this scumbag.
ADL and KKK born of the same murder 100 years ago.
Well, look at that.
What do you know?
Of course, the ADL goes on to take total monopolistic control of all publishing in this country, and the KKK gets, you know, treated like a domestic terror group and totally disintegrated.
Not that I even have any love for the KKK, but this is just the mere image of them.
So I feel actually the same about the KKK as I do about the ADL.
Only the KKK has absolutely no power anywhere.
And that's really what the ADL should be.
That's what it should be the type of thing where if anybody finds out you're ever associated with the ADL, you're totally ostracized from society forever.
That's how it should be.
In the exact same way that anybody's found out that they used to be in the KKK.
Well, they're not getting a respectable job, are they?
They're not going to be treated like a respectable celebrity by mainstream media.
Obviously not.
Well, that's how Jonathan Greenblatt should be treated.
That's how anybody associated with the ADL ever should be treated, in my opinion.
And so our pressure on the ADL has worked and they've been forced to back down.
And now they've been removed from the FBI as their authority.
So that's wonderful to see.
Wonderful to see.
Thank you, Cash Patel.
Long, long overdue.
So I'm sure somebody else, I'm sure some other group will be formed now that'll probably be even worse, but we got to keep our eye on that.
Now, I have an example of what I'm talking about when, because, you know, the reason InfoWars is so powerful, the reason I've always loved InfoWars and the reason I wanted to work at InfoWars for so long is because, yes, Alex has always identified these giant threats that are in the complete blind spot of most Americans.
And when you learn about these things, it can be horrifying and blackpilling, devastating in a lot of ways when the rug gets pulled out from under you and you realize, you know, like my uncle's in the military and he, you know, he was having like an existential crisis when he was like, I was participating in this.
I ran like bombing runs for these people.
What did they get me to do for them?
And it's like, man, you can really go down a dangerous path.
So, what I loved about InfoWars was it would present you that information, but then it would tell you, in all honesty, we don't have to put up with this.
Humanity is stronger than this.
And if we can spread this message, if we can make people aware, they'll wake up.
They'll understand how crazy all of this is.
They won't stand for it either.
We can all get out from under this insanity.
And I believe that.
And it's not just about, you know, fighting something that's hopeless, but just keeping hope up because, you know, it's hard to feel black pilled.
It's because it's a self-fulfilling prophecy.
If you think that you've already lost and you've already lost, quote from the Romans: opponent is never vanquished unless they believe themselves so.
So if you believe that you've been beaten, if you believe that there's nothing you can do, then you're absolutely right.
If, on the other hand, you believe that you can fight back, if you believe that you can wake up enough people, then you've got a fighting chance.
So it's absolutely true.
So I'm like the last person to want to say, like, we're beyond conversation, but at a certain point, you can only be presented evidence so often before you have to just like understand that it's real and true.
This example may be like the best I've ever found, but it's just one of many examples I could point to.
In this case, it's from Reddit of all places.
And just take a look at this exchange.
This is just illustrative.
It's an example of just what we deal with continuously.
So apparently, Nigel Farage made a comment about migrants eating swans.
Okay, it's like this thing in the UK.
If you read Robin Hood, you know, he gets like the death penalty for killing a deer because they're the king's deer.
Well, the swans, every swan in the UK is the personal pet of the queen.
Okay, so they're like, they're like the bald eagles in the UK.
Okay.
So you can't hurt them, can't do anything to them.
So Nigel Farage says, hey, there's migrants.
They're eating swans.
They're eating the swans.
They're going out and they're thinking these stupid English people have these delicious swans walking around and they don't even eat them.
They're so dumb, right?
Because, you know, their IQ is an average of like 75 and they don't understand that if you kill all the swans now, there won't be swans anymore.
Okay.
Have you seen the countries of these people where they come from?
Have you seen India ever?
Have you seen any part of India ever?
There's no nature in India.
It is all sludge.
The entire continent is sludge and trash and filth.
I'm not even exaggerating.
There's a game people play where you try to go on Google Maps, you try to find somewhere in India where you can't see trash, and it's impossible.
These are people, you know, poaching all the salmon in Canadian rivers now.
Because for hundreds of years, the white people that live there have moderated their hunting, have set aside certain places or certain times of the year where you don't hunt.
So the actual population of fish will be there the next year.
Now you've got a bunch of Indians that are there.
Nobody's enforcing the law.
They don't know or care about the law.
They think you're all suckers for letting all these great salmon go by without catching them.
So they're taking nets out and just scooping up thousands of salmon from the river.
How long will that last?
Couple years, maybe?
Then no more salmon.
Happens over and over and over again.
It keeps happening.
Okay.
So somebody on the UK, subreddit, posts this image of or this video of Farage saying migrants are eating swans.
The first response to this is: a bunch of BS from Farage Royal Parks have responded to the claim saying no swans have been taken.
Okay, so hey, the authorities say this never happened.
So it's false.
Okay.
158 upvotes to that.
So then the response to him is a link of one, two, three, four, five, six, seven, eight examples of video and photo evidence of people taking swans.
BBC articles, Instagram posts, each one of these links to an example of a video of an immigrant catching, killing, and cooking and eating a swan.
How do you think this was received?
This is what I'm talking about with the frustration.
How do you think it went?
Someone says, nobody's eating swans.
You present them with photographic evidence of many, many, many people eating swans.
What do you think the response is?
Do you think they go, oh, gee, okay, I thought that was fake.
It's real?
Well, shoot.
Farage is right.
You think that happened?
Do you think that happened?
So, this person posts a dozen examples of this happening.
Says, I'd wait for you to apologize and admit that you're wrong, but that won't happen.
You'll just perform mental gymnastics instead.
The response to that, apologize.
Even if a few people have taken some swans, it doesn't mean you can stereotype an entire minority.
Okay, are we going to keep talking to this person?
They have been proven undebatably wrong.
The photographic evidence against their claim presented, and it just doesn't even matter.
It does not matter in the slightest.
And it would be one thing if it was just this crazy person, right?
It would be a whole different situation if this little interchange, this little exchange resulted in a bunch of people going, ah, gee, I guess this is real.
We didn't know.
No, no, no.
The statement ignoring the evidence has 72 up votes.
The evidence itself, 121 negative votes.
It's negative.
Gotten 121 more down votes than up votes.
What are we supposed to do?
We're supposed to argue with these people.
We're supposed to debate these people.
We're supposed to trust these people to have a semblance of humanity in them.
They're so brainwashed.
They cannot be argued with.
And it pains me to say that.
And I don't know where we go from here if we can't, if you can be presented photographic evidence of something.
Now, it's one thing if they go, ah, that's fake.
Okay, that's a person killing a swan, but there's no evidence it's in the UK.
It's never the debate.
This person acknowledges that the evidence is real, acknowledges that the videos are accurate and they do show what they were just claiming never happened, but it doesn't matter.
It doesn't matter.
One small example of something I run into probably 100 times a day.
Very, very, very similar things to this.
It doesn't matter what the evidence is.
I see it on our own side too.
Utterly infuriating.
I see it on our own side when it's when, and it's just the most annoying thing ever.
You're controlled by Israel.
And I'll be like, on Monday, I spent the entire show talking about Israel in the most negative light I possibly can.
Doesn't matter.
All that is, I guess, is evidence of just how well controlled we are.
Controlled opposition.
You only talk about Israel because you're allowed to, because you're controlled by Israel.
Oh, okay.
That makes sense.
Genuinely, I don't even know what to do anymore at this point.
What do we do?
What do you do when evidence doesn't matter?
The outcome of policy doesn't matter.
It doesn't matter anymore.
What do you do when your fellow Americans keep voting for judges that let criminals out with 40 felony convictions?
The whole point of America is you're supposed to have an intelligent, informed voting class that will hold your leadership in check that will be outraged if they abuse their power, exceed their authority, say things that are offensive, and then you'll not vote for them anymore.
What do you do when people keep voting for Jasmine Crockett?
What do you do with these with these people?
It's like Beto O'Rourke.
When Beto O'Rourke was running against Ted Cruz, I did a man on the street.
It's probably the only man on the street thing I've ever actually done at the University of Houston.
Going up to people, asking them about Beto, saying, What do you like about him?
And there were three things that were like his main things.
He didn't take PAC money.
I can't remember the other two.
He was Hispanic, so he understands the migrant plight.
And there was one other thing, and I would ask them, Is this what you like about him?
And the people would say, Yep, those are the three reasons I like him.
And I'd go, okay, he does take PAC money.
Here's the Open Secrets report that shows his number one contributor is in fact a PAC.
It's in the name.
He's not Hispanic.
He's a white guy that actually his father said, I'm going to name him Roberts.
We can call him Beto.
So he'll get votes from Hispanic people.
So he literally was like born and sculpted to be this fraudulent guy.
Do you think any of them said, gee, the three things I liked turn out to be false?
I guess I won't vote for them.
No, of course not.
They got mad at me.
And these people vote, and their vote counts just as much as yours.
What do we do?
Welcome back, folks.
Third hour of War Room is on.
Still have a lot of videos to get to and a lot of stories to tell you about.
We'll get back to, well, crime, immigration.
It's all round up into one because we'll go to some of the incredible footage from last night's riots at the ICE facility.
And we'll see exactly how impotent the local police are versus the federal police.
Of course, you've probably heard the news.
InfoWars has been denied the stay that would have prevented the authorities here in Texas of shutting us down.
Alex Jones bankruptcy does not shield InfoWars assets, Judge says.
That is the headline from Bloomberg Law.
Guys, if you can bring that story in for me, we're waiting to hear more from Alex Jones.
He has been in conference with the lawyers this whole time.
So hopefully we'll hear from him by the end of the show.
But I'm probably just as, if not more eager to find out about this than you are.
So, you know, I'll bring you any information we get as we get it.
Rex Jones just posted about it saying, sadly, it seems like Free Speech Systems, otherwise known as InfoWars, has received its execution after two years in federal bankruptcy court and a fake auction.
Highest bidder did not receive the assets.
The political persecution is finally complete.
The stay has been lifted.
Last time this happened, they illegally stormed the building, cut off the internet, and, quote, the onion gloatingly took over our website and mounted the metaphysical head of InfoWars on their wall.
I'm so proud of the 31 years of excellence and to have been a small, small part in the birthplace of alternative media.
This is not over.
Perhaps one day there will be justice.
We can hope.
And then, of course, a reminder to follow at AJN Live.
Follow at AJN Live immediately.
And we'll bring any updates there.
This is from Bloomberg.
Bloomberg.
Alex Jones bankruptcy does not shield InfoWars assets.
Judge says the litigation pause in the right-wing conspiracy theorists, Chapter 7 bankruptcy, which also prevents creditor collection efforts, does not apply to the assets of InfoWars' parent company, Free Speech Systems LLC.
Judge Christopher Lopez of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court in the Southern District of Texas said during a Wednesday hearing, Free Speech Systems' own bankruptcy proceeding was dismissed last year.
The language of the June 2024 dismissal order and subsequent related rulings is deeply confusing, said Jones return, Jones, said the Jones attorney.
Lopez expressed frustration at that comment, saying that the language was careful to avoid any misunderstanding and suggesting that Brooks isn't versed in bankruptcy law.
The family's been embroiled in lengthy legal battles with Jones, who owes more than $1 billion in judgment over the false claims the 2012 Sandy Hook shooting was a hoax.
Lopez' Wednesday ruling gave the families the clarity they sought after Jones was granted a hold in late August on a court-appointed receiver telling in appeals court free speech systems assets were the property of Jones' Chapter 7 estate.
The parties didn't find it clear that there was no automatic stay on free speech systems assets.
And another attorney, Jones attorney, Shelby Jordan, said another attorney.
The InfoWars parent bankruptcy dismissal order didn't convert its assets into property of Jones liquidation, liquidating estate, Lopez said.
This is why it's so confusing because you've got InfoWars itself that sued, but then Alex was sued, but then Alex owns InfoWars.
So InfoWars is an asset in that lawsuit, but it's different than the lawsuit against InfoWars, where those assets are directly being confronted.
It's very, very confusing.
And none of this should ever have happened because all the proceedings, as far as I'm concerned, were completely illegal.
Even just from the statements of the people doing it, saying, we don't want money.
We just want to shut him down and shut him up.
That's not what this is for.
That's a violation of the First Amendment.
The first time they said that, the whole thing should have been thrown out.
Can you imagine?
I guess you don't have to.
I guess you don't have to imagine.
I guess it happens over and over.
I guess this is almost like Letitia James saying, elect me and I'll get elected to, or I'll go after Trump for whatever.
And then, you know, trying to send him to jail for 400 years.
You would think that the moment the prosecutor said, I'm doing this to destroy his political agenda, not because he committed a crime, but because I hate him and want to silence him.
You'd think our law system wouldn't stand for that.
But there's one thing you've noticed, should have noticed, should have learned so far, even in just today's report, this whole system is Corrupt beyond belief is the word I'll use for it.
Just gonna use the F word.
Welcome back, folks.
Third hour is on.
This is the war room.
Still haven't heard from Alex Jones.
We expect him to be joining us at some point, but it may be after this show's over that things actually get decided.
But again, we expect could be as early as tomorrow.
As we know, the order to liquidate Infowars, have sheriffs come in, confiscate everything, lock the doors was already made months ago.
We've been able to delay it, waylay it.
I know I post this on, and people go, oh, again, oh, you're being shut down again.
It's like, yes, again.
Yes, again.
Once again, we are being led to the executioner's block, the hood over our head, the blade sharpened, only to have a stay, put out, be pardoned at the last second.
Of course, this isn't just happening.
It's because we're fighting back.
If we just wanted to, we could have just let the onion have it a year ago.
We fought back at every pass, and we've had victory at every pass.
For the first time, one of our requests has not gone through, even though I think it should have.
And just everything about this is just so utterly fraudulent and criminal.
It's infuriating.
But that's the world we live in now.
That's a world that's been created for us.
It's a world that Enforce has been trying to prevent the entire time, which is why we've been destroyed.
unidentified
That's right.
harrison smith
We're not giving up.
And of course, you can still support us at the AlexJonesStore.com.
Follow us at AJN Live.
The Alex Jones Network will be our escape pod and we'll continue to operate and tell you the truth and bring you the interviews and break down the headlines like we always do, telling you the things that make us so dangerous, the things that are real and true and anti-human.
Let's talk, let's get back into crime here because again, it's crime, it's immigration, it's a little bit of everything.
But I want to start with our old friend Don Lemon.
Let's go to clip 30 here.
Actually, you know what?
Let's go to clip 36 first.
Let's go to clip 36 first.
Here's Don Lemon talking about white people.
Let's watch.
don lemon
Wake up, white men.
unidentified
What the fuck is wrong with you?
harrison smith
It's a great question.
don lemon
But you're too dumb to even realize that.
Because you're lazy and sitting in front of a computer or a phone and you're just eating it up.
unidentified
My gosh, look at what they're doing.
All of a sudden, my heritage is going to be over that.
I want to live in a country where white kids go to white schools and white people marry each other.
What is wrong with that?
I want to grow up in the country that my great-grandfather grew up in.
That country doesn't exist anymore, asshole.
harrison smith
You think it can't?
Do you think it can't?
No other race is expected to put up with this.
No other race is demonized like we are, is hated like we are.
And I respond to this video by saying, actually, Tuna, I'm going to tell you why violence is the answer.
There's another video where he says violence isn't the answer.
It is, actually.
Violence is, in fact, the answer.
I'll explain that in just a second.
And I had people in my comments going, oh, you're falling for the divide.
Don't fall for the racial divide.
Fall for the racial divide.
So Don Lemon is supposed to demonize my race, literally gloating over the fact that my homeland, I don't have another homeland.
My family's been here since the Mayflower.
The latest my family got here was the late 1700s.
I don't have another homeland.
This is my homeland.
My grandfathers did build this place.
If you to gloatingly mock the idea that we're upset that we're losing it, what the hell is wrong with you?
And why would anybody put up with this?
People say, you're falling for it.
Don't fall for the hate.
That's not hate.
I love white people.
And white people should love themselves.
It's all love for white people.
I love black people too.
But everybody expresses that in mainstream media at least.
Can you find anybody that expresses love for white people, appreciation for white people, white culture, white accomplishments?
So my message to white people is listen to Don Lemon.
Stand up.
No, it's time to stand up.
It's time to stop taking this.
It's time to recognize that you might not see race, but race sees you.
The idea that you would criticize a white person for responding to something like that.
Somebody's out there going, oh, I want to live in a white country where my white kids play with other white kids.
You're never going to.
It's over.
So I'm going to go, F this guy.
Somebody goes, whoa, whoa, man.
Hey, they're not talking to Don Lemon.
They're talking to me, saying I shouldn't engage in hate.
I've never said anything even remotely that hateful.
So criticize him.
Go after him.
You want to go after somebody who's hateful?
Go after Don Lemon.
You want to tell somebody not to divide people.
It's a sick thing to say.
And you don't have to take it.
White people are awesome.
We've built the entire world.
We discovered most people.
They were living in mud and eating each other.
And they probably will go back to that once we're eradicated.
So, I mean, if you look at, you know, there's this book that I keep talking about, the source of civilization.
It's called something like that.
From, I'm blinking.
I'm blinking on the name right now.
Just search history, history of civilization.
It's a book Elon Musk is a big fan of.
It was written around the turn of the 20th century, early 1900s.
Europe was the only civilized place at that time.
As we would consider something civilized, it's just Europe and places where Europeans went.
The diaspora was civilized.
Nowhere, I mean, China wasn't really like brought into the 20th century until like the 60s.
And you're reading this book and it's like you forget.
But yeah, the turn of the 19th century in China, it was still like, you know, everybody bought and sold women.
like, you know, marriage was all a financial transaction, and everybody was basically slaves.
It is truly unbelievable.
Because look, I got nothing but love and respect for other races.
I think that I love when they celebrate their heritage and have pride in who they are, where they came from.
Good, you should.
No, it's not that.
It's not that history of civilization.
Will Durant.
It's by Will Durant.
It's called The Story of Civilization, I think, by Will Durant.
Everybody should read the first couple chapters, folks.
You've got to read the first couple of chapters of The Story of Civilization by Will Durant.
It's on audiobook on YouTube.
You can literally just put it on while you're driving.
It will give you a perspective that has been deliberately eradicated since that book was written.
Not to get off on too big of a tangent.
The point being, white people should not be taking this and shouldn't have to take this and shouldn't be expected to take this.
Nobody else takes this.
Nobody else opens up their civilization to anybody, let alone to white people.
Somehow we're expecting.
So this multicultural world is really just white people giving up everything our forefathers handed down to us for people that didn't build it, don't appreciate it, and in fact, hate and despise and gloat over its destruction.
Okay.
Is that a deal that we accept?
And people have been browbeaten into this where they've internalized it themselves, where they will genuinely feel like deep discomfort if you express liking white people, wanting to be around white people.
Just understand, just check your biases, okay?
You have to do an audit of yourself and go, is this really a bad thing or have I been conditioned to think this is a bad thing?
What's actually bad about this?
What's bad about white people?
Ended slavery world over.
That's pretty cool.
Developed the concept of human rights and exported it by force to people who reject it.
That's an accomplishment.
I could go on.
Would you like me to go on?
It's just the idea of Don Lemon, who, by the way, has a white boyfriend.
I'll say it that way.
I'll say he has a white boyfriend.
I was thinking of some more disgusting ways to say that, but it's disgusting as it is.
These people don't even, they don't even believe it themselves.
They just want a weapon to wield against you.
And the answer is violence.
It's like that meme.
It's like that meme went viral recently where it's like, violence isn't the answer.
Opens up history book.
Oh no.
Oh God.
Oh no.
Oh wait.
Oh wait a second.
Oh wait, it is actually the answer.
Actually, the way that we got here was through violence.
Actually, the world that we live in now was created by force.
And it sucks.
And the people who did it aren't listening to your requests to go back to the way it was before.
In fact, they're so thoroughly vindictive and hateful, they will destroy your world and then they'll destroy evidence of your world.
And then they'll say your world never existed.
And thinking it did exist is just because you hate us.
We heard Hillary Clinton say that exact argument in case you didn't understand what she was saying there.
They take images of the 1950s when things were nice and they say that never existed.
That's propaganda.
Actually, that was just covering up a time when everybody was miserable and hateful and mean and nobody could do anything that they wanted.
So they'll destroy your paradise.
They'll turn it into a slum.
And they'll destroy the pictures of your paradise and tell you that never existed.
You're crazy and actually a racist for saying that it did.
It existed for everybody, by the way.
It existed for black people too.
Go watch interviews from black people talking about the 1950s.
It is indistinguishable from white people.
Talking about their life before the government swept in to help them.
Before the Civil Rights Act, when the black population in this country had their own communities and their own standards, literally, I mean, you take the script or the transcript of one of these interviews, you couldn't tell if it was white or black.
Listen to black people talking about growing up in South Philadelphia in the 1940s and 50s.
You know what they describe?
Well, they certainly don't describe crackheads and shootouts, gangs, murders.
They describe white picket fences and all the women wearing dresses and all the men wearing suits and the whole family filling up the auditorium every time the school had a production.
They destroy that.
Then they tell you actually, actually, what existed there was just a chaos of racial hate.
Totally absurd, completely ridiculous.
In effect, genocidal, really.
An intent genocidal.
Even beyond that.
What is the word when you destroy a group of people and then destroy the memory of that people?
Because that's a step beyond.
Here's John Lemon saying violence is not the answer, Clip 30.
don lemon
Men who look like you, men who vote like you, and men who sound like you.
White men, something is broken.
Something is cracked deep inside when so many of you believe the answer to fear, to loss, to change is violence.
Are you listening to me?
I hope I'm saying it loud enough for the people in the back.
harrison smith
Oh, oh, we got you, dumbass.
We hear you loud and clear, you utter failure, you ridiculous nobody, since you left your, since you are no longer being pushed forward by the mainstream media, the only place anybody's going to see you is on my show.
So you're welcome.
You're welcome for showing your clip because nobody's actually watching you because you were always a propped up DEI hire.
So he's again, something's broken in you, white men, because you respond with violence.
Now, most people are responding to this with, of course, statistical claims and charts showing that, in fact, black people show violence at a rate just massively exceeding anything white people ever accomplish.
That's not the whole story, actually.
Because there are some pretty interesting stats.
Black women commit murder at a higher rate than white men.
So that's pretty interesting.
Black children commit murder at a higher rate than white men.
Did you know that?
Like teenagers, like 14 to 19, higher rate of murder than adult white men.
So, okay, so, but I don't think that's what he's talking about.
Exactly.
What he's talking about is organized violence.
Now, when it comes to organized violence, nobody holds a candle to white people.
We conquered the entire world by accident.
Okay, we weren't even trying to.
We were really just fighting with other white countries.
England and like France, there's a clip going around from Thomas Soule, I think his name is.
Not the economist, but the activist in Australia, who's in jail right now, by the way.
You know, his point is: you know, Europeans were just fighting with other Europeans and just wanted to conquer things so that the other Europeans didn't get there first.
We never even thought of other races as like a threat or competition.
When it comes to organized violence, it's next level.
And so, why do I say violence is the answer?
Because it actually is.
Let's look at some examples.
These are all just from the last day or two.
Okay, clip 19 first.
This is how you deploy violence in a way that actually makes everybody safer.
Okay, let's watch.
It's a security guard, this case in the UK, at a grocery store called Asda.
And let's roll it.
unidentified
There you go.
harrison smith
I'm not going to take any chances as the security guard 32 claims man knocked out and dragged outside store, threatened to stab him and kill shoppers.
Yeah, when you've got an insane psychopath criminal wandering around yelling he's going to stab people, well, sometimes you need a white guy to take out the trash.
That's violence in a controlled fashion, in a protective way of being deployed.
A Daniel Penny, if you will.
So that's one example.
Violence being the answer.
Now, you could have talked to that guy, but you probably would have gotten stabbed.
Could have tried to educate that guy, but you might as well educate a rock.
Now, when you're confronted with the chaotic, aimless, vicious violence of random criminals, what you need in return and in opposition to that is organized, concentrated, controlled extreme violence the other direction.
Okay?
One big punch, boom, problem solved.
Look at that.
Hours of conversation would have been wasted.
One swift punch to the jaw, and the issue is eliminated.
Look at that.
Problem solved.
Let's go to clip 70 here.
Another example of extreme violence being used once again to chase down.
And again, I didn't even, I didn't even go out and look for these clips.
They all do happen to be black perpetrators, but you know, it's reality.
So Pueblo, Colorado police have released a video showing an officer forced to run over 36-year-old Antonio Herrera.
And this guy was trying to like carjack a family.
He's like, already carjacked somebody.
He's got a knife.
He's running around threatening to stab people and he tries to steal a car with kids in it.
And then we deploy violence.
Let's watch.
Running away.
He's going for the car with the family in it.
So we deploy violence.
Boom.
Problem solved.
And there's the gun in the air.
That's right.
He didn't have a knife.
He had a gun.
Violence is the answer.
Not chaotic violence, not random violence, not violence against innocent people.
God forbid anything ever happened to Don Lemon.
I want him alive.
I want him saying stupid things to give me content.
Please say more, Don Lemon.
Give us more instructions for white people.
Please remind us of, you know, who you people are and what you actually think.
Do you want more?
Should we do more?
Because we've got the opposite to go to, too.
But no, let's go to clip 38 here.
Clip 38.
Let's watch this.
This case, the guy didn't even deploy violence, but the mere threat of violence is enough in this case to save a save a woman.
Let's watch.
This girl was getting attacked.
Shout out to this guy for saving her.
White dude, no shirt.
None of his business.
But he goes out of his way to hop the fence and interject himself in the violence, and it stops.
Why does it stop?
Because he's a tall, muscular white guy who could beat your butt.
So you let him walk away with the girl.
Yeah, violence.
Violence is needed to meet violence.
Okay.
Righteous violence.
Yeah, righteous violence.
That's what this is.
100%.
Now, the opposite of that would be naivety, ignorance.
I've got a video to explain that too.
Clip 46.
This shows an absence of violence.
This shows a people who are so removed from violence, they are, we are literally the dodo bird.
We have lost the ability to even see threats and have no ability to react to them appropriately.
So let's go now to clip 46, female nature in action.
Let's watch.
So here you see a black guy trying to kick a door in, trying to bust a glass door.
Then somebody sees him, so he knocks and he looks innocent.
Now, he just kicked the door one second ago.
She heard that.
Here comes a little old white lady.
And far be it from her to think that, and she's on the ground, okay?
And she's being robbed and she's being viciously attacked.
And he's stealing her purse, ripping it out of her hands, and running away.
So, you know, Don Lemon, like that, that's the video.
That's the mindset Don Lemon wants you in.
Is totally ignorant to an obvious threat right in front of you.
The guy's trying to kick the door down, and this little old lady doesn't even enter into her mind that maybe you shouldn't be there.
Maybe if he was supposed to be there, he'd have a way of getting in.
Total dodo bird behavior.
So you got to get over that.
You got to stop being that way.
There's another video that's going viral today.
This guy, Cam Higbee, I guess his name is.
He's one of the guys that took the Israel trip, and he's doing a sort of ask me anything setup where he's at his table and he posts this video where he's like, this young man was desperate to get to a job interview and he was going to sell his bike to afford the train ticket.
So we just gave him the money for the train ticket.
And it's, a dude was trying to sell a brand new bike for $10.
That bike was stolen, you idiot.
But the guy's black, so you cannot suspect him of anything.
You cannot think that, you know, maybe he wasn't telling the truth.
Oh, he wants to sell a $400 bike for $10.
Nothing suspicious about that, right?
Again, it's not even a white and black thing.
It's a white thing.
Stop being so gullible and naive.
All right, welcome back, folks.
Final segment of the war room.
We should be joined by Alex Jones here any minute.
I do have some more videos to go to.
And let's go.
I don't know.
I got funny videos to go to.
I don't even feel like going to them now because we want to talk about Minnesota and people making these fake Minnesota ads that just show what an utter crap hole it all is.
But here's the latest.
Post-millennial reporter, Katie Davis Court, assaulted by Antifa Militant in Portland amid ICE riot.
There's actually a very interesting series of videos posted by Kate Davis Court Davis Court.
I'm not sure how to pronounce her name exactly, but she is there in the mix of it and doing incredible work capturing the violence here.
But we got it.
You got to go to her account and look at the videos because there's one where she's being attacked.
There's a second one where she's following her attacker and there's a cop there, but the cop won't do anything.
And then the third video is the ICE agents coming out and actually arresting her and actually doing the local police jobs for them because they refuse to, even though the local authorities keep saying, we don't need the federal officers here.
The local police can handle it.
And then they do nothing when violence occurs.
So that's what happened.
So you should check that out.
And according to Attorney General Pam Bondi, a task force in Memphis that arrived just 48 hours ago has already seized 20 illegal firearms and made 53 arrests, as well as finding a missing juvenile.
Three firearms recovered at the home of a murder suspect at President Trump's direction.
We're making America safe again.
Again, all these cities run by Democrats who allow their criminals to run completely out of control, will not stick the local police on them.
And so Trump's having to send in the feds.
I really wish he wasn't.
I wish they would just let the police do their jobs and then we wouldn't have to worry about any of this.
Feds bust pipeline pumping Massachusetts driver's licenses to illegals in other states.
Massachusetts driver's licenses for illegal immigrants sold by Beacon Hill as a road safety reform has blown up into a federal fraud scandal.
Prosecutors say the base state has become ground zero for a multi-year scheme that has turned out hundreds of licenses for illegals across the Northwest.
And already they've arrested like hundreds of these guys who get driver's licenses with no pictures and no names, but they're official driver's licenses.
Explain that to me.
alex jones
Yeah, they're giving out.
Well, remember, Biden started, it's now been released, giving out social security numbers to illegals as soon as they got here.
harrison smith
Right.
alex jones
Men, women, children to get their new voters.
harrison smith
This is one of the things I discovered during Doge.
Elon Musk gave a big presentation showing the charts of all the social security numbers given out.
unidentified
Yeah.
alex jones
And now it's coming out, though, at the state levels.
They're all doing it.
It's being released.
Well, here's the big announcement.
You know, I hate Alex Jones is always right, or pretty much always right.
Enough time, I'm always right.
We've survived so many attacks.
And, you know, it became a thing like, oh, these aren't real attacks because they're surviving, even though we're like at the very tip of the spear talking about the New World Order, basically when nobody was in any mass media.
And so I've gotten the ire of the globalists.
My crew has gotten the ire of the globalists.
We've been through hell.
We've been incredibly persecuted.
But I want to just say I'm so proud of the crew and their perseverance and yourself and just everybody and what they've done.
You see this Bloomberg headline from just a few hours ago, and I would have come on earlier, but I talked to lawyers for hours as they drove back from Houston to Austin to get the make sure I was right about it.
And of course, what I said right after the ruling, listening to it myself, I had a guest on talking and I'm like listening to it on the phone.
And you didn't listen to the audio or watch the video, but I was listening to it.
And the judge said, no, I am lifting this tag for Judge Gwer Gamble, the Soros judge, the show trial with HBO here in Austin.
They already have the receiver appointed.
They already have the order to the sheriff's department.
Now it's just up to them to implement it.
And he lifted it.
Even though his previous orders said no, he came out and said, my orders never said that.
My lawyers are very seasoned.
Shelby, Jordan, and others said they've never seen anything like it.
And they believe it's because of how damning our filing was with all the total proof of process violation, which sounds like a boring name.
That means criminal violation of rights.
He said previously that the auction was a fraud.
And the first thing he said to Chris Murray, the U.S. trustee, is, well, what is you and your side going to do responding to InfoWars?
Well, he's supposedly with us.
He's supposedly the trustee.
The judge literally said, what are you and your side going to say first, Murray?
What are the plaintiffs going to say?
Which is like an absolute broadside.
So he was really pissed.
First, he was like really pissed.
And he usually likes, you know, Shelby, who's a very well-known lawyer, one of the top respected guys in Texas.
And he's been around for a long time.
And he was very, very curt with him.
And he just basically punted.
He pontius piloted it, which has gone on three years.
That's marathon for a bankruptcy because they would always say, criminally investigate him, court, use their own money to investigate him.
Four investigations.
The judge said it a year ago.
They go, there's no investigations.
I mean, nothing came out of this.
You never filed anything.
You never found anything.
He's told the truth.
IRS audit.
We get a huge tax return, but then it gets paid into the bankruptcy.
I mean, they thought this Lex Luther thing, as they said enough on TV, was true.
And of course, none of it was true.
The New York Times had to say last year.
Turns out InfoWars had meager assets.
So here's the big announcement.
The Death Star is clear to fire.
Like at the end of episode four, when it's orbiting the planet, it finally goes, the Death Star is clear to fire.
And Governor Tarkin, whatever his name is, says you may fire at will, Commander.
So it's lined up.
They've all been all with the news, the plaintiffs, lawyers, all of them, Democrat Party operatives, former federal prosecutors saying the last gas.
We've got him.
We don't want money.
We want him off the air.
Then separately, there'd be an article.
He's got hundreds of millions hidden.
It's our money.
While they do PR and raise money off me saying I'm victimizing him.
I never did any of this stuff.
They say in my name, I did these things that I never did and that nobody ever did.
That's what they had to have show trials.
I was already found guilty where the judges control the evidence.
But even there, my lawyers would say, did anyone in Infowars ever say your name?
unidentified
No.
alex jones
Did anybody ever do anything to you?
Well, who peed on the graves?
I don't know.
Somebody told me.
Who?
I don't know.
Well, who came to your house?
I don't know.
Somebody told me.
Well, who were they?
I don't know.
Did you?
I mean, literally, I saw a leprechaun in my toilet this morning.
Well, you saw it.
Well, no, actually, my neighbor did, but I can tell you who they are.
I mean, but they just beat the dead horse.
Like, Trump hates all Mexicans, says they're all criminals.
No clip anywhere close.
Trump says the KKK are very fine people.
He said they're not very fine people.
They don't care, people.
So here's the deal.
We have been spared so many times by God in this fight, the last eight years of law affair that's been so intense.
But Judge Gware Gamble despises me, absolutely hates me.
They already have the receiver appointed.
Last time they had the fake auction, November 13th.
Remember, they were here the next day.
So I expect they're here tomorrow.
And of course, there'll be the sheriff's department.
We'll be nice.
They got a court order.
Come on in.
Sure.
Okay.
Bye-bye.
I mean, Rob's going to sleep up here tonight.
Because I didn't last time they went through all this.
And I got a few mementos.
I already knew this was coming this morning.
There was like an old pit up of one of our magazines 15 years ago on the wall.
This man wants your guns with a bomb on the cover.
I took that off, went and gave it, you know, to some of the crew.
And I said, hey, the new studio, let's have this.
But if you ask where InfoWars is going, I will not be the owner of it.
It's the Alex Shows Network.
It's Big Lee.
And we've got all these great sponsors and backers coming on board.
We have a little backup studio built that they finance and run and own.
They're literally have gone in now on the new studio that's bigger and even better than this.
But we're going to have a podcast studios, a news desk, and then one studio for the host, but a bigger one, you know, nicer than these.
And that's it.
So, and we intend to go 20 hours a day at least or 19, you know, from midnight to five will be rebroadcast.
And I want like hire people that I believe in, that I think are smart, that I agree with, disagree with, that have integrity.
And I want just like X up on the wall and the news feeds and kind of like bloop, bloop, bloop, like covering things as they break.
That's my vision is lots of one-hour shows.
And people that are really good, see who have great stamina.
If somebody wants to come in and do a 7 a.m. show and come back at 3 p.m. and do an hour, that's great.
But other people can do an hour, cut it up, do reporting, do a podcast, go on other shows.
I want to, and I'll be the news director.
And then they can harass me with a non-dischargeable debt and chase me around.
It means nothing to me.
I mean, I've never been about, you know, money and stuff like that.
So it really means nothing to me.
What matters is truth.
I'm allowed to work wherever I want.
I'm allowed to have a talk show.
And I'll do this with a gun to my head.
And they said, we're going to kill you.
I'd say, pull the trigger.
So I'm willing to die for this, like Charlie Kirk.
And I got people wanting to kill me, obviously, and you too.
So we're all getting swatted and the rest of it.
So you think taking money away and exaggerating it hundreds of times?
I never made $60 million in my career.
And most of the money I did make, almost $60 million, I had to ratchet up in the last eight years.
I was paid more in the last eight years than I was before because I needed to beg for money and get my income up because I got to pay the lawyers.
So, oh, yeah, there was some years I got paid $5 million and $4 million of them went to the, because I mean, I got the big Democrats, but people go, well, why are you fighting?
It's the price of freedom.
It's the price of war.
I didn't have to die like Charlie Kirk.
Just had to have my name dripped through the mud and my parents sued and everybody harassed everything else.
But that's okay.
I knew what I was getting into.
My point is to our enemies.
If you think this harassment and all this garbage deters me or deters other Americans, yeah, you'll deter a few cowards and a few people that are like that.
You just thinned the herd with Darwinism of the weak people culturally.
We're getting left with the warriors here.
And it's a lot more than you thought, isn't it?
You thought a mug shot would turn the world off against Trump.
You thought trying to kill him or kill anyone, you're lucky you didn't kill him.
Boy, you'd have really got a problem.
We're winning, not distributed around the world.
Populism is rising.
And so, again, the bottom line is you can read the articles.
We finally got him.
We'll shut him down within a week.
Whatever.
But their fake auction, their fake shutdown before that with private security in May 31st last year.
That wasn't real.
I didn't leave.
When they come, sheriff's department.
I know the sheriff's department well.
You don't know them all, but they like me.
Everybody knows who I am.
Most of them listen.
Talked to some of them today.
I've run into some.
And they love me.
And they all listen, literally.
So most of them.
So, so, hey, have a cup of coffee.
All right.
How fast we got to get out?
All right.
Sure, great.
Have a good one.
See you later.
And we can leave it all on the field 16 years in this building.
This building changed the world, the people in it, what we did.
And it will make all of it more epic and more powerful going forward.
And the bad guys know that.
That's why they said we want to own his name.
They put that in bankruptcy last year.
The 13th Amendment applies to everybody else against intentional servitude and slavery.
Did you hear me?
Indigenous servitude and slavery, indentured servitude and slavery.
But it doesn't apply.
Alex Jones is a special case.
They believe they can set these precedents with this straw man in me that's so demonized.
Elon Musk came in and blocked it.
They say they're going to own the name InfoWar.
It's a generic term, meaning information war.
I looked it up, you know, the name and talking to folks I knew in intelligence, Vic Freeland, in 1996.
He said, you need a website.
I said, well, what's a good name?
He goes, well, you really are an information war.
Let's see if that's available.
He went to InfoWar.
It was not available.
InfoWars was.
We paid $9.
He actually registered first.
Wikipedia says we started $9.99.
That's incorrect.
It has my name spelled wrong too, my middle name.
I can tell you how you really spell my middle name.
They may have fixed it.
But the point is, InfoWars is a generic term, meaning fighting with information.
Some truths, some lies.
We use truth, they use lies.
So now they're going to make the term info war even bigger.
When I first started using the term info war, that I'd heard of here and there, but I didn't really understand it.
Vic Freeland, the deputy fire chief in Austin, is the guy that really educated me.
Nobody was using it.
Now it's a household word.
You don't take that out of the vernacular and you don't capture a URL and then put fake news up.
They said to literally confuse people about my message and go, oh, InfoWar.
That's that guy that's into space aliens and chewpacabras.
I predict they're so dumb that they never listen.
So I'm not giving my enemies any news because they can't stop themselves.
Can you imagine when they try to wear our skin?
They say they're going to misrepresent and act like they're me.
They claim they own my catalog.
They claim they're going to misrepresent it all.
I'm not like an actress or actor or musical artist or something.
Somebody like Prince, who sold his name to Sony, and then they could come take it.
I never did a 360, bro.
I'm not an indentured servant.
You will lose.
And our countersuits are powerful.
They can run, but they can't hide.
I don't know.
harrison smith
So, so, how, how soon could this happen?
I mean, could this be the last 10 minutes we broadcast out of these studios?
alex jones
Yeah, I was talking to Shelby and my lawyers earlier as they drove back from Houston, like literally 30 minutes ago, and they said it could be tonight.
harrison smith
Right.
alex jones
I mean, they, here's the thought: they did their fake auction, they did their fake security raid, got butt on their face, hang on their face.
So they're probably going to want to be a little more careful about it.
Also, the sheriff's department, you know, is usually pretty reasonable or whatever.
I would imagine that we don't miss the call or whatever.
We'll get a call.
And I'm going to reach out to them in the morning and say, hey, if you get this, just let us know.
It wants to be really easy.
We can show you around and, you know, everything else.
And just, this is a husk.
This is like a butterfly coming out of the cocoon here.
And, and, but I always fought for it, and we never backed down about it.
But, but this is not a defeat.
This is a great case of perseverance.
And this is all these wars and all these battles and things we've won.
And now they think if they can get the symbol of it and the name of it of a website, somehow that legitimizes all their attempts to take us off the air over the years.
And all they did with the law fair on Trump was making bigger.
So, but it's that totalitarian instinct of who they are.
So I am.
harrison smith
People can follow AJN live, right, on Axe.
Where should people go in case?
alex jones
Yeah, I mean, I mean, there's the Alex Jones channel on Rumble that we're going to really start promoting and pushing big time and doing streams through them.
It's already big.
We're going to really push it.
There's X at Real Alex Jones, the backup at AJN Live.
And then the radio stations can pick up the Alex Show show all day long.
So they're already ready.
The stations are all there.
That's our little secret ace in the hole to pick it all up.
And so we just flip a switch.
Remember when they came in with the fake auction and cut the internet and we were on and didn't miss a beat?
unidentified
Yeah.
alex jones
It was during your show.
They shut your show down.
harrison smith
I was midway through my sentence.
The screen went black.
Yeah, it's crazy.
alex jones
So, so, so, but, but I got on the air and you got on the air.
And that's one reason I was so critical.
Oh, and you remember that December 10th hearing?
It was 9th and 10th.
And the judge ruled for us at the end, saying, I can't authorize a fraudulent sale.
I can't be part of your fraud.
Lopez would never be part of the fraud they brought in.
But at the end of the day, like Pontius Pilot, he said, I'll give you what you want and signed off on it today, which my lawyers thought.
I mean, their filing is so horrible.
It's all their quotes and admissions.
We don't want money.
We want to shut him down.
This is political.
Ha ha ha.
Yeah, we rigged the, you know, we rigged the, I mean, we deposed them and they said, yeah, we rigged the auction.
We don't want you to have it.
unidentified
That's fraud.
alex jones
That's criminal.
So, so, but listen, the DOJ is still investigating.
You think you got that killed?
Think again.
You wait till your little deputy AGs.
We were thinking way ahead of that.
Thanks for showing yourself.
Just a little more weight.
We're getting close.
But the civil stuff, and you think you shut this down and magically the money goes away.
No, no, no, no, no, no.
Now that we're going to be out of the bankruptcy, all these backers can legally back us and do all this stuff.
And as long as Mr. Jones never touches any of it, you can't do anything.
And so you think you've won the war just begun.
You just act like Admiral Yamamoto, or you just act like Emperor Harrieto right after they hit Pearl Harbor.
You just sit back and you just adjust your suspenders and you play with a little pee-pee and you just, you just keep laughing.
Just go, oh, it's so funny.
Or like Santa Anta Ana after you wiped out the Alamo.
Just feel good, maybe fire up a cigar and just keep on laughing because I know history.
I know the arc of justice, as Martin Luther King talked about, bench towards justice, and I know, and I can see it all around me.
So, salute the listeners and viewers and supporters.
Salute the crew.
And the big thing is going to be when we announce these new news sites and all this new stuff, it's just everybody hits the ground running because the InfoWar has just begun.
Alex, there's the Alex Jones Network that's on AJN.
There's a whole bunch of systems.
In fact, I'm not even sure that those may be fans ones they just threw up.
But we'll have a whole list of that for people.
We'll have it all ready.
It is ready.
And so we'll trot it all out in front of you.
But the biggest thing is just go to RealAlex Jones on X, go to the Alex Jones Network on Rumble.
And here's the other thing: band.video.
All that belongs to you.
We used to have radio stations and TV stations that didn't want to carry the full show, but people wanted to buy time to air my films and shows.
And a lot of station owners just wanted to air it.
I mean, big stations at LA, New York, you name it, commercial stations.
But I was constantly signing forms to authorize legal and then calling the station.
Yes.
So I had lawyers write forms on InfoWars.com saying all of this is free to air.
All this belongs to the American people and the people of the world.
And it's all there.
So we've been free to air and it's been a non-exclusive license to all of you for 25, 26, 27 years.
There's dozens of letters that were updated over the years, over 25 of them.
Actually, more than that.
There's a whole stack for the lawyers.
And they're digitally there.
They're on the digital archive.
It's all there.
So you can't, it's like I could publish a book.
I could write a book and say this is copyright, trademark free.
This is a gift to the world.
It belongs to you, like publishing a song saying it's free rights to the world.
Well, if I later declare bankruptcy on assets I have, you can't come back and say a thing I gave away belonged to me because it belonged to the world.
So this is perfectly positioned.
We're going to sue Bloomberg and the Everytown group that publicly owns and runs the onion.
We're going to sue the onion guy that's back on the news saying the one thing in my life is getting Infowars so I can wear his skin.
Did you hear that a few words?
unidentified
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
alex jones
I mean, this is creepy.
Good, dude.
You are stepping into the damages now.
You are stepping out of the rig court in Democrat-controlled Austin in Connecticut and then out of the bankruptcy court that three years gave you big problems.
You're stepping into civil liability with all the things you've done and all your statements about, yeah, look at the onion attack on Charlie Kirk.
You are, you are, and people say, well, we'll just move on from them.
No, it's about justice.
And so the shoe will be under the foot because here's the thing.
I go to work for other people.
I'm like, I don't want basically anything except I want you to fund this First Amendment Foundation 20 million a year to sue these people.
See, that's what this war is about.
See, because you're messing with somebody who doesn't give a crap about money, money to me is an engine of victory.
And people buy stuff from us.
They're doing that.
So they're funding warriors that don't back down.
So go to the alexonstore.com.
Because again, that's another thing.
I don't own that.
Big Lee's established, has all these other clients.
That's what they do.
They sell high-quality supplements, t-shirts, all of it.
They've done a great job.
And they have financed and run and owned the Alex Jones Network.
Though there's other partners about to come in, there's a bunch of stuff about to happen.
So, so there's the brand new phone mobile app.
I haven't gotten to.
Oh my God, I should have plugged that.
Chase got that going.
Can we put that back on screen?
The actual URL if we can.
If you just go to thealxonstore.com, you can learn about the URL because there's an actual URL.
Here it's on my phone.
I'll just, you know, we plug stuff like that.
We probably just want to show the URL.
Here, let me just do that.
harrison smith
I always tell the crew, it's like it looks like it's on the app store.
So if you go in the app store and search AJN Live.
alex jones
Yeah, but there's actually a URL.
I'll just pull it up.
harrison smith
Here's your URL as well.
We can go to the AlexJonesStore.com, support us.
Hey, this might be your last chance to get something with the InfoWars brand from InfoWars.
Say it again.
AlexJonesapp.com.
AlexJonesAPP.com.
alex jones
I put that on screen.
harrison smith
Yeah, AlexJonesapp.com.
alex jones
Good job reminding me of that, guys.
harrison smith
Get the app.
Go to the alexjonesstore.com.
Follow AJN Live on X, AJN Live on X. You don't have an X account.
You got to get one.
But I don't think you need one to go to AJN Live at AJN Live.
X.com slash AJN Live.
alex jones
Yeah, the biggest thing is AlexJonesApp.com is where you go and get the app for free.
So we'll just put it on screen.
AlexJonesapp.com.
There it is, alexjonesapp.com.
So there's going to be, and literally, they've already filed.
They're going to go to court and say, we own his name.
He is a slave.
They already said this.
They said 13th Amendment does not apply to him.
I'm so demonized, courts will go, oh, God, he peed on kids' graves.
Nobody ever did.
It's made up.
And they're just like, we will give you his name.
We will, we will.
But this is the weird judicial culture that literally still thinks CNN has viewers, but they're like literally hanging on in their own little weird bubble.
And so as the sandcastles crumble into the sea, very, very quickly, it's, it's, but I appreciate you.
I appreciate everybody.
But back to Owen.
We're up here on the 10th of December.
He's hugging me.
Love Owen so great.
You know, we're all together.
And, you know, he thought we were going to be shut down in November.
He just quit and left, but he came back.
We were so happy.
And then he just did that whole thing.
That's why it hurt my feelings was because, you know, and I probably overreacted.
And I just wish Owen well, but I appreciate all you guys not abandoning ship in this fight.
harrison smith
Well, same with the crew, too, because everybody, we've all been under this bankruptcy and we've all seen it from the inside.
So, you know, we understand the pressure that you've been under.
And I mean, people don't understand.
During the commercial breaks, Alex is like running out and meeting with lawyers and running back in.
You don't see it when you watch the show behind the scenes.
It's been chaos and high energy.
And, you know, I always feel defeated at this.
And then you come in and fire me up again.
alex jones
But then we get to see people go on air and say, it's all fake.
And I'm just like, you know, it's just like, man, because I don't like Braggo, man.
We were like the most battle hardened, most victories of any by this whole crew.
Like, we are the best, which isn't saying much, God almighty, but people don't celebrate people that are literally dying for them.
And I just, you know, I mean, a lot of you do, and you're the reason we're still on air, but this is our biggest challenge.
They're coming for us to get through us to get to you.
ThealxjonStore.com.
Go there.
We got a big sale.
Get the best creatine private labeled out there.
That means we already go get, we go privately the best.
We already know it's the best and get it one free.
That's all there.
And alexjonesab.com.
Love the folks at Bigley.
They are there.
Such great people launching so much.
And they know they're going to get sued by these people.
They're going to get run into a brick wall because I don't own that company and there's nothing going on.
So this is a long fight.
unidentified
Feel the unstoppable power of Alex Jones, fueled by ultimate creatine powder.
This is the secret weapon behind his relentless energy.
Creatine monohydrate ignites his muscles, blasting through lifts and sprints with raw warrior strength, building the physique of a true patriot.
With micronized mixability, Alex dominates every day, recovering like a titan to crush fatigue and soar to new heights of performance.
His mind becomes a fortress, sharper focus, unbreakable memory, powered by creatine to outlast any mental battle.
This nootropic powerhouse defends against fatigue, keeping Alex Jones razor sharp for the fight.
join him and at least your inner strengths grab ultimate creatine powder now at the alexjonesstore.com fuel your fight and rise with alex jones today that's pure gold I'd have in between, like maybe the creatine zooming in a little, stepping towards you.
alex jones
But also, it's just 30 seconds left.
unidentified
You'd have me go paka chucka womb bak quak quak kuk, whatever it is.
You know, that little like ooga chaka muga bucka womg kuka.
alex jones
I'll be really good.
Ultimate Life Force is a pretty ostentatious name.
But when we're sitting back thinking what the name of this new incredible supplement should be, that's really what it is.
Now, you know, because of the COVID saga and the assaults and the man-made virus and the poison, so-called vaccines that do the exact same thing, order your body to create the toxic spike protein, that there have been a lot of great anti-spike protein detox formulas that have come out.
And I've promoted them and I've bought a lot of her friends and family and given it to them.
But so many times, the doctors and people I talk to that say, hey, these are good detox will say, well, this has got some of what you want.
This has got some of what else you want.
So, you know, tell your friends or family to take these two together.
So about a year ago, and it's taken us that long to bring this out, I said to myself, well, let me check with formulators and doctors and experts and say, you know, would it be good to combine some of the best-selling formulas and put everything into it, a kitchen sink approach?
And they said, absolutely, none of this interacts badly with each other.
It's just all really well-known, healthy compounds for your body.
But just one of the things that is in this new formula, Ultimate Life Force, at thealexjonstore.com is NAC, 400 milligrams of high quality.
And that is a big dose, along with everything else in it.
Now, remember, during COVID, Fauci and others demonized NAC and tried to ban its sale.
I mean, how crazy is that?
It's just good for your body overall.
It's the precursor and breaks down into glutathione, which is the number one antioxidant in the body and the engine of cleaning out the cells.
So they were trying to demonize glutathione, basically, but glutathione raw doesn't break down as well in the gut.
People take it as IV.
But as in NAC, it does.
And I'm not a scientist.
I just read the material, do your own research, but it's amazing.
That's one of the ingredients in Ultimate Life Force now available at thealxjonesstore.com.
Oh, and one other big point I want to make.
You can always subscribe for ultramethylene blue or ultimate CMOS.
It's all ultimate because it's all the strongest out there.
Ultimate turmeric, the strongest, 95% trachuminoid with other super anti-inflammatories, which again, it's not just about being anti-inflammatory.
It's good for your whole body.
That's what these ingredients do as well, but from a different angle.
It's important to understand that you can lock in these supplements, which sell out routinely, sometimes for months, by subscribing to a monthly delivery.
And anytime you want, you can cancel for free.
And then you get locked in a bigger discount on the future delivery and they hold it back so it never sells out.
But in an introductory offer, we're offering 50% off on your subscription.
And that does it in perpetuity.
You lock that in.
It's not always like that.
It's usually 25% on supplements.
And so this is a hell of a deal.
50% off on Ultimate Life Force, introductory offer out of the gates.
It's not just for detox.
It's good for your whole body.
Export Selection