Participants
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
|
unidentified
|
The silent majority is no longer silent. | |
| This is The War Room with Owen Schroyer. | ||
| Please stand by for further details. | ||
| We return you now to your regularly scheduled program. | ||
| Ladies and gentlemen, it is Wednesday, March 26, 2025. | ||
| This is the InfoWars War Room, the fastest three hours on the internet. | ||
| Starts now. | ||
| We got a bunch of breaking news. | ||
| I got some big announcements. | ||
| I got some big guests. | ||
| But President Trump is speaking live right now from the White House. | ||
| He's joined by some members of his cabinet. | ||
| Let's pick up the president speaking live. | ||
| It's fallen below now $3. | ||
| $3 for the first time in years since I was there. | ||
| It's fallen below $3. | ||
| We're going to get it down quite a bit lower. | ||
| That's going to bring prices still further down. | ||
| And people are going to be able to buy their groceries again. | ||
| And so important. | ||
| And again, I want to just congratulate you, Brooke. | ||
| What a job you've done over there with the eggs. | ||
| I was in office for one week, and I got this one article that was so bad that Donald Trump has caused a massive egg problem. | ||
| And I said, this is terrible. | ||
| And they showed it. | ||
| It's like, you know, terrible. | ||
| But it was during his term that it went up, right? | ||
| But they were hammering me. | ||
| They thought they had us until I put you in that position. | ||
| And I don't know what the hell magic wand you use. | ||
| And now they don't talk about it anymore. | ||
| It's terrible. | ||
| Well, we'll talk. | ||
| We have to talk about it, you know? | ||
| If they don't talk about it, we talk about it. | ||
| Right, Brooke? | ||
| But what a job you've done. | ||
| Now we need Congress to pass the largest tax cuts in American history. | ||
| And Mike is going to get that. | ||
| And I think now, I think we can finally say one big, beautiful bill, because everybody's there. | ||
| I spoke with John Thune, who's doing a terrific job also, and the senators. | ||
| And we want one big, beautiful bill. | ||
| Just put it all in that bill, and we'll figure a way to have it passed, right? | ||
| We'll figure a way. | ||
| But we have... | ||
| It'll be the largest tax cuts in American history. | ||
| When you add that onto the fact that if they don't pass this, you will have the largest tax increase by far, because... | ||
| The tax increase that I passed five years ago, the biggest in history, bigger than the Reagan tax cuts, what happens is that jumps back to where they used to be. | ||
| So if you add that onto the other normal tax increases that the Democrats want to give, this would be the largest tax increase in history by 58% or more, I guess, but 58%. | ||
| And I don't know how anybody can vote for a Democrat, but I know one thing that I believe the Democrats are going to be forced to help vote for this bill. | ||
| And then we have the very important continuation of debt. | ||
| I don't call it a debt increase because we're not looking to increase. | ||
| We want to just continue that line. | ||
| And we should call it, I think, from now on, Mike, we're going to call it the continuation because that's what it is. | ||
| That was thrown into our lap unnecessarily, but we have it and it's fine that we have it. | ||
| But I think we're going to get tremendous support, even from Democrats, because Otherwise, they're voting for the biggest tax increase in history by far by, I think, 38 points. | ||
| And I don't think they're going to want to do that. | ||
| So, Mike, I hear you're doing great on it. | ||
| And we're going to have tremendous goodies in the bag for women, too. | ||
| The women between the fertilization and all of the other things that we're talking about. | ||
| It's going to be great. | ||
| We're joined today. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Fertilization. I'm still very proud of it. | |
| I don't care. | ||
| I'll be known as the fertilization president. | ||
|
unidentified
|
That's okay. | |
| That's not bad. | ||
| That's not bad. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I've been called much worse. | |
| Actually, I like it, right? | ||
| I like it. | ||
| Thank you. | ||
| We're joined today by many of the women members of the House and Senate. | ||
| Who make up so much and make this all happen, and I especially want to recognize the leaders of the brand-new Republican Women's Caucus, Senator Katie Britt. | ||
| Again, Katie, thank you. | ||
| Thank you, Katie. | ||
| Great job you do. | ||
| And Representative Kat Kamek, who just announced a new baby girl. | ||
|
unidentified
|
That's great. | |
| I also want to say driving force behind the effort to create a women's history museum, working very much with some of the women in this room. | ||
| I'm not sure if it's been discussed specifically, but to create a women's museum on the National Mall. | ||
| Boy, this Trump, he's really anti-woman, huh? | ||
| He doesn't like surrounding himself with women. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Quite the exact opposite, but that's what the fake news media tells you. | |
| We'll pick up more from President Trump. | ||
| A lot of ceremony there. | ||
| We've got other news to cover, big guests, big announcements. | ||
| I'll let you know what's coming on the other side of this break. | ||
| All right, Owen Troyer here, your host of the InfoWars War Room. | ||
| We heard briefly from President Trump. | ||
| He's got a meeting with women of the White House. | ||
| You know, he's promoting women and making sure women know they're going to be protected and cared about under this administration. | ||
| So, of course, the fake news says the exact opposite. | ||
| A lot of ceremony there. | ||
| If there is any breaking news, we will let you know. | ||
| If there's any reason we need to pop in again, we will let you know. | ||
| We'll be monitoring that, but I want to tell you what we have coming up today. | ||
| More left-wing terrorism, and I was stunned by this. | ||
| And when I went live, I was just sent the report from fellow investigative journalist Brianna Morello. | ||
| She said, hey, you should report on this today. | ||
| And I went to see if anybody was reporting on it, and the answer was no. | ||
| In 2017, there was an attempted mass murder of Republicans at the congressional baseball game practice. | ||
| Now, without getting too long-winded into this, the New York Times promoted the location of the practice. | ||
| Mentioned in their story how there's, like, no security. | ||
| And then a radical leftist Democrat, big Bernie supporter, I believe he worked for the Bernie campaign, drove from Missouri to Washington, D.C. to commit a mass shooting. | ||
| He was walking around even asking people, where are the Republicans? | ||
| Is this the Republican practice? | ||
| And then opened fire. | ||
| Of course, hit a couple people. | ||
| Hit Republican members of Congress. | ||
| Luckily, nobody died in the process, and he was then arrested. | ||
| James Hodgkinson is his name. | ||
| Well, the congressional Republicans had been requesting the records from this attack from the FBI since 2017. | ||
| Well, they finally got it today. | ||
| So it took almost 10 years, but they finally got it today. | ||
| Now, why is this relevant? | ||
| Because I've got more incidents of... | ||
| Left-wing terror, Democrat Party terror, with the continuation of the attacks on Teslas. | ||
| We now have a situation with a radical trans individual on a college campus is attacking a Turning Point USA booth, trying to attack the people there with a bike lock. | ||
| So we've got the video from that. | ||
| And then you've got this national organized... | ||
| Crime syndicate. | ||
| I would say it's organized terror. | ||
| It's like if you do it in public, then somehow, yeah, there's Steve Scalise, survived the shooting. | ||
| It's like, oh, you know, we're an organized terror group, but if we just talk about our stuff in public and just pretend like it's normal politics, then, you know, we'll be good. | ||
| And so now they're organizing nationwide, focusing on Tesla dealerships, like the one they just found a bomb at. | ||
| Earlier this week in Austin. | ||
| And you got all these different leftist groups and they're saying, we're targeting this Tesla group. | ||
| And then next week we're targeting this Tesla group. | ||
| And it's all these different dealerships. | ||
| So I got news on that. | ||
| But see, nobody. | ||
| I was sent this around 2 o'clock. | ||
| And I said, somebody's got to be covering this. | ||
| Congressional Republicans, after eight years finally getting the records from the FBI in regards to the... | ||
| What would have been a mass murder scene, a mass shooting at the congressional baseball practice? | ||
| Nobody's covering it. | ||
| Oh. I guess we just don't cover Democrat Party terrorism. | ||
| We just don't mainstream it. | ||
| They'll sit here and talk about January 6th any time they get an opportunity, but when a Democrat shows up with a gun and actually attempts to kill people, that was the plan. | ||
| Nobody went to D.C. on January 6th with a plan to harm anybody. | ||
| It was a political protest. | ||
| And then when a Democrat goes to a Republican event with the intent, with the plan to murder Republicans, we just don't talk about it. | ||
| Just brushing under the rug. | ||
| Oh, just more Democrat Party terrorism. | ||
| No big deal. | ||
| So Kash Patel made that announcement around noon. | ||
| He's also been in and out of hearings this week. | ||
| I don't know if anything comes of it anyway. | ||
| It's just, hey, let's put on full display here, especially if we're not going to take necessary actions to end it. | ||
| Let's put on full display how the radical left, the Democrat Party, is just openly hate-filled and violent. | ||
| And just remind you, here's what they tried to do in 2017. | ||
| A mass shooting attempt. | ||
| No one called to take your guns after that. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Mm-hmm. | |
| How convenient. | ||
| So I'll box all that up for you with that update. | ||
| Now, we do have news out of D.C. This story about the Signal text thread with the Trump administration and then the Atlantic hack scumbag editor Publishing the story. | ||
| He's now published more. | ||
| He's now published more screenshots from the chat. | ||
| I'll sort out all that for you. | ||
| But what's more ridiculous, it's now become an actual case in the District of Columbia. | ||
| And what are the odds the judge assigned to the case is Judge Boasberg. | ||
| The same judge blocking up the Trump agenda. | ||
| The same judge blocking violent criminals from being deported. | ||
| And now he's got the case with the signal message debacle? | ||
| You know, there's a lot of different ways to take this. | ||
| And I'll break it all down with the latest round of information. | ||
| But I mean, this is just... | ||
| The whole thing is so rigged, man. | ||
| It's just ridiculous. | ||
| It's just ridiculous. | ||
| I've also got the entire White House presser from yesterday. | ||
| I mean, really, we should just be reading the whole thing, but it's about a 10-page document preserving and protecting the integrity of American elections. | ||
| And, I mean, it's good, folks. | ||
| The problem is... | ||
| You're going to be dealing with these blue states that are going to block it. | ||
| They're just going to ignore it. | ||
| And you already have these special elections that are ongoing right now. | ||
| The Democrats just won one in Pennsylvania, by the way. | ||
| So the GOP was asleep at the switch on that. | ||
| And, you know, strangely enough, it was Scott Presler who's very familiar with the ground game in Pennsylvania. | ||
| He wrote the playbook for a victory. | ||
| He was warning two weeks ago, and he was requesting from the GOP, he said, hey, we need money in this race. | ||
| There's a special election. | ||
| The Democrats are outspending. | ||
| They're going to win this race. | ||
| And then the Democrat won the race, and the Republicans just kind of sat it out. | ||
| So every election matters right now. | ||
| But that's why what this administration did to protect the elections was so important. | ||
| I could read the whole thing, but it's 10 pages long. | ||
| And then we got some other... | ||
| Odds and ends out of D.C. as well, and then some hearing clips with NPR. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Huh. NPR. | |
| Honestly, Trump needs to just defund it, and I would probably just defund it, defund PBS. | ||
| PBS is not nearly as bad, and over the years it's... | ||
| You know what? | ||
| It's offered some decent stuff for kids. | ||
| And okay. | ||
| But you know what? | ||
| It's time to just shut it all down. | ||
| It's time to shut it all down. | ||
| It's not necessary. | ||
| And if you're putting out good content or TV shows for kids, which is probably what PBS is most famous for, then you can survive. | ||
| You don't need the taxpayer dollars. | ||
| You can sell TV ads and you'll be fine. | ||
| You can sell sponsors, market products for parents and kids. | ||
| You'll be fine. | ||
| You'll be fine. | ||
| So it all needs to be shut down, and I think that's where this is going, based off of what happened with this hearing. | ||
| So, I got all that for you. | ||
| Let me just, let me start into the SignalGate coverage with this clip from Caroline Levitt, press secretary, who was asked about this today, and here was her response in clip one. | ||
| Previous question from Jennifer. | ||
| As for your original question about who's leading, looking into the messaging thread, the National Security Council, the White House Counsel's Office, and also, yes, Elon Musk's team, Elon Musk has offered to put his technical experts on this to figure out how this number was inadvertently added to the chat. | ||
| Again, to take responsibility and ensure this can never happen again. | ||
| I have two questions. | ||
| Okay, now, I'm gonna have more on this with Laura Loomer. | ||
| At 5 o'clock Central, so in just about two hours, and she's got her sources, obviously. | ||
| I've got my sources, and I think when we combine forces, probably get a pretty good idea of what went down. | ||
| But let's just respond to this, and let's just lay it all out here and tell you what's really going on. | ||
| Because there's agendas on both sides. | ||
| There's a right-wing agenda, a Trump administration agenda, obviously, and then there's the left-wing agenda. | ||
| But let's just go directly into, let's just dive right into this. | ||
| Anybody that uses Signal, or really any messaging app, has probably been in a group chat and has probably witnessed what happens in group chats, and they just get totally out of control. | ||
| And maybe the group chat started with an agenda, started with a purpose, but slowly but surely it just becomes a bunch of yapping, A bunch of noise. | ||
| And then you just kind of tune it out. | ||
| You might even mute it. | ||
| And you're not going there, reading every message or looking at every development. | ||
| And I do use Signal. | ||
| And I'm in a bunch of groups I just totally ignore. | ||
| Because it's just nothing but noise. | ||
| The original purpose, not even there anymore. | ||
| But people get added. | ||
| People get removed. | ||
| And so it's this constant flow. | ||
| And if you're not... | ||
| Following it, you don't know. | ||
| So I don't send anything anymore. | ||
| I don't read it anymore because I have no idea what's going on. | ||
| I don't know who's in there. | ||
| But in Signal and in most messaging apps, it will tell you when someone is added to the group. | ||
| And you'll know. | ||
| It's not like it's a secret. | ||
| And you can look at the group and you can see all the names. | ||
| It's not hidden information. | ||
| But it could get lost in translation. | ||
| And when you look at some of the things that Goldberg has shared, which he just shared a second round of screenshots from this, it looks like even this Trump administration chat thread is filled with a bunch of noise. | ||
| Maybe not as bad as a chat group you might end up in, but there's still a bunch of noise. | ||
| People sending emojis and just responding to stuff with no substance. | ||
| And so it's like, I can't deal with it. | ||
| So I could easily see you're in this group that has a purpose. | ||
| Someone gets added or removed, you don't even see it. | ||
| Somebody sends a message, you don't even see it. | ||
| So that is totally understandable. | ||
| And if you're Pete Hegseth, you could have easily missed it, could have easily not have noticed it. | ||
| You could say, well, gee, Pete, you need to pay closer attention. | ||
| Okay, so maybe that's your biggest knock against Hegseth here, is that he's not going in there looking at every... | ||
| Every piece of information coming through or checking who's in the chat group every time he sends information. | ||
| A bit nitpicky, I'd say, but okay, fine. | ||
| That's about the biggest criticism of Hegseth you're going to have here. | ||
| Now you're getting into technicalities. | ||
| Is it classified information? | ||
| Is it war plans? | ||
| Technically, no. | ||
| Technically, no. | ||
| Was it sensitive materials? | ||
| Was it... | ||
| A strategy or just the transcript, the blueprint of an attack plan appears to be that way. | ||
| Should it have been shared with a journalist from The Atlantic? | ||
| Absolutely not. | ||
| Is this a totally embarrassing moment for the Trump campaign? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Absolutely. Yes. | |
| It is, and anybody saying otherwise is just not being honest. | ||
| It is totally embarrassing. | ||
| Should never have happened. | ||
| And I wouldn't be surprised if old Goldberg from the Atlantic has more screenshots that he plans to share later. | ||
| But let's be perfectly clear. | ||
| This idea that... | ||
| We don't know how Goldberg got into the chat, and we need Musk's team of technical experts to look into it. | ||
| It's a joke. | ||
| It's insulting to your intelligence. | ||
| Somebody knows who did it. | ||
| In fact, if you go to the top here, and by the way, most of the consensus is that it was Walls, and he's kind of running what appears to be a very guilty, cover your ass campaign. | ||
| But guys, go back to the front there, at the top, when you were scrolling from those screenshots. | ||
| So, based off of this, it looks like Walls started the group, Waltz started the group, added whatever the number was. | ||
| I think it said, what did it say at the top? | ||
| 19 people? | ||
| 19? So, based off of this, which is not total proof, but if you look at what you have as evidence, Waltz started the group about the Houthi strikes. | ||
| Put 19 people in the group, including Goldberg. | ||
| Now, was that a mistake that he added Goldberg? | ||
| Could be. | ||
| Was it he added Goldberg because Goldberg requested it? | ||
| He wanted to know what was going on. | ||
| He was writing a story. | ||
| We don't know. | ||
| And Waltz is claiming ignorance like he was set up or somehow it was a hack. | ||
| It was not a hack. | ||
| You added him. | ||
| You made a mistake. | ||
| Or you added him for some other reason. | ||
| But I would tend to believe Waltz when he says he knew nothing about it as far as... | ||
| Or no, let me just say this. | ||
| He says he doesn't have normal contact with Goldberg and he doesn't message Goldberg. | ||
| I would believe that to an extent. | ||
| But clearly, based off what we see here, you did have his contact. | ||
| And you did add it to the group. | ||
| So I'm not sure what to believe as far as that's concerned. | ||
| I don't expect him to be fired. | ||
| I don't think Trump wants to fire anybody right now. | ||
| I don't think that's good press, so he's just keeping everybody around. | ||
| But the consensus, the evidence we have, looks like Waltz is the one that did it. | ||
| Now, Waltz isn't the one that shared the strike timing plan. | ||
| That was Hegseth. | ||
| But Hegseth obviously didn't know there was an Atlantic journalist, hack journalist, in the group chat. | ||
| So you can sit here and point fingers. | ||
| It is absolutely an embarrassment. | ||
| Normally, somebody would probably lose their job for this. | ||
| I don't think Trump is going to do that in the immediate future for obvious reasons. | ||
| There are rumors, let's say, from other Green Berets, because Walt is a Green Beret, that there may or may not have been a very... | ||
| Intense meeting between the two? | ||
| This is just hearsay. | ||
| But what about the aftermath? | ||
| So, okay, probably a mistake. | ||
| Not a good look. | ||
| And now the Trump campaign and the Trump supporters are running cover. | ||
| And then the Democrats got their own narrative. | ||
| And what is that? | ||
| They're going after Pete Hegseth. | ||
| The Democrats have wanted Pete Hegseth's scalp since he got the nomination. | ||
| They've been trying to get his scalp since the nomination, the confirmation process, and after he was confirmed. | ||
| Now, does that mean, now that they're attacking Hegseth and putting him on Drudge Report and claiming he's drinking again, does that mean it was an op from the very beginning to go after Hegseth? | ||
| No, I would say it wasn't. | ||
| I would say they're taking this opportunity as another chance to get Hegseth's scalp. | ||
| So, there was a blunder. | ||
| There was a mistake. | ||
| Goldberg took advantage of it for his own selfish reasons. | ||
| And now the Democrats are using it as an op against Hegseth. | ||
| They could be going after Waltz. | ||
| They're not. | ||
| They're going after Hegseth. | ||
| But here's the thing about it that is totally insane and shows that there's really, I don't think anybody's being honest in this entire debacle. | ||
| And that's what it is. | ||
| It's a debacle. | ||
| Why is nobody pointing the finger and scolding Jeff Goldberg? | ||
| He is the one that published the plans. | ||
| Hegseth didn't publish the plans to the public. | ||
| Waltz didn't publish the plans to the public. | ||
| Goldberg and the Atlantic did. | ||
| They did that. | ||
| They're the scumbags. | ||
| They, according to their own narrative, leaked classified intel. | ||
| Goldberg did that. | ||
| Not Waltz, not Hegseth. | ||
| Did maybe they make a mistake? | ||
| Yes. Is it a bad look now? | ||
| Yes. But who actually published it? | ||
| Who actually leaked it? | ||
| Goldberg. Goldberg did it. | ||
| He's the scumbag. | ||
| He's the leaker. | ||
| He's the one that needs to be in court with the corrupt Judge Bosberg, not Hegseth. | ||
| Now, how he got in there, okay, find out. | ||
| But you notice who's not talking about how he got in there? | ||
| You notice who's not being asked how he got added to the group? | ||
| Goldberg! Somebody explain this to me. | ||
| Somebody explain to me how the guy that got into the chat that didn't belong there published what they lied and said was classified war plans, which it's, you know, it's kind of blurring the lines here, but technically there was nothing classified. | ||
| It was war plans. | ||
| But it shouldn't have been leaked. | ||
| It was not supposed to be meant for the public. | ||
| It was embarrassing. | ||
| It was sensitive. | ||
| But how is it that all this is going on and now Hegseth is the fall guy? | ||
| Waltz is running a cover-your-ass campaign? | ||
| Where's the pressure on Goldberg? | ||
| Does Goldberg have no ethics? | ||
| He didn't have to publish it. | ||
| Notice how he's silent the whole time. | ||
| He never went into the thread. | ||
| And said, hey guys, I don't think I'm supposed to be in this group. | ||
| He never removed himself from the group. | ||
| He never warned anybody he was on the group. | ||
| He sat in there like the rat bastard he is. | ||
| And he took all the messages. | ||
| And he took all the screenshots. | ||
| And then he published them in the Atlantic. | ||
| He's the leaker. | ||
| He's the scumbag. | ||
| And guess what else? | ||
| He knows how he got into that text thread. | ||
| But nobody's demanding answers from Goldberg. | ||
| Now, the answers might be embarrassing to the Trump administration. | ||
| You could easily, somebody could easily call Goldberg and ask. | ||
| Maybe somebody has. | ||
| You could easily subpoena Goldberg. | ||
| Now that it's a case, now that it's in the District of Columbia courts, you could subpoena him for answers. | ||
| Sit him down, make him testify. | ||
| You could find out. | ||
| But no. | ||
| It's all Hegseth, Hegseth, Hegseth. | ||
| It's all Trump administration. | ||
| Leaks, classified war plans. | ||
| No. Goldberg is the scumbag. | ||
| Goldberg is the leaker. | ||
| Goldberg was the one hiding in this chat without warning anybody. | ||
| Goldberg had the ethics decision to either publish these screenshots or not. | ||
| It was Goldberg! | ||
| Why isn't anybody asking Goldberg, where is the pressure on Goldberg? | ||
| He is the one. | ||
| So all the finger pointing, all the finger wagging, all the demands for answers, they can all be found and pointed at one man and one man only, and that's Goldberg from The Atlantic. | ||
| So just remember that, because if this story isn't going anywhere, he's probably going to publish more crap. | ||
| There's only one name who knows the answers, and that's Goldberg, and he's the one that published them. | ||
| By the way, getting lost in translation of that whole, it's now being referred to as signal gate, was a little message from J.D. Vance. | ||
| Makes me like him even more. | ||
| By the way, he was speaking at Quantico today to the Marines. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Vance, Trump, 2028, anybody? | |
| Thomas Massey noticed it. | ||
| He says, what the media isn't talking about in the leaked signal chat... | ||
| The vice president and two others in Trump's administration expressed the same concern I did upon learning of the strikes on the Houthis. | ||
| We're spending U.S. dollars to protect Europe-Asia shipping lanes. | ||
| Is that America first? | ||
| And so what he's talking about, and the thread you'll see Vance talking about, he's sick of protecting Europe. | ||
| I forget the exact words he used in the message, but it was something along those lines. | ||
| And then Massey reminds everybody the real people using those shipping lanes, the real countries benefiting from those shipping lanes are not the United States. | ||
| Now, obviously, the Houthis are a target of Israel, so that's probably really our involvement there, not necessarily about the shipping lanes, but you don't really talk about Israel controlling our foreign policy, so you try to make it about trade and how it benefits us. | ||
| But that's what's really going on. | ||
| But you see that and you say, yeah, I just hate bailing out Europe again, J.D. Vance. | ||
| And he's right. | ||
| It's exactly what it is. | ||
| Now, I could see Trump just understanding how he deals. | ||
| He's trying to get peace in the Middle East. | ||
| He's trying to get peace in Ukraine. | ||
| He's trying to work all of these trade deals. | ||
| And he knows, it's unfortunate but it's true, one of the big leverage points is the U.S. military strength, might, and will. | ||
| And he also knows that these countries are not just benefiting, many of them not just benefiting from our military might, but they're benefiting from our treasury as well. | ||
| Especially when it comes to NATO. | ||
| And so Trump is probably over here like, okay, well, I could let these terrorists continue to mess with your shipping industry and control this shipping lane. | ||
| Or we can go in and take them out, but, you know, you're going to have to give and take with us, too. | ||
| So it's really sad that that is the case. | ||
| You know, I gotta say too, you look at how all of this goes, and a lot of life is about compromise. | ||
| A lot of success is about compromise. | ||
| But you see this stuff, and it's just like, this is why I could never get involved in politics. | ||
| Because you see... | ||
| How much you have to compromise. | ||
| And it's just true. | ||
| What? How many politicians are left that haven't compromised something? | ||
| Any? Maybe Thomas Massey? | ||
| Are there any politicians that haven't compromised themselves, their ideology, their agenda, their constituents along the way? | ||
| Is there any of them? | ||
| Rand Paul, the crew says in my ear. | ||
| The point is, it's just, you're constantly having to compromise. | ||
| And life is all about compromise. | ||
| But I mean, when you're in politics, you almost don't even have control over it half the time. | ||
| You almost don't even have control of what you're compromising. | ||
| And you might say it happens in media too, especially if you're in a large corporate media, then you're compromising all the time. | ||
| That's why so many people are leaving the corporate media. | ||
| I don't have to compromise here. | ||
| I mean, I guess the one compromise I make here is that when you work for InfoWars and when you work for Alex Jones, you're going to be constantly under attack, you're going to be constantly terrorized, and then there's going to be things that you don't even do, that you don't even have anything to do with, and then you end up in court or you end up in jail over things you don't even do, just because you work for Alex Jones. | ||
| So, okay, that's a personal compromise I've had to make, but that just affects me. | ||
| But you know what, I'm... | ||
| I'm just ranting here, but you just see how dirty it all is. | ||
| You just see how dirty it all is. | ||
| And then the people that are now embedded in the Trump campaign. | ||
| And look, I get it. | ||
| And I know why the Trump campaign invited all these social media people to the White House to make them feel special and then hope they wouldn't be critical. | ||
| And so, you know what? | ||
| It does take a little bit of a... | ||
| Increased spine, fortitude, maybe even bravery. | ||
| It's sad, but it's true. | ||
| To be critical of them as they've opened their arms and you want that access and you want that privilege and you want that prestige that comes along with it. | ||
| And so now what do you do? | ||
| Do you compromise your ethics? | ||
| Do you compromise telling the people that follow you the truth? | ||
| But see, that's why I'm so glad. | ||
| I'm not in politics. | ||
| I'm not in the corporate media. | ||
| I'm not in the White House. | ||
| But I'm just going off here. | ||
| But I see that from J.D. Vance, and I'm like, you know, this makes me like Vance even more, and he just, he gets it. | ||
| But it's like, okay, you know, here we are. | ||
| Here we are again. | ||
| We're Europe's military. | ||
| We're Israel's military. | ||
| Like, I really hate it. | ||
| But guess we have to compromise. | ||
| And so that's what goes on, folks. | ||
| Not here. | ||
| Not here. | ||
| All right. | ||
| I've also got all the left-wing terrorism that we've got updates on. | ||
| A couple of updates. | ||
| But let's go to the Hill today. | ||
| And this is the real... | ||
| State-run media. | ||
| Now, we've learned through USAID that a lot of these other left-wing outlets were also funded by taxpayers, but that's just through money laundering, dark money, and just, you know, moving money around to eventually landed at these left-wing anti-Trump, anti-American outlets. | ||
| NPR, PBS, that's just a direct taxpayer-funded operation. | ||
| So you had the NPR CEO... | ||
| And this is a push to defund NPR and likely PBS as well, and I'll show you why PBS should be defunded. | ||
| It's not what it used to be, folks. | ||
| At one point, I might have stood up for PBS. | ||
| Most of us probably grew up on PBS shows. | ||
| It doesn't justify the taxpayer dollars for it, but at least it had substance. | ||
| At least it wasn't anti-American. | ||
| So a lot of kids grew up on Sesame Street or Mr. Rogers or Barney or some of the other shows that it offered. | ||
| And it was popular in the 90s. | ||
| It probably could have made it on its own anyway. | ||
| But so here's the CEO of NPR back and forth with Marjorie Taylor Greene in clip three. | ||
| In 2021, you called the First Amendment the number one challenge in American journalism because it makes it hard to crack down on bad information. | ||
| You said in a TED Talk that our reverence for the truth. | ||
| Might be a distraction. | ||
| You've also expressed support for de-platforming individuals you view as fascist. | ||
| Who do you think should be charged with cracking down on so-called bad information? | ||
| Is it NPR? | ||
| Is it the government? | ||
| Is it you, Ms. Marr? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Congresswoman, Madam Chair, thank you so much for the opportunity to address this. | |
| Is it up to you and NPR to crack down on bad information or decide the truth? | ||
| Answer the question, yes or no, Ms. Marr. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Absolutely not. | |
| I'm a very strong believer in free speech, and I believe that more speech... | ||
| Your public statements say otherwise. | ||
| Ms. Maher, in 2021, when speaking at an Atlantic Council event, you said that when you were CEO of Wikipedia, you took a very active approach to disinformation and misinformation. | ||
| During the COVID pandemic and the 2020 election, you said you censored information through conversations with government. | ||
| Which governments were those, Ms. | ||
| Maher? The Biden administration, yes or no? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Madam Chair, Wikipedia never censored any information. | |
| These are your public statements, Ms. | ||
| Maher. Ms. | ||
| Moore, are you familiar with section 399? | ||
| So what, did she just admit to being a liar? | ||
| By the way, Wikipedia... | ||
| I mean, look, Wikipedia, it is a pretty good, I mean, I'd say overall, probably good. | ||
| It does have a purpose, it does get utilized, but it's also filled with propaganda as well. | ||
| And, for example, I've had people, because I didn't want to do it myself, but there's been things on my Wikipedia page that are either inaccurate or just other things that we've tried to correct or have changed, and so I'll just have other people do it. | ||
| Because it wouldn't let me do it. | ||
| And it always rejects it. | ||
| So it doesn't mind propagandizing people on Wikipedia either. | ||
| Not that it's a reliable source, but it is a source for information. | ||
| But why would NPR be so anti-American? | ||
| Why would NPR be so anti-Trump? | ||
| Well, maybe here's the answer in clip five. | ||
|
unidentified
|
You're a rabid progressive. | |
| Do you not think it's a problem that your political leanings make it seem to the American people that you're not biased and you're not doing your job? | ||
| Because you agree that your job is to have journalistic integrity, right? | ||
| Absolutely, but there is a strong firewall between the newsroom and anything that I do. | ||
| Let's talk about the newsroom. | ||
| You have 87 registered Democrats, not a single Republican in your editor board. | ||
| How does that work to give us the perception that you're doing your job of actually delivering unbiased information? | ||
| I would agree with you that that number is a concern if it is accurate. | ||
| I do believe that we need to have journalists who represent the full breadth of the American society so that we can report well for all Americans. | ||
| I think that you are failing. | ||
| I realize you've only been there for a year, but I just really think that while it is a small portion of your budget, you very much should expect to restructure your revenue streams because I don't think that NPR is necessarily worth saving. | ||
| No, it's not. | ||
| It's time to shut it down, actually. | ||
| It's time to shut it down. | ||
| Oh, I had no idea it was all these Democrats in my board meetings. | ||
| 87 editorial board members. | ||
| Every single one is a registered Democrat. | ||
| She had no idea. | ||
| And now that she's finding out for the first time, she is flabbergasted. | ||
| She can't believe it. | ||
| It's a misrepresentation. | ||
| I'm sure. | ||
| So, okay. | ||
| As if you don't have enough reason to shut down NPR. | ||
| Oh, and you know, by the way, you have to understand, most people don't know any of this, right? | ||
| They don't know any of this. | ||
| So the common perception of NPR, which is nationally syndicated, nationally syndicated radio, their website probably does decent traffic, but that's not the real power. | ||
| The real power is their nationally syndicated radio that is also on every broadcast outlet available. | ||
| Satellite radio, apps where you get podcasts, everything. | ||
| NPR is everywhere. | ||
| Perception from the public is this is just straight, down-the-line, neutral news reporting. | ||
| And that's how they present themselves. | ||
| That's supposed to be the mission. | ||
| And then that's the perception. | ||
| And that's why they go on air and they just read headlines like, oh, yes, you know, this is the headline, this is today's news. | ||
| No, it's just like lulling you to sleep, like, oh, we're just reading you the news, yes. | ||
| And it's just all Democrat Party propaganda now. | ||
| But that's the power. | ||
| The average person is like, eh, I want to get a news update. | ||
| Tunes into NPR, thinks they're getting neutral news, they're getting straight Democrat Party propaganda. | ||
| Okay. Time to shut it down. | ||
| And then there's PBS. | ||
| Well, it's not the PBS that we grew up on. | ||
| Not even close. | ||
| Huh. I don't know. | ||
| Did you ever see anything like this growing up on PBS? | ||
| I can't... | ||
| I can't say I did. | ||
| Let's see. | ||
| What is PBS offering for the children here in the year 2025? | ||
| What is PBS... | ||
| What kind of programming are they offering for the kids here in clip 12? | ||
|
unidentified
|
So, get your singing voices ready. | |
| And we're going to start with our hips. | ||
| The hips on the drag queen go swish, swish, swish, swish, swish. | ||
| The shoulders on the drag queen go shimmy, shimmy, shimmy, shimmy, shimmy, shimmy, shimmy, shimmy. | ||
| Blah, blah, blah. | ||
| The mouth on the drag queen goes blah, blah, blah. | ||
| All through the town. | ||
| Wow. That will haunt your sleep tonight. | ||
| That's for kids. | ||
| That was drag queen dance time for kids. | ||
| Three to eight years old. | ||
| Why do you have to dress up like a... | ||
| I don't even know what you call that, like a clown demon? | ||
| Why do you have to dress up like a clown demon to present to children? | ||
| Can't you just... | ||
| Is that normally how you dress? | ||
| I mean, you could do it in jeans and a polo. | ||
| You could dress like Mr. Rogers and, you know, entertain children. | ||
| Why do you have to dress like a clown demon? | ||
| But, I mean, really, that is haunting. | ||
| And what is with that logo they do, too? | ||
| I mean, the whole thing is off the rails. | ||
| The whole thing is demonic now. | ||
|
unidentified
|
What is that logo, even? | |
| That is disturbing, I gotta say. | ||
| That is very disturbing. | ||
| Oh, that's Lil Miss Hot Mess. | ||
| Wow. I wonder what that is slang for. | ||
| I don't even want to know. | ||
| I can take a guess. | ||
| She probably wears diapers. | ||
| It's hot mess, after all. | ||
| She's got a hot mess going on. | ||
| So that's NPR. | ||
| That's PBS. | ||
| President Trump. | ||
| Doge. Time to defund. | ||
| Time to shut it down. | ||
| And if you even wanted to give them a grace period, I wouldn't offer them that. | ||
| But say, we'll give you a grace period. | ||
| We'll give you a month, two months, whatever. | ||
| You try to figure it out. | ||
| And you can fund yourself. | ||
| Go fund yourself. | ||
| Go fund yourself. | ||
| If you offer programming that people actually want to consume or watch or listen to on the radio, then you can just go ahead and fund yourself. | ||
| Just like everybody else has to do. | ||
| We're done. | ||
| No more taxpayer funding to indoctrinate America and specifically the children. | ||
| So that is just incredible. | ||
| That is just incredible. | ||
| We need to move on that. | ||
| That's a quick one. | ||
| That's just a quick one. | ||
| Just a quick... | ||
| Executive order, shutting down NPR, shutting down PBS. | ||
| Just shut it down. | ||
| It's fine. | ||
| That's a quick one. | ||
| Don't need a bunch of lawyers. | ||
| You don't need to print a bunch of pages. | ||
| You can do that in one page. | ||
| One page, one signature, Trump's, and shut it down. | ||
| We're not funding this crap anymore. | ||
| And, you know, really you need to move forward with making all of this sexual abuse of children. | ||
| But I guess that's too much to ask. | ||
| You're in here gyrating like a stripper in front of kids. | ||
| I mean, you can't take your kid to the strip club, but if it's a drag queen, then it's okay. | ||
| Like, as long as it's liberal. | ||
| It's amazing how they've masked all this crap with just liberal. | ||
| It's like some weird, dark Jedi. | ||
| It's like, I'm gonna chop off a kid's balls. | ||
| What? Why? | ||
| Oh, that's liberal. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Oh, oh, oh, well, gee, I didn't realize it was liberal. | |
| Oh, that's loving and liberal. | ||
| I'm gonna do a... | ||
| I'm going to do a strip tease for kids. | ||
| You're going to what? | ||
| I'm doing a strip tease for kids. | ||
| Oh my gosh, that's disgusting. | ||
| You're a pedophile. | ||
| No, no, no, no, no. | ||
| It's liberal. | ||
| It's progressive. | ||
| Oh! Oh! | ||
| Oh, you're doing a stripper show for kids that's liberal and progressive? | ||
| Oh! Oh, you're chopping off little boys and girls' functioning body parts because it's liberal progressive? | ||
| Oh! Oh, well then in that case, go forth. | ||
| Go forth. | ||
| Alright, now it all kinds of ties into this announcement from Speaker Johnson. | ||
| And this has kind of been the frustration for years with Speaker Johnson. | ||
| The House has the power of the purse. | ||
| And at the end of the day, it's one of the biggest powers you can have. | ||
| And that's why the founding fathers invested so much power via the House with the power of the purse. | ||
| So you can shut all this stuff down. | ||
| And you have the power to do it, by the way. | ||
| And, you know, the Republicans have never really utilized the powers that they're given. | ||
| And I get it. | ||
| They don't want to use power. | ||
| They don't want to abuse power. | ||
| But quite frankly, that's why we're in this mess. | ||
| And you got drag queen stripper time for kids. | ||
| And you got dismembering little children of their genitalia. | ||
| So because the Republicans refuse to use any power, for the American people, that is. | ||
| For, you know, foreign countries they might. | ||
| But for the American people, not interested. | ||
| So now you've got drag queen stripper time for kids and you've got dismembering children because the Republicans refuse to use power. | ||
| But maybe Mike Johnson is getting it. | ||
| So he talks about defunding the federal courts here in clip two. | ||
|
unidentified
|
It's getting pretty ugly. | |
| House Speaker Mike Johnson issuing an open threat now, saying that Congress has authority to stop providing funding to federal courts. | ||
| Listen to what the Speaker said just a little while ago. | ||
| We do have authority over the federal courts, as you know. | ||
| We can eliminate an entire district court. | ||
| We have power funding over the courts and all these other things. | ||
| But desperate times call for desperate measures, and Congress is going to act. | ||
| So stay tuned for that. | ||
| All right, Jay, let's get right to it. | ||
| This is all centered around the Alien Enemies Act and whether deportations fall under the president's Article II powers. | ||
| So what's the reaction in Congress now to what the speaker just said today? | ||
| Well, there are Republicans up here on the Hill, Kira, who want Johnson, frankly, to go further and support impeaching judges who politically have shown that they, or not politically, rather, but legally show that they disagree with the administration. | ||
| He just admitted it. | ||
| He just admitted it's all politics. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Politically. But these judges and other judges all the way up to the chief justice of the Supreme Court have said that these judges are acting. | |
| Hold on a second. | ||
| Hold on. | ||
| That was so rich. | ||
| I love that little slip of the tongue there. | ||
| Can we hear that one more time? | ||
| He just admitted the whole thing. | ||
| And you notice how he kind of caught himself and said, oops! | ||
| Oops! I just admitted the whole thing is political. | ||
| Oops! So, never mind, it's a legal thing. | ||
| Oh, yeah, there's a big legal debate. | ||
| There's a big legal debate about whether you illegally cross the border or not if you're breaking the law or a criminal. | ||
| Yeah. It's really cloudy whether or not that's a crime. | ||
| We don't know. | ||
| And if you cross the border illegally and then rape or murder somebody or go occupy an entire apartment building with a gang, we're not sure if that's a crime or not. | ||
| The judge is trying to figure out if that's a crime. | ||
| It's not political. | ||
| It's legal. | ||
| Yeah, okay. | ||
| Let's hear him say the truth real quick, but then quickly he's like, oops, I said the truth. | ||
| I've got to correct the record here and lie. | ||
| Go ahead. | ||
|
unidentified
|
They disagree with the administration. | |
| The accusation from the administration is that these judges are acting politically. | ||
| But these judges and other judges all the way up to the chief justice of the Supreme Court have said that these judges are acting within their... | ||
| We missed part of the clip that I wanted to replay. | ||
| But the point is, he said it. | ||
| They are acting politically. | ||
| This isn't about a debate over the law. | ||
| Everybody knows that. | ||
| You can't enter the country illegally. | ||
| There's a process. | ||
| You can't come here and commit crimes. | ||
| There's still crimes, whether you're an illegal or not. | ||
| And then you get put on the map. | ||
| So the problem is, you commit a crime. | ||
| Now you're on the map. | ||
| Now you can get deported. | ||
| And they're just saying, no. | ||
| We're not so sure about that. | ||
| I don't know if we can deport you. | ||
| What? But the ABC News reporter accidentally told the truth. | ||
| He said, the judges are acting politically. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Or, I mean, legally. | |
| I forgot there's a debate. | ||
| There's a debate of whether you can even have a border, folks. | ||
| We don't even know. | ||
| Are you allowed to have a border? | ||
| Are you allowed to have a language? | ||
| Are you even allowed to have a flag? | ||
| Are you even allowed to have a flag? | ||
| Are you even allowed to have a country? | ||
| We might have to ask one of these judges. | ||
| We're not so sure. | ||
| Maybe you can't even vote for a president, actually. | ||
| We're going to have to review all of this because we're not acting politically. | ||
| This is all a question of law. | ||
| Alright? Yeah, get it right. | ||
| Alright, when we come back, I'm going to get into the latest In the terror attacks against Tesla, cars, dealerships, everything else, and then how it just expands to the larger problem that we have with the Democrats being a domestic terror group. | ||
| Folks, remember to continue to support us by shopping at thealexjonesstore.com. | ||
| Brand new, limited edition Infowars coin. | ||
| For those fans of Alex Jones and Infowars, this is a must-have collectible coin. | ||
| It is currently 20% off as an introductory rate. | ||
| Limited amount of stock. | ||
| The Alex Jones portrait, you might say, etched in silver on one side. | ||
| And then the classic InfoWars box logo with the stars in the background. | ||
| 2025 below it on the other side. | ||
| So Alex Jones portrait with the American flag. | ||
| Jones signature on one end. | ||
| On the other side, the InfoWars classic logo. | ||
| Draped in stars with 2025 on the back. | ||
| Limited edition, limited stock. | ||
| So many loyal fans of Alex Jones. | ||
| I expect this coin to sell out fast. | ||
| So get it while it lasts, but the introductory price right now at thealexjonesstore.com is 20% off. | ||
| And don't forget, when you are a member of the VIP club, you can get an even bigger discount. | ||
| For more information about how to become a VIP member and the benefits that come along with it, go to thealexjonesstore.com slash VIP. | ||
| We really appreciate our VIPs. | ||
| You are funding us into the future, and for that, we are grateful. | ||
| alexjonesstore.com and thealexjonesstore.com slash VIP. | ||
|
unidentified
|
if any folks are going to come back here at night and firebomb this And all I want to see happen on my birthday is for Elon to be taken down. | |
| Yes. Your words have consequences. | ||
| And what happened after she said that about Elon Musk, she's a Texan in her own home state. | ||
| After she said that, this morning, three explosive devices were found in Austin, Texas. | ||
| We're here live on the scene at the Tesla dealership, where earlier today, an incendiary device, a homemade bomb, was discovered having been planted. | ||
| And of course, this is typical or in line or as predicted by Infowars. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I wonder if any folks are going to come back here at night and firebomb this place. | |
| It's crazy that we were here just a little over a week ago with Alex Jones, and he literally predicted to a guy blocking the road for us to even leave, a protester, that they were gonna try to fire bomb this place. | ||
| And then eight, nine days later, that's exactly what happened at the very location that we were at nine days ago. | ||
| I mean, Alex Jones was right. | ||
| Damaging a personal vehicle does not affect Elon. | ||
| If anything, it's giving him more money to fix the vehicle that you damaged. | ||
| Quite a lot of damage. | ||
| He keyed this side as well, which, as you can see, this side It even looks like it affected above the tire. | ||
| This is a lot more damage. | ||
| This comes less than a week after a possible arson at a Tesla dealership in Kansas City. | ||
| So for this to be happening in Kansas, of all places, is super shocking. | ||
| Things spiraled out of control when a white SUV followed her and cut her off, stopping in the middle of the road. | ||
| Gets out and walks straight up to my door window. | ||
| So I cracked my window, and I said, what is the problem? | ||
| And he goes, you need to sell your car. | ||
| This is a Nazi car. | ||
| You're driving it. | ||
| You need to sell your car. | ||
| It's just that they're just told you're bad. | ||
| They're told you're evil. | ||
| And then they just see you, and they just feel good, and they're going to get in your face. | ||
| And so now these people, they're swatting people's families. | ||
| They're swatting crew members' families here. | ||
| They don't want to talk about it. | ||
| Now the FBI is investigating. | ||
| Now they're making arrests of people burning down the Tesla factories and charging them with federal crimes. | ||
| So these people doing this need to understand you're going to get in trouble. | ||
| You're going to go to jail. | ||
| But they're so enraged. | ||
| They're so angry. | ||
| They're so brainwashed. | ||
| And they think that they are the good guys. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Do I want to get Elon Musk out of politics? | |
| Yeah, the world's richest man, the most influential in history, is now calling the shots. | ||
| What has he done that really bothers you? | ||
| He's arrogant, drugged up, naive. | ||
| Welfare man, you're on your candid camera. | ||
| You are. | ||
| You got nothing better to do? | ||
|
unidentified
|
You jealous? | |
| You jealous of the man? | ||
| Is that it? | ||
| Jealous, loser. | ||
| No, you're not. | ||
| You're a communist, anti-American loser. | ||
| You're jealous of success. | ||
| That's what you are. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Losers, communist, Marin County bums. | |
| Yes, you are. | ||
| You're a loser. | ||
| Why do you hate Musk? | ||
| Why do you hate Musk? | ||
| So what? | ||
| You're a self-righteous moron. | ||
| No, I won't be quiet. | ||
| Who the hell do you think you are, you loser? | ||
| You're going to go Kia Tesla now? | ||
| Go Kia, Tesla. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Go ahead. | |
| Show what great people you are. | ||
| Folks, you see the faces of losers? | ||
| These self-righteous communists. | ||
| They call themselves patriots. | ||
| They are the poison of the earth. | ||
|
unidentified
|
You were recently on a Tesla takedown call calling for violence on the 29th. | |
| Would you like to clarify your comments? | ||
| As you can see. | ||
| Congresswoman, will you condone violence? | ||
| Investigators say someone shot out his driver's side window with a BB gun. | ||
| As he drove through the town of Zebulun late Sunday night. | ||
|
unidentified
|
We have a family. | |
| We got kids, you know, so who knows if that would have gone through and I was driving with my kids or, you know, it would have hit my buddy or something. | ||
| Vandalism and threats against the electric car brand continued to rise throughout the country. | ||
| Authorities cracking down on public backlash against Tesla CEO Elon Musk. | ||
| They have misjudged the American people. | ||
| Yeah, they'll be able to intimidate 10, 20 percent. | ||
| But the other 80 percent are pissed. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Networks lie to you about what's happening now. | |
| Infowars tells you the truth about what's happening next. | ||
| So a great compilation put together there by the Infowars team. | ||
| I mean, you could do hours and hours of just the targeted terror attacks on Tesla. | ||
| That's the bound report at band.video. | ||
| Still an excellent source for videos, ladies and gentlemen, and all the Infowars archives. | ||
| Don't take that for granted. | ||
| Telling you right now, don't take it for granted. | ||
| At man.video. | ||
| Document all the stuff. | ||
| You never know. | ||
| You just never know. | ||
| So, let me go back to that one report you got a little bit of. | ||
| And then we'll look at some of the other violence. | ||
| This is in Wichita, Kansas. | ||
| This is a handicapped woman. | ||
| How loving, how liberal. | ||
| Of course, Jasmine Crockett making fun of the handicapped with the wheelchair joke. | ||
| And now they're attacking Teslas that are owned by handicapped individuals like this one young lady in Wichita, Kansas. | ||
| So loving, so liberal. | ||
| Just exploding with hate in every direction until they hit some innocent person here in clip 10. Now she says she feels targeted. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Damaging a personal vehicle does not affect Elon. | |
| If anything, it's giving him more money to fix the vehicle that you damaged. | ||
| It's not damaging who you're thinking it is. | ||
| Just before 6 p.m. on Thursday, Abigail Gale and her family were seated for dinner at Olive Garden. | ||
| Over an hour later, they left. | ||
| What they found waiting for them was shocking. | ||
| What is the country coming to you when you can't even sit down for dinner at Olive Garden in peace? | ||
|
unidentified
|
It even looks like it affected above the tire. | |
| This is a lot more damage. | ||
| This comes less than a week after a possible arson at a Tesla dealership in Kansas City. | ||
| Gill believes her brand new Tesla was targeted because of the current political climate and perception of Tesla CEO Elon Musk. | ||
| But it felt really disappointing that this is happening in such a great country, a great state. | ||
| So for this to be happening in Kansas, of all places, is super shocking. | ||
| She says her family has had discussions around if it's even safe to be driving a Tesla anymore, in part because of incidents like hers. | ||
| If she could send a message to the man who keyed her car, it's this. | ||
| You have put a very big crisis on me because physically I am in a wheelchair. | ||
| I just hope that he definitely gets the correct punishment. | ||
| I hope he pays all of the damages. | ||
| It is well over $1,000, possibly over $10,000 of damage. | ||
| I hope that the Wichita police continue to find him. | ||
| Yeah. Yale tells me she contacted the Wichita Police Department almost immediately and says they're still waiting for answers. | ||
| You know, I have to wonder what the FBI is actually doing here, folks. | ||
|
unidentified
|
And. And, um, mm-mm-mm. | |
| Thank you. | ||
| Because here, let me tell you what's going to happen. | ||
| And you can hear it from that young lady there. | ||
| She's like, oh, I can't believe this would happen. | ||
| And it feels targeted. | ||
| So, based off of that, she probably doesn't follow politics, political news, current events on a day-to-day basis. | ||
| She's probably somewhat informed, but you can, I mean, to be stunned that your Tesla's being targeted, I mean, that's, you just, you're not following. | ||
| And this is going to reach a point very soon. | ||
| Ladies and gentlemen, this is going to reach a point very, very soon where people are going to be completely fed up and out of patience. | ||
| And when that happens, that's when people start to take things into their own hands and now it might get messy. | ||
| But I'll have more updates on this later, but I'm going to tell you right now. | ||
| The people who have had their Teslas attacked, the Tesla dealerships that have been attacked, and this ties into the swatting stuff too. | ||
| Folks, there have been almost no results from the federal government. | ||
| None. So it's not just me up here impatient because I've been dealing with this for almost 10 years and then I've been the target of it. | ||
| I'm telling you. | ||
| The people who have had their Teslas attacked and there have been no arrests. | ||
| The Tesla dealerships that have been attacked and there have been no arrests. | ||
| It's not good. | ||
| People are going to run out of patience, man. | ||
| They have the personnel. | ||
| By the way, the FBI has like hundreds of job postings right now. | ||
| They're looking for help. | ||
| It's not like I want the FBI to expand or continue hiring people. | ||
| I'd shut the whole thing down, put it at the state level. | ||
| Doesn't matter. | ||
| That's not what's going on. | ||
| There is really not much action that I can see. | ||
| I'd love to be proven wrong. | ||
| Very rarely am I wrong, and I don't come on air and stake my reputation of being right lightly on things like this. | ||
| I'm just telling you, there have been very little to no results. | ||
| So I wouldn't come on air here and say, oh, they're not doing anything unless I was confident that they're not doing anything. | ||
| You understand? | ||
| So I don't know what's going on. | ||
| We keep hearing about it. | ||
| We keep hearing we're going to label them domestic terrorists. | ||
| We keep hearing the FBI and the DOJ and everybody else. | ||
| They're all over it. | ||
| Hundreds of attacks. | ||
| And I think we've had four arrests. | ||
| And one of those is because the person lit themselves on fire. | ||
| So that was kind of a gimme. | ||
| That's not a very good batting average. | ||
| No. So what the hell is going on? | ||
| What in the hell is going on? | ||
| You have a domestic terror group completely unhinged attacking property, businesses, individuals. | ||
| What do you get? | ||
| Where is the investigation at? | ||
| The Democrats already arrested hundreds of January 6th protesters weeks after Biden got in. | ||
| Hundreds. These people didn't even commit a violent crime. | ||
| But Teslas continue to be attacked. | ||
| People continue to get swatted and harassed at their own home. | ||
| Tesla dealerships. | ||
| Where are we at? | ||
| Where are we at? | ||
| Is there a strategy? | ||
| Is there an operation? | ||
| Is there anything going on? | ||
| And you can tell me there is all day long. | ||
| Doesn't work here. | ||
| Not gonna work here. | ||
| I don't think it works with you either. | ||
| I don't think it's gonna be working with the American people in a couple of months either. | ||
| Especially the people that are being targeted. | ||
| Because at the local level, folks, the detectives... | ||
| Even attorney generals at a state level, they only have so much that they can do. | ||
| And then it reaches a point where the resources, the technological capabilities are all being housed at the federal level. | ||
| And so they need the DOJ. | ||
| They need the FBI. | ||
| Maybe even the NSA. | ||
| They need to utilize that technology, their abilities, when it comes to finding out who's doing this and they're not getting it. | ||
| And if I'm wrong, I'll be proven wrong. | ||
| But I wouldn't come on here and say it if it wasn't true. | ||
| And that's where we're at. | ||
| Now, I am curious here in clip 11. This is another guy. | ||
| He's got like a homemade four-wheeler. | ||
| I mean, this is just how unhinged they are. | ||
| Think about how unhealthy it must be. | ||
| This guy just decides he's going to ram his four-wheeler, like some sort of a... | ||
| Homemade rig on a four-wheeler here. | ||
| He's like broken one down and rebuilt it or something. | ||
| And he just goes, he just decides to ram it. | ||
| This man is about 400 pounds. | ||
| Probably had to, he probably had to like reinforce some of the frame there when you're that big. | ||
| And it looks like he has an electric scooter on his back. | ||
| And what is that, like a field hockey stick? | ||
| Something going on here. | ||
| Looks like he probably works at a hospital or something too. | ||
| A medical uniform he's got on there? | ||
| They had to customize a 5X. | ||
| He just rams. | ||
| He just said, oh, I see a Tesla. | ||
| I'm just going to ram my entire vehicle into it. | ||
| How long is it going to be until somebody does that with a car? | ||
| Folks, this guy should already be arrested. | ||
| If this gentleman right here... | ||
| Was walking the grounds of the Capitol on January 6th, he would have already been arrested. | ||
| So they got this guy, Texarkana man arrested for damaging Tesla with mini four-wheeler. | ||
| I am curious though, what do you think the fate of that four-wheeler is, guys? | ||
| Do you think there's any way we could get our hands on that? | ||
| You think it'll go up in like a police auction or something? | ||
| Yeah, maybe head on down to Texarkana. | ||
| Police auction, mini four-wheeler. | ||
| If it can support that man, it can probably support me and maybe a couple writers as well. | ||
| Maybe the whole crew. | ||
| But a lot of these people are on video. | ||
| So that might be the fifth arrest then, because I think that's a new one. | ||
| So I think that might be the fifth arrest that they've made out of hundreds of perps. | ||
| But I'm telling you right now, if this is not stopped, if there isn't... | ||
| I mean, this guy... | ||
| How do you stop this, folks? | ||
| You have to make an example of people. | ||
| You have to make it such a big punishment that it motivates whoever else might be involved in the future to not do it or demotivates them. | ||
| But I'm telling you right now, somebody will ram their car into a Tesla. | ||
| And we'll be lucky if no one's in the vehicle when it happens. | ||
| Oh, that's crazy. | ||
| Really? They're firebombing Tesla dealerships. | ||
| They're lighting entire parking lots on fire. | ||
| You just saw a guy ram his four-wheeler on. | ||
| He's riding it without a helmet. | ||
| He rams it into a Tesla. | ||
| You don't think some radical leftist is going to just pop off and ram their entire vehicle into one? | ||
| You still don't understand what we're dealing with then. | ||
| We played the video yesterday. | ||
| The one girl talking about how she sees a Tesla. | ||
| She loses her mind. | ||
| She goes into fits of rage. | ||
| The one dude who says, I had to quit my job. | ||
| I can no longer leave my house because when I see a Trump supporter, I can't control myself. | ||
| I'm a danger. | ||
| This is... | ||
| Oh, man. | ||
| I mean, it's just going to get worse because they're not doing anything serious. | ||
| I'm just being honest, folks. | ||
| They're just not. | ||
| So we'll see. | ||
| We'll see what it takes. | ||
| But I'm telling you right now, we'll be sitting right here probably another month from now. | ||
| It'll be the same story. | ||
| And people are going to be fed up, man. | ||
| And the voices are going to get louder and louder of the impatience at the lack of action. | ||
| Because every day that goes by and they don't do mass arrests and quick sentencing and then huge press conferences about this. | ||
| I mean, major heat. | ||
| The next person is making their plan to key a Tesla. | ||
| The next person is making their plan to slash tires. | ||
| The next person is making their plan to ram a Tesla with their own vehicle. | ||
| The next person is making the plan to make a homemade explosive device and put it at a Tesla dealership. | ||
| This isn't even addressing the swatting incidents. | ||
| There's a domestic terror group. | ||
| They are operating, and they're operating for the most part freely. | ||
| And at the current pace, they have no fear of the federal government. | ||
| They have no fear of the Department of Justice under Pam Bondi. | ||
| They might have some fear of the FBI. | ||
| Goodbye. Goodbye. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Thank you. | |
| That might be the only one they have fear of. | ||
| Maybe local police, but it's not enough to stop them yet. | ||
| It's not enough to stop them yet. | ||
| And by the way... | ||
| They're continuing to operate openly online. | ||
| Joe Biggs was trying to get this to Elon Musk. | ||
| He posted it at him. | ||
| They got a big protest going down in Orlando. | ||
| A Tesla dealership in Orlando. | ||
| Orlando against Tesla. | ||
| And then it's this group from Seattle that's helping to organize it. | ||
| And if you pull up the full post from Biggs, you can see this Seattle group that's Tesla takedown. | ||
| Join the March 29th Global Day of Action, and their logo is a crow, a black crow with a wrench, because I guess that's them. | ||
| They're going to be bashing things with a wrench. | ||
| They're going to be bashing people's head with a wrench, I guess is what the logo represents. | ||
| They call themselves troublemakers. | ||
| So what? | ||
| They're going to fly to Orlando from Seattle? | ||
| Who's paying for that? | ||
| Are they going to hop on a crow? | ||
| But see, we've got to be smart here, because I was thinking about this, and there's obviously an operation to try to trigger a mass event. | ||
| There's obviously an operation to try to trigger mass violence, and we have to be careful not to get sucked into it. | ||
| I'm begging. | ||
| I'm just begging the Department of Justice and FBI to make this their top priority. | ||
| Because I'm telling you right now, somebody's going to take this into their own hands and it's not going to be pretty. | ||
| And I was thinking about it and I'm like, at what point now do I decide, and really I guess you could say I've already decided, you've got to be very smart, but it's like, because You're going to start seeing now people are going to show up to these protests in support of Musk. | ||
| You're already kind of seeing that. | ||
| But that's going to be the new thing. | ||
| And then it's going to become these Tesla dealerships become this standoff situation with Trump supporters and radical leftists. | ||
| And it's just like they did in 2016, folks. | ||
| And it's the exact same thing. | ||
| And then it culminated on January 6th, which they wanted. | ||
| I mean, they wanted mass violence. | ||
| They wanted buildings burning. | ||
| Probably they wanted the Capitol to burn. | ||
| I mean, that was the plan. | ||
| Set this all up for four years and then culminated on January 6th. | ||
| Now, they didn't get what they wanted because the left kind of backed off a little bit. | ||
| I mean, they had their operatives in there stirring the pot and bashing windows and everything, but it wasn't as much. | ||
| And Trump supporters are fortunately, you know, even though we kind of got walked into a trap, they were smart enough at some point to back off and say, okay, this is a trap. | ||
| We got to back off. | ||
| But they're doing it again. | ||
| This is all the same stuff, they're doing it again. | ||
| And so at what point do you say, okay, we can't play a role in this at all. | ||
| And that's why I'm begging the federal government to do something to shut this down. | ||
| Because this is going to get worse and worse, and then it's going to become a standoff situation, and then somebody or markable people are going to get really hurt. | ||
| People will get really hurt and you could even have a fatal incident if this isn't stopped soon. | ||
| And they could. | ||
| They absolutely could. | ||
| So I don't know why it's not a bigger priority. | ||
| I have a feeling that Musk is probably as impatient and ticked off about this as the rest of us are. | ||
| But... It's just going to get worse, folks. | ||
| I mean, it's every day. | ||
| Every day it's a new incident. | ||
| Every single day. | ||
| And they're going to continue to have these protests, and it's going to get more and more momentum. | ||
| With every Tesla that gets attacked, that just gives them momentum. | ||
| With every Tesla dealership that gets attacked, that just gives them more momentum. | ||
| They like that. | ||
| That's what they want. | ||
| They see a Tesla under attack. | ||
| They're like, oh, hell yeah. | ||
| They see a Tesla dealership with a bomb at it. | ||
| They're like, oh, yeah, where do I sign up? | ||
| That's what we're dealing with here. | ||
| These are domestic terrorists. | ||
| And if they were at a college protest handing out a pamphlet, they'd all be in prison or deported. | ||
| But because it's an... | ||
| Actual terror group operating here violently, they just get to go on. | ||
| So the crew is just pulling up all these different events that they're planning. | ||
| It's 2016 all over again. | ||
| They're going to build this up. | ||
| They're going to have a standoff at Tesla dealerships between the right and the left, and then somebody's going to pop off and it's going to get out of control. | ||
| And then you know what they're going to do? | ||
| They're going to blame it on Trump. | ||
| And they're going to blame it on Musk. | ||
| It's like we've been here before. | ||
| I mean, wow! | ||
| It's like we've seen it all before. | ||
| That's not the only left-wing violence, by the way. | ||
| You've got Charlie Kirk with TPUSA, and they're very active on college campuses. | ||
| And it's probably the most active conservative group that actually goes to the college campuses. | ||
| It's where the left dominates. | ||
| And they set up boos and, you know, they hand out, you know, conservative material or, you know, maybe they got some TPUSA memorabilia and stuff. | ||
| You can sign up for an email list or become a volunteer. | ||
| It's just kind of, you know, a basic booth type stuff that they have going on. | ||
| But they have these, it's mostly college kids that go out there that man these boos. | ||
| Some volunteers, young girls, young guys. | ||
| And then, oh, and then the radical left attacks them on college campuses. | ||
| But even on a college campus, we can't get it deemed terrorism. | ||
| Even on a college campus, we can't get the feds involved. | ||
| When it's a radical leftist trans individual with a bike lock attacking a conservative booth. | ||
| It's just true, folks. | ||
| It's just true. | ||
| If it was a booth with an Israeli flag, And it was a college student with whatever the KIFA, whatever they put on their head, walked up with a bike lock. | ||
| That person would be deported, sent to jail for 30 years, and it'd be the biggest story in the world, in American media. | ||
| They wouldn't stop talking about it. | ||
| It'd be the lead on every show. | ||
| But since it's not, since it's just another radical left-wing trans person attacking a conservative on a college campus, you don't hear about it. | ||
| It doesn't get the big news. | ||
| No, we'll make a big deal of it. | ||
| We'll force their hand. | ||
| And then they'll cover it for five seconds and go right back to whatever their main concern is. | ||
| I'm telling you, folks, I'm just telling you, people are going to be so fed up with this. | ||
| It's going to become such an issue of impatience. | ||
| This is not going to go away. | ||
| And... So they find out, though, this individual, Likely even had a history, even on this campus, with attacking conservatives. | ||
| But Charlie Kirk was making the announcements. | ||
| It was Paige Naumann under attack here that you see at UNT, University of North Texas. | ||
| Paige Naumann and her Secretary Grace on the campus there getting attacked by this radical leftist trans individual with a bike lock. | ||
| I didn't see, by the way, did anybody see any of the anti-Israel protesters swinging bike locks at students? | ||
| I didn't see that, but if they had a pamphlet, if they had a piece of paper, then they're, you know, full federal operation ongoing. | ||
| But for a bike lock, you're good. | ||
| No problem. | ||
| You just try to assault someone in the bike lock conservative, you're fine. | ||
| And here's the booking report from this individual. | ||
| And guess who handled it? | ||
| The local police and the campus police in Collin County, Texas. | ||
| What did I say from the very beginning? | ||
| This is how all these college protests should be dealt with anyway. | ||
| So, you can see the double standard, you can see the issue, and I'm telling you right now, this is not going to stop. | ||
| They are not afraid, and really they just have no control. | ||
| They've completely lost control. | ||
| They cannot help themselves but to engage in hatred and violence. | ||
| And there is no fear. | ||
| The fear of law enforcement has not hit them enough to stop it. | ||
| You know, we do have some power here. | ||
| We do have some influence here. | ||
| And if you're tuning in, you know you are way ahead of the curve, way ahead of the trend for what it's worth. | ||
| But we just want to make sure... | ||
| The three hours you spend with us every day are well worth your time because we are greatly appreciative of your time. | ||
| But last night, a certain segment that we did here was also featured from Jesse Waters Primetime, doing a great job over there. | ||
| See if any of this sounds familiar in clip six. | ||
| The progressives are primarying the old timers. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Watch. Donald Trump and Elon Musk are dismantling our country piece by piece. | |
| And so many Democrats seem content to just sit back and let them. | ||
| So I say it's time to drop the excuses and grow a f***ing spine. | ||
| I'm Kat Abogazale, and I'm running for Congress in Illinois' 9th District. | ||
| That woman right there, Kat, she used to work at Media Matters. | ||
| She used to clip things we said on Fox and try to get us all fired. | ||
| By the way, after a little more research, you have to understand what's happening here. | ||
| Way ahead of the curve on this, but now we've got a clearer picture. | ||
| They're really gearing up, folks. | ||
| I'm telling you, the radical progressive left is really gearing up to challenge the Democrat establishment. | ||
| Oh, there's our friend Kat. | ||
| What did she say her last name when she said it so fast? | ||
| She's changed it. | ||
| She's changed her name now, by the way. | ||
| She used to just go by Kat Abu, and now she's Abu Zabagzugatish. | ||
| There's pictures you can find of her that you'll enjoy much more than that crew. | ||
| I'll leave it at that. | ||
| I mean, my goodness. | ||
| But, she's running in the 9th District, and she's got her little Muslim headdress on in the background of her campaign announcement videos and her fundraising videos. | ||
| You know, that's actually... | ||
| That might be the biggest Jewish district in Illinois. | ||
| Yeah. And generally speaking, Jewish Americans are pretty diligent politically. | ||
| Now, they do still vote Democrat. | ||
| On average, the American Jew does still vote Democrat more so than Republican. | ||
| But I don't think that is a good idea if you're running in a Jewish district to have your pro-Muslim, pro-Palestine, and probably for her pro-Habbas. | ||
| Probably not the best idea. | ||
| Oh, and look at that. | ||
| They're already overwhelming her social medias with the Israeli flag. | ||
| So, why am I telling you this? | ||
| Because you have to understand what's happening here, folks. | ||
| The big money is behind the progressive left. | ||
| And it's all being pulled from the Democrats. | ||
| And this just happened in California, which is usually a multi-million dollar fundraiser that they all pulled their money. | ||
| They want more to be done against Trump. | ||
| The Democrat establishment thinks not enough has been done. | ||
| They've only tried to shoot him, imprison him, take all of his money, separate him from his wife and family. | ||
| But it's not enough. | ||
| It's not enough! | ||
| So really, the Democrat establishment, which is psychotic as well, but they have some political wisdom, and they're backing off, and they're just like, look, we've tried everything, it doesn't work. | ||
| Trump is now more powerful than ever, but he's only got this administration, and then it's over. | ||
| So we gotta think about the future here, and we gotta think about not totally alienating our base. | ||
| Going after Trump like this has failed us. | ||
| So, like, the Schumers and the establishments are kind of backing off because it's a better idea politically, but the progressives are, oh, they want more to be done. | ||
| They're not happy. | ||
| So the money is behind the radical left. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I would bet. | |
| I love how she puts the Star of David on her little thing there, too. | ||
| So she knows it's a Jewish district, but believe me, she's no fan of Israel. | ||
| I don't know how that plays in the district, but, I mean, putting the Muslim headdress in the background of your campaign announcement videos is, I mean, it's quite some symbolism right there. | ||
| Notice there's no American flag either. | ||
| You guys see any American flags? | ||
| No. So it's, my guess is somebody reached out to her and told her to run. | ||
| This is, this is... | ||
| I would bet it's not organic at all. | ||
| Now, she's not a serious candidate, but who knows she could win. | ||
| But so why is this important? | ||
| She's not trying to get local money. | ||
| She doesn't, who knows what she even knows or cares about the actual district she's running in. | ||
| This is a national campaign. | ||
| There's national dark money behind it. | ||
| She was probably told to go do this. | ||
| And it's a larger sign that now everybody's kind of picking up on. | ||
| There is a war inside the Democrat Party for the future of the party. | ||
| And it's the radical progressive left, and it's being led by Sanders and AOC, and then they're going to start bringing in radical leftist, communist, anti-American people like this that just have a big social media following, and they're going to throw money behind them to really rattle the cage of the Democrat establishment. | ||
| So that's what's really going on. | ||
| Is she a serious candidate or not? | ||
| I mean, time will tell. | ||
| But that's not even what's important. | ||
| She's just a pawn in a larger game that's going on. | ||
| And now everybody's starting to see it. | ||
| And now these Democrats can barely even walk the halls of Congress without some reporter saying, is there a war inside the Democrat Party? | ||
| Are you going to primary a bunch of Democrats? | ||
| Is Schumer going to get primaried? | ||
| Is O.C. going to run? | ||
| Is Sanders going to run? | ||
| So everybody kind of sees it. | ||
| And it's all out in the open. | ||
| But they just don't talk about it. | ||
| Because the Democrats are always supposed to be in unison and working together. | ||
| This can't happen. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Oh, it's happening. | |
| Oh, it's happening, all right. | ||
| Tell you what else is happening. | ||
| Big super sale at thealexjonesstore.com. | ||
| And, you know, I'm a little upset, actually. | ||
| Because normally when we get something cool like this, I actually get the prop to put on my desk. | ||
| But I don't have the limited edition Alex Jones coin that just came out at thealexjonesstore.com. | ||
| I don't have it. | ||
| I can't even get one. | ||
| Limited edition. | ||
| If you're a fan of Alex Jones, if you're a fan of InfoWars, you're going to love this one. | ||
| One side has the portrait of Alex standing in front of the American flag with the Alex Jones signature. | ||
| And then the other side has the classic InfoWars box logo with the stars behind it, 2025 on the bottom. | ||
| This limited edition silver coin is at an introductory rate of 20% off right now at thealexjonesstore.com. | ||
| You get a deeper discount when you are a VIP member, thealexjonesstore.com slash VIP. | ||
| For more details, you get an even bigger discount. | ||
| But the introductory rate, 20% off right now. | ||
| Limited time, limited stock, InfoWars Alex Jones coin, the latest silver coin in the memorabilia limited edition collection. | ||
| This coin will sell out probably pretty fast, I would guess, especially for the longtime loyal Alex Jones listeners. | ||
| But it will sell out. | ||
| Get it while it's in stock. | ||
| Just launched today, 20% off introductory rate. | ||
| TheAlexJonesStore.com. | ||
| Bigger discount, TheAlexJonesStore.com slash VIP. | ||
| We really appreciate our VIPs. | ||
| It's your sustained membership that budgets us into the future, and we thank you for that. | ||
| All right, let's go to Marjorie Taylor Greene. | ||
| This is pretty fun. | ||
| She gets into it with a foreign reporter at a press conference. | ||
| Classic MTG, clip 14. Yep. | ||
| Anybody else? | ||
| What country are you from? | ||
| We don't give a crap about your opinion and your reporting. | ||
| Why don't you go back to your country where you have a major migrant problem? | ||
| You should care about your own borders. | ||
| Let me tell you something. | ||
| Do you care about people from your country? | ||
| What about all the women that are raped by migrants? | ||
| Do you care about that? | ||
| No, do you care? | ||
| Okay, you're done. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Do you care about American lives being put at risk? | |
| You know what I know? | ||
|
unidentified
|
I don't care about service members fighting for your country. | |
| I don't care about your family. | ||
| Do you have a relevant question? | ||
| Yeah, this is an American journalist. | ||
| Thank you. | ||
| You know, it's really just more, it's just like, how would you describe that, guys? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Satisfying? Cathartic? | |
| Did the reporter deserve it? | ||
| I don't know. | ||
| We're just sick of the fake news. | ||
| We just want our representatives to finally push back against it, stand up for America. | ||
| She might have been bringing up a good point, to be honest. | ||
| Yeah, you know, you just kind of, it's just like, you know, sometimes you like a little razzle-dazzle. | ||
| But no, actually, it is J.D. Vance that said he's sick of having to... | ||
| To be Europe's military, basically. | ||
| And by the way, folks, the strike, they said they targeted some Houthi missile man. | ||
| They blew up this apartment he was going into, killed five civilians, wounded 11 others. | ||
| It's not good. | ||
| It's not what we want. | ||
| And it is for other countries. | ||
| But again, I get it. | ||
| Trump has other agenda items, and he's trying to work all these deals, and it's just like, man. | ||
| Meanwhile, No news on this yet, by the way. | ||
| I asked the crew to look it up, and I think Massey actually announced this hours ago, and then he just published this, co-sponsored by Representative MTG, by the way. | ||
| Today I introduced House Resolution 2356, the Dual Loyalty Disclosure Act. | ||
| If we continue allowing dual citizens to run for federal office... | ||
| Candidates should disclose to voters all countries in which they hold citizenship. | ||
| Thank you co-sponsors Andy Biggs, MTG, and Clay Higgins. | ||
| That sounds perfectly reasonable and rational. | ||
| There should be no reason why they wouldn't pass that bill, right? | ||
| Well, I guess we'll find out. | ||
| Speaking of foreign loyalties, this is pretty stunning. | ||
| And when I went through the D.C. system, you do realize a lot of the judges are foreigners. | ||
| I had two cases that were brought in front of foreigners. | ||
| A third of all D.C. district judges are foreign-born. | ||
| How crazy is that? | ||
| The United States District Court for the District of Columbia, the source of many of the cases interfering with President Donald Trump's authority, Has 15 judges, counting Chief Judge James Boasberg, and five of them were born outside of the United States. | ||
| By the way, it's not just the judges, folks. | ||
| A lot of the attorneys are as well. | ||
| Imagine that. | ||
| Imagine you have a First Amendment case, and the attorney prosecuting you isn't even from America. | ||
| How would that make you feel? | ||
| You know who else wasn't born in America? | ||
| Judge Tanya Chutkin. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Mm-hmm. | |
| Judge Amit Mehta. | ||
| These names sound familiar? | ||
| All the judges that are blocking the Trump administration, blocking the Trump agenda? | ||
| Hmm. The senior group of judges... | ||
| Which are the ones not born in a foreign country, were all nominated by Reagan in the 1980s. | ||
| So what does that mean? | ||
| In 10 years, every single District of Columbia judge is going to be a foreign-born judge? | ||
| Reasonably. Reasonably. | ||
| I think Thomas Massey, the Dual Loyalty Disclosure Act, I would say that's... | ||
| Obviously completely reasonable. | ||
| Now, would you take it a step further and say you have to be born in the United States to be a member of Congress? | ||
| Reasonable debate. | ||
| I'd say a reasonable debate. | ||
| You do have members of Congress not born here, obviously. | ||
| But, okay, do you take it a step further, not just do a loyalty? | ||
| Do you have a citizenship in another country? | ||
| Are you loyal to another country or just the United States? | ||
| But should you be born here? | ||
| Well, it's... | ||
| It's a fair debate to have. | ||
| But then there's the issue with the judges. | ||
| Should a judge? | ||
| Should a judge be born in the United States? | ||
| Should a judge only have loyalty to one country? | ||
| I think it's a fair debate. | ||
| But you can't have that debate. | ||
| Or you're a xenophobe. | ||
| Or a racist. | ||
| Oh yeah. | ||
| See, that's how they stop you from having real debates. | ||
| By throwing all these buzzwords, attack words out there. | ||
| Meanwhile, remember you have the big protests against Netanyahu happening in Israel. | ||
| You also have protests against Hamas in Gaza. | ||
| Hundreds of Palestinians shouted anti-Hamas slogans at a rare protest in Gaza on Tuesday. | ||
| So you see, what is the real story? | ||
| When I read this, what is the real story to me? | ||
| The real story is most people on this planet, no matter where you're from, just want to live in peace. | ||
| They just want to live in peace. | ||
|
unidentified
|
They don't want war. | |
| And that's why you have people protesting Netanyahu in Israel. | ||
| That's why you have people protesting Hamas in Palestine, in the Gaza Strip. | ||
| They just want peace, folks. | ||
| It's the same story, isn't it? | ||
| It's corrupt government forcing you into war. | ||
| It's corrupt government lying, false flagging, controlling your money, controlling your future. | ||
| People just want to be free. | ||
| They just want to be free. | ||
| They want to live in peace and prosperity. | ||
| But we still have this sick, demonic entity called a government that just won't let us have it. | ||
| Just can't allow it. | ||
| By the way, there was this other weird event that happened when on Monday it was a big story and they were all using this to push that these Palestinian protesters on college campuses were somehow involved as a terror group because that's the narrative. | ||
| If you go out and protest, you're a terrorist now. | ||
| You're a Hamas terrorist now. | ||
| So they shared this story thinking it was a very pro-Israel story. | ||
| It was a very, see, this is why we have to arrest and deport anybody that protests Israel because they're literally terrorists. | ||
| It's right out of the George Bush playbook. | ||
| Damning evidence that Colombia's Students for Justice in Palestine chapter knew Hamas was about to attack on October 7th. | ||
| And it shows here that right before the attack was happening, this group basically got kicked into action. | ||
| And based off the rhetoric of their posting, appeared to know that there was an event about to take place. | ||
| Now this could all be coincidence. | ||
| But think about it. | ||
| They're claiming, oh look, this Justice for Palestine chapter knew there was going to be a Hamas attack, so therefore they're terrorists. | ||
| Interesting. So if a college group, if a college protest group, A college protest chapter knew that there was going to be an attack. | ||
| I'm sure, though, the Israeli intelligence didn't. | ||
| Ooh, I guess he didn't think that one fully through. | ||
| So, somehow, a bunch of college students at Columbia University, they knew there was going to be a Hamas attack on October 7th, but Israel intelligence didn't. | ||
| I don't think that's really the story that you wanted it to be. | ||
| But of course, it's pretty widely known now that Israel did know about it, and for whatever reason, just stood down. | ||
| Meanwhile, the political persecution of Brazil's President Bolsonaro continues. | ||
| Now, he's supposed to be running for president again, but man, Brazil is in trouble. | ||
| Especially with this judge, who looks like Voldemort, who's persecuting Bolsonaro supporters as well. | ||
| Brazil's Supreme Court to put Bolsonaro on trial for alleged coup attempt. | ||
| It's the same playbook that they did with Trump, folks. | ||
| I mean, it's crazy. | ||
| It's the exact same playbook. | ||
| They had their own January 6th. | ||
| Now they're going after Bolsonaro. | ||
| Now they're trying to say he can't even run for president again. | ||
| It's the same playbook they did against Trump. | ||
| And it's really heartbreaking. | ||
| It is. | ||
| It's heartbreaking for the Brazilian people. | ||
| It's heartbreaking for Brazilian Americans. | ||
| And, you know, personally speaking, I think Brazil is one of the coolest countries and most beautiful countries in the world. | ||
| But its politics are so bad right now, I'm afraid to even go back. | ||
| That's how bad it is, because I know how corrupt these communists are that put a literally known criminal in the presidential office. | ||
| Lula, a known criminal. | ||
| They pulled him out of jail and put him in the president's office in Brazil. | ||
| I mean, crazy stuff. | ||
| So they're out of control. | ||
| They already tried to kill Bolsonaro, too. | ||
| Don't forget about that. | ||
| So a lot of similarities, man. | ||
| And I'm telling you. | ||
| And I'd love to see China involved as well, but they got their own political preferences. | ||
| But, I mean, the trifecta of... | ||
| You could have a treaty if you wanted, but, I mean, the trifecta to change the world and move it towards freedom would be Russia. | ||
| United States of America and Brazil. | ||
| Engineering, innovation, resources, everything. | ||
| The desire to be free, hate communism, very Christian nations. | ||
| That would be the partnership, that would be the global allies that could move the entire planet towards freedom. | ||
| The whole planet towards capitalism. | ||
| Brilliant people. | ||
| I mean, it's just... | ||
| But see, that's why the globalists want to drive down Brazil into communists. | ||
| That's why the globalists don't want you to be able to choose who your own president is or have your own media. | ||
| That's why they want you at war with Russia and hating Russia. | ||
| Because they know, folks, if there are three countries that could partner up and truly just take down globalism and bring prosperity to the world, it is Russia, America, and Brazil. | ||
| It really is. | ||
| And you got other great countries in there that have stuff as well. | ||
| But I mean, the resources, the people, the history against communism, all of it. | ||
| That would be the one. | ||
| And this is why Trump, though, knows, because they steal elections here, that he had to sign the executive order yesterday. | ||
| And this is a really large, the printout here, I think is 10 pages, from the White House. | ||
| Preserving and protecting the integrity of American elections. | ||
| Free, fair, and honest elections unmarred by fraud, errors, or suspicion are fundamental to maintaining our constitutional republic. | ||
| The right of American citizens to have their voices properly counted and tabulated without illegal dilution is vital to determining the rightful winner of an election. | ||
| And so it goes on here. | ||
| Section 1, Section 2, and this thing is huge. | ||
| Section 3. And, I mean, this will really gut, in a lot of ways, a lot of the voter fraud. | ||
| The problem is, it's not just voter fraud that we deal with, but it's actual election law and how they took the senators back to a state vote that is why the Democrats have been able to win the Senate when they never would. | ||
| Under the originalist political science, the Democrats would never win the Senate when it was left to the... | ||
| State houses, the state legislature, where it should be, but the Democrats changed the rules because they wanted to steal Senate seats and take over the Senate, and they did it. | ||
| And then they gave the senators more power than even the states in some cases. | ||
| So you're dealing with that. | ||
| And then you're dealing with the gerrymandering, which is another way Democrats steal seats in the House. | ||
| So the Democrats would have never, ever controlled the Senate until they changed the laws. | ||
| And I think if you went by the old laws today, I think the number was... | ||
| The Republicans would have 60, I know it was at least 60 senators, if you went back to the original political science, the Republicans would have 60 senators right now, but it might even be more than that. | ||
| I think it is more than that. | ||
| And then, what they did in the House was they gerrymandered all these districts because they just look at the city's 80% vote for Democrats in the major metropolitan areas, and the Democrats said, hey, we don't need 80% of the vote, we just need 51% of the vote. | ||
| So why don't we fraction off this 80% blue city and let's just siphon 10% over to this red district and take it over. | ||
| And then let's siphon another 10% over to this red district and take it over. | ||
| And so then instead of one house seat, we get three. | ||
| And that's how they gerrymander. | ||
| So it's not just the issues with election fraud and voter fraud and voter ID and illegals voting and all this other stuff that goes on. | ||
| Which is a problem, and the voting machines, that's all a real problem, and addressing that will get some integrity back and give us a chance again. | ||
| But really, you've got to go all the way back, and you really need to get back to the original political science if you want to permanently defeat the Democrats. | ||
| That's what you need to do. | ||
| That's probably a long shot, if never shot, but I mean... | ||
| If you really want to understand how our elections are stolen, it's not just about the fraud. | ||
| It's about the gerrymandering, how they steal House seats, and it's about changing the law so they can steal Senate seats. | ||
| That's how they really rig elections. | ||
| The voting machines, everything else, we can probably take care of that, and hopefully we now will with President Trump. | ||
| But that's not the only issue we face. | ||
| All right. | ||
| Laura Loomer coming up. | ||
| Big announcements. | ||
| You're not going to want to miss this coming up. | ||
| All right, we got big news coming up with Laura Loomer. | ||
| You're not going to want to miss this. | ||
| We're going to dive into a bunch of different stories, including how do some of these bad actors get into the Trump administration? | ||
| And I understand a lot of people say, hey, you know, Trump makes these picks. | ||
| He's got to deal with it. | ||
| Well, I mean, folks, you have to delegate. | ||
| You have to delegate, and you can't sit there and obsess over a couple picks or a couple smaller picks because you have to delegate and you have work to do. | ||
| But man, some bad actors have definitely got inside the administration. | ||
| And Loomer has some breaking news on one in particular that might even tie back into this signal debacle. | ||
| And then she's got some other news she wants to break too. | ||
| President Trump just took some questions from the press from the Oval Office. | ||
| So let's listen to that before Laura joins us in five minutes. | ||
| And what we're going to be doing is a 25% tariff on all cars that are not made in the United States. | ||
| If they're made in the United States, there's absolutely no tariff. | ||
| We started off with a 2.5% base, which is what we were at, and we go to 25%. | ||
| And basically, as you know, and as you've been seeing, not reporting as accurately as it should be reported, because it's a massive story. | ||
| Business is coming back to the United States so that they don't have to pay tariffs. | ||
| And I think also because of November 5th, the election, they're very happy. | ||
| AI is coming back to levels that nobody's ever seen before. | ||
| It's sort of a new business, I guess, when you think about it. | ||
| But plants are going up all over the United States, and many of them have already been started. | ||
| We're getting early electricity taken care of. | ||
| We're getting permits very quickly for them. | ||
| And we're going to make their life very happy. | ||
| They're coming in with tens of billions of dollars. | ||
| Individual plants will cost 10, 15, 20 billion dollars. | ||
| We're going to let them build electricity generating plants along with their plant. | ||
| And they can't even believe it. | ||
| And we're going to get them very quick permits, as I've done always. | ||
| I did that in Louisiana with two LNG plants. | ||
| I got one permit in one day after waiting 14 years and the other one in one week after waiting. | ||
| For 12 years. | ||
| But this is very exciting to me. | ||
| This is the automobile industry and this will continue to spur growth like you haven't seen. | ||
| Before I was elected, we were losing all of our plants that were being built in Mexico and Canada and other places. | ||
| Now those plants largely have stopped and they're moving them. | ||
| To our country. | ||
| You know, I haven't seen a mask in so long. | ||
| You're wearing a mask. | ||
| So nice of you. | ||
| I haven't seen anybody wearing a mask in a long time. | ||
| It's good. | ||
| You feel more comfortable, right? | ||
| Good. That's good. | ||
| Look, it's all a witch hunt. | ||
| Here we are talking about some of the greatest business deals ever made. | ||
| The greatest companies in the world are moving into the United States. | ||
| And you want to ask about whether or not Signal works. | ||
| I don't know that Signal works. | ||
| I think Signal could be defective, to be honest with you. | ||
| And I think that's what we have to, because you use Signal, and we use Signal, and everybody uses Signal. | ||
| But it could be a defective platform, and we're going to have to find that out. | ||
| Well, the bottom line there, I didn't see Trump say it. | ||
| Maybe he said it with a different... | ||
| But I guess it's now official that it was Waltz that added Goldberg to the chat. | ||
| So I guess it's no longer hearsay. | ||
| I guess Trump just confirmed it, which was obviously the case the whole time. | ||
| But now, I mean, I don't know. | ||
| I'd like to hear it from Trump. | ||
| That was just the Fox News bottom line. | ||
| It just said, I was told Waltz was responsible. | ||
| I mean, that's, folks, that's kind of throwing Waltz under the bus there because he claimed he had no idea what was going on. | ||
| Which it was obvious if you watched his Fox News interview. | ||
| He was nervous. | ||
| He was uncomfortable. | ||
| He was doing a cover your ass. | ||
| It was pretty clear after that to me that it's like, yeah, okay. | ||
| He probably knows he was responsible. | ||
| Should have just owned it. | ||
| Apologized to the president. | ||
| And taken his licks. | ||
| Instead he denied it. | ||
| Now he's just been thrown under the bus by Trump. | ||
| Now I understand where Trump is at right now. | ||
| I don't think he wants to start firing people. | ||
| He kind of made those mistakes. | ||
| Like getting rid of Flynn in his first administration and some others. | ||
| And so I don't think he's trying to fire people that maybe behind the scenes he's sick of, like a Bondi, which I'm sure Laura Loomer will talk about. | ||
| But I guess Trump just made it official. | ||
| I guess, I don't know, maybe Waltz has taken responsibility for it. | ||
| We'll ask Laura Loomer on the other side. | ||
| All right, I got a ton of news here to cover with Laura Loomer. | ||
| And I guess we'll start, Laura, with the big story you broke today. | ||
| An individual that has somehow gotten... | ||
| Access to the Trump administration. | ||
| And I'm not sure. | ||
| I was following your earlier reporting before I went on air. | ||
| It looked like you were starting to pull the threads that even maybe have tied this into the whole signal debacle. | ||
| But, Laura, why don't you get into the discovery you made? | ||
| I believe the individual's name was Wong. | ||
| Getting into the Trump administration and what you've learned since you broke that news earlier today. | ||
| Well, thanks for having me on, Owen. | ||
| Look, I'm just really focused on tightening up vetting within the Trump administration. | ||
| This is something that I complained about a lot during the campaign, and it's something that I'm... | ||
| Very concerned about now as it relates to the second administration of President Donald Trump is the vetting crisis. | ||
| It's something that everybody's aware of. | ||
| It's the big elephant in the room that nobody wants to talk about because there seems to be, and not just seems to be, there is a deficiency as it relates to vetting. | ||
| Vetting doesn't just encapsulate an individual and their background and their resume and their associations. | ||
| Vetting also encapsulates an individual's spouse, their children, their professional affiliations. | ||
| They're family members and people within direct proximity to them. | ||
| And you would think that in a position like the Deputy National Security Advisor directly underneath Michael Walls, that there would be a little bit more vetting going on. | ||
| And so I broke the story today because Alex Wong is one of the individuals who was in the Signal Chat. | ||
| You can see the list of names of Trump administration officials who were put inside the Signal Chat. | ||
| His name is there, right underneath Steve Wyckoff's name, because it's alphabetical order. | ||
| Says Alex Wong, the Chinese deputy national security advisor appointed by President Trump, who is at the center of the Signal Gate scandal, is married to U.S. Attorney Candace Chu Wong, her maiden name is Chu, a Chinese woman who is one of the key attorneys involved in prosecuting J6ers. | ||
| So now, you know, nobody can really deny these receipts, but it's all like a blame game of, oh, you know, Laura. | ||
| Please, you know, please delete your tweet. | ||
| Alex is a really nice guy. | ||
| Oh, you know, please, Laura. | ||
| He's a good guy. | ||
| Oh, you know, because nobody wants to actually do hardcore vetting. | ||
| It's all about emotion. | ||
| It's about who's friends with who in the administration, as opposed to doing what's in the best interest of President Donald Trump. | ||
| Maybe it's politically incorrect to say this. | ||
| I don't really care. | ||
| I don't think we should be having Chinese individuals in positions of national security, especially in the position or the role of deputy national security advisor. | ||
| We've already seen the tentacles of the CCP and how far they extend. | ||
| I'm not accusing Alex Wong of working for the CCP, but this is an individual who served as a national security advisor for Trump-hater Mitt Romney's presidential campaign in 2012. | ||
| He's the guy who was... | ||
| I was directly responsible for firing Rich Grinnell during Mitt Romney's presidential campaign because they said that Rick Grinnell was gay and that, oh, if you're gay, you can't work for Mitt Romney, even though Rick Grinnell himself has been a Trump loyalist. | ||
| Wait, you mean delightful Peter? | ||
| Oh, Mitt Romney? | ||
| Delightful Peter? | ||
| Oh, yes, yes. | ||
| That's his nickname. | ||
| I'm sure that has nothing to do with his sexual bending, but okay. | ||
| But it goes to show you that there really is just such a lack of vetting. | ||
| And, you know, look, I know a lot of people who work for President Trump, and I know a lot of people who worked in the first Trump administration and people who work in the second administration. | ||
| Nobody has anything good to say about Alex Wong. | ||
| I mean, the people that are running cover for him are people that maybe they've had friendly interactions with him, but people who are, you know, from the State Department, people who have had a professional working experience with him have nothing good to say about him. | ||
| He has a history of being a Trump-hater, associations with Trump-haters, he's a neocon, and... | ||
| You know, I don't understand why the Trump administration, given President Trump's orders to fire and get rid of everybody from the FBI and the DOJ who was involved in persecuting and going after January Sixers, why he's allowed to have this position as the deputy national security. | ||
| Council advisor, when his wife was involved in persecuting and going after January Sixers, she clerked for Justice Sotomayor, who called President Trump a white supremacist. | ||
| So at the end of the day, you have to ask yourself, who's doing the vetting here? | ||
| And why is there so much nepotistic garbage that is basically creating a bunch of filth within the inner circle for Donald Trump? | ||
| It just seems like there's this... | ||
| There's this pattern, this very unfortunate scenario where people who have serious conflicts of interest or conflicts as it relates to individuals and their family are allowed to surround the president, jeopardizing our own national security, but then actual loyalists are kept out of working with President Trump. | ||
| The second part of the investigation that I published today, looking into... | ||
| Alex, who also used to work for Covington and Burling, which is one of the law firms that President Trump rescinded their security clearance and blocked them from getting any more federal contracts. | ||
| So you have a guy who works for a firm that was stripped of their security clearance. | ||
| And this guy who used to work for them is now the deputy national security advisor and an assistant to the president of the United States. | ||
| I don't know how the geniuses who work for President Trump square that up. | ||
| But again, I don't know. | ||
| I don't work for President Trump, so I can't really explain how they decipher all this vetting or lack of vetting and how they put two and two together when President Trump says, hey, we're going to have an executive order to make sure that we're stripping all these law firms that engaged in weaponized government against me. | ||
| And try to jail me and all of my loyalists. | ||
| But then I'm going to make the guy that used to work for the same law firm my assistant and also the national security, the deputy national security advisor under Michael Waltz. | ||
| I don't really understand the thinking. | ||
| Seems like a lot of mental gymnastics going on. | ||
| But again, you know, there has to be a come-to-Jesus moment with the people who work for Donald Trump. | ||
| Because... You know, this isn't just some little accident. | ||
| This is a massive scandal involving our nation's top intelligence officials now putting a reporter from a hostile leftist publication on a chat that was supposed to be secure communication. | ||
| So either they have incompetent people in positions of power or they're not doing enough vetting or, you know, some aspects of the Trump administration are just being run like a frat house. | ||
| Either of those three things are wrong, and they present the president in a bad light, and they jeopardize the president and his administration, and people need to be more careful. | ||
| They need to be more careful. | ||
| They need to have better judgment. | ||
| It's embarrassing. | ||
| I mean, I'm one of the most ardent Trump supporters out there. | ||
| I'm a Trump loyalist. | ||
| I'm never going to be anti-Trump. | ||
| That being said... | ||
| I'm sitting here laughing my ass off at these excuses. | ||
| It's embarrassing. | ||
| Oh, we're going to have Elon Musk do a forensic audit and try to figure out who accidentally added. | ||
| It's like some conspiracy. | ||
| Wow, how did a leftist reporter get into a signal chat with all of the intelligence officials from the Trump administration? | ||
| Because somebody was reckless and nobody's paying attention because everybody is acting like we're all friends here and nobody's actually having regard for President Trump and their surroundings. | ||
| And they screwed up. | ||
| I'm going to try to pretend like it's some kind of covert secret operation and somebody hacked into the signal chat when in reality it was their own internal screw-up. | ||
| So it's just kind of embarrassing given the fact that they're like sending Elon Musk, of all people, on some kind of like secret mission. | ||
| Oh my God, the world's richest man, an advisor to president, the co-president has to sit there and do some secret operation to find out how this happened. | ||
| I mean, we all know how it happened. | ||
| It's embarrassing. | ||
| Just admit that you screwed up. | ||
| Well, and I look at this, too, because let's, you know, let's translate this, because all of this is now just like normie slop, is what you're getting a lot of, is just normie slop. | ||
| And so we don't really deal in normie slop. | ||
| Yeah, because there are no standards. | ||
| There's no standards. | ||
| It's being run like a frat house. | ||
| Let's translate this, though, Laura. | ||
| Let's translate this. | ||
| Musk knows. | ||
| So somebody comes to us and says, oh, will you help me? | ||
| Musk probably just shakes his head and nods. | ||
| He knows there's nothing there. | ||
| He knows what happens. | ||
| He's just saying, okay, whatever. | ||
| Pat him on the head and leave. | ||
| If I were to create a signal chat right now and I were to add you and I were to say top secret signal chat, there's at least four steps that I would have to take in order to add you. | ||
| You don't just accidentally, you know, buzz out somebody into your signal chat. | ||
| Did you see what Trump just said from the Oval Office? | ||
| I have not seen the video because I've gone back-to-back interviews. | ||
| Let me play this video because you need to see this. | ||
| I literally just got off another interview to do this interview, so go ahead and play the clip. | ||
| I'm going to play this for you guys. | ||
| Show me the one where he talks about we might have problems with signal. | ||
| You know that one? | ||
| Play for me the one where he talks about there might be problems with signal, if you guys have that one. | ||
| Look, it's all a witch hunt. | ||
| Here we are talking about some of the greatest business deals ever made. | ||
| The greatest companies in the world are moving into the United States. | ||
| And you want to ask about whether or not Signal works. | ||
| I don't know that Signal works. | ||
| I think Signal could be defective, to be honest with you. | ||
| And I think that's what we have to, because you use Signal and we use Signal. | ||
| So that's what I wanted you to hear. | ||
| Now, Laura, let's translate this here. | ||
| He thinks Signal might be defective. | ||
| Okay, somebody is now, to me, what I just heard is somebody's now lying to Trump. | ||
| Somebody is now lying to Trump. | ||
| They lie to Trump every day. | ||
| What's new? | ||
| This is what I'm talking about, about the lack of vetting. | ||
| They lied to Donald Trump about the binder gate situation involving Pam Bondi. | ||
| Pam Bondi lied to Susie Wiles. | ||
| She lied to Donald Trump. | ||
| She lied to President Trump's staff and said that she had nothing to do with the binders when she's the one who walked into the room and handled the binders. | ||
| She literally was like the only one that had to do with the binders. | ||
| People lie to Donald Trump every day. | ||
| I mean... | ||
| I don't know. | ||
| And look, I'm not undermining Donald Trump and his intelligence. | ||
| He's obviously a brilliant man. | ||
| He's somebody I greatly admire. | ||
| I worked my ass off to help him get elected. | ||
| But at some point in time, he's got to know that the people around him are just full of shit, right? | ||
| The people around him are clearly lying to him about the way things are going down. | ||
| So, I mean, there has to be some accountability here. | ||
| You can't just embarrass the president of the United States of America and pretend like... | ||
| You know, oh, nobody knows how signal works, and oh, signals compromise when signal was literally created by the CIA. | ||
| If signals compromise, then what does that say about the intelligence officials who are communicating war plans over signal chats? | ||
| I mean, they really need to stop lying to the president of the United States about their own screw-ups, because then President Trump goes and talks to the press, and he's supposed to be able to trust his advisors. | ||
| The president is supposed to be able to trust the people giving him information. | ||
| But there are a lot of people surrounding Donald Trump who are either being deceitful, they don't want to take accountability for their lack of vetting, and they don't want to admit that they screwed up. | ||
| And now the media is going to go mock Donald Trump. | ||
| They're going to say, oh, Donald Trump is saying that Signal is defective after his own administration said that it was, they testified under oath in a hearing yesterday saying that Signal was a safe and effective means of communication. | ||
| And they've already confirmed that. | ||
| That's like official government operations now is on Signal. | ||
| Like they use Signal because it's the most reliable when it comes to encrypted messaging. | ||
| So somebody obviously... | ||
| Lied to Trump. | ||
| I mean, I don't know how else to translate from what he just said. | ||
| Somebody's like, oh no, sir, this was an app problem. | ||
| We have a problem with the app. | ||
| But they also said it looks like... | ||
| They lied to Trump every day. | ||
| But it looks like they're also now reporting that Waltz is either taking responsibility or Trump is saying it was Waltz, which, I mean, clearly that's where all the evidence pointed to begin with, which I guess would lead me to my next topic of conversation. | ||
| I just posted this and we can kind of review this and get your opinion. | ||
| Well, President Trump said the other day that it was a staffer. | ||
| First, he said that it was a staffer. | ||
| So if you look at his previous statements, he said that Michael Waltz told him that it was a staffer. | ||
| It was one of his staffers. | ||
| So Michael Waltz is probably now just trying to, you know, assume the leadership position because at the end of the day, it doesn't matter if it's a staffer or not. | ||
| It falls under his jurisdiction since he's the head. | ||
| He's the director. | ||
| And so if you're the director, you're the one who is in charge of your own department. | ||
| So you have to take responsibility for something that happened if you're the leader. | ||
| I don't really think that we're getting the full story. | ||
| I don't think we're getting the truth. | ||
| Because if it was a staffer and Michael Waltz is taking responsibility for it, okay, yeah, he's going to maybe fall on the sword for one of his staffers. | ||
| But at the end of the day, you know, we need to know who actually did this. | ||
| Because that person cannot be trusted with classified information going forward. | ||
| I mean, if you're going to be that reckless, you cannot be trusted to be working in the intelligence department for the United States government. | ||
| I mean, these are supposed to be the best and brightest. | ||
| I mean, we were told that only the best people. | ||
| I was told, personally, that Donald Trump only hires the best people, Owen. | ||
| So I was told that there is somehow a very strict vetting process and that the president of the United States only hires the best people. | ||
| So I don't really know, like... | ||
| If this really, you know, encapsulates the definition of the best, if you're going to be so stupid that you're going to, like, not even know how a signal chat works. | ||
| But I don't know. | ||
| We clearly seem to have different understandings of what the word best means. | ||
| That's a conversation for another time. | ||
| I don't even think it's really that much of a controversy. | ||
| I think it's pretty clear what happened. | ||
| Somebody added him to the chat, whether it was Waltz or his staffer. | ||
| That's what happened. | ||
| They added him to the chat. | ||
| Now, the question is why? | ||
| Was it a mistake? | ||
| Was it intentional? | ||
| That's really the only question. | ||
| But it's like, you can't sit here. | ||
| I mean, so now you're going to ask everybody in the administration, hey, every time you send a message, you need to look through the entire group chat, even though it's supposed to be just for the intelligence community. | ||
| I mean, that's ridiculous. | ||
| So it's just, somebody, Trump is not going to fire anybody right now. | ||
| I'm pretty sure that's clear. | ||
| Otherwise, I think Bondi would probably be gone. | ||
| I don't think he wants to fire anybody in the near future, just for optics reasons. | ||
| But I'd say Waltz is probably now in that line. | ||
| Probably. So let's do this. | ||
| I don't think there's a lot of vetting going on. | ||
| It gets a lot worse because now they're trying to say, oh, you know, there's nothing wrong. | ||
| There's nothing wrong with Alex Wong. | ||
| So if you look at the continued investigation that I put out today, you can pull these screenshots up for everybody to see. | ||
| His wife, a woman by the name of Candace Chu Wong, who was a U.S. attorney who was involved in prosecuting Jay Sixers, has a direct tie to the CCP via her dead father. | ||
| Her father died several years ago, but if you look at his professional history, and we can pull this up right now, because it's a very complex subject matter here, so you should probably just pull the screenshots up for everybody to see it. | ||
| But the wife of Alex Wong, who is the Deputy National Security Advisor, okay? | ||
| Her father, so Alex Wong's father-in-law, worked with this company called AsiaSat for 23 years. | ||
| And while he was one of the main overseeing managers of AsiaSat, and he, of course, was the fourth employee they ever hired. | ||
| He was in charge of overseeing their satellite systems, which are directly owned in a joint ownership situation, ownership agreement between the Chinese government, the CCP. | ||
| We already know what it means to be state-owned in China. | ||
| That means it's an entity of the CCP. | ||
| And then the CCP-affiliated Carlyle Group, which is a private equity fund. | ||
| You know, how can they allow for an individual who has a direct tie to the CCP via his father-in-law, who they're now trying to claim, and I'm getting phone calls from all types of people, from the admin and people who know Alex Wan, telling me, no, no, they're Taiwanese. | ||
| No, no, no, they're dissidents. | ||
| If you're a dissident and you're anti-China or you're anti-CCP, you are not going to be in a managerial position for a company that controls the military satellites. | ||
| For China, you're not going to be in a position of leadership if you are truly a dissident. | ||
| You have to be approved by the Chinese Communist Party. | ||
| So I don't understand what the cope is. | ||
| There's massive cope going on by the State Department officials, by people at DNI, by people within the National Security Council, by people within President Trump's own administration. | ||
| I mean, you guys have talked about the CCP extensively here at Infowars. | ||
| Are they really going to gaslight us into thinking that a Taiwanese dissident was able to have a senior level position at the most prominent satellite company in Asia that is co-owned by China and controlled by the CCP that has direct partnerships with the People's Liberation Army of China? | ||
| I mean, what kind of gaslighting is this administration engaged in right now that they're going to actually have officials from the administration call me on my cell phone and try to tell me that these individuals don't have ties to the CCP? | ||
| You don't get to work for a company like Asia Sat unless you have ties to the CCP. | ||
| Hold on a second. | ||
| You got a call from the administration claiming that today? | ||
| I got a phone call from an administration official today who was trying to essentially walk me off the ledge and tell me that Alex Wong and his family are Taiwanese and that the parents of his wife were Taiwanese dissidents. | ||
| And I was trying to show them these receipts and say, no, he was in a managerial position. | ||
| Asia sat. | ||
| You can look it up. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I already provided all of the screenshots and you can see for yourself. | |
| All right. | ||
| I want to move on here. | ||
| And get into this. | ||
| I want to get your take on this. | ||
| I just did a Trump administration report card. | ||
| Obviously, it's really early. | ||
| It's two months in. | ||
| And grades can change throughout the course. | ||
| But I was like, you know what? | ||
| Let's issue a report card. | ||
| We've seen enough now. | ||
| We've seen some body of work now that I think it's fair enough to give some grades. | ||
| I want to get Laura Loomer's response to my report card I just released. | ||
| Let's put it up on the screen. | ||
| Laura, follow along and take notes for any agreements or disagreements you may have here. | ||
| The Trump administration report card, according to me, Trump A, Vance A, Musk A +, Miller A +, Hegseth A-, Wiles C, Noam B-, Rubio A-, Gabbard C +, Kennedy C, Ratcliffe C, Patel B +, McMahon B, Besson A-, Zeldin A, Leavitt A, Loeffler A-, Lutnik B +, Turner A-, Burgum B-, Duffy B, Vaught C+. | ||
| Collins B plus Wright C Rollin C Stefanik D Bondi F Walls F you Why are you giving Suzy Wiles a C? | ||
| It's about an average for the whole administration. | ||
| I mean, if you want to just say the bottom grade, she gets the bottom grade. | ||
| I think that people bully kind of beat up on Suzy a lot. | ||
| I would say that Suzy's doing a pretty good job. | ||
| I don't think it's fair to blame Susie Wiles for the screw-ups of other people. | ||
| I gave her a C. That's a passing grade. | ||
| I don't think she deserves a C. I think she deserves a higher grade than that. | ||
| You're the one complaining about who gets access to the Trump administration. | ||
| She's the one! | ||
| Well, there's other people within the Trump administration who control vetting. | ||
| It's not just Susie. | ||
| These are also department heads. | ||
| There are people within the PPO office as well. | ||
| So it's not all on Susie Wiles. | ||
| Like, sure, Susie Wiles oversees things, but at the end of the day, Susie Wiles also expects people within the administration to be honest with her. | ||
| And so if other people in other departments are not doing their jobs effectively, that's not necessarily Susie's fault. | ||
| Okay, alright. | ||
| I hear what you're saying here. | ||
| I just think that she should have a higher grade than a C. Alright, I hear you loud and clear. | ||
| I'll leave it at that. | ||
| And you forgot to put Tom Homan on the list. | ||
| I think he's doing a great job. | ||
| I didn't see Homan on your report card. | ||
| Well, he's not technically part of the administration. | ||
| He's the border czar. | ||
| So I kind of counted that in with Noam's B-. | ||
| Yeah. I mean, I think that they definitely need to increase the number of mass deportations because they're... | ||
| They're quite low. | ||
| I mean, Bondi definitely deserves an F. You got that one right, for sure. | ||
| Any other comments on the report card? | ||
| No, I'd say... | ||
|
unidentified
|
It's pretty fair. | |
| Pretty fair right now. | ||
| But I would say that Susie Wiles deserves a higher score. | ||
| I think that she has done better than a C. I think to respond to the no-um is that... | ||
| I was thinking the same thing, which maybe I'd put her in the C range because we don't have the numbers, but the truth is she is on the ground doing work, even though she kind of gets dolled up and gets a hard time for, you know, getting dolled up for it. | ||
| She is on the ground. | ||
| She is doing work. | ||
| And the truth is they are being blocked at all. | ||
| I mean, the local governments, the mayors, the governors, the courts, they're all blocking them from these deportations. | ||
| If they had full-spectrum cooperation, they could probably get the mass deportations. | ||
| The problem is they're just getting blocked every step of the way. | ||
| Yeah, I mean, I don't really understand what Kennedy's been doing either. | ||
| He probably deserves a lower score, too, to be fair. | ||
| He hasn't done anything. | ||
| What has he done? | ||
| Well, that's why he's at a C. So it's kind of neutral. | ||
| He should probably be at a D. He should probably be at a D, honestly. | ||
| He hasn't done anything. | ||
| He's been very pro-Israel, Laura. | ||
| His Maha operatives are currently on a tirade across the country in states like Texas and Florida and West Virginia, passing anti-small business and anti-consumer legislation to push for food die bans when they could be doing this on a federal level. | ||
| He's literally trying to create a state commerce chaos. | ||
| All right, Laura Loomer, four-minute break. | ||
| We'll be right back. | ||
| All right, Laura Loomer here. | ||
| She was breaking a news story with us in the last segment. | ||
| She's also got another... | ||
| Story, her and her team are working on, and Laura, it was pretty easy to see where this was heading, but after Crockett's antics during House proceedings a couple months ago, I said, okay, yeah, she's eventually going to get violent. | ||
| I mean, it was obvious that Crockett was going to get violent at some point in time. | ||
| Unfortunately, it was with your reporter. | ||
| Would you care to update my audience on that story? | ||
| Yeah, so... | ||
| I've been covering these Tesla takedown events, these very violent protests that have been happening at Tesla showrooms and supercharger locations across the country. | ||
| And Loomer Unleashed was really the first media entity to identify and also name and expose the organizers of these events. | ||
| And we found one of their group organizer calls the other evening, and we noticed that Congresswoman Jasmine Crockett was on the call. | ||
| So we screen recorded the video call, and we were the first to post the video of her basically saying that on this Saturday, which is March 29th, her birthday, Which she made clear during the call. | ||
| She said that all she wants for her birthday is for Tesla to be taken down and for Elon Musk to be taken down. | ||
| So we post a video. | ||
| It goes viral. | ||
| Elon talks about it, right? | ||
| Everybody's talking about it and, you know, pretending like, oh, my God, we just discovered what Tesla takedown is for the first time because, you know, the media is very behind. | ||
| They don't want to actually, you know, put in the work to identify these things like we do at Loomer Unleashed. | ||
|
unidentified
|
And so... | |
| We decided that we were going to go confront her and ask her why she was inciting violence against Elon Musk and Tesla. | ||
| So I told Charles to go to the Capitol and go confront her and ask her if she would condemn the Tesla takedown violence and the violence that she was inciting. | ||
| And he asked her multiple times and she was ignoring him. | ||
| And then on, I believe, the third time that he asked her, she violently grabbed his cell phone and dug her ghetto nails into the top of his left hand, leaving indentations and a red mark. | ||
| And the video has gone viral. | ||
| You said she took her nails? | ||
| Like, she had fake nails? | ||
| She dug into his skin? | ||
| Yeah, we posted the photo on X. Okay, I wasn't really sure what that was. | ||
| So that was a scratch mark because she grabbed him so hard or she scraped it? | ||
| God, scratch marks? | ||
| So, I don't know if you've ever, like, you know, gotten in a fight with a girl who has, like, fake nails. | ||
| I don't know. | ||
| I don't know your personal life, you know? | ||
| But if you've ever, like, gotten a little rough. | ||
| With a woman with fake acrylic nails in some capacity. | ||
| Wow, Laura, why don't you just say it? | ||
| Why don't you just say it, Laura? | ||
| Grabbed onto you, okay? | ||
| If a woman with fake nails has ever grabbed onto you and dug into your skin, then you would know that it would leave a red mark. | ||
| My nails are not as long as Jasmine Crockett's, but if I were to go like this, right, on my hand, you would see that, let me see if I can show the camera. | ||
| It would leave a... | ||
| Here, actually, you can actually use my hands and wrists for an example right now. | ||
| You can't really see because, again, you have to do it really hard, but that was about five minutes after the fact, and you can clearly see the sharp nail indentation and the scratch marks on the top of his hand. | ||
| So she grabbed him. | ||
| She dug... | ||
| And then you could see the scrape towards the back of his hand where the hair is. | ||
| So she ripped the skin, actually. | ||
| So she actually scratched his skin and dug her fake nails into the top of his arm. | ||
|
unidentified
|
That's crazy. | |
| And she tried to steal the phone? | ||
| She tried to rip the phone? | ||
| Yeah, she tried to steal Charles' cell phone. | ||
| And you can see it from the video that we posted that's now been seen millions of times. | ||
| And then Charles went to go file an official police report with the Capitol Police. | ||
| And then today he also filed an ethics complaint at the Congressional Ethics Office. | ||
| They call it the CEO or COE, actually, Congressional Office of Ethics. | ||
| It's in the basement of the Longworth building, I believe. | ||
| And so Charles went there today to file an ethics complaint. | ||
| And now we're also in talks with the lawyer to discuss suing her for... | ||
| I guess he was just confronted about it about 30 minutes or so ago by a Daily Caller reporter. | ||
| The video is now circulating online. | ||
| I just saw it before logging on to do this interview. | ||
| But it just kind of begs the question, why did Republican Tim Burchett not say anything? | ||
| And why is he just sitting back and being chummy with a very rabidly Aggressive, violent Marxist congresswoman who is inciting violence against Republicans and assaulted a member of the press right in front of his face. | ||
| And this is the problem. | ||
| You can go ahead and play the video if you want. | ||
| This is a problem with the Republican Party. | ||
| They like to talk a big talk and they like to complain and they want to talk about how, oh, you know, these Tesla takedown events are so awful because they want to get maxed out campaign donations from Elon Musk, who is a billionaire and has America packed because, you know, they want his money, right? | ||
| Everybody wants to be funded by the richest man in the world. | ||
| They want to rack up those Elon bucks. | ||
| But the reality is, is when push comes to shove, Owen, nobody has the balls to censure her. | ||
| Nobody has the balls to actually file an ethics complaint. | ||
| Members of Congress have the Congressional Office of Ethics so that they can file ethics complaints against their colleagues who are in violation. | ||
| And you just see such a weak man in Mike Johnson. | ||
| Everybody likes to say that he's such a nice man. | ||
| He's such a kind man. | ||
| He's such a Christian man. | ||
| Who really cares at the end of the day if he's a Christian? | ||
| I don't care, honestly. | ||
| I don't really care if he's a Christian. | ||
| Godly man talking about forgiveness and grace if he's going to be such a pussy at the end of the day that he's not actually going to hold anybody accountable or press for charges to be pushed against Jasmine Crockett. | ||
| We might as well just have Speaker Joaquin Jeffries. | ||
| I mean, honestly, give the Democrats back control of the House. | ||
| Let's do it. | ||
| Let's have the Democrats win in 2026 because Republicans do not want to fight. | ||
| Let's let the Democrats take back control of the House because nobody in the Republican Party has a spine. | ||
| Nobody in the Republican Party wants... | ||
| So let's have a repeat of what happened during the first Trump administration when you had a president in the White House with oppositional Republicans, feckless Republicans, and then eventually Democrats controlling the House because that's where we're headed. | ||
| And you know what? | ||
| The Republicans are going to deserve it. | ||
| They're going to deserve to lose if they're not going to actually use the power that they have now. | ||
| They don't want to do anything, Owen, and I know you feel the same way. | ||
| We're just sick and tired of watching Democrats sit back and get everything they want, get away with violence. | ||
| You're in Austin, Texas. | ||
| They just had a bomb planted at the Tesla in Austin, Texas. | ||
| Isn't that enough to be censuring these Democrats like Jasmine Crockett, who are in direct coordination with these domestic terrorists? | ||
| Why can we have jihadist members of Congress, Ilhan Omar, Rashida Tlaib, refusing to condemn the Hamas flag that myself and Charles Downs caught on camera being flown outside of the White House the other day? | ||
| Why do we have radical Muslims serving in the United States Congress when Trump is in the White House and the Republicans have control of the House and the Senate? | ||
| Why? Just give the Democrats control. | ||
| It's so nauseating. | ||
| I'm going to have a heart attack one of these days from screaming so much, from getting my blood pressure up so much. | ||
| I was going to ask you, maybe you could finally tell us how you really feel. | ||
| I'm like out of breath right now. | ||
| You know, I'm so out of breath on a daily basis because I'm just like developing so much stress from having to basically scream at the TV and scream at the phone every single day. | ||
| All right, I'm going to stop you right there. | ||
| We don't want to hold on right there. | ||
| But it's true, though. | ||
| It's true. | ||
| Just let Hakeem Jeffries be Speaker of the House. | ||
| Just do it. | ||
| Let's just get it over with. | ||
| Let's just do it right now. | ||
| Let's have Speaker Jeffries as the Speaker of the House because Mike Johnson is... | ||
| We're going to let Jasmine Crockett and all these other ghetto DEI trash hires in Congress, Ilhan Omar, AOC, Rashida Tlaib. | ||
| Here's the problem, Laura. | ||
| That video, guys, put the video where Crockett is strutting around before she assaulted your reporter there. | ||
| She's strutting around. | ||
| She's the cock of the walk. | ||
| She's untouchable. | ||
| She's strutting. | ||
| She's waving her arms. | ||
| She's sashaying her out. | ||
| She's untouchable. | ||
| She's hot. | ||
| But my point is they have no fear. | ||
| Laura, that's just what I'm saying. | ||
| They have no fear. | ||
| She thinks she's the coolest thing going. | ||
| She thinks she's the hottest thing going. | ||
| They have no fear. | ||
| They're attacking Teslas. | ||
| They're attacking Trump supporters. | ||
| They're sashaying around Congress, calling for the violence, engaging in violence. | ||
| They have no fear. | ||
| Why would they? | ||
| I mean, you have Republicans like Tim Burchett that are like, oh, well, good luck, Jasmine. | ||
| Good luck, Jasmine. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I know you just threatened to hit Ted Cruz over the head, Jasmine, but good luck, Jasmine. | |
| Hope I see you in the committee, Jasmine. | ||
| I mean, we're all just friends, right? | ||
| Let's just sit around and sing kumbaya. | ||
| All right. | ||
| Let's just do it. | ||
| Yeah. Meanwhile, what's the point of fighting so hard? | ||
| You went to jail, Owen. | ||
| You went to jail. | ||
| What is the point of fighting for the Republican Party when they're not going to do anything? | ||
| I am sick of the Republican Party. | ||
| I am so close to just ripping up my Republican Party registration. | ||
| Why did we work so hard to get Donald Trump back in the White House? | ||
| And why did we work so hard to take back the House and the Senate if these Republicans are going to sit on their goddamn asses and do nothing? | ||
| Well, let me expand on that here, too. | ||
| Not only have I been arrested multiple times, as you're well aware, your team reported on it, too. | ||
| I had guns pointed at my head, lasers on my head, chest, and back just a week ago now. | ||
| And there's nothing going on. | ||
| They talk about investigations and stuff. | ||
| There's nothing going on. | ||
| There's no fear. | ||
| They have no fear. | ||
| There is no fear. | ||
| There is nothing stopping this Democrat terrorism. | ||
| It is simply not stopping. | ||
| Nothing is stopping Jasmine Crockett from becoming even more radical than she already is as she gets away with what she just did to your reporter. | ||
| It's only going to get worse. | ||
| And I would just say this. | ||
| It's not just me either. | ||
| She's done it to Nancy Mays. | ||
| She's done it to Marjorie Taylor Greene. | ||
| She's done it to a lot of people. | ||
| It's not just me. | ||
| But Laura, here's my point. | ||
| Even when she does things to members of Congress that are considered aggressions, right? | ||
| What do they call it? | ||
| What's the term that they have in Congress for when you have inappropriate insults? | ||
| It's like some fancy word. | ||
| I don't even know what it is. | ||
| Like lack of decorum? | ||
| They have some official term in Congress, and she's violated this policy when speaking to Marjorie Taylor Greene, who I'm no fan of, but to her credit, you know. | ||
| She should have been held accountable, right? | ||
| She wasn't held accountable for what she said to Marjorie. | ||
| She wasn't held accountable for what she did to Nancy Mace. | ||
| She's never held accountable for what she did during the congressional address a couple weeks ago. | ||
| She's never held accountable. | ||
| She was literally caught on a domestic terrorist group call calling for Teslas to be set on fire, calling. | ||
| And that's I'm not saying that she called for them to be set on fire. | ||
| That's what the organizers of these events are doing. | ||
| They are they are encouraging people to set cars on fire. | ||
| They are encouraging people to plant bombs at Tesla showroom locations, and they are trying to get Elon Musk. | ||
| But it's not only that. | ||
| It's not only that. | ||
| They are doing all the Tesla terrorism you just mentioned. | ||
| There's a video where a radical leftist trans individual tried to hit a conservative TPUSA person over the head with a bike lock. | ||
| They're engaging in all this swatting stuff. | ||
| I'm not going to go public with any names, and I don't know if this has happened to you, if you want to be on record or not, but I'm just saying. | ||
| I have conservative reporters that reach out to me that I'm friends with, and they say, Owen, I'm worried they're coming for me next. | ||
| I'm worried I'm getting swatted next. | ||
| I've already been swatted. | ||
| They haven't even been swatted yet and they're having trouble sleeping. | ||
| They're laying in their bed wondering, when are the cops coming to point guns at me? | ||
| When are they coming to kick my family's door downs? | ||
| Trump won the election. | ||
| Why are his supporters losing sleep? | ||
| Why are Trump supporters the ones laying in bed scared to the left? | ||
| It should be the opposite. | ||
| They're the terrorists. | ||
| They're the bad guys. | ||
| They're the ones that lost. | ||
| So that's my final rant. | ||
| Final words, Laura Loomer. | ||
| I mean, I agree with you. | ||
| The Republicans need to decide whether or not we're going to have a repeat of the first Trump administration where we just saw the radical left get away with everything, and then eventually they gain power again, and they're able to terrorize Trump with impeachments and investigations and judicial coups. | ||
| And the Republicans have the power now, and if they're not going to actually crack down on violent members of Congress when they have the acts of violence on video, then can we really expect these people to lead? | ||
| Do they really deserve to be in the majority if they're not? | ||
| We're not even going to enforce law and order. | ||
| We heard for years now, nobody's above the law. | ||
| Nobody's above the law. | ||
| The Democrats are lawless. | ||
| We need to restore law and order. | ||
| Okay, well then do it. | ||
| Do it. | ||
| Do it, Mike Johnson. | ||
| What are you waiting for? | ||
| It's just unbelievable. | ||
| And so, look, I'm not rooting for the Democrats. | ||
| Democrats to win, but at least the Democrats put up a fight. | ||
| I mean, God, the Republicans don't fight for anything. | ||
| The Republicans sit back and they refuse to hold anybody accountable. | ||
| They almost made President Trump's head explode in 4K on live television and nobody's been held accountable. | ||
| Nobody has gone to jail. | ||
| Nobody has actually been held accountable for the violence that is coming out of our own federal government through weaponized government, through violent members of the Biden administration. | ||
| Now, violent members of Congress within the Democrat Party. | ||
| They are emboldened and somebody's going to get killed. | ||
| Somebody's going to get killed and then the Republicans are going to have blood on their hands because if they're not going to actually take action when they have the ability to do so, then you know what? | ||
| They deserve to lose. | ||
| I'm not going to sit back and be sad on election night in 2026 when the Republicans lose and nobody should be sad because... | ||
| It is inexcusable. | ||
| I want to know what the reason is for these Republicans to be going along to get along when they are witnessing acts of assault in the halls of Congress. | ||
| If a Democrat were to be assaulted by a Republican, that Republican would be in jail. | ||
| You went to jail for stepping foot inside the United States Capitol. | ||
| No, did not go in. | ||
| Didn't even go in. | ||
| Well, for not even stepping foot. | ||
| Excuse me, right? | ||
| Jasmine Crockett committed violence inside the United States Congress and nothing has happened to her. | ||
| Now she's getting treated like a queen, right? | ||
| She's a black queen. | ||
| She's an independent black woman who don't need no man. | ||
| She don't need no man because she's just going to claw your face. | ||
| She's going to pop a cap in your ass with her ghetto black girl nails, right? | ||
| That's what we're going to do these days. | ||
| We're just going to behave like a bunch of rabid animals. | ||
| And someone's going to get hurt. | ||
| But look, it's to this point now where I just have to throw my hands up in the air and say, what the hell? | ||
| What's going to happen is going to happen, Owen. | ||
| There's nothing that we can do to stop it because what else can we do? | ||
| We can be blue in the face. | ||
| We could be blue in the face talking about the incitement of violence. | ||
| If the Republicans don't want to do anything about it and they're just going to talk a big talk and Pam Bondi's not going to do anything about it and the FBI's not going to do anything about it, then... | ||
| We're just going to have to watch our country evolve into chaos, and perhaps we're just going to have to take matters into our own hands that we can't even depend on these new administration officials to clean up the violence in the Democrat Party. | ||
| Yeah, and that's what I'm afraid of, and I was thinking about it. | ||
| I was just thinking about it even today. | ||
| I was like, you know, it's like, do I even want to go to these protests anymore? | ||
| Because eventually it is going to get violent. | ||
| Something's going to blow up. | ||
| A car's going to ram through it. | ||
| Somebody's going to bring a gun. | ||
| I mean, it's just... | ||
| This is the direction it's going. | ||
| And until somebody stops it, it's exactly as you described it. | ||
| Laura Loomer is on fire. | ||
| Appreciate your time today. | ||
| Great reporting is normal. | ||
| And any other breaking news, obviously share it with me. | ||
| We'll bring it on the air. | ||
| Yeah, thanks for having me on. | ||
| And people can follow me on X at Laura Loomer and on X at Loomer Unleashed. | ||
| Loomer Unleashed. | ||
| I'd say she was pretty unleashed today. | ||
| You know, Laura Loomer wouldn't want to be on her bad side. | ||
| It's a life lesson for you if you take anything away from the show. | ||
| All right. | ||
| We got a little bit of time left here. | ||
| I'm going to cover some other news stories I have left on my desk. | ||
| I want to let you know, in case you didn't see, we got a brand new, just launched today, limited edition silver coin at thealexjonesstore.com. | ||
| If you're a fan of Alex Jones, if you've been listening to Alex Jones for a long time and InfoWars, this is the one for you. | ||
| Limited edition silver Alex Jones signature. | ||
| Fundraiser coin. | ||
| And yes, it is a fundraiser. | ||
| You know, most of our products don't make much profit, folks. | ||
| That's just the truth. | ||
| We like to sell supplements, highest quality, lowest price. | ||
| And so they're very, very small margins for us. | ||
| Same with the t-shirts. | ||
| T-shirts are usually small margins anyway. | ||
| But this is the stuff that can fund us. | ||
| But you are... | ||
| Getting, obviously, a silver coin, the portrait of Alex Jones, the InfoWars logo, Alex's signature. | ||
| It is a collectible item for the Alex Jones audience, the loyal fans that have been here for decades and to fund us into the future. | ||
| Limited edition. | ||
| Obviously, a limited number of coins were minted. | ||
| Now, an introductory rate right now, 20% off this piece of InfoWars history, Alex Jones history. | ||
| 20% off right now. | ||
| Introductory rate. | ||
| When you are a VIP member at thealexjonesstore.com slash VIP, you get an even larger discount. | ||
| So, so many benefits when you become a VIP member. | ||
| Go to thealexjonesstore.com slash VIP to learn of all the benefits that come along with that membership, including, but not limited to, monthly store credits that you can spend, however you... | ||
| Feel at TheAlexJonesStore.com. | ||
| But limited edition coin for sale now. | ||
| It will sell out, guaranteed. | ||
| Get it while it lasts. | ||
| And we really want to thank our VIPs. | ||
| We can't thank you enough. | ||
| It's your monthly membership that funds us and budgets us into the future. | ||
| To learn of all the benefits, go to TheAlexJonesStore.com slash VIP. | ||
| And to shop with us and support us, go to TheAlexJonesStore.com. | ||
| Check out all the apparel, the hats, the t-shirts, the supplements. | ||
| And memorabilia, thealexjonesstore.com. | ||
| We thank our audience for your continued support. | ||
| Okay, let's see here. | ||
| We got through all the videos. | ||
| Let's just pick up some of this news here. | ||
| Oh, and let me also follow up with something else. | ||
| As I was talking to Joe Paggs earlier today about the ongoing investigations, as well as Chase Geiser last night. | ||
| Folks, there's very little to nothing going on. | ||
| I'm going to be honest. | ||
| It's really unfortunate, and I talked to Joe today, and I told him I would do this press release for him because we're trying to get down to the bottom of this stuff, and there's just little to no action. | ||
| So, from Joe Paggs this morning, my family and I were swatted at 2.21 a.m. at my home two weeks ago. | ||
| To this date, I have spoken to the FBI once, and a county detective is investigating. | ||
| This is unacceptable. | ||
| They wanted me murdered by cop in my own doorway because I'm conservative and support President Trump. | ||
| Time for answers and arrests. | ||
| I will not let the spotlight dim on this disgusting act against my family and me and the families of other conservative influencers. | ||
| By the way, I've not heard from Ted Cruz or John Cornyn. | ||
| I'm in Texas and know them both very well. | ||
| I had my representative Chip Roy on yesterday and have heard from other members of Congress. | ||
| If it were just me, I get it. | ||
| No big deal to many. | ||
| We're talking about dozens of conservative voices attacked in a very small time frame for believing in America first and getting this country back on track. | ||
| And again, folks, I'm not going to sit up here and tough guy, but I'll give you the understanding. | ||
| It's not that I'm living a scared life. | ||
| I mean, if you know me, do I seem like the kind of person that's scared? | ||
| And I've got my Second Amendment right. | ||
| That's not what this is about. | ||
| It's the mystery. | ||
| And it's kind of like if you've ever had, which I struggle with in the past, it's been years, thank God, because it's one of the worst things, but when you have insomnia, it's like insomnia. | ||
| And what people that have never had insomnia don't understand, it's like insomnia becomes this obsession with... | ||
| Am I ever going to sleep? | ||
| And so it's not like, it's just like you're constantly wondering, will I fall asleep? | ||
| Will I fall asleep? | ||
| Well, it's like insomnia. | ||
| It's like, will the cops come? | ||
| Will the cops come? | ||
| Will the cops come? | ||
| And it just, it can't leave your head. | ||
| And I'm talking to other people off record, and I'm not going to say their names, and they have, some have been dealing with some pizza deliveries. | ||
| But others are just saying, hey, you know, I'm concerned they're coming for me next. | ||
| And I'm losing sleep. | ||
| I'm worried. | ||
| What should I do? | ||
| And I tell them, I say, well, call your local police and tell them the situation if you're afraid and let them know, and maybe that can help. | ||
| If you're in a red district, they'll be very helpful. | ||
| If you're in a red conservative area, you'll get a lot of help from the police. | ||
| If you're in a blue area, you're pretty much cooked. | ||
| They're coming. | ||
| But, you know what, let me just say this. | ||
| Let me just go ahead and say this. | ||
| I already have all the information that I would need to give. | ||
| To detectives, the FBI, whoever wants to investigate. | ||
| And I can literally give you the exact path to find this individual. | ||
| I know the source. | ||
| I know exactly where you need to get the metadata. | ||
| And I can give it all to you. | ||
| Right now. | ||
| I don't have the resources. | ||
| But I can literally give you five sources right now to track metadata back to the individual. | ||
| And I can give you the source of where they're getting the information. | ||
| Of everybody's address. | ||
| And their families. | ||
| And their phone numbers. | ||
| I literally can give all of that over to the FBI right now. | ||
| Everything. And then all you have to do is do the investigation. | ||
| I don't have the abilities to track and trace metadata. | ||
| Phone numbers. | ||
| IP addresses. | ||
| I don't have it. | ||
| You do. | ||
| But I can give you... | ||
| Five sources right now that has the metadata. | ||
| I can give you the website where they're getting the information. | ||
| And then all you have to do, you can use my case or you can use the dozens of cases. | ||
| And then all you have to do is cross-reference all of it and you will find the individual or the individuals involved. | ||
| That's all you have to do. | ||
| And I know you have the technology to do it. | ||
| I know you have the technology to plug all this data into a system. | ||
| Cross-reference all of it, and then pin where it's coming from, pin it from an app or multiple apps. | ||
| I already know it. | ||
| I literally can give it all to you, and nobody will come. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Nobody. It's really frustrating. | |
| But that's where we're at. | ||
| And I promised the other victims of this, including Joe Paggs earlier, I said, I'm not going to let this go. | ||
| It's not just about me. | ||
| It's about who's this going to happen to next and when is it going to go horribly wrong? | ||
| And when can conservatives, when can Trump supporters actually get some peace in our own country that we care about so much that we're fighting for so hard? | ||
| When can we get some actual peace and some actual justice? | ||
| So I ended up going on a bit of a rant here and decided to just... | ||
| Skip over the rest of the news for the day. | ||
| But that's going to do it for today's edition of the InfoWars War Room. | ||
| We appreciate everybody's time. | ||
| Good job to the crew. | ||
| Appreciate everybody for listening. | ||
| We'll be back live tomorrow morning. | ||
| Harrison Smith in the morning. | ||
| Alex Jones in the afternoon. | ||
| And then right here, your early evenings. | ||
| 21-hour break. | ||
| We'll see you tomorrow. | ||
| When you think Second American Revolution, when you think 1776, when you think about what's happening in the world right now, you think about one place, and that's the Infowar, because you're the Infowar. | ||
| And right now, you can spread the word and keep us on air more than ever by visiting thealexkilstore.com with over 400 kick-ass designs like this baby that I designed, and I think it's great. | ||
| They say the pin is mightier than the sword, and that's absolutely true, and that's what this is, is a walking billboard for freedom and to meet like-minded people and let globalists know we're the majority, and we're taking the country back. | ||
| Razor-sharp, stainless steel, 10-inch battle blade, a 2025 upgrade on the famous World War II trench time with the skull crusher, with the brass knuckles, and with that beautiful blade, with the Spartan ride on it, with tip of the spear, and the classic Infowars on the other side. | ||
| Fight and tyranny's never been so much fun. | ||
| Get your blade. | ||
| Get your shirts, get your ball caps, get it all, and fund the second American Revolution in the information war today at theallowshowstore.com and I salute you. | ||
| Ah, that's better. | ||
| Over 400 incredible designs of patron apparel, ball caps, t-shirts, hoodies, sweaters, everything at theallowshowstore.com. | ||
| Bye. There's other stuff like this. | ||
| Limited edition, highest quality, stainless steel, razor sharp, upgraded 2025 version of the World War II trench knife with the brass knuckles, the skull crusher, and it's got InfoWars laser etched on it as well. | ||
| It's incredible. | ||
| It's a memento of the fight we're in right now, and I thank you all for your support, but everybody wants to get this. | ||
| We've had a few of these in the past with other designs and they sell out quickly. | ||
| So get yours now at theoutshowstore.com. | ||
|
unidentified
|
We've had a few of these in the past. | |
| Now, back to our program. | ||
| There's a lot of amazing t-shirt designs out there. | ||
| But this is an art masterpiece. | ||
| And boy, does it send a message. | ||
| Elon Musk with a chainsaw. | ||
| Exclusively at TheAlexShowStore.com. | ||
| And then this. | ||
| Selling out fast. | ||
| Learn about all this and more at TheAlexShowStore.com. | ||
| Funding the second American Revolution worldwide. | ||
|
unidentified
|
*Music* | |
| Get your limited edition Gulf of America shirt at thealishonestore.com and the limited edition Spartan trench warfare knife. | ||
| Engraved with the Spartan in the words, Tim of the Spear, the legendary M4s on the other side. | ||
| This is high quality. | ||
| This is powerful. |
Export Selection