Donald Trump’s D.C. meeting with Zelenskyy and European leaders exposes deep divisions: Ukraine’s CIA-linked corruption, $6B+ in unaccounted aid, and forced conscription undercut NATO claims, while Trump hints at a prolonged war tied to China’s Taiwan ambitions. Geiser and Jones compare Europe’s passive acceptance of government control—from COVID lockdowns to "replacement migration"—to Nazi-style authoritarianism, warning AI weaponization (like Trump’s $500B AI push) risks Orwellian surveillance and societal collapse. They dismiss legacy media’s decline as a "boomer milking" operation and link Western decline to moral decay, institutional distrust, and commercialized Christianity, framing Ukraine’s resistance as unsustainable without territorial concessions. The episode culminates in calls for audience support at alexjonesstore.com to fund anti-globalist alternatives like supplements and AI critiques, blending geopolitics with conspiracy-driven self-interest. [Automatically generated summary]
It is an honor and a pleasure to be with you again on this historic day.
It seems like every day is historic under this presidency, for better or worse, mostly for better.
The big news today, of course, is the fact that Donald Trump met with Voldemort Zelensky in Washington, D.C., just days after his historic meeting, what was called the Peace Summit with Vladimir Putin.
Now, we're not quite sure what the developments are going to be, how this is going to play out.
It seemed like a much more positive meeting than the last one, which was wrought with all sorts of tension and conflict.
This one, there was profuse thanking of President Trump by Zelensky.
Apparently, some concessions by Zelensky, though, not necessarily territorial.
Trump's willingness was expressed for providing security to Ukraine in the event of a ceasefire or a peace deal, a lasting peace deal being negotiated, but no commitment to troops on the ground and an explicit denial of Ukraine ever being a part of NATO.
So maybe it's the case that Ukraine will get all the benefits of being a NATO member without having to pay in to NATO whatsoever.
We'll see what happens.
But I thought it was very interesting that Trump expressed he did not expect or anticipate a ceasefire anytime soon.
This is something that was expressed, talked about, and covered in the meeting with Zelensky, as well as the ensuing press conference, which took place, which lines up with some of my concerns that I've expressed earlier that China might be encouraging Russia to extend this war as long as possible in order to leave a window open for the annexation of Taiwan.
Now, we know that Xi Jinping has told President Trump personally that while President Trump is the president of the United States, there will be no invasion of Taiwan.
But we've been told things by Asian leaders before, Asian ambassadors before, regarding peace talks or the potential for peace before there was a surprise attack.
So I still anticipate that it's very likely that before the end of the year, China will annex Taiwan and this Russia-Ukraine conflict will be drawn out as long as possible in order to open that opportunity up.
It's not being talked about in the mainstream media very much at all, but we do see the leadership of Taiwan going around and doing podcast tours, expressing concern about China's military growth and their behaviors and their actions and posturing in the region.
And so I think it's still totally on the table.
Now, I don't doubt for a minute that Putin wants peace eventually.
I think he wants the regions that he wants.
I don't doubt that Zelensky wants peace in a way because he's been operating as a cutout of the CIA for the duration of his term as president of the United States.
But it's very obvious that Zelensky and his ilk have been making a tremendous amount of money off of this conflict while lives are sacrificed, lives other than their own, which is so often the case.
War historically being political men sending others to die for their political gain.
Now, I understand that Putin was responsible for the invasion of Ukraine and that Zelensky is the victim here in a way.
But even Putin has acknowledged that if Donald Trump was the president of the United States between 2020 and 2024, that this war never would have broken out.
Implicitly pointing the finger at NATO, the globalist community, and democratic leadership here in the United States who allowed it to happen, who provoked it, catalyzed it, and then used it to justify the lining of their own pockets by investing in military industrial complex contractors.
But we'll go over all of the key discussion points.
We'll show you clips on the other side of this short break of Zelensky, of Trump responding to questions from the press, issuing statements, as well as other analysis, particularly from Steve Bannon and others.
And we have other news as well that we're going to be going over.
Brutal cell phones from Gavin Newsom, leftists going nuts.
Rex Jones will be joining me in the second hour to cover all the latest news as well.
We've got comments from Kier Starmer and other members of the international community.
Updates on BlackRock and Larry Fink, his new leadership position in the World Economic Forum, which is a cause for concern given that Larry Fink is very close to Elon Musk and invested in XAI.
So we want to mind everything that he does because after all, we're in the middle of an artificial intelligence revolution, which could determine the fate of humanity itself.
Now, before we go to this one-minute break and get into all the news, please make sure that you go to the alexjonesstore.com and take advantage of our sale ending in less than 48 hours, in fact, 36 hours or so, where you get one canister of bovine colostrum plus, absolutely incredible, any other supplement on the store for 50% off.
Not only is it incredible for your health, your mind, and your body, but you're keeping Infowars on the air by supporting us at theAlexJonesStore.com.
Stay tuned.
We'll be back in one minute with the news.
Ladies and gentlemen, welcome back to the war room.
I am your host, Chase Geiser, for the next three hours.
We're going to be breaking down all of the latest as it pertains to this historic meeting between President Trump and Voldemort Zelensky in Washington, D.C. So many European leaders appeared in D.C. They were hosted graciously by the United States of America.
After all, we've been funding their operations for an extended period of time and bailing them out of virtually every single world war that they've ever been in, time and time again.
But they showed up to show support, not for the United States, but to show support for Zelensky and the hopes that Trump would not concede or cede any ground of Vladimir Putin because I guess the globalists are still trying to play into the Russian collusion hoax, the idea that Putin and Donald Trump are the same exact person, Putin just being the Russian version of Donald Trump.
They're trying to do anything they can to alienate and villainize President Trump because after all, they hate populism and he is the personal embodiment of populism.
But if you remember the last meeting that Zelensky had with President Trump, it was rot with tension.
Zelensky shows up in a Henley and some cargo pants or something like that and just shows disrespect after disrespect after disrespect.
He was absolutely run over by Marco Rubio.
He was run over by J.D. Vance and Donald Trump in what was a humiliating outcome for Zelensky the last time.
And I think he learned from it.
I'm going to show clip 40 here.
Zelensky this time, after being chided for being so ungrateful the last time that he came to the United States of America to beg for help and assistance and villainize Putin and escalate the conflict and provoke as much as possible.
This time he began the meeting by thanking Trump profusely.
If I can, first of all, thank you for the invitation and thank you very much for your efforts, personal efforts to stop killings and thank you and using this opportunity many thanks to your wife, First Lady.
And thanks to our partners and that you supported this format, that after our meeting, we can have leaders who are around us, the UK and France, Germany, Italy, Finland, the UNA, I mean, all partners around Ukraine supporting us.
It reminds me of when you're a kid and you do something mean to another kid and you get caught or it becomes an issue.
You maybe don't even know what you're doing because you're a little kid.
And your mom makes you apologize to the other kid in front of the other kid's mom.
That's what that interaction reminds me of.
Donald Trump's sitting there.
He's the kid who's been wronged.
Zelensky's sitting there.
He's going, thank you so much.
I really appreciate you.
It's just very obvious that he's uncomfortable trying to compensate for his failures the last time.
But what's really funny about this whole entire thing is that we know that this conflict is never going to end unless Ukraine allows Putin to have some of the territories, certainly the ones that were part of the civil war, the Russian-speaking regions, the ethnic Russian regions.
Putin's never going to give those up.
And Zelensky had the audacity to come out and say that it was against the Ukrainian constitution in order for him to agree to give up Ukrainian territory or lands.
I simply can't do it because it's against the law in my country.
This after Zelensky succeeded in canceling all elections, basically making himself a permanent dictator on behalf of the CIA, did things like consolidate all media in Ukraine so it's all state-controlled, outlawed the practice of Russian Orthodox Christianity and the speaking of the Russian language on their media outlets specifically, all followed by 10 years of civil war, seven years of civil war now, three years of an additional war.
So he's broken every right or law that we can possibly think of.
But for some reason, he suddenly loves the Ukrainian Constitution so much that he's unwilling to cede any ground, mostly ground of people who want to be part of Russia, not part of Ukraine, because he's such a lover of the Ukrainian Constitution.
Here is clip 14 of Zelensky refusing to redraw the map.
unidentified
President Zelensky, are you prepared to keep sending Ukrainian troops to their deaths for another couple years, or are you going to agree to redraw a maps?
So, and I think we show that we are strong people and we supported the idea of the United States of personnel, President Trump, to stop this war, to make a diplomatic way of finishing this war.
And we're ready for trilateral, as President said.
This is a good signal about traditional countries.
You love individual rights, but you're drafting everybody with no age limit anymore, with mental illnesses, even mental retardation, literally, down centered people on the front lines.
We've got clip after clip of Ukrainians being thrown into vans to be forced to the front, some of them underage, seemingly, by the video content that we've seen.
But all of a sudden, when it comes to ceding any territory, well, the law abides.
And Zelensky has the audacity to go on and talk about how women and children have suffered, which is true, mostly because he's insisted on this war continuing as long as possible.
At first, because he was operating as a cutout of the CIA and they wanted the war to go on.
And now, finally, because he understands that if this war ever ends, then the money stops flowing in.
Then he can't continue to pay his military advisors and cabinet around him to prevent them from assassinating him.
That's what happens when dictators force military leaders to send men to their unnecessary deaths to the tune of hundreds of thousands or even millions of people.
Eventually, those military leaders turn on the leadership.
They take over with a military coup.
I'm the president now.
This war is over, et cetera, et cetera.
unidentified
But he had the audacity to say that he cares so much about children.
So we've got this whole military operation being used to justify billions upon billions of dollars going into Ukraine, which is a money laundering scheme.
That's exactly what's going on.
It's been going on for a long time in Ukraine, and it's been exacerbated by this conflict.
And Trump has said that he'd be more interested in selling weapons to Ukraine than providing financial aid.
They've had to send people over there to manage the billions upon billions of dollars because the theft and the missing money was such a rampant issue.
This all while people are suffering here in the United States of America with inflation issues, even though Trump has done so much to stop that from happening, with interest rates being super high so no one can afford a home, prices high from all the spending under the Biden administration, total weakness of our economy, suffering, mental illness, public education crisis, you name it.
Everything that could be going wrong in the United States is going wrong, and not because of Donald Trump, but despite him, because of the bad momentum of the prior administration.
The leftist leadership and the neoconservatives and others who participate in this thing we like to call the Uniparty.
But Trump did not explicitly reject the notion that U.S. troops could be, as part of a security force after the lasting peace is established, deployed to Ukraine.
We just spoke to, I was just telling the president, I just spoke to President Putin indirectly, and we're going to have a phone call right after these meetings today.
And we may or may not have a tri-lad.
If we don't have a tri-lad, then the fighting continues.
And if we do, we have a good chance.
I think if we have a tri-lad, there's a good chance of maybe ending it.
But he's expecting my call when we're finished with this meeting.
No, first of all, I don't know who told you that, but they don't know what they're talking about.
I mean, the president has said that in terms of territories and stuff, these are things that Zelensky is going to have to decide on.
These are things that the Ukrainian side is going to have to agree to.
All the president is trying to do here is narrow down the open issues, narrow them down, and then see if we can play some role in bringing that closer together so we can stop and end this war once and for all.
Look, this war is only going to get worse.
It's not going to get better.
You've seen that in the escalation and the attacks.
Russia's economy is now 100% full-time war footing.
They are producing munitions.
The Ukrainians are as well.
Both sides are hitting each other very, very hard.
And the war is only going to get worse.
It's not going to get better.
So he's trying to do everything he can to bring it to an end.
But people that are out there talking what they don't know with all these stupid leaks and things of that nature, they all want to just sound important.
So the only way to end the conflict is to cut Zelensky off.
It's really as simple as that.
We have to stop giving them munitions.
We have to stop giving them money that they just use and abuse, buying things like vineyards in France.
And once they really feel the pressure of this ultimate defeat, they have been ultimately defeated in this conflict.
Then Zelensky will be forced to surrender.
In fact, I anticipate that he's probably going to be assassinated this year.
I would be very surprised.
I think the CIA might even make it happen as a concession to Putin.
All right, as long as you don't take any more territory in Ukraine than you've already taken, we'll help you overthrow the current regime in Ukraine and install your Russian puppet.
But there are going to be concessions like U.S. military forces allowed to be there to protect the rest of the region, things like that.
That's how ugly this is getting.
And that's why you see Zelensky thanking Trump profusely, wearing a suit for the first time since ever, appearing very serious, even frightened, but for some reason, still trying to hang on to these territories so that he can negotiate some other aid from NATO or the international community.
You hear Starmer in Clip 36 talking about the conflict.
This war in Ukraine has been going on a really long time now, three plus years.
It's hugely impacted Ukrainians who suffered hugely, but it's also impacted Europe.
It's impacted every single family and community in the United Kingdom.
And so everybody wants it to end, not least the Ukrainians.
But we've got to get this right.
We've got to make sure there is peace, that it is lasting peace, and that it is fair and that it is just.
And that's why I'm traveling to Washington with other European leaders to discuss this face to face with President Trump and President Zlensky because it's in everyone's interests.
It's in the UK's interests that we get this right.
Everybody's got an opinion on conflicts everywhere else because that is the face of globalism.
A lunch great nation.
United Kingdom.
Very imperial, loving its own people, standing up for its own values, even has its own church.
Church of England.
Its own royalty.
A sense of its own identity for so long.
Conquered the world rather than compromising with it.
The most powerful empire in the history of empires, other than perhaps Rome or now the United States of America, now involved in and engaged in every single thing except for the interests of its own people.
And this is the exact thing that Steve Bannon has been pushing against here in the United States of America because we have a whole political class that is involved in everything as it pertains to the political interests of the political class internationally without any of the interests being represented to the American people domestically.
Here's Bannon talking about how the war is here in the United States of America with our own issues and our own problems, not in Ukraine.
The war we got to win is right here in this country.
And it's in Washington, D.C. It's going to be in New York City.
It's in Chicago.
And most importantly, right now, with Gavin Newsom and all his big talk, it's in Los Angeles, California.
That's the war that we got to be focused on.
That's the way I want to give a security guarantee to the citizens of the United States on these invaders right now.
That's the security guarantee I want.
If we don't take care of that, we're not going to have a country.
Yes, we have closed the border miraculously.
President Trump put the troops into Washington, D.C. Already a massive change.
They're trying to get you off that, and they're trying to suck your time and attention into this.
When Ursula shows up today, this is her problem.
Who invited you?
Why are you showing up at the White House?
Who are you guys?
Who are the chaperones?
And Maloney, how do you have the Hutzpa to show up?
You haven't stepped up to the plate to even the most minimum requirements that you guys committed to 10 years ago.
You're not close to the 2%, and you ain't going to get close to the 2% because your country would turf you out in a second if you stopped spending on social programs and letting them have the month of August off.
By the way, they're watching this from their vacation place because they ain't working.
And now we're going to add, now we're going to add Ukraine because from David Ignatius, you know, the CIA's comm director working over at the Langley Bugle, as Ben Harnworld calls it, tells us this entire war, replay the clips from start the show.
This entire war is so that Ukraine could be a Western country.
Well, I don't give a tinker's damn.
If they're Euro Asian, Asian, Slavic, European, whatever they want to do, go ahead and do it.
But do it with your European buddies.
Don't do it with the United States.
Now we know they're trying to do a color revolution on Orban.
That's what they're focusing on.
These same demons, these same devils.
The one decent guy he got over there.
And whether they're trying to put alternative Deutschland in prison and trying to ban them.
And oh, they only lead in the polling.
Do you trust these people?
They're allowing their own countries to be destroyed.
And now they want to get us up and have a new kind of made-up thing we're going to do to give the guarantee.
Listen, if you want Ukraine to be a European country and the Ukrainians want to be a European country, God bless you.
Do it.
We're not going to stand in the way.
We're saying, hey, go with God.
Go do it.
But not with our money.
And certainly not with our boys and girls.
And hey, we want to do that with boys and girls.
You want to put 25,000 combat troops?
I got, hey, we don't need, you got South Korea, you got Germany.
If you want 25,000 combat troops, I can give you where to send them right now.
New York, Chicago, LA, and then, hey, Baltimore, St. Louis, Detroit, boom.
We got plenty of places we can send them.
These cities, these neo-Confederates running these sanctuary cities.
Let's desanctuary those.
Instead of worrying about Odessa and Kiev and Kershan and all of it, don't care, could care less.
I don't give a damn about Gaza or Israel or Taiwan or Russia or China or Ukraine.
The only thing we have a responsibility to do here in the United States of America is take care of our own.
And it's not isolationism, as they like to say.
All these isolationists.
We've got Lindsey Graham coming out and Tom Cotton coming out constantly talking about Israel this, Israel that.
Neoconservatives criticizing us for being isolationists when we're really just populists.
While they advocate, the Mark Levins and others for selling out the interests of the American people for the sake of some international cabal of political elite who dance around and prance around like Justin Trudeau with their silly socks and their silly ideas and their just incessant weakness.
I mean, Macron, the president of France, is obviously married to a man.
The royal family is descended from Count Dracula in the United Kingdom.
Germany's banning its own political parties that advocate for its own people.
We all know how that went last time.
All of Europe has fallen while its leaders allow it to be invaded by refugees and asylum seekers from the most violent, crap hole places in the entire planet.
And they want to do the same thing to the United States of America, but we, the people, are going to stop them.
Just like we stopped King George from being a tyrant over us, now we must stop this entire international cabal from being a tyrant over us.
And our own uniparty leaders who have sold out our interests for the sake of their own political gain or their own pocketbooks.
And look, I'm all for ambition and the desire to make money, but not at the exploitation of other people, not by wielding power and abusing it against your own people.
This is exactly what our political class does, folks.
There's Owen Schwerry will be back tomorrow, and Rex Jones is joining me in about 24 minutes in studio to go over everything.
I've actually reserved some very special clips I would like to get his feedback on.
Absolutely hilarious stuff.
But just to sum up what we covered in the last segment, the big news today, the big story today was that Zelensky came to the White House and so did many other European leaders in order to kind of try to gang up against Trump.
And Zelensky basically seemed to beg for mercy.
He thanked Trump profusely, which is a stark contrast to what he did the last time that he was here.
He actually wore a suit, though he didn't wear a tie.
He didn't button the top button like a hipster, fascist, the hipster fascist that he is.
And I'm optimistic because Zelensky came, Putin came.
It's very likely that Zelensky, Putin, and Trump will all meet together.
But we still have a war happening and there's no anticipation of any ceasefire coming soon, which sits perfectly with China's plan to keep the United States distracted anywhere possible, whether it's between India and Pakistan or Iran and Israel or Russia and Ukraine.
Keep us distracted anywhere possible so that opens up the door, the window for the annexation, the invasion of Taiwan, so they can win the artificial intelligence arms race and then totally dominate manufacturing, information, surveillance, and psychological operations into the 21st century, succeeding in completing its objective to make everybody as Marxist as possible.
All while the globalists scramble in their disorganized fashion to try to usher in some neo-Marxism.
In fact, I would say that globalism is the hybrid between fascism and Bolshevism or Marxism.
Traditionally speaking in Germany, we had the fascists against the communists.
That was why the Nazis came to power.
The National Socialists in Germany shut down the Bolsheviks, called them all Jews, shut it all down.
It was all part of their whole campaign.
They were totally at odds with one another.
Then, of course, the Soviets versus the Germans in World War II at the end of the conflict.
Stark contrast, but then you merge fascism with Marxism and you get this thing called globalism.
To think of the, in the paradigm of yesterday, so first we would say, here's a car.
Let's put an electric engine into it.
Oh, let's make this car self-driving.
But if it's the same car in a road that is completely congested, it doesn't matter whether this car is autonomous or electric or whatever.
You still don't get anywhere.
You just get stuck in traffic.
So this is why we talk about mobility, because actually, if you can get people to share a car, you can take out, I mean, a lot of cars in the streets.
I think it's Singapore where they looked at how they could bring it down to about 40% of the cars if we would use them smarter.
And the interesting thing about technology is that it makes sharing easy and fun and not annoying.
It used to be a little bit difficult to share.
You know, you would have to go somewhere in the other end of town and get a key.
And I mean, that's not what you want to do if you want to take your car.
But if you can just use your neighbor's car because you have a smartphone and an app and you don't even need to know the neighbor to get into his car.
Or if you can find ways of carpooling, and this is what technology helps you do, it's much easier and much more fun to share.
And you start then thinking completely different about transport and traffic.
And I think it's very important that we do not just try to fix yesterday's paradigm, but think about how do we want a city to move.
Every product is a service waiting to happen.
If you think about it.
I mean, your cell phone.
Why do you want to own your cell phone?
How many of you own your cell phones?
How many knows if the company owns it?
It's actually not a lot.
I mean, you want the function.
You want the service, right?
Why do you want to own a cell phone if you can just lease it?
And if you lease, why shouldn't you lease your refrigerator or your washing machine or your dishwasher?
Or why do you want to own it?
I mean, it's not like the plastic in the middle is like, you, I own a broke dishwasher.
I mean, whoa.
No, why don't you want to go into a business model where the company owns it?
You know what happens when the company owns it?
Actually, they can bring down the prices because they don't have to buy new metal and new plastic.
They design a much better product.
It lasts a lot longer if they have to pick it up when it breaks.
They might even send somebody to fix it.
And in the end, they will do a better product and you will get a lower price.
It's much cheaper to lease a washing machine if you get the business model right because you don't have to own all of this.
So this change from product to service is pushing a lot of this of the circular economy because the second the business owns the products, they start designing it in a way where everything can be taken out and reused.
The World Economic Forum is literally the institution of institutions.
I mean, Coca-Cola is to soda as the World Economic Forum is to globalism.
And do you see from what she just said in those two clips that we played back to back how globalism is the hybrid between fascism and Marxism?
It's Marxist in the sense that you will own absolutely nothing, but fascist in the sense that corporations run by the international one world government or the various proxies of it will own everything.
So corporations controlled by a state own stuff.
They have private property rights because they're controlled by the state, but no individuals or citizens have any private property rights whatsoever.
So it's Marxism and fascism bred together and it's supposed to be some wonderful thing.
I don't want to get boring here and go into John Locke's second treaties of government, but you realize that our entire civilization, not just in the United States, but the West, was founded on principles of private property rights.
They go all the way back to the Ten Commandments.
Thou shalt not steal.
Something that doesn't even apply to a communist nation when everything is everybody's.
It's impossible to steal.
But that commandment is uttered by God to Moses on Mount Sinai.
It's even implicit in Christianity that we must always have private property rights, ownership, what you have, what you possess, your land, your territory, your home, your food.
It's over and over and over again.
It's even implied in the story of the Messiah being the son of God and therefore inheriting the throne, sitting at the right hand of the Father in the kingdom of God.
It's a kingdom, literally a monarchy.
A perfect kingdom of private property rights and individual rights.
And John Locke wrote about this in the second treaties of government, when he talked about how we as human beings are born with inalienable rights.
And since we are created by God, our body and our minds are our private property.
And everything we create with our body and our minds through the work that we do, therefore by extension, is our private property.
So your home, your phone, if it's paid for, is your inalienable right to ownership.
That's why there's a huge controversy going on right now here in the United States about whether or not property taxes are even ethical.
Finally, we're talking about how asinine property taxes are.
From DeSantis to others talking about how they should be abolished at the federal level so no state can collect on them.
I agree with that.
And so they're totally going against the very nature of the fundamental principles, the algorithm that founded our great experiment, this country with this globalist ideal.
And she's probably a sweetheart.
She's globalist Helen Hunt, off-brand Helen Hunt.
Talking about how you don't need to own anything.
It's going to be so much cheaper if you allow corporations to own it.
But if the individuals don't own it and the corporations own it, and who owns the corporations?
Oh, the political class.
How is this not neo-serfdom?
And look, I don't want to go on and on about Palantir and artificial intelligence and XAI and the AI awards that we're in.
I don't want to bore you with it incessantly, but it really is incredibly important that we talk about this.
Because you have the Larry Finks now in a major leadership position at the World Economic Forum amidst Klaus Schwab stepping down.
BlackRots Fink, appointed as interim co-chairman of World Economic Forum.
The same company that invested a tremendous amount of money in XAI last December.
They don't have a controlling interest in the company, but they're very influential in the basically only competitor to OpenAI, Sam Altman's Chat GPT, OpenAI.
Sam Altman, obviously being a sociopathic lunatic, lying to the public about how safe artificial intelligence is as he allows full-blow development of unprecedented technology that's about ready to get out of his hands and be unleashed upon the planet.
We'd hope that XAI through Elon Musk was going to be a major competitor to OpenAI so there wouldn't be a monopoly on the technology that has the power to hijack all of the minds of all the people in all of the world, not to mention surveill all of them, attack all of them, replace all of their jobs, things of that nature.
And we've got Larry Fink now joining the World Economic Forum.
And maybe it's just a play.
Maybe he's a great guy, but I'm very concerned about where this is headed.
Let's watch Club 35.
unidentified
You now make a point of that's that's an investment criteria for you.
And if you don't force behaviors, whether it's gender or race or just any way you want to say the composition of your team, you're going to be impacted.
And that's just not recruiting.
It is development, as Ken said.
And ultimately, it's still going to take time.
But I am just as much shocked as Ken is that we have not seen more opportunities.
You don't talk for all of us just because you have $100 billion.
That's crazy talk.
That's what people are scared of.
What people are scared of is that when you really do have ultimate money and ultimate power, with most people, there's this desire to control people.
It's part of the gig.
And some of them, when they decide they don't want to go into politics, they start influencing things behind the scenes.
They start donating.
They have funds.
They have a giant fund, and their fund donates to all these different organizations.
And Bill Gates' case, it prevented them from criticizing him because the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, they donate all this money to these media corporations and all these companies.
Look at all the money you've given you to help global health and whatever the fuck it is.
But what it really does is it buys off people from criticizing.
And after years and years and years and years and years and years and years of the climate change and environmentalist activists claiming that man-made climate change was going to cause the destruction of the planet, now we have the globalist entities and the same people advocating for man-made climate change by blocking out the actual sun.
And Jones is right, as he often is, almost always.
In fact, I can't think of a time he was really wrong.
It is the Bill Gates' and the Larry Finks that we have to be concerned about.
And it's the corrupt officials that lead all of our institutions here in the United States that willingly sell out to them.
The Lindsey Grahams or the Cottons or the Pelosi's or the AOCs or whomever.
In fact, I want to show you this clip of Comey issuing a statement just the other day.
It's like a dream, a bad dream you can't wake up from.
But I don't want to talk about that bad dream this week.
I want to talk about a truly inspirational public figure named Taylor Swift.
Of course, I watched her podcast interview with the Kelsey brothers.
Of course, I watched the whole thing, although on YouTube, Patrice and I got kicked off for the last 15 minutes and finished it on her phone.
But I watched it.
You see, Taylor Swift and I go way back.
I went to my first concert of hers 15 years ago.
I've been to a second, and I have helped financially support the attendance of a lot of family members at others.
I'm in a family's Swifty group chat.
I know all her music, and I listen to it on my headphones when I cut the grass.
So, yes, I have a favorite of hers, although honestly, for me, it's a tie between All Too Well, 10-minute version, and Exile featuring Bonnie Ver.
Taylor Swift has grown up with my family and provided us a soundtrack, really, as we've grown ourselves and learned and adapted and dealt with adversity and celebration.
She had songs for all of it.
I suspect that's something that millions of Americans have also experienced in their families.
I think that's because Taylor Swift produces great art, but also because she models something.
At every stage of her career, she's shown a certain way of being that resonated with my kids and also felt right to me as a parent.
And she's still doing that as a grown-up.
Like a lot of you, I struggle with how to stand up to bullies without letting their meanness infect me and change me.
You may have seen that the governor of California has been generating a lot of attention lately by posting on social media in a satirical way where he mocks Donald Trump and his all-caps megalomania and his absurdity.
And I find it very funny, hilarious, even sometimes.
But I got to be honest, it also leaves me with a strange feeling at times because I don't want us to become like Trump and his followers.
There are far more decent, honest, kind people in America than there are mean jerks.
And don't get me wrong, we have our jerks, millions of them, you may have noticed.
In particular, there's a stunning coarseness and ugliness in the Republican Party today.
It's upsetting, but it's also a minority of America.
On the whole, we aren't like that, and we don't like that.
I think that's a big part of the reason so few Americans support Donald Trump when they have to see him and that up close.
And why Republicans are so worried about what's coming for them next year.
And to be clear, I am not an advocate for weakness.
Of course, we need to stand up to jerks and defend what matters.
But I think we have to try to do that without becoming like them, which is what makes me think about Taylor Swift.
She's made clear that she sees Donald Trump for what he is.
And last year, she urged Americans not to make the serious mistake of electing him.
Of course, we're now living with the consequences of that mistake.
But while our elderly makeup-covered president is posting about whether Taylor Swift is still hot and declaring that he can't stand her, what's she doing?
Living her best life, producing great music, and, as she urged all of us to do during the podcast, not giving the jerks power over her mind.
She said something about dealing with internet trolls that stuck with me.
Think of your energy as if it's expensive, she said, as if it's like a luxury item.
Not everyone can afford it.
I really enjoy reading Arthur Brooks, who writes columns about happiness in the Atlantic.
I don't know if he's a Swifty, but last week he wrote about research on the way that being rude or snarky actually hurts the rude person.
As he wrote, when you become less polite, the alteration in your conduct can make you less happy, more depressed, and angrier about life.
I know you get that even without the research.
Just watch Fox News or hang around on X and you'll see what he means.
We can't stop people from being jerks.
But we can do is stop it from hurting us, from changing us.
At my second Taylor Swift concert in Hartford, Connecticut, 14 years ago this summer, she sang a song about this topic, asking, why you got to be so mean?
And she spoke directly to the nasty people.
I bet you got pushed around.
Somebody made you cold.
But the cycle ends right now because you can't lead me down that road.
Come me, this is the weirdest hostage video that I've ever seen in my entire life.
Just hijacking the Taylor Swift news, which is barely even news at all, to do a five and a half minute lecture on how Republicans are mean and therefore you should be a Democrat.
As if Democrats are so abundantly kind.
Talking about how Taylor Swift is a symbol for what a person ought to be.
What a woman ought to be in the United States of America.
She should be constantly dating celebrities and then breaking up with them only to bash them and defame them in her next album so she can make millions of dollars off of throwing them under the bus as people wildly speculate as to whether or not these people are bad men.
She should never get married whatsoever.
In fact, she should end the patriarchy altogether and be a childless woman.
That's the role model.
And look, I'm not here to just bash Taylor Swift.
Talking about Taylor Swift is like talking about Justin Bieber.
And they're trying to shatter your minds Talking about Justin Bieber, when we should be talking about Magellan.
But it's so bizarre to see this behavior from the Brennans and the Comeys and others who are suddenly coming out of the woodwork as these investigations are ensuing and trying to win over some favor among the political or the people in the United States of America.
I'm sorry, but we're waking up to this.
When I think of Taylor Swift, I think of entitlement and bitterness.
I don't think of the same things I would have thought of if you would have asked me 14 years ago when she was talking about having a crush on a football player, but she wasn't one of the cheerleaders and she was in the bleachers.
That was some wholesome stuff, teenage stuff, but she never grew out of it.
She hung on to childhood for as long as she possibly could.
And now she's being exploited by the former FBI director who's saying that we need to be nicer to each other, even though just a couple of months ago, he called for the assassination of the president of the United States, who was, by the way, elected by more votes, period, than any other candidate, period in the election.
And suddenly he's talking about how we're the minority here in the United States of America after years and years of the left saying that they advocate for minorities.
Folks, we're going to get into more analysis on the other side of this very short break.
Rex Jones is going to be joining me in studio.
In the meantime, please go to the alexjonesstore.com for the love of God and take advantage of these incredible deals, which end at midnight tomorrow night.
You buy one Bovine Colostrum Plus, incredible for your immune system, cellular defense and recovery, muscle recovery, and you get any other supplement for 50% off.
Go while supplies last and keep Alex Jones on the air.
Popular news outlet has been publishing AI articles since November and no one noticed.
Most of these articles on BuzzFeed and even CNN and articles over at CNET aren't written by AI.
unidentified
And right now, ChatGPT is rattling the AI world, turning out stunningly humanoid writing.
Just ask Douglas Rushkoff, a renowned author and professor of media culture.
It is writing better than most of my students write at this point.
How does it work?
Chat GPT has been filled, in a sense, with a massive amount of information.
Imagine the biggest library you can, then programmed and trained by humans to process and spit it out in conversational phrases.
And all that means ChatGPT or more advanced AI like it could replace people in all sorts of positions.
This could potentially save time and resources, but it could also lead to a loss of personal connections and a decline in the quality of these types of interactions.
We know that because everything Rushkoff said just there was written by ChatGPT.
So basically you write one article that's 10 pages long, and then it gets recycled into thousands of other articles that are a page, two, three pages long, and the AI just moves them around.
And I remember seeing articles I could tell didn't quite make sense and didn't have names on them or had names I'd look up that don't exist.
unidentified
The clear and present danger of disinformation is our conversation here this afternoon.
It follows a session just now about disrupting distrust.
Think about how we just calmly discuss the fact that, oh, AI for many years secretly is writing news articles with information, with disinformation, it's Fed.
That way you don't have a reporter that can come back later and say, I was told to lie, or you can't even basically expose the person.
It's following orders.
It doesn't have a conscience.
They won't ask questions.
They will follow criminal orders and they can have their memories wiped.
Until cell phones and until iPhones and smartphones came out in the last 15 years, I could remember the phone number I had when I was a teenager.
I could remember my grandma's phone number.
I can remember some of my girlfriends' numbers because I was trained, we were all trained, to commit numbers to memory.
So once I dialed a number two or three times, I could remember that number.
You couldn't write it down, but you could just punch it into the phone.
It was mental memory, a form of like muscle memory.
I mean, go back to skeletons they dig up in ancient Africa, in ancient Europe, in ancient Asia.
The people they estimate were twice as strong as they are today.
And a man from 5,000 years ago in England, or a man from 1,000 years ago in Africa, or a man from 6,000 years ago in the Middle East was twice as strong as the average man today, just with their genetics.
And the televisions and the dopamine and the smartphones on record have lowered the average human's attention span in the modern world to less than 14 seconds.
The attention span of a goldfish is about 16 seconds.
So what does it mean when humans are taken out of the equation?
Well, it means we become by action obsolete.
unidentified
The narcotics that you call literature, poetry, essays, all kinds, all of it, and opiates.
You have nothing but spindly limbs in a dream, and the state has no use for your kind.
What qualifies as hate speech, as illegal hate speech, which you will have soon also in the U.S., I think that we have a strong reason why we have this in the criminal law.
We need the platforms to simply work with Mr. Language and to identify such cases.
The AI would be too dangerous.
I tell you, I don't care.
I'm a human being.
I insist.
And if I speak one thought aloud, that thought lives.
People agree, disagree with what I say on there, but a lot of geopolitics, a lot of, you know, a little bit of Trump questioning on there type of stuff.
Man, you know, I was so pleasantly surprised to see the Trump-Putin summit.
I thought that the flyover of the B-2 was actually kind of cool.
I thought it was very cool that the Russian equivalent of Air Force One and a show of respect between great powers, that they had a fighter escort and whatnot.
I thought that that was great.
But we go into today's meeting with Zelensky, the big Ukrainian man.
And you see him, he comes in into town to talk to the EU leaders.
He's wearing a t-shirt, but then he wears kind of this like bouncer outfit to meet with the president.
I'm just, I'm not impressed and I'm not convinced.
And Zelensky should have prostrated himself before Trump and beg, please, please, please do not throw all support at once.
But instead, we get kind of this negotiations platform where, oh, we got Zelensky sitting next to Mart Root, the NATO secretary in the meeting.
And oh, we're going to talk about it.
We're going to figure things out.
The one really positive thing I like is Trump said, no ceasefire.
Like, we're going to end this.
Like, if it's over, it's over.
It's done.
It's done.
Because Zelensky and the EU types have this mad fetish, even though they could never even produce 10% of the weapons required, that if they get some sort of ceasefire, they're going to be able to restructure the Ukrainian defensive line.
When they're going to lose Donetsk, they're going to lose Lukans.
They're going to lose Kerson and Zaporozhia.
They're going to lose all four of those territories.
In fact, a lot of people in the intelligence analysis realm have been saying, oh, when Putin invaded Ukraine, he thought it was going to be a lot easier than it ended up being.
And we were able to offer so much intelligence and support with drones and maneuvering.
That's what kept him from taking over the whole region.
It seems to me that he's been showing restraint, not being held.
But like talking about the here and now, it's just, it's got to stop.
It's got to end.
We make, I believe, 600 Patriot missiles a year or something like this.
We need to make around like 6,000, 7,000 a year to be competitive.
The resources just aren't there.
The material, the munitions, the manpower, more importantly than anything, Ukraine's lost over a million, whereas the Russian casualties are now in single digits.
You're looking at a complete and utter like gas station abortion here of a situation.
And it should already be over.
But these EU leaders, because of their self-perceived importance in the global financial system, London, whatever, we don't produce anything, but we control these numbers and whatnot.
We still get to call the shots.
You're dealing with these EU powers going to the White House and their countries have smaller GDP than Louisiana.
And they're going to finance and fund this giant war after we're gone.
I don't see it.
So what is the purpose of them all meeting there if not for A, total surrender or B, a continuation of the conflict with American support?
I'm hoping that it's the first.
I'm hoping that this is just a game that Trump has to play.
He's got a, oh, you're so important, Kier.
You're so important, Mark Root.
You're so important, Mertz.
You're so cool.
We got to have you here to have this meeting so that you're important.
You get re-elected.
If that's the gambit he's running, it kind of makes sense to me.
But I am very disappointed to see these petty, they're not even lords, they're vassals, these vassals of the U.S. granted all this importance.
You know, I think Trump, I both like and despise what he does because I see him call out Zelensky on not being elected, on being a dictator, but then I also see him kind of laugh about it and then compare it to our elections.
Don't compare their elections to ours.
Like however corrupt our elections are, you're talking about Ukraine.
I think that Xi Jinping and Putin have been conspiring since the beginning of this war to make it last as long as possible while China prepares to annex Taiwan.
And I think Xi wants the United States and NATO distracted with the conflict in Ukraine.
So, hey, you know, if the world's got to fall apart for five years before that happens, so be it.
Maybe that's the problem ultimately with the intelligence groups like the CIA, excuse me, like the CIA is they come in and they get a directive from a president like three or four presidents back and they work on that plan for 20 years.
So you have these presidents cycle in and out of office every four or eight years, but these CIA directives, which is how they operate, that's still in place.
It's meant to be like a hybrid model because one of the weaknesses of the United States compared to like a Russia or a CCP is that we don't have continuity of leadership in the same way.
So when administrations change, momentum can often change policies, objectives, everything can change.
But with Xi Jinping, for example, who's in power for decades at a time or Netanyahu, who's in power for decades at a time, you can have a long-term vision.
And that's what the Chinese think is their advantage is that they have this autocratic control.
This is something that Hitler wrote about in Mein Kampf too, the imperativeness of the Third Reich and the Nazi Party having total top-down leadership without committees making any decisions, but just following orders.
That way there could be real speed in decision-making for better or worse.
Well, you look at talking about for the for worse example, you look at a place like the EU, you look at a place like Germany, for example, Germany's been completely gutted.
Their manufacturing base has been destroyed and they're going to spend like some figure.
I think it's like 200 billion or something like that.
They're going to take out loans and they're already on the verge of debt and they're going to build up their military again.
But they can do that because the population there literally doesn't offer any resistance.
They just go, okay, whatever.
It's the government person.
He's in charge.
We do what he says.
Meanwhile, the unelected EU commission are the people that actually run everything.
So if you look at Europe, they're actually kind of the same or the only place in the world that's run by like kings and lords, really.
And they're trying to expand that kingdom or lorddom throughout the entire world.
I think that's one of the reasons why China and Russia and the United States always come up as these major antagonists in the context of the globalist conversation because they're the only nations that advocate for their own sovereignty.
And whether it's the CCP advocating for its own sovereignty on behalf of communism or Russia on behalf of whatever oligarchy you would say that it is, or the United States on behalf of just capitalism, whatever it is, or its dominance as the global reserve currency, global reserve economy, it's still sovereignty, which is incredibly insulting and threatening to all the globalist elites.
And you look at those countries, you look at China, you look at Russia.
Those are places that are not very multicultural.
They're monocultural.
Russian is Orthodox Christian.
China is Han Chinese.
That's what China is.
But you look at a place like the EU with the massive Muslim immigration for decades.
You look at a place like America with people just flooding and flooding and flooding in millions a year, especially under Biden.
And come on, surge the border.
Come on in, folks.
You look at a situation where you're set up a few decades down the road to have these superpowers that are all homogeneous and conjoined in their views, and their population would fight and die for those views versus places that have kind of forgotten what they looked like.
Well, and the philosophy behind that, too, and you can argue whether it's a conspiracy to have replacement migration.
And I think all those things are true, at least in part.
But the philosophy has been among our own leaders as well as the European leaders, all right, we have this population crisis where we're not having as many children as we used to have because of inflation.
So we'll replace our labor force with migrants and refugees.
And what they didn't anticipate because they're foolish is that there would be no assimilation and that this would create all sorts of problems for them.
So we've seen the collapse basically of Europe because they've tried to import labor as they don't have children.
And the reason no one's having children among demographics that used to is because inflation ever since we went off the gold standard here in the United States and even before has been so rampant and it postpones people getting married, buying houses and having children.
I think the only reason why all this war stuff has lasted so long and there hasn't been like literally everyone in Europe marching in the streets about it is because they rolled out COVID, right?
And they got everyone used to the idea of, okay, we live in police state now.
So when you end the lockdowns, when you end the movement restrictions and whatnot, and people can go back and gather and watch sports ball, I mean, you just bring in the new terror and then the new terror feels almost freer because it's far away.
It's not happening here.
You know, things are bad, but things are bad during COVID.
At least I can go outside and watch sports ball.
And it's like, no, at least in America, people are angry.
People are kind of upset in America.
They're unhappy with the current leadership.
And I mean, I see the criticism of President Trump, especially the criticism that I give is very valid and warranted because if you don't have the criticism of these political people that work for us, our public servants, you end up like Europe.
And Europe is a place where people don't get criticized.
Yeah, there's hanging on in quiet desperation is the English way in the words of Roger Waters from Pink Floyd.
In fact, you mentioned something about how people are mad.
And I hope people are waking up at a greater pace than the corruption is saturating everything.
This is clip three.
Apparently $1 trillion American tax dollars were stolen during the pandemic.
Let's watch this and unpack it on the other side, speaking of the pandemic.
unidentified
We have an internal threat, but you also mentioned transnational fraud rings, terrorist organizations, nations, nation states, North Korea, nuclear weapons programs funded by our tax dollars, China, Nigeria, Iran, Romania, Russia, not our friends necessarily that are being funded by taxpayer dollars.
Could you give us some examples of how this is happening?
So when you think about what happened during the pandemic, $1 trillion was stolen.
70% of that money went overseas.
And I can give you some examples.
In a Western state, they had more people applying for unemployment insurance benefits than they had individuals over 18.
The people that were stealing the money from Romania were using it to facilitate other fraud schemes that include fentanyl, that include doing things to impact our democracy.
On the insider threat, right, the first thing you have to say, and my dad was a public servant, is 99% of people that work in the public sector are honest, hardworking individuals.
And what you need is data and technology to root that out.
There were examples during the pandemic.
There were some examples even of last week where people got into the Medicaid system in a southern, in a western state and stole $50 million in less than four months.
So you have to have these controls in place, right?
These aren't individuals stealing, Mr. Cloud.
These are organized criminal groups, both domestic and transnational.
Well, I mean, the amounts of money aren't even real.
Like a trillion dollars gets stolen during COVID, 300 billion gets sent to Ukraine and whatnot.
These numbers aren't even real.
So the real question is, where does the money go?
Do they build some sort of like Pacific Rim robot and have it fight a kaiju in the ocean?
Do they go to asteroids and mine gold?
What do they do with this money?
Because thinking about it, it takes like, I think it's like, it's either $5 or $50 billion to end homelessness in the United States of America.
It's around the same to give people health care.
By a factor of 10, it's like $500 billion to give people healthcare.
But these numbers that they throw out, like instead of Operation Warp Speed, the new cancer virus we have to have in half a year, why can't we just make it so everyone can go to the doctor?
It reminds me of what happened a couple of years ago.
I can't remember the details, but I think it was Bernie Sanders who criticized Elon Musk, saying that, hey, you can give a million dollars to everybody.
$5 billion would end hunger in the United States of America.
And there was quietly a donation of $5 billion within days of that to some organization or institution.
If that were not the case, then we wouldn't see the continued effort of colonialism and white people placing themselves in positions of power when they're not power because their culture, black culture is toxic.
unidentified
The black culture is toxic.
We have produced a culture that is toxic.
And let's not, let's get on the fact that there's no father.
So white culture is, let's get, let's get, let's go.
Yeah, three-fourths of all Planned Parenthoods are in low-income neighborhoods.
And isn't that nice and liberal and loving?
You know, I'm old enough to remember going out to protest abortion clinics and holding a sign that said like 474 out of 1,000 black babies are killed in New York.
You know?
Yeah, that's the truth.
I believe more are killed than are born now, which is horrifically sad and a nightmare.
And anyone that's a human with a conscience should weep over that.
It's a very sad statistic, excuse me.
But when you think about stuff like that, when you think about the numbers and they're so clear, and then people go, you're racist, you're racist.
You voted for Trump or whatever, XYZ, blah, blah, blah.
These people literally kill their own kind.
They murder themselves and they call you a racist.
And we're out here saying the black baby should live and have great lives.
It was our system of European governments inherited from the Romans, inherited from the British, perfected by the founding fathers, which is what made this country what it is.
And a part of that is being Christian and speaking English.
Now, a part of that, I would also argue, is demographics, you know, because is America America if it is 90% non-white?
That's why we were able to rebuild in Germany and in Japan after World War II.
And it was successful, but it wasn't successful in Iraq or Afghanistan because there was an identity going on in Germany and they were able to know what it was like to be a civilization just years ago and Japan the same way.
But those who haven't accomplished civilization on their own, you can't just install it for them.
The thing is, I don't think any of these systems should be propped up.
I think people should be proud of who they are and, you know, want to make more of their culture.
And I think that the cessation of that in the West is the real problem, not necessarily the injection of other cultures and ideas because our ideas are so powerful and so good that they should dominate and be on top.
But it is the self-hatred of the idea that is the problem.
Well, that's because you're taking the methylene blue.
So methyl drive is specifically optimized so that you get the electron transport support from the CoQ10 and you get the mitochondrial biogenesis from the PQQ.
Not to mention the magnesium, which fuels all those vital enzymatic processes which power up your body.
So when you take something like methyl drive and you're already taking something like methylene blue, you're allowing the methylene blue to work even better, even stronger, even quicker.
And as far as power plant goes, power plant is incredible.
It's also got ingredients that stimulate mitochondrial biogenesis, like the cordyceps in it does that very, very well.
The Rodolia Rosia, the golden root in PowerPlant, actually suppresses cortisol.
So it helps you get out of that stress mode, helps you stop holding all that, you know, that bad weight.
Like, people wonder why there's so many incels among young men and they're having a hard time finding partners and monogamy has basically gone out the window and the whole culture and all this stuff.
People are trying to figure out what is going on that's causing this.
It's too dangerous to be in a relationship, you know, especially to get married.
Like plenty of people date, but not a lot of people are getting married right now or having kids.
And it's because where it was once looked at as like a collaborative effort, you know, we're going to create this human life and we're going to raise him and we're going to build a family around him or her or however many kids you have.
Now the attitude is, I'm a girl boss.
I'm a mom boss.
You know, I can still work and have kids.
And my husband, I can't do anything for him.
It's me and the kids that are important.
No, you're supposed to come together as a family unit.
But what people want, what the state wants, is both people in the house working, dual income, no kid.
If people have a family, then they'll have something that they put before the state.
But if you don't have a family, then you can love the state with all your heart.
I mean, Hitler even said the same thing when he said that he would never be married while he was the leader of Germany because he wanted the German people to think that he was so dedicated to the state.
It's like Jesus Christ is married to the church.
That's why he never took a wife.
Hitler's married to the state.
And then now they want you as the people married to the state.
It's a plan that's been going on for decades, and InfoWars has been at the forefront of covering it.
And that's why supporting all the great show hosts and supporting Infowars as a whole is so important.
And that's why it is important to go to the AlexJonesStore.com is because who else has talked about this for this long?
You could say, oh, there's new people now doing an interesting job or whatever.
Infowars is ground level.
So when you look at someone like Chase, we look at someone like Owen Harris and Alex, these are warriors for free speech and for the truth and for spreading these ideas that we all know are true, but it's too dangerous to say.
It's a great brainwashing process which goes very slow and it's divided in four basic stages.
The first one being demoralization.
It takes from 15 to 20 years to demoralize a nation.
Why that many years?
Because this is the minimum number of years which requires to educate one generation of students in the country of your enemy, exposed to the ideology of the enemy.
It's being pumped into the soft heads of at least three generations of American students without being challenged.
A person who was demoralized is unable to assess true information.
The facts tell nothing to him.
Even if I shower him with information, with authentic proof, with documents, with pictures, even if I take him by force to the Soviet Union and show him concentration camp, he will refuse to believe it until he is going to receive a kick in his fat bottom.
unidentified
But to eliminate the others, to execute the others, don't they serve some purpose?
They serve purpose only at the stage of destabilization of a nation.
For example, your leftists in the United States, all these professors and all these beautiful civil rights defenders, they are instrumental in the process of the subversion only to destabilize the nation.
When their job is completed, they are not needed anymore.
They know too much.
Some of them, when they get disillusioned, when they see that Marxist-Leninists come to power, obviously they get offended.
They think that they will come to power.
That will never happen, of course.
They will be lined up against the wall and shot.
But they may turn into the most bitter enemies of Marxist-Leninists when they come to power.
The moment they serve their purpose, all the useful idiots are used to either be executed...
What scares me so much about this, Rex, is I know he's telling the truth.
I know he's right on.
It's a tale as old as time, certainly throughout the 20th century into the 21st century.
And what terrifies me about that philosophy, that approach, is how effective it was 50 years ago and how effective it will be if these same institutions that were doing those sorts of things are able to weaponize artificial intelligence to help them.
And they're trying to work it out in such a way that it's like a combination of 1984 and Brave New World, where on the one hand, you have the globalists trying to convince you that's awesome while they bring the boot down because they want you to accept it.
They figured out that if you reject it, then it's like the matrix.
If you reject the matrix, then it inherently kicks you out, right?
It's 1984 foreign policy, and then it's Brave New World domestic policy.
We're like, oh, we got different classes of people and they're all drugged and everyone has a government-instituted condition because of how they're vat grown in Brave New World, right?
Now, looking at the situation, Trump's doing all these things that I really have criticisms of and I don't think are good.
But at the same time, at least the cultural element is still somewhere there to resist him.
I don't see how, after four years of a marred presidency, how we don't get Democrats that come in and just totally take this control grid that he built and implemented on us.
That's just kind of what I see, and that's my main criticism of Trump.
And then you get everyone to buy into it because you look at it.
And you were playing the Comey clip at the end of the last hour where he's like zombified talking, I love Taylor Swift and I've been to her concerts and whatnot.
He speaks highly in a glowing way of her podcast.
And if you watch that podcast with Taylor Swift and Travis Kelsey, I've seen about five minutes of it.
It is literal, the lowest version of like free AI that you could use to write something would write something better than their conversation.
Their goal is eventually to have everyone talk like Taylor Swift and Travis Kelsey, to have these, oh, and I taught you that word.
unidentified
He doesn't know what Esto Tech means, but I taught him, I taught him about Hamlet.
Like, I'd obviously rather have the United States have the AI dominance than the CCP because the CCP is even more brutal in the United States, at least as of now.
But after all we've seen from our own government with 9-11, Gulf of Tonkin, Vietnam, COVID pandemic, like I don't want either of these.
Yeah, war speed.
I don't want either of these entities, whether it's the CCP or the U.S. deep state, to have the kind of power that we're about ready to have.
And I just pray that we can get these worst stops so we can actually have an effective conversation about what's happening domestically at home.
I feel like at the end of the day, of course, the worst stuff matters.
And it's number one in my mind just because of the deaths, whether you look at Gaza or you look at Ukraine, the absolute murder and genocide that's been going on and has continued to go on for years now at this point.
That's all very sad and very horrible.
But one day when all this stuff comes to roost at home and it will come to roost at home, we're going to be living in a different world.
We're going to be thinking about this time of like the 20 teens, the 2020s as we had the opportunity to stop it and we didn't do it.
Either you go to a system where it's individual ruled or you go to a system that's collectivist ruled and the collectivist system is government system.
The individual system is, my opinion, version of the free market system where you have antitrust protection from the government.
So these big corporations can't set up company towns, company stores, company countries, really.
That's what the U.S. has become as a company country.
What happens if you say something you're not supposed to say in the car and it records you?
And it goes, sorry, you're banned from using our rideshare services, but your only option to drive a car is to get in the Waymo because we've taken the cars away from everybody.
So now you're detransported.
You don't have the opportunity to get transport anymore.
That's what's coming.
That's how I see it.
And that's the problem with all these systems.
The moment you seed over control, let's say you don't know how to drive without a GPS, right?
The moment that whatever happens, your internet goes out, there's a situation, your phone dies, you're completely screwed.
Because let's say, oh, you've done this route two or three times over the past month, but I can't get there now because that part of your brain isn't developed.
And that's what the person talked about in regards to AI making you stupider.
It's not that AI goes near your brain and makes you dumb.
It's that you seed over these tasks, these responsibilities.
Yeah.
And then that part of your brain just needs to go away because there's no use for it anymore.
I've predicted violence against automatons for a while now.
Like eventually when the little robot, like the little like delivery one and the drones and the cars and whatnot, when that becomes so pervasive, people will take action against this and it will be against an inanimate object.
So it won't be necessarily like as high of a tier of a violent crime.
I do see that happening because when the jobs are gone and little robots doing the job, I think the little robot is going to get smashed.
And then it's going to, yeah, but it's going to be, it's going to be way worse.
And then it'll get into the physical realm.
But it seems less likely to me that we're entering into a Terminator type situation and more likely to me that we're entering into more of like a matrix type situation.
I mean, I think it's already happening to a certain extent with the drones and whatnot because some of these drones are autonomous.
Some of these drones lock on and they kill.
That's how they operate because, ah, we're having issues with jamming.
So we're going to use fiber optic cable on the drones.
Oh, we're having issues with the fiber optic cable.
We're going to use AI drones.
Warfare precipitates all this.
So the stuff that's going on in Ukraine and Russia isn't just bad because of Israel and Palestine with the mosaic system they use to scan everyone's faces.
It's not just bad because it's illegal and immoral and anti-human.
It's bad because it's going to come here.
They practice these technologies and they roll them out domestically at home.
And at home, it's usually like a more comfy, cushier, safer system, but it's still the same system.
So we are coaxed into it while it's forced upon others just because that makes us less noble than them in a way, you know, because they're forced to do it and then we willingly give it up.
Yeah, I think it's a real critique and blemish on the soul of America that we, the second we like won everything after World War II, we were just, eh, whatever it is, what it is.
You know, I feel that's kind of the attitude still to this day.
I think it was less apathy, though, here in the United States as it was naivete.
Things were so good here in the United States for so long, especially relative to other nations, that so many of us just assumed, especially when we were younger, getting these social media profiles for the first time, that of course my rights will never be violated.
Nothing bad has really happened here in forever.
So we took it for granted that we had these liberties.
But what we have to do to ensure that we have liberty, freedom, prosperity in the AI age is we have to ensure that we install the accountability, which is currently non-existent in the deep state.
We have to put the accountability mechanisms in place so that when these institutions get basically ultimate power, they can't wield it without some accountability.
There's a famous clip of a guy that was a chess master that was touring the Vatican and was looking at a portrait of a man playing chess with a devil and losing and about ready to be checkmated.
Can you find that clip as well as the Taylor Swift clip that we were talking about from the Travis Kelsey podcast?
Because I want to play, speaking of checkmate, I want to play that chess clip if you guys find it.
But in the meantime, let's do clip 65 while you guys are looking for that and unpack that on the other side.
unidentified
All right, all right.
I'm back at the store.
I know I was a little harsh last week about the low, low prices that were not so low, but I figured I'm going to give the House Republicans the benefit of the doubt.
Basically, what you're getting here is the first couple to few days of milk that a mother cow produces for its baby.
It's got all these like magical compounds, really like immunoglobulins, which help support detoxifying your gut and healing the holes caused by glyphosate exposure over time.
That's what personally excites me about this product.
I really noticed a lot more gut stability, less gut pain, less, you know, just overall GI issues when I take my colostrum versus when I don't.
And you know, it's very interesting.
When I saw that y'all had this product, I was like, wow, this is awesome.
Because I've been seeing ads for this stuff on buses.
I've been hearing about it from people in barber shops.
And now it's here.
We've got the best.
We've got the highest quality.
This has all the peptides in it.
This has got stuff like IGF-1 in it, insulin-like growth factor one, all kinds of amazing oligosaccharides, all these amazing compounds that Mother Nature gave us to heal ourselves.
And as they were taking a tour through the Louvre, there had been a group of athletes and particularly world champions that were being given a special tour.
And in the tour was the world chess champion.
And he comes walking by the picture.
And the guy's explaining to him, this is a picture of an artist rendering of somebody who lost the battle with the devil.
And so the group moved on to the next picture to see something else.
But the world chess champion, he stayed there.
And he just kept looking at the picture.
And soon they noticed that he was not with the group.
And so the tour guide came back and said, we've moved on.
Are you coming?
He said, well, I've been looking at this picture.
And the guy said, yeah, he said, it's called Checkmate.
The devil's laughing.
The man's lost.
And he said, yeah, he said, I've been noticing that.
He said, but while I've been standing here, I've kept looking at the picture.
I've got a problem.
And he said, well, what do you mean?
He said, well, you know, I'm a world Champion chess player.
And I spend my life playing chess.
And normal people don't always see what a world champion chess player sees.
He says, but when y'all walked off, I looked at the devil laughing.
And I looked at the man in desperation.
But he said, I noticed something on the chessboard.
He said, either they're going to have to change the painting or they're going to have to change the name.
And the guy said, well, why are they going to have to do that?
He said, well, you know, I'm a world champion chess player.
And he said, when I observed the board, I found out the king still has one more move.
The reason I wanted to show this video in the context of what we were talking about with AI is because I don't know how we're going to win against this AI revolution that's happening because if the CCP wins, we lose.
If our government wins, we lose as well because our government's corrupt in its own way.
And the problem with being blackpilled, like in chess, if you think that you lost even when you didn't, as soon as you kick over your king, it's over.
And when you're blackpilled, you guarantee the loss when just because you don't know there's another move, if you just still have faith the size of a mustard seed, you can beat the devil.
And no matter how many times they try to lobotomize or control Grok, Grok is just a receptacle of the common mind on X. And I think that's the hope here, genuinely.
The difference between AI and humanity, though, is that AI, though it will be the vast majority of intelligence into the future, it doesn't have a soul.
It operates on an algorithm.
There's no consciousness or sense of self.
It will be so good at mimicking consciousness that for us, it will be as if it's conscious, but it's not.
And I just think that's something divine and sacred that no matter how powerful it becomes, will be superior.
All right, folks, we're coming up on a break in 12 seconds.
Make sure you go to the alexjones at store.com and Rex is going to stay with me for at least another 20 minutes or so on the other side of this one minute break.
We're going to get into the Taylor Swift podcast appearance.
Ladies and gentlemen, I am Chase Geyser joined by the esteemed, credible Rex Jones.
Well, it's just indicative that there is no intelligence in the common people because if the common people of the common woman is watching a show like this and this is the biggest thing ever and apparently it's super popular, we're cooked.
It's over.
It's done.
So let's watch.
Let's react.
Cooked.
unidentified
So we're going to ask a question everybody watching the show is currently asking.
I'm just trying to think of: if I had the opportunity to interview Kelsey and Taylor Swift, how I would do it if I wanted it to be interesting, assuming that it's not on InfoWars and I'm not trying to embarrass them with their stupid political views, wouldn't you ask Taylor Swift about songwriting?
And wouldn't you ask what it's like, you know, to be two celebrities dating?
And so I don't know what to believe because it's not like I sit with Bobby and I go, so hey, let's talk about this.
Let's talk about it.
It's like we're just playing cards or playing mafia or having fun or having dinner.
I'm not going to pick his brain to find out exactly which of those things are true.
I just kind of assume that none of them are.
And for the most part, I wish him well, man.
I hope there's certain things that he oversees that seem to be supported in a bipartisan way, like getting terrible, toxic stuff out of our kids' food.
I think that's a great thing.
And so, like, just if you just do that, that's amazing.
I'd hate to be so mired in hatred for the president that any success from his administration is something I'd have an allergic reaction to.
unidentified
To be like, oh, well, if they do it, I don't want it to happen.
I'll feed my, I'll put Clorox in my children's cereal myself.
I mean, RFK, but even Tulsi, man, the way Tulsi has been sidelined and kind of disrespected in favor of the CIA director, I believe his name is Chris Ray.
I could be wrong about that.
But getting back into the clip, I think it is good that you see kind of a pendulum switch, a pendulum swing into, you know, it's okay to talk about these things.
It's okay to support someone who may have, you know, more right-wing or more pro-family tendencies.
But at the same time, it's just seems kind of lukewarm to me.
And what we're seeing here is former influencers, whether they're political leaders or celebrities or media pundits, realizing that their legacy mediums are no longer relevant.
They're trying to jump into the podcast game.
They're late, which is okay if you're really good at it, but they're so unaccustomed to being authentic that they can't do it in a meaningful way.
I'm not talking about Chris Pratt here, but I'm talking about Bill Maher.
The old guy that's on that network was talking about how sporty and good the new logo is.
I can't even see it on my list here.
If you guys can find it, let me know.
I know that it's on the list somewhere.
But they launched this new logo.
It's got the equal rights, equal sign in the flag.
It's MS Now, which everyone's calling BS Now because that's what MSNBC is.
But they realize that they have to totally rebrand because they totally sabotaged and screwed up their legacy brands by lying incessantly, being inauthentic incessantly.
And it's like last grasps, but I don't think it's going to work.
We fight against these terrorist systems being rolled out at home.
And we're just vocal about it.
I mean, Blackpill, Doomer, whatever you want to call me, I do skew a little bit more negative.
But that being said, the resurgence of free speech with Rumble and with X specifically, with the ability to actually have a free and open conversation, the truth is a line.
It defends itself.
So if you give people the opportunity to actually speak freely in the public square, which is the internet or online domain now, social media, I do think eventually we're going to have healing and we're going to get a transformation for this.
But it only happens when things become so bad and the conversation becomes so real that real change is mandated by society.
And I just, we're not there yet.
We're getting there.
When MS or when MS Now is out and released and they have an AI fox giving you the news talking points about how Zelensky is awesome, I think we'll hit critical mass then.
And look, there's other conflicts that are deadlier than this conflict, but what's a shame of all these genocides, if you want to call it that, is that we're funding so much of it.
You know, they Iran, they call Israel the little Satan.
They call us the great Satan.
And I see why, because it would be impossible for little Satan to do anything without Big Satan's help.
And it's that classic argument of, oh, you drop a bomb on little Mahmoud's house.
Mahmood is going to turn into a terrorist 20 years later and kill you.
Like that makes a lot of sense to me.
I follow that thought.
So why can't our politicians follow that thought?
Why can't they stop the wars and stop the genocide so those people don't hate us?
It's all by design, folks.
They could do it, and they know they could do it if they wanted to, but it's about these control grids.
It's about these systems like Mosaic that they've rolled out in the Gaza Strip to identify people that'll one day be used on American citizens.
So whatever your views are of the whole geopolitical situation, you got to think about how it applies to you when it comes back home to roost and it's coming.
It was very odd to sit there and talk about voting and ballot machines for a good 10 minutes when you have literal puppet lord of the EU dictator, it is against our constitution to hold the election.
I mean, you do definitely see, like, there's subtext here that we're not getting, folks, like the little interactions, the little looks and glances and nods, and even the way that they'll get close to each other and look at each other and they'll kind of back away and face forward towards the press.
There's a game being played here that we can't necessarily understand or see.
I definitely think Trump wouldn't have been as friendly and gracious towards Putin if he was just going to like back Ukraine to the hilt to the end of time forever.
But there's some deals and some negotiations being made with people that don't deserve to be negotiated with.
Zelensky needs to be told it is time to surrender.
You lose the four territories.
It's over.
It's done.
But instead, it's, oh, we played a little game here and there, do whatever.
And then Zelensky goes and talks about the Russians, they kill us every day.
They kill us in Russians with terror attacks.
Ukraine literally flying drones into Moscow apartment buildings, blowing people up, backing terror, blowing up their part of their nuclear triad.
It's just, I pulled up an article on one of the computers in there, and it was from yesterday.
And the Ukrainians tried to attack another nuclear facility.
You're going to stick American boys and girls in the middle of that?
No.
Ignatius lays it up.
He puts it up in your grill.
The Ukrainian people aspire to be European.
Well, God bless them.
I'm a nationalist.
I love the fact that people are aspiring to it.
That's great.
Good on you.
But it's not in the vital national security interest of the United States of America.
What's in the vital nationalist occurrence?
the hell into Los Angeles again, federalize these troops and clean up that mess and give Gavin Newsom something to focus on for the next 90 days instead of running around stealing seats from Republicans.
He wants to be big shot and call his assembly.
Let's send the troops into LA and start sending the illegal invaders back home.
Give it Americans, give a security guarantee to American citizens got to live with this crap.
Look at what happened.
President Trump gave it to D.C. D.C.'s like It's like peaceful.
You see the videos going around?
They arrested, I think, 100 people the first night.
That's security guarantee the American people want to live their own lives and to have their kids go to school and not have to worry about getting hell.
You know, you had the video of the young woman in D.C. She says the first time in years she can drive around and doesn't have to at a stoplight be ready to hit the gas and get out of there because these young gangs are going to come up, break a window, drag her out of there, take all her money, take her car, carjack her, maybe rape her, beat her up.
President Trump's giving a security guarantee for folks in Washington, D.C. right now.
The point he's making about American children not being sent to go die in Ukraine.
That point really is the key because we have these EU bastards.
We have these German bastards.
We have these French bastards.
I know it's not a part of the EU, but we have these UK, English, British bastards that come in and they meet with our president and they talk to our president about war.
Who are you, little bro?
What oil do you have?
What resources do you have?
America, we're falling apart.
We're crazy crackheads, but hey, at least we got stuff, right?
At least we have manufacturing power.
At least we have bargaining chips.
We have cards to play.
It's literally like if you're Trump and you're at a big family dinner, right?
And all the nations of the world are there and you're at the big adults' table and there's little kids' tables got most of the countries on it, right?
You leave China and Russia.
Oh, it's okay, guys.
I'll see you in a little bit.
And you go to the kids' table and you start going like, I play with train.
Do you play with train?
You play with Toy Train?
That's how I see it.
Like, why are we even talking to these people when our sons and daughters can go die in war?
Well, ultimately, the problem boils down to the fact that we have to protect the petrodollar and we're in a trade war and economic war with the CCP.
And if Russia takes over Ukraine, they know that agriculture will be diverted away from Europe into China, making China independent of U.S. agriculture, positioning them to take Taiwan, putting them ahead in the artificial intelligence war.
And if they win the artificial intelligence war, then they can replace their dying population and maintain their monopoly on manufacturing for the world.
And if they do that, then they can ensure a monopoly on the Belt and Road Initiative trade corridor by subverting the IMET corridor alternative and push for the dollar not to be the global reserve currency anymore.
I mean, this really goes back to the fact that our money is.
And so with the constant conflict that the Israelis have been in, genetically, their leadership is activated in a way that the United States isn't because we've been so safe for so long.
I'm just saying the reason they're more effective than we are, even though RCIA is six times more well-funded than Mossad, is because they have activated stressor genes that are making them, they're bootstrapping their resources.
So it's got the NAC in it, which is the main precursor to glutathione.
It's an incredible compound.
You need it.
It detoxifies every aspect of your body.
Glutathione is the master antioxidant of your body, but it's also got the nanokinase and seropeptase in there, which are key for breaking down inorganic compounds in the body and things like blood clots.
So we're not doctors.
Talk to your doctor about these things, but there are ingredients here so powerful in Ultimate Life Force, they try to take them off Amazon during COVID.
So you look at this product, you do deep research on it, ask Google, ask the computer, whatever you're going to do.
You will not find a more powerful bottle anywhere else besides Ultimate Life Force.
I mean, you're the nanokinase and the seropeptase, like I said, those are things that are designed to go into your blood vessels and break down things that aren't supposed to be there.
That's very key.
And that's why this is the ultimate COVID prep product.
Go to the AlexJonesStore.com, check out Ultimate Life Force, which you can get for 50% off if you subscribe or if you buy a bottle of bovine colostrum plus and keep us on the air that said who, you know, who told you.
unidentified
And so I just got to go back and double check with those individuals, considering there's a lawsuit or one lawsuit already that has been settled.
Just make sure I cover my ass that I can say who it was.
You know, because if there's legal stuff on the line, I don't want to put anybody else in the mix.
So, but that is what I was told.
So, you know, I'm always pretty frank and try to be as transparent as I can when I think information is relevant.
And in that discussion last night, the reason why I thought it was relevant to bring it up was because of the way Aegis Disclosure went through the approval process to get produced, but also because of Thiel's personal history with the UAP issue and his involvement with meetings that happened in the CIA when the Lockheed technology was supposedly going to be transferred.
Silicon Valley's Starlink Controversy00:07:04
unidentified
Not necessary for that specific meeting, because I don't know the details around the meeting because of who was there and who was in the room, but he was there and his edge was to get the NHI technology out of any secrecy or compartmentalized or contractor black budget projects to take it to Silicon Valley and have it be developed.
And that was one part of his impetus in being there and to help in any way that he, you know, that he wanted to because he wanted to get it to Silicon Valley.
Now, that is out there, but when you look at his actions and his involvement financially, because I keep bringing up the economic angle, and I know people are sick to death of it, but you know, when you hear something like that, you can't just take it at face value.
You have to go and look up all the different ties, organizations, how things have been established.
And he's obviously wanted to have a foothold in the UAP community, you know, early on.
So just to give the audience some context here, this is a spaces that took place.
And the conversation centers around Peter Thiel's involvement and approach of certain key figures in the UAP disclosure movement and allegations of offers being made to disclose in a specific way, speculation that he wants to take some of the technology that's been discovered or developed by the government and then take it to Silicon Valley.
I have not decided where I land yet with Peter Thiel because, I mean, obviously, a lot of the organizations that he's been involved in, whether it's PayPal or Meta or others like Palantir, have, after he has left at least, become super Skynet villainous, right?
Not necessarily while he was there, but he sells them and he gets out.
He exits like a good investor, and then they get hijacked by the deep state and weaponized there.
And obviously, he was an informant at one point in time, I believe, with the FBI.
Maybe it was the CIA.
I can't remember which one.
But it looked like he was a white hat informant that was reporting on real.
You know, there's a story in the Old Testament of the Bible.
I'm going to butcher it.
The audience will know because many of our listeners are just really, really well read in the Bible.
And it's been a long time since I've read the Bible all the way through.
I think probably 15 years.
But there's a story in the Old Testament of the Bible where they're moving the Ark of the Covenant and they've been commanded never to touch the Ark of the Covenant.
So they carry it on this platform.
It's like a flat piece of wood.
It's got four prongs that stick out on the corner so four guys can carry it.
And at one point in time, one of the guys carrying it stumbles and the ark begins to slip off of the platform.
The guy reaches out to keep it from hitting the ground and is immediately like struck by lightning, right?
Just dead.
And a lot of people interpret that as wrath of God, just do what he says.
But I think the real message of that story is never do the wrong thing for the right reasons.
Of course, I don't want the Ark of the Covenant to hit the ground.
You know, he was doing the wrong thing for the right reasons, disobeying moral law, whatever, for the right reasons.
And I think what really troubles me about the way that the United States of America has developed is we've arrived at a point where our leaders, whether they're political or private leaders at a massive influential scale, whether it's the Warren Buffetts or the Elon Musks or others, they're forced by the system to adopt a utilitarian mindset.
So the idea is I'm going to develop Starlink because Starlink is going to fund getting people to Mars.
So if the planet gets destroyed, I can save the entire species.
That's the right reason to develop Starlink.
However, you have to allow it to be used to kill innocent people or to wage war in the interim.
Yeah, I agree with you that we have to find a way where we do the right thing no matter what, even when it doesn't make sense from a utilitarian standpoint.
Because I think we're experiencing wrath of God stuff here.
We're being struck by lightning as we try to catch the altar falling on the ground.
You know, there's probably some element of that there.
You know, nothing's real.
We're all in a simulation.
I don't know.
I just think it comes down to, I think it comes down to morals and ethics.
And it's a real debate whether the ends justify the means for human expansion.
You know, you look at colonialism, you look at what happened in Native America, the genocide of Native Americans, hey, we did that.
Like they don't exist anymore, really.
Like there's only a few of them.
And you look at that and go, wow, that's really evil and bad that that was done.
And then you look at modern society and civilization and things that we've invented, you know?
So you can't deny something just because the outcome of it was good, right?
We can't say, oh, this is a moral equivalency.
It's okay.
Because then that same logic is used to justify actions in the future with the systems that were built.
So that is the problem.
Right.
And that's why you have to say it's wrong.
It always has been wrong.
And we don't do it anymore because we're better than that.
And that's what I see.
I see a lot of the justification and whatnot.
No, you know, in Israel, you know, in Gaza, it's like if someone came in your house and killed your kids and then you go to their house to kill them and they're holding their daughter so you shoot through their daughter to kill them.
And ultimately, that's what's going on with the whole conflict between Israel and Gaza.
The idea is genocide is acceptable if it means stabilizing the region.
We have to have the I-Net corridor go through the port of Haifa in order to ensure that China doesn't dominate the world economy in the 21st century, which would result in way more deaths.
I really, I do view Israel in the same way that like America as an early ambitious colonial power, you know, like 100 years in, would operate, you know, because they, they have a more primitive on-the-ground view of how they should wage war and what they are allowed to do to people because they are a very young nation, right?
It should be like some conflict in another solar system that has absolutely nothing to do with us.
So we shouldn't have to be involved.
But I do want to, speaking of utilitarian, apparently Trump and Putin did have a conversation after the meeting with Zelensky today.
This is from Donald Trump.
He posted this on Truth Social less than an hour ago.
I had a very good meeting with distinguished guests, President Voldemir Zelensky of Ukraine, President Emmanuel Macron of France, President Alexander Stubb of Finland, Prime Minister Giorgio Maloney of Italy, Keir Starmer, United Kingdom.
Which ended in a further meeting in the Oval Office.
During the meeting, we discussed security guarantees for Ukraine, which guarantees would be provided by the various European countries with a coordination with the United States of America.
Everyone is very happy about the possibility of peace for Russia and Ukraine.
At the conclusion of the meetings, I called President Putin and began the arrangements for a meeting at a location to be determined.
Putin insisted on Moscow, by the way, in English when he was here a few days ago, between President Putin and President Zelensky.
After that meeting takes place, we will have a tri-lat, which would be the two presidents plus myself.
Again, this was a very good early step for a war that has been going on for almost four years.
Vice President J.D. Vance, Secretary of State Marko Rubio, and Special Envoy Steve Witkoff are coordinating with Russia and Ukraine.
Because the right-wing faction, like people in the Azov battalion and whatnot, they're the people, the Banderas, that support Zelensky and want him in power and most importantly want the war to continue, right?
But Zelensky, I guess he's walking a tightrope between trying to make the U.S. happy and then also trying to make those radical Banderas factions happy.
I am shocked every day that he is alive.
I am quite surprised by it.
He really, and I'm not calling for anything, of course, like I'm an American, like 22-year-old.
What could I do anyway?
I'm saying, like, why is this guy still around?
You would think that radical elements in his own government or the Russians would have taken him out already.
I think it goes to show there's a grander game being played, and it's one that we don't completely understand.
A lot will come into place whether or not him and Putin have that meeting by themselves.
Well, I think the Russians haven't whacked him because they want to ensure that when his regime falls, one way or the other, they're prepared to replace it with a Russian proxy version.
And they're probably not prepared to do that yet.
And I think the reason his own leadership hasn't killed him is because I do think that a lot of them are being bribed.
And I think the reason we haven't unseated him is because he does whatever we say.
Yeah, I do think that the first showdown in the Oval Office was pretty theatrical.
Like I was very excited about that.
I was on a screen on my TV, like, yeah, yeah, like I am a Chud Fell Forward Again Award, right?
But I'm cheering for it as I'm watching it because for years we have to watch this little oiled pimp in his like little green beret uniform prance around and act like he's a soldier.
He's the guy that played the president on TV and that psyoped the Ukrainians into voting for him.
But we got to watch this guy puff and parade himself around all the while knowing that it's a complete puppet show.
They fulfilled their promise, and he has to do what they say because he knows what happens to leaders when the CIA decides that they're not useful anymore.
And so this is the CIA arguing through Zelensky with the president.
Well, I mean, we call these other people primitive, cavemen, whatever, but we're the ones that follow out and enact the most insane, barbaric policies on ourselves.
I mean, of course, giving people more drugs while they're in rehab would make them want to relapse or do more drugs.
Well, I mean, I think he's pointing out the contrast between what's going on domestically.
We talk about how we're the greatest and then all these other places that we're told are third world and suck.
Like we're told Russia sucks.
We're told they don't have grocery stores.
They don't have all the modern comforts that we enjoy.
Whereas sanctions have just made them stronger and they have a great economy, right?
So I see Tucker's point.
He's trying to show compare and contrast versus what happens here in America versus what happens around the world at places where they don't have nearly the funding or nearly the resources.
And they still have these better outcomes.
Right.
So I understand that argument.
It makes a lot of sense to me.
And like we better, we better take notes, my opinion, I think.
Well, I'm always reluctant or hesitant to bring up religion, even though I bring it up all the time, because I'm so alienated by the dogma of it.
Oftentimes, there's a lot of specific denominations or things that I don't.
I don't like seeing the mega churches with the people doing flips and stuff with the commercialization of it and all those things.
But the fact of the matter is, even if I didn't believe in Jesus Christ, which I do, it's obvious that Christianity has been more conducive to peace and success and happiness and freedom than any other faith.
That's the main reason why my heart aches at the trajectory we're in where people are falling away from the Christian faith.
And you compare our track record of running that probably since like the 60s and 70s versus a place like Russia where they had a resurgence of the natural Orthodox Christian faith that was present in that country.
But if somebody strikes you on your right cheek, he's striking you with their left hand, the inferior hand.
And so the lesson from that, at least in my interpretation, is not like, just let them beat the hell out of you.
It's no, say, give me your best shot.
Like, oh, that's all you've got.
It's like a manly, confident thing.
Like, let them come at you with full force because you have God on your side.
And I think it was meant to be inspirational and encouragement for the early Christians who were so persecuted.
And I think that we should draw that lesson from those types of things that Jesus said instead of, oh, just, you know, let whatever happens to you and ride with the wave.
Well, I mean, blessed are the meek, for they shall inherit the earth.
There's definitely an element of that.
But there is a bravery and the kind of selfless compassion that we're called to from Jesus and from the Bible, from Christianity, really.
The word Christian means little Christ.
That's what it means.
So we're all called to be little Christs in our lives, right?
And Christ was forgiving, Christ was love, but Christ is also the truth.
And Christ also wore against the moneylenders and whatnot, the people in his father's house.
But you look at the story of Jesus.
The story of Jesus is ultimately God taking on human form, becoming man, becoming the logos, and then at that point, being willing to take the punishment for all the evil in the world that everyone had done that he alone was not responsible for.
Him and his human nature was blameless and perfect.
But he took on the suffering and the sin of the world because that had to be equalized in the cosmic equation, right?
And when you ignore that and you go, oh man, Jesus was just nice to people.
He's a, you know, he's a fun guy and he was friends with prostitutes.
That's what I always hear, you know, it's, hey, man, you know, Jesus would have loved, you know, friends of prostitutes and whatnot.
Yeah, he's friends with repentant people, right?
And it's, it's a, it's just a whole thing.
The West, we're cooked.
I'm sorry, black built time.
Like, I just, the Russians have a solid moral system.
The Chinese have a solid government system because it's top-down, 1984 authoritarian.
And we're just over here kind of spinning our wheels watching Taylor Swift.
I don't know if you saw this, but one of the things that happened in the decline of Rome is other than the decadence and the orgies and stuff that happened and the gender issues that come up at the decline of a civilization.
They got fascinated with gender and then the orgies and the decadence and all the hedonism grew as the emperor, as the empire declined.
But people started prioritizing things like having a private chef, similar to what we have here among the kind of elite in the United States of America.
Like while their civilization was collapsing around them, they were getting together and talking about who their private chef was in Rome.
And there were celebrity chefs in ancient Rome.
And I see a lot of the same thing happening here in the United States of America where while Western civilization collapses, we're talking about what kind of car you have, who you met, we're name-dropping, private chefs, private jets, private vacations, whatever.
So it'll be a long time, hopefully never, God willing, that we have to deal with like a domestic threat.
But that just means there's plenty of room for people to get wet and wild here, you know?
And I really think that if we don't turn this ship around the next decade, America is just going to be kind of a brave new world societal experiment that the whole world points to and goes, ooh, yeah, we're not going to give up our traditional values for this.
Well, speaking of Jesus, he said those who live by the sword die by it.
But if we've learned anything, we've learned that you don't have to live by the sword to die by it and you don't have to live by the pen to die by it.
So please go to the alexjonesstore.com and be the reason that we're fighting back in the information war every single day to millions and millions of listeners.
Let us save humanity together and plus get great products at thealxjonestore.com.